US20070182243A1 - Soft-stop braking control - Google Patents

Soft-stop braking control Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070182243A1
US20070182243A1 US11/346,755 US34675506A US2007182243A1 US 20070182243 A1 US20070182243 A1 US 20070182243A1 US 34675506 A US34675506 A US 34675506A US 2007182243 A1 US2007182243 A1 US 2007182243A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vehicle
brake
braking
pressure
threshold
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11/346,755
Other versions
US7475953B2 (en
Inventor
Douglas Osborn
James Techentin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kelsey Hayes Co
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/346,755 priority Critical patent/US7475953B2/en
Assigned to KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY reassignment KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: OSBORN, DOUGLAS CHARLES, TECHENTIN, JAMES ANDREW
Priority to PCT/US2007/002416 priority patent/WO2007092200A2/en
Publication of US20070182243A1 publication Critical patent/US20070182243A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US7475953B2 publication Critical patent/US7475953B2/en
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Assignors: KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC, TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC.
Assigned to TRW INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP., KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC, TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC. reassignment TRW INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP. RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Assignors: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60TVEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T7/00Brake-action initiating means
    • B60T7/12Brake-action initiating means for automatic initiation; for initiation not subject to will of driver or passenger
    • B60T7/22Brake-action initiating means for automatic initiation; for initiation not subject to will of driver or passenger initiated by contact of vehicle, e.g. bumper, with an external object, e.g. another vehicle, or by means of contactless obstacle detectors mounted on the vehicle
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60TVEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T8/00Arrangements for adjusting wheel-braking force to meet varying vehicular or ground-surface conditions, e.g. limiting or varying distribution of braking force
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60TVEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T2201/00Particular use of vehicle brake systems; Special systems using also the brakes; Special software modules within the brake system controller
    • B60T2201/02Active or adaptive cruise control system; Distance control
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B60VEHICLES IN GENERAL
    • B60TVEHICLE BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF; BRAKE CONTROL SYSTEMS OR PARTS THEREOF, IN GENERAL; ARRANGEMENT OF BRAKING ELEMENTS ON VEHICLES IN GENERAL; PORTABLE DEVICES FOR PREVENTING UNWANTED MOVEMENT OF VEHICLES; VEHICLE MODIFICATIONS TO FACILITATE COOLING OF BRAKES
    • B60T2230/00Monitoring, detecting special vehicle behaviour; Counteracting thereof
    • B60T2230/04Jerk, soft-stop; Anti-jerk, reduction of pitch or nose-dive when braking

Definitions

  • This invention relates in general to vehicle braking, and more specifically, to gradual vehicle braking.
  • pressurized hydraulic braking fluid is applied to the vehicle brake actuators as demanded by the drivers braking demand input. That is, a proportional braking force is applied to the vehicle brake actuators in response to the driver's force exerted on the brake pedal.
  • Applying too much braking pressure to the brake pedal during an end of stop operation may lead to a sudden jolt or jerk stop (i.e., wrap-up) as the vehicle comes to a complete stop. This typically occurs when the driver fails to relieve braking pressure to the vehicle brake pedal so as to ease off the pressure applied.
  • wrap-up is displeasing to passengers traveling in a vehicle as it is for the driver of a vehicle.
  • bringing the vehicle to a gradual stop has been entirely dependent upon the driver's actions of applying just the right amount of force to the vehicle brake pedal by manually easing off the brake pedal so as to reduce wrap-up at the end of stop operation.
  • the present invention has the advantage of eliminating a hard stop (wrap-up) during an end of the stop braking operation that is most common when the driver is applying more than the required braking pressure to stop the vehicle and fails to reduce brake pressure to the vehicle brake actuator as the vehicle comes to a complete stop.
  • the present invention also has the advantage of monitoring other factors such as secondary braking functions and target sensing to discontinue a soft-stop braking routine and allow for full control of vehicle braking by the driver or for the application of secondary braking operations.
  • a method for applying a soft-stop control to the vehicle brake actuators of a vehicle during a vehicle stop operation.
  • a brake apply operation is detected.
  • a determination is made whether the vehicle speed is below a first threshold stopping speed.
  • Braking pressure to the vehicle actuators is reduced as a function of vehicle speed, vehicle deceleration, and brake apply pressure if the vehicle speed is below the first threshold stopping speed.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic of a vehicle soft-stop system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart for a method for a soft-stop routine of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 there is shown a schematic diagram of a vehicle and its associated hydraulic braking system and target sensing system.
  • the vehicle is shown generally at 10 and includes vehicle wheels 11 a, b, c, d .
  • the hydraulic braking system includes vehicle brake actuators 12 a, b, c, d with each vehicle brake actuator including a respective brake actuation member (slave cylinder) and friction member actuable by the actuation member for engaging a rotatable braking surface of the vehicle wheels 11 a, b, c, d respectively.
  • Braking fluid circuits 14 , 16 , 18 , 20 provide braking fluid from a source of pressurized brake fluid such as a manually operated master cylinder 22 for pressurizing vehicle brake actuators 12 a, b, c, d respectively.
  • a vehicle brake control module 24 may be used in cooperation with the master cylinder 22 to provide primary braking functions (i.e., as demanded by a driver) and secondary braking functions (i.e., automated vehicle stability control functions).
  • Various hydraulically controlled valves (not shown) within the brake control module 24 control the hydraulic pressure to the four vehicle brake actuators 12 a, b, c, d either independently or in combination for performing various deceleration or stability control operations.
  • a pressure sensor 25 is coupled to at least one fluid circuit for sensing hydraulic pressure output from the master cylinder 22 via the respective fluid circuit.
  • Secondary braking functions are invoked for maintaining a function of vehicle stability control. Such secondary braking functions are automatically implemented in response to either a driver's brake apply demand when vehicle stability issues are occurring (e.g., ABS functionality) or when a vehicle encounters stability control problems without a driver's braking apply demand (e.g., traction control functionality).
  • Other secondary braking functions may include vehicle stability control functionality (VSC), yaw stability control functionality (YSC), corner brake control (CBC), dynamic rear proportioning (DRP), and deceleration based isolation (DBI).
  • VSC vehicle stability control functionality
  • YSC yaw stability control functionality
  • CBC corner brake control
  • DBI deceleration based isolation
  • the vehicle 10 is also shown to include a target proximity sensing system 26 .
  • the target is meant to include a person, vehicle, moving or stationary object detectable by the target proximity sensing system 26 .
  • the target proximity sensing system 26 may include a forward target sensing unit 28 , such as an adaptive cruise control system (ACC) sensor.
  • the ACC typically includes a radar sensor that senses the proximity of a target forward of the vehicle 10 .
  • the target proximity sensing system 26 may also include a rear proximity sensing unit 32 that senses targets rearward of the vehicle 10 such as backup sensors for detecting such targets as a person, vehicle, or object.
  • the brake control module 24 also controls the soft-stop control functions of the present invention.
  • Soft-stop control functions automatically reduce braking pressure during a vehicle stop when the vehicle is within a predetermined speed range for bringing the vehicle to a gradual stop while avoiding a hard stop jerk that is typically the result of a driver having more pedal pressure than that which is required to stop the vehicle in a reasonably short distance when braking.
  • Soft-stop would only be applied to vehicle stops made without the assistance of other forms of secondary braking control functions being active (e.g., ABS active). The intent is to eliminate the sudden end of a stop wrap-up by reducing braking pressure by 25-75%.
  • the braking control unit 24 To activate the soft-stop algorithm, the braking control unit 24 must detect a brake apply operation and the vehicle speed must be between a first threshold stopping speed and a second threshold stopping speed.
  • the brake apply operation may be detected by a brake switch, the master cylinder pressure being greater than a predetermined stop pressure threshold, or sensing the travel of the brake pedal beyond a predetermined brake pedal distance threshold. Requiring the vehicle speed to be below the first threshold stopping speed, typically between 3 and 10 mph, allows the vehicle to be stopped within the substantially same stopping distance as intended by the driver. Otherwise, reducing pressure to the vehicle brake actuators while the vehicle has too much inertia may lead to the vehicle stopping significantly beyond the drivers intended stopping location.
  • the intention of the soft-stop routine is to eliminate the vehicle wrap-up while substantially maintaining the intended stopping distance as intended by the driver.
  • all secondary braking functions must be inactive. If any secondary braking function is active, then the brake control module 24 will not activate the soft-stop routine. In addition, if any secondary braking function becomes active while the soft start routine is active, the brake control module 24 will deactivate the soft-stop routine as secondary braking operations take priority over the soft-stop functions.
  • the brake control unit 24 is also in communication with the target proximity sensing system 26 .
  • sensed outputs from the target proximity sensing system 26 are provided to the brake control module 24 for sensing the proximity of a target forward or rearward of the vehicle 10 . If at any time a target as sensed by the target proximity sensing system 26 is within a target distance threshold, then the soft-stop routine is deactivated (if presently in an activation state) or is prevented from being activated (if presently in a deactivation state).
  • the brake control module 24 modulates (e.g., energizes and de-energizes) respective hydraulically controlled valves for reducing hydraulic pressure to the vehicle brake actuators 12 a,b,c,d for gradually bringing the vehicle to a gradual stop without wrap-up at the end of stop operation. If a secondary braking function becomes active, or a target is sensed within the target distance threshold, or the master cylinder pressure below the predetermined stop pressure threshold while the soft start routine is active, then the soft-stop routine is immediately deactivated and full braking apply control as demanded by the driver is applied. For example, activation of a secondary braking operation would indicate that a stability control issue is occurring and the brake control module 24 is currently attempting to correct the condition.
  • Another example of which would deactivate the soft-stop routine includes sensing a target in the trajectory travel path of the vehicle within the target distance threshold. For safety purposes, the soft-stop routine is discontinued to allow the driver to perform an immediate stop, if required.
  • Yet another example of which would deactivate the soft-stop routine includes sensing a drop in the master cylinder pressure below a predetermined pressure threshold. Such a pressure reduction in the master cylinder would indicate the driver is attempting to intentionally relieve braking pressure. The soft-stop routine would be discontinued and full braking apply control is provided to the driver.
  • wrap-up is no longer an issue and full braking control is provided to the driver.
  • This allows the driver to have full control over the brake pressure applied to the brake actuators for maintaining the vehicle in a stopped position as intended by the driver.
  • the advantage is to reduce the braking pressure applied to the vehicle brakes actuators while the vehicle is traveling within a predetermined for eliminating wrap-up.
  • FIG. 2 is a method for applying a soft-stop braking routine during an end of stop operation.
  • a routine is initiated for determining whether to activate a soft-stop algorithm.
  • a determination is made whether the vehicle brakes have been applied by the driver of the vehicle.
  • a brake apply operation by the driver is typically sensed by a brake switch being actuated, or by sensing of the brake pedal travel beyond a predetermined pedal distance travel, or when the master cylinder pressure is above a predetermined pressure threshold. Pressure output by the master cylinder being above a predetermined pressure threshold could indicate that that pressure is being applied to the vehicle brakes but due to an inoperable brake switch or brake pedal travel sensor, the system has not identified the brake apply operation.
  • step 57 If either the brake switch, braking pedal travel sensor, or master cylinder pressure does not indicate a brake apply operation is being demanded by the driver, then the routine is exited in step 57 . If the determination is made in step 42 that a brake apply operation is occurring, then a determination is made whether any secondary braking functions are active.
  • step 43 a determination is made whether an anti-lock braking function is active. If the anti-lock braking function is active, then the routine is exited in step 57 . If the anti-lock braking function is inactive, then the routine proceeds to step 44 .
  • step 44 a determination is made as to whether the corner brake control function is active. If the corner brake control function is active, then the routine is exited in step 57 . If the corner brake control function is inactive, then the routine proceeds to step 45 .
  • step 45 a determination is made whether the front deceleration based isolation function is active. If the front deceleration based isolation function is active, then the routine is exited in step 57 . If the front deceleration based isolation function is inactive, then the routine proceeds to step 46 .
  • step 46 a determination is made whether the vehicle speed is less than the first threshold stopping speed.
  • the first threshold speed may be a predetermined value, or may be calculated as a function of the vehicle's rate of deceleration. If the vehicle speed is greater than the first threshold stopping speed, then the routine is exited in step 57 . If the vehicle speed is less than the first threshold stopping speed, then the routine proceeds to step 47 .
  • step 47 a determination is made whether the rate of change of the driver's braking effort (brake apply pressure) is within a predetermined braking rate threshold.
  • a rate of change greater than the predetermined braking rate threshold indicates that the driver is increasing braking efforts faster than what is typically expected and it is determined that the driver's intent is to stop the vehicle immediately.
  • a rate of change less than the predetermined braking rate threshold indicates that the driver braking efforts are decreasing (i.e., while the vehicle speed is below the first threshold speed) and it is determined that the driver is relieving braking pressure intentionally to manually perform a soft stop.
  • the braking efforts of the driver can be determined by the master cylinder pressure or brake pedal travel.
  • step 53 If the determination is made that the rate of change of the driver's braking effort is outside of the predetermined braking rate threshold, then the routine is exited via step 53 . If the braking effort is within the predetermined braking rate threshold, then the routine proceeds to step 48 .
  • step 48 a determination is made whether the vehicle is traveling in a forward direction. If the vehicle is traveling in a forward direction, then a determination is made in step 51 as to whether a target is within the forward trajectory path of the vehicle and whether the target is within a target distance threshold. If the target is within the target distance threshold, then the routine is exited in step 57 . If the target is not within the target distance threshold, then the routine proceeds to step 52 where the soft start algorithm is activated.
  • step 48 if the determination is made that the vehicle is not traveling in a forward direction, then a determination is made in step 49 as to whether the vehicle is traveling in a rearward direction. If the vehicle is not traveling in the rearward direction, then the vehicle may be already stopped which would not require the activation of the soft-stop algorithm. The routine is then exited in step 57 . If the vehicle is traveling in a rearward direction, then a determination is made in step 50 as to whether a target is sensed by the rear target sensing unit and if the target is within a target threshold distance. If the determination is made that the target is within the target distance threshold, then the routine is exited in step 57 . If the determination is made in step 50 that the target is not within the target distance threshold, then the soft start algorithm is activated in step 52 .
  • the second threshold speed may be a predetermined value, or may be calculated as a function of the vehicle's rate of deceleration.
  • the inertia of the vehicle must be at least at a minimum speed for the soft-stop control to be effective, otherwise, soft-stop will have little or no advantageous effect on the end of stop operation. As a result, a vehicle traveling at a speed less than the second threshold stopping speed will not utilize soft-stop operation or discontinue use of the soft-stop operation.
  • the routine is then exited via step 55 .
  • An end of stop (EOS) is activated in which full braking control is returned to the driver's control in step 55 .
  • step 54 determines whether the rate of change of the driver's braking effort is greater than the predetermined braking rate threshold which would indicate that the driver is increasing the braking pressure to abruptly stop the vehicle instead of softly stopping the vehicle. If the determination is made that the rate of change of the driver's braking effort is greater than the predetermined braking rate threshold, then the routine is exited via step 55 . If the rate of change of the braking effort is not greater than the predetermined braking rate threshold, then the braking pressure to the vehicle brake actuators are reduced, typically by 25-75%, in step 56 for performing a soft-stop operation to the vehicle.
  • step 56 After braking pressure is reduced in step 56 , the routine returns to step 53 to continuously check vehicle speed and the driver's braking efforts, respectively, for maintaining a reduced braking pressure.
  • the reduced braking pressure can be a continued reduction in pressure or the holding of the targeted pressure. If the determination is made in step 53 that the vehicle speed is less than the second threshold stopping speed, then full the soft-stop algorithm is discontinued and full braking control is returned to the driver's control in step 55 . This allows the driver to have full control over the brake pressure applied to the brake actuators for maintaining the vehicle in a stopped position.
  • the routine is exited in step 57 .

Abstract

A method is provided for applying a soft-stop control to the vehicle brake actuators of a vehicle during a vehicle stop operation. A brake apply operation is detected. A determination is made whether the vehicle speed is below a first threshold stopping speed. Braking pressure to the vehicle actuators is reduced as a function of vehicle speed, vehicle deceleration, and brake apply pressure if the vehicle speed is below the first threshold stopping speed.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • Not Applicable
  • STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
  • Not Applicable
  • REFERENCE TO A SEQUENCE LISTING, A TABLE, OR A COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTING COMPACT DISC APPENDIX
  • Not Applicable
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates in general to vehicle braking, and more specifically, to gradual vehicle braking.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • For vehicle braking systems using a manually applied vacuum braking system or boost assist braking system, pressurized hydraulic braking fluid is applied to the vehicle brake actuators as demanded by the drivers braking demand input. That is, a proportional braking force is applied to the vehicle brake actuators in response to the driver's force exerted on the brake pedal. Applying too much braking pressure to the brake pedal during an end of stop operation may lead to a sudden jolt or jerk stop (i.e., wrap-up) as the vehicle comes to a complete stop. This typically occurs when the driver fails to relieve braking pressure to the vehicle brake pedal so as to ease off the pressure applied. The wrap-up is displeasing to passengers traveling in a vehicle as it is for the driver of a vehicle. As a result, bringing the vehicle to a gradual stop has been entirely dependent upon the driver's actions of applying just the right amount of force to the vehicle brake pedal by manually easing off the brake pedal so as to reduce wrap-up at the end of stop operation.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention has the advantage of eliminating a hard stop (wrap-up) during an end of the stop braking operation that is most common when the driver is applying more than the required braking pressure to stop the vehicle and fails to reduce brake pressure to the vehicle brake actuator as the vehicle comes to a complete stop. The present invention also has the advantage of monitoring other factors such as secondary braking functions and target sensing to discontinue a soft-stop braking routine and allow for full control of vehicle braking by the driver or for the application of secondary braking operations.
  • In one aspect of the present invention, a method is provided for applying a soft-stop control to the vehicle brake actuators of a vehicle during a vehicle stop operation. A brake apply operation is detected. A determination is made whether the vehicle speed is below a first threshold stopping speed. Braking pressure to the vehicle actuators is reduced as a function of vehicle speed, vehicle deceleration, and brake apply pressure if the vehicle speed is below the first threshold stopping speed.
  • Various objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic of a vehicle soft-stop system of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a flowchart for a method for a soft-stop routine of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
  • Referring now to the Drawings and particularly to FIG. 1, there is shown a schematic diagram of a vehicle and its associated hydraulic braking system and target sensing system. The vehicle is shown generally at 10 and includes vehicle wheels 11 a, b, c, d. The hydraulic braking system includes vehicle brake actuators 12 a, b, c, d with each vehicle brake actuator including a respective brake actuation member (slave cylinder) and friction member actuable by the actuation member for engaging a rotatable braking surface of the vehicle wheels 11 a, b, c, d respectively. Braking fluid circuits 14, 16, 18, 20 provide braking fluid from a source of pressurized brake fluid such as a manually operated master cylinder 22 for pressurizing vehicle brake actuators 12 a, b, c, d respectively.
  • A vehicle brake control module 24 may be used in cooperation with the master cylinder 22 to provide primary braking functions (i.e., as demanded by a driver) and secondary braking functions (i.e., automated vehicle stability control functions). Various hydraulically controlled valves (not shown) within the brake control module 24 control the hydraulic pressure to the four vehicle brake actuators 12 a, b, c, d either independently or in combination for performing various deceleration or stability control operations. A pressure sensor 25 is coupled to at least one fluid circuit for sensing hydraulic pressure output from the master cylinder 22 via the respective fluid circuit.
  • Secondary braking functions are invoked for maintaining a function of vehicle stability control. Such secondary braking functions are automatically implemented in response to either a driver's brake apply demand when vehicle stability issues are occurring (e.g., ABS functionality) or when a vehicle encounters stability control problems without a driver's braking apply demand (e.g., traction control functionality). Other secondary braking functions may include vehicle stability control functionality (VSC), yaw stability control functionality (YSC), corner brake control (CBC), dynamic rear proportioning (DRP), and deceleration based isolation (DBI).
  • The vehicle 10 is also shown to include a target proximity sensing system 26. The target is meant to include a person, vehicle, moving or stationary object detectable by the target proximity sensing system 26. The target proximity sensing system 26 may include a forward target sensing unit 28, such as an adaptive cruise control system (ACC) sensor. The ACC typically includes a radar sensor that senses the proximity of a target forward of the vehicle 10. The target proximity sensing system 26 may also include a rear proximity sensing unit 32 that senses targets rearward of the vehicle 10 such as backup sensors for detecting such targets as a person, vehicle, or object.
  • The brake control module 24 also controls the soft-stop control functions of the present invention. Soft-stop control functions automatically reduce braking pressure during a vehicle stop when the vehicle is within a predetermined speed range for bringing the vehicle to a gradual stop while avoiding a hard stop jerk that is typically the result of a driver having more pedal pressure than that which is required to stop the vehicle in a reasonably short distance when braking. Soft-stop would only be applied to vehicle stops made without the assistance of other forms of secondary braking control functions being active (e.g., ABS active). The intent is to eliminate the sudden end of a stop wrap-up by reducing braking pressure by 25-75%.
  • To activate the soft-stop algorithm, the braking control unit 24 must detect a brake apply operation and the vehicle speed must be between a first threshold stopping speed and a second threshold stopping speed. The brake apply operation may be detected by a brake switch, the master cylinder pressure being greater than a predetermined stop pressure threshold, or sensing the travel of the brake pedal beyond a predetermined brake pedal distance threshold. Requiring the vehicle speed to be below the first threshold stopping speed, typically between 3 and 10 mph, allows the vehicle to be stopped within the substantially same stopping distance as intended by the driver. Otherwise, reducing pressure to the vehicle brake actuators while the vehicle has too much inertia may lead to the vehicle stopping significantly beyond the drivers intended stopping location. The intention of the soft-stop routine is to eliminate the vehicle wrap-up while substantially maintaining the intended stopping distance as intended by the driver.
  • In addition to the above conditions being met, all secondary braking functions must be inactive. If any secondary braking function is active, then the brake control module 24 will not activate the soft-stop routine. In addition, if any secondary braking function becomes active while the soft start routine is active, the brake control module 24 will deactivate the soft-stop routine as secondary braking operations take priority over the soft-stop functions.
  • The brake control unit 24 is also in communication with the target proximity sensing system 26. When the soft-stop routine is activated or prior to the soft-stop routine being activated, sensed outputs from the target proximity sensing system 26 are provided to the brake control module 24 for sensing the proximity of a target forward or rearward of the vehicle 10. If at any time a target as sensed by the target proximity sensing system 26 is within a target distance threshold, then the soft-stop routine is deactivated (if presently in an activation state) or is prevented from being activated (if presently in a deactivation state).
  • When the soft-stop routine is activated, the brake control module 24 modulates (e.g., energizes and de-energizes) respective hydraulically controlled valves for reducing hydraulic pressure to the vehicle brake actuators 12 a,b,c,d for gradually bringing the vehicle to a gradual stop without wrap-up at the end of stop operation. If a secondary braking function becomes active, or a target is sensed within the target distance threshold, or the master cylinder pressure below the predetermined stop pressure threshold while the soft start routine is active, then the soft-stop routine is immediately deactivated and full braking apply control as demanded by the driver is applied. For example, activation of a secondary braking operation would indicate that a stability control issue is occurring and the brake control module 24 is currently attempting to correct the condition.
  • Another example of which would deactivate the soft-stop routine includes sensing a target in the trajectory travel path of the vehicle within the target distance threshold. For safety purposes, the soft-stop routine is discontinued to allow the driver to perform an immediate stop, if required.
  • Yet another example of which would deactivate the soft-stop routine includes sensing a drop in the master cylinder pressure below a predetermined pressure threshold. Such a pressure reduction in the master cylinder would indicate the driver is attempting to intentionally relieve braking pressure. The soft-stop routine would be discontinued and full braking apply control is provided to the driver.
  • Once the vehicle is traveling less than the second threshold stopping speed, typically 2-5 mph, wrap-up is no longer an issue and full braking control is provided to the driver. This allows the driver to have full control over the brake pressure applied to the brake actuators for maintaining the vehicle in a stopped position as intended by the driver. The advantage is to reduce the braking pressure applied to the vehicle brakes actuators while the vehicle is traveling within a predetermined for eliminating wrap-up.
  • FIG. 2 is a method for applying a soft-stop braking routine during an end of stop operation. In step 41, a routine is initiated for determining whether to activate a soft-stop algorithm. In step 42, a determination is made whether the vehicle brakes have been applied by the driver of the vehicle. A brake apply operation by the driver is typically sensed by a brake switch being actuated, or by sensing of the brake pedal travel beyond a predetermined pedal distance travel, or when the master cylinder pressure is above a predetermined pressure threshold. Pressure output by the master cylinder being above a predetermined pressure threshold could indicate that that pressure is being applied to the vehicle brakes but due to an inoperable brake switch or brake pedal travel sensor, the system has not identified the brake apply operation. If either the brake switch, braking pedal travel sensor, or master cylinder pressure does not indicate a brake apply operation is being demanded by the driver, then the routine is exited in step 57. If the determination is made in step 42 that a brake apply operation is occurring, then a determination is made whether any secondary braking functions are active.
  • In step 43, a determination is made whether an anti-lock braking function is active. If the anti-lock braking function is active, then the routine is exited in step 57. If the anti-lock braking function is inactive, then the routine proceeds to step 44.
  • In step 44, a determination is made as to whether the corner brake control function is active. If the corner brake control function is active, then the routine is exited in step 57. If the corner brake control function is inactive, then the routine proceeds to step 45.
  • In step 45, a determination is made whether the front deceleration based isolation function is active. If the front deceleration based isolation function is active, then the routine is exited in step 57. If the front deceleration based isolation function is inactive, then the routine proceeds to step 46.
  • In step 46, a determination is made whether the vehicle speed is less than the first threshold stopping speed. The first threshold speed may be a predetermined value, or may be calculated as a function of the vehicle's rate of deceleration. If the vehicle speed is greater than the first threshold stopping speed, then the routine is exited in step 57. If the vehicle speed is less than the first threshold stopping speed, then the routine proceeds to step 47.
  • In step 47, a determination is made whether the rate of change of the driver's braking effort (brake apply pressure) is within a predetermined braking rate threshold. A rate of change greater than the predetermined braking rate threshold indicates that the driver is increasing braking efforts faster than what is typically expected and it is determined that the driver's intent is to stop the vehicle immediately. A rate of change less than the predetermined braking rate threshold indicates that the driver braking efforts are decreasing (i.e., while the vehicle speed is below the first threshold speed) and it is determined that the driver is relieving braking pressure intentionally to manually perform a soft stop. The braking efforts of the driver can be determined by the master cylinder pressure or brake pedal travel. If the determination is made that the rate of change of the driver's braking effort is outside of the predetermined braking rate threshold, then the routine is exited via step 53. If the braking effort is within the predetermined braking rate threshold, then the routine proceeds to step 48.
  • In step 48, a determination is made whether the vehicle is traveling in a forward direction. If the vehicle is traveling in a forward direction, then a determination is made in step 51 as to whether a target is within the forward trajectory path of the vehicle and whether the target is within a target distance threshold. If the target is within the target distance threshold, then the routine is exited in step 57. If the target is not within the target distance threshold, then the routine proceeds to step 52 where the soft start algorithm is activated.
  • In step 48, if the determination is made that the vehicle is not traveling in a forward direction, then a determination is made in step 49 as to whether the vehicle is traveling in a rearward direction. If the vehicle is not traveling in the rearward direction, then the vehicle may be already stopped which would not require the activation of the soft-stop algorithm. The routine is then exited in step 57. If the vehicle is traveling in a rearward direction, then a determination is made in step 50 as to whether a target is sensed by the rear target sensing unit and if the target is within a target threshold distance. If the determination is made that the target is within the target distance threshold, then the routine is exited in step 57. If the determination is made in step 50 that the target is not within the target distance threshold, then the soft start algorithm is activated in step 52.
  • In step 53, a determination is made as to whether the vehicle speed is greater than that a second threshold stopping speed. The second threshold speed may be a predetermined value, or may be calculated as a function of the vehicle's rate of deceleration. The inertia of the vehicle must be at least at a minimum speed for the soft-stop control to be effective, otherwise, soft-stop will have little or no advantageous effect on the end of stop operation. As a result, a vehicle traveling at a speed less than the second threshold stopping speed will not utilize soft-stop operation or discontinue use of the soft-stop operation. The routine is then exited via step 55. An end of stop (EOS) is activated in which full braking control is returned to the driver's control in step 55.
  • If the determination is made in step 53 that the vehicle speed is greater than the second threshold stopping speed, then a determination is made in step 54 whether the rate of change of the driver's braking effort is greater than the predetermined braking rate threshold which would indicate that the driver is increasing the braking pressure to abruptly stop the vehicle instead of softly stopping the vehicle. If the determination is made that the rate of change of the driver's braking effort is greater than the predetermined braking rate threshold, then the routine is exited via step 55. If the rate of change of the braking effort is not greater than the predetermined braking rate threshold, then the braking pressure to the vehicle brake actuators are reduced, typically by 25-75%, in step 56 for performing a soft-stop operation to the vehicle.
  • After braking pressure is reduced in step 56, the routine returns to step 53 to continuously check vehicle speed and the driver's braking efforts, respectively, for maintaining a reduced braking pressure. The reduced braking pressure can be a continued reduction in pressure or the holding of the targeted pressure. If the determination is made in step 53 that the vehicle speed is less than the second threshold stopping speed, then full the soft-stop algorithm is discontinued and full braking control is returned to the driver's control in step 55. This allows the driver to have full control over the brake pressure applied to the brake actuators for maintaining the vehicle in a stopped position. The routine is exited in step 57.
  • In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the principle and mode of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in its preferred embodiment. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope.

Claims (20)

1. A method for applying a soft-stop control to the vehicle brake actuators of a vehicle during a vehicle stop operation, said method comprising the steps of:
detecting a brake apply operation;
determining if the vehicle speed is below a first threshold stopping speed; and
reducing braking pressure to said vehicle brake actuators as a function of vehicle speed, vehicle deceleration, and brake apply pressure if said vehicle speed is below said first threshold stopping speed.
2. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step on determining if a secondary braking function is active, wherein said step of reducing said braking pressure is discontinued if a secondary braking function is active during said brake apply operation.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein said secondary braking function includes an anti-lock braking function.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein said secondary braking function includes a corner brake control function.
5. The method of claim 2 wherein said secondary braking function includes a deceleration based isolation function.
6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of sensing for a target proximate to said vehicle, wherein said step of reducing said braking pressure is discontinued if a target is sensed within a target distance threshold of said vehicle.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein said target is sensed forward of said vehicle.
8. The method of claim 6 wherein said target is sensed rearward of said vehicle.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of reducing said braking pressure is discontinued if said vehicle speed is less than a second threshold stopping speed.
10. The method of claim 1 wherein said step detecting a brake apply operation comprises sensing said master cylinder pressure greater than a predetermined stop pressure threshold.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein said step detecting a brake apply operation comprises sensing an activation of a brake switch.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein said step detecting a brake apply operation comprises sensing a travel of a brake pedal greater than a predetermined brake pedal distance threshold.
13. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of reducing said braking pressure is discontinued if a rate of change of said brake apply pressure is outside of a predetermined braking rate threshold.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein said rate of change of said brake apply pressure is determined by sensing a rate of change of said master cylinder pressure.
15. The method of claim 13 wherein said rate of change of said brake apply pressure is determined by sensing a change in a travel distance of a brake pedal.
16. A method for applying a soft-stop control to the vehicle brake actuators of a vehicle during a vehicle stop operation, said method comprising the steps of:
detecting a brake apply operation by a driver in response to a master cylinder pressure being above a predetermined braking rate threshold;
determining that a secondary brake operation is inactive;
determining that a vehicle speed is between a first threshold stopping speed and a second threshold stopping speed; and
reducing brake pressure to said vehicle brake actuators as a function of said master cylinder pressure, said vehicle speed, and a vehicle deceleration if said secondary brake operation is inactive and said vehicle speed is between said first and second threshold stopping speed.
17. The method of claim 16 further comprising the step of sensing for a target proximate to said vehicle, wherein said step of reducing said braking pressure to said vehicle brakes is discontinued if a target is sensed rearward of said vehicle is within a target distance threshold.
18. The method of claim 16 wherein said step of reducing said braking pressure is discontinued if a rate of change of said brake pressure is outside of a predetermined braking rate threshold.
19. A method for applying a soft-stop control to the vehicle brake actuators of a vehicle during a vehicle stop operation, said method comprising the steps of:
detecting a brake apply operation by an activation of a brake switch;
determining that a secondary brake operation is inactive;
determining that a vehicle speed is between a first threshold stopping speed and a second threshold stopping speed; and
reducing brake pressure to said vehicle brake actuators as a function of said master cylinder pressure, said vehicle speed, and a vehicle deceleration if said secondary brake operation is inactive and said vehicle speed is between said first and second threshold stopping speed.
20. A method for applying a soft-stop control to the vehicle brake actuators of a vehicle during a vehicle stop operation, said method comprising the steps of:
detecting a brake apply operation by sensing a travel of a brake pedal greater than a predetermined brake pedal travel threshold;
determining that a secondary brake operation is inactive;
determining that a vehicle speed is between a first threshold stopping speed and a second threshold stopping speed; and
reducing brake pressure to said vehicle brake actuators as a function of said master cylinder pressure, said vehicle speed, and a vehicle deceleration if said secondary brake operation is inactive and said vehicle speed is between said first and second threshold stopping speed.
US11/346,755 2006-02-03 2006-02-03 Soft-stop braking control Expired - Fee Related US7475953B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/346,755 US7475953B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2006-02-03 Soft-stop braking control
PCT/US2007/002416 WO2007092200A2 (en) 2006-02-03 2007-01-29 Soft-stop braking control

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/346,755 US7475953B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2006-02-03 Soft-stop braking control

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070182243A1 true US20070182243A1 (en) 2007-08-09
US7475953B2 US7475953B2 (en) 2009-01-13

Family

ID=38333326

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/346,755 Expired - Fee Related US7475953B2 (en) 2006-02-03 2006-02-03 Soft-stop braking control

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US7475953B2 (en)
WO (1) WO2007092200A2 (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090273231A1 (en) * 2006-07-25 2009-11-05 Josef Knechtges Method and control device for stopping a motor vehicle without jolting
US20100030445A1 (en) * 2008-07-31 2010-02-04 Toshimi Ishikawa Brake force maintain control device
US20140025270A1 (en) * 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems Llc Radar initiated foundation braking only for autonomous emergency braking situations
US20160009265A1 (en) * 2013-03-29 2016-01-14 Nissin Kogyo Co., Ltd. Vehicle brake hydraulic pressure control apparatus
GB2529628A (en) * 2014-08-26 2016-03-02 Jaguar Land Rover Ltd Managing vehicle deceleration
WO2016030089A1 (en) * 2014-08-26 2016-03-03 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Controlling the deceleration of a vehicle
DE102017204636A1 (en) 2016-04-15 2017-10-19 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and device for smooth stopping of a motor vehicle
EP3363696A1 (en) * 2017-02-20 2018-08-22 Delphi Technologies LLC Automated vehicle control system with multiple brake-pedal selected disengagement modes
CN108501914A (en) * 2018-05-30 2018-09-07 广州汽车集团股份有限公司 Vehicle braking method, equipment, system and computer storage media
WO2018231715A1 (en) * 2017-06-12 2018-12-20 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Slow speed automated vehicle brake pressure control system
US10294081B2 (en) 2016-04-21 2019-05-21 Otis Elevator Company Escalator braking system and escalator braking control method
CN110588614A (en) * 2018-06-12 2019-12-20 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Method, device and system for comfortable brake parking
EP3789254A1 (en) * 2019-09-02 2021-03-10 Robert Bosch GmbH Method, device and system for automatic braking of vehicle
CN115071651A (en) * 2022-06-22 2022-09-20 浙江极氪智能科技有限公司 Adaptive adjustment parking method, device and storage medium
WO2022268408A1 (en) * 2021-06-21 2022-12-29 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Method for controlling a braking torque of a vehicle during an at least partly automated traversal of an incline and/or a decline, computing device, and assistance system for a vehicle
JP7464620B2 (en) 2019-03-15 2024-04-09 コンティネンタル・テーベス・アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト・ウント・コンパニー・オッフェネ・ハンデルスゲゼルシヤフト Method and control system for avoiding impact moments during deceleration of a vehicle - Patents.com

Families Citing this family (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE10355218A1 (en) * 2003-11-26 2005-06-30 Daimlerchrysler Ag Method and device for carrying out a braking process
US9459622B2 (en) 2007-01-12 2016-10-04 Legalforce, Inc. Driverless vehicle commerce network and community
US9098545B2 (en) 2007-07-10 2015-08-04 Raj Abhyanker Hot news neighborhood banter in a geo-spatial social network
US9064288B2 (en) 2006-03-17 2015-06-23 Fatdoor, Inc. Government structures and neighborhood leads in a geo-spatial environment
US9373149B2 (en) * 2006-03-17 2016-06-21 Fatdoor, Inc. Autonomous neighborhood vehicle commerce network and community
JP2011025720A (en) * 2009-07-21 2011-02-10 Denso Corp Acceleration control device
JP5563004B2 (en) * 2012-03-28 2014-07-30 日信工業株式会社 Brake hydraulic pressure control device for vehicles
US9439367B2 (en) 2014-02-07 2016-09-13 Arthi Abhyanker Network enabled gardening with a remotely controllable positioning extension
US9457901B2 (en) 2014-04-22 2016-10-04 Fatdoor, Inc. Quadcopter with a printable payload extension system and method
US9022324B1 (en) 2014-05-05 2015-05-05 Fatdoor, Inc. Coordination of aerial vehicles through a central server
US9441981B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2016-09-13 Fatdoor, Inc. Variable bus stops across a bus route in a regional transportation network
US9971985B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2018-05-15 Raj Abhyanker Train based community
US9451020B2 (en) 2014-07-18 2016-09-20 Legalforce, Inc. Distributed communication of independent autonomous vehicles to provide redundancy and performance
DE102016213031A1 (en) 2016-07-18 2018-01-18 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method for smoothly stopping a motor vehicle
US9821781B1 (en) 2016-09-30 2017-11-21 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Methods and apparatus to control braking of a vehicle during low deceleration operations
US20180330325A1 (en) 2017-05-12 2018-11-15 Zippy Inc. Method for indicating delivery location and software for same
US10427656B2 (en) * 2017-06-09 2019-10-01 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Braking system
US11180146B2 (en) 2019-05-14 2021-11-23 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Brake control technique to stop a vehicle for assisting automatic trailer hitching
CN112644442B (en) * 2021-01-05 2022-03-08 中车株洲电力机车研究所有限公司 Safety braking method and device

Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3829167A (en) * 1972-11-21 1974-08-13 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Automatic deceleration control system
US4833469A (en) * 1987-08-03 1989-05-23 David Constant V Obstacle proximity detector for moving vehicles and method for use thereof
US4852950A (en) * 1987-09-16 1989-08-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicle braking system capable of preventing rock-back motion of driver/passenger upon vehicle stopping
US4986611A (en) * 1989-02-20 1991-01-22 Nippondenso Co., Ltd. Anti-lock brake control system for use in motor vehicle
US5275474A (en) * 1991-10-04 1994-01-04 General Motors Corporation Vehicle wheel slip control on split coefficient surface
US5278764A (en) * 1990-01-29 1994-01-11 Nissan Motor Company, Limited Automatic braking system with proximity detection to a preceding vehicle
US5463384A (en) * 1991-02-11 1995-10-31 Auto-Sense, Ltd. Collision avoidance system for vehicles
US5931547A (en) * 1997-03-05 1999-08-03 Lerner; Meir Yisochor Anti-collision system
US5948035A (en) * 1997-09-18 1999-09-07 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for predicting minimum stopping distance required to brake running vehicle
US6249736B1 (en) * 1998-02-21 2001-06-19 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for controlling a braking system in open loop
US20010032045A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2001-10-18 Unisia Jecs Corporation Automotive brake control system with anti-skid braking device
US6325469B1 (en) * 1996-09-06 2001-12-04 General Motors Corporation Brake control system
US6582034B2 (en) * 2000-08-04 2003-06-24 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicular brake control method and apparatus
US6606548B2 (en) * 2000-03-07 2003-08-12 Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha Hydraulic brake pressure controller and method for pressure increase in a wheel brake cylinder
US7000998B2 (en) * 2002-01-18 2006-02-21 Hitachi, Ltd. Brake control apparatus and method
US20060158033A1 (en) * 2005-01-20 2006-07-20 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Brake fluid pressure control apparatus and method
US7125085B2 (en) * 2004-09-21 2006-10-24 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Braking force retaining unit
US7209221B2 (en) * 1994-05-23 2007-04-24 Automotive Technologies International, Inc. Method for obtaining and displaying information about objects in a vehicular blind spot

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3829167A (en) * 1972-11-21 1974-08-13 Goodyear Tire & Rubber Automatic deceleration control system
US4833469A (en) * 1987-08-03 1989-05-23 David Constant V Obstacle proximity detector for moving vehicles and method for use thereof
US4852950A (en) * 1987-09-16 1989-08-01 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicle braking system capable of preventing rock-back motion of driver/passenger upon vehicle stopping
US4986611A (en) * 1989-02-20 1991-01-22 Nippondenso Co., Ltd. Anti-lock brake control system for use in motor vehicle
US5278764A (en) * 1990-01-29 1994-01-11 Nissan Motor Company, Limited Automatic braking system with proximity detection to a preceding vehicle
US5463384A (en) * 1991-02-11 1995-10-31 Auto-Sense, Ltd. Collision avoidance system for vehicles
US5275474A (en) * 1991-10-04 1994-01-04 General Motors Corporation Vehicle wheel slip control on split coefficient surface
US7209221B2 (en) * 1994-05-23 2007-04-24 Automotive Technologies International, Inc. Method for obtaining and displaying information about objects in a vehicular blind spot
US6325469B1 (en) * 1996-09-06 2001-12-04 General Motors Corporation Brake control system
US5931547A (en) * 1997-03-05 1999-08-03 Lerner; Meir Yisochor Anti-collision system
US5948035A (en) * 1997-09-18 1999-09-07 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Method and apparatus for predicting minimum stopping distance required to brake running vehicle
US6249736B1 (en) * 1998-02-21 2001-06-19 Robert Bosch Gmbh Method and device for controlling a braking system in open loop
US6606548B2 (en) * 2000-03-07 2003-08-12 Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha Hydraulic brake pressure controller and method for pressure increase in a wheel brake cylinder
US20010032045A1 (en) * 2000-03-16 2001-10-18 Unisia Jecs Corporation Automotive brake control system with anti-skid braking device
US6582034B2 (en) * 2000-08-04 2003-06-24 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Vehicular brake control method and apparatus
US7000998B2 (en) * 2002-01-18 2006-02-21 Hitachi, Ltd. Brake control apparatus and method
US7125085B2 (en) * 2004-09-21 2006-10-24 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Braking force retaining unit
US20060158033A1 (en) * 2005-01-20 2006-07-20 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Brake fluid pressure control apparatus and method

Cited By (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9139171B2 (en) * 2006-07-25 2015-09-22 Lucas Automotive Gmbh Method and control device for stopping a motor vehicle without jolting
US20090273231A1 (en) * 2006-07-25 2009-11-05 Josef Knechtges Method and control device for stopping a motor vehicle without jolting
US20100030445A1 (en) * 2008-07-31 2010-02-04 Toshimi Ishikawa Brake force maintain control device
US8315773B2 (en) * 2008-07-31 2012-11-20 Advics Co., Ltd. Brake force maintain control device
US20140025270A1 (en) * 2012-07-19 2014-01-23 Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems Llc Radar initiated foundation braking only for autonomous emergency braking situations
US9932024B2 (en) * 2013-03-29 2018-04-03 Autoliv Nissin Brake Systems Japan Co., Ltd. Vehicle brake hydraulic pressure control apparatus
US20160009265A1 (en) * 2013-03-29 2016-01-14 Nissin Kogyo Co., Ltd. Vehicle brake hydraulic pressure control apparatus
US10421442B2 (en) * 2014-08-26 2019-09-24 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Managing vehicle deceleration
GB2529628B (en) * 2014-08-26 2018-01-31 Jaguar Land Rover Ltd Managing vehicle deceleration
WO2016030088A1 (en) * 2014-08-26 2016-03-03 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Managing vehicle deceleration
WO2016030089A1 (en) * 2014-08-26 2016-03-03 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Controlling the deceleration of a vehicle
AU2015309173B2 (en) * 2014-08-26 2018-11-22 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Controlling the deceleration of a vehicle
GB2529628A (en) * 2014-08-26 2016-03-02 Jaguar Land Rover Ltd Managing vehicle deceleration
US10160431B2 (en) 2014-08-26 2018-12-25 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Controlling the deceleration of a vehicle
AU2015309172B2 (en) * 2014-08-26 2019-02-21 Jaguar Land Rover Limited Managing vehicle deceleration
DE102017204636A1 (en) 2016-04-15 2017-10-19 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and device for smooth stopping of a motor vehicle
CN107310555A (en) * 2016-04-15 2017-11-03 福特全球技术公司 The method and apparatus steadily stopped for motor vehicles
DE102017204636B4 (en) 2016-04-15 2023-01-26 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Method and device for stopping a motor vehicle smoothly
US10294081B2 (en) 2016-04-21 2019-05-21 Otis Elevator Company Escalator braking system and escalator braking control method
EP3363696A1 (en) * 2017-02-20 2018-08-22 Delphi Technologies LLC Automated vehicle control system with multiple brake-pedal selected disengagement modes
US10525943B2 (en) 2017-02-20 2020-01-07 Aptiv Technologies Limited Automated vehicle control system with multiple brake-pedal selected disengagement modes
US10384660B2 (en) 2017-06-12 2019-08-20 Aptiv Technologies Limited Slow speed automated vehicle brake pressure control system
WO2018231715A1 (en) * 2017-06-12 2018-12-20 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Slow speed automated vehicle brake pressure control system
CN108501914A (en) * 2018-05-30 2018-09-07 广州汽车集团股份有限公司 Vehicle braking method, equipment, system and computer storage media
CN110588614A (en) * 2018-06-12 2019-12-20 罗伯特·博世有限公司 Method, device and system for comfortable brake parking
JP7464620B2 (en) 2019-03-15 2024-04-09 コンティネンタル・テーベス・アクチエンゲゼルシヤフト・ウント・コンパニー・オッフェネ・ハンデルスゲゼルシヤフト Method and control system for avoiding impact moments during deceleration of a vehicle - Patents.com
EP3789254A1 (en) * 2019-09-02 2021-03-10 Robert Bosch GmbH Method, device and system for automatic braking of vehicle
WO2022268408A1 (en) * 2021-06-21 2022-12-29 Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft Method for controlling a braking torque of a vehicle during an at least partly automated traversal of an incline and/or a decline, computing device, and assistance system for a vehicle
CN115071651A (en) * 2022-06-22 2022-09-20 浙江极氪智能科技有限公司 Adaptive adjustment parking method, device and storage medium

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2007092200A2 (en) 2007-08-16
US7475953B2 (en) 2009-01-13

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7475953B2 (en) Soft-stop braking control
US7712845B2 (en) Method to reduce the turn radius of motor vehicles utilizing automatic single side rear brake application
US7344205B2 (en) Parking assist control apparatus and storage medium for parking assist control program
CN103079916B (en) For the method utilizing automatic parking brake that vehicle is protected
KR101278379B1 (en) Brake device for a vehicle with an electric parking brake system and corresponding control method
US11485334B2 (en) Supplemental deceleration using electronic parking brake in fully integrated braking systems
US6428120B1 (en) Method and device for controlling a vehicle
US20090082935A1 (en) Methods and systems to control braking of a trailer hitched to a vehicle
JPH10157585A (en) Method for performing automatic braking effect
US6007163A (en) Brake control apparatus for a vehicle
US9539993B2 (en) By-wire fallback braking mode for brake-by-wire systems in vehicles
US10933846B2 (en) System, method, computer program and control unit for preventing a vehicle from rolling away
US10315630B2 (en) Method for operating a vehicle braking assist system
US8046146B2 (en) Adaptive ABS control
US20160236662A1 (en) Method for operating a braking system and a braking system
US9175701B2 (en) Speed control strategy
US9004615B2 (en) Method for operating a hydraulic brake system of a motor vehicle and a hydraulic braking system
JP2007022135A (en) Automatic braking device of vehicle
Kant Sensotronic brake control (SBC)
US20230398966A1 (en) Yaw rate regulation activation
US20230211764A1 (en) Device and Method for Controlling a Braking System, Braking System and Vehicle
US20110060510A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Increasing Brake Pressure
US20070069578A1 (en) Method for shortening a stopping distance
EP3789255B1 (en) Brake system for commercial vehicle
CN113631441B (en) Method and control device for avoiding jerk torque during deceleration of a vehicle

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, MICHIGAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:OSBORN, DOUGLAS CHARLES;TECHENTIN, JAMES ANDREW;REEL/FRAME:017556/0350

Effective date: 20060201

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

CC Certificate of correction
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NE

Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNORS:TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC.;TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC;KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:029529/0534

Effective date: 20120928

AS Assignment

Owner name: TRW VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMS INC., MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:031645/0697

Effective date: 20131028

Owner name: TRW AUTOMOTIVE U.S. LLC, MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:031645/0697

Effective date: 20131028

Owner name: KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY, MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:031645/0697

Effective date: 20131028

Owner name: TRW INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP., MICHIGAN

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:031645/0697

Effective date: 20131028

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

STCH Information on status: patent discontinuation

Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362

FP Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20210113