US20080162330A1 - Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds - Google Patents

Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080162330A1
US20080162330A1 US11/980,099 US98009907A US2008162330A1 US 20080162330 A1 US20080162330 A1 US 20080162330A1 US 98009907 A US98009907 A US 98009907A US 2008162330 A1 US2008162330 A1 US 2008162330A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
auction
bidders
rule
round
bidder
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/980,099
Inventor
Scott W. Atkinson
Anthony F. Bernard
William D. Rupp
Daniel C. Heckmann
Vincent F. Rago
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ariba Inc
Original Assignee
Ariba Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
Priority to US10114198P priority Critical
Priority to US11084698P priority
Priority to US09/252,790 priority patent/US6230146B1/en
Priority to US09/753,074 priority patent/US7599878B2/en
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=27379135&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20080162330(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Ariba Inc filed Critical Ariba Inc
Priority to US11/980,099 priority patent/US20080162330A1/en
Publication of US20080162330A1 publication Critical patent/US20080162330A1/en
Application status is Abandoned legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/04Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/08Auctions, matching or brokerage
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/02Banking, e.g. interest calculation, credit approval, mortgages, home banking or on-line banking
    • G06Q40/025Credit processing or loan processing, e.g. risk analysis for mortgages

Abstract

A method of conducting an auction in at least two rounds is disclosed. The method includes conducting the first auction round, applying a rule to an occurrence in the first auction round, and conducting the second auction round in accordance with the application of the rule to the occurrence in the first auction round. A system for conducting an auction in at least two rounds is also disclosed. The system includes a sponsor processor, a first bidder processor communicating with the sponsor processor, and a second bidder processor communicating with the sponsor processor. In the system, the sponsor processor contains instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to conduct the first auction round, apply a rule to an occurrence in the first auction round, and conduct a second auction round in accordance with the applied rule.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/252,790, filed Feb. 19, 1999, currently pending and assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The disclosed invention relates generally to conducting multiple auction rounds for one or more lots of goods or services, and in particular, to basing a rule for an auction round on an occurrence in a previous auction round, wherein a condition for defining the rule is defined prior to commencing the previous auction.
  • 2. Description of the Background
  • Procurement of goods and services have traditionally involved high transaction costs. The cost of finding and qualifying potential bidders has been particularly high. The advent of electronic commerce has introduced new methods of procurement that lower some of the transaction costs associated with procurement. Electronic procurement, in particular business-to-business electronic procurement, matches buyers and suppliers and facilitates transactions that take place on networked processors.
  • Four models of electronic procurement have been developed: catalog, buyer-bidding auctions, seller-bidding auctions, and exchange marketplaces.
  • The “catalog” model was an early form of online electronic procurement. Initially, electronic catalogs were developed primarily by sellers, typically suppliers, to help customers obtain information about products, and order supplies electronically. Those first electronic catalogs were single-source; i.e. they only allowed customers to obtain information and products from that supplier.
  • Although the first electronic catalogs reduced the information search cost associated with procurement, customers were disadvantageously “locked in” to one supplier at each electronic catalog. Customers were thus unable to compare a number of competing products in a single catalog. Therefore, certain suppliers with single-source catalogs began including competitors' products in their systems. The inclusion of competing products in electronic catalogs reduced procurement information search costs even further. By offering competing products, electronic catalogs became “electronic markets.”
  • Many electronic catalogs, however, were biased toward the supplier offering the electronic catalog, and it was thought that procurement costs could be lowered further through an unbiased market. Therefore, third-party “market makers” developed markets for many standard products and services, which were intended to be unbiased markets.
  • Electronic commerce using the electronic catalog model typically involves one buyer and one seller at a time. When many buyers compete for the right to buy from one seller, a buyer-bidding auction model, or forward auction, is created. Catalog and buyer-bidding auction models, however, have limitations and do not work well in every situation. For example, it is difficult for a supplier to publish set prices in a catalog for custom products. Therefore, when a buyer requires a custom product, pricing for that product typically will not be found in a catalog. Likewise, it is difficult to specify a custom product and identify buyers who might use that custom product for a buyer-bidding auction. Additionally, there may be only one buyer interested in a custom product, such that a buyer-bidding auction may not be applicable in all cases. Thus, few suppliers can typically provide custom goods and services and standard product and pricing information is typically not available for buyers of custom industrial products.
  • Referring again to the cost of traditional procurement, and particularly procurement of custom products and services, when a company required a custom product, a buyer for the company would typically procure the product by searching for potential suppliers and then acquire price quotes from the potential suppliers for the needed custom product. The search tended to be slow and random, and typically relied heavily on personal relationships. The costs associated with locating vendors, comparing prices, and negotiating a deal were therefore large. The cost of switching suppliers was also large, such that an incumbent supplier's quoted price was most likely not the lowest price he could offer because the incumbent supplier knew the buyer would face switching costs to use another supplier. As an additional consequence, new suppliers had a difficult time entering the market because of those high switching costs.
  • Therefore, supplier-bidding auctions for products and services defined by a buyer have been developed. The assignee of the present application has developed a system in which sellers downwardly bid against one another to achieve the lowest market price in a supplier-bidding auction. In such auctions, various goods or services may simultaneously be placed for auction. In certain situations, however, there is a need to provide two or more auctions falling chronologically one after another. Each such auction falling in chronological order is referred to herein as an “auction round.”
  • Thus, there is a need for a system, apparatus and process whereby a sponsor may conduct an auction having multiple auction rounds which is referred to herein as “bidding in rounds.” Furthermore, when bidding in auction rounds, there is a need to provide a system, apparatus and process whereby an aspect of a subsequent auction round may be based on an occurrence in a previous round.
  • There is also a need for a system, a method, and an apparatus that allows a purchaser to purchase goods and/or services from more than one supplier. There is a need for a system, a method, and an apparatus that allows a purchaser to purchase a quantity of goods or service that is greater than the quantity that at least one bidding supplier is able to provide. Furthermore, there is a need for a system, a method, and an apparatus that allows a purchaser to view the actions of bidders in an auction, weigh those actions, and determine from those actions which bidders will be invited to participate in a future auction.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • In accordance with one form of the present invention, there is provided a method and system of conducting an auction in at least two rounds. The method includes forming a rule for a second auction round, conducting the first auction round, applying the rule to an occurrence in the first auction round, and conducting a second auction round in accordance with the applied rule. In a preferred embodiment, an outcome of the first auction round, such as, for example, the identity of one or more leading bidders in the first round, the identity of the bidder that was awarded a contract in the first round, or the identity of one or more non-leading bidders in the first round, are used in conjunction with the rule in order to determine the conduct of the second auction round. The method of the present invention can be applied to both reverse and forward auctions. In addition, the method is particularly applicable to online auctions where bidders submit bids to an auction coordinator electronically through an online facility during the auction process.
  • In a particular embodiment, the method of the present invention is directed to the conducting of an auction in at least two rounds. In this embodiment, a determination is made that a bidder may participate in a subsequent auction round only if the bidder was not awarded a contract in a previous auction round. In accordance with this embodiment, a first auction round is conducted, and a contract is awarded to a bidder in the first auction round. Thereafter, a second auction round that includes only bidders that were not awarded a contract in the first auction round is conducted.
  • In accordance with another embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of conducting an auction in at least two rounds, wherein a determination is made that a bidder may participate in a subsequent auction round if that bidder is a leading bidder in a previous auction round. In accordance with this aspect of the invention, a first auction round which includes a plurality of bidders is conducted, and one or more of the plurality of the bidders is designated as non-leading bidder(s) in accordance with the conducting of the first auction round. Thereafter, a second auction round that excludes the non-leading bidders is conducted. In further embodiments, a third auction round which includes only leading bidders from a first or second auction round may be subsequently conducted.
  • A system for conducting an auction in at least two rounds is also disclosed. The system includes a sponsor processor, a first bidder processor communicating with the sponsor processor, and a second bidder processor communicating with the sponsor processor. The sponsor processor contains instructions which, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to conduct a first auction round, apply a rule to an occurrence in the first auction round, and conduct a second auction round in accordance with the applied rule.
  • A computer readable medium having instructions stored thereon is also disclosed. The instructions are such that when executed by a processor, the instructions cause the processor to conduct the first auction round, apply a rule to an occurrence in the first auction round, and conduct a second auction in accordance with the applied rule.
  • In accordance with yet a further embodiment, the present invention is directed to a bidding device operated by a bidder during an online auction. The bidding device could, for example, be a personal computer, workstation, or terminal used by the bidder during the auction. The bidding device includes software that enables the bidder to submit bids to a sponsor processor during a first auction round. The sponsor processor applies a rule to an occurrence in the first auction round. The bidding device is then selectively enabled to allow the bidder to submit bids to the sponsor processor in a second auction round in accordance with the applied rule.
  • Thus, the present invention provides a method, apparatus and system whereby a sponsor may beneficially conduct an auction having multiple auction rounds. Furthermore, the present invention beneficially provides a method, apparatus and system whereby an aspect of a subsequent auction round may be based on an occurrence in a previous round.
  • The present invention also provides a system, a method, and an apparatus that allows a purchaser to purchase goods and/or services from more than one supplier. In addition, the present invention provides a system, a method, and an apparatus that allows a purchaser to purchase a quantity of goods or service that is greater than the quantity that at least one bidding supplier is able to provide. Furthermore, the present invention provides a system, a method, and an apparatus that allows a purchaser to view the actions of bidders in an auction, weigh those actions, and determine from those actions which bidders will be invited to participate in a future auction.
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides solutions to the shortcomings of prior online auctions. Those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate, therefore, that those and other details, features, and advantages will become further apparent in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals are employed to designate like parts or steps, are included to provide a further understanding of the invention, are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, and illustrate embodiments of the invention that together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
  • In the drawings:
  • FIG. 1A is a schematic illustration of the entities involved in an embodiment of an auction wherein the sponsor identifies goods or services to be purchased in a request for quotation;
  • FIG. 1B is a schematic illustration of entities participating in an embodiment of an auction;
  • FIG. 1C is a schematic illustration of entities participating in an embodiment of a contract award following an auction;
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of communications links between the coordinator, the buyer, and the suppliers in an embodiment of an auction;
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of auction software and computers hosting that software in an embodiment of an auction;
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic illustration of an embodiment of an auction network;
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram illustrating an embodiment of an auction that occurs in rounds, in accordance with the present invention; and
  • FIG. 6 is a flow diagram illustrating another embodiment of an auction that occurs in rounds, in accordance with the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments of the present invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. It is to be understood that the Figures and descriptions of the present invention included herein illustrate and describe elements that are of particular relevance to the present invention, while eliminating, for purposes of clarity, other elements found in typical auction systems and computer networks. The present invention described below extends the operation of the inventive auction systems and methods described in greater detail in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/252,790, entitled “Method and System for Conducting Electronic Auctions” filed Feb. 19, 1999, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/490,877, entitled “Method and System for Partial Quantity Evaluated Rank Bidding in Online Auctions” filed Jan. 24, 2000, the disclosures of which are hereby expressly incorporated in the present application.
  • In a supplier-bidding auction or reverse auction, bids, which are often in the form of a price quote, typically start high and move downward over time as bidders interact to establish a closing price. Typically, the auction marketplace is one-sided, with one buyer and many potential suppliers, although multiple-buyer auctions are possible. Typically, products are purchased in the form of components or materials. “Components” may include fabricated tangible pieces or parts that become parts of assemblies of durable products. Example components include gears, bearings, and appliance shelves. “Materials” may include bulk quantities of raw materials that are further transformed into products. Example materials include corn syrup and sheet steel. Services may also be purchased in such a reverse auction.
  • Industrial buyers do not typically purchase one component at a time. Rather, they tend to purchase whole families of similar components. Therefore, in a typical industrial supplier-bidding auction, products are grouped together in “lots” of related items for bidding. In a regular lot bidding auction, each lot is composed of several “line items.” In the regular lot bidding auction, the suppliers bid on each line item and the bidder 30 having the best bid for all of the parts in the lot is the best bidder 30. The best bidder 30 is typically awarded a contract to supply the items in the lot. In an aggregate type lot bid, a single bid for all of the line items is submitted by each bidder 30 and the bidder 30 submitting the lowest aggregate price is the best bidder 30. By lotting products, potential suppliers can bid on lots for which they are best suited, and are not typically required to bid on every lot. Such a division into lots beneficially reduces the barrier to entry for new potential suppliers that only have capability to supply some of the needed products in the auction. Reducing the barrier to entry also benefits the purchaser by injecting additional bidders 30 into bidding for certain lots.
  • Typically, components in a lot are related to one another such that it is more efficient to have a supplier provide all of the components in that lot. As an example, a buyer might purchase a given plastic knob in two different colors, or might purchase a nameplate in four different languages. Those parts are so similar that it is nearly always more efficient to purchase those related components from the same supplier because, for example, all of the knobs may be made using with same mold. Thus, such related items are typically grouped in a single “lot.” As is known by one skilled in the art, there are many additional methods of lotting products for an auction.
  • The basic process for a purchaser sponsored supplier-bidding or reverse auction, as conducted by the assignee of the present invention, is described below with reference to FIG. 1. FIG. 1 illustrates the functional elements and entities involved in setting up and conducting a typical supplier-bidding auction. FIG. 1A illustrates the creation of an auctioning event, FIG. 1B illustrates the bidding during an auction, and FIG. 1C illustrates results after completion of a successful auction.
  • As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, while the invention is generally described in terms of one buyer and multiple suppliers, the present invention may also be used in other types of electronic markets, such as auctions having multiple potential buyers and sellers, forward auctions having a single seller and multiple potential purchasers, upward-bidding auctions, or electronic exchange marketplaces. The term “sponsor” will be utilized herein to identify the party or parties that originate the auction. In a forward auction, for example, the sponsor would typically be the supplier or seller of one or more goods or services. In such a forward auction, that sponsor might state a good that it desires to sell and receive bids from parties wishing to purchase that good. Those parties wishing to purchase that good would furthermore be “bidders” 30 in such a forward auction.
  • In a reverse auction example, the sponsor would typically be the purchaser or buyer of one or more goods or services. In such a reverse auction, that supplier might state a good that it desires to purchase and receive bids from parties wishing to supply that good. Those parties wishing to supply that good would furthermore be “bidders” 30 in such a reverse auction.
  • In the typical supplier-bidding reverse auction model, the product or service to be purchased is usually defined by the sponsor of the auction. As shown in FIG. 1A, when the sponsor 10 decides to use the auctioning system of the present invention to procure products or services, the sponsor 10 provides information to an auction coordinator 20. That information may include information about incumbent suppliers and historic prices paid for the products or services to be auctioned, for example. Typically, the sponsor 10 may also work with the auction coordinator 20 to define the products and services to be purchased in the auction and, if desired, lot the products and services appropriately so that needed products and services can be procured using optimal auction dynamics. A specification may then be prepared for each desired product or service, and a Request for Quotation (“RFQ”) generated for the auction.
  • Next, the auction coordinator 20 typically identifies potential suppliers 30, preferably with input from the sponsor 10, and invites the potential suppliers 30 to participate in the upcoming auction. The suppliers 30 that are selected to participate in the auction become bidders 30 and may be given access to the RFQ, typically through an RFQ in a tangible form, such as on paper or in an electronic format.
  • As shown in FIG. 1B, during a typical auction, bids are made for lots. Bidders 30 may submit actual unit prices for all line items within a lot, however, the competition in an auction is typically based on the aggregate value bid for all line items within a lot. The aggregate value bid for a lot may, therefore, depend on the level and mix of line item bids and the quantity of goods or services that are offered for each line item. Thus, bidders 30 submitting bids at the line item level may actually be competing on the lot level. During the auction, the sponsor 10 can typically monitor the bidding as it occurs. Bidders 30 may also be given market feedback during the auction so that they may bid competitively.
  • Feedback, including bidder 30 identity, about bidding activity is referred to as “market feedback” and includes any information or data related to the bidders 30 or their bids, interrelationships between those bids, and any other bid related information or data that is received before or during the auction. Market feedback may include, for example, bids that have been placed by other bidders 30, the rank of a participants bid in relation to one or more other bidders 30, the identity of bidders 30, or any subset of that information. Market feedback may also include non-pricing information such as, for example, the quality of the goods to be provided by bidders 30 and shipping costs associated with one or more bidders 30. Providing such market feedback to bidders 30 in an auction helps create real-time competitive interaction among participants in the auction because, without feedback, bidders 30 who are not leading in an auction might not be aware or their relative position and would have less incentive to revise their price quotes and place additional bids to remain competitive.
  • After the auction, the auction coordinator 20 may analyze the auction results with the sponsor 10. The sponsor 10 typically conducts final qualification of the low bidding supplier or suppliers 30. The sponsor 10 may furthermore retain the right not to award business to a low bidding supplier 30 based on final qualification or other business concerns. As shown in FIG. 1C, at least one supply contract is usually drawn up and executed based on the results of the auction.
  • The auction may be conducted electronically between bidders 30 at their respective remote sites and the auction coordinator 20 at its site. In an alternative embodiment, instead of the auction coordinator 20 managing the auction at its site, the sponsor 10 may perform auction coordinator tasks at its site.
  • Information may be conveyed between the coordinator 20 and the bidders 30 via any known communications medium. As shown in FIG. 2, bidders 30 may be connected to the auction through the Internet via a network service provider 40 accessed, for example, through a dial-up telephone connection. Alternately, sponsors 10 and bidders 30 may be coupled to the auction by communicating directly with the coordinator 20 through a public switched telephone network, a wireless network, or any other known connection method. Other methods of connecting sponsors 10 and bidder 30 and other communications mediums are known to those skilled in the art, and are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.
  • A computer software application may be used to manage the auction. The software application may include two components: a client component 31 and a server component 23. FIG. 3 illustrates a server component 23 and a client component 31 resident in host computers in a first embodiment. As may be seen in FIG. 3, the server component of that embodiment includes an operating system 24, competitive bidding event or auction communication software 26, and Internet protocol software 27. The server software is hosted on a computer 20 having a processor 21, random access memory 22, and a data storage facility 23. The host computer 20 also includes input and output devices 29 such as, for example a monitor, printer, mouse and keyboard, and a communications interface 28 for communicating with the client component 31. The client component of the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, includes competitive bidding event communication software 37, and Internet protocol software 35. The client component software is hosted on a computer 32 having a processor 33, random access memory 34, and a data storage facility 36. The host computer 32 also includes input and output devices 39 such as, for example a monitor, printer, mouse and keyboard, and a communications interface 38 for communicating with the server component 23.
  • The client component 31 is used by the bidders 30 to make bids during the auction, and to receive and display feedback from the auction. The client component may, for example, be a program that is installed on a bidder's computer, or it may be software that is accessed and run from a Website. Bids can typically only be submitted using the client component of the application, thereby ensuring that sponsors 10 cannot circumvent the bidding process, and that only invited suppliers 30 participate in the bidding. Each computer software application may be stored in a data storage device and executed by a processor such as those described in connection with FIG. 4 hereinbelow.
  • Bids are sent over the communications medium to, for example, the auction coordinator, or where the sponsor 10 is performing auction coordination tasks, directly to the sponsor 10. Bids are received by the server component 23. The client component includes software functions for making a connection over the Internet, or other medium, to the server component. Bids are submitted over this connection and feedback is sent to connected bidders 30.
  • When a bidder 30 submits a bid, that bid is sent to the server component and evaluated to determine whether it is a valid or acceptable bid. Feedback about received bids is sent to connected bidders 30 as is applicable, enabling bidders 30 receiving feedback to see changes in market conditions and plan competitive responses.
  • The embodiments described herein utilize an online reverse auction, wherein the present invention is performed by a computer processor, as an example in which the present invention may be utilized. In those examples, suppliers 30 bid to supply goods or services to a purchaser 10 and the purchaser 10 typically purchases the goods or services from the lowest priced qualified bidder 30. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention may be used in other applications, would not necessarily have to occur online, and may be performed by other than a computer processor. The present invention may also be utilized in connection with auctions other than reverse auctions. For example, the present invention may be advantageously utilized with forward auctions, wherein the party offering the highest priced qualified bid, rather than the lowest priced qualified bid, is awarded the goods or services being sold. In the case of a forward auction, the “leading bid” is the highest amount offered and the leading bidder 30 is the purchaser party 10 making that highest offer, while in a reverse auction, the “leading bid” is the lowest amount offered and the leading bidder 30 is the supplier party 30 making that lowest bid. Similarly, placing a “better bid” in a reverse auction indicates placing a lower bid, while placing a “better bid” in a forward auction indicates placing a higher bid.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an auction network 70 of the present invention for operating an auction, and into which the server component 23 and client component 31 may be incorporated. The auction network 70 may be divided into three functional sections: a client access network 71, a communications network 73, and a data processing network 76. The client access network 71 may, for example, include one or more client machines 72 for accessing and communicating with the communications network 73. The communications network 73 may include one or more primary communications servers 74, secondary communications servers 75, and directory, login and reporting servers 90. The data processing network 76 may include production servers 77, training and reporting servers 80, reporting and training databases 86, and production databases 84. The production servers 77 and training and reporting servers 80 are referred to collectively herein as bid servers 77 and 80.
  • The client machines 72 may be, for example, personal computers and may be located at each bidder 30 and purchaser site 10 for accessing the auction. The client machines 72 may access the auction by, for example, connecting to a web site operated by the party hosting the auction. The client machines 72 may also receive software from the communications network 73 that facilitates communications with the communications network 73. Each client machine 72 may have a processor that executes applicable software, and a data storage device that stores applicable software and other auction data.
  • The primary communications servers 74 are utilized to provide information to bids 58 received from the client machines 72 to the bid servers 77 and 80, and to provide that bid information from the bid servers 77 and 80 to the client machines 72. The primary communications servers 74 may furthermore act as a firewall to prevent direct access to the bid servers 77 and 80 by the client machines. The secondary communications servers 75 act as backups to the primary communications servers 74. The secondary communications servers 75 will perform the communication functions normally performed by the primary communications servers 74 if a failure occurs in the primary communications servers 74, thereby providing redundancy to the auction network 70.
  • The directory, login, and reporting servers 90 may perform a variety of functions that may be performed by a single server or include separate servers for the various functions. The directory, login, and reporting servers 90 may include a web server that acts as a portal for access to the auction network 70. As such, the directory, login, and reporting servers 90 will receive login requests for access to the auction network 70 via, for example, the Internet. The directory, login, and reporting servers 90 may make access decisions as to whether a client machine 72 is permitted to access the communications network 73. If access is permitted, the directory, login, and reporting servers 90 will direct the client machine 72 to the appropriate portion of the auction network 70. The directory, login, and reporting servers 90, may provide reports to client machines 72. For example, information from prior auctions which may be utilized by purchasers 10 to make a decision as to which bidder 30 will be awarded the sale and to permit the purchaser 10 to consider the way in which the auction proceeded so that future auctions may be refined.
  • The production servers 77 run the bidding software that facilitates the auction process such as, for example, the software illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6. The production servers 77 may communicate with client machines 72 through primary and secondary communications servers 74 and 75. The production servers 77 may also be redundant so that if a failure occurs in the production server 77 that is being utilized in an auction event, the redundant backup production server 77 may perform the functions of the failed production server 77 and, thus, prevent failure of the auction.
  • The training and reporting servers 80 operate in a manner similar to the production servers 77 and provide reports for auctions. It is useful to operate test auctions to test the operating systems and to train personnel and clients. Such testing may be performed on the production servers 77 or, to prevent any degradation of system operation in actual auctions, one or more separate training servers may be utilized for testing and training. Reporting may also be accomplished on the production servers 77 or the report creation functions may be offloaded to one or more reporting servers 80. The reporting servers 80 may furthermore be combined with the training servers 80.
  • Each server 74, 75, 77, 80, and 90 may have a processor that executes applicable software, and a data storage device that stores applicable software and data. It should be noted that, although the present invention is described in terms of a server component and a client component, one skilled in the art will understand that the present invention is not limited to a client/server program relationship model, and may be implemented in a peer-to-peer communications model or any other model known to those skilled in the art.
  • Data related to auctions may furthermore be held in one or more storage devices. The data storage devices may, for example, be a magnetic storage device, a random access memory device (RAM), or a read only memory device (ROM). The data may include pre-auction data, post auction data, and data that is related to active auctions. Pre-auction data may include, for example, suppliers 30 that are permitted to bid on a particular auction and the scheduled auction starting and ending times. Post auction data may include the bids and bid times received in a particular auction and reports displaying that data in user friendly formats. Active auction data may include data received from the bidders 30 as the auction is taking place and related data such as the rank of each bidder 30.
  • The “rank” of the bidders 30 is generally determined by comparing the lowest amount bid by each bidder 30 and ordering the bidders 30 according to those lowest bids. The bidder 30 ranked first is the bidder 30 that has bid an amount lower than any other bidder 30 in a reverse auction. The last rank may be a rank equal to the number of bidders 30 who have submitted bids in the auction, and the bidder 30 having that last rank is the bidder 30 that has submitted the highest amount in a reverse auction that is based on price only. Of course, there are many known ways to calculate rank, and any of those may be used in connection with the subject invention. The other bidders 30 are generally ranked between first and last according to the amounts of their lowest submitted bids. Thus, a higher, or better ranked bidder 30 in a reverse auction is a bidder 30 who has placed a comparatively lower bid, while a higher, or better ranked bidder 30 in a forward auction is a bidder 30 who has placed a comparatively higher bid. An auction may alternately be based on one or more factors other than price, such as quality, delivery factors, and/or other factors that are referred to herein collectively as “total value.” Thus, rank may also be based on factors other than price, including total value and any other factor that is useful in an auction setting. A bid or bid amount is a value that is submitted by each participating bidder 30 for comparison to the bids of other bidders 30, and may likewise be based on a variety of bid factors that are considered important to the bid participants. Those factors may include, for example, price, quality, other costs such as delivery costs, or a total value. Bids may also be placed in a number of ways including, for example, absolute total value, or comparative value such as bidding in relation to an index price.
  • Three databases, or groupings of databases, are incorporated into the auction network illustrated in FIG. 4. The production databases 84 hold data that will be used by or is received from the production servers 77, while the reporting and training databases 86 hold data that will be used by or is received from the training and reporting servers 80.
  • The directory, login, and reporting servers 90 illustrated provide a web portal for the client machines 72. The directory, login, and reporting servers 90 provide an initial contact point for the client machines 72, access to auctions in which the client machine 72 is permitted to participate, and reports relating to active and closed auctions.
  • One skilled in the art will recognize that certain components of the network described herein, while beneficial to an auction network, are not necessary components in an operational auction network. For example, the secondary communications servers 75 could be removed where the benefit of redundancy is not desired, and the primary communications servers 74 could be removed and the client machines 72 could communicate directly with the bid servers 77 and 80.
  • The present invention permits a sponsor 10 conducting more than one auction to base the conduct of a subsequent auction on one or more occurrences in a previous auction. In one embodiment, the present invention includes a method of conducting an auction in at least two rounds. In that embodiment, a subsequent round of auction is conducted in accordance with a rule, that is defined prior to a preceding round of auction and is based on one or more occurrences in the preceding auction round. During or after the preceding round of auction, the occurrences are considered in light of the rule, and a subsequent auction round is then conducted utilizing the rule. The present invention may, for example, be executed on the auction network 70, or may be operated manually or in connection with other known mechanisms.
  • Each auction round may be viewed as a separate auction wherein identified goods or services are placed for auction, bidders 30 place bids to purchase or sell the identified goods or services, a predefined period elapses after which the auction terminates and, typically, a contract is awarded for the sale of the identified goods or services. Furthermore, a contract is typically awarded to the lowest bidding supplier or the highest bidding purchaser, depending on whether suppliers or purchasers are bidding in the auction.
  • A sponsor 10 may wish to conduct an auction in several rounds for a variety of reasons including, for example, the need to purchase more goods than may be supplied by the bidders 30 or a desire to learn from an early auction round and make alterations in subsequent rounds. In certain circumstances, it is beneficial to award contracts to multiple bidders 30 in multiple rounds rather than awarding contracts to the lowest bidders 30 in a single auction round because market or bidding dynamics will cause total bid prices to be lower when bidding in multiple rounds. For example, where multiple contracts will, or are likely, to be awarded from a single auction, a bidder 30 may place bids that maintain that bidder 30 in second or higher rank, knowing that it will be awarded a contract at a higher price in spite of not being the lowest bidder. Bidding in rounds may beneficially diminish the practice of bidding for second or higher rank, because only the first ranked or lowest bidder is awarded a contract in each round.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow diagram 200 illustrating an embodiment of the present invention wherein a purchasing sponsor 10 desires to purchase a large quantity of goods, and wherein a second auction round will include qualified bidders 30 from a first auction round. At 202, the sponsor 10 will typically prepare a request for quote (“RFQ”) describing the goods to be purchased. At 204, that RFQ is provided to potential bidders 30. Each potential bidder 30 that desires to participate in the auction may then respond to the RFQ at 206. The potential bidder 30 will typically respond by indicating the desired goods that bidder 30 is willing to provide, the quantity and quality of the goods that the bidder 30 can provide, and conditions under which the bidder 30 can provide those goods in those quantities and qualities. Those conditions may include the time period during which the identified goods may be provided. In a certain circumstance, none of the potential bidders 30 may be able to provide the desired quantity of goods in the desired time period. In another circumstance certain bidders 30 may be able to provide the entire desired quantity of goods, while other bidders 30 cannot provide the entire quantity desired. In the latter circumstance, the sponsor 10 may wish to permit those potential suppliers 30 that cannot provide the entire quantity of goods to participate in one or more rounds of the auction, for example, to assure that a minimum number of bidders 30 participate in the auction, or because they are preferred suppliers 30.
  • The sponsor 10 may wish to contract for all of desired goods or services at one time despite of the inability of all bidders 30 to provide all desired goods or services. Thus, the sponsor 10 may choose to award contracts to multiple low bidders 30 or may conduct multiple rounds of bidding and award contracts to the lowest bidder 30 in each round until the total quantity of goods desired has been purchased. If the sponsor 10 desires to conduct bidding in rounds, at 208, the sponsor 10 may formulate a rule conditioning the inclusion of a bidder 30 in a subsequent auction round on that bidder 30 having not been awarded a contract in a preceding round. That rule may or may not be expressed to potential bidders 30 before the opening of, or during, a given auction round. Thus at 210, the sponsor 10 may conduct a first round auction, the outcome of which is an award of a contract to the lowest bidder 30 at 212. The sponsor 10 will then apply the rule that awarded bidders 30 may not participate in subsequent rounds to an appropriate occurrence in the first round of the auction at 214. In the present example, the rule is applied to the outcome and, more specifically, to the awarded bidder 30, to determine participation in the second auction round. Thus, in the example of FIG. 5, the bidder 30 that is awarded a contract in the first auction round may not participate in the second auction round. At 218, the sponsor 10 will determine whether additional goods or services should to be purchased at that time, and if an additional purchase is to be made, an additional auction round will be conducted. The sponsor 10 will repeat the process of conducting an auction round at 210, awarding a contract at 212, applying the rule to the outcome at 214, and determining whether another auction round should be conducted at 218. Thus, the contract that is awarded each round may, for example, cover a portion of the entire quantity of goods or services desired to be purchased in the auction.
  • When more than two rounds of bidding are contemplated, under the circumstances described in connection with FIG. 5, the sponsor 10 may condition participation in subsequent rounds on having not received an award in any preceding round. Thus, the sponsor 10 may subtract the amount of goods purchased thus far in the auction from the amount of goods needed to determine whether additional goods need to be purchased at 218. If additional goods need to be purchased, the sponsor 10 will typically return to 210 and conduct an additional auction round that does not include successful bidders 30 from previous rounds. The sponsor 10 will then repeat the process of conducting an auction round at 210, awarding a contract at 212, applying the rule to the outcome at 214, and determining whether another auction round should be conducted at 218, until no further auction rounds are necessary.
  • FIG. 6 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention, wherein a purchasing sponsor 10 has little experience with electronic auctions, at least in connection with goods to be purchased at that time, and wherein the sponsor 10 will conduct a second auction round including qualified bidders 30 from a first auction round. Such a sponsor 10 may wish to learn from an early auction round and make alterations in subsequent rounds. As in the example illustrated previously in FIG. 5, the sponsor 10 prepares an RFQ at 302 and provides that RFQ to potential bidders 30 at 304. At 306, the potential bidders 30 respond to the RFQ. In the specific embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6, the sponsor 10 is interested in determining which bidders 30 will actively participate in an initial auction round. Therefore, the sponsor 10 will initiate a first auction round for purchasing a portion of the total goods to be purchased in the auction. Prior to conducting the first auction round, however, the sponsor 10 will create a rule at 308 for including a bidder 30 in a subsequent auction round that is based on an occurrence in the first auction round. That rule may or may not be expressed to the potential bidders 30. The rule utilized in the example depicted in FIG. 6 limits inclusion in subsequent auction rounds to bidders 30 ranking in the top three bidders 30 in the first auction round. Thus, only the top three bidders 30 in the first auction round will be permitted to participate in subsequent auction rounds. Reasons for limiting the number of bidders 30 include, but are not limited to, a desire to minimize the number of entities that may view the auction to protect privacy, to remove bidders 30 who are unlikely to be competitive, and to narrow the field for interactive bidding in order to reduce the number of bidders to only those that will be active and save on computer and human resources that support the auction. Other rules that may be utilized include, but are not limited to, permitting only those bidders 30 that place a minimum number of bids to participate subsequently, allowing only those bidders 30 whose best bids fall within a certain number or percentage of dollars or other units of the leading bid to participate in subsequent auction rounds, and/or allowing only non-leading bidders (i.e., bidders that did not win an award in a previous round) to participate in a subsequent round. Other factors, such as quality, could also be utilized in formulating the rules. In an auction where geographic location is important, the bidders that are permitted to participate in a subsequent round may, for example, be those that are both competitive in pricing and are located close to the sponsor. A rule could thus be established that creates a ranking that includes both bid price and distance. When factored together, a different list of bidders might be formed than if price alone were used.
  • After the rule has been formulated, an auction round will be conducted at 310. At 314, the rule is applied to the appropriate occurrence or occurrences of the first auction round to select, in the example provided in FIG. 6, the three lead bidders 30 for participation in the next auction round. At 318, a determination is made as to whether another auction round is to be conducted. If another auction round is to be conducted, the sponsor 10 will repeat the process of conducting an auction round at 310, applying the rule to the outcome at 314, and determining whether another auction round should be conducted at 318, until no further auction rounds are necessary. It is noted that a rule formulated in, for example, a first round auction, may be applied to one or more subsequent auction rounds. Furthermore, additional rules may be developed in rounds subsequent to the first round. Thus a single rule, formulated during or after the first auction, may, for example, be the only rule applied to subsequent auction rounds. Alternately, one or more rules formulated in preceding rounds may be applied in varying combinations to subsequent auction rounds. Also, in multiple round auctions, no rule may be applied to certain rounds.
  • Various forms of auctions may also be utilized in different rounds in the present invention. For example, a purchasing sponsor 10 may conduct a sealed bid type first round auction, wherein each bidder 30 submits a single bid to the sponsor 10 in, for example, a sealed envelope, or through an electronic sealed bid collection mechanism. The sponsor 10 may then view all of the bids at a prearranged time. The sponsor 10 may select a winning bidder 30, usually on the basis of the lowest bid submitted, at that time, or the sponsor may use the sealed bids solely to make a decision as to how the second round auction will be conducted. The second round auction could then be, for example, an electronic auction in which only bidders 30 qualifying in the first round auction are permitted to participate. For example, in a certain auction a first round sealed bid is used to determine which bidders 30 qualify to participate in a second round auction to follow.
  • In another example, a large base of suppliers, which may be, for example, two hundred suppliers, would create a cumbersome electronic auction if all two hundred suppliers participated in that auction. Thus, it may be beneficial to have a simplified round of bidding following which only the best ranked bidders are allowed to move on to an interactive auction. In this example the two hundred bidders may submit bids in an offline auction round. The top bidders may then be allowed to participate in a second, online auction round. Thus, for example, the top ten percent, or twenty bidders in the example provided, in the first round auction may be permitted to participate in the second online auction round.
  • In another embodiment, wherein similar or identical goods or services are purchased in both the first and second rounds, the first round price is utilized as an initial and/or ceiling bid for each bidder 30 in the second round. Where the sealed bid is utilized as an initial and a ceiling bid, the sealed bid price submitted by each bidder 30 qualifying to participate in the second round auction is entered as an initial bid for that bidder 30 at the beginning of the second round auction and bidders 30 are not permitted to place bids greater than that initial ceiling bid throughout the second round auction. Of course, the initial ceiling bid may also be utilized in additional rounds subsequent to the second round. Furthermore, as may be seen in the previous example, multiple rules may be formulated from one or more auction rounds and those rules may determine which bidders 30 qualify to participate in future rounds, bidder 30 initial bid pricing, and/or ceiling bid level for each bidder 30. As will be recognized by one skilled in the art, any of a variety of decisions that may be based on prior bidding history may also be considered when determining rules and conditions for subsequent auction rounds. For example, the quantity of goods to be auctioned in a round may be determined by pricing levels achieved for various quantities in previous rounds or quantities offered by bidders in previous rounds.
  • In certain circumstances, a purchasing sponsor 10 may desire to purchase goods from two or more suppliers 30. In such a situation, a single supplier 30 may be able to provide the entire quantity of goods desired. Multiple bidders 30, furthermore, typically do not place equal low bids. Thus, there may be a financial benefit to the sponsor 10 to purchase all goods from the lowest bidding supplier 30. The sponsor 10 may, however, desire to purchase goods from multiple bidders 30, for example, to assure a steady supply of goods where the sponsor 10 envisions a likelihood that one supplier 30 may, for example, have production problems that interrupt delivery of a critical component. The sponsor 10 may, therefore, wish to award contracts to multiple low bidders 30 or may conduct multiple rounds of bidding and award contracts to the lowest bidder 30 in each round until the total quantity of goods desired has been purchased.
  • An embodiment of the present invention, wherein the sponsor 10 wishes to purchase a good from two suppliers 30 in two auction rounds to assure a steady supply of that critical good, is described with reference to FIG. 5. In that embodiment, that critical good is a necessary component for operation of many products manufactured by the sponsor 10. Furthermore, the sponsor 10 has previously experienced shortages of the critical good because a single supplier 30 had encountered production problems. Thus, the sponsor 10 wishes to purchase between 50% and 70% of the expected supply of the critical good that the sponsor 10 will need over the next year from a single bidder 30 in a first round auction. The sponsor 10 wishes furthermore to purchase the remainder of the critical good that it will need over the next year from a different single bidder in a second round auction.
  • The critical good embodiment will be further described with reference to FIG. 5, and the critical good will be assumed to be an integrated circuit. Thus, at 202 of FIG. 5, the sponsor 10 prepares an RFQ stating its integrated circuit requirements including the quantity of integrated circuits that are projected to be needed over the next year, and a requirement that any participating bidder 30 must be able to provide at least 50% of the total quantity needed over the next year. The sponsor 10 also provides an optional statement in the RFQ informing the bidders 30 that the auction will be conducted in two rounds and only 50% to 70% of the total integrated circuit requirement will be purchased from the successful bidder 30 in the first auction round. The RFQ is provided to potential suppliers 30 at 204 and the potential suppliers 30 respond to the RFQ at 206. As previously discussed in connection with FIG. 5, the sponsor 10 formulates a rule conditioning the inclusion of a bidder 30 in a subsequent auction round on that bidder 30 having not been awarded a contract in a preceding round. Thus, as desired, the bidder 30 awarded a contract in the first auction round will not participate in the second auction round, and so may not be awarded an additional contract in the second auction round. At 210, the sponsor 10 conducts a first round auction, the outcome of which is an award of a contract to the lowest bidder 30, at 212. That bidder 30 may be given an option at the time of the award to select the quantity of integrated circuits that it will provide under the contract, with the constraints that the awarded bidder 30 must provide between 50% and 70% of the total requirements. Alternately, the awarded bidder 30 may state the maximum quantity of integrated circuits that it can provide prior to commencement of the auction and be awarded the lesser of that maximum quantity or 70% of the sponsor requirement, for example. The contracted quantity of goods may also be provided by utilizing any other known method of making such a determination. The sponsor 10 will then apply the rule that awarded bidders 30 may not participate in subsequent rounds to the second auction round at 214, and conduct a second auction round accordingly. The winning bidder 30 in the second auction round will then be awarded a contract for the remaining quantity of goods required by the sponsor 10.
  • While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof. In particular, it should be noted that while the auction functions described above have been described in the context of downward pricing (reverse) auctions, the auction functions can be equally applied to upward pricing (forward) auctions. Thus, it is intended that the present invention cover the modifications and variations of this invention provided they come within the scope of the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims (25)

1. A method of conducting an auction, comprising:
defining, prior to a first auction, a rule for a second auction based at least in part on user input, the rule limiting participation of bidders in the second auction based on an occurrence in the first auction;
conducting the first auction; and
conducting the second auction in accordance with an application of the rule to an occurrence in the first auction.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the occurrence includes an outcome of the first auction.
3. (canceled)
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the rule includes selecting at least two leading bidders from the first auction.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the rule includes permitting only the at least two leading bidders to participate in the second auction.
6. (canceled)
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the rule includes not permitting a winning bidder of the first auction to participate in the second auction.
8. (canceled)
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the bidders are electronically coupled to an auction coordinator during the conducting of the first and second auctions.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the bidders submit bids to the auction coordinator online during the conducting of the first and second auctions.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the first auction is a reverse auction.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the first auction is a forward auction.
13. (canceled)
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the rule includes permitting only bidders bidding less than a predetermined amount in the first auction to participate in the second auction.
15-29. (canceled)
30. A system for conducting an auction, comprising:
a processor configured to:
define, prior to a first auction, a rule for a second auction based at least in part on user input, the rule limiting participation of bidders in the second auction based on an occurrence in the first auction;
conduct the first auction; and
conduct the second auction in accordance with an application of the rule to an occurrence in the first auction; and
a memory coupled to the processor and configured to provide the processor with instructions.
31. The system of claim 30, wherein the occurrence includes an outcome of the first auction.
32. The system of claim 30, wherein the rule includes selecting at least two leading bidders from the first auction.
33. The system of claim 30, wherein the rule includes not permitting a winning bidder of the first auction to participate in the second auction.
34. The system of claim 30, wherein the first auction is a reverse auction.
35. The system of claim 30, wherein the first auction is a forward auction.
36. A computer program product for conducting an auction, the computer program product being embodied in a tangible computer readable storage medium and comprising computer instructions for:
defining, prior to a first auction, a rule for a second auction based at least in part on user input, the rule limiting participation of bidders in the second auction based on an occurrence in the first auction;
conducting the first auction; and
conducting the second auction in accordance with an application of the rule to an occurrence in the first auction.
37. The computer program product of claim 36, wherein the occurrence includes an outcome of the first auction.
38. The computer program product of claim 36, wherein the rule includes not permitting a winning bidder of the first auction to participate in the second auction.
39. The computer program product of claim 36, wherein the rule includes permitting only bidders bidding less than a predetermined amount in the first auction to participate in the second auction.
US11/980,099 1998-09-18 2007-10-30 Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds Abandoned US20080162330A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10114198P true 1998-09-18 1998-09-18
US11084698P true 1998-12-04 1998-12-04
US09/252,790 US6230146B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-02-19 Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots
US09/753,074 US7599878B2 (en) 1999-02-19 2000-12-29 Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds
US11/980,099 US20080162330A1 (en) 1998-09-18 2007-10-30 Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/980,099 US20080162330A1 (en) 1998-09-18 2007-10-30 Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/753,074 Continuation US7599878B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2000-12-29 Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080162330A1 true US20080162330A1 (en) 2008-07-03

Family

ID=27379135

Family Applications (10)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/252,790 Expired - Lifetime US6230146B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-02-19 Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots
US09/311,559 Expired - Lifetime US6223167B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for handling disruptions in the management of electronic auctions
US09/311,558 Expired - Lifetime US6499018B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for controlling bidding in electronic auctions using bidder-specific bid limitations
US09/311,555 Expired - Lifetime US6230147B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for controlling an electronic auction during the transition to a closed state
US09/311,557 Expired - Lifetime US6216114B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime intervals in electronic auctions
US09/311,556 Expired - Lifetime US6199050B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for bidding in electronic auctions using flexible bidder-determined line-item guidelines
US09/311,582 Expired - Lifetime US6408283B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for maintaining the integrity of electronic auctions using a configurable bid monitoring agent
US11/980,136 Abandoned US20080071672A1 (en) 1998-09-18 2007-10-30 Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction
US11/980,099 Abandoned US20080162330A1 (en) 1998-09-18 2007-10-30 Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds
US11/982,388 Expired - Fee Related US7813966B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2007-10-31 Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime interval in electronic auctions

Family Applications Before (8)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/252,790 Expired - Lifetime US6230146B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-02-19 Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots
US09/311,559 Expired - Lifetime US6223167B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for handling disruptions in the management of electronic auctions
US09/311,558 Expired - Lifetime US6499018B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for controlling bidding in electronic auctions using bidder-specific bid limitations
US09/311,555 Expired - Lifetime US6230147B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for controlling an electronic auction during the transition to a closed state
US09/311,557 Expired - Lifetime US6216114B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime intervals in electronic auctions
US09/311,556 Expired - Lifetime US6199050B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for bidding in electronic auctions using flexible bidder-determined line-item guidelines
US09/311,582 Expired - Lifetime US6408283B1 (en) 1998-09-18 1999-05-14 Method and system for maintaining the integrity of electronic auctions using a configurable bid monitoring agent
US11/980,136 Abandoned US20080071672A1 (en) 1998-09-18 2007-10-30 Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/982,388 Expired - Fee Related US7813966B2 (en) 1998-09-18 2007-10-31 Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime interval in electronic auctions

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (10) US6230146B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1114384A1 (en)
JP (1) JP2002525760A (en)
AU (1) AU6392999A (en)
CA (1) CA2344253A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2000017797A1 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060242056A1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2006-10-26 Walker Jay S System and method for encouraging competitive participation in an auction
US20090182632A1 (en) * 2008-01-14 2009-07-16 Joseph Tsiyoni Internet trading
US20090198609A1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2009-08-06 Oracle International Corporation Facilitating multi-phase electronic bid evaluation
US20100030621A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2010-02-04 Inderpal Guglani Apparatus Configured to Host an Online Marketplace
US20100076860A1 (en) * 2008-09-23 2010-03-25 Edisher Kaghashvili Online Timeshift Auctions
US8392317B2 (en) 2010-11-09 2013-03-05 Ariba, Inc. Facilitating electronic auction of prepayment of an invoice
US20130246219A1 (en) * 2012-03-14 2013-09-19 Google Inc. Ranking and optimizing trips
US8612300B2 (en) 2006-09-08 2013-12-17 Ariba, Inc. Buyer/supplier network that aids supplier enablement through collaboration between buyers and suppliers
US8688537B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2014-04-01 Ariba, Inc. Maintenance of a company profile of a company associated with a supplier/buyer commerce network
US8719141B1 (en) * 2004-10-26 2014-05-06 Optimaret, Inc. Apparatus and method for conducting a recurring auction using a participant retention mechanism
US8732036B2 (en) 2010-05-07 2014-05-20 Ariba, Inc. Supplier/buyer network that provides catalog updates
US20140279137A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Ebay Inc. Methods, systems, and apparatus for dynamic bid resolution
US9836773B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2017-12-05 Ariba, Inc. Evaluation and selection of quotes of a commerce network
US9990634B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2018-06-05 Ariba, Inc. Managing an experience of a member organization of a collaborative commerce community through a network

Families Citing this family (362)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5710000A (en) * 1994-09-16 1998-01-20 Affymetrix, Inc. Capturing sequences adjacent to Type-IIs restriction sites for genomic library mapping
US7937312B1 (en) * 1995-04-26 2011-05-03 Ebay Inc. Facilitating electronic commerce transactions through binding offers
US7702540B1 (en) 1995-04-26 2010-04-20 Ebay Inc. Computer-implement method and system for conducting auctions on the internet
US6243691B1 (en) * 1996-03-29 2001-06-05 Onsale, Inc. Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
US7747507B2 (en) * 1996-05-23 2010-06-29 Ticketmaster L.L.C. Computer controlled auction system
US5794207A (en) * 1996-09-04 1998-08-11 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers
US6850907B2 (en) * 1996-12-13 2005-02-01 Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. Automated price improvement protocol processor
US5905974A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-05-18 Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Automated auction protocol processor
US6598029B1 (en) * 1997-02-24 2003-07-22 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for energy supply with request for service
US7268700B1 (en) 1998-01-27 2007-09-11 Hoffberg Steven M Mobile communication device
US7599878B2 (en) * 1999-02-19 2009-10-06 Ariba, Inc. Method, apparatus, and system for bidding in rounds
US7499876B2 (en) * 1999-02-19 2009-03-03 Ariba, Inc. Method and apparatus for configurably adjusting a bid in an online auction
US7152043B2 (en) * 1999-02-19 2006-12-19 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions
US6230146B1 (en) 1998-09-18 2001-05-08 Freemarkets, Inc. Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots
US20020077959A1 (en) * 1999-02-19 2002-06-20 Marc Alaia Method and system for using line item bid limits in electonic auctions
US7383206B2 (en) * 1999-02-19 2008-06-03 Ariba, Inc. Method and apparatus for multiple variable bidding in an online auction
US7283980B2 (en) * 1999-05-14 2007-10-16 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime intervals in electronic auctions
US7225152B2 (en) * 1999-02-19 2007-05-29 Ariba, Inc. Method, apparatus, and system for varying an award volume in an auction
US7451106B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2008-11-11 E-Lynxx Corporation System and method for competitive pricing and procurement of customized goods and services
US6647373B1 (en) * 1998-12-24 2003-11-11 John Carlton-Foss Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic reverse auction information
US8086518B1 (en) 2000-12-29 2011-12-27 Ariba, Inc. Allotting an award volume in an auction
US20020026321A1 (en) 1999-02-26 2002-02-28 Sadeg M. Faris Internet-based system and method for fairly and securely enabling timed-constrained competition using globally time-sychronized client subsystems and information servers having microsecond client-event resolution
US6963854B1 (en) * 1999-03-05 2005-11-08 Manugistics, Inc. Target pricing system
US7617144B2 (en) * 1999-03-19 2009-11-10 Primex Holdings Llc Auction market with price improvement mechanism
US7107227B1 (en) * 1999-03-29 2006-09-12 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for publicizing commercial transactions on a computer network
US7840476B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2010-11-23 Ariba, Inc. Transformation bidding with tooling requirements
US7249085B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2007-07-24 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with multi-parameter price equalization bidding
US7392214B1 (en) * 1999-04-30 2008-06-24 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for trading
US7165046B2 (en) * 2000-05-18 2007-01-16 Efficient Auctions Llc System and method for an efficient dynamic multi-unit auction
US6536037B1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2003-03-18 Accenture Llp Identification of redundancies and omissions among components of a web based architecture
US6564192B1 (en) * 1999-06-08 2003-05-13 Freemarkets, Inc. Method and system for differential index bidding in online auctions
US6629082B1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2003-09-30 W.R. Hambrecht & Co. Auction system and method for pricing and allocation during capital formation
US7330826B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2008-02-12 Perfect.Com, Inc. Method, system and business model for a buyer's auction with near perfect information using the internet
US6525747B1 (en) * 1999-08-02 2003-02-25 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for conducting a discussion relating to an item
US20030093355A1 (en) * 1999-08-12 2003-05-15 Gabriel N. Issa, Llc Method, system and computer site for conducting an online auction
US6347444B1 (en) * 1999-08-24 2002-02-19 Jason Irby Method for refurbishing an automotive wheel
US7685048B1 (en) 1999-09-01 2010-03-23 Bloomberg L.P. Electronic trading system for forwards spread trades
US8429055B1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2013-04-23 Ebay, Inc. Method for internet bidding
US7801802B2 (en) * 1999-09-02 2010-09-21 Walker Digital, Llc Method, system and computer program product for facilitating an auction behavior and automatic bidding in an auction
US6892186B1 (en) * 1999-09-15 2005-05-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Auction method and apparatus for electronic commerce
US20030216993A1 (en) * 1999-09-20 2003-11-20 Eyal Goldwerger System, method and computer program product for providing online service contract negotiation service
US6449611B1 (en) * 1999-09-30 2002-09-10 Fred Frankel Business model for recovery of missing goods, persons, or fugitive or disbursements of unclaimed goods using the internet
US7085740B1 (en) * 1999-10-04 2006-08-01 Raphael Meyers Method and apparatus for conducting auctions
US20030158810A1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2003-08-21 Naiem Dathi Method, system, and apparatus for open services architecture
US20020069134A1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2002-06-06 Neal Solomon System, method and apparatus for aggregation of cooperative intelligent agents for procurement in a distributed network
US20020046157A1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2002-04-18 Neal Solomon System, method and apparatus for demand-initiated intelligent negotiation agents in a distributed network
US7395237B1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2008-07-01 Leanlogistics, Inc. Methods and apparatus for connecting shippers and carriers in the third party logistics environment via the internet
US20030074301A1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2003-04-17 Neal Solomon System, method, and apparatus for an intelligent search agent to access data in a distributed network
US20020055903A1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2002-05-09 Neal Solomon System, method, and apparatus for a cooperative communications network
US6876991B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2005-04-05 Collaborative Decision Platforms, Llc. System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US7376611B1 (en) * 1999-11-12 2008-05-20 Sabre, Inc. Demand aggregation and distribution system
US6600497B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2003-07-29 Elliot A. Gottfurcht Apparatus and method to navigate interactive television using unique inputs with a remote control
US7020845B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2006-03-28 Gottfurcht Elliot A Navigating internet content on a television using a simplified interface and a remote control
US20060229930A9 (en) * 1999-11-15 2006-10-12 Gottfurcht Elliot A Method to generate advertising revenue based on time and location
US7062446B1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2006-06-13 Dana Corporation Apparatus and method for tracking and managing physical assets
US20020082966A1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2002-06-27 Dana Commercial Credit Corporation System and method for benchmarking asset characteristics
US7130815B1 (en) 1999-11-16 2006-10-31 Softface, Inc. (A Subsidiary Of Ariba, Inc.) Method and system for conducting reserve request reverse auctions for electronic commerce
US20050131729A1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2005-06-16 Melby John M. Apparatus and method for tracking and managing physical assets
US6952680B1 (en) 1999-11-16 2005-10-04 Dana Corporation Apparatus and method for tracking and managing physical assets
US20060053075A1 (en) * 2001-11-26 2006-03-09 Aaron Roth System and method for tracking asset usage and performance
US20020077944A1 (en) * 1999-11-16 2002-06-20 Bly J. Aaron System and method for disposing of assets
US6847939B1 (en) * 1999-11-18 2005-01-25 Olsale.Com Ltd. System and method of conducting on-line auctions
US20020013763A1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2002-01-31 Harris Scott C. Real time auction with end game
US8170924B1 (en) * 1999-12-08 2012-05-01 Harris Technology, Llc Real time auction with end game
US7610233B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2009-10-27 Accenture, Llp System, method and article of manufacture for initiation of bidding in a virtual trade financial environment
US7167844B1 (en) 1999-12-22 2007-01-23 Accenture Llp Electronic menu document creator in a virtual financial environment
WO2001046833A2 (en) * 1999-12-23 2001-06-28 Logistics.Com, Inc. Bid positioning system
EP1244989A2 (en) * 1999-12-29 2002-10-02 Ebreviate, Inc. Sourcing system and method
US7231363B1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2007-06-12 Wall Corporation Method and system for rebrokering orders in a trading system
US7356498B2 (en) 1999-12-30 2008-04-08 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US9727916B1 (en) 1999-12-30 2017-08-08 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading exchange system having integrated quote risk monitoring and integrated quote modification services
US7792713B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2010-09-07 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for disguised price bidding in online auctions
US7835957B1 (en) * 2000-01-24 2010-11-16 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for correcting market failures with participant isolation in dutch style online auctions
US7233915B2 (en) * 2000-01-25 2007-06-19 Alan Metcalfe Electronic activity and business system and method
US7225151B1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2007-05-29 Brad S Konia Online auction bid management system and method
US7451107B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2008-11-11 Supply Chain Connect, Llc Business-to-business electronic commerce clearinghouse
AU3660901A (en) * 2000-02-01 2001-08-14 Digital Freight Exchange Inc Method and system for negotiating transportation contracts via a global computernetwork
US7401029B2 (en) * 2000-02-16 2008-07-15 Trx, Inc. Tool for analyzing corporate airline bids
US20020026401A1 (en) * 2000-02-21 2002-02-28 Hueler Kelli Hustad System and method for facilitating electronic bidding between buyers and sellers in financial industries
US7647270B2 (en) * 2000-03-08 2010-01-12 W.R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc System and methods for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
US7415436B1 (en) * 2000-03-08 2008-08-19 W. R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc System and method for pricing and allocation of commodities or securities
AU4202301A (en) * 2000-03-08 2001-09-17 Fuerst Shvadron A computer system and method for providing a seller/buyer environment over a network
US20010037280A1 (en) * 2000-03-09 2001-11-01 Ingraham Scott S. System and method for facilitating renting and purchasing relationships
US6665649B1 (en) * 2000-03-10 2003-12-16 International Business Machines Corporation Smooth end of auction on the internet
EP1358594A1 (en) * 2000-03-13 2003-11-05 Volt Information Sciences, Inc. System and method for internet based procurement of goods and services
JP2001265960A (en) * 2000-03-15 2001-09-28 Viva Computer Co Ltd System for real time internet auction
US7539628B2 (en) 2000-03-21 2009-05-26 Bennett James D Online purchasing system supporting buyer affordability screening
US20020004787A1 (en) * 2000-03-28 2002-01-10 Moshal David Clive Method for conducting an exchange over a network
US7797220B2 (en) * 2000-04-21 2010-09-14 Mcintyre Kevin A Range bid model
US8332302B1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2012-12-11 Galahad Entertainment, Llc Method and apparatus for auctioning items
GB2353876A (en) * 2000-05-02 2001-03-07 First Property Online Com Ltd Allocating an entity
KR20030009466A (en) * 2000-05-04 2003-01-29 맥킨지 앤드 컴퍼니, 인크. Method and apparatus for conducting a bidding session
US6393410B1 (en) * 2000-05-12 2002-05-21 Frederick Thompson Process and a system for listing information relating to a construction project over a computer network
GB2379537A (en) * 2000-05-18 2003-03-12 Treasuryconnect Llc Electronic trading systems and methods
US20070055578A1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2007-03-08 Commonwealth Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc. Internet and wireless integrated virtual presence
US6970886B1 (en) 2000-05-25 2005-11-29 Digimarc Corporation Consumer driven methods for associating content indentifiers with related web addresses
KR100400984B1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2003-10-08 정도현 System and method of auction
JP2002032614A (en) * 2000-06-26 2002-01-31 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> Auction system related to service provision, server, auction site, client terminal for participating in auction, network auction method, and storage medium
WO2002001322A2 (en) * 2000-06-28 2002-01-03 Rohsen Technology & Marketing, Inc. Methods and systems for business-to-business sourcing services
US20020007340A1 (en) * 2000-06-28 2002-01-17 Isaf Stephen T. Partner relationship management system
US20040186805A1 (en) * 2000-07-01 2004-09-23 Gologorsky Steven Phillip Sealed-bid auction comprising staged bid publication
US20040064399A1 (en) * 2000-07-01 2004-04-01 Gologorsky Steven Phillip Multi-variable computer-based auctions
WO2002003303A1 (en) * 2000-07-05 2002-01-10 Paid Search Engine Tools, L.L.C. Paid search engine bid management
JP2004517378A (en) * 2000-07-13 2004-06-10 マニュギスティックス・インコーポレイテッド System and method for optimizing the delivery and transport
JP2002049769A (en) * 2000-08-01 2002-02-15 Tsubasa System Co Ltd On-line transaction system
US20030220867A1 (en) * 2000-08-10 2003-11-27 Goodwin Thomas R. Systems and methods for trading and originating financial products using a computer network
US20020026400A1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2002-02-28 Bondglobe Inc. System and method to establish trading mechanisms employing auctions and reverse auctions
US7299207B1 (en) * 2000-08-23 2007-11-20 Demont & Breyer, Llc Data processing system that provides an auction with programmable proxy bids
US7908180B2 (en) * 2000-08-28 2011-03-15 Keith Goclowski Interactive vehicle auction and sale system
US20050015321A1 (en) * 2000-08-30 2005-01-20 Susanne Vindekilde System and method for listing offerings of commercial paper and other interests
DE10043860A1 (en) * 2000-09-04 2002-04-18 Volkswagen Ag Method and apparatus for performing an electronic auction in a communication network
WO2002021347A1 (en) * 2000-09-04 2002-03-14 Ozb2B Pty Ltd Materials supply contract system and method
JP2002109325A (en) * 2000-09-19 2002-04-12 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> System and method for buying merchandise, storage medium recorded with program for performing merchandise buying method and server used for the same
US7461024B2 (en) 2000-09-27 2008-12-02 Montgomery Rob R Bidder-side auction dynamic pricing agent, system, method and computer program product
US20020082978A1 (en) * 2000-09-29 2002-06-27 Ahmed Ghouri System and method for soliciting bids
US7340429B2 (en) * 2000-10-23 2008-03-04 Ebay Inc. Method and system to enable a fixed price purchase within a online auction environment
US7617145B1 (en) * 2000-10-24 2009-11-10 Worldwide Farm Equipment Auctions.Com Ltd. Adaptive bidding increments in an online auction system
US20020095307A1 (en) * 2000-10-27 2002-07-18 Manugistics, Inc. System and method for inventory and capacity availability management
US7668761B2 (en) * 2000-10-27 2010-02-23 Jda Software Group System and method for ensuring order fulfillment
US7321872B1 (en) * 2000-10-30 2008-01-22 Chicago Board Options Exchange Automated trading exchange system and method utilizing a randomized opening procedures
US7870054B2 (en) * 2000-11-10 2011-01-11 Ariba, Inc. Method, apparatus and system for advancing a bidder to a selected rank
US7634439B1 (en) 2000-11-14 2009-12-15 Ariba, Inc. Method and apparatus to perform buy versus leasing transformational bidding
US7702560B1 (en) 2000-11-16 2010-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for interactive offer system
WO2002042981A1 (en) * 2000-11-22 2002-05-30 Ausubel Lawrence M System and method for a dynamic auction with package bidding
US8103574B2 (en) * 2000-11-29 2012-01-24 International Business Machines Corporation Online offer and bid management with sealed bids
US7299206B2 (en) 2000-11-30 2007-11-20 Ebay Inc. Method and system to implement seller authorized buying privileges within a network-based shopping facility
US7047215B2 (en) * 2000-12-06 2006-05-16 International Business Machines Corporation Parts requirement planning system and method across an extended supply chain
US7720744B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2010-05-18 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for shifting bids and offers in a trading interface
US7146334B2 (en) * 2000-12-08 2006-12-05 Xerox Corporation System and method of determining latent demand for at least one of a plurality of commodities
US20030088494A1 (en) * 2000-12-11 2003-05-08 Juhnyoung Lee Business method and system for expediting request for quotation (RFQ) processes in a network environment
CA2329282A1 (en) * 2000-12-21 2002-06-21 Worldwide Farm Equipment Auctions.Com Ltd. Method of prebidding in a combined auction format
US20020138391A1 (en) * 2000-12-23 2002-09-26 Kroeger Dann E. System, method and article of manufacture for a bid manager in an integrated scheduling and document management framework
US20020087456A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-07-04 Daniel Abeshouse Method, apparatus, and system for synchronizing timing of an auction throug a computer network
US20020087382A1 (en) * 2001-01-03 2002-07-04 Tiburcio Vincio B. Method and system for assigning and tracking tasks, such as under an electronic auction
US7359874B2 (en) * 2001-01-08 2008-04-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for facilitating parts procurement and production planning across an extended supply chain
CN102024347A (en) 2001-01-09 2011-04-20 托普科德公司 Systems and methods for coding competitions
JP3505619B2 (en) * 2001-01-17 2004-03-08 ミネベア株式会社 Planar lighting device
US7865420B1 (en) * 2001-01-22 2011-01-04 Voyager Technologies, Inc. Real time electronic commerce telecommunication system and method
US8200547B2 (en) * 2001-01-22 2012-06-12 Voyager Technologies, Inc. Real time electronic commerce telecommunication system and method
US20020103721A1 (en) * 2001-01-31 2002-08-01 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic catalog for on-line offering and bid system
US7720745B2 (en) * 2001-02-06 2010-05-18 Oracle International Corporation Method and system for implementing catalog inventory auctions in an electronic exchange
US7734505B2 (en) * 2001-02-06 2010-06-08 Oracle International Corporation Method and system for implementing automatic auction extensions and adjustable bid increments in an electronic exchange
US7412412B2 (en) * 2001-02-12 2008-08-12 Avotus Inc. Network reverse auction and spending analysis methods
US7072061B2 (en) * 2001-02-13 2006-07-04 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for extracting information from RFQ documents and compressing RFQ files into a common RFQ file type
US7084998B2 (en) * 2001-02-13 2006-08-01 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for processing files using a printer driver
US20020111839A1 (en) * 2001-02-13 2002-08-15 Nitin Nayak Method and system for forming dynamic vendor coalitions in collaborative e-commerce
US7277878B2 (en) 2001-02-13 2007-10-02 Ariba, Inc. Variable length file header apparatus and system
US8380608B2 (en) * 2001-02-15 2013-02-19 Ariba, Inc. System and method for creating a spot market
US20020111895A1 (en) * 2001-02-15 2002-08-15 Blair William R. System and method for creating catalog neutral products
US20020120702A1 (en) * 2001-02-26 2002-08-29 Schiavone Vincent J. Method and apparatus for dynamic prioritization of electronic mail messages
US20020120692A1 (en) * 2001-02-26 2002-08-29 Schiavone Vincent J. System and method for conducting predefined transactions via an electronic mail messaging infrastructure
US7475025B2 (en) 2001-03-08 2009-01-06 International Business Machines Corporation Read-only user access for web based auction
US20020147655A1 (en) * 2001-03-19 2002-10-10 Say Mustafa Erhan Method of exchanging goods by an auction
US7801793B2 (en) 2001-03-29 2010-09-21 International Business Machines Corporation User-specified time-based proxy firing in online auctions
US6818006B2 (en) * 2001-04-03 2004-11-16 Medtronic Vascular, Inc. Temporary intraluminal filter guidewire
US7533187B1 (en) * 2001-04-05 2009-05-12 Marcellino Tanumihardja Wireless device detection
US7386589B1 (en) 2001-04-05 2008-06-10 Remote Sales, Llc Managed messaging platform with message response aggregation
US20060095357A1 (en) * 2001-04-05 2006-05-04 Remote Sales LLC, a limited liability corporation of the State of Nevada Wireless payment processing
US7827087B2 (en) * 2001-04-24 2010-11-02 Goldman Sachs & Co. Automated securities trade execution system and method
US20020198931A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2002-12-26 Murren Brian T. Architecture and process for presenting application content to clients
US7346921B2 (en) * 2001-04-30 2008-03-18 Ge Capital Corporation Definition of low-level security rules in terms of high-level security concepts
US20030078949A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2003-04-24 Scholz Bernhard J. Automatic generation of forms with input validation
US20030009433A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2003-01-09 Murren Brian T. Automatic identification of computer program attributes
US7519546B2 (en) * 2001-04-30 2009-04-14 General Electric Company Maintaining synchronization of information published to multiple subscribers
US7392217B2 (en) * 2001-05-09 2008-06-24 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for controlling traders from manipulating electronic trading markets
US7213000B2 (en) * 2001-05-10 2007-05-01 International Business Machines Corporation Reserve price auctioning
AUPR557001A0 (en) * 2001-06-08 2001-07-12 G.H. Michell & Sons (Australia) Pty. Ltd. Wool tender selling system
US7653584B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2010-01-26 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated execution system having participation
US7272575B2 (en) * 2001-07-13 2007-09-18 Lilly Mae Vega Method and system for facilitating service transactions
US20040210490A1 (en) * 2001-08-30 2004-10-21 Almstead Karl F. Tool for managing bids
US7890375B2 (en) * 2001-07-31 2011-02-15 Half.Com, Inc. Method and system to facilitate pre-ordering via an electronic commerce facility, and to automatically facilitate satisfying of a pre-order upon listing of an appropriate offer via the electronic commerce facility
US7702561B2 (en) * 2001-07-31 2010-04-20 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic method for generating a mathematical program to identify an optimal all-or-nothing bid set for procurement-related reverse auctions
US20030036975A1 (en) * 2001-08-02 2003-02-20 Martin Joshua J.D. Method of conducting an electronic rolling auction permitting the auction sponsor to make changes to the auctioned item
US20030055662A1 (en) * 2001-09-18 2003-03-20 Kevin Collins System and method for auditing electronic auctions
US7475036B2 (en) * 2001-09-24 2009-01-06 Areun, Inc. Computer web-based auction platform
US7765142B2 (en) * 2001-10-01 2010-07-27 Thomson Licensing Apparatus and methods for measuring multimedia demand and for maximizing broadcast channel utilization
US7536362B2 (en) * 2001-11-07 2009-05-19 Ariba, Inc. Method for selecting an optimal balance between direct cost and a number of suppliers
US7359878B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2008-04-15 Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution, Inc. Pricing apparatus for resolving energy imbalance requirements in real-time
US8126799B2 (en) * 2002-01-09 2012-02-28 Ariba, Inc. Method of bidding to drive competition in an auction
US20030135444A1 (en) * 2002-01-15 2003-07-17 Nachiappan Annamalai Multiple award optimization
US7146331B1 (en) 2002-01-17 2006-12-05 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for supplier prioritization
US20030158806A1 (en) * 2002-02-15 2003-08-21 Hanley James P. Automated ranked bid sales method and system
AUPS095702A0 (en) * 2002-03-07 2002-03-28 Ozb2B Pty Ltd System and method for conducting online auctions
US7350698B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2008-04-01 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Line item approval processing in an electronic purchasing system and method
US20060248504A1 (en) * 2002-04-08 2006-11-02 Hughes John M Systems and methods for software development
US7778866B2 (en) * 2002-04-08 2010-08-17 Topcoder, Inc. Systems and methods for software development
US7292990B2 (en) * 2002-04-08 2007-11-06 Topcoder, Inc. System and method for software development
US8776042B2 (en) * 2002-04-08 2014-07-08 Topcoder, Inc. Systems and methods for software support
US20070220479A1 (en) * 2006-03-14 2007-09-20 Hughes John M Systems and methods for software development
US7558745B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2009-07-07 Volt Information Sciences, Inc. Method of and system for enabling and managing sub-contracting entities
US7925568B2 (en) 2002-04-10 2011-04-12 Volt Information Sciences, Inc. Computer system and method for producing analytical data related to the project bid and requisition process
US20030200168A1 (en) * 2002-04-10 2003-10-23 Cullen Andrew A. Computer system and method for facilitating and managing the project bid and requisition process
US7698146B2 (en) * 2002-04-24 2010-04-13 Volt Information Sciences Inc. System and method for collecting and providing resource rate information using resource profiling
US7483852B2 (en) * 2002-04-24 2009-01-27 Ariba, Inc. Total value bidding
US8566730B2 (en) * 2003-04-25 2013-10-22 Daniel B. Alter Graphical user interface that identifies the reasons for public disagreements
US20040044614A1 (en) * 2002-05-07 2004-03-04 Roger Wagner Live auction using electronic auction paddles
US20030212604A1 (en) * 2002-05-09 2003-11-13 Cullen Andrew A. System and method for enabling and maintaining vendor qualification
US20040006530A1 (en) * 2002-07-03 2004-01-08 Freemarkets, Inc. Automated lotting
US20040019493A1 (en) * 2002-07-29 2004-01-29 Lois Townsend Support system for large transaction process
US7974908B1 (en) 2002-07-29 2011-07-05 Ariba, Inc. System and method for promoting competition in an auction
US8554650B1 (en) 2002-07-31 2013-10-08 Ariba, Inc. Importable template
US20040034590A1 (en) * 2002-08-19 2004-02-19 David Zinberg On-line auction
WO2004024867A2 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-03-25 University Of Florida Vigilant vector system
US7409360B1 (en) 2002-10-08 2008-08-05 Public Service Electric & Gas Company Method and system for computer-based auctioning of basic generation services
US8566212B2 (en) 2002-10-31 2013-10-22 Bgc Partners, Inc. Electronic systems and methods for providing a trading interface with advanced features
US7693747B2 (en) * 2002-10-31 2010-04-06 Ariba, Inc. Methods, system, and medium for initiating an online auction utilizing a line item detail report
US8930256B2 (en) * 2002-10-31 2015-01-06 Bgc Partners, Inc. Keyboard trading system
US7313688B2 (en) * 2003-06-11 2007-12-25 Bishop Jr James William Method and apparatus for private messaging among users supported by independent and interoperating couriers
US10366373B1 (en) 2002-12-09 2019-07-30 Live Nation Entertainment, Incorporated Apparatus for access control and processing
US9477820B2 (en) 2003-12-09 2016-10-25 Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. Systems and methods for using unique device identifiers to enhance security
US9740988B1 (en) 2002-12-09 2017-08-22 Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. System and method for using unique device indentifiers to enhance security
US7904346B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2011-03-08 Ebay Inc. Method and system to adjust a seller fixed price offer
US7921052B2 (en) * 2002-12-31 2011-04-05 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Efficient online auction style listings that encourage out-of-channel negotiation
WO2004061614A2 (en) * 2002-12-31 2004-07-22 Ebay Inc. Method and system for price negotiations in a network-based commerce system
US7593866B2 (en) 2002-12-31 2009-09-22 Ebay Inc. Introducing a fixed-price transaction mechanism in conjunction with an auction transaction mechanism
US7779247B2 (en) * 2003-01-09 2010-08-17 Jericho Systems Corporation Method and system for dynamically implementing an enterprise resource policy
US8126701B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2012-02-28 Ariba, Inc. Translation technology in electronic sourcing
US9818136B1 (en) 2003-02-05 2017-11-14 Steven M. Hoffberg System and method for determining contingent relevance
US7870017B2 (en) * 2003-02-26 2011-01-11 Efficient Frontier Method and apparatus for position bidding
US8489460B2 (en) 2003-02-26 2013-07-16 Adobe Systems Incorporated Method and apparatus for advertising bidding
DE10310911A1 (en) * 2003-03-13 2004-09-23 Adiva Computertechnologie Gmbh Internet auction computer system comprises an intermediary server which acts as an interface between a supplier server and an auction database server to facilitate insertion of a large number of product records
US20080091587A1 (en) * 2003-04-09 2008-04-17 Delacruz Cedric G System and method for pre-emptive auctioning
TW200421138A (en) * 2003-04-09 2004-10-16 Hon Hai Prec Ind Co Ltd Equipment outsourcing system and method
US20040215548A1 (en) * 2003-04-22 2004-10-28 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program product for receiving bids for multiple auctions and presenting real-time auction results
US8346653B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2013-01-01 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Automated trading system for routing and matching orders
US7613650B2 (en) * 2003-04-24 2009-11-03 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading securities or derivatives through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US7676421B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2010-03-09 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for providing an automated auction for internalization and complex orders in a hybrid trading system
US7552083B2 (en) * 2003-04-24 2009-06-23 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Hybrid trading system for concurrently trading through both electronic and open-outcry trading mechanisms
US7653588B2 (en) 2003-04-24 2010-01-26 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for providing order routing to a virtual crowd in a hybrid trading system
WO2004102323A2 (en) * 2003-05-06 2004-11-25 Dana Corporation System or method for analyzing information organized in a configurable manner
US20050080712A1 (en) * 2003-06-18 2005-04-14 Bauer David J. Online bidding system with interactive voice recognition interface
US7315832B2 (en) 2003-06-18 2008-01-01 Copart, Inc. Online bidding system
US7792828B2 (en) * 2003-06-25 2010-09-07 Jericho Systems Corporation Method and system for selecting content items to be presented to a viewer
US8676679B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2014-03-18 Bloomberg L.P. Counterparty credit limits in computerized trading
FR2857124A1 (en) * 2003-07-03 2005-01-07 Thomson Licensing Sa Method for processing online auctions in real time
US20050027614A1 (en) * 2003-07-25 2005-02-03 Chaterauction.Com Fractional private aircraft auction system and method
US20050065871A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-03-24 Nucenz Technologies, Inc. Collateralized loan market systems and methods
US20050071374A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Parker James Fredrick Method and system for computer implemented management of assembly manufacture
US20070043629A1 (en) * 2004-09-29 2007-02-22 Cmarket, Inc. Method and apparatus for creating a catalog for an on-line charitable auction or fund raising event from a virtual consignment database in accordance with an organization profile
US20050228742A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-10-13 Cmarket, Inc. Method and apparatus for creating and conducting on-line charitable fund raising activities with competitive events
US20050080715A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-04-14 Cmarket, Inc. Method and apparatus for creating and conducting on-line charitable fund raising activities
US20050086248A1 (en) * 2003-10-16 2005-04-21 Charles Atchison Issue tracking
US20050091140A1 (en) * 2003-10-24 2005-04-28 Jeff Sloan Valuation tool and method for electronic commerce including auction listings
US10002385B2 (en) * 2003-10-28 2018-06-19 Bgc Partners, Inc. Managing the execution of trades between market makers
US7853482B2 (en) 2003-10-28 2010-12-14 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Complex prices in bidding
US8131625B2 (en) * 2003-11-17 2012-03-06 Bgc Partners, Inc. Customizable trading display of market data
US8131626B2 (en) * 2003-11-17 2012-03-06 Bgc Partners, Inc. Customizable trading display of market data
US7783555B2 (en) 2003-12-11 2010-08-24 Ebay Inc. Auction with interest rate bidding
US8463627B1 (en) 2003-12-16 2013-06-11 Ticketmaster Systems and methods for queuing requests and providing queue status
US20050182705A1 (en) * 2004-01-08 2005-08-18 Mclemore Greg System and apparatus for bidding
CA2554270A1 (en) * 2004-01-29 2005-08-11 Ozb2B Pty. Ltd. Default final offers in online auctions
AU2005207980B2 (en) * 2004-01-29 2009-10-29 Ozb2B Pty Ltd Default final offers in online auctions
US8560355B2 (en) * 2004-02-19 2013-10-15 Idss (Internet Destination Sales System) Internet destination sales system with ASP-hosted member interface
WO2005079131A1 (en) * 2004-02-25 2005-09-01 Jean-Guy Moya Network auction system and method
WO2005084402A2 (en) * 2004-03-02 2005-09-15 Volt Information Sciences Inc. Method of and system for consultant re-seller business information transfer
US7584123B1 (en) 2004-04-06 2009-09-01 Ticketmaster Systems for dynamically allocating finite or unique resources
US20050228745A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-10-13 Cmarket, Inc. Method and apparatus for conducting on-line auction events in coordination with incentive promotion for bidders
US20050228746A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-10-13 Cmarket, Inc. Method and apparatus for contribution based placement of donor advertisements
US20050246265A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-11-03 Cmarket, Inc. Method and apparatus for assigning value to an item donated to an on-line charitable auction or fund raising event
US20050228744A1 (en) * 2004-04-09 2005-10-13 Cmarket, Inc. Method and apparatus for modifying the winning bid in an on-line auction to benefit a charitable organization
US20050240519A1 (en) * 2004-04-26 2005-10-27 Aiken Curtis E Sr System and method for automated commerce directed towards minority suppliers
US7974892B2 (en) 2004-06-23 2011-07-05 Concur Technologies, Inc. System and method for expense management
US7917414B2 (en) * 2004-06-28 2011-03-29 Joshua David Nathanson System and method for an automated sales system with remote negotiation and post-sale verification
WO2006019986A2 (en) * 2004-07-15 2006-02-23 The Nyse, Inc. System and method for a hybrid auction market
US8200568B2 (en) * 2004-07-21 2012-06-12 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for managing trading orders received from market makers
US7577605B2 (en) * 2004-08-04 2009-08-18 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for managing trading using alert messages for outlying trading orders
US7529707B2 (en) * 2004-08-04 2009-05-05 Bgc Partners, Inc. System and method for managing trading using alert messages for outlying trading orders
US8170946B2 (en) * 2004-08-21 2012-05-01 Co-Exprise, Inc. Cost management file translation methods, systems, and apparatuses for extended commerce
US20060041499A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2006-02-23 Transaxtions Llc Obtaining A Need With Guiding Information And Credit Worthiness Using A Competitive Process
US7590589B2 (en) 2004-09-10 2009-09-15 Hoffberg Steven M Game theoretic prioritization scheme for mobile ad hoc networks permitting hierarchal deference
US20060080210A1 (en) * 2004-09-23 2006-04-13 Pricegrabber.Com, Inc. System and network for obtaining competitive quotes on user-configured articles
JP2006099191A (en) * 2004-09-28 2006-04-13 Dee Corp Bid management device, bid management method, and bid management computer program
US20080065513A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-13 Cmarket, Inc. Method and apparatus for sponsoring a consignable item in an on-line charitable auction or fund raising event
JPWO2006057051A1 (en) * 2004-11-29 2008-06-05 富士通株式会社 Auction system and auction program
US7698169B2 (en) * 2004-11-30 2010-04-13 Ebay Inc. Method and system to provide wanted ad listing within an e-commerce system
SG159530A1 (en) * 2005-02-11 2010-03-30 Volt Inf Sciences Inc Project work change in plan/scope administrative and business information synergy system and method
US7945463B2 (en) * 2005-03-22 2011-05-17 Ticketmaster Apparatus and methods for providing queue messaging over a network
US9608929B2 (en) 2005-03-22 2017-03-28 Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. System and method for dynamic queue management using queue protocols
US20060218070A1 (en) * 2005-03-23 2006-09-28 Lange William W Method of advertising, marketing and auctioning real estate
US20090164361A1 (en) * 2005-03-23 2009-06-25 Lange William W Last Call for a Real Estate Property, a Chattel or a Financial Instrument for Online and Off-line Uses
GB2425626A (en) * 2005-03-24 2006-11-01 Espeed Inc System for protecting against erroneous price entries in the electronic trading of financial and other instruments
US7809629B2 (en) 2005-04-07 2010-10-05 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Market participant issue selection system and method
US8027904B2 (en) * 2005-05-04 2011-09-27 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating and trading corporate debt security derivative investment instruments
US20060253369A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2006-11-09 Chicago Board Options Exchange Method of creating and trading derivative investment products based on an average price of an underlying asset during a calculation period
US20080082436A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2008-04-03 Shalen Catherine T System And Method For Creating And Trading A Digital Derivative Investment Instrument
US8326716B2 (en) * 2005-05-04 2012-12-04 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating and trading derivative investment products based on a statistical property reflecting the variance of an underlying asset
US8326715B2 (en) 2005-05-04 2012-12-04 Chicago Board Operations Exchange, Incorporated Method of creating and trading derivative investment products based on a statistical property reflecting the variance of an underlying asset
US20060253368A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2006-11-09 Chicago Board Options Exchange System and method for creating and trading credit rating derivative investment instruments
US20060253355A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2006-11-09 Chicago Board Options Exchange System and method for creating and trading a digital derivative investment instrument
US8489489B2 (en) * 2005-05-05 2013-07-16 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for trading derivatives in penny increments while disseminating quotes for derivatives in nickel/dime increments
US7650307B2 (en) * 2005-06-28 2010-01-19 Ebay Inc. Method and system to enable a fixed price purchase within a multi-unit online auction environment
JP2009503733A (en) * 2005-08-01 2009-01-29 ヴォルト インフォメーション サイエンシズ インコーポレーテッドVolt Information Sciences Inc. Management system and method of outsourcing and service level agreements provisioning was
US8005744B2 (en) * 2005-09-23 2011-08-23 Alan Hamor Methods and systems for facilitating bids on products and services
US8874477B2 (en) 2005-10-04 2014-10-28 Steven Mark Hoffberg Multifactorial optimization system and method
US20070100738A1 (en) * 2005-10-21 2007-05-03 Mullendore Robert G Cyclical auction system supporting variable termination
US20080262943A1 (en) * 2005-10-21 2008-10-23 Mullendore Robert G Auction system supporting elastic auctions
US20070112646A1 (en) * 2005-10-27 2007-05-17 Seeley John E Method of bidding on the construction and installation of a fire alarm or security system
US20070106593A1 (en) * 2005-11-07 2007-05-10 Grant Lin Adaptive stochastic transaction system
US20070118432A1 (en) * 2005-11-21 2007-05-24 Vijay Vazirani Systems and methods for optimizing revenue in search engine auctions
US8229832B2 (en) * 2006-01-09 2012-07-24 Bgc Partners, Inc. Systems and methods for establishing first on the follow trading priority in electronic trading systems
US7770143B2 (en) * 2006-01-20 2010-08-03 Hughes John M System and method for design development
US9600822B2 (en) * 2006-02-06 2017-03-21 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Structured computer-assisted method and apparatus for filtering information presentation
WO2007092406A2 (en) 2006-02-07 2007-08-16 Ticketmaster Methods and systems for reducing burst usage of a networked computer system
US20070192180A1 (en) * 2006-02-10 2007-08-16 Lange William W Real estate media/prospect tracking system
US20070203823A1 (en) * 2006-02-24 2007-08-30 Michael Whelchel Systems and methods of providing online live auctions
US8005746B2 (en) * 2006-04-10 2011-08-23 Digimarc Corporation Auction methods and systems
US20070250378A1 (en) * 2006-04-24 2007-10-25 Hughes John M Systems and methods for conducting production competitions
US20080052146A1 (en) * 2006-05-01 2008-02-28 David Messinger Project management system
US20070288107A1 (en) * 2006-05-01 2007-12-13 Javier Fernandez-Ivern Systems and methods for screening submissions in production competitions
AU2007282165B2 (en) * 2006-05-09 2012-07-26 Ticketmaster Apparatus for access control and processing
US8024235B2 (en) * 2006-06-21 2011-09-20 Microsoft Corporation Automatic search functionality within business applications
US7831479B2 (en) * 2006-06-29 2010-11-09 Scargill Lawson S Method and program product for conducting an electronic auction including the automatic extension of auction end time
US20080015967A1 (en) * 2006-07-14 2008-01-17 Joseph Melville Gilmer Trend Contract
US20080306853A1 (en) * 2006-07-30 2008-12-11 Mclemore Greg System and Apparatus for Bidding
US7809630B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2010-10-05 Raytheon Company Method and system for prioritizing a bidder in an auction
US20080114671A1 (en) * 2006-11-09 2008-05-15 Ebay Inc. Cascade bidding
US8140425B2 (en) 2006-11-13 2012-03-20 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for generating and trading derivative investment instruments based on a volatility arbitrage benchmark index
US20080120249A1 (en) * 2006-11-17 2008-05-22 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method of creating and trading derivative investment products based on a statistical property reflecting the volatility of an underlying asset
US8073116B2 (en) * 2007-01-03 2011-12-06 At&T Intellectual Property I. L.P. Interactive handling of disputes
US20080167960A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2008-07-10 Topcoder, Inc. System and Method for Collective Response Aggregation
US20080196000A1 (en) * 2007-02-14 2008-08-14 Fernandez-Lvern Javier System and method for software development
US20080222055A1 (en) * 2007-03-07 2008-09-11 Hughes John M System and Method for Creating Musical Works
US8073792B2 (en) * 2007-03-13 2011-12-06 Topcoder, Inc. System and method for content development
US20080281760A1 (en) * 2007-04-30 2008-11-13 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation Service Negotiation
US7739154B1 (en) * 2007-05-03 2010-06-15 At&T Corp Method and system for dynamically extending the duration of an auction
US20080306854A1 (en) * 2007-06-05 2008-12-11 W.R. Hambrecht + Co., Llc Event Timing Mechanisms for Dutch Auction of Securities
JP5007861B2 (en) * 2007-06-15 2012-08-22 ヤフー株式会社 Bid support system
US20090030910A1 (en) * 2007-07-25 2009-01-29 Stephen Bennett Information storage and management system and method for automating online requests and transactions
NZ582897A (en) * 2007-08-07 2012-09-28 Ticketmaster L L C Allocating computing resources to authorised requesters based on ranking criteria
US8165953B2 (en) 2007-09-04 2012-04-24 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for creating and trading a derivative investment instrument over a range of index values
US20090111594A1 (en) * 2007-10-29 2009-04-30 Spence Charles H Billiards practice device
US20090204534A1 (en) * 2007-11-09 2009-08-13 Tilly Edward T Method and system for providing order routing to a virtual crowd in a hybrid trading system and executing an entire order
US8249972B2 (en) 2007-11-09 2012-08-21 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating a volatility benchmark index
US20090177555A1 (en) * 2008-01-02 2009-07-09 Milgrom Paul R Assignment exchange and auction
US8271345B1 (en) 2008-12-22 2012-09-18 Auctionomics Inc. Systems and method for incorporating bidder budgets in multi-item auctions
WO2009089447A1 (en) * 2008-01-11 2009-07-16 Topcoder, Inc. System and method for conducting competitions
US20090240628A1 (en) * 2008-03-20 2009-09-24 Co-Exprise, Inc. Method and System for Facilitating a Negotiation
US20100088250A1 (en) * 2008-10-03 2010-04-08 The Bank Of New York Mellon Auction Method and Platform
US8788381B2 (en) * 2008-10-08 2014-07-22 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated System and method for creating and trading a digital derivative investment instrument
JP5143711B2 (en) * 2008-11-28 2013-02-13 富士通フロンテック株式会社 Seri-bidding terminal and system
US20100217679A1 (en) * 2009-02-20 2010-08-26 Ira Eckstein Ticket trading method
US8050978B2 (en) * 2009-02-27 2011-11-01 Raytheon Company Method and system for an electronic marketplace for information products
US20100280937A1 (en) * 2009-05-01 2010-11-04 Hiatt Jr John C Method and system for creating and trading mortgage-backed security products
US7953647B2 (en) * 2009-07-15 2011-05-31 Ebay Inc. System and method for verifying bidding price
US8386330B1 (en) 2009-07-17 2013-02-26 Global Eprocure Tool for auction grouping by preference and extensions of time
US8788357B2 (en) * 2009-08-12 2014-07-22 Iqnavigator, Inc. System and method for productizing human capital labor employment positions/jobs
CN102640179A (en) * 2009-09-18 2012-08-15 奥多比公司 Advertisee-history-based bid generation system and method for multi-channel advertising
US8321322B2 (en) * 2009-09-28 2012-11-27 Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Method and system for creating a spot price tracker index
US20110307802A1 (en) * 2010-06-10 2011-12-15 Shreyank Gupta Review of requests to modify contextual data of a programming interface
US9781170B2 (en) 2010-06-15 2017-10-03 Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. Establishing communication links using routing protocols
CA2802686A1 (en) 2010-06-15 2011-12-22 Ticketmaster, Llc Methods and systems for computer aided event and venue setup and modeling and interactive maps
US8620750B2 (en) 2010-10-21 2013-12-31 Concur Technologies, Inc. Method and system for targeting messages to travelers
US8412559B2 (en) 2011-01-19 2013-04-02 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for improved calculation of coefficient for price sensitivity
US8504442B2 (en) 2011-05-06 2013-08-06 Adbucket Com Inc Bidding on a plurality of products or services with contingencies
US20120296757A1 (en) * 2011-05-17 2012-11-22 Smith Brendan A Iterative auction system and method
US20130054317A1 (en) 2011-08-24 2013-02-28 Raj Vasant Abhyanker Geospatially constrained gastronomic bidding
US9400959B2 (en) 2011-08-31 2016-07-26 Concur Technologies, Inc. Method and system for detecting duplicate travel path information
JP6199884B2 (en) * 2011-12-09 2017-09-20 パブマティック・インコーポレーテッドPubmatic,Incorporated Precision control applications that deliver online advertising
US9286601B2 (en) 2012-09-07 2016-03-15 Concur Technologies, Inc. Methods and systems for displaying schedule information
WO2015050585A1 (en) 2013-05-24 2015-04-09 Shrimp Trader, Inc. Methods and systems for product management
US20140379390A1 (en) 2013-06-20 2014-12-25 Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. Location-based presentations of ticket opportunities
US9807096B2 (en) 2014-12-18 2017-10-31 Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. Controlled token distribution to protect against malicious data and resource access

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6006194A (en) * 1997-10-01 1999-12-21 Merel; Peter A. Computer-implemented system for controlling resources and policies

Family Cites Families (78)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3581072A (en) 1968-03-28 1971-05-25 Frederick Nymeyer Auction market computation system
US3863060A (en) 1972-10-30 1975-01-28 Hewlett Packard Co General purpose calculator with capability for performing interdisciplinary business calculations
JPH0133869B2 (en) 1982-04-30 1989-07-17 Casio Computer Co Ltd
US4674044A (en) 1985-01-30 1987-06-16 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. Automated securities trading system
JPH0743748B2 (en) 1986-02-17 1995-05-15 株式会社オークネット Information transmission processing method of auction information transmission processing system
US4799156A (en) 1986-10-01 1989-01-17 Strategic Processing Corporation Interactive market management system
US4845625A (en) 1987-04-29 1989-07-04 Stannard Louis A Flight bidding system or the like especially for airline personnel
US4842275A (en) 1988-04-21 1989-06-27 Yury Tsatskin Method for conducting a competition
US4992940A (en) 1989-03-13 1991-02-12 H-Renee, Incorporated System and method for automated selection of equipment for purchase through input of user desired specifications
US5136501A (en) 1989-05-26 1992-08-04 Reuters Limited Anonymous matching system
US5220501A (en) 1989-12-08 1993-06-15 Online Resources, Ltd. Method and system for remote delivery of retail banking services
US5243515A (en) 1990-10-30 1993-09-07 Lee Wayne M Secure teleprocessing bidding system
GB9027249D0 (en) 1990-12-17 1991-02-06 Reuters Ltd Offer matching system
US5297032A (en) 1991-02-01 1994-03-22 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated Securities trading workstation
GB9103907D0 (en) 1991-02-25 1991-04-10 Beaumont Maxin International L Interactive transaction processing system
US5193056A (en) 1991-03-11 1993-03-09 Signature Financial Group Inc. Data processing system for hub and spoke financial services configuration
US5453601A (en) 1991-11-15 1995-09-26 Citibank, N.A. Electronic-monetary system
US5375055A (en) 1992-02-03 1994-12-20 Foreign Exchange Transaction Services, Inc. Credit management for electronic brokerage system
US5402336A (en) 1993-01-15 1995-03-28 Ss&D Corporation System and method for allocating resources of a retailer among multiple wholesalers
US5802502A (en) 1993-05-24 1998-09-01 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company System for selective communication connection based on transaction pricing signals
US5394324A (en) 1993-12-08 1995-02-28 Xerox Corporation Auction-based control system for energy resource management in a building
US5799151A (en) 1994-04-04 1998-08-25 Hoffer; Steven M. Interactive electronic trade network and user interface
US5809483A (en) 1994-05-13 1998-09-15 Broka; S. William Online transaction processing system for bond trading
US5915209A (en) * 1994-11-21 1999-06-22 Lawrence; David Bond trading system
US5684963A (en) 1995-03-20 1997-11-04 Discreet Logic, Inc. System and method for distributing video from a plurality of video providers
US5553145A (en) * 1995-03-21 1996-09-03 Micali; Silvia Simultaneous electronic transactions with visible trusted parties
US5689652A (en) 1995-04-27 1997-11-18 Optimark Technologies, Inc. Crossing network utilizing optimal mutual satisfaction density profile
US5640569A (en) 1995-04-28 1997-06-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Diverse goods arbitration system and method for allocating resources in a distributed computer system
US5664115A (en) 1995-06-07 1997-09-02 Fraser; Richard Interactive computer system to match buyers and sellers of real estate, businesses and other property using the internet
US5826244A (en) 1995-08-23 1998-10-20 Xerox Corporation Method and system for providing a document service over a computer network using an automated brokered auction
US5765138A (en) 1995-08-23 1998-06-09 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing interactive evaluation of potential vendors
JPH09101994A (en) 1995-10-06 1997-04-15 Fujitsu General Ltd Auction system
US5832496A (en) 1995-10-12 1998-11-03 Ncr Corporation System and method for performing intelligent analysis of a computer database
US5758327A (en) 1995-11-01 1998-05-26 Ben D. Gardner Electronic requisition and authorization process
US5606602A (en) 1995-11-06 1997-02-25 Summit Telecom Systems, Inc. Bidding for telecommunications traffic
US5715402A (en) 1995-11-09 1998-02-03 Spot Metals Online Method and system for matching sellers and buyers of spot metals
US5721735A (en) 1995-12-08 1998-02-24 Multipoint Networks Method and apparatus for arbitrating access of plural bidding devices to a central device using a goal index
US6026383A (en) 1996-01-04 2000-02-15 Ausubel; Lawrence M. System and method for an efficient dynamic auction for multiple objects
US5905975A (en) * 1996-01-04 1999-05-18 Ausubel; Lawrence M. Computer implemented methods and apparatus for auctions
US6055518A (en) 1996-02-01 2000-04-25 At&T Corporation Secure auction systems
US5794219A (en) 1996-02-20 1998-08-11 Health Hero Network, Inc. Method of conducting an on-line auction with bid pooling
US5758328A (en) 1996-02-22 1998-05-26 Giovannoli; Joseph Computerized quotation system and method
US6243691B1 (en) 1996-03-29 2001-06-05 Onsale, Inc. Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
DE69707668T2 (en) 1996-03-29 2004-06-17 Ebay Inc., San Jose Method and process system and transmitted by electronic auction information
US5774873A (en) 1996-03-29 1998-06-30 Adt Automotive, Inc. Electronic on-line motor vehicle auction and information system
US5835896A (en) * 1996-03-29 1998-11-10 Onsale, Inc. Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
US6023685A (en) * 1996-05-23 2000-02-08 Brett; Kenton F. Computer controlled event ticket auctioning system
US5799285A (en) 1996-06-07 1998-08-25 Klingman; Edwin E. Secure system for electronic selling
US5897621A (en) 1996-06-14 1999-04-27 Cybercash, Inc. System and method for multi-currency transactions
US5862223A (en) * 1996-07-24 1999-01-19 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce
US5890138A (en) 1996-08-26 1999-03-30 Bid.Com International Inc. Computer auction system
JP3407561B2 (en) 1996-09-04 2003-05-19 株式会社日立製作所 Auction apparatus and method
US5794207A (en) 1996-09-04 1998-08-11 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate buyer-driven conditional purchase offers
US5966699A (en) * 1996-10-11 1999-10-12 Zandi; Richard System and method for conducting loan auction over computer network
US5905974A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-05-18 Cantor Fitzgerald Securities Automated auction protocol processor
US5797127A (en) 1996-12-31 1998-08-18 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method, apparatus, and program for pricing, selling, and exercising options to purchase airline tickets
DK10797A (en) * 1997-01-30 1997-01-30 Autocom Aps A method for holding an auction, and uses of the method
US6047274A (en) 1997-02-24 2000-04-04 Geophonic Networks, Inc. Bidding for energy supply
US6401080B1 (en) 1997-03-21 2002-06-04 International Business Machines Corporation Intelligent agent with negotiation capability and method of negotiation therewith
US5803500A (en) * 1997-03-27 1998-09-08 Mossberg; Bjoern E. F. Method and kit for conducting an auction
US6119229A (en) 1997-04-11 2000-09-12 The Brodia Group Virtual property system
US6161099A (en) 1997-05-29 2000-12-12 Muniauction, Inc. Process and apparatus for conducting auctions over electronic networks
US6058379A (en) * 1997-07-11 2000-05-02 Auction Source, L.L.C. Real-time network exchange with seller specified exchange parameters and interactive seller participation
US6061663A (en) 1998-04-21 2000-05-09 The Nasdaq Stock Market, Inc. Index rebalancing
US6415269B1 (en) 1998-05-29 2002-07-02 Bidcatcher, L.P. Interactive remote auction bidding system
JP2003502764A (en) 1999-06-23 2003-01-21 アリバ インコーポレイテッド A method and apparatus for the trading market design and placement
US6285989B1 (en) 1998-08-07 2001-09-04 Ariba, Inc. Universal on-line trading market design and deployment system
US6151589A (en) 1998-09-10 2000-11-21 International Business Machines Corporation Methods for performing large scale auctions and online negotiations
US7283980B2 (en) 1999-05-14 2007-10-16 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for controlling the initiation and duration of overtime intervals in electronic auctions
US7152043B2 (en) 1999-02-19 2006-12-19 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for dynamically controlling overtime in electronic auctions
US6230146B1 (en) 1998-09-18 2001-05-08 Freemarkets, Inc. Method and system for controlling closing times of electronic auctions involving multiple lots
US7010511B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2006-03-07 Kinney Jr Sam E Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with net present value bidding
US7249085B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2007-07-24 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for conducting electronic auctions with multi-parameter price equalization bidding
US6564192B1 (en) 1999-06-08 2003-05-13 Freemarkets, Inc. Method and system for differential index bidding in online auctions
US6871191B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2005-03-22 Sam E. Kinney, Jr. Method and system for partial quantity evaluated rank bidding in online auctions
US7792713B1 (en) 2000-01-24 2010-09-07 Ariba, Inc. Method and system for disguised price bidding in online auctions
US6366891B1 (en) 2000-02-08 2002-04-02 Vanberg & Dewulf Data processing system for conducting a modified on-line auction
US7734505B2 (en) * 2001-02-06 2010-06-08 Oracle International Corporation Method and system for implementing automatic auction extensions and adjustable bid increments in an electronic exchange

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6006194A (en) * 1997-10-01 1999-12-21 Merel; Peter A. Computer-implemented system for controlling resources and policies

Cited By (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060242056A1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2006-10-26 Walker Jay S System and method for encouraging competitive participation in an auction
US8630916B2 (en) * 1998-12-31 2014-01-14 Inventor Holdings, Llc System and method for encouraging competitive participation in an auction
US20140304089A1 (en) * 2004-10-26 2014-10-09 Optimaret, Inc. System and Method for Conducting a Recurring Auction Using a Participant Retention Mechanism
US8719141B1 (en) * 2004-10-26 2014-05-06 Optimaret, Inc. Apparatus and method for conducting a recurring auction using a participant retention mechanism
US8612300B2 (en) 2006-09-08 2013-12-17 Ariba, Inc. Buyer/supplier network that aids supplier enablement through collaboration between buyers and suppliers
US8359230B2 (en) 2008-01-14 2013-01-22 Joseph Tsiyoni Internet trading
US20090182632A1 (en) * 2008-01-14 2009-07-16 Joseph Tsiyoni Internet trading
US20090198609A1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2009-08-06 Oracle International Corporation Facilitating multi-phase electronic bid evaluation
US8433615B2 (en) * 2008-02-05 2013-04-30 Oracle International Corporation Facilitating multi-phase electronic bid evaluation
US20100030623A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2010-02-04 Inderpal Guglani Method of providing an online marketplace
US20100030622A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2010-02-04 Inderpal Guglani Apparatus configured to host an online marketplace
US20100030656A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2010-02-04 Inderpal Guglani Apparatus configured to host an online marketplace
US20100030621A1 (en) * 2008-07-29 2010-02-04 Inderpal Guglani Apparatus Configured to Host an Online Marketplace
US20100076860A1 (en) * 2008-09-23 2010-03-25 Edisher Kaghashvili Online Timeshift Auctions
US8732036B2 (en) 2010-05-07 2014-05-20 Ariba, Inc. Supplier/buyer network that provides catalog updates
US8392317B2 (en) 2010-11-09 2013-03-05 Ariba, Inc. Facilitating electronic auction of prepayment of an invoice
US8688537B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2014-04-01 Ariba, Inc. Maintenance of a company profile of a company associated with a supplier/buyer commerce network
US9836773B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2017-12-05 Ariba, Inc. Evaluation and selection of quotes of a commerce network
US9990634B2 (en) 2011-05-22 2018-06-05 Ariba, Inc. Managing an experience of a member organization of a collaborative commerce community through a network
US20130246219A1 (en) * 2012-03-14 2013-09-19 Google Inc. Ranking and optimizing trips
US20140279137A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Ebay Inc. Methods, systems, and apparatus for dynamic bid resolution

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US6408283B1 (en) 2002-06-18
AU6392999A (en) 2000-04-10
JP2002525760A (en) 2002-08-13
US20080162332A1 (en) 2008-07-03
US6230147B1 (en) 2001-05-08
EP1114384A1 (en) 2001-07-11
US6223167B1 (en) 2001-04-24
US6230146B1 (en) 2001-05-08
US6499018B1 (en) 2002-12-24
US7813966B2 (en) 2010-10-12
WO2000017797A9 (en) 2000-07-13
CA2344253A1 (en) 2000-03-30
WO2000017797A1 (en) 2000-03-30
US6199050B1 (en) 2001-03-06
US6216114B1 (en) 2001-04-10
US20080071672A1 (en) 2008-03-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7555445B2 (en) Network auction system and method
US8700493B2 (en) Methods and apparatus for freshness and completeness of information
US8666876B2 (en) System and method for creating a customer account
CA2380848C (en) Systems and methods for linking orders in electronic trading systems
US5835896A (en) Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
US7584124B2 (en) Method, system and business model for a buyer&#39;s auction with near perfect information using the internet
EP0900424B1 (en) Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic auction information
US9710856B2 (en) System and method for adapting market data and evaluating unequal offers
US6606607B1 (en) Individualized, real-time, interactive e-commerce auction
US7203662B2 (en) Apparatus, system and method for automatically making operational selling decisions
US8682911B2 (en) User performance rating system
US20030182213A1 (en) System and method of assessing and rating vendor risk and pricing of technology delivery insurance
US7398229B2 (en) System and method for conducting electronic commerce
US6954733B1 (en) Internet based computer system and method for component exchange
US20040093302A1 (en) System and method for providing logistics for a sale or transfer of goods with proceeds provided to a third party
US7966210B2 (en) Data distribution method and system
US6598026B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for brokering transactions
US20050033683A1 (en) Method and apparatus for deploying high-volume listings in a network trading platform
CA2568604C (en) System and methods for electronic commerce using personal and business networks
US7584139B2 (en) Systems and methods for trading and originating financial products using a computer network
US7650307B2 (en) Method and system to enable a fixed price purchase within a multi-unit online auction environment
US7493280B2 (en) Method and system for setting an optimal reserve price for an auction
US20030023499A1 (en) Apparatus, system and method for automatically making operational purchasing decisions
US20020004775A1 (en) Online patent and license exchange
US20020013760A1 (en) System and method for implementing electronic markets

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION