US20080209024A1 - Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080209024A1
US20080209024A1 US11844271 US84427107A US2008209024A1 US 20080209024 A1 US20080209024 A1 US 20080209024A1 US 11844271 US11844271 US 11844271 US 84427107 A US84427107 A US 84427107A US 2008209024 A1 US2008209024 A1 US 2008209024A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
visitor
web
banner
qualification
com
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11844271
Inventor
Elijahu Shapira
David S. Montgomery
W. Glen Boyd
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Oracle America Inc
Original Assignee
Webtrends Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063Operations research or analysis
    • G06Q10/0637Strategic management or analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063Operations research or analysis
    • G06Q10/0637Strategic management or analysis
    • G06Q10/06375Prediction of business process outcome or impact based on a proposed change
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0201Market data gathering, market analysis or market modelling
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0202Market predictions or demand forecasting
    • G06Q30/0204Market segmentation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0242Determination of advertisement effectiveness
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0242Determination of advertisement effectiveness
    • G06Q30/0246Traffic
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0269Targeted advertisement based on user profile or attribute
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0273Fees for advertisement
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0277Online advertisement

Abstract

Different web pages on a web server are associated with different qualification profiles, each of which is assigned a value by the web-site proprietor. Traffic data hits at the web-site are analyzed to determine which web pages the visitor viewed on the web server. Each qualifying visitor is thereafter associated with a qualification profile and a corresponding value. In another aspect of the invention, visitors arriving as a result of an advertisement on a remote web-site are tracked. The web-site proprietor is consequently able to determine a return on advertising investment based on the value of visitors brought to the site by the tracked advertisement.

Description

  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/187,681, filed Jul. 22, 2005, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/240,208, filed Jan. 29, 1999 (issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,925,442, on Aug. 2, 2005).
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention relates generally to web-server traffic data analysis and more particularly to a system and method for determining the value of visitors to a web site.
  • [0003]
    The worldwide web (hereinafter “web”) is rapidly becoming one of the most important publishing mediums today. The reason is simple: web servers interconnected via the Internet provide access to a potentially worldwide audience with a minimal investment in time and resources in building a web site. The web server makes available for retrieval and posting a wide range of media in a variety of formats, including audio, video and traditional text and graphics. And the ease of creating a web site makes reaching this worldwide audience a reality for all types of visitors, from corporations, to startup companies, to organizations and individuals.
  • [0004]
    This recent growth of the Internet over the past few years has opened new markets for business. Individuals use the Internet for everything from buying new cars to ordering a pizza to hiring a plumber. The ease with which people can use the Internet for such activities has spurred businesses to offer the services and products people desire on the Internet.
  • [0005]
    Unlike other forms of media, a web site is interactive, and the web server can passively gather access information about each visitor by observing and logging the traffic data exchanged between the web server and the visitor. Important facts about the visitors can be determined directly or inferentially by analyzing the traffic data and the context of the “hit.” Moreover, traffic data collected over a period of time can yield statistical information, such as the number of visitors visiting the site each day, what countries, states or cities the visitors connect from, and the most active day or hour of the week. Such statistical information is useful in tailoring marketing or managerial strategies to better match the apparent needs of the audience. Each hit is also encoded with the date and time of the access.
  • [0006]
    Visitors to a web site are not of uniform interest to the site operator. For example, a relatively low quality visitor might be one that merely reads the home page of the site and moves on. A higher quality visitor might be one that locates, e.g., a product description page, and an even higher quality visitor might be one who visits the price page. The highest quality visitor is, of course, one that orders and pays for goods or services offered by the web site.
  • [0007]
    Visitors may be induced to visit a web site via advertisements placed on remote web sites. One common way to advertise on the Internet is with banner ads. A banner ad shows a picture or statement of a business's products and services and allows a visitor to click on the ad to visit the web site hosted by the business. The visit may be to obtain more information, or, as is hoped by the business, to effect a purchase of a product or service via the web site.
  • [0008]
    The problem with Internet advertising is measuring its effectiveness. Internet advertising campaigns vary in price, depending on several factors such as where the ad is to be placed and the expected viewing population. One advertising campaign might cost a business, for example, $1,000.00 to be on display for one month at one site, whereas the same ad might cost only $500.00 at another site. Further, it has been difficult to determine exactly how many visitors an advertising campaign generated. In the above example, the $500.00 advertising campaign might have generated 10,000 visits in the month the ad was up, whereas the $1,000.00 advertising campaign might have generated only 7,000 visits a month. Finally, the value an advertising campaign generates is a function of what happens after the visitors visit the site. In the above example, although the $500.00 advertising campaign generated more hits, if none of those visitors made any purchase of the business's products or services, their collective value would be close to $0.00. On the other hand, although the $1,000.00 advertising campaign generated fewer hits, those visitors might all have purchased products or services, making their collective value at least several hundreds of thousands of dollars. It is this difficulty in gauging the effectiveness of advertising campaigns that makes their use a gamble. Accordingly, there remains a need for a way to analyze the effectiveness of advertising campaigns to determine their relative worth.
  • [0009]
    It would be desirable to analyze the information gathered by the web server to determine the quality of visitors to the web site.
  • [0010]
    It would also be desirable for the site operator to use the determined visitor quality to analyze the effectiveness of the operator's advertising.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0011]
    A business owner indicates what advertising campaigns that are run for the web site of interest. The business owner also constructs profiles that define products or services the business owner wants to sell, and assigns each profile a value. The software then analyzes the web site's log files (which track every exchange of traffic data between the web site and other computers over the Internet) and matches visitors with both an advertising campaign and a profile. Finally, the software sums the value for each visitor matched with an advertising campaign according to the profiles with which the visitor is matched.
  • [0012]
    One object of the present invention is to allow an Internet business owner a way to track the value of visitors who visit the web site.
  • [0013]
    Another object of the present invention is to allow an Internet business owner a way to calculate the return on investment for each advertising campaign the business owner is currently running.
  • [0014]
    The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will become more readily apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment that proceeds with reference to the drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0015]
    FIG. 1 shows the communication between a remote visitor, a first web site, and a second web site, where the second web site refers the visitor to the first web site.
  • [0016]
    FIG. 2 shows a prior art format used in recording a “hit” of traffic data received by the server of FIG. 1.
  • [0017]
    FIGS. 3 and 4 illustrate hits memorialized in the log file of the server in FIG. 1.
  • [0018]
    FIGS. 5 and 6 show an embodiment for data structures that store qualification profiles and advertising campaigns.
  • [0019]
    FIG. 7 shows a flow diagram for processing records of traffic data hits and calculating the return on investment for advertising campaigns in a first embodiment of the invention.
  • [0020]
    FIG. 8 shows a flow diagram for assigning a traffic data hit to a visitor session in the first embodiment.
  • [0021]
    FIG. 9 shows a flow diagram for assigning visitor sessions to qualification profiles based on the visitor's activity in the first embodiment.
  • [0022]
    FIG. 10 is a second embodiment that shows a flow diagram for processing traffic records offline from a data source, such as a log file, evaluating the traffic, and correlating the value to any corresponding ad campaigns.
  • [0023]
    FIG. 11 shows a flow diagram for closing and accumulating visitor sessions in the second embodiment.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • [0024]
    FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram of a prior art system for analyzing traffic data in a distributed computing environment 9. It is more fully described in “WebTrends Installation and Visitor Guide,” version 2.2, October 1996, and in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/801,707, filed on Feb. 14, 1997, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference for all purposes. WebTrends is a trademark of WebTrends Corporation, Portland, Oreg.
  • [0025]
    A first server 10 provides web site and related services to remote visitors. By way of example, the remote visitors can access the server 10 from a remote computer system 12 interconnected with the server 10 over a network connection 13, such as the Internet or an intranet, a dial up (or point-to-point) connection 14 or a direct (dedicated) connection 17. Other types of remote access connections are also possible.
  • [0026]
    Each request by a remote visitor to the server 10—and the reply thereto—comprises a “hit” of raw traffic data 11. The format used in recording each traffic data hit 11 and an example of a traffic data hit 11 are described below with reference to FIGS. 2-4. The server 10 preferably stores each traffic data hit 11 in a log file 15, although a database 16 or other storage structure can be used. The present invention can be implemented using any source of traffic data hits.
  • [0027]
    The present embodiment of the invention is implemented in part via a computer program run on server 10. It should be appreciated, however, that the invention could be implemented as well by a program operating on a different computer, such as a work station connected to server 10 or a computer connected to server 10 via an intranet or other network. As will shortly be seen, the computer implementing the invention need not even be connected to the server; it is necessary only that the traffic data hits generated by the server be accessible by the computer implementing the invention. For example, the computer implementing the invention could monitor and process the traffic directly with network connection 13.
  • [0028]
    Five sources of traffic data hits 11 (remote system or visitor 12, dial-up connection 14, log file 15, database 16 and direct connection 17) are shown. Other sources are also possible. The traffic data hits 11 can originate from any single source or from a combination of these sources. The program examines each traffic data hit 11 and analyzes the access information obtained from the traffic data in a manner later described in more detail.
  • [0029]
    In the described embodiment, the server 10 is typically an Intel Pentium-based computer system equipped with a processor, memory, input/output interfaces, a network interface, a secondary storage device and a user interface, preferably such as a keyboard and display. The server 10 typically operates under the control of either the Microsoft Windows NT or Unix operating systems and executes either Microsoft Internet Information Server or NetScape Communications Server software. Pentium, Microsoft, Windows, Windows NT, Unix, Netscape and Netscape Communications Server are trademarks of their respective owners. However, other server 10 configurations varying in hardware, such as DOS-compatible, Apple Macintosh, Sun Workstation and other platforms, in operating systems, such as MS-DOS, Unix and others, and in web software are also possible. Apple, Macintosh, Sun and MS-DOS are trademarks of their respective owners.
  • [0030]
    A second server 8 also provides web site and related services to remote visitors such as visitor 12. It is constructed and operates in substantially the same manner as first server 10 and can be accessed in the same fashion.
  • [0031]
    The present invention is preferably implemented as a computer program executed by the server 10 and embodied in a storage medium comprising computer-readable code. In the described embodiment, the program is written in the C programming language, although other programming languages are equally suitable. It operates in a Microsoft Windows environment and can analyze Common Log File, Combined Log File and proprietary log file formats from industry standard web servers, such as those licensed by NetScape, NCSA, O'Reilly WebSite, Quarterdeck, C-Builder, Microsoft, Oracle, EMWAC, and other Windows 3.x, Windows NT 95, Unix and Macintosh Web servers.
  • [0032]
    FIG. 2 shows a format used in storing a “hit” of raw traffic data 11 received by the server of FIG. 1. A raw traffic data hit 11 is not in the format shown in FIG. 2. Rather, the contents of each field in the format is determined from the data exchanged between the server 10 and the source of the traffic data hit 11 and the information pulled from the data is stored into a data hit using the format of FIG. 2 prior to being stored in the log file 15 (shown in FIG. 1) or processed.
  • [0033]
    Each traffic data hit 11 is a formatted string of ASCII data. The format is based on the standard log file format developed by the National Center for Supercomputing Applications (NCSA), the standard logging format used by most web servers. The format consists of seven fields as follows:
  • [0000]
    Field Name Description
    Visitor Address (30): Internet protocol (IP) address or domain name of the
    visitor accessing the site.
    RFC931 (31): Obsolete field usually left blank, but increasingly used
    by many web servers to store the host domain name
    for multi-homed log files.
    Visitor Authentication (32): Exchanges the visitor name if required for access to the
    web site.
    Date/Time (33): Date and time of the access and the time offset from
    GMT.
    Request (34): Either GET (a page request) or POST (a form
    submission) command.
    Return Code (35): Return status of the request which specifies whether the
    transfer was successful.
    Transfer Size (36): Number of bytes transferred for the file request, that is,
    the file size.
  • [0034]
    In addition, three optional fields can be employed as follows:
  • [0000]
    Field Name Description
    Referring URL (37): URL used to obtain web site information for
    performing the “hit.”
    Agent (38): Browser version, including make, model or version
    number and operating system.
    Cookie (39): Unique identifier permissively used to identify a
    particular visitor.
  • [0035]
    Other formats of traffic data hits 11 are also possible, including proprietary formats containing additional fields, such as time to transmit, type of service operation and others. Moreover, modifications and additions to the formats of raw traffic data hits 11 are constantly occurring and the extensions required by the present invention to handle such variations of the formats would be known to one skilled in the art.
  • [0036]
    In operation, remote visitor 12, whose Internet address might be visitor.sample.org, clicks on a link to request a web page from the second web server 8, whose Internet address might be www.portal.com (Another name for a web page address in Internet parlance is Universal Resource Locator, or URL.) This click generates a traffic data hit consisting of a reply. In this case, the traffic data hit is a request for the second web server 8 to provide to the remote visitor 12 the web page http.//www.portal.com/somepage.htm. Since the remote visitor 12 generated the request, the traffic data hit is a “GET” command. Upon receiving the traffic data hit, the second web server 8 sends a reply back to the remote visitor 12 consisting of an “OK” message and the requested web page. The computer of visitor 12 then displays the requested web page http.//www.portal.com/somepage.htm on the remote visitor's 12 browser.
  • [0037]
    Somewhere on the provided web page might be an advertisement for the first web server, whose Internet address is www.example.com. This advertisement is an advertising campaign run by the first web server 10. If the remote visitor is interested in finding out more about the products or services advertised, she might then click on the advertisement, which includes a link that redirects the visitor to the first web server 10. This generates a second request for a web page. This request is directed to the first web server 10. By clicking on the advertisement, the visitor requests the first web server 10 to provide the web page http.//www.example.com/portal_ad.htm via a second traffic data hit 11 a, shown in FIG. 3. It should be clear that the requested web page http://www.example.com/portal_ad.htm in traffic data hit 11 a is on the first web server 10, and not on the second web server 8. Upon receiving the traffic data hit 11 a requesting web page http://www.example.com/portal_ad.htm, the first web server 10 sends data back to the remote visitor 12 containing an “OK” message and the requested web page. The first web server also writes an entry in its log file memorializing the request for web page http://www.example.com/portal_ad.htm. This entry 11 a stores several important pieces of information. Entry 11 a stores the remote visitor's Internet address (visitor.sample.org), the time and date of the request ([12/Jan/1996:20:37:55+0000], or Jan. 12, 1996, at 8:37:55 PM, Greenwich Mean Time), the request issued by the remote visitor 12 (“GET/portal_ad.htm HTTP/1.0”, and the referring URL (http://www.portal.com/somepage.htm). (Note that, although it is not shown, the second web server 8 can also create its own log file entries similar to those of log file 15.)
  • [0038]
    After being referred to server 10 as described above, remote visitor 12 visits several pages on server 10. In FIG. 4, hits are depicted that represent visits by the remote visitor, whose Internet address is visitor.sample.org, to these pages on server 10. The remote visitor 12 first generates a traffic data hit 11 b, requesting the web page default.htm. When the web server 10 receives the traffic data hit 11 b, the web server replies by sending data containing a response message, along with the requested web page default.htm. The web server also writes entry 11 b into its log file 15. The log file entry 11 b indicates remote visitor's 12 request for the web page default.htm.
  • [0039]
    A little while later, the remote visitor 12 requests web page products.htm in traffic data hit 11 c. The web server 10 receives the traffic data hit 11 c and sends back data containing a response message and the requested web page products.htm. The web server 10 also writes another entry 11 c into the log file 15. This log file entry 11 c indicates the remote visitor's request for the web page products.htm.
  • [0040]
    FIG. 5 shows an embodiment for the qualification profiles. Generally speaking, a qualification profile comprises predetermined activity at a web site. It is used to correlate a pattern of activity with a value. The pattern of activity could indicate a level of interest in a product or service offered at the web site. In FIG. 5, the qualification profile data structure 300 is shown holding two qualification profiles 305 and 310; however, the invention can be implemented with any number of qualification profiles. The names for the qualification profiles are assigned by the site operator, and may be more meaningful than the arbitrary names Qualification profile 1 and Qualification profile 2 used here. For example, they might be the names of different products or classes of products offered for sale by the operator of the site on server 10. Qualification profile 305 includes three qualification levels 315, 320, and 325; qualification profile 310 includes two qualification levels 330 and 335. Each qualification level represents a different level of interest in the product or service represented by the qualification profile. Although the preferred embodiment has three qualification levels—fully qualified, moderately qualified, and minimally qualified—the invention may be implemented with any number, and as shown in FIG. 5, different qualification profiles can have different numbers of qualification levels.
  • [0041]
    As each qualification level includes the same type of information, only qualification level 315 will be discussed in greater detail, although FIG. 5 shows the detail for the other qualification levels 320, 325, 330, and 335. Qualification level 315 includes two elements: a set of requirements 340 (or entry criteria) a visitor must meet to qualify for the qualification level in that qualification profile, and a quantitative value 345 to assign to each visitor who qualifies for that qualification level. It should be appreciated that the value associated with a qualification level need not be quantitative: it may simply be inherent in the requirements of the qualification level,
  • [0042]
    The set of requirements 340 a visitor must meet to qualify for that qualification level in that qualification profile are very flexible. First, in the preferred embodiment, the sets of requirements 340 do not have to be related in any way. For example, it is not required that the set of requirements for qualification level 315 be a proper subset of the set of requirements for qualification level 325.
  • [0043]
    In the preferred embodiment, the sets of requirements 340 can be tied to web pages (or URLs) a visitor must visit. Requirements 340 could also be tied to the elapsed time the visitor spends at the site or on a particular page or group of pages, or to information submitted by a visitor in a form located on one of the web pages. Another example of requirements 340 includes visiting a content group, which is simply a collection of pages or a class of URLs. In addition, one of requirements 340 could be a return visit by a visitor. It should be appreciated that the site operator provides such information as the name of the qualification profiles 305 and 310, the chosen qualification levels 315, 320, 325, 330, and 335, the sets of requirements 340, and the qualitative value 345 to assign to each visitor who qualifies for the qualification level in that qualification profile.
  • [0044]
    Not shown in FIG. 5 is the nonqualified visitor value that is assigned to each visitor who does not qualify for any qualification profile.
  • [0045]
    FIG. 6 shows a data structure for the advertising campaigns. In FIG. 6, the advertising campaign data structure 375 is shown holding three advertising campaigns 377, 378, and 379; however, there is no requirement that there be any particular number of advertising campaigns. The names for the advertising campaigns are assigned by the site operator, and may be more meaningful than the arbitrary names Advertising Campaign 1, Advertising Campaign 2, and Advertising Campaign 3 used here. For example, in the case of tracking banner advertisements that refer visitors from other web sites, the name of the referring site might be used. As each advertising campaign includes the same type of information, only advertising campaign 377 will be discussed in greater detail, although FIG. 6 shows the detail for the other advertising campaigns 378 and 379. Advertising campaign 377 includes five elements: an entry page 380 (an entry page is the first hit in a visitor session: in FIG. 1, the web page http://www.examnple.com/portal_ad.htm is the entry page), a referrer 383 (a referrer is a web page that links a visitor to the advertised web site: in FIG. 1, the web page http://www.portal.com/somepage.htm is the referrer), a start date 386 for the advertising campaign, an end date 389 for the advertising campaign, and a cost 392 for the advertising campaign during the period from the start date 386 to the end date 389. The entry page 380 and the referrer 383 help the program associate each visitor with an advertising campaign. To make it possible to distinguish between advertising campaigns, entry pages 380 and referrers 383 should be unique. Although not required, in the preferred embodiment the entry page 380 and the referrer 383 are mutually exclusive elements: the operator can assign only one of the two, and the other remains blank.
  • [0046]
    FIG. 7 illustrates a first embodiment of the invention. In FIG. 7, at step 700, a data source, such as a log file, is opened for reading. At step 705, the program checks to see if there are any hits left in the log file for processing. If there are, the next hit is read from the log file at step 710. At step 715, the current hit is assigned to a visitor session, described with reference to FIG. 8.
  • [0047]
    Turning to FIG. 8, in step 500, the hit is analyzed to determine the address of the visitor who generated the hit. This information is easily determined, as the structure of the hit is well documented, as described above and depicted in FIGS. 2-4.
  • [0048]
    Still looking at FIG. 8, once the current hit's visitor address has been determined, at step 505 the program scans the visitor session database. A visitor session is a sequence of hits received from a single visitor. The sequence extends between the first hit until a predetermined time after the most recent hit has lapsed without further hits. Although the term visitor was used to describe the qualification profiles and ad campaigns with reference to FIGS. 5 and 6, the program in fact tracks visitor sessions. Each visitor session, of course, is associated with a single visitor. All visitor sessions are maintained in a database. At step 510 the program checks to see if the visitor address exists in the visitor session database. If the visitor address is new to the visitor session database, then at step 515 a new entry to the visitor session database is created, using the information from the hit (which includes what, if any, advertising campaign the visitor followed, discussed below). If the visitor address already existed at step 510, then at step 520 the date and time of the current hit are determined. At step 525 the program checks to see how long it has been since the visitor's last activity, i.e., since the last hit was received from that visitor. If it has been longer than the predetermined session time, then the session for that visitor is concluded. When the same visitor revisits the site after their session was concluded, then step 515 is performed and a new visitor record in the visitor database is created. But if the visitor session is still active, i.e., the predetermined time from the last hit has not lapsed when the next hit arrives, step 530 is performed and the visitor database is updated according to the current hit. This includes updating the visitor's last date and time of activity and updating the list of actions the visitor has performed.
  • [0049]
    After completion of the routine of FIG. 8, control then returns to step 705 in FIG. 7 to process additional hits as described above. If, however, there are no hits left in the log file for processing at step 705, control moves to step 720, where the program checks to see if there are any visitor sessions that need to be assigned to qualification profiles. If there are visitor sessions left to process, then step 725 reads the history for one of the remaining visitor sessions. Step 730, in a routine depicted in FIG. 9, then assigns the current visitor session to all qualification profiles for which it qualifies.
  • [0050]
    Referring to FIG. 9, at step 600, the complete history of the visitor session to which the current hit was assigned is read.
  • [0051]
    There are currently two ways that the program can identify which particular advertising campaign a visitor followed to the site. One is by referrer. A referrer is the web page that held the link the visitor followed to reach the web site. For example, referring back to FIGS. 1-4, the referrer is the web page http.//www.portal.com/somepage.html, which referred the remote visitor 12 to the first web site 10, www.example.com.
  • [0052]
    The second way the program can identify which particular advertising campaign a visitor followed to the site is by the entry page. The entry page is the first web page on server 10 visited; in the case of advertising campaigns, each advertising campaign can have a different entry page (all of which differ from the entry page used by visitors who are not following an advertising campaign). For example, referring to FIG. 3, the entry page on server 10 is the web page http://www.example.com/portal_ad.htm.
  • [0053]
    Regardless of the method the advertising campaign uses to determine what advertisement a visitor followed, if any, that information is available from the first hit a visitor generates at the web site. Referring back to FIG. 3, entry 11 a shows both the requested page (“GET/portal_ad.htm HTTP/1.0”) and the referring site (“http://www.portal.com/somepage.htm”). Thus, the program uses the first hit a visitor generates to determine what advertising campaign they followed. The entry page and referrer is assigned in step 601, and—based on this data—the ad campaign is assigned in step 603.
  • [0054]
    At step 605 the first qualification profile is read. Again, there is no concern of trying to read a non-existent object: if no qualification profiles exist, the program will not be used, since no analysis is needed. At step 610 the visitor session history (read at step 600) is compared with the requirements of the qualification levels of the current qualification profile (read at step 605). At step 615, the program checks to see if the visitor session has met all the requirements for any of the qualification levels of the current qualification profile. If it has, then at step 620 the visitor session is added to the appropriate qualification levels of the current qualification profile. Note that, in the preferred embodiment, within each qualification profile, the qualification levels are ranked, and a visitor session is added to the highest-ranking qualification level of each qualification profile for which the visitor session meets the requirements, but this limitation is not always necessary. (The preferred embodiment also ranks qualification levels: the visitor is added to the highest ranked qualification level—within each qualification profile—for which the visitor qualifies.) At step 625, whether or not the visitor session met the requirements for any of the qualification levels of the current qualification profile, the program checks to see if there are any more qualification profiles defined. If there are, then at step 630 the next qualification profile is read and control returns to step 610. Otherwise, the processing of the current hit is finished, and control reverts to step 720 in FIG. 7.
  • [0055]
    If there are remaining visitor sessions to process, the FIG. 7 routine does so in steps 725 and 730 as described above. Conversely, if there are no remaining visitor sessions left to process at step 720, control is transferred to step 735, where the return-on-investment (ROI) analysis is performed.
  • [0056]
    Before describing the ROI analysis consideration will first be given to the raw data and its format that exists after the routines of FIGS. 7-9 are run as described above. For each ad campaign, the number of visitor sessions that met each level of each qualification profile is stored in tables, as depicted in the Table A example:
  • [0000]
    TABLE A
    QP1 QP2
    L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 NQ
    ADC1 4 6 7 3 5 35
    ADC2 5 9 12 6 11 63
    ADC3 1 0 2 3 4 20
    NADC 21 35 46 28 39 211
    QPn—Qualification Profile n
    ADCn—Ad Campaign n
    NQ—Not qualified for any QP
    NADC—No Ad Campaign
    Ln—Qualification Level n
  • [0057]
    Those visitor sessions that do not result from an ad campaign that is being monitored are classified in the No-Ad-Campaign category. Those visitor sessions that do not meet the criteria of any of the Qualification Profiles are categorized in the NQ column. For each referrer, the number of visitor sessions that met each qualification profile is stored in tables, as depicted in the Table B example:
  • [0000]
    TABLE B
    QP1 QP2
    L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 NQ
    R1 2 7 4 2 6 25
    R2 4 2 16 2 11 83
    R3 2 3 7 0 0 10
    NR 31 32 43 22 31 124
    Rn—Referrer n
    NR—No Referrer
  • [0058]
    Those visitor sessions that have no referrer are classified in the No-Referrer category. One instance in which a visitor session has no referrer arises when a visitor types in the monitored web-site address (typically a home page URL) and goes directly to the web site. All visitor sessions that do have a referrer are associated with the referrer. In other words, all referrers are tracked. When a new referrer is encountered, a new entry in the table is made.
  • [0059]
    The ROI analysis uses the following raw data: Tables A and B; the period of the report, which is the time of the first to the last records processed; the qualification profiles (FIG. 5); the ad campaigns (FIG. 6); and the nonqualified visitor value assigned to the visitor sessions that wind up in the NQ category.
  • [0060]
    Tables 1-9 below show sample output tables that can be generated by ROI analysis. These tables cross-correlate information from the raw data in various ways. For example, Table 1 shows the number of visitors referred to the web server from six different referring URLs, along with the value of the visitors referred. For each referrer, the number of visitor sessions is shown, as well as the total visitor sessions for all referrers. For each referrers, the value of the visitor sessions for each qualification level is calculated by multiplying the value from that level (FIG. 5) times the visitor sessions meeting the criteria for the qualification profile. Total value of the visitor sessions for all referrers is the sum of these products.
  • [0061]
    Various additional variables can be calculated using the raw data, and displayed in tables, additional tables, like Tables 2-9 below. Although each calculation is not described, the manner of using the raw data to generate each of the calculated variables in the tables can be easily inferred from the name of the variable in view of the following brief description of the table
  • [0062]
    Table 2 hows the number of visitors in each qualification profile (in this instance downloading of specified products Product 1, Product 2, and Product 3), arranged by qualification level and referring URL. Table 3 shows the number of visitors from each of six advertising campaigns, broken down into qualified and non-qualified visitors, and the values the visitors generate. Although not shown, it should be noted that all untracked visitors, i.e., those not associated with a tracked ad campaign, can be summarized in the same categories as those shown in Table 3 for tracked visitors. Table 4 shows the number of visitors referred from each advertising campaign, sorted by qualification profile and qualification level. Table 5 shows visitors assigned to each qualification profile and the value they generate sorted by advertising campaign. Table 6 shows visitors for each qualification profile and the value they generated, sorted by qualification level and advertising campaign. Table 7 shows the cost of each of the six advertising campaigns and the cost per visitor for each visitor referred from the respective advertising campaigns. Table 8 shows the return on investment from each advertising campaign, where the return on investment is based on the value of the visitors referred from the respective advertising campaigns less the cost of each campaign. Finally, Table 9 shows the daily return on investment shown in Table 8.
  • [0000]
    TABLE 1
    Summary of Results by Referrer
    Value of
    Visitor Visitors
    Referrer Sessions Referred
    1 http://www.yahoo.com/ 1303 $3,229.50
    2 http://www.excite.com/ 980 $2,238.00
    3 http://www.builder.com/ 900 $2,511.50
    4 http://www.intergreat.com/ 605 $1,540.50
    5 http://www.lycos.com/ 443 $1,194.00
    6 http://www.hotwired.com/ 257 $652.50
    Total 4488 $11,366.00
  • [0000]
    TABLE 2
    Top Referring Sites By Qualification Profile and Qualification Level
    Qualification Qualification Visitor % of
    Profile Level Referrer Sessions Total
    1 Product 1 Fully Qualified http://www.yahoo.com/ 24 34.29%
    http://www.builder.com/ 21 30.00%
    http://www.excite.com/ 9 12.86%
    http://www.intergreat.com/ 8 11.43%
    http://www.lycos.com/ 6 8.57%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 2 2.86%
    Subtotal 70 100.00%
    Moderately http://www.builder.com/ 53 34.64%
    Qualified http://www.yahoo.com/ 41 26.80%
    http://www.excite.com/ 20 13.07%
    http://www.lycos.com/ 18 11.76%
    http://www.intergreat.com/ 12 7.84%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 9 5.88%
    Subtotal 153 100.00%
    Minimally http://www.builder.com/ 72 30.90%
    Qualified http://www.yahoo.com/ 60 25.75%
    http://www.intergreat.com/ 32 13.73%
    http://www.excite.com/ 30 12.88%
    http://www.lycos.com/ 22 9.44%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 17 7.30%
    Subtotal 233 100.00%
    Group Subtotal 456 100.00%
    2 Product 2 Fully Qualified http://www.yahoo.com/ 13 34.21%
    http://www.builder.com/ 8 21.05%
    http://www.intergreat.com/ 6 15.79%
    http://www.excite.com/ 5 13.16%
    http://www.lycos.com/ 4 10.53%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 2 5.26%
    Subtotal 38 100.00%
    Moderately http://www.lycos.com/ 23 31.51%
    Qualified http://www.builder.com/ 15 20.55%
    http://www.intergreat.com/ 14 19.18%
    http://www.yahoo.com/ 12 16.44%
    http://www.excite.com/ 9 12.33%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 0 0.00%
    Subtotal 73 100.00%
    Minimally http://www.yahoo.com/ 32 28.57%
    Qualified http://www.builder.com/ 23 20.54%
    http://www.intergreat.com/ 26 23.21%
    http://www.lycos.com/ 15 13.39%
    http://www.excite.com/ 10 8.93%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 6 5.36%
    Subtotal 112 100.00%
    Group Subtotal 223 100.00%
    3 Product 3 Fully Qualified http://www.builder.com/ 12 33.33%
    http://www.lycos.com/ 9 25.00%
    http://www.intergreat.com/ 7 19.44%
    http://www.yahoo.com/ 4 11.11%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 3 8.33%
    http://www.excite.com/ 1 2.78%
    Subtotal 36 100.00%
    Moderately http://www.intergreat.com/ 19 29.69%
    Qualified http://www.builder.com/ 15 23.44%
    http://www.lycos.com/ 13 20.31%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 11 17.19%
    http://www.yahoo.com/ 6 9.38%
    http://www.excite.com/ 0 0.00%
    Subtotal 64 100.00%
    Minimally http://www.builder.com/ 28 26.42%
    Qualified http://www.intergreat.com/ 22 20.75%
    http://www.lycos.com/ 21 19.81%
    http://www.hotwired.com/ 16 15.09%
    http://www.yahoo.com/ 13 12.26%
    http://www.excite.com/ 6 5.66%
    Subtotal 106 100.00%
    Group Subtotal 206 100.00%
    Total 885 100.00%
  • [0000]
    TABLE 3
    Summary of Results by Ad Campaign
    Non- Non- Qualified
    Qualified Qualified Qualified Visitor Qualified Total Visitor
    Visitor Visitor Visitor Average Visitors Visitor Average Total Visitor
    Ad Campaign Sessions Value Sessions Value Total Value Sessions Value Value
    1 Yahoo! Banner 1098 $2,196.00 205 $5.04 $1,033.50 1303 $2.48 $3,229.50
    2 Builder.com Banner 653 $1,306.00 247 $4.88 $1,205.50 900 $2.79 $2,511.50
    3 Excite Banner 890 $1,780.00 90 $5.09 $458.00 980 $2.28 $2,238.00
    4 Intergreat Banner 459 $918.00 146 $4.26 $622.50 605 $2.55 $1,540.50
    5 Lycos Banner 312 $624.00 131 $4.35 $570.00 443 $2.70 $1,194.00
    6 HotWired WebMonkey 193 $386.00 64 $4.16 $266.50 257 $2.54 $652.50
    Banner
    Total 3605 $7,210.00 883 $4.71 $4,156.00 4488 $2.53 $11,366.00
  • [0000]
    TABLE 4
    Results by Ad Campaign, Qualification Profile and Qualification Level
    % of
    Qualification Qualification Visitor Visitor
    Ad Campaign Profile Level Sessions Sessions Value
    1 Yahoo! Banner Product 1 Fully Qualified 24 1.84% $192.00
    Moderately Qualified 41 3.15% $246.00
    Minimally Qualified 60 4.60% $300.00
    Product 2 Fully Qualified 13 1.00% $78.00
    Moderately Qualified 12 0.92% $48.00
    Minimally Qualified 32 2.46% $96.00
    Product 3 Fully Qualified 4 0.31% $20.00
    Moderately Qualified 6 0.46% $21.00
    Minimally Qualified 13 1.00% $32.50
    Non-Qualified 1098 84.27% $2,196.00
    Subtotal 1303 100.00% $3,229.50
    2 Excite Banner Product 1 Fully Qualified 9 0.92% $72.00
    Moderately Qualified 20 2.04% $120.00
    Minimally Qualified 30 3.06% $150.00
    Product 2 Fully Qualified 5 0.51% $30.00
    Moderately Qualified 9 0.92% $36.00
    Minimally Qualified 10 1.02% $30.00
    Product 3 Fully Qualified 1 0.10% $5.00
    Moderately Qualified 0 0.00% $0.00
    Minimally Qualified 6 0.61% $15.00
    Non-Qualified 890 90.82% $1,780.00
    Subtotal 980 100.00% $2,238.00
    3 Builder.com Banner Product 1 Fully Qualified 21 2.33% $168.00
    Moderately Qualified 53 5.89% $318.00
    Minimally Qualified 72 8.00% $360.00
    Product 2 Fully Qualified 8 0.89% $48.00
    Moderately Qualified 15 1.67% $60.00
    Minimally Qualified 23 2.56% $69.00
    Product 3 Fully Qualified 12 1.33% $60.00
    Moderately Qualified 15 1.67% $52.50
    Minimally Qualified 28 3.11% $70.00
    Non-Qualified 653 72.56% $1,306.00
    Subtotal 900 100.00% $2,511.50
    4 Intergreat Banner Product 1 Fully Qualified 8 1.32% $64.00
    Moderately Qualified 12 1.98% $72.00
    Minimally Qualified 32 5.29% $160.00
    Product 2 Fully Qualified 6 0.99% $36.00
    Moderately Qualified 14 2.31% $56.00
    Minimally Qualified 26 4.30% $78.00
    Product 3 Fully Qualified 7 1.16% $35.00
    Moderately Qualified 19 3.14% $66.50
    Minimally Qualified 22 3.64% $55.00
    Non-Qualified 459 75.87% $918.00
    Subtotal 605 100.00% $1,540.50
    5 Lycos Banner Product 1 Fully Qualified 6 1.35% $48.00
    Moderately Qualified 18 4.06% $108.00
    Minimally Qualified 22 4.97% $110.00
    Product 2 Fully Qualified 4 0.90% $24.00
    Moderately Qualified 23 5.19% $92.00
    Minimally Qualified 15 3.39% $45.00
    Product 3 Fully Qualified 9 2.03% $45.00
    Moderately Qualified 13 2.93% $45.50
    Minimally Qualified 21 4.74% $52.50
    Non-Qualified 312 70.43% $624.00
    Subtotal 443 100.00% $1,194.00
    6 HotWired WebMonkey Product 1 Fully Qualified 2 0.78% $16.00
    Banner Moderately Qualified 9 3.50% $54.00
    Minimally Qualified 17 6.61% $85.00
    Product 2 Fully Qualified 0 0.00% $0.00
    Moderately Qualified 0 0.00% $0.00
    Minimally Qualified 6 2.33% $18.00
    Product 3 Fully Qualified 3 1.17% $15.00
    Moderately Qualified 11 4.28% $38.50
    Minimally Qualified 16 6.23% $40.00
    Non-Qualified 193 75.10% $386.00
    Subtotal 257 100.00% $652.50
    Total 4488 100.00% $11,366.00
  • [0000]
    TABLE 5
    Results by Qualification Profile
    Qualified % of
    Qualification Visitor Visitor % of
    Profile Ad Campaign Sessions Sessions Value Value
    1 Product 1 Builder.com Banner 146 32.02% $846.00 32.01%
    Yahoo! Banner 125 27.41% $738.00 27.92%
    Excite Banner 59 12.94% $342.00 12.94%
    Intergreat Banner 52 11.40% $296.00 11.20%
    Lycos Banner 46 10.09% $266.00 10.06%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 28 6.14% $155.00 5.86%
    Subtotal 456 100.00% $2,643.00 100.00%
    2 Product 2 Yahoo! Banner 57 25.79% $222.00 26.30%
    Builder.com Banner 46 20.81% $177.00 20.97%
    Intergreat Banner 46 20.81% $170.00 20.14%
    Lycos Banner 42 19.00% $161.00 19.08%
    Excite Banner 24 10.86% $96.00 11.37%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 26 2.71% $18.00 2.13%
    Subtotal 221 100.00% $844.00 100.00%
    3 Product 3 Builder.com Banner 55 26.70% $182.50 27.28%
    Intergreat Banner 48 23.30% $156.50 23.39%
    Lycos Banner 43 20.87% $143.00 21.38%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 30 14.56% $93.50 13.98%
    Yahoo! Banner 23 11.17% $73.50 10.99%
    Excite Banner 27 3.40% $20.00 2.99%
    Subtotal 206 100.00% $669.00 100.00%
  • [0000]
    TABLE 6
    Results by Qualification Profile and Qualification Level
    % of % of
    Qualification Qualification Visitor Visitor Visitor Visitor
    Profile Level Ad Campaign Sessions Sessions Value Value
    1 Product 1 Fully Qualified Yahoo! Banner 24 34.29% $192.00 34.29%
    Builder.com Banner 21 30.00% $168.00 30.00%
    Excite Banner 9 12.86% $72.00 12.86%
    Intergreat Banner 8 11.43% $64.00 11.43%
    Lycos Banner 6 8.57% $48.00 8.57%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 2 2.86% $16.00 2.86%
    Subtotal 70 100.00% $560.00 100.00%
    Moderately Builder.com Banner 53 34.64% $318.00 34.64%
    Qualified Yahoo! Banner 41 26.80% $246.00 26.80%
    Excite Banner 20 13.07% $120.00 13.07%
    Lycos Banner 18 11.76% $108.00 11.76%
    Intergreat Banner 12 7.84% $72.00 7.84%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 9 5.88% $54.00 5.88%
    Subtotal 153 100.00% $918.00 100.00%
    Minimally Builder.com Banner 72 30.90% $360.00 30.90%
    Qualified Yahoo! Banner 60 25.75% $300.00 25.75%
    Intergreat Banner 32 13.73% $160.00 13.73%
    Excite Banner 30 12.88% $150.00 12.88%
    Lycos Banner 22 9.44% $110.00 9.44%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 17 7.30% $85.00 7.30%
    Subtotal 233 100.00% $1,165.00 100.00%
    Total 456 $2,643.00
    2 Product 2 Fully Qualified Yahoo! Banner 13 36.11% $78.00 36.11%
    Builder.com Banner 8 22.22% $48.00 22.22%
    Intergreat Banner 6 16.67% $36.00 16.67%
    Excite Banner 5 13.89% $30.00 13.89%
    Lycos Banner 4 11.11% $24.00 11.11%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 0 0.00% $0.00 0.00%
    Subtotal 36 100.00% $216.00 100.00%
    Moderately Lycos Banner 23 31.51% $92.00 31.51%
    Qualified Builder.com Banner 15 20.55% $60.00 20.55%
    Intergreat Banner 14 19.18% $56.00 19.18%
    Yahoo! Banner 12 16.44% $48.00 16.44%
    Excite Banner 9 12.33% $36.00 12.33%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 0 0.00% $0.00 0.00%
    Subtotal 73 100.00% $292.00 100.00%
    Minimally Yahoo! Banner 32 28.57% $96.00 28.57%
    Qualified Intergreat Banner 26 23.21% $78.00 23.21%
    Builder.com Banner 23 20.54% $69.00 20.54%
    Excite Banner 10 8.93% $30.00 8.93%
    Lycos Banner 15 13.39% $45.00 13.39%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 6 5.36% $18.00 5.36%
    Subtotal 112 100.00% $336.00 100.00%
    Total 221 $844.00
    3 Product 3 Fully Qualified Builder.com Banner 12 33.33% $60.00 33.33%
    Lycos Banner 9 25.00% $45.00 25.00%
    Intergreat Banner 7 19.44% $35.00 19.44%
    Yahoo! Banner 4 11.11% $20.00 11.11%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 3 8.33% $15.00 8.33%
    Excite Banner 1 2.78% $5.00 2.78%
    Subtotal 36 100.00% $180.00 100.00%
    Moderately Intergreat Banner 19 29.69% $66.50 29.69%
    Qualified Builder.com Banner 15 23.44% $52.50 23.44%
    Lycos Banner 13 20.31% $45.50 20.31%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 11 17.19% $38.50 17.19%
    Yahoo! Banner 6 9.38% $21.00 9.38%
    Excite Banner 0 0.00% $0.00 0.00%
    Subtotal 64 100.00% $224.00 100.00%
    Minimally Builder.com Banner 28 26.42% $70.00 26.42%
    Qualified Intergreat Banner 22 20.75% $55.00 20.75%
    Lycos Banner 21 19.81% $52.50 19.81%
    HotWired WebMonkey Banner 16 15.09% $40.00 15.09%
    Yahoo! Banner 13 12.26% $32.50 12.26%
    Excite Banner 6 5.66% $15.00 5.66%
    Subtotal 106 100.00% $265.00 100.00%
    Total 206 $669.00
  • [0000]
    TABLE 7
    Ad Campaign Costs
    Total Qalified Cost Per
    Cost This Visitor Cost Per Visitor Qualified
    Ad Campaign Period Sessions Visitor Sessions Visitor
    1 Yahoo! Banner $1,250.00 1303 $0.96 205 $6.10
    2 Excite Banner $433.00 980 $0.44 90 $4.81
    3 Builder.com Banner $1,250.00 900 $1.39 247 $5.06
    4 Intergreat Banner $200.00 605 $0.33 146 $1.37
    5 Lycos Banner $2,000.00 443 $4.51 131 $15.27
    6 HotWired WebMonkey Banner $1,250.00 257 $4.86 64 $19.53
    Total $6,383.00 4488 $1.42 883 $7.23
  • [0000]
    TABLE 8
    Ad Campaign Return on Investment
    # Days Cost of Total Visitor % ROI
    Active This Campaign Value ROI This This
    Ad Campaign Period This Period Generated Period Period
    1 Yahoo! Banner 7 $1,250.00 $3,229.50 $1,979.50 158.36%
    2 Excite Banner 16 $433.00 $2,238.00 $1,805.00 416.86%
    3 Intergreat Banner 5 $200.00 $1,540.50 $1,340.50 670.25%
    4 Builder.com Banner 7 $1,250.00 $2,511.50 $1,261.50 100.92%
    5 HotWired WebMonkey Banner 9 $1,250.00 $652.50 ($597.50) −47.80%
    6 Lycos Banner 12 $2,000.00 $1,194.00 ($806.00) −40.30%
    Total $6,383.00 $11,366.00 $4,983.00 78.07%
  • [0000]
    TABLE 9
    Ad Campaign Daily Return on Investment
    # Days
    Active Cost Visitor
    This Per Value Per ROI Per
    Ad Campaign Period Day Day Day
    1 Yahoo! Banner 7 $178.57 $461.36 $282.79
    2 Intergreat Banner 5 $40.00 $308.10 $268.10
    3 Builder.com Banner 7 $178.57 $358.79 $180.21
    4 Excite Banner 16 $27.06 $139.88 $112.81
    5 HotWired WebMonkey 9 $138.89 $72.50 ($66.39)
    Banner
    6 Lycos Banner 12 $166.67 $99.50 ($67.17)
    Total $563.09 $1,340.62 $777.52
  • [0063]
    Turning now to FIGS. 10 and 11, illustrated therein is a flow chart, indicated generally as program 800, depicting steps in a computer program constructed in accordance with the present invention. As is the case with the previously described programs, program 800 operates on server 10 in the present embodiment of the invention, although this is not required.
  • [0064]
    Program 800 is advantageous in that it tracks only criteria of interest for each active visitor session and—at the conclusion of each session—determines whether the visitor whose session was monitored meets the criteria for each qualification profile. And if so, the program assigns the visitor accordingly. This naturally requires less processing and memory resources than program 700.
  • [0065]
    Turning now to FIG. 10, in step 801, the program checks to see if there are more hits in the log file. If so, in step 805, the program reads the next hit generated by interaction of a remote visitor with server 10. If it is a hit from a new visitor, i.e., there is no visitor session active for the particular visitor who produced the current hit, a new visitor session is created in step 815. At the same time, the visitor session is assigned to an entry page and referrer and to an ad campaign in steps 817, 819, respectively, as described above. Thereafter, a checklist is assigned to the new visitor session in 820. The checklist is merely a list of all of the requirements for each qualification level in each qualification profile. In the case where criteria for each of the requirements are selected web pages identified by URLs on the site, the checklist assigned to each visitor session in step 820 is merely a list of all of those URLs.
  • [0066]
    Returning again to step 810, if there is a visitor session active for the particular visitor who produced the current hit, that visitor's session is updated. When a visitor session is updated responsive to a current hit from that visitor, the information in the hit is examined to determine whether or not any of the URLs on the checklist were visited and, if so, that URL is flagged. In the present embodiment of the invention, the same checklist is assigned to each visitor session.
  • [0067]
    This process begins in step 824 when the hit is examined to determine whether or not the page is on the checklist. If so, that page on the list is flagged in step 825, and a session timing clock, which is unique to each visitor session, is reset and started in step 830. If not, the program moves from step 824 to step 830 to reset and start the clock associated with that visitor session. In other words, every hit from the visitor resets and starts the clock in step 830 whether the visitor views a page on the checklist or not. After resetting and starting the clock, the program—in step 835—checks each open visitor session. For each session, in step 840, the program determines whether the clock associated with that visitor session has timed out. Put differently, it determines whether the predetermined time used to define each visitor session has lapsed without another hit from that visitor. If not, the program leaves the visitor session open and returns control to step 835 to check the next visitor session. If the session has lapsed, the program closes that session in accordance with FIG. 11, which is described shortly, and returns control to step 835 to check the next session. After all current sessions are checked using the routine in steps 835, 840, and FIG. 11, control is transferred again to step 801 to check for more hits, as described above.
  • [0068]
    When there are no more hits in the log file, control transfers to decision box 837, which checks all remaining open visitor sessions and closes each in accordance with FIG. 11. Each time a session is closed, control again returns to step 837 to close the next visitor session until all are closed by the FIG. 11 routine. Control then goes to step 839, wherein the ROI analysis is performed in the same manner as described in connection with the embodiment of FIGS. 7-9.
  • [0069]
    Turning now to FIG. 11, consideration will be given to the manner in which a visitor session is closed. With reference to FIG. 10, this occurs after step 840, when each session expires, and after step 801, when there are no more hits to process and all remaining visitor sessions are consequently closed. In steps 845, 850, the session is closed, and the checklist associated with the session is examined to determine which pages the visitor viewed during the visitor session. In step 855 the flagged pages are compared with the pages designated in each qualification level within each qualification profile. In step 860, the visitor is assigned to the highest qualification level, like qualification level 315 in FIG. 5, in each qualification profile, like qualification profile 305 in FIG. 5, for which she qualifies. This is accomplished in the same manner as described in connection with FIG. 9. Next, in step 865, Tables A and B are updated accordingly. It is from these tables that data are extracted, as described above, to produce tables like those shown in Tables 1-9 above.
  • [0070]
    Having illustrated and described the principles of our invention in a preferred embodiment thereof, it should be readily apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. We claim all modifications coming within the spirit and scope of the accompanying claims.

Claims (23)

  1. 1. A method of identifying an object on a web page, comprising:
    receiving a communication indicating user activation of an object, the communication comprising an object identifier and additional identifying indicia for the object;
    comparing the object identifier and the additional identifying indicia of the user-activated object with records comprising object identifiers and additional identifying indicia; and
    responsive to the object identifier of the user-activated object being within a predetermined tolerance factor with respect to an object identifier of a stored record, and the identifier of the stored record having additional identifying indicia matching the additional identifying indicia of the user-activated object: indicating a match between the user-activated object and the stored record.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises at least one of an action and a type.
  3. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises an action and a type.
  4. 4. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a report including statistics for user-activated objects.
  5. 5. The method of claim 1, further comprising generating a report including a representation of the web page and visual indicators quantifying user activations for objects on the web page.
  6. 6. A method of identifying an object, the object having an object identifier and additional identifying indicia, comprising:
    comparing the object identifier and the additional identifying indicia of the object with records comprising object identifiers and additional identifying indicia;
    responsive to the object identifier of the object being within a predetermined tolerance factor with respect to an object identifier of a stored record, and the identifier of the stored record having additional identifying indicia matching the additional identifying indicia of the object: indicating a match between the object and the stored record.
  7. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises at least one of an action and a type.
  8. 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises an action and a type.
  9. 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the object is a component of a web page, the method further comprising generating a report including a representation of the web page and visual indicators quantifying user activations for objects on the web page.
  10. 10. An article of machine-readable media, containing code that, when executed by the machine, causes the machine to:
    receive a communication indicating user activation of an object, the communication comprising an object identifier and additional identifying indicia for the object;
    compare the object identifier and the additional identifying indicia of the user-activated object with records comprising object identifiers and additional identifying indicia; and
    responsive to the object identifier of the user-activated object being within a predetermined tolerance factor with respect to an object identifier of a stored record, and the identifier of the stored record having additional identifying indicia matching the additional identifying indicia of the user-activated object: indicating a match between the user-activated object and the stored record.
  11. 11. The article of claim 10, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises at least one of an action and a type.
  12. 12. The article of claim 10, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises an action and a type.
  13. 13. The article of claim 10, wherein the code further causes the machine to generate a report including statistics for user-activated objects.
  14. 14. The article of claim 10, wherein the code further causes the machine to generate a report including a representation of the web page and visual indicators quantifying user activations for objects on the web page.
  15. 15. An article of machine-readable media, containing code that, when executed by the machine, causes the machine to:
    compare an object identifier and additional identifying indicia of an object on a web page with records comprising object identifiers and additional identifying indicia;
    responsive to the object identifier of the object being within a predetermined tolerance factor with respect to an object identifier of a stored record, and the identifier of the stored record having additional identifying indicia matching the additional identifying indicia of the object: indicating a match between the object and the stored record.
  16. 16. The article of claim 15, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises at least one of an action and a type.
  17. 17. The article of claim 15, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises an action and a type.
  18. 18. The article of claim 15, wherein the code further causes the machine to generate a report including a representation of the web page and visual indicators quantifying user activations for objects on the web page.
  19. 19. A system for identifying an object on a web page, comprising:
    a communication device, for receiving a communication indicating user activation of an object, the communication comprising an object identifier and additional identifying indicia for the object;
    an object comparator, coupled to the communication device, for comparing the object identifier and the additional identifying indicia of the user-activated object with records comprising object identifiers and additional identifying indicia; and
    a match indicator, coupled to the object comparator, for, responsive to the object identifier of the user-activated object being within a predetermined tolerance factor with respect to an object identifier of a stored record, and the identifier of the stored record having additional identifying indicia matching the additional identifying indicia of the user-activated object: indicating a match between the user-activated object and the stored record.
  20. 20. The system of claim 19, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises at least one of an action and a type.
  21. 21. The system of claim 19, wherein the additional identifying indicia comprises an action and a type.
  22. 22. The system of claim 19, further comprising a report generator, for generating a report including statistics for user-activated objects.
  23. 23. The system of claim 19, further comprising a report generator, for generating a report including a representation of the web page and visual indicators quantifying user activations for objects on the web page.
US11844271 1999-01-29 2007-08-23 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server Abandoned US20080209024A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09240208 US6925442B1 (en) 1999-01-29 1999-01-29 Method and apparatus for evaluating vistors to a web server
US11187681 US7558741B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2005-07-22 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server
US11844271 US20080209024A1 (en) 1999-01-29 2007-08-23 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11844271 US20080209024A1 (en) 1999-01-29 2007-08-23 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080209024A1 true true US20080209024A1 (en) 2008-08-28

Family

ID=22905583

Family Applications (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09240208 Active 2021-05-29 US6925442B1 (en) 1999-01-29 1999-01-29 Method and apparatus for evaluating vistors to a web server
US11114640 Active US7596506B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2005-04-25 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server
US11187681 Active US7558741B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2005-07-22 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server
US11844271 Abandoned US20080209024A1 (en) 1999-01-29 2007-08-23 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server
US11844260 Active 2021-11-07 US7991640B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2007-08-23 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server
US13166005 Active US8417557B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2011-06-22 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server

Family Applications Before (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09240208 Active 2021-05-29 US6925442B1 (en) 1999-01-29 1999-01-29 Method and apparatus for evaluating vistors to a web server
US11114640 Active US7596506B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2005-04-25 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server
US11187681 Active US7558741B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2005-07-22 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11844260 Active 2021-11-07 US7991640B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2007-08-23 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server
US13166005 Active US8417557B2 (en) 1999-01-29 2011-06-22 Method and apparatus for evaluating visitors to a web server

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (6) US6925442B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1151379A4 (en)
CA (1) CA2359684A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000045264A1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100070621A1 (en) * 2008-09-18 2010-03-18 Urdan Jonathan M Passive parameter based demographics generation
US20100121684A1 (en) * 2008-11-12 2010-05-13 Reachforce Inc. System and Method for Capturing Information for Conversion into Actionable Sales Leads
US20110022425A1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2011-01-27 David Block Automated Internet Based Interactive Travel Planning and Management System
US20120232955A1 (en) * 2008-11-12 2012-09-13 Reachforce Inc. System and Method for Capturing Information for Conversion into Actionable Sales Leads

Families Citing this family (124)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6925442B1 (en) 1999-01-29 2005-08-02 Elijahu Shapira Method and apparatus for evaluating vistors to a web server
US6993531B1 (en) * 1999-02-04 2006-01-31 Naas Aaron J System and method of routine navigation
US6393479B1 (en) * 1999-06-04 2002-05-21 Webside Story, Inc. Internet website traffic flow analysis
US7577582B1 (en) 1999-09-21 2009-08-18 Nextag, Inc. Methods and apparatus for facilitating transactions
US6771289B1 (en) * 2000-03-02 2004-08-03 Microsoft Corporation Cluster-based visualization of user traffic on an internet site
US7523191B1 (en) * 2000-06-02 2009-04-21 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for monitoring user interaction with web pages
US7962603B1 (en) 2000-06-06 2011-06-14 Nobuyoshi Morimoto System and method for identifying individual users accessing a web site
US7702541B2 (en) * 2000-08-01 2010-04-20 Yahoo! Inc. Targeted e-commerce system
US20060015390A1 (en) * 2000-10-26 2006-01-19 Vikas Rijsinghani System and method for identifying and approaching browsers most likely to transact business based upon real-time data mining
US9819561B2 (en) 2000-10-26 2017-11-14 Liveperson, Inc. System and methods for facilitating object assignments
US8868448B2 (en) 2000-10-26 2014-10-21 Liveperson, Inc. Systems and methods to facilitate selling of products and services
US20020062223A1 (en) * 2000-11-21 2002-05-23 Netiq Corporation System and method for adding network traffic data to a database of network traffic data
FR2819916B1 (en) * 2001-01-25 2003-04-04 Numsight Sa Process for treatment requettes Internet files
US20020116223A1 (en) * 2001-02-20 2002-08-22 Aurora Health Care, Inc. System and method for selection of a primary care physician
US8817757B2 (en) * 2001-12-12 2014-08-26 At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. Zero-configuration secure mobility networking technique with web-based authentication interface for large WLAN networks
US7185085B2 (en) * 2002-02-27 2007-02-27 Webtrends, Inc. On-line web traffic sampling
JP2003258911A (en) * 2002-03-06 2003-09-12 Hitachi Ltd Access node device and analyzing method for internet utilization state
US20030217106A1 (en) * 2002-03-25 2003-11-20 Eytan Adar System and method for profiling clients within a system for harvesting community knowledge
US7143365B2 (en) * 2002-06-18 2006-11-28 Webtrends, Inc. Method and apparatus for using a browser to configure a software program
US20040024864A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-05 Porras Phillip Andrew User, process, and application tracking in an intrusion detection system
US7349827B1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2008-03-25 Doubleclick Inc. System and method for reporting website activity based on inferred attribution methodology
US7853684B2 (en) * 2002-10-15 2010-12-14 Sas Institute Inc. System and method for processing web activity data
JP2004171105A (en) * 2002-11-18 2004-06-17 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Advertisement effect analysis method and advertising system
US20040172379A1 (en) * 2003-02-27 2004-09-02 Elyse Mott Method, system and apparatus for acquiring data from a database
US20040199397A1 (en) * 2003-03-26 2004-10-07 Scott Dresden Integrated dynamic pricing and procurement support for e-commerce advertising channels
JP2007520775A (en) * 2003-06-20 2007-07-26 ゲイアソフト リミテッド Management and organization system for facilitating development process
US7409422B2 (en) * 2003-08-21 2008-08-05 Microsoft Corporation Declarative page view and click tracking systems and methods
US20050144065A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-30 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Keyword advertisement management with coordinated bidding among advertisers
US20050137939A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-23 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Server-based keyword advertisement management
US20050144064A1 (en) * 2003-12-19 2005-06-30 Palo Alto Research Center Incorporated Keyword advertisement management
US8583472B2 (en) * 2004-09-10 2013-11-12 Fmr Llc Measuring customer service levels
US20070050251A1 (en) * 2005-08-29 2007-03-01 Microsoft Corporation Monetizing a preview pane for ads
US9432468B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2016-08-30 Liveperson, Inc. System and method for design and dynamic generation of a web page
US8738732B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-05-27 Liveperson, Inc. System and method for performing follow up based on user interactions
US9116944B1 (en) * 2005-10-15 2015-08-25 Aaron T. Emigh Promotion selection via interest detection
WO2007109694A3 (en) * 2006-03-20 2007-12-27 Vincent Granville Scoring quality of traffic to network sites using interrelated traffic parameters
EP2021995A4 (en) * 2005-12-06 2011-06-01 Berman Joel Method and system for scoring quality of traffic to network sites
US20080114651A1 (en) * 2006-02-02 2008-05-15 Microsoft Corporation Omaha - user price incentive model
US20070179846A1 (en) * 2006-02-02 2007-08-02 Microsoft Corporation Ad targeting and/or pricing based on customer behavior
US20070179853A1 (en) * 2006-02-02 2007-08-02 Microsoft Corporation Allocating rebate points
US20080140491A1 (en) * 2006-02-02 2008-06-12 Microsoft Corporation Advertiser backed compensation for end users
US20070179849A1 (en) * 2006-02-02 2007-08-02 Microsoft Corporation Ad publisher performance and mitigation of click fraud
US8996406B2 (en) * 2006-02-02 2015-03-31 Microsoft Corporation Search engine segmentation
US7894677B2 (en) * 2006-02-09 2011-02-22 Microsoft Corporation Reducing human overhead in text categorization
US20070233566A1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2007-10-04 Dema Zlotin System and method for managing network-based advertising conducted by channel partners of an enterprise
US8943039B1 (en) 2006-08-25 2015-01-27 Riosoft Holdings, Inc. Centralized web-based software solution for search engine optimization
US8972379B1 (en) 2006-08-25 2015-03-03 Riosoft Holdings, Inc. Centralized web-based software solution for search engine optimization
US7877392B2 (en) 2006-03-01 2011-01-25 Covario, Inc. Centralized web-based software solutions for search engine optimization
US20070260512A1 (en) * 2006-05-04 2007-11-08 Sattley Bruce R Methods and apparatus for measuring the effect of online advertising on online user behavior
US7814112B2 (en) 2006-06-09 2010-10-12 Ebay Inc. Determining relevancy and desirability of terms
US8725830B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2014-05-13 Linkedin Corporation Accepting third party content contributions
US8869066B2 (en) 2006-07-06 2014-10-21 Addthis, Llc Generic content collection systems
US8676961B2 (en) * 2006-07-27 2014-03-18 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for web destination profiling
US8452832B2 (en) * 2006-07-27 2013-05-28 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for population-targeted advertising
US8838560B2 (en) * 2006-08-25 2014-09-16 Covario, Inc. System and method for measuring the effectiveness of an on-line advertisement campaign
US20080052278A1 (en) * 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Semdirector, Inc. System and method for modeling value of an on-line advertisement campaign
US8214272B2 (en) * 2006-09-05 2012-07-03 Rafael A. Sosa Web site valuation
US8819214B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2014-08-26 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Click value determination with incentive schemes for website visitors and advertisers
US8056092B2 (en) 2006-09-29 2011-11-08 Clearspring Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for widget-container hosting and generation
US8046248B2 (en) * 2006-12-21 2011-10-25 Yahoo! Inc. Identifying items that have experienced recent interest bursts
US20080201206A1 (en) 2007-02-01 2008-08-21 7 Billion People, Inc. Use of behavioral portraits in the conduct of E-commerce
US8103649B2 (en) * 2007-02-05 2012-01-24 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Search system and search method
US9009728B2 (en) 2007-03-06 2015-04-14 Addthis, Inc. Method and apparatus for widget and widget-container distribution control based on content rules
US20080222232A1 (en) * 2007-03-06 2008-09-11 Allen Stewart O Method and Apparatus for Widget and Widget-Container Platform Adaptation and Distribution
US8266274B2 (en) 2007-03-06 2012-09-11 Clearspring Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for data processing
KR20090127351A (en) * 2007-03-19 2009-12-10 마켓셰어 파트너스 엘엘씨 Automatically prescribing total budget for marketing and sales resources and allocation across spending categories
US8166157B2 (en) * 2007-03-23 2012-04-24 Fmr Llc Enterprise application performance monitors
US20080243613A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2008-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Optimization of pay per click advertisements
CA2631040A1 (en) * 2007-05-10 2008-11-10 Publicinsite, Ltd. Website affiliation analysis method and system
US20090006179A1 (en) * 2007-06-26 2009-01-01 Ebay Inc. Economic optimization for product search relevancy
US9137093B1 (en) * 2007-07-02 2015-09-15 Comscore, Inc. Analyzing requests for data made by users that subscribe to a provider of network connectivity
US8631015B2 (en) * 2007-09-06 2014-01-14 Linkedin Corporation Detecting associates
US7698422B2 (en) 2007-09-10 2010-04-13 Specific Media, Inc. System and method of determining user demographic profiles of anonymous users
US8209378B2 (en) 2007-10-04 2012-06-26 Clearspring Technologies, Inc. Methods and apparatus for widget sharing between content aggregation points
US20090112976A1 (en) * 2007-10-29 2009-04-30 Hutchinson Kevin P Method for measuring web traffic
US20100281389A1 (en) * 2007-10-29 2010-11-04 Hutchinson Kevin P System for measuring web traffic
US7752308B2 (en) * 2007-10-30 2010-07-06 Hutchinson Kevin P System for measuring web traffic
US20090144117A1 (en) * 2007-11-29 2009-06-04 David Cavander Automatically prescribing total budget for marketing and sales resources and allocation across spending categories
JP5530368B2 (en) * 2008-02-21 2014-06-25 マーケットシェア パートナーズ リミテッド ライアビリティ カンパニー Automatic designation of the total budget and sales resources of marketing, and distribution over the expenditure category
JP5350472B2 (en) * 2008-06-19 2013-11-27 ワイズ テクノロジーズ インコーポレイテッド Product ranking methods and products ranking system to rank in more than one product on the topic
US8171156B2 (en) * 2008-07-25 2012-05-01 JumpTime, Inc. Method and system for determining overall content values for content elements in a web network and for optimizing internet traffic flow through the web network
US8799200B2 (en) 2008-07-25 2014-08-05 Liveperson, Inc. Method and system for creating a predictive model for targeting webpage to a surfer
US8762313B2 (en) 2008-07-25 2014-06-24 Liveperson, Inc. Method and system for creating a predictive model for targeting web-page to a surfer
US8805844B2 (en) 2008-08-04 2014-08-12 Liveperson, Inc. Expert search
US20100042476A1 (en) * 2008-08-14 2010-02-18 Gauri Dinesh K Method and system for target marketing and category based search
EP2329403A4 (en) * 2008-08-15 2012-10-10 Marketshare Partners Llc Automated decision support for pricing entertainment tickets
CN101685516A (en) * 2008-09-28 2010-03-31 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Method and system for measuring network marketing effect
US9892417B2 (en) 2008-10-29 2018-02-13 Liveperson, Inc. System and method for applying tracing tools for network locations
WO2010051433A1 (en) 2008-10-31 2010-05-06 Marketshare Partners Llc Automated specification, estimation, discovery of causal drivers and market response elasticities or lift factors
US20100131835A1 (en) * 2008-11-22 2010-05-27 Srihari Kumar System and methods for inferring intent of website visitors and generating and packaging visitor information for distribution as sales leads or market intelligence
US8396742B1 (en) 2008-12-05 2013-03-12 Covario, Inc. System and method for optimizing paid search advertising campaigns based on natural search traffic
US8549019B2 (en) * 2009-05-26 2013-10-01 Google Inc. Dynamically generating aggregate tables
US9305105B2 (en) * 2009-05-26 2016-04-05 Google Inc. System and method for aggregating analytics data
US8792632B2 (en) * 2009-08-13 2014-07-29 Genesys Telecommunications Laboratories, Inc. System and methods for scheduling and optimizing inbound call flow to a call center
US8370202B2 (en) * 2009-08-28 2013-02-05 Google Inc. Audience segment estimation
US8543591B2 (en) * 2009-09-02 2013-09-24 Google Inc. Method and system for generating and sharing dataset segmentation schemes
US8751544B2 (en) * 2009-09-02 2014-06-10 Google Inc. Method and system for pivoting a multidimensional dataset
CN102024224A (en) * 2009-09-11 2011-04-20 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 E-commerce system and method for getting commodities on and/or off shelves at optimal time
US8671089B2 (en) 2009-10-06 2014-03-11 Brightedge Technologies, Inc. Correlating web page visits and conversions with external references
US8554699B2 (en) 2009-10-20 2013-10-08 Google Inc. Method and system for detecting anomalies in time series data
US8583584B2 (en) * 2009-10-20 2013-11-12 Google Inc. Method and system for using web analytics data for detecting anomalies
US8689136B2 (en) * 2010-02-03 2014-04-01 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for backend advertisement conversion
US20110209067A1 (en) * 2010-02-19 2011-08-25 Bogess Keandre System and Method for Website User Valuation
US9767212B2 (en) 2010-04-07 2017-09-19 Liveperson, Inc. System and method for dynamically enabling customized web content and applications
US9350598B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2016-05-24 Liveperson, Inc. Authentication of service requests using a communications initiation feature
US8918465B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2014-12-23 Liveperson, Inc. Authentication of service requests initiated from a social networking site
US20120158951A1 (en) * 2010-12-21 2012-06-21 Sitecore A/S Method and a system for analysing traffic on a website
US9015141B2 (en) 2011-02-08 2015-04-21 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture to measure search results
US20120203592A1 (en) * 2011-02-08 2012-08-09 Balaji Ravindran Methods, apparatus, and articles of manufacture to determine search engine market share
US8825841B2 (en) 2011-03-25 2014-09-02 Sitecore A/S Method and a system for analysing traffic on a website including multiple visits by the visitors
US8782166B1 (en) * 2011-07-20 2014-07-15 Google Inc. System for generating a site pathing report based on real-time analytics data
US8782162B1 (en) * 2011-07-20 2014-07-15 Google Inc. System for merging and comparing real-time analytics data with conventional analytics data
US20130035975A1 (en) * 2011-08-05 2013-02-07 David Cavander Cross-media attribution model for allocation of marketing resources
US9218611B1 (en) 2011-09-27 2015-12-22 Google Inc. System and method for determining bid amount for advertisement to reach certain number of online users
US9064269B1 (en) * 2011-09-27 2015-06-23 Google Inc. Cookie correction system and method
US9299085B2 (en) 2011-09-27 2016-03-29 Google Inc. System and method for estimating potential unique online users an advertisement can reach
US9202227B2 (en) 2012-02-07 2015-12-01 6 Sense Insights, Inc. Sales prediction systems and methods
US8943002B2 (en) 2012-02-10 2015-01-27 Liveperson, Inc. Analytics driven engagement
US8805941B2 (en) 2012-03-06 2014-08-12 Liveperson, Inc. Occasionally-connected computing interface
US9563336B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2017-02-07 Liveperson, Inc. Dynamic user interface customization
US9672196B2 (en) 2012-05-15 2017-06-06 Liveperson, Inc. Methods and systems for presenting specialized content using campaign metrics
US9952738B1 (en) 2012-05-30 2018-04-24 Callidus Software Inc. Creation and display of dynamic content component based on a target user accessing a website
US20140188596A1 (en) * 2012-12-28 2014-07-03 International Business Machines Corporation Statistical marketing attribution correlation
US20150012350A1 (en) * 2013-07-02 2015-01-08 Yue Li Measuring the value of marketing contributions to deals

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6360261B1 (en) * 1997-02-14 2002-03-19 Webtrends Corporation System and method for analyzing remote traffic data in distributed computing environment
US6804701B2 (en) * 1999-10-04 2004-10-12 Urchin Software Corporation System and method for monitoring and analyzing internet traffic

Family Cites Families (45)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH0822403A (en) 1994-07-11 1996-01-23 Fujitsu Ltd Monitor device for computer system
JPH0897159A (en) * 1994-09-29 1996-04-12 Handotai Process Kenkyusho:Kk Method and system for epitaxial growth
WO1996015517A3 (en) * 1994-11-02 1996-08-08 Visible Interactive Corp Interactive personal interpretive device and system for retrieving information about a plurality of objects
US5724521A (en) * 1994-11-03 1998-03-03 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for providing electronic advertisements to end users in a consumer best-fit pricing manner
US6460036B1 (en) * 1994-11-29 2002-10-01 Pinpoint Incorporated System and method for providing customized electronic newspapers and target advertisements
US5758257A (en) * 1994-11-29 1998-05-26 Herz; Frederick System and method for scheduling broadcast of and access to video programs and other data using customer profiles
US6571279B1 (en) * 1997-12-05 2003-05-27 Pinpoint Incorporated Location enhanced information delivery system
US5706436A (en) 1995-02-01 1998-01-06 Cabletron Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for evaluation network traffic performance
US5729742A (en) 1995-02-27 1998-03-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for enabling multiple computer systems to share a single sequential log
US5600632A (en) 1995-03-22 1997-02-04 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Methods and apparatus for performance monitoring using synchronized network analyzers
US5675510A (en) 1995-06-07 1997-10-07 Pc Meter L.P. Computer use meter and analyzer
US5892917A (en) 1995-09-27 1999-04-06 Microsoft Corporation System for log record and log expansion with inserted log records representing object request for specified object corresponding to cached object copies
US5898837A (en) 1996-02-23 1999-04-27 Bay Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for monitoring a dedicated communications medium in a switched data network
US6018619A (en) * 1996-05-24 2000-01-25 Microsoft Corporation Method, system and apparatus for client-side usage tracking of information server systems
US5787253A (en) 1996-05-28 1998-07-28 The Ag Group Apparatus and method of analyzing internet activity
US5727129A (en) 1996-06-04 1998-03-10 International Business Machines Corporation Network system for profiling and actively facilitating user activities
US5774660A (en) 1996-08-05 1998-06-30 Resonate, Inc. World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network
US6016475A (en) * 1996-10-08 2000-01-18 The Regents Of The University Of Minnesota System, method, and article of manufacture for generating implicit ratings based on receiver operating curves
US5870559A (en) * 1996-10-15 1999-02-09 Mercury Interactive Software system and associated methods for facilitating the analysis and management of web sites
US5958008A (en) 1996-10-15 1999-09-28 Mercury Interactive Corporation Software system and associated methods for scanning and mapping dynamically-generated web documents
US5974572A (en) * 1996-10-15 1999-10-26 Mercury Interactive Corporation Software system and methods for generating a load test using a server access log
US5905988A (en) * 1996-11-13 1999-05-18 Imaginon Method and apparatus for database transformation and adaptive playback
US5796942A (en) 1996-11-21 1998-08-18 Computer Associates International, Inc. Method and apparatus for automated network-wide surveillance and security breach intervention
US5732218A (en) 1997-01-02 1998-03-24 Lucent Technologies Inc. Management-data-gathering system for gathering on clients and servers data regarding interactions between the servers, the clients, and users of the clients during real use of a network of clients and servers
US5968125A (en) 1997-01-21 1999-10-19 Net. Roi Process for optimizing the effectiveness of a hypertext element
US6366956B1 (en) * 1997-01-29 2002-04-02 Microsoft Corporation Relevance access of Internet information services
JP2000512048A (en) * 1997-03-05 2000-09-12 コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ Presentation of multimedia titles frequency of visits history priority is given to the low node
US6023744A (en) 1997-03-07 2000-02-08 Microsoft Corporation Method and mechanism for freeing disk space in a file system
US5796952A (en) 1997-03-21 1998-08-18 Dot Com Development, Inc. Method and apparatus for tracking client interaction with a network resource and creating client profiles and resource database
US5878223A (en) 1997-05-07 1999-03-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for predictive caching of information pages
US5996007A (en) * 1997-06-16 1999-11-30 John Klug Method for providing selected content during waiting time of an internet session
JP3191730B2 (en) * 1997-07-17 2001-07-23 三菱電機株式会社 Hydraulic valve timing adjusting apparatus
US6112240A (en) 1997-09-03 2000-08-29 International Business Machines Corporation Web site client information tracker
US6393407B1 (en) * 1997-09-11 2002-05-21 Enliven, Inc. Tracking user micro-interactions with web page advertising
US5954798A (en) * 1997-10-06 1999-09-21 Ncr Corporation Mechanism for dependably managing web synchronization and tracking operations among multiple browsers
US6128624A (en) 1997-11-12 2000-10-03 Ncr Corporation Collection and integration of internet and electronic commerce data in a database during web browsing
US6078928A (en) * 1997-12-12 2000-06-20 Missouri Botanical Garden Site-specific interest profiling system
US6055572A (en) 1998-01-20 2000-04-25 Netscape Communications Corporation System and method for creating pathfiles for use to predict patterns of web surfaces
US6298123B1 (en) * 1998-03-26 2001-10-02 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Interconnect traffic tracking
US6098079A (en) 1998-04-02 2000-08-01 Mitsubishi Electric Information Technology Center America, Inc. (Ita) File version reconciliation using hash codes
US6317787B1 (en) 1998-08-11 2001-11-13 Webtrends Corporation System and method for analyzing web-server log files
US6330592B1 (en) * 1998-12-05 2001-12-11 Vignette Corporation Method, memory, product, and code for displaying pre-customized content associated with visitor data
US6925442B1 (en) 1999-01-29 2005-08-02 Elijahu Shapira Method and apparatus for evaluating vistors to a web server
US6789115B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2004-09-07 Merrill Lynch & Company System for collecting, analyzing, and reporting high volume multi-web server usage
US6701362B1 (en) * 2000-02-23 2004-03-02 Purpleyogi.Com Inc. Method for creating user profiles

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6360261B1 (en) * 1997-02-14 2002-03-19 Webtrends Corporation System and method for analyzing remote traffic data in distributed computing environment
US6804701B2 (en) * 1999-10-04 2004-10-12 Urchin Software Corporation System and method for monitoring and analyzing internet traffic

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9916543B2 (en) * 2000-06-09 2018-03-13 Airport America Automated internet based interactive travel planning and management system
US20110022425A1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2011-01-27 David Block Automated Internet Based Interactive Travel Planning and Management System
US20100070621A1 (en) * 2008-09-18 2010-03-18 Urdan Jonathan M Passive parameter based demographics generation
US8549163B2 (en) * 2008-09-18 2013-10-01 Jonathan M. Urdan Passive parameter based demographics generation
US20130346604A1 (en) * 2008-09-18 2013-12-26 Jonathan M. Urdan Passive Parameter Based Demographics Generation
US20120232955A1 (en) * 2008-11-12 2012-09-13 Reachforce Inc. System and Method for Capturing Information for Conversion into Actionable Sales Leads
US9721266B2 (en) * 2008-11-12 2017-08-01 Reachforce Inc. System and method for capturing information for conversion into actionable sales leads
US20100121684A1 (en) * 2008-11-12 2010-05-13 Reachforce Inc. System and Method for Capturing Information for Conversion into Actionable Sales Leads

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
EP1151379A4 (en) 2002-04-24 application
US7991640B2 (en) 2011-08-02 grant
US20110251904A1 (en) 2011-10-13 application
US20080208947A1 (en) 2008-08-28 application
US7596506B2 (en) 2009-09-29 grant
WO2000045264A1 (en) 2000-08-03 application
US20050256951A1 (en) 2005-11-17 application
US6925442B1 (en) 2005-08-02 grant
EP1151379A1 (en) 2001-11-07 application
CA2359684A1 (en) 2000-08-03 application
US20050256954A1 (en) 2005-11-17 application
US8417557B2 (en) 2013-04-09 grant
US7558741B2 (en) 2009-07-07 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6401075B1 (en) Methods of placing, purchasing and monitoring internet advertising
Chandon et al. Effects of configuration and exposure levels on responses to web advertisements
US6438578B1 (en) System and method for generating a modified web page in response to an information request from a client computer
Hamill et al. Internet marketing in the internationalisation of UK SMEs
US6477483B1 (en) Service for load testing a transactional server over the internet
Jain et al. An approach for determining optimal product sampling for the diffusion of a new product
Mena Data mining your website
US6510462B2 (en) Collection of images in Web use reporting system
US6321209B1 (en) System and method for providing a dynamic advertising content window within a window based content manifestation environment provided in a browser
US7376722B1 (en) Network resource monitoring and measurement system and method
US20100125505A1 (en) System for broadcast of personalized content
US20030088465A1 (en) Internet-based advertising and referral system
US6895387B1 (en) Dynamic marketing based on client computer configurations
US20020169835A1 (en) E-mail communications system, method and program
US7120590B1 (en) Electronically distributing promotional and advertising material based upon consumer internet usage
US6854074B2 (en) Method of remotely monitoring an internet web site
US20110137733A1 (en) Methods for capturing and reporting metrics regarding ad placement
US6928474B2 (en) Using a probability associative matrix algorithm to modify web pages
US20070255821A1 (en) Real-time click fraud detecting and blocking system
US20050055269A1 (en) Systems and methods for determining user actions
US20010037283A1 (en) Systems, methods, and computer program products for facilitating the establishment of cross-referral agreements among members of a marketing community
US20070116239A1 (en) Method and system for providing telephone communications between a website visitor and a live agent
US20040215509A1 (en) Method of distributing targeted internet advertisements
US20030115074A1 (en) Tracking system and method
US20080077478A1 (en) Systems and methods for interactively delivering advertisement units to a web browser

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:WEBTRENDS INC.;REEL/FRAME:023355/0546

Effective date: 20091011

Owner name: WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.,CALIFORNIA

Free format text: AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE TO PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:WEBTRENDS INC.;REEL/FRAME:023355/0546

Effective date: 20091011

AS Assignment

Owner name: SILICON VALLEY BANK, OREGON

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:WEBTRENDS INC.;REEL/FRAME:026319/0001

Effective date: 20110328

AS Assignment

Owner name: WEBTRENDS INC., OREGON

Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO CAPITAL FINANCE, LLC;REEL/FRAME:041598/0987

Effective date: 20110331

AS Assignment

Owner name: ORACLE AMERICA, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:WEBTRENDS INC.;REEL/FRAME:042775/0589

Effective date: 20170612