Connect public, paid and private patent data with Google Patents Public Datasets

Method of cleaning membranes

Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080237125A1
US20080237125A1 US12130664 US13066408A US2008237125A1 US 20080237125 A1 US20080237125 A1 US 20080237125A1 US 12130664 US12130664 US 12130664 US 13066408 A US13066408 A US 13066408A US 2008237125 A1 US2008237125 A1 US 2008237125A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
membrane
wt
cleaning
sodium
sulfite
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12130664
Inventor
Paul Martin Gallagher
Tom Rainier
Aaron J. Balczewski
Daniel A. Cargnel
Original Assignee
Paul Martin Gallagher
Tom Rainier
Balczewski Aaron J
Cargnel Daniel A
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D65/00Accessories or auxiliary operations, in general, for separation processes or apparatus using semi-permeable membranes
    • B01D65/02Membrane cleaning or sterilisation ; Membrane regeneration
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis, ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/14Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
    • B01D61/145Ultrafiltration
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis, ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/14Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
    • B01D61/147Microfiltration
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D61/00Processes of separation using semi-permeable membranes, e.g. dialysis, osmosis, ultrafiltration; Apparatus, accessories or auxiliary operations specially adapted therefor
    • B01D61/14Ultrafiltration; Microfiltration
    • B01D61/16Feed pretreatment
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D71/00Semi-permeable membranes for separation processes or apparatus characterised by the material; Manufacturing processes specially adapted therefor
    • B01D71/06Organic material
    • B01D71/30Polyalkenyl halides
    • B01D71/32Polyalkenyl halides containing fluorine atoms
    • B01D71/34Polyvinylidene fluoride
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2311/00Details relating to membrane separation process operations and control
    • B01D2311/04Specific process operations in the feed stream; Feed pretreatment
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2321/00Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
    • B01D2321/04Backflushing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2321/00Details relating to membrane cleaning, regeneration, sterilization or to the prevention of fouling
    • B01D2321/16Use of chemical agents
    • B01D2321/168Use of other chemical agents
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F1/00Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F1/44Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by dialysis, osmosis or reverse osmosis
    • C02F1/444Treatment of water, waste water, or sewage by dialysis, osmosis or reverse osmosis by ultrafiltration or microfiltration
    • Y02A20/131

Abstract

The present invention relates a method for cleaning polymeric microfiltration membranes and membrane units, and to compositions useful in such methods. The compositions include at least one soluble sulfite reducing agent and a compatible solvent.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATION
  • [0001]
    This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/333,828, filed Nov. 16, 2001.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention relates a method for cleaning polymeric microfiltration membranes and membrane units, and to compositions useful in such methods.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    Synthetic membranes are used for a variety of applications including desalination, gas separation, filtration, and dialysis. The properties of the membranes vary depending on the morphology of the membrane, i.e. properties such as symmetry, pore shape, and pore size, and the polymeric material used to form the membrane.
  • [0004]
    Different membranes can be used for specific separation processes, including microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and reverse osmosis. MF and UF processes are carried out under differential pressure and are distinguished by the size of the particle or molecule that the membrane is capable of retaining or passing. MF can remove very fine colloidal particles in the micrometer and sub micrometer range. As a general rule, it can filter particles down to 0.1 μm, whereas ultrafiltration can retain particles as small as 0.01 μm and smaller. Reverse osmosis operates on an even smaller scale.
  • [0005]
    As the size of the particles to be separated decreases, the pore size of the membrane decreases and the pressure required to carry out the separation accordingly increases.
  • [0006]
    A large surface area is generally needed when a large filtrate flow is required. One known technique to make a filtration apparatus more compact is to form a membrane in the shape of a hollow porous fiber. Modules of such fibers can be made with an extremely large surface area per unit volume. Microporous synthetic membranes are particularly suitable for use in hollow fibers and are typically produced by phase inversion techniques.
  • [0007]
    Microporous phase inversion membranes are particularly well suited to the application of removal of colloidal suspensions, viruses, and bacteria. Of all types of membranes, the hollow fiber membrane contains the largest membrane area per unit volume.
  • [0008]
    UF and MF membranes are used in separating particles and colloidal matter from liquids. In a typical scenario, water containing solutes and precipitates is passed through a bank of semipermeable tubular membranes housed in a module, often at elevated pressures. The filtered water is drawn off and collected, leaving a residue of solid material in the membrane pores or on the unfiltered side of the membrane.
  • [0009]
    It is preferred that the pores of the membrane be kept relatively free of contaminants. As the amount of pore blockage increases, the filtration efficiency of the module decreases and the amount of pressure required to maintain a viable throughput of liquid increases. As pressure increases, the likelihood of membrane rupture becomes more significant.
  • [0010]
    Under some circumstances, it may be desirable to treat water containing impurities with a flocculating agent prior to filtration. The purpose of flocculating agents is to cause dispersed colloids to coagulate and form ‘flocs’. Flocs have the advantage of entrapping smaller colloidal particles, thereby making filtration more efficient. They may also aid in the removal of dissolved particles. Under the influence of a flocculating agent, dissolved and suspended particles coagulate and precipitate from the water, thereby removing color, and turbidity.
  • [0011]
    Thus, in practice, the filtrate containing the flocculating agents, colloids, bacteria and other particulate matter is passed through the filtration unit under pressure, expelling filtered water and leaving the floe trapped within the unit, and more particularly on the waste side of the membrane and in the pores of the membrane. Flocs are particularly problematical in causing membrane blockage, and membrane performance gradually diminishes with use until it becomes necessary to clean the membranes.
  • [0012]
    One of the most commonly employed flocculating agents in the water purification field is ferric chloride, and the resultant floe is known as Fe floe. Build-up of Fe floe leads to iron fouling and eventually results in membrane performance degradation that diminishes the lifetime of these high cost membrane units. Two of the most widely used membrane compositions, polypropylene (PP) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), foul irreversibly with Fe floc and can become useless.
  • [0013]
    Residual material accumulating in and on the membrane is often removed by ‘backwashing’, that is, running the current of water counter to its normal direction of flow to dislodge the contaminants from the membrane. Gas backwashing of the membrane is also possible.
  • [0014]
    Backwashing generally involves increasing the pressure on both sides of the hollow fibers within a module a relatively high value before suddenly releasing that pressure on the unfiltered side of the membrane walls to cause a sudden pressure differential across the walls, which causes a backwash action. However, it is difficult to achieve complete removal of particulate matter, especially when flocculants have been used.
  • [0015]
    In addition to backwashing, the membranes may be de-fouled by more conventional cleaning regimes such as solution treatment with one or more of (and usually in a sequential manner) citric acid, oxidizing agents, in particular chlorine, and chelating agents such as EDTA.
  • [0016]
    Citric acid is usually regarded as a satisfactory cleaning agent, however, even it does not provide ideal levels of cleaning, and the membrane performance diminishes even following regular use/cleaning cycles. Moreover, the cleaning process usually involves a number of steps, and one or more of the steps may need to be conducted for long periods of time. Temperature control is also usually required.
  • [0017]
    Inorganic acids and bases are the mainstay of conventional cleaning agents. As well as suffering from the drawbacks mentioned above; these agents present their own problems because they may chemically attack the membranes and/or module components. Combinations of an aqueous inorganic acid, generally nitric acid, and a reducing agent, e.g., ascorbic acid, have also been used. However, none of the above regimes sufficiently de-foul membranes, particularly PVDF membranes, of the floc. Hence, there exists the need to improve the cleaning regime while at the same time avoiding the use of potentially severe cleaning agents.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0018]
    It is desirable to overcome or ameliorate at least one of the disadvantages of the prior art methods of de-fouling membranes, to provide a useful alternative to conventional methods of de-fouling membranes, or to provide suitable compositions for use in cleaning or de-fouling membranes.
  • [0019]
    In a preferred embodiment, there is provided a method of cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant including the step of contacting the contaminant with a composition including at least one soluble sulfite reducing agent and a compatible solvent. The term sulfite as used herein is used in its broadest general sense and includes, without limitation, sulfite, bisulfite, metabisulfite, hydrosulfite, and the like.
  • [0020]
    Preferably the membrane is of a hollow fiber configuration, although alternatively it may be a flat sheet membrane or other membrane configuration. In highly preferred embodiments, the membrane is formed from PVDF (polyvinylidene fluoride) polymer, although the methods of the preferred embodiments are applicable to polysulfone, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyacrylonitrile (PAN), fluorinated membranes, cellulose acetate membranes and the like and mixtures of the above, as well as all commonly used membrane polymers.
  • [0021]
    Preferably, the soluble sulfite reducing agent is sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite or mixtures thereof. Most preferably, a mixture of sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite is used. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that, for instance, besides sodium, other soluble salts such as potassium or other alkali metals or alkaline earth metals may be used. The solvent is preferably water. However any suitable solvent that is compatible with the materials comprising the membrane and is a suitable solvent for the sulfite may also be employed.
  • [0022]
    It is also preferred that the sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite are present in an amount of 20 wt. % to 65 wt. % each, when used alone or in combination. This combination may be used neat or further diluted when in use, for example, to around 0.5 wt. %. Dilutions of about 2 wt % are particularly preferred. However, any suitable dilution may be employed.
  • [0023]
    Preferably, and without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, the contaminant believed to be removed by solubilization resulting from a reduction to a lower valence state of at least a part of the contaminant
  • [0024]
    Preferably, the method reduces the cleaning time relative to known cleaning methods and is carried out at low or ambient temperatures.
  • [0025]
    Accordingly, in a first embodiment, a method of cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant is provided, the method including the step of contacting the contaminant with a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
  • [0026]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the contaminant includes a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide.
  • [0027]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the contaminant includes ferric floc.
  • [0028]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the contaminant includes an organic compound.
  • [0029]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the solvent includes water.
  • [0030]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, or mixtures thereof.
  • [0031]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, method further includes the step of reducing a valence state of an atom of the contaminant to a lower valence state, whereby the contaminant is solubilized and removed from the membrane.
  • [0032]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the composition further includes an enhancing agent.
  • [0033]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the enhancing agent includes inorganic acids, organic acids, or mixtures thereof.
  • [0034]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the enhancing agent includes citric acid.
  • [0035]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the solvent includes water and the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
  • [0036]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.1 wt. % to about 5 wt. % of a component including sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
  • [0037]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of a component including sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, or mixtures thereof.
  • [0038]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the composition includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and from about 0.5 wt. % to about 1.5 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite.
  • [0039]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the membrane includes a hollow fiber microfiltration membrane or a hollow fiber ultrafiltration membrane.
  • [0040]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the membrane includes a flat microfiltration membrane or a flat ultrafiltration membrane.
  • [0041]
    In an aspect of the first embodiment, the membrane includes a polyvinylidene fluoride polymer.
  • [0042]
    In a second embodiment, a composition for cleaning a membrane contaminated with a contaminant is provided, the composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
  • [0043]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the contaminant includes a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide.
  • [0044]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the contaminant is ferric floc.
  • [0045]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, or mixtures thereof.
  • [0046]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
  • [0047]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the composition further includes an enhancing agent.
  • [0048]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the enhancing agent includes an inorganic acid or an organic acid.
  • [0049]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the organic acid includes citric acid.
  • [0050]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 20 wt. % to about 60 wt. % sodium metabisulfite, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % of sulfite reducing agent in a solubilized form.
  • [0051]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium metabisulfite.
  • [0052]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite, and wherein the sulfite reducing agent is capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % soluble sulfite reducing agent present in solubilized form.
  • [0053]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the sulfite reducing agent includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite.
  • [0054]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the composition includes from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and from about 20 wt. % to about 65 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite, wherein the sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite are capable of dilution to a working concentration of about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sulfite reducing agent in solubilized form.
  • [0055]
    In an aspect of the second embodiment, the composition includes from about 0.5 wt. % to about 2 wt. % sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
  • [0056]
    In a third embodiment, a method for cleaning a membrane is provided, the method including the step of cleaning the membrane using a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
  • [0057]
    In a fourth embodiment, a membrane is provided wherein the membrane is capable of cleaning by a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
  • [0058]
    In a fifth embodiment, a membrane is provided, wherein the membrane is contaminated with a contaminant including a metal oxide or a metal hydroxide, and wherein the membrane is capable of cleaning by a composition including a sulfite reducing agent and a solvent, wherein the sulfite reducing agent is soluble in the solvent, and wherein the solvent is compatible with the membrane.
  • [0059]
    In an aspect of the fifth embodiment, the membrane includes a hollow fiber or a flat sheet.
  • [0060]
    In an aspect of the fifth embodiment, the membrane includes a polyvinylidene fluoride polymer.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0061]
    The following description and examples illustrate a preferred embodiment of the present invention in detail. Those of skill in the art will recognize that there are numerous variations and modifications of this invention that are encompassed by its scope. Accordingly, the description of a preferred embodiment should not be deemed to limit the scope of the present invention.
  • [0062]
    Ferric chloride is the preferred flocculating agent in water clean-up procedures. However, standard cleaning regimes have not been highly effective in cleaning PVDF membranes of the resultant Fe floc, leading to significant commercial costs associated with ultimate irreversible membrane fouling by metal oxides and/or hydroxides.
  • [0063]
    Surprisingly, the present inventors have found that the methods of the preferred embodiments are particularly suited for PVDF membranes. When metabisulfite was used as a cleaning agent on PVDF membranes, there was successful removal of metal oxides and metal hydroxides.
  • [0064]
    More surprisingly, when sodium hydrosulfite and sodium metabisulfite were used in combination as cleaning agents for PVDF membranes, significant antifouling properties ere observed.
  • [0065]
    One commercial blend of sodium hydrosulfite (20-65 wt. %) and sodium metabisulfite (20-65 wt. %) was found to be particularly useful. This mixture, marketed as SUPER IRON OUT®, has been commercially available since the 1950's, although it has not been used for cleaning membranes. SUPER IRON OUT® has been marketed to household consumers as an all-purpose rust and stain remover, water softener, a cleaning agent for toilets, sinks tubs, dishwashers, white clothing, and fabrics as well as exterior surfaces, i.e. as a general household reductant.
  • [0066]
    This material may be used neat, although it is possible to use it diluted in an amount such that the dilution is as low as 0.5 wt. %, although dilutions of around 2 wt. % have been found advantageous.
  • [0067]
    Alternatively, standardized solutions may be prepared from the starting materials. While the exact concentration will be selected depending on the time limits set for the membrane cleaning and on cost considerations, it has been found particularly-useful to use solutions of around 2 wt. %/volume total sulfite content based on the starting materials, i.e. 2 g sodium metabisulfite per 100 ml of water, or 1 g sodium bisulfite and 1 g of sodium hydrosulfite per 100 ml of water, and the like.
  • [0068]
    The commercial importance of this new application is that it allows ferric floc applications to be run at 20 to 30% higher water flux than has previously been thought possible. Using such high fluxes is normally to be avoided because of the extreme fouling that takes place under such conditions, and the resultant difficulty in cleaning badly fouled membranes, wherein the floc is forced hard into the pores and cannot be readily physically removed by backwashing, or by chemical cleaners.
  • [0069]
    With the advent of the cleaning method of the preferred embodiments, the ferric floe applications can be run at the higher flux and the fouled membranes can be quickly and efficiently cleaned. The ability to use such high fluxes can translate into a significant commercial advantage.
  • [0070]
    As more liquid is filtered, the amount of residue removed from that liquid increases in the pores and on the outside and needs to be cleaned.
  • [0071]
    The methods of the preferred embodiments can be used in conjunction with backwashing methodology, or as a stand-alone cleaning method suitable for carrying out “cleaning-in-place” (CIP). CIP involves cleaning the membrane module without removal from its normal in situ place of operation.
  • [0072]
    In general terms, one form of CIP cleaning involves isolating the module to be cleaned by means of taps and pipes and the like from fluid communication with the remainder of the system. The water or liquid normally filtered is then replaced with a cleaning fluid. The cleaning fluid is then allowed to run through the membrane module to carry out the cleaning. The cleaning fluid may be recycled through the module, or allowed to pass through the module just once before being run off to waste, depending upon the particular requirements of the system and the amount of contaminants being removed.
  • [0073]
    The CIP procedure can take place at ambient temperatures or at controlled temperatures outside the normal range of filtration temperatures, e.g. at higher temperatures to increase dissolution of solids, or at lower temperatures to allow for a greater concentration of dissolved gaseous agents e.g., especially chlorine gas, in the fluid. The CIP can be carried out for varying lengths of time and at pressures outside the normal range of those used for filtration.
  • [0074]
    Once the cleaning is completed, the filtration agent is flushed to remove traces of the cleaning agent before being returned to service by being reconnected to the normal fluid flow.
  • [0075]
    CIP can be carried out manually or by means of fully automated systems which activate in response to pressure differentials or after predetermined module operating times.
  • [0076]
    A preferred embodiment is described below, by way of example only.
  • [0077]
    The examples given below relate to modules prepared from banks of hollow fiber PVDF membranes. The membrane modules are as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,373, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. The module includes a shell within which is positioned a bundle containing from about 2800 to about 30,000 hollow fibers with a diameter of 500 μm to 650 μm and a lumen diameter of 250 μm to 310 μm, with a pore size of 0.2 μm, but these sizes may be varied as required. Moreover, membrane and module configurations different from the one described above may also be employed with the methods of preferred embodiments, as will be appreciated by one skilled in the art.
  • [0078]
    At each end of the fiber bundle, a potting compound holds the ends of the fibers in place without blocking the lumens and closes off each end of the module. The liquid feed is pumped into the module, between the shell and the outside of the hollow fibers. Some of the feed liquid passes into the lumen of the fibers, being filtered as it does so. The clean liquid then concentrates in the inside of the lumen, and flows, or is drawn off and taken outside the module, as a clarified liquid.
  • [0079]
    In the CIP method exemplified, the cleaning agent is introduced in place of the untreated liquid stream. However, those skilled in the art will realize that the flow can be introduced counter to that normally used.
  • EXAMPLES
  • [0080]
    CIP Comparative Method 1—Raw Water Filtration Module
  • [0081]
    Membranes in a raw water filtration module were cleaned using a 2 wt. % solution of citric acid in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, a solution of 300 ppm Cl in water at 20° C. was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. The total duration of the CIP was 3 hours. Table 1 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure (TMP), resistance (R), and flow (in gallons per minute per module) both before and after the CIP.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 1
    BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP
    TMP Flow TMP Flow
    (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod)
    8.1 4.27 4.4 3.5 2.21 4.9
  • [0082]
    CIP Comparative Method 2—Clarified Water Filtration Module
  • [0083]
    Membranes in a clarified water filtration module (containing flocculant) were cleaned 400 ppm solution of Cl in water at 20° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. Then the membranes were washed with a 2.7 wt. % citric acid solution in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, an overnight soak was conducted. The total duration of the CEP was 13 hours. Table 2 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure, resistance, and flow both before and after the CIP.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 2
    BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP
    TMP Flow TMP Flow
    (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod)
    11 7.48 4.9 5.9 3.56 4.9
  • [0084]
    CIP Comparative Method 3—Clarified Water Filtration Module
  • [0085]
    Membranes in a clarified water filtration module (containing flocculant) were cleaned using a 1000 ppm solution of Cl in water at 20° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. Then the membranes were washed with a 4 wt. % citric acid solution in water at 35° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes. Three repeats of a 300 second aeration followed by a 300 second soak were conducted. Then, an overnight soak in a 1000 ppm Cl solution in water was conducted. The total duration of the CIP was 13 hours. Table 3 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure, resistance, and flow both before and after the CIP.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 3
    BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP
    TMP Flow TMP Flow
    (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod)
    10.9 10.61 3.6 5.4 3.34 3.6
  • [0086]
    CIP Comparative Method 4—Raw Water Filtration Module
  • [0087]
    Membranes in a raw water filtration module were cleaned using a solution of 300 ppm Cl in water at 20° C., followed by an overnight soak. Then, the membranes were cleaned with a 2 wt. % citric acid solution in water at 40° C. for two hours. The total duration of the CIP was 13 hours. Table 4 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure CIM), resistance (R), and flow (in gallons per minute per module) both before and after the CIP.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 4
    BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP
    TMP Flow TMP Flow
    (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod)
    5.58 4.08 3.85 3.5 2.63 3.75
  • [0088]
    CIP Method 1—Clarified Water Filtration Module
  • [0089]
    Membranes in a clarified water filtration module (containing flocculant) were cleaned using a 2 wt. % solution of SUPER IRON OUT® in water at 20° C. for 30 minutes. Then the membranes were washed with a solution of 1000 ppm Cl in water at 20° C., which was recirculated for 60 minutes, followed by a 30 minute soak. The total duration of the CIP was 2 hours. Table 5 provides measurements of transmembrane pressure, resistance, and flow both before and after the CIP. The data demonstrate a substantial reduction in transmembrane pressure and resistance, and an increase in flow following the cleaning method.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 5
    BEFORE CIP AFTER CIP
    TMP Flow TMP Flow
    (psi) R (gpm/mod) (psi) R (gpm/mod)
    10.6 7.19 4.8 5 2.8 5.7
  • [0090]
    It can be seen from all the above examples that cleaning-the membranes, by both conventional methods and by the methods of the preferred embodiments, results in a reduction in transmembrane pressure, a decrease in resistance, and an increase in flow, all indicators that the membrane has been cleaned.
  • [0091]
    The results with SUPER IRON OUT® are significantly better than the comparative conventional methods. It enables the highest restoration of flow and the most significant decrease in resistance on cleaning.
  • [0092]
    It has also achieved these results at ambient temperatures, and with fewer steps, meaning that the amount of external apparatus required to carry out the CIP of the module is considerably reduced.
  • [0093]
    Possibly most significantly, however, it achieved this high level of cleaning in 2 hours for clarified (flocculant-containing) water. To achieve close to this result using the standard methods required overnight CIP times, typically around 13 hours. This dramatic reduction in CIP time translates into a reduction in downtime of modules, as well as allowing higher liquid throughput by permitting effective clean up after running at high flux rates.
  • [0094]
    Sulfite agents such as sodium metabisulfite and SUPER IRON OUT® can also be used in conjunction with other conventional methods, for example, in conjunction with sulfuric acid for cleaning membranes (including polypropylene membranes). In low concentrations, it is believed sodium metabisulfite may act as a sacrificial agent, protecting the membrane from degradation by other cleaning agents.
  • [0095]
    Further investigations were carried out to better standardize the active amount of sulfite agent present (rather than relying on the broader ranges which may be found in proprietary formulations and to investigate the optimal cleaning compositions, as established by the differing criteria to determine membrane de-fouling.
  • [0096]
    Two sets of experiments were carried out to determine the efficiency of sulfite cleaning compositions of precisely defined composition relative to citric acid and chlorine, and measured with reference to different criteria. In both sets of experiments, the membranes were fouled with a mixture of 100 ppm humic acid and 100 ppm FeCl3.6H2O, by filtering this mixture through the membranes.
  • [0097]
    In the transmembrane pressure recovery and refouling experiments, the same equipment was used to filter the cleaning solution through the membranes. The TMP change versus time was recorded while filtering this humic acid/iron solution through the membrane before and after the clean. The results are shown in Table 6.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 6
    Fouling
    Final TMP Initial TMP TMP rate
    before clean after clean recovery post-clean
    Clean (kPa) (kPa) (kPa) (kPa/min)
    2 wt. % Citric acid 38 18 20 0.07
    200 ppm NaOCl 46 21 25 0.6
    2 wt. % SHS 60 21 39 0.15
    2 wt. % SMBS 36 20 16 0.08
    1.5 wt. % SMBS + 31 17 14 0.1
    0.5 wt. % SHS
    0.5 wt. % SMBS + 39 20 19 0.1
    1.5 wt. % SHS
    1 wt. % SMBS + 36 20 16 0.3
    1 wt. % SHS
    SMBS = sodium metabisulfite
    SHS = sodium hydrosulfite
  • [0098]
    The results in the experiment show that the TMP recoveries were similar for all the cleaning methodologies used except for 2 wt. % sodium hydrosulfite which gave a significantly higher recovery than the other cleaning agents.
  • [0099]
    The best post-clean fouling rates were also investigated. The poorest post-clean fouling rate was found using the conventional chlorine clean. The best post clean fouling was found using 2 wt. % citric acid and 2 wt. % SMBS, with the 1.5 wt. % SMBS/0.5 wt. % SHS and 0.5 wt. % SMBS/1.5 wt % SHS mixtures also performing very well.
  • [0100]
    In the second set of experiments, the dirty membranes were placed in jars of the cleaning solution and allowed to soak. The permeability of the fibers was measured before and after the clean. The results are shown in Table 7.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 7
    %
    Perme-
    Permeability Permeability Permeability ability
    before clean after clean recovery re-
    Clean (L/m2 · hour) (L/m2 · hour) (L/m2 · hour) covery
    2 wt. % Citric acid 589 795 206 135
    200 ppm NaOCl 277 576 299 207
    2 wt. % SHS 383 795 412 208
    2 wt. % SMBS 454 714 260 157
    1.5 wt. % SMBS + 350 774 424 221
    0.5 wt. % SHS
    0.5 wt. % SMBS + 591 835 244 141
    1.5 wt. % SHS
    1 wt. % SMBS + 378 824 446 236
    1 wt. % SHS
    SMBS = sodium metabisulfite
    SHS = sodium hydrosulfite
  • [0101]
    The citric acid gave the lowest permeability recovery. Three cleans, 1.5% SMBS+0.5 wt. % SHS, 1 wt. % SMBS+1 wt. % SHS, and 2 wt. % SHS gave the best permability recoveries. The permeability recoveries for the sulfite cleaning agents show that for two specific combinations, 1.5 wt. % SMBS/0.5 wt. % SHS and 1 wt. % SMBS/1 wt. % SHS, the permeability recovery (of 221% and 236%, respectively) was greater than the permeability recovery for either the SMBS or SHS alone, indicating a synergistic relationship between the two. On the basis of the individual mixture components, a 1 wt. %:1 wt. % SMBS/SHS mixture would be expected to restore about 183% (based on 208%/2+157%/ 2) of the permeability, yet the actual value was 236%.
  • [0102]
    The other cleaning combinations are likewise not simply additive, indicating that in combination, the two sulfite cleaning agents may act co-operatively.
  • [0103]
    Thus, it can be seen that the sulfite cleaning method of the preferred embodiments provided in all cases a good TMP recovery, good permeability recovery and a low rate of post clean fouling. The all round performance was not matched by conventional cleaning methodologies. Further, sulfite cleaning required less time to achieve CIP (cleaning in place) de-fouling of membranes than conventional (chlorine) membrane cleans.
  • [0104]
    The above description discloses several methods and materials of the present invention. This invention is susceptible to modifications in the methods and materials, as well as alterations in the fabrication methods and equipment. Such modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of this disclosure or practice of the invention disclosed herein. Consequently, it is not intended that this invention be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed herein, but that it cover all modifications and alternatives coming within the true scope and spirit of the invention as embodied in the attached claims. All patents, applications, and other references cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

Claims (16)

1-36. (canceled)
37. A method of cleaning a microfiltration or ultrafiltration porous polymeric membrane contaminated with a contaminant, comprising:
providing a cleaning solution prepared from at least two sulfites and a solvent; and
contacting the contaminated microfiltration or ultrafiltration porous polymeric membrane with the cleaning solution.
38. The method according to claim 37, wherein the cleaning solution further comprises an enhancing agent.
39. The method according to claim 38, wherein the enhancing agent is selected from the group consisting of inorganic acids, organic acids, and mixtures thereof.
40. The method according to claim 39, wherein the enhancing agent comprises citric acid.
41. The method according to claim 37, wherein the sulfites are selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, potassium sulfite, and mixtures thereof.
42. The method according to claim 41, wherein the solvent comprises water and the sulfites comprise sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
43. A method of treating water, comprising:
providing a water treatment system comprising a microfiltration or ultrafiltration membrane;
connecting a source of water to be treated to the water treatment system;
filtering the water through the membrane, thereby retaining a contaminant on a surface of the membrane;
providing a cleaning solution prepared from at least two sulfites and a solvent; and
contacting the contaminated membrane with the cleaning solution.
44. The method of claim 43, further comprising the step of adding a flocculating agent to the water.
45. The method of claim 43, further comprising the step of isolating the membrane from the source of water to be treated.
46. The method of claim 45, further comprising the step of reconnecting the membrane to the source of water to be treated.
47. The method of claim 43, wherein the at least two sulfites are selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, and potassium sulfite.
48. A method of cleaning a microfiltration or ultrafiltration membrane, comprising the step of:
cleaning the microfiltration or ultrafiltration membrane using a composition comprising at least two sulfites.
49. The method of claim 48, wherein the at least two sulfites are selected from the group consisting of sodium metabisulfite, sodium hydrosulfite, sodium sulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium hydrosulfite, and potassium sulfite.
50. The method of claim 49, wherein the composition comprises sodium metabisulfite and sodium hydrosulfite.
51. The method of claim 48, wherein the composition further comprises an enhancing agent.
US12130664 2001-11-16 2008-05-30 Method of cleaning membranes Abandoned US20080237125A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US33382801 true 2001-11-16 2001-11-16
US10298471 US6955762B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2002-11-15 Method of cleaning membranes
US11073137 US20050218073A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2005-03-04 Method of cleaning membranes
US11145773 US20050224411A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2005-06-06 Method of cleaning membranes
US12130664 US20080237125A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2008-05-30 Method of cleaning membranes

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12130664 US20080237125A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2008-05-30 Method of cleaning membranes

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11145773 Continuation US20050224411A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2005-06-06 Method of cleaning membranes

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080237125A1 true true US20080237125A1 (en) 2008-10-02

Family

ID=23304416

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10298471 Active 2023-06-28 US6955762B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2002-11-15 Method of cleaning membranes
US11073137 Abandoned US20050218073A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2005-03-04 Method of cleaning membranes
US11145773 Abandoned US20050224411A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2005-06-06 Method of cleaning membranes
US12130664 Abandoned US20080237125A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2008-05-30 Method of cleaning membranes

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10298471 Active 2023-06-28 US6955762B2 (en) 2001-11-16 2002-11-15 Method of cleaning membranes
US11073137 Abandoned US20050218073A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2005-03-04 Method of cleaning membranes
US11145773 Abandoned US20050224411A1 (en) 2001-11-16 2005-06-06 Method of cleaning membranes

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (4) US6955762B2 (en)
DE (2) DE60213184T2 (en)
EP (1) EP1312408B1 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102407076A (en) * 2011-10-11 2012-04-11 清远加多宝草本植物科技有限公司 Membrane element cleaning agent in membrane separation industry

Families Citing this family (45)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040232076A1 (en) * 1996-12-20 2004-11-25 Fufang Zha Scouring method
ES2353254T3 (en) 1996-12-20 2011-02-28 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Washing procedure.
ES2326590T3 (en) * 2000-04-10 2009-10-15 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Retention system hollow fiber.
WO2002038256A1 (en) * 2000-11-13 2002-05-16 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Modified membranes
DE60217848D1 (en) 2001-04-04 2007-03-15 Us Filter Wastewater Group Inc Potting of hollow fibers
WO2002102500A1 (en) * 2001-06-20 2002-12-27 Us Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. Membrane polymer compositions
JP4975950B2 (en) 2001-08-09 2012-07-11 シーメンス・ウォーター・テクノロジーズ・コーポレーション Membrane module cleaning method
JP2005502467A (en) * 2001-09-18 2005-01-27 ユー・エス・フィルター・ウェイストウォーター・グループ・インコーポレイテッドU.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. High-solids module
DE60213184T2 (en) * 2001-11-16 2007-06-28 U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. Method for cleaning membranes
US7247238B2 (en) * 2002-02-12 2007-07-24 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Poly(ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene) membranes
CN100503018C (en) 2002-06-18 2009-06-24 西门子水技术公司 Methods of minimizing the effect of integrity loss in hollow fibre membrane modules
KR101002466B1 (en) 2002-10-10 2010-12-17 지멘스 워터 테크놀로지스 코포레이션 Backwash method
CN1735452B (en) 2002-12-05 2010-04-28 西门子水技术公 Mixing chamber
CN103285737B (en) 2003-08-29 2016-01-13 伊沃夸水处理技术有限责任公司 Backwash
WO2005046849A1 (en) 2003-11-14 2005-05-26 U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. Improved module cleaning method
US8758621B2 (en) 2004-03-26 2014-06-24 Evoqua Water Technologies Llc Process and apparatus for purifying impure water using microfiltration or ultrafiltration in combination with reverse osmosis
EP2380854A3 (en) 2004-04-22 2012-07-04 Siemens Industry, Inc. Filtration apparatus comprising a membrane bioreactor and a treatment vessel for digesting organic materials
US7862719B2 (en) 2004-08-20 2011-01-04 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Square membrane manifold system
EP1807180B1 (en) 2004-09-07 2013-02-13 Siemens Industry, Inc. Reduction of backwash liquid waste
JP4896025B2 (en) 2004-09-14 2012-03-14 シーメンス・ウォーター・テクノロジーズ・コーポレイションSiemens Water Technologies Corp. Method and apparatus for removing solids from the membrane module
WO2006029465A1 (en) 2004-09-15 2006-03-23 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Continuously variable aeration
CN101065177B (en) * 2004-11-02 2011-07-27 西门子水技术公司 Submerged cross-flow filtration
US7591950B2 (en) * 2004-11-02 2009-09-22 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Submerged cross-flow filtration
CA2591408C (en) 2004-12-24 2015-07-21 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Cleaning in membrane filtration systems
EP1838422A4 (en) 2004-12-24 2009-09-02 Siemens Water Tech Corp Simple gas scouring method and apparatus
CN101184548B (en) 2005-04-29 2011-10-05 西门子水技术公司 Chemical clean for membrane filter
US20060273038A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Syed Murtuza A Chemical cleaning for membranes
JP2009504399A (en) 2005-08-22 2009-02-05 シーメンス・ウォーター・テクノロジーズ・コーポレーション Assembly for a water filtration minimizing backwashing using a tubular manifold
WO2007044442A3 (en) * 2005-10-05 2009-05-07 Edward J Jordan Method and system for treating wastewater
US20070138090A1 (en) 2005-10-05 2007-06-21 Jordan Edward J Method and apparatus for treating wastewater
US20070092464A1 (en) * 2005-10-25 2007-04-26 Duff Rocky J Betadine neutralizer
US8293098B2 (en) 2006-10-24 2012-10-23 Siemens Industry, Inc. Infiltration/inflow control for membrane bioreactor
WO2008123972A1 (en) 2007-04-02 2008-10-16 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Improved infiltration/inflow control for membrane bioreactor
US9764288B2 (en) 2007-04-04 2017-09-19 Evoqua Water Technologies Llc Membrane module protection
EP3078411A1 (en) 2007-05-29 2016-10-12 Evoqua Water Technologies LLC Membrane cleaning with pulsed airlift pump
US8236178B2 (en) * 2007-08-20 2012-08-07 Earth Renaissance Technologies, Llc Reverse osmosis water recover method
JP2013500144A (en) 2008-07-24 2013-01-07 シーメンス インダストリー インコーポレイテッドSiemens Industry, Inc. Method and filtration systems for performing a structural support to the filtration membrane module array in the filtration system
CA2734796A1 (en) 2008-08-20 2010-02-25 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Improved membrane system backwash energy efficiency
DE102008039676A1 (en) * 2008-08-26 2010-03-04 Inge Watertechnologies Ag Apparatus and method for backwashing of filter membrane modules
WO2010142673A1 (en) 2009-06-11 2010-12-16 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Methods for cleaning a porous polymeric membrane and a kit for cleaning a porous polymeric membrane
US9022224B2 (en) 2010-09-24 2015-05-05 Evoqua Water Technologies Llc Fluid control manifold for membrane filtration system
EP2763776A4 (en) 2011-09-30 2015-07-01 Evoqua Water Technologies Llc Improved manifold arrangement
WO2014004645A1 (en) 2012-06-28 2014-01-03 Siemens Industry, Inc. A potting method
DE112013004713T5 (en) 2012-09-26 2015-07-23 Evoqua Water Technologies Llc Membrane safety device
US9815027B2 (en) 2012-09-27 2017-11-14 Evoqua Water Technologies Llc Gas scouring apparatus for immersed membranes

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3139401A (en) * 1962-01-05 1964-06-30 Hach Chemical Co Method for removing rust from water softeners
US3183191A (en) * 1960-04-19 1965-05-11 Hach Chemical Co Stain and rust removing composition
US3700591A (en) * 1970-09-24 1972-10-24 Us Interior Cleaning of used membrane with oxalic acid
US6280626B1 (en) * 1998-08-12 2001-08-28 Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. Membrane separator assembly and method of cleaning the assembly utilizing gas diffuser underneath the assembly
US6468430B1 (en) * 1998-07-21 2002-10-22 Toray Industries, Inc. Method for inhibiting growth of bacteria or sterilizing around separating membrane
US6955762B2 (en) * 2001-11-16 2005-10-18 U. S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. Method of cleaning membranes

Family Cites Families (150)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US655505A (en) * 1900-02-13 1900-08-07 Lloyd Sherbondy Morrow End-gate fastener for mining-cars.
US2105700A (en) * 1936-07-13 1938-01-18 William D Ramage Process for purification of beverages
US2926086A (en) * 1957-07-30 1960-02-23 Universal Oil Prod Co Stabilization of non-distilled alcoholic beverages and the resulting product
NL269380A (en) 1960-09-19
US3693406A (en) 1970-01-26 1972-09-26 Air Intake Renu Method for inspecting filters
US3708071A (en) * 1970-08-05 1973-01-02 Abcor Inc Hollow fiber membrane device and method of fabricating same
US3955998A (en) * 1973-06-21 1976-05-11 Phillips Petroleum Company Aqueous gels for plugging fractures in subterranean formation and production of said aqueous gels
US3992301A (en) 1973-11-19 1976-11-16 Raypak, Inc. Automatic flushing system for membrane separation machines such as reverse osmosis machines
US3968192A (en) 1974-04-19 1976-07-06 The Dow Chemical Company Method of repairing leaky hollow fiber permeability separatory devices
GB1496805A (en) * 1975-09-19 1978-01-05 Unilever Ltd Dithionite composition
US4192750A (en) 1976-08-09 1980-03-11 Massey-Ferguson Inc. Stackable filter head unit
US4193780A (en) 1978-03-20 1980-03-18 Industrial Air, Inc. Air filter construction
JPS54162684A (en) * 1978-06-14 1979-12-24 Ebara Infilco Co Ltd Preliminary treating method for contaminated membrane
US4188817A (en) 1978-10-04 1980-02-19 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Method for detecting membrane leakage
JPS5634133B2 (en) * 1979-03-28 1981-08-08
US4218324A (en) 1979-05-03 1980-08-19 Textron, Inc. Filter element having removable filter media member
US4248648A (en) 1979-07-18 1981-02-03 Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc. Method of repairing leaks in a hollow capillary fiber diffusion device
JPS5621604A (en) * 1979-07-27 1981-02-28 Toray Ind Inc Separation of liquid by semipermeable composite membrane
JPS56121685A (en) * 1980-02-29 1981-09-24 Ebara Infilco Co Ltd Treatment of liquid containing iron ion and manganese ion
JPH0248579B2 (en) 1980-10-17 1990-10-25 Asahi Glass Co Ltd
US4384474A (en) 1980-10-30 1983-05-24 Amf Incorporated Method and apparatus for testing and using membrane filters in an on site of use housing
JPS6351722B2 (en) 1980-12-18 1988-10-14 Toyo Boseki
US4496470A (en) * 1981-01-12 1985-01-29 The B. F. Goodrich Company Cleaning composition
US4812235A (en) 1982-03-29 1989-03-14 Hr Textron, Inc. Filter element assembly replaceable mesh pack
US4540490A (en) 1982-04-23 1985-09-10 Jgc Corporation Apparatus for filtration of a suspension
WO1983003984A1 (en) 1982-05-13 1983-11-24 Gerhard Kunz Method for the treatment of a liquid phase, particularly method for desalting aqueous solutions, as well as device for its implementation
JPS6343124B2 (en) 1982-06-03 1988-08-29 Dee Eru Emu Dokutoru Hansu Myuraa Ag
GB2132366B (en) 1982-12-27 1987-04-08 Brunswick Corp Method and device for testing the permeability of membrane filters
CA1221645A (en) 1983-02-28 1987-05-12 Yoshihiro Okano Filtration apparatus using hollow fiber-membrane
DE3317396A1 (en) * 1983-05-13 1984-11-15 Henkel Kgaa esters using coloymeren and amides of acrylic and / or methacrylic acid as pour point depressants for paraffin loesungen
GB8313635D0 (en) 1983-05-17 1983-06-22 Whatman Reeve Angel Plc Porosimeter
EP0126714A3 (en) * 1983-05-20 1986-03-05 Christ AG Method and apparatus for the treatment of solutions by reverse osmosis
US4636296A (en) 1983-08-18 1987-01-13 Gerhard Kunz Process and apparatus for treatment of fluids, particularly desalinization of aqueous solutions
US4650586A (en) 1983-09-26 1987-03-17 Kinetico, Inc. Fluid treatment system
US4756875A (en) 1983-09-29 1988-07-12 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Apparatus for filtering water containing radioactive substances in nuclear power plants
EP0160014B1 (en) 1983-09-30 1993-01-07 Memtec Limited Cleaning of filters
DE3582394D1 (en) * 1984-04-11 1991-05-08 Syrinx Res Pty Ltd Membrane with a high flux.
US4609465A (en) 1984-05-21 1986-09-02 Pall Corporation Filter cartridge with a connector seal
DE3568946D1 (en) 1984-07-09 1989-04-27 Millipore Corp Improved electrodeionization apparatus and method
JPS6125903U (en) 1984-07-24 1986-02-15
DE3428307C2 (en) 1984-08-01 1990-06-07 Filterwerk Mann & Hummel Gmbh, 7140 Ludwigsburg, De
US5192478A (en) * 1984-10-22 1993-03-09 The Dow Chemical Company Method of forming tubesheet for hollow fibers
JPH0667459B2 (en) 1985-03-05 1994-08-31 メムテック・リミテッド Fine solid concentration method and apparatus in suspension
US5024762A (en) 1985-03-05 1991-06-18 Memtec Limited Concentration of solids in a suspension
US4642182A (en) 1985-03-07 1987-02-10 Mordeki Drori Multiple-disc type filter with extensible support
EP0216876B1 (en) 1985-03-28 1990-05-16 Memtec Limited Cooling hollow fibre cross-flow separators
JPS62502452A (en) 1985-04-10 1987-09-24
JPH0472569B2 (en) * 1985-04-27 1992-11-18 Toyo Boseki
CA1247329A (en) 1985-05-06 1988-12-27 Craig J. Brown Fluid treatment process and apparatus
US4660411A (en) 1985-05-31 1987-04-28 Reid Philip L Apparatus for measuring transmission of volatile substances through films
US4656865A (en) 1985-09-09 1987-04-14 The Dow Chemical Company System for analyzing permeation of a gas or vapor through a film or membrane
US4876006A (en) 1985-10-08 1989-10-24 Ebara Corporation Hollow fiber filter device
DE3546091C2 (en) 1985-12-24 1988-05-19 Kernforschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh, 7500 Karlsruhe, De
US4779448A (en) 1986-01-28 1988-10-25 Donaldson Company, Inc. Photoelectric bubble detector apparatus and method
JPH0742861B2 (en) 1986-03-10 1995-05-15 ヤマハ発動機株式会社 An intake system for an internal combustion engine
DE3617724A1 (en) 1986-05-27 1987-12-03 Akzo Gmbh A method for determining the bubble point or the largest pore of membranes or filter materials
FR2600265B1 (en) 1986-06-20 1991-09-06 Rhone Poulenc Rech semi-permeable membranes dryable and has hydrophilic basic polyvinylidene fluoride
US4670145A (en) 1986-07-08 1987-06-02 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Multiple bundle fluid separation apparatus
ES2014516A6 (en) 1986-07-11 1990-07-16 Mentec Ltd Procedure for cleaning filters.
US4921610A (en) 1986-09-04 1990-05-01 Memtec Limited Cleaning of hollow fibre filters
JP2607579B2 (en) 1986-09-12 1997-05-07 メムテック・リミテッド Hollow fiber filter cartridge and the head
US5094750A (en) 1986-09-12 1992-03-10 Memtec Limited Hollow fibre filter cartridge and header
US4834998A (en) * 1986-12-22 1989-05-30 Heublein, Inc. Ultrafiltration of red wines
US4846970A (en) 1987-06-22 1989-07-11 Osmonics, Inc. Cross-flow filtration membrane test unit
US4784771A (en) 1987-08-03 1988-11-15 Environmental Water Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for purifying fluids
US5221478A (en) 1988-02-05 1993-06-22 The Dow Chemical Company Chromatographic separation using ion-exchange resins
US4999038A (en) 1989-02-07 1991-03-12 Lundberg Bo E H Filter unit
DE3904544C2 (en) 1989-02-15 1990-12-06 Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft Zur Foerderung Der Angewandten Forschung Ev, 8000 Muenchen, De
NL8901090A (en) 1989-04-28 1990-11-16 X Flow Bv Method for the production of a microporous membrane and such a membrane.
US4988444A (en) * 1989-05-12 1991-01-29 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Prevention of biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes
US5005430A (en) 1989-05-16 1991-04-09 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Automated membrane filter sampler
US5364527A (en) 1990-06-20 1994-11-15 Heinz Zimmermann Apparatus and process for treating water
US5138870A (en) 1989-07-10 1992-08-18 Lyssy Georges H Apparatus for measuring water vapor permeability through sheet materials
DE3923128A1 (en) 1989-07-13 1991-01-24 Akzo Gmbh Flat or capillary membrane of polyvinylidene fluoride on the basis of a homogeneous mixture and a second, rendered hydrophilic by chemical reaction of the polymeric
DE69029850D1 (en) 1989-09-29 1997-03-13 Memtec Ltd Manifold for filter cartridges
US5227063A (en) 1989-10-03 1993-07-13 Zenon Environmental Inc. Tubular membrane module
US5079272A (en) 1989-11-30 1992-01-07 Millipore Corporation Porous membrane formed from interpenetrating polymer network having hydrophilic surface
US5158721A (en) 1989-11-30 1992-10-27 Millipore Corporation Porous membrane formed from interpenetrating polymer network having hydrophilic surface
DE4000978A1 (en) * 1990-01-16 1991-07-18 Basf Ag A process for removing heavy metal ions from wine and drinks weinaehnlichen
US5066375A (en) 1990-03-19 1991-11-19 Ionics, Incorporated Introducing and removing ion-exchange and other particulates from an assembled electrodeionization stack
ES2126571T3 (en) 1990-04-20 1999-04-01 Usf Filtration Limited Sets of modular microporous filters.
US5104546A (en) 1990-07-03 1992-04-14 Aluminum Company Of America Pyrogens separations by ceramic ultrafiltration
US5182019A (en) * 1990-08-17 1993-01-26 Zenon Environmental Inc. Cartridge of hybrid frameless arrays of hollow fiber membranes and module containing an assembly of cartridges
US5104535A (en) * 1990-08-17 1992-04-14 Zenon Environmental, Inc. Frameless array of hollow fiber membranes and module containing a stack of arrays
US5248424A (en) 1990-08-17 1993-09-28 Zenon Environmental Inc. Frameless array of hollow fiber membranes and method of maintaining clean fiber surfaces while filtering a substrate to withdraw a permeate
FR2666245B1 (en) 1990-08-31 1992-10-23 Lyonnaise Eaux method for controlling the operating modes of an automatic water filtration device to the tubular membranes.
JP2904564B2 (en) 1990-08-31 1999-06-14 オルガノ株式会社 Scrubbing method filtration tower using a hollow fiber membrane
JP2858913B2 (en) 1990-09-26 1999-02-17 オルガノ株式会社 Filtration methods using a hollow fiber membrane
USH1045H (en) 1990-11-19 1992-05-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army Air bubble leak detection test device
US5069065A (en) 1991-01-16 1991-12-03 Mobil Oil Corporation Method for measuring wettability of porous rock
EP0510328B1 (en) 1991-03-07 1995-10-04 Kubota Corporation Apparatus for treating activated sludge
DE4119040C2 (en) 1991-06-10 1997-01-02 Pall Corp Method and apparatus for testing the operating condition of filter elements
US5211823A (en) 1991-06-19 1993-05-18 Millipore Corporation Process for purifying resins utilizing bipolar interface
DE69230766T2 (en) 1991-08-07 2000-08-31 Usf Filtration Ltd Concentration of solids in a slurry by the use of carbon-fiber membranes
US5135663A (en) * 1991-10-18 1992-08-04 Loctite Corporation Method of treating (meth)acrylic monomer-containing wastewater
US5137631A (en) 1991-10-22 1992-08-11 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Multiple bundle permeator
US5198116A (en) 1992-02-10 1993-03-30 D.W. Walker & Associates Method and apparatus for measuring the fouling potential of membrane system feeds
DE69316325D1 (en) 1992-02-12 1998-02-19 Mitsubishi Rayon Co Hohlfasermembranemodul
EP0592066B1 (en) 1992-05-01 1997-09-03 Memtec Japan Limited Apparatus for testing membrane filter integrity
EP0641247B1 (en) 1992-05-18 1996-10-30 Minntech Corporation Hollow fiber filter cartridge and method of manufacture
JP3364804B2 (en) 1992-11-02 2003-01-08 メムテック リミテッド Fiber monitoring device
FR2697446B1 (en) * 1992-11-03 1994-12-02 Aquasource A method of processing a fluid containing suspended solids and in solution, by use of separation membranes.
US5320760A (en) 1992-12-07 1994-06-14 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Method of determining filter pluggage by measuring pressures
US5401401A (en) 1993-01-13 1995-03-28 Aquaria Inc. Hang on tank canister filter
US5389260A (en) 1993-04-02 1995-02-14 Clack Corporation Brine seal for tubular filter
US5361625A (en) 1993-04-29 1994-11-08 Ylvisaker Jon A Method and device for the measurement of barrier properties of films against gases
US5297420A (en) 1993-05-19 1994-03-29 Mobil Oil Corporation Apparatus and method for measuring relative permeability and capillary pressure of porous rock
FR2705734B1 (en) 1993-05-25 1995-06-30 Snecma Method and device for improving the safety of fluid filters.
US5419816A (en) 1993-10-27 1995-05-30 Halox Technologies Corporation Electrolytic process and apparatus for the controlled oxidation of inorganic and organic species in aqueous solutions
FR2713220B1 (en) 1993-11-30 1996-03-08 Omnium Traitement Valorisa water purification installation of water to submerged filtration membranes.
US5403479A (en) 1993-12-20 1995-04-04 Zenon Environmental Inc. In situ cleaning system for fouled membranes
JPH07313850A (en) * 1994-05-30 1995-12-05 Kubota Corp Method for backward washing immersion-type ceramic membrane separator
US5531900A (en) 1994-07-07 1996-07-02 University Of Arizona Modification of polyvinylidene fluoride membrane and method of filtering
US5470469A (en) 1994-09-16 1995-11-28 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Hollow fiber cartridge
US6077435A (en) * 1996-03-15 2000-06-20 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Filtration monitoring and control system
US5906742A (en) * 1995-07-05 1999-05-25 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Microfiltration membranes having high pore density and mixed isotropic and anisotropic structure
US5944997A (en) * 1995-08-11 1999-08-31 Zenon Environmental Inc. System for maintaining a clean skein of hollow fibers while filtering suspended solids
US5639373A (en) 1995-08-11 1997-06-17 Zenon Environmental Inc. Vertical skein of hollow fiber membranes and method of maintaining clean fiber surfaces while filtering a substrate to withdraw a permeate
US6685832B2 (en) * 1995-08-11 2004-02-03 Zenon Environmental Inc. Method of potting hollow fiber membranes
US6193890B1 (en) * 1995-08-11 2001-02-27 Zenon Environmental Inc. System for maintaining a clean skein of hollow fibers while filtering suspended solids
DE69636130D1 (en) * 1995-08-11 2006-06-14 Zenon Environmental Inc Permeatsammelsystem
FR2741280B1 (en) * 1995-11-22 1997-12-19 Omnium Traitement Valorisa Method for cleaning a filtration installation of the type submerged membrane
US5888401A (en) * 1996-09-16 1999-03-30 Union Camp Corporation Method and apparatus for reducing membrane fouling
JP3686918B2 (en) * 1996-10-16 2005-08-24 森村興産株式会社 Wastewater, solid-liquid separation for filtration devices such as wastewater
WO1998025694A1 (en) * 1996-12-10 1998-06-18 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Improved microporous membrane filtration assembly
ES2353254T3 (en) * 1996-12-20 2011-02-28 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Washing procedure.
DE19700493A1 (en) * 1997-01-09 1998-07-16 Bayer Ag A method for cleaning surfaces
US6048454A (en) * 1997-03-18 2000-04-11 Jenkins; Dan Oil filter pack and assembly
KR100491071B1 (en) * 1997-05-30 2005-05-24 유.에스. 필터 웨이스트워터 그룹, 인크. Predicting logarithmic reduction values
US6354444B1 (en) * 1997-07-01 2002-03-12 Zenon Environmental Inc. Hollow fiber membrane and braided tubular support therefor
US5914039A (en) * 1997-07-01 1999-06-22 Zenon Environmental Inc. Filtration membrane with calcined α-alumina particles therein
US6083393A (en) * 1997-10-27 2000-07-04 Pall Corporation Hydrophilic membrane
US6039872A (en) * 1997-10-27 2000-03-21 Pall Corporation Hydrophilic membrane
CA2342346C (en) * 1998-09-25 2008-04-15 U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. Apparatus and method for cleaning membrane filtration modules
US6641733B2 (en) * 1998-09-25 2003-11-04 U. S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. Apparatus and method for cleaning membrane filtration modules
JP3645814B2 (en) * 1998-10-09 2005-05-11 ゼノン、エンバイロンメンタル、インコーポレーテッドZenon Environmental, Inc. Circulation aeration system for submerged membrane module
US6550747B2 (en) * 1998-10-09 2003-04-22 Zenon Environmental Inc. Cyclic aeration system for submerged membrane modules
DE69924642D1 (en) * 1998-11-23 2005-05-12 Zenon Environmental Inc Water filtration by means of underwater membranes
JP2000157850A (en) * 1998-11-27 2000-06-13 Nitto Denko Corp Separating membrane preservation liquid and separating membrane module
US6221247B1 (en) * 1999-06-03 2001-04-24 Cms Technology Holdings, Inc. Dioxole coated membrane module for ultrafiltration or microfiltration of aqueous suspensions
US6214231B1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2001-04-10 Zenon Environmental Inc. System for operation of multiple membrane filtration assemblies
JP3603692B2 (en) * 1999-09-14 2004-12-22 日立プラント建設株式会社 Membrane separation method and apparatus
US6589426B1 (en) * 1999-09-29 2003-07-08 Zenon Environmental Inc. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration module and system
CA2290053C (en) * 1999-11-18 2009-10-20 Zenon Environmental Inc. Immersed membrane module and process
US6440303B2 (en) * 2000-03-02 2002-08-27 Chapin Manufacturing, Inc. Fluid filter
ES2326590T3 (en) * 2000-04-10 2009-10-15 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Retention system hollow fiber.
JP2002058968A (en) * 2000-08-18 2002-02-26 Suehiro Tadashi Filter
WO2002038256A1 (en) * 2000-11-13 2002-05-16 Usf Filtration And Separations Group Inc. Modified membranes
DE60217848D1 (en) * 2001-04-04 2007-03-15 Us Filter Wastewater Group Inc Potting of hollow fibers
US7247238B2 (en) * 2002-02-12 2007-07-24 Siemens Water Technologies Corp. Poly(ethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene) membranes

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3183191A (en) * 1960-04-19 1965-05-11 Hach Chemical Co Stain and rust removing composition
US3139401A (en) * 1962-01-05 1964-06-30 Hach Chemical Co Method for removing rust from water softeners
US3700591A (en) * 1970-09-24 1972-10-24 Us Interior Cleaning of used membrane with oxalic acid
US6468430B1 (en) * 1998-07-21 2002-10-22 Toray Industries, Inc. Method for inhibiting growth of bacteria or sterilizing around separating membrane
US6280626B1 (en) * 1998-08-12 2001-08-28 Mitsubishi Rayon Co., Ltd. Membrane separator assembly and method of cleaning the assembly utilizing gas diffuser underneath the assembly
US6955762B2 (en) * 2001-11-16 2005-10-18 U. S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc. Method of cleaning membranes

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102407076A (en) * 2011-10-11 2012-04-11 清远加多宝草本植物科技有限公司 Membrane element cleaning agent in membrane separation industry

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
EP1312408B1 (en) 2006-07-19 grant
DE60213184T2 (en) 2007-06-28 grant
EP1312408A3 (en) 2003-08-06 application
US6955762B2 (en) 2005-10-18 grant
DE60213184D1 (en) 2006-08-31 grant
EP1312408A2 (en) 2003-05-21 application
US20050224411A1 (en) 2005-10-13 application
US20050218073A1 (en) 2005-10-06 application
US20040000520A1 (en) 2004-01-01 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Schäfer et al. Fouling effects on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural waters
Yan et al. Application of the Al2O3–PVDF nanocomposite tubular ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for oily wastewater treatment and its antifouling research
US20070181496A1 (en) Process and apparatus for purifying impure water using microfiltration or ultrafiltration in combination with reverse osmosis
US5501798A (en) Microfiltration enhanced reverse osmosis for water treatment
US20070278152A1 (en) Method of improving performance of ultrafiltration or microfiltration membrane process in landfill leachate treatment
Madaeni et al. Chemical cleaning of reverse osmosis membrane fouled by wastewater
US5024762A (en) Concentration of solids in a suspension
US6071413A (en) Process for removing organic and inorganic contaminants from phenolic stripped sour water employing reverse omosis
US4931186A (en) Concentration of solids in a suspension
Schlichter et al. Study of a hybrid process combining ozonation and membrane filtration—filtration of model solutions
US6270671B1 (en) Method and apparatus for microfiltration
US20070278151A1 (en) Method of improving performance of ultrafiltration or microfiltration membrane processes in backwash water treatment
US6027649A (en) Process for purifying water using fine floc and microfiltration in a single tank reactor
US20050173341A1 (en) Blended polymer media for treating aqueous fluids
US20060273038A1 (en) Chemical cleaning for membranes
Li et al. Treatment of oily wastewater by organic–inorganic composite tubular ultrafiltration (UF) membranes
JP2001079366A (en) Method for washing membrane
US20110042320A1 (en) Treatment of contaminated water from gas wells
US4986918A (en) Membrane separation system and method of operation
JPH1176769A (en) Cleaning method of filter membrane module
Ahn et al. Treatment of domestic wastewater using microfiltration for reuse of wastewater
JP2001327967A (en) Operating method and manufacturing method of membrane filtration plant
JP2004230280A (en) Production method for hydrophilic polyvinylidene fluoride-based resin porous membrane
US5853593A (en) Filtration method for metal working waste water
JPH1066972A (en) Cleaning and regenerating method of separation membrane for water treatment