US20080079425A1 - Method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material - Google Patents

Method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080079425A1
US20080079425A1 US11/589,677 US58967706A US2008079425A1 US 20080079425 A1 US20080079425 A1 US 20080079425A1 US 58967706 A US58967706 A US 58967706A US 2008079425 A1 US2008079425 A1 US 2008079425A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
coating
composite material
thickness
measurement
determining
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/589,677
Other versions
US7352194B1 (en
Inventor
Antonio Fuente Souviron
Joaquin Pascual Fernandez
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Airbus Operations SL
Original Assignee
Airbus Espana SL
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Airbus Espana SL filed Critical Airbus Espana SL
Assigned to AIRBUS ESPANA, S.L. reassignment AIRBUS ESPANA, S.L. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: FUENTE SOUVIRON, ANTONIO, PASCUAL FERNANDEZ, JOAQUIN
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7352194B1 publication Critical patent/US7352194B1/en
Publication of US20080079425A1 publication Critical patent/US20080079425A1/en
Assigned to AIRBUS OPERATIONS S.L. reassignment AIRBUS OPERATIONS S.L. CHANGE OF NAME (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AIRBUS ESPANA, S.L.
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01BMEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B7/00Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques
    • G01B7/02Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness
    • G01B7/06Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness for measuring thickness
    • G01B7/10Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness for measuring thickness using magnetic means, e.g. by measuring change of reluctance
    • G01B7/105Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring length, width or thickness for measuring thickness using magnetic means, e.g. by measuring change of reluctance for measuring thickness of coating

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for determining the thicknesses of coatings on composite materials by means of the application of induced currents.
  • Eddy currents also known as parasitic currents or Foucault currents
  • Induced currents or Eddy currents are circulating electric currents induced by an alternating magnetic field in an insulated conductor. Eddy currents are not induced on an insulating material, the alternating magnetic field traversing the mentioned non-conducting material.
  • induced currents are currently well known as a non-destructive test method for determining the thicknesses of a non-conducting coating on a conducting metal, or the thickness of a non-magnetic metal coating on a magnetic metal.
  • induced currents are currently well known as a non-destructive test method for determining the thicknesses of a non-conducting coating on a conducting metal, or the thickness of a non-magnetic metal coating on a magnetic metal.
  • composite materials such as carbon fiber
  • the present invention is oriented to the solution of these drawbacks.
  • the present invention proposes an indirect measurement method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material, such as carbon fiber, comprising the following steps:
  • FIG. 1 shows an on-screen representation of the zero calibration of the measurement method object of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows an on-screen representation of the calibration of the measurement method object of the invention using a 175 ⁇ m Mylar polyester sheet as a reference.
  • FIG. 3 shows a test piece used for testing the measurement method object of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a micrograph showing the roughness of a composite material with textured surface, constituting an additional difficulty in the measurement method of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows the micrographs performed on one of the test pieces examined with the measurement method of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows the results curve obtained for the testing of the test pieces examined with the method object of the invention in comparison with real data.
  • FIG. 7 shows the placing of the measuring probe on the composite material to be measured according to the measurement method of the present invention.
  • the method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material, such as carbon fiber, developed by the present invention consists of carrying out an indirect measurement considering the composite material or carbon fiber as a lift-off against a planar metal sheet, such as an aluminium alloy sheet.
  • the method described in this invention can be applied to a wide range of thicknesses of coatings ranging from 20 ⁇ m to 300 ⁇ m, because in no case are they so thick that they cannot be traversed by the low frequency technique proposed herein.
  • Thin thicknesses of carbon fiber mainly 1 to 5 mm, allow obtaining very reliable results in the measurement of the thicknesses of the coating, because they have a greater relative importance in the separation of variables.
  • the aluminium sheet must have a suitable thickness, preferably more than 2 mm and must not be plated. 2024, 7075 sheets and the like, in different treatment conditions, are suitable for carrying out the calibration and therefore the measurements.
  • results obtained with the present method are compared with micrographic cut measurements which are determining in situations of conflict.
  • the zero calibration is carried out using to that end a paint-free carbon fiber test piece, which is the coating measured in this specific case.
  • a paint-free carbon fiber test piece which is the coating measured in this specific case.
  • FIG. 1 showing the on-screen display of the equipment and in which the impedance vector angle or phase has been adjusted to 233° in order to obtain a vertical representation given that the lift-off effect is being measured, the descending vertical line is located in the first height square of the screen, therefore reaching a height of 1 square (out of 8 in total) corresponding to the paint-free carbon fiber test piece, i.e. to the calibration zero.
  • the calibration is carried out based on a 175 ⁇ m calibrated Mylar type polyester sheet on a carbon fiber test piece.
  • the lift-off reaches up to height square 6 of the screen, giving a 5 square variation.
  • test piece used for the test can be observed in FIG. 3 , which test piece comprises 5 work areas: 1.—black paint-free area (to calibrate the zero of the equipment); 2.—first white paint layer; 3.—second yellow paint layer; 4.—third grey paint layer and 5.—fourth bluish paint layer.
  • the examined test piece of FIG. 3 has a nominal fiber thickness of 1.6 mm. Smaller or greater thicknesses will evidently need an adjustment of the low frequency probe gain in order to achieve the same amplitude, in the same direction as the thickness. Thus for example, fiber thicknesses of 3.2 mm require 44 dB instead of the 41 dB used in the previous calibration.
  • the micrograph of FIG. 4 represents the roughness of a composite material with textured surface, reaching a maximum value of almost 125 ⁇ m.
  • Table 1 shows the results obtained in the test pieces tested by the induced current method of the invention versus the real data of the micrographic cut of these test pieces, as well as two Mylar type reference polyester sheets used in the calibration of the method, in the measurement margins.
  • the method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material by using induced currents has the main features that are detailed below:

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material by applying induced currents characterized in that the composite material together with its coating is placed on a conducting material, in which circulating electric currents induced by an alternating magnetic field are created, an indirect measurement being subsequently carried out based on the measurement of the lift-off effect that the coating, together with the composite material, offers in induced currents against the mentioned conducting material.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for determining the thicknesses of coatings on composite materials by means of the application of induced currents.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Induced currents or Eddy currents (also known as parasitic currents or Foucault currents) are circulating electric currents induced by an alternating magnetic field in an insulated conductor. Eddy currents are not induced on an insulating material, the alternating magnetic field traversing the mentioned non-conducting material.
  • The use of induced currents is currently well known as a non-destructive test method for determining the thicknesses of a non-conducting coating on a conducting metal, or the thickness of a non-magnetic metal coating on a magnetic metal. However, currently there is no reliable method for the application of induced currents in the measurement of thicknesses on composite materials, such as carbon fiber, because this material, although it is a conductor, has a very low electric conductivity.
  • Other type of techniques, such as ultrasound techniques, have currently been proposed as non-destructive test methods for determining the thicknesses on composite materials, although this type of techniques use very complex equipment and have not provided reliable results.
  • The present invention is oriented to the solution of these drawbacks.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention proposes an indirect measurement method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material, such as carbon fiber, comprising the following steps:
      • arranging the composite material together with its coating in a planar configuration such that it has a constant thickness in the measurement areas and comprises a coating-free area;
      • arranging the side of the composite material without coating on a sheet of conducting material of a constant thickness;
      • generating induced currents on the conducting material by means of a multichannel type induced current generating equipment;
      • choosing a low frequency and high penetrating power probe to carry out the measurements, adjusting the gain thereof to the adjustment desired in the measurement;
      • carrying out the zero calibration of the method by measuring the coating-free area of the composite material with the probe;
      • carrying out a reference calibration by measuring a calibrated composite material fiber with the probe;
      • carrying out the measurement of the composite material together with its coating with the probe;
      • determining the thickness of the coating of the composite material taking into account the effect of the decrease of the intensity of the induced currents upon traversing the composite material and the coating when said currents move away from the current generating equipment, based on the measurement of the lift-off effect that the coating and the composite material offer in induced currents against the sheet of conducting material.
  • Other features and advantages of the present invention will be disclosed in the following detailed description of an illustrative embodiment of its object in relation to the attached figures.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows an on-screen representation of the zero calibration of the measurement method object of the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows an on-screen representation of the calibration of the measurement method object of the invention using a 175 μm Mylar polyester sheet as a reference.
  • FIG. 3 shows a test piece used for testing the measurement method object of the invention.
  • FIG. 4 shows a micrograph showing the roughness of a composite material with textured surface, constituting an additional difficulty in the measurement method of the invention.
  • FIG. 5 shows the micrographs performed on one of the test pieces examined with the measurement method of the invention.
  • FIG. 6 shows the results curve obtained for the testing of the test pieces examined with the method object of the invention in comparison with real data.
  • FIG. 7 shows the placing of the measuring probe on the composite material to be measured according to the measurement method of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material, such as carbon fiber, developed by the present invention, consists of carrying out an indirect measurement considering the composite material or carbon fiber as a lift-off against a planar metal sheet, such as an aluminium alloy sheet.
  • The method described in this invention can be applied to a wide range of thicknesses of coatings ranging from 20 μm to 300 μm, because in no case are they so thick that they cannot be traversed by the low frequency technique proposed herein.
  • Thin thicknesses of carbon fiber, mainly 1 to 5 mm, allow obtaining very reliable results in the measurement of the thicknesses of the coating, because they have a greater relative importance in the separation of variables.
  • The aluminium sheet must have a suitable thickness, preferably more than 2 mm and must not be plated. 2024, 7075 sheets and the like, in different treatment conditions, are suitable for carrying out the calibration and therefore the measurements.
  • The results obtained with the present method are compared with micrographic cut measurements which are determining in situations of conflict.
  • EXAMPLES
  • The results obtained in a specific embodiment of the invention are set forth below, using a multichannel Zetec MIZ-40 A as an induced current equipment, a Leica Q 550 MW Image Analyzer as micrographic equipment, and an absolute Donut Nortec/R/100 Hz-1 kHz/0.50-1.00 inches, P/N 9215653/S/N FO4173, type probe with the following characteristics as a measuring probe:
  • Frequency: 950 Hz
  • Angle: 233°
  • Gain: 41 dB
  • Horizontal scale: 2.0 V/D
  • Vertical scale: 0.4 V/D
  • Drive: 16
  • Firstly, the zero calibration is carried out using to that end a paint-free carbon fiber test piece, which is the coating measured in this specific case. As can be seen in FIG. 1, showing the on-screen display of the equipment and in which the impedance vector angle or phase has been adjusted to 233° in order to obtain a vertical representation given that the lift-off effect is being measured, the descending vertical line is located in the first height square of the screen, therefore reaching a height of 1 square (out of 8 in total) corresponding to the paint-free carbon fiber test piece, i.e. to the calibration zero.
  • Then, as shown in FIG. 2, the calibration is carried out based on a 175 μm calibrated Mylar type polyester sheet on a carbon fiber test piece. The lift-off reaches up to height square 6 of the screen, giving a 5 square variation. Five squares of the screen are therefore equivalent to 175 μm in the present calibration (1 square=35 μm). Depending on the margin of thicknesses to be measured it will be possible to calibrate the equipment with sufficient amplitude so as to be able to adjust the calibration in each specific case.
  • One of the test pieces used for the test can be observed in FIG. 3, which test piece comprises 5 work areas: 1.—black paint-free area (to calibrate the zero of the equipment); 2.—first white paint layer; 3.—second yellow paint layer; 4.—third grey paint layer and 5.—fourth bluish paint layer. Once the previous calibration has been carried out, with the zero adjustment and the 175 μm Mylar type polyester sheet reference, the readings of the thickness of each of the layers in different test pieces was carried out, comparing the readings with the absolute micrograph measurements.
  • The examined test piece of FIG. 3 has a nominal fiber thickness of 1.6 mm. Smaller or greater thicknesses will evidently need an adjustment of the low frequency probe gain in order to achieve the same amplitude, in the same direction as the thickness. Thus for example, fiber thicknesses of 3.2 mm require 44 dB instead of the 41 dB used in the previous calibration.
  • Another important issue to be considered is the finishing surface of the carbon fiber to be examined. Composite materials with textured surfaces are very rough, and this can make the measurement of very thin paint thicknesses difficult, particularly if a considerable thickness of said fiber is considered. For small thicknesses, as in this example (1.6 mm), this fact can be minimized by applying pressure with the probe on the fiber and the aluminium support sheet, as well as thanks to the wide rounded configuration of the Donut type probe used.
  • Thus, the micrograph of FIG. 4 represents the roughness of a composite material with textured surface, reaching a maximum value of almost 125 μm.
  • Another relevant issue in this method is the importance of the calibration zero, which must be carried out between each of the measurements with the aim of preventing as much as possible the fluctuations that may interfere therein. This entails calibrating the zero before each reading.
  • Table 1 below shows the results obtained in the test pieces tested by the induced current method of the invention versus the real data of the micrographic cut of these test pieces, as well as two Mylar type reference polyester sheets used in the calibration of the method, in the measurement margins.
  • TABLE 1
    Layer
    Test
    1 2 3 4
    piece Real Obt. Real Obt. Real Obt. Real Obt.
    2 42 39 68 49 139 105 172 161
    3 41 35 52 70 114  98 139 140
    4 41 42 55 70 105 105 140 143
    5 43 49 54 70  90 105 135 133
    Mylars: 195/193 18.9/17.5 in μm
  • In reference to FIG. 6, showing the linear curve of the obtained results, a greater adjustment in the work margins (40 and 140 μm) and a greater dispersion in the central areas (70 and 100 μm), probably due to a lack of homogeneity in the 2nd and 3rd paint layers and to the greater relative incidence of the roughness of the fiber since it is a textured surface, can be observed. However, the adjustment is sufficiently good and precise if the starting restrictions are taken into account.
  • Thus, the method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material by using induced currents, developed by the present invention, has the main features that are detailed below:
      • the measurement is indirect, considering the carbon fiber coating and the paint coating as a lift-off against a planar aluminium alloy sheet;
      • the normally planar configuration allows the access to both sides of the fiber;
      • a paint-free area of material is needed to calibrate the zero of the measurement method;
      • the zero calibration must take place before any measurement, with the aim of avoiding possible fluctuations of the method:
      • the greater the thickness of the fiber, the greater the gain necessary in the measuring probe;
      • it is necessary to use a low frequency Donut type probe, with a frequency such that it confers a high penetrating power to it; and
      • the obtained adjustment depends on the gain of the probe used, being around 15 μm.
  • Modifications comprised within the scope defined by the following claims can be introduced in the preferred embodiment which has just been described.

Claims (4)

1. A measurement method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
arranging the composite material together with its coating in a planar configuration such that it has a constant thickness in the measurement areas and comprises a coating-free area;
arranging the side of the composite material without coating on a sheet of conducting material with a constant thickness;
generating induced currents on the conducting material by means of a multichannel type induced current generating equipment;
choosing a low frequency and high penetrating power probe to carry out the measurements, adjusting the gain thereof to the adjustment desired in the measurement;
carrying out the zero calibration of the method by measuring the coating-free area of the composite material with the probe;
carrying out a reference calibration by measuring a calibrated composite material fiber with the probe;
carrying out the measurement of the composite material together with its coating with the probe;
determining the thickness of the coating of the composite material taking into account the effect of the decrease of intensity of the induced currents upon traversing the composite material and the coating when said currents move away from the current generating equipment, based on the measurement of the lift-off effect that the coating and the composite material offer in induced currents against the sheet of conducting material.
2. A measurement method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material according to claim 1, characterized in that the thickness of the coating ranges from 20 to 300 μm.
3. A measurement method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material according to claim 1, characterized in that the composite material is carbon fiber.
4. A measurement method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material according to claim 1, characterized in that the conducting material has a constant thickness greater than or equal to 2 mm.
US11/589,677 2006-09-29 2006-10-30 Method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material Expired - Fee Related US7352194B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ESPCT/ES06/70140 2006-09-29
PCT/ES2006/070140 WO2008037818A1 (en) 2006-09-29 2006-09-29 Method for determining the coating thickness on a composite material

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/437,851 Division US20090298771A1 (en) 2004-02-20 2009-05-08 Use of secreted protein products for preventing and treating pancreatic diseases and/or obesity and/or metabolic syndrome

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US7352194B1 US7352194B1 (en) 2008-04-01
US20080079425A1 true US20080079425A1 (en) 2008-04-03

Family

ID=39227290

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/589,677 Expired - Fee Related US7352194B1 (en) 2006-09-29 2006-10-30 Method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US7352194B1 (en)
CN (1) CN101657693B (en)
ES (1) ES2365291B1 (en)
WO (1) WO2008037818A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9194687B1 (en) 2010-02-04 2015-11-24 Textron Innovations Inc. System and method for measuring non-conductive coating thickness using eddy currents
CN105115411A (en) * 2015-09-09 2015-12-02 海安迪斯凯瑞探测仪器有限公司 Coating thickness gauge probe

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2495869B (en) * 2009-03-18 2013-10-23 Helmut Fischer Gmbh Inst Fur Elektronik Und Messtechnik Measurement stand and method of its electrical control
US9927233B2 (en) 2013-01-10 2018-03-27 Elcometer Limited Coating thickness measuring instrument and methods
CN103344174B (en) * 2013-07-12 2016-03-09 爱德森(厦门)电子有限公司 A kind of eddy current thickness measuring method of uneven conductive material surface cover thickness
CN103615965B (en) * 2013-12-20 2017-01-25 爱德森(厦门)电子有限公司 Eddy-based method for measuring thickness of covering layer on surface of cambered metal with variable curvature
CN107782235A (en) * 2017-10-26 2018-03-09 内蒙古航天红峡化工有限公司 A kind of measuring method of carbon fiber storepipe face coat thickness
US10876882B1 (en) * 2019-06-26 2020-12-29 Honeywell International Inc. Online grade selection for weight measurements of composite sheets
CN112831767A (en) * 2021-01-04 2021-05-25 中国航空制造技术研究院 Composite processing method for metallized film on surface of composite material

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4745809A (en) * 1986-08-12 1988-05-24 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Composite analyzer tester
US5293132A (en) * 1990-06-05 1994-03-08 Defelsko Corporation Coating thickness measurement gauge
US5847562A (en) * 1996-05-08 1998-12-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Thickness gauging of single-layer conductive materials with two-point non linear calibration algorithm
US6297648B1 (en) * 1996-08-16 2001-10-02 The Boeing Company Oscillating cavity paint meter
US20030038628A1 (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-02-27 Nath Shridhar Champaknath Self reference eddy current probe, measurement system, and measurement method
US20040021461A1 (en) * 2002-06-04 2004-02-05 Jentek Sensors, Inc. High resolution inductive sensor arrays for UXO
US6794886B1 (en) * 2001-11-01 2004-09-21 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation Tank probe for measuring surface conductance
US6815958B2 (en) * 2003-02-07 2004-11-09 Multimetrixs, Llc Method and apparatus for measuring thickness of thin films with improved accuracy
US6815947B2 (en) * 2003-01-12 2004-11-09 Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. Method and system for thickness measurements of thin conductive layers
US20040227524A1 (en) * 2003-05-12 2004-11-18 Boris Kesil Method and system for measuring thickness of thin films with automatic stabilization of measurement accuracy
US6989675B2 (en) * 2003-03-13 2006-01-24 Multimetrixs Llc Method and apparatus for precision measurement of film thickness
US7173435B1 (en) * 2006-01-27 2007-02-06 The Boeing Company Thickness measuring apparatus and method using a microwave cavity resonator

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3404720A1 (en) * 1984-02-10 1985-08-14 Karl Deutsch Prüf- und Meßgerätebau GmbH + Co KG, 5600 Wuppertal METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MEASURING THICKNESS
JPS6138503A (en) * 1984-07-31 1986-02-24 Ketsuto Kagaku Kenkyusho:Kk Film thickness gauge
US4747310A (en) * 1986-08-12 1988-05-31 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Probe for composite analyzer tester
DE68917136T2 (en) * 1989-02-17 1994-12-15 Bell Helicopter Textron Inc METHOD FOR DETECTING PROTECTIVE LAYERS ON COMPOSITE MATERIALS.
US5485082A (en) * 1990-04-11 1996-01-16 Micro-Epsilon Messtechnik Gmbh & Co. Kg Method of calibrating a thickness measuring device and device for measuring or monitoring the thickness of layers, tapes, foils, and the like
CN2132151Y (en) * 1992-08-16 1993-05-05 陕西机械学院 Plastics thickness measuring instrument for compound metal-plastic wide-strip
US5559428A (en) * 1995-04-10 1996-09-24 International Business Machines Corporation In-situ monitoring of the change in thickness of films
US6793865B2 (en) * 2000-02-11 2004-09-21 Textron Automotive Company Inc. Gage thickness measurement by use of inductive sensors
US7084621B2 (en) * 2002-09-25 2006-08-01 Lam Research Corporation Enhancement of eddy current based measurement capabilities

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4745809A (en) * 1986-08-12 1988-05-24 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Composite analyzer tester
US5293132A (en) * 1990-06-05 1994-03-08 Defelsko Corporation Coating thickness measurement gauge
US5847562A (en) * 1996-05-08 1998-12-08 The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration Thickness gauging of single-layer conductive materials with two-point non linear calibration algorithm
US6297648B1 (en) * 1996-08-16 2001-10-02 The Boeing Company Oscillating cavity paint meter
US20030038628A1 (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-02-27 Nath Shridhar Champaknath Self reference eddy current probe, measurement system, and measurement method
US6794886B1 (en) * 2001-11-01 2004-09-21 Kla-Tencor Technologies Corporation Tank probe for measuring surface conductance
US20040021461A1 (en) * 2002-06-04 2004-02-05 Jentek Sensors, Inc. High resolution inductive sensor arrays for UXO
US6815947B2 (en) * 2003-01-12 2004-11-09 Nova Measuring Instruments Ltd. Method and system for thickness measurements of thin conductive layers
US6815958B2 (en) * 2003-02-07 2004-11-09 Multimetrixs, Llc Method and apparatus for measuring thickness of thin films with improved accuracy
US6989675B2 (en) * 2003-03-13 2006-01-24 Multimetrixs Llc Method and apparatus for precision measurement of film thickness
US20040227524A1 (en) * 2003-05-12 2004-11-18 Boris Kesil Method and system for measuring thickness of thin films with automatic stabilization of measurement accuracy
US7173435B1 (en) * 2006-01-27 2007-02-06 The Boeing Company Thickness measuring apparatus and method using a microwave cavity resonator

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9194687B1 (en) 2010-02-04 2015-11-24 Textron Innovations Inc. System and method for measuring non-conductive coating thickness using eddy currents
CN105115411A (en) * 2015-09-09 2015-12-02 海安迪斯凯瑞探测仪器有限公司 Coating thickness gauge probe

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2365291B1 (en) 2012-08-08
ES2365291A1 (en) 2011-09-28
WO2008037818A1 (en) 2008-04-03
US7352194B1 (en) 2008-04-01
CN101657693A (en) 2010-02-24
CN101657693B (en) 2012-02-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7352194B1 (en) Method for determining the thickness of a coating on a composite material
US6377039B1 (en) Method for characterizing coating and substrates
US8760155B2 (en) Magnetism measuring method and device
US6407546B1 (en) Non-contact technique for using an eddy current probe for measuring the thickness of metal layers disposed on semi-conductor wafer products
US9453817B2 (en) Nondestructive inspection device using alternating magnetic field, and nondestructive inspection method
Levikari et al. Acoustic phenomena in damaged ceramic capacitors
CN110568263A (en) Multi-parameter detection method and device for conductor with metal coating
O’Donoghue et al. Planar magnetic shielding for use with electromagnetic tracking systems
US7095224B2 (en) Process control and damage monitoring
US11733282B2 (en) Probe for non-intrusively detecting imperfections in a test object
US11041798B2 (en) Arrangement for determining the achievable adhesive strength before forming a connection having material continuity to a surface of a joining partner
Cosarinsky et al. Material characterization by electrical conductivity assessment using impedance analysis
US20230243779A1 (en) Method And Arrangement For Crack Detection At An Edge In A Metallic Material
JPH10288605A (en) Magnetic testing device and method
JP2006337250A (en) Method for measuring depth of treatment using eddy current, and measuring apparatus using the same
US10876989B2 (en) Method for non-intrusively detecting imperfections in a test object
Maddox et al. Imaging corrosion under insulation with a mechanically-translatable atomic magnetometer
US20050116724A1 (en) Method of non-contact measuring electrical conductivity of polymer electrolyte thin films with using combined sensor
CA2168556C (en) Detecting flaws in a carbon anode
Yamada et al. Variable-RL-cancel circuit for precise JC measurement using third-harmonic voltage method
Svenman et al. Investigation of effects from realistic influences on inductive gap measurement
JP2002039997A (en) Magnetic measuring device and method
Żurek et al. Selection of Transformer Sheets Using an Impedance Method
Shay et al. Remote temperature and stress monitoring using low-frequency inductive sensing
Burkhardt Conductivity and Thickness Layer Measurements of Conductive Layers on Conductive Base Materials Using Calibrated Apparent Conductivity Measurements

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRBUS ESPANA, S.L., SPAIN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FUENTE SOUVIRON, ANTONIO;PASCUAL FERNANDEZ, JOAQUIN;REEL/FRAME:019022/0837;SIGNING DATES FROM 20070122 TO 20070201

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

AS Assignment

Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS S.L., SPAIN

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:AIRBUS ESPANA, S.L.;REEL/FRAME:026124/0168

Effective date: 20090320

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20200401