US20080273654A1 - Multi-Modal Imaging Registration Calibration Device and Method - Google Patents
Multi-Modal Imaging Registration Calibration Device and Method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080273654A1 US20080273654A1 US11/744,375 US74437507A US2008273654A1 US 20080273654 A1 US20080273654 A1 US 20080273654A1 US 74437507 A US74437507 A US 74437507A US 2008273654 A1 US2008273654 A1 US 2008273654A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- phantom
- point sources
- emission point
- support member
- planes
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 20
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 title claims description 39
- 238000002059 diagnostic imaging Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Titanium Chemical compound [Ti] RTAQQCXQSZGOHL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 229910052732 germanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 3
- GNPVGFCGXDBREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N germanium atom Chemical compound [Ge] GNPVGFCGXDBREM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 229910052719 titanium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000010936 titanium Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims 5
- 229920006327 polystyrene foam Polymers 0.000 claims 2
- 238000002600 positron emission tomography Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 238000012636 positron electron tomography Methods 0.000 description 25
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229920006328 Styrofoam Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002591 computed tomography Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000008261 styrofoam Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012879 PET imaging Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013519 translation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000017531 blood circulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013170 computed tomography imaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004807 localization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012831 peritoneal equilibrium test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012877 positron emission topography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002195 synergetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/02—Arrangements for diagnosis sequentially in different planes; Stereoscopic radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/03—Computed tomography [CT]
- A61B6/037—Emission tomography
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis; Apparatus or devices for radiation diagnosis combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating thereof
- A61B6/582—Calibration
- A61B6/583—Calibration using calibration phantoms
Definitions
- the invention relates to multi-modal medical diagnostic imaging. More particularly, the invention relates to a device and method used to calibrate registration between the different imaging modes of a multi-modal imaging system.
- Diagnostic imaging systems which use multiple imaging modalities are known in the art. For example, it is known to combine CT and PET sub-systems in a multi-modal imaging system to obtain synergistic advantages above and beyond the imaging advantages provided by each type of imagining modality individually.
- one imaging modality provides one type of information—for example, the CT modality can provide structural or anatomical patient data while the other imaging modality provides another type of information—for example, the PET modality provides functional (e.g., blood flow) patient data.
- data from an initial or preliminary CT scan of a patient can be used to generate an attenuation map, which is used to compensate for bodily attenuation of the emissions registered by the PET imaging system.
- the images from the two different modes are fused together so that the treating physician can see more clearly and accurately the relationship between the different types of information (i.e., structural and functional).
- the different imaging systems are mounted on different support structures (gantries) and are located at different positions in space with respect to each other, it is necessary to generate a transformation function which brines the separate images into registration with each other and compensates for the difference in vantage points from which the different images are acquired.
- Such a transformation function is also required in order to relate attenuation data taken from one perspective to attenuation that would be experienced from another perspective. Generating such a transformation function requires that a calibration scan be conducted using a phantom with known geometries and geometric relationship to the patient bed and scanning apparatus.
- a calibration device (“phantom”) and associated method according to an embodiment of the invention overcomes the deficiencies of such prior art calibration devices.
- the invention features a scan registration calibration device (phantom).
- the phantom includes a support member and a multiplicity of emission point sources supported by the support member.
- the emission point sources are disposed within a plurality of parallel planes distributed along a length of the support member.
- three emission point sources may be arranged in a triangular configuration to define each of the planes, and the triangular configuration may invert on successive planes.
- fourteen of such planes are each spaced apart by about 68 millimeters over the entire 90 centimeter length of the phantom.
- the support member is suitably made from STYROFOAM, with the emission point sources embedded therein.
- the emission point sources may be made from germanium and titanium and sized to emit approximately 2 ⁇ Ci of radiation.
- the invention features a method for calibrating registration between a pair of imaging modalities in a multi-modal medical diagnostic imaging system.
- a phantom is placed on the patient pallet of the imaging system.
- the phantom has a multiplicity of emission point sources disposed within a plurality of parallel planes distributed along a lengthwise direction of the phantom, and the phantom is placed on the patient pallet such that the lengthwise direction of the phantom is aligned with a lengthwise direction of the patient pallet.
- the phantom is then scanned using both of the imaging modalities at each of a plurality of scanning positions to generate first and second sets of imaging data corresponding to the pair of imaging modalities, with at least two of the planes being contained within the field of view of at least one of the imaging modalities at each of the scanning positions.
- the phantom is scanned at enough scanning positions such that all of the emission point sources are scanned.
- the first and second sets of imaging data are processed to generate a registration transfer function by means of which scan data obtained from the vantage point of one of the pair of imaging modalities can be mapped to the vantage point of the other of the pair of imaging modalities.
- three of the planes may be contained within the field of view of the at least one imaging modality at each of the scanning positions, and the phantom may be scanned at a plurality of locations.
- the field of view of the at least one imaging modality at each of the scanning locations overlaps with the field of view of the imaging modality at another of the scanning locations.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a calibration phantom according to an embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 2 is a side view, taken at an oblique elevational angle, illustrating emission point sources scanned at each bed position with a standard three-ring PET scanner;
- FIG. 3 is a side view, taken at an oblique elevational angle, illustrating emission point sources scanned at each bed position with a standard four-ring PET scanner;
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view illustrating a calibration set-up using the phantom shown in FIG. 1 .
- a scan calibration device (phantom) 10 according to the invention is illustrated in FIGS. 1 through 4 .
- the phantom 11 includes a support member 12 and a multiplicity of emission point sources 14 embedded in and distributed across the support member in a highly precise arrangement, which is described below.
- the support member 12 is a generally rectilinear, brick-shaped member that is long enough to provide calibration for an entire body scan. For current scanning systems, 90 centimeters is sufficient length. Although a perfectly square cross-section (taken transverse to the lengthwise axis of the support member) might be ideal, the phantom 10 must fit on top of the pallet of the patient handling system. Therefore, a rectangular cross-section allows for maximum spreading of the point sources on top of the pallet while still allowing the phantom 10 to fit within the tunnel of the scanning system gantry. For current scanning systems, a width of 16 inches (40.64 centimeters) and a height of 8 inches (20.32 centimeters) is sufficient.
- the support member 12 may be fabricated from any material that is radio-transparent and that allows the emission point sources 14 to be embedded in it fairly easily.
- STYROFOAM is one such material that may be used.
- the emission point sources 14 preferably are made from germanium, with titanium powder added to provide better visualization in the CT scan.
- Each point source is 2 millimeters in diameter and 2 millimeters long, which provides a radiation emission level of about 2 ⁇ Ci.
- the emission point sources 14 are arranged in a plurality of parallel planes along the length of the support member 12 , with the longitudinal axis of the support member 12 being normal to each plane.
- the longitudinal axis of the support member 12 being normal to each plane.
- three emission point sources arranged in a triangular pattern define each plane, and the planes are spaced apart by 68 millimeters.
- Other geometric arrangements of emission point sources which all lie within a common plane are, of course, deemed to be within the scope of the present invention.
- the plane-defining geometric arrangement of emission point sources 14 is “inverted” on each successive plane.
- two emission point sources 14 are located near the bottom longitudinal edges of the support member 12 (i.e., where the side surfaces of the support member join the bottom surface) and a third emission point source is centrally located (i.e., half way between the side surfaces) at the top surface of the support member 12 ; on the next adjacent plane (e.g., the plane 18 in FIG.
- two emission point sources 14 are located near the top longitudinal edges of the support member 12 (i.e., where the side surfaces of the support member join the top surface) and a third emission point source is centrally located at the bottom surface of the support member 12 .
- the triangles (and hence planes) defined by the six emission point sources 14 at each of the left and right ends of the support member 12 are specifically illustrated; the remainder are omitted for clarity.
- this arrangement is repeated seven times over the length of the support member 12 , for a total of 42 emission point sources (3 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 7).
- This arrangement of emission point sources in parallel planes, and the longitudinal spacing of the planes, ensures that at least six emission point sources, and possibly nine depending on the type of PET scan apparatus employed, can be scanned for each bed location in a standard PET scanning system, with overlapping PET fields of view for each of the bed locations.
- a standard three-ring PET scanner has a field of view that is 162 millimeters wide and an associated bed position spacing of 117.5 millimeters, with eight overlapping scan positions along the length of the phantom demarcated by brackets and dashed lines as illustrated in FIG. 2 . (In FIGS.
- the phantom 10 is depicted as if it is rotated slightly about its longitudinal axis, so that all three plane-defining emission point sources 14 are visible for each defined plane.) Given the above-noted spacing of 68 millimeters between the planes of the emission point sources, two such planes—i.e., six emission point sources easily fall within the three-ring PET scanner field of view at all scan positions along the length of the phantom. Similarly, a standard four-ring PET scanner has a field of view that is 216 millimeters wide and an associated bed position spacing of 150 millimeters, with six overlapping scan positions along the length of the phantom demarcated by brackets and dashed lines as illustrated in FIG. 2 .
- a phantom 10 is preferably supported by about one to two inches (2.54 to 5.08 centimeters) above the pallet 20 of an imaging system, e.g., by another piece of STYROFOAM 22 , as illustrated in FIG. 4 . This makes it easier to isolate the emission point sources from the pallet 20 in the CT image before processing the image to find the centers of the emission point sources.
- a six-position bed scan (in the case of a four-ring PET scanner) is then collected that covers the entire length of the phantom 10 and contains 42 emission point sources that are detected in both PET and CT. Since the system model includes gantry rotation as a parameter, each PET volume must be processed separately. On the other hand, since the CT data is collected as one contiguous volume, it must be repartitioned into six individual volumes that correspond to the PET volumes. There is no method currently in the existing commercially available PET/CT software to process the PET bed positions individually without stitching them together in the end, so this process actually begins with the PET sinograms and performs a simple filtered back-projection reconstruction without attenuation correction. The reconstructions are performed at full resolution, and the Z location of the PET volume is known from the bed position.
- the conjugate points can be located.
- the emission point sources will appear as small bright spheres in the volume and can be located relatively easily using a simple thresholding and localization algorithm; the three-dimensional coordinate of the centroid of each extracted sphere is used as the location of the observation.
- these three-dimensional coordinates are found for all emission point sources in both imaging modalities, they must each be converted to spatial coordinates using the parameters specific to each gantry. For example, the definition of the origin in each slice and the pixel size are unique specifications that will allow the transformation of image coordinates in pixels to spatial coordinates in millimeters.
- a standard photogrammetric process is employed that takes observations from two independent sources and does a least squares fit between the conjugate points using a model of the expected transformation between the points.
- translation as well as rotation between the points is to be expected, from one or both of the gantries being tilted, and a shear is also to be expected, from the bed possibly not coming into the gantries exactly perpendicular to the imaging planes.
- This method is known in the art at least via a paper published by Charles Stearns in 2003 and entitled “Measuring Gantry-Gantry and Gantry-Table Alignment in PET/CT,” Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2003, IEEE Vol. 4, October 19-25 pages 2481-2485.
- the PET point locations can be transformed into the CT coordinate system and residual error can be observed.
- the average residual error has been typically observed in conjugate points at 2 millimeters for just a translation shift and under 0.5 millimeters for a full model including rotation and shear. This registration is applied in the reconstruction of each bed position to make a whole body volume that is best registered between the PET and CT modalities.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radiology & Medical Imaging (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Heart & Thoracic Surgery (AREA)
- High Energy & Nuclear Physics (AREA)
- Surgery (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine (AREA)
- Apparatus For Radiation Diagnosis (AREA)
Abstract
A phantom and associated method for calibrating registration in a multi-modal medical diagnostic imaging system are presented. The phantom features a plurality of emission point sources arranged in multiple parallel planes along the length of the phantom, with enough planes to allow mode registration to be calibrated over the length of an entire full-body scan. According to the method, calibration scans are performed at each of several scan positions along the length of the phantom, with at least two planes of emission point sources covered by the scan at each position.
Description
- In general, the invention relates to multi-modal medical diagnostic imaging. More particularly, the invention relates to a device and method used to calibrate registration between the different imaging modes of a multi-modal imaging system.
- Diagnostic imaging systems which use multiple imaging modalities are known in the art. For example, it is known to combine CT and PET sub-systems in a multi-modal imaging system to obtain synergistic advantages above and beyond the imaging advantages provided by each type of imagining modality individually. With such a multi-modal system, one imaging modality provides one type of information—for example, the CT modality can provide structural or anatomical patient data while the other imaging modality provides another type of information—for example, the PET modality provides functional (e.g., blood flow) patient data. Additionally, data from an initial or preliminary CT scan of a patient can be used to generate an attenuation map, which is used to compensate for bodily attenuation of the emissions registered by the PET imaging system.
- In order to optimize the benefit of such dual imaging modalities, the images from the two different modes are fused together so that the treating physician can see more clearly and accurately the relationship between the different types of information (i.e., structural and functional). Because the different imaging systems are mounted on different support structures (gantries) and are located at different positions in space with respect to each other, it is necessary to generate a transformation function which brines the separate images into registration with each other and compensates for the difference in vantage points from which the different images are acquired. Such a transformation function is also required in order to relate attenuation data taken from one perspective to attenuation that would be experienced from another perspective. Generating such a transformation function requires that a calibration scan be conducted using a phantom with known geometries and geometric relationship to the patient bed and scanning apparatus.
- One arrangement that has been used in the past for such calibration scans has been a pair of short rods installed on the patient bed, with the rods intersecting in three-dimensional space. While such an arrangement has worked well for calibrating a single-position scan, it has not worked so well for multiple-position scans, and errors of as much as 2.5 millimeters in image registration have been measured. It is believed that such errors arise because the precise motion of the patient bed is not perfectly known or predictable over the entire scan range, which results in misalignment between the bed, PET, and CT positions for anything more than a one- or two-position scan. Thus, such a two-rod phantom arrangement is not ideally suited for calibrating a multiple-position scan such as a whole-body scan, which may require as much as five to seven scan positions.
- A calibration device (“phantom”) and associated method according to an embodiment of the invention overcomes the deficiencies of such prior art calibration devices. In a first aspect, the invention features a scan registration calibration device (phantom). The phantom includes a support member and a multiplicity of emission point sources supported by the support member. The emission point sources are disposed within a plurality of parallel planes distributed along a length of the support member.
- In exemplary embodiments, three emission point sources may be arranged in a triangular configuration to define each of the planes, and the triangular configuration may invert on successive planes. Suitably, fourteen of such planes are each spaced apart by about 68 millimeters over the entire 90 centimeter length of the phantom. The support member is suitably made from STYROFOAM, with the emission point sources embedded therein. The emission point sources may be made from germanium and titanium and sized to emit approximately 2 μCi of radiation.
- In another embodiment, the invention features a method for calibrating registration between a pair of imaging modalities in a multi-modal medical diagnostic imaging system. According to the method, a phantom is placed on the patient pallet of the imaging system. The phantom has a multiplicity of emission point sources disposed within a plurality of parallel planes distributed along a lengthwise direction of the phantom, and the phantom is placed on the patient pallet such that the lengthwise direction of the phantom is aligned with a lengthwise direction of the patient pallet. The phantom is then scanned using both of the imaging modalities at each of a plurality of scanning positions to generate first and second sets of imaging data corresponding to the pair of imaging modalities, with at least two of the planes being contained within the field of view of at least one of the imaging modalities at each of the scanning positions. The phantom is scanned at enough scanning positions such that all of the emission point sources are scanned. The first and second sets of imaging data are processed to generate a registration transfer function by means of which scan data obtained from the vantage point of one of the pair of imaging modalities can be mapped to the vantage point of the other of the pair of imaging modalities.
- In exemplary embodiments of the method, three of the planes may be contained within the field of view of the at least one imaging modality at each of the scanning positions, and the phantom may be scanned at a plurality of locations. Preferably, the field of view of the at least one imaging modality at each of the scanning locations overlaps with the field of view of the imaging modality at another of the scanning locations.
- Exemplary embodiments of the invention will now be described in greater detail in connection with the drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a calibration phantom according to an embodiment of the invention; -
FIG. 2 is a side view, taken at an oblique elevational angle, illustrating emission point sources scanned at each bed position with a standard three-ring PET scanner; -
FIG. 3 is a side view, taken at an oblique elevational angle, illustrating emission point sources scanned at each bed position with a standard four-ring PET scanner; and -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view illustrating a calibration set-up using the phantom shown inFIG. 1 . - Phantom
- A scan calibration device (phantom) 10 according to the invention is illustrated in
FIGS. 1 through 4 . The phantom 11 includes asupport member 12 and a multiplicity ofemission point sources 14 embedded in and distributed across the support member in a highly precise arrangement, which is described below. - The
support member 12 is a generally rectilinear, brick-shaped member that is long enough to provide calibration for an entire body scan. For current scanning systems, 90 centimeters is sufficient length. Although a perfectly square cross-section (taken transverse to the lengthwise axis of the support member) might be ideal, thephantom 10 must fit on top of the pallet of the patient handling system. Therefore, a rectangular cross-section allows for maximum spreading of the point sources on top of the pallet while still allowing thephantom 10 to fit within the tunnel of the scanning system gantry. For current scanning systems, a width of 16 inches (40.64 centimeters) and a height of 8 inches (20.32 centimeters) is sufficient. - It should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that a length of 90 centimeters is exemplary. Other lengths, weights and widths can be used and still fall within the scope of the invention.
- The
support member 12 may be fabricated from any material that is radio-transparent and that allows theemission point sources 14 to be embedded in it fairly easily. STYROFOAM is one such material that may be used. - The
emission point sources 14 preferably are made from germanium, with titanium powder added to provide better visualization in the CT scan. Each point source is 2 millimeters in diameter and 2 millimeters long, which provides a radiation emission level of about 2 μCi. - As best illustrated in
FIGS. 1 and 4 , theemission point sources 14 are arranged in a plurality of parallel planes along the length of thesupport member 12, with the longitudinal axis of thesupport member 12 being normal to each plane. For example, in the illustrated embodiment, three emission point sources arranged in a triangular pattern define each plane, and the planes are spaced apart by 68 millimeters. Other geometric arrangements of emission point sources which all lie within a common plane are, of course, deemed to be within the scope of the present invention. - Furthermore, in the illustrated embodiment, the plane-defining geometric arrangement of
emission point sources 14 is “inverted” on each successive plane. Thus, on one plane (e.g., theleftmost plane 16 inFIG. 1 ), twoemission point sources 14 are located near the bottom longitudinal edges of the support member 12 (i.e., where the side surfaces of the support member join the bottom surface) and a third emission point source is centrally located (i.e., half way between the side surfaces) at the top surface of thesupport member 12; on the next adjacent plane (e.g., theplane 18 inFIG. 1 ), on the other hand, twoemission point sources 14 are located near the top longitudinal edges of the support member 12 (i.e., where the side surfaces of the support member join the top surface) and a third emission point source is centrally located at the bottom surface of thesupport member 12. (The triangles (and hence planes) defined by the sixemission point sources 14 at each of the left and right ends of thesupport member 12 are specifically illustrated; the remainder are omitted for clarity.) In the illustrated embodiment, this arrangement is repeated seven times over the length of thesupport member 12, for a total of 42 emission point sources (3×2×7). - This arrangement of emission point sources in parallel planes, and the longitudinal spacing of the planes, ensures that at least six emission point sources, and possibly nine depending on the type of PET scan apparatus employed, can be scanned for each bed location in a standard PET scanning system, with overlapping PET fields of view for each of the bed locations. For example, a standard three-ring PET scanner has a field of view that is 162 millimeters wide and an associated bed position spacing of 117.5 millimeters, with eight overlapping scan positions along the length of the phantom demarcated by brackets and dashed lines as illustrated in
FIG. 2 . (InFIGS. 2 and 3 , thephantom 10 is depicted as if it is rotated slightly about its longitudinal axis, so that all three plane-definingemission point sources 14 are visible for each defined plane.) Given the above-noted spacing of 68 millimeters between the planes of the emission point sources, two such planes—i.e., six emission point sources easily fall within the three-ring PET scanner field of view at all scan positions along the length of the phantom. Similarly, a standard four-ring PET scanner has a field of view that is 216 millimeters wide and an associated bed position spacing of 150 millimeters, with six overlapping scan positions along the length of the phantom demarcated by brackets and dashed lines as illustrated inFIG. 2 . Given the spacing of 68 millimeters between the planes of the emission point sources, three such planes—i.e., nine emission point sources—easily fall with the four-ring PET scanner field of view at all scan positions along the length of the phantom. - Use of Phantom in Registration Calibration
- To calibrate registration of a multi-modal imaging system, e.g., a PET/CT imaging system, a
phantom 10 according to the invention is preferably supported by about one to two inches (2.54 to 5.08 centimeters) above the pallet 20 of an imaging system, e.g., by another piece ofSTYROFOAM 22, as illustrated inFIG. 4 . This makes it easier to isolate the emission point sources from the pallet 20 in the CT image before processing the image to find the centers of the emission point sources. - A six-position bed scan (in the case of a four-ring PET scanner) is then collected that covers the entire length of the
phantom 10 and contains 42 emission point sources that are detected in both PET and CT. Since the system model includes gantry rotation as a parameter, each PET volume must be processed separately. On the other hand, since the CT data is collected as one contiguous volume, it must be repartitioned into six individual volumes that correspond to the PET volumes. There is no method currently in the existing commercially available PET/CT software to process the PET bed positions individually without stitching them together in the end, so this process actually begins with the PET sinograms and performs a simple filtered back-projection reconstruction without attenuation correction. The reconstructions are performed at full resolution, and the Z location of the PET volume is known from the bed position. - Once the PET volumes have been reconstructed and the CT volumes assembled by accumulating slices with matching Z coordinates, the conjugate points can be located. In both the PET and CT scans, the emission point sources will appear as small bright spheres in the volume and can be located relatively easily using a simple thresholding and localization algorithm; the three-dimensional coordinate of the centroid of each extracted sphere is used as the location of the observation. Once these three-dimensional coordinates are found for all emission point sources in both imaging modalities, they must each be converted to spatial coordinates using the parameters specific to each gantry. For example, the definition of the origin in each slice and the pixel size are unique specifications that will allow the transformation of image coordinates in pixels to spatial coordinates in millimeters. Once these conjugate points exist in a spatial coordinate system, they can be compared and fitted to determine how to align the gantries.
- A standard photogrammetric process is employed that takes observations from two independent sources and does a least squares fit between the conjugate points using a model of the expected transformation between the points. (In practice, translation as well as rotation between the points is to be expected, from one or both of the gantries being tilted, and a shear is also to be expected, from the bed possibly not coming into the gantries exactly perpendicular to the imaging planes.) This method is known in the art at least via a paper published by Charles Stearns in 2003 and entitled “Measuring Gantry-Gantry and Gantry-Table Alignment in PET/CT,” Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2003, IEEE Vol. 4, October 19-25 pages 2481-2485. Once the model parameters have been determined, the PET point locations can be transformed into the CT coordinate system and residual error can be observed. Using this process, the average residual error has been typically observed in conjugate points at 2 millimeters for just a translation shift and under 0.5 millimeters for a full model including rotation and shear. This registration is applied in the reconstruction of each bed position to make a whole body volume that is best registered between the PET and CT modalities.
- Although illustrative embodiments of the invention have been described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various changes and modifications can be effected therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Claims (17)
1. A phantom for use in calibrating a nuclear medical imaging system, comprising:
a support member; and
a multiplicity of emission point sources supported by the support member;
wherein a plurality of emission point sources are disposed within each of a plurality of parallel planes distributed along a length of said support member in a scanning direction of said imaging system.
2. The phantom of claim 1 , wherein a plane is defined by three emission point sources arranged in a triangular configuration.
3. The phantom of claim 2 , wherein the triangular configuration inverts on successive planes.
4. The phantom of claim 1 , wherein said planes are spaced apart by a preselected distance such that at least two planes are within a field of view of said system for any given scan position.
5. The phantom of claim 1 , wherein said phantom is 90 centimeters long.
6. The phantom of claim 1 , wherein said phantom is 90 centimeters long and includes fourteen of said planes spaced apart by 68 millimeters.
7. The phantom of claim 1 , wherein said support member is made from polystyrene foam and said emission point sources are embedded therein.
8. The phantom of claim 1 , wherein said emission point sources comprise germanium and titanium.
9. The phantom of claim 8 , wherein said emission point sources are sized to emit approximately 2 μCi.
10. A method for calibrating registration between a pair of imaging modalities in a multi-modal medical diagnostic imaging system having a patient pallet, comprising:
placing a phantom on the patient pallet, said phantom having a multiplicity of emission point sources disposed within a plurality of parallel planes distributed along a lengthwise direction of the phantom and the phantom being placed on the patient pallet such that the lengthwise direction of the phantom is aligned with a lengthwise direction of the patient pallet;
scanning the phantom using both of said imaging modalities at each of a plurality of scanning positions to generate first and second sets of imaging data corresponding to said pair of imaging modalities, at least two of said planes being contained within the field of view of at least one of said imaging modalities at each of said scanning positions and said phantom being scanned at enough scanning positions such that all of the emission point sources are scanned; and
processing said first and second sets of imaging data to generate a registration transfer function by means of which scan data obtained from the vantage point of one of said pair of imaging modalities can be mapped to the vantage point of the other of said pair of imaging modalities.
11. The method of claim 10 , wherein three of said planes are included within the field of view of said at least one of said imaging modalities at each of said scanning positions.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein said phantom is scanned at least six scanning positions.
13. The method of claim 10 , wherein said phantom is scanned at eight scanning positions.
14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the field of view of said at least one imaging modality at each of said scanning locations overlaps with the field of view of said at least one imaging modality at another of said scanning locations.
15. The method of claim 10 , wherein one of said imaging modalities is Positron Emission Tomography (PET).
16. A phantom for use in calibrating a nuclear medical imaging system, comprising:
a solid support member; and
a plurality of emission point sources embedded in said solid support member such that a subset plurality of said plurality of emission point sources defines a plane within said solid support member, a plurality of parallel planes being distributed along a length of said solid support member.
17. The phantom of claim 16 , wherein said solid support member is made of polystyrene foam.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/744,375 US7449681B1 (en) | 2007-05-04 | 2007-05-04 | Multi-modal imaging registration calibration device and method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/744,375 US7449681B1 (en) | 2007-05-04 | 2007-05-04 | Multi-modal imaging registration calibration device and method |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080273654A1 true US20080273654A1 (en) | 2008-11-06 |
US7449681B1 US7449681B1 (en) | 2008-11-11 |
Family
ID=39939520
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/744,375 Expired - Fee Related US7449681B1 (en) | 2007-05-04 | 2007-05-04 | Multi-modal imaging registration calibration device and method |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7449681B1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090087061A1 (en) * | 2007-09-27 | 2009-04-02 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Intrinsic Co-Registration For Modular Multimodality Medical Imaging Systems |
US20130034286A1 (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2013-02-07 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Registration of Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography |
US20170112462A1 (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2017-04-27 | Hexagon Metrology, Inc. | Three-dimensional computed tomography gauge |
US20180005400A1 (en) * | 2016-06-30 | 2018-01-04 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for multi-modality imaging component alignment |
US10168409B2 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2019-01-01 | I.R.C.C.S. Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo” | Universal phantom structure for quality inspections both on computerized tomography and on magnetic resonance tomography |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7675028B2 (en) * | 2008-06-23 | 2010-03-09 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Low-scattering foam phantom for molecular imaging |
US20120076371A1 (en) * | 2010-09-23 | 2012-03-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Phantom Identification |
US9474501B2 (en) | 2013-08-15 | 2016-10-25 | Koninklijke Philips N.V. | Hybrid method based on simulation and experimental data to normalize pet data |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4771177A (en) * | 1985-11-01 | 1988-09-13 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Point source for testing a gamma camera |
US20060214097A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | Wang Sharon X | Detector head position correction for hybrid SPECT/CT imaging apparatus |
-
2007
- 2007-05-04 US US11/744,375 patent/US7449681B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4771177A (en) * | 1985-11-01 | 1988-09-13 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Point source for testing a gamma camera |
US20060214097A1 (en) * | 2005-03-28 | 2006-09-28 | Wang Sharon X | Detector head position correction for hybrid SPECT/CT imaging apparatus |
Cited By (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20090087061A1 (en) * | 2007-09-27 | 2009-04-02 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Intrinsic Co-Registration For Modular Multimodality Medical Imaging Systems |
US8498464B2 (en) * | 2007-09-27 | 2013-07-30 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Intrinsic co-registration for modular multimodality medical imaging systems |
US20130034286A1 (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2013-02-07 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Registration of Emission Tomography and Computed Tomography |
US8705832B2 (en) * | 2011-08-03 | 2014-04-22 | Siemens Medical Solutions Usa, Inc. | Registration of emission tomography and computed tomography |
US10168409B2 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2019-01-01 | I.R.C.C.S. Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo” | Universal phantom structure for quality inspections both on computerized tomography and on magnetic resonance tomography |
US20170112462A1 (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2017-04-27 | Hexagon Metrology, Inc. | Three-dimensional computed tomography gauge |
CN108449984A (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2018-08-24 | 海克斯康测量技术有限公司 | Three-dimensional computed tomography gauge |
US10222492B2 (en) * | 2015-10-23 | 2019-03-05 | Hexagon Metrology, Inc. | Three-dimensional computed tomography gauge |
US20180005400A1 (en) * | 2016-06-30 | 2018-01-04 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for multi-modality imaging component alignment |
US10049465B2 (en) * | 2016-06-30 | 2018-08-14 | General Electric Company | Systems and methods for multi-modality imaging component alignment |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7449681B1 (en) | 2008-11-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7449681B1 (en) | Multi-modal imaging registration calibration device and method | |
US7307252B2 (en) | Detector head position correction for hybrid SPECT/CT imaging apparatus | |
US8160675B2 (en) | Retrospective sorting of 4D CT into breathing phases based on geometric analysis of imaging fiducials | |
JP4782680B2 (en) | Calibration image alignment apparatus and method in PET-CT system | |
CN104107065B (en) | Optimal conversion of 3D image sets between different spaces | |
US9934603B2 (en) | Three-dimensional resolution gauge for evaluating performance of tomographic imaging systems | |
ES2800032T3 (en) | Medical imaging system with a fixed network of X-ray detectors and method of using it | |
JPH1033524A (en) | Method for detecting and correcting image distortion for medical imaging | |
CN105844586A (en) | Features-based 2d/3d image registration | |
JP2006175236A (en) | Operation method of medical imaging device | |
US20030212320A1 (en) | Coordinate registration system for dual modality imaging systems | |
KR20130094704A (en) | Orthopedic fixation with imagery analysis | |
US20100329534A1 (en) | Method and device for the acquisition of x-ray images for a three-dimensional image reconstruction | |
JP2017537727A (en) | Imaging system for imaging an elongated region of interest of an object | |
Lesaint et al. | Calibration for circular cone-beam CT based on consistency conditions | |
CN105813569A (en) | Systems and methods for multi-modality imaging | |
US9895113B2 (en) | Systems and methods for planar imaging with detectors having moving detector heads | |
US20150071515A1 (en) | Image reconstruction method and device for tilted helical scan | |
CN1315436C (en) | Fluorescent check computerized tomograph method | |
Tomaževič et al. | “Gold standard” data for evaluation and comparison of 3D/2D registration methods | |
CN1981705A (en) | System and method for cross table tomosynthesis imaging for trauma applications | |
US20080080758A1 (en) | Method for determining final projection matrices | |
Chan et al. | Reconstruction and positional accuracy of 3D ultrasound on vertebral phantoms for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spinal surgery | |
Hwang et al. | Geometry calibration for a dental cone-beam CT system with an offset detector | |
US10682113B2 (en) | Self-calibrating device for X-ray imaging scanners |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:RAPPOPORT, VITALIY;HAYDEN, CHARLES;STOUGHTON, ROBERT SMITH;REEL/FRAME:019571/0235;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070531 TO 20070604 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20161111 |