US20100282053A1 - Deployable projectile - Google Patents

Deployable projectile Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20100282053A1
US20100282053A1 US11975829 US97582907A US2010282053A1 US 20100282053 A1 US20100282053 A1 US 20100282053A1 US 11975829 US11975829 US 11975829 US 97582907 A US97582907 A US 97582907A US 2010282053 A1 US2010282053 A1 US 2010282053A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
projectile
target
intercepting
interceptor
launch
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11975829
Inventor
Jahangir S. Rastegar
Thomas Spinelli
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Omnitek Partners LLC
Rastegar Jahangir S
Original Assignee
Omnitek Partners LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/36Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information
    • F42B12/46Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect for dispensing materials; for producing chemical or physical reaction; for signalling ; for transmitting information for dispensing gases, vapours, powders or chemically-reactive substances
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41JTARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J2/00Reflecting targets, e.g. radar-reflector targets; Active targets transmitting electromagnetic or acoustic waves
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B10/00Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
    • F42B10/02Stabilising arrangements
    • F42B10/14Stabilising arrangements using fins spread or deployed after launch, e.g. after leaving the barrel
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/34Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect expanding before or on impact, i.e. of dumdum or mushroom type

Abstract

A method for protecting a second location against a first projectile fired from a first location at the second location. The method including: firing at least one second projectile toward the first projectile; and increasing a footprint of the second projectile via a deployment from the second projectile to prevent the first projectile from striking the second location. The method can also include detonating a charge upon contact of the first projectile with the deployment; timing an operation of the second projectile to increase an amount of damage and/or redirection of the first projectile; tracking the first projectile and guiding the second projectile to intercept the first projectile based on the tracking and/or the various launching platforms so as to increase the likelihood of protection against the first projectile.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/807,964 filed on May 31, 2007 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/290,948 filed on May 17, 2007, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/236,063 filed on Sep. 4, 2002, which claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/317,308 filed on Sep. 5, 2001, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by their reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    1. Field of the Invention
  • [0003]
    The present invention relates generally to projectiles, and more particularly, to missiles and other projectiles, which have deployable blades to increase its footprint and/or decrease its momentum.
  • [0004]
    2. Prior Art
  • [0005]
    Numerous systems have been developed or are under development for protection against various threats such as missiles or projectiles. In certain systems, particularly if weight is not a major problem, a properly designed passive or active armor may provide adequate protection. In other systems, an incoming missile may be defeated by a super-high rate of small to medium caliber fire in either a pure kinetic mode or with the assistance of high explosives. Guided missiles of various kinds have also been developed for such purposes. A number of smart or guided projectiles are also under development for such applications. Many of such protection systems are or planned to be used in combination.
  • [0006]
    A review of the existing protective systems clearly indicate the lack of any effective measures against weapons such as shoulder fired RPG type of weapons, particularly those fired at very close range, such as from a 50 meter radius. No such weapons have been planned nor are under development. The development of such protection systems is essential for all lightly armored vehicles such as FCS, particularly for those that are to be used in missions within urban environments. Such protection system may also be used on helicopters and other mobile platforms, on fixed command posts and/or various facilities.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0007]
    An objective of the present invention is to provide novel projectiles that effectively defeat shoulder fired rockets or the like within a radius of 50 meters. A number of different versions of such interceptors are provided herein and their general merits and shortcomings for different modes of application, such as method of launch and available sensory information are discussed. The preferred interceptor designs are totally mechanical and passive and do not carry any explosives. The proposed designs are, however, naturally suitable for development into projectiles that are significantly more destructive to the target by the addition of relatively small but directional explosive charges without requiring sophisticated electronics and sensory gear and requiring any means of tracking, and/or guidance and control. It is, however, shown that the projectile and its means of delivery can be made smarter in a step by step manner by the addition of on-board sensory, decision making (micro-processors), and/or means of guidance and control. In this regard, the novelty of the proposed interceptors and means of delivery is that the basic and bare projectile is still a highly effective protective weapon and that its effectiveness and performance can be incrementally enhanced by the addition of the aforementioned components and that it can eventually be turned into a very smart and extremely effective weapon against shoulder fired missiles and the like that are fired from very close range.
  • [0008]
    In addition, the provided projectiles and their means of delivery may be used as a supplement to the existing anti-missile protection systems as the last protective weapon to be used if all other weapons fail to stop or divert the incoming missile.
  • [0009]
    The main characteristics of the provided innovative interceptors include: The intercepting projectile is fired from a regular gun; The intercepting projectile may be fired from a rifled or smooth bore barrel; The intercepting projectile deploys into a propeller-like interceptor rotating at high speeds; By deploying the intercepting projectile into a spinning propeller, the probability of hit is increased by orders of magnitude; The intercepting projectile fired from smooth bore gains its spinning speed by the aerodynamic forces acting on the propeller; The firing speed and spin rates determine the mode of flight from high drag “free spinning” flight to low drag air-screw modes of flight; In the totally passive mode of operation, the target is either destroyed or knocked out of course; The propeller that hits the target can be used as a trigger to properly detonate a directional charge to defeat the target; On-board target seeking sensors may be added to the intercepting projectile to optimally time the deployment of the propeller to achieve maximum rotational speed at the time of target impact; Relatively simple guidance and control actuation may be added to the intercepting projectile (propellers) to guide the projectile towards the target; and One-way means of communication between a “ground” station (the vehicle to be protected) and the intercepting vehicle can be added for guiding the projectile towards the target.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0010]
    These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the apparatus and methods of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings where:
  • [0011]
    FIG. 1 illustrates a graph showing a trajectory of an intercepting projectile and a target projectile and the process of interceptor projectile deployment and interception.
  • [0012]
    FIG. 2 illustrates a graph showing a trajectory of a whirlybird intercepting projectile and a target projectile and the process of interceptor projectile deployment and interception.
  • [0013]
    FIG. 3 illustrates a first implementation of a deploying means for an interceptor projectile of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • [0014]
    The novel intercepting projectiles (alternatively referred to herein as “interceptors”) and their means of delivery for effectively defeating shoulder fired rockets or other similar weapons that are fired from very close range, in the order of a 50 meters radius, will now be described in detail. The basic operation of the systems and methods of the present invention for target interception and target defeat will then be described.
  • [0015]
    Consider an incoming projectile or missile (target) with a cross-sectional area A (radius r) that is traveling at a speed of V. An intercepting projectile is launched that would deflect or destroy (defeat) the target at an interception distance, L, say about 40 meters.
  • [0016]
    Let the interceptor projectile be traveling at a speed of Vi and a have a cross-sectional area Ai (radius ri). Also let the closest distance from the center of the target to the center of the intercepting projectile be d. In order to maximize the probability of intercept the following observations are true.
  • [0017]
    In order to achieve an interception, the distance d must be smaller than the difference between the radii of the interceptor and the target, i.e.,
  • [0000]

    d≦r i −r  (1)
  • [0018]
    To increase the probability of interception, either the distance d has to be made small or the cross-sectional area of the intercepting projectile Ai (i.e., the radius ri) has to be made large. Attempt is obviously always made to fire as close as possible in the direction of the incoming target. However, making the distance d small as compared to the radius of, for example, a medium caliber projectile is technically very challenging, particularly since due to the very short travel distances, minimal time is available to even achieve considerable course correction if a very smart intercepting projectile is fired at the target. By increasing the radius ri of the intercepting projectile, the probability of hit is significantly increased since the cross-sectional area Ai of the intercepting projectile is proportional to the square of its radius. However, the latter option means firing a very large caliber projectile at the target, which is obviously impractical.
  • [0019]
    The interaction time t during which the interception can occur, i.e., the time during which the target and the intercepting projectile are side by side longitudinally, is proportional to the sum of the lengths of the target l and the intercepting projectile li while being inversely proportional to the sum of the corresponding two velocities V and Vi, i.e.,
  • [0000]

    t≦(l+l i)/(V+V i)  (2)
  • [0020]
    In order to increase the probability of intercept, i.e., interaction between the target and the intercepting projectile, the interaction time t has to be maximized. The only parameters that can be manipulated here are the velocity of the intercepting projectile Vi which should be made as small as possible, and the total length of the intercepting projectile li which should be made as long as possible. The length of the intercepting projectile cannot be made to be too long, particularly since when using a propeller type of interceptor, since the “thickness” (longitudinal dimension) of the propellers cannot be excessive. An intercepting projectile with a slow linear velocity would, however, make the aforementioned interception distance L (the distance away from the system or structure that is to be protected and at which the interception occurs) too small.
  • [0021]
    It is, therefore shown that the probability of intercept is maximized by using intercepting projectiles that have large cross-sections Ai and travel at relatively slow speeds. However, both prospects have serious drawbacks since they require that very large caliber projectiles to be fired at the target which is to be intercepted a very short distance from the vehicle or other systems or structures to be protected.
  • [0022]
    The novel intercepting projectile concepts disclosed herein are readily shown to achieve all the advantages of large cross-section and slow moving intercepting projectiles while all their shortcomings are avoided. This is the case since the provided intercepting projectiles are designed with the following basic characteristic: The proposed intercepting projectiles have varying cross-sectional area Ai, varying linear velocity Vi, and varying spinning rate ω (angular velocity about the longitudinal axis of the projectile). The proposed intercepting projectiles are launched (fired) with small cross-sectional areas at high speeds. As the intercepting projectile approaches the incoming target, its effective cross-sectional area is increased significantly, while its linear velocity is decreased and its spinning rate is increased. The presence of sensory information that can be used to trigger the above process when the intercepting projectile is at an optimal distance from the target would obviously enhance the effectiveness of the interception.
  • [0023]
    The above basic characteristics that the intercepting projectiles are desired to have can be readily achieved by the novel designs that are being proposed. In general, the following two basic design options are available.
  • [0024]
    In a first implementation the projectiles is windmilled. In windmilling, an intercepting projectile is launched from a small or medium caliber gun barrel. The projectile is constructed with a set of deployable propellers that are spring loaded. The propeller release mechanism will be fast acting, preferably based on detonation of a small charge.
  • [0025]
    Due to the short distance to the point of target interception, the optimal exit velocity is expected to be high but subsonic. The projectile is preferably launched from a rifled gun and is therefore spinning as it exists the muzzle. If a smooth bore barrel has to be used, for example to ensure the survival of the deployment mechanism and components or as may be required when sensors and electronic gear are added to make the projectile more smart, then fins have to be added to ensure projectile stability. The required spinning rates may then be induced partially by the fins and the aerodynamic design of the projectile and by the propeller themselves.
  • [0026]
    At an optimal distance from the target, the propellers are deployed to increase the effective cross-sectional area to equal the span of the propellers. The propellers would then windmill, creating drag and slowing the interceptor. The spinning rate of the projectile is also increased.
  • [0027]
    To describe the methods and devices of the present invention in more detail, FIG. 1 illustrates a sketch of the trajectories of the incoming projectile (target) and the interceptor. In this illustration, time t is plotted on the vertical axis and the horizontal distance X from the location that is to be protected (i.e., where the interceptor is launched) is plotted on the horizontal axis. Obviously we are in three-dimensional space, but for such short distances and times, a one-space-plus-time problem is a good approximation.
  • [0028]
    The trajectory of the incoming projectile is approximated by the straight line (constant velocity) with a slope 1/V, where V is the velocity of the incoming targeted projectile. The time of impact at the protected object if there were no interception would then be tim=X/V, which sets the time scale for the present problem. Here, X is considered to be the distance at which the intercepting projectile is fired at the target. For example, if the velocity V is 150 m/s (Mach=0.5) and the distance X is 50 m, then the characteristic time is about ⅓ of a second.
  • [0029]
    At the time td, a number of radial arms (airscrew) unfold, hinged aft. These arms are airfoil shaped in their cross-section. They act as a windmill, deriving torque from the axial flow. The axial flow velocity is the speed of the intercepting projectile. Thus, the transient effect of unfolding the radial arms is to reduce the linear momentum of the projectile (slow it down) and increase its angular momentum (spin it up). The end of the transient is then when there is no exchange of momentum, i.e., when the airscrew is essentially an anemometer. Of course, overall aerodynamic drag will cause both linear and angular momentum to decrease in time, but on a longer time scale.
  • [0030]
    The intercepting projectile may be spinning from being fired from a rifled barrel, in fact, the initial rotational (spinning) velocity is a design parameter of the problem. This rotational velocity must, however, be such that there is a windmilling effect.
  • [0031]
    After deployment, there is the spin up and linear velocity slowdown phase, which is shown in FIG. 1 as the slope becoming more vertical.
  • [0032]
    After the deployment and linear velocity slowdown and spin up phase comes the intercept phase. During the time before the intercept phase begins, two events must occur: (1) The speed of the projectile interceptor Vi should be slowed to a speed much smaller than the target velocity V. This will maximize the intercept time; and (2) The projectile interceptor should have an angular speed (spin rate) such that one of the blades (radial arms) will hit the incoming projectile during the intercept phase. The overall blade diameter should be large enough to maximize an intercept.
  • [0033]
    The linear and angular speeds are preferred to be more or less constant during the intercept phase. Thus, during the intercept phase, if the intercept time t, equation (2), times the angular speed of the interceptor ω, times the number of airscrews, n, is larger than 2π, the interceptor has increased its effective length li thereby the intercept time t is significantly increased.
  • [0034]
    The probability of a blade of the interceptor touching the incoming projectile (target) is 100 percent if the distance between centerlines of the two objects, d, is less than the difference between their radii as indicated by the relationship (1). As pictured in FIG. 1, the windmill should be aft of the center of gravity for longitudinal stability, i.e., the windmill should pull the interceptor backwards.
  • [0035]
    A simple mathematical model of the interceptor after deployment involves two forms of Newton's second law, one for the linear motion and the other for the angular motion.
  • [0000]
    m Vi t = - D ( V , α ) ( 3 ) I α . = ɛ D ( V , α ) r 0 ( 4 )
  • [0000]
    where D is drag due to transferal of linear momentum to torque, which is a quadratic function of the velocities, and will decelerate the interceptor, and α is a drag parameter.
  • [0036]
    This drag will then provide a positive torque, with efficiency ε and radial length r0 that will spin up the interceptor. A detonation for a planar blast is preferably triggered when an air blade contacts the incoming projectile. A significantly more effective method is to sense the location of the propeller that strikes the target to trigger a directional charge.
  • [0037]
    In the most “passive” design, the propellers would be spring-loaded and deploy at a preset time following launch. There are a number of scenarios of intercept that we shall examine. Such scenarios result due to, for example, variations in the initial distance (the distance of the target from the location to be protected as the interceptor is fired), distance of intercept, speed of incoming projectile, and the charge necessary to deflect or destroy the target. The problem is therefore a multi-objective design problem.
  • [0038]
    Some design parameters are: The initial spin rate of the interceptor; The number of airscrews and possibility of more than one layer; The initial velocity of the interceptor; Propeller deployment time; and Means and method of detonating the charge, the type of charge and the detonation related parameters. These parameters suggest the various degrees of “smartness” that can be built into the target interception system, from the dumbest of all being that all the parameters are statically preset, through being preset at launch, to be controlled via sensory information and onboard microprocessors continuously during flight. The pitch of the blades may also be varied for optimal action.
  • [0039]
    The intercepting projectile preferably has a typical projectile shape, i.e., a body of revolution with an ogive bow.
  • [0040]
    The primary advantages of the windmill type of interceptors are that: (1) Because of the increased cross section, a less sophisticated aiming mechanism is needed; (2) No actuators or on board electronics are necessary; (3) No tracking of interceptor is required; (4) Only detection of incoming projectile is required; (5) A bank of such devices could be fired simultaneously; (6) The rapid-fire multi-barrel gun can fire a “wall” of interceptors at the target to assure successful intercept; and (7) The intercept projectiles and their means of delivery may be made incrementally “smarter” and more lethal.
  • Whirlybird Deploying Interceptor Projectile
  • [0041]
    A simpler concept would have a constant interceptor area Ai in time, with the interceptor launched as a whirlybird. Using a torsional spring to spin the intercept projectile at launch. Thrust is generated by the spinning propellers. Following launch, the spinning rate and the linear velocity may be significantly increased by firing appropriately positioned shots. In comparison with the previous option, the linear velocity Vi would be low, hence the intercept distance L will be small. This concept is for objects that have some other means of protection, such as a light armor, or have a relatively small profile so that by minimally deflecting the target, collision could be avoided.
  • [0042]
    The trajectory of the whirlybird concept for intercept is illustrated in FIG. 2. Similar to FIG. 1, the trajectory of the incoming projectile is shown. The trajectory of the whirlybird is shown on the left. Note that after an initial acceleration (not shown) there is a longer period of deceleration.
  • [0043]
    Here the function of the airscrew is to transfer the angular momentum (from launch) of the projectile to linear momentum by energizing the axial flow though the blades. The transfer drag slows the rotation of the propellers, which in turn provides transferred momentum to overcome the aerodynamic drag of linear motion. The end result is a continuous slowing of both rotational and linear velocity of the interceptor.
  • [0044]
    The whirlybird interceptor is designed such that during the intercept time, the linear velocity is low enough but the rotational velocity is still high enough to guarantee a hit. For this reason, the number of propeller arms should to be more than the previous embodiment and the possibility of employing more than one layer of propellers that are positioned at a predetermined distance from each other. A directional charge would also be more appropriate compared to a plain charge since the point of interception is close to the object being protected.
  • [0045]
    A number of design are possible, such as (1) To increase the distance traveled, the interceptor can be fired to provide some initial linear momentum, and/or (2) Depending upon the firing speed, the airscrews may still act as propellers or may act as a windmill decelerating the interceptor from launch.
  • [0046]
    As pictured in FIG. 2, the propellers must be in front of the center of gravity for longitudinal stability (The propellers pull the interceptor through the air).
  • [0047]
    The design parameters are: (1) Initial torque; (2) Initial linear velocity; and (3) the number of blades. In addition, the pitch of the blades may be allowed to change (decrease) with time, so as to keep the rotation speed high by minimizing the rotational drag.
  • [0048]
    The primary advantages of the whirlybird type of interceptors are that: (1) Because of the increased cross section, a less sophisticated aiming mechanism is needed; (2) No actuators or on board electronics are necessary; (3) No tracking of interceptor is required; (4) Only detection of incoming projectile is required; and (5) A bank of such devices could be fired simultaneously.
  • [0049]
    In general and similar to any other protective weapon, the effectiveness of the weapon is increased if the target is rapidly spotted and the intercepting projectiles are fired in its direction as accurately as possible. Since the primary objective of the projectile interceptors, a list of possible launch platforms and their mode of operation are briefly described. Here, the objective is that the development of launch platforms can be rather routine, even though some of the options are technologically challenging. The latter statement is believed to be justified since other similar platforms with even more strict requirements have in the past been developed by the military.
  • [0050]
    The options available for the launch platforms include the following: (1) Multiple launch tubes (barrels) are mounted radially over a relatively slow but fast enough rotating (in the horizontal plane) platform. By having multiple launch tubes positioned a short angular distance from each other, the platform has to only be rotated a few degrees to direct the interceptor in the direction of the incoming target. The pointing becomes even faster since the platform does not have to be stopped for firing. A number of launch tubes may also be stacked at each location; (2) Similar to the previous platform with the difference that the platform is continuously rotating. As the result and by having enough launch tubes in the radial direction, one of the launch tubes will be pointing in the appropriate direction for firing almost instantaneously; (3) A fixed set of launch tubes may be directed in the directions of maximum threat. This is particularly appropriate for stationary objects or objects that are not moving and have positioned themselves in a position in which there are only limited directions from which they would be threatened. Such platforms may, for example be set up all around a camp to protect the interior assets from incoming threats; (4) All the above launch platforms may be equipped with guns that fire multiple rounds very rapidly. The platforms may also be equipped with radar or other target sensing and fire control systems.
  • [0051]
    Referring now to FIG. 3 an alternative implementation for deploying the blades of a projectile is shown. Referring to FIG. 3, a purely mechanical means for deploying the blades is shown. FIG. 3 shows a projectile 100 having a shell 102 with slots 104. In the interior of the projectile 100 is housed a slidable mass 106 having flexible blades 108 depending therefrom towards the rear of the projectile 100. Upon firing of the projectile 100, the acceleration of the projectile causes the mass 106 to move relative to the shell towards the rear of the projectile. As the mass 106 moves rearward, a block 110 forces the flexible blades 108 to enter the slots 104 and deploy from the shell 102. The block can also be shaped to also twist the blades 108 as they deploy to facilitate either propelling or slowing of the projectile 100. A damping means (not shown) may be added to slow the acceleration of the mass 106 resulting in a slowing of the deployment of the blades 108. Further, a similar arrangement can be used without using the acceleration of the projectile 100 to deploy the blades 108. For instance, a charge can be detonated in the vicinity of area A to drive the mass rearward. The charge can be detonated at the time of firing or at a predetermined time interval after firing.
  • [0052]
    While there has been shown and described what is considered to be preferred embodiments of the invention, it will, of course, be understood that various modifications and changes in form or detail could readily be made without departing from the spirit of the invention. It is therefore intended that the invention be not limited to the exact forms described and illustrated, but should be constructed to cover all modifications that may fall within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (4)

  1. 1-10. (canceled)
  2. 11. A method for protecting a second location against a first projectile fired from a first location at the second location, the method comprising:
    firing at least one second projectile toward the first projectile; and
    increasing a footprint of the second projectile via a deployment from the second projectile to prevent the first projectile from striking the second location;
    wherein the firing comprises one or more of:
    positioning multi-tube launchers at varying angular intervals at least around a portion of the second location, the multi-tube launchers having a plurality of launch tubes, each of the launch tubes for launching a corresponding second projectile;
    positioning multiple layers of launch tubes for launching the second projectile at varying angular intervals at least around a portion of the second location;
    moving a launch tube for launching the second projectile in a desired direction toward the first projectile prior to firing; and
    continuously rotating the multi-tube launcher for launching the second projectile so that at least one of the launch tubes thereof is oriented towards the first projectile.
  3. 12. An apparatus for protecting a second location against a first projectile fired from a first location at the second location, the apparatus comprising:
    at least one second projectile to be fired toward the first projectile;
    means for increasing a footprint of the second projectile via a deployment from the second projectile to prevent the first projectile from striking the second location; and
    one or more launch tubes for firing the second projectile;
    wherein the one or more launch tubes comprises means for continuously rotating a multi-tube launcher for launching the second projectile so that at least one of the launch tubes thereof is oriented towards the first projectile, the multi-tube launchers having a plurality of launch tubes, each of the launch tubes for launching a corresponding second projectile.
  4. 13-16. (canceled)
US11975829 2001-09-05 2007-10-22 Deployable projectile Abandoned US20100282053A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US31730801 true 2001-09-05 2001-09-05
US10236063 US6997110B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2002-09-04 Deployable bullets
US11290948 US7231875B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2005-11-30 Deployable bullets having a tranquilizer
US11807964 US7765911B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2007-05-31 Deployable projectile
US11975829 US20100282053A1 (en) 2001-09-05 2007-10-22 Deployable projectile

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11975829 US20100282053A1 (en) 2001-09-05 2007-10-22 Deployable projectile

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20100282053A1 true true US20100282053A1 (en) 2010-11-11

Family

ID=26929422

Family Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10236063 Active 2023-01-18 US6997110B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2002-09-04 Deployable bullets
US11290948 Expired - Fee Related US7231875B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2005-11-30 Deployable bullets having a tranquilizer
US11290947 Expired - Fee Related US7234399B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2005-11-30 Deployable bullets having high voltage electrodes
US11807964 Active 2023-11-28 US7765911B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2007-05-31 Deployable projectile
US11975829 Abandoned US20100282053A1 (en) 2001-09-05 2007-10-22 Deployable projectile

Family Applications Before (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10236063 Active 2023-01-18 US6997110B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2002-09-04 Deployable bullets
US11290948 Expired - Fee Related US7231875B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2005-11-30 Deployable bullets having a tranquilizer
US11290947 Expired - Fee Related US7234399B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2005-11-30 Deployable bullets having high voltage electrodes
US11807964 Active 2023-11-28 US7765911B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2007-05-31 Deployable projectile

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (5) US6997110B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2006057658A3 (en) * 2004-04-09 2007-11-22 Corey A Fuzak Primer launched projectile systems
US20080017179A1 (en) * 2004-05-12 2008-01-24 Pepperball Technologies, Inc. Compressed Gas Cartridge Puncture Apparatus
US20060254108A1 (en) * 2005-04-20 2006-11-16 Park Yong S Electrical discharge immobilization weapon projectile having multiple deployed contacts
US7405654B2 (en) * 2005-07-08 2008-07-29 Procedyne Corp. Fluidized bed technology for security enhancement
US7549376B1 (en) * 2005-07-15 2009-06-23 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Non-lethal projectile carrier
US7905180B2 (en) 2006-06-13 2011-03-15 Zuoliang Chen Long range electrified projectile immobilization system
US7373887B2 (en) * 2006-07-01 2008-05-20 Jason Stewart Jackson Expanding projectile
US7966937B1 (en) 2006-07-01 2011-06-28 Jason Stewart Jackson Non-newtonian projectile
US8176850B2 (en) * 2006-10-19 2012-05-15 Xtek Limited Special purpose small arms ammunition
US7455015B2 (en) * 2006-10-19 2008-11-25 Xtek Limited Special purpose small arms ammunition
WO2008059477A3 (en) * 2006-11-13 2009-04-16 Rafael Armament Dev Authoritiy Warhead for intercepting system
US20080178728A1 (en) * 2007-01-25 2008-07-31 Kapeles John A Frangible non-lethal projectile
US7856929B2 (en) 2007-06-29 2010-12-28 Taser International, Inc. Systems and methods for deploying an electrode using torsion
US7984676B1 (en) 2007-06-29 2011-07-26 Taser International, Inc. Systems and methods for a rear anchored projectile
US7958828B1 (en) * 2007-08-03 2011-06-14 Safariland, Llc Drag stabilized low lethality impact munitions and methods
WO2009039221A3 (en) * 2007-09-18 2009-05-07 Joseph L Goode Systems, methods and apparatus for use in distributing irritant powder
US8485475B2 (en) * 2009-12-16 2013-07-16 Daniel W. Allen Debris removal management system and method of operation thereof
US8587918B2 (en) * 2010-07-23 2013-11-19 Taser International, Inc. Systems and methods for electrodes for insulative electronic weaponry
JP5645111B2 (en) * 2010-09-08 2014-12-24 正芳 鈴木 bullet
US20120085259A1 (en) * 2010-10-12 2012-04-12 Cronemberger Pedro De Oliveira Cartridge for light-weighted projectiles
EP2533006A3 (en) * 2011-06-06 2015-03-18 Plasan Sasa Ltd. Armor element and an armor module comprising the same
RU2477443C1 (en) * 2011-09-20 2013-03-10 Российская Федерация, от имени которой выступает Министерство обороны Российской Федерации Cassette-type warheads
US9551552B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2017-01-24 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for aerial interception of aerial threats
US9501055B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2016-11-22 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for engagement management of aerial threats
US9170070B2 (en) 2012-03-02 2015-10-27 Orbital Atk, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for active protection from aerial threats
US9593918B2 (en) 2013-05-14 2017-03-14 Procedyne Corp. Tear gas enhanced fluidized bed security system and method
US9797696B2 (en) * 2014-08-14 2017-10-24 OATH Corporation Conic taper tip fracturing projectiles
US9585867B2 (en) 2015-08-06 2017-03-07 Charles Everett Ankner Cannabinod formulation for the sedation of a human or animal

Citations (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2925965A (en) * 1956-03-07 1960-02-23 Collins Radio Co Guided missile ordnance system
US2984157A (en) * 1950-09-29 1961-05-16 Charles A Johnstone Missile launching systems
US3064537A (en) * 1953-08-04 1962-11-20 Maurice H Baller Beacon launching system
US3106132A (en) * 1961-03-06 1963-10-08 Earl E Biermann Launcher
US3153367A (en) * 1959-07-23 1964-10-20 Frederick W Ross Anti-missile system
US3158062A (en) * 1959-10-12 1964-11-24 Pneumo Dynamics Corp Missile container and launcher
US3534653A (en) * 1967-12-05 1970-10-20 Herbert H Specht Controlled dispersion missile dispenser
US3865009A (en) * 1973-09-13 1975-02-11 Us Navy Launcher mount
US4172407A (en) * 1978-08-25 1979-10-30 General Dynamics Corporation Submunition dispenser system
US4372216A (en) * 1979-12-26 1983-02-08 The Boeing Company Dispensing system for use on a carrier missile for rearward ejection of submissiles
US4409880A (en) * 1980-12-17 1983-10-18 The Boeing Company Missile stowage and launcher system
US4444117A (en) * 1981-03-30 1984-04-24 The Boeing Company Stacked tube submunition dispenser
US4455943A (en) * 1981-08-21 1984-06-26 The Boeing Company Missile deployment apparatus
US4625646A (en) * 1980-10-06 1986-12-02 The Boeing Aerospace Company Aerial missile having multiple submissiles with individual control of submissible ejection
US5067411A (en) * 1989-08-10 1991-11-26 British Aerospace Public Limited Company Weapon systems
US5452640A (en) * 1993-05-06 1995-09-26 Fmc Corporation Multipurpose launcher and controls
US6230629B1 (en) * 1999-01-21 2001-05-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Rapid ignition infrared decoy for anti-ship missile
US20030029347A1 (en) * 2001-06-04 2003-02-13 Lloyd Richard M. Kinetic energy rod warhead with optimal penetrators
US20030126978A1 (en) * 2001-09-05 2003-07-10 Rastegar Jahangir S. Deployable projectiles
US20030172832A1 (en) * 2000-01-24 2003-09-18 O'dwyer James Michael Anti-missile missiles
US20040055498A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-25 Lloyd Richard M. Kinetic energy rod warhead deployment system
US6832740B1 (en) * 1985-12-19 2004-12-21 Short Brothers Plc Missile system and method of missile guidance
US20060130695A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2006-06-22 O'dwyer Sean P Target interception
US7494089B2 (en) * 2005-11-23 2009-02-24 Raytheon Company Multiple kill vehicle (MKV) interceptor and method for intercepting exo and endo-atmospheric targets
US7494090B2 (en) * 2006-03-01 2009-02-24 Raytheon Company Multiple kill vehicle (MKV) interceptor with autonomous kill vehicles

Family Cites Families (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2251918A (en) * 1939-03-15 1941-08-12 Horace W Dawson Antiaircraft projectile
US3390849A (en) * 1965-01-08 1968-07-02 Industrial Nucleonics Corp Identifying flying craft
US3502025A (en) * 1967-10-02 1970-03-24 Wyle Laboratories Nonpenetrating drug injecting bullet
US3901158A (en) * 1969-05-13 1975-08-26 Thomas E Ferb Hypodermic projectile
US3782286A (en) * 1970-11-12 1974-01-01 E Richie Non-lethal projectile and launcher therefor
US3834311A (en) * 1971-06-01 1974-09-10 Mb Ass Cartridge
US4008667A (en) * 1973-12-13 1977-02-22 The L.O.M. Corporation Controlled range bullet
US3952662A (en) * 1974-05-29 1976-04-27 Greenlees William D Non-lethal projectile for riot control
US4030421A (en) * 1975-06-26 1977-06-21 Smith & Wesson Chemical Company, Inc. Dual purpose projectile and weapon combination
US4038902A (en) * 1976-08-17 1977-08-02 Welsh Robert B Artillery weapon
US4104974A (en) * 1977-05-19 1978-08-08 Robinett Max L Tranquilizer ejector for disabling robbers
DE3116175C2 (en) * 1981-04-23 1984-09-13 Heckler & Koch Gmbh, 7238 Oberndorf, De
US4735612A (en) * 1986-09-03 1988-04-05 Ballistivet, Inc. Trauma minimizing dart
US5009164A (en) * 1988-01-11 1991-04-23 Mny Holdings And Agencies Limited Non-penetrating projectile and means therefor
US4863428A (en) * 1988-03-24 1989-09-05 Ballistivet, Inc. Injecting projectile dart
FR2629908B1 (en) * 1988-04-12 1993-05-14 Thomson Brandt Armements Aerodynamic braking device of a body
US5750918A (en) * 1995-10-17 1998-05-12 Foster-Miller, Inc. Ballistically deployed restraining net
US5898125A (en) * 1995-10-17 1999-04-27 Foster-Miller, Inc. Ballistically deployed restraining net
US5698815A (en) * 1995-12-15 1997-12-16 Ragner; Gary Dean Stun bullets
FR2749381B1 (en) * 1996-06-04 1998-08-07 Giat Ind Sa An explosive projectile
US6279482B1 (en) * 1996-07-25 2001-08-28 Trw Inc. Countermeasure apparatus for deploying interceptor elements from a spin stabilized rocket
DE19706632A1 (en) * 1997-02-20 1998-09-03 Daimler Benz Aerospace Ag Projectiles with an active agent
US5831199A (en) * 1997-05-29 1998-11-03 James McNulty, Jr. Weapon for immobilization and capture
CA2362809A1 (en) * 1999-02-16 2000-08-24 David Russell Middleton Hypodermic dart
US6880466B2 (en) * 2002-06-25 2005-04-19 Brent G. Carman Sub-lethal, wireless projectile and accessories
US7065915B2 (en) * 2002-07-25 2006-06-27 Hung-Yi Chang Electric shock gun
US7076903B2 (en) * 2002-10-17 2006-07-18 Edwards Christopher M Safety lock for a firearm

Patent Citations (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2984157A (en) * 1950-09-29 1961-05-16 Charles A Johnstone Missile launching systems
US3064537A (en) * 1953-08-04 1962-11-20 Maurice H Baller Beacon launching system
US2925965A (en) * 1956-03-07 1960-02-23 Collins Radio Co Guided missile ordnance system
US3153367A (en) * 1959-07-23 1964-10-20 Frederick W Ross Anti-missile system
US3158062A (en) * 1959-10-12 1964-11-24 Pneumo Dynamics Corp Missile container and launcher
US3106132A (en) * 1961-03-06 1963-10-08 Earl E Biermann Launcher
US3534653A (en) * 1967-12-05 1970-10-20 Herbert H Specht Controlled dispersion missile dispenser
US3865009A (en) * 1973-09-13 1975-02-11 Us Navy Launcher mount
US4172407A (en) * 1978-08-25 1979-10-30 General Dynamics Corporation Submunition dispenser system
US4372216A (en) * 1979-12-26 1983-02-08 The Boeing Company Dispensing system for use on a carrier missile for rearward ejection of submissiles
US4625646A (en) * 1980-10-06 1986-12-02 The Boeing Aerospace Company Aerial missile having multiple submissiles with individual control of submissible ejection
US4409880A (en) * 1980-12-17 1983-10-18 The Boeing Company Missile stowage and launcher system
US4444117A (en) * 1981-03-30 1984-04-24 The Boeing Company Stacked tube submunition dispenser
US4455943A (en) * 1981-08-21 1984-06-26 The Boeing Company Missile deployment apparatus
US6832740B1 (en) * 1985-12-19 2004-12-21 Short Brothers Plc Missile system and method of missile guidance
US5067411A (en) * 1989-08-10 1991-11-26 British Aerospace Public Limited Company Weapon systems
US5452640A (en) * 1993-05-06 1995-09-26 Fmc Corporation Multipurpose launcher and controls
US6230629B1 (en) * 1999-01-21 2001-05-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Rapid ignition infrared decoy for anti-ship missile
US20030172832A1 (en) * 2000-01-24 2003-09-18 O'dwyer James Michael Anti-missile missiles
US20030029347A1 (en) * 2001-06-04 2003-02-13 Lloyd Richard M. Kinetic energy rod warhead with optimal penetrators
US20030126978A1 (en) * 2001-09-05 2003-07-10 Rastegar Jahangir S. Deployable projectiles
US6860448B2 (en) * 2001-09-05 2005-03-01 Omnitek Partners, Llc Deployable projectiles
US20060130695A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2006-06-22 O'dwyer Sean P Target interception
US20040055498A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-25 Lloyd Richard M. Kinetic energy rod warhead deployment system
US7494089B2 (en) * 2005-11-23 2009-02-24 Raytheon Company Multiple kill vehicle (MKV) interceptor and method for intercepting exo and endo-atmospheric targets
US7494090B2 (en) * 2006-03-01 2009-02-24 Raytheon Company Multiple kill vehicle (MKV) interceptor with autonomous kill vehicles

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US7234399B2 (en) 2007-06-26 grant
US7765911B2 (en) 2010-08-03 grant
US6997110B2 (en) 2006-02-14 grant
US20100162915A1 (en) 2010-07-01 application
US7231875B2 (en) 2007-06-19 grant
US20070101891A1 (en) 2007-05-10 application
US20070101892A1 (en) 2007-05-10 application
US20030041768A1 (en) 2003-03-06 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3903804A (en) Rocket-propelled cluster weapon
US5509357A (en) Dual operating mode warhead
US6666402B2 (en) 2-D projectile trajectory corrector
US6279482B1 (en) Countermeasure apparatus for deploying interceptor elements from a spin stabilized rocket
US3877383A (en) Munition
US6626077B1 (en) Intercept vehicle for airborne nuclear, chemical and biological weapons of mass destruction
US7202809B1 (en) Fast acting active protection system
US6231002B1 (en) System and method for defending a vehicle
US5691502A (en) Low velocity radial deployment with predeterminded pattern
US4638737A (en) Multi-warhead, anti-armor missile
US5661254A (en) System for protecting a target from missiles
US4149166A (en) Doppler countermeasure device
US6513438B1 (en) Method for offering a phantom target, and decoy
US6666145B1 (en) Self extracting submunition
US5400688A (en) Missile defense system
US5440993A (en) High velocity impulse rocket
US4444117A (en) Stacked tube submunition dispenser
US7530315B2 (en) Weapon and weapon system employing the same
US4742774A (en) Small arms ammunition
US20070261542A1 (en) Airborne platform protection apparatus and associated system and method
US6231003B1 (en) Apparatus for defending a vehicle against an approaching threat
US20070285304A1 (en) Target orbit modification via gas-blast
US4712465A (en) Dual purpose gun barrel for spin stabilized or fin stabilized projectiles and gun launched rockets
US6920827B2 (en) Vehicle-borne system and method for countering an incoming threat
US20060169832A1 (en) Rocket propelled barrier defense system