Connect public, paid and private patent data with Google Patents Public Datasets

Method, computer, machine-readable medium, computer program and system, concerning the manufacture of dental prostheses

Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090246736A1
US20090246736A1 US12415473 US41547309A US2009246736A1 US 20090246736 A1 US20090246736 A1 US 20090246736A1 US 12415473 US12415473 US 12415473 US 41547309 A US41547309 A US 41547309A US 2009246736 A1 US2009246736 A1 US 2009246736A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
data
dental
prosthesis
record
milling
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12415473
Inventor
Stephan Holzner
Gerhard Weber
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Synthes GmbH
Original Assignee
Stephan Holzner
Gerhard Weber
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61CDENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C5/00Filling or capping teeth
    • A61C5/70Tooth crowns; Making thereof
    • A61C5/77Methods or devices for making crowns
    • G16H50/50
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T409/00Gear cutting, milling, or planing
    • Y10T409/30Milling
    • Y10T409/303752Process

Abstract

The invention relates to the examination of a dental prosthesis, wherein the dental prosthesis is examined with finite element methods. Furthermore, the invention relates to the automated manufacture of a dental prosthesis, wherein the shape of a remaining tooth area is directly determined on the basis of the remaining tooth area itself. Furthermore, the invention relates to a method, wherein manufacturing data (milling data) which have been created with a system for calculating manufacturing data (system for calculating milling data) are optionally forwarded to one or another manufacturing machine (milling machine) at different locations.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • [0001]
    This is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/486,979, which was filed on Jul. 13, 2006, and which in turn claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(b) of German Patent Application Serial No. 102005035475.0, which was filed on Jul. 28, 2005.
  • [0002]
    The invention relates to a method, a computer, a machine-readable medium, and a computer program with program code means by which a data record representing a dental prosthesis can be examined.
  • [0003]
    Further, the invention relates to a method and a system for the manufacture of a dental prosthesis, wherein a data record for a dental prosthesis is created and transmitted to a production system on the basis of a data record representing a remaining tooth area.
  • [0004]
    Furthermore, the invention relates to two methods and two systems for the manufacture of a dental prosthesis as well as a method for examining a dental prosthesis data record, a computer, a machine-readable medium, and a computer program concerning the examination of a dental prosthesis data record. These objects relate to the treatment of manufacturing data (e.g. milling data) as they are employed for the manufacture of dental prostheses.
  • [0005]
    Furthermore, the invention relates to two methods and two systems for creating dental prosthesis data records.
  • [0006]
    From WO 02/39056 A1, it is known to digitally detect the shapes of remaining tooth areas by means of patterns and to generate the shapes of dental prostheses on the basis thereof with the aid of software. In the process, data records representing a dental prosthesis are created which can subsequently be used when the dental prostheses are manufactured, for example by milling.
  • [0007]
    It is an object of the present invention to improve the dental prostheses which can be manufactured by this procedure. This object is achieved by a method according to claim 1, a computer according to claim 12, a machine-readable medium according to claim 13, and a computer program according to claim 14.
  • [0008]
    It is another object of the present invention to facilitate or accelerate the manufacture of dental prostheses. This object is achieved by a method according to claim 15 and a system according to claim 20.
  • [0009]
    It is another object of the present invention to integrate as optimally as possible existing appliances into the manufacture of dental prostheses. This object is achieved by a method according to claim 21, a system according to claim 25, a method according to claim 26 or 30, a system according to claim 29, a computer according to claim 31, a machine-readable medium according to claim 32, and a computer program with program code means according to claim 33.
  • [0010]
    It is another object of the present invention to permit the user the modeling of dental prostheses with means as simple as possible. This object is achieved by a method according to claim 37 and a system according to claim 39.
  • [0011]
    This object is also achieved by a method according to claim 40 and a system according to claim 42.
  • [0012]
    Advantageous embodiments are disclosed in the respective subclaims.
  • [0013]
    For improving the dental prostheses, it is suggested to examine the data records of the dental prostheses with finite element methods. With these methods, very diverse properties of the dental prostheses can be examined or else simulated. For example, the breaking strength of the dental prosthesis or the stability of a dental prosthesis during production etc. can be examined.
  • [0014]
    In application, dental prostheses underlie strong forces, for example, during chewing. In the process, the dental prosthesis is subjected to the pressure between upper and lower jaws. Therefore, in the examination of the data record, the data record of the remaining tooth area onto which the dental prosthesis is to be fitted and/or the data of the opposite tooth area (i.e. the upper jaw if the dental prosthesis is intended for the lower jaw, or vice versa, respectively) are advantageously considered. However, an examination without these data is also possible if, for example, any kind of force onto the dental prosthesis is simulated with predetermined limits. In the process, one can examine whether the dental prosthesis can deal with these forces.
  • [0015]
    A dental prosthesis is subjected to certain forces even during production, while it is, for example, manufactured by milling it out of a blank with a cutter head. The stability of the dental prosthesis for the production process can also be examined with finite element methods. Here, it has to be considered that the forces during production might be smaller than those in application, that, however, the milling material sometimes is raw ceramic material which is essentially more brittle compared to fired ceramic material.
  • [0016]
    In an advantageous operation, the result of the examination is filed for documentation purposes. Depending on the result of the examination, the data record of the dental prosthesis can be modified to achieve a sufficiently high and desired breaking strength.
  • [0017]
    The examination of the data record can be performed before as well as after the manufacture of the dental prosthesis. The performance beforehand has the advantage that the dental prosthesis can be possibly manufactured in a modified manner. On the other hand, an examination is possibly only necessary when the dental prosthesis is already broken and one has to determine why it is broken.
  • [0018]
    If the dental prosthesis is broken or if the examination of the dental prosthesis shows that it can be easily broken, a dental prosthesis data record is created which was preferably automatically changed such that the breaking strength was increased at the point of break. This can be performed, for example, by correspondingly increasing the wall thickness, by additional or thicker webs or the like. Moreover, the dental prosthesis of the new dental prosthesis data record is preferably manufactured directly. The new dental prosthesis data record can again be examined for its breaking strength. Here, with a repeating iteration method (breaking strength test, change of the dental prosthesis data record), a dental prosthesis data record can be obtained which corresponds to an optimized dental prosthesis.
  • [0019]
    Moreover, if only after the manufacture of the dental prosthesis the breaking strength is possibly doubted, the examinations with respect to the breaking strength can be performed in order to prove that the dental prosthesis can meet possible requirements.
  • [0020]
    Here, it is advantageous to graphically represent the tensions and/or forces and/or pressures that can lead to breaking, for example with colors, shades of gray, etc. These tensions, forces and/or pressures are established with the finite element method. This graphical representation as a rule permits a good possibility of judging the breaking strength by skilled observers and then also provides a good indication for possible or necessary changes of the dental prosthesis data record.
  • [0021]
    Such graphical representations can be established as individual pictures or else as video clips. They can be accessible to the person who created the dental prosthesis data record, for example by e-mail, by a web server or otherwise (by mail).
  • [0022]
    In an advantageous approach, the dental prosthesis is manufactured and subsequently photographed, so that the photos (also electronic pictures) can also be filed.
  • [0023]
    The method is advantageously integrated into a production process. In this case, it is e.g. also conceivable as regular part of a quality assurance process.
  • [0024]
    For performing the method, a correspondingly equipped computer can be provided. Moreover, a machine-readable medium or a computer program can be provided for performing the methods.
  • [0025]
    When a data record is obtained which represents the shape of a remaining tooth area, usually, a model of the remaining tooth area is made as the latter can then be separated into individual parts and can thus be optimally scanned. In the method proposed herein, however, the possibility of determining the shape of a remaining tooth area directly on the basis of the remaining tooth area is considered. Here, the shape of the remaining tooth area is, for example, determined in the oral cavity of the patient. The thus gathered data are transmitted to modeling software by which a dental prosthesis data record can be created on the basis of which a production system can manufacture the dental prosthesis.
  • [0026]
    The data record is preferably obtained with a so-called chair side system that is arranged directly at the dentist's chair. If therefore during dental treatment it becomes necessary to manufacture a dental prosthesis, the shape of the remaining tooth area can be directly obtained. This is advantageously performed with an optical probe which can, for example, well measure cavities in teeth.
  • [0027]
    While the data record is advantageously obtained at the dentist himself, the modeling software can, for example, be employed in a dentistry laboratory or a production center. This relieves the dentist of such work. The production system and the modeling software neither have to be at the same location as the production system can be, for example, in a central production center, whereas the modeling software is used by a dental laboratory technician or in a dentistry laboratory.
  • [0028]
    The manufacture of a dental prosthesis in a production center normally has great advantages with respect to the quality of the dental prostheses as here corresponding apparatuses and experience are available.
  • [0029]
    The dental prosthesis is advantageously an inlay, but it can also be an overlay, a crown, a part of an implant or a bridge.
  • [0030]
    In the method, the dental prosthesis data record is advantageously at the same time examined with finite element methods. This can be made at the location where the dental prosthesis data record is created as then the dental prosthesis data record can be adjusted on the basis of this examination. However, the examination can also take place at the location of the manufacture of the dental prosthesis as here condense calculation capacity is available by which one can quickly check whether it makes sense to produce such a dental prosthesis at all.
  • [0031]
    For performing the method, a correspondingly assembled system can be provided.
  • [0032]
    Some dentistry laboratories have digitally controllable milling machines by means of which smaller dental prostheses can be manufactured relatively quickly.
  • [0033]
    In production centers, normally higher-quality milling machines are available by means of which one can also easily manufacture large dental prostheses. For doing so, systems for calculating milling data are available in the production centers, which calculate milling data required for the control of the milling machine from data representing a dental prosthesis. These calculations require considerable calculating capacities. In the method, the execution of the milling data calculation can be performed at one location, the milling data can then be transmitted to another location by remote data transmission, and at the other location, the dental prosthesis can be manufactured. This makes it possible to have the milling data calculation performed in a production center, but to carry out the dental prosthesis manufacture with a milling machine in the dentistry laboratory. This also has the advantage that the dental prosthesis is available directly in the dentistry laboratory. With a manufacture of the dental prosthesis in the production center, the dental prosthesis first has to be dispatched.
  • [0034]
    Instead of manufacturing dental prostheses with milling machines, construction methods can also be employed, such as laser lithography, where liquid or powdery medium is applied layer upon layer and the respective uppermost layer is hardened by laser irradiation. Thus, very diverse structures can be manufactured. Representatively of general manufacturing methods for dental prostheses, here the milling method will be discussed. However, in all manufacturing methods, the same problems arise, as in each case a data record describing a dental prosthesis has to be converted into manufacturing data that control a machine which can naturally by very elaborate.
  • [0035]
    It is furthermore advantageous if the dental prosthesis data record is also created at the first location, i.e. for example in the dentistry laboratory. The dental prosthesis data record can then also be transmitted to the production center by remote data transmission.
  • [0036]
    This relieves the dental laboratory technician of the maintenance and purchase of systems for calculating milling data, and he can make use of them quasi as a service of a production center, or in this case rather a calculation center.
  • [0037]
    However, it is also possible that in the dentistry laboratory only the data record that describes the remaining tooth area is gathered, that this data record is sent to the production center and that there the data record that represents the dental prosthesis is created.
  • [0038]
    The transmission of the milling data from the second location or the first location can, for example, be performed only after a decision on whether the transmission is to take place at all. Of course, it is also possible that the milling data are not transmitted but rather forwarded to a milling machine available at a second location, i.e. for example within the production center.
  • [0039]
    For performing the method, a correspondingly equipped system can exist.
  • [0040]
    In other methods, it can be examined whether the milling data are to be transmitted to the first location or whether they are to be forwarded to a milling machine at the second location. For doing so, the data record representing the dental prosthesis or only a part thereof as well as the record of the milling data can be examined.
  • [0041]
    The manufacture of large dental prostheses can thus be performed in the production center whereas the manufacture of small dental prostheses can be performed in the dentistry laboratory with their smaller milling machines. For doing so, a correspondingly equipped system can also exist.
  • [0042]
    Even independently of where or how a dental prosthesis data record was created, one can generally examine whether the milling data are transmitted to a remote location or to a near location by means of a dental prosthesis data record or a milling data record. For doing so, a corresponding computer, a machine-readable medium or a computer program with program code means for performing the method can be provided.
  • [0043]
    In all methods, one can perform the examination of the dental prosthesis data record with finite element methods at one or several of the different locations.
  • [0044]
    Advantageous embodiments of the invention are to be illustrated with reference to the accompanying Figures, wherein:
  • [0045]
    FIGS. 1 a and 1 b show a dental prosthesis and a remaining tooth area in different positions relative to one another,
  • [0046]
    FIG. 2 shows a dental prosthesis with finite elements,
  • [0047]
    FIG. 3 shows a dental prosthesis between upper jaw and lower jaw,
  • [0048]
    FIGS. 4 a and 4 b show a tooth with a cavity,
  • [0049]
    FIG. 5 shows a schematic representation of a procedure for the manufacture of a dental prosthesis,
  • [0050]
    FIG. 6 shows another schematic representation of a method for the manufacture of a dental prosthesis.
  • [0051]
    FIGS. 7-25 are flow diagrams illustrating different aspects of the method of the invention.
  • [0052]
    FIG. 1 a shows a dental prosthesis 1 located above a remaining tooth area 2. The remaining tooth area 2 comprises two prepared stumps of the tooth 3 and 4 as well as a gingival area 5.
  • [0053]
    In FIG. 1 b, the dental prosthesis 1 is shown as it is fitted on the remaining tooth area 2. Here, the dental prosthesis 1 is a bridge. For the remaining tooth area 2 as well as for the dental prosthesis 1, there can be a digital data record representing the remaining tooth area or the dental prosthesis 1. Such a data record representing a dental prosthesis 1 can be examined with a finite element method.
  • [0054]
    In FIG. 2, it is schematically shown how the data record of the dental prosthesis 1 was subdivided into a large number of small elements 6 (finite elements) by means of appropriate software. This approach permits to simulate tensions that can occur in the dental prostheses due to exterior forces. For example, one can examine what force is required for breaking the dental prosthesis at the site marked by arrow 7. The schematic subdivision into finite elements 6 shown in FIG. 2 is only given by way of example. It will be advantageous to consider finite elements varying in size and shape.
  • [0055]
    FIG. 3 shows how the dental prosthesis 1 is fitted on a remaining tooth area 2. Above the dental prosthesis 1, furthermore a tooth area 8 is represented which corresponds to the opposite jaw. Data representing the remaining tooth area 2 as well as the remaining tooth area 8 can be considered in the examination of the data record of the dental prosthesis 1.
  • [0056]
    A dental prosthesis 1 is, for example, milled out of a blank during manufacture. In the process, forces that can also lead to a break are applied on the dental prosthesis being formed. As a rule, the dental prosthesis is not milled out of the end material, but in case of ceramics out of a preliminary stage which is subsequently fired whereby it obtains its complete hardness. The material which is worked by milling, however, is comparably brittle. In order to avoid a break in the process, the data record of the dental prosthesis can therefore also be examined for stability during production.
  • [0057]
    In FIG. 4 a, a tooth 9 into which a cavity was milled is schematically shown. The cavity 10 can, for example, have been made for removing caries. An inlay can be provided for filling the cavity 10.
  • [0058]
    In order to determine the shape of the inlay, the shape of the cavity 10 has to be determined. This can, on the one hand, be performed by producing a mould of the cavity 10 and the tooth 9 by means of which then a model of the hollowed tooth 9 is created.
  • [0059]
    However, it is easier to determine the shape of the cavity 10 directly. This can be performed, for example, with an optical probe 11 (see FIG. 5) which is brought into a corresponding position relative to the cavity 10, so that the same can be completely scanned.
  • [0060]
    Instead of gathering a data record from only one tooth 9 and one cavity 10, one can also scan a larger remaining tooth area. This can be performed, for example, by individual scans from predetermined directions.
  • [0061]
    The thus obtained data can be stored or processed in a unit 12 (see FIG. 5). From there, the data representing the remaining tooth area can be transmitted to modeling software 14. The software can also be installed, for example, in a computer with the aid of which a dental prosthesis data record 15 is created. The modeling software can create the dental prosthesis data record all-automatically, i.e. without any human help, or semiautomatically on the basis of operator inputs.
  • [0062]
    The thus obtained dental prosthesis data record 15 is transmitted to a production system 17 which, for example, first calculates milling data and subsequently controls a cutter head 18. With the cutter head 18, one can mill a dental prosthesis 20 out of a blank 19. Instead of milling, one can also employ any other method of manufacturing dental prostheses, such as laser lithography. The dental prosthesis can be dispatched to the patient's location, so that the dental prosthesis 20 can be fitted.
  • [0063]
    The data record representing the shape of the remaining tooth area is preferably obtained at the dentist. The modeling of the dental prosthesis data record is advantageously made by a dental laboratory technician or in a dentistry laboratory, respectively. The manufacture of the dental prosthesis or the production system 17, respectively, is preferably located in a production center. In this manner, the various components which are employed in the manufacture of dental prostheses can be optimally linked so that an optimal utilization can be obtained. The production centers having high throughput capacities can optimally utilize the appliances and correspondingly optimize them, while in various dentistry laboratories, the systems for the creation (modeling) of dental prosthesis data records can be optimally employed and correspondingly optimized. Here, furthermore a procedure wherein the production is not executed in the production center itself, but where the manufacturing data record is rather calculated like in a computer center and sent to the dentistry laboratory is particularly advantageous (also see below). There, the dental prosthesis can be manufactured, so that it is directly at the dental laboratory technician's hand. In the computer center, the quality assurance and filing can then be possibly centrally performed for documentation purposes.
  • [0064]
    The transmission 13, 16 is performed, for example, via Internet which permits the transmission of relatively large data volumes. Other remote data transmission means are also possible.
  • [0065]
    However, it is also possible that two of the components 12, 14, 17, or else all three of them are with the dentist.
  • [0066]
    While in FIGS. 4 and 5 the case of an inlay is shown, an overlay, a crown, a part of an implant or a bridge can also be manufactured in this manner.
  • [0067]
    FIG. 6 shows two remote locations (A) and (B). Location (A) is, for example, that of a dentistry laboratory, and location (B) that of a production center and/or computer center. At location (B), a system for calculating milling data 24 is installed which can calculate the milling data for the control of a milling machine 26, 30 from a dental prosthesis data record. The milling machine 26 can mill a dental prosthesis out of a blank 28 with a cutter head 27. Equally, the milling machine 30 can mill a dental prosthesis out of a blank 32 with the cutter head 31. Instead of the milling machine 26 and/or the milling machine 30, other machines for manufacturing dental prostheses can also be provided. Correspondingly, instead of or in addition to the system for calculating milling data, a corresponding system for calculating manufacturing data has to be provided.
  • [0068]
    From the system for calculating milling data 24, the milling data can be transmitted to location (A) by means of remote data transmission 25, so that they can be forwarded to the milling machine 26 installed there. The milling data can also be forwarded from the system for calculating milling data 24 to a milling machine 30 at the same location (B) (see 29). Whether the milling data are transmitted to the milling machine 26 or to the milling machine 30, can depend on various factors. On the one hand, it can be preset on the orderer's demand. However, one can also examine which manufacturing mode is more reasonable, quicker, cheaper or otherwise advantageous. The manufacture with the milling machine 26, for example, has the advantage that a dispatch of the dental prosthesis to the dentistry laboratory is not necessary. The manufacture in the production center (B), however, has the advantage that by large scale manufacture low costs can be achieved as a good utilization of the milling machine 30 can be ensured. Moreover, larger dental prostheses difficult to manufacture can be better manufactured with a more accurate and precise milling machine 23 provided with a larger working range.
  • [0069]
    The dental prosthesis data record from which the system for calculating milling data 24 calculates the milling data can either have been created at location (A) or at location (B), i.e. either by the dental laboratory technician or in the production center. It can be created all-automatically or semiautomatically by means of software. In FIG. 6, the case is shown where a dental prosthesis data record 22 was created at location (A) by the dental laboratory technician with a computer 21 and subsequently transmitted (23) to the production center at location (B). With the method, it is thus for example possible that a dental laboratory technician creates a dental prosthesis data record 22 with his computer 21, transmits the same by remote data transmission, such as, for example, via Internet (23) to the production center (B), where the system for calculating milling data 24 calculates the milling data and sends them back to location (A) by remote data transmission (25) where then the dental prosthesis can be manufactured with the milling machine 26.
  • [0070]
    In the production center (B), a central filing of the data in a corresponding memory 34 (see reference numeral 33) can also be performed. Here, the milling data record as well as the dental prosthesis data record can be filed.
  • [0071]
    It is also possible to transmit milling data to the milling machine 26 at the dental laboratory technician as well as to forward them to a milling machine 30 in the production center. In this case, for example, in the dentistry laboratory (A), a prototype of a dental prosthesis can be manufactured from a comparably soft material, which is inserted until the dental prosthesis of the production center (B) made of a harder material is manufactured and dispatched.
  • [0072]
    The represented milling machines can be triaxial milling machines (as symbolically indicated in the Figures). However, four-axial or five-axial milling machines can also be provided. Such appliances, however, are essentially more expensive, so that its employment rather offers itself in the production center (B).
  • One System <-> at Least Two Users
  • [0073]
    In a method for creating dental prosthesis data records, a user usually needs a computer with corresponding software which permits the modeling of dental prostheses. These computers are especially equipped for quick graphical data processing and are therefore technically rather complex. In order to offer a user the possibility of modeling dental prostheses with as little effort as possible, a method according to claim 37 and a system according to claim 38 are provided. Here, two users get the possibility of sharing one system, wherein, however, both users can keep their respective data separately from one another. To this end, advantageously an operating system of the computer is provided that permits separate data storage by several users (multi-user operating system). It is thus possible for two users to independently share one system. This can be interesting, for example, for two dental laboratories and/or dental practices which are situated close to one another and can share one system.
  • Data Server, Modeling Client
  • [0074]
    In order to create dental prosthesis data records, one starts from digitalized data describing a remaining tooth area. Here, these data can be either obtained on the basis of models (usually from plaster) or directly at the remaining tooth area. For obtaining these data records, as a rule a corresponding scanner is provided which can scan remaining tooth areas or models. The scanner is as a rule connected to a computer which controls the scanner and stores or further processes, respectively, the scan data. The scanning is performed relatively quickly, i.e. within a period of down to less than a minute.
  • [0075]
    The modeling of a dental prosthesis is usually performed at the same computer as here the data and corresponding software for processing the data relevant for the dental prosthesis already exist. This modeling is largely computer-aided. However, this takes a relatively long time (compared to scanning). If the dental prosthesis is modeled, the next scanning operation for the next dental prosthesis can follow.
  • [0076]
    In contrast, there is the task of reducing the time for the creation of dental prosthesis data records or improving the utilization of the scanner and/or computer.
  • [0077]
    For doing so, a data server is provided on which scan data are collected and/or stored. This server can, for example, control a scanner by which scan data are collected. Then, however, one or more other computers (clients) are provided by which the dental prosthesis data records can be created (modeling). Meanwhile, however, the next scanning operation can be already executed, so that the data are then directly available for the next dental prosthesis data modeling when the previous modeling operation is completed. It is also possible to simultaneously model with several clients. Nevertheless, only one server is necessary as not much time is required for scanning. In case of many client computers, however, more than one server with scan data can also be provided in order to achieve higher capacities.
  • [0078]
    The server and the client or clients can be situated in the same dentistry laboratory and/or at the same dentist and/or production center. With this method or with such a system, it is, however, also possible that various dentists/laboratories/production centers share one system for obtaining scan data, and that they then, however, perform the modeling of the dental prostheses independently.

Claims (57)

1. (canceled)
2. (canceled)
3. (canceled)
4. (canceled)
5. (canceled)
6. (canceled)
7. (canceled)
8. (canceled)
9. (canceled)
10. (canceled)
11. (canceled)
12. (canceled)
13. (canceled)
14. (canceled)
15. Method for manufacturing a dental prosthesis, comprising the steps of:
obtaining a data record representing the shape of a remaining tooth area directly on the basis of the remaining tooth area,
transmitting the data record to modeling software by which a dental prosthesis data record can be created,
examining the dental prosthesis data record to determine whether the dental prosthesis data record is to be transmitted to a production system, and
transmitting the dental prosthesis data record to the production system that manufactures the dental prosthesis, if the determination is positive.
16. Method according to claim 15, wherein the data record is obtained using a chair side system.
17. Method according to claim 15, wherein the data record is obtained at a first location and the dental prosthesis data record is created and/or the dental prosthesis is manufactured at a second location that is different than the first location.
18. Method according to claim 15, wherein the dental prosthesis is an inlay, an overlay, a crown, part of an implant or a bridge.
19. Method according to claim 15, wherein examining the dental prosthesis data record includes examining a data record representing a dental prosthesis using finite element methods.
20. System for manufacturing a dental prosthesis having
a device for obtaining a data record representing a shape of a remaining tooth area directly on the basis of the remaining tooth area,
means for transmitting the data record to modeling software by which a dental prosthesis data record can be created,
means for executing the modeling software for creating the dental prosthesis data record,
means for examining whether the dental prosthesis data record is to be transmitted to a production system that can manufacture a dental prosthesis, and
means for transmitting the dental prosthesis data record to the production system, if the determination is positive.
21. Method for manufacturing a dental prosthesis, comprising the steps of:
creating a dental prosthesis data record,
calculating manufacturing data with a system for calculating manufacturing data at a first location on the basis of the dental prosthesis data record,
deciding at the first location whether the manufacturing data are to be transmitted to a second location,
transmitting the manufacturing data by remote data transmission from the first location to the second location, if the determination is positive, and
manufacturing the dental prosthesis at the second location, if the determination is positive.
22. Method according to claim 21, wherein the dental prosthesis data record is created at the second location, and transmitted to the first location by remote data transmission.
23. (canceled)
24. Method according to claim 21, further comprising examining the dental prosthesis data record using a method wherein a data record representing a dental prosthesis is examined using finite element methods.
25. System for manufacturing a dental prosthesis having:
a device for creating a dental prosthesis data record,
a system for calculating manufacturing data at a first location for calculating the manufacturing data on the basis of the dental prosthesis data record,
means for deciding at the first location whether the manufacturing data are to be transmitted to a second location,
remote data transmission means for transmitting the manufacturing data from the first location to a second location, and
means for manufacturing the dental prosthesis at the second location.
26. Method for manufacturing a dental prosthesis,
comprising the steps of:
creating a dental prosthesis data record,
calculating manufacturing data with a system for calculating manufacturing data-at a first location on the basis of the dental prosthesis data record,
examining the manufacturing data to determine whether the manufacturing data are to be transmitted to a manufacturing machine at the first location and/or at a second location, and
manufacturing the dental prosthesis at the second location and/or at the first location, according to a result of the determination.
27. Method according to claim 26, wherein the dental prosthesis data record is created at the second location and transmitted to the first location by remote data transmission.
28. Method according to claim 26, further comprising examining the dental prosthesis data record using a method wherein a data record representing a dental prosthesis is examined using finite element methods.
29. System for manufacturing a dental prosthesis, comprising:
a device for creating a dental prosthesis data record,
a system for calculating manufacturing data at a first location for calculating the manufacturing data on the basis of the dental prosthesis data record,
means for examining the manufacturing data to determine whether the manufacturing data are to be transmitted to a manufacturing machine at the first location and/or to a second location, and
means for manufacturing the dental prosthesis at the second location and/or at the first location.
30. Method, comprising:
examining a dental prosthesis data record and/or a manufacturing data record
determining whether the manufacturing data record is to be forwarded to a manufacturing machine at a first location or transmitted via remote data transmission to a second location, and
forwarding the manufacturing data record to a manufacturing machine at the first location or transmitting the manufacturing data record via remote data transmission to the second location, according to the determination result.
31. Computer at a first location, comprising:
storage means for storing manufacturing data and/or a dental prosthesis data record, and
examination means, by which the manufacturing data and/or the dental prosthesis data record can be examined in order to determine whether the manufacturing data are to be transmitted to a second location via remote data transmission or forwarded to a manufacturing machine at the first location.
32. Computer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by a computer, perform the method according to claim 30.
33. Computer program including program code means for performing the method of claim 30 when executed on a computer.
34. Method according to claim 21, further comprising filing the dental prosthesis data record and/or the manufacturing data at the first location.
35. Method according to claim 21, wherein the respective data transmission is performed via Internet.
36. Method according to claim 21, the determination is made based on a difference in size and/or precision and/or speed of respective manufacturing machines utilized at the first location and at the second location.
37. (canceled)
38. (canceled)
39. (canceled)
40. (canceled)
41. (canceled)
42. (canceled)
43. Method according to claim 16, wherein the chair side system comprises an optical probe.
44. Method according to claim 21, wherein the manufacturing data comprise milling data.
45. Method according to claim 21, wherein the system for calculating manufacturing data comprises a system for calculating milling data.
46. Method according to claim 25, wherein the system for calculating manufacturing data comprises a system for calculating milling data.
47. Method according to claim 26, wherein the manufacturing data comprise milling data.
48. Method according to claim 26, wherein the system for calculating manufacturing data comprises a system for calculating milling data.
49. Method according to claim 26, wherein the manufacturing machine comprises a milling machine.
50. Method according to claim 29, wherein the system for calculating manufacturing data comprises a system for calculating milling data.
51. Method according to claim 29, wherein the manufacturing data comprise milling data.
52. Method according to claim 29, wherein the manufacturing machine comprises a milling machine.
53. Method according to claim 30, wherein the manufacturing data record comprises a milling data record.
54. Method according to claim 30, wherein the manufacturing machine comprises a milling machine.
55. Method according to claim 31, wherein the manufacturing data comprise milling data.
56. Method according to claim 31, wherein the manufacturing machine comprises a milling machine.
57. Method according to claim 36, wherein the manufacturing machine comprises a milling machine.
US12415473 2005-07-28 2009-03-31 Method, computer, machine-readable medium, computer program and system, concerning the manufacture of dental prostheses Abandoned US20090246736A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102005035475 2005-07-28
DE200510035475 DE102005035475A1 (en) 2005-07-28 2005-07-28 concerning methods, computer, computer readable medium, computer program and system, the production of dental prostheses
US11486979 US7689308B2 (en) 2005-07-28 2006-07-13 Method, computer-readable medium, and computer program, concerning the manufacture of dental prostheses after breakage of initial prostheses
US12415473 US20090246736A1 (en) 2005-07-28 2009-03-31 Method, computer, machine-readable medium, computer program and system, concerning the manufacture of dental prostheses

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12415473 US20090246736A1 (en) 2005-07-28 2009-03-31 Method, computer, machine-readable medium, computer program and system, concerning the manufacture of dental prostheses

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090246736A1 true true US20090246736A1 (en) 2009-10-01

Family

ID=37805390

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11486979 Active 2027-09-17 US7689308B2 (en) 2005-07-28 2006-07-13 Method, computer-readable medium, and computer program, concerning the manufacture of dental prostheses after breakage of initial prostheses
US12415473 Abandoned US20090246736A1 (en) 2005-07-28 2009-03-31 Method, computer, machine-readable medium, computer program and system, concerning the manufacture of dental prostheses

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11486979 Active 2027-09-17 US7689308B2 (en) 2005-07-28 2006-07-13 Method, computer-readable medium, and computer program, concerning the manufacture of dental prostheses after breakage of initial prostheses

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US7689308B2 (en)
DE (1) DE102005035475A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110123955A1 (en) * 2009-11-26 2011-05-26 Pou Yu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Method of preparing digital model and artificial tooth applied to dental implant
EP2737873A1 (en) * 2012-11-29 2014-06-04 3M Innovative Properties Company Method of making a dental restoration and system therefore

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2921131A1 (en) 2005-06-30 2015-09-23 Biomet 3i, LLC Method for manufacturing dental implant components
US8257083B2 (en) * 2005-10-24 2012-09-04 Biomet 3I, Llc Methods for placing an implant analog in a physical model of the patient's mouth
DE102007014985A1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2008-10-02 Aepsilon Rechteverwaltungs Gmbh A method for producing dental replacement parts, procedure to create a data set and computer readable medium
US8206153B2 (en) 2007-05-18 2012-06-26 Biomet 3I, Inc. Method for selecting implant components
DE102007053072A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-20 Cadfem Gmbh Apparatus and method for processing data, which relate to dental prostheses
US8777612B2 (en) 2007-11-16 2014-07-15 Biomet 3I, Llc Components for use with a surgical guide for dental implant placement
JP2011517612A (en) 2008-04-15 2011-06-16 バイオメット・3アイ・エルエルシー How to produce accurate bone and soft tissue digital dental models
ES2559402T3 (en) 2008-04-16 2016-02-12 Biomet 3I, Llc Method for visualization of pre-operative surgical instrumentation used with a guide for the placement of dental implants
US20100105011A1 (en) * 2008-10-29 2010-04-29 Inpronto Inc. System, Method And Apparatus For Tooth Implant Planning And Tooth Implant Kits
US8083522B2 (en) * 2008-10-29 2011-12-27 Inpronto Inc. Method for tooth implants
US8457930B2 (en) * 2009-04-15 2013-06-04 James Schroeder Personalized fit and functional designed medical prostheses and surgical instruments and methods for making
US8521317B2 (en) * 2009-11-24 2013-08-27 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Systems, methods, apparatuses, and computer-readable storage media for designing and manufacturing prosthetic dental items
EP2462893B8 (en) 2010-12-07 2014-12-10 Biomet 3i, LLC Universal scanning member for use on dental implant and dental implant analogs
WO2012158769A1 (en) 2011-05-16 2012-11-22 Biomet 3I, Llc Temporary abutment with combination of scanning features and provisionalization features
US9089382B2 (en) 2012-01-23 2015-07-28 Biomet 3I, Llc Method and apparatus for recording spatial gingival soft tissue relationship to implant placement within alveolar bone for immediate-implant placement
US9452032B2 (en) 2012-01-23 2016-09-27 Biomet 3I, Llc Soft tissue preservation temporary (shell) immediate-implant abutment with biological active surface
US20130216971A1 (en) * 2012-02-21 2013-08-22 I Practice Marketing, LLC Wireless intra-oral imaging system and method
US8926328B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2015-01-06 Biomet 3I, Llc Jigs for placing dental implant analogs in models and methods of doing the same
US9861455B2 (en) 2013-07-30 2018-01-09 TI Intellectual Property Inc. Dental implant system
US9668834B2 (en) 2013-12-20 2017-06-06 Biomet 3I, Llc Dental system for developing custom prostheses through scanning of coded members
US9700390B2 (en) 2014-08-22 2017-07-11 Biomet 3I, Llc Soft-tissue preservation arrangement and method
DE102015202286A1 (en) * 2015-02-10 2016-08-11 Siemens Healthcare Gmbh A method for generating a production model for a medical implant
CN106037966B (en) * 2016-05-12 2018-01-02 中国人民解放军第四军医大学 An oral prosthesis cad / method for automated processing of metal 3d

Citations (64)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4742473A (en) * 1985-07-16 1988-05-03 Shugar Joel K Finite element modeling system
US5131844A (en) * 1991-04-08 1992-07-21 Foster-Miller, Inc. Contact digitizer, particularly for dental applications
US5452219A (en) * 1990-06-11 1995-09-19 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Method of making a tooth mold
US5616899A (en) * 1995-06-05 1997-04-01 Recigno Laboratories, Inc. System for managing cases in dental laboratory
US6109919A (en) * 1997-04-28 2000-08-29 Astra Aktiebolag Implant system
US6287121B1 (en) * 1997-10-31 2001-09-11 Dcs Forschungs & Emtwicklungs Ag Material for a dental prosthesis, method and device for determining the shape of a remaining tooth area to be provided with a dental prosthesis, method and arrangement for producing a dental prosthesis and use of the arrangement
US6295513B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2001-09-25 Eagle Engineering Of America, Inc. Network-based system for the manufacture of parts with a virtual collaborative environment for design, developement, and fabricator selection
US6341240B1 (en) * 1997-07-28 2002-01-22 International Business Machines Corporation Method of allocating work in capacity planning
US20020025503A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2002-02-28 Eric Chapoulaud Custom orthodontic appliance forming method and apparatus
US20020064759A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2002-05-30 Durbin Duane Milford Method and system for viewing, altering and archiving digital models of dental structures and computer integrated manufacturing of physical models of dental structures
US6431871B1 (en) * 1998-08-22 2002-08-13 Ralph G. Luthardt Method for the computer-controlled production of dentures
US20020174000A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2002-11-21 Katz Steven Bruce Method for managing a workflow process that assists users in procurement, sourcing, and decision-support for strategic sourcing
US6575751B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2003-06-10 Shade Analyzing Technologies, Inc. Interactive dental restorative network
US20030109950A1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2003-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and systems for planning operations in manufacturing plants
US20030118970A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 3M Innovative Properties Company Removable dental models
US20030163212A1 (en) * 2002-02-25 2003-08-28 Smith Kevin Scott Method and system for manufacture of parts
US20040019382A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2004-01-29 Farid Amirouche System and method for prosthetic fitting and balancing in joints
US20040078212A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2004-04-22 Matts Andersson Method, arrangement and program for a prosthetic installation
US6739870B2 (en) * 2001-09-26 2004-05-25 3M Innovative Properties Company Use of finite element analysis for orthodontic mechanics and appliance selection
US6772026B2 (en) * 2000-04-05 2004-08-03 Therics, Inc. System and method for rapidly customizing design, manufacture and/or selection of biomedical devices
US6821123B2 (en) * 1997-04-10 2004-11-23 Nobel Biocare Ab Arrangement and system for production of dental products and transmission of information
US20040248066A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2004-12-09 Recigno David T. Dental appliance on-line ordering including display of end product image and mold three-dimensional scanning for digital transmission
US6835066B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2004-12-28 Gc Corporation Process for preparing dental prosthesis
US20050015167A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-01-20 Searcy Allison Fay Synchronized production with dynamic logistics routing
US20050043809A1 (en) * 2001-09-21 2005-02-24 Leif Ryd Osteoprosthesis component
US6881229B2 (en) * 2001-06-14 2005-04-19 Amedica Corporation Metal-ceramic composite articulation
US20050130104A1 (en) * 2003-12-12 2005-06-16 Centre De Recherche Et De Formation En Implantologie Methods of commissioning and manufacturing customized dental implants
US20050137740A1 (en) * 2003-12-18 2005-06-23 Mikko Lindstrom Flexible distributed manufacturing method and system therefor
US20050143967A1 (en) * 2002-01-23 2005-06-30 Christof Holberg Method, device and computer product for making an individual model of a jaw-bone
US6925447B2 (en) * 2000-02-04 2005-08-02 Medtronic, Inc. Responsive manufacturing and inventory control
US20050192835A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Align Technology, Inc. Dental data mining
US20050234577A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Loughran Stephen A Scheduling system
US20060098008A1 (en) * 2002-06-04 2006-05-11 Christof Holberg Method, device and computer program product for generating a three-dimensional model
US20060127840A1 (en) * 2004-12-14 2006-06-15 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Dental treatment unit with measuring device and three-dimensional measuring device
US20060127848A1 (en) * 2002-08-26 2006-06-15 Osaka Industrial Promotion Organization Artificial tooth root implantation position determining instrument, artificial tooth root implantation position determining method, guide member manufacturing device, sensor, drill, artificial tooth manufacturing device, computer program, and recorded medium
US20060131770A1 (en) * 2004-10-28 2006-06-22 Bego Bremer Goldschlagerei Wilh Herbst Gmbh & Kg Process for the production of a dental model, a dental model with a ceramic layer deposited thereon and a dental moulding, dental model,,and use of 3D printer and a kit
US7092784B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2006-08-15 Align Technology Systems and methods for forming an object
US20060253214A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2006-11-09 William Gross System
US7134874B2 (en) * 1997-06-20 2006-11-14 Align Technology, Inc. Computer automated development of an orthodontic treatment plan and appliance
US20060257815A1 (en) * 2005-04-05 2006-11-16 Vincenzo De Dominicis Device for simulating the effects of an orthodontic appliance
US20060282187A1 (en) * 2003-09-15 2006-12-14 International Business Machines Corporation System for dispatching semiconductors lots
US7162318B1 (en) * 2003-12-17 2007-01-09 Glovia International, Inc. Resource management and planning using a memory resident data module
US20070015110A1 (en) * 2005-05-26 2007-01-18 Zimmer Dental, Inc. Prosthetic dental device
US20070154866A1 (en) * 2005-11-22 2007-07-05 Advanced Dental Technologies Inc. System & method for the design, creation and installation of implant-supported dental prostheses
US7241142B2 (en) * 2004-03-19 2007-07-10 Align Technology, Inc. Root-based tooth moving sequencing
US20070212667A1 (en) * 2006-03-13 2007-09-13 Jung Wayne D Systems and methods for preparing dental restorations
US20070218426A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-09-20 D4D Technologies, Llc Digital impression for remote manufacturing of dental impressions
US20070226005A1 (en) * 2006-01-06 2007-09-27 Kevin Smith Totaldentist
US20070239299A1 (en) * 2006-04-06 2007-10-11 Milne Robert J Large scale supply planning
US7320592B2 (en) * 1998-10-08 2008-01-22 Align Technology, Inc. Defining tooth-moving appliances computationally
US7340316B2 (en) * 2004-06-28 2008-03-04 Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. System and method for producing medical devices
US7363239B1 (en) * 1999-11-26 2008-04-22 Nobel Biocare Ab Arrangement for producing complete or partial dental products
US7463942B2 (en) * 2000-09-06 2008-12-09 Geodigm Corporation Dental prosthesis manufacturing process, dental prosthesis pattern & dental prosthesis made thereby
US20090130633A1 (en) * 2005-12-30 2009-05-21 Kraemer Michael A System and method for managing data relating to dental products and manufacturing processes
US7590462B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2009-09-15 Orametrix, Inc. Interactive orthodontic care system based on intra-oral scanning of teeth
US7716062B2 (en) * 2002-05-28 2010-05-11 Ortho-Tain Inc Dental appliances and systems and methods for distributing dental appliances
US7717708B2 (en) * 2001-04-13 2010-05-18 Orametrix, Inc. Method and system for integrated orthodontic treatment planning using unified workstation
US20100152873A1 (en) * 2006-01-20 2010-06-17 3M Innovative Properties Company Local enforcement of accuracy in fabricated models
US20100223034A1 (en) * 2003-05-02 2010-09-02 Orametrix, Inc. Method and system for enhanced orthodontic trearment plenning
US7818082B2 (en) * 2003-10-16 2010-10-19 Tt Ip, Llc Method and apparatus for planning a manufacturing schedule using an adaptive learning process
US7835952B2 (en) * 2002-05-17 2010-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation System, method, and computer program product for creating a production plan
US7865381B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2011-01-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for objectively optimizing manufacturing sourcing
US20110049738A1 (en) * 1999-11-10 2011-03-03 Sun Benjamin J Methods for making dental prosthesis by three-dimensional printing
US7904192B2 (en) * 2004-01-14 2011-03-08 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Finite capacity scheduling using job prioritization and machine selection

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10313690B4 (en) 2003-03-26 2013-08-22 3M Deutschland Gmbh Processing shape data of a dental prosthesis
EP1658825B1 (en) * 2004-11-22 2016-12-21 3M Deutschland GmbH System and method for manufacturing dental prostheses

Patent Citations (67)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4742473A (en) * 1985-07-16 1988-05-03 Shugar Joel K Finite element modeling system
US5452219A (en) * 1990-06-11 1995-09-19 Dentsply Research & Development Corp. Method of making a tooth mold
US5131844A (en) * 1991-04-08 1992-07-21 Foster-Miller, Inc. Contact digitizer, particularly for dental applications
US5616899A (en) * 1995-06-05 1997-04-01 Recigno Laboratories, Inc. System for managing cases in dental laboratory
US6821123B2 (en) * 1997-04-10 2004-11-23 Nobel Biocare Ab Arrangement and system for production of dental products and transmission of information
US6109919A (en) * 1997-04-28 2000-08-29 Astra Aktiebolag Implant system
US7134874B2 (en) * 1997-06-20 2006-11-14 Align Technology, Inc. Computer automated development of an orthodontic treatment plan and appliance
US6341240B1 (en) * 1997-07-28 2002-01-22 International Business Machines Corporation Method of allocating work in capacity planning
US6287121B1 (en) * 1997-10-31 2001-09-11 Dcs Forschungs & Emtwicklungs Ag Material for a dental prosthesis, method and device for determining the shape of a remaining tooth area to be provided with a dental prosthesis, method and arrangement for producing a dental prosthesis and use of the arrangement
US6431871B1 (en) * 1998-08-22 2002-08-13 Ralph G. Luthardt Method for the computer-controlled production of dentures
US7320592B2 (en) * 1998-10-08 2008-01-22 Align Technology, Inc. Defining tooth-moving appliances computationally
US6575751B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2003-06-10 Shade Analyzing Technologies, Inc. Interactive dental restorative network
US20050003329A1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2005-01-06 Shade Analyzing Technologies, Inc. Interactive dental restorative network
US6295513B1 (en) * 1999-03-16 2001-09-25 Eagle Engineering Of America, Inc. Network-based system for the manufacture of parts with a virtual collaborative environment for design, developement, and fabricator selection
US20110049738A1 (en) * 1999-11-10 2011-03-03 Sun Benjamin J Methods for making dental prosthesis by three-dimensional printing
US7363239B1 (en) * 1999-11-26 2008-04-22 Nobel Biocare Ab Arrangement for producing complete or partial dental products
US7590462B2 (en) * 1999-11-30 2009-09-15 Orametrix, Inc. Interactive orthodontic care system based on intra-oral scanning of teeth
US20090291417A1 (en) * 1999-11-30 2009-11-26 Rubbert Ruedger Interactive orthodontic care system based on intra-oral scanning of teeth
US20020025503A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2002-02-28 Eric Chapoulaud Custom orthodontic appliance forming method and apparatus
US6925447B2 (en) * 2000-02-04 2005-08-02 Medtronic, Inc. Responsive manufacturing and inventory control
US20030109950A1 (en) * 2000-03-31 2003-06-12 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and systems for planning operations in manufacturing plants
US6772026B2 (en) * 2000-04-05 2004-08-03 Therics, Inc. System and method for rapidly customizing design, manufacture and/or selection of biomedical devices
US7092784B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2006-08-15 Align Technology Systems and methods for forming an object
US7463942B2 (en) * 2000-09-06 2008-12-09 Geodigm Corporation Dental prosthesis manufacturing process, dental prosthesis pattern & dental prosthesis made thereby
US20020064759A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2002-05-30 Durbin Duane Milford Method and system for viewing, altering and archiving digital models of dental structures and computer integrated manufacturing of physical models of dental structures
US20040078212A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2004-04-22 Matts Andersson Method, arrangement and program for a prosthetic installation
US6835066B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2004-12-28 Gc Corporation Process for preparing dental prosthesis
US7717708B2 (en) * 2001-04-13 2010-05-18 Orametrix, Inc. Method and system for integrated orthodontic treatment planning using unified workstation
US20020174000A1 (en) * 2001-05-15 2002-11-21 Katz Steven Bruce Method for managing a workflow process that assists users in procurement, sourcing, and decision-support for strategic sourcing
US6881229B2 (en) * 2001-06-14 2005-04-19 Amedica Corporation Metal-ceramic composite articulation
US20050043809A1 (en) * 2001-09-21 2005-02-24 Leif Ryd Osteoprosthesis component
US6739870B2 (en) * 2001-09-26 2004-05-25 3M Innovative Properties Company Use of finite element analysis for orthodontic mechanics and appliance selection
US20030118970A1 (en) * 2001-12-21 2003-06-26 3M Innovative Properties Company Removable dental models
US20050143967A1 (en) * 2002-01-23 2005-06-30 Christof Holberg Method, device and computer product for making an individual model of a jaw-bone
US20030163212A1 (en) * 2002-02-25 2003-08-28 Smith Kevin Scott Method and system for manufacture of parts
US7177713B2 (en) * 2002-02-25 2007-02-13 University Of North Carolina At Charlotte Method and system for optimizing manufacture of parts
US20040019382A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2004-01-29 Farid Amirouche System and method for prosthetic fitting and balancing in joints
US7835952B2 (en) * 2002-05-17 2010-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation System, method, and computer program product for creating a production plan
US7716062B2 (en) * 2002-05-28 2010-05-11 Ortho-Tain Inc Dental appliances and systems and methods for distributing dental appliances
US20060098008A1 (en) * 2002-06-04 2006-05-11 Christof Holberg Method, device and computer program product for generating a three-dimensional model
US20060127848A1 (en) * 2002-08-26 2006-06-15 Osaka Industrial Promotion Organization Artificial tooth root implantation position determining instrument, artificial tooth root implantation position determining method, guide member manufacturing device, sensor, drill, artificial tooth manufacturing device, computer program, and recorded medium
US20100223034A1 (en) * 2003-05-02 2010-09-02 Orametrix, Inc. Method and system for enhanced orthodontic trearment plenning
US20040248066A1 (en) * 2003-06-03 2004-12-09 Recigno David T. Dental appliance on-line ordering including display of end product image and mold three-dimensional scanning for digital transmission
US20050015167A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-01-20 Searcy Allison Fay Synchronized production with dynamic logistics routing
US20060282187A1 (en) * 2003-09-15 2006-12-14 International Business Machines Corporation System for dispatching semiconductors lots
US7818082B2 (en) * 2003-10-16 2010-10-19 Tt Ip, Llc Method and apparatus for planning a manufacturing schedule using an adaptive learning process
US20050130104A1 (en) * 2003-12-12 2005-06-16 Centre De Recherche Et De Formation En Implantologie Methods of commissioning and manufacturing customized dental implants
US7162318B1 (en) * 2003-12-17 2007-01-09 Glovia International, Inc. Resource management and planning using a memory resident data module
US20050137740A1 (en) * 2003-12-18 2005-06-23 Mikko Lindstrom Flexible distributed manufacturing method and system therefor
US7904192B2 (en) * 2004-01-14 2011-03-08 Agency For Science, Technology And Research Finite capacity scheduling using job prioritization and machine selection
US20050192835A1 (en) * 2004-02-27 2005-09-01 Align Technology, Inc. Dental data mining
US7241142B2 (en) * 2004-03-19 2007-07-10 Align Technology, Inc. Root-based tooth moving sequencing
US20050234577A1 (en) * 2004-04-16 2005-10-20 Loughran Stephen A Scheduling system
US7340316B2 (en) * 2004-06-28 2008-03-04 Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. System and method for producing medical devices
US20060131770A1 (en) * 2004-10-28 2006-06-22 Bego Bremer Goldschlagerei Wilh Herbst Gmbh & Kg Process for the production of a dental model, a dental model with a ceramic layer deposited thereon and a dental moulding, dental model,,and use of 3D printer and a kit
US20060127840A1 (en) * 2004-12-14 2006-06-15 Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh Dental treatment unit with measuring device and three-dimensional measuring device
US20060253214A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2006-11-09 William Gross System
US20060257815A1 (en) * 2005-04-05 2006-11-16 Vincenzo De Dominicis Device for simulating the effects of an orthodontic appliance
US20070015110A1 (en) * 2005-05-26 2007-01-18 Zimmer Dental, Inc. Prosthetic dental device
US7865381B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2011-01-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for objectively optimizing manufacturing sourcing
US20070154866A1 (en) * 2005-11-22 2007-07-05 Advanced Dental Technologies Inc. System & method for the design, creation and installation of implant-supported dental prostheses
US20090130633A1 (en) * 2005-12-30 2009-05-21 Kraemer Michael A System and method for managing data relating to dental products and manufacturing processes
US20070226005A1 (en) * 2006-01-06 2007-09-27 Kevin Smith Totaldentist
US20100152873A1 (en) * 2006-01-20 2010-06-17 3M Innovative Properties Company Local enforcement of accuracy in fabricated models
US20070218426A1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2007-09-20 D4D Technologies, Llc Digital impression for remote manufacturing of dental impressions
US20070212667A1 (en) * 2006-03-13 2007-09-13 Jung Wayne D Systems and methods for preparing dental restorations
US20070239299A1 (en) * 2006-04-06 2007-10-11 Milne Robert J Large scale supply planning

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110123955A1 (en) * 2009-11-26 2011-05-26 Pou Yu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Method of preparing digital model and artificial tooth applied to dental implant
US8386062B2 (en) * 2009-11-26 2013-02-26 Pou Tu Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Method of preparing digital model and artificial tooth applied to dental implant
EP2737873A1 (en) * 2012-11-29 2014-06-04 3M Innovative Properties Company Method of making a dental restoration and system therefore
WO2014085149A1 (en) * 2012-11-29 2014-06-05 3M Innovative Properties Company Method of making a dental restoration and system therefor
CN104822340A (en) * 2012-11-29 2015-08-05 3M创新有限公司 Method of making dental restoration and system therefor

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US20070050074A1 (en) 2007-03-01 application
US7689308B2 (en) 2010-03-30 grant
DE102005035475A1 (en) 2007-05-10 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Yeo et al. In vitro marginal fit of three all-ceramic crown systems
Örtorp et al. The fit of cobalt–chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: A comparative in vitro study
US7112065B2 (en) Method for defining a finish line of a dental prosthesis
US20080153067A1 (en) Methods for placing an implant analog in a physical model of the patient&#39;s mouth
US7322824B2 (en) Design and manufacture of dental implant restorations
US20080085489A1 (en) Surgical guides and methods for positioning artificial teeth and dental implants
US20090220916A1 (en) Impression scanning for manufacturing of dental restorations
Tan et al. An in vitro comparison of vertical marginal gaps of CAD/CAM titanium and conventional cast restorations
US6835066B2 (en) Process for preparing dental prosthesis
US7865261B2 (en) Method and device for producing dental prosthesis elements
US20040073417A1 (en) Orthodontic treatment planning with user-specified simulation of tooth movement
US20050250075A1 (en) Method for preparing a physical plaster model
Strub et al. Computer-aided design and fabrication of dental restorations: current systems and future possibilities
US20040133293A1 (en) Method and system for automated mass manufacturing of custom tooth die models for use in the fabrication of dental prosthetics
US20040219490A1 (en) Device and method for manufacturing dental prosthesis
Bidra et al. Computer-aided technology for fabricating complete dentures: systematic review of historical background, current status, and future perspectives
US7474932B2 (en) Dental computer-aided design (CAD) methods and systems
US20060127848A1 (en) Artificial tooth root implantation position determining instrument, artificial tooth root implantation position determining method, guide member manufacturing device, sensor, drill, artificial tooth manufacturing device, computer program, and recorded medium
US7333874B2 (en) Method and system for designing and producing dental prostheses and appliances
US20100105008A1 (en) Methods For Manufacturing Dental Implant Components
US6915178B2 (en) Dental prosthesis manufacturing process, dental prosthesis pattern &amp; dental prosthesis made thereby
US20110276159A1 (en) Computer-aided Fabrication Of A Removable Dental Prosthesis
US20060003292A1 (en) Digital manufacturing of removable oral appliances
US20120088208A1 (en) Method for Defining a Dental Framework Design Volume
Moldovan et al. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAM-made zirconia copings

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: INSTITUT STRAUMANN AG,SWITZERLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOLZNER, STEPHAN;WEBER, GERHARD;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100610 TO 20100611;REEL/FRAME:024552/0973