US20120023911A1 - Detection of exhaust particulate filter substrate failure - Google Patents

Detection of exhaust particulate filter substrate failure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120023911A1
US20120023911A1 US12/844,985 US84498510A US2012023911A1 US 20120023911 A1 US20120023911 A1 US 20120023911A1 US 84498510 A US84498510 A US 84498510A US 2012023911 A1 US2012023911 A1 US 2012023911A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
difference
theoretical
temperature
pressure
particulate filter
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/844,985
Inventor
Zhiping Steven Liu
Eugene V. Gonze
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Original Assignee
GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by GM Global Technology Operations LLC filed Critical GM Global Technology Operations LLC
Priority to US12/844,985 priority Critical patent/US20120023911A1/en
Assigned to GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. reassignment GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: LIU, ZHIPING STEVEN, GONZE, EUGENE V.
Assigned to WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY reassignment WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Assigned to GM Global Technology Operations LLC reassignment GM Global Technology Operations LLC CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Publication of US20120023911A1 publication Critical patent/US20120023911A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N11/00Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus, e.g. for catalytic activity
    • F01N11/002Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus, e.g. for catalytic activity the diagnostic devices measuring or estimating temperature or pressure in, or downstream of the exhaust apparatus
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N11/00Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus, e.g. for catalytic activity
    • F01N11/002Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus, e.g. for catalytic activity the diagnostic devices measuring or estimating temperature or pressure in, or downstream of the exhaust apparatus
    • F01N11/005Monitoring or diagnostic devices for exhaust-gas treatment apparatus, e.g. for catalytic activity the diagnostic devices measuring or estimating temperature or pressure in, or downstream of the exhaust apparatus the temperature or pressure being estimated, e.g. by means of a theoretical model
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2550/00Monitoring or diagnosing the deterioration of exhaust systems
    • F01N2550/04Filtering activity of particulate filters
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2560/00Exhaust systems with means for detecting or measuring exhaust gas components or characteristics
    • F01N2560/08Exhaust systems with means for detecting or measuring exhaust gas components or characteristics the means being a pressure sensor
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2560/00Exhaust systems with means for detecting or measuring exhaust gas components or characteristics
    • F01N2560/14Exhaust systems with means for detecting or measuring exhaust gas components or characteristics having more than one sensor of one kind
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2900/00Details of electrical control or of the monitoring of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • F01N2900/06Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing
    • F01N2900/0601Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing being estimated
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2900/00Details of electrical control or of the monitoring of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • F01N2900/06Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing
    • F01N2900/14Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing said parameters being related to the exhaust gas
    • F01N2900/1406Exhaust gas pressure
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2900/00Details of electrical control or of the monitoring of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • F01N2900/06Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing
    • F01N2900/16Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing said parameters being related to the exhaust apparatus, e.g. particulate filter or catalyst
    • F01N2900/1602Temperature of exhaust gas apparatus
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N2900/00Details of electrical control or of the monitoring of the exhaust gas treating apparatus
    • F01N2900/06Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing
    • F01N2900/16Parameters used for exhaust control or diagnosing said parameters being related to the exhaust apparatus, e.g. particulate filter or catalyst
    • F01N2900/1606Particle filter loading or soot amount
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N3/00Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
    • F01N3/02Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust
    • F01N3/021Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters
    • F01N3/033Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters in combination with other devices
    • F01N3/035Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for cooling, or for removing solid constituents of, exhaust by means of filters in combination with other devices with catalytic reactors, e.g. catalysed diesel particulate filters
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F01MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; ENGINE PLANTS IN GENERAL; STEAM ENGINES
    • F01NGAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR MACHINES OR ENGINES IN GENERAL; GAS-FLOW SILENCERS OR EXHAUST APPARATUS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
    • F01N3/00Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust
    • F01N3/08Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous
    • F01N3/10Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust
    • F01N3/18Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control
    • F01N3/20Exhaust or silencing apparatus having means for purifying, rendering innocuous, or otherwise treating exhaust for rendering innocuous by thermal or catalytic conversion of noxious components of exhaust characterised by methods of operation; Control specially adapted for catalytic conversion ; Methods of operation or control of catalytic converters
    • F01N3/2066Selective catalytic reduction [SCR]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A50/00TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE in human health protection, e.g. against extreme weather
    • Y02A50/20Air quality improvement or preservation, e.g. vehicle emission control or emission reduction by using catalytic converters
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/10Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
    • Y02T10/40Engine management systems

Definitions

  • the invention generally relates to a method of detecting failure of a substrate in a particulate filter of an exhaust system of a vehicle.
  • An exhaust system for a vehicle may include a particulate filter. If the engine includes a diesel engine, then the particulate filter is commonly referred to as a diesel particulate filter.
  • the particulate filter filters particulate matter, i.e., soot, from the exhaust gas of the engine.
  • the particulate filter may include one or more substrates that define a plurality of apertures, through which the exhaust gas must flow. The particulate matter collects on the substrate as the exhaust gas flows through the apertures.
  • the particulate filter is occasionally regenerated to remove the collected particulate matter. Regeneration of the particulate filter includes heating the particulate filter to a temperature sufficient to burn the collected particulate matter, which converts the particulate matter to carbon dioxide that dissipates into the atmosphere.
  • An on board diagnostic system may monitor the status of the particulate filter to determine if the particulate filter, and specifically the substrate, has failed. Failure of the substrate may include, but is not limited to, damage to the substrate or removal of the substrate.
  • a method of detecting a failure in a substrate of a particulate filter in an exhaust system of a vehicle includes calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical temperature difference between an upstream end and a downstream end of the particulate filter, and an actual temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, and comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to a temperature differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold.
  • the method further includes calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and an actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, and comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to a pressure differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold.
  • the method further includes indicating a substrate failure if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold, or if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold.
  • a method of detecting a failure in a substrate of a particulate filter in an exhaust system of a vehicle includes measuring the actual temperature difference between an upstream end and a downstream end of the particulate filter, calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and the actual temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, and comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to a temperature differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold.
  • the method further includes comparing a measured particulate matter level of particulate matter trapped in the particulate filter to a particulate matter threshold to determine if the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold.
  • the method further includes measuring the actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and an actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, and comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to a pressure differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold when the particulate matter level is less than the particulate matter threshold.
  • the method further includes indicating a substrate failure if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold, or if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and
  • both the temperature differential and the pressure differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter are examined to detect a failure of the substrate in the particulate filter.
  • a thermal mass of the particulate filter causes the temperature downstream of the particulate filter to be less than a temperature upstream of the particulate filter.
  • the temperature differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter falls below a temperature differential threshold. Damage too or removal of the substrate causes the temperature differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter to rise above the temperature differential threshold.
  • a flow restriction in the particulate filter causes a pressure downstream of the particulate filter to be less than a pressure upstream of the particulate filter.
  • the pressure differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter falls below a pressure differential threshold. Damage to or removal of the substrate causes the pressure differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter to rise above the pressure differential threshold. Accordingly, comparing the actual temperature differential and the actual pressure differential the temperature differential threshold and the pressure differential threshold respectively may indicate damage too or removal of the substrate. Using both the temperature and the pressure of the particulate increases the ability to detect damage and/or removal of the substrate.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an engine and an exhaust system of a vehicle.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a method of detecting failure in a substrate of a particulate filter of the exhaust system.
  • an exhaust system is generally shown at 20 .
  • the exhaust system 20 is coupled to an engine 22 of a vehicle.
  • the engine 22 may include, but is not limited to, a diesel engine 22 .
  • Fuel ignites within a plurality of cylinders (not shown) of the engine 22 , producing a flow of exhaust gas that is directed through the exhaust system 20 in a direction indicated by arrow 23 .
  • the exhaust system 20 treats the exhaust gas to reduce undesirable emissions, and remove particulate matter, i.e., soot, from the exhaust gas.
  • the exhaust system 20 may include an oxidation catalyst 24 .
  • the oxidation catalyst 24 includes a flow-through honeycomb structure that is covered with a chemical catalyst.
  • the chemical catalyst may include a precious metal, including but not limited to, platinum or palladium.
  • the chemical catalyst when heated to a light-off temperature, interacts with and oxidizes pollutants in the exhaust gas, such as carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons, thereby reducing undesirable emissions.
  • the oxidation catalyst 24 may include any suitable type of oxidation catalyst 24 , and may be sized and or configured in any suitable manner required to meet specific design parameters.
  • the exhaust system 20 may further include a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system 26 .
  • the SCR system 26 includes an exhaust fluid injector 28 , which injects an exhaust fluid, such as but not limited to a mixture of urea and water, into the flow of exhaust gas.
  • a mixer 30 mixes the exhaust fluid with the exhaust gas. When heated by the exhaust gas, the exhaust fluid forms ammonia.
  • the SCR system 26 further includes a converter 32 .
  • the converter 32 includes a catalyst that causes or accelerates a chemical reaction between the ammonia created by the exhaust fluid and the NOx (nitrogen oxides) in the exhaust gas to form nitrogen and water vapor.
  • the exhaust system 20 further includes a particulate filter 34 .
  • the particulate filter 34 filters particulate matter, i.e., soot, from the exhaust gas of the engine 22 .
  • the particulate filter 34 may include one or more substrate 36 that define a plurality of apertures, through which the exhaust gas must flow. The particulate matter collects on the substrate 36 as the exhaust gas flows through the apertures.
  • the particulate filter 34 is occasionally regenerated to remove the collected particulate matter. Regeneration of the particulate filter 34 includes heating the particulate filter 34 to a temperature sufficient to burn the collected particulate matter to carbon dioxide.
  • the particulate filter 34 is disposed downstream of the converter 32 .
  • the particulate filter 34 includes an upstream end 38 , disposed between the converter 32 and the particulate filter 34 , and a downstream end 40 , disposed opposite the upstream end 38 of the particulate filter 34 .
  • the exhaust system 20 further includes a first temperature sensor 42 and a second temperature sensor 44 .
  • the first temperature sensor 42 is disposed adjacent the upstream end 38 of the particulate filter 34
  • the second temperature sensor 44 is disposed adjacent the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 .
  • the first temperature sensor 42 measures a temperature of the exhaust gas upstream of the particulate filter 34 .
  • the second temperature sensor 44 measures a temperature of the exhaust gas downstream of the particulate filter 34 .
  • the first temperature sensor 42 and the second temperature sensor 44 may include any suitable temperature sensor capable of sensing the temperature of the exhaust gas within the exhaust system 20 . Because the particulate filter 34 includes a thermal mass, the particulate filter 34 absorbs heat from the exhaust gas as the exhaust gas flows through the particulate filter 34 .
  • the temperature of the exhaust gas at the second temperature sensor 44 is less than the temperature of the exhaust gas at the first temperature sensor 42 .
  • a temperature differential between the first temperature sensor 42 and the second temperature sensor 44 falls within a given temperature range for given operating conditions. Accordingly, if the temperature differential is outside the given temperature range for a specific operating condition, and particularly greater than an upper temperature threshold, then it is likely that the thermal mass of the particulate filter 34 has been altered. For example, removal and/or damage of the substrate 36 may cause the temperature differential between the first temperature sensor 42 and the second temperature to fall outside the given temperature range.
  • the exhaust system 20 further includes a first pressure sensor 46 and a second pressure sensor 48 .
  • the first pressure sensor 46 is disposed adjacent the upstream end 38 of the particulate filter 34
  • the second pressure sensor 48 is disposed adjacent the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34
  • the first pressure sensor 46 measures a fluid pressure, i.e., gas pressure, of the exhaust gas upstream of the particulate filter 34
  • the second pressure sensor 48 measures a fluid pressure, i.e., gas pressure, of the exhaust gas downstream of the particulate filter 34 .
  • the first pressure sensor 46 and the second pressure sensor 48 may include any suitable pressure sensor capable of sensing the fluid pressure of the exhaust gas within the exhaust system 20 .
  • the particulate filter 34 redirects the flow of exhaust gas through the apertures of the substrate 36 , the particulate filter 34 decreases the fluid pressure, i.e., the gas pressure, as the exhaust gas flows through the particulate filter 34 . Accordingly, during normal operation, the pressure of the exhaust gas at the second pressure sensor 48 is less than the pressure of the exhaust gas at the first pressure sensor 46 . When the particulate filter 34 , and particularly the substrate 36 of the particulate filter 34 , is operating properly, a pressure differential between the first pressure sensor 46 and the second pressure sensor 48 falls within a given pressure range for given operating conditions.
  • the pressure differential is outside the given pressure range for a specific operating condition, and particularly greater than an upper pressure threshold, then it is likely that the flow path of the exhaust gas through the particulate filter 34 has been altered. For example, removal and/or damage of the substrate 36 may cause the pressure differential between the first pressure sensor 46 and the second pressure sensor 48 to fall outside the given pressure range.
  • a method of detecting a failure in the substrate 36 of the particulate filter 34 in the exhaust system 20 of the vehicle is shown generally at 50 .
  • the method includes defining a theoretical temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 , block 52 .
  • the theoretical temperature difference is the temperature difference between the first temperature sensor 42 and the second temperature sensor 44 that should occur if the particulate filter 34 and particularly the substrate 36 are operating properly.
  • Defining the theoretical temperature difference may include calculating a theoretical upstream temperature and a theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system 20 .
  • the theoretical downstream temperature is subtracted from the theoretical upstream temperature to obtain the theoretical temperature difference.
  • an equation may be generated to calculate the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature based on the mass of the exhaust gas, the flow rate of the exhaust gas, temperature of the exhaust gas upstream of the particulate filter 34 , the time over which the theoretical temperature difference is calculated, or some other known variable of the exhaust system 20 .
  • defining the theoretical temperature difference may include referencing stored temperature values from a table of temperature values for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system 20 to determine the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas.
  • the theoretical downstream temperature is subtracted from the theoretical upstream temperature to obtain the theoretical temperature difference.
  • the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature for specific operating conditions may be determined, for example, through testing at various operating conditions.
  • These values may be stored in memory of an engine control unit, and may be referenced to determine the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the engine 22 and the exhaust system 20 . Accordingly, the engine control unit may learn the current operating conditions of the engine 22 and the exhaust system 20 , and use the current operating conditions to reference the temperature table to determine the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas.
  • the method further includes measuring the actual temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 , block 54 .
  • the first temperature sensor 42 measures an actual upstream temperature of the exhaust gas
  • the second temperature sensor measures an actual downstream temperature of the exhaust gas.
  • the actual downstream temperature is subtracted from the actual upstream temperature to obtain the actual temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 .
  • the method further includes calculating an absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 , and the actual temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 , block 56 .
  • the absolute value is the real number value of the difference, regardless of a positive or negative sign. Accordingly, the actual temperature difference is subtracted from the theoretical temperature difference to obtain the temperature difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference. The absolute value is then taken of the temperature difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference.
  • the method further includes defining a temperature differential threshold, block 58 .
  • the temperature differential threshold is an upper temperature limit associated with proper operation of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36 . Accordingly, a temperature below the temperature differential threshold is indicative of proper functioning of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36 , whereas a temperature above the temperature differential threshold is indicative of a failure of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36 .
  • the method further includes comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to the temperature differential threshold, block 60 .
  • the absolute value of the temperature difference is compared to the temperature differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold.
  • the method further includes indicating a substrate 36 failure, block 64 .
  • the failure may be indicated in any suitable manner, including but not limited to displaying a warning light and/or sound, or otherwise scheduling maintenance.
  • the method further includes defining a particulate matter threshold, block 68 .
  • the particulate matter threshold is the maximum recommended amount of particulate matter deposited or trapped within the particulate filter 34 . An amount of particulate matter above the particulate matter threshold may adversely affect the flow of the exhaust gas through the particulate filter 34 .
  • the method further includes detecting a particulate matter level of particulate matter trapped in the particulate filter 34 , block 70 , and comparing the particulate matter level to the particulate matter threshold to determine if the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold, block 72 .
  • the particulate matter level is the current level or amount of particulate matter deposited or trapped within the particulate filter 34 .
  • the particulate matter level may be determined in any suitable manner, including but not limited to the use of sensors and/or calculations.
  • the particulate matter level may be compared to the particulate matter threshold after comparing the absolute value of the temperature difference to the temperature differential threshold.
  • the method further includes defining a theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 , block 76 .
  • the theoretical pressure difference is the pressure difference between the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor 48 that should occur if the particulate filter 34 and particularly the substrate 36 are operating properly.
  • Defining the theoretical pressure difference may include calculating a theoretical upstream pressure and a theoretical downstream pressure of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system 20 .
  • the theoretical downstream pressure is subtracted from the theoretical upstream pressure to obtain the theoretical pressure difference.
  • an equation may be generated to calculate the theoretical upstream pressure and the theoretical downstream pressure based on the flow rate of the exhaust gas, the temperature of the exhaust gas upstream of the particulate filter 34 , or some other known variable of the exhaust system 20 .
  • defining the theoretical pressure difference may include referencing stored pressure values from a table of pressure values for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system 20 to determine the theoretical upstream pressure and the theoretical downstream pressure of the exhaust gas.
  • the theoretical downstream pressure is subtracted from the theoretical upstream pressure to obtain the theoretical pressure difference.
  • the theoretical upstream pressure and the theoretical downstream pressure for specific operating conditions may be determined, for example, through testing at various operating conditions.
  • These values may be stored in memory of the engine control unit, and may be referenced to determine the theoretical upstream pressure and the theoretical downstream pressure of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the engine 22 and the exhaust system 20 . Accordingly, the engine control unit may learn the current operating conditions of the engine 22 and the exhaust system 20 , and use the current operating conditions to reference the pressure table to determine the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas.
  • the method further includes measuring the actual pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 , block 78 .
  • the first pressure sensor 46 measures an actual upstream pressure of the exhaust gas
  • the second pressure sensor 48 measures an actual downstream pressure of the exhaust gas.
  • the actual downstream pressure is subtracted from the actual upstream pressure to obtain the actual pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 .
  • the method further includes calculating an absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 , and the actual pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 , block 80 .
  • the absolute value is the real number value of the difference, regardless of a positive or negative sign. Accordingly, the actual pressure difference is subtracted from the theoretical pressure difference to obtain the pressure difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference. The absolute value is then taken of the pressure difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference.
  • the method further includes defining a pressure differential threshold, block 82 .
  • the pressure differential threshold is an upper pressure limit associated with proper operation of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36 . Accordingly, a pressure below the pressure differential threshold is indicative of proper functioning of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36 , whereas a pressure above the pressure differential threshold is indicative of a failure of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36 .
  • the method further includes comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to the pressure differential threshold, block 84 .
  • the absolute value of the pressure difference is compared to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold.
  • the method may further include indicating a substrate 36 failure, block 64 .
  • the failure may be indicated in any suitable manner, including but not limited to displaying a warning light and/or sound, or otherwise scheduling maintenance.
  • the method may further include stopping analysis of the substrate 36 without indicating a substrate 36 failure, block 90 .
  • the method may further include stopping analysis of the substrate 36 without indicating a substrate 36 failure, block 90 .
  • the analysis is exited prior to comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to the pressure differential threshold, block 84 .
  • the elevated particulate matter level may adversely affect the upstream pressure and/or downstream pressure of the exhaust gas, rendering the analysis between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference inaccurate.
  • the elevated particulate matter level increases fluid flow resistance through the particulate filter 34 , thereby increasing the upstream pressure and/or decreasing the downstream pressure.
  • the pressure analysis to determine if the substrate 36 has failed may be abandoned because the altered actual pressure difference may render the analysis untrustworthy. Therefore, it should be appreciated that the particulate matter level is compared to the particulate matter threshold before comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to the pressure differential threshold.

Abstract

A method of detecting failure of a substrate in a particulate filter includes comparing an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical temperature difference and an actual temperature difference between an upstream end and a downstream end of the particulate filter to a temperature differential threshold, and comparing an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical pressure difference and an actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter to a pressure differential threshold. Failure of the substrate is indicated by one or both of the temperature difference and the pressure difference being greater than the temperature differential threshold and the pressure differential threshold respectively.

Description

    TECHNICAL FIELD
  • The invention generally relates to a method of detecting failure of a substrate in a particulate filter of an exhaust system of a vehicle.
  • BACKGROUND
  • An exhaust system for a vehicle may include a particulate filter. If the engine includes a diesel engine, then the particulate filter is commonly referred to as a diesel particulate filter. The particulate filter filters particulate matter, i.e., soot, from the exhaust gas of the engine. The particulate filter may include one or more substrates that define a plurality of apertures, through which the exhaust gas must flow. The particulate matter collects on the substrate as the exhaust gas flows through the apertures. The particulate filter is occasionally regenerated to remove the collected particulate matter. Regeneration of the particulate filter includes heating the particulate filter to a temperature sufficient to burn the collected particulate matter, which converts the particulate matter to carbon dioxide that dissipates into the atmosphere.
  • An on board diagnostic system may monitor the status of the particulate filter to determine if the particulate filter, and specifically the substrate, has failed. Failure of the substrate may include, but is not limited to, damage to the substrate or removal of the substrate.
  • SUMMARY
  • A method of detecting a failure in a substrate of a particulate filter in an exhaust system of a vehicle is provided. The method includes calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical temperature difference between an upstream end and a downstream end of the particulate filter, and an actual temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, and comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to a temperature differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold. The method further includes calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and an actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, and comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to a pressure differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold. The method further includes indicating a substrate failure if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold, or if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold.
  • A method of detecting a failure in a substrate of a particulate filter in an exhaust system of a vehicle is also provided. The method includes measuring the actual temperature difference between an upstream end and a downstream end of the particulate filter, calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and the actual temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, and comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to a temperature differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold. The method further includes comparing a measured particulate matter level of particulate matter trapped in the particulate filter to a particulate matter threshold to determine if the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold. The method further includes measuring the actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and an actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter, and comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to a pressure differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold when the particulate matter level is less than the particulate matter threshold. The method further includes indicating a substrate failure if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold, or if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold.
  • Accordingly, both the temperature differential and the pressure differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter are examined to detect a failure of the substrate in the particulate filter. A thermal mass of the particulate filter causes the temperature downstream of the particulate filter to be less than a temperature upstream of the particulate filter. During normal operation of the particulate filter, the temperature differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter falls below a temperature differential threshold. Damage too or removal of the substrate causes the temperature differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter to rise above the temperature differential threshold. Similarly, a flow restriction in the particulate filter causes a pressure downstream of the particulate filter to be less than a pressure upstream of the particulate filter. During normal operation of the particulate filter, the pressure differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter falls below a pressure differential threshold. Damage to or removal of the substrate causes the pressure differential between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter to rise above the pressure differential threshold. Accordingly, comparing the actual temperature differential and the actual pressure differential the temperature differential threshold and the pressure differential threshold respectively may indicate damage too or removal of the substrate. Using both the temperature and the pressure of the particulate increases the ability to detect damage and/or removal of the substrate.
  • The above features and advantages and other features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best modes for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an engine and an exhaust system of a vehicle.
  • FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a method of detecting failure in a substrate of a particulate filter of the exhaust system.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Referring to FIG. 1, wherein like numerals indicate like parts throughout the several views, an exhaust system is generally shown at 20. The exhaust system 20 is coupled to an engine 22 of a vehicle. The engine 22 may include, but is not limited to, a diesel engine 22. Fuel ignites within a plurality of cylinders (not shown) of the engine 22, producing a flow of exhaust gas that is directed through the exhaust system 20 in a direction indicated by arrow 23. The exhaust system 20 treats the exhaust gas to reduce undesirable emissions, and remove particulate matter, i.e., soot, from the exhaust gas.
  • The exhaust system 20 may include an oxidation catalyst 24. The oxidation catalyst 24 includes a flow-through honeycomb structure that is covered with a chemical catalyst. The chemical catalyst may include a precious metal, including but not limited to, platinum or palladium. The chemical catalyst, when heated to a light-off temperature, interacts with and oxidizes pollutants in the exhaust gas, such as carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons, thereby reducing undesirable emissions. The oxidation catalyst 24 may include any suitable type of oxidation catalyst 24, and may be sized and or configured in any suitable manner required to meet specific design parameters.
  • The exhaust system 20 may further include a Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system 26. The SCR system 26 includes an exhaust fluid injector 28, which injects an exhaust fluid, such as but not limited to a mixture of urea and water, into the flow of exhaust gas. A mixer 30 mixes the exhaust fluid with the exhaust gas. When heated by the exhaust gas, the exhaust fluid forms ammonia. The SCR system 26 further includes a converter 32. The converter 32 includes a catalyst that causes or accelerates a chemical reaction between the ammonia created by the exhaust fluid and the NOx (nitrogen oxides) in the exhaust gas to form nitrogen and water vapor.
  • The exhaust system 20 further includes a particulate filter 34. The particulate filter 34 filters particulate matter, i.e., soot, from the exhaust gas of the engine 22. The particulate filter 34 may include one or more substrate 36 that define a plurality of apertures, through which the exhaust gas must flow. The particulate matter collects on the substrate 36 as the exhaust gas flows through the apertures. The particulate filter 34 is occasionally regenerated to remove the collected particulate matter. Regeneration of the particulate filter 34 includes heating the particulate filter 34 to a temperature sufficient to burn the collected particulate matter to carbon dioxide.
  • As shown, the particulate filter 34 is disposed downstream of the converter 32. The particulate filter 34 includes an upstream end 38, disposed between the converter 32 and the particulate filter 34, and a downstream end 40, disposed opposite the upstream end 38 of the particulate filter 34.
  • The exhaust system 20 further includes a first temperature sensor 42 and a second temperature sensor 44. The first temperature sensor 42 is disposed adjacent the upstream end 38 of the particulate filter 34, and the second temperature sensor 44 is disposed adjacent the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34. The first temperature sensor 42 measures a temperature of the exhaust gas upstream of the particulate filter 34. The second temperature sensor 44 measures a temperature of the exhaust gas downstream of the particulate filter 34. The first temperature sensor 42 and the second temperature sensor 44 may include any suitable temperature sensor capable of sensing the temperature of the exhaust gas within the exhaust system 20. Because the particulate filter 34 includes a thermal mass, the particulate filter 34 absorbs heat from the exhaust gas as the exhaust gas flows through the particulate filter 34. Accordingly, during normal operation, the temperature of the exhaust gas at the second temperature sensor 44 is less than the temperature of the exhaust gas at the first temperature sensor 42. When the particulate filter 34, and particularly the substrate 36 of the particulate filter 34, is operating properly, a temperature differential between the first temperature sensor 42 and the second temperature sensor 44 falls within a given temperature range for given operating conditions. Accordingly, if the temperature differential is outside the given temperature range for a specific operating condition, and particularly greater than an upper temperature threshold, then it is likely that the thermal mass of the particulate filter 34 has been altered. For example, removal and/or damage of the substrate 36 may cause the temperature differential between the first temperature sensor 42 and the second temperature to fall outside the given temperature range.
  • The exhaust system 20 further includes a first pressure sensor 46 and a second pressure sensor 48. The first pressure sensor 46 is disposed adjacent the upstream end 38 of the particulate filter 34, and the second pressure sensor 48 is disposed adjacent the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34 The first pressure sensor 46 measures a fluid pressure, i.e., gas pressure, of the exhaust gas upstream of the particulate filter 34. The second pressure sensor 48 measures a fluid pressure, i.e., gas pressure, of the exhaust gas downstream of the particulate filter 34. The first pressure sensor 46 and the second pressure sensor 48 may include any suitable pressure sensor capable of sensing the fluid pressure of the exhaust gas within the exhaust system 20.
  • Because the particulate filter 34 redirects the flow of exhaust gas through the apertures of the substrate 36, the particulate filter 34 decreases the fluid pressure, i.e., the gas pressure, as the exhaust gas flows through the particulate filter 34. Accordingly, during normal operation, the pressure of the exhaust gas at the second pressure sensor 48 is less than the pressure of the exhaust gas at the first pressure sensor 46. When the particulate filter 34, and particularly the substrate 36 of the particulate filter 34, is operating properly, a pressure differential between the first pressure sensor 46 and the second pressure sensor 48 falls within a given pressure range for given operating conditions. Accordingly, if the pressure differential is outside the given pressure range for a specific operating condition, and particularly greater than an upper pressure threshold, then it is likely that the flow path of the exhaust gas through the particulate filter 34 has been altered. For example, removal and/or damage of the substrate 36 may cause the pressure differential between the first pressure sensor 46 and the second pressure sensor 48 to fall outside the given pressure range.
  • Referring to FIG. 2, a method of detecting a failure in the substrate 36 of the particulate filter 34 in the exhaust system 20 of the vehicle is shown generally at 50. The method includes defining a theoretical temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34, block 52. The theoretical temperature difference is the temperature difference between the first temperature sensor 42 and the second temperature sensor 44 that should occur if the particulate filter 34 and particularly the substrate 36 are operating properly.
  • Defining the theoretical temperature difference may include calculating a theoretical upstream temperature and a theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system 20. The theoretical downstream temperature is subtracted from the theoretical upstream temperature to obtain the theoretical temperature difference. For example, an equation may be generated to calculate the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature based on the mass of the exhaust gas, the flow rate of the exhaust gas, temperature of the exhaust gas upstream of the particulate filter 34, the time over which the theoretical temperature difference is calculated, or some other known variable of the exhaust system 20.
  • Alternatively, defining the theoretical temperature difference may include referencing stored temperature values from a table of temperature values for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system 20 to determine the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas. The theoretical downstream temperature is subtracted from the theoretical upstream temperature to obtain the theoretical temperature difference. The theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature for specific operating conditions may be determined, for example, through testing at various operating conditions. These values may be stored in memory of an engine control unit, and may be referenced to determine the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the engine 22 and the exhaust system 20. Accordingly, the engine control unit may learn the current operating conditions of the engine 22 and the exhaust system 20, and use the current operating conditions to reference the temperature table to determine the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas.
  • The method further includes measuring the actual temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34, block 54. The first temperature sensor 42 measures an actual upstream temperature of the exhaust gas, and the second temperature sensor measures an actual downstream temperature of the exhaust gas. The actual downstream temperature is subtracted from the actual upstream temperature to obtain the actual temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34.
  • The method further includes calculating an absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34, and the actual temperature difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34, block 56. The absolute value is the real number value of the difference, regardless of a positive or negative sign. Accordingly, the actual temperature difference is subtracted from the theoretical temperature difference to obtain the temperature difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference. The absolute value is then taken of the temperature difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference.
  • The method further includes defining a temperature differential threshold, block 58. The temperature differential threshold is an upper temperature limit associated with proper operation of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36. Accordingly, a temperature below the temperature differential threshold is indicative of proper functioning of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36, whereas a temperature above the temperature differential threshold is indicative of a failure of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36.
  • The method further includes comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to the temperature differential threshold, block 60. The absolute value of the temperature difference is compared to the temperature differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold.
  • If the absolute value of the temperature difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold, indicated at 62, then the method further includes indicating a substrate 36 failure, block 64. The failure may be indicated in any suitable manner, including but not limited to displaying a warning light and/or sound, or otherwise scheduling maintenance.
  • If the absolute value of the temperature difference is less than the temperature differential threshold, indicated at 66, then the method further includes defining a particulate matter threshold, block 68. The particulate matter threshold is the maximum recommended amount of particulate matter deposited or trapped within the particulate filter 34. An amount of particulate matter above the particulate matter threshold may adversely affect the flow of the exhaust gas through the particulate filter 34.
  • The method further includes detecting a particulate matter level of particulate matter trapped in the particulate filter 34, block 70, and comparing the particulate matter level to the particulate matter threshold to determine if the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold, block 72. The particulate matter level is the current level or amount of particulate matter deposited or trapped within the particulate filter 34. The particulate matter level may be determined in any suitable manner, including but not limited to the use of sensors and/or calculations. The particulate matter level may be compared to the particulate matter threshold after comparing the absolute value of the temperature difference to the temperature differential threshold.
  • If the particulate matter level is less than the particulate matter threshold, indicated at 74, then the method further includes defining a theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34, block 76. The theoretical pressure difference is the pressure difference between the first pressure sensor and the second pressure sensor 48 that should occur if the particulate filter 34 and particularly the substrate 36 are operating properly.
  • Defining the theoretical pressure difference may include calculating a theoretical upstream pressure and a theoretical downstream pressure of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system 20. The theoretical downstream pressure is subtracted from the theoretical upstream pressure to obtain the theoretical pressure difference. For example, an equation may be generated to calculate the theoretical upstream pressure and the theoretical downstream pressure based on the flow rate of the exhaust gas, the temperature of the exhaust gas upstream of the particulate filter 34, or some other known variable of the exhaust system 20.
  • Alternatively, defining the theoretical pressure difference may include referencing stored pressure values from a table of pressure values for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system 20 to determine the theoretical upstream pressure and the theoretical downstream pressure of the exhaust gas. The theoretical downstream pressure is subtracted from the theoretical upstream pressure to obtain the theoretical pressure difference. The theoretical upstream pressure and the theoretical downstream pressure for specific operating conditions may be determined, for example, through testing at various operating conditions. These values may be stored in memory of the engine control unit, and may be referenced to determine the theoretical upstream pressure and the theoretical downstream pressure of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the engine 22 and the exhaust system 20. Accordingly, the engine control unit may learn the current operating conditions of the engine 22 and the exhaust system 20, and use the current operating conditions to reference the pressure table to determine the theoretical upstream temperature and the theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas.
  • The method further includes measuring the actual pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34, block 78. The first pressure sensor 46 measures an actual upstream pressure of the exhaust gas, and the second pressure sensor 48 measures an actual downstream pressure of the exhaust gas. The actual downstream pressure is subtracted from the actual upstream pressure to obtain the actual pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34.
  • The method further includes calculating an absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34, and the actual pressure difference between the upstream end 38 and the downstream end 40 of the particulate filter 34, block 80. The absolute value is the real number value of the difference, regardless of a positive or negative sign. Accordingly, the actual pressure difference is subtracted from the theoretical pressure difference to obtain the pressure difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference. The absolute value is then taken of the pressure difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference.
  • The method further includes defining a pressure differential threshold, block 82. The pressure differential threshold is an upper pressure limit associated with proper operation of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36. Accordingly, a pressure below the pressure differential threshold is indicative of proper functioning of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36, whereas a pressure above the pressure differential threshold is indicative of a failure of the particulate filter 34 and/or the substrate 36.
  • The method further includes comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to the pressure differential threshold, block 84. The absolute value of the pressure difference is compared to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold.
  • If the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold, indicated at 86, then the method may further include indicating a substrate 36 failure, block 64. The failure may be indicated in any suitable manner, including but not limited to displaying a warning light and/or sound, or otherwise scheduling maintenance.
  • If the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is less than the temperature differential threshold, indicated at 66, and if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is less than the pressure differential threshold, indicated at 88, then the method may further include stopping analysis of the substrate 36 without indicating a substrate 36 failure, block 90.
  • If the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold, indicated at 92, then the method may further include stopping analysis of the substrate 36 without indicating a substrate 36 failure, block 90. The analysis is exited prior to comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to the pressure differential threshold, block 84. If the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold, indicated at 92, then the elevated particulate matter level may adversely affect the upstream pressure and/or downstream pressure of the exhaust gas, rendering the analysis between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference inaccurate. Specifically, the elevated particulate matter level increases fluid flow resistance through the particulate filter 34, thereby increasing the upstream pressure and/or decreasing the downstream pressure. As such, the pressure analysis to determine if the substrate 36 has failed may be abandoned because the altered actual pressure difference may render the analysis untrustworthy. Therefore, it should be appreciated that the particulate matter level is compared to the particulate matter threshold before comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to the pressure differential threshold.
  • While the best modes for carrying out the invention have been described in detail, those familiar with the art to which this invention relates will recognize various alternative designs and embodiments for practicing the invention within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (20)

1. A method of detecting a failure in a substrate of a particulate filter in an exhaust system of a vehicle, the method comprising:
calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical temperature difference between an upstream end and a downstream end of the particulate filter and an actual temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter;
comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to a temperature differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold;
calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and an actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter;
comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to a pressure differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold; and
indicating a substrate failure if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold or if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold.
2. A method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising defining a particulate matter threshold.
3. A method as set forth in claim 2 further comprising detecting a particulate matter level of particulate matter trapped in the particulate filter.
4. A method as set forth in claim 3 further comprising comparing the particulate matter level to the particulate matter threshold to determine if the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold.
5. A method as set forth in claim 4 wherein comparing the particulate matter level to the particulate matter threshold is further defined as comparing the particulate matter level to the particulate matter threshold after comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to the temperature differential threshold.
6. A method as set forth in claim 5 wherein comparing the particulate matter level to the particulate matter threshold is further defined as comparing the particulate matter level to the particulate matter threshold before comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to the pressure differential threshold.
7. A method as set forth in claim 6 further comprising stopping analysis of the substrate without indicating a substrate failure prior to comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to the pressure differential threshold when the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold.
8. A method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising defining the theoretical temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter.
9. A method as set forth in claim 8 wherein defining the theoretical temperature difference includes calculating a theoretical upstream temperature and a theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system.
10. A method as set forth in claim 8 wherein defining the theoretical temperature difference includes referencing stored temperature values from a table for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system to determine a theoretical upstream temperature and a theoretical downstream temperature of the exhaust gas.
11. A method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising defining the theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter.
12. A method as set forth in claim 11 wherein defining the theoretical pressure difference includes calculating a theoretical upstream pressure and a theoretical downstream pressure of the exhaust gas for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system.
13. A method as set forth in claim 11 wherein defining the theoretical pressure difference includes referencing stored pressure values from a table for the current operating conditions of the exhaust system to determine a theoretical upstream pressure and a theoretical downstream pressure of the exhaust gas.
14. A method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising measuring the actual temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter.
15. A method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising measuring the actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter.
16. A method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising defining the temperature differential threshold.
17. A method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising defining the pressure differential threshold.
18. A method as set forth in claim 1 further comprising stopping analysis of the substrate without indicating a substrate failure if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is less than the temperature differential threshold and if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is less than the pressure differential threshold.
19. A method of detecting a failure in a substrate of a particulate filter in an exhaust system of a vehicle, the method comprising:
measuring the actual temperature difference between an upstream end and a downstream end of the particulate filter;
calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and the actual temperature difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter;
comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to a temperature differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold;
comparing a measured particulate matter level of particulate matter trapped in the particulate filter to a particulate matter threshold to determine if the particulate matter level is greater than the particulate matter threshold;
measuring the actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter;
calculating an absolute value of a difference between a theoretical pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter and an actual pressure difference between the upstream end and the downstream end of the particulate filter;
comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference to a pressure differential threshold to determine if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold when the particulate matter level is less than the particulate matter threshold; and
indicating a substrate failure if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference is greater than the temperature differential threshold, or if the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical pressure difference and the actual pressure difference is greater than the pressure differential threshold.
20. A method as set forth in claim 19 wherein comparing a particulate matter level of particulate matter trapped in the particulate filter to a particulate matter threshold is further defined as comparing the particulate matter level to the particulate matter threshold after comparing the absolute value of the difference between the theoretical temperature difference and the actual temperature difference to the temperature differential threshold.
US12/844,985 2010-07-28 2010-07-28 Detection of exhaust particulate filter substrate failure Abandoned US20120023911A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/844,985 US20120023911A1 (en) 2010-07-28 2010-07-28 Detection of exhaust particulate filter substrate failure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/844,985 US20120023911A1 (en) 2010-07-28 2010-07-28 Detection of exhaust particulate filter substrate failure

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120023911A1 true US20120023911A1 (en) 2012-02-02

Family

ID=45525300

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/844,985 Abandoned US20120023911A1 (en) 2010-07-28 2010-07-28 Detection of exhaust particulate filter substrate failure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20120023911A1 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014014763A1 (en) * 2012-07-18 2014-01-23 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods for reducing secondary emissions from catalyst components
CN104420953A (en) * 2013-09-04 2015-03-18 北汽福田汽车股份有限公司 Exhaust treatment system restored by selective catalytic and exhaust treatment method restored by selective catalytic
JP2015519518A (en) * 2012-06-13 2015-07-09 マック トラックス インコーポレイテッド Method for monitoring parts of exhaust aftertreatment system, exhaust aftertreatment system, and control device for exhaust aftertreatment system
CN104838101A (en) * 2012-12-07 2015-08-12 丰田自动车株式会社 Device for detecting fault in exhaust gas purifier
EP2864601A4 (en) * 2012-06-21 2016-03-30 Mack Trucks Method for detecting abnormally frequent diesel particulate filter regeneration, engine and exhaust after treatment system, and warning system and method
US20160186636A1 (en) * 2014-12-31 2016-06-30 Audi Ag Method of operating an exhaust emission control device, and corresponding exhaust emission control device
US20160265413A1 (en) * 2013-10-24 2016-09-15 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for monitoring a particulate filter
AU2015264906B2 (en) * 2014-12-08 2017-02-02 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Function diagnostic system for filter of internal combustion engine
WO2017119836A1 (en) * 2016-01-05 2017-07-13 Scania Cv Ab A method and a system for determining a performance of a particulate filter of an engine
FR3063769A1 (en) * 2017-03-09 2018-09-14 Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa METHOD FOR MONITORING THE OPERATING STATE OF A PARTICLE FILTER AND EXHAUST GAS POST-PROCESSING SYSTEM
US10287957B2 (en) * 2015-04-06 2019-05-14 Denso Corporation Exhaust gas purification device
CN110397495A (en) * 2019-07-02 2019-11-01 武汉理工大学 A kind of performance estimation method of the engine post-treatment apparatus based on data-driven
US10501531B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2019-12-10 Prothena Biosciences Limited Tau immunotherapy
CN110657011A (en) * 2019-09-30 2020-01-07 潍柴动力股份有限公司 SCR (Selective catalytic reduction) blockage fault detection method, SCR blockage fault detection device and vehicle
US10752679B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2020-08-25 Prothena Biosciences Limited Tau immunotherapy
US10889638B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2021-01-12 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
US10906964B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2021-02-02 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
US10961302B2 (en) 2019-03-03 2021-03-30 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
CN112973257A (en) * 2021-02-18 2021-06-18 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Filter element anti-blocking detection method and device, storage medium and water purification equipment
US11066975B2 (en) * 2018-12-19 2021-07-20 Vitesco Technologies GmbH Method and device for diagnosis of a particle filter arranged in the exhaust gas system of a petrol-operated internal combustion engine
US11136911B2 (en) * 2018-12-19 2021-10-05 Vitesco Technologies GmbH Method and device for diagnosis of a particle filter arranged in the exhuast gas system of a petro-operated internal combustion engine
CN113803144A (en) * 2021-09-15 2021-12-17 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Aftertreatment hydrocarbon coverage judgment method and aftertreatment system
US11958896B2 (en) 2018-05-02 2024-04-16 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau

Cited By (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2015519518A (en) * 2012-06-13 2015-07-09 マック トラックス インコーポレイテッド Method for monitoring parts of exhaust aftertreatment system, exhaust aftertreatment system, and control device for exhaust aftertreatment system
EP2864601A4 (en) * 2012-06-21 2016-03-30 Mack Trucks Method for detecting abnormally frequent diesel particulate filter regeneration, engine and exhaust after treatment system, and warning system and method
US9482124B2 (en) 2012-06-21 2016-11-01 Mack Trucks, Inc. Method for detecting abnormally frequent diesel particulate filter regeneration, engine and exhaust aftertreatment system, and warning system and method
WO2014014763A1 (en) * 2012-07-18 2014-01-23 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods for reducing secondary emissions from catalyst components
US10060845B2 (en) 2012-07-18 2018-08-28 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods for reducing secondary emissions from catalyst components
US9623377B2 (en) 2012-07-18 2017-04-18 Cummins Inc. Systems and methods for reducing secondary emissions from catalyst components
EP2930323A4 (en) * 2012-12-07 2016-02-17 Toyota Motor Co Ltd Device for detecting fault in exhaust gas purifier
CN104838101A (en) * 2012-12-07 2015-08-12 丰田自动车株式会社 Device for detecting fault in exhaust gas purifier
EP2930323A1 (en) * 2012-12-07 2015-10-14 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Device for detecting fault in exhaust gas purifier
US10501531B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2019-12-10 Prothena Biosciences Limited Tau immunotherapy
US11643457B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2023-05-09 Prothena Biosciences Limited Tau immunotherapy
CN104420953A (en) * 2013-09-04 2015-03-18 北汽福田汽车股份有限公司 Exhaust treatment system restored by selective catalytic and exhaust treatment method restored by selective catalytic
US20160265413A1 (en) * 2013-10-24 2016-09-15 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for monitoring a particulate filter
AU2015264906B2 (en) * 2014-12-08 2017-02-02 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Function diagnostic system for filter of internal combustion engine
US9719399B2 (en) * 2014-12-31 2017-08-01 Audi Ag Method of operating an exhaust emission control device, and corresponding exhaust emission control device
US20160186636A1 (en) * 2014-12-31 2016-06-30 Audi Ag Method of operating an exhaust emission control device, and corresponding exhaust emission control device
US10287957B2 (en) * 2015-04-06 2019-05-14 Denso Corporation Exhaust gas purification device
KR20180095684A (en) * 2016-01-05 2018-08-27 스카니아 씨브이 악티에볼라그 Method and system for determining performance of engine particle filter
WO2017119836A1 (en) * 2016-01-05 2017-07-13 Scania Cv Ab A method and a system for determining a performance of a particulate filter of an engine
KR102114410B1 (en) 2016-01-05 2020-05-22 스카니아 씨브이 악티에볼라그 Method and system for determining performance of engine particle filter
US10781738B2 (en) 2016-01-05 2020-09-22 Scania Cv Ab Method and a system for determining a performance of a particulate filter of an engine
US10889638B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2021-01-12 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
US10752679B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2020-08-25 Prothena Biosciences Limited Tau immunotherapy
US11584791B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2023-02-21 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
US10906964B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2021-02-02 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
US11492393B2 (en) 2016-05-02 2022-11-08 Prothena Biosciences Limited Tau immunotherapy
FR3063769A1 (en) * 2017-03-09 2018-09-14 Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa METHOD FOR MONITORING THE OPERATING STATE OF A PARTICLE FILTER AND EXHAUST GAS POST-PROCESSING SYSTEM
US11958896B2 (en) 2018-05-02 2024-04-16 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
US11066975B2 (en) * 2018-12-19 2021-07-20 Vitesco Technologies GmbH Method and device for diagnosis of a particle filter arranged in the exhaust gas system of a petrol-operated internal combustion engine
US11136911B2 (en) * 2018-12-19 2021-10-05 Vitesco Technologies GmbH Method and device for diagnosis of a particle filter arranged in the exhuast gas system of a petro-operated internal combustion engine
US10961302B2 (en) 2019-03-03 2021-03-30 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
US11926659B2 (en) 2019-03-03 2024-03-12 Prothena Biosciences Limited Antibodies recognizing tau
CN110397495A (en) * 2019-07-02 2019-11-01 武汉理工大学 A kind of performance estimation method of the engine post-treatment apparatus based on data-driven
CN110657011A (en) * 2019-09-30 2020-01-07 潍柴动力股份有限公司 SCR (Selective catalytic reduction) blockage fault detection method, SCR blockage fault detection device and vehicle
CN112973257A (en) * 2021-02-18 2021-06-18 珠海格力电器股份有限公司 Filter element anti-blocking detection method and device, storage medium and water purification equipment
CN113803144A (en) * 2021-09-15 2021-12-17 潍柴动力股份有限公司 Aftertreatment hydrocarbon coverage judgment method and aftertreatment system

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20120023911A1 (en) Detection of exhaust particulate filter substrate failure
JP5714919B2 (en) Method for predicting the amount of nitrogen oxides and exhaust system using the same
US8966882B2 (en) Differential pressure-based enablement of a particulate filter diagnostic
JP6283742B2 (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring particle filters
US8794057B2 (en) Diagnostic operation strategy for diesel oxidation catalyst aging level determination using NOx sensor NO2 interference
JP4363211B2 (en) Abnormality detection device for exhaust gas purification device of internal combustion engine
CN103362614B (en) The nitrogen dioxide generation diagnostic of diesel aftertreatment system
KR101234638B1 (en) METHOD FOR PREDICTING NOx AMOUNT AMD EXHAUST SYSTEM USING THE SAME
JP5760423B2 (en) NOx purification rate reduction cause diagnosis device
US8646253B2 (en) Procedure and device for controlling an exhaust gas purification system
US9739761B2 (en) Particulate matter filter diagnostic techniques based on exhaust gas analysis
US9234474B2 (en) Control oriented model for LNT regeneration
JP5604953B2 (en) Exhaust gas purification device and control method of exhaust gas purification device
EP2885513A1 (en) Method for detecting sulphur poisoning in an exhaust treatment system
US9074507B2 (en) Event-based deviation integration temperature control loop diagnostic system
WO2010079621A1 (en) Apparatus for determination of component passing through catalyst, and exhaust gas purification apparatus for internal combustion engine
JP2012036860A (en) Device for diagnosing catalyst degradation
KR20120060642A (en) METHOD FOR PREDICTING SOx STORED AT DeNOx CATALYST AND EXHAUST SYSTEM USING THE SAME
US7478553B2 (en) Method for detecting excessive burn
GB2520174A (en) An on-board diagnostics system for catalyzed substrate
US9068495B2 (en) Oxidation catalyst/hydrocarbon injector testing system
KR102135304B1 (en) Device and method for diagnosing a nitrogen oxide trap
JP5640539B2 (en) Urea water quality abnormality diagnosis device
US8978357B2 (en) System and method for determining an exhaust system condition
US9084966B2 (en) Diesel oxidation catalyst aging level determination using NOX sensor NO2 interference

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:LIU, ZHIPING STEVEN;GONZE, EUGENE V.;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100714 TO 20100715;REEL/FRAME:024752/0593

AS Assignment

Owner name: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, DELAWARE

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025327/0156

Effective date: 20101027

AS Assignment

Owner name: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:025781/0333

Effective date: 20101202

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION