New! View global litigation for patent families

US20080027837A1 - Computer Implemented System for Determining a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System, Optimization Application Therefor, and Method Therefor, and Decision Support Tool for Facilitating User Determination of a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System - Google Patents

Computer Implemented System for Determining a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System, Optimization Application Therefor, and Method Therefor, and Decision Support Tool for Facilitating User Determination of a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080027837A1
US20080027837A1 US11838614 US83861407A US2008027837A1 US 20080027837 A1 US20080027837 A1 US 20080027837A1 US 11838614 US11838614 US 11838614 US 83861407 A US83861407 A US 83861407A US 2008027837 A1 US2008027837 A1 US 2008027837A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
ij
λ
system
single
inventory
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11838614
Inventor
Bart Feldman
Michael Aronowich
Ofra Natan
Sofia Mariamova
Henry Harel
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ORACLE DEMANTRA R & D CENTER ISRAEL LTD
Original Assignee
Demantra Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063Operations research or analysis
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation or scheduling for a business operation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063Operations research or analysis
    • G06Q10/0631Resource planning, allocation or scheduling for a business operation
    • G06Q10/06315Needs-based resource requirements planning or analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/08Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading, distribution or shipping; Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
    • G06Q10/087Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement, balancing against orders
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q20/00Payment architectures, schemes or protocols
    • G06Q20/08Payment architectures
    • G06Q20/20Point-of-sale [POS] network systems
    • G06Q20/203Inventory monitoring
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0202Market predictions or demand forecasting

Abstract

Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system on the basis of the relative merit of allocating a draw unit of one of a multitude of different consumer items to one of a multitude of different locations in accordance with an allocation decision criterion subject to one or more constraints, an optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and including a Decision Support Tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a Divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/407,201, filed on Apr. 7, 2003, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/370,143, filed on Apr. 8, 2002, each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The invention is in the field of determining distribution policies for single period inventory systems.
  • GLOSSARY OF TERMS
  • [0003]
    The following terms listed alphabetically together with their acronyms are employed in the description and claims of this application with respect to the present invention:
  • [0000]
    Availability Aij, and System Availability Percentage % SA
  • [0004]
    Availability Aij is an industry term referring to the probability of completely satisfying the demand for an ith consumer item where i=1, 2, . . . , m at a jth location where j=1, 2, . . . , n of a single period inventory system without an occurrence of a sellout due to insufficient draw at that location. In mathematical terms, Aij=F(λij,Dij) where F is the cumulative probability distribution function (cdf) of demand for the ith consumer item at the jth location, and λij and Dij are its mean demand and draw, respectively. The probability distribution function in the discrete case and the probability density function in the continuous case are both denoted by the letter “f”. The System Availability Percentage % SA for a single period inventory system is given by % SA=1000ΣΣAij/mn=100−% ESO.
  • [0000]
    Demand Xij, Mean Demand λi, and Mean Demand Matrix λ
  • [0005]
    The demand process for a consumer item at a location has a random but non-stationary nature, and therefore cannot be subjected to ensemble inferences based on a single realization. Mean demands λij for a consumer item at a location over time are presupposed to be the outcome of a stochastic process which can be simulated by a forecast model whilst the demand Xij for an ith consumer item at a jth location of a single period inventory system at a future point in time is a random variable with a conditional probability distribution conditioned on its mean demand λij at that point in time. A mean demand matrix λ is a matrix of mean demands λij.
  • [0000]
    Distribution Policy
  • [0006]
    A distribution policy is the delivered quantities of each ith consumer item where i=1, 2, . . . , m at each jth location where j=1, 2, . . . , n of a single period inventory system in accordance with a predetermined business strategy.
  • [0000]
    Draw Dij, and Draw Matrix D
  • [0007]
    Draw Dij is an industry term referring to the delivered quantity of an ith consumer item to a jth location of a single period inventory system. A draw matrix D is a matrix of draws Dij.
  • [0000]
    Returns R(λij,Dij), Total Expected Returns ER(λ,D), and Expected Returns Percentage % ER
  • [0008]
    Returns R(λij,Dij) is an industry term referring to the number of unsold items of an ith consumer item at a jth location of a single period inventory system, and is given by R(λij,Dij)=max(Dij−λij,0) where Dij, Xij, and Xij are the ith consumer item's draw, demand and mean demand, respectively, at the jth location. The total expected returns ER at all n locations of a single period inventory system is given by ER(λ,D)=ΣΣER(λij,Dij) where ER(λij,Dij) is the expected value of R(λij,Dij). The expected returns percentage % ER of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system is given by % ER(λ,D)=100ER(λ,D)/ΣΣDij=100−% ES(λ,D).
  • [0000]
    Safety Stock SSi and Total Safety Stock Q
  • [0009]
    For the purpose of the present invention, safety stock SSi refers to the difference between an actual draw of an ith consumer item at a jth location of a single period inventory system and its demand forecast at that location, namely, SSij=Dij−λij, and therefore can assume positive or negative values. This is in contradistinction to the traditional industry definition of safety stock, namely, SSij=max{0, Dij−λij}. The total safety stock Q of all m consumer items at all n locations of a single period inventory system is given by Q=ΣΣSSij.
  • [0000]
    Sales S(λij,Dij), Total Expected Sales ES(λ,D), and Expected Sales Percentage % ES
  • [0010]
    Sales S(λij,Dij) refers to the number of sold items of an ith consumer item at a jth location of a single period inventory system as upper bounded by the draw Dij at that location for that consumer item at each point in time, and is given by S(λij,Dij)=min(Dij,Xij)=Dij−R(λij,Dij) where Dij, Xij, and λij are the ith consumer item's draw, demand, and mean demand, respectively, at the jth location. The total expected sales ES(λ,D) of all m consumer items at all n locations of a single period inventory system is given by ES(λ,D)=ΣΣES(λij,Dij) where ES(λij,Dij) is the expected value of S(λij,Dij). The expected sales percentage % ES of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system is given by % ES(λ,D)=100ES(λ,D)/ΣΣDij=100−% ER(λ,D).
  • [0000]
    Sellout SO(λij,Dij), Expected Number of Sellouts ESO(λij,Dij), Total Expected Number of Sellouts ESO(λ,D), and Expected Sellout Percentage % ESO
  • [0011]
    Sellout SO(λij,Dij) is an industry term referring to an occurrence of demand being greater than a delivered quantity of an ith consumer item at a jth location of a single period inventory system, namely, SO(λij,Dij)=δ(Dij<Xij) where δ is a binary indicator function: δ ( condition ) = 1 , if condition is true 0 , else
    where Dij, Xij, and λij are the ith consumer item's draw, demand, and mean demand, respectively, at that the jth location. The expected number of sellouts ESO(λij,Dij) for an ith consumer item at a jth location of a single period inventory system is given by ESO(λij,Dij)=P(Xij>Dij)=1−F(λij,Dij). The total expected number of sellouts of all m consumer items at all n locations of a single period inventory system is given by ESO(λ,D)=ΣΣESO(λij,Dij)=mn−ΣΣF(λij,Dij). The expected sellout percentage (% ESO) of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system is given by % ESO(λ,D)=100ESO(λ,D)/mn=100−% SA.
    Single Period Inventory Systems
  • [0012]
    Single period inventory systems are largely concerned with consumer items having a limited shelf life at the end of which an item loses most, if not all, of its consumer value, and the stock of which is not replenished to prevent an occurrence of a sellout. Such consumer items can include perishable goods, for example, fruit, vegetables, flowers, and the like, and fixed lifetime goods, for example, printed media publications, namely, daily newspapers, weeklies, monthlies, and the like. Two common problems of single period inventory systems are known in the industry as the so-called “newsvendor” problem, i.e., the sale of the same item throughout a multi-location single period inventory system and the so-called “knapsack” problem, i.e., the sale of different items at the same location.
  • [0000]
    Stockout ST(λij,Dij), Expected Stockout EST(λij,Dij), Total Expected Stockout EST(λ,D), and Expected Stockout Percentage % EST
  • [0013]
    Stockout ST(λij,Dij) is the quantity of unsatisfied demand for an ith consumer item at a jth location of a single period inventory system, and is given by ST(λij,Dij)=max(Xij−Dij,0)=Xij−S(λij,Dij) where Dij, Xij and λij are the ith consumer item's draw, demand, and mean demand, respectively, at the jth location. The total expected stockout EST(λ,D) of all m consumer items at all n locations of a single period inventory system is given by EST(λ,D)=ΣΣEST(λij,Dij) where EST(λij,Dij) is the expected value of ST(λij,Dij). The expected stockout percentage % EST for a distribution policy is given by % EST(λ,D)=100EST(λ,D)/ΣΣDij.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0014]
    One computer implemented approach for calculating a demand forecast involves defining a so-called demand forecast tree capable of being graphically represented by a single top level node with at least two branches directly emanating therefrom, each branch having at least one further node. The demand forecast is computed on the basis of historical sales data typically associated with bottom level nodes of a demand forecast tree by a forecast engine capable of determining a mathematical simulation model for a demand process. One such forecast engine employing statistical seasonal causal time series models of count data is commercially available from Demantra Ltd, Israel, under the name Demantra™ Demand Planner.
  • [0015]
    One exemplary demand forecast application is the media distribution problem, namely, determining the number of copies of different daily newspapers to be delivered daily to different locations to minimize two mutually conflicting indices commonly quantified for evaluating the efficacy of a distribution policy for a newspaper: the frequency of sellouts, and the number of returns both typically expressed in percentage terms. It is common practice in the industry that a draw for a newspaper at a location for a given day is greater than its demand forecast at that location for that day so as to reduce the probability of a sellout but with the inherent penalty that returns will be greater. In the case of distribution policies for newspapers, safety stocks are allocated to locations to ensure a predetermined availability level for a given demand probability function to achieve a reasonable balance between expected returns and expected occurrences of sellouts. Moreover, it is common practice that locations are sorted into one of several classes depending on the average number of copies sold, each class being assigned a different availability level, say, 70%, 80%, and the like.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0016]
    Broadly speaking, the present invention provides a novel computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system on the basis of performance metrics, for example, returns, sellout, and stockout other than the hitherto employed availability metric. In contradistinction to prevailing distribution policy practice which effectively regards each location of a single period inventory system as an isolated entity, the present invention is based on the notion that a distribution policy should allocate draw units on the basis of relative merit in accordance with an allocation decision criterion subject to one or more constraints rather than in some arbitrary absolute fashion. The choice of the most appropriate allocation decision criterion coupled with one or more constraints for a single period inventory system is highly dependent on characteristics of the single period inventory system in question, for example, the frequency distribution of the mean demands at its nodes, amongst others, and a business objective.
  • [0017]
    The preferred allocation decision criteria of the present invention can be divided into two groups as follows:
  • [0018]
    Group I consists of simple allocation decision criteria, including inter alia:
  • [0000]
    (i) maximum incremental availability maxi,j {F(λij,Dij+1)−F(λij,Dij)};
  • [0000]
    (ii) minimum availability mini,j {F(λij,Dij)};
  • [0000]
    (iii) minimum incremental expected return mini,j {ER(λij,Dij+1)−ER(λij,Dij)}; and
  • [0000]
    (iv) maximum decremental expected stockout maxi,j {EST(λij,Dij)−EST(λij,Dij+1)};
  • [0019]
    each being subject to one or more of the following constraints ΣΣSSij≦Q where Q is the total safety stock threshold for delivery of all m consumer items to all n locations, ΣjSSij≦q1 i where q1 i is the safety stock of the ith consumer item at all locations, ΣiSSij<q2 j where q2 j is the safety stock of all the consumer items at a jth location, % EST(λ,D)≦s where s is a predetermined expected stockout percentage threshold, % ER(λ,D)≦r where r is a predetermined expected return percentage threshold, % ESO(λ,D)≦e where e is a predetermined expected sellout percentage threshold, aij≦Dij≦bij where aij and bij are respectively lower and upper boundaries for a draw of an ith consumer item at a jth location of a single period inventory system; A≦ΣΣDij≦B where A and B are respectively lower and upper boundaries for the draw of all m consumer items at all n locations of a single period inventory system, A1 i≦Σ1Dij≦B1 i where A1 i and B1 j are respectively lower and upper boundaries for the draw of all m consumer items at a jth location of a single period inventory system, and A1 i≦EjDij≦B1 i where A1 i and B1 i are respectively lower and upper boundaries for the draw of a ith consumer items at all n locations of a single period inventory system.
  • [0020]
    Group II consists of weighted composite allocation decision criteria each having two components oppositely acting upon the draw matrix D required to yield a predetermined business objective expressed in terms of an expected returns percentage (% ER) or an expected percentage of a parameter associated with occurrences of sellouts of all m consumer items at all n locations of a single period inventory system. The parameter associated with occurrences of sellouts may be either the number of sellouts of all m consumer items at all n locations of a single period inventory system in which case the allocation decision criterion is as follows:
  • [0000]
    (v) w1(% ER(λ,D)−% ER(λ,D0))+w2(% ESO(λ,D0)−% ESO(λ,D)) or
  • [0000]
    the number of stockouts at all n locations of a single period inventory system in which case the allocation decision criterion is as follows:
  • [0000]
    (vi) w1(% ER(λ,D)−% ER(λ,D0))+w2(% EST(λ,D0)−% EST(λ,D))
  • [0021]
    where w1 and w2 are weights, and D0 is an initial draw matrix. The weighted composite allocation decision criteria can be subject to one or more of the above mentioned constraints, and also % ER(λ,D)=% ESO(λ,D) in the case of criterion (v), and also % ER(λ,D)=% EST(λ,D) in the case of criterion (vi). Typically D0=λ. In point of fact, the latter criterion is conceptually more valid than the former criterion since the two parameters “returns” and “stockouts” have the same dimensions, namely, units of consumer items, which is not the dimension of sellouts. But this notwithstanding, it is envisaged that the former sellout criterion will gain more acceptance than the latter stockout criterion since expected sellout percentages rather than expected stockout percentages are more traditional in the art of single period inventory systems.
  • [0022]
    To reach an optimal allocation of draw units, the simplest approach is to allocate additional draw units one by one starting from an initial draw allocation, say, equal to the mean demand matrix. But in the case of allocating a predetermined total draw quantity ΣΣDij or total predetermined safety stock quantity Q, it may be allocated with less iterations if it is initially allocated between the locations of a single period inventory system, say, in accordance with a predetermined availability at each location, and thereafter the initial draw allocation is fine-tuned to optimal allocations at each location in accordance with a selected allocation decision criterion by so-called pairwise switching.
  • [0023]
    In connection with the weighted composite allocation decision criteria (v) and (vi), the present invention also provides a computer implemented Decision Support Tool for graphically displaying the expected returns percentages % ER for a multitude of expected returns percentages against their corresponding minimal expected sellout percentages % ESO, or vice versa. Alternatively, the Decision Support Tool can preferably graphically display expected returns percentages % ER for a multitude of expected returns percentages against their corresponding minimal expected stockout percentages % EST, or vice versa.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0024]
    In order to better understand the invention and to see how it can be carried out in practice, preferred embodiments will now be described, by way of non-limiting examples only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
  • [0025]
    FIG. 1 is a pictorial representation showing a demand forecast tree for computing demand forecast information for five different perishable consumer items;
  • [0026]
    FIG. 2 is a table showing historical sales data associated with the demand forecast tree of FIG. 1;
  • [0027]
    FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, and including a Decision Support Tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system;
  • [0028]
    FIG. 4 is a pictorial representation of a simple single period inventory system having three locations for draw allocation in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0029]
    FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a method for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system in accordance with the present invention;
  • [0030]
    FIG. 6 is a flow chart showing the steps of a method for re-allocating a predetermined draw to the locations of a single period inventory system based on maximal incremental availability in accordance with a first preferred embodiment of the method of FIG. 5;
  • [0031]
    FIG. 7 is a table summarizing the results of the iterations for re-allocating the combined total draw of the demand forecast and 15 safety stock units between the locations of the single period inventory system of FIG. 4 in accordance with the method of FIG. 6;
  • [0032]
    FIG. 8 is a flow chart similar to the flow chart of FIG. 6 but for the one-by-one allocation of a predetermined draw to the locations of a single period inventory system in accordance with a second preferred embodiment of the method of FIG. 5;
  • [0033]
    FIG. 9 is a table similar to the table of FIG. 7 except in accordance with the method of FIG. 8 for the one-by-one allocation of up to 20 safety stock units;
  • [0034]
    FIG. 10 is a flow chart showing the steps of a method in accordance with the present invention for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system using a weighted composite allocation decision criterion;
  • [0035]
    FIG. 11 is a table summarizing the minimal expected sellout percentages (% ESO) for a multitude of expected returns percentages (% ER) for allocating draw units to the locations of the single period inventory system of FIG. 4 in accordance with the method of FIG. 10 together with their corresponding draw vectors D; and
  • [0036]
    FIG. 12 is a graph showing the results of the table of FIG. 11 for facilitating user determination of the distribution policy for a single period inventory system.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0037]
    FIG. 1 shows an exemplary demand forecast tree 1 having a single top level node (00) with five branches A, B, C, D and E for correspondingly representing the sale of Item I (top level-1 node (10)) at Locations 1 and 2 (bottom level nodes (11) and (21)), Item II (top level-1 node (20)) at Locations 1 and 3 (bottom level nodes (21) and (23)), Item III (top level-1 node (30)) at Locations 1, 2 and 3 (bottom level nodes (31), (32) and (33)), Item IV (top level-1 node (40)) also at Locations 1, 2 and 3 (bottom level nodes (41), (42) and (43)); and Item V (top level-1 node (50)) at Location 1 (bottom level node (51)) only. FIG. 2 shows an exemplary table 2 containing historical sales data for Item I at the bottom level nodes (11) and (12). Similar tables exist for the sale of the other items at their respective locations.
  • [0038]
    FIG. 3 shows a computer implemented system 3 with a processor 4, memory 6, a user interface 7, including suitable input devices, for example, a keypad, a mouse, and the like, and output means, for example, a screen, a printer, and the like, with other computer components for enabling operation of the system including result analysis. The computer implemented system 3 includes a database 8 for storing historical time series of sales information of items at locations, a forecast engine 9 for forecasting the mean demand λij for each ith perishable consumer item at each jth location on the basis of the historical sales data, and an optimization application 11 for determining the distribution policy for a single period inventory system subject to one or more constraints. The computer implemented system 3 also includes a Decision Support Tool (DST) 12 for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system. The computer implemented system 3 may be implemented as illustrated and described in commonly assigned co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/058,830 entitled “Computer Implemented Method and System for Demand Forecast Applications”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Whilst the present invention is being described in the context of a fully functional computer implemented system, it is capable of being distributed in as a program product in a variety of forms, and the present invention applies equally regardless of the particular type of signal bearing media used to carry out distribution. Examples of such media include recordable type media, e.g., CD-ROM and transmission type media, e.g., digital communication links.
  • [0039]
    The present invention will now be exemplified for an exemplary “newsvendor” problem for determining the distribution policy for a single period inventory system 13 for delivering a single newspaper title between three locations, namely, j=1, 2 and 3 (see FIG. 4). For the sake of the example below, demand at Locations 1, 2 and 3 are assumed to have a Poisson probability distribution, and the single period inventory system has a mean demand vector λ=(10, 40, 100) but the present invention can be equally applied to other probability distributions of demand. Based on this assumption, the expressions for calculating expected return (ER) and expected stockout (EST) for Locations 1, 2, and 3 are as follows:
    ERij ,D j)=D j fj ,D j−1)+(D j−λj)Fj,Dj−2)
    ESTj ,D j)=D j fj ,D j)+(λj −D j)(1−Fj ,D j−1))
    where f(•) is the Poisson probability distribution function (pdf) and F(•) is the Poisson cumulative probability distribution function (cdf) for the demand for the consumer item at the jth location, and λj and Dj are respectively the mean demand value and the draw at that location.
  • [0040]
    The use of the present invention for determining the distribution policy for the single period inventory system 13 is now described with reference to FIGS. 6-9 in connection with the first simple allocation decision criterion, namely, maximum incremental availability as given by maxj {F(λj,Dj+1)−F(λj,Dj)} subject to one or more of the following constraints: ΣSSj≦Q % ER(λ,D)≦r; % ESO(λ,D)≦e; % EST(λ,D)≦s; aj≦Dj≦bj; and A≦ΣDj≦B. The use of the present invention as exemplified in FIGS. 6-10 can be equally extended to the other simple allocation decision criterion (ii) to (iv) by substitution of their corresponding expressions into the blocks entitled Criterion and Objective in the flow diagrams of FIGS. 6 and 8.
  • [0041]
    To better exemplify the potential of the present invention for more advantageously allocating draw, the following performance metrics % SA, % ESO, % ER, % ES, and % EST are employed for comparing the allocation of the same safety stock quantity in accordance with the conventional approach of the same availability at each location and maximum incremental availability. In accordance with a conventional 80% availability at each location, this imposes a safety stock allocation of 2, 5 and 8 units to Locations 1, 2 and 3, respectively, which yields the following results: % SA=80.2%, % ESO=19.8%, % ER=10.7%, % ES=89.3%, and % EST=11.6%. FIG. 7 shows how the same safety stock allocation of Q=15 units using pairwise switching can arrive at a safety stock allocation of 5, 6 and 4 units to Locations 1, 2 and 3, respectively, which yields the following results: % SA=82.6%, % ESO=−17.4%, % ER=10.9%, % ES=89.1%, and % EST=1.8%, namely, adramatically increased % SA from 80.2% to 82.6% whilst paying only marginal penalties in terms of increased expected returns percentage (% ER) from 10.7% to 10.9% and increased expected stockout percentage (% EST) from 1.6% to 1.8%. The results exemplify that since locations with different mean demands contribute differently to overall system availability % SA, this performance metric can be improved substantially by allocating draw units to the locations which contribute most at a prevailing draw allocation Dc at the expense of other locations. In the present case, the initial safety stock allocation of providing an about 80% availability at each of the Locations 1, 2 and 3 is morphed to availabilities of 95%, 85%, and 68%, respectively.
  • [0042]
    As mentioned earlier, pairwise switching can only be employed in the case of re-allocation of a predetermined draw. The table of FIG. 9 shows the incremental effect of one-by-one allocation of safety stock units to the Locations 1, 2 and 3, the column entitled “winning location” indicating which Location 1, 2 or 3 receives the next additional safety stock unit on the basis of its incremental availability being the greatest at any given prevailing draw allocation Dc. The table of FIG. 9 enables determining the results of the performance metrics % SA, % ESO, % ER, % ES, and % EST for termination conditions other than a predetermined safety stock quantity, say, % ESO≦15% which in this case imposes a safety stock allocation of 5, 7 and 6 units to the Locations 1, 2 and 3, respectively, which yields % SA=75.9%, % ESO=14.1%, % ER=12.1%, % ES=87.9%, and % EST=1.4%.
  • [0043]
    The use of the present invention for allocating draw to the Locations 1, 2 and 3 is now described with reference to FIGS. 10-12 in connection with the first weighted composite allocation decision criterion, namely, w1(% ER(λ,D)−% ER(λ,D0))+w2(% ESO(λ,D0)−% ESO(λ,D)) subject to one or more of the following constraints: ΣSSi≦Q, % ER(λ,D)≦r; % ESO(λ,D)≦e; % EST(λ,D)≦s; ai≦Di≦bi; and A≦ΣDi≦B. FIG. 11 shows the results for repetitions of the method set out in the flow diagram of FIG. 10 for different expected returns percentage constraints % ER(λ,D)≦r at intervals of about 2% to calculate their corresponding minimal expected sellout percentages % ESO. The DST 12 graphically shows these results (see FIG. 12) for enabling a user to select a draw vector D, thereby determining the draw allocation between the Locations 1, 2 and 3. This approach can be repeated for a multitude of different expected sellout percentage constraints % ESO(λ,D)≦e, say, at intervals of 5%. Also, this approach may be repeated using the second weighted composite allocation decision criterion based on stockouts rather than sellouts.
  • [0044]
    While the invention has been described with respect to a limited number of embodiments, it will be appreciated that many variations, modifications, and other applications of the invention can be made within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (12)

  1. 1. A computer implemented Decision Support Tool (DST) for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, wherein:
    the DST is operable to receive the mean demands of a consumer item at the locations of the single period inventory system;
    the DST is operable to calculate the expected percentages of a parameter associated with the occurrences of sellout at the locations of the single period inventory system for a multitude of expected returns percentages (% ER), or vice versa; and
    the DST is operable to output the multitude of expected returns percentages (% ER) against their corresponding expected percentages of the parameter, or vice versa.
  2. 2. The DST according to claim 1 wherein the parameter is the expected number of sellouts of the consumer item at all n locations of the single period inventory system, and the weighted composite allocation decision criterion is given by:
    w1(% ER(λ,D)−% ER(λ,D0))+w2 (% ESO(λ,D0)−% ESO(λ,D)) where w1, and w2 are weights, and D0 is an initial draw vector.
  3. 3. The DST according to claim 2 wherein D0=λ).
  4. 4. The DST according to claim 1 wherein the parameter is the expected stockout of the consumer item at all n locations of the single period inventory system and the weighted composite allocation decision criterion is given by:
    w1(% ER(λ,D)−% ER(λ,D0))+w2(% EST(−λ,D0)−% EST(λ,D)) where w1 and w2 are weights, and D0 is an initial draw vector.
  5. 5. The DST according to claim 4 wherein D0=λ.
  6. 6. The DST according to claim 1 wherein the consumer item is a printed media publication.
  7. 7. Computer implemented method for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, the method comprising the steps of:
    (a) calculating the corresponding expected percentages of a parameter associated with the occurrences of sellout at the locations of the single period inventory system for a multitude of expected returns percentages (% ER), or vice versa; and
    (b) displaying the multitude of expected returns percentages (% ER) against their corresponding expected percentages of the parameter, or vice versa.
  8. 8. The method according to claim 7 wherein the parameter is the expected number of sellouts of the consumer item at all n locations of the single period inventory system, and the weighted composite allocation decision criterion is given by:
    w1(% ER(λ,D)−% ER(λ,D0))+w2 (% ESO(λ,D0)−% ESO(λ,D)) where w1 and w2 are weights, and D0 is an initial draw vector.
  9. 9. The method according to claim 8 wherein D0=λ.
  10. 10. The method according to claim 9 wherein the parameter is the expected stockout of the consumer item at all n locations of the single period inventory system and the weighted composite allocation criterion is given by:
    w1(% ER(λ,D)−% ER(λ,D0))+w2 (% EST(λ,D0)−% EST(λ,D)) where w1 and w2 are weights, and D0 is an initial draw vector.
  11. 11. The method according to claim 9 wherein D0=λ.
  12. 12. The method according to claim 7 wherein the consumer item is a printed media publication.
US11838614 2002-04-08 2007-08-14 Computer Implemented System for Determining a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System, Optimization Application Therefor, and Method Therefor, and Decision Support Tool for Facilitating User Determination of a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System Abandoned US20080027837A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US37014302 true 2002-04-08 2002-04-08
US10407201 US7664683B2 (en) 2002-04-08 2003-04-07 Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system
US11838614 US20080027837A1 (en) 2002-04-08 2007-08-14 Computer Implemented System for Determining a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System, Optimization Application Therefor, and Method Therefor, and Decision Support Tool for Facilitating User Determination of a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11838614 US20080027837A1 (en) 2002-04-08 2007-08-14 Computer Implemented System for Determining a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System, Optimization Application Therefor, and Method Therefor, and Decision Support Tool for Facilitating User Determination of a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080027837A1 true true US20080027837A1 (en) 2008-01-31

Family

ID=29218879

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10407201 Active 2027-01-13 US7664683B2 (en) 2002-04-08 2003-04-07 Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system
US11838614 Abandoned US20080027837A1 (en) 2002-04-08 2007-08-14 Computer Implemented System for Determining a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System, Optimization Application Therefor, and Method Therefor, and Decision Support Tool for Facilitating User Determination of a Distribution Policy for a Single Period Inventory System
US12693311 Active 2023-05-24 US8036958B2 (en) 2002-04-08 2010-01-25 Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10407201 Active 2027-01-13 US7664683B2 (en) 2002-04-08 2003-04-07 Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12693311 Active 2023-05-24 US8036958B2 (en) 2002-04-08 2010-01-25 Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US7664683B2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030200158A1 (en) * 2002-04-08 2003-10-23 Bart Feldman Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system
US20040172344A1 (en) * 2002-11-25 2004-09-02 Zachariah Stockwell Method and apparatus for automatic replenishment of goods to customer locations
US20100069416A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-03-18 Glaxo Group Limited Azabicyclo [3.1.0] Hexyl Derivatives as Modulators of Dopamine D3 Receptors

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8046275B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2011-10-25 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Synchronizing an allocation table with a procurement system
US7908186B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2011-03-15 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Distribution matrix in an allocation table
US7689477B2 (en) * 2004-04-16 2010-03-30 Sap Aktiengesellschaft Apparatus and program product for generating an allocation table in a computerized procurement system
US20060173728A1 (en) * 2005-01-21 2006-08-03 Lianjun An Adaptive product configuration model
US20100241490A1 (en) * 2009-03-19 2010-09-23 William John Purcell Evaluating extended supply chains
US20140058794A1 (en) * 2012-08-27 2014-02-27 Sap Ag Method And System For Orders Planning And Optimization With Applications To Food Consumer Products Industry
US9600793B2 (en) * 2013-12-09 2017-03-21 International Business Machines Corporation Active odor cancellation
US20150199206A1 (en) * 2014-01-13 2015-07-16 Bigtera Limited Data distribution device and data distribution method thereof for use in storage system

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4744027A (en) * 1986-08-22 1988-05-10 American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories Method and apparatus for optimizing system operational parameters
US5596493A (en) * 1991-04-19 1997-01-21 Meiji Milk Products Co., Ltd. Method for classifying sale amount characteristics, method for predicting sale volume, method for ordering for restocking, system for classifying sale amount characteristics and system for ordering for restocking
US5946662A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-08-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method for providing inventory optimization
US6144945A (en) * 1997-07-14 2000-11-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method for fast and accurate evaluation of periodic review inventory policy
US6341269B1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2002-01-22 Mercani Technologies, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture to optimize inventory and merchandising shelf space utilization
US20030033180A1 (en) * 2000-10-27 2003-02-13 Manugistics, Inc. System and method for optimizing resource plans
US20030200158A1 (en) * 2002-04-08 2003-10-23 Bart Feldman Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system
US6826538B1 (en) * 1999-07-28 2004-11-30 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Method for planning key component purchases to optimize revenue
US6944598B1 (en) * 1999-09-17 2005-09-13 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Binary trees for detecting inventory problems in an enterprise model
US7092929B1 (en) * 2000-11-08 2006-08-15 Bluefire Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for planning analysis
US7136830B1 (en) * 1999-07-20 2006-11-14 World Factory, Inc. Method of producing, selling, and distributing articles of manufacture through the automated aggregation of orders and the visual representation of standardized shipping volumes
US7240027B2 (en) * 2000-04-07 2007-07-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Method and apparatus for monitoring the flow of items through a store or warehouse

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4744027A (en) * 1986-08-22 1988-05-10 American Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories Method and apparatus for optimizing system operational parameters
US5596493A (en) * 1991-04-19 1997-01-21 Meiji Milk Products Co., Ltd. Method for classifying sale amount characteristics, method for predicting sale volume, method for ordering for restocking, system for classifying sale amount characteristics and system for ordering for restocking
US5946662A (en) * 1996-03-29 1999-08-31 International Business Machines Corporation Method for providing inventory optimization
US6144945A (en) * 1997-07-14 2000-11-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method for fast and accurate evaluation of periodic review inventory policy
US6341269B1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2002-01-22 Mercani Technologies, Inc. System, method and article of manufacture to optimize inventory and merchandising shelf space utilization
US7136830B1 (en) * 1999-07-20 2006-11-14 World Factory, Inc. Method of producing, selling, and distributing articles of manufacture through the automated aggregation of orders and the visual representation of standardized shipping volumes
US6826538B1 (en) * 1999-07-28 2004-11-30 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Method for planning key component purchases to optimize revenue
US6944598B1 (en) * 1999-09-17 2005-09-13 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Binary trees for detecting inventory problems in an enterprise model
US7240027B2 (en) * 2000-04-07 2007-07-03 The Procter & Gamble Company Method and apparatus for monitoring the flow of items through a store or warehouse
US20030033180A1 (en) * 2000-10-27 2003-02-13 Manugistics, Inc. System and method for optimizing resource plans
US7092929B1 (en) * 2000-11-08 2006-08-15 Bluefire Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for planning analysis
US20030200158A1 (en) * 2002-04-08 2003-10-23 Bart Feldman Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030200158A1 (en) * 2002-04-08 2003-10-23 Bart Feldman Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system
US7664683B2 (en) 2002-04-08 2010-02-16 Oracle International Corporation Computer implemented system for determining a distribution policy for a single period inventory system, optimization application therefor, and method therefor, and decision support tool for facilitating user determination of a distribution policy for a single period inventory system
US20040172344A1 (en) * 2002-11-25 2004-09-02 Zachariah Stockwell Method and apparatus for automatic replenishment of goods to customer locations
US20100069416A1 (en) * 2006-04-03 2010-03-18 Glaxo Group Limited Azabicyclo [3.1.0] Hexyl Derivatives as Modulators of Dopamine D3 Receptors

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US7664683B2 (en) 2010-02-16 grant
US20030200158A1 (en) 2003-10-23 application
US20100169167A1 (en) 2010-07-01 application
US8036958B2 (en) 2011-10-11 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Thomas et al. Managing marketing communications with multichannel customers
Kukalis Determinants of strategic planning systems in large organizations: a contingency approach
US6708155B1 (en) Decision management system with automated strategy optimization
Lariviere et al. Selling to the newsvendor: An analysis of price-only contracts
US7668761B2 (en) System and method for ensuring order fulfillment
US6078905A (en) Method for optimizing risk management
Karsak et al. Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach
Timmer et al. Does information and communication technology drive EU-US productivity growth differentials?
Smith et al. Management of multi-item retail inventory systems with demand substitution
US20090043637A1 (en) Extended value and risk management system
Soman et al. Combined make-to-order and make-to-stock in a food production system
Belobaba Survey Paper—Airline yield management an overview of seat inventory control
US20080077459A1 (en) Price markdown apparatus
Carr et al. The inverse newsvendor problem: Choosing an optimal demand portfolio for capacitated resources
US20060241986A1 (en) Production optimizer for supply chain management
US20050197918A1 (en) System and method for planning, allocation, and purchasing
Dekker et al. On the (S− 1, S) lost sales inventory model with priority demand classes
US20040059621A1 (en) Methods apparatus for allocating resources in the presence of uncertainty
US5946212A (en) Method of allocating work in capacity planning
US20050131947A1 (en) Data processing system and method
US6341240B1 (en) Method of allocating work in capacity planning
US20080040250A1 (en) System and Method for Analysing Risk Associated with an Investment Portfolio
US6317752B1 (en) Version testing in database mining
Hand Modelling consumer credit risk
Hatten et al. A strategic model of the US brewing industry: 1952-1971

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: DEMANTRA LTD., ISRAEL

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:FELDMAN, BART C.;ARONOWICH, MICHAEL;NATAN, OFRA;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060425 TO 20060426;REEL/FRAME:044387/0112