US20100330890A1 - Polishing pad with array of fluidized gimballed abrasive members - Google Patents
Polishing pad with array of fluidized gimballed abrasive members Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100330890A1 US20100330890A1 US12/753,479 US75347910A US2010330890A1 US 20100330890 A1 US20100330890 A1 US 20100330890A1 US 75347910 A US75347910 A US 75347910A US 2010330890 A1 US2010330890 A1 US 2010330890A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- abrasive
- substrate
- members
- article
- abrasive article
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000005498 polishing Methods 0.000 title claims description 35
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 162
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 92
- 230000036316 preload Effects 0.000 claims description 79
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 50
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 31
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 30
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 claims description 25
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 claims description 25
- 239000003082 abrasive agent Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012876 topography Methods 0.000 abstract description 35
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 abstract description 33
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 26
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 18
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 10
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 9
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000010432 diamond Substances 0.000 description 7
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 7
- 239000000314 lubricant Substances 0.000 description 6
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 235000012431 wafers Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000007517 polishing process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 5
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005530 etching Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 3
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 2
- -1 for example Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000696 magnetic material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002113 nanodiamond Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000000206 photolithography Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 2
- 125000006850 spacer group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003746 surface roughness Effects 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000004952 Polyamide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005411 Van der Waals force Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006061 abrasive grain Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012790 adhesive layer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005219 brazing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005229 chemical vapour deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000994 depressogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910003460 diamond Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000007516 diamond turning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005323 electroforming Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005538 encapsulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001746 injection moulding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001540 jet deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001050 lubricating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000013011 mating Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910001092 metal group alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000620 organic polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002647 polyamide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920000642 polymer Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 229920002635 polyurethane Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004814 polyurethane Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010008 shearing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011343 solid material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000002904 solvent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009987 spinning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000992 sputter etching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001771 vacuum deposition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D7/00—Bonded abrasive wheels, or wheels with inserted abrasive blocks, designed for acting otherwise than only by their periphery, e.g. by the front face; Bushings or mountings therefor
- B24D7/16—Bushings; Mountings
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D13/00—Wheels having flexibly-acting working parts, e.g. buffing wheels; Mountings therefor
- B24D13/02—Wheels having flexibly-acting working parts, e.g. buffing wheels; Mountings therefor acting by their periphery
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D13/00—Wheels having flexibly-acting working parts, e.g. buffing wheels; Mountings therefor
- B24D13/14—Wheels having flexibly-acting working parts, e.g. buffing wheels; Mountings therefor acting by the front face
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D5/00—Bonded abrasive wheels, or wheels with inserted abrasive blocks, designed for acting only by their periphery; Bushings or mountings therefor
- B24D5/16—Bushings; Mountings
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
- B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
- B24D99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- B24D99/005—Segments of abrasive wheels
Definitions
- the present application is directed to an abrasive article with an array of independently gimballed abrasive members that are capable of selectively engaging with nanometer-scale and/or micrometer-scale height variations and micrometer-scale and/or millimeter-scale wavelengths of waviness, on the surfaces of substrates.
- Each abrasive member maintains a fluid bearing with the substrate.
- the spacing and fly attitude of the abrasive members can be adjusted to follow the topography of the substrate to remove a generally uniform layer of material, to engage with the peaks on the substrate to remove target wavelengths of waviness, and/or to remove debris and contamination from the surface of the substrate.
- the abrasive members can include abrasive features, or can interact with free abrasive particles at an interface with the substrate, or a combination thereof.
- CMP chemical mechanical processing
- FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate the shape of bits formed by etching, such as ion milling or reactive etching. Note that the tops of the bits are rounded, leading to head media spacing loss, roughness at the rounded areas, and magnetic damage due to etching of magnetic materials. Such bits are not viable for magnetic recording. The uneven material increases head media spacing and potential damage to the diamond-like-carbon overcoats. CMP processes have proven inadequate to achieving smooth and flat tops both before and after magnetic material deposition.
- CMP is currently the primary approach to planarizing wafers, semiconductors, optical components, magnetic media for hard disk drives, and bit patterned or discrete track media (collectively “substrates”).
- CMP uses pads to press sub-micron sized particles suspended in the slurry against the surface of the substrate. The nature of the material removal varies with the hardness of the CMP pad. Soft CMP pads conform to the nanotopography and tend to remove material generally uniformly from the entire surface. Hard CMP pads as shown in FIG. 4 conform less to the nanotopography and therefore remove more material from the peaks or high spots on the surface and less material from low spots.
- polishing a substrate with a soft pad also transfers various features from the polishing pad to the substrate.
- Roughness and waviness is typically caused by uneven pressure applied by the pad during the polishing process.
- the uneven pressure can be caused by the soft pad topography, the run out of the moving components, or the machined imperfections transferred to the pads. Run-out is the result of larger pressures at the edges of the substrate due to deformation of the soft pad.
- Soft pad polishing of heterogeneous layered materials, such as semiconductor devices causes differential removal and damage to the electrical devices.
- a CMP pad is generally of a polyurethane or other flexible organic polymer.
- the particular characteristics of the CMP pad such as hardness, porosity, and rigidity, must be taken into account when developing a particular CMP process for processing of a particular substrate.
- wear, hardness, uneven distribution of abrasive particles, and other characteristics of the CMP pad may change over the course of a given CMP process. This is due in part to water absorption as the CMP pad takes up some of the aqueous slurry when encountered at the wafer surface during CMP.
- This sponge-like behavior of the CMP pad leads to alteration of CMP pad characteristics, notably at the surface of the CMP pad. Debris coming from the substrate and abrasive particles can also accumulate in the pad surface.
- This accumulation causes a “glazing” or hardening of the top of the pad, thus making the pad less able to hold the abrasive particles of the slurry and decreasing the pad's overall polishing performance. Further, with many pads the pores used to hold the slurry become clogged, and the overall asperity of the pad's polishing surface becomes depressed and matted.
- the present application is directed to an abrasive article with an array of independently gimballed abrasive members that are capable of selectively engaging with nanometer-scale and/or micrometer-scale height variations and micrometer-scale and/or millimeter-scale wavelengths of waviness, on the surfaces of substrates.
- Each abrasive member maintains a fluid bearing with the substrate.
- the spacing, which includes clearance, pitch, and roll, of the abrasive members can be adjusted to follow the topography of the substrate to remove a generally uniform layer of material; to engage with the peaks on the substrate to remove target wavelengths of waviness; and/or to remove debris and contamination from the surface of the substrate.
- the gimbals permit each abrasive member to move independently in at least pitch and roll relative to the substrate.
- the fluid bearing can be hydrodynamic, hydrostatic, or a combination thereof.
- the fluid can be gas, liquid, or a combination thereof.
- the present abrasive article can be used before or after features are formed on the substrates.
- a hydrodynamic and/or hydrostatic bearing is used to provide vertical, pitch and roll stiffness to the abrasive member and to control the spacing and pressure distribution across the fluid bearing features on the abrasive members. Adjustments to certain variables, such as for example, the spacing (which includes minimal spacing and fly attitude of the abrasive members), pitch and roll stiffness which control fly attitude, the preload, and/or the abrasive features can be used to modify the cutting force applied to the substrate
- Fluid bearing structures are fairly complex with a substantial number of variables involved in their design.
- the primary forces involved in a given fluid bearing are the gimbal structure and the preload.
- the gimbal structure applies both a pitch and roll moments to the individual abrasive members, and hence, the fluid bearing structures. If the gimbal is extremely stiff, the fluid bearing may not be able to form a pitch or roll angle.
- the preload and preload offset bias the fluid bearing toward the substrate.
- the preload is typically applied by a different structure than the gimbal structure.
- Fluid bearing surface geometries play a large role in pressurization of the bearing. Possible geometries include tapers, steps, trenches, crowns, cross curves, twists, wall profile, and cavities. Finally, external factors such as viscosity of the bearing fluid and linear velocity play an extremely important role in pressurizing bearing structures.
- the individual abrasive members are capable of selectively engaging with nanometer-scale and micrometer-scale height variations and/or micrometer-scale or millimeter-scale wavelengths of waviness on the surface of substrates to perform one or more of the following three overlapping and complementary functions: 1) following the topography of the substrate to remove a generally uniform layer of material; 2) engaging with the surface features such as peaks and valleys on the substrate to remove target wavelengths of waviness; and/or 3 ) removing debris and contamination from the surface of the substrate. Consequently, the present abrasive articles can be engineered to perform a wide variety of functions, including lapping, planarization, polishing, cleaning, and burnishing substrates.
- the abrasive members may 1 ) include abrasive features positioned to interact with the substrate, 2) interact with free abrasive particles at the interface with the substrate, or 3) a combination thereof. Free abrasive particles can be used with either topography following or topography removing abrasive members.
- abrasive features generally have a hardness greater than the substrate, this property is not required for every embodiment since any two solid materials that repeatedly rub against each other will tend to wear each other away.
- relatively soft polymeric abrasive features molded on the abrasive members can be used to remove surface contaminants or can interact with free abrasive particles to remove material from the surface of a harder substrate.
- abrasive feature refers to a portion of an abrasive member that comes in physical contact with a substrate or a contaminant on a substrate, independent of the relative hardness of the respective materials and the resulting cut rate.
- FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of the topography present in any surface including very short wavelength known as roughness, micro-waviness in the range of 1 micron-1 mm, and finally runnout in the range greater than a millimeter.
- FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a topography following abrasive member 1000 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the abrasive member 1000 is typically designed to follow the topography by assuring that the trailing edge area has the largest pressure peak.
- the fluid bearing can be pitched to ensure that the leading edge is spaced substantially higher above the substrate than the trailing edge.
- the trailing edge in contact with the substrate 1006 of the abrasive member 1000 applies a cutting force to nanometer-scale and/or micron-scale height variations 1008 on the surface 1004 , while following the millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths in the waviness on the substrate.
- the abrasive member 1000 removes a generally uniform layer of material 1012 from peaks and valleys on the surface 1004 , such as for example, removing or controlling the thickness of an oxide layer.
- topography following refers to an individually gimbaled abrasive member that generally follows millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths of waviness on a substrate, while engaging with nanometer-scale height variations to primarily remove a generally uniform amount of material from the surface.
- the strategy described in FIG. 6 is analogous to debris removal while maintaining a lower cutting force at the substrate while generating a large force to interact and remove asperities 1005 .
- FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of a topography removing abrasive member 1050 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the leading edge 1056 and/or trailing edge 1058 of the abrasive member 1050 applies a cutting force to peaks 1060 of millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths of the waviness 1062 on the surface 1054 of the substrate, while engaging with the valleys.
- Topography removal from original surface 1054 leads to a new surface 1012 substantially flatter.
- topography removing refers to an individually gimbaled abrasive member that primarily removes nanometer-scale and/or micrometer-scale height variations from peaks and valleys of millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths in the waviness on a substrate. Note that the abrasive removing member dimensions and pressure distribution dictates the peak and valley removal rate.
- FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of a chemical mechanical polishing member 1100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the trailing edge 1106 of the abrasive member 1100 follows the millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths in the waviness 1108 on the substrate, while interacting with free abrasives 1090 .
- the abrasive member 1100 preferably is in contact at the trailing edge while the leading edge 1114 is free of contact with the substrate.
- the proposed chemical polishing strategy can be changed to render both leading and trailing edges in contact with the substrate while applying a force onto the free abrasives 1090 to promote material removal from the substrate 1004 to remove both the peaks and the valleys of the substrate surface.
- a similar strategy as shown in FIG. 7 can also be adapted to remove the substrate topography of the substrate by designing the abrasive element to remove peaks of the substrate.
- abrasive features are available for the present abrasive members, such as for example, a surface roughness formed on the leading and/or trailing edges of the abrasive members. That surface roughness may include a hard coat, such as for example, diamond-like-carbon.
- the abrasive features may be discrete abrasive particles, such as for example, fixed diamonds.
- the abrasive features may be structured abrasives, discussed further below.
- the dimensions of the abrasive members can be greater than the target wavelengths.
- the wavelengths are determined by the gas pressure profile generated by the abrasive member and the size of the abrasive member. As a rule of thumb, the smallest circumferential wavelength is about one-fourth the length of the abrasive members.
- the dimensions of the abrasive members and the pressure profile due to the hydrostatic and/or hydrodynamic lift (gas and/or liquid) determine the ability of the abrasive member to follow the waviness of the substrate. Assuming that the abrasive members can follow 1 ⁇ 4 of its size, then all wavelengths smaller than the 1 ⁇ 4 will cause interference with the abrasive members and material removal will ensue due to the interactions. Portions of the abrasive members generate a hydrodynamic lift causing predictable waviness following capability and stabilizing force countering the cutting forces.
- FIG. 1 is the configuration of a single bit on a bit patterned media for a hard disk drive.
- FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an array of bits on a bit patterned media.
- FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of a soft pad in contact with a wavy substrate
- FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a hard pad in contact with a wavy substrate
- FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of the components describing a surface topography
- FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a debris removing abrasive member in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of a topography removing abrasive member in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of a CMP abrasive member in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is an exploded view of an abrasive article with gimbaled abrasive members in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a preload mechanism for the abrasive article of FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a gimbal structure for the abrasive article of FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 12 is a perspective view of the abrasive members for the abrasive article of FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 13A is another perspective view of the abrasive members for the abrasive article of FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 13B is a detailed perspective view of the fluid bearing surface on the abrasive members of FIG. 9 .
- FIG. 14A-14C is a detailed perspective view of the fluid bearing surface on the abrasive members of FIG. 9 with various abrasive surface additives.
- FIG. 15 is a perspective view of a unitary abrasive article in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 16 is a perspective view of the gimbal assemblies of the abrasive article of FIG. 15 .
- FIG. 17 is a perspective view of the fluid bearing surfaces of the abrasive article of FIG. 15 .
- FIG. 18 is an exploded view of an abrasive article with an integral hydrostatic bearing structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 19 is a bottom view of the abrasive article of FIG. 18 with the membrane removed.
- FIG. 20 is a detailed top view of the abrasive article of FIG. 18 with the membrane removed.
- FIG. 21 is an exploded view of the hydrostatic abrasive member.
- FIGS. 22 and 23 are perspective views of the hydrostatic abrasive member assembly of FIG. 21 .
- FIG. 24 is a bottom perspective view of the hydrostatic abrasive member assembly of FIG. 21 .
- FIG. 25 is a perspective view of an annular fluid bearing surface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 26B is a pressure profile graph of the fluid bearing of FIG. 26A .
- FIG. 27 is a perspective view of a hydrodynamic abrasive member in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 28 is a pressure profile generated at one of the pads for the abrasive member of FIG. 27 .
- FIG. 29 is an exploded view of a hydrodynamic abrasive member assembly in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 30 is a perspective view of the hydrodynamic abrasive member assembly of FIG. 29 .
- FIGS. 31A-31C are various views of a cylindrical array of abrasive members in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 32 is an exploded view of the cylindrical array of abrasive members of FIGS. 31A-31C .
- FIG. 33 is a plurality of the cylindrical array abrasive member assemblies of FIGS. 31A-31C in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 34 is a schematic illustration of an abrasive member for topography following applications in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 35 is a schematic illustration of an abrasive member for topography following applications in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 36 is a schematic illustration of an abrasive member for topography removing applications in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 37 illustrate a hydrodynamic abrasive member for use in CMP in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 38 illustrates a hydrostatic abrasive member for use in CMP in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 39 illustrates an alternate abrasive article with curved hydrodynamic fluid bearing surfaces in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 40 illustrates a hydrostatic version of the abrasive article of FIG. 39 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 41 illustrates an alternate abrasive article with integrated fluid delivery through a gimbal in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 42 illustrates an alternate abrasive article of FIG. 41 with consumable design in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 43 illustrates an alternate arrangement of abrasive article of FIG. 41 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is an exploded view of an abrasive article 50 with an array of gimballed abrasive members 52 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the abrasive article 50 includes gimbal structure 54 , preload mechanism 56 , and the abrasive members 52 .
- the abrasive article 50 can be manufactured in circular and non-circular shapes.
- the abrasive members 52 can be arranged in a regular pattern a random configuration, an off-set pattern or a variety of other configurations.
- FIG. 10 provides a detailed view of the preload mechanism 56 of FIG. 9 .
- the preload mechanism 56 includes a series of outer rings 58 each with a plurality of preload beams 60 configured to apply a preload on each of the abrasive members 52 .
- the preload applied by the beams 60 is preferably concentrated toward the center of the abrasive members 52 so as to not interfere with pitch and roll motions during polishing.
- a dimple 61 at the end of the load beam 60 pushes against the abrasive member to transfer preload.
- FIGS. 11 and 12 illustrate the gimbal structure 54 of FIG. 9 .
- Framework 62 supports an array of gimbal assemblies 64 .
- each gimbal assembly 64 includes one or more arms 66 , a cross member 68 with attachment features 72 .
- the gimbal assemblies 64 allow each of the abrasive members 52 to independently follow millimeter-scale and micrometer-scale waviness of the substrate during polishing.
- the gimbal assemblies 54 control the static attitude or pitch of each abrasive member 52 .
- the arms 66 and cross members 68 permit the abrasive members 52 to move through at least pitch and roll, while assuring adequate torque is applied to the abrasive members 52 .
- the members 66 and 68 can be configured to promote topography following or topography removing behavior in the abrasive members 52 .
- Various alternate gimbal assemblies are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,774,305; 5,856,896; 6,069,771; 6,459,260; 6,493,192; 6,714,386; 6,744,602; 6,952,330; 7,057,856; and 7,203,033.
- FIG. 12 illustrates the array of abrasive members 52 prior to assembly onto the gimbal assemblies 64 .
- the abrasive members 52 can be made from a variety of materials, such as for example, metal, ceramic, polymers, or composites thereof.
- the abrasive members 52 are preferably arranged in a random or off-set pattern to impart a uniform polishing pattern onto the substrate.
- shear forces between the rotating substrate 107 and the abrasive article 52 entrain an air cushion that applies fluid dynamic lift on fluid bearing surfaces 94 and 98 on the abrasive member 52 .
- the dynamic lift causes the abrasive members 52 to assume a fly attitude during the relative rotation of a substrate 107 .
- the fluid bearing developed allows the abrasive members 52 to follow the micrometer-scale and/or millimeter-scale wavelengths of waviness (“waviness”) on the substrate 107 , while removing nanometer-scale and/or micrometer-scale height variations.
- waviness waviness
- the leading edges 94 of the abrasive members 52 generate a lift countering the cutting forces.
- each of the abrasive members 52 can independently adjust to the waviness of the substrate 107 and maintain a constant cutting force/pressure, the amount of material removed across the substrate 107 is substantially uniform.
- the present embodiment is particularly well suited to remove a uniform amount of an oxide layer on a semiconductor.
- the ability of the abrasive members 52 to follow the waviness enables uniform material removal at a level not attainable by conventional CMP processes.
- FIGS. 13A and 13B illustrate one possible geometry of the fluid bearing surface 90 of the abrasive members 52 .
- the fluid bearing surfaces 90 include various fluid bearing features 92 that promote the creation of a fluid bearing with the substrate 107 .
- leading edge 92 of the fluid bearing surface 90 includes a pair of pressure pads separated.
- the trailing edge 98 includes is formed from pressure pad.
- the pads 92 and 98 can be formed with a crown and cross-curve.
- the leading edges 94 are optionally tapered or stepped to help initiate aerodynamic lift.
- a negative suction force areas can be generated in the fluid bearing surface 90 to stabilize the abrasive members 52 during flying.
- the fluid bearing surface 90 can also include trenches to enable higher pressurization during the flying.
- FIG. 13B illustrates the addition of a hard coating on the polishing surfaces 96 A and 96 B.
- the DLC is applied by chemical vapor deposition.
- the term “chemically vapor deposited” and “CVD” refer to materials deposited by vacuum deposition processes, including, but not limited to, thermally activated deposition from reactive gaseous precursor materials, as well as plasma, microwave, DC, or RF plasma arc-jet deposition from gaseous precursor materials.
- Various methods of applying a hard coat to a substrate are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,821,189 (Coad et al.); 6,872,127 (Lin et al.); 7,367,875 (Slutz et al.); and 7,189,333 (Henderson), which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- FIGS. 14A-C are a schematic representation of the abrasive members 52 with the addition of various abrasive elements to the surface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Nano diamonds are added to the bearing surfaces 96 A, 96 B and 96 C.
- nano-diamonds are attached to the pads 96 , 100 via existing processes (CVD encapsulation, brazing, adhesives, embedding, etc.).
- CVD encapsulation, brazing, adhesives, embedding, etc. Methods of uniformly dispersing nanometer size abrasive grains are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Pub. No. 2007/0107317 (Takahagi et al.), which is hereby incorporated by reference.
- Various geometrical features and arrangement of abrasive particles on abrasive articles are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,821,461 (Holmstrand), 3,921,342 (Day), and 3,683,562 (Day), and U.S. Pat. Pub. No.
- FIG. 14B illustrates abrasive particles 340 , such as nano-scale diamonds, attached to a polyamide backing layer 342 located on the pads 96 that act as the abrasive features in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- a slurry of nano-scale diamonds and adhesive are spin coated, sprayed coated, or otherwise deposited directly onto the pads 96 .
- FIG. 14C illustrates perspective and side views of an engineered surface imparted to the pads 96 A-C in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the engineered surface is preferably nanometer-scale or micrometer-scale.
- a hard coat, such as DLC, is preferably applied to the engineered surface.
- the engineered surface allows for precise stress management between the polished substrate and the nano-features. Such precise stress management yields a predictable surface finish and the gap allows for residual material to be removed.
- Various engineered surfaces 130 are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,194,317 (Kaisaki et al); 6,612,917 (Bruxvoort); 7,160,178 (Gagliardi et al.); 7,404,756 (Ouderkirk et al.); and U.S. Publication No. 2008/0053000 (Palmgren et al.), which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- a slurry of abrasive particles is located at the interface between the abrasive element and the, such as for example, in a standard chemical-mechanical polishing process.
- Various methods of chemical-mechanical processing are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,811,467 (Beresford et al.) and U.S. Pat. Publication Nos. 2004/0072510 (Kinoshita et al.) and 2008/0004743 (Goers et al.), which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- the abrasive members 52 are manufactured with one or more sensors to monitor the polishing process, such as for example, acoustic emission or friction sensor.
- the present interference lapping preferably results in a surface finish or roughness (Ra) of less than about 20 Angstrom, and more preferably less than about 0.2 Angstrom.
- FIGS. 15-16 illustrate a fully integrated gimbaled abrasive article 150 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- Preload structure 152 includes circumferential ribs 154 and radial ribs 156 to impart a desired preload onto abrasive members 158 .
- Gimbal assemblies 160 include a collection of flexible ribs 162 , 164 connecting the preload structure 152 to the abrasive members 158 .
- the abrasive article 150 is preferably fabricated as a single unit, such as by injection molding. The fabrication process can include multiple mold injection steps to meet the system requirements.
- FIG. 16 illustrates fluid bearing features fabricated on the abrasive members 158 , such as discussed above.
- the fluid bearing surfaces can include any of the abrasive features discussed herein.
- FIG. 17 presents a view of an alternate abrasive article 358 in which the fluid bearing features 352 A, 352 B, 352 C (“352”) include a plurality of grooves 354 oriented generally parallel to the direction of travel of the abrasive members 358 relative to the substrate.
- the grooves 354 release fluid located at the interface between the fluid bearing features 352 , reducing the lift on the abrasive members 358 .
- the grooves 354 reduce the fly height of the abrasive members 358 .
- the grooves 354 permit a low fly height and/or a low preload.
- the grooved abrasive members 358 are particularly well suited to fully flooded applications.
- the depth of the grooves 354 must be sufficient to reduce hydrodynamic pressure between the abrasive members 358 and the substrate. In most cases, the grooves 354 have a depth of greater than about 5 micrometers.
- the grooves 354 allow a reduction in the hydrodynamic film while allowing the use of nano-scale diamonds attached to the fluid bearing features 352 .
- nano-scale diamonds attached to a polymeric film are attached to the fluid bearing features 352 .
- the grooves 354 permit the load on the abrasive members 358 to be sufficiently low.
- the fluid bearing features 352 are grooved abrasive composites.
- the grooves 354 also permit the fly height to be engineered for particular applications. Assuming all other processing variables are held constant, increasing the size or number of grooves 354 reduces fly height, and hence, increases interference between the substrate.
- the spacing height of the abrasive members 358 above the substrate can also be engineered, such as by changing the size and shape of the fluid bearing features 352 .
- FIGS. 18-20 illustrate an alternate abrasive article 200 with an array of abrasive members 212 having an integrated hydrostatic bearing structure 202 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- Membrane 216 seals gas conduits 204 in the bearing structure 202 .
- FIGS. 19 and 20 illustrate the integrated hydrostatic bearing structure 202 without sealing membrane 216 shown.
- Gas conduits 204 are fabricated in gimbal assembly 206 and along preload ribs 208 . Holes 210 extending through the abrasive members 212 to fluid bearing surfaces 214 (see FIG. 19 ).
- the gas conduits 204 are externally pressurized to provide a hydrostatic bearing on each abrasive member 212 .
- the fluid bearing surfaces 214 can include any of the abrasive features discussed herein.
- fluid bearing surfaces 214 of the abrasive members 212 are fabricated with button pressure ports 218 to form a hydrostatic bearing on each abrasive member 212 .
- the hydrostatic bearing generated at each fluid bearing surface 214 is designed to counter the cutting forces during the polishing process.
- a button bearing design is shown. Additional configurations can easily be adapted such as multiple ports onto each abrasive member 212 to enable the abrasive member to form a pitch and roll moment.
- a pressure port 218 is located near the leading edges 220 to increase the pitch of the abrasive members 212 for topography following applications. In another embodiment, pressure ports 218 are located at both the leading edges 220 and trailing edges 222 of the abrasive members 212 to configure the pitch for topography removing applications.
- the abrasive article 200 is particularly useful when the relative speed between the substrate and the abrasive members 212 is not high enough to form a fluid bearing or hydrodynamic film.
- the external pressure applied to the abrasive members 212 forms a hydrostatic film capable of following the substrate waviness and countering the cutting forces emanating from the interference between the peaks of the abrasive member 200 and the substrate.
- the hydrostatic fluid bearing may be used in combination with a hydrodynamic fluid bearing.
- the hydrostatic fluid bearing is used during start-up rotation and/or ramp-down of the abrasive article 200 relative to a substrate.
- a preferred method for making the abrasive composites 312 having precisely shaped abrasive composites 312 is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 (Pieper et al) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816 (Spurgeon et al.), both incorporated herein by reference.
- Other descriptions of suitable methods are reported in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,437,754; 5,454,844 (Hibbard et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,7543 (Calhoun); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,223 (Pieper et al.), all incorporated herein by reference.
- Production tools for making the abrasive members may be in the form of a belt, a sheet, a continuous sheet or web, a coating roll such as a rotogravure roll, a sleeve mounted on a coating roll, or die.
- the production tool may be made of metal, (e.g., nickel), metal alloys, or plastic.
- the production tool is fabricated by conventional techniques, including photolithography, knurling, engraving, hobbing, electroforming, or diamond turning. For example, a copper tool may be diamond turned and then a nickel metal tool may be electroplated off of the copper tool. Preparations of production tools are reported in U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 (Pieper et al.); U.S. Pat. No.
- FIG. 21-24 give a perspective view of hydrostatic abrasive article 550 with an array of hydrostatic abrasive members 552 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- External pressure source 554 is applied to each of the abrasive members 552 to control clearance 556 with the substrate 558 .
- Preload 612 biases the abrasive members 552 toward the substrate 558 .
- Polishing is accomplished by relative motion between the hydrostatic abrasive article 550 and the substrate 558 , such as linear, rotational, orbital, ultrasonic, and the like.
- FIG. 21 is an exploded view of the hydrostatic abrasive article 550 of FIG. 31 .
- External pressure source 554 delivers pressurized gas (e.g., air) to plenum 600 in preload structure 602 .
- Cover 604 is provided to enclose the plenum 600 .
- a plurality of pressure ports 606 in the plenum 600 are fluidly coupled to the pressure ports on the gimbal mechanism 590 by bellows couplings 608 .
- Springs 610 transfer the preload 612 from the preload structure 602 to each of the gimbal mechanisms 590 .
- the externally applied load 612 , the geometry of the hydrostatic bearing 564 , 572 , and the external pressure control the desired spacing 556 between the abrasive members 552 and the substrate 558 .
- Holder structure 620 is attached to the preload structure 602 by stand-offs 622 .
- the holder structure 620 sets the preload 624 applied on each abrasive member 552 and limits the deformation of the gimbal mechanisms 590 in order to avoid damage while the individual preload 624 is applied.
- An adhesive layer (not shown) attaches the abrasive members 552 to the gimbal box-like structure 594 .
- the external preload 612 applied to the array of abrasive members 552 is greater than or equal to the preloads 624 generated by the independently suspended abrasive members 552 in order to allow the gimbal mechanisms 590 to comply with the substrate 558 and not interfere with the holder structure 620 .
- FIGS. 22 and 23 illustrate dimple structure 630 interposed between the springs 610 and the gimbal mechanism 590 .
- the dimple structure 630 delivers the preload as a point source.
- a flexible bellow 608 Offset from the springs 610 and the dimple 630 is a flexible bellow 608 that delivers the external pressure to each individual abrasive member 552 via the gimbal mechanisms 590 .
- the gimbal mechanisms 590 , preload structure 602 , and holder structure 620 can also be used in a hydrodynamic application without the pressure ports 566 and bellows couplings 608 .
- FIG. 23 is a bottom view of the hydrostatic abrasive article 550 with the individual abrasive members 552 organized in a serial fashion. Note that other configurations can easily be accommodated, such as for example an off-set or random pattern.
- Controlling the magnitude of the pressure applied to the abrasive members changes the clearance between the substrate and the abrasive members.
- the frequency response of the system is independent of the compliance of the material selected for the abrasive member but can be engineered by the selection of the gimballing mechanism, including the hydrostatic bearing design.
- the pressure generated by the hydrostatic bearing contributes to forming pitch, z-height, and roll forces that counter the cutting forces emanating from surface defects interaction and potential contact with the substrate.
- the hybrid abrasive member 552 can operate with a hydrostatic fluid bearing and/or a hydrodynamic fluid bearing.
- the hydrostatic pressure ports 566 apply lift to the abrasive member 552 prior to movement of the substrate 558 .
- the lift permits clearance 556 to be set before the substrate 558 starts to move. Consequently, preload 612 does not damage the substrate 558 during start-up.
- the hydrostatic fluid bearing can be reduced or terminated. The procedure can also be reversed at the end of the polishing process.
- FIG. 24 illustrates a gimbal assembly 588 that contains an array of gimbal mechanisms 590 of FIG. 21 .
- Each gimbal mechanism 590 includes four L-shaped springs 592 A, 592 B, 592 C, 592 D (collectively “592”) that suspend the abrasive members 552 above the substrate 558 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- Box-like structure 594 is optionally fabricated on each gimbal structure 590 to help align the abrasive members 552 .
- the box-like structure 594 also includes a port 596 that delivers the pressurized gas to the backs of the abrasive members 552 and out the pressure ports 566 .
- FIG. 25 illustrates an embodiment of an individual abrasive member 552 with both hydrostatic and hydrodynamic fluid bearing capabilities designed into bottom surface 560 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the bottom surface 560 of the abrasive member 552 includes both air bearing features 564 and pressure ports 566 .
- Leading edge 562 of the abrasive member 552 includes a pair of fluid bearing pads 564 A, 564 B (collectively “564”) each with at least one associated pressure port 566 A, 566 B.
- Trailing edge 570 also includes a pair of fluid bearing pads 572 A, 572 B (collectively “572”) and associated pressure ports 566 C, 566 D.
- the fluid bearing pads 564 A, 564 B are fabricated on the trailing edge 570 .
- the leading edge 562 typically flies higher than the trailing edge 570 , which sets the pitch of the abrasive member 552 relative to the substrate 558 .
- the trailing edge 574 , 564 A, and 564 B is typically designed to be in interference with the surface defects on the substrate 558 .
- Both leading edge and trailing edge structures 562 , 570 contribute to controlling the amount of interference with substrate. It is also possible to control the pressure applied to the pressure ports 566 A, 566 B at the leading edge 562 to increase or decrease the pitch of the abrasive member 552 .
- FIG. 26A illustrates a circular hydrostatic abrasive member 640 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the cylindrical shaped recess 642 and pressure port 644 create a generally constant pressure at center, with a logarithmical decaying pressure radially outward.
- FIG. 26B is a graphical illustration of the pressure profile for the circular abrasive member of FIG. 38 .
- the circular abrasive member has a generally constant pressure profile 646 in center region 642 adjacent to the pressure port 644 .
- the pressure at the outer edges 648 of the abrasive member matches ambient pressure.
- This pressure profile operates similar to a nonlinear spring.
- One embodiment envisions a cylindrical shaped recess, such as 642 , at each corner of the abrasive member 560 of FIG. 25 .
- FIG. 27 illustrates a hydrodynamic abrasive member 650 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the abrasive member 650 is generally the same as discussed above, except that no pressure ports are required.
- Fluid bearing surfaces 652 A, 652 B, 652 C, 652 D, 652 E (collectively “ 652 ”) located along the leading edge 654 and trailing edge 656 create hydrodynamic lift between the abrasive member 650 and the substrate.
- the air for the fluid bearing enters along the leading edge 654 and exits along the trailing edge 656 .
- the fluid bearing surfaces 652 also enhance the stability at the interface and a cutting surface to remove surface defects from the substrate.
- the conditions promoting hydrodynamic lift are bearing design, gas/liquid shearing, and linear velocity of the abrasive member 650 relative to the substrate. Such conditions can promote the formation of a fluid film (oil, water, gas) between the abrasive member and the substrate. The relative velocity is obtained by rotating the substrate and/or the abrasive members 650 .
- FIG. 28 illustrates a pressure curve generate by the abrasive member 650 of FIG. 27 at each pressure pad. Note that the pressure vanishes to atmospheric pressure at the edges of the fluid bearing surfaces and builds-up to a maximum 672 at the trailing edge fluid bearing surfaces 652 C, 652 D, 652 E. Each of the fluid bearing surfaces pressurizes under the shear force of the lubricating fluid (air or liquid) to generate a pressure force contributing to lift and countering the cutting forces emanating from the polishing or polishing operation. The pressure formed under the fluid bearing surfaces maintains a certain clearance between the substrate 658 and the abrasive members 650 .
- FIG. 29-30 offer a hydrodynamic abrasive article 670 of the present embodiment.
- An array of abrasive members 650 is attached to preload structure 660 by an array of gimbal mechanisms 662 .
- Preload 664 is transmitted to the gimbal mechanisms 662 by dimpled springs 666 , generally as discussed above.
- the suspended abrasive members 650 have a static pitch and roll stiffness through the hydrodynamic fluid bearing and a z-stiffness through the gimbal mechanisms 662 .
- the fluid bearing surfaces 652 can include any of the abrasive features discussed herein.
- the hydrodynamic fluid film formed at each abrasive member 650 controls the dynamic response of the structure.
- the frequency response of such system can be designed to be in the 5-100 kHz range, which is sufficient to comply with the substrate surface 668 and to interact with surface debris.
- the spacing between the polishing surfaces 652 C, 652 D, 652 E can be controlled to cause interaction with surface defects with little to no material removal from the substrate 658 .
- the hydrodynamic forces In order for the fluid bearing surfaces 652 to develop a stable interface, the hydrodynamic forces must be greater than external disturbances caused by the interference or contact between the polishing surfaces 652 C, 652 D, 652 E and the surface defects.
- FIGS. 31A-31C illustrate an abrasive member assembly 750 with an array of abrasive members 768 arranged in a cylindrical array in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 32 is an exploded view of the abrasive member assembly 750 of FIG. 31A-31C .
- the abrasive member 750 preferably forms a contact interface with the substrate, although this embodiment may be used with a hydrodynamic or hydrostatic bearing.
- Cylinder preload fixture 752 includes a plurality of dimpled spring members 754 that apply an outward radial preload 756 on each gimbal mechanism 758 .
- the preload 756 is transferred by dimple member 760 acting on rear surface 762 of the gimbal mechanisms 758 .
- the gimbal mechanisms 758 are interconnected into a gimbal assembly 764 by support structure 766 .
- the individual abrasive members 768 are attached to the gimbal mechanisms 758 .
- FIGS. 32-33 illustrate a plurality of the abrasive member assemblies 750 of FIG. 45 arranged in a stack configuration 782 .
- the cylindrical structure can be used to clean planar or non-planar substrates.
- axis of rotation 780 is oriented parallel to the surface 784 of the substrate 786 .
- the stacked configuration 782 is optionally rotated while engaged with the substrate 786 .
- the substrate 786 can be stationary or moving.
- a hydrostatic bearing can optionally be generated at the interface of the abrasive members 768 and the substrate via external pressurization means, as discussed above.
- the hydrostatic approach permits the abrasive members 768 to hover over the substrate surface at any desired clearance while still being able to interact and remove surface defects.
- a stable contacting interface can also be used with the abrasive members 768 .
- the abrasive members 768 can either be a porous sponge-like material or a hard coated slider.
- the gimbal mechanisms 758 and preload mechanisms 754 permit the abrasive members 768 to follow the run-out and waviness of the substrate while the abrasive members 768 intimately contact and clean the substrate.
- Controlling the magnitude of the pressure applied to the abrasive members changes the clearance between the substrate and the abrasive members.
- the frequency response of the system is independent of the compliance of the material selected for the abrasive members but can be engineered by the selection of the gimballing mechanism, including the hydrostatic bearing design.
- the pressure generated by the hydrostatic bearing contributes to forming pitch, z-height and roll forces that counter the cutting forces emanating from surface defects interaction and potential contact with the substrate.
- FIG. 34 illustrates an abrasive member 800 modeled for topography following applications.
- the leading edge 802 includes a plurality of discrete features 804 separated by cavities 806 that permit air flow and particles to enter.
- the cavity depth 812 is about 2 micrometers to about 3 micrometers to promote a negative suction force in the presence of air as a lubricant.
- leading edge pads 804 are rounded to promote the redistribution of debris and lubricant.
- This example of a low contact force abrasive member 800 includes leading edge step 818 that increases lift at the leading edge 802 .
- the modeled air bearing structure forms a positive lift from the pressurization of the bearing surface pads and a negative suction force located in the cavity of the air bearing.
- the design presented tradeoff the air bearing pitch angle with the cutting force increase due to a preload increase as demonstrated in Table 1.
- Table 1 shows that the leading edge 802 clears the substrate, while the trailing edge 810 is in contact. This approach permits the trailing edge 810 to follow the substrate waviness.
- the leading and trailing edge pressurization contribute to the stability of the design during asperity interactions and debris removal. This design is ideal for cleaning debris and removing nano level amounts of material in the presence of a thin film lubricant.
- FIG. 35 illustrates an abrasive member 820 modeled for topography following applications.
- the leading edge 822 includes a plurality of discrete features 824 separated by slots 826 that permit air flow and particles to enter.
- This example of a low contact force abrasive member 820 includes leading edge step 828 and extended sides 830 to increase the negative pressure force (suction force).
- the leading edge step 828 has a depth of about 0.1 micrometers to about 0.5 micrometers to promote the formation of higher pressure at the leading edge 822 .
- the trailing edge 832 is formed of discrete pads 834 to reduce the spacing between the substrate and the abrasive member, and to allow for circulation of lubricant and debris.
- Table 2 provides a summary of various performance parameters for the abrasive member as a function of preload.
- FIG. 36 illustrates an abrasive member 840 modeled for topography removing applications.
- the leading edge 842 includes a plurality of discrete features 844 separated by slots 846 that permit air flow and particles to enter.
- the trailing edge 848 similarly includes a plurality of discrete features 850 separated by slots 852 .
- the features 844 , 850 have of about 2 micrometers with respect to the cavity 830 and are formed with rounded leading edge surfaces to distribute both lubricant and wear debris.
- the cavity depth is sufficient to create a positive pressure profile at the top of the pads 844 , 850 and a negative suction force.
- the proper selection of the pressure distributions controls the pitch angle of the abrasive member 840 and the minimum spacing above the substrate.
- the abrasive member 840 does not follow certain target wavelengths of waviness.
- the pitch angle of the abrasive member 840 is therefore substantially reduced to cause both the leading edges 842 and the trailing edges 848 to not follow the target wavelengths of waviness and to cause wear of the interacting surfaces.
- Table 3 provides a summary of various performance parameters for the abrasive member as a function of preload.
- FIG. 37 illustrates an abrasive member 870 for use with free abrasive particles, such as in CMP.
- Leading edge pressurization 882 causes the abrasive member 870 to pitch upward so leading edge 872 does not contact the substrate. The pitch also contributes to the ability of the abrasive member 870 to follow the topography of the substrate.
- Spacer rails 876 at trailing edge 874 help set a known spacing between the free abrasives (not shown) and the polishing recessed surface 880 .
- the distance between the surface 880 and the spacer rails 876 must be smaller than the average size of the free abrasives to ensure intimate contact of the polishing recessed surface 880 with the free abrasives.
- the rails 876 control the spacing between the abrasive member 870 and the substrate and provide a predictable interference between the trapped free abrasive particles and the substrate.
- a series of shaped recessed polishing surfaces 880 are fabricated at the trailing edge 874 between the rails 876 to interact with the free abrasive particles present in the chemical mechanical polishing slurry.
- the recesses have a depth 882 of about 10 nanometers to about 200 nanometers relative to rails 876 , which is smaller than the diameter of the free abrasive particles.
- the leading edges 884 of the recessed pads 880 are shaped to allow progressive entrance of the free abrasive particles to the interface of the abrasive member 870 with the substrate.
- the design presents a leading edge 884 pressurized zone and a trailing edge 874 pressurized zone.
- the trailing edge 874 is able to both follow the topography while the recessed polishing surfaces 880 cause the free abrasive particles to be in intimate contact with the substrate.
- the resulting contact pressure is substantially uniform and independent of the substrate topography.
- FIG. 38 illustrates abrasive member 900 for use with free abrasive particles, similar to CMP.
- abrasive member 900 for use with free abrasive particles, similar to CMP.
- One or more button bearings 902 , 914 are fabricated at the leading edge 906 , such as illustrated in FIGS. 26A and 26B .
- Pad 908 is formed at the trailing edge 910 .
- the pad 908 includes ramp 912 that promotes movement of the free abrasive particles into the interface with the substrate.
- the trailing edge 910 is in contact with the slurry, causing the free abrasive particles to contact the surface and remove material.
- the hydrostatic bearing establishes a stable bearing and assures topography following.
- the hydrostatic bearing provides a substantially constant polishing pressure across the substrate.
- FIG. 39 illustrates an abrasive article 1150 with an array of abrasive member 1152 with integrated preload applied through the platform 1174 and gimbal structure 1156 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the illustrated abrasive members 1152 includes spherical fluid bearing structures 1180 each shown with a spherical or cylindrical curvature. The illustrated curvature is substantially exaggerated to illustrate the concept.
- Each abrasive member 1152 includes a plurality of extensions 1156 that contribute to forming an individual gimballing assembly.
- the extensions 1156 are mounted to tabs 1172 on preload pad 1174 , such as for example, by an adhesive, solvent bonding, ultrasonic welding, and the like.
- the extensions 1156 can flex and twist on either side of the tabs 1172 so the abrasive members 1152 can be independently displace vertically, and in pitch and roll.
- the abrasive members 1152 and extension 1156 are molded as a unitary structure.
- Preload members are positioned between the preload pad (underneath the spherical abrasive member) and rear surfaces 1158 of the abrasive members 1152 .
- the preload members are preferably resilient to permit deflection of the abrasive members 1152 in the vertical direction.
- the preload members are preferably attached to either the preload pad 1174 or the abrasive members 1152 .
- the abrasive members 1152 optionally include one or more cavities or steps 1180 near leading edge to promote formation of a fluid bearing.
- the abrasive members can be either topography following or topography removing.
- the spherical configuration permits a progressive interactions with free abrasives.
- the spherical shape also allows for a elliptical contact with desirable topography following properties.
- FIG. 40 illustrates an abrasive article 1200 with an array of abrasive member 1202 substantially with hydrostatic ports 1204 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
- the hydrostatic ports 1204 are preferably button bearings located at leading edges 1206 of the abrasive members 1202 .
- Rear surfaces 1208 of each abrasive member 1202 includes channels that fluidly communicate with opening in sealing layer 1214 .
- the openings fluidly communicate with holes 1216 in preload members 1226 .
- Rear surface of preload pad 1218 includes a series of channels and backing layer 1224 .
- FIG. 41 gives an exploded view of a configuration with a distant preload cartridge comprising a dimple holder 1565 , a spring preload 1563 and a spring housing 1561 attached to a preload cartridge holder 1520 .
- the preload cartridge holder contains a series of hydrostatic ports 1521 .
- the spring housing connects the hydrostatic pressure from the preload cartridge holder to the gimball assembly.
- a four-layer gimball assembly 1541 , 1542 , 1543 , and 1544 delivers the inlet hydrostatic pressure to the abrasive member cover 1582 through a series of springs.
- the abrasive member assembly is formed with a top membrane 1582 attached to an air flow channel member 1583 .
- the abrasive member 1590 contains the hydrostatic bearing arrangement. The pressurized air is supplied by opening mating the air flow channel member 1583 and the abrasive member 1590 .
- FIG. 42 shows an abrasive member 1590 with a series of hydrostatic ports organized in a concentric manner.
- a channel 1610 at atmospheric pressure boundary condition connects hydrostatic button bearings 1600 .
- FIG. 43 shows a ganged arrangement of abrasive members 1590 .
- Each abrasive member is independently gimbaled and preloaded to perform desired polishing operations.
- An abrasive article for polishing a surface of a substrate includes a gimbal structure, a plurality of abrasive members, a preload mechanism and a fluid beaming feature on the abrasive article.
- the gimbal structure includes a plurality of gimbal assemblies.
- the abrasive members comprise a first surface engaged with one of the gimbal assemblies, and a second surface.
- the gimbal assemblies permit each abrasive member to move independently along a pitch axis and a roll axis.
- the preload mechanism biases the second surface of the abrasive members toward the substrate.
- the fluid bearing feature is located on the second surface of at least some of the plurality of the abrasive members.
- the fluid bearing is configured to generate lift forces during motion of the abrasive article relative to the substrate.
- the fluid bearing feature comprises an abrasive material attached to the second surface of the abrasive member.
- the abrasive article further includes a slurry of free abrasive particles located at the interface of the second surface and the substrate.
- the plurality of abrasive members comprises an interconnected array of molded abrasive members.
- the abrasive members can be in a patterned array. The pattern can include a circular array, a rectangular array, or an off-set pattern.
- the array is a random pattern.
- the abrasive article of claim 1 wherein the fluid bearing feature comprises a fluid bearing feature a leading edge of the second surface and a fluid bearing surface at a trailing edge of the second surface of the abrasive members.
- the fluid bearing feature of the abrasive article can include abrasive composites.
- An abrasive article for polishing a surface of a substrate includes an integrated structure and a including a plurality of gimbal assemblies and a plurality of preload structures.
- the a plurality of abrasive members each includes a first surface and a second surface. The first surface is engaged with one of the integrated gimbal assemblies and one of the preload structures. The second surface is for polishing the substrate.
- the gimbal assembly, to which the abrasive member is attached permits the abrasive member to move independently in at least pitch and roll,
- the preload structure biases the second surface of the abrasive member toward the substrate.
- the bearing structure is a hydrostatic bearing structure while in other embodiments, the bearing structure is a hydrodynamic bearing structure.
- the abrasive features include abrasives attached to the fluid bearing features of the abrasive members.
- the plurality of abrasive members can include an interconnected array of molded abrasive members.
- the abrasive members comprise a cylindrically shaped bearing surface.
- the abrasive members can also include a grooved bearing surface. In other words, the bearing surface can have a groove or grooves therein.
- the abrasive features include an abrasive material attached to the second surface of the abrasive members, a slurry of free abrasive particles located at the interface of the second surface and the substrate, or a combination thereof.
- An abrasive article for polishing a substrate includes a plurality of interconnected abrasive members wherein at least some of the plurality of interconnected abrasive members include at least one bearing structure.
- the abrasive members further include a first surface and a second surface.
- An abrasive feature is located on the second surface of the abrasive members. The abrasive feature applies a cutting or a contact force to the substrate during motion of the abrasive article relative to the substrate.
- the bearing structure can be a hydrostatic bearing structure or a hydrodynamic bearing structure.
- Abrasives can be attached to the abrasive feature of the abrasive member.
- the plurality of interconnected abrasive members include an interconnected array of molded abrasive members.
- the abrasive members can be set forth in an array.
- the second surface can also be cylindrically shaped.
- the second surface also can have a groove therein.
- An abrasive feature can also include one or more abrasive materials attached to the second surface of the abrasive members, the abrasive article.
- the abrasive article further includes a slurry of free abrasive particles located at the interface of the second surface and the substrate.
- An apparatus for polishing a surface of a substrate includes a gimbal structure including an array of gimbal assemblies; and preload mechanism that biases the array of gimbal assemblies toward the substrate.
- Some embodiments of the apparatus include a plurality of gas conduits adapted to deliver pressurized gas to one or more pressure ports positioned opposite the substrate.
- Other embodiments of the invention are possible. Although the description above contains much specificity, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the inventions.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Finish Polishing, Edge Sharpening, And Grinding By Specific Grinding Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/221,554 filed Jun. 30, 2009 and entitled “Abrasive Article with Array of Gimballed Abrasive Members and Method of Use”, and of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/248,194 filed Oct. 2, 2009 and entitled “Method and Apparatus for Nano-Scale Cleaning”, both of which are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
- The present application is directed to an abrasive article with an array of independently gimballed abrasive members that are capable of selectively engaging with nanometer-scale and/or micrometer-scale height variations and micrometer-scale and/or millimeter-scale wavelengths of waviness, on the surfaces of substrates. Each abrasive member maintains a fluid bearing with the substrate. The spacing and fly attitude of the abrasive members can be adjusted to follow the topography of the substrate to remove a generally uniform layer of material, to engage with the peaks on the substrate to remove target wavelengths of waviness, and/or to remove debris and contamination from the surface of the substrate. The abrasive members can include abrasive features, or can interact with free abrasive particles at an interface with the substrate, or a combination thereof.
- Semiconductor wafers are typically fabricated using photolithography, which is adversely affected by inconsistencies or unevenness in the wafer surface. This sensitivity is accentuated with the current drive toward smaller, more highly integrated circuit designs. After each layer of the circuit is etched on the wafer, an oxide layer is put down as the base for the next layer. Each layer of the circuit can create roughness and waviness to the wafer that is preferably removed before depositing the next circuit layer. For many semiconductor applications the chemical mechanical processing (“CMP”) is customized for each layer. A change in a single processing parameter, such as for example, pad design, slurry formulation, or pressure applied by the pad, can require the entire CMP process to be redesigned and recertified.
-
FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate the shape of bits formed by etching, such as ion milling or reactive etching. Note that the tops of the bits are rounded, leading to head media spacing loss, roughness at the rounded areas, and magnetic damage due to etching of magnetic materials. Such bits are not viable for magnetic recording. The uneven material increases head media spacing and potential damage to the diamond-like-carbon overcoats. CMP processes have proven inadequate to achieving smooth and flat tops both before and after magnetic material deposition. - CMP is currently the primary approach to planarizing wafers, semiconductors, optical components, magnetic media for hard disk drives, and bit patterned or discrete track media (collectively “substrates”). CMP uses pads to press sub-micron sized particles suspended in the slurry against the surface of the substrate. The nature of the material removal varies with the hardness of the CMP pad. Soft CMP pads conform to the nanotopography and tend to remove material generally uniformly from the entire surface. Hard CMP pads as shown in
FIG. 4 conform less to the nanotopography and therefore remove more material from the peaks or high spots on the surface and less material from low spots. - Traditionally, soft CMP pads have been used to remove a uniform surface layer as shown in
FIG. 3 , such as removing a uniform oxide layer on a semiconductor device. Polishing a substrate with a soft pad also transfers various features from the polishing pad to the substrate. Roughness and waviness is typically caused by uneven pressure applied by the pad during the polishing process. The uneven pressure can be caused by the soft pad topography, the run out of the moving components, or the machined imperfections transferred to the pads. Run-out is the result of larger pressures at the edges of the substrate due to deformation of the soft pad. Soft pad polishing of heterogeneous layered materials, such as semiconductor devices, causes differential removal and damage to the electrical devices. - A CMP pad is generally of a polyurethane or other flexible organic polymer. The particular characteristics of the CMP pad such as hardness, porosity, and rigidity, must be taken into account when developing a particular CMP process for processing of a particular substrate. Unfortunately, wear, hardness, uneven distribution of abrasive particles, and other characteristics of the CMP pad may change over the course of a given CMP process. This is due in part to water absorption as the CMP pad takes up some of the aqueous slurry when encountered at the wafer surface during CMP. This sponge-like behavior of the CMP pad leads to alteration of CMP pad characteristics, notably at the surface of the CMP pad. Debris coming from the substrate and abrasive particles can also accumulate in the pad surface. This accumulation causes a “glazing” or hardening of the top of the pad, thus making the pad less able to hold the abrasive particles of the slurry and decreasing the pad's overall polishing performance. Further, with many pads the pores used to hold the slurry become clogged, and the overall asperity of the pad's polishing surface becomes depressed and matted.
- Shortcomings of current CMP processes affect other aspects of substrate processing as well. The sub-micron particles used in CMP tend to agglomerate and strongly adhere to each other and to the substrate, resulting in nano-scale surface defects. Van der Waals forces create a very strong bond between these surface debris and the substrate. Once surface debris form on a substrate it is very difficult to effectively remove them using conventional cleaning methods. Various methods are known in the art for removing surface debris from substrates after CMP, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,980,536; 5,099,557; 5,024,968; 6,805,137 (Bailey); 5,849,135 (Selwyn); 7,469,443 (Liou); 6,092,253 (Moinpour et al.); 6,334,229 (Moinpour et al.); 6,875,086 (Golzarian et al.); 7,185,384 (Sun et al.); and U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 2004/0040575 (Tregub et al.); and 2005/0287032 (Tregub et al.), but have proven inadequate for the next generation semiconductors and magnetic media.
- Current processing of substrates for semiconductor devices and magnetic media treats uniform surface layer reduction, planarization to remove waviness, and cleaning as three separate disciplines. The incremental improvements in each of these disciplines have not kept pace with the shrinking feature size of features demanded by the electronics industry.
- The present application is directed to an abrasive article with an array of independently gimballed abrasive members that are capable of selectively engaging with nanometer-scale and/or micrometer-scale height variations and micrometer-scale and/or millimeter-scale wavelengths of waviness, on the surfaces of substrates. Each abrasive member maintains a fluid bearing with the substrate. The spacing, which includes clearance, pitch, and roll, of the abrasive members can be adjusted to follow the topography of the substrate to remove a generally uniform layer of material; to engage with the peaks on the substrate to remove target wavelengths of waviness; and/or to remove debris and contamination from the surface of the substrate.
- The gimbals permit each abrasive member to move independently in at least pitch and roll relative to the substrate. The fluid bearing can be hydrodynamic, hydrostatic, or a combination thereof. The fluid can be gas, liquid, or a combination thereof. The present abrasive article can be used before or after features are formed on the substrates.
- A hydrodynamic and/or hydrostatic bearing is used to provide vertical, pitch and roll stiffness to the abrasive member and to control the spacing and pressure distribution across the fluid bearing features on the abrasive members. Adjustments to certain variables, such as for example, the spacing (which includes minimal spacing and fly attitude of the abrasive members), pitch and roll stiffness which control fly attitude, the preload, and/or the abrasive features can be used to modify the cutting force applied to the substrate
- Fluid bearing structures are fairly complex with a substantial number of variables involved in their design. The primary forces involved in a given fluid bearing are the gimbal structure and the preload. The gimbal structure applies both a pitch and roll moments to the individual abrasive members, and hence, the fluid bearing structures. If the gimbal is extremely stiff, the fluid bearing may not be able to form a pitch or roll angle. The preload and preload offset (location where the preload is applied) bias the fluid bearing toward the substrate. The preload is typically applied by a different structure than the gimbal structure.
- Fluid bearing surface geometries play a large role in pressurization of the bearing. Possible geometries include tapers, steps, trenches, crowns, cross curves, twists, wall profile, and cavities. Finally, external factors such as viscosity of the bearing fluid and linear velocity play an extremely important role in pressurizing bearing structures.
- The individual abrasive members are capable of selectively engaging with nanometer-scale and micrometer-scale height variations and/or micrometer-scale or millimeter-scale wavelengths of waviness on the surface of substrates to perform one or more of the following three overlapping and complementary functions: 1) following the topography of the substrate to remove a generally uniform layer of material; 2) engaging with the surface features such as peaks and valleys on the substrate to remove target wavelengths of waviness; and/or 3) removing debris and contamination from the surface of the substrate. Consequently, the present abrasive articles can be engineered to perform a wide variety of functions, including lapping, planarization, polishing, cleaning, and burnishing substrates.
- In connection with performing any of these three functions, the abrasive members may 1) include abrasive features positioned to interact with the substrate, 2) interact with free abrasive particles at the interface with the substrate, or 3) a combination thereof. Free abrasive particles can be used with either topography following or topography removing abrasive members.
- While the abrasive features generally have a hardness greater than the substrate, this property is not required for every embodiment since any two solid materials that repeatedly rub against each other will tend to wear each other away. For example, relatively soft polymeric abrasive features molded on the abrasive members can be used to remove surface contaminants or can interact with free abrasive particles to remove material from the surface of a harder substrate. As used herein, “abrasive feature” refers to a portion of an abrasive member that comes in physical contact with a substrate or a contaminant on a substrate, independent of the relative hardness of the respective materials and the resulting cut rate.
-
FIG. 5 is a schematic illustration of the topography present in any surface including very short wavelength known as roughness, micro-waviness in the range of 1 micron-1 mm, and finally runnout in the range greater than a millimeter. -
FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a topography followingabrasive member 1000 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Theabrasive member 1000 is typically designed to follow the topography by assuring that the trailing edge area has the largest pressure peak. For example, the fluid bearing can be pitched to ensure that the leading edge is spaced substantially higher above the substrate than the trailing edge. The trailing edge in contact with thesubstrate 1006 of theabrasive member 1000 applies a cutting force to nanometer-scale and/or micron-scale height variations 1008 on thesurface 1004, while following the millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths in the waviness on the substrate. Consequently, theabrasive member 1000 removes a generally uniform layer of material 1012 from peaks and valleys on thesurface 1004, such as for example, removing or controlling the thickness of an oxide layer. As used herein, “topography following” refers to an individually gimbaled abrasive member that generally follows millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths of waviness on a substrate, while engaging with nanometer-scale height variations to primarily remove a generally uniform amount of material from the surface. The strategy described inFIG. 6 is analogous to debris removal while maintaining a lower cutting force at the substrate while generating a large force to interact and removeasperities 1005. -
FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of a topography removingabrasive member 1050 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Theleading edge 1056 and/or trailingedge 1058 of theabrasive member 1050 applies a cutting force to peaks 1060 of millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths of thewaviness 1062 on thesurface 1054 of the substrate, while engaging with the valleys. Topography removal fromoriginal surface 1054 leads to anew surface 1012 substantially flatter. As used herein, “topography removing” refers to an individually gimbaled abrasive member that primarily removes nanometer-scale and/or micrometer-scale height variations from peaks and valleys of millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths in the waviness on a substrate. Note that the abrasive removing member dimensions and pressure distribution dictates the peak and valley removal rate. -
FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of a chemicalmechanical polishing member 1100 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The trailingedge 1106 of theabrasive member 1100 follows the millimeter-scale and/or micrometer-scale wavelengths in the waviness 1108 on the substrate, while interacting withfree abrasives 1090. Theabrasive member 1100 preferably is in contact at the trailing edge while theleading edge 1114 is free of contact with the substrate. The proposed chemical polishing strategy can be changed to render both leading and trailing edges in contact with the substrate while applying a force onto thefree abrasives 1090 to promote material removal from thesubstrate 1004 to remove both the peaks and the valleys of the substrate surface. A similar strategy as shown inFIG. 7 can also be adapted to remove the substrate topography of the substrate by designing the abrasive element to remove peaks of the substrate. - Various abrasive features are available for the present abrasive members, such as for example, a surface roughness formed on the leading and/or trailing edges of the abrasive members. That surface roughness may include a hard coat, such as for example, diamond-like-carbon. In another embodiment, the abrasive features may be discrete abrasive particles, such as for example, fixed diamonds. In yet another embodiment, the abrasive features may be structured abrasives, discussed further below.
- For example, to remove all the wavelengths smaller than a desired value, the dimensions of the abrasive members can be greater than the target wavelengths. The wavelengths are determined by the gas pressure profile generated by the abrasive member and the size of the abrasive member. As a rule of thumb, the smallest circumferential wavelength is about one-fourth the length of the abrasive members.
- The dimensions of the abrasive members and the pressure profile due to the hydrostatic and/or hydrodynamic lift (gas and/or liquid) determine the ability of the abrasive member to follow the waviness of the substrate. Assuming that the abrasive members can follow ¼ of its size, then all wavelengths smaller than the ¼ will cause interference with the abrasive members and material removal will ensue due to the interactions. Portions of the abrasive members generate a hydrodynamic lift causing predictable waviness following capability and stabilizing force countering the cutting forces.
-
FIG. 1 is the configuration of a single bit on a bit patterned media for a hard disk drive. -
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an array of bits on a bit patterned media. -
FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of a soft pad in contact with a wavy substrate -
FIG. 4 is a schematic representation of a hard pad in contact with a wavy substrate -
FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of the components describing a surface topography -
FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of a debris removing abrasive member in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of a topography removing abrasive member in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 8 is a schematic illustration of a CMP abrasive member in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 9 is an exploded view of an abrasive article with gimbaled abrasive members in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 10 is a perspective view of a preload mechanism for the abrasive article ofFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a gimbal structure for the abrasive article ofFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 12 is a perspective view of the abrasive members for the abrasive article ofFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 13A is another perspective view of the abrasive members for the abrasive article ofFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 13B is a detailed perspective view of the fluid bearing surface on the abrasive members ofFIG. 9 . -
FIG. 14A-14C is a detailed perspective view of the fluid bearing surface on the abrasive members ofFIG. 9 with various abrasive surface additives. -
FIG. 15 is a perspective view of a unitary abrasive article in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 16 is a perspective view of the gimbal assemblies of the abrasive article ofFIG. 15 . -
FIG. 17 is a perspective view of the fluid bearing surfaces of the abrasive article ofFIG. 15 . -
FIG. 18 is an exploded view of an abrasive article with an integral hydrostatic bearing structure in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 19 is a bottom view of the abrasive article ofFIG. 18 with the membrane removed. -
FIG. 20 is a detailed top view of the abrasive article ofFIG. 18 with the membrane removed. -
FIG. 21 is an exploded view of the hydrostatic abrasive member. -
FIGS. 22 and 23 are perspective views of the hydrostatic abrasive member assembly ofFIG. 21 . -
FIG. 24 is a bottom perspective view of the hydrostatic abrasive member assembly ofFIG. 21 . -
FIG. 25 is a perspective view of an annular fluid bearing surface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 26B is a pressure profile graph of the fluid bearing ofFIG. 26A . -
FIG. 27 is a perspective view of a hydrodynamic abrasive member in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 28 is a pressure profile generated at one of the pads for the abrasive member ofFIG. 27 . -
FIG. 29 is an exploded view of a hydrodynamic abrasive member assembly in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 30 is a perspective view of the hydrodynamic abrasive member assembly ofFIG. 29 . -
FIGS. 31A-31C are various views of a cylindrical array of abrasive members in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 32 is an exploded view of the cylindrical array of abrasive members ofFIGS. 31A-31C . -
FIG. 33 is a plurality of the cylindrical array abrasive member assemblies ofFIGS. 31A-31C in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 34 is a schematic illustration of an abrasive member for topography following applications in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 35 is a schematic illustration of an abrasive member for topography following applications in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 36 is a schematic illustration of an abrasive member for topography removing applications in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 37 illustrate a hydrodynamic abrasive member for use in CMP in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 38 illustrates a hydrostatic abrasive member for use in CMP in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 39 illustrates an alternate abrasive article with curved hydrodynamic fluid bearing surfaces in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 40 illustrates a hydrostatic version of the abrasive article ofFIG. 39 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 41 illustrates an alternate abrasive article with integrated fluid delivery through a gimbal in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 42 illustrates an alternate abrasive article ofFIG. 41 with consumable design in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 43 illustrates an alternate arrangement of abrasive article ofFIG. 41 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 9 is an exploded view of anabrasive article 50 with an array of gimballedabrasive members 52 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Theabrasive article 50 includesgimbal structure 54,preload mechanism 56, and theabrasive members 52. Theabrasive article 50 can be manufactured in circular and non-circular shapes. Theabrasive members 52 can be arranged in a regular pattern a random configuration, an off-set pattern or a variety of other configurations. -
FIG. 10 provides a detailed view of thepreload mechanism 56 ofFIG. 9 . Thepreload mechanism 56 includes a series ofouter rings 58 each with a plurality of preload beams 60 configured to apply a preload on each of theabrasive members 52. The preload applied by the beams 60 is preferably concentrated toward the center of theabrasive members 52 so as to not interfere with pitch and roll motions during polishing. Adimple 61 at the end of the load beam 60 pushes against the abrasive member to transfer preload. -
FIGS. 11 and 12 illustrate thegimbal structure 54 ofFIG. 9 .Framework 62 supports an array ofgimbal assemblies 64. In the illustrated embodiment, eachgimbal assembly 64 includes one ormore arms 66, across member 68 with attachment features 72. Thegimbal assemblies 64 allow each of theabrasive members 52 to independently follow millimeter-scale and micrometer-scale waviness of the substrate during polishing. - The
gimbal assemblies 54 control the static attitude or pitch of eachabrasive member 52. Thearms 66 andcross members 68 permit theabrasive members 52 to move through at least pitch and roll, while assuring adequate torque is applied to theabrasive members 52. Themembers abrasive members 52. Various alternate gimbal assemblies are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,774,305; 5,856,896; 6,069,771; 6,459,260; 6,493,192; 6,714,386; 6,744,602; 6,952,330; 7,057,856; and 7,203,033. -
FIG. 12 illustrates the array ofabrasive members 52 prior to assembly onto thegimbal assemblies 64. Theabrasive members 52 can be made from a variety of materials, such as for example, metal, ceramic, polymers, or composites thereof. Theabrasive members 52 are preferably arranged in a random or off-set pattern to impart a uniform polishing pattern onto the substrate. - As illustrated in
FIG. 12 , shear forces between therotating substrate 107 and theabrasive article 52 entrain an air cushion that applies fluid dynamic lift on fluid bearing surfaces 94 and 98 on theabrasive member 52. The dynamic lift causes theabrasive members 52 to assume a fly attitude during the relative rotation of asubstrate 107. The fluid bearing developed allows theabrasive members 52 to follow the micrometer-scale and/or millimeter-scale wavelengths of waviness (“waviness”) on thesubstrate 107, while removing nanometer-scale and/or micrometer-scale height variations. Typically, the leadingedges 94 of theabrasive members 52 generate a lift countering the cutting forces. - Since each of the
abrasive members 52 can independently adjust to the waviness of thesubstrate 107 and maintain a constant cutting force/pressure, the amount of material removed across thesubstrate 107 is substantially uniform. The present embodiment is particularly well suited to remove a uniform amount of an oxide layer on a semiconductor. The ability of theabrasive members 52 to follow the waviness enables uniform material removal at a level not attainable by conventional CMP processes. -
FIGS. 13A and 13B illustrate one possible geometry of thefluid bearing surface 90 of theabrasive members 52. The fluid bearing surfaces 90 include various fluid bearing features 92 that promote the creation of a fluid bearing with thesubstrate 107. In the illustrated embodiment, leadingedge 92 of thefluid bearing surface 90 includes a pair of pressure pads separated. The trailingedge 98 includes is formed from pressure pad. A discussion of the lift created by rotating rigid disks is provided in U.S. Pat. No. 7,218,478. - In one embodiment, the
pads edges 94 are optionally tapered or stepped to help initiate aerodynamic lift. For air bearing type bearings a negative suction force areas can be generated in thefluid bearing surface 90 to stabilize theabrasive members 52 during flying. Thefluid bearing surface 90 can also include trenches to enable higher pressurization during the flying. -
FIG. 13B illustrates the addition of a hard coating on the polishing surfaces 96A and 96B. In one embodiment the DLC is applied by chemical vapor deposition. As used herein, the term “chemically vapor deposited” and “CVD” refer to materials deposited by vacuum deposition processes, including, but not limited to, thermally activated deposition from reactive gaseous precursor materials, as well as plasma, microwave, DC, or RF plasma arc-jet deposition from gaseous precursor materials. Various methods of applying a hard coat to a substrate are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,821,189 (Coad et al.); 6,872,127 (Lin et al.); 7,367,875 (Slutz et al.); and 7,189,333 (Henderson), which are hereby incorporated by reference. -
FIGS. 14A-C are a schematic representation of theabrasive members 52 with the addition of various abrasive elements to the surface in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Nano diamonds are added to the bearing surfaces 96A, 96B and 96C. - In another embodiment, nano-diamonds (i.e., with a major diameter less than 1 micrometer) are attached to the
pads pads -
FIG. 14B illustrates abrasive particles 340, such as nano-scale diamonds, attached to apolyamide backing layer 342 located on thepads 96 that act as the abrasive features in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In another embodiment, a slurry of nano-scale diamonds and adhesive are spin coated, sprayed coated, or otherwise deposited directly onto thepads 96. -
FIG. 14C illustrates perspective and side views of an engineered surface imparted to thepads 96A-C in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The engineered surface is preferably nanometer-scale or micrometer-scale. A hard coat, such as DLC, is preferably applied to the engineered surface. - The engineered surface allows for precise stress management between the polished substrate and the nano-features. Such precise stress management yields a predictable surface finish and the gap allows for residual material to be removed. Various
engineered surfaces 130 are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,194,317 (Kaisaki et al); 6,612,917 (Bruxvoort); 7,160,178 (Gagliardi et al.); 7,404,756 (Ouderkirk et al.); and U.S. Publication No. 2008/0053000 (Palmgren et al.), which are hereby incorporated by reference. - In another embodiment, a slurry of abrasive particles is located at the interface between the abrasive element and the, such as for example, in a standard chemical-mechanical polishing process. Various methods of chemical-mechanical processing are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,811,467 (Beresford et al.) and U.S. Pat. Publication Nos. 2004/0072510 (Kinoshita et al.) and 2008/0004743 (Goers et al.), which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- In some embodiments, the
abrasive members 52 are manufactured with one or more sensors to monitor the polishing process, such as for example, acoustic emission or friction sensor. The present interference lapping preferably results in a surface finish or roughness (Ra) of less than about 20 Angstrom, and more preferably less than about 0.2 Angstrom. -
FIGS. 15-16 illustrate a fully integrated gimbaledabrasive article 150 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.Preload structure 152 includescircumferential ribs 154 andradial ribs 156 to impart a desired preload ontoabrasive members 158.Gimbal assemblies 160 include a collection offlexible ribs preload structure 152 to theabrasive members 158. Theabrasive article 150 is preferably fabricated as a single unit, such as by injection molding. The fabrication process can include multiple mold injection steps to meet the system requirements. - Instead of applying the preload directly to the
abrasive members 158, the preload is applied by thepreload structure 152 through thegimbal assemblies 160. This configuration is ideal for low preload applications. Care must be taken not to cause excessive deformation of thegimbal assemblies 160 during preload applications.FIG. 16 illustrates fluid bearing features fabricated on theabrasive members 158, such as discussed above. The fluid bearing surfaces can include any of the abrasive features discussed herein. -
FIG. 17 presents a view of an alternateabrasive article 358 in which the fluid bearing features 352A, 352B, 352C (“352”) include a plurality ofgrooves 354 oriented generally parallel to the direction of travel of theabrasive members 358 relative to the substrate. Thegrooves 354 release fluid located at the interface between the fluid bearing features 352, reducing the lift on theabrasive members 358. - The
grooves 354 reduce the fly height of theabrasive members 358. In applications where the fluid is a liquid, thegrooves 354 permit a low fly height and/or a low preload. The groovedabrasive members 358 are particularly well suited to fully flooded applications. - The depth of the
grooves 354 must be sufficient to reduce hydrodynamic pressure between theabrasive members 358 and the substrate. In most cases, thegrooves 354 have a depth of greater than about 5 micrometers. - By reducing the hydrodynamic film, it is possible to use lubricants with a higher viscosity and/or maintain a low preload on each
abrasive member 358, while still achieving interference with the substrate. In some applications, thegrooves 354 allow a reduction in the hydrodynamic film while allowing the use of nano-scale diamonds attached to the fluid bearing features 352. - In one embodiment, nano-scale diamonds attached to a polymeric film, such as illustrated in
FIG. 14B , are attached to the fluid bearing features 352. Thegrooves 354 permit the load on theabrasive members 358 to be sufficiently low. In another embodiment, the fluid bearing features 352 are grooved abrasive composites. Thegrooves 354 also permit the fly height to be engineered for particular applications. Assuming all other processing variables are held constant, increasing the size or number ofgrooves 354 reduces fly height, and hence, increases interference between the substrate. The spacing height of theabrasive members 358 above the substrate can also be engineered, such as by changing the size and shape of the fluid bearing features 352. -
FIGS. 18-20 illustrate an alternateabrasive article 200 with an array ofabrasive members 212 having an integratedhydrostatic bearing structure 202 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.Membrane 216 sealsgas conduits 204 in thebearing structure 202. -
FIGS. 19 and 20 illustrate the integratedhydrostatic bearing structure 202 without sealingmembrane 216 shown.Gas conduits 204 are fabricated in gimbal assembly 206 and alongpreload ribs 208.Holes 210 extending through theabrasive members 212 to fluid bearing surfaces 214 (seeFIG. 19 ). Thegas conduits 204 are externally pressurized to provide a hydrostatic bearing on eachabrasive member 212. The fluid bearing surfaces 214 can include any of the abrasive features discussed herein. - As best illustrated in
FIG. 19 ,fluid bearing surfaces 214 of theabrasive members 212 are fabricated withbutton pressure ports 218 to form a hydrostatic bearing on eachabrasive member 212. The hydrostatic bearing generated at eachfluid bearing surface 214 is designed to counter the cutting forces during the polishing process. For illustrative purposes, a button bearing design is shown. Additional configurations can easily be adapted such as multiple ports onto eachabrasive member 212 to enable the abrasive member to form a pitch and roll moment. - In one preferred embodiment, a
pressure port 218 is located near the leading edges 220 to increase the pitch of theabrasive members 212 for topography following applications. In another embodiment,pressure ports 218 are located at both the leading edges 220 and trailingedges 222 of theabrasive members 212 to configure the pitch for topography removing applications. - The
abrasive article 200 is particularly useful when the relative speed between the substrate and theabrasive members 212 is not high enough to form a fluid bearing or hydrodynamic film. The external pressure applied to theabrasive members 212 forms a hydrostatic film capable of following the substrate waviness and countering the cutting forces emanating from the interference between the peaks of theabrasive member 200 and the substrate. - The hydrostatic fluid bearing may be used in combination with a hydrodynamic fluid bearing. In one embodiment, the hydrostatic fluid bearing is used during start-up rotation and/or ramp-down of the
abrasive article 200 relative to a substrate. - A preferred method for making the abrasive composites 312 having precisely shaped abrasive composites 312 is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 (Pieper et al) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816 (Spurgeon et al.), both incorporated herein by reference. Other descriptions of suitable methods are reported in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,437,754; 5,454,844 (Hibbard et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,7543 (Calhoun); and U.S. Pat. No. 5,304,223 (Pieper et al.), all incorporated herein by reference.
- Production tools for making the abrasive members may be in the form of a belt, a sheet, a continuous sheet or web, a coating roll such as a rotogravure roll, a sleeve mounted on a coating roll, or die. The production tool may be made of metal, (e.g., nickel), metal alloys, or plastic. The production tool is fabricated by conventional techniques, including photolithography, knurling, engraving, hobbing, electroforming, or diamond turning. For example, a copper tool may be diamond turned and then a nickel metal tool may be electroplated off of the copper tool. Preparations of production tools are reported in U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,917 (Pieper et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,235 (Gagliardi et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,454,844 (Hibbard et al.); U.S. Pat. No. 5,435,816 (Spurgeon et al.); PCT WO 95/07797 (Hoopman et al.); and PCT WO 95/22436 (Hoopman et al.), all incorporated herein by reference. In an alternate embodiment, the abrasive members are used in combination with the gimbal mechanism such as disclosed in
FIG. 9 . -
FIG. 21-24 give a perspective view of hydrostaticabrasive article 550 with an array of hydrostaticabrasive members 552 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.External pressure source 554 is applied to each of theabrasive members 552 to controlclearance 556 with thesubstrate 558. Preload 612 biases theabrasive members 552 toward thesubstrate 558. Polishing is accomplished by relative motion between the hydrostaticabrasive article 550 and thesubstrate 558, such as linear, rotational, orbital, ultrasonic, and the like. -
FIG. 21 is an exploded view of the hydrostaticabrasive article 550 ofFIG. 31 .External pressure source 554 delivers pressurized gas (e.g., air) toplenum 600 inpreload structure 602. Cover 604 is provided to enclose theplenum 600. A plurality ofpressure ports 606 in theplenum 600 are fluidly coupled to the pressure ports on thegimbal mechanism 590 by bellows couplings 608. -
Springs 610 transfer thepreload 612 from thepreload structure 602 to each of thegimbal mechanisms 590. The externally appliedload 612, the geometry of the hydrostatic bearing 564, 572, and the external pressure control the desiredspacing 556 between theabrasive members 552 and thesubstrate 558. -
Holder structure 620 is attached to thepreload structure 602 by stand-offs 622. Theholder structure 620 sets thepreload 624 applied on eachabrasive member 552 and limits the deformation of thegimbal mechanisms 590 in order to avoid damage while theindividual preload 624 is applied. An adhesive layer (not shown) attaches theabrasive members 552 to the gimbal box-like structure 594. Theexternal preload 612 applied to the array ofabrasive members 552 is greater than or equal to thepreloads 624 generated by the independently suspendedabrasive members 552 in order to allow thegimbal mechanisms 590 to comply with thesubstrate 558 and not interfere with theholder structure 620. -
FIGS. 22 and 23 illustratedimple structure 630 interposed between thesprings 610 and thegimbal mechanism 590. Thedimple structure 630 delivers the preload as a point source. Offset from thesprings 610 and thedimple 630 is aflexible bellow 608 that delivers the external pressure to each individualabrasive member 552 via thegimbal mechanisms 590. Thegimbal mechanisms 590,preload structure 602, andholder structure 620 can also be used in a hydrodynamic application without the pressure ports 566 and bellows couplings 608. -
FIG. 23 is a bottom view of the hydrostaticabrasive article 550 with the individualabrasive members 552 organized in a serial fashion. Note that other configurations can easily be accommodated, such as for example an off-set or random pattern. - Controlling the magnitude of the pressure applied to the abrasive members changes the clearance between the substrate and the abrasive members. The frequency response of the system is independent of the compliance of the material selected for the abrasive member but can be engineered by the selection of the gimballing mechanism, including the hydrostatic bearing design. The pressure generated by the hydrostatic bearing contributes to forming pitch, z-height, and roll forces that counter the cutting forces emanating from surface defects interaction and potential contact with the substrate.
- The hybrid
abrasive member 552 can operate with a hydrostatic fluid bearing and/or a hydrodynamic fluid bearing. The hydrostatic pressure ports 566 apply lift to theabrasive member 552 prior to movement of thesubstrate 558. The lift permitsclearance 556 to be set before thesubstrate 558 starts to move. Consequently, preload 612 does not damage thesubstrate 558 during start-up. Once thesubstrate 558 reaches its safe speed and the hydrodynamic fluid bearing is fully formed, the hydrostatic fluid bearing can be reduced or terminated. The procedure can also be reversed at the end of the polishing process. -
FIG. 24 illustrates a gimbal assembly 588 that contains an array ofgimbal mechanisms 590 ofFIG. 21 . Eachgimbal mechanism 590 includes four L-shapedsprings abrasive members 552 above thesubstrate 558 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Box-like structure 594 is optionally fabricated on eachgimbal structure 590 to help align theabrasive members 552. The box-like structure 594 also includes aport 596 that delivers the pressurized gas to the backs of theabrasive members 552 and out the pressure ports 566. -
FIG. 25 illustrates an embodiment of an individualabrasive member 552 with both hydrostatic and hydrodynamic fluid bearing capabilities designed intobottom surface 560 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thebottom surface 560 of theabrasive member 552 includes both air bearing features 564 and pressure ports 566. - Leading
edge 562 of theabrasive member 552 includes a pair offluid bearing pads 564A, 564B (collectively “564”) each with at least one associatedpressure port edge 570 also includes a pair of fluid bearing pads 572A, 572B (collectively “572”) and associatedpressure ports 566C, 566D. - The
fluid bearing pads 564A, 564B are fabricated on the trailingedge 570. Theleading edge 562 typically flies higher than the trailingedge 570, which sets the pitch of theabrasive member 552 relative to thesubstrate 558. The trailingedge substrate 558. Both leading edge and trailingedge structures pressure ports leading edge 562 to increase or decrease the pitch of theabrasive member 552. -
FIG. 26A illustrates a circular hydrostaticabrasive member 640 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The cylindrical shapedrecess 642 andpressure port 644 create a generally constant pressure at center, with a logarithmical decaying pressure radially outward. -
FIG. 26B is a graphical illustration of the pressure profile for the circular abrasive member ofFIG. 38 . The circular abrasive member has a generally constant pressure profile 646 incenter region 642 adjacent to thepressure port 644. The pressure at the outer edges 648 of the abrasive member matches ambient pressure. This pressure profile operates similar to a nonlinear spring. One embodiment envisions a cylindrical shaped recess, such as 642, at each corner of theabrasive member 560 ofFIG. 25 . -
FIG. 27 illustrates a hydrodynamicabrasive member 650 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Theabrasive member 650 is generally the same as discussed above, except that no pressure ports are required. Fluid bearing surfaces 652A, 652B, 652C, 652D, 652E (collectively “652”) located along theleading edge 654 and trailing edge 656 create hydrodynamic lift between theabrasive member 650 and the substrate. The air for the fluid bearing enters along theleading edge 654 and exits along the trailing edge 656. The fluid bearing surfaces 652 also enhance the stability at the interface and a cutting surface to remove surface defects from the substrate. - The conditions promoting hydrodynamic lift are bearing design, gas/liquid shearing, and linear velocity of the
abrasive member 650 relative to the substrate. Such conditions can promote the formation of a fluid film (oil, water, gas) between the abrasive member and the substrate. The relative velocity is obtained by rotating the substrate and/or theabrasive members 650. -
FIG. 28 illustrates a pressure curve generate by theabrasive member 650 ofFIG. 27 at each pressure pad. Note that the pressure vanishes to atmospheric pressure at the edges of the fluid bearing surfaces and builds-up to a maximum 672 at the trailing edge fluid bearing surfaces 652C, 652D, 652E. Each of the fluid bearing surfaces pressurizes under the shear force of the lubricating fluid (air or liquid) to generate a pressure force contributing to lift and countering the cutting forces emanating from the polishing or polishing operation. The pressure formed under the fluid bearing surfaces maintains a certain clearance between thesubstrate 658 and theabrasive members 650. -
FIG. 29-30 offer a hydrodynamicabrasive article 670 of the present embodiment. An array ofabrasive members 650 is attached to preloadstructure 660 by an array ofgimbal mechanisms 662.Preload 664 is transmitted to thegimbal mechanisms 662 bydimpled springs 666, generally as discussed above. The suspendedabrasive members 650 have a static pitch and roll stiffness through the hydrodynamic fluid bearing and a z-stiffness through thegimbal mechanisms 662. The fluid bearing surfaces 652 can include any of the abrasive features discussed herein. - The hydrodynamic fluid film formed at each
abrasive member 650 controls the dynamic response of the structure. The frequency response of such system can be designed to be in the 5-100 kHz range, which is sufficient to comply with thesubstrate surface 668 and to interact with surface debris. The spacing between the polishing surfaces 652C, 652D, 652E can be controlled to cause interaction with surface defects with little to no material removal from thesubstrate 658. In order for the fluid bearing surfaces 652 to develop a stable interface, the hydrodynamic forces must be greater than external disturbances caused by the interference or contact between the polishing surfaces 652C, 652D, 652E and the surface defects. -
FIGS. 31A-31C illustrate anabrasive member assembly 750 with an array ofabrasive members 768 arranged in a cylindrical array in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.FIG. 32 is an exploded view of theabrasive member assembly 750 ofFIG. 31A-31C . - The
abrasive member 750 preferably forms a contact interface with the substrate, although this embodiment may be used with a hydrodynamic or hydrostatic bearing.Cylinder preload fixture 752 includes a plurality ofdimpled spring members 754 that apply an outwardradial preload 756 on eachgimbal mechanism 758. Thepreload 756 is transferred bydimple member 760 acting on rear surface 762 of thegimbal mechanisms 758. Thegimbal mechanisms 758 are interconnected into a gimbal assembly 764 bysupport structure 766. The individualabrasive members 768 are attached to thegimbal mechanisms 758. -
FIGS. 32-33 illustrate a plurality of theabrasive member assemblies 750 ofFIG. 45 arranged in astack configuration 782. The cylindrical structure can be used to clean planar or non-planar substrates. In one embodiment, axis ofrotation 780 is oriented parallel to thesurface 784 of thesubstrate 786. Thestacked configuration 782 is optionally rotated while engaged with thesubstrate 786. Thesubstrate 786 can be stationary or moving. - A hydrostatic bearing can optionally be generated at the interface of the
abrasive members 768 and the substrate via external pressurization means, as discussed above. The hydrostatic approach permits theabrasive members 768 to hover over the substrate surface at any desired clearance while still being able to interact and remove surface defects. A stable contacting interface can also be used with theabrasive members 768. Theabrasive members 768 can either be a porous sponge-like material or a hard coated slider. Thegimbal mechanisms 758 and preloadmechanisms 754 permit theabrasive members 768 to follow the run-out and waviness of the substrate while theabrasive members 768 intimately contact and clean the substrate. - Controlling the magnitude of the pressure applied to the abrasive members changes the clearance between the substrate and the abrasive members. The frequency response of the system is independent of the compliance of the material selected for the abrasive members but can be engineered by the selection of the gimballing mechanism, including the hydrostatic bearing design. The pressure generated by the hydrostatic bearing contributes to forming pitch, z-height and roll forces that counter the cutting forces emanating from surface defects interaction and potential contact with the substrate.
-
FIG. 34 illustrates anabrasive member 800 modeled for topography following applications. Theleading edge 802 includes a plurality ofdiscrete features 804 separated bycavities 806 that permit air flow and particles to enter. Thecavity depth 812 is about 2 micrometers to about 3 micrometers to promote a negative suction force in the presence of air as a lubricant. - The front of the
leading edge pads 804 are rounded to promote the redistribution of debris and lubricant. This example of a low contact forceabrasive member 800 includesleading edge step 818 that increases lift at theleading edge 802. The modeled air bearing structure forms a positive lift from the pressurization of the bearing surface pads and a negative suction force located in the cavity of the air bearing. The design presented tradeoff the air bearing pitch angle with the cutting force increase due to a preload increase as demonstrated in Table 1. - Table 1 shows that the
leading edge 802 clears the substrate, while the trailingedge 810 is in contact. This approach permits the trailingedge 810 to follow the substrate waviness. The leading and trailing edge pressurization contribute to the stability of the design during asperity interactions and debris removal. This design is ideal for cleaning debris and removing nano level amounts of material in the presence of a thin film lubricant. -
TABLE 1 Negative Positive Pitch (micro- Preload pressure pressure Contact force radians)/Fly (grams) grams) (grams) (grams) height (nm) 3 −0.89 3.88 0 318/24 5 −1.03 6.02 0.01 233/10 8 −1.18 8.93 0.24 163/4.2 10 −1.27 10.72 0.54 130/2.5 12 −1.31 12.47 0.83 113/1.7 -
FIG. 35 illustrates anabrasive member 820 modeled for topography following applications. Theleading edge 822 includes a plurality ofdiscrete features 824 separated byslots 826 that permit air flow and particles to enter. This example of a low contact forceabrasive member 820 includesleading edge step 828 andextended sides 830 to increase the negative pressure force (suction force). Theleading edge step 828 has a depth of about 0.1 micrometers to about 0.5 micrometers to promote the formation of higher pressure at theleading edge 822. Note that the trailingedge 832 is formed ofdiscrete pads 834 to reduce the spacing between the substrate and the abrasive member, and to allow for circulation of lubricant and debris. - Table 2 provides a summary of various performance parameters for the abrasive member as a function of preload.
-
TABLE 2 Negative Positive Pitch (micro- Preload pressure pressure Contact force radians)/Fly (grams) (grams) (grams) (grams) height (nm) 3 −2.9 5.7 0.26 200/3.3 5 −3.18 7.5 0.6314 159/1.4 8 −3.4 10.2 1.14 118/0.5 11 −3.5 13.0 1.6 91/0.18 12 CRASH -
FIG. 36 illustrates anabrasive member 840 modeled for topography removing applications. Theleading edge 842 includes a plurality ofdiscrete features 844 separated byslots 846 that permit air flow and particles to enter. The trailingedge 848 similarly includes a plurality ofdiscrete features 850 separated byslots 852. Thefeatures cavity 830 and are formed with rounded leading edge surfaces to distribute both lubricant and wear debris. - The cavity depth is sufficient to create a positive pressure profile at the top of the
pads abrasive member 840 and the minimum spacing above the substrate. - In the case of topography removing, the
abrasive member 840 does not follow certain target wavelengths of waviness. The pitch angle of theabrasive member 840 is therefore substantially reduced to cause both theleading edges 842 and the trailingedges 848 to not follow the target wavelengths of waviness and to cause wear of the interacting surfaces. - A simple exercise demonstrates the capability of this design given in Table 3. By varying the externally applied preloads from about 0.1 grams to about 10 grams, a reduction in the pitch angle and spacing is attained, causing a higher level of wear and interactions between both the leading and trailing
edges - Note that at 5 grams of preload a negative suction force and a total positive pressure is generated to counter the contact force of 2.56 grams and the 5 grams of preload. An increase in preload as shown causes a substantially linear increase in contact force responsible for the removal of material at the substrate.
- Table 3 provides a summary of various performance parameters for the abrasive member as a function of preload.
-
TABLE 3 Negative Positive Pitch (micro- Preload Pressure Pressure Contact force radians)/fly (grams) (grams) (grams) (grams) height (nm) .1 −2.33 2.43 0 31/21 1 −2.39 3.31 0.075 12/14 5 −2.4 4.91 2.56 4/4.8 7 −2.48 5.35 4.13 2.6/3.2 10 −2.50 5.97 6.53 8/1.5 -
FIG. 37 illustrates anabrasive member 870 for use with free abrasive particles, such as in CMP. Leadingedge pressurization 882 causes theabrasive member 870 to pitch upward so leading edge 872 does not contact the substrate. The pitch also contributes to the ability of theabrasive member 870 to follow the topography of the substrate. - Spacer rails 876 at trailing
edge 874 help set a known spacing between the free abrasives (not shown) and the polishing recessedsurface 880. The distance between thesurface 880 and the spacer rails 876 must be smaller than the average size of the free abrasives to ensure intimate contact of the polishing recessedsurface 880 with the free abrasives. Therails 876 control the spacing between theabrasive member 870 and the substrate and provide a predictable interference between the trapped free abrasive particles and the substrate. - A series of shaped recessed polishing surfaces 880 are fabricated at the trailing
edge 874 between therails 876 to interact with the free abrasive particles present in the chemical mechanical polishing slurry. The recesses have adepth 882 of about 10 nanometers to about 200 nanometers relative torails 876, which is smaller than the diameter of the free abrasive particles. The leadingedges 884 of the recessedpads 880 are shaped to allow progressive entrance of the free abrasive particles to the interface of theabrasive member 870 with the substrate. - The design presents a
leading edge 884 pressurized zone and a trailingedge 874 pressurized zone. The trailingedge 874 is able to both follow the topography while the recessed polishing surfaces 880 cause the free abrasive particles to be in intimate contact with the substrate. The resulting contact pressure is substantially uniform and independent of the substrate topography. -
FIG. 38 illustratesabrasive member 900 for use with free abrasive particles, similar to CMP. In the case of conditions where a hydrodynamic film is difficult to establish, such as for example in the case of slow spinning plates and the presence of large amount of debris interfering with the formation of a hydrodynamic film, it is desirable to switch to a hydrostatic bearing concept. - One or
more button bearings leading edge 906, such as illustrated inFIGS. 26A and 26B .Pad 908 is formed at the trailingedge 910. Thepad 908 includesramp 912 that promotes movement of the free abrasive particles into the interface with the substrate. The trailingedge 910 is in contact with the slurry, causing the free abrasive particles to contact the surface and remove material. The hydrostatic bearing establishes a stable bearing and assures topography following. The hydrostatic bearing provides a substantially constant polishing pressure across the substrate. -
FIG. 39 illustrates anabrasive article 1150 with an array ofabrasive member 1152 with integrated preload applied through theplatform 1174 andgimbal structure 1156 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The illustratedabrasive members 1152 includes sphericalfluid bearing structures 1180 each shown with a spherical or cylindrical curvature. The illustrated curvature is substantially exaggerated to illustrate the concept. - Each
abrasive member 1152 includes a plurality ofextensions 1156 that contribute to forming an individual gimballing assembly. Theextensions 1156 are mounted to tabs 1172 onpreload pad 1174, such as for example, by an adhesive, solvent bonding, ultrasonic welding, and the like. Theextensions 1156 can flex and twist on either side of the tabs 1172 so theabrasive members 1152 can be independently displace vertically, and in pitch and roll. For ease of manufacturing theabrasive members 1152 andextension 1156 are molded as a unitary structure. - Preload members are positioned between the preload pad (underneath the spherical abrasive member) and
rear surfaces 1158 of theabrasive members 1152. The preload members are preferably resilient to permit deflection of theabrasive members 1152 in the vertical direction. The preload members are preferably attached to either thepreload pad 1174 or theabrasive members 1152. - The
abrasive members 1152 optionally include one or more cavities orsteps 1180 near leading edge to promote formation of a fluid bearing. By changing the curvature of the fluid bearing surface, the shape or location of the cavities, or a variety of other variables, the abrasive members can be either topography following or topography removing. The spherical configuration permits a progressive interactions with free abrasives. The spherical shape also allows for a elliptical contact with desirable topography following properties. -
FIG. 40 illustrates anabrasive article 1200 with an array ofabrasive member 1202 substantially withhydrostatic ports 1204 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Thehydrostatic ports 1204 are preferably button bearings located at leadingedges 1206 of theabrasive members 1202. - Rear surfaces 1208 of each
abrasive member 1202 includes channels that fluidly communicate with opening insealing layer 1214. The openings fluidly communicate withholes 1216 inpreload members 1226. Rear surface ofpreload pad 1218 includes a series of channels andbacking layer 1224. As a result, a pressurized gas delivered to the channels flows through the backing layer, to the preload pad channels, in the abrasive members ports and out thepressure ports 1204. -
FIG. 41 gives an exploded view of a configuration with a distant preload cartridge comprising adimple holder 1565, aspring preload 1563 and aspring housing 1561 attached to apreload cartridge holder 1520. The preload cartridge holder contains a series ofhydrostatic ports 1521. The spring housing connects the hydrostatic pressure from the preload cartridge holder to the gimball assembly. A four-layer gimball assembly abrasive member cover 1582 through a series of springs. The abrasive member assembly is formed with atop membrane 1582 attached to an airflow channel member 1583. Theabrasive member 1590 contains the hydrostatic bearing arrangement. The pressurized air is supplied by opening mating the airflow channel member 1583 and theabrasive member 1590. -
FIG. 42 shows anabrasive member 1590 with a series of hydrostatic ports organized in a concentric manner. Achannel 1610 at atmospheric pressure boundary condition connectshydrostatic button bearings 1600. -
FIG. 43 shows a ganged arrangement ofabrasive members 1590. Each abrasive member is independently gimbaled and preloaded to perform desired polishing operations. - Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that each intervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lower limit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in that stated range is encompassed within the inventions. The upper and lower limits of these smaller ranges which may independently be included in the smaller ranges is also encompassed within the inventions, subject to any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the stated range includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either both of those included limits are also included in the inventions.
- Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which these inventions belong. Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also be used in the practice or testing of the present inventions, the preferred methods and materials are now described. All patents and publications mentioned herein, including those cited in the Background of the application, are hereby incorporated by reference to disclose and describe the methods and/or materials in connection with which the publications are cited.
- An abrasive article for polishing a surface of a substrate, the abrasive article includes a gimbal structure, a plurality of abrasive members, a preload mechanism and a fluid beaming feature on the abrasive article. The gimbal structure includes a plurality of gimbal assemblies. The abrasive members comprise a first surface engaged with one of the gimbal assemblies, and a second surface. The gimbal assemblies permit each abrasive member to move independently along a pitch axis and a roll axis. The preload mechanism biases the second surface of the abrasive members toward the substrate. The fluid bearing feature is located on the second surface of at least some of the plurality of the abrasive members. The fluid bearing is configured to generate lift forces during motion of the abrasive article relative to the substrate. In some embodiments, the fluid bearing feature comprises an abrasive material attached to the second surface of the abrasive member. In still other embodiments, the abrasive article further includes a slurry of free abrasive particles located at the interface of the second surface and the substrate. In one embodiment, the plurality of abrasive members comprises an interconnected array of molded abrasive members. The abrasive members can be in a patterned array. The pattern can include a circular array, a rectangular array, or an off-set pattern. In another embodiment, the array is a random pattern. The abrasive article of
claim 1 wherein the fluid bearing feature comprises a fluid bearing feature a leading edge of the second surface and a fluid bearing surface at a trailing edge of the second surface of the abrasive members. The fluid bearing feature of the abrasive article can include abrasive composites. - An abrasive article for polishing a surface of a substrate includes an integrated structure and a including a plurality of gimbal assemblies and a plurality of preload structures. The a plurality of abrasive members each includes a first surface and a second surface. The first surface is engaged with one of the integrated gimbal assemblies and one of the preload structures. The second surface is for polishing the substrate. The gimbal assembly, to which the abrasive member is attached, permits the abrasive member to move independently in at least pitch and roll, The preload structure biases the second surface of the abrasive member toward the substrate. One or more fluid bearing features on the second surface of the abrasive member generate lift forces during motion of the abrasive article relative to the substrate. In some embodiments, the bearing structure is a hydrostatic bearing structure while in other embodiments, the bearing structure is a hydrodynamic bearing structure. In still other embodiments, the abrasive features include abrasives attached to the fluid bearing features of the abrasive members. The plurality of abrasive members can include an interconnected array of molded abrasive members. In some embodiments, the abrasive members comprise a cylindrically shaped bearing surface. The abrasive members can also include a grooved bearing surface. In other words, the bearing surface can have a groove or grooves therein. In another embodiment, the abrasive features include an abrasive material attached to the second surface of the abrasive members, a slurry of free abrasive particles located at the interface of the second surface and the substrate, or a combination thereof.
- An abrasive article for polishing a substrate includes a plurality of interconnected abrasive members wherein at least some of the plurality of interconnected abrasive members include at least one bearing structure. The abrasive members further include a first surface and a second surface. An abrasive feature is located on the second surface of the abrasive members. The abrasive feature applies a cutting or a contact force to the substrate during motion of the abrasive article relative to the substrate. The bearing structure can be a hydrostatic bearing structure or a hydrodynamic bearing structure. Abrasives can be attached to the abrasive feature of the abrasive member. In some embodiments, the plurality of interconnected abrasive members include an interconnected array of molded abrasive members. The abrasive members can be set forth in an array. The second surface can also be cylindrically shaped. The second surface also can have a groove therein. An abrasive feature can also include one or more abrasive materials attached to the second surface of the abrasive members, the abrasive article. In some embodiments, the abrasive article further includes a slurry of free abrasive particles located at the interface of the second surface and the substrate.
- An apparatus for polishing a surface of a substrate includes a gimbal structure including an array of gimbal assemblies; and preload mechanism that biases the array of gimbal assemblies toward the substrate. Some embodiments of the apparatus include a plurality of gas conduits adapted to deliver pressurized gas to one or more pressure ports positioned opposite the substrate. Other embodiments of the invention are possible. Although the description above contains much specificity, these should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, but as merely providing illustrations of some of the presently preferred embodiments of this invention. It is also contemplated that various combinations or sub-combinations of the specific features and aspects of the embodiments may be made and still fall within the scope of the inventions. It should be understood that various features and aspects of the disclosed embodiments can be combined with or substituted for one another in order to form varying modes of the disclosed inventions. Thus, it is intended that the scope of at least some of the present inventions herein disclosed should not be limited by the particular disclosed embodiments described above.
- Thus the scope of this invention should be determined by the appended claims and their legal equivalents. Therefore, it will be appreciated that the scope of the present invention fully encompasses other embodiments which may become obvious to those skilled in the art, and that the scope of the present invention is accordingly to be limited by nothing other than the appended claims, in which reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless explicitly so stated, but rather “one or more.” All structural, chemical, and functional equivalents to the elements of the above-described preferred embodiment that are known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference and are intended to be encompassed by the present claims. Moreover, it is not necessary for a device or method to address each and every problem sought to be solved by the present invention, for it to be encompassed by the present claims. Furthermore, no element, component, or method step in the present disclosure is intended to be dedicated to the public regardless of whether the element, component, or method step is explicitly recited in the claims.
Claims (26)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/753,479 US20100330890A1 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2010-04-02 | Polishing pad with array of fluidized gimballed abrasive members |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US22155409P | 2009-06-30 | 2009-06-30 | |
US24819409P | 2009-10-02 | 2009-10-02 | |
US12/753,479 US20100330890A1 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2010-04-02 | Polishing pad with array of fluidized gimballed abrasive members |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100330890A1 true US20100330890A1 (en) | 2010-12-30 |
Family
ID=42712712
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/753,479 Abandoned US20100330890A1 (en) | 2009-06-30 | 2010-04-02 | Polishing pad with array of fluidized gimballed abrasive members |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100330890A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011002881A1 (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110159784A1 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2011-06-30 | First Principles LLC | Abrasive article with array of gimballed abrasive members and method of use |
US20120149279A1 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2012-06-14 | Schwappach Karl G | Abrasive article with array of composite polishing pads |
US20130244541A1 (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2013-09-19 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for correcting slider parallelism error using compensation lapping |
US9221148B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2015-12-29 | Rdc Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for processing sliders for disk drives, and to various processing media for the same |
WO2022260737A1 (en) * | 2021-06-11 | 2022-12-15 | Sponge-Jet, Inc. | Abrasive media blends and related methods |
DE112016005417B4 (en) | 2015-11-26 | 2023-11-23 | Sumco Corporation | Wafer polishing process |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2016081951A1 (en) | 2014-11-23 | 2016-05-26 | M Cubed Technologies | Wafer pin chuck fabrication and repair |
WO2017030867A2 (en) | 2015-08-14 | 2017-02-23 | M Cubed Technologies, Inc. | Method for deterministic finishing of a chuck surface |
JP6942117B2 (en) | 2015-08-14 | 2021-09-29 | エム キューブド テクノロジーズ, インコーポレイテッド | Methods for removing contamination from the chuck surface |
WO2017030873A1 (en) | 2015-08-14 | 2017-02-23 | M Cubed Technologies, Inc. | Wafer chuck featuring reduced friction support surface |
JP6831835B2 (en) | 2015-08-14 | 2021-02-17 | エム キューブド テクノロジーズ, インコーポレイテッド | Machines with highly controllable processing tools for finishing workpieces |
Citations (67)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3683562A (en) * | 1970-09-24 | 1972-08-15 | Spitfire Tool & Machine Co Inc | Means for applying a liquid abrasive over the surface of a rotatable lapping table of a lapping machine |
US3921342A (en) * | 1973-12-17 | 1975-11-25 | Spitfire Tool & Machine Co Inc | Lap plate |
US4219898A (en) * | 1979-02-14 | 1980-09-02 | Presby Harry A | Floating brush floor cleaner |
US4614380A (en) * | 1983-11-03 | 1986-09-30 | The Boeing Company | Power driven rotary floor preparation device |
US4821461A (en) * | 1987-11-23 | 1989-04-18 | Magnetic Peripherals Inc. | Textured lapping plate and process for its manufacture |
US4980536A (en) * | 1987-07-02 | 1990-12-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Removal of particles from solid-state surfaces by laser bombardment |
US5014468A (en) * | 1989-05-05 | 1991-05-14 | Norton Company | Patterned coated abrasive for fine surface finishing |
US5024968A (en) * | 1988-07-08 | 1991-06-18 | Engelsberg Audrey C | Removal of surface contaminants by irradiation from a high-energy source |
US5070656A (en) * | 1988-08-03 | 1991-12-10 | Brogden Thomas H N | Grinding machine |
US5081734A (en) * | 1990-10-09 | 1992-01-21 | The Re Partnership | Floor scraping machine |
US5083839A (en) * | 1990-06-27 | 1992-01-28 | Rick Younger | Apparatus for grooving or grinding pavement |
US5099557A (en) * | 1988-07-08 | 1992-03-31 | Engelsberg Audrey C | Removal of surface contaminants by irradiation from a high-energy source |
US5152917A (en) * | 1991-02-06 | 1992-10-06 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Structured abrasive article |
US5209760A (en) * | 1990-05-21 | 1993-05-11 | Wiand Ronald C | Injection molded abrasive pad |
US5435816A (en) * | 1993-01-14 | 1995-07-25 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Method of making an abrasive article |
US5437754A (en) * | 1992-01-13 | 1995-08-01 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Abrasive article having precise lateral spacing between abrasive composite members |
US5454844A (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1995-10-03 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Abrasive article, a process of making same, and a method of using same to finish a workpiece surface |
US5489235A (en) * | 1993-09-13 | 1996-02-06 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Abrasive article and method of making same |
US5549961A (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1996-08-27 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Abrasive article, a process for its manufacture, and a method of using it to reduce a workpiece surface |
US5628862A (en) * | 1993-12-16 | 1997-05-13 | Motorola, Inc. | Polishing pad for chemical-mechanical polishing of a semiconductor substrate |
US5683143A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1997-11-04 | Pearl Abrasive Company | Abrasive surface treatment apparatus having removable blocks |
US5774305A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1998-06-30 | Seagate Technology, Inc. | Head gimbal assembly to reduce slider distortion due to thermal stress |
US5800248A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1998-09-01 | Ontrak Systems Inc. | Control of chemical-mechanical polishing rate across a substrate surface |
US5827112A (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 1998-10-27 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for grinding wafers |
US5849135A (en) * | 1996-03-12 | 1998-12-15 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Particulate contamination removal from wafers using plasmas and mechanical agitation |
US5856896A (en) * | 1996-12-04 | 1999-01-05 | Seagate Technology, Inc. | Gimbal suspension for supporting a head in a disc drive assembly |
US5927264A (en) * | 1998-01-08 | 1999-07-27 | Worley; Kenneth | Extended wear stone polishing disk |
US6069771A (en) * | 1996-11-04 | 2000-05-30 | Seagate Technology, Inc. | Gimbal micropositioning device |
US6092253A (en) * | 1996-12-30 | 2000-07-25 | Intel Corporation | Flexible-leaf substrate edge cleaning apparatus |
US6102789A (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2000-08-15 | Norton Company | Abrasive tools |
US6123612A (en) * | 1998-04-15 | 2000-09-26 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Corrosion resistant abrasive article and method of making |
US6179886B1 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 2001-01-30 | Ambler Technologies, Inc. | Method for producing abrasive grains and the composite abrasive grains produced by same |
US6194317B1 (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2001-02-27 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method of planarizing the upper surface of a semiconductor wafer |
US6234886B1 (en) * | 1996-11-06 | 2001-05-22 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Multiple abrasive assembly and method |
US6273793B1 (en) * | 1998-09-23 | 2001-08-14 | Seagate Technology Llc | Apparatus and method for reducing disc surface asperities to sub-microinch height |
US6328632B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2001-12-11 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Polishing pads and planarizing machines for mechanical and/or chemical-mechanical planarization of microelectronic substrate assemblies |
US6334229B1 (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 2002-01-01 | Lam Research Corporation | Apparatus for cleaning edges of contaminated substrates |
US6364757B2 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2002-04-02 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mechanical and chemical-mechanical planarization of microelectronic substrates |
US6459260B1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2002-10-01 | Seagate Technology Llc | Head suspension assembly for testing a slider |
US6493192B2 (en) * | 2000-06-22 | 2002-12-10 | Seagate Technology Llc | Disc drive with improved head pitch adjustment |
US20030096558A1 (en) * | 2001-11-20 | 2003-05-22 | Zheng Guo Qiang | Method and apparatus for treating the surface of a media, such as a magnetic hard disk, while operating. such as during dynamic electrical testing |
US6607425B1 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2003-08-19 | Lam Research Corporation | Pressurized membrane platen design for improving performance in CMP applications |
US6612917B2 (en) * | 2001-02-07 | 2003-09-02 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive article suitable for modifying a semiconductor wafer |
US6638151B2 (en) * | 2000-02-09 | 2003-10-28 | Tateo Uegaki | Polishing instrument |
US20040040575A1 (en) * | 2002-08-28 | 2004-03-04 | Alexander Tregub | Brush for cleaning/scrubbing a substrate |
US6714386B1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2004-03-30 | Seagate Technology Llc | Disc drive having a suspension limiter for improved shock performance |
US20040072510A1 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2004-04-15 | Toshiya Kinoshita | Cmp conditioner, method for arranging rigid grains used for cmp conditioner, and method for manufacturing cmp conditioner |
US6744602B2 (en) * | 2001-08-22 | 2004-06-01 | Seagate Technology Llc | Modified gimbal tongue designs to reduce particle sensitivity |
US6780095B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2004-08-24 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mechanical and chemical-mechanical planarization of microelectronic substrates |
US6805137B2 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2004-10-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for removing contamination particles from substrates |
US6811467B1 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2004-11-02 | Seagate Technology Llc | Methods and apparatus for polishing glass substrates |
US6869344B2 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2005-03-22 | Elm Inc. | Apparatus for polishing optical disk |
US6875086B2 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2005-04-05 | Intel Corporation | Surface planarization |
US6926598B2 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2005-08-09 | Noritake Super Abrasive Co., Ltd. | Grinding wheel |
US20050223649A1 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-13 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Nonwoven abrasive articles and methods |
US20050287032A1 (en) * | 2004-06-24 | 2005-12-29 | Alexander Tregub | Anti-bacterial protection to improve performance of post CMP clean brush |
US20060135050A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2006-06-22 | Petersen John G | Resilient structured sanding article |
US7160178B2 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2007-01-09 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | In situ activation of a three-dimensional fixed abrasive article |
US7185384B2 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2007-03-06 | Intel Corporation | Wafer cleaning brush |
US20070107317A1 (en) * | 2003-10-22 | 2007-05-17 | Japan Science And Technology Agency | Liquid composition, manufacturing method thereof, low dielectric constant films, abrasive materials, and electronic components |
US7294158B2 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2007-11-13 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive product, method of making and using the same, and apparatus for making the same |
US20080004743A1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-01-03 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive Articles, CMP Monitoring System and Method |
US20080053000A1 (en) * | 2006-08-30 | 2008-03-06 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Extended life abrasive article and method |
US7404756B2 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2008-07-29 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Process for manufacturing optical and semiconductor elements |
US7469443B2 (en) * | 2005-01-10 | 2008-12-30 | Intel Corporation | Brush for cleaning wafer |
US20090258573A1 (en) * | 2008-04-15 | 2009-10-15 | Muldowney Gregory P | Chemical Mechanical Polishing Method |
US7887396B2 (en) * | 2001-11-15 | 2011-02-15 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlled slurry distribution |
Family Cites Families (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
BR9407536A (en) | 1993-09-13 | 1997-08-26 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Abrasive article manufacturing processes and workpiece refining with the same production tool for manufacturing the same and master die production process for forming the same |
JP3874790B2 (en) | 1994-02-22 | 2007-01-31 | スリーエム カンパニー | Abrasive article, process for its production and its use for finishing |
JPH10286777A (en) * | 1997-04-09 | 1998-10-27 | Nikon Corp | Polishing tool plate |
CN1222431A (en) * | 1997-11-05 | 1999-07-14 | 阿普莱克斯公司 | Polishing system including hydrostatic fluid bearing support |
US6952330B1 (en) | 1999-06-11 | 2005-10-04 | Seagate Technology Llc | Dynamic flying attitude control using augmented gimbal |
US6503132B2 (en) * | 2000-10-03 | 2003-01-07 | Seagate Technology Llc | Hybrid burnish/glide head with advanced air bearing fly height control rails |
US6821189B1 (en) | 2000-10-13 | 2004-11-23 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive article comprising a structured diamond-like carbon coating and method of using same to mechanically treat a substrate |
US6872127B2 (en) | 2002-07-11 | 2005-03-29 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd | Polishing pad conditioning disks for chemical mechanical polisher |
US6852016B2 (en) | 2002-09-18 | 2005-02-08 | Micron Technology, Inc. | End effectors and methods for manufacturing end effectors with contact elements to condition polishing pads used in polishing micro-device workpieces |
US7203033B2 (en) | 2002-10-02 | 2007-04-10 | Seagate Technology Llc | Head gimbal assembly with an integrated mechanical and electrical attachment and a stiff plate |
US20050025973A1 (en) | 2003-07-25 | 2005-02-03 | Slutz David E. | CVD diamond-coated composite substrate containing a carbide-forming material and ceramic phases and method for making same |
US7057856B2 (en) | 2003-11-06 | 2006-06-06 | Seagate Technology Llc | Gimbal strut shape to increase buckling load |
DE102004058797A1 (en) * | 2004-06-12 | 2006-01-05 | IGAM Ingenieurgesellschaft für angewandte Mechanik mbH | Method for processing functional elements with curved surfaces comprises adjusting the geometry of a tool contour depending on the pivoting angle and rotary angle of the tool during rotation of a polishing tool about its own axis |
US7218478B2 (en) | 2004-09-28 | 2007-05-15 | Hitachi Global Storage Technologies Netherlands B.V. | Disk drive with negative-pitch slider having protrusion pad contacting the disk when the disk is rotating at operating speed |
-
2010
- 2010-04-02 US US12/753,479 patent/US20100330890A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2010-06-30 WO PCT/US2010/040595 patent/WO2011002881A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (71)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3683562A (en) * | 1970-09-24 | 1972-08-15 | Spitfire Tool & Machine Co Inc | Means for applying a liquid abrasive over the surface of a rotatable lapping table of a lapping machine |
US3921342A (en) * | 1973-12-17 | 1975-11-25 | Spitfire Tool & Machine Co Inc | Lap plate |
US4219898A (en) * | 1979-02-14 | 1980-09-02 | Presby Harry A | Floating brush floor cleaner |
US4614380A (en) * | 1983-11-03 | 1986-09-30 | The Boeing Company | Power driven rotary floor preparation device |
US4980536A (en) * | 1987-07-02 | 1990-12-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Removal of particles from solid-state surfaces by laser bombardment |
US4821461A (en) * | 1987-11-23 | 1989-04-18 | Magnetic Peripherals Inc. | Textured lapping plate and process for its manufacture |
US5099557A (en) * | 1988-07-08 | 1992-03-31 | Engelsberg Audrey C | Removal of surface contaminants by irradiation from a high-energy source |
US5024968A (en) * | 1988-07-08 | 1991-06-18 | Engelsberg Audrey C | Removal of surface contaminants by irradiation from a high-energy source |
US5070656A (en) * | 1988-08-03 | 1991-12-10 | Brogden Thomas H N | Grinding machine |
US5014468A (en) * | 1989-05-05 | 1991-05-14 | Norton Company | Patterned coated abrasive for fine surface finishing |
US5209760A (en) * | 1990-05-21 | 1993-05-11 | Wiand Ronald C | Injection molded abrasive pad |
US5083839A (en) * | 1990-06-27 | 1992-01-28 | Rick Younger | Apparatus for grooving or grinding pavement |
US5081734A (en) * | 1990-10-09 | 1992-01-21 | The Re Partnership | Floor scraping machine |
US5304223A (en) * | 1991-02-06 | 1994-04-19 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Structured abrasive article |
US5152917A (en) * | 1991-02-06 | 1992-10-06 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Structured abrasive article |
US5152917B1 (en) * | 1991-02-06 | 1998-01-13 | Minnesota Mining & Mfg | Structured abrasive article |
US5437754A (en) * | 1992-01-13 | 1995-08-01 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Abrasive article having precise lateral spacing between abrasive composite members |
US5435816A (en) * | 1993-01-14 | 1995-07-25 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Method of making an abrasive article |
US5489235A (en) * | 1993-09-13 | 1996-02-06 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Abrasive article and method of making same |
US5549961A (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1996-08-27 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Abrasive article, a process for its manufacture, and a method of using it to reduce a workpiece surface |
US5454844A (en) * | 1993-10-29 | 1995-10-03 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Abrasive article, a process of making same, and a method of using same to finish a workpiece surface |
US5628862A (en) * | 1993-12-16 | 1997-05-13 | Motorola, Inc. | Polishing pad for chemical-mechanical polishing of a semiconductor substrate |
US5774305A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1998-06-30 | Seagate Technology, Inc. | Head gimbal assembly to reduce slider distortion due to thermal stress |
US5683143A (en) * | 1996-01-11 | 1997-11-04 | Pearl Abrasive Company | Abrasive surface treatment apparatus having removable blocks |
US5849135A (en) * | 1996-03-12 | 1998-12-15 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Particulate contamination removal from wafers using plasmas and mechanical agitation |
US5800248A (en) * | 1996-04-26 | 1998-09-01 | Ontrak Systems Inc. | Control of chemical-mechanical polishing rate across a substrate surface |
US6334229B1 (en) * | 1996-05-01 | 2002-01-01 | Lam Research Corporation | Apparatus for cleaning edges of contaminated substrates |
US6069771A (en) * | 1996-11-04 | 2000-05-30 | Seagate Technology, Inc. | Gimbal micropositioning device |
US6234886B1 (en) * | 1996-11-06 | 2001-05-22 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Multiple abrasive assembly and method |
US5856896A (en) * | 1996-12-04 | 1999-01-05 | Seagate Technology, Inc. | Gimbal suspension for supporting a head in a disc drive assembly |
US6092253A (en) * | 1996-12-30 | 2000-07-25 | Intel Corporation | Flexible-leaf substrate edge cleaning apparatus |
US6179886B1 (en) * | 1997-09-05 | 2001-01-30 | Ambler Technologies, Inc. | Method for producing abrasive grains and the composite abrasive grains produced by same |
US5827112A (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 1998-10-27 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for grinding wafers |
US6364757B2 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2002-04-02 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mechanical and chemical-mechanical planarization of microelectronic substrates |
US6780095B1 (en) * | 1997-12-30 | 2004-08-24 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mechanical and chemical-mechanical planarization of microelectronic substrates |
US5927264A (en) * | 1998-01-08 | 1999-07-27 | Worley; Kenneth | Extended wear stone polishing disk |
US6102789A (en) * | 1998-03-27 | 2000-08-15 | Norton Company | Abrasive tools |
US7198553B2 (en) * | 1998-04-15 | 2007-04-03 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Corrosion resistant abrasive article and method of making |
US6123612A (en) * | 1998-04-15 | 2000-09-26 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Corrosion resistant abrasive article and method of making |
US6194317B1 (en) * | 1998-04-30 | 2001-02-27 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Method of planarizing the upper surface of a semiconductor wafer |
US6273793B1 (en) * | 1998-09-23 | 2001-08-14 | Seagate Technology Llc | Apparatus and method for reducing disc surface asperities to sub-microinch height |
US6714386B1 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2004-03-30 | Seagate Technology Llc | Disc drive having a suspension limiter for improved shock performance |
US6328632B1 (en) * | 1999-08-31 | 2001-12-11 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Polishing pads and planarizing machines for mechanical and/or chemical-mechanical planarization of microelectronic substrate assemblies |
US6638151B2 (en) * | 2000-02-09 | 2003-10-28 | Tateo Uegaki | Polishing instrument |
US6493192B2 (en) * | 2000-06-22 | 2002-12-10 | Seagate Technology Llc | Disc drive with improved head pitch adjustment |
US6607425B1 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2003-08-19 | Lam Research Corporation | Pressurized membrane platen design for improving performance in CMP applications |
US20040072510A1 (en) * | 2000-12-21 | 2004-04-15 | Toshiya Kinoshita | Cmp conditioner, method for arranging rigid grains used for cmp conditioner, and method for manufacturing cmp conditioner |
US6612917B2 (en) * | 2001-02-07 | 2003-09-02 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive article suitable for modifying a semiconductor wafer |
US6869344B2 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2005-03-22 | Elm Inc. | Apparatus for polishing optical disk |
US6459260B1 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2002-10-01 | Seagate Technology Llc | Head suspension assembly for testing a slider |
US6744602B2 (en) * | 2001-08-22 | 2004-06-01 | Seagate Technology Llc | Modified gimbal tongue designs to reduce particle sensitivity |
US6805137B2 (en) * | 2001-08-27 | 2004-10-19 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for removing contamination particles from substrates |
US7887396B2 (en) * | 2001-11-15 | 2011-02-15 | Novellus Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlled slurry distribution |
US20030096558A1 (en) * | 2001-11-20 | 2003-05-22 | Zheng Guo Qiang | Method and apparatus for treating the surface of a media, such as a magnetic hard disk, while operating. such as during dynamic electrical testing |
US7294158B2 (en) * | 2002-07-26 | 2007-11-13 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive product, method of making and using the same, and apparatus for making the same |
US20040040575A1 (en) * | 2002-08-28 | 2004-03-04 | Alexander Tregub | Brush for cleaning/scrubbing a substrate |
US7185384B2 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2007-03-06 | Intel Corporation | Wafer cleaning brush |
US6811467B1 (en) * | 2002-09-09 | 2004-11-02 | Seagate Technology Llc | Methods and apparatus for polishing glass substrates |
US6875086B2 (en) * | 2003-01-10 | 2005-04-05 | Intel Corporation | Surface planarization |
US6926598B2 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2005-08-09 | Noritake Super Abrasive Co., Ltd. | Grinding wheel |
US7160178B2 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2007-01-09 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | In situ activation of a three-dimensional fixed abrasive article |
US20070107317A1 (en) * | 2003-10-22 | 2007-05-17 | Japan Science And Technology Agency | Liquid composition, manufacturing method thereof, low dielectric constant films, abrasive materials, and electronic components |
US20050223649A1 (en) * | 2004-04-13 | 2005-10-13 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Nonwoven abrasive articles and methods |
US20050287032A1 (en) * | 2004-06-24 | 2005-12-29 | Alexander Tregub | Anti-bacterial protection to improve performance of post CMP clean brush |
US7404756B2 (en) * | 2004-10-29 | 2008-07-29 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Process for manufacturing optical and semiconductor elements |
US7169029B2 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2007-01-30 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Resilient structured sanding article |
US20060135050A1 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2006-06-22 | Petersen John G | Resilient structured sanding article |
US7469443B2 (en) * | 2005-01-10 | 2008-12-30 | Intel Corporation | Brush for cleaning wafer |
US20080004743A1 (en) * | 2006-06-28 | 2008-01-03 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Abrasive Articles, CMP Monitoring System and Method |
US20080053000A1 (en) * | 2006-08-30 | 2008-03-06 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Extended life abrasive article and method |
US20090258573A1 (en) * | 2008-04-15 | 2009-10-15 | Muldowney Gregory P | Chemical Mechanical Polishing Method |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20110159784A1 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2011-06-30 | First Principles LLC | Abrasive article with array of gimballed abrasive members and method of use |
US20120149279A1 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2012-06-14 | Schwappach Karl G | Abrasive article with array of composite polishing pads |
US8801497B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2014-08-12 | Rdc Holdings, Llc | Array of abrasive members with resilient support |
US8808064B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2014-08-19 | Roc Holdings, LLC | Abrasive article with array of composite polishing pads |
US8840447B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2014-09-23 | Rdc Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for polishing with abrasive charged polymer substrates |
US8926411B2 (en) * | 2009-04-30 | 2015-01-06 | Rdc Holdings, Llc | Abrasive article with array of composite polishing pads |
US8944886B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2015-02-03 | Rdc Holdings, Llc | Abrasive slurry and dressing bar for embedding abrasive particles into substrates |
US9221148B2 (en) | 2009-04-30 | 2015-12-29 | Rdc Holdings, Llc | Method and apparatus for processing sliders for disk drives, and to various processing media for the same |
US20130244541A1 (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2013-09-19 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for correcting slider parallelism error using compensation lapping |
US9343084B2 (en) * | 2012-03-14 | 2016-05-17 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for correcting slider parallelism error using compensation lapping |
DE112016005417B4 (en) | 2015-11-26 | 2023-11-23 | Sumco Corporation | Wafer polishing process |
WO2022260737A1 (en) * | 2021-06-11 | 2022-12-15 | Sponge-Jet, Inc. | Abrasive media blends and related methods |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2011002881A1 (en) | 2011-01-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8808064B2 (en) | Abrasive article with array of composite polishing pads | |
US20100330890A1 (en) | Polishing pad with array of fluidized gimballed abrasive members | |
US20110159784A1 (en) | Abrasive article with array of gimballed abrasive members and method of use | |
US5769697A (en) | Method and apparatus for polishing semiconductor substrate | |
TWI748222B (en) | Polishing articles and integrated system for manufacturing chemical mechanical polishing articles | |
TWI757410B (en) | A thin plastic polishing article for cmp applications | |
JP3823086B2 (en) | Polishing pad and polishing method | |
EP2025459B1 (en) | Layered-filament lattice for chemical mechanical polishing | |
US7807252B2 (en) | Chemical mechanical polishing pad having secondary polishing medium capacity control grooves | |
KR101674058B1 (en) | Chemical mechanical polishing apparatus having pad conditioning disk, and pre-conditioner unit | |
JP2001062701A (en) | Preconditioning of fixed abrasive member | |
KR101392401B1 (en) | Wafer retaininer ring with a function of pad conditioner and method for producing the same | |
US9221148B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for processing sliders for disk drives, and to various processing media for the same | |
KR20000006568A (en) | Surface polishing machine | |
US20080064302A1 (en) | Polishing apparatus, polishing pad, and polishing method | |
US20110027549A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for embedding abrasive particles into substrates | |
US20110143638A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for manufacturing a polishing article with uniform height abrasive particles | |
KR100536046B1 (en) | Polishing pad conditioner and chemical and mechanical polishing apparatus having the same | |
US20110256803A1 (en) | Fluidized web polishing apparatus and method using contact pressure feedback | |
US20110034107A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for reciprocal polishing | |
JP2018133510A (en) | Wafer adsorption apparatus and CMP apparatus | |
JP2005131779A (en) | Composite material tool plate for polishing | |
US20040224617A1 (en) | Static pad conditioner | |
JP2022534384A (en) | Polishing platen and method of manufacturing polishing platen | |
JP2023516869A (en) | Substrate polisher with contact extensions or adjustable stops |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: FIRST PRINCIPALS, LLC, MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BOUTAGHOU, ZINE-EDDINE;REEL/FRAME:026696/0721 Effective date: 20110622 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCHWAPPACH, KARL, MINNESOTA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF CLAIMED INVENTIONS IN THE LISTED CASES, TO THE EXTENT THAT THESE CASES INCLUDE CLAIMS TO INVENTIONS THAT ARE DISCLOSED IN U.S. SERIAL NO. 12/784,908, OR ANY DIVISIONS, CONTINUATIONS, OR RENEWALS THEREOF;ASSIGNORS:FIRST PRINCIPALS, LLC;BOUTAGHOU, ZINE-EDDINE;REEL/FRAME:028357/0264 Effective date: 20110408 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |