US20110220577A1 - Process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from water - Google Patents

Process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from water Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20110220577A1
US20110220577A1 US13/046,480 US201113046480A US2011220577A1 US 20110220577 A1 US20110220577 A1 US 20110220577A1 US 201113046480 A US201113046480 A US 201113046480A US 2011220577 A1 US2011220577 A1 US 2011220577A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
arsenic
iii
water
nanoparticles
ppm
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/046,480
Inventor
Nahar Singh
Rashmi
Sukhvir Singh
Renu Pashricha
Prabhat Kumar Gupta
Daya Soni
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSIR
Original Assignee
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSIR
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSIR filed Critical Council of Scientific and Industrial Research CSIR
Assigned to COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH reassignment COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: KUMAR, GUPTA PRABHAT, PASHRICHA, RENU, RASHMI, SINGH, NAHAR, SINGH, SUKHVIR, SONI, DAYA
Publication of US20110220577A1 publication Critical patent/US20110220577A1/en
Priority to US13/960,311 priority Critical patent/US8715612B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/30—Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
    • B01J20/3042—Use of binding agents; addition of materials ameliorating the mechanical properties of the produced sorbent
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82—NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82Y—SPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y30/00—Nanotechnology for materials or surface science, e.g. nanocomposites
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/02—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising inorganic material
    • B01J20/0203—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising inorganic material comprising compounds of metals not provided for in B01J20/04
    • B01J20/024—Compounds of Zn, Cd, Hg
    • B01J20/0244—Compounds of Zn
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/28—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J20/28002—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their physical properties
    • B01J20/28004—Sorbent size or size distribution, e.g. particle size
    • B01J20/28007—Sorbent size or size distribution, e.g. particle size with size in the range 1-100 nanometers, e.g. nanosized particles, nanofibers, nanotubes, nanowires or the like
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01—PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01J—CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00—Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/30—Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
    • B01J20/3085—Chemical treatments not covered by groups B01J20/3007 - B01J20/3078
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B82—NANOTECHNOLOGY
    • B82Y—SPECIFIC USES OR APPLICATIONS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MEASUREMENT OR ANALYSIS OF NANOSTRUCTURES; MANUFACTURE OR TREATMENT OF NANOSTRUCTURES
    • B82Y40/00—Manufacture or treatment of nanostructures
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/28—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
    • C02F1/281—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using inorganic sorbents
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/28—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption
    • C02F1/288—Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by sorption using composite sorbents, e.g. coated, impregnated, multi-layered
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
    • C02F2101/10—Inorganic compounds
    • C02F2101/103—Arsenic compounds
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
    • C02F2101/10—Inorganic compounds
    • C02F2101/20—Heavy metals or heavy metal compounds
    • C02F2101/22—Chromium or chromium compounds, e.g. chromates
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2103/00—Nature of the water, waste water, sewage or sludge to be treated
    • C02F2103/06—Contaminated groundwater or leachate
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F2305/00—Use of specific compounds during water treatment
    • C02F2305/08—Nanoparticles or nanotubes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process for the removal of arsenic and Chromium [Cr(III) & Cr(VI)] from contaminated water.
  • the present invention relates to a process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from contaminated water using nanoparticles of zinc peroxide (ZnO 2 ) capped with glycerol/triethylamine (TEA)/poly vinyl pyrrolidone (PVP). More particularly, the present invention relates to a process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from the contaminated water to a level that is suitable for safe drinking.
  • arsenic and chromium free water can help the affected person to get rid of the symptoms of arsenic and chromium toxicity.
  • arsenic and chromium free water is urgently desired to mitigate arsenic and chromium toxicity and protection of the health of human beings living in the areas affected by arsenic and chromium contamination.
  • Arsenic occurs in rocks, soil, water and air in ⁇ 3, 0, +3 and +5 valence state. It is widely distributed having average concentration of 2 mg/kg.
  • the burning of fossil fuels, refining of petroleum mining, smelting of metals like Zn, Cu, Ni, and Pb, are major anthropogenic sources for arsenic contamination in air, water and soil.
  • the electrolytic cell has been used to remove color impurities such as dyes from wastewater solution.
  • the ferrous iron generated at the anode reacts with hydroxide ion to form an iron complex or compound, which further was found to react with or otherwise remove the color bodies from aqueous media as an insoluble precipitate.
  • iron (II) and iron (III) oxides [L.C. Roberts, S. J. Hug, T. Ruettimann, M. Billah, A. W. Khan and M. T. Rahman; Arsenic removal with iron (II) and iron (III) in waters with high silicate and phosphate concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(1), 307 (2004)], sand and zero-valent iron [O. X. Leupin and S. J. Hug. Oxidation and removal of arsenic(III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron; Water Res. 39(9), 1729 (2005)], hardened paste of Portland cement [Kundu, S. S.
  • arsenite (As 3+ ) species is first oxidized to arsenate (As 5+ ) in the presence of atmospheric oxygen, or Ozone or free chlorine.
  • arsenate species got adsorbed over the surface of iron oxide during filtration and are removed from the contaminated water.
  • Roberts L.C. et al. have used Fe (II) and Fe (III) to remove arsenic from water with high silicate and phosphate concentrations.
  • Chromium is a common heavy metal contaminant of water supplies, largely arising from the textile, leather and wood production industries.
  • the metal industry mainly discharged trivalent chromium.
  • Hexavalent chromium in industrial wastewater mainly originates from tanning and painting. Chromium may be applied as a catalyser, in wood impregnation, in audio and video production and in lasers. Chromite is the starting product for inflammable material and chemical production. Levels of chromium in drinking water have been controlled in the past by expensive, often toxic chemical based cleansing procedures.
  • Trivalent chromium is a dietary requirement for a number of organisms as trivalent chromium is an essential trace element for humans and with insulin it removes glucose from blood and also plays a vital role in fat metabolism.
  • hexavalent chromium is very toxic to flora and fauna.
  • the human body contains approximately 0.03 ppm of chromium.
  • Daily intake of chromium depends upon feed and levels, and is usually approximately 15-200 but may be as high as 1 mg.
  • the Placenta is the organ having highest chromium amounts.
  • Chromium deficits may enhance diabetes symptoms. Chromium can also be found in RNA. Chromium deficits are very rare, and chromium feed supplements is not often applied.
  • Chromium (III) toxicity is unlikely, at least when it is taken up through food and drinking water. It may even improve health, and cure neuropathy and encephalopathy.
  • Hexavalent chromium is known for its negative health and environmental impact.
  • Chromium oxide is a strong oxidant and after dissolution it forms chromium acid, which corrodes the organs. The lethal dose is approximately 1-2 gm. Most countries apply a legal limit of 50 ppb chromium in drinking water. A professional illness in chromium industries is chromium sores upon skin contact with chromates. . Chromium trioxide dust uptake in the workplace may cause cancer, and damage the respiration tract.
  • the trivalent chromium can be removed by contacting the solution with a weak acid cation exchange resin.
  • the chromate can be removed by a weak base anion exchange resin in the presence of acid [Chopra, Randhir C, “Removal of chromium, chromate, molybdate and zinc” U.S. Pat. 3,972,810 (1976)].
  • Each of the resins requires different regenerate so that the process will require bulky equipment due to the requirement for separate sites for the regeneration of the two resins.
  • the chromium can be removed but the other pollutant is added to its solution.
  • hexavalent chromium undergoes cathodic reduction to form trivalent chromium as insoluble chromic hydroxide, which complexes with iron at the anode
  • the trivalent chromium compound physically or chemically combine with the insoluble iron derivative to thereby permit removal from solution.
  • the precipitate is then removed from aqueous by any conventional techniques.
  • Another way of removing Cr(VI) from drinking water is to reduce the Cr(VI) to Cr(III) and precipitate it as chromium hydroxide.
  • the main objective of the present invention is to provide a process for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from the contaminated water.
  • Another objective of the present invention is to reduce the size of the zinc peroxide nanoparticles suitable for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from the contaminated water
  • Another object of the present invention is to provide a low cost, high yield and simple process for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from the contaminated water by using nanoparticles of zinc peroxide.
  • Yet another object is to provide a process for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from the contaminated water without getting any change in the pH of water after treatment.
  • Yet another object is to provide low cost ZnO 2 nanoparticles capped with glycerol /PVP/TEA having size 20 ⁇ 5 nm for the removal of arsenic and chromium from the contaminated water.
  • the present invention provides a process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from contaminated water using zinc peroxide nanoparticles comprising treating the contaminated water containing arsenic and chromium with the nanoparticles of zinc peroxide in a ratio (w/v) ranging from 8:1 to 12:1 (mg/ml), having the concentration of arsenic, Cr(III&VI) contamination below 50 ppm in water, at a temperature of 25-30° C., for a period of 5-10 min, followed by filtration to obtain the desired low concentrated contamination permissible drinking water.
  • the zinc peroxide nanoparticles used have size below 50 nm.
  • the amount of zinc peroxide used for the removal of arsenic and chromium is preferably in the range of 225-250 mg per 25 ppm of arsenic and chromium contaminated water.
  • the zinc peroxide nanoparticles are prepared by the process comprising the following steps:
  • step (b) adding glycerol/PVP/TEA to the solution mixture obtained in step (a) in a ratio of zinc acetate to glycerol in the range of 2:0.5 to 6:1(w/w), PVP in the range of 10:0.25 to 10:1 (w/w) and TEA in the range of 1:1 to 1:0.5 (w/w) with respect to zinc acetate respectively;
  • step (c) adding a polar organic solvent to the solution mixture obtained in step (b), under stirring, at ambient temperature in the range of 25-30° C., followed by adding equimolar quantity of hydrogen peroxide with respect to zinc acetate to obtain the desired nanoparticles of zinc peroxide.
  • the weight ratio of zinc acetate to glycerol used is preferably in the range of 2:0.5 to 3:1.
  • the weight ratio of zinc acetate to PVP used is preferably in the range of 10:0.5 to 10:1 (w/w).
  • the weight ratio of zinc acetate to TEA used is preferably in the range of 1:1 to 1:0.5 (w/w).
  • yield of ZnO 2 nanoparticles obtained is in the range of 98-99% with respect to the starting material.
  • the ZnO 2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 50 ppm to 0.1, 0.14, and 0.18 ppm, respectively without disturbing the pH of water.
  • the ZnO 2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 30 ppm to 0.03, 0.07 and 0.08 ppm, respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
  • the ZnO 2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 25 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG in case of arsenic and 0.01 in case of Cr(III&VI) without disturbing pH of the water.
  • the ZnO 2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 20 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
  • the ZnO 2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 15 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
  • the ZnO 2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 10 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
  • the ZnO 2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 5 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water
  • FIG. 1 XRD Pattern of ZnO 2 powder
  • FIG. 2 TEM of ZnO 2 powder as synthesized
  • FIG. 3 TEM and EDS of ZnO 2 powder after reacting with arsenic (showing adsorption of arsenic on the surface of zinc peroxide)
  • FIG. 4 TEM of ZnO 2 powder after removing Arsenic
  • FIG. 5 TEM and EDS of ZnO 2 powder after reacting with chromium (showing adsorption of chromium on the surface of zinc peroxide)
  • FIG. 6 TEM of ZnO 2 powder after removing chromium
  • FIG. 7 FTIR of ZnO 2 powder after arsenic removing
  • FIG. 8 FTIR of ZnO 2 powder after Cr(III&VI) removal
  • the present invention demonstrates the use of chemically prepared ZnO 2 nanoparticles capped with glycerol and PVP for removal of arsenic and chromium metal ion from the contaminated water.
  • the synthesized ZnO 2 nanoparticles remove arsenic and chromium from the contaminated water from the level of 25 ppm to less than the detection limits of the AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS instruments used respectively, which is less than the USEPA prescribed limit 10 ppb for arsenic and 50 ppb for chromium for drinking water.
  • ZnO 2 nanoparticles used for arsenic and chromium removal, were synthesized using zinc acetate di-hydrate as precursors in ammonical water medium at room temperature.
  • 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in minimum quantity of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml by acetone/methanol/ ethanol water mixture (Water: solvent: 4:1).
  • 0.5 gm PVP or 2.5 gm of glycerol or 1:1 quantity of TEA of with respect to zinc acetate were added to reduce the size of particles of the zinc peroxide.
  • 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide was added in above solution at pH 9-11 at room temperature.
  • the maximum quantity of zinc peroxide nanoparticles of 20 ⁇ 5 nm were synthesized by varying quantity of the capping agent, pH and by varying solvent to water ratio.
  • the solution was stirred on magnetic stirrer for 1 hour after adding hydrogen peroxide solution.
  • the precipitate was centrifuged washed several times with 1:1 water-solvent mixture and then with de-ionized water several times. Finally the precipitate was dried at 105° C. in an oven upto complete dryness.
  • XRD of synthesized zinc peroxide nanoparticles shows pure phase of zinc peroxide and HRTEM micrograph shows spherical nature of the nanoparticles.
  • Standard arsenic and Cr(III) solutions of 1000-ppm concentration were used after desired dilutions, while 1000-ppm of Cr(VI) was prepared from high purity potassium dichromate following primary method and it was further diluted to desired range by proper dilution.
  • HGAAS highly sensitive hydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy
  • the novelty of the invention lies in the use of ZnO 2 nanoparticles as the adsorbent for arsenic/Cr(III&VI) metal ions and the level up to which it removes the arsenic/Cr(III&VI) concentration from 25 ppm to the potable limits (less than 0.01 ppm in case of arsenic and 0.01 in case of Cr(III&VI)).
  • This invention makes the contaminated water almost free of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) after filtration that could be use for drinking and various household utilities.
  • Treatment with ZnO 2 nanoparticles maintains the pH of the water to the permissible limit.
  • the proposed method for the synthesis of zinc peroxide is eco-friendly and there is no generation of any toxic gases during synthesis.
  • the proposed material is low cost in comparison to other materials available for the removal of arsenic.
  • the solvent used in the synthesis process can be recovered by distillation, which is further added advantages of the process for reduction of the cost of the process.
  • the process does not add any impurities in the water as it is insoluble in water and can be separated by any known method.
  • the synthesis method is so simple and fast and within 2-3 hours on can get synthesized nanoparticles of zinc peroxide with more than 98% yield.
  • the particles of 10 ⁇ 5 are more efficiently removes arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from contaminated water but in this process centrifugation is essential to separate zinc peroxide from the water.
  • the particles of 10 ⁇ 5 nm sizes can be synthesized by varying the concentration of solvent and capping agent.

Abstract

The present invention provides low cost and highly effective method for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from contaminated water using zinc peroxide nanoparticles (20±5 nm) capped with glycerol/PVP/TEA upto the permissible range of drinking water. As Arsenic and chromium occurs naturally in the earth's crust. When rocks, minerals, and soil erode, they release arsenic and chromium into groundwater. Arsenic and chromium occurs naturally in varying amounts in groundwater in various parts of country from ppb level to ppm level. The average concentration of arsenic and chromium as per USEPA standard in drinking water it is 10 parts per billion and 0.05 ppm (50 ppb) respectively. In drinking water the level of chromium is usually low as well, but contaminated water may contain the dangerous Cr(III&VI). Although Cr(III) is an essential nutrient for humans and shortages may cause heart problems, disruptions of metabolisms and diabetes. But the uptake of too much Cr(III) can cause health effects as well, for instance skin rashes. Cr(VI) is known to cause various health effects Skin rashes, upset stomachs, respiratory problems, weakened immune systems, kidney and liver damage and lung cancer The persons who are drinking water having upto 50 ppb of arsenic and 0.05 ppm chromium over for many years could experience skin damage or problems with their circulatory system, and may have an increased risk of getting cancer. Keeping the above facts we developed a cost effective nanoparticles for the removal of Arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from potable water upto potable range.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a process for the removal of arsenic and Chromium [Cr(III) & Cr(VI)] from contaminated water. Particularly, the present invention relates to a process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from contaminated water using nanoparticles of zinc peroxide (ZnO2) capped with glycerol/triethylamine (TEA)/poly vinyl pyrrolidone (PVP). More particularly, the present invention relates to a process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from the contaminated water to a level that is suitable for safe drinking.
    • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Presence of arsenic (As) and chromium metal ions in drinking water has become the issue of global concern. Long-term exposure to even low concentrations of arsenic in the drinking water may cause skin, lung or prostrate cancer and cardiovascular, pulmonary, immunological and neurological disorder [Environment Health Criteria 224, Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds, Second edition, World Health Organization 2001; S. Shevade and R. G. Ford. Use of synthetic zeolites for arsenate removal from pollutant water. Water Res. 38(14-15), 3197 (2004)].
  • At present there is no effective medicine available, which can treat disease, causes by arsenic and chromium, so use of arsenic and chromium free water can help the affected person to get rid of the symptoms of arsenic and chromium toxicity. Hence, the requirement of arsenic and chromium free water is urgently desired to mitigate arsenic and chromium toxicity and protection of the health of human beings living in the areas affected by arsenic and chromium contamination.
  • World Health Organization (WHO) & Environment Protection Agency (EPA) has established a level of 10 μg/L arsenic and 50 μg/L of chromium in drinking water from January 2006. But in several countries like Bangladesh, India, arsenic and chromium concentration in the drinking water can be as high as 500 μg/L or more. The reduction of arsenic and chromium from such high concentrations and made it potable as per WHO prescribe limit is a very challenging task.
  • Arsenic occurs in rocks, soil, water and air in −3, 0, +3 and +5 valence state. It is widely distributed having average concentration of 2 mg/kg. The burning of fossil fuels, refining of petroleum mining, smelting of metals like Zn, Cu, Ni, and Pb, are major anthropogenic sources for arsenic contamination in air, water and soil.
  • Therefore high toxicity and widespread occurrence created a pressing need for effective monitoring, measurement and remediation of arsenic in soil and groundwater. The effect and degree of toxicity of arsenic depends on its inorganic or organic forms and oxidation state. Inorganic arsenicals are more toxic than organic arsenicals and in inorganic arsenicals trivalent form is more toxic than the pentavalent form.
  • Reference may be made to Y. Lee, I. H. Um and J. Yoon, Arsenic (III) oxidation by iron(VI) (ferrate) and subsequent removal of arsenic (V) by iron (III) coagulation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(24), 5750 (2003); B. Daus, R. Wennrich and H. Weiss, Sorption materials for arsenic removal from water: a comparative study. Water Res. 38(12), 2948 (2004); S. Bang, G. P. Korfiatis and X. Meng, Removal of arsenic from water by zero-valent iron. J. Hazard Mater. 121(1-3), 61 (2005); Y. S. Shen. Study of arsenic removal from drinking water. J. American Water Works Association, 65(8), 543 (1973) and A. Joshi and M. Chaudhary. Removal of arsenic from groundwater by iron-oxide-coated sand. ASCE J. Environ. Engineering. 122(8), 769 (1996), which discloses several methods for the removal of arsenic from contaminated water to the consumable limit.
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 4,566,975, heavy metals such as arsenic are removed in a two step process which involves an alkaline precipitation carried out at a pH of at least about 8 and using ferrous sulfate as an additive.
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 4,880,510, the electrolytic cell has been used to remove color impurities such as dyes from wastewater solution. The ferrous iron generated at the anode reacts with hydroxide ion to form an iron complex or compound, which further was found to react with or otherwise remove the color bodies from aqueous media as an insoluble precipitate.
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 4,490,257, contaminants are removed by electrolysis process. The electrodes are resistant to corrosion.
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 5,043,080, contaminated groundwater is treated with hydrogen peroxide and transition metal ions at an acid pH in the presence of ultraviolet light. The main object, however, is the removal of organic contaminants rather than heavy metals.
  • In U.S. Pat. No. 4,163,716, it was recognized that heavy metals and color bodies from dye house affluent could be removed with ferrous ions supplied by iron electrodes with the ferrous ion oxidizing to the ferric state by use of an oxidizing agent such as hydrogen peroxide. At a pH of between 7 and 9, heavy metals and traces of color adhere to the ferric hydroxide floc, which then may be removed. This process also involves a pH adjustment from a reaction pH of below 6.5 to a pH of from 7 to 9 to achieve removal of color particles.
  • The common technologies used for removal of arsenic are oxidation, co-precipitation, adsorption onto sorptive media, ion exchange resin and membrane techniques etc. Presently, various materials like activated carbon (AC), zirconium coated activated carbon (Zr-AC) [B. Daus, R. Wennrich and H. Weiss, Sorption materials for arsenic removal from water: a comparative study. Water Res. 38(12), 2948 (2004)]; iron hydroxide [W. Wang, D. Bejan and N. J. Bunce, Removal of arsenic from synthetic acid mine drainage by electrochemical pH adjustment and co-precipitation with iron hydroxide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(19), 4500 (2003)]; iron (II) and iron (III) oxides [L.C. Roberts, S. J. Hug, T. Ruettimann, M. Billah, A. W. Khan and M. T. Rahman; Arsenic removal with iron (II) and iron (III) in waters with high silicate and phosphate concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol. 38(1), 307 (2004)], sand and zero-valent iron [O. X. Leupin and S. J. Hug. Oxidation and removal of arsenic(III) from aerated groundwater by filtration through sand and zero-valent iron; Water Res. 39(9), 1729 (2005)], hardened paste of Portland cement [Kundu, S. S. Kavalakatt, A. Pal, S. K. Ghosh, M. Mandal and T. Pal; Removal of arsenic using hardened paste of Portland cement: batch adsorption and column study. Water Res. 38(17), 3780 (2004)]; iron oxide coated polymers [A. Katasoyiannis and A. I. Zouboulis, Removal of arsenic from contaminated water sources by sorption onto iron-oxide-coated polymeric materials, Water Res. 36(20), 5141 (2002)]; biological systems (bacteria) [A. Katasoyiannis and A. I. Zouboulis; [Application of biological processes for the removal of arsenic from groundwater] Water Res. 38(1), 17 (2004)] has been removed arsenic from contaminated water through biological process and could be used for drinking and other household utilities.
  • The above materials and methods are effective and reduce arsenic concentration in the potable water upto acceptable limits. But these materials and methods have their own advantages and disadvantages like, oxidation process is very simple and low cost but it is very slow and removes only a part of the arsenic, co-precipitation by alum or iron is again simple and low capital arrangement but it produces toxic sludge's and pre-oxidation is required to start the reaction.
  • The use of iron or iron oxide for removing arsenic is dominative as it is very cheap, highly effective and can purify large volume of water. In this process, arsenite (As3+) species is first oxidized to arsenate (As5+) in the presence of atmospheric oxygen, or Ozone or free chlorine. Reference may be made to G. Hering, P. Y. Chen. J. A. Wilkie, M. Elimelech and S. Liang. Arsenic removal by ferric chloride. J. American Water Works Association; 88(4), 155 (1996). Wherein the arsenate species got adsorbed over the surface of iron oxide during filtration and are removed from the contaminated water. Roberts L.C. et al. have used Fe (II) and Fe (III) to remove arsenic from water with high silicate and phosphate concentrations.
  • Reference may be made to Daus B. et al. Water Res. 2004 Jul; 38-(12): 2948-54 that has proved that arsenite and arsenate can be removed from water using Activated carbon (AC), zirconium loaded Activated carbon with other materials successfully.
  • Reference may be made to Water Res. 2003 May; 37(10): 2478-88, wherein the arsenic was effectively removed by steel manufacturing byproducts like evaporation cooler dust (ECD), oxygen gas sludge (OGS), and basic oxygen furnace slag (BOFS).
  • Reference may be made to Bang S. et al. J. Hazard Mater. 2005 May 20, 121(1-3): 61-67, who has reported effect of dissolved oxygen and pH on the removal of Arsenic from water and concluded that at pH 6 that arsenate removal (99.8%) was faster than arsenite (82.6%) and more dissolved oxygen and low pH increases the rate of iron corrosion and leads to the formation of iron hydroxide, which ultimately adsorbs arsenic from the solution.
  • Reference may be made to S. Kundu, S. S. Kavalakatt, A. Pal, S. K. Ghosh, M. Mandal, and T. Pal, Water Res. 2004 Oct; 38(17): 3780-90 wherein Portland cement (HPPC) paste has been used as adsorbent for the removal of arsenic from water and have shown that 95% arsenate and 88% Arsenite can be removed easily.
  • Reference may be made to Sarkar, A. et al. Water Res. 2005 May; 39(10): 2196-206 wherein activated alumina has been used as adsorbent for arsenic removal from drinking water.
  • Reference may be made to Bang S. et al. Chemosphere. (2005) Jul; 60(3): 389-97 wherein granular titanium dioxide (TiO2) has been used for the removal of arsenic from groundwater.
  • Reference may be made to Oklahoma State University, USA, Advanced ceramic reports; Issue: August 2004, page: 6 wherein Porous Zinc oxide beads has been used to remove arsenic from the contaminated water.
  • Chromium is a common heavy metal contaminant of water supplies, largely arising from the textile, leather and wood production industries. The metal industry mainly discharged trivalent chromium. Hexavalent chromium in industrial wastewater mainly originates from tanning and painting. Chromium may be applied as a catalyser, in wood impregnation, in audio and video production and in lasers. Chromite is the starting product for inflammable material and chemical production. Levels of chromium in drinking water have been controlled in the past by expensive, often toxic chemical based cleansing procedures. Trivalent chromium is a dietary requirement for a number of organisms as trivalent chromium is an essential trace element for humans and with insulin it removes glucose from blood and also plays a vital role in fat metabolism.
  • But hexavalent chromium is very toxic to flora and fauna. The human body contains approximately 0.03 ppm of chromium. Daily intake of chromium depends upon feed and levels, and is usually approximately 15-200 but may be as high as 1 mg. The Placenta is the organ having highest chromium amounts. Chromium deficits may enhance diabetes symptoms. Chromium can also be found in RNA. Chromium deficits are very rare, and chromium feed supplements is not often applied. Chromium (III) toxicity is unlikely, at least when it is taken up through food and drinking water. It may even improve health, and cure neuropathy and encephalopathy. Hexavalent chromium is known for its negative health and environmental impact. It causes allergic and asthmatic reactions and it is 1000 times more toxic than trivalent chromium. Exposure to hexavalent chromium causes diarrhoea, stomach and intestinal bleeding, cramps, paralysis and liver and kidney damage. The hexavalent chromium is mutagenic and carcinogenic in nature. Toxic effects may be passed on to children through the placenta. Chromium oxide is a strong oxidant and after dissolution it forms chromium acid, which corrodes the organs. The lethal dose is approximately 1-2 gm. Most countries apply a legal limit of 50 ppb chromium in drinking water. A professional illness in chromium industries is chromium sores upon skin contact with chromates. . Chromium trioxide dust uptake in the workplace may cause cancer, and damage the respiration tract.
  • Common Cr(VI) removal technologies for drinking water applications are ion exchange, membranes, reduction/ precipitation/ coagulation/ filtration, sorptive media etc. The trivalent chromium can be removed by contacting the solution with a weak acid cation exchange resin. The chromate can be removed by a weak base anion exchange resin in the presence of acid [Chopra, Randhir C, “Removal of chromium, chromate, molybdate and zinc” U.S. Pat. 3,972,810 (1976)]. Each of the resins requires different regenerate so that the process will require bulky equipment due to the requirement for separate sites for the regeneration of the two resins. Thus the chromium can be removed but the other pollutant is added to its solution. The most common industrial chromium treatment methods are reduction/ precipitation/filtration. In this process, the Cr(VI) is reduced to Cr(III) typically by some reductant and chromium precipitated out as Cr(OH)3 and further coagulation were carried out with ferric salt and filtered.[Besselievre, E. B. (1969); The treatment of industrial wastes, McGraw-Hill, New York].
  • Reference may be made to Several U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,926,754; 4,036,726; and 4,123,339, which claims removal of hexa or trivalent chromium from wastewater electrochemically. In these patents, a process is described wherein wastewater containing hexavalent chromium ions is caused to flow between a plurality of electrodes. When the anode has a surface of iron/iron alloy/insoluble iron compound, an iron hydroxide derivative will be produced electrochemically. In this process, hexavalent chromium undergoes cathodic reduction to form trivalent chromium as insoluble chromic hydroxide, which complexes with iron at the anode The trivalent chromium compound, physically or chemically combine with the insoluble iron derivative to thereby permit removal from solution. The precipitate is then removed from aqueous by any conventional techniques.
  • Reference may be made to Jakobsen, K. and Laska, R. (1977) Advanced treatment methods for electroplating wasters, Pollution Engineering, 8:42-46] wherein aspearin as resin have been used in ion exchange for removal of chromium.
  • Another way of removing Cr(VI) from drinking water is to reduce the Cr(VI) to Cr(III) and precipitate it as chromium hydroxide. Reference may be made to El-Shafey. J. Phys. IV France, 107(2003) 419 wherein carbon sorbent has been used to remove Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions in the pH range 2.2-2.6.
  • Reference may be made to A. Li Bojic, M Purenovic and D Bojic, Water SA, 30(3), 2004, wherein micro-alloyed aluminium composite (MAIC) has been used as reducing agent for Cr(VI) removal from water. The mechanism of action is based on processes of reduction and co-precipitation by Al(OH)3, because Cr(VI) is removed from the water phase as metal chromium and insoluble Cr(OH)3 .
  • Reference may be made to Liora Rosenthal-Toib et al., Synthesis of stabilized nanoparticles of zinc peroxide, Chemical Engineering Journal Vol 136, March 2008, wherein stabilized nanoparticles of zinc peroxide were prepared by an oxidation-hydrolysis-precipitation procedure. However the surface modifiers used in the present invention are different from the one reported in prior art.
    • OBJECTIVE OF THE INVENTION
  • The main objective of the present invention is to provide a process for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from the contaminated water.
  • Another objective of the present invention is to reduce the size of the zinc peroxide nanoparticles suitable for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from the contaminated water Another object of the present invention is to provide a low cost, high yield and simple process for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from the contaminated water by using nanoparticles of zinc peroxide.
  • Yet another object is to provide a process for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from the contaminated water without getting any change in the pH of water after treatment.
  • Yet another object is to provide low cost ZnO2 nanoparticles capped with glycerol /PVP/TEA having size 20±5 nm for the removal of arsenic and chromium from the contaminated water.
    • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from contaminated water using zinc peroxide nanoparticles comprising treating the contaminated water containing arsenic and chromium with the nanoparticles of zinc peroxide in a ratio (w/v) ranging from 8:1 to 12:1 (mg/ml), having the concentration of arsenic, Cr(III&VI) contamination below 50 ppm in water, at a temperature of 25-30° C., for a period of 5-10 min, followed by filtration to obtain the desired low concentrated contamination permissible drinking water.
  • In an embodiment of the present invention, the zinc peroxide nanoparticles used have size below 50 nm.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the amount of zinc peroxide used for the removal of arsenic and chromium is preferably in the range of 225-250 mg per 25 ppm of arsenic and chromium contaminated water.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the zinc peroxide nanoparticles are prepared by the process comprising the following steps:
  • a) dissolving zinc acetate in ammonium hydroxide to obtain a solution mixture having pH in the range of 9-11;
  • b) adding glycerol/PVP/TEA to the solution mixture obtained in step (a) in a ratio of zinc acetate to glycerol in the range of 2:0.5 to 6:1(w/w), PVP in the range of 10:0.25 to 10:1 (w/w) and TEA in the range of 1:1 to 1:0.5 (w/w) with respect to zinc acetate respectively;
  • c) adding a polar organic solvent to the solution mixture obtained in step (b), under stirring, at ambient temperature in the range of 25-30° C., followed by adding equimolar quantity of hydrogen peroxide with respect to zinc acetate to obtain the desired nanoparticles of zinc peroxide.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the weight ratio of zinc acetate to glycerol used is preferably in the range of 2:0.5 to 3:1.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the weight ratio of zinc acetate to PVP used is preferably in the range of 10:0.5 to 10:1 (w/w).
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the weight ratio of zinc acetate to TEA used is preferably in the range of 1:1 to 1:0.5 (w/w).
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, yield of ZnO2 nanoparticles obtained is in the range of 98-99% with respect to the starting material.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 50 ppm to 0.1, 0.14, and 0.18 ppm, respectively without disturbing the pH of water.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 30 ppm to 0.03, 0.07 and 0.08 ppm, respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
  • In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 25 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG in case of arsenic and 0.01 in case of Cr(III&VI) without disturbing pH of the water.
  • In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 20 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
  • In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 15 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
  • In yet another embodiment of the present invention, the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 10 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
  • In still another embodiment of the present invention, the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III&VI) each from 5 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water
    • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 XRD Pattern of ZnO2 powder
  • FIG. 2 TEM of ZnO2 powder as synthesized
  • FIG. 3 TEM and EDS of ZnO2 powder after reacting with arsenic (showing adsorption of arsenic on the surface of zinc peroxide)
  • FIG. 4 TEM of ZnO2 powder after removing Arsenic
  • FIG. 5 TEM and EDS of ZnO2 powder after reacting with chromium (showing adsorption of chromium on the surface of zinc peroxide)
  • FIG. 6 TEM of ZnO2 powder after removing chromium
  • FIG. 7 FTIR of ZnO2 powder after arsenic removing
  • FIG. 8 FTIR of ZnO2 powder after Cr(III&VI) removal
    •  DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention demonstrates the use of chemically prepared ZnO2 nanoparticles capped with glycerol and PVP for removal of arsenic and chromium metal ion from the contaminated water. The synthesized ZnO2 nanoparticles remove arsenic and chromium from the contaminated water from the level of 25 ppm to less than the detection limits of the AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS instruments used respectively, which is less than the USEPA prescribed limit 10 ppb for arsenic and 50 ppb for chromium for drinking water.
  • Synthesis of zinc peroxide nanoparticles
  • In the present invention ZnO2 nanoparticles, used for arsenic and chromium removal, were synthesized using zinc acetate di-hydrate as precursors in ammonical water medium at room temperature. For the synthesis of ZnO2, 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in minimum quantity of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml by acetone/methanol/ ethanol water mixture (Water: solvent: 4:1). 0.5 gm PVP or 2.5 gm of glycerol or 1:1 quantity of TEA of with respect to zinc acetate were added to reduce the size of particles of the zinc peroxide. Further, 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide was added in above solution at pH 9-11 at room temperature. The maximum quantity of zinc peroxide nanoparticles of 20±5 nm were synthesized by varying quantity of the capping agent, pH and by varying solvent to water ratio. The solution was stirred on magnetic stirrer for 1 hour after adding hydrogen peroxide solution. The precipitate was centrifuged washed several times with 1:1 water-solvent mixture and then with de-ionized water several times. Finally the precipitate was dried at 105° C. in an oven upto complete dryness. XRD of synthesized zinc peroxide nanoparticles shows pure phase of zinc peroxide and HRTEM micrograph shows spherical nature of the nanoparticles. We have also synthesized particles of sizes 10±5 and 45±5 by varying the solvent and capping agent concentration. The efficiency increases as the particles sizes reduces. But at the same time it is not possible for us to separate the nanoparticles of zinc peroxide without centrifuge because particles of lower sizes float in the water and without centrifuge does not settled down. The particles of bigger sizes as claimed gets settled down and water can be separate easily. However we are in the process to make some device, which can filter the particles of low size.
  • Arsenic/ Chromium metal ion removal using ZnO2 nanoparticles:
  • Standard arsenic and Cr(III) solutions of 1000-ppm concentration (SCP science USA) were used after desired dilutions, while 1000-ppm of Cr(VI) was prepared from high purity potassium dichromate following primary method and it was further diluted to desired range by proper dilution.
  • For each experiment known quantity (by weight) of ZnO2 nanoparticles powder was mixed in 25 ml of standard arsenic/ Cr(III) and Cr(VI) solution in an ultrasonic cleaner (5-10 min). The mixture was then subjected to 2-3 minutes of centrifugation process to remove the ZnO2 nanoparticles. The remaining solution was filtered by any known method to remove the residual ZnO2 nanoparticles like Buckner funnel. The filtered water was then tested for the left over arsenic, Cr(III) and Cr(VI) content.
  • In the present invention a highly sensitive hydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy (HGAAS) was used in which arsenic in presence of hydrochloric acid and sodium borohydride forms arsenic hydride (AsH3), which atomizes at 900° C. and produces the spectra. This technique is highly sensitive and arsenic can be detected upto 0.03 ppb.
  • The determination of Cr(III&VI) was carried out by Flame atomic absorption spectrometer at the optimize conditions for chromium, while the lower concentration less than 0.1 ppm were analyzed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometer.
  • The novelty of the invention lies in the use of ZnO2 nanoparticles as the adsorbent for arsenic/Cr(III&VI) metal ions and the level up to which it removes the arsenic/Cr(III&VI) concentration from 25 ppm to the potable limits (less than 0.01 ppm in case of arsenic and 0.01 in case of Cr(III&VI)).
  • Several experiment were carried out for varying quantity of arsenic, Cr(III&VI) with fixed quantity of ZnO2 nanoparticles.
  • The following examples are given by the way of illustration and therefore should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention.
    • Example 1 Methods for the preparation of ZnO2 nanoparticles using glycerol as surface modifier
  • (i) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous acetone (Water to solvent: 4:1). 2.5 gm of glycerol was added to the above solution mixture at pH 9.5 followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm.
  • (ii) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous acetone (Water to solvent: 4:1). 5 gm of glycerol was added to the above solution mixture at pH 9.5 followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 10±5 nm.
  • (iii) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous acetone (Water to solvent: 4:1). 0.5 gm of glycerol was added to the above solution mixture at pH 9.5 followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 45±5 nm.
    • Example 2 Preparation of ZnO2 nanoparticles using PVP as surface modifier
  • (i) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous methanol (Water to solvent: 4:1). 0.5 gm of PVP was added to the above solution mixture at pH 10, followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm.
  • (ii) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous methanol (Water to solvent: 4:1). 1 gm of PVP was added to the above solution mixture at pH 10, followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 10±5 nm.
  • (iii) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous methanol (Water to solvent: 4:1). 0.15 gm of PVP was added to the above solution mixture at pH 10, followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 45±5 nm.
    • Example 3 Preparation of ZnO2 nanoparticles using TEA as surface modifier
  • (i) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous ethanol (Water to solvent: 4:1). 5gm of TEA was added to the above solution mixture at pH 11, followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm.
  • (ii) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous ethanol (Water to solvent: 4:1). 10 gm of TEA was added to the above solution mixture at pH 11, followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 10±5 nm.
  • (iii) 10 gm of zinc acetate was dissolved in 15 mL of ammonia solution and it was diluted to 200 ml of aqueous ethanol (Water to solvent: 4:1). 1.5gm of TEA was added to the above solution mixture at pH 11, followed by adding 65 ml of hydrogen peroxide to obtain the nanoparticles of the zinc peroxide having average particle size distribution of 45±5 nm.
    • Example 4 Removal of Arsenic and chromium from water using zinc peroxide nanoparticles
  • Three different ranges nonmaterial i.e. 10±5, 45±5 and 20±5 nm sizes have been used for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI). All the three ranges of ZnO2 nanoparticles remove arsenic and Cr(III&VI) effectively. The particles of 10±5 nm sizes requires centrifuge after process to separate out from the water because the small particles get filtered through Buckner funnel. The arsenic and Cr(III&VI) efficiency of nanoparticles reduces as the size of nanoparticles increases (>50 nm). The following example has been given for the 20±5 nm size nanoparticles.
  • Quantity of ZnO2 having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm taken for process=0.25 g
  • Water taken=25 ml
  • Concentration of Arsenic and Cr(III&VI) taken=50 ppm
  • Concentration of Arsenic after treatment with ZnO2=0.1 ppm
  • Concentration of Cr(III) after treatment with ZnO2=0.14 ppm
  • Concentration of Cr(VI) after treatment with ZnO2=0.18 ppm
    • Example 5
  • Quantity of ZnO2 having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm taken for process=0.25 g
  • Water taken=25 ml
  • Concentration of Arsenic and Cr(III&VI) taken=30 ppm Concentration of Arsenic after treatment with ZnO2=0.03 ppm Concentration of Cr(III) after treatment with ZnO2=0.07 ppm
  • Concentration of Cr(VI) after treatment with ZnO2=0.08 ppm
    • Example 6
  • Quantity of ZnO2 having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm taken for process=0.25 g
  • Water taken=25 ml
  • Concentration of Arsenic and Cr(III&VI) taken=25 ppm
  • Concentration of Arsenic after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit of AAS-HG instrument
  • Concentration of Cr(III) after treatment with ZnO2=less than 0.01 ppm by GFAAS instrument Concentration of Cr(VI) after treatment with ZnO2=0.01 ppm by GFAAS instrument
    • Example 7
  • Quantity of ZnO2 having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm taken for process=0.25 g
  • Water taken=25 ml
  • Concentration of Arsenic and Cr(III&VI) taken=20 ppm
  • Concentration of Arsenic after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit of AAS-HG instrument
  • Concentration of Cr(III) after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit of FAAS/GFAAS instrument
  • Concentration of Cr(VI) after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit of FAAS/GFAAS instrument
    • Example 8
  • Quantity of ZnO2 having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm taken for process=0.25 g
  • Water taken=25 ml
  • Concentration of Arsenic and Cr(III&VI) taken=15 ppm
  • Concentration of Arsenic after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit of AAS-HG instrument
  • Concentration of Cr(III) after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit FAAS/GFAAS of instrument
  • Concentration of Cr(VI) after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit FAAS/GFAAS of instrument.
    • Example 9
  • Quantity of ZnO2 having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm taken for process=0.25 g
  • Water taken=25 ml
  • Concentration of Arsenic and Cr(III&VI) taken =10 ppm
  • Concentration of Arsenic after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit of AAS-HG instrument
  • Concentration of Cr(III) after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit FAAS/GFAAS of instrument
  • Concentration of Cr(VI) after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit FAAS/GFAAS of instrument
    • Example 10
  • Quantity of ZnO2 having average particle size distribution of 20±5 nm taken for process=0.25 g
  • Water taken=25 ml
  • Concentration of Arsenic, Cr(III&VI)taken=5 ppm
  • Concentration of Arsenic after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit of AAS-HG instrument
  • Concentration, of Cr(III) after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit FAAS/GFAAS of instrument
  • Concentration of Cr(VI) after treatment with ZnO2=below detection limit FAAS/GFAAS of instrument
  • Advantages of the present invention:
  • 1. This invention makes the contaminated water almost free of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) after filtration that could be use for drinking and various household utilities.
  • 2. Treatment with ZnO2 nanoparticles maintains the pH of the water to the permissible limit.
  • 3. The proposed method for the synthesis of zinc peroxide is eco-friendly and there is no generation of any toxic gases during synthesis.
  • 4. The material was synthesized at low temperature and there is no requirement of any specific instruments.
  • 5. The method gives more than 98% yield, which is an added advantage of the process.
  • 6. The proposed material is low cost in comparison to other materials available for the removal of arsenic.
  • 7. The solvent used in the synthesis process can be recovered by distillation, which is further added advantages of the process for reduction of the cost of the process.
  • 8. The process does not add any impurities in the water as it is insoluble in water and can be separated by any known method.
  • 9. The synthesis method is so simple and fast and within 2-3 hours on can get synthesized nanoparticles of zinc peroxide with more than 98% yield.
  • 10. The particles of 10±5 are more efficiently removes arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from contaminated water but in this process centrifugation is essential to separate zinc peroxide from the water. The particles of 10±5 nm sizes can be synthesized by varying the concentration of solvent and capping agent.

Claims (16)

1. A process for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from contaminated water using zinc peroxide nanoparticles comprising treating the contaminated water containing arsenic and chromium with the nanoparticles of zinc peroxide in a ratio (w/v) ranging from 8:1 to 12:1 (mg/ml), having the concentration of arsenic, Cr(III&VI) contamination below 50 ppm in water, at ambient temperature, for a period of 5-10 min, followed by filtration to obtain the desired low concentrated contamination permissible drinking water.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the zinc peroxide nanoparticles used have size below 50 nm.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the amount of zinc peroxide used for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III &VI) is preferably in the range of 225-250 mg per 25 ppm of arsenic and Cr(III &VI) contaminated water.
4. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the zinc peroxide nanoparticles are prepared by the process comprising the following steps:
a) dissolving zinc acetate in ammonium hydroxide to obtain a solution mixture having pH in the range of 9-11;
b) adding glycerol/PVP/TEA to the solution mixture obtained in step (a) in a ratio of zinc acetate to glycerol in the range of 2:0.5 to 6:1(w/w), PVP in the range of 10:0.25 to 10:1 (w/w) and TEA in the range of 1:1 to 1:0.5 (w/w) with respect to zinc acetate respectively;
c) adding a polar organic solvent to the solution Mixture obtained in step (b), under stirring, at ambient temperature in the range of 25-30° C., followed by adding equimolar quantity of hydrogen peroxide with respect to zinc acetate to obtain the desired nanoparticles of zinc peroxide.
5. A process as claimed in claim 4, wherein the weight ratio of zinc acetate to glycerol used is preferably in the range of 2:0.5 to 3:1.
6. A process as claimed in claim 4, wherein the weight ratio of zinc acetate to PVP used is preferably in the range of 10:0.5 to 10:1 (w/w).
7. A process as claimed in claim 4, wherein the weight ratio of zinc acetate to TEA used is preferably in the range of 1:1 to 1:0.5 (w/w).
8. A process as claimed in claim 4, wherein yield of ZnO2 nanoparticles obtained is in the range of 98-99% with respect to the starting material.
9. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III) and Cr(VI) each from 50 ppm to 0.1, 0.14, and 0.18 ppm, respectively without disturbing the pH of water.
10. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III) and Cr(VI) each from 30 ppm to 0.03, 0.07 and 0.08 ppm, respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
11. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic, Cr(III) and Cr(VI) each from 25 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG in case of arsenic and 0.01 in case of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) without disturbing pH of the water.
12. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic and Cr(III&VI) each from 20 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
13. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic and Cr(III&VI)each from 15 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
14. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic and Cr(III&VI) each from 10 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
15. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ZnO2 nanoparticles removes arsenic and Cr(III&VI) each from 5 ppm to less than the detection limit of AAS-HG and FAAS/GFAAS respectively without disturbing pH of the water.
16. A process for the removal of arsenic and Cr(III&VI) from contaminated water, substantially as herein described with reference to the examples and drawings accompanying this specification.
US13/046,480 2010-03-12 2011-03-11 Process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from water Abandoned US20110220577A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/960,311 US8715612B2 (en) 2010-03-12 2013-08-06 Process for preparing zinc peroxide nanoparticles

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IN0578/DEL/2010 2010-03-12
IN578DE2010 2010-03-12

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/960,311 Continuation US8715612B2 (en) 2010-03-12 2013-08-06 Process for preparing zinc peroxide nanoparticles

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110220577A1 true US20110220577A1 (en) 2011-09-15

Family

ID=44558953

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/046,480 Abandoned US20110220577A1 (en) 2010-03-12 2011-03-11 Process for the removal of arsenic and chromium from water
US13/960,311 Expired - Fee Related US8715612B2 (en) 2010-03-12 2013-08-06 Process for preparing zinc peroxide nanoparticles

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/960,311 Expired - Fee Related US8715612B2 (en) 2010-03-12 2013-08-06 Process for preparing zinc peroxide nanoparticles

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US20110220577A1 (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103962103A (en) * 2014-05-11 2014-08-06 桂林理工大学 Method for preparing adsorbing material from lotus seed hulls and application of adsorbing material
CN104162407A (en) * 2014-07-23 2014-11-26 大连理工大学 Method for deeply treating nickel-containing sewage by modified diatomite
WO2015119772A1 (en) * 2014-02-05 2015-08-13 University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions including a vacancy-engineered (ve)-zno nanocomposite, methods of making a composition, methods of using a composition
WO2016024290A1 (en) 2014-08-12 2016-02-18 Council Of Scientific & Industrial Research A process for the detection and adsorption of arsenic
CN105731587A (en) * 2015-12-18 2016-07-06 南京大学 Method for reducing hexavalent chromium through micromolecular diketone-ultraviolet light
WO2016137978A1 (en) * 2015-02-23 2016-09-01 University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions including a vacancy-engineered (ve)-zno nanocomposite, methods of making the compositions and methods of using the compositions
RU2602862C1 (en) * 2015-05-05 2016-11-20 Акционерное общество "Калужский научно-исследовательский институт телемеханических устройств" Method for reduction of chromium(+6) in spent solutions
US10106436B2 (en) 2013-03-16 2018-10-23 Chemica Technologies, Inc. Selective adsorbent fabric for water purification
US10384191B2 (en) 2017-04-19 2019-08-20 King Abdulaziz University Star-shape nanoparticle and a method of using thereof to detect arsenic in a solution
CN111675384A (en) * 2020-06-28 2020-09-18 辽宁鑫知界科技有限公司 Heavy metal sewage treatment process

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
PL434715A1 (en) * 2020-07-17 2022-01-24 Nanoxo Spółka Z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnością Production method of oxygen-zink nanomolecules, zink peroxide nanomolecules produced by said method and their use
US11377584B1 (en) 2021-04-23 2022-07-05 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Nanodissolver for iron sulfide scale removal

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3926754A (en) * 1972-02-11 1975-12-16 Andco Inc Electrochemical contaminant removal from aqueous media
US4036726A (en) * 1975-02-07 1977-07-19 Andco Incorporated Method and apparatus for electrochemical contaminant removal from liquid media
US4123339A (en) * 1975-02-07 1978-10-31 Andco Industries, Inc. Method and apparatus for electrochemical contaminant removal from liquid media
US4163716A (en) * 1973-10-22 1979-08-07 Feltex Limited Process for the purification of contaminated water
US4490257A (en) * 1983-02-25 1984-12-25 Becker Dieter J Process for purification of waste waters accumulated from pulp production, particularly from chlorine bleaching of pulp
US4566975A (en) * 1983-09-12 1986-01-28 Boliden Aktiebolag Method for purifying aqueous solutions
US4880510A (en) * 1988-02-16 1989-11-14 Andco Environmental Processes, Inc. Method for removing dye stuffs from wastewater
US5043080A (en) * 1990-02-26 1991-08-27 Solarchem Enterprises Inc. Treating contaminated effluents and groundwaters
US20070086935A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 Huimin Chen Water treatment compositions and methods of making and using
WO2007141781A2 (en) * 2006-06-05 2007-12-13 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. Decontaminating fluids and methods of use thereof
US20090018668A1 (en) * 2003-12-09 2009-01-15 Separation Design Group, Llc Sorption method, device, and system
US20090069181A1 (en) * 2006-05-30 2009-03-12 Solvay Sa Product and Process for Treating Water Bodies, Sediments and Soils

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3926754A (en) * 1972-02-11 1975-12-16 Andco Inc Electrochemical contaminant removal from aqueous media
US4163716A (en) * 1973-10-22 1979-08-07 Feltex Limited Process for the purification of contaminated water
US4036726A (en) * 1975-02-07 1977-07-19 Andco Incorporated Method and apparatus for electrochemical contaminant removal from liquid media
US4123339A (en) * 1975-02-07 1978-10-31 Andco Industries, Inc. Method and apparatus for electrochemical contaminant removal from liquid media
US4490257A (en) * 1983-02-25 1984-12-25 Becker Dieter J Process for purification of waste waters accumulated from pulp production, particularly from chlorine bleaching of pulp
US4566975A (en) * 1983-09-12 1986-01-28 Boliden Aktiebolag Method for purifying aqueous solutions
US4880510A (en) * 1988-02-16 1989-11-14 Andco Environmental Processes, Inc. Method for removing dye stuffs from wastewater
US5043080A (en) * 1990-02-26 1991-08-27 Solarchem Enterprises Inc. Treating contaminated effluents and groundwaters
US20090018668A1 (en) * 2003-12-09 2009-01-15 Separation Design Group, Llc Sorption method, device, and system
US20070086935A1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2007-04-19 Huimin Chen Water treatment compositions and methods of making and using
US20090069181A1 (en) * 2006-05-30 2009-03-12 Solvay Sa Product and Process for Treating Water Bodies, Sediments and Soils
WO2007141781A2 (en) * 2006-06-05 2007-12-13 Yeda Research And Development Co. Ltd. Decontaminating fluids and methods of use thereof

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Health Canada; "Chromium"; January 1979 (Updated September 1986); Health Canada *
Kuriyavar, Satish I., Adbulaziz Bagabas, Allen W. Apblett, and B.P. Kiran; "Nanosphere Oxides for Environmental Remediation"; 2005; Oklahoma State University; Pages 1, 2, 6, 7 *
Rosenthal-Toib, Liora, Keren Zohar, Meital Alagem, Yoed Tsur; "Synthesis of stabilized nanoparticles of zinc peroxide"; 1 March 2008; Chemical Engineering Journal; Volume 136, Issues 2-3; Pages 425-429 *

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10683216B2 (en) 2013-03-16 2020-06-16 Chemica Technologies, Inc. Selective adsorbent fabric for water purification
US10106436B2 (en) 2013-03-16 2018-10-23 Chemica Technologies, Inc. Selective adsorbent fabric for water purification
CN106414334A (en) * 2014-02-05 2017-02-15 中佛罗里达大学研究基金会公司 Compositions including a vacancy-engineered (VE)-ZNO nanocomposite, methods of making a composition, methods of using a composition
WO2015119772A1 (en) * 2014-02-05 2015-08-13 University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions including a vacancy-engineered (ve)-zno nanocomposite, methods of making a composition, methods of using a composition
US9215877B2 (en) 2014-02-05 2015-12-22 University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions including a vacancy-engineered(VE)-ZnO nanocomposite, methods of making a composition , method of using a composition
EP3102540A4 (en) * 2014-02-05 2017-09-20 University of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions including a vacancy-engineered (ve)-zno nanocomposite, methods of making a composition, methods of using a composition
CN103962103A (en) * 2014-05-11 2014-08-06 桂林理工大学 Method for preparing adsorbing material from lotus seed hulls and application of adsorbing material
CN104162407A (en) * 2014-07-23 2014-11-26 大连理工大学 Method for deeply treating nickel-containing sewage by modified diatomite
WO2016024290A1 (en) 2014-08-12 2016-02-18 Council Of Scientific & Industrial Research A process for the detection and adsorption of arsenic
US10151736B2 (en) 2014-08-12 2018-12-11 Council Of Scientific & Industrial Research Process for the detection and adsorption of arsenic
CN107548279A (en) * 2015-02-23 2018-01-05 中佛罗里达大学研究基金会有限公司 Include the composition of room engineering (VE) ZnO nano compound, prepare the method for the composition and the method using the composition
WO2016137978A1 (en) * 2015-02-23 2016-09-01 University Of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions including a vacancy-engineered (ve)-zno nanocomposite, methods of making the compositions and methods of using the compositions
RU2602862C1 (en) * 2015-05-05 2016-11-20 Акционерное общество "Калужский научно-исследовательский институт телемеханических устройств" Method for reduction of chromium(+6) in spent solutions
CN105731587A (en) * 2015-12-18 2016-07-06 南京大学 Method for reducing hexavalent chromium through micromolecular diketone-ultraviolet light
US10384191B2 (en) 2017-04-19 2019-08-20 King Abdulaziz University Star-shape nanoparticle and a method of using thereof to detect arsenic in a solution
CN111675384A (en) * 2020-06-28 2020-09-18 辽宁鑫知界科技有限公司 Heavy metal sewage treatment process

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20130324673A1 (en) 2013-12-05
US8715612B2 (en) 2014-05-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8715612B2 (en) Process for preparing zinc peroxide nanoparticles
Wang et al. High performance and simultaneous sequestration of Cr (VI) and Sb (III) by sulfidated zerovalent iron
You et al. Magnetic cobalt ferrite biochar composite as peroxymonosulfate activator for removal of lomefloxacin hydrochloride
Viraraghavan et al. Arsenic in drinking water—problems and solutions
US20120103915A1 (en) Method and device for purification of arsenic contaminated water
Ruj et al. An economical strategy towards the managing of selenium pollution from contaminated water: A current state-of-the-art review
Lichtfouse et al. Technologies to remove selenium from water and wastewater
Lichtfouse et al. Methods for selenium removal from contaminated waters: a review
Zeng et al. Efficient removal of arsenite by a composite of amino modified silica supported MnO2/Fe–Al hydroxide (SNMFA) prepared from biotite
Georgaka et al. Study of the Cu (II) removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on titania
CN108374095B (en) Method for recovering silver from silver-containing aqueous solution
GR1008962B (en) Method for producing stannous oxide-hydroxide for the removal of hexavalent chromium from potable water
WO2008001442A1 (en) Anion adsorbent, water or soil cleanup agent and process for producing the same
Simeonidis et al. Nanoparticles for heavy metal removal from drinking water
Kaprara et al. Evaluation of current treatment technologies for Cr (VI) removal from water sources at sub-ppb levels
JP2004290777A (en) Method for treating arsenic-containing water
Kumar et al. Remediation of toxic fluoride from aqueous media by various techniques
El-Dafrawy et al. Synthesis of nano-CaO particles and its application for the removal of copper (II), Lead (II), cadmium (II) and iron (III) from aqueous solutions
Ding et al. Adsorption performance of tetratitanate nanowhiskers for Ni2+ from aqueous solution and removal of Ni2+ from actual electroplating wastewater via successive oxidation and adsorption processes
Caniyilmaz Arsenic removal from groundwater by Fe-Mn oxidation and microfiltration
Qiu et al. Ternary metal composite membrane FCMNCM enhances the separation of As (Ⅲ) in water through the multifunctional cooperation
Zheng et al. Arsenic in the Environment Source, Characteristics, and Technologies for Pollution Elimination
Radzinski An investigation into the activated carbon-catalyzed arsenic oxidation process
JP2004181431A (en) Purification method of aqueous solution and purified aqueous solution
Pradhan Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from Contaminated Water by Using a Novel Adsorbent; Cerium Based Polyaniline

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: COUNCIL OF SCIENTIFIC & INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH, INDIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SINGH, NAHAR;RASHMI;SINGH, SUKHVIR;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:026241/0645

Effective date: 20110308

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION