US20120014470A1 - Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same - Google Patents

Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120014470A1
US20120014470A1 US13/242,073 US201113242073A US2012014470A1 US 20120014470 A1 US20120014470 A1 US 20120014470A1 US 201113242073 A US201113242073 A US 201113242073A US 2012014470 A1 US2012014470 A1 US 2012014470A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
modulator
signal
output
quadrature
quadrature modulator
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/242,073
Inventor
Pak Shing Cho
Jacob Khurgin
Isaac Shpantzer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Celight Inc
Original Assignee
Celight Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/613,772 external-priority patent/US7272271B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/669,130 external-priority patent/US7327913B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/672,372 external-priority patent/US7186772B2/en
Application filed by Celight Inc filed Critical Celight Inc
Publication of US20120014470A1 publication Critical patent/US20120014470A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02FOPTICAL DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CONTROL OF LIGHT BY MODIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MEDIA OF THE ELEMENTS INVOLVED THEREIN; NON-LINEAR OPTICS; FREQUENCY-CHANGING OF LIGHT; OPTICAL LOGIC ELEMENTS; OPTICAL ANALOGUE/DIGITAL CONVERTERS
    • G02F1/00Devices or arrangements for the control of the intensity, colour, phase, polarisation or direction of light arriving from an independent light source, e.g. switching, gating or modulating; Non-linear optics
    • G02F1/01Devices or arrangements for the control of the intensity, colour, phase, polarisation or direction of light arriving from an independent light source, e.g. switching, gating or modulating; Non-linear optics for the control of the intensity, phase, polarisation or colour 
    • G02F1/21Devices or arrangements for the control of the intensity, colour, phase, polarisation or direction of light arriving from an independent light source, e.g. switching, gating or modulating; Non-linear optics for the control of the intensity, phase, polarisation or colour  by interference
    • G02F1/225Devices or arrangements for the control of the intensity, colour, phase, polarisation or direction of light arriving from an independent light source, e.g. switching, gating or modulating; Non-linear optics for the control of the intensity, phase, polarisation or colour  by interference in an optical waveguide structure
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/25Arrangements specific to fibre transmission
    • H04B10/2507Arrangements specific to fibre transmission for the reduction or elimination of distortion or dispersion
    • H04B10/2543Arrangements specific to fibre transmission for the reduction or elimination of distortion or dispersion due to fibre non-linearities, e.g. Kerr effect
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/501Structural aspects
    • H04B10/503Laser transmitters
    • H04B10/505Laser transmitters using external modulation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/501Structural aspects
    • H04B10/503Laser transmitters
    • H04B10/505Laser transmitters using external modulation
    • H04B10/5053Laser transmitters using external modulation using a parallel, i.e. shunt, combination of modulators
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/501Structural aspects
    • H04B10/503Laser transmitters
    • H04B10/505Laser transmitters using external modulation
    • H04B10/5057Laser transmitters using external modulation using a feedback signal generated by analysing the optical output
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/501Structural aspects
    • H04B10/503Laser transmitters
    • H04B10/505Laser transmitters using external modulation
    • H04B10/5057Laser transmitters using external modulation using a feedback signal generated by analysing the optical output
    • H04B10/50577Laser transmitters using external modulation using a feedback signal generated by analysing the optical output to control the phase of the modulating signal
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/508Pulse generation, e.g. generation of solitons
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/516Details of coding or modulation
    • H04B10/532Polarisation modulation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/516Details of coding or modulation
    • H04B10/54Intensity modulation
    • H04B10/541Digital intensity or amplitude modulation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/50Transmitters
    • H04B10/516Details of coding or modulation
    • H04B10/548Phase or frequency modulation
    • H04B10/556Digital modulation, e.g. differential phase shift keying [DPSK] or frequency shift keying [FSK]
    • H04B10/5561Digital phase modulation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B10/00Transmission systems employing electromagnetic waves other than radio-waves, e.g. infrared, visible or ultraviolet light, or employing corpuscular radiation, e.g. quantum communication
    • H04B10/60Receivers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/005Optical Code Multiplex
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/02Wavelength-division multiplex systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04JMULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION
    • H04J14/00Optical multiplex systems
    • H04J14/08Time-division multiplex systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L7/00Arrangements for synchronising receiver with transmitter
    • H04L7/0075Arrangements for synchronising receiver with transmitter with photonic or optical means
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02FOPTICAL DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CONTROL OF LIGHT BY MODIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MEDIA OF THE ELEMENTS INVOLVED THEREIN; NON-LINEAR OPTICS; FREQUENCY-CHANGING OF LIGHT; OPTICAL LOGIC ELEMENTS; OPTICAL ANALOGUE/DIGITAL CONVERTERS
    • G02F2201/00Constructional arrangements not provided for in groups G02F1/00 - G02F7/00
    • G02F2201/12Constructional arrangements not provided for in groups G02F1/00 - G02F7/00 electrode
    • G02F2201/126Constructional arrangements not provided for in groups G02F1/00 - G02F7/00 electrode push-pull
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02FOPTICAL DEVICES OR ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE CONTROL OF LIGHT BY MODIFICATION OF THE OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF THE MEDIA OF THE ELEMENTS INVOLVED THEREIN; NON-LINEAR OPTICS; FREQUENCY-CHANGING OF LIGHT; OPTICAL LOGIC ELEMENTS; OPTICAL ANALOGUE/DIGITAL CONVERTERS
    • G02F2203/00Function characteristic
    • G02F2203/06Polarisation independent

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to optical communications especially coherent communication with quaternary phase shift keying (QPSK) modulation format.
  • Quadrature modulators are used in these systems for QPSK data encoding.
  • the present invention relates to methods and systems of control for integrated quadrature modulators.
  • Multi-level phase-shift-keying offers high spectral efficiency transmission in coherent optical communication systems.
  • Quaternary PSK (QPSK) format in particular, has recently received much attention.
  • An optical QPSK signal can be generated, e.g., by an integrated LiNbO 3 quadrature modulator (QM) with two parallel Mach-Zehnder modulators (MZMs) nested in a MZ interferometer. Each MZM is driven to produce a binary PSK (BPSK) signal.
  • An optical QPSK signal is produced when two MZMs are biased at their null transmission points and the MZ interferometer is biased at the quadrature phase ( ⁇ /2).
  • Input optical beam 2 is splitted into two arms of the MZ interferometer by a splitter 3 .
  • Two Mach-Zehnder modulators 4 and 5 are placed in parallel; each MZM being located in each arm of the MZ interferometer.
  • the biases of the MZMs are controlled by control signals 7 and 8 and driven by RF data signals 8 and 9 .
  • the Phase port of the QM 10 controls relative phase shift between the arms of the MZ interferometer.
  • the method and system are disclosed for an automatic feedback control of integrated quadrature modulator for generation of optical quaternary phase-shift-keyed signal in coherent optical communications.
  • the method comprises the steps of detecting at least a part of output signal from the modulator; extracting of a particular portion of the output signal in RF frequency domain; and minimizing the output signal in RF frequency domain by dithering a voltage applied to a phase shifter of the QPSK modulator. Additionally the method includes detecting the output signal power and minimizing this output signal power by dithering a voltage applied to a first and a second bias of the QPSK modulator.
  • Alternative method includes detecting the output signal power and maximizing this output signal power by dithering a voltage applied to a first and a second bias of the QPSK modulator.
  • the control loop algorithm uses a steepest decent algorithm to search for optimal operating points of the quadrature modulator via dithering of its biases and phase.
  • the criteria, for the dithering are based on minimization of the RF signal voltage and maximization or minimization of the optical average power of the output signal.
  • optical communications system incorporates QPSK modulator for data encoding with the feedback loop control of the modulator to improve transmission performance.
  • the communication system includes an integrated coherent receiver based on 90-degrees optical hybrid
  • Yet another object of the present invention is an optical communications system operating in two polarization states of light
  • the system incorporates two QPSK modulators each having its feedback loop control.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a quadrature modulator with two parallel MZMs nested in a MZ interferometer with a phase bias (Prior Art).
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of control unit for quadrature modulator in optical communications.
  • FIG. 3 shows simulation results for (a) average power versus bias voltage of MZM and (b) integrated RF spectral power versus ⁇ IQ for NRZ drive signal swing of 0.75 and 1.2V ⁇ .
  • FIG. 4 shows constellation plots of the QM optical output at startup (a) and after 50 iterations of the control loop (b). Plot of deviations of the two biases and phase from then optimal points ( ⁇ and ⁇ /2) versus iteration number are shown in (c).
  • FIG. 5 shows BER versus received optical power of the differentially detected QPSK signal with automatic control loop or with manual adjustment of the QM.
  • Inset shows eye diagram (top) of the differentially detected 12.5 GSmp/s QPSK signal and the directly detected output from the QM (bottom), Horizontal scale: 20 ps/div.
  • FIG. 6 shows block diagram of an optical communication system that includes quadrature modulator having a control unit according to FIG. 2 .
  • FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of a coherent optical receiver for the optical communications system of FIG. 6 .
  • FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of a coherent optical receiver operating in two polarization states of light.
  • FIG. 9 shows block diagram of an optical communication system operating in two polarization states of light.
  • FIG. 2 A schematic diagram for a feedback control loop for the quadrature modulator is shown in FIG. 2 .
  • a light source 12 is launched into a quadrature modulator 1 .
  • the light source is a CW or pulsed laser.
  • the quadrature modulator is driven by two high-speed (>10 Gbits/s) non-return-to-zero (NRZ) binary data streams through RF ports 8 and 9 .
  • the optical output of the quadrature modulator is divided into two paths using a tap 13 .
  • the optical beam 14 from the tapped output is impinged to a low-speed (e.g., 750 MHz) photodetector 15 .
  • the photodetector 15 is a single photon absorption photodetector.
  • the electrical signal 16 from the photodetector 15 is divided into two by splitter 17 with one path connected to a DC block 18 to reject dc components of the electrical signal. This is followed by a RF spectral power detector (e.g., Schottky diode) 19 to extract the low-frequency RF spectral power (V RF ).
  • the signal is then digitized using an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 20 connected to a digital signal processing (DSP) unit 21 .
  • ADC analog-to-digital converter
  • DSP digital signal processing
  • the DSP unit contains a code that executes the control loop algorithm.
  • the second path from the photodetector output is directly connected to another ADC 22 that provides monitoring of the optical average power. Outputs of the DSP unit are converted in analog signals by digital-to-analog converters 23 , 24 , 25 and directed to the two bias ports 6 and 7 and the phase port 10 of the quadrature modulator 1 .
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a QM with two push-pull type MZMs with RF and DC bias electrodes nested in a MZ interferometer with a phase electrode for quadrature bias.
  • the output average power over a period of time T is
  • V B ⁇ V ⁇ , ⁇ 3V ⁇ , . . . , so that the above can be written as follows
  • the average power of the MZM output should be maximized for V ⁇ ⁇ V pp ⁇ 2V ⁇ or minimized for 0 ⁇ V pp ⁇ V ⁇ .
  • FIG. 3 a shows a simulated output optical average power of the QM versus V B for V pp of 075 and 1.2V ⁇ .
  • the simulation uses a 12.5 Gb/s NRZ pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) with a word length of 2 11 ⁇ 1 with realistic waveforms (finite rise and fall times and ringings) driving the two MZMs of the QM biased to quadrature phase.
  • PRBS 12.5 Gb/s NRZ pseudo-random binary sequence
  • the two NRZ signals are complementary with a 2-symbol relative time delay. Gaussian noise was added to the chive signal and to the input optical field to check the robustness of the response.
  • Gaussian noise was added to the chive signal and to the input optical field to check the robustness of the response.
  • the simulation result is consistent with the dependence of the average power on the MZM bias analyzed above.
  • FIG. 3 b shows the simulated integrated RF spectral power of P QM (V RF ) for V pp of 0.75 and 1.2V ⁇ versus ⁇ IQ using similar NRZ drive signals with Gaussian noise as in FIG. 3 a. The results are in agreement with the analysis. Note that the dependence of V RF on ⁇ IQ is not affected by V pp . Based on the analysis and results shown in FIG. 3 , a QM control loop algorithm and model was developed.
  • the control loop uses a steepest decent algorithm to search for optimal operating points of the QM via dithering of its biases and phase.
  • the dithering is performed continuously while monitoring the two feedback signals: V RF and the average optical power.
  • the criteria for the dithering is based on minimization of the signal V RF and maximizes or minimizes the optical average power if the peak-to-peak NRZ drive signal is above or below the half-wave voltage (V ⁇ ) of the quadrature modulator as described earlier.
  • FIG. 4 shows typical simulation results of the control loop with Gaussian noise added to the drive signals and to the input optical field as before.
  • the control loop is quite robust even in the presence of significant amount of amplitude and phase noise. Convergence to optimal operating points was observed for many random initial biases and phases of the QM tested.
  • a packaged LiNbO 3 QM was driven by two 12.5 Gb/s NRZ PRBS (word length: 2 15 ⁇ 1) signals.
  • the two NRZ signals are complementary with a 2-symbol relative time delay.
  • the NRZ drive voltage swing applied to the QM was V PP ⁇ 1.2V ⁇ .
  • the output of the QM was tapped off and directed to a 750-MHz photodetector where its output was divided into two with one path connected to a Schottky diode detector to extract the low-frequency RF spectral power (V RF ).
  • the signal was amplified and directed to a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) analog-to-digital converter (ADC) connected to a desktop computer (PC) running a code based on the control loop algorithm described earlier.
  • COTS commercial off-the-shelf
  • ADC analog-to-digital converter
  • PC desktop computer
  • the second path was amplified and directly connected to the ADC that provides monitoring of the optical average power.
  • Outputs of a COTS digital-to-analog converter connected to the PC are directed to the two MZM bias ports and the phase port of the QM. This completes the QM feedback control loop.
  • the 12.5 GSym/s optical QPSK signal was directed to a receiver with an optical pre-amp and a band-pass filter.
  • Differential detection of the 12.5 GSym/s QPSK signal was employed using a fiber-based asymmetric Mach-Zehnder (AMZ) interferometer with a one-symbol differential delay (80 ps).
  • the two outputs of the AMZ demodulator were directed to a 15-GHz balanced photoreceiver.
  • the differential phase shift of the AMZ was adjusted to approximately ⁇ /4 to obtain maximum eye opening.
  • FIG. 5 shows BER measurements of the differentially detected QPSK signal using the automatic control loop. Measurements using manual adjustment of the DC biases and phase of the QM by minimizing the BER are also shown.
  • a power penalty of about 1 dB at 10 ⁇ 9 BER was observed for the control loop. This is attributed to the dithering and the relatively flat responses of V RV and the average power near their optimal points as can be seen in FIG. 2 . Nevertheless, the control loop concept was demonstrated and validated using COTS components.
  • the QM control loop was operated continuously for about 20 hours with no degradation in performance. The control loop is expected to work for higher symbol rates since no high-speed components are required in the loop.
  • the control loop also works for RZ format of the QPSK signal. Generation and detection of 12.5 GSym/s RZ-DQPSK has using the QM control loop was conducted and its performance was verified.
  • Coherent communications system with quadrature modulator having a control unit is another object of the present invention.
  • Optical transmitter comprises a light source 12 and a quadrature modulator 1 with a control unit 26 that allows optimizing the data transmission performance.
  • Encoded optical signal is transmitted over the transmission link 28 to the coherent optical receiver 29 where the data is decoded by mixing the transmitted optical signal with a signal from a local oscillator 30 .
  • the coherent optical receiver is an integrated receiver based on 90-degrees optical hybrid as disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent applications Ser. No. 10/669,130 filed on Sep. 22, 2003 and Ser. No. 10/672,372 filed on Feb. 7, 2007 by the same inventors, incorporated herein by references.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a coherent receiver 29 of the preferred embodiment. It includes an optical interface 31 and a receiving unit 32 .
  • the interface includes a first device input 33 and a second device input 34 ; first 35 , second 36 , third 37 and fourth 38 couplers (mixers); a first phase shifter 39 and a second phase shifter 40 , and first 41 , second 42 , third 43 , and fourth 44 outputs.
  • the optical interface further includes two crossing waveguides 45 and 46 , which cross each other.
  • the receiving unit 32 includes four photodetectors 47 , 48 , 49 , and 50 having outputs 51 , 52 , 53 , and 54 respectively.
  • the receiver further includes data digital signal processing unit 55 .
  • the first 33 and the second 34 device inputs both are connected, respectively, to the first coupler 35 and the second coupler 36 .
  • One output of the first coupler 35 is connected to one input, of the third coupler 37 while another output of the first coupler 35 is connected to the one input of the fourth coupler 38 by a first crossing waveguide 45 .
  • An output of the second coupler 36 is connected to another input of the fourth coupler 38 while another output of the second coupler 36 is connected to another input of the third coupler 37 by a second crossing waveguide 46 .
  • the optical interface also includes at least one phase shifter positioned between two locations. The first location is one of the outputs of the first or second coupler.
  • the other location is one of the inputs of the third or fourth couplers, which corresponds (connected by a crossing waveguide) to the first location.
  • the first and second outputs of the third coupler 37 produce the first 41 and the second 42 device outputs, respectively.
  • the first and second outputs of the fourth coupler 38 produce the third 43 and the fourth 44 device outputs, respectively.
  • the photodetectors are PIN photodiodes.
  • the photodiodes are located at equal distance apart.
  • the distance between the neighbor photodiodes can be from 0.01 to 1 mm. In the preferred embodiment the distance is from 0.1 to 0.2 mm.
  • the array of the photodiodes is fabricated on top of a single substrate. InGaAs photodiodes produced by OSI Optoelectronics, Inc. (Hawthorne, Calif.) are examples of such photodiodes.
  • the substrate is made of alumina.
  • an optical signal in two polarization states is transmitted over the communications link and by a two polarization coherent detector.
  • a coherent optical receiver 59 operating in two polarizations is shown in FIG. 8 . It includes an optical interface 60 and a set of photodiodes 61 .
  • the interface includes a first device input 62 , a second device input 63 , a third device input 64 , a fourth device input 65 , a fifth device input 66 ; a polarization beam splitter 67 , first 68 , second 69 , third 70 , fourth 71 , fifth 72 , sixth 73 , seventh 74 , and eighth 75 couplers (mixers); a first phase shifter 76 , a second phase shifter 77 , a third phase shifter 78 , and a fourth phase shifter 79 , first 80 , second 81 , third 82 , fourth 63 , fifth 84 , sixth 85 , seventh 86 , eighth 87 , ninth 88 , and tenth 89 device outputs.
  • the device further includes two sets of crossing waveguides ( 90 and 91 ) and ( 92 and 93 ).
  • the receiver may optionally include two alignment waveguides 94 and 95 are located on opposite sides of the optical interface 60 .
  • the photodetectors are PIN photodiodes.
  • the photodiodes are located at equal distance apart. The distance between the neighbor photodiodes can be from 0.01 to 1 mm. In the preferred embodiment the distance is from 0.1 to 0.2 mm.
  • the photodetector unit 61 is performed by light passing through waveguides 94 and 95 and positioning the unit 61 to maximize the current from photodiodes 96 and 105 .
  • the accuracy of alignment is at least 1 micron. In the preferred embodiment the accuracy is about 0.1 micron.
  • Two-polarization transmitter 106 includes the light source 12 and two (PSK modulators 1 a and 1 b, each being controlled by its control unit 26 a and 26 b respectively.
  • Output beam from the light source 12 is split into two beams by polarization beam splitter 107 .
  • Each of modulators 1 a and 1 b operates with the light of one polarization state.
  • Output beam from the modulators 1 a and 1 b being combined by a polarization beam combiner 108 is transmitted over the communications link 28 towards the coherent optical receiver 59 operating in two light polarization states The transmitted signal impinges the input 64 of the receiver 59 .
  • the transmitted signal is mixed with two signals from a local oscillator 109 operating in two light polarization states.
  • Local oscillator beams 110 and 110 have orthogonal polarization states and impinge the receiver 59 via the inputs 63 and 65 shown in FIG. 8 .
  • the elements in the optical receivers 31 and 60 can each be formed as part of a single planar chip made of an electro-optical material.
  • the chip is a monolithic piece of a wafer that can be made of semiconductor or ferroelectric materials including but not limited to LiNbO 3 , and the like.
  • different effects relative to the output of the chip of the present invention are possible., including but not limited to, (i) thermo-optical, (ii) electro-optical, (iii) electro-absorption, and the like.
  • the electro-optical material which can be LiNbO 3 , can be cut at X, Y, or Z planes.
  • the device of the present invention can utilize a variety of different processes in its creation, including but not limited to, metal in-diffusion and/or (annealed) protonic-exchange technology, wet etching, reactive ion (beam) etching, plasma etching, and the like.
  • the optical interfaces 31 and 60 of the present invention when integrated on a single chip and/or in single package, can be used for various applications, including those that require simultaneous measurement of phase and amplitude of the optical field.
  • the receiving units 32 and 61 include the balanced receivers and optionally Trans-Impedance Amplifiers (TIAs), all formed as a part of a single integrated package.
  • TIAs Trans-Impedance Amplifiers
  • the integrated device chip can be made of the semiconductor material selected from Si and InP.
  • quadrature modulator is not limited to optical communications either free-space, fiber or waveguide.
  • the present invention is related to any other possible applications of QPSK modulation technique.

Abstract

The method and system are disclosed for automatic feedback control of integrated optical quadrature modulator for generation of optical quaternary phase-shift-keyed signal in coherent optical communications. The method comprises the steps of detecting at least a part of an output optical signal from the QPSK modulator, extracting of a particular portion of the output signal in frequency domain, and processing the signal in frequency domain to optimize the transmission of an optical link. The system and method of optical communications in fiber or free space are disclosed that implement the quadrature data modulator with automatic feedback control.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present invention claims is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 11/679,376 filed Feb. 27, 2007, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 10/613,772 filed Jul. 2, 2003 and also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent applications Ser. No. 10/669,130 filed on Sep. 22, 2003 and Ser. No. 10/672,372 filed on Feb. 7, 200, all of them incorporated herein by reference.
  • FIELD OF INVENTION
  • This invention relates generally to optical communications especially coherent communication with quaternary phase shift keying (QPSK) modulation format. Quadrature modulators are used in these systems for QPSK data encoding. The present invention relates to methods and systems of control for integrated quadrature modulators.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Multi-level phase-shift-keying (PSK) offers high spectral efficiency transmission in coherent optical communication systems. Quaternary PSK (QPSK) format, in particular, has recently received much attention. An optical QPSK signal can be generated, e.g., by an integrated LiNbO3 quadrature modulator (QM) with two parallel Mach-Zehnder modulators (MZMs) nested in a MZ interferometer. Each MZM is driven to produce a binary PSK (BPSK) signal. An optical QPSK signal is produced when two MZMs are biased at their null transmission points and the MZ interferometer is biased at the quadrature phase (π/2). FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a quadrature modulator 1 known in the prior art. The principle of its operation is as follows. Input optical beam 2 is splitted into two arms of the MZ interferometer by a splitter 3. Two Mach- Zehnder modulators 4 and 5 are placed in parallel; each MZM being located in each arm of the MZ interferometer. The biases of the MZMs are controlled by control signals 7 and 8 and driven by RF data signals 8 and 9. The Phase port of the QM 10 controls relative phase shift between the arms of the MZ interferometer.
  • In modern communication systems operating at a speed exceeding 10 Gbits/s, a precise stabilization of QPSK modulators is required. There is a need for an automatic feedback control loop that searches for these biases and phase operating points of the QM at initial startup and maintains them during operation.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The method and system are disclosed for an automatic feedback control of integrated quadrature modulator for generation of optical quaternary phase-shift-keyed signal in coherent optical communications.
  • The method comprises the steps of detecting at least a part of output signal from the modulator; extracting of a particular portion of the output signal in RF frequency domain; and minimizing the output signal in RF frequency domain by dithering a voltage applied to a phase shifter of the QPSK modulator. Additionally the method includes detecting the output signal power and minimizing this output signal power by dithering a voltage applied to a first and a second bias of the QPSK modulator.
  • Alternative method includes detecting the output signal power and maximizing this output signal power by dithering a voltage applied to a first and a second bias of the QPSK modulator.
  • The control loop algorithm uses a steepest decent algorithm to search for optimal operating points of the quadrature modulator via dithering of its biases and phase. The criteria, for the dithering are based on minimization of the RF signal voltage and maximization or minimization of the optical average power of the output signal.
  • An optical communications system is proposed that incorporates QPSK modulator for data encoding with the feedback loop control of the modulator to improve transmission performance. In the preferred embodiment the communication system includes an integrated coherent receiver based on 90-degrees optical hybrid
  • Yet another object of the present invention is an optical communications system operating in two polarization states of light The system incorporates two QPSK modulators each having its feedback loop control.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a quadrature modulator with two parallel MZMs nested in a MZ interferometer with a phase bias (Prior Art).
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic diagram of control unit for quadrature modulator in optical communications.
  • FIG. 3 shows simulation results for (a) average power versus bias voltage of MZM and (b) integrated RF spectral power versus ΔφIQ for NRZ drive signal swing of 0.75 and 1.2Vπ.
  • FIG. 4 shows constellation plots of the QM optical output at startup (a) and after 50 iterations of the control loop (b). Plot of deviations of the two biases and phase from then optimal points (π and π/2) versus iteration number are shown in (c).
  • FIG. 5 shows BER versus received optical power of the differentially detected QPSK signal with automatic control loop or with manual adjustment of the QM. Inset shows eye diagram (top) of the differentially detected 12.5 GSmp/s QPSK signal and the directly detected output from the QM (bottom), Horizontal scale: 20 ps/div.
  • FIG. 6 shows block diagram of an optical communication system that includes quadrature modulator having a control unit according to FIG. 2.
  • FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of a coherent optical receiver for the optical communications system of FIG. 6.
  • FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of a coherent optical receiver operating in two polarization states of light.
  • FIG. 9 shows block diagram of an optical communication system operating in two polarization states of light.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • A schematic diagram for a feedback control loop for the quadrature modulator is shown in FIG. 2. A light source 12 is launched into a quadrature modulator 1. In the preferred embodiment the light source is a CW or pulsed laser. The quadrature modulator is driven by two high-speed (>10 Gbits/s) non-return-to-zero (NRZ) binary data streams through RF ports 8 and 9. The optical output of the quadrature modulator is divided into two paths using a tap 13. The optical beam 14 from the tapped output is impinged to a low-speed (e.g., 750 MHz) photodetector 15. In the preferred embodiment the photodetector 15 is a single photon absorption photodetector. The electrical signal 16 from the photodetector 15 is divided into two by splitter 17 with one path connected to a DC block 18 to reject dc components of the electrical signal. This is followed by a RF spectral power detector (e.g., Schottky diode) 19 to extract the low-frequency RF spectral power (VRF). The signal is then digitized using an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) 20 connected to a digital signal processing (DSP) unit 21. The DSP unit contains a code that executes the control loop algorithm. The second path from the photodetector output is directly connected to another ADC 22 that provides monitoring of the optical average power. Outputs of the DSP unit are converted in analog signals by digital-to- analog converters 23, 24, 25 and directed to the two bias ports 6 and 7 and the phase port 10 of the quadrature modulator 1.
  • The principle of feedback loop operation becomes clear from the following detailed description of its operation. FIG. 1 shows a schematic of a QM with two push-pull type MZMs with RF and DC bias electrodes nested in a MZ interferometer with a phase electrode for quadrature bias. Consider a single MZM, the directly detected optical output power is Po(t)=(kPi2){1+cos [π(Vs(t)+VB)/Vπ }, where Vs(t) is the NRZ drive signal with a peak-to-peak voltage swing Vpp, VB is the bias voltage, Vπ is the half-wave voltage, Pt is the input optical power, and k accounts for the insertion loss of the MZM. To generate optical BPSK signal, the MZM bias is set to the null transmission with VB=±Vπ, ±3Vπ, . . . , and Vs varies between ±Vπ. The output average power over a period of time T is
  • P o ( t ) = kP i 2 ( 1 + 1 T 0 T cos [ π V π ( V s ( t ) + V B ) ] t ) .
  • Taking the derivative of the above with respect to VB and equating to zero gives
  • P o ( t ) V B = - k P i 2 π V π 1 T 0 T sin [ π V π ( V s ( t ) + V B ) ] t = 0 sin [ π V π ( V s ( t ) + V B ) ] = 0.
  • The above is satisfied if Ts=mVπ and VB=nVπ(m,n=0,±1,±2, . . . ). Taking the second derivative of
    Figure US20120014470A1-20120119-P00001
    Po(t)
    Figure US20120014470A1-20120119-P00002
    with respect to VB gives
  • 2 P o ( t ) V B 2 = - k P i 2 ( π V π ) 2 1 T 0 T cos [ π V π ( V s ( t ) + V B ) ] t .
  • Therefore, the conditions for extrema of the average optical power are
  • P o ( t ) max 2 P o ( t ) V B 2 < 0 cos [ π V π ( V s ( t ) + V B ) ] > 0 , P o ( t ) min 2 P o ( t ) V B 2 > 0 cos [ π V π ( V s ( t ) + V B ) ] < 0.
  • For null transmission of the MZM, VB=≧Vπ, ±3Vπ, . . . , so that the above can be written as follows
  • P o ( t ) max 2 P o ( t ) V B 2 < 0 cos [ π V π V s ( t ) ] < 0 V π < V pp 2 V π , P o ( t ) min 2 P o ( t ) V B 2 > 0 cos [ π V π V s ( t ) ] > 0 0 < V pp < V π .
  • Therefore, in order to maintain null transmission of the MZM for BPSK operation the average power of the MZM output should be maximized for Vπ<Vpp≦2Vπ or minimized for 0<Vpp<Vπ.
  • FIG. 3 a shows a simulated output optical average power of the QM versus VB for Vpp of 075 and 1.2Vπ. The simulation uses a 12.5 Gb/s NRZ pseudo-random binary sequence (PRBS) with a word length of 211−1 with realistic waveforms (finite rise and fall times and ringings) driving the two MZMs of the QM biased to quadrature phase. The two NRZ signals are complementary with a 2-symbol relative time delay. Gaussian noise was added to the chive signal and to the input optical field to check the robustness of the response. As can be seen, the simulation result is consistent with the dependence of the average power on the MZM bias analyzed above.
  • Consider now the phase bias of the MZ interferometer of the QM where the phase shift between the two BPSK signals (I and Q) is ΔφIQ. It can be shown that the directly detected output power of the QM is given by

  • P QM=(kP i/4){1−cos(πV I /V π)/2−cos(πV Q /V π)/2+2 sin[πVI/(2V π)] sin [πV Q/(2V π)] cos(ΔφIQ)},
  • where VI and VQ are the NRZ binary data signals applied to the two Minis biased at their null transmission points (VB=Vπ). Assuming VI and VQ varies between ±Vπ, the detected output can thus be simplified as follows
  • P QM = { k P i [ 1 + cos ( Δφ IQ ) ] / 2 , for V I = V Q = ± V π , k P i [ 1 - cos ( Δφ IQ ) ] / 2 , for V I = ± V π and V Q = V π .
  • It is clear that data-like binary pattern will appear at the output of the QM if the MZ interferometer is not in quadrature (ΔφIQ≠π/2). The RF spectrum of PQM contains low-frequency components due to this data pattern. Therefore, a minimum integrated RF spectral power of PQM should be an indication that ΔφIQ is close to π/2. FIG. 3 b shows the simulated integrated RF spectral power of PQM (VRF) for Vpp of 0.75 and 1.2Vπ versus ΔφIQ using similar NRZ drive signals with Gaussian noise as in FIG. 3 a. The results are in agreement with the analysis. Note that the dependence of VRF on ΔφIQ is not affected by Vpp. Based on the analysis and results shown in FIG. 3, a QM control loop algorithm and model was developed.
  • The control loop uses a steepest decent algorithm to search for optimal operating points of the QM via dithering of its biases and phase. The dithering is performed continuously while monitoring the two feedback signals: VRF and the average optical power. The criteria for the dithering is based on minimization of the signal VRF and maximizes or minimizes the optical average power if the peak-to-peak NRZ drive signal is above or below the half-wave voltage (Vπ) of the quadrature modulator as described earlier.
  • FIG. 4 shows typical simulation results of the control loop with Gaussian noise added to the drive signals and to the input optical field as before. One can see that the control loop is quite robust even in the presence of significant amount of amplitude and phase noise. Convergence to optimal operating points was observed for many random initial biases and phases of the QM tested.
  • EXAMPLE 1 QM Control Loop Experiment
  • An experiment on closed-loop control of the QM was conducted to investigate its performance for generation of a 12.5-GSym/s optical QPSK signal. A packaged LiNbO3 QM was driven by two 12.5 Gb/s NRZ PRBS (word length: 215−1) signals. The two NRZ signals are complementary with a 2-symbol relative time delay. The NRZ drive voltage swing applied to the QM was VPP˜1.2Vπ. The output of the QM was tapped off and directed to a 750-MHz photodetector where its output was divided into two with one path connected to a Schottky diode detector to extract the low-frequency RF spectral power (VRF). The signal was amplified and directed to a commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) analog-to-digital converter (ADC) connected to a desktop computer (PC) running a code based on the control loop algorithm described earlier. The second path was amplified and directly connected to the ADC that provides monitoring of the optical average power. Outputs of a COTS digital-to-analog converter connected to the PC are directed to the two MZM bias ports and the phase port of the QM. This completes the QM feedback control loop.
  • The 12.5 GSym/s optical QPSK signal was directed to a receiver with an optical pre-amp and a band-pass filter. Differential detection of the 12.5 GSym/s QPSK signal was employed using a fiber-based asymmetric Mach-Zehnder (AMZ) interferometer with a one-symbol differential delay (80 ps). The two outputs of the AMZ demodulator were directed to a 15-GHz balanced photoreceiver. The differential phase shift of the AMZ was adjusted to approximately ±π/4 to obtain maximum eye opening. FIG. 5 shows BER measurements of the differentially detected QPSK signal using the automatic control loop. Measurements using manual adjustment of the DC biases and phase of the QM by minimizing the BER are also shown. A power penalty of about 1 dB at 10−9 BER was observed for the control loop. This is attributed to the dithering and the relatively flat responses of VRV and the average power near their optimal points as can be seen in FIG. 2. Nevertheless, the control loop concept was demonstrated and validated using COTS components. The QM control loop was operated continuously for about 20 hours with no degradation in performance. The control loop is expected to work for higher symbol rates since no high-speed components are required in the loop. The control loop also works for RZ format of the QPSK signal. Generation and detection of 12.5 GSym/s RZ-DQPSK has using the QM control loop was conducted and its performance was verified.
  • Coherent communications system with quadrature modulator having a control unit is another object of the present invention.
  • The block diagram of a coherent communications system according to the present invention is shown in FIG. 6. Optical transmitter comprises a light source 12 and a quadrature modulator 1 with a control unit 26 that allows optimizing the data transmission performance. Encoded optical signal is transmitted over the transmission link 28 to the coherent optical receiver 29 where the data is decoded by mixing the transmitted optical signal with a signal from a local oscillator 30.
  • In the preferred embodiment the coherent optical receiver is an integrated receiver based on 90-degrees optical hybrid as disclosed in co-pending U.S. patent applications Ser. No. 10/669,130 filed on Sep. 22, 2003 and Ser. No. 10/672,372 filed on Feb. 7, 2007 by the same inventors, incorporated herein by references.
  • FIG. 7 illustrates a coherent receiver 29 of the preferred embodiment. It includes an optical interface 31 and a receiving unit 32. The interface includes a first device input 33 and a second device input 34; first 35, second 36, third 37 and fourth 38 couplers (mixers); a first phase shifter 39 and a second phase shifter 40, and first 41, second 42, third 43, and fourth 44 outputs. The optical interface further includes two crossing waveguides 45 and 46, which cross each other. The receiving unit 32 includes four photodetectors 47, 48, 49, and 50 having outputs 51, 52, 53, and 54 respectively. The receiver further includes data digital signal processing unit 55.
  • The first 33 and the second 34 device inputs both are connected, respectively, to the first coupler 35 and the second coupler 36. One output of the first coupler 35 is connected to one input, of the third coupler 37 while another output of the first coupler 35 is connected to the one input of the fourth coupler 38 by a first crossing waveguide 45. An output of the second coupler 36 is connected to another input of the fourth coupler 38 while another output of the second coupler 36 is connected to another input of the third coupler 37 by a second crossing waveguide 46. The optical interface also includes at least one phase shifter positioned between two locations. The first location is one of the outputs of the first or second coupler. The other location is one of the inputs of the third or fourth couplers, which corresponds (connected by a crossing waveguide) to the first location. The first and second outputs of the third coupler 37 produce the first 41 and the second 42 device outputs, respectively. The first and second outputs of the fourth coupler 38 produce the third 43 and the fourth 44 device outputs, respectively.
  • Signals coming out of the outputs 41, 42, 43, and 44 impinge photodetectors 47, 48, 49, and 50, respectively. It is preferred that the photodetectors are PIN photodiodes. The photodiodes are located at equal distance apart. The distance between the neighbor photodiodes can be from 0.01 to 1 mm. In the preferred embodiment the distance is from 0.1 to 0.2 mm. The array of the photodiodes is fabricated on top of a single substrate. InGaAs photodiodes produced by OSI Optoelectronics, Inc. (Hawthorne, Calif.) are examples of such photodiodes. In the preferred embodiment the substrate is made of alumina.
  • In another embodiment an optical signal in two polarization states is transmitted over the communications link and by a two polarization coherent detector. One embodiment of a coherent optical receiver 59 operating in two polarizations is shown in FIG. 8. It includes an optical interface 60 and a set of photodiodes 61. The interface includes a first device input 62, a second device input 63, a third device input 64, a fourth device input 65, a fifth device input 66; a polarization beam splitter 67, first 68, second 69, third 70, fourth 71, fifth 72, sixth 73, seventh 74, and eighth 75 couplers (mixers); a first phase shifter 76, a second phase shifter 77, a third phase shifter 78, and a fourth phase shifter 79, first 80, second 81, third 82, fourth 63, fifth 84, sixth 85, seventh 86, eighth 87, ninth 88, and tenth 89 device outputs. The device further includes two sets of crossing waveguides (90 and 91) and (92 and 93). The receiver may optionally include two alignment waveguides 94 and 95 are located on opposite sides of the optical interface 60.
  • Signals coming out of the ten outputs 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89 impinge photodetectors 96, 97, 98, 99, 100,101, 102, 103, 104, 105, respectively. It is preferred that the photodetectors are PIN photodiodes. Similarly to the device in FIG. 7, the photodiodes are located at equal distance apart. The distance between the neighbor photodiodes can be from 0.01 to 1 mm. In the preferred embodiment the distance is from 0.1 to 0.2 mm. During the fabrication the optical interface 60 alignment relatively the photodetector unit 61 is performed by light passing through waveguides 94 and 95 and positioning the unit 61 to maximize the current from photodiodes 96 and 105. The accuracy of alignment is at least 1 micron. In the preferred embodiment the accuracy is about 0.1 micron.
  • An optical communication link shown in FIG. 9 illustrates light transmission in two polarizations according to the present invention. Two-polarization transmitter 106 includes the light source 12 and two (PSK modulators 1 a and 1 b, each being controlled by its control unit 26 a and 26 b respectively. Output beam from the light source 12 is split into two beams by polarization beam splitter 107. Each of modulators 1 a and 1 b operates with the light of one polarization state. Output beam from the modulators 1 a and 1 b being combined by a polarization beam combiner 108 is transmitted over the communications link 28 towards the coherent optical receiver 59 operating in two light polarization states The transmitted signal impinges the input 64 of the receiver 59. In the receiver 59 the transmitted signal is mixed with two signals from a local oscillator 109 operating in two light polarization states. Local oscillator beams 110 and 110 have orthogonal polarization states and impinge the receiver 59 via the inputs 63 and 65 shown in FIG. 8.
  • The elements in the optical receivers 31 and 60 can each be formed as part of a single planar chip made of an electro-optical material. In various embodiments, the chip is a monolithic piece of a wafer that can be made of semiconductor or ferroelectric materials including but not limited to LiNbO3, and the like. In various embodiments, different effects relative to the output of the chip of the present invention are possible., including but not limited to, (i) thermo-optical, (ii) electro-optical, (iii) electro-absorption, and the like. The electro-optical material, which can be LiNbO3, can be cut at X, Y, or Z planes. The device of the present invention can utilize a variety of different processes in its creation, including but not limited to, metal in-diffusion and/or (annealed) protonic-exchange technology, wet etching, reactive ion (beam) etching, plasma etching, and the like.
  • Integration of components in a single chip, such as LiNbO3 and the like, can, among other things, reduce cost, improve performance, and provide better stability and control. The optical interfaces 31 and 60 of the present invention, when integrated on a single chip and/or in single package, can be used for various applications, including those that require simultaneous measurement of phase and amplitude of the optical field. In the preferred embodiment the receiving units 32 and 61 include the balanced receivers and optionally Trans-Impedance Amplifiers (TIAs), all formed as a part of a single integrated package.
  • Alternatively the integrated device chip can be made of the semiconductor material selected from Si and InP.
  • The description of the invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Obviously, many modifications and variations will be apparent to practitioners skilled in this art. The application of the disclosed quadrature modulator is not limited to optical communications either free-space, fiber or waveguide. The present invention is related to any other possible applications of QPSK modulation technique.

Claims (20)

1. The method for automatic feedback control of an integrated optical quadrature modulator comprising the steps of:
data encoding of an input optical signal in the quadrature modulator,
detecting at least a first part of an output optical signal from the quadrature modulator, extracting of a particular portion of the output signal in RF frequency domain and minimizing the portion of the output signal in RF frequency domain by tuning a voltage applied to a phase shifter connected to I and Q components of the quadrature modulator, the phase shifter providing a 90 degrees phase shift between I and Q components of the optical signal;
achieving convergence to an optimal operating point of the quadrature modulator by the voltage tuning; and
outputting a second part of the output optical signal with 90-degrees phase shift between I and Q signal components, wherein
the second part of the output optical signal is PSK modulated.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the tuning consists of dithering a control voltage applied to the phase shifter.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the tuning is performed using a steepest descent algorithm.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the tuning is performed continuously during the quadrature modulator operation.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising discontinuing tuning when the optimal operating point is achieved.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein I component of the output signal is produced a first Mach-Zehnder (MZM) modulator and Q component of the output signal is produced a second Mach-Zehnder modulator, two MZMs forming a MZ interferometer, which serves as the quadrature modulator; and wherein
each MZM is driven to produce binary PSK.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the optimal operating point corresponds to each of the MZMs is biased at their null transmission point and the MZ interferometer is biased at the quadrature phase.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the second output optical signal is QPSK modulated.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the input signal to the quadrature modulator is pulsed signal.
10. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
detecting a power of the output optical signal,
tuning a first voltage applied to a first bias of the quadrature modulator and a second voltage applied to a second bias, and
minimizing the power of the output optical signal.
11. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
detecting a power of the output optical signal,
tuning a first voltage applied to a first bias of the quadrature modulator and a second voltage applied to a second bias, and
maximizing the power of the output optical signal.
12. A quadrature modulator, comprising:
a first modulator producing I component of an optical beam;
a second modulator producing Q component of the optical beam; the second modulator positioned in parallel to the first modulator forming a MZ interferometer;
a phase shifter introducing a 90-degrees phase shift between I and Q components of the optical beam;
a combiner combining I and Q components of the optical beam and outputting a quadrature modulated optical signal; and
a feedback loop connected to the combiner and the phase shifter; the feedback loop optimizing operation of the phase shifter to achieve the modulator operation at an optimal operating point.
13. The modulator of claim 12, wherein the first and the second modulators are Mach-Zehnder modulators.
14. The modulator of claim 13, wherein the feedback loop further includes branches providing optimization of MZMs operation.
15. The modulator of claim 13, wherein the optimal operation point corresponds to each of the MZMs is biased at their null transmission point and the MZ interferometer is biased at a π/2 phase.
16. The modulator of claim 12, wherein the feedback loop comprises a waveguide connected to the quadrature modulator output, extracting of a particular portion of the output signal, converting in RF frequency domain and minimizing the portion of the output signal in RF frequency domain by tuning a voltage applied to a phase shifter of the MZ interferometer.
17. The modulator of claim 16, further comprising a DSP unit controlling the feedback loop.
18. An optical communications system, comprising:
a transmitter for creating and sending a quadrature modulated signal, the transmitter including a quadrature modulator producing QPSK data modulation of an optical signal; the quadrature modulator comprising a first feedback loop connected to an output of the quadrature modulator and controlling a phase shifter of the quadrature modulator to achieve its operation at 90 degrees point;
a receiver, receiving the quadrature modulated signal and recovering QPSK modulated data.
19. The system of claim 18, wherein the first feedback loop provides an improved system performance allowing to achieve higher BER than without the feedback loop.
20. The system of claim 18, further comprising a second and a thirds feedback loop connected to an output of the quadrature modulator and controlling a first and a second Mach-Zehnder modulators, which produce I and Q components of the QPSK signal, respectively; and all three feedback loops improving performance of the system allowing to achieve higher BER than without the feedback loops.
US13/242,073 2003-07-02 2011-09-23 Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same Abandoned US20120014470A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/613,772 US7272271B2 (en) 2001-09-26 2003-07-02 Electro-optical integrated transmitter chip for arbitrary quadrature modulation of optical signals
US10/669,130 US7327913B2 (en) 2001-09-26 2003-09-22 Coherent optical detector and coherent communication system and method
US10/672,372 US7186772B2 (en) 2002-09-27 2003-09-26 Coating composition for forming self-layering or self-coating lacquer systems
US77761006P 2006-02-28 2006-02-28
US11/679,376 US8050351B2 (en) 2003-07-02 2007-02-27 Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/679,376 Continuation US8050351B2 (en) 2003-07-02 2007-02-27 Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120014470A1 true US20120014470A1 (en) 2012-01-19

Family

ID=46327394

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/679,376 Expired - Fee Related US8050351B2 (en) 2003-07-02 2007-02-27 Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same
US13/242,073 Abandoned US20120014470A1 (en) 2003-07-02 2011-09-23 Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/679,376 Expired - Fee Related US8050351B2 (en) 2003-07-02 2007-02-27 Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US8050351B2 (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140233965A1 (en) * 2013-02-21 2014-08-21 Fujitsu Limited System and Method for Monitoring and Control of an Optical Modulator for an M-QAM Transmitter
EP2849361A1 (en) * 2013-09-12 2015-03-18 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for determining the conjugate relationship of a QPSK signal and method and apparatus for dispersion compensation
US11002992B2 (en) * 2017-03-15 2021-05-11 Nokia Solutions & Networks Oy Bias control of optical modulators
US11086187B2 (en) * 2017-03-15 2021-08-10 Nokia Solutions & Networks Oy Bias control of optical modulators
US11493710B2 (en) * 2018-03-27 2022-11-08 Nec Corporation Pluggable optical module, optical communication system, and optical communication method

Families Citing this family (57)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4440091B2 (en) * 2004-12-24 2010-03-24 住友大阪セメント株式会社 Light modulator
US7715671B2 (en) * 2006-05-19 2010-05-11 Jds Uniphase Corporation Asymmetric Mach-Zehnder interferometer having a reduced drive voltage coupled to a compact low-loss arrayed waveguide grating
US7633062B2 (en) * 2006-10-27 2009-12-15 Los Alamos National Security, Llc Radiation portal monitor system and method
WO2008086507A1 (en) * 2007-01-10 2008-07-17 Decision Sciences Corporation Information collecting and decision making via tiered information network systems
US7945105B1 (en) 2008-04-07 2011-05-17 Decision Sciences International Corporation Automated target shape detection for vehicle muon tomography
US8288721B2 (en) * 2007-04-23 2012-10-16 Decision Sciences International Corporation Imaging and sensing based on muon tomography
JP5168685B2 (en) * 2007-09-18 2013-03-21 独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 Quadrature amplitude modulation signal generator
WO2009134506A2 (en) * 2008-02-07 2009-11-05 University Of Washington Enhanced silicon all-optical modulator
US20090297094A1 (en) 2008-03-05 2009-12-03 University Of Washington All-optical modulation and sdwitching with patterned optically absorbing polymers
JP2010028741A (en) * 2008-07-24 2010-02-04 Yokogawa Electric Corp Optical transmitter
US20100021163A1 (en) * 2008-07-24 2010-01-28 The University Of Melbourne Method and system for polarization supported optical transmission
US8688037B2 (en) * 2008-09-26 2014-04-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Magnetic latching mechanism for use in mating a mobile computing device to an accessory device
US8699882B2 (en) * 2009-01-08 2014-04-15 Ofidium Pty Ltd Signal method and apparatus
US8909003B1 (en) 2009-01-16 2014-12-09 University Of Washington Through Its Center For Commercialization Low-noise and high bandwidth electric field sensing with silicon-polymer integrated photonics and low drive voltage modulator fiber-based antenna link
US9344196B1 (en) 2009-05-28 2016-05-17 Freedom Photonics, Llc. Integrated interferometric optical transmitter
US8401405B2 (en) 2009-05-28 2013-03-19 Freedom Photonics, Llc. Monolithic widely-tunable coherent receiver
JP5390972B2 (en) * 2009-07-16 2014-01-15 古河電気工業株式会社 Optical phase modulator and optical phase modulator
JP2011022479A (en) * 2009-07-17 2011-02-03 Mitsubishi Electric Corp Multi-value optical transmitter
EP2362558B1 (en) * 2010-02-16 2016-04-13 Xieon Networks S.à r.l. Optical network element
JP5454256B2 (en) * 2010-03-17 2014-03-26 富士通株式会社 Optical waveguide device and optical receiver comprising such an optical waveguide device
US8818141B1 (en) 2010-06-25 2014-08-26 University Of Washington Transmission line driven slot waveguide mach-zehnder interferometers
US8649688B2 (en) * 2011-01-28 2014-02-11 Ciena Corporation Radio frequency drive level control system and method for an electro-optic phase modulator
WO2012114777A1 (en) * 2011-02-25 2012-08-30 日本電信電話株式会社 Optical modulator
JP5462837B2 (en) * 2011-06-24 2014-04-02 株式会社アドバンテスト Optical device or light modulator
JP5748370B2 (en) * 2011-08-22 2015-07-15 日本電信電話株式会社 Optical modulator and bias voltage control method
KR101793733B1 (en) * 2011-10-14 2017-11-06 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for calibration of supply modualtion in transmitter
US9608732B2 (en) * 2012-02-21 2017-03-28 Nec Corporation Optical transmitter, optical communication system, and optical communication method
JP6257098B2 (en) * 2012-05-25 2018-01-10 コーニング インコーポレイテッド Differential optical signal transmission system
US8849129B2 (en) * 2012-07-20 2014-09-30 Finisar Corporation Method and apparatus for stabilization of optical transmitter
US9300406B2 (en) * 2012-08-06 2016-03-29 Skorpios Technologies, Inc. Method and system for the monolithic integration of circuits for monitoring and control of RF signals
KR20140068533A (en) * 2012-11-28 2014-06-09 한국전자통신연구원 Multi-channel photoreceiver module
EP2782270A1 (en) 2013-03-20 2014-09-24 Xieon Networks S.à.r.l. Optical IQ modulator control
CN105393111B (en) 2013-04-29 2018-07-27 决策科学国际公司 μ detector arrays station
US9712247B2 (en) 2013-11-20 2017-07-18 Cisco Technology, Inc. Low bit rate signaling with optical IQ modulators
US9176361B2 (en) * 2014-03-11 2015-11-03 Sony Corporation Optical analog to digital converter and method
EP3113390B1 (en) * 2014-03-27 2019-05-08 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Device and method for monitoring optical performance parameter, and optical transmission system
JP6519999B2 (en) 2014-07-16 2019-05-29 富士通株式会社 Optical transmitter and detector
US9634786B2 (en) 2015-02-13 2017-04-25 Georgia Tech Research Corporation Communication systems with phase-correlated orthogonally-polarized light-stream generator
US10408049B2 (en) 2015-12-03 2019-09-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Downhole telemetry using adaptive feedback
JP6627640B2 (en) 2016-05-16 2020-01-08 富士通株式会社 Optical transmitter
US10401655B2 (en) * 2016-12-16 2019-09-03 Elenion Technologies, Llc Bias control of optical modulators
US10320152B2 (en) 2017-03-28 2019-06-11 Freedom Photonics Llc Tunable laser
CN108667520B (en) * 2017-03-31 2020-12-29 富士通株式会社 Bias control device and method for optical transmitter modulator and optical transmitter
US10545390B2 (en) * 2017-11-10 2020-01-28 Lumentum Operations Llc Calibration for an optical device
US10523478B1 (en) * 2018-06-12 2019-12-31 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. System and method for generating high speed digitized-RF signals
WO2020028409A1 (en) * 2018-07-30 2020-02-06 The Regents Of The University Of California Transmitter architecture for generating 4n-qam constellation with no digital-to-analog converters (dac) in signal path requirement
US11095374B2 (en) * 2019-05-14 2021-08-17 Infinera Corporation Out-of-band communication channel for sub-carrier-based optical communication systems
US10742324B1 (en) 2019-05-21 2020-08-11 Elenion Technologies, Llc Bias control of optical modulators
US11209714B2 (en) 2019-07-17 2021-12-28 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc Radio frequency passband signal generation using photonics
US11444690B2 (en) 2019-07-17 2022-09-13 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc Timing measurement apparatus
US11159241B2 (en) 2019-07-18 2021-10-26 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc High power handling digitizer using photonics
US11032628B2 (en) * 2019-07-19 2021-06-08 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc Electronic demodulation of optically phase demodulated signals
US11184087B2 (en) 2019-08-08 2021-11-23 Lawrence Livermore National Security, Llc Optical encoder devices and systems
CN110661570B (en) * 2019-09-29 2023-04-11 长春理工大学 Space laser communication system
JP7419949B2 (en) * 2020-04-16 2024-01-23 富士通オプティカルコンポーネンツ株式会社 Optical transmission equipment, optical multiplexer and optical transmission method
CN113419229B (en) * 2021-06-04 2023-07-25 广东工业大学 Phase-adjustable microwave photon frequency conversion system and implementation method thereof
CN115065373B (en) * 2022-04-21 2023-12-12 海能达通信股份有限公司 Multi-slot transceiver and multi-slot communication method

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5323406A (en) * 1992-11-02 1994-06-21 Yee Ting K Photonic mixer for photonically multiplying two electrical signals in two optically interconnected interferometric modulators operated at modulation outside the linear range
US20030076570A1 (en) * 2001-10-23 2003-04-24 Teradvance Communications, Llc Method, system and apparatus for optically receiving information
US6621367B2 (en) * 1999-12-28 2003-09-16 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Signal power dynamic range compressing circuit and power amplifier using the same
US20040008395A1 (en) * 2000-11-22 2004-01-15 Jds Uniphase Corporation Cascaded RZ and NRZ laser modulators having RZ/NRZ phase alignment bias control
US20050089263A1 (en) * 2002-08-13 2005-04-28 Avanex France Optical circulator
US20050117191A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2005-06-02 Robert Griffin Modulation control

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6404535B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2002-06-11 Trw Inc. Optically implemented wideband complex correlator using a multi-mode imaging device
GB2379846B (en) * 2000-10-25 2003-08-27 Toshiba Res Europ Ltd Encoding,decoding and communication method and apparatus
GB2370473B (en) * 2000-12-21 2004-04-07 Marconi Caswell Ltd Improvements in or relating to optical communication
JP2003163363A (en) * 2001-11-29 2003-06-06 Fujitsu Ltd Semiconductor photodetector
US7394992B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2008-07-01 Mintera Corporation Control of an optical modulator for desired biasing of data and pulse modulators
US6650458B1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2003-11-18 Bookham Technology Plc Electro-optic modulator with continuously adjustable chirp
US7315575B2 (en) * 2004-03-08 2008-01-01 Nortel Networks Limited Equalization strategy for dual-polarization optical transport system

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5323406A (en) * 1992-11-02 1994-06-21 Yee Ting K Photonic mixer for photonically multiplying two electrical signals in two optically interconnected interferometric modulators operated at modulation outside the linear range
US6621367B2 (en) * 1999-12-28 2003-09-16 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Signal power dynamic range compressing circuit and power amplifier using the same
US20040008395A1 (en) * 2000-11-22 2004-01-15 Jds Uniphase Corporation Cascaded RZ and NRZ laser modulators having RZ/NRZ phase alignment bias control
US20030076570A1 (en) * 2001-10-23 2003-04-24 Teradvance Communications, Llc Method, system and apparatus for optically receiving information
US20050117191A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2005-06-02 Robert Griffin Modulation control
US20050089263A1 (en) * 2002-08-13 2005-04-28 Avanex France Optical circulator

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20140233965A1 (en) * 2013-02-21 2014-08-21 Fujitsu Limited System and Method for Monitoring and Control of an Optical Modulator for an M-QAM Transmitter
US9344194B2 (en) * 2013-02-21 2016-05-17 Fujitsu Limited System and method for monitoring and control of an optical modulator for an M-QAM transmitter
EP2849361A1 (en) * 2013-09-12 2015-03-18 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for determining the conjugate relationship of a QPSK signal and method and apparatus for dispersion compensation
US20150132014A1 (en) * 2013-09-12 2015-05-14 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Qpsk signal conjugate relationship identification method and apparatus, and dispersion compensation method and system
US9438352B2 (en) * 2013-09-12 2016-09-06 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. QPSK signal conjugate relationship identification method and apparatus, and dispersion compensation method and system
US11002992B2 (en) * 2017-03-15 2021-05-11 Nokia Solutions & Networks Oy Bias control of optical modulators
US11086187B2 (en) * 2017-03-15 2021-08-10 Nokia Solutions & Networks Oy Bias control of optical modulators
US11493710B2 (en) * 2018-03-27 2022-11-08 Nec Corporation Pluggable optical module, optical communication system, and optical communication method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US8050351B2 (en) 2011-11-01
US20070133918A1 (en) 2007-06-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8050351B2 (en) Quadrature modulator with feedback control and optical communications system using the same
US7272271B2 (en) Electro-optical integrated transmitter chip for arbitrary quadrature modulation of optical signals
US7483600B2 (en) Integrated coherent optical detector
EP1796297B1 (en) Optical DQPSK receiver apparatus
US7715720B2 (en) Coherent optical detector and coherent communication system and method
US8285153B2 (en) Single chip two-polarization quadrature synthesizer, analyser and optical communications system using the same
EP2267923B1 (en) Optical transmission system
JP5952968B2 (en) Method and apparatus for stabilization of an optical transmitter
US8588621B2 (en) System and method for generating multilevel coded optical signals
US20090214224A1 (en) Method and apparatus for coherent analog rf photonic transmission
US9235100B1 (en) Apparatus for dual-polarization QAM and optical communications system using the same cross-reference to related application
US10901153B2 (en) Null bias mach-zehnder interferometer with ring resonators
JP2010503894A (en) Interference operation of electroabsorption modulator
US20070292142A1 (en) Method for Generating Carrier Residual Signal and Its Device
EP1518142A2 (en) Electro-optical integrated transmitter chip for arbitrary quadrature modulation of optical signals
US5113524A (en) Quantum state control apparatus, optical receiver and optical communication system
JP5198996B2 (en) Light modulator
Chiba et al. 16-level quadrature amplitude modulation by monolithic quad-parallel Mach-Zehnder optical modulator
US10812197B1 (en) Pulsed Sagnac loop phase-modulated microwave photonic link
Korn et al. First monolithic GaAs IQ electro-optic modulator, demonstrated at 150 Gbit/s with 64-QAM
Kaplan et al. LiNbO3 integrated optical QPSK modulator and coherent receiver
Wiberg et al. Dispersion-tolerant millimeter-wave photonic link using polarization-dependent modulation
Yamazaki et al. IQ-coupling-loss-free polarization-switched QPSK modulator
US20240056196A1 (en) Direct detection of modulated coherent optical signals by means of a structure exhibiting fano resonance
Noe et al. Direct modulation 565 Mb/s DPSK experiment with 62.3 dB loss span and endless polarization control

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION