US20080075708A1

US20080075708A1 - Broad specturm anti-viral therapeutics and prophylaxis

Info

Publication number: US20080075708A1
Application number: US11/893,621
Authority: US
Inventors: Mang Yu; Fang Fang
Original assignee: Mang Yu; Fang Fang
Current assignee: NexBio Inc
Priority date: 2002-11-22
Filing date: 2007-08-15
Publication date: 2008-03-27
Also published as: AU2003294401C1; AU2003294401A1; WO2004047735A2; EP1567185B1; CN1729013B; EP1567185A4; KR20090087971A; CA2506526C; US8084036B2; KR20050085130A; JP2006508193A; CA2506526A1; EP1567185A2; HK1080763A1; CN1729013A; US20050004020A1; CN101804200A; AU2003294401B2; JP5348651B2; WO2004047735A3

Abstract

Provided are new compositions and methods for preventing and treating pathogen infection. In particular, provided are compounds having an anchoring domain that anchors the compound to the surface of a target cell, and a therapeutic domain that can act extracellularly to prevent infection of the target cell by a pathogen, such as a virus. Preferred target cells are epithelial cells. Also provided are compositions and methods for preventing viral diseases, such as influenza, using compounds having anchoring domains that can bind target cells linked to enzymatic activities that can act extracellularly to interfere with viral infection of target cells. Also provided are compositions and methods for preventing viral diseases such as influenza using compounds having anchoring domains that can bind target cells linked to protease inhibitors that can act extracellularly to interfere with viral infection of target cells.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/718,986, to Mang Yu and Fang Fang, filed on Nov. 21, 2003, entitled “Broad Spectrum Anti-Viral Therapeutics and Prophylaxis,” which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/428,535, filed Nov. 22, 2002, entitled “Broad Spectrum Anti-Viral Therapeutics and Prophylaxis,” and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/464,217, filed Apr. 19, 2003, entitled “Class of broad spectrum anti-viral protein.” The subject matter of each of these applications is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to therapeutic compositions that can be used to prevent and treat infection of human and animal subjects by a pathogen, and specifically to protein-based therapeutic compositions that can be used for the prevention and treatment of viral infections, such as the prevention and treatment of influenza infection.
2. Description of Related Art
Influenza is a highly infectious acute respiratory disease that has plagued the human race since ancient times. It is characterized by recurrent annual epidemics and periodic major worldwide pandemics. Because of the high disease-related morbidity and mortality, direct and indirect social economic impacts of influenza are enormous. Yearly epidemics cause approximately 300,000 hospitalizations and 25,000 deaths in the United States alone. Four pandemics occurred in the last century; together they caused tens of millions of deaths. Mathematical models based on earlier pandemic experiences have estimated that 89,000-207,000 deaths, 18-42 million outpatient visits and 20-47 million additional illnesses will occur during the next pandemic (Meltzer, M I, Cox, N J and Fukuda, K. (1999) Emerg Infect Dis 5:659-671). 0006] Influenza is typically caused by infection of two types of viruses, Influenza virus A and Influenza virus B (the third type Influenza virus C only causes minor common cold-like symptoms). They belong to the orthomyxoviridae family of RNA viruses. Both type A and type B viruses have 8 segmented negative-strand RNA genomes enclosed in a lipid envelope derived from the host cell. The viral envelope is covered with spikes that are composed of three types of proteins: hemagglutinin (HA) which attaches virus to host cell receptors and mediates fusion of viral and cellular membranes; neuraminidase (NA) which facilitates the release of the new viruses from host cells; and a small number of M2 proteins which serve as ion channels.
Infections by influenza type A and B viruses are typically initiated at the mucosal surface of the upper respiratory tract. Viral replication is primarily limited to the upper respiratory tract but can extend to the lower respiratory tract and cause bronchopneumonia that can be fatal.
Influenza viral protein hemagglutinin (HA) is the major viral envelope protein. It plays an essential role in viral infection. The importance of HA is evidenced by the fact that it is the major target for protective neutralizing antibodies produced by the host immune response (Hayden, F G. (1996) In Antiviral drug resistance (ed. D. D. Richman), pp. 59-77. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.). It is now clear that HA has two different functions in viral infection. First, HA is responsible for the attachment of the virus to sialic acid cell receptors. Second, HA mediates viral entry into target cells by triggering fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes.
HA is synthesized as a precursor protein, HA0, which is transferred through the Golgi apparatus to the cell surface as a trimeric molecular complex. HA0 is further cleaved to generate the C terminus HA1 (residue 328 of HA0) and the N terminus of HA2. It is generally believed that the cleavage occurs at the cell surface or on released viruses. The cleavage of HA0 into HA1/HA2 is not required for HA binding to sialic acid receptor; however, it is believed to be necessary for viral infectivity (Klenk, H D and Rott, R. (1988) Adv Vir Res. 34:247-281; Kido, H, Niwa, Y, Beppu, Y and Towatari, T. (1996) Advan Enzyme Regul 36:325-347; Skehel, J J and Wiley, D C. (2000) Annu Rev Biochem 69:531-569; Zambon, M. (2001) Rev Med Virol 11:227-241.)
Currently, influenza is controlled by vaccination and anti-viral compounds. Inactivated influenza vaccines are now in worldwide use, especially in high-risk groups. The vaccine viruses are grown in fertile hen's eggs, inactivated by chemical means and purified. The vaccines are usually trivalent, containing representative influenza A viruses (H1N1 and H3N2) and influenza B strains. The vaccine strains need to be regularly updated in order to maintain efficacy; this effort is coordinated by the World Health Organization (WHO). During inter-pandemic periods, it usually takes 8 months before the updated influenza vaccines are ready for the market (Wood, J. (2001) Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 356:1953-1960). However, historically, pandemics spread to most continents within 6 months, and future pandemics are expected to spread even faster with increased international travel (Gust, I D, Hampson, AW., and Lavanchy, D. (2001) Rev Med Virol 11:59-70). Therefore it is inevitable that an effective vaccine will be unavailable or in very short supply during the first waves of future pandemics.
Anti-viral compounds have become the mainstay for treating inter-pandemic diseases. Currently, they are also the only potential alternative for controlling pandemics during the initial period when vaccines are not available. Two classes of antiviral compounds are currently on the market: the M2 inhibitors, such as amantadine and rimantadine; and the NA inhibitors, which include oseltamivir (Tamiflu) and zanamivir (Relenza). Both classes of molecules have proven efficacy in prevention and treatment of influenza. However, side effects and the risk of generating drug-resistant viruses remain the top two concerns for using them widely as chemoprophylaxis (Hayden, F G. (1996) In Antiviral drug resistance (ed. D. D. Richman), pp. 59-77. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.). Most importantly, future pandemic strains, either evolved naturally or artificially created by genetic engineering in bio-warfare, may be resistant to all the available anti-viral compounds, and this will have devastating consequences globally.
In summary, currently available vaccination and anti-viral compounds are limited by some fundamental shortcomings. Novel therapeutic and prophylactic modalities are needed to address future influenza pandemics.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention recognizes that current therapeutics for preventing and treating infection by pathogens are often difficult to provide in a timely manner, can have undesirable side effects, and can lead to drug-resistant pathogen strains.
The present invention provides new compositions and methods for preventing and treating pathogen infection. In particular, the present invention provides compounds having an anchoring domain that anchors the compound to the surface of a target cell, and a therapeutic domain that can act extracellularly to prevent infection of the target cell by a pathogen, such as a virus.
In one aspect, the invention provides a protein-based composition for preventing or treating infection by a pathogen. The composition comprises a compound that comprises at least one therapeutic domain comprising a peptide or protein, where the therapeutic domain has at least one extracellular activity that can prevent the infection of a target cell by a pathogen, and at least one anchoring domain that can bind at or near the membrane of a target cell.
In some embodiments of this aspect of the present invention, the at least one therapeutic domain comprises an inhibitory activity that prevents or impedes the infection of a target cell by a pathogen. In a preferred embodiment, the inhibitory activity inhibits the activity of a protease that can process a viral protein necessary for infection of a target cell. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the compound comprises a therapeutic domain that can inhibit the processing of the HA protein of influenza virus, and the anchoring domain can bind the compound at the surface of a respiratory epithelial cell.
In some embodiments of the present invention, at least one therapeutic domain comprises a catalytic activity. In a preferred embodiment, the catalytic activity removes a moiety from the surface of a target cell that is necessary for infection of the target cell. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the therapeutic domain is a sialidase that can digest sialic acid moieties on the surface of epithelial target cells, and the anchoring domain is a GAG-binding domain of a human protein that can bind heparin or heparan sulfate moieties at the surface of an epithelial cell.
In another aspect, the present invention includes a pharmaceutical composition for treating or preventing pathogen infection in a subject. The pharmaceutical composition comprises a compound of the present invention comprising at least one therapeutic domain and at least one anchoring domain. The pharmaceutical composition can also comprise solutions, stabilizers, fillers and the like. In some preferred embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated as an inhalant. In some preferred embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition is formulated as a nasal spray.
In yet another aspect, the present invention includes a method for treating or preventing infection by a pathogen. The method includes applying a pharmaceutically effective amount of a compound of the present invention to at least one target cell of a subject. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition is applied by the use of a spray or inhalant.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of the primary amino acid structure of aprotinin.
FIG. 2 shows GAG-binding sequences of six human genes: PF4, human platelet factor 4; IL8, human interleukin 8; AT III, human antithrombin III; ApoE, human apolipoprotein E; AAMP, human angio-associated migratory cell protein; human amphiregulin.
FIG. 3 is a sequence comparison between human sialidases NEU2 and NEU4.
FIG. 4 is a table comparing substrate specificity of bacterial and fungal sialidases.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Definitions
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Generally, the nomenclature used herein and the manufacture or laboratory procedures described below are well known and commonly employed in the art. Conventional methods are used for these procedures, such as those provided in the art and various general references. Where a term is provided in the singular, the inventors also contemplate the plural of that term. Where there are discrepancies in terms and definitions used in references that are incorporated by reference, the terms used in this application shall have the definitions given herein. As employed throughout the disclosure, the following terms, unless otherwise indicated, shall be understood to have the following meanings:
A “pathogen” can be any virus or microorganism that can infect a cell. A pathogen can be a virus, bacterium, or protozoan.
A “target cell” is any cell that can be infected by a pathogen.
An “extracellular activity that can prevent the infection of a target cell by a pathogen” is any activity that can block or impede infection of a target cell by a pathogen by acting at or near the exterior surface of a target cell. The extracellular activity can be an activity such as, but not limited to, a catalytic activity or an inhibitory activity. For example, a catalytic activity can be an enzymatic activity that degrades one or more entities (such as but not limited to ligands, receptors, or enzymes) on a pathogen, on a target cell, or in the vicinity of a target cell, in which the one or more entities contribute to the infection process. A catalytic activity can also modify one or more entities on a pathogen, on a target cell, or in the vicinity of a target cell, such that the infection-promoting property of the entity is reduced. An inhibitory activity can be an activity that, for example, binds to a receptor or ligand and prevents the receptor or ligand from binding a moiety, where the binding is necessary for or promotes the infection process. An inhibitory activity can also be an inhibitor of an enzyme or receptor that prevents the enzyme or receptor from performing a function that is necessary for or promotes the infection process. The exterior of a target cell includes the target cell membrane itself, as well as the extracellular milieu surrounding the target cell, including extracellular matrix, intracellular spaces, and luminal spaces. For epithelial cells, the exterior of a target cell also includes the apical or luminal surface of the cell membrane that form luminal linings, and the extracellular milieu near the luminal surface. An “extracellular activity that can prevent the infection of a target cell by a pathogen” can be any type of chemical entity, including a protein, polypeptide, peptide, nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid, nucleic acid analogue, nucleotide, nucleotide analogue, small organic molecule, polymer, lipids, steroid, fatty acid, carbohydrate, and the like, including combinations of any of these. Preferably, however, the activity comprises a peptide or protein or coupled to a peptide or protein.
A “domain that can anchor said at least one therapeutic domain to the membrane of a target cell”, also called an “extracellular anchoring domain” or simply, “anchoring domain” refers to a chemical entity can that can stably bind a moiety that is at or on the exterior of a cell surface or is in close proximity to the surface of a cell. An extracellular anchoring domain can be reversibly or irreversibly linked to one or more moieties, such as, preferably, one or more therapeutic domains, and thereby cause the one or more attached therapeutic moieties to be retained at or in close proximity to the exterior surface of a eukaryotic cell. Preferably, an extracellular anchoring domain binds at least one molecule on the surface of a target cell or at least one molecule found in close association with the surface of a target cell. For example, an extracellular anchoring domain can bind a molecule covalently or noncovalently associated with the cell membrane of a target cell, or can bind a molecule present in the extracellular matrix surrounding a target cell. An extracellular anchoring domain preferably is a peptide, polypeptide, or protein, and can also comprise any additional type of chemical entity, including one or more additional proteins, polypeptides, or peptides, a nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid, nucleic acid analogue, nucleotide, nucleotide analogue, small organic molecule, polymer, lipids, steroid, fatty acid, carbohydrate, or a combination of any of these.
As used herein, a protein or peptide sequences is “substantially homologous” to a reference sequence when it is either identical to a reference sequence, or comprises one or more amino acid deletions, one or more additional amino acids, or more one or more conservative amino acid substitutions, and retains the same or essentially the same activity as the reference sequence. Conservative substitutions may be defined as exchanges within one of the following five groups:
I. Small, aliphatic, nonpolar or slightly polar residues: Ala, Ser, Thr, Pro, Gly
II. Polar, negatively charged residues and their amides: Asp, Asn, Glu, Gln
III. Polar, positively charged residues: H is, Arg, Lys
IV. Large, aliphatic nonpolar residues: Met, Leu, Ile, Val, Cys
V. Large aromatic residues: Phe, Try, Trp
Within the foregoing groups, the following substitution are considered to be “highly conservative”: Asp/Glu, H is/Arg/Lys, Phe/Tyr/Trp, and Met/Leu/Ile/Val. Semi-conservative substitutions are defined to be exchanges between two of groups (I)-(IV) above which are limited to supergroup (A), comprising (I), (II), and (III) above, or to supergroup (B), comprising (IV) and (V) above. In addition, where hydrophobic amino acids are specified in the application, they refer to the amino acids Ala, Gly, Pro, Met, Leu, Ile, Val, Cys, Phe, and Trp, whereas hydrophilic amino acids refer to Ser, Thr, Asp, Asn, Glu, Gln, His, Arg, Lys, and Tyr.
A “sialidase” is an enzyme that can remove a sialic acid residue from a substrate molecule. The sialidases (N-acylneuraminosylglycohydrola-ses, EC 3.2.1.18) are a group of enzymes that hydrolytically remove sialic acid residues from sialo-glycoconjugates. Sialic acids are alpha-keto acids with 9-carbon backbones that are usually found at the outermost positions of the oligosaccharide chains that are attached to glycoproteins and glycolipids. One of the major types of sialic acids is N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), which is the biosynthetic precursor for most of the other types. The substrate molecule can be, as nonlimiting examples, an oligosaccharide, a polysaccharide, a glycoprotein, a ganglioside, or a synthetic molecule. For example, a sialidase can cleave bonds having alpha(2,3)-Gal, alpha(2,6)-Gal, or alpha(2,8)-Gal linkages between a sialic acid residue and the remainder of a substrate molecule. A sialidase can also cleave any or all of the linkages between the sialic acid residue and the remainder of the substrate molecule. Two major linkages between Neu5Ac and the penultimate galactose residues of carbohydrate side chains are found in nature, Neu5Ac alpha (2,3)-Gal and Neu5Ac alpha (2,6)-Gal. Both Neu5Ac alpha (2,3)-Gal and Neu5Ac alpha (2,6)-Gal molecules can be recognized by influenza viruses as the receptor, although human viruses seem to prefer Neu5Ac alpha (2,6)-Gal, avian and equine viruses predominantly recognize Neu5Ac alpha (2,3)-Gal. A sialidase can be a naturally-occurring sialidase, an engineered sialidase (such as, but not limited to a sialidase whose amino acid sequence is based on the sequence of a naturally-occurring sialidase, including a sequence that is substantially homologous to the sequence of a naturally-occurring sialidase). As used herein, “sialidase” can also mean the active portion of a naturally-occurring sialidase, or a peptide or protein that comprises sequences based on the active portion of a naturally-occurring sialidase.
I. Composition for Preventing or Treating Infection by a Pathogen
The present invention includes peptide or protein-based compounds that comprise at least one domain that can anchor at least one therapeutic domain to the membrane of a eukaryotic cell and at least one therapeutic domain having an extracellular activity that can prevent the infection of a cell by a pathogen. By “peptide or protein-based” compounds, it is meant that the two major domains of the compound have an amino acid framework, in which the amino acids are joined by peptide bonds. A peptide or protein-based compound can also have other chemical compounds or groups attached to the amino acid framework or backbone, including moieties that contribute to the anchoring activity of the anchoring domain, or moieties that contribute to the infection-preventing activity or the therapeutic domain. For example, the protein-based therapeutics of the present invention can comprise compounds and molecules such as but not limited to: carbohydrates, fatty acids, lipids, steroids, nucleotides, nucleotide analogues, nucleic acid molecules, nucleic acid analogues, peptide nucleic acid molecules, small organic molecules, or even polymers. The protein-based therapeutics of the present invention can also comprise modified or non-naturally occurring amino acids. Non-amino acid portions of the compounds can serve any purpose, including but not limited to: facilitating the purification of the compound, improving the solubility or distribution or the compound (such as in a therapeutic formulation), linking domains of the compound or linking chemical moieties to the compound, contributing to the two-dimensional or three-dimensional structure of the compound, increasing the overall size of the compound, increasing the stability of the compound, and contributing to the anchoring activity or therapeutic activity of the compound.
The peptide or protein-based compounds of the present invention can also include protein or peptide sequences in addition to those that comprise anchoring domains or therapeutic domains. The additional protein sequences can serve any purpose, including but not limited to any of the purposes outlined above (facilitating the purification of the compound, improving the solubility or distribution or the compound, linking domains of the compound or linking chemical moieties to the compound, contributing to the two-dimensional or three-dimensional structure of the compound, increasing the overall size of the compound, increasing the stability of the compound, or contributing to the anchoring activity or therapeutic activity of the compound). Preferably any additional protein or amino acid sequences are part of a single polypeptide or protein chain that includes the anchoring domain or domains and therapeutic domain or domains, but any feasible arrangement of protein sequences is within the scope of the present invention.
The anchoring domain and therapeutic domain can be arranged in any appropriate way that allows the compound to bind at or near a target cell membrane such that the therapeutic domain can exhibit an extracellular activity that prevents or impedes infection of the target cell by a pathogen. The compound will preferably have at least one protein or peptide-based anchoring domain and at least one peptide or protein-based therapeutic domain. In this case, the domains can be arranged linearly along the peptide backbone in any order. The anchoring domain can be N-terminal to the therapeutic domain, or can be C-terminal to the therapeutic domain. It is also possible to have one or more therapeutic domains flanked by at least one anchoring domain on each end. Alternatively, one or more anchoring domains can be flanked by at least one therapeutic domain on each end. Chemical, or preferably, peptide, linkers can optionally be used to join some or all of the domains of a compound.
It is also possible to have the domains in a nonlinear, branched arrangement. For example, the therapeutic domain can be attached to a derivatized side chain of an amino acid that is part of a polypeptide chain that also includes, or is linked to, the anchoring domain.
A compound of the present invention can have more than one anchoring domain. In cases in which a compound has more than one anchoring domain, the anchoring domains can be the same or different. A compound of the present invention can have more than one therapeutic domain. In cases in which a compound has more than one therapeutic domain, the therapeutic domains can be the same or different. Where a compound comprises multiple anchoring domains, the anchoring domains can be arranged in tandem (with or without linkers) or on alternate sides of other domains, such as therapeutic domains. Where a compound comprises multiple therapeutic domains, the therapeutic domains can be arranged in tandem (with or without linkers) or on alternate sides of other domains, such as, but not limited to, anchoring domains.
A peptide or protein-based compound of the present invention can be made by any appropriate way, including purifying naturally occurring proteins, optionally proteolytically cleaving the proteins to obtain the desired functional domains, and conjugating the functional domains to other functional domains. Peptides can also be chemically synthesized, and optionally chemically conjugated to other peptides or chemical moieties. Preferably, however, a peptide or protein-based compound of the present invention is made by engineering a nucleic acid construct to encode at least one anchoring domain and at least one therapeutic domain together (with or without nucleic acid linkers) in a continuous polypeptide. The nucleic acid constructs, preferably having appropriate expression sequences, can be transfected into prokaryotic or eukaryotic cells, and the therapeutic protein-based compound can be expressed by the cells and purified. Any desired chemical moieties can optionally be conjugated to the peptide or protein-based compound after purification. In some cases, cell lines can be chosen for expressing the protein-based therapeutic for their ability to perform desirable post-translational modifications (such as, but not limited to glycosylation).
A great variety of constructs can be designed and their protein products tested for desirable activities (such as, for example, binding activity of an anchoring domain, or a binding, catalytic, or inhibitory activity of a therapeutic domain). The protein products of nucleic acid constructs can also be tested for their efficacy in preventing or impeding infection of a target cell by a pathogen. In vitro and in vivo tests for the infectivity of pathogens are known in the art, such as those described in the Examples for the infectivity of influenza virus.
Anchoring Domain
As used herein, an “extracellular anchoring domain” or “anchoring domain” is any moiety that can stably bind an entity that is at or on the exterior surface of a target cell or is in close proximity to the exterior surface of a target cell. An anchoring domain serves to retain a compound of the present invention at or near the external surface of a target cell.
An extracellular anchoring domain preferably binds 1) a molecule expressed on the surface of a target cell, or a moiety, domain, or epitope of a molecule expressed on the surface of a target cell, 2) a chemical entity attached to a molecule expressed on the surface of a target cell, or 3) a molecule of the extracellular matrix surrounding a target cell.
An anchoring domain is preferably a peptide or protein domain (including a modified or derivatized peptide or protein domain), or comprises a moiety coupled to a peptide or protein. A moiety coupled to a peptide or protein can be any type of molecule that can contribute to the binding of the anchoring domain to an entity at or near the target cell surface, and is preferably an organic molecule, such as, for example, nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid, nucleic acid analogue, nucleotide, nucleotide analogue, small organic molecule, polymer, lipids, steroid, fatty acid, carbohydrate, or any combination of any of these.
A molecule, complex, domain, or epitope that is bound by an anchoring domain may or may not be specific for the target cell. For example, an anchoring domain may bind an epitope present on molecules on or in close proximity to the target cell and that occur at sites other than the vicinity of the target cell as well. In many cases, however, localized delivery of a therapeutic compound of the present invention will restrict its occurrence primarily to the surface of target cells. In other cases, a molecule, complex, moiety, domain, or epitope bound by an anchoring domain may be specific to a target tissue or target cell type.
Target tissue or target cell type includes the sites in an animal or human body where a pathogen invades or amplifies. For example, a target cell can be an endothelial cell that can be infected by a pathogen. A composition of the present invention can comprise an anchoring domain that can bind a cell surface epitope, for example, that is specific for the endothelial cell type. In another example, a target cell can be an epithelial cell and a composition of the present invention can bind an epitope present on the cell surface of many epithelial cell types, or present in the extracellular matrix of different types of epithelial cells. In this case localized delivery of the composition can restrict its localization to the site of the epithelial cells that are targets of the pathogen.
A compound for preventing or treating infection by a pathogen can comprise an anchoring domain that can bind at or near the surface of epithelial cells. For example, heparan sulfate, closely related to heparin, is a type of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) that is ubiquitously present on cell membranes, including the surface of respiratory epithelium. Many proteins specifically bind to heparin/heparan sulfate, and the GAG-binding sequences in these proteins have been identified (Meyer, F A, King, M and Gelman, R A. (1975) Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 392: 223-232; Schauer, S. ed., pp 233. Sialic Acids Chemistry, Metabolism and Function. Springer-Verlag, 1982). For example, the GAG-binding sequences of human platelet factor 4 (PF4) (SEQ ID NO:2), human interleukin 8 (IL8) (SEQ ID NO:3), human antithrombin III (AT III) (SEQ ID NO:4), human apoprotein E (ApoE) (SEQ ID NO:5), human angio-associated migratory cell protein (AAMP) (SEQ ID NO:6), or human amphiregulin (SEQ ID NO:7) (FIG. 2) have been shown to have very high affinity (in the nanomolar range) towards heparin (Lee, M K and Lander, A D. (1991) Pro Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2768-2772; Goger, B, Halden, Y, Rek, A, Mosl, R, Pye, D. Gallagher, J and Kungl, A J. (2002) Biochem. 41:1640-1646; Witt, D P and Lander A D (1994) Curr Bio 4:394-400; Weisgraber, K H, Rall, S C, Mahley, R W, Milne, R W and Marcel, Y. (1986) J Bio Chem 261:2068-2076). The GAG-binding sequences of these proteins are distinct from their receptor-binding sequences, so they will not induce the biological activities associated with the full-length proteins or the receptor-binding domains. These sequences, or other sequences that have been identified or are identified in the future as heparin/heparan sulfate binding sequences, or sequences substantially homologous to identified heparin/heparan sulfate binding sequences that have heparin/heparan sulfate binding activity, can be used as epithelium-anchoring-domains in compounds of the present invention that can be used to prevent or treat, for example, respiratory epithelium-infecting viruses such as, but not limited to, influenza virus.
An anchoring domain can bind a moiety that is specific to the target cell type of a particular species or can bind a moiety that is found in the target cell type of more than one species. In cases where the anchoring domain can bind moieties that are present at the surface of target cells of more than one species, and a virus or pathogen can infect more than one species, a therapeutic compound can have utility for more than one species (providing that the therapeutic domain is also effective across the relevant species.) For example, in the case of therapeutic compounds that can be used against influenza virus, a therapeutic compound of the present invention that has an anchoring domain that binds heparin/heparan sulfate, the compound can be used in mammals (including humans) as well as avians.
Therapeutic Domain
A compound of the present invention includes at least one therapeutic domain that has an extracellular activity that can prevent or impede the infection of a cell by a pathogen. The therapeutic activity can be, as nonlimiting examples, a binding activity, a catalytic activity, or an inhibitory activity. In some embodiments of the present invention, the therapeutic activity acts to modify or inhibit a function of the pathogen that contributes to infectivity of the cell by the pathogen. In other embodiments, a therapeutic domain can modify or inhibit a function of the target cell or target organism.
For example, the therapeutic domain can bind a receptor on a target cell that is necessary for binding of the pathogen to a target cell. In this way the therapeutic moiety can block binding of the pathogen to a target cell and prevent infection. In an alternative, a therapeutic domain can bind a molecule or epitope on a pathogen to prevent an interaction of the molecule or epitope with a target cell that is necessary for infection. A therapeutic domain can also have a catalytic activity that can degrade a molecule or epitope of the pathogen or host that allows for or promotes infection of a target cell by a host. In yet other embodiments, a therapeutic domain can be an inhibitor of an activity that is necessary for target cell infection by a pathogen. The inhibited activity can be an activity of the host organism or of the pathogen.
The therapeutic domain preferably acts extracellularly, meaning that its infection-preventing activity takes place at the target cell surface or in the immediate area surrounding the target cell, including sites within the extracellular matrix, intracellular spaces, or luminal spaces of tissues.
A therapeutic domain is preferably a peptide or protein domain (including a modified or derivatized peptide or protein domain), or comprises a moiety coupled to a peptide or protein. A moiety coupled to a peptide or protein can be any type of molecule that can prevent or impede the infection of a target cell by a pathogen, and is preferably an organic molecule, such as, for example, nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid, nucleic acid analogue, nucleotide, nucleotide analogue, small organic molecule, polymer, lipids, steroid, fatty acid, carbohydrate, or any combination of any of these.
A therapeutic domain can be a synthetic peptide or polypeptide, or can comprise a synthetic molecule that can be conjugated to a peptide or polypeptide, can be a naturally-occurring peptide or protein, or a domain of naturally-occurring protein. A therapeutic domain can also be a peptide or protein that is substantially homologous to a naturally-occurring peptide or protein.
A therapeutic domain can have utility in a particular species, or can prevent or impede pathogen infection in more than one species. For example, therapeutic domains that inhibit pathogen functions can in general be used in a range of species that can be infected by the host, while therapeutic domains that interrupt host-pathogen interactions by interfering with a property of the host may or may not be species-specific. In many cases, anchoring domains and therapeutic domains can be effective in more than one species, so that compounds of the present invention can be used to advance human and animal health, while reducing propagation and spread of the virus through animal hosts. For example, when the therapeutic domain is a sialidase, a sialidase that can cleave more than one type of linkage between a sialic acid residue and the remainder of a substrate molecule, in particular, a sialidase that can cleave both alpha(2,6)-Gal and alpha (2,3)-Gal linkages, can protect humans from infections by a broad-spectrum of influenza viruses, including viruses that are naturally hosted in different species such as birds, pigs or horses.
Linkers
A compound of the present invention can optionally include one or more linkers that can join domains of the compound. Linkers can be used to provide optimal spacing or folding of the domains of a compound. The domains of a compound joined by linkers can be therapeutic domains, anchoring domains, or any other domains or moieties of the compound that provide additional functions such as enhancing compound stability, facilitating purification, etc. A linker used to join domains of compounds of the present invention can be a chemical linker or an amino acid or peptide linker. Where a compound comprises more than one linker, the linkers can be the same or different. Where a compound comprises more than one linker, the linkers can be of the same or different lengths.
Many chemical linkers of various compositions, polarity, reactivity, length, flexibility, and cleavability are known in the art of organic chemistry. Preferred linkers of the present invention include amino acid or peptide linkers. Peptide linkers are well known in the art. Preferably linkers are between one and one hundred amino acids in length, and more preferably between one and thirty amino acids in length, although length is not a limitation in the linkers of the compounds of the present invention. Preferably linkers comprise amino acid sequences that do not interfere with the conformation and activity of peptides or proteins encoded by monomers of the present invention. Some preferred linkers of the present invention are those that include the amino acid glycine. For example, linkers having the sequence:
(GGGGS (SEQ ID NO: 10))n, where n is a whole number between 1 and 20, or more preferably between 1 and 12, can be used to link domains of therapeutic compounds of the present invention.
Composition Comprising at Least One Anchoring Domain and at Least One Protease Inhibitor
In some aspects of the present invention, a therapeutic domain that has an extracellular activity that can prevent the infection of a cell by a pathogen is a protease inhibitor. The protease inhibitor can be any type of chemical entity, such as, for example, a carbohydrate or polymer, but is preferably a protein or peptide that inhibits the activity of an enzyme. Preferably, the protease inhibitor inhibits the activity of an enzyme that at least partially processes at least one pathogen or host cell protein, where the processing of the pathogen or host cell protein is necessary for pathogen infectivity. The enzyme that can process a viral protein necessary for pathogen infectivity can be a pathogen enzyme, or an enzyme that originates from the host organism. Preferably, the processing enzyme acts at or near the target cell surface, so that a compound of the present invention that is anchored at or near the surface of a target cell can effectively inhibit the activity of the enzyme.
Compounds of the present invention that comprise protease inhibitory domains can be used to inhibit infection by any pathogen that requires a protease in its life cycle, in which the protease is active at or near the surface of the host cell. These protein-based compositions can have, for example, one of the following structures:
(Anchoring Domain)n-linker-(Protease Inhibitor)n (n=1, 2, 3 or more) or:
(Protease Inhibitor)n-linker-(Anchoring Domain)n (n=1, 2, 3 or more)
The protease inhibitor can be a monomeric form of a peptide or polypeptide or can be multiple copies of the same polypeptide that are either linked directly or with spacing sequence in between. Alternatively, different polypeptide-based protease inhibitors can be linked with each other, such as, for example, aprotinin linked with soybean protease inhibitor as protease inhibiting functional domains. The polypeptides or peptides can be linked directly or via a spacer composed of peptide linker sequence. The anchoring domain can be any peptide or polypeptide that can bind at or near the surface of target cells.
The protease inhibitor can be a naturally occurring protease inhibitor (or an active portion thereof) or can be an engineered protease inhibitor. A peptide protease inhibitor used in a compound of the present invention can have a sequence substantially homologous to a naturally occurring protease inhibitor, having one or more deletions, additions, or substitutions while retaining the activity, or substantially retaining the same activity, of the naturally occurring protease inhibitor.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, a therapeutic compound of the present invention is for the prevention and treatment of influenza in humans, and the therapeutic domain is a protein or peptide protease inhibitor that can inhibit a serine protease that can cleave the influenza virus hemagglutinin precursor protein HA0 into HA1 and HA2.
A number of serine protease inhibitors have been shown to reduce HA cleavage and influenza virus activation in cultured cells, in chicken embryos and in lungs of infected mice. They include many of the commonly used trypsin inhibitors, such as: aprotinin (Zhimov O P, Ikizler M R and Wright P F. (2002) J Virol 76:8682-8689), leupeptin (Zhimov O P, Ikizler M R and Wright P F. (2002) J Virol 76:8682-8689; Tashiro M, Klenk H D and Rott R. (1987) J Gen Virol 68:2039-2043), soybean protease inhibitor (Barbey-Morel C L, Oeltmann T N, Edwards K M and Wright P F. (1987) J Infect Dis 155:667-672), e-aminocaproic acid (Zhimov O P, Ovchartenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. 1982. Arch Virol 73:263-272) and n-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethylketone (TLCK) (Barbey-Morel C L, Oeltmann T N, Edwards K M and Wright P F. (1987) J Infect Dis 155:667-672). Among these, aerosol inhalation of aprotinin has shown definitive therapeutic effects against influenza and parainfluenza bronchopneumonia in mice (Zhimov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. (1984) J Gen Virol 65:191-196; Zhimov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. (1985) J Gen Virol 66:1633-1638; Zhimov O P. (1987) J Med Virol 21:161-167; Ovcharenko A V and Zhimov O P. (1994) Antiviral Res 23:107-118) as well as in human (Zhimov O P. (1983) Problems Virol. 4:9-12 (in Russian)).
Aprotinin (SEQ ID NO: 1; FIG. 1) is a 58 amino acid polypeptide inhibitor (also called Trasylol or bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI)). A compound of the present invention can have one or more aprotinin domains; for example, a therapeutic composition of the present invention can have from one to six aprotinin polypeptides, more preferably from one to three aprotinin polypeptides. A compound of the present invention can also have a therapeutic domain comprising a polypeptide or peptide having substantial homology to the amino acid sequence of aprotinin.
A compound for preventing or treating influenza that comprises a protease inhibitor preferably comprises an anchoring domain that can bind at or near the surface of epithelial cells. In some preferred embodiments, the epithelium anchoring domain is a GAG-binding sequence from a human protein, such as, for example, the GAG-binding sequence of human platelet factor 4 (PF4) (SEQ ID NO:2), human interleukin 8 (IL8) (SEQ ID NO:3), human antithrombin III (AT III) (SEQ ID) NO:4), human apoprotein E (ApoE) (SEQ ID NO:5), human angio-associated migratory cell protein (AAMP) (SEQ ID NO:6), or human amphiregulin (SEQ ID NO:7) (FIG. 2). A compound of the present invention can also have an anchoring domain comprising a polypeptide or peptide having substantial homology to the amino acid sequences of the GAG-binding domains listed in SEQ ID NO:2, SEQ ID NO:3, SEQ ID NO:4, SEQ ID NO:5, SEQ ID NO:6, and SEQ ID NO:7.
Clinically, a drug comprising aprotinin and an epithelial anchoring domain can be administered by aerosol inhalation to cover the entire respiratory tract to prevent and treat bronchopneumonia caused by influenza viruses, or any other virus, such as parainfluenza virus, that requires serine proteases in its life cycle. Alternatively, an aprotinin/epithelial anchoring domain fusion protein can be administered as nasal spray to treat uncomplicated early stage influenza cases or other infections by respiratory viruses. In addition, an aprotinin/epithelial anchoring domain fusion protein can be used as a prophylaxis for influenza or other viral infections before an infection occurs.
Composition Comprising at Least One Anchoring Domain and at Least One Catalytic Activity
In some aspects of the present invention, a therapeutic domain that has an extracellular activity that can prevent the infection of a cell by a pathogen is a catalytic activity. The enzymatic activity can be a catalytic activity that removes, degrades or modifies a host molecule or complex or a pathogen molecule or complex that contributes to the infectivity of the pathogen. Preferably the host molecule or complex or pathogen molecule or complex that is removed, degraded, or modified by the enzymatic activity of a compound of the present invention is on, at, or near the surface of a target cell, so that a compound of the present invention that is anchored to the surface of a target cell can effectively inhibit the host or pathogen molecule or complex.
For example, a therapeutic domain can have a catalytic activity that can digest a molecule or epitope of the pathogen or target cell that is required for host-pathogen binding, and subsequent entry of the pathogen into the target cell. Receptors on target cells that allow for the entry of viruses into cells can be the target of an enzymatic activity of a compound of the present invention.
Compounds of the present invention that comprise catalytic domains can be used to inhibit infection by any pathogen that uses a receptor to gain entry to a target cell, as long as removal of the receptor does not impair the organism. These protein-based compositions can have, for example, one of the following structures:
(Anchoring Domain)n-[linker]-(Enzymatic Activity)n (n=1, 2, 3 or more) or:
(Enzymatic Activity)n (n=1, 2, 3 or more)-[linker]-(Anchoring Domain)n,
where the linkers are optional.
The enzymatic activity can be a monomeric form of a peptide or polypeptide or can be multiple copies of the same polypeptide that are either linked directly or with spacing sequence in between. The polypeptides or peptides can be linked directly or via a spacer composed of peptide linker sequence. The anchoring domain can be any peptide or polypeptide that can bind to or near the surface of target cells.
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, a therapeutic domain comprises a sialidase that can eliminate or greatly reduce the level of sialic acid on the surface of epithelial cells. Sialic acid is a receptor for influenza viruses. Thus, treating the surface of respiratory epithelial cells with a sialidase can prevent influenza infections or interrupt early infections. The therapeutic domain can comprise a complete sialidase protein, or an active portion thereof. Compositions can be tested for their efficacy in cleaving sialic acid residues and reducing infection of target cells by influenza virus or other pathogens using methods known in the art and described in the examples.
Preferred sialidases are the large bacterial sialidases that can degrade the receptor sialic acids Neu5Ac alpha(2,6)-Gal and Neu5Ac alpha(2,3)-Gal. For example, the bacterial sialidase enzymes from Clostridium perfringens (Genbank Accession Number X87369), Actinomyces viscosus (SEQ ID NO: 12; Genbank Accession Number X62276), Arthrobacter ureafaciens, or Micromonospora viridifaciens (Genbank Accession Number D01045) can be used. Therapeutic domains of compounds of the present invention can comprise all or a portion of the amino acid sequence of a large bacterial sialidase or can comprise amino acid sequences that are substantially homologous to all or a portion of the amino acid sequence of a large bacterial sialidase. Other preferred sialidases are the human sialidases such as those encoded by the genes NEU2 (SEQ ID NO:8; Genbank Accession Number Y16535; Monti, E, Preti, Rossi, E., Ballabio, A and Borsani G. (1999) Genomics 57:137-143) and NEU4 (SEQ ID NO:9; Genbank Accession Number NM080741; Monti, E, Preti, A, Venerando, B. and Borsani, G. (2002) Neurochem Res 27:646-663) (FIG. 3). Therapeutic domains of compounds of the present invention can comprise all or a portion of the amino acid sequences of a human sialidase or can comprise amino acid sequences that are substantially homologous to all or a portion of the amino acid sequences of a human sialidase. Preferably, where a therapeutic domain comprises a portion of the amino acid sequences of a naturally occurring sialidase, or sequences substantially homologous to a portion of the amino acid sequences of a naturally occurring sialidase, the portion comprises essentially the same activity as the human sialidase.
A compound for preventing or treating influenza that comprises an enzymatic domain preferably comprises an anchoring domain that can bind at or near the surface of epithelial cells. In some preferred embodiments, the epithelium-anchoring domain is a GAG-binding sequence from a human protein, such as, for example, the GAG-binding amino acid sequences of human platelet factor 4 (PF4) (SEQ ID NO:2), human interleukin 8 (IL8) (SEQ ID NO:3), human antithrombin III (AT III) (SEQ ID NO:4), human apoprotein E (ApoE) (SEQ ID NO:5), human angio-associated migratory cell protein (AAMP) (SEQ ID NO:6), and human amphiregulin (SEQ ID NO:7) (FIG. 2). An epithelial anchoring domain can also be substantially homologous to a naturally occurring GAG-binding sequence, such as those listed in FIG. 2.
It is also within the scope of the present invention to use compounds comprising a human sialidase, or comprising a sialidase with substantial homology to a human sialidase, in the absence of an anchoring domain, in the treatment or prevention of pathogen infections, such as but not limited to influenza, paramyxovirus, coronavirus, rotavirus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. The present invention recognizes that such infections may be prevented or abated by the use of sialidases, such as, but not limited to, human sialidases such as NEU2 and NEU4. The sialidases can optionally be adapted, by genetic or chemical engineering, or by pharmaceutical formulation, to improve their half life or retention at the respiratory epithelium.
Because influenza viruses primarily infect the upper respiratory tract, removing the receptor sialic acid locally in the nasal cavity and nasopharynx area can prevent infections or interrupt early infections. The sialidase can be delivered to the upper respiratory tract as a nasal spray, and it can be used either in therapeutic mode during early stage of influenza (or other infection) or in prophylactic mode before the infection occurs. Alternatively, it can be delivered to the lower respiratory tract as an inhalant to treat influenza and to prevent influenza complications, such as bronchopneumonia.
II. Pharmaceutical Compositions
The present invention includes compounds of the present invention formulated as pharmaceutical compositions. The pharmaceutical compositions comprise a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier prepared for storage and preferably subsequent administration, which have a pharmaceutically effective amount of the compound in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or diluent. Acceptable carriers or diluents for therapeutic use are well known in the pharmaceutical art, and are described, for example, in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa. (1990)). Preservatives, stabilizers, dyes and even flavoring agents can be provided in the pharmaceutical composition. For example, sodium benzoate, sorbic acid and esters of p-hydroxybenzoic acid can be added as preservatives. In addition, antioxidants and suspending agents can be used.
Depending on the target cell, the compounds of the present invention can be formulated and used as tablets, capsules or elixirs for oral administration; salves or ointments for topical application; suppositories for rectal administration; sterile solutions, suspensions, and the like for use as inhalants or nasal sprays. Injectables can also be prepared in conventional forms either as liquid solutions or suspensions, solid forms suitable for solution or suspension in liquid prior to injection, or as emulsions. Suitable excipients are, for example, water, saline, dextrose, mannitol, lactose, lecithin, albumin, sodium glutamate, cysteine hydrochloride and the like. In addition, if desired, the injectable pharmaceutical compositions can contain minor amounts of nontoxic auxiliary substances, such as wetting agents, pH buffering agents and the like.
The pharmaceutically effective amount of a test compound required as a dose will depend on the route of administration, the type of animal or patient being treated, and the physical characteristics of the specific animal under consideration. The dose can be tailored to achieve a desired effect, but will depend on such factors as weight, diet, concurrent medication and other factors which those skilled in the medical arts will recognize. In practicing the methods of the present invention, the pharmaceutical compositions can be used alone or in combination with one another, or in combination with other therapeutic or diagnostic agents. These products can be utilized in vivo, preferably in a mammalian patient, preferably in a human, or in vitro. In employing them in vivo, the pharmaceutical compositions can be administered to the patient in a variety of ways, including topically, parenterally, intravenously, subcutaneously, intramuscularly, colonically, rectally, nasally or intraperitoneally, employing a variety of dosage forms. Such methods can also be used in testing the activity of test compounds in vivo.
In preferred embodiments, these pharmaceutical compositions may be in the form of orally-administrable suspensions, tablets; nasal sprays; or inhalants.
When administered orally as a suspension, compositions of the present invention are prepared according to techniques well-known in the art of pharmaceutical formulation and may contain microcrystalline cellulose for imparting bulk, alginic acid or sodium alginate as a suspending agent, methylcellulose as a viscosity enhancer, and sweeteners/flavoring agents known in the art. As immediate release tablets, these compositions may contain microcrystalline cellulose, dicalcium phosphate, starch, magnesium stearate and lactose and/or other excipients, binders, extenders, disintegrants, diluents and lubricants known in the art. Components in the formulation of a mouthwash or rinse include antimicrobials, surfactants, cosurfactants, oils, water and other additives such as sweeteners/flavoring agents known in the art.
When administered by a drinking solution, the composition comprises one or more of the compounds of the present invention, dissolved in water, with appropriate pH adjustment, and with carrier. The compound may be dissolved in distilled water, tap water, spring water, and the like. The pH can preferably be adjusted to between about 3.5 and about 8.5. Sweeteners may be added, e.g., 1% (w/v) sucrose.
Lozenges can be prepared according to U.S. Pat. No. 3,439,089, herein incorporated by reference for these purposes.
When administered by nasal aerosol or inhalation, the pharmaceutical compositions are prepared according to techniques well-known in the art of pharmaceutical formulation and may be prepared as solutions in saline, employing benzyl alcohol or other suitable preservatives, absorption promoters to enhance bioavailability, fluorocarbons, and/or other solubilizing or dispersing agents known in the art. See, for example, Ansel, H. C. et al., Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Drug Delivery Systems, Sixth Ed. (1995). Preferably these compositions and formulations are prepared with suitable nontoxic pharmaceutically acceptable ingredients. These ingredients are known to those skilled in the preparation of nasal dosage forms and some of these can be found in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Ed., Mack Publishing Co., Easton, Pa. (1990, a standard reference in the field. The choice of suitable carriers is highly dependent upon the exact nature of the nasal dosage form desired, e.g., solutions, suspensions, ointments, or gels. Nasal dosage forms generally contain large amounts of water in addition to the active ingredient. Minor amounts of other ingredients such as pH adjusters, emulsifiers or dispersing agents, preservatives, surfactants, jelling agents, or buffering and other stabilizing and solubilizing agents may also be present. Preferably, the nasal dosage form should be isotonic with nasal secretions.
Nasal formulations can be administers as drops, sprays, aerosols or by any other intranasal dosage form. Optionally, the delivery system can be a unit dose delivery system. The volume of solution or suspension delivered per dose can preferably be anywhere from about 5 to about 2000 microliters, more preferably from about 10 to about 1000 microliters, and yet more preferably from about 50 to about 500 microliters. Delivery systems for these various dosage forms can be dropper bottles, plastic squeeze units, atomizers, nebulizers or pharmaceutical aerosols in either unit dose or multiple dose packages.
The formulations of this invention may be varied to include; (1) other acids and bases to adjust the pH; (2) other tonicity imparting agents such as sorbitol, glycerin and dextrose; (3) other antimicrobial preservatives such as other parahydroxy benzoic acid esters, sorbate, benzoate, propionate, chlorbutanol, phenylethyl alcohol, benzalkonium chloride, and mercurials; (4) other viscosity imparting agents such as sodium carboxymethylcellulose, microcrystalline cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polyvinyl alcohol and other gums; (5) suitable absorption enhancers; (6) stabilizing agents such as antioxidants, like bisulfite and ascorbate, metal chelating agents such as sodium edetate and drug solubility enhancers such as polyethylene glycols.
III. Method of Preventing or Treating Infection by a Pathogen
The present invention also includes methods of preventing or treating infection by a pathogen. The method includes: treating a subject that is infected with a pathogen or at risk of being infected with a pathogen with a pharmaceutical composition of the present invention that comprises a compound that comprises at least one anchoring domain that can anchor the compound at or near the surface of a target cell and at least one therapeutic domain comprising a peptide or protein that has at least one extracellular activity that can prevent the infection of a target cell by a pathogen. The subject to be treated can be an animal or human subject.
Compounds of the present invention can be designed for human use or animal use. In some aspects of the present invention, a compound of the present invention can be used to prevent pathogen infection in a class of animals, such as mammals. In some aspects of the present invention, a composition can be used for human and animal use (although the formulation may differ). In these aspects, the active domains of a compound can be effective against more than one pathogen species, type, subtype, or strain and can be active in more than one host species. For example, some preferred compounds of the present invention that comprise, for example, active domains such as protease inhibitors that prevent processing of the HA protein of influenza virus, or sialidases that remove sialic acid receptors from target cells, or anchoring domains such as domains that bind heparin or heparan sulfate, can be used in birds, mammals, or humans. Such compounds that can be effective against a range of pathogens with the capacity to infect different host species can also be used in humans to combat infection by pathogens that are naturally hosted in other species.
In some preferred embodiments of the present invention, the pharmaceutical composition prevents infection by influenza, and a therapeutically effective amount of the pharmaceutical composition is applied to the respiratory epithelial cells of a subject. This can be done by the use of an inhaler, or by the use of a nasal spray. Preferably, the inhaler or nasal spray is used from one to four times a day.
Dosage
As will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art, the useful in vivo dosage to be administered and the particular mode of administration will vary depending upon the age, weight and type of patient being treated, the particular pharmaceutical composition employed, and the specific use for which the pharmaceutical composition is employed. The determination of effective dosage levels, that is the dose levels necessary to achieve the desired result, can be accomplished by one skilled in the art using routine methods as discussed above. In non-human animal studies, applications of the pharmaceutical compositions are commenced at higher dose levels, with the dosage being decreased until the desired effect is no longer achieved or adverse side effects are reduced or disappear. The dosage for a compound of the present invention can range broadly depending upon the desired affects, the therapeutic indication, route of administration and purity and activity of the compound. Typically, human clinical applications of products are commenced at lower dosage levels, with dosage level being increased until the desired effect is achieved. Alternatively, acceptable in vitro studies can be used to establish useful doses and routes of administration of the test compound. Typically, dosages can be between about 1 ng/kg and about 10 mg/kg, preferably between about 10 ng/kg and about 1 mg/kg, and more preferably between about 100 ng/kg and about 100 micrograms/kg.
The exact formulation, route of administration and dosage can be chosen by the individual physician in view of the patient's condition (see, Fingle et al., in The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (1975)). It should be noted that the attending physician would know how to and when to terminate, interrupt or adjust administration due to toxicity, organ dysfunction or other adverse effects. Conversely, the attending physician would also know to adjust treatment to higher levels if the clinical response were not adequate. The magnitude of an administrated does in the management of the disorder of interest will vary with the severity of the condition to be treated and to the route of administration. The severity of the condition may, for example, be evaluated, in part, by standard prognostic evaluation methods. Further, the dose and perhaps dose frequency, will also vary according to the age, body weight and response of the individual patient, including those for veterinary applications.
Thus, in accordance with the present invention, there is further provided a method of treating and a pharmaceutical composition for treating influenza virus infection and prevention of influenza virus infection. The treatment involves administering to a patient in need of such treatment a pharmaceutical carrier and a therapeutically effective amount of any composition of the present invention, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof.
In one preferred regimen, appropriate dosages are administered to each patient by either nasal spray or by oral lozenge. It will be understood, however, that the specific dose level and frequency of dosage for any particular patient may be varied and will depend upon a variety of factors including the activity of the specific salt or other form employed, the metabolic stability and length of action of that compound, the age, body weight, general health, sex, diet, mode and time of administration, rate of excretion, drug combination, the severity of the particular condition, and the host undergoing therapy.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

Synthesizing Aprotinin Genes, Purifying and Testing Aprotinin Fusion Proteins

Introduction
Influenza viral protein hemagglutinin (HA) is the major influenza envelope protein. It plays an essential role in viral infection. The importance of HA is evidenced by the fact that it is the major target for protective neutralizing antibodies produced by the host immune response (Hayden, F G. (1996) In Antiviral drug resistance (ed. D. D. Richman), pp. 59-77. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.). It is now clear that HA has two different functions in viral infection. First, HA is responsible for the attachment of the virus to sialic acid cell receptors. Second, HA mediates viral entry into target cells by triggering fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes.
HA is synthesized as a precursor protein, HA0, which is transferred through the Golgi apparatus to the cell surface as a trimeric molecular complex. HA0 is further cleaved to generate the C terminus HA1 (residue 328 of HA0) and the N terminus of HA2. It is generally believed that the cleavage occurs at the cell surface or on released viruses. The cleavage of HA0 into HA1/HA2 is not required for HA binding to a sialic acid receptor; however, it is essential for viral infectivity (Klenk, H D and Rott, R. (1988) Adv VirRes. 34:247-281; Kido, H, Niwa, Y, Beppu, Y. and Towatari, T. (1996) Advan Enzyme Regul 36:325-347; Skehel, J J and Wiley, D C. (2000) Annu Rev Biochem 69:531-569).
Sensitivity of HA0 to host proteases is determined by the proteolytic site in the external loop of HA0 molecule. The proteolytic site may contain either a single Arg or Lys residue (monobasic cleavage site) or several Lys and/or Arg residues in R—X—K/R—R motif (multibasic cleavage site). Only the influenza A virus subtypes H5 and H7 have HA proteins carrying the multibasic cleavage site. All other influenza A, B and C viruses contain HA proteins having the monobasic cleavage site. Influenza A viruses having multibasic cleavage sites are more virulent and induce systemic infection in hosts whereas viruses with a monobasic HA site initiate infection only in the respiratory tract in mammals or in the respiratory and enteric tracts in avian species (Klenk, H D and Garten W. 1994. Trend Micro 2:39-43 for review). Fortunately, human infection by the highly virulent avian influenza A H5 and H7 subtypes, which carry the multibasic cleavage site, has so far only occurred in a handful of cases discovered mostly in Hong Kong. The vast majority of influenza infections are caused by viruses with HA proteins are cleaved at the monobasic cleavage site.
Influenza virus HA subtypes 5 and 7 that contain multibasic cleavage sites are activated by furin, a member of the subtilisin-like endoproteases, or the pre-protein convertase family. Furin cleaves the virus intracellularly and is ubiquitously present in many cell types, allowing the virulent, systemic infection seen with such viruses (Klenk, H D and Garten W. 1994. Trend Micro 2:39-43; Nakayama, K. 1997. Biochem 327:625-635). All other influenza viruses, which have HAs with monobasic cleavage sites, are activated by secreted, trypsin-like serine proteases. Enzymes that have been implicated in influenza virus activation include: plasmin (Lazarowitz S G, Goldberg A R and Choppin P W. 1973. Virology 56:172-180), mini-plasmin (Murakami M, Towatari T, Ohuchi M, Shiota M, Akao M, Okumura Y, Parry M A and Kido H. (2001) Eur J Biochem 268: 2847-2855), tryptase Clara (Kido H, Chen Y and Murakami M. (1999) In B. Dunn (ed.), Proteases of infectious agents. p. 205-217, Academic Press, New York, N.Y.), kallikrein, urokinase, thrombin (Scheiblauer H, Reinacher M, Tashiro M and Rott R. (1992) J Infec Dis 166:783-791), blood clotting factor Xa (Gotoh B, Ogasawara T, Toyoda T, Inocencio N, Hamaguchi M and Nagai Y. (1990) EMBO J. 9:4189-4195), acrosin (Garten W, Bosch F X, Linder D, Rott R and Klenk H D. (1981) Virology 115:361-374.), proteases from human respiratory lavage (Barbey-Morel C L, Oeltmann T N, Edwards K M and Wright P F. (1987) J Infect Dis 155:667-672) and bacterial proteases from Staphylococcus aureus (Tashiro M, Ciborowski P, Reinacher M, Pulverer G, Klenk H D and Rott R. (1987) Virology 157:421-430) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Callan R J, Hartmann F A, West S E and Hinshaw V S. (1997) J Virol 71:7579-7585). Activation of influenza viruses by host serine proteases is generally considered to occur extracellularly either at the plasma membrane or after virus release from the cell.
Aprotinin, also called Trasylol, or bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (BPTI) is a polypeptide having 58 amino acids. It belongs to the family of Kunitz-type inhibitors and competitively inhibits a wide spectrum of serine proteases, including trypsin, chymotrypsin, plasmin and plasma kallikrein. Aprotinin has long been used as a human therapeutics, such as treatment of pancreatitis, various states of shock syndrome, hyperfibrinolytic haemorrhage and myocardial infarction. It is also used in open-heart surgery, including cardiopulmonary bypass operations, to reduce blood loss (Fritz H and Wunderer G. (1983) Arzneim-Forsch 33:479-494).
The safety of aprotinin in human has been well documented through years of clinical applications. In addition, aprotinin is apparently a very weak immunogen as aprotinin-specific antibodies have not been observed in human sera so far (Fritz H and Wunderer G. (1983) Arzneim-Forsch 33:479-494). Another desired feature of aprotinin as a drug candidate is its superb stability. It can be kept at room temperature for at least 18 months without any loss of activity (Fritz H and Wunderer G. (1983) Arzneim-Forsch 33:479-494).
To achieve significant viral inhibition in animal studies that have been performed, aprotinin was administered at high doses. For example, 280 micrograms to 840 micrograms per day of aprotinin was injected intraperitoneally into each mouse for 6 days (Zhimov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. (1984) J Gen Virol 65:191-196); a lower dosage was required for aerosol inhalation, still, each mouse was given 63-126 micrograms per day for 6 days (Ovcharenko A V and Zhimov O P. (1994) Antiviral Res 23:107-118). A very high dose of aprotinin would be required in human based on extrapolation from the mouse data. Therefore to achieve better efficacy in human, the potency of aprotinin molecule needs to be significantly improved.
Aprotinin functions by competitively inhibiting serine proteases that are mostly on the surface of host respiratory epithelial cells. Local concentration of aprotinin in the vicinity of host proteases is therefore the key factor determining competitive advantage of aprotinin. We use two approaches that work synergistically to boost competitive advantage of aprotinin on the surface of respiratory epithelium.
First, the avidity (functional affinity) of aprotinin is increased by making multivalent aprotinin fusion proteins consisting of two, three, or more aprotinin proteins connected via linkers. Such a molecule is able to bind to membrane proteases in a multivalent fashion, which has significant kinetic advantage over the aprotinin monomer. Monomeric aprotinin binds to bovine trypsin very tightly with dissociation constant (Ki) being 6.0×10⁻¹⁴mol/l. However, its affinity compared to other proteases, such as chymotrypsin, plasmin and Kallikrein, which have been implicated in activation of influenza viruses, is much lower with Ki being at the level of 10⁻⁸to 10⁻⁹moll (Fritz H and Wunderer G. (1983) Arzneim-Forsch 33:479-494). Multimerization can increase aprotinin's affinity to these proteases exponentially.
Second, we fuse aprotinin with a respiratory epithelium-anchoring domain. The anchoring domain localizes aprotinin to the proximity of host membrane-associated proteases and maintains a high local concentration of aprotinin on epithelial surface. The anchoring domain also increases retention time of the drug on the respiratory epithelium.
Cloning
Aprotinin is a single chain polypeptide having 58 amino acid residues and 3 intra-chain disulfide bonds (SEQ ID NO: 1). The amino acid sequence of aprotinin is shown in FIG. 1. Genes encoding aprotinin and aprotinin fusion proteins are synthesized by PCR using overlapping oligonucleotides with codons optimized for E. coli expression as templates. The PCR products are cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO vector (Invitrogen). After sequencing, the genes are subcloned into an expression vector pQE (Qiagen). The vector carries a purification tag, Hisx6, to allow easy purification of the recombinant proteins. The constructs are used to transform E. coli. The transformed cells grown in LB-ampicillin medium to mid-log phase are induced by IPTG according to standard protocols. Cells are pelleted and lysed in phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS) by sonication. The enzymes, which have His₆purification tag, are purified using a nickel column (Qiagen).
The following aprotinin fusion proteins are made:
1. Dimeric and trimeric aprotinin. Two or three aprotinin genes are linked via a flexible linker as the following constructs:
Aprotinin-(GGGGS (SEQ ID NO: 10))n (n=3, 4 or 5)-Aprotinin; and
Aprotinin-(GGGGS(SEQ ID NO:10))n (n=3, 4 or 5)-Aprotinin-(GGGGS(SEQ ID NO:10))n (n=3, 4 or 5)-Aprotinin
The length of the linker sequence may determine three-dimensional flexibility of the multimeric aprotinin and thereby influence functional affinity of the molecule. Therefore constructs having linkers with various lengths are made.
Fully functional recombinant monomeric aprotinin has been produced in E. coli (Auerswald E A, Horlein D, Reinhardt G, Schroder W and Schnabel E. (1988). Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler Vol 369, Suppl., pp 27-35). We therefore expect proper folding of multivalent aprotinin proteins in E. coli cells. Besides expressing protein in various common E. coli cell strains, such as BL21, JM83, etc, the multivalent aprotinin proteins are also expressed in Origami™ cells (Novagen, Bad Soden, Germany). The Origami™ cell strain does not have thioredoxin and glutathione reductase and thus has an oxidizing cytoplasm. This cell strain has been used to successfully express a number of proteins that contain disulfide bonds (Bessette P H, Aslund F, Beckwith J and Georgiou G. (1999) Pro Natl Acad Sci USA 96:13703-13708; Venturi M, Seifert C and Hunte C. (2001) J Mol Biol 315:1-8.).
2. The epithelium cell-anchoring aprotinin. An epithelium cell-anchoring sequence is fused with aprotinin. The epithelium-anchoring sequence can be any peptide or polypeptide sequence that has affinity towards the surface of epithelial cells. We have selected three human GAG-binding sequences: PF4 (aa 47-70; SEQ ID NO: 2), IL-8 (aa 46-72; SEQ ID NO: 3), and AT III (aa 118-151; SEQ ID NO: 4) (FIG. 2). These sequences bind to heparin/heparan sulfate with nanomolar-level affinities (Table 1). Heparin/Heparan Sulfate are ubiquitously present on the respiratory epithelium. In separate constructs, the GAG-binding sequences are fused with the aprotinin gene on the N terminus and on the C terminus via a generic linker sequence GGGGS as the following constructs:
(GAG domain-GGGGS(SEQ ID NO: 10)-Aprotinin); and
(Aprotinin-GGGGS(SEQ ID NO: 10)-GAG domain)

TABLE 1

Affinities to Heparin

Protein Kd nM (ref)

PF4 27 (44)

IL-8 <5 (43)

ATIII 11 (42)

ApoE 620 (45)

Photometric Trypsin Inhibition Assay
The trypsin inhibition activity of aprotinin and aprotinin fusion proteins is measured by a photometric assay described previously in detail (Fritz H and Wunderer G. (1983) Arzneim-Forsch 33:479-494). Briefly, in this assay aprotinin inhibits the trypsin-catalyzed hydrolysis of Na-benzoyl-L-arginine-p-nitroanilide (BzArgpNA or L-BAPA) (Sigma), which is followed photometrically at 405 nm. One trypsin unit (U_BAPA) corresponds to the hydrolysis of 1 micromole substrate per min. One inhibitor unit (IU_BAPA) decreases the activity of two trypsin units by 50%, which corresponds arithmetically to the inhibition of 1 U_BAPAof trypsin. The specific activity of aprotinin is given in IU_BAPA/mg polypeptide.
Surface Plasmon Resonance Assay
The affinities of dimeric and trimeric aprotinin with various linkers are compared against the monomeric aprotinin using surface plasmon resonance assay, or BIAcore analysis (BIAcore, Piscataway, N.J.) with human plasmin as the target. Similarly, BIAcore assay with heparin as the target is used to analyze affinity between GAG binding aprotinin fusion proteins and heparin.
When plasmin is used as the target, purified human plasmin (Sigma) is immobilized on the CM5 chip according manufacturer's instructions (BLAcore, Piscataway, N.J.). When heparin is the target, biotinylated albumin and albumin-heparin (Sigma) are captured on a streptavidin-coated BIAcore SA chip as described previously (Xiang Y and Moss B. (2003) J Virol 77:2623-2630).

Example 2

Establishing Improved Tissue Culture Models for Studies on Influenza Virus Infection

Stocks of Influenza Viruses
Influenza viral strains are obtained from ATCC and the repository at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. All experiments involving influenza viruses are conducted at Bio-safety level II.
Viruses are propagated by injection into the allantoic cavity of nine-day-old chicken embryos as described (Zhirnov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. (1985) J Gen Virol 66:1633-1638). Alternatively, viral stocks are grown on Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells in minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 0.3% bovine serum albumin and 0.5 micrograms of trypsin per ml. After incubating for 48 to 72 hours, the culture medium is clarified by low speed centrifugation. Viral particles are pelleted by ultracentrifugation through a 25% sucrose cushion. Purified viruses are suspended in 50% glycerol-0.1M Tris buffer (pH 7.3) and stored at −20° C.
Plaque Assays
Infectivity and titer of the viral stocks are determined by two kinds of plaque assays, a conventional one and a modified one (Tobita, K, Sugiura, A, Enomoto, C. and Furuyama, M. (1975) Med Microbiol Immnuol 162:9-14; Zhirnov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. (1982) Arch Virol 71:177-183). The conventional plaque assay is routinely used as a virus titration method. It requires exogenous trypsin in agar overlay added immediately after virus infection to MDCK monolayers (Tobita, K, Sugiura, A, Enomoto, C. and Furuyama, M. (1975) Med Microbiol Immnuol 162:9-14). This method artificially increases infectivity of the viral stocks being tested by activating all the viral particles that have uncleaved HA.
Zhimov et. al. designed a modified plaque assay consisting of a double agar overlay, with trypsin being included in the second layer which is added 24 hours after infection (Zhimov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. (1982) Arch Virol 71:177-183). Three days after infection, cells are fixed with a 10% formaldehyde solution, agarose layers are removed, fixed cells are stained with hematoxylin-eosin solution and plaques are counted. The modified plaque assay allows accurate determination of the real infectivity of viral stocks that contain both cleaved and uncleaved HA. Combining results from both conventional and modified plaque assays, one can distinguish viruses containing cleaved or uncleaved HA and correlate infectivity of viral stocks with the status of HA cleavage.
Human Cell Culture Models
1. Short-term culture of primary human epithelial cells. Conventional in vitro influenza virus infection is mostly carried out in MDCK cells with exogenous trypsin added to the culture medium. This is far from being physiological and is inappropriate for the work proposed here because trypsin is not the protease that activate influenza viruses in vivo. Very limited numbers of in vitro tissue culture models that are able to support the growth of influenza virus without an exogenous protease have been reported so far, those being primary cultures with primate cells of renal origin, cells lining the allantoic and amniotic cavities of embryonated eggs, fetal tracheal ring organ cultures and primary human adenoid epithelial cells (Endo Y, Carroll K N, Ikizler M R and Wright P F. (1996) J Virol 70:2055-2058). Among these, the latest work with primary human adenoid epithelial cells is the closest mimic of human conditions. In this case, Endo et. al. (Endo Y, Carroll K N, Ikizler M R and Wright P F. (1996) J Virol 70:2055-2058) isolated epithelial cells from surgical samples of human adenoids, and cultured the epithelial cells on a collagen matrix (Vitrogen 100, Celtrix Laboratories, Palo Alto, Calif.) in Transwell inserts (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.). Cells were maintained in 50% Ham's F12 and 50% Eagles minimal essential media with supplements of growth factors and trace elements. The cells reached confluency in 10 to 14 days, remaining largely as a monolayer but with discrete patches of ciliated cells, which maintained regular ciliary activity for 1 to 3 weeks after reaching confluency. In this system, influenza A virus grew to a titer of 10⁶PFU/ml with a multiplicity of infection of 0.001 (Endo Y, Carroll K N, Ikizler M R and Wright P F. (1996) J Virol 70:2055-2058). Progressive cytopathogenic effects were also present during infection. The biggest drawback of this system is that it requires fresh human adenoid tissue.
To solve this problem, primary human adenoid epithelial cells are replaced with primary human airway epithelial cells that are commercially available (Cambrex), and the cells are grown under the same conditions. Such short-term culture of primary human airway epithelial cells is relatively quick to establish and is useful as the first-line experimental model for most of the in vitro infection and antiviral experiments.
2. Well-differentiated human airway epithelium (WD-HAE). In order to best mimic the in vivo condition of human airway, the model of well-differentiated human airway epithelium (WD-HAE) is used. WD-HAE is stratified epithelium that has all the differentiated cells of the normal human airway epithelium, including functional ciliated cells and mucus secreting cells. Therefore, in this model system influenza viruses are most likely to be activated by host proteases that are physiologically relevant. Although WD-HAE has been widely used to study respiratory viral infections, such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) (Zhang L, Peeples M E, Boucher R C, Collins P L and Pickles R J. (2002) J Virol 76:5654-5666) measles virus (Sinn P L, Williams G, Vongpunsawad S, Cattaneo R and McCray P B. (2002) J Virol 76:2403-2409, or human rhinovirus, it has not previously been used to study influenza viruses.
A detailed protocol of WD-HAE has been described previously (Krunkosky T M, Fischer B M, Martin L D, Jones N, Akley N J and Adler K B. (2000) Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 22:685-692). Briefly, commercial primary human bronchial epithelial cells (Cambrex) are cultured on Transwell-clear culture inserts (Costar) that are thin-coated with rat-tail collagen I. Cells are cultured submerged for the first 5 to 7 days in medium containing a 1:1 mixture of bronchial epithelial cell growth medium (BEGM) (Cambrex) and DMEM with high glucose with supplement of growth factors (Krunkosky T M, Fischer B M, Martin L D, Jones N, Akley N J and Adler K B. (2000) Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 22:685-692). When cultures are 70% confluent (days 5 to 7), the air-liquid interface is created by removing the apical medium and exposing cells only to medium on their basal surface. Cells are cultured for additional 14 days in air-liquid interphase, for a total of 21 days in culture, and are then ready for experiments. The differentiated epithelium can be maintained in vitro for weeks.
Epithelial morphology and degree of differentiation is documented by routine histology (Endo Y, Carroll K N, Ikizler M R and Wright P F. (1996) J Virol 70:2055-2058). Briefly, following fixation with 10% buffered formalin, the epithelial cells are embedded in paraffin, sectioned and stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and with periodic acid-Schiff stain for mucus secreting cells.
Influenza infection is carried out in the above two model systems by adding 0.001 to 1 MOI of viruses to the differentiated cells. The titer and infectivity of viruses in the supernatant are followed over a period of 3 to 7 days. The level of influenza viral amplification and the infectivity of influenza viruses are evaluated using conventional and modified plaque assays.

Example 3

Comparing Functions of the Aprotinin Fusion Proteins In Vitro

Anti-Viral Effects of Aprotinin Fusion Proteins
1. Pre-infection treatment. Aprotinin fusion proteins are added to primary human cell cultures at various concentrations and allowed to incubate with the cells for 1 hour. The cells are washed with fresh medium and immediately inoculated with influenza viruses at MOI 0.01 to 1. Cells are washed again after 1 hour and cultured for 3 to 5 days. Titer and infectivity of viruses in the supernatant are measured at various time points by two plaque assays. The cytopathic effect caused by viral infection is evaluated by staining viable cells with crystal violet and quantifying by measuring absorption at 570 nm at the end of the experiment. The percentage of cell protection by aprotinin fusion proteins is calculated by 100.times.{(aprotinin treated sample-untreated infected sample)/(uninfected control-untreated infected sample)}. The drug efficacy for cell protection is described by its Effective Concentration that achieves 50% of the cell protection (EC₅₀). Since HA activation only occurs to newly released viral particles, the first round of viral infection occurs normally and viral titer rises in the first 24 hours after infection. However, starting from the second round, infectivity of viruses drops and viral titer gradually decreases as result of aprotinin treatment. Results from this experiment differentiate various types of different aprotinin fusion proteins by their efficacies in a single prophylactic treatment.
Alternatively, timing of initial viral inoculation is altered from immediately after aprotinin treatment to 2-24 hours post treatment. Viral titer, infectivity and cytopathic effect are measured for 3 to 5 day after infection as described above. Results from these experiments distinguish various aprotinin fusion proteins by the lengths of the effective window after a single prophylactic treatment.
2. Post-infection Treatment. For multi-dose treatment, cells are first infected by viral inoculations at 0.001 to 0.1 MOI for 1 hour. Various concentrations of aprotinin fusion proteins are added immediately afterwards, additional treatments are applied at 8-hour intervals during the first 48 hours post infection. Cells are cultured until day 7 post infection. Viral titer and infectivity in the media are followed during the whole process. Cytopathic effect is evaluated at the end of the experiment.
For single dose treatment, cells are first infected by viral inoculations at 0.001 to 0.1 MOI for 1 hour. Treatments of aprotinin fusion proteins at various concentrations are applied at different time points during the first 48 hours after infection, but each cell sample only receives one treatment during the whole experiment. Cells are cultured until day 7 post infection. Viral titer and infectivity in the media are followed during the whole process. Cytopathic effect is evaluated at the end of the experiment. Results from these experiments distinguish different types of aprotinin fusion proteins for their therapeutic potency.
Inhibition of HA Cleavage by Aprotinin Fusion Proteins
To demonstrate that aprotinin fusion proteins inhibit influenza viral infection by inhibiting cleavage of influenza HA protein, a human primary epithelial cell culture is infected with influenza virus at MOI of 1. Aprotinin fusion proteins are added to the culture either right before viral inoculation or immediately after the viral infection. At 6.5 hour post infection, the culture is incubated for 1 hour in MEM lacking cold methionine and containing ³⁵S-labeled methionine (Amersham) at a concentration of 100 microCi/ml (pulse). Thereafter, the cells are washed twice with MEM containing a 10-fold concentration of cold methionine and incubated in MEM for additional 3 hours (chase). After labeling, cells are dissolved in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer, HA is precipitated by anti-serum against the particular strain of virus used for infection (anti-influenza sera can be obtained from ATCC and Center of Disease Control and Prevention), and the immunocomplex is then purified by protein G-Sepharose (Amersham). Samples are fractionated by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. In samples untreated by aprotinin fusion proteins, HA1 and HA2 are expected to be the predominant HA species; while in aprotinin treated samples, HA0 is expected to be the major type of HA present.

Example 4

Synthesizing Genes of Five Sialidases, Expressing and Purifying the Sialidase Proteins

Introduction
Influenza viruses belong to the orthomyxoviridae family of RNA viruses. Both type A and type B viruses have 8 segmented negative-strand RNA genomes enclosed in a lipid envelope derived from the host cell. The viral envelope is covered with spikes that are composed of three proteins: hemagglutinin (HA), which attaches virus to host cell receptors and mediates fusion of viral and cellular membranes; neuraminidase (NA), which facilitates the release of the new viruses from the host cell; and a small number of M2 proteins that serve as ion channels. For Influenza A virus, HA and NA both undergo antigenic drift and antigenic shift, the viral subtypes are distinguished by serologic differences between their HA and NA proteins. There are total 15 types of HA (H1-H15) and 9 types of NA (N1-N9), but only three HA (H1-H3) and two NA (N1 and N2) have been found in human Influenza A virus so far (Granoff, A. & Webster, R. G., ed. Encyclopedia of Virology, 2^ndEdition, Vol 2). In contrast to Influenza A virus, no distinct antigenic subtypes are recognized for Influenza virus B.
While Influenza B virus circulates only in humans, Influenza A virus can be isolated from a whole host of animals, such as pigs, horses, chickens, ducks and other kinds of birds, which accounts for genetic reassortment of Influenza A virus that results in antigenic shift. Wild aquatic birds are considered to be the primordial reservoir of all influenza viruses for avian and mammalian species. There is extensive evidence for transmission of the virus between aquatic birds and other species including pigs and horses and indirect transmission to humans through pigs. Direct transmission from pigs or chickens to humans has also been documented (Ito, T. (2000) Microbiol Immunol 44(6):423-430).
The host cell receptor for influenza viruses is the cell surface sialic acid. Sialic acids are α-keto acids with 9-carbon backbones that are usually found at the outermost positions of the oligosaccharide chains that are attached to glycoproteins and glycolipids. One of the major types of sialic acids is N-acetylneuraminic acid (Neu5Ac), which is the biosynthetic precursor for most of the other types. Two major linkages between Neu5Ac and the penultimate galactose residues of carbohydrate side chains are found in nature, Neu5Ac α(2,3)-Gal and Neu5Ac α(2,6)-Gal. Both Neu5Ac α(2,3)-Gal and Neu5Ac α(2,6)-Gal molecules can be recognized by Influenza A virus as the receptor (Schauer, R. (1982) Adv. Carbohydrate Chem & Biochem 40:131-235), while human viruses seem to prefer Neu5Ac α(2,6)-Gal, avian and equine viruses predominantly recognize Neu5Ac α(2,3)-Gal (Ito, T. (2000) Microbiol Immunol 44(6):423-430).
Infections by influenza type A and B viruses are typically initiated at the mucosal surface of the upper respiratory tract. Viral replication is primarily limited to the upper respiratory tract but can extend to the lower respiratory tract and causes bronchopneumonia that can be fatal. The risk of death is one per 10,000 infections, but is significantly greater for high-risk groups with pre-existing cardiopulmonary conditions and for immunologically nave individuals during a pandemic.
A therapeutic compound comprising a sialidase that can effectively degrade both receptor sialic acids, Neu5Ac α(2,6)-Gal and Neu5Ac α(2,3)-Gal, can confer protection against the broadest range of influenza viruses, including animal viruses. It can also remain effective as the viral strains change yearly. Because sialidase targets the host cell rather than virus and acts at the “choking point” in a viral life cycle, generation of resistant virus is improbable. Protein-bound sialic acid turns over homogeneously on cell surface with half-life of 33 hours (Kreisel, W, Volk, B A, Buchsel, R. and Reutter, W. (1980) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:1828-1831). Therefore we estimate that once-a-day or twice-a-day administration of a sialidase would confer sufficient protection against influenza.
Sialidases are found in higher eukaryotes, as well as in some mostly pathogenic microbes, including viruses, bacteria and protozoans. Viral and bacterial sialidases have been well characterized, and the three-dimensional structures of some of them have been determined (Crennell, S J, Garman, E, Layer, G, Vimr, E. and Taylor, G. (1994) Structure 2:535-544; Janakiraman, M N, White, C L, Layer, W G, Air, G M and Luo, M. (1994) Biochemistry 33:8172-8179; Pshezhetsky, A, Richard, C, Michaud, L, Igdoura, S, Wang, S, Elsliger, M, Qu, J, Leclerc, D, Gravel, R, Dallaire, L. and Potier, M. (1997) Nature Genet. 15: 316-320). Several human sialidases have also been cloned in the recent years (Milner, C M, Smith, S V, Carrillo M B, Taylor, G L, Hollinshead, M and Campbell, R D. (1997) J Bio Chem 272:4549-4558; Monti, E, Preti, A, Nesti, C, Ballabio, A and Borsani G. 1999. Glycobiol 9:1313-1321; Wada, T, Yoshikawa, Y, Tokuyama, S, Kuwabara, M, Akita, H. and Miyagi, T. (1999) Biochem Biophy Res Communi 261:21-27; Monti, E, Bassi, M T, Papini, N, Riboni, M, Manzoni, M, Veneranodo, B, Croci, G, Preti, A, Ballabio, A, Tettamanti, G. and Borsani, G. (2000) Bichem J349:343-351). All the sialidases characterized share a four amino acid motif in the amino terminal portion followed by the Asp box motif which is repeated three to five times depending on the protein. (Monti, E, Bassi, M T, Papini, N, Riboni, M, Manzoni, M, Veneranodo, B, Croci, G, Preti, A, Ballabio, A, Tettamanti, G. and Borsani, G. (2000) Bichem J 349:343-351; Copley, R R, Russell, R B and Ponting, CP. (2001) Protein Sci 10:285-292). While the overall amino acid identity of the sialidase superfamily is relatively low at about 20-30%, the overall fold of the molecules, especially the catalytic amino acids, are remarkably similar (Wada, T, Yoshikawa, Y, Tokuyama, S, Kuwabara, M, Akita, H. and Miyagi, T. (1999) Biochem Biophy Res Communi 261:21-27; Monti, E, Bassi, M T, Papini, N, Riboni, M, Manzoni, M, Veneranodo, B, Croci, G, Preti, A, Ballabio, A, Tettamanti, G. and Borsani, G. (2000) Bichem J 349:343-351; Copley, R R, Russell, R B and Ponting, C P. (2001) Protein Sci 10:285-292).
The sialidases are generally divided into two families: “small” sialidases have molecular weight of about 42 kDa and do not require divalent metal ion for maximal activity; “large” sialidases have molecular weight above 65 kDa and may require divalent metal ion for activity (Wada, T, Yoshikawa, Y, Tokuyama, S, Kuwabara, M, Akita, H. and Miyagi, T. (1999) Biochem Biophy Res Communi 261:21-27; Monti, E, Bassi, M T, Papini, N, Riboni, M, Manzoni, M, Veneranodo, B, Croci, G, Preti, A, Ballabio, A, Tettamanti, G. and Borsani, G. (2000) Bichem J 349:343-351; Copley, R R, Russell, R B and Ponting, CP. (2001) Protein Sci 10:285-292).
Over fifteen sialidase proteins have been purified and they vary greatly from one another in substrate specificities and enzymatic kinetics. To confer a broad-spectrum protection against influenza viruses, a sialidase needs to effectively degrade sialic acid in both α(2,6)-Gal and α(2,3)-Gal linkages and in the context of glycoproteins and some glycolipids. Viral sialidases, such as those from influenza A virus, fowl plague virus and Newcastle disease virus, are generally specific for Neu5Ac α(2,3)-Gal and only degrade Neu5Ac α(2,6)-Gal very inefficiently. Small bacterial sialidases generally react poorly to sialic acid in the context of glycoproteins and glycolipids. By contrast, large bacterial sialidases can effectively cleave sialic acid in both (α,2-6) linkage and (α,2-3) linkage in the context of most natural substrates (FIG. 4; Vimr, D R. (1994) Trends Microbiol 2: 271-277; Drzeniek, R. (1973) Histochem J 5:271-290; Roggentin, P, Kleineidam, R G and Schauer, R. (1995) Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 376:569-575; Roggentin, P, Schauer, R, Hoyer, L L and Vimr, E R. (1993) Mol Microb 9:915-921). Because of their broad substrate specificities, large bacterial sialidases are better candidates.
Among the large bacterial sialidases with known substrate specificity shown in FIG. 4, Vibrio cholerae sialidase requires Ca2+ for activity making it less preferred. More preferred sialidases include the 71 kDa enzyme from Clostridium perfringens, the 113 kDa enzyme from Actinomyces viscosus and sialidase of Arthrobacter ureafaciens. A third sialidase, the 68 kDa enzyme from Micromonospora viridifaciens, has been known to destroy influenza viral receptor (Air, G M and Layer, W G. (1995) Virology 211:278-284), and is also a candidate.
These enzymes have high specific activity (600 U/mg protein for C. perfringens (Corfield, A P, Veh, R W, Wember, M, Michalski, J C and Schauer, R. (1981) Bichem J 197:293-299) and 680 U/mg protein for A. viscosus (Teufel, M, Roggentin, P. and Schauer, R. (1989) Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler 370:435-443)), are fully active without divalent metal iron, and have been cloned and purified as recombinant proteins from E. coli (Roggentin, P, Kleineidam, R G and Schauer, R. (1995) Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 376:569-575, Teufel, M, Roggentin, P. and Schauer, R. (1989) Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler 370:435-443, Sakurada, K, Ohta, T and Hasegawa, M. (1992) J Bacteriol 174: 6896-6903). In addition, C. perfringens is stable in solution at 2-8° C. for several weeks, and at 4° C. in the presence of albumin for more than two years (Wang, F Z, Akula, S M, Pramod, NP, Zeng, L. and Chandran, B. (2001) J Virol 75:7517-27). A. viscosus is labile towards freezing and thawing, but is stable at 4° C. in 0.1 M acetate buffer, pH 5 (Teufel, M, Roggentin, P. and Schauer, R. (1989) Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler 370:435-443).
Although the chances of inducing immune reactions using bacterial sialidases is very low because the proteins will be used topically in the upper respiratory tract and will not be absorbed systemically, a human enzyme would be more desirable for long-term use in human subjects.
Four sialidase genes have been cloned from human so far: NEU1/G9/lysosomal sialidase (Pshezhetsky, A, Richard, C, Michaud, L, Igdoura, S, Wang, S, Elsliger, M, Qu, J, Leclerc, D, Gravel, R, Dallaire, L. and Potier, M. (1997) Nature Genet. 15: 316-320., Milner, C M, Smith, S V, Carrillo M B, Taylor, G L, Hollinshead, M and Campbell, R D. (1997). J Bio Chem 272:4549-4558); NEU3, a membrane-associated sialidase isolated from human brain (Wada, T, Yoshikawa, Y, Tokuyama, S, Kuwabara, M, Akita, H. and Miyagi, T. (1999) Biochem Biophy Res Communi 261:21-27, Monti, E, Bassi, M T, Papini, N, Riboni, M, Manzoni, M, Veneranodo, B, Croci, G., Preti, A, Ballabio, A, Tettamanti, G. and Borsani, G. (2000) Bichem J 349:343-351), NEU2 a 42 kDa sialidase expressed in human skeletal muscle at a very low level (Monti, E, Preti, A, Nesti, C, Ballabio, A and Borsani G. (1999) Glycobiol 9:1313-1321), and NEU4 a 497 amino acid protein (Genebank NM080741) expressed in all human tissues examined (Monti, E, Preti, A, Venerando, B. and Borsani, G. (2002) Neurochem Res 27:646-663).
Amino acid sequence comparison reveals NEU2 (SEQ ID NO:8) and NEU4 (SEQ ID NO:9) are both cytosolic sialidases. 9 out of 12 of the amino acid residues which form the catalytic site of S. typhimurium sialidase are conserved in both NEU2 and NEU4 (Monti, E, Preti, A, Nesti, C, Ballabio, A and Borsani G. (1999) Glycobiol 9:1313-1321, FIG. 3). In addition, NEU4 also shows a stretch of about 80 amino acid residues (aa 294-373) that appears unique among known mammalian sialidases (Monti, E, Preti, A, Venerando, B. and Borsani, G. (2002) Neurochem Res 27:646-663). Unlike the selected large bacterial sialidases, the substrate specificity of NEU2 and NEU4 is unknown. It will need to be tested if NEU2 and NEU4 can effectively degrade the influenza virus receptors.
Sialidase Assay
NEU2, NEU4 and M. viridifaciens enzymes will be stored in PBS and 50% glycerol at −20° C. C. perfringens and A. viscosus enzymes are stored in 10 mM acetate buffer (pH5) at 4° C. Protein preps are characterized by HPLC and SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Specific activities and stability of the enzymes will be monitored by sialidase assay.
The enzymatic activity of sialidases are determined by fluorimetric 2′-(4-methylumbelliferyl)-alpha-D-N-acetylneuraminic acid) (4Mu-NANA) (Sigma) as the substrate. Specifically, reactions are set up in duplicate in 0.1M Na citrate/phosphate buffer pH5.6, in the presence of 400 micrograms bovine serum albumin, with 0.2 mM 4MU-NANA in a final volume of 100 microliters, and incubated at 37° C. for 5-10 min. Reactions are stopped by addition of 1 ml of 0.2 M glycines/NaOH pH10.2. Fluorescence emission is measured on a fluorometer with excitation at 365 nm and emission at 445 nm, using 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MU) to obtain a calibration curve.

Example 5

Comparing Functions of the Sialidases In Vitro and Selecting one Sialidase for Further Studies

1. Stocks of Influenza Viruses
Influenza viral strains are obtained from the ATCC and the repository at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Viral stocks are grown on Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells in minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 0.3% bovine serum albumin and 0.5 micrograms of trypsin per ml. After incubating for 48 to 72 hours, the culture medium is clarified by low speed centrifugation. Viral particles are pelleted by ultracentrifugation through a 25% sucrose cushion. Purified viruses are suspended in 50% glycerol-0.1M Tris buffer (pH 7.3) and stored at −20° C. Viral titer is determined by plaque assay (Tobita, K, Sugiura, A, Enomoto, C. and Furuyama, M. (1975) Med Microbiol Immnuol 162: 9-14), or TCID₅₀, which is the dose of virus required to infect 50% of the MDCK cells.
Selected human and animal influenza A strains with specificity towards Neu5Ac alpha(2,6)-Gal or Neu5Ac alpha(2,3)-Gal and have high affinity to the receptors (measured by high hemagglutination activity) are chosen for in vitro tests:

- 1. Strains that recognize receptor Neu5Ac alpha(2,6)-Gal include human isolates A/aichi/2/68, A[Udorn/307/72, A/Prot Chaimers/1/73 and A/Victoria/3/75, etc. (Connor, R J, Kawaoka, Y, Webster, R G and Paulson J C. (1994) Virology 205:17-23).
- 2. Strains that have Neu5Ac alpha(2,3)-Gal specificity include animal isolates A/duckUkraine/1/63, A/duckMemphis/928/74, A/duckhokk/5/77, A/Eq/Miami/1/63, A/EqUr/1/63, A/Eq/Tokyo/71, A/Eq/Prague/71, etc (Connor, R J, Kawaoka, Y, Webster, R G and Paulson J C. (1994) Virology 205:17-23).
  2. Hemagglutination Assay

This assay is used to rapidly determine the efficiency of each enzyme to destroy receptors Neu5Ac alpha(2,6)-Gal and Neu5Ac alpha(2,3)-Gal.
Specifically, 6 ml of Chicken red blood cells (SPAFAS Inc., Norwich, Conn.) are diluted in two times the volume of PBS, centrifuge for 5 min at 500.times.g and re-suspended in PBS of original volume. Sialidases are added to the chicken erythrocytes at various concentrations and allowed to incubate at room temperature for 30 min. The cells are then washed three times to remove sialidase proteins, and then are resuspended in PBS to 6 ml. Control cells are incubated with BSA and washed. Various strains of influenza virus, which recognize either Neu5Ac alpha(2,6)-Gal or Neu5Ac alpha(2,3)-Gal as the receptor as listed above, are prepared in microtiter plates as serial dilutions in PBS (100 microliters) of the original viral stocks. Sialidase-treated or control chicken red blood cell suspensions (100 microliters of the 0.5% solution prepared above) are added to each well at 4° C. The plates are read after 2 h. The lowest concentration of virus that causes the blood cell to agglutinate is defined as one hemagglutination unit. We will be looking for enzymes that effectively abolish hemagglutination by all viral strains.
3. Viral Inhibition Assay
Confluent monolayers of MDCK cells are treated with various concentrations of sialidases for 1 h, washed twice with buffer, then infected with various strains of influenza virus. After incubation for 1 hr, the cells are washed again to remove unbound virus. To estimate the decrease in viral binding sites on cell surface, the cells are overlaid with agar and incubated at 37° C. The number of plaques in the sialidase treated cells will be compared against those in control cells. Alternatively, the cells will be cultured in regular medium at 37° C., and viral titers in the culture media are measured at various time during culture as TCID₅₀.
To demonstrate that sialidase treatment can inhibit a pre-existing infection, MDCK monolayers are first infected with a low titer of virus. After washing off the unbound virus, the cells are then cultured in the presence of a sialidase. Fresh sialidase is added to cell culture very 24 h. Viral titer in the cultured medium is measured over a 72-hour period.
4. Cytotoxicity Assay
Primary human bronchial epithelial cells are purchased (Clonetics) and cultured in supplemented minimal medium following manufacture's instruction. Sialidases are added to the culture medium at various concentrations. Cell growth over a period of 7-10 days will be measured. Cells will also be observed regularly for microscopic cytopathic effects.

Example 6

Constructing and Testing Sialidase Fusion Proteins

1. Choosing a GAG-Binding Sequence as the Anchoring Domain.
One sialidase is selected for its best overall properties, including anti-viral activity, toxicity, stability, ease of production, etc. We will then genetically link it to a GAG-binding sequence, sub-clone the fusion genes into pQE vector, express and purify the fusion proteins from E. coli.
We have selected six possible human GAG-binding sequences: PF4 (aa 47-70) (SEQ ID NO:2), IL-8 (aa 46-72) (SEQ ID NO:3), AT III (aa 118-151) (SEQ ID NO:4), ApoE (aa 132-165) (SEQ ID NO:5), human angio-associated migratory cell protein (AAMP) (aa 14-25) (SEQ ID NO:6), and amphiregulin (aa 25-45) (SEQ ID NO:7) (FIG. 2). These sequences generally bind to heparin with nanomolar-level affinities; however, their affinities may vary from one another by an order of magnitude (Table 1). Since it is not clear which anchoring domain will enable the most effective functioning of the sialidase, all four GAG-binding sequences are fused with the sialidase gene either on the N terminus or the C terminus via a generic linker sequence GGGGS as the following constructs:
(GAG binding domain-GGGGS(SEQ ID NO:10)-Sialidase); or
(Sialidase-GGGGS(SEQ ID NO:10)-GAG binding domain)
Different fusion proteins are compared by a modified viral inhibition assay. Specifically, confluent monolayers of MDCK cells are treated with same amount of each fusion protein for a limited duration, such as 30 min. The cells are then washed twice with buffer to remove unbound sialidase fusion proteins, and incubated in culture medium for an additional 1 hour. Afterwards, strains of influenza virus are added to the cells for 1 hr and then cells are washed again to remove unbound virus. Viral titers in the culture media are measured during 72-h cultures as TCID₅₀. The un-fused sialidase protein will be used to compare against the fusion proteins in this assay. If the results are too close to rank all fusion proteins, we will make the assay more stringent by shortening treatment window for the fusion proteins, lowering protein concentrations and increasing the level of viral challenge.
2. Optimizing the Fusion Protein Construct
After selecting the best fusion protein from the earlier experiments, the construct is further optimized by testing different linker length. In this regard, the following constructs are made:
(Sialidase-(GGGGS(S]EQ ID NO:110))n (n=0, 1, 2, 3, or 4)-GAG binding domain)
The proteins are expressed and purified and compared in the modified viral protection assay as described above.
In addition, if earlier data indicate that higher affinity of the fusion protein towards heparan sulfate brings better potency, we also plan to test if the potency can be further improved by increasing the GAG-binding affinity. This can be achieved by creating a multivalent GAG binding mechanism in the fusion protein in constructs like these:
(Sialidase-GGGGS(SEQ ID NO:10))n-HS binding domain-GAG binding domain); or:
(GAG binding domain-(GGGGS(SEQ ID NO:10))n-Sialidase-(GGGGS(SEQ ID NO:10))n-GAG binding domain)
The purified fusion proteins are ranked based on their activities in the modified viral protection assay as described above.
3. Cytotoxicity Assay
The effects of the fusion proteins on normal cell growth and morphology are monitored by culturing primary human bronchial epithelial cells with various concentrations of the fusion proteins and following growth curve of the cells and observing any microscopic cytopathic effects.

Example 7

Fusion Proteins Against Other Infectious Microbes

Fusion proteins composed of a functional domain and an anchorage domain are designed for many more different applications. For example, a sialidase fusion protein as proposed here can also be used as a therapeutic/prophylactic agent against infections by other viruses and bacteria besides influenza viruses, because many other infectious microbes, such as paramyxoviruses (Wassilewa, L. (1977) Arch Virol 54:299-305), coronaviruses (Vlasak, R., Luytjes, W., Spaan, W. and Palese, P. (1988) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4526-4529), rotaviruses (Fukudome, K., Yoshie, O. and Konno, T. (1989) Virology 172:196-205) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Ramphal, R. and Pyle, M. (1983) Infect Immun 41:339-44) etc, are also known to use sialic acid as cellular receptors. For example, aprotinin fused with a heparin-binding domain can make a fusion protein that be used to prevent/treat infection of other viruses besides influenza that require host serine proteases from activation, such as parainfluenza virus.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Achyuthan, K E and Achyuthan A M. 2001. Comparative enzymology, biochemistry and pathophysiology of human exo-a-sialidases (neuraminidases). Comparative Biochem & Physiol part B 129:29-64.
Air, G M and Layer, W G. 1995. Red cells bound to influenza virus N9 neuraminidase are not released by the N9 neuraminidase activity. Virology 211:278-284.
Auerswald E A, Horlein D, Reinhardt G, Schroder W and Schnabel E. 1988. Expression, isolation and characterization of recombinant [Arg¹⁵, Glu⁵²] Aprotinin. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler Vol 369, Suppl., pp 27-35.
Barbey-Morel C L, Oeltmann T N, Edwards K M and Wright P F. 1987. Role of respiratory tract proteases in infectivity of influenza A virus. J Infect Dis 155:667-672.
Bessette P H, Aslund F, Beckwith J and Georgiou G. 1999. Efficient folding of proteins with multiple disulfide bonds in the Escherichia coli cytoplasm. Pro Natl Acad Sci USA 96:13703-13708.
Callan R J, Hartmann F A, West S E and Hinshaw V S. 1997. Cleavage of influenza A virus H1 hemagglutinin by swine respiratory bacterial proteases. J Virol 71:7579-7585.
Connor, R J, Kawaoka, Y, Webster, R G and Paulson J C. 1994. Receptor specificity in human, avian, and equine H2 and H3 influenza virus isolates. Virology 205:17-23.
Copley, R R, Russell, R B and Ponting, C P. 2001. Sialidase-like Asp-boxes: sequence-similar structures within different protein folds. Prot Sci 10:285-292.
Corfield, A P, Veh, R W, Wember, M, Michalski, J C and Schauer, R. 1981. The release of N-acetyl- and N-glycolloyl-neuraminic acid from soluble complex carbohydrates and erythrocytes by bacterial, viral and mammalian sialidases. Bichem J 197:293-299.
Crennell, S J, Garman, E, Layer, G, Vimr, E. and Taylor, G. 1994. Crystal structure of Vibrio Cholerae neuraminidase reveals dual lectin-like domains in addition to the catalytic domain. Structure 2:535-544.
Drzeniek, R. Substrate specificity of neuraminidases. 1973. Histochem J 5:271-290.
Endo Y, Carroll K N, Ikizler M R and Wright P F. 1996. Growth of influenza virus in primary, differentiated epithelial cells derived from adenoids. J Virol 70:2055-2058.
Fritz H and Wunderer G. 1983. Biochemistry and applications of aprotinin, the kallikrein inhibitor from bovine organs. Arzneim-Forsch 33:479-494.
Fukudome, K., Yoshie, O. and Konno, T. 1989. Comparison of human, simian, and bovine rotaviruses for requirement of sialic acid in hemagglutination and cell adsorption. Virology 172:196-205.

Garten W, Bosch F X, Linder D, Rott R and Klenk H D. 1981. Proteolytic activation of the influenza virus hemagglutinin: the structure of the cleavage site and the enzymes involved in cleavage. Virology 115:361-374.

Goger, B, Halden, Y, Rek, A, Mosl, R, Pye, D, Gallagher, J and Kungl, A J. 2002. Different affinities of glycosaminoglycan oligosaccharides for monomeric and dimeric interleukin-8: a model for chemokine regulation at inflammatory sites. Bichem 41:1640-1646.
Gotoh B, Ogasawara T, Toyoda T, Inocencio N, Hamaguchi M and Nagai Y. 1990. An endoprotease homologous to the blood clotting factor X as a determinant of viral tropism in chick embryo. EMBO J. 9:4189-4195.
Granoff, A. & Webster, R. G., ed. Encyclopedia of Virology, 2^ndEdition, Vol 2.
Gust, I D, Hampson, A W. and Lavanchy, D. 2001. Planning for the next pandemic. Rev Med Virol 11:59-70.
Hayden, F G. 1996. Amantadine and rimantadine-mechanisms. In Antiviral drug resistance (ed. D. D. Richman), pp. 59-77. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Hosoya M, Matsuyama S, Baba M, Susuki H and Shigeta S. 1992. Effects of protease inhibitors on replication of various myxoviruses. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 36:1432-1436.
Ito, T. 2000. Interspecies transmission and receptor recognition of influenza a virus. Microbiol. Immunol 44(6):423-430.
Janakiraman, M N, White, C L, Layer, W G, Air, G M and Luo, M. 1994. Structure of influenza virus neuraminidase B/lee/40 complexed with sialic acid and a dehydro analog at 1.8-A resolution: implications for the catalytic mechanism. Biochemistry 33:8172-8179.
Kido, H, Niwa, Y, Beppu, Y. and Towatari, T. 1996. Cellular proteases involved in the pathogenicity of enveloped animal viruses, human immunodeficiency virus, influenza virus A and sendai virus. Advan Enzyme Regul 36:325-347.
Kido H, Chen Y and Murakami M. 1999. Cellular proteinases and viral infection: influenza virus, sendai virus and HIV-1, p. 205-217. In B. Dunn (ed.), Proteases of infectious agents. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
Klenk, H D and Rott, R. 1988. The molecular biology of influenza virus pathogenicity. Adv Vir Res 34:247-281.
Klenk, H D and Garten W. 1994. Host cell proteases controlling virus pathogenicity. Trend Micro 2:39-43.

Kreisel, W, Volk, B A, Buchsel, R. and Reutter, W. 1980. Different half-lives of the carbohydrate and protein moieties of a 110,000-dalton glycoproteins isolated from plasma membranes of rat liver. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:1828-1831.

Krunkosky T M, Fischer B M, Martin L D, Jones N, Akley N J and Adler K B. 2000. Effects of TNF-α on expression of ICAM-1 in human airway epithelial cells in vitro. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 22:685-692.
Lazarowitz S G, Goldberg A R and Choppin P W. 1973. Proteolytic cleavage by plasmin of the HA polypeptide of influenza virus: host cell activation of serum plasminogen. Virology 56:172-180.

Lee, M K and Lander, A D. 1991. Analysis of affinity and structural selectivity in the binding of proteins to glycosaminoglycans: development of a sensitive electrophoretic approach. Pro Natl Acad Sci USA 88:2768-2772.

Meltzer, M I, Cox, N J and Fukuda, K. 1999. The economic impact of pandemic influenza in the United States: priorities for intervention. Emerg Infect Dis 5:659-671.
Meyer, F A, King, M and Gelman, R A., 1975. On the role of sialic acid in the rheological properties of mucus. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 392: 223-232.
Milner, C M, Smith, S V, Carrillo M B, Taylor, G L, Hollinshead, M and Campbell, R D. 1997. Identification of a sialidase encoded in the human major histocompatibility complex. J Bio Chem 272:4549-4558.
Monti, E, Preti, A, Venerando, B. and Borsani, G. 2002. Recent development in mammalian sialidase molecular biology. Neurochem Res 27:646-663.
Monti, E, Preti, A, Nesti, C, Ballabio, A and Borsani G. 1999. Expression of a novel human sialidase encoded by the NEU2 gene. Glycobiol 9:1313-1321.
Monti, E, Bassi, M T, Papini, N, Riboni, M, Manzoni, M, Veneranodo, B, Croci, G, Preti, A, Ballabio, A, Tettamanti, G. and Borsani, G. 2000. Identification and expression of NEU3, a novel human sialidase associated to the plasma membrane. Bichem J 349:343-351.
Murakami M, Towatari T, Ohuchi M, Shiota M, Akao M, Okumura Y, Parry M A and Kido H. 2001. Mini-plasmin found in the epithelial cells of bronchioles triggers infection by broad-spectrum influenza A viruses and Sendai virus. Eur J Biochem 268: 2847-2855.
Nakayama, K. 1997. Furin: a mammalian subtilisin/kex2p-like endoprotease involved in process of a wide variety of precursor proteins. Biochem 327:625-635.
Ovcharenko A V and Zhimov O P. 1994. Aprotinin aerosol treatment of influenza and paramyxovirus bronchopneumonia of mice. Antiviral Res 23:107-118.
Pshezhetsky, A, Richard, C, Michaud, L, Igdoura, S, Wang, S, Elsliger, M, Qu, J, Leclerc, D, Gravel, R, Dallaire, L. and Potier, M. 1997. Cloning, expression and chromosomal mapping of human lysosomal sialidase and characterization of mutations in sialidosis. Nature Genet 15: 316-320.
Ramphal, R. and Pyle, M. 1983. Evidence for mucins and sialic acid as receptors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the lower respiratory tract. Infect Immun 41:339-44.
Roggentin, P, Kleineidam, R G and Schauer, R. 1995. Diversity in the properties of two sialidase isoenzymes produced by Clostridium perfringens spp. Biol Chem Hoppe-Seyler 376:569-575.
Roggentin, P, Schauer, R, Hoyer, L L and Vimr, E R. 1993. The sialidase superfamily and its spread by horizontal gene transfer. Mol Microb 9:915-921.
Rosenberg A. ed. Biology of the Sialic Acids. 1995. pp 270-273.
Sakurada, K, Ohta, T. and Hasegawa, M. 1992. Cloning, expression and characterization of the Micromonospora viridifaciens neuraminidase gene in Streptomyces lividans. J Bacteriol 174: 6896-6903.
Schauer, S. ed., pp 233. Sialic Acids Chemistry, Metabolism and Function. Springer-Verlag, 1982.
Schauer, R. 1982. Chemistry, metabolism, and biological functions of sialic acids. Adv. Carbohydrate Chem & Biochem 40:131-235.
Scheiblauer H, Reinacher M, Tashiro M and Rott R. 1992. Interactions between bacteria and influenza A virus in the development of influenza pneumonia. J Infec Dis 166:783-791.
Sinn P L, Williams G, Vongpunsawad S, Cattaneo R and McCray P B. 2002. Measles virus preferentially transduces the basolateral surface of well-differentiated human airway epithelia. J Virol 76:2403-2409.
Skehel, J J and Wiley, D C. 2000. Receptor binding and membrane fusion in virus entry: the influenza hemagglutinin. Annu Rev Biochem 69:531-569.
Tashiro M, Klenk H D and Rott R. 1987. Inhibitory effect of a protease inhibitor, leupeptin, on the development of influenza pneumonia, mediated by concomitant bacteria. J Gen Virol 68:2039-2043.
Tashiro M, Ciborowski P, Reinacher M, Pulverer G, Klenk H D and Rott R. 1987. Synergistic role of staphylococcal proteases in the induction of influenza virus pathogenecity. Virology 157:421-430.
Teufel, M, Roggentin, P. and Schauer, R. 1989. Properties of sialidase isolated from Actinomyces viscosus DSM43798. Biol Chem Hoppe Seyler 370:435-443.
Tobita, K, Sugiura, A, Enomoto, C. and Furuyama, M. 1975. Plaque assay and primary isolation of influenza A viruses in an established line of canine kidney cells (MDCK) in the presence of trypsin. Med Microbiol Immuol 162:9-14.
Venturi M, Seifert C and Hunte C. 2001. High level production of functional antibody Fab fragments in an oxidizing bacterial cytoplasm. J Mol Biol 315:1-8.
Vimr, D R. 1994. Microbial sialidases: does bigger always mean better? Trends Microbiol 2: 271-277.
Vlasak, R., Luytjes, W., Spaan, W. and Palese, P. 1988. Human and bovine coronaviruses recognize sialic acid-containing receptors similar to those of influenza C viruses. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4526-4529.
Wada, T, Yoshikawa, Y, Tokuyama, S, Kuwabara, M, Akita, H. and Miyagi, T. 1999. Cloning, expression, and chromosomal mapping of a human ganglioside sialidase. Biochem Biophy Res Communi 261:21-27.
Wang, F Z, Akula, S M, Pramod, N P, Zeng, L. and Chandran, B. 2001. Human herpesvirus 8 envelope glycoproteins K8.1 A interaction with the target cells involves heparan sulfate. J Virol 75:7517-27
Wassilewa, L. 1977. Cell receptor for paramyxoviruses. Arch Virol 54:299-305.
Weisgraber, K H, Rall, S C, Mahley, R W, Milne, R W and Marcel, Y. 1986. Human apoliproprotein E, determination
Witt, D P and Lander A D. 1994. Differential binding of chemokines to glycosaminoglycan subpopulations. Curr Bio 4:394-400.
Wood, J. 2001. Developing vaccines against pandemic influenza. Phil Trans R Soc LondB 356:1953-1960.
Xiang Y and Moss B. 2003. Molluscum contagiosum virus interleukin-18 (IL-18) binding protein is secreted as a full-length form that bind cell surface glycosaminoglycans through the C-terminal tail and a furin-cleaved form with only the IL-18 binding domain. J Virol 77:2623-2630.
Zambon, M. 2001. The pathogenesis of influenza in humans. Rev Med Virol 11:227-241.
Zhang L, Peeples M E, Boucher R C, Collins P L and Pickles R J. 2002. Respiratory syncytial virus infection of human airway epithelial cells is polarized, specific to ciliated cells, and without obvious cytopathology. J Virol 76:5654-5666.
Zhimov O P, Ovchartenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. 1982. Protective effect of protease inhibitors in influenza virus infected animals. Arch Virol 73:263-272
Zhimov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. 1982. A modified plaque assay method for accurate analysis of infectivity of influenza viruses with uncleaved hemagglutinin. Arch Virol 71:177-183.

Zhimov O P. 1983. Proteolytic activation of myxoviruses and a new strategy in the treatment of viral diseases. Problems Virol. 4:9-12. (In Russian).

Zhimov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. 1984. Suppression of influenza virus replication in infected mice by protease inhibitors. J Gen Virol 65:191-196.
Zhimov O P, Ovcharenko A V and Bukrinskaya A G. 1985. Myxovirus replication in chicken embryos can be suppressed by aprotinin due to the blockage of viral glycoprotein cleavage. J Gen Virol 66:1633-1638.
Zhimov O P. 1987. High protection of animals lethally infected with influenza virus by aprotinin-rimantadine combination. J Med Virol 21:161-167.
Zhimov O P, Ikizler M R and Wright P F. 2002. Cleavage of influenza A virus hemagglutinin in human respiratory epithelium is cell associated and sensitive to exogenous antiproteases. J Virol 76:8682-8689.

All publications, including patent documents, Genbank sequence database entries including nucleotide and amino acid sequences and accompanying information, and scientific articles, referred to in this application and the bibliography and attachments are incorporated by reference in their entirety for all purposes to the same extent as if each individual publication were individually incorporated by reference.
All headings are for the convenience of the reader and should not be used to limit the meaning of the text that follows the heading, unless so specified.

Claims

1. A pharmaceutical formulation comprising a sialidase or an active portion thereof, wherein the active portion retains enzymatic activity and does not comprise the full length enzyme.

2. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1 that is formulated as a spray.

3. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1 that is formulated as an inhalant.

4. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1 that is formulated as a suspension, a solution for injection or a solution for oral administration.

5. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1 that is formulated as a solution for eye drops.

6. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1 that is formulated as a cream, salve, gel, or ointment.

7. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1 that is formulated as a tablet, capsule or lozenge.

8. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1, wherein the sialidase is a eukaryotic sialidase, a bacterial sialidase or a viral sialidase, or is substantially homologous thereto.

9. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 8, wherein the sialidase is a eukaryotic sialidase or is substantially homologous to a eukaryotic sialidase.

10. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 9, wherein the sialidase is a human sialidase or is substantially homologous to a human sialidase.

11. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 10, wherein the sialidase is substantially homologous to the NEU2 or NEU4 genes and comprises a sequence of amino acids that is substantially homologous to the sequence of amino acids set forth in SEQ ID NO:8 or SEQ ID NO:9.

12. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 8, wherein the sialidase is a bacterial sialidase or is substantially homologous to a bacterial sialidase.

13. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 12, wherein the bacterial sialidase is selected from the group consisting of Vibrio cholerae sialidase, Clostridium perfringens sialidase, Actinomyces viscosus sialidase and Micromonospora viridifaciens sialidase.

14. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 13, wherein the bacterial sialidase is Actinomyces viscosus sialidase.

15. A method for the prophylaxis, prevention or treatment of infection by a pathogen, comprising:

administering a therapeutically effective amount of the formulation of claim 1 to target cells of a subject.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein the cells are endothelial cells.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein the cells are epithelial cells.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the epithelial cells are respiratory epithelial cells, adenoid epithelial cells or bronchial epithelial cells.

19. The method of claim 15, wherein the administering is by use of a nasal spray.

20. The method of claim 15, wherein the administering is by use of an inhaler.

21. The method of claim 15, wherein the administering is by oral administration.

22. The method of claim 15, wherein the administering is performed from once to four times a day.

23. The method of claim 15, wherein the pathogen is a bacterium.

24. The method of claim 15, wherein the pathogen is a virus.

25. The method of claim 24, wherein the virus is selected from among influenza, parainfluenza, adenovirus, retrovirus and respiratory syncytial virus.

26. The method of claim 25, wherein the virus is influenza virus.

27. A delivery system, comprising the pharmaceutical formulation of claim 1.

28. The delivery system of claim 27 that is a nebulizer, an atomizer or a dropper bottle.

29. A method of using a sialidase for the prevention, prophylaxis or treatment of infection by a pathogen, comprising:

administering, to target cells of a subject, a therapeutically effective amount of at least one sialidase or an active portion thereof, wherein the active portion retains enzymatic activity and does not comprise a full length enzyme.

30. The method of claim 29, wherein the cells are endothelial cells.

31. The method of claim 29, wherein the cells are epithelial cells.

32. The method of claim 31, wherein the epithelial cells are respiratory epithelial cells, adenoid epithelial cells or bronchial epithelial cells.

33. The method of claim 29, wherein the sialidase is a viral sialidase, a bacterial sialidase, or a eukaryotic sialidase, or is substantially homologous thereto.

34. The method of claim 33, wherein the sialidase is a eukaryotic sialidase or is substantially homologous to a eukaryotic sialidase.

35. The method of claim 34, wherein the sialidase is a human sialidase or is substantially homologous to a human sialidase.

36. The method of claim 35, wherein the sialidase is NEU2 (SEQ ID NO:8), or NEU4 (SEQ ID NO:9), or is substantially homologous thereto.

37. The method of claim 29, wherein the sialidase is a bacterial sialidase or is substantially homologous to a bacterial sialidase.

38. The method of claim 37, wherein the bacterial sialidase is selected from the group consisting of Vibrio cholerae sialidase, Clostridium perfringens sialidase, Actinomyces viscosus sialidase and Micromonospora viridifaciens sialidase.

39. The method of claim 38, wherein the bacterial sialidase is Actinomyces viscosus sialidase.

40. The method of claim 29, wherein the administering is by use of a nasal spray.

41. The method of claim 29, wherein the administering is by use of an inhaler.

42. The method of claim 29, wherein the administering is by oral administration.

43. The method of claim 29, wherein the administering is performed from once to four times a day.

44. The method of claim 29, wherein the pathogen is a bacterium.

45. The method of claim 29, wherein the pathogen is a virus.

46. The method of claim 45, wherein the virus is selected from among influenza, parainfluenza, adenovirus, retrovirus and respiratory syncytial virus.

47. The method of claim 46, wherein the virus is influenza virus.

48. The method of claim 15 or claim 29, wherein the subject is a human subject.

49. The method of claim 15 or claim 29, wherein the subject is an animal subject.

50. A compound, comprising:

an anchoring domain, wherein the anchoring domain comprises a peptide or protein that can bind to heparin or heparan sulfate at the surface of a target cell; and

a therapeutic chemical entity; wherein

the potency of the compound in the prevention, prophylaxis or treatment of a disease afflicting a target cell is greater than the potency of the therapeutic chemical entity in the absence of the anchoring domain.

51. The compound of claim 50, wherein retention of the compound at or near the surface of the target cell is greater than retention of the therapeutic chemical entity in the absence of the anchoring domain.

52. The compound of claim 50 or claim 51, wherein the target cell is an epithelial cell.

53. The compound of claim 52, wherein the epithelial cell is a respiratory epithelial cell.

54. The compound of claim 50 or claim 51, wherein the target cell is an endothelial cell.

55. The compound of claim 50, wherein the therapeutic chemical entity is a protein, polypeptide, peptide, nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid, nucleic acid analogue, nucleotide, nucleotide analogue, small organic molecule, polymer, lipid, steroid, fatty acid or carbohydrate.

56. The compound of claim 55, wherein the therapeutic chemical entity is a protein or a polypeptide.

57. The compound of claim 56, wherein the protein or polypeptide is an enzyme or a catalytically active portion thereof.

58. The compound of claim 57, wherein the enzyme is a sialidase.

59. The compound of claim 58, wherein the sialidase is a eukaryotic sialidase, a bacterial sialidase or a viral sialidase, or is substantially homologous thereto.

60. The compound of claim 59, wherein the sialidase is a eukaryotic sialidase or is substantially homologous to a eukaryotic sialidase.

61. The compound of claim 60, wherein the sialidase is a human sialidase or is substantially homologous to a human sialidase.

62. The compound of claim 61, wherein the sialidase is substantially homologous to the NEU2 or NEU4 genes and comprises a sequence of amino acids that is substantially homologous to the sequence of amino acids set forth in SEQ ID NO:8 or SEQ ID NO:9.

63. The compound of claim 59, wherein the sialidase is a bacterial sialidase or is substantially homologous to a bacterial sialidase.

64. The compound of claim 63, wherein the bacterial sialidase is selected from among Vibrio cholerae sialidase, Clostridium perfringens sialidase, Actinomyces viscosus sialidase and Micromonospora viridifaciens sialidase.

65. The compound of claim 64, wherein the bacterial sialidase is Actinomyces viscosus sialidase.

66. The compound of claim 50, further comprising at least one peptide linker that links the anchoring domain to the therapeutic chemical entity.

67. The compound of claim 66, wherein the peptide linker comprises at least one glycine residue.

68. The compound of claim 67, wherein the peptide linker comprises the sequence (GGGGS)n, where n is a whole number from 1 to 20.

69. The compound of claim 50, wherein the anchoring domain comprises a GAG-binding amino acid sequence of a naturally-occurring protein, or a sequence that is substantially homologous to the GAG-binding sequence of a naturally-occurring protein.

70. The compound of claim 69, wherein the GAG-binding amino acid sequence is from a mammalian protein.

71. The compound of claim 70, wherein the mammalian protein is a human protein.

72. The compound of claim 71, wherein the GAG-binding amino acid sequence comprises the GAG-binding amino acid sequence of human platelet factor 4 (SEQ ID NO:2), human interleukin 8 (SEQ ID NO:3), human antithrombin III (SEQ ID NO:4), human apoprotein E (SEQ ID NO:5), human angio-associated migratory protein (SEQ ID NO:6), or human amphiregulin (SEQ ID NO:7), or a sequence substantially homologous thereto.

73. A pharmaceutical formulation, comprising the compound of claim 50.

74. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 73 that is formulated as a spray.

75. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 73 that is formulated as an inhalant.

76. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 73 that is formulated as a suspension, a solution for injection or a solution for oral administration.

77. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 73 that is formulated as a solution for eye drops.

78. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 73 that is formulated as a cream, salve, gel, or ointment.

79. The pharmaceutical formulation of claim 73 that is formulated as a tablet, capsule or lozenge.

80. A delivery system, comprising the pharmaceutical formulation of any of claims 74-77.

81. The delivery system of claim 80 that is a nebulizer, an atomizer or a dropper bottle.

82. A method of increasing the potency of a therapeutic chemical entity in the prevention, prophylaxis or treatment of a disease, comprising:

linking the therapeutic chemical entity to an anchoring domain, wherein the anchoring domain comprises a peptide or protein that can bind to heparin or heparan sulfate at the surface of a target cell; whereby the potency of the therapeutic chemical entity is increased relative to its potency in the absence of the anchoring domain.

83. The method of claim 82, wherein the linking is by a linker, wherein the linker is a chemical linker or a peptide linker.

84. The method of claim 82, wherein the therapeutic chemical entity is a protein, polypeptide, peptide, nucleic acid, peptide nucleic acid, nucleic acid analogue, nucleotide, nucleotide analogue, small organic molecule, polymer, lipid, steroid, fatty acid or carbohydrate.

85. The method of claim 84, wherein the therapeutic chemical entity is a protein or a polypeptide.

86. The method of claim 85, wherein the protein or polypeptide is an enzyme or a catalytically active portion thereof.

87. The method of claim 86, wherein the enzyme is a sialidase.

88. The method of claim 87, wherein the sialidase is a eukaryotic sialidase, a bacterial sialidase or a viral sialidase, or is substantially homologous thereto.

89. The method of claim 88, wherein the sialidase is a eukaryotic sialidase or is substantially homologous to a eukaryotic sialidase.

90. The method of claim 89, wherein the sialidase is a human sialidase or is substantially homologous to a human sialidase.

91. The method of claim 90, wherein the sialidase is substantially homologous to the NEU2 or NEU4 genes and comprises a sequence of amino acids that is substantially homologous to the sequence of amino acids set forth in SEQ ID NO:8 or SEQ ID NO:9.

92. The method of claim 88, wherein the sialidase is a bacterial sialidase or is substantially homologous to a bacterial sialidase.

93. The method of claim 92, wherein the bacterial sialidase is selected from among Vibrio cholerae sialidase, Clostridium perfringens sialidase, Actinomyces viscosus sialidase and Micromonospora viridifaciens sialidase.

94. The method of claim 93, wherein the bacterial sialidase is Actinomyces viscosus sialidase.

95. The method of any of claims 85-94, wherein linkage of the anchoring domain to the therapeutic chemical entity is by fusion.

96. The method of claim 82, wherein the anchoring domain comprises a GAG-binding amino acid sequence of a naturally-occurring protein, or a sequence that is substantially homologous to the GAG-binding sequence of a naturally-occurring protein.

97. The method of claim 96, wherein the GAG-binding amino acid sequence is from a mammalian protein.

98. The method of claim 97, wherein the mammalian protein is a human protein.

99. The method of claim 98, wherein the GAG-binding amino acid sequence comprises the GAG-binding amino acid sequence of human platelet factor 4 (SEQ ID NO:2), human interleukin 8 (SEQ ID NO:3), human antithrombin III (SEQ ID NO:4), human apoprotein E (SEQ ID NO:5), human angio-associated migratory protein (SEQ ID NO:6), or human amphiregulin (SEQ ID NO:7), or a sequence substantially homologous thereto.

100. A method for the prophylaxis, prevention or treatment of infection by a pathogen, comprising:

administering a therapeutically effective amount of the formulation of claim 73 to target cells of a subject.

101. The method of claim 100, wherein the cells are endothelial cells.

102. The method of claim 100, wherein the cells are epithelial cells.

103. The method of claim 102, wherein the epithelial cells are respiratory epithelial cells, adenoid epithelial cells or bronchial epithelial cells.

104. The method of claim 100, wherein the administering is by use of a nasal spray.

105. The method of claim 100, wherein the administering is by use of an inhaler.

106. The method of claim 100, wherein the administering is by oral administration.

107. The method of claim 100, wherein the administering is performed from once to four times a day.

108. The method of claim 100, wherein the pathogen is a bacterium.

109. The method of claim 100, wherein the pathogen is a virus.

110. The method of claim 109, wherein the virus is selected from among influenza, parainfluenza, adenovirus, retrovirus and respiratory syncytial virus.

111. The method of claim 100, wherein the subject is a human subject.

112. The method of claim 100, wherein the subject is an animal subject.

113. The method of claim 25, wherein the virus is parainfluenza virus.

114. The method of claim 46, wherein the virus is parainfluenza virus.

115. The method of claim 110, wherein the virus is parainfluenza virus.