US20070143317A1 - Mechanism for managing facts in a fact repository - Google Patents

Mechanism for managing facts in a fact repository Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070143317A1
US20070143317A1 US11399857 US39985706A US2007143317A1 US 20070143317 A1 US20070143317 A1 US 20070143317A1 US 11399857 US11399857 US 11399857 US 39985706 A US39985706 A US 39985706A US 2007143317 A1 US2007143317 A1 US 2007143317A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
fact
facts
value
condition
inferring
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11399857
Inventor
Andrew Hogue
Jonathan Betz
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Google LLC
Original Assignee
Google LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30011Document retrieval systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/3061Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F17/30705Clustering or classification
    • G06F17/30707Clustering or classification into predefined classes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30861Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
    • G06F17/30864Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30908Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor of semistructured data, the undelying structure being taken into account, e.g. mark-up language structure data
    • G06F17/30914Mapping or conversion
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/953Organization of data
    • Y10S707/962Entity-attribute-value

Abstract

Methods and systems for processing facts with one or more janitors. Facts are extracted from documents on the Internet or other sources. Facts can be any data or series of data in the documents including an attribute and a file. The data can be in the form of text, graphics, or multimedia content. Janitors transform facts responsive to inferring a certain condition associated with facts. The condition can be related to one or more of an attribute, a value, or an object of a fact being analyzed. For example, janitors can perform normalization, remove or merge similar or duplicate facts, segregate multiple values of a fact, and the like. An administrator can select which janitors are applied to facts and in which order.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation-in-part the following applications, all of which are incorporated by reference herein:
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/024,784, entitled “Supplementing Search Results with Information of Interest”, filed on Dec. 30, 2004, by Jonathan T. Betz;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/142,853, entitled “Learning Facts from Semi-Structured Text”, filed on May 31, 2005, by Shubin Zhao, Jonathan T. Betz;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/341,069, entitled “Object Categorization for Information Extraction”, filed on Jan. 27, 2006, by Jonathan T. Betz;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,838, entitled “Modular Architecture for Entity Normalization”, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Jonathan T. Betz, Farhan Shamsi; and
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,765, entitled “Attribute Entropy as a Signal in Object Normalization”, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Jonathan T. Betz, Vivek Menezes;
  • This application is related to the following applications, all of which are incorporated by reference herein:
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/366,162, entitled “Generating Structured Information,” filed Mar. 1, 2006, by Egon Pasztor and Daniel Egnor;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/357,748, entitled “Support for Object Search”, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Alex Kehlenbeck, Andrew W. Hogue;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/342,290, entitled “Data Object Visualization”, filed on Jan. 27, 2006, by Andrew W. Hogue, David Vespe, Alex Kehlenbeck, Mike Gordon, Jeffrey C. Reynar, David Alpert;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/342,293, entitled “Data Object Visualization Using Maps”, filed on Jan. 27, 2006, by Andrew W. Hogue, David Vespe, Alex Kehlenbeck, Mike Gordon, Jeffrey C. Reynar, David Alpert;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,679, entitled “Query Language”, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Andrew W. Hogue, Doug Rohde;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,837, entitled “Automatic Object Reference Identification and Linking in a Browseable Fact Repository”, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Andrew W. Hogue;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,851, entitled “Browseable Fact Repository”, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Andrew W. Hogue, Jonathan T. Betz;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,842, entitled “ID Persistence Through Normalization”, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Jonathan T. Betz, Andrew W. Hogue;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,728, entitled “Annotation Framework”, filed Feb. 17, 2006, by Tom Ritchford, Jonathan T. Betz;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/341,907, entitled “Designating Data Objects for Analysis”, filed on Jan. 27, 2006, by Andrew W. Hogue, David Vespe, Alex Kehlenbeck, Mike Gordon, Jeffrey C. Reynar, David Alpert;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. 11/342,277, entitled “Data Object Visualization Using Graphs”, filed on Jan. 27, 2006, by Andrew W. Hogue, David Vespe, Alex Kehlenbeck, Mike Gordon, Jeffrey C. Reynar, David Alpert;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. ______, entitled “Entity Normalization Via Name Normalization”, filed on Mar. 31, 2006, by Jonathan T. Betz, Attorney Docket No. 24207-11047;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. ______, entitled “Determining Document Subject by Using Title and Anchor Text of Related Documents”, filed on Mar. 31, 2006, by Shubin Zhao, Attorney Docket No. 24207-11049;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. ______, entitled “Unsupervised Extraction of Facts”, filed on Mar. 31, 2006, by Jonathan T. Betz and Shubin Zhao, Attorney Docket No. 24207-11056;
      • U.S. application Ser. No. ______, entitled “Anchor Text Summarization for Corroboration”, filed on Mar. 31, 2006, by Jonathan T. Betz and Shubin Zhao, Attorney Docket No. 24207-11046; and
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates generally to database management, and more particularly, to managing data extracted from the World Wide Web.
  • 2. Background of the Invention
  • Data sources often present information in a manner that is not easily accessible by a user. For example, when the user queries web pages through a search engine, the user is burdened with reviewing individual search results for pertinent information. In other words, the information must be manually synthesized across several web pages.
  • Data stored on the web and similar hyperlinked networks has no set format and has no set content. Thus, data from the web or similar networks is often referred to as unstructured data because it is not received in a specific format and the documents contents are not necessarily identified as structured fields. Extraction and processing of data from unstructured sources, such as the World Wide Web presents unique challenges. Extraction of data from the Web is especially challenging due to the wide variety of topics covered and the almost infinite number of authors that are providing that information. In addition, not all information on the World Wide Web is factually accurate. In fact, just the opposite is true. It must be assumed that at least some of the data obtained from the Web is not true, is incomplete, or is outdated.
  • Conventional techniques for harvesting data from sources such as web pages also are limited by the variety of styles used to present information. The design of web pages using Hyper Text Markup Language, or HTML, is a creative process. Information can be presented in text paragraphs, tables, or across separate web pages of a domain. Furthermore, information such as a date can be presented in different formats such a “Dec. 2, 1981”, “Dec. 2, 1981”, and “12 Dec. 1981.” Moreover, similar information harvested from different sources can cause data duplication.
  • For these reasons, what is needed is a method and system for processing facts extracted from web-based documents to transform to predetermined constraints.
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention provides methods and systems for using a janitor to process facts extracted from the Word Wide Web. In one embodiment, janitors are software programs that transform facts into more useful data and/or provide functions to clean up and corroborate facts. Janitors can also process facts to detect and process duplicates. Janitors can transform facts responsive to inferring a certain condition associated with facts. Generally, a fact is information, data, or a series of data that can be represented as an attribute and a value. Facts can be in the form of text, graphics, or multimedia content. For example, a web page can list a series of presidents in a first column of a table and list their dates of births in another column. In one embodiment, facts are extracted from documents on the World Wide Web for storage in a fact repository. One or more janitors transform facts in accordance with constraints designed to improve the quality of facts. In one embodiment, facts can be processed as they are extracted from documents. In another embodiment, facts can be retrieved from the fact repository and processed after storage.
  • The condition can be related to one or more of an attribute, a value, or an object of a fact being analyzed. For example, janitors can perform normalization, remove or merge similar or duplicate facts, segregate multiple values of a fact, synthesize new facts from old, and the like. In one embodiment, an administrator can select which janitors are applied to facts. The administrator can choose to apply several janitors.
  • Advantageously, janitors improve the quality of facts extracted from the World Wide Web and stored in a fact repository. The improved facts are more useful and reliable to users.
  • The features and advantages described herein are not all inclusive, and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one skilled in the art in view of the drawings, specifications, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes and may not have been selected to circumscribe the claimed invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The teachings of the present invention can be readily understood by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Like reference numerals are used for like elements in the accompanying drawings.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a system for gathering facts according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 2(a)-(e) illustrate example data structures for facts within a fact repository.
  • FIGS. 3(a)-(b) illustrate exemplary data paths for fact processing according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method for processing facts according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method for processing facts according to another embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method for transforming facts based on a condition according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • The figures depict embodiments of the present invention for purposes of illustration only. One skilled in the art will readily recognize from the following discussion that alternative embodiments of the structures and methods illustrated herein may be employed without departing from the principles of the invention described herein.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
  • Methods and systems for processing facts with janitors are described. Facts are extracted from documents on the Internet or other sources. Generally, facts are information, data, or a series of data that can be represented in a logical form of an attribute and a value. Facts can be in the form of text, graphics, or multimedia content. For example, a web page can list a series of presidents in a first column of a table and list their dates of births in another column. Janitors are used to transform facts into more useful data (e.g., to clean-up facts).
  • Exemplary Systems
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a system 100 for managing facts according to one embodiment of the present invention. System 100 comprises document hosts 102, object requestor 152, and data processing system 106. The components are communicatively coupled through a network 104 (e.g., a data network such as the Internet, a telephone network, etc.). At a high level, system 100 can gather and organize facts, and then retrieve facts in accordance with queries. For example, facts can be gathered from a set of web pages related to baseball players, and then presented in response to a query term such as “baseball”, “sports”, etc.
  • Document host 102 comprises one more hosts that store and provide access to documents. Document host 102 can be implemented in a computing device (e.g., personal computer, a workstation, mini-computer, or mainframe, or a PDA) including a processor and operating system. Document host 102 can communicate over network 104 via networking protocols (e.g., TCP/IP), and be configured to use application and presentation protocols (e.g., HTTP, HTML, SOAP, D-HTML, Java). A document comprises facts represented by any data that are discernable by a machine including any combination of text, graphics, multimedia content, etc. A document (e.g., an e-mail, a web page, a file, news group posting, a blog, or a web advertisement) may be encoded in various formats such as a markup language (e.g., HTML), an interpreted language (e.g., JavaScript), an application-specific format (e.g., DOC format for Microsoft Word, or PDF format for Adobe Reader), or any other computer readable or executable format. A document can include references to other documents or other embedded information (e.g., hyperlinks). A document stored in a document host 102 may be accessed by a Uniform Resource Locator (URL), or Web address, or any other appropriate form of identification and/or location. The documents stored by document host 102 are typically held in a file directory, a database, or other data repository. A document from which a particular fact may be extracted is a source document (or “source”) of that particular fact. In other words, a source of a fact includes that fact (or a synonymous fact) within its contents.
  • Data processing system 106 includes one or more importers 108, one or more janitors 110 with a controller 111, a build engine 112, a service engine 114, and a fact repository 115. Each of the components can be implemented as software modules (or programs) executed by a processor 116.
  • Importers 108 can include one or more modules for different types of documents (e.g., an HTML importer, a PDF importer, etc.). Importers 108 processes documents received from document hosts 102 by parsing the data content of documents to identify facts, and extracting the identified facts from the documents. Importers 108 also determine the subject or subjects with which the facts are associated, and stores the facts in fact repository 115 as individual objects of data.
  • Janitors 110 can be self-contained software modules, or a software architecture with a functionality module that can be customized for a particular function. Janitors 110 manage facts by processing various combinations of objects, attributes, or values, according to janitor rules. Janitors 110 can include one or more modules that each perform a different data management function. An administrator can configure controller 111 (or a script) to call janitors 110 based on a specific ordering. For example, if only dates are extracted from documents, janitors 110 that specifically operate on dates can be used for processing date facts.
  • In one embodiment, janitors 110 infer a condition of a fact and, in response, transform an attribute and/or value of the fact in accordance with a predetermined constraint. Each janitor 110 can be configured to infer a certain condition of the fact. The fact is transformed to meet predetermined constraints. Generally, janitors 110 can perform functions such as data cleansing, object merging, fact merging, fact induction, and the like, as described in more detail below. For example, data cleansing can remove useless facts that have a low frequency of use. Object merging can combine duplicate objects that appear to represent the same entity. Fact merging can combine duplicate facts that have different formats. Fact induction can imply new facts from existing facts, such as implying that a capitalized name appearing before a comma and a state name is a city name. Some janitors 110 describe desired characteristics of a fact, such as a format or categorization of the attribute and/or value. One janitor 110 can normalize attribute names and values, and delete duplicate and near-duplicate facts so that an object does not have redundant information. For example, we might find on one page that Britney Spears' birthday is “Dec. 2, 1981” while on another page that her date of birth is “Dec. 2, 1981.” Birthday and Date of Birth can be rewritten as Birthdate by one janitor 110 and then another janitor 110 can recognize that Dec. 2, 1981 and Dec. 2, 1981 are different forms of the same date. Janitor 110 transforms the dates to a preferred form. There are numerous rules that can be implemented, a particular set of which depends on a particular implementation. Specific rules are described in more detail below. Various embodiments of janitors 110 and methods operating therein are described in more detail below.
  • Referring again to system 100, build engine 112 builds and manages repository 115. Service engine 114 is an interface for querying repository 115. Service engine 114 processes queries, scores matching objects, and returns them to the caller. Service engine 114 is also used by janitors 110.
  • Fact repository 115 comprises a storage element such a RAM or ROM device in combination with software such as a file system or a database manager. Fact repository 115 stores the facts extracted from the documents. The facts can be stored as a list, a file system, or database data. Exemplary data structures for storing facts in fact repository 215 are described in more detail below with respect to FIGS. 2(a)-(e).
  • Object requesters 152, 154 are entities that request objects from fact repository 115. Object requesters 152, 154 may be understood as clients of the system 106, and can be implemented in any computer device or architecture. As shown in FIG. 1, a first object requester 152 is located remotely from system 106, while a second object requester 154 is located in data processing system 106. For example, in a computer system hosting a blog, the blog may include a reference to an object whose facts are in fact repository 115. An object requester 152, such as a browser displaying the blog, will access data processing system 106 so that the information of the facts associated with the object can be displayed as part of the blog web page. As a second example, janitors 120 or other entities considered to be part of data processing system 106 can function as object requester 154, requesting the facts of objects from fact repository 115.
  • Memory 107 includes importers 108, janitors 110, build engine 112, service engine 114, and requester 154, each of which are preferably implemented as instructions stored in memory 107 and executable by processor 126. Memory 107 also includes fact repository 115. Fact repository 115 can be stored in a memory of one or more computer systems or in a type of memory such as a disk. FIG. 1 also includes a computer readable medium 128 containing, for example, at least one of importers 108, janitors 110, build engine 112, service engine 114, requester 154, and at least some portions of repository 115. FIG. 1 also includes one or more input/output devices 120 that allow data to be input and output to and from data processing system 106. It will be understood that data processing system 106 preferably also includes standard software components such as operating systems and the like and further preferably includes standard hardware components not shown in the figure for clarity of example.
  • Data Structures
  • FIGS. 2(a)-(e) show example data structures for the facts as stored. As shown in FIG. 2(a), each fact 204 includes a unique identifier for that fact, such as a fact ID 210. Each fact 204 includes at least an attribute 212 and a value 214. For example, a fact associated with an object representing George Washington may include an attribute of “date of birth” and a value of “Feb. 22, 1732.” In one embodiment, all facts are stored as alphanumeric characters since they are extracted from web pages. In another embodiment, facts also can store binary data values. Other embodiments, however, may store fact values as mixed types, or in encoded formats.
  • As described above, each fact is associated with an object ID 209 that identifies the object that the fact describes. Thus, each fact that is associated with a same entity (such as George Washington), has the same object ID 209. In one embodiment, objects are not stored as separate data entities in memory. In this embodiment, the facts associated with an object contain the same object ID, but no physical object exists. In another embodiment, objects are stored as data entities in memory, and include references (for example, pointers or IDs) to the facts associated with the object. The logical data structure of a fact can take various forms; in general, a fact is represented by a tuple that includes a fact ID, an attribute, a value, and an object ID. The storage implementation of a fact can be in any underlying physical data structure.
  • FIG. 2(b) shows an example of facts having respective fact IDs of 10, 20, and 30 in repository 215. Facts 10 and 20 are associated with an object identified by object ID “1.” Fact 10 has an attribute of “Name” and a value of “China.” Fact 20 has an attribute of “Category” and a value of “Country.” Thus, the object identified by object ID “1” has a name fact 205 with a value of “China” and a category fact 206 with a value of “Country.” Fact 30 208 has an attribute of “Property” and a value of ““Bill Clinton was the 42nd President of the United States from 1993 to 2001.” Thus, the object identified by object ID “2” has a property fact with a fact ID of 30 and a value of “Bill Clinton was the 42nd President of the United States from 1993 to 2001.” In the illustrated embodiment, each fact has one attribute and one value. The number of facts associated with an object is not limited; thus while only two facts are shown for the “China” object, in practice there may be dozens, even hundreds of facts associated with a given object. Also, the value fields of a fact need not be limited in size or content. For example, a fact about the economy of “China” with an attribute of “Economy” could have a value including several paragraphs of text, numbers, or perhaps even tables of figures. This content can be formatted, for example, in a markup language. For example, a fact having an attribute “original html” might have a value of the original html text taken from the source web page.
  • Also, while the illustration of FIG. 2(b) shows the explicit coding of object ID, fact ID, attribute, and value, in practice the content of the fact can be implicitly coded as well (e.g., the first field being the object ID, the second field being the fact ID, the third field being the attribute, and the fourth field being the value). Other fields include but are not limited to: the language used to state the fact (English, etc.), how important the fact is, the source of the fact, a confidence value for the fact, and so on.
  • FIG. 2(c) shows an example object reference table 210 that is used in some embodiments. Not all embodiments include an object reference table. The object reference table 210 functions to efficiently maintain the associations between object IDs and fact IDs. In the absence of an object reference table 210, it is also possible to find all facts for a given object ID by querying the repository to find all facts with a particular object ID. While FIGS. 2(b) and 2(c) illustrate the object reference table 210 with explicit coding of object and fact IDs, the table also may contain just the ID values themselves in column or pair-wise arrangements.
  • FIG. 2(d) shows an example of a data structure for facts within repository 215, according to some embodiments of the invention showing an extended format of facts. In this example, the fields include an object reference link 216 to another object. The object reference link 216 can be an object ID of another object in the repository 215, or a reference to the location (e.g., table row) for the object in the object reference table 210. The object reference link 416 allows facts to have as values other objects. For example, for an object “United States,” there may be a fact with the attribute of “president” and the value of “George W. Bush,” with “George W. Bush” being an object having its own facts in repository 215. In some embodiments, the value field 214 stores the name of the linked object and the link 216 stores the object identifier of the linked object. Thus, this “president” fact would include the value 214 of “George W. Bush”, and object reference link 416 that contains the object ID for the “George W. Bush” object. In some other embodiments, facts 204 do not include a link field 216 because the value 214 of a fact 204 may store a link to another object.
  • Each fact 204 also may include one or more metrics 218. A metric provides an indication of quality of the fact. In some embodiments, the metrics include a confidence level and an importance level. The confidence level indicates the likelihood that the fact is correct. The importance level indicates the relevance of the fact to the object, compared to other facts for the same object. The importance level may optionally be viewed as a measure of how vital a fact is to an understanding of the entity or concept represented by the object.
  • Each fact 204 includes a list of one or more sources 220 that include the fact and from which the fact was extracted. Each source may be identified by a Uniform Resource Locator (URL), or Web address, or any other appropriate form of identification and/or location, such as a unique document identifier.
  • The facts illustrated in FIG. 2(d) include an agent field 222 that identifies which importer 108 extracted the fact. For example, importers 108 may be a specialized importer that extracts facts from a specific source (e.g., the pages of a particular web site, or family of web sites) or type of source (e.g., web pages that present factual information in tabular form), or an importer 208 that extracts facts from free text in documents throughout the Web, and so forth.
  • Some embodiments include one or more specialized facts, such as a name fact 207 and a property fact 208. A name fact 207 is a fact that conveys a name for the entity or concept represented by the object ID. A name fact 207 includes an attribute 224 of “name” and a value, which is the name of the object. For example, for an object representing the country Spain, a name fact would have the value “Spain.” A name fact 207, being a special instance of a general fact 204, includes the same fields as any other fact 204; it has an attribute, a value, a fact ID, metrics, sources, etc. The attribute 224 of a name fact 207 indicates that the fact is a name fact, and the value is the actual name. The name may be a string of characters. An object ID may have one or more associated name facts, as many entities or concepts can have more than one name. For example, an object ID representing Spain may have associated name facts conveying the country's common name “Spain” and the official name “Kingdom of Spain.” As another example, an object ID representing the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may have associated name facts conveying the agency's acronyms “PTO” and “USPTO” as well as the official name “United States Patent and Trademark Office.” If an object does have more than one associated name fact, one of the name facts may be designated as a primary name and other name facts may be designated as secondary names, either implicitly or explicitly.
  • A property fact 208 is a fact that conveys a statement about the entity or concept represented by the object ID. Property facts are generally used for summary information about an object. A property fact 208, being a special instance of a general fact 404, also includes the same parameters (such as attribute, value, fact ID, etc.) as other facts 404. The attribute field 426 of a property fact 408 indicates that the fact is a property fact (e.g., attribute is “property”) and the value is a string of text that conveys the statement of interest. For example, for the object ID representing Bill Clinton, the value of a property fact may be the text string “Bill Clinton was the 42nd President of the United States from 1993 to 2001.” Some object IDs may have one or more associated property facts while other objects may have no associated property facts. It should be appreciated that the data structures shown in FIGS. 2(a)-(d) and described above are merely exemplary. The data structure of the repository 215 may take on other forms. Other fields may be included in facts and some of the fields described above may be omitted. Additionally, each object ID may have additional special facts aside from name facts and property facts, such as facts conveying a type or category (for example, person, place, movie, actor, organization, etc.) for categorizing the entity or concept represented by the object ID. In some embodiments, an object's name(s) and/or properties may be represented by special records that have a different format than the general facts records 204.
  • As described previously, a collection of facts is associated with an object ID of an object. An object may become a null or empty object when facts are disassociated from the object. A null object can arise in a number of different ways. One type of null object is an object that has had all of its facts (including name facts) removed, leaving no facts associated with its object ID. Another type of null object is an object that has all of its associated facts other than name facts removed, leaving only its name fact(s). Alternatively, the object may be a null object only if all of its associated name facts are removed. A null object represents an entity or concept for which the data processing system 206 has no factual information and, as far as the data processing system 106 is concerned, does not exist. In some embodiments, facts of a null object may be left in the repository 215, but have their object ID values cleared (or have their importance set to a negative value). However, the facts of the null object are treated as if they were removed from the repository 215. In some other embodiments, facts of null objects are physically removed from repository 215.
  • FIG. 2(e) is a block diagram illustrating an alternate data structure 290 for facts and objects in accordance with preferred embodiments of the invention. In this data structure, an object 290 contains an object ID 292 and references or points to facts 294. Each fact includes a fact ID 295, an attribute 297, and a value 299. In this embodiment, an object 290 actually exists in memory 207.
  • It should be appreciated that the components of document host and data processing system 406 can be distributed over multiple computers. For example, repository 215 can have components deployed over multiple servers. For convenience, however, the components of data processing system 206 are discussed as though they were implemented on a single computer.
  • Exemplary Data Paths
  • FIGS. 3(a)-(b) show alternative data paths for fact processing. As shown in FIG. 3(a), janitors 10 process facts as they are extracted from documents on document hosts 102 on the World Wide Web. Data stored on the web and similar hyperlinked networks has no set format and has no set content. Thus, data from the web or similar networks is often referred to as unstructured data. The processed facts are then stored in fact repository 115. This embodiment may be ideal for janitors 110 that operate on one fact at a time to perform functions such as normalization. Some janitors such as those in FIG. 3(a) may also access facts already stored in the repository to process a newly extracted fact. For example, a janitor may compare the value of a new fact to values of facts that have been previously extracted, stored in the repository (and possibly indexed).
  • In FIG. 3(b), janitors 110 access facts from fact repository 115, after the facts are extracted from document hosts 102. Janitors 110 can thus be configured to process multiple facts previously stored in the repository 115. This embodiment may be ideal for janitors 110 that operate on several facts at a time to perform functions such as merging, although it can also be used to “clean up,” formats, spelling, etc of facts already in the repository.
  • Is will be understood that some systems contain a combination of the types of janitors shown in FIGS. 3(a) and 3(b), so that janitors process facts when the facts are initially placed in the repository and also post-processes facts after the facts have initially been placed in the repository.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method 400 of processing facts during extraction, according to one embodiment of the present invention. Optionally, an administrator (which can be a human being or automated software) configures 410 janitors 110 according to an implementation of facts using a script or other controller. In one embodiment, a specific algorithm, or ordering, of janitors 110 is configured for a specific implementation. For example, janitors 110 performing normalization or other types of clean-up operations can be applied to facts early in an order. Subsequently, janitors 110 making inductions based on two or more facts can be applied. If janitors 110 making inductions were run first, they would not be as efficient, because similar facts may not be compatible until transformed to a common format. In another embodiment, a predetermined, ordered set of janitors 110 can be provided by controller 111.
  • Importers 108 extract 420 facts from documents stored on document hosts 102. Generally, the extraction process analyzes documents for indicators of facts such as attribute value pairs. For example, a table is encoded using specific tags in HTML (e.g., <td>). Importers 108 can identify the table and determine whether column headers or row headers are appropriate attributes, and further, whether corresponding cells are appropriate values. Importers 108 can also be directed to documents known to contain facts under a known template. Fact repository 115 stores 420 facts.
  • Individual janitors 110 process 430 facts as described below with respect to FIG. 6. More than one janitor 110 can process a fact. Additionally, one janitor 110 can process an object, associated with multiple facts or can compare the facts associated with multiple objects (e.g., during object merging and/or duplicate detection). After processing, the fact is stored 440 in fact repository 115.
  • FIG. 5 is a flow chart illustrating a method 500 of processing facts already stored on fact repository 115. An administrator configures 510 janitors as described. However, there may be differences in the number and/or type of janitors 110 applied to facts since facts are processed from the fact repository 115 rather than during extraction as above. Importers 108 extract 520 facts from documents stored on document hosts 102 and store 530 the facts in fact repository 115. Janitors process 540 facts after extraction. However, after being processed by janitors 110, facts can be stored under a different organization. For example, similar facts can be grouped under a single object.
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a method 600 of transforming facts with an inferred condition according to one embodiment of the present invention. A script or other controller receives 610 a fact (or more than one fact) containing an attribute and a value. The script or controller selects 620 a janitor to process the fact. As described, janitors 110 can be applied sequentially or according to a specific algorithm. In addition, a subset of all available janitors 110 can be used for processing certain facts.
  • A janitor 110 infers 630 a condition associated with the fact from the attribute and/or value. In one embodiment, inferences can be made from multiple facts associated with an object. Conditions of attributes and/or values can be birthdates, numerical values, names, cities, etc. A janitor 110 detecting fact for a Date of Birth and a fact for a Social Security Number, may infer that the facts concern a person. Because the fact concerns a person, the janitor 110 can apply specific constraints associated with persons such as the format of a person's name, or associate the fact with other person facts. In some embodiments, the janitor can also add a new fact explicitly indicating that the associated object represents a “person.” Subsequently, additional janitors 110 configured to operate on persons can examine the fact to make additional inferences and adjustments. Thus, a janitor 110 may not perform any operation on the fact if the appropriate condition cannot be inferred. Facts typically require inferences since they are not specially formatted for fact repository 115 as is data that is generated for a particular database.
  • The janitor 110 transforms 640 the fact to a predetermined constraint by adjusting the attribute and/or value. For example, the name of an attribute or format of a value can be changed as discussed above. If the fact has needs to be processed by more janitors in the configured order, the process repeats at the step selecting 620 a janitor.
  • The above paragraphs provide some general discussion and examples of janitors. The paragraphs that follow provide some specific examples of janitors. Different embodiments of the present invention may include some, all, or none of these example janitors. For the purpose of clarity, only a few types of janitors 110 have been described below. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that other types of janitors 110 are possible in addition to those described below.
  • In some embodiments, some janitors 110 reduce information in fact repository 115. A singleton-attribute janitor 110 identifies attributes which should be unique per object, and eliminates all but one instance of that attribute on any given object. For example, a person should only have one date of birth. A blacklist janitor 110 reads in a list of patterns, and deletes any fact that matches a pattern. For example, blacklist janitor 110 can be used to remove curse words. A string-cleanup janitor 110 trims unuseful characters, such as @, #, %, or !, from the beginning or end of attributes. A name-group-threshold-match janitor 110 merges duplicate objects if they share a certain number of attributes, based on their entropy. An entropy is calculated for each value as described in further detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,765. Objects having similar facts can be merged if associated entropy values fall within an entropy threshold. The name-group-threshold-match janitor 110 is described in further detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,765. A near-duplicate-fact merger janitor 110 identifies duplicate facts within an object.
  • Thus, some janitors compare a first fact to a plurality of existing facts. The existing facts can be obtained from the repository or from any other appropriate source. In some janitors, a fact is compared to existing facts to determine whether the new fact should be stored in the fact repository. In one janitor, if the fact duplicates a threshold number of existing facts, the fact is not stored in the fact repository. In another janitor, if the fact is corroborated by a threshold number of existing facts, the fact is stored in the fact repository. In another janitor, if the fact is not corroborated by a threshold number of existing facts, the fact is not stored in the fact repository. Because the facts extracted from the world-wide web are from unstructured data, the facts can have many formats when they re initially extracted and some of the facts that are compared by the janitors may not have the same format. For example, dates can be in MMDDYY format, DDMMYY format, in formats where months are spelled out (“December”), and so on. Some janitors know about various formats, such as various date formats, and take those formats into account when comparing facts to facts in the repository. In some embodiments, the facts are normalized before they are stored in the repository. In some embodiments, a janitor may require that another janitor runs first in order to normalize formatting of the facts to be compared. Any of these situations allows a comparing janitor to compare facts that had different formats when they were extracted.
  • One set of janitors 110 is applied to delete certain facts. A persisted-id-fact-deleter janitor 110 deletes any fact from a previous repository that should no longer be kept as described in further detail in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/356,842. A stuttering-fact-deleter janitor 110 removes any fact whose attribute and value are the same. A reference-redirect-collapser janitor 110 collapses value links that point to objects that have been merged. An invalid-fact-deleter janitor 110 removes any fact that fail some basic validity checks (e.g., the value is empty). A suspicious-fact-deleter janitor 110 removes facts with lengthy attributes (e.g., 3 words) and repeat information that appears elsewhere in the object. These facts can result from extraction problems. An invalid-language-deleter janitor 110 removes any fact in certain languages. This janitor 110 can be used to segregate facts by language. A legal-constraint janitor 110 enforces constraints on objects for legal purposes. For example, certain document can be limited as to how many facts should be extracted. An unlicensed-fact-finder janitor 110 removes any facts marked as being ‘internal only’ for legal or other reasons. A small-object-deleter janitor 110 removes any object with too few facts. A dangling-reference-deletion janitor 110 removes any fact with a value link that points at a non-existent object. An object can be missing when removed by another janitor 110. A name-references-resolver janitor 110 identifies references to other objects in facts and creates search links to the other objects.
  • One set of janitors 110 can characterize preferred formats such as canonical forms. A place-cannonicalizer janitor 110 rewrites place names into canonical form. For example, the value “Trenton, N.J.” can be rewritten to “Trenton, N.J.” A date-canonicalizer janitor 110 rewrites dates into a canonical form. For example, the date “2006-02-16” is rewritten to “16 Feb. 2006.” A measurement-cleanup janitor 110 rewrites measurements to a canonical form. For example, the measurements “5′4″” or “5 ft. 4 in.” can be rewritten to “5′ 4”.” An attribute-cannonicalizer janitor 110 rewrites attributes. For example, “birthday”, “birthdate”, and “birth date” can be rewritten to “date of birth.” An article-value-normalizer janitor 110 rewrites values with articles to a readable format. For example, the value “Foo, The” can be rewritten to “The Foo.”
  • Other janitors 110 can be implemented as well. A type-identifier janitor 110 assigns type values to objects based on a subset of janitors 110. For example, every fact with a “date of birth” attribute is assigned a type value of “person.” A born-died cleanup janitor 110 splits facts associated with birth and death dates into several facts. For example, the fact “Born: 14 Jul. 1960 in Scranton, Pa.” can be split into a fact for date of birth and another fact for place of birth. A near-duplicate-fact-merger janitor 110 combines duplicate facts. A value-dereferencer janitor 110 identifies a fact having a value which is a link to another object, and updates a display value of the fact to be the name of the object.
  • The order in which the steps of the methods of the present invention are performed is purely illustrative in nature. The steps can be performed in any order or in parallel, unless otherwise indicated by the present disclosure. The methods of the present invention may be performed in hardware, firmware, software, or any combination thereof operating on a single computer or multiple computers of any type. Software embodying the present invention may comprise computer instructions in any form (e.g., source code, object code, interpreted code, etc.) stored in any computer-readable storage medium (e.g., a ROM, a RAM, a magnetic media, a compact disc, a DVD, etc.). Such software may also be in the form of an electrical data signal embodied in a carrier wave propagating on a conductive medium or in the form of light pulses that propagate through an optical fiber.
  • While particular embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from this invention in its broader aspect and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications, as fall within the true spirit of this invention.
  • In the above description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art that the invention can be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, structures and devices are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid obscuring the invention.
  • Reference in the specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment.
  • Some portions of the detailed description are presented in terms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on data bits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions and representations are the means used by those skilled in the data processing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their work to others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally, conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desired result. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physical quantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take the form of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored, transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It has proven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, to refer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters, terms, numbers, or the like.
  • It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar terms are to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and are merely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unless specifically stated otherwise as apparent from the discussion, it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizing terms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or “determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action and processes of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device, that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical (electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers and memories into other data similarly represented as physical quantities within the computer system memories or registers or other such information storage, transmission or display devices.
  • The present invention also relates to an apparatus for performing the operations herein. This apparatus can be specially constructed for the required purposes, or it can comprise a general-purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored in the computer. Such a computer program can be stored in a computer readable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type of disk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and magnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random access memories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any type of media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupled to a computer system bus.
  • The algorithms and modules presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems can be used with programs in accordance with the teachings herein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specialized apparatuses to perform the method steps. The required structure for a variety of these systems will appear from the description below. In addition, the present invention is not described with reference to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that a variety of programming languages can be used to implement the teachings of the invention as described herein. Furthermore, as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the relevant art, the modules, features, attributes, methodologies, and other aspects of the invention can be implemented as software, hardware, firmware or any combination of the three. Of course, wherever a component of the present invention is implemented as software, the component can be implemented as a standalone program, as part of a larger program, as a plurality of separate programs, as a statically or dynamically linked library, as a kernel loadable module, as a device driver, and/or in every and any other way known now or in the future to those of skill in the art of computer programming. Additionally, the present invention is in no way limited to implementation in any specific operating system or environment.
  • It will be understood by those skilled in the relevant art that the above-described implementations are merely exemplary, and many changes can be made without departing from the true spirit and scope of the present invention. Therefore, it is intended by the appended claims to cover all such changes and modifications that come within the true spirit and scope of this invention.

Claims (32)

  1. 1. A computer-implemented method for processing facts extracted from web-based-documents, comprising:
    extracting a fact from a plurality of web-based documents stored on document hosts, the fact comprising an attribute and a value, at least two of the web-based documents presenting the fact in different formats;
    applying two or more janitors to the fact, each janitor inferring one or more conditions associated with the fact from at least one of the attribute and value, and responsive to inferring the one or more conditions, each of the two or more janitors transforming the fact in accordance with a different predetermined constraint for the condition by adjusting at least one of the attribute and value; and
    storing the transformed fact in a fact repository.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the applying two or more janitors comprises:
    applying a first and a second janitor in a predetermined order to infer a first condition and a second condition, respectively, wherein the second janitor is able to detect the second condition responsive to applying the first janitor.
  3. 3. A computer-implemented method for processing facts extracted from web-based-documents, comprising:
    extracting a fact from an unstructured web-based document, the fact containing an attribute and a value;
    inferring a condition associated with the fact from at least one of the attribute and value;
    responsive to inferring the condition, transforming the fact to a predetermined constraint for the condition by adjusting at least one of the attribute and value; and
    storing the transformed fact in a fact repository.
  4. 4. The method of claim 3, wherein:
    inferring the condition comprises inferring a type for the fact, and
    transforming the fact comprises transforming the fact to a predetermined constraint for the fact type.
  5. 5. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
    receiving another fact,
    wherein inferring the condition comprises inferring that the facts have the same condition, and
    wherein transforming the fact comprises comparing the facts.
  6. 6. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
    receiving another fact containing another attribute and another value,
    wherein inferring the condition comprises detecting that at least one of the attributes or the values are similar,
    wherein transforming the fact comprises merging the facts.
  7. 7. The method of claim 3, wherein:
    transforming the fact comprises reformatting the value according to the predetermined constraint.
  8. 8. The method of claim 3, wherein:
    inferring the condition comprises inferring that the value includes two or more independent values, and
    transforming the fact comprises generating two or more new facts, each one of the two or more new facts having one of the two or more independent values.
  9. 9. The method of claim 3, wherein:
    inferring the condition comprises inferring the condition based on an object associated with the fact, the object being common to both the fact and at least one other fact.
  10. 10. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
    retrieving the fact from storage in the fact repository.
  11. 11. The method of claim 3, further comprising:
    receiving the fact during extraction from the web-based document.
  12. 12. The method of claim 3, wherein the web-based document is encoded in Hypertext Markup Language, and the fact is extracted from an HTML table in the document.
  13. 13. A computer-implemented method for processing facts extracted from documents, comprising:
    extracting a fact from an unstructured web-based document, the fact containing an attribute and a value;
    applying a collection of janitors in a predetermined order to process the fact, each janitor configured to infer a different condition associated with a fact from at least one of the attribute and value, and responsive to the janitor inferring the specific condition, the janitor transforming the fact to a different predetermined constraint for the condition by adjusting at least one of the attribute and value, and responsive to the janitor failing to infer the specific condition, the janitor discontinuing processing of the fact; and
    storing the fact in a fact repository of the computer.
  14. 14. A computer program product stored on a computer readable medium and configured to perform a method for processing facts extracted from unstructured web-based documents and stored in a repository, comprising:
    extracting a fact containing an attribute and a value, the fact extracted from an unstructured web-based document;
    inferring a condition associated with the fact from at least one of the attribute and value;
    responsive to inferring the condition, transforming the fact to a predetermined constraint for the condition by adjusting at least one of the attribute and value; and
    storing the facts in the fact repository.
  15. 15. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein:
    inferring the condition comprises inferring a type for the fact, and
    transforming the fact comprises transforming the fact to a predetermined constraint for the fact type.
  16. 16. The computer program product of claim 14, further comprising:
    receiving another fact,
    wherein inferring the condition comprises inferring that the facts have the same condition, and
    wherein transforming the fact comprises normalizing the facts.
  17. 17. The computer program product of claim 14, further comprising:
    receiving another fact containing another attribute and another value,
    wherein inferring the condition comprises detecting that at least one of the attributes or the values are similar,
    wherein transforming the fact comprises merging the facts.
  18. 18. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein:
    transforming the fact comprises reformatting the value according to the predetermined constraint.
  19. 19. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein:
    inferring the condition comprises inferring that the value includes two or more independent values, and
    transforming the fact comprises generating two or more new facts, each one of the two or more new facts having one of the two or more independent values.
  20. 20. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein:
    inferring the condition comprises inferring the condition based on an object associated with the fact, the object used as a common indexer for both the fact and at least one other fact.
  21. 21. The computer program product of claim 14, further comprising:
    retrieving the fact from storage in the fact repository.
  22. 22. The computer program product of claim 14, further comprising:
    receiving the fact during extraction from the document.
  23. 23. The computer program product of claim 14, wherein the web-based document is encoded in Hypertext Markup Language, and the fact is extracted from a table as indicated within the encoding.
  24. 24. A system for processing facts extracted from documents, comprising:
    an extractor to extract facts, the facts each containing an attribute and a value, the facts extracted from a plurality of unstructured web-based documents;
    two or more janitors configured to receive a fact, each of the two or more janitors configured to operate in a predetermined order and to infer a different specific condition associated with the fact from at least one of the attribute and value, the two or more janitors configured to transform the fact to a predetermined constraint for the condition by adjusting at least one of the attribute and value, and store the fact.
  25. 25. The system of claim 24, further comprising:
    a script module, in communication with the one or more janitors, the script to describe an order for the one or more janitors to process the fact.
  26. 26. A method performed by a software janitor in a data processing system, comprising:
    receiving a first fact containing an attribute and a value, the value having a first format when it was been extracted from an unstructured web-based document;
    receiving a plurality of existing facts, the plurality of facts each containing an attribute and a value, each value having been previously extracted from an unstructured web-based document, and at least one of the values having had a second format different from the first format at the time the existing fact was extracted from the web-based document; and
    comparing the value of the first fact to values of the existing facts to determine whether the first fact should be stored in a fact repository of the data processing system.
  27. 27. The method of claim 26, wherein comparing to determine whether the first fact should be stored in the fact repository comprises: not storing the fact in the fact repository if it duplicates a threshold number of the existing facts.
  28. 28. The method of claim 26, wherein comparing to determine whether the first fact should be stored in the fact repository comprises storing the fact in the fact repository if it is corroborated by a threshold number of the existing facts.
  29. 29. The method of claim 26, wherein comparing to determine whether the first fact should be stored in the fact repository comprises refraining from storing the fact in the fact repository if it is not corroborated by a threshold number of the existing facts.
  30. 30. The method of claim 26, further comprising: normalizing the first fact and the at least one existing fact prior to comparing the first fact and the existing facts.
  31. 31. The method of claim 26, wherein comparing the first fact and the existing facts further comprises being able to compare facts in the first and second formats.
  32. 32. The method of claim 26, wherein receiving the plurality of existing facts comprises receiving the plurality of existing facts from the fact repository.
US11399857 2004-12-30 2006-04-07 Mechanism for managing facts in a fact repository Abandoned US20070143317A1 (en)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2478404 true 2004-12-30 2004-12-30
US11142853 US7769579B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Learning facts from semi-structured text
US11341069 US7464090B2 (en) 2006-01-27 2006-01-27 Object categorization for information extraction
US11356765 US8244689B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2006-02-17 Attribute entropy as a signal in object normalization
US11356838 US7672971B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2006-02-17 Modular architecture for entity normalization
US11399857 US20070143317A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2006-04-07 Mechanism for managing facts in a fact repository

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11399857 US20070143317A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2006-04-07 Mechanism for managing facts in a fact repository

Related Parent Applications (5)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US2478404 Continuation-In-Part 2004-12-30 2004-12-30
US11142853 Continuation-In-Part US7769579B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Learning facts from semi-structured text
US11341069 Continuation-In-Part US7464090B2 (en) 2006-01-27 2006-01-27 Object categorization for information extraction
US11356765 Continuation-In-Part US8244689B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2006-02-17 Attribute entropy as a signal in object normalization
US11356838 Continuation-In-Part US7672971B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2006-02-17 Modular architecture for entity normalization

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070143317A1 true true US20070143317A1 (en) 2007-06-21

Family

ID=37309560

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11142853 Active 2027-05-11 US7769579B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Learning facts from semi-structured text
US11394414 Active 2032-11-06 US8825471B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2006-03-31 Unsupervised extraction of facts
US11399857 Abandoned US20070143317A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2006-04-07 Mechanism for managing facts in a fact repository
US14460117 Active 2025-11-07 US9558186B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2014-08-14 Unsupervised extraction of facts

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11142853 Active 2027-05-11 US7769579B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2005-05-31 Learning facts from semi-structured text
US11394414 Active 2032-11-06 US8825471B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2006-03-31 Unsupervised extraction of facts

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US14460117 Active 2025-11-07 US9558186B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2014-08-14 Unsupervised extraction of facts

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (4) US7769579B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1891557A2 (en)
CN (1) CN101253498B (en)
CA (1) CA2610208C (en)
WO (1) WO2006132793A3 (en)

Cited By (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070198600A1 (en) * 2006-02-17 2007-08-23 Betz Jonathan T Entity normalization via name normalization
US20070198597A1 (en) * 2006-02-17 2007-08-23 Betz Jonathan T Attribute entropy as a signal in object normalization
US20080288487A1 (en) * 2007-05-18 2008-11-20 Microsoft Corporation Typed Relationships between Items
US20090307183A1 (en) * 2008-06-10 2009-12-10 Eric Arno Vigen System and Method for Transmission of Communications by Unique Definition Identifiers
US7739212B1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2010-06-15 Google Inc. System and method for updating facts in a fact repository
US20110047153A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2011-02-24 Betz Jonathan T Identifying the Unifying Subject of a Set of Facts
US7966291B1 (en) 2007-06-26 2011-06-21 Google Inc. Fact-based object merging
US7970766B1 (en) * 2007-07-23 2011-06-28 Google Inc. Entity type assignment
US7991797B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2011-08-02 Google Inc. ID persistence through normalization
US20120005221A1 (en) * 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 Microsoft Corporation Extracting facts from social network messages
US8122026B1 (en) 2006-10-20 2012-02-21 Google Inc. Finding and disambiguating references to entities on web pages
US8239350B1 (en) 2007-05-08 2012-08-07 Google Inc. Date ambiguity resolution
US8260785B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2012-09-04 Google Inc. Automatic object reference identification and linking in a browseable fact repository
US8347202B1 (en) 2007-03-14 2013-01-01 Google Inc. Determining geographic locations for place names in a fact repository
US8645391B1 (en) 2008-07-03 2014-02-04 Google Inc. Attribute-value extraction from structured documents
US8650175B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2014-02-11 Google Inc. User interface for facts query engine with snippets from information sources that include query terms and answer terms
US8682913B1 (en) 2005-03-31 2014-03-25 Google Inc. Corroborating facts extracted from multiple sources
US8738643B1 (en) 2007-08-02 2014-05-27 Google Inc. Learning synonymous object names from anchor texts
US8812435B1 (en) * 2007-11-16 2014-08-19 Google Inc. Learning objects and facts from documents
US8825471B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2014-09-02 Google Inc. Unsupervised extraction of facts
US8996470B1 (en) 2005-05-31 2015-03-31 Google Inc. System for ensuring the internal consistency of a fact repository
US9208229B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2015-12-08 Google Inc. Anchor text summarization for corroboration
US9286271B2 (en) 2010-05-26 2016-03-15 Google Inc. Providing an electronic document collection
US9384285B1 (en) 2012-12-18 2016-07-05 Google Inc. Methods for identifying related documents
US9495341B1 (en) 2012-12-18 2016-11-15 Google Inc. Fact correction and completion during document drafting
US9514113B1 (en) 2013-07-29 2016-12-06 Google Inc. Methods for automatic footnote generation
US9529791B1 (en) 2013-12-12 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Template and content aware document and template editing
US9529916B1 (en) 2012-10-30 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Managing documents based on access context
US9542374B1 (en) 2012-01-20 2017-01-10 Google Inc. Method and apparatus for applying revision specific electronic signatures to an electronically stored document
US9594554B2 (en) * 2015-07-30 2017-03-14 International Buisness Machines Corporation Extraction and transformation of executable online documentation
US9703763B1 (en) 2014-08-14 2017-07-11 Google Inc. Automatic document citations by utilizing copied content for candidate sources
US9842113B1 (en) 2013-08-27 2017-12-12 Google Inc. Context-based file selection
US9870554B1 (en) 2012-10-23 2018-01-16 Google Inc. Managing documents based on a user's calendar

Families Citing this family (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7567976B1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2009-07-28 Google Inc. Merging objects in a facts database
US7512620B2 (en) * 2005-08-19 2009-03-31 Google Inc. Data structure for incremental search
US9495358B2 (en) 2006-10-10 2016-11-15 Abbyy Infopoisk Llc Cross-language text clustering
US8285697B1 (en) 2007-01-23 2012-10-09 Google Inc. Feedback enhanced attribute extraction
US7984032B2 (en) * 2007-08-31 2011-07-19 Microsoft Corporation Iterators for applying term occurrence-level constraints in natural language searching
US9128945B1 (en) 2008-05-16 2015-09-08 Google Inc. Query augmentation
US20140142920A1 (en) 2008-08-13 2014-05-22 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for Utilizing Structural Information in Semi-Structured Documents to Generate Candidates for Question Answering Systems
US8412749B2 (en) * 2009-01-16 2013-04-02 Google Inc. Populating a structured presentation with new values
EP2416257A4 (en) * 2009-03-31 2015-04-22 Fujitsu Ltd Computer-assisted name identification equipment, name identification method, and name identification program
CN102200983A (en) * 2010-03-25 2011-09-28 日电(中国)有限公司 Attribute extraction device and method
US8346792B1 (en) 2010-11-09 2013-01-01 Google Inc. Query generation using structural similarity between documents
US9460207B2 (en) * 2010-12-08 2016-10-04 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Automated database generation for answering fact lookup queries
US8655866B1 (en) 2011-02-10 2014-02-18 Google Inc. Returning factual answers in response to queries
US8719692B2 (en) 2011-03-11 2014-05-06 Microsoft Corporation Validation, rejection, and modification of automatically generated document annotations
US9582591B2 (en) 2011-03-11 2017-02-28 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Generating visual summaries of research documents
US9632994B2 (en) 2011-03-11 2017-04-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Graphical user interface that supports document annotation
US9075873B2 (en) 2011-03-11 2015-07-07 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Generation of context-informative co-citation graphs
US9626348B2 (en) 2011-03-11 2017-04-18 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Aggregating document annotations
US8768782B1 (en) 2011-06-10 2014-07-01 Linkedin Corporation Optimized cloud computing fact checking
US9087048B2 (en) 2011-06-10 2015-07-21 Linkedin Corporation Method of and system for validating a fact checking system
US9116996B1 (en) 2011-07-25 2015-08-25 Google Inc. Reverse question answering
CN102662986A (en) * 2012-01-13 2012-09-12 中国科学院计算技术研究所 System and method for microblog message retrieval
US20130246435A1 (en) * 2012-03-14 2013-09-19 Microsoft Corporation Framework for document knowledge extraction
US8819047B2 (en) 2012-04-04 2014-08-26 Microsoft Corporation Fact verification engine
US9619458B2 (en) 2012-07-20 2017-04-11 Salesforce.Com, Inc. System and method for phrase matching with arbitrary text
US9659059B2 (en) * 2012-07-20 2017-05-23 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Matching large sets of words
US20140052647A1 (en) * 2012-08-17 2014-02-20 Truth Seal Corporation System and Method for Promoting Truth in Public Discourse
EP2916238A4 (en) * 2012-10-19 2016-06-15 Rakuten Inc Corpus generating device, corpus generating method, and corpus generating program
US9483159B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2016-11-01 Linkedin Corporation Fact checking graphical user interface including fact checking icons
US9235626B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2016-01-12 Google Inc. Automatic generation of snippets based on context and user interest
US9224103B1 (en) 2013-03-13 2015-12-29 Google Inc. Automatic annotation for training and evaluation of semantic analysis engines
US9235653B2 (en) 2013-06-26 2016-01-12 Google Inc. Discovering entity actions for an entity graph
US9342622B2 (en) 2013-06-27 2016-05-17 Google Inc. Two-phase construction of data graphs from disparate inputs
US9785696B1 (en) 2013-10-04 2017-10-10 Google Inc. Automatic discovery of new entities using graph reconciliation
CN105706078A (en) 2013-10-09 2016-06-22 谷歌公司 Automatic definition of entity collections
US9798829B1 (en) 2013-10-22 2017-10-24 Google Inc. Data graph interface
US10002117B1 (en) 2013-10-24 2018-06-19 Google Llc Translating annotation tags into suggested markup
US9626358B2 (en) 2014-11-26 2017-04-18 Abbyy Infopoisk Llc Creating ontologies by analyzing natural language texts
US9659056B1 (en) 2013-12-30 2017-05-23 Google Inc. Providing an explanation of a missing fact estimate
RU2586577C2 (en) 2014-01-15 2016-06-10 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Аби ИнфоПоиск" Filtering arcs parser graph
US9972055B2 (en) 2014-02-28 2018-05-15 Lucas J. Myslinski Fact checking method and system utilizing social networking information
US9643722B1 (en) 2014-02-28 2017-05-09 Lucas J. Myslinski Drone device security system
US8990234B1 (en) * 2014-02-28 2015-03-24 Lucas J. Myslinski Efficient fact checking method and system
US9189514B1 (en) 2014-09-04 2015-11-17 Lucas J. Myslinski Optimized fact checking method and system
US20160078364A1 (en) * 2014-09-17 2016-03-17 Microsoft Corporation Computer-Implemented Identification of Related Items
US9672251B1 (en) * 2014-09-29 2017-06-06 Google Inc. Extracting facts from documents
US20160162576A1 (en) * 2014-12-05 2016-06-09 Lightning Source Inc. Automated content classification/filtering
CN105488105A (en) * 2015-11-19 2016-04-13 百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司 Establishment method for information extraction template and knowledge data processing method and apparatus

Citations (96)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5010478A (en) * 1986-04-11 1991-04-23 Deran Roger L Entity-attribute value database system with inverse attribute for selectively relating two different entities
US5133075A (en) * 1988-12-19 1992-07-21 Hewlett-Packard Company Method of monitoring changes in attribute values of object in an object-oriented database
US5519608A (en) * 1993-06-24 1996-05-21 Xerox Corporation Method for extracting from a text corpus answers to questions stated in natural language by using linguistic analysis and hypothesis generation
US5717911A (en) * 1995-01-23 1998-02-10 Tandem Computers, Inc. Relational database system and method with high availability compliation of SQL programs
US5717951A (en) * 1995-08-07 1998-02-10 Yabumoto; Kan W. Method for storing and retrieving information on a magnetic storage medium via data blocks of variable sizes
US5778373A (en) * 1996-07-15 1998-07-07 At&T Corp Integration of an information server database schema by generating a translation map from exemplary files
US5778378A (en) * 1996-04-30 1998-07-07 International Business Machines Corporation Object oriented information retrieval framework mechanism
US5787413A (en) * 1996-07-29 1998-07-28 International Business Machines Corporation C++ classes for a digital library
US6038560A (en) * 1997-05-21 2000-03-14 Oracle Corporation Concept knowledge base search and retrieval system
US6044366A (en) * 1998-03-16 2000-03-28 Microsoft Corporation Use of the UNPIVOT relational operator in the efficient gathering of sufficient statistics for data mining
US6052693A (en) * 1996-07-02 2000-04-18 Harlequin Group Plc System for assembling large databases through information extracted from text sources
US6064952A (en) * 1994-11-18 2000-05-16 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Information abstracting method, information abstracting apparatus, and weighting method
US6073130A (en) * 1997-09-23 2000-06-06 At&T Corp. Method for improving the results of a search in a structured database
US6202065B1 (en) * 1997-07-02 2001-03-13 Travelocity.Com Lp Information search and retrieval with geographical coordinates
US6212526B1 (en) * 1997-12-02 2001-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Method for apparatus for efficient mining of classification models from databases
US6240546B1 (en) * 1998-07-24 2001-05-29 International Business Machines Corporation Identifying date fields for runtime year 2000 system solution process, method and article of manufacture
US20020013841A1 (en) * 1997-11-20 2002-01-31 Limor Schweitzer System, method and computer program product for reporting in a network-based filtering and aggregating platform
US6349275B1 (en) * 1997-11-24 2002-02-19 International Business Machines Corporation Multiple concurrent language support system for electronic catalogue using a concept based knowledge representation
US20020038307A1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2002-03-28 Zoran Obradovic Systems and methods for knowledge discovery in spatial data
US20020042707A1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-04-11 Gang Zhao Grammar-packaged parsing
US6377943B1 (en) * 1999-01-20 2002-04-23 Oracle Corp. Initial ordering of tables for database queries
US20020065845A1 (en) * 2000-05-17 2002-05-30 Eiichi Naito Information retrieval system
US20020073115A1 (en) * 2000-02-17 2002-06-13 Davis Russell T. RDL search engine
US20020083039A1 (en) * 2000-05-18 2002-06-27 Ferrari Adam J. Hierarchical data-driven search and navigation system and method for information retrieval
US6438543B1 (en) * 1999-06-17 2002-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for cross-document coreference
US20030018652A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2003-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Apparatus and accompanying methods for visualizing clusters of data and hierarchical cluster classifications
US6519631B1 (en) * 1999-08-13 2003-02-11 Atomica Corporation Web-based information retrieval
US20030058706A1 (en) * 2001-09-17 2003-03-27 Hiroyuki Okamoto Tree system diagram output method, computer program and recording medium
US20030069880A1 (en) * 2001-09-24 2003-04-10 Ask Jeeves, Inc. Natural language query processing
US20030078902A1 (en) * 2001-10-22 2003-04-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method, system, and program for maintaining a database of data objects
US6567936B1 (en) * 2000-02-08 2003-05-20 Microsoft Corporation Data clustering using error-tolerant frequent item sets
US6567846B1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2003-05-20 E.Piphany, Inc. Extensible user interface for a distributed messaging framework in a computer network
US20030097357A1 (en) * 2000-05-18 2003-05-22 Ferrari Adam J. System and method for manipulating content in a hierarchical data-driven search and navigation system
US6572661B1 (en) * 1999-01-11 2003-06-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for automated annotation of files
US6584464B1 (en) * 1999-03-19 2003-06-24 Ask Jeeves, Inc. Grammar template query system
US20030120675A1 (en) * 1999-03-03 2003-06-26 Siebel Systems, Inc. Application instantiation based upon attributes and values stored in a meta data repository, including tiering of application layers, objects, and components
US20040003067A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Daniel Ferrin System and method for enabling a user interface with GUI meta data
US20040024739A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-02-05 Kanisa Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US6693651B2 (en) * 2001-02-07 2004-02-17 International Business Machines Corporation Customer self service iconic interface for resource search results display and selection
US6704726B1 (en) * 1998-12-28 2004-03-09 Amouroux Remy Query processing method
US20040059726A1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2004-03-25 Jeff Hunter Context-sensitive wordless search
US20040088292A1 (en) * 2002-10-31 2004-05-06 International Business Machines Corporation Global query correlation attributes
US6738767B1 (en) * 2000-03-20 2004-05-18 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for discovering schematic structure in hypertext documents
US20040107125A1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2004-06-03 Accenture Llp Business alliance identification in a web architecture
US6754873B1 (en) * 1999-09-20 2004-06-22 Google Inc. Techniques for finding related hyperlinked documents using link-based analysis
US20040122846A1 (en) * 2002-12-19 2004-06-24 Ibm Corporation Fact verification system
US20040123240A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic completion of dates
US20040122844A1 (en) * 2002-12-18 2004-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for use of metadata to create multidimensional cubes in a relational database
US6845354B1 (en) * 1999-09-09 2005-01-18 Institute For Information Industry Information retrieval system with a neuro-fuzzy structure
US6850896B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2005-02-01 Market-Touch Corporation Method and system for managing and providing sales data using world wide web
US6873982B1 (en) * 1999-07-16 2005-03-29 International Business Machines Corporation Ordering of database search results based on user feedback
US20050076012A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-04-07 Udi Manber Personalized searchable library with highlighting capabilities
US20050086222A1 (en) * 2003-10-16 2005-04-21 Wang Ji H. Semi-automatic construction method for knowledge base of encyclopedia question answering system
US6886010B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2005-04-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery
US20050108630A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2005-05-19 Wasson Mark D. Extraction of facts from text
US6901403B1 (en) * 2000-03-02 2005-05-31 Quovadx, Inc. XML presentation of general-purpose data sources
US6904429B2 (en) * 1997-09-29 2005-06-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Information retrieval apparatus and information retrieval method
US20050125311A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2005-06-09 Ghassan Chidiac System and method for automated part-number mapping
US20060036504A1 (en) * 2004-08-11 2006-02-16 Allocca William W Dynamically classifying items for international delivery
US7003506B1 (en) * 2000-06-23 2006-02-21 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for creating an embedded search link document
US7003552B2 (en) * 2001-06-25 2006-02-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing apparatus and control method therefor
US7003719B1 (en) * 1999-01-25 2006-02-21 West Publishing Company, Dba West Group System, method, and software for inserting hyperlinks into documents
US7007228B1 (en) * 1999-07-29 2006-02-28 International Business Machines Corporation Encoding geographic coordinates in a fuzzy geographic address
US20060047838A1 (en) * 2004-06-25 2006-03-02 Abhishek Chauhan Inferring server state in a stateless communication protocol
US7013308B1 (en) * 2000-11-28 2006-03-14 Semscript Ltd. Knowledge storage and retrieval system and method
US20060064411A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-23 William Gross Search engine using user intent
US7020662B2 (en) * 2001-05-29 2006-03-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for determining a directory entry's class of service based on the value of a specifier in the entry
US20060074910A1 (en) * 2004-09-17 2006-04-06 Become, Inc. Systems and methods of retrieving topic specific information
US20060074824A1 (en) * 2002-08-22 2006-04-06 Jinyan Li Prediction by collective likelihood from emerging patterns
US20060085465A1 (en) * 2004-10-15 2006-04-20 Oracle International Corporation Method(s) for updating database object metadata
US7043521B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2006-05-09 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Technologies, Llc Search agent for searching the internet
US7051023B2 (en) * 2003-04-04 2006-05-23 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and methods for generating concept units from search queries
US20060112110A1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2006-05-25 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for automating data normalization using text analytics
US20060123046A1 (en) * 2003-03-07 2006-06-08 Microsoft Corporation System and method for unknown type serialization
US7158980B2 (en) * 2003-10-02 2007-01-02 Acer Incorporated Method and apparatus for computerized extracting of scheduling information from a natural language e-mail
US20070005593A1 (en) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-04 Microsoft Corporation Attribute-based data retrieval and association
US20070005639A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Xerox Corporation Categorization including dependencies between different category systems
US7162499B2 (en) * 2000-06-21 2007-01-09 Microsoft Corporation Linked value replication
US7165024B2 (en) * 2002-02-22 2007-01-16 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Inferring hierarchical descriptions of a set of documents
US20070016890A1 (en) * 2001-08-31 2007-01-18 Stephan Brunner Configurator using structure to provide a user interface
US7174504B2 (en) * 2001-11-09 2007-02-06 Wuxi Evermore Software, Inc. Integrated data processing system with links
US20070038610A1 (en) * 2001-06-22 2007-02-15 Nosa Omoigui System and method for knowledge retrieval, management, delivery and presentation
US7181471B1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2007-02-20 Fujitsu Limited Fact data unifying method and apparatus
US20070055656A1 (en) * 2005-08-01 2007-03-08 Semscript Ltd. Knowledge repository
US7194380B2 (en) * 2003-02-28 2007-03-20 Chordiant Software Europe Limited Classification using probability estimate re-sampling
US20070073768A1 (en) * 2003-10-15 2007-03-29 Goradia Gautam D Interactive system for building and sharing one's own databank of wisdom bytes, such as words of wisdom, basic truths and/or facts and and feats, in one or more languages
US20070094246A1 (en) * 2005-10-25 2007-04-26 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for searching dates efficiently in a collection of web documents
US7216073B2 (en) * 2001-03-13 2007-05-08 Intelligate, Ltd. Dynamic natural language understanding
US20070130123A1 (en) * 2005-12-02 2007-06-07 Microsoft Corporation Content matching
US20070143282A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-06-21 Betz Jonathan T Anchor text summarization for corroboration
US20070150800A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2007-06-28 Betz Jonathan T Unsupervised extraction of facts
US7363312B2 (en) * 2002-07-04 2008-04-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Combining data descriptions
US7493317B2 (en) * 2005-10-20 2009-02-17 Omniture, Inc. Result-based triggering for presentation of online content
US7493308B1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2009-02-17 A9.Com, Inc. Searching documents using a dimensional database
US20090119255A1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2009-05-07 Metacarta, Inc. Methods of Systems Using Geographic Meta-Metadata in Information Retrieval and Document Displays
US7672971B2 (en) * 2006-02-17 2010-03-02 Google Inc. Modular architecture for entity normalization

Family Cites Families (203)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5440730A (en) 1990-08-09 1995-08-08 Bell Communications Research, Inc. Time index access structure for temporal databases having concurrent multiple versions
CA2048306A1 (en) 1990-10-02 1992-04-03 Steven P. Miller Distributed configuration profile for computing system
US5347653A (en) 1991-06-28 1994-09-13 Digital Equipment Corporation System for reconstructing prior versions of indexes using records indicating changes between successive versions of the indexes
US5694590A (en) 1991-09-27 1997-12-02 The Mitre Corporation Apparatus and method for the detection of security violations in multilevel secure databases
JPH05174020A (en) 1991-12-26 1993-07-13 Okinawa Nippon Denki Software Kk Japanese word processor
US5574898A (en) 1993-01-08 1996-11-12 Atria Software, Inc. Dynamic software version auditor which monitors a process to provide a list of objects that are accessed
US7082426B2 (en) 1993-06-18 2006-07-25 Cnet Networks, Inc. Content aggregation method and apparatus for an on-line product catalog
US5546507A (en) 1993-08-20 1996-08-13 Unisys Corporation Apparatus and method for generating a knowledge base
US5560005A (en) 1994-02-25 1996-09-24 Actamed Corp. Methods and systems for object-based relational distributed databases
US5680622A (en) 1994-06-30 1997-10-21 Borland International, Inc. System and methods for quickly detecting shareability of symbol and type information in header files
US5675785A (en) 1994-10-04 1997-10-07 Hewlett-Packard Company Data warehouse which is accessed by a user using a schema of virtual tables
US5608903A (en) 1994-12-15 1997-03-04 Novell, Inc. Method and apparatus for moving subtrees in a distributed network directory
US5724571A (en) 1995-07-07 1998-03-03 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating query responses in a computer-based document retrieval system
EP0856175A4 (en) 1995-08-16 2000-05-24 Univ Syracuse Multilingual document retrieval system and method using semantic vector matching
US5838979A (en) 1995-10-31 1998-11-17 Peritus Software Services, Inc. Process and tool for scalable automated data field replacement
US5793966A (en) 1995-12-01 1998-08-11 Vermeer Technologies, Inc. Computer system and computer-implemented process for creation and maintenance of online services
US5701470A (en) 1995-12-08 1997-12-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for space efficient object locking using a data subarray and pointers
US5815415A (en) 1996-01-19 1998-09-29 Bentley Systems, Incorporated Computer system for portable persistent modeling
US5802299A (en) * 1996-02-13 1998-09-01 Microtouch Systems, Inc. Interactive system for authoring hypertext document collections
US5819210A (en) 1996-06-21 1998-10-06 Xerox Corporation Method of lazy contexted copying during unification
US5987460A (en) * 1996-07-05 1999-11-16 Hitachi, Ltd. Document retrieval-assisting method and system for the same and document retrieval service using the same with document frequency and term frequency
US5819265A (en) 1996-07-12 1998-10-06 International Business Machines Corporation Processing names in a text
US6820093B2 (en) 1996-07-30 2004-11-16 Hyperphrase Technologies, Llc Method for verifying record code prior to an action based on the code
US5826258A (en) * 1996-10-02 1998-10-20 Junglee Corporation Method and apparatus for structuring the querying and interpretation of semistructured information
US7269587B1 (en) 1997-01-10 2007-09-11 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Scoring documents in a linked database
US6285999B1 (en) * 1997-01-10 2001-09-04 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Method for node ranking in a linked database
US5920859A (en) * 1997-02-05 1999-07-06 Idd Enterprises, L.P. Hypertext document retrieval system and method
US6466940B1 (en) * 1997-02-21 2002-10-15 Dudley John Mills Building a database of CCG values of web pages from extracted attributes
US6134555A (en) * 1997-03-10 2000-10-17 International Business Machines Corporation Dimension reduction using association rules for data mining application
US5822743A (en) * 1997-04-08 1998-10-13 1215627 Ontario Inc. Knowledge-based information retrieval system
US5882743A (en) 1997-04-21 1999-03-16 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Absorbent folded hand towel
US5974254A (en) 1997-06-06 1999-10-26 National Instruments Corporation Method for detecting differences between graphical programs
WO1999005597A1 (en) 1997-07-25 1999-02-04 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Visualisation in a modular software system
WO1999005593A1 (en) 1997-07-25 1999-02-04 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Software system generation
US6263358B1 (en) 1997-07-25 2001-07-17 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Scheduler for a software system having means for allocating tasks
US5909689A (en) 1997-09-18 1999-06-01 Sony Corporation Automatic update of file versions for files shared by several computers which record in respective file directories temporal information for indicating when the files have been created
US6996572B1 (en) 1997-10-08 2006-02-07 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for filtering of information entities
US6018741A (en) 1997-10-22 2000-01-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for managing objects in a dynamic inheritance tree
US6112210A (en) 1997-10-31 2000-08-29 Oracle Corporation Apparatus and method for null representation in database object storage
US5943670A (en) * 1997-11-21 1999-08-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for categorizing objects in combined categories
US6094650A (en) * 1997-12-15 2000-07-25 Manning & Napier Information Services Database analysis using a probabilistic ontology
FI106089B (en) 1997-12-23 2000-11-15 Sonera Oyj follow-up of the mobile terminal mobile communication system
JPH11265400A (en) 1998-03-13 1999-09-28 Omron Corp Information processor, its method, network system, and recording medium
US6078918A (en) 1998-04-02 2000-06-20 Trivada Corporation Online predictive memory
US6112203A (en) * 1998-04-09 2000-08-29 Altavista Company Method for ranking documents in a hyperlinked environment using connectivity and selective content analysis
US6122647A (en) * 1998-05-19 2000-09-19 Perspecta, Inc. Dynamic generation of contextual links in hypertext documents
US6327574B1 (en) 1998-07-07 2001-12-04 Encirq Corporation Hierarchical models of consumer attributes for targeting content in a privacy-preserving manner
CN1352558B (en) * 1998-07-30 2012-06-13 橘生药品工业株式会社 Immediate release medicinal compositions for oral use
US6665837B1 (en) * 1998-08-10 2003-12-16 Overture Services, Inc. Method for identifying related pages in a hyperlinked database
US6694482B1 (en) 1998-09-11 2004-02-17 Sbc Technology Resources, Inc. System and methods for an architectural framework for design of an adaptive, personalized, interactive content delivery system
US6470330B1 (en) 1998-11-05 2002-10-22 Sybase, Inc. Database system with methods for estimation and usage of index page cluster ratio (IPCR) and data page cluster ratio (DPCR)
US6565610B1 (en) 1999-02-11 2003-05-20 Navigation Technologies Corporation Method and system for text placement when forming maps
US6397228B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2002-05-28 Verizon Laboratories Inc. Data enhancement techniques
US6763496B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2004-07-13 Microsoft Corporation Method for promoting contextual information to display pages containing hyperlinks
US6263328B1 (en) 1999-04-09 2001-07-17 International Business Machines Corporation Object oriented query model and process for complex heterogeneous database queries
US20030195872A1 (en) 1999-04-12 2003-10-16 Paul Senn Web-based information content analyzer and information dimension dictionary
US6606625B1 (en) * 1999-06-03 2003-08-12 University Of Southern California Wrapper induction by hierarchical data analysis
US6473898B1 (en) * 1999-07-06 2002-10-29 Pcorder.Com, Inc. Method for compiling and selecting data attributes
CA2281331A1 (en) 1999-09-03 2001-03-03 Liviu Ignat Database management system
JP2003519828A (en) 1999-09-21 2003-06-24 チョイスメーカー テクノロジーズ インコーポレイテッド Stochastic record link model derived from the training data
WO2001027713A3 (en) 1999-10-15 2001-12-27 Milind Kotwal Method of categorization and indexing of information
US6665666B1 (en) * 1999-10-26 2003-12-16 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and program product for answering questions using a search engine
US6804667B1 (en) * 1999-11-30 2004-10-12 Ncr Corporation Filter for checking for duplicate entries in database
US6963867B2 (en) 1999-12-08 2005-11-08 A9.Com, Inc. Search query processing to provide category-ranked presentation of search results
US7305380B1 (en) 1999-12-15 2007-12-04 Google Inc. Systems and methods for performing in-context searching
US6606659B1 (en) 2000-01-28 2003-08-12 Websense, Inc. System and method for controlling access to internet sites
US6665659B1 (en) * 2000-02-01 2003-12-16 James D. Logan Methods and apparatus for distributing and using metadata via the internet
US6584646B2 (en) 2000-02-29 2003-07-01 Katoh Electrical Machinery Co., Ltd. Tilt hinge for office automation equipment
US6311194B1 (en) * 2000-03-15 2001-10-30 Taalee, Inc. System and method for creating a semantic web and its applications in browsing, searching, profiling, personalization and advertising
US6502102B1 (en) * 2000-03-27 2002-12-31 Accenture Llp System, method and article of manufacture for a table-driven automated scripting architecture
US6643641B1 (en) 2000-04-27 2003-11-04 Russell Snyder Web search engine with graphic snapshots
US6957213B1 (en) 2000-05-17 2005-10-18 Inquira, Inc. Method of utilizing implicit references to answer a query
US7028250B2 (en) 2000-05-25 2006-04-11 Kanisa, Inc. System and method for automatically classifying text
US6487495B1 (en) 2000-06-02 2002-11-26 Navigation Technologies Corporation Navigation applications using related location-referenced keywords
US6745189B2 (en) 2000-06-05 2004-06-01 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for enabling multi-indexing of objects
US6963876B2 (en) 2000-06-05 2005-11-08 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for searching extended regular expressions
GB0015233D0 (en) 2000-06-21 2000-08-16 Canon Kk Indexing method and apparatus
EP1311924A2 (en) 2000-06-22 2003-05-21 Yaron Mayer System and method for searching, finding and contacting dates on the internet in instant messaging networks and/or in other methods that enable immediate finding and creating immediate contact
US6578032B1 (en) 2000-06-28 2003-06-10 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for performing phrase/word clustering and cluster merging
US7080085B1 (en) 2000-07-12 2006-07-18 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for ensuring referential integrity for heterogeneously scoped references in an information management system
US6728728B2 (en) * 2000-07-24 2004-04-27 Israel Spiegler Unified binary model and methodology for knowledge representation and for data and information mining
US6675159B1 (en) 2000-07-27 2004-01-06 Science Applic Int Corp Concept-based search and retrieval system
US7100082B2 (en) 2000-08-04 2006-08-29 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Check creation and maintenance for product knowledge management
US7146536B2 (en) 2000-08-04 2006-12-05 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Fact collection for product knowledge management
US7080073B1 (en) 2000-08-18 2006-07-18 Firstrain, Inc. Method and apparatus for focused crawling
US6556991B1 (en) 2000-09-01 2003-04-29 E-Centives, Inc. Item name normalization
US6823495B1 (en) * 2000-09-14 2004-11-23 Microsoft Corporation Mapping tool graphical user interface
US6832218B1 (en) 2000-09-22 2004-12-14 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for associating search results
US6684205B1 (en) 2000-10-18 2004-01-27 International Business Machines Corporation Clustering hypertext with applications to web searching
JP2002157276A (en) 2000-11-16 2002-05-31 Hitachi Software Eng Co Ltd Method and system for supporting solution of problem
US20020174099A1 (en) * 2000-11-28 2002-11-21 Anthony Raj Minimal identification
US8402068B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2013-03-19 Half.Com, Inc. System and method for collecting, associating, normalizing and presenting product and vendor information on a distributed network
JP2002230035A (en) 2001-01-05 2002-08-16 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> Information arranging method, information processor, information processing system, storage medium and program transmitting device
US6879969B2 (en) 2001-01-21 2005-04-12 Volvo Technological Development Corporation System and method for real-time recognition of driving patterns
US7143099B2 (en) 2001-02-08 2006-11-28 Amdocs Software Systems Limited Historical data warehousing system
US6820081B1 (en) 2001-03-19 2004-11-16 Attenex Corporation System and method for evaluating a structured message store for message redundancy
US20020147738A1 (en) 2001-04-06 2002-10-10 Reader Scot A. Method and appratus for finding patent-relevant web documents
KR100860354B1 (en) * 2001-04-12 2008-09-25 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. Method and system for registering a user preference, and computer readible medium containing computer program product
US6556610B1 (en) * 2001-04-12 2003-04-29 E20 Communications, Inc. Semiconductor lasers
US20020169770A1 (en) * 2001-04-27 2002-11-14 Kim Brian Seong-Gon Apparatus and method that categorize a collection of documents into a hierarchy of categories that are defined by the collection of documents
US7263656B2 (en) 2001-07-16 2007-08-28 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Method and device for scheduling, generating and processing a document comprising blocks of information
US7412078B2 (en) 2001-07-18 2008-08-12 Hyunjae Tech Co., Ltd. System for automatic recognizing license number of other vehicles on observation vehicles and method thereof
EP1429258A4 (en) 2001-07-26 2007-08-29 Ibm Data processing method, data processing system, and program
CA2354443A1 (en) 2001-07-31 2003-01-31 Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee Method and system for visually constructing xml schemas using an object-oriented model
US6868411B2 (en) 2001-08-13 2005-03-15 Xerox Corporation Fuzzy text categorizer
US7398201B2 (en) 2001-08-14 2008-07-08 Evri Inc. Method and system for enhanced data searching
US7809710B2 (en) * 2001-08-14 2010-10-05 Quigo Technologies Llc System and method for extracting content for submission to a search engine
US7197449B2 (en) 2001-10-30 2007-03-27 Intel Corporation Method for extracting name entities and jargon terms using a suffix tree data structure
JP3931214B2 (en) 2001-12-17 2007-06-13 日本アイ・ビー・エム株式会社 Data analysis apparatus and program
US6965900B2 (en) 2001-12-19 2005-11-15 X-Labs Holdings, Llc Method and apparatus for electronically extracting application specific multidimensional information from documents selected from a set of documents electronically extracted from a library of electronically searchable documents
US7096231B2 (en) * 2001-12-28 2006-08-22 American Management Systems, Inc. Export engine which builds relational database directly from object model
US7209906B2 (en) 2002-01-14 2007-04-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for implementing a metrics engine for tracking relationships over time
US7398461B1 (en) 2002-01-24 2008-07-08 Overture Services, Inc. Method for ranking web page search results
CA2475319A1 (en) * 2002-02-04 2003-08-14 Cataphora, Inc. A method and apparatus to visually present discussions for data mining purposes
US20030149567A1 (en) * 2002-02-04 2003-08-07 Tony Schmitz Method and system for using natural language in computer resource utilization analysis via a communications network
US20030154071A1 (en) 2002-02-11 2003-08-14 Shreve Gregory M. Process for the document management and computer-assisted translation of documents utilizing document corpora constructed by intelligent agents
JP4098539B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2008-06-11 富士通株式会社 Recommendation method of profile information, program and apparatus
JP3896014B2 (en) 2002-03-22 2007-03-22 株式会社東芝 Information collecting system, information collection method, and program for executing the information collected in the computer
US7418736B2 (en) 2002-03-27 2008-08-26 British Telecommunications Plc Network security system
US6857053B2 (en) 2002-04-10 2005-02-15 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for backing up objects by creating groups of objects
US7171350B2 (en) 2002-05-03 2007-01-30 Industrial Technology Research Institute Method for named-entity recognition and verification
US6963880B1 (en) 2002-05-10 2005-11-08 Oracle International Corporation Schema evolution of complex objects
US20040015481A1 (en) 2002-05-23 2004-01-22 Kenneth Zinda Patent data mining
US7003522B1 (en) 2002-06-24 2006-02-21 Microsoft Corporation System and method for incorporating smart tags in online content
US20040117188A1 (en) 2002-07-03 2004-06-17 Daniel Kiecza Speech based personal information manager
US20040064447A1 (en) 2002-09-27 2004-04-01 Simske Steven J. System and method for management of synonymic searching
US20040167908A1 (en) * 2002-12-06 2004-08-26 Attensity Corporation Integration of structured data with free text for data mining
US7277879B2 (en) 2002-12-17 2007-10-02 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Concept navigation in data storage systems
US7472182B1 (en) 2002-12-31 2008-12-30 Emc Corporation Data collection policy for storage devices
US7421660B2 (en) * 2003-02-04 2008-09-02 Cataphora, Inc. Method and apparatus to visually present discussions for data mining purposes
US8589373B2 (en) 2003-09-14 2013-11-19 Yaron Mayer System and method for improved searching on the internet or similar networks and especially improved MetaNews and/or improved automatically generated newspapers
WO2004092881A3 (en) * 2003-04-07 2007-05-10 Sevenecho Llc Method, system and software for digital media narrative personalization
US7747571B2 (en) 2003-04-15 2010-06-29 At&T Intellectual Property, I,L.P. Methods, systems, and computer program products for implementing logical and physical data models
EP1477892B1 (en) 2003-05-16 2015-12-23 Sap Se System, method, computer program product and article of manufacture for inputting data in a computer system
US20040243552A1 (en) * 2003-05-30 2004-12-02 Dictaphone Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for viewing data
US8095544B2 (en) 2003-05-30 2012-01-10 Dictaphone Corporation Method, system, and apparatus for validation
JP2004362223A (en) 2003-06-04 2004-12-24 Hitachi Ltd Information mining system
US7836391B2 (en) 2003-06-10 2010-11-16 Google Inc. Document search engine including highlighting of confident results
US9026901B2 (en) 2003-06-20 2015-05-05 International Business Machines Corporation Viewing annotations across multiple applications
US7162473B2 (en) 2003-06-26 2007-01-09 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for usage analyzer that determines user accessed sources, indexes data subsets, and associated metadata, processing implicit queries based on potential interest to users
US7739588B2 (en) 2003-06-27 2010-06-15 Microsoft Corporation Leveraging markup language data for semantically labeling text strings and data and for providing actions based on semantically labeled text strings and data
US7761480B2 (en) 2003-07-22 2010-07-20 Kinor Technologies Inc. Information access using ontologies
WO2005010727A3 (en) * 2003-07-23 2005-06-09 Elliot I Bricker Extracting data from semi-structured text documents
CA2536265C (en) 2003-08-21 2012-11-13 Idilia Inc. System and method for processing a query
US20050055365A1 (en) 2003-09-09 2005-03-10 I.V. Ramakrishnan Scalable data extraction techniques for transforming electronic documents into queriable archives
US7644076B1 (en) 2003-09-12 2010-01-05 Teradata Us, Inc. Clustering strings using N-grams
US8086690B1 (en) 2003-09-22 2011-12-27 Google Inc. Determining geographical relevance of web documents
JP4729844B2 (en) * 2003-10-16 2011-07-20 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Server device, a method of providing information, and program
US20050144241A1 (en) 2003-10-17 2005-06-30 Stata Raymond P. Systems and methods for a search-based email client
GB0325626D0 (en) 2003-11-03 2003-12-10 Infoshare Ltd Data aggregation
US20050138007A1 (en) 2003-12-22 2005-06-23 International Business Machines Corporation Document enhancement method
US8150824B2 (en) * 2003-12-31 2012-04-03 Google Inc. Systems and methods for direct navigation to specific portion of target document
US20050149851A1 (en) * 2003-12-31 2005-07-07 Google Inc. Generating hyperlinks and anchor text in HTML and non-HTML documents
US7499913B2 (en) 2004-01-26 2009-03-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method for handling anchor text
US7424467B2 (en) * 2004-01-26 2008-09-09 International Business Machines Corporation Architecture for an indexer with fixed width sort and variable width sort
RU2006133549A (en) 2004-02-20 2008-05-20 ДАУ ДЖОУНС РЕЙТЕРЗ БИЗНЕС ИНТЕРЭКТИВ, Эл Эл Си (US) The system and method of intelligent search and retrieval
US7756823B2 (en) 2004-03-26 2010-07-13 Lockheed Martin Corporation Dynamic reference repository
US7725498B2 (en) * 2004-04-22 2010-05-25 International Business Machines Corporation Techniques for identifying mergeable data
US7260573B1 (en) 2004-05-17 2007-08-21 Google Inc. Personalizing anchor text scores in a search engine
US20050278314A1 (en) 2004-06-09 2005-12-15 Paul Buchheit Variable length snippet generation
US7716225B1 (en) 2004-06-17 2010-05-11 Google Inc. Ranking documents based on user behavior and/or feature data
US7454430B1 (en) 2004-06-18 2008-11-18 Glenbrook Networks System and method for facts extraction and domain knowledge repository creation from unstructured and semi-structured documents
US20060041375A1 (en) 2004-08-19 2006-02-23 Geographic Data Technology, Inc. Automated georeferencing of digitized map images
US7809695B2 (en) 2004-08-23 2010-10-05 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Information retrieval systems with duplicate document detection and presentation functions
US20060047691A1 (en) 2004-08-31 2006-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Creating a document index from a flex- and Yacc-generated named entity recognizer
US20060053171A1 (en) 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for curating one or more multi-relational ontologies
US20060053175A1 (en) 2004-09-03 2006-03-09 Biowisdom Limited System and method for creating, editing, and utilizing one or more rules for multi-relational ontology creation and maintenance
JP4587756B2 (en) 2004-09-21 2010-11-24 ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 The semiconductor integrated circuit device
US9137115B2 (en) 2004-12-06 2015-09-15 Bmc Software, Inc. System and method for resource reconciliation in an enterprise management system
US20060167991A1 (en) 2004-12-16 2006-07-27 Heikes Brian D Buddy list filtering
US20060143227A1 (en) 2004-12-27 2006-06-29 Helm Martin W System and method for persisting software objects
US8719779B2 (en) 2004-12-28 2014-05-06 Sap Ag Data object association based on graph theory techniques
US20060149800A1 (en) 2004-12-30 2006-07-06 Daniel Egnor Authoritative document identification
US7685136B2 (en) * 2005-01-12 2010-03-23 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program product for managing document summary information
US7953720B1 (en) 2005-03-31 2011-05-31 Google Inc. Selecting the best answer to a fact query from among a set of potential answers
US7587387B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2009-09-08 Google Inc. User interface for facts query engine with snippets from information sources that include query terms and answer terms
US20060238919A1 (en) 2005-04-20 2006-10-26 The Boeing Company Adaptive data cleaning
US20060248456A1 (en) 2005-05-02 2006-11-02 Ibm Corporation Assigning a publication date for at least one electronic document
US20060259462A1 (en) * 2005-05-12 2006-11-16 Sybase, Inc. System and Methodology for Real-time Content Aggregation and Syndication
US7590647B2 (en) 2005-05-27 2009-09-15 Rage Frameworks, Inc Method for extracting, interpreting and standardizing tabular data from unstructured documents
US20060277169A1 (en) 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Lunt Tracy T Using the quantity of electronically readable text to generate a derivative attribute for an electronic file
CA2545232A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2007-01-29 Cognos Incorporated Method and system for creating a taxonomy from business-oriented metadata content
US7797282B1 (en) 2005-09-29 2010-09-14 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for modifying a training set
KR100755678B1 (en) 2005-10-28 2007-09-05 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method for detecting named entity
US7532979B2 (en) 2005-11-10 2009-05-12 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. Method and system for creating universal location referencing objects
US7555471B2 (en) 2006-01-27 2009-06-30 Google Inc. Data object visualization
US7991797B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2011-08-02 Google Inc. ID persistence through normalization
US8954426B2 (en) * 2006-02-17 2015-02-10 Google Inc. Query language
US7454398B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2008-11-18 Google Inc. Support for object search
US7774328B2 (en) * 2006-02-17 2010-08-10 Google Inc. Browseable fact repository
US8260785B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2012-09-04 Google Inc. Automatic object reference identification and linking in a browseable fact repository
US8700568B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2014-04-15 Google Inc. Entity normalization via name normalization
US8712192B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2014-04-29 Microsoft Corporation Geo-coding images
US7685201B2 (en) 2006-09-08 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Person disambiguation using name entity extraction-based clustering
US8458207B2 (en) 2006-09-15 2013-06-04 Microsoft Corporation Using anchor text to provide context
US8122026B1 (en) 2006-10-20 2012-02-21 Google Inc. Finding and disambiguating references to entities on web pages
US7698336B2 (en) 2006-10-26 2010-04-13 Microsoft Corporation Associating geographic-related information with objects
US7917154B2 (en) 2006-11-01 2011-03-29 Yahoo! Inc. Determining mobile content for a social network based on location and time
US8108501B2 (en) 2006-11-01 2012-01-31 Yahoo! Inc. Searching and route mapping based on a social network, location, and time
US8347202B1 (en) 2007-03-14 2013-01-01 Google Inc. Determining geographic locations for place names in a fact repository
US8316007B2 (en) 2007-06-28 2012-11-20 Oracle International Corporation Automatically finding acronyms and synonyms in a corpus
US8812435B1 (en) 2007-11-16 2014-08-19 Google Inc. Learning objects and facts from documents
US8024281B2 (en) 2008-02-29 2011-09-20 Red Hat, Inc. Alpha node hashing in a rule engine

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5010478A (en) * 1986-04-11 1991-04-23 Deran Roger L Entity-attribute value database system with inverse attribute for selectively relating two different entities
US5133075A (en) * 1988-12-19 1992-07-21 Hewlett-Packard Company Method of monitoring changes in attribute values of object in an object-oriented database
US5519608A (en) * 1993-06-24 1996-05-21 Xerox Corporation Method for extracting from a text corpus answers to questions stated in natural language by using linguistic analysis and hypothesis generation
US6064952A (en) * 1994-11-18 2000-05-16 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Information abstracting method, information abstracting apparatus, and weighting method
US5717911A (en) * 1995-01-23 1998-02-10 Tandem Computers, Inc. Relational database system and method with high availability compliation of SQL programs
US5717951A (en) * 1995-08-07 1998-02-10 Yabumoto; Kan W. Method for storing and retrieving information on a magnetic storage medium via data blocks of variable sizes
US5778378A (en) * 1996-04-30 1998-07-07 International Business Machines Corporation Object oriented information retrieval framework mechanism
US6052693A (en) * 1996-07-02 2000-04-18 Harlequin Group Plc System for assembling large databases through information extracted from text sources
US5778373A (en) * 1996-07-15 1998-07-07 At&T Corp Integration of an information server database schema by generating a translation map from exemplary files
US5787413A (en) * 1996-07-29 1998-07-28 International Business Machines Corporation C++ classes for a digital library
US6038560A (en) * 1997-05-21 2000-03-14 Oracle Corporation Concept knowledge base search and retrieval system
US6202065B1 (en) * 1997-07-02 2001-03-13 Travelocity.Com Lp Information search and retrieval with geographical coordinates
US6073130A (en) * 1997-09-23 2000-06-06 At&T Corp. Method for improving the results of a search in a structured database
US6904429B2 (en) * 1997-09-29 2005-06-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Information retrieval apparatus and information retrieval method
US20020013841A1 (en) * 1997-11-20 2002-01-31 Limor Schweitzer System, method and computer program product for reporting in a network-based filtering and aggregating platform
US6349275B1 (en) * 1997-11-24 2002-02-19 International Business Machines Corporation Multiple concurrent language support system for electronic catalogue using a concept based knowledge representation
US6212526B1 (en) * 1997-12-02 2001-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Method for apparatus for efficient mining of classification models from databases
US6044366A (en) * 1998-03-16 2000-03-28 Microsoft Corporation Use of the UNPIVOT relational operator in the efficient gathering of sufficient statistics for data mining
US6567846B1 (en) * 1998-05-15 2003-05-20 E.Piphany, Inc. Extensible user interface for a distributed messaging framework in a computer network
US6240546B1 (en) * 1998-07-24 2001-05-29 International Business Machines Corporation Identifying date fields for runtime year 2000 system solution process, method and article of manufacture
US6704726B1 (en) * 1998-12-28 2004-03-09 Amouroux Remy Query processing method
US6572661B1 (en) * 1999-01-11 2003-06-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for automated annotation of files
US6377943B1 (en) * 1999-01-20 2002-04-23 Oracle Corp. Initial ordering of tables for database queries
US7003719B1 (en) * 1999-01-25 2006-02-21 West Publishing Company, Dba West Group System, method, and software for inserting hyperlinks into documents
US20030120675A1 (en) * 1999-03-03 2003-06-26 Siebel Systems, Inc. Application instantiation based upon attributes and values stored in a meta data repository, including tiering of application layers, objects, and components
US6584464B1 (en) * 1999-03-19 2003-06-24 Ask Jeeves, Inc. Grammar template query system
US20040107125A1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2004-06-03 Accenture Llp Business alliance identification in a web architecture
US20040024739A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2004-02-05 Kanisa Inc. System and method for implementing a knowledge management system
US6438543B1 (en) * 1999-06-17 2002-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for cross-document coreference
US6873982B1 (en) * 1999-07-16 2005-03-29 International Business Machines Corporation Ordering of database search results based on user feedback
US7007228B1 (en) * 1999-07-29 2006-02-28 International Business Machines Corporation Encoding geographic coordinates in a fuzzy geographic address
US6519631B1 (en) * 1999-08-13 2003-02-11 Atomica Corporation Web-based information retrieval
US6845354B1 (en) * 1999-09-09 2005-01-18 Institute For Information Industry Information retrieval system with a neuro-fuzzy structure
US6754873B1 (en) * 1999-09-20 2004-06-22 Google Inc. Techniques for finding related hyperlinked documents using link-based analysis
US6850896B1 (en) * 1999-10-28 2005-02-01 Market-Touch Corporation Method and system for managing and providing sales data using world wide web
US7181471B1 (en) * 1999-11-01 2007-02-20 Fujitsu Limited Fact data unifying method and apparatus
US20020038307A1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2002-03-28 Zoran Obradovic Systems and methods for knowledge discovery in spatial data
US6567936B1 (en) * 2000-02-08 2003-05-20 Microsoft Corporation Data clustering using error-tolerant frequent item sets
US6886005B2 (en) * 2000-02-17 2005-04-26 E-Numerate Solutions, Inc. RDL search engine
US20020073115A1 (en) * 2000-02-17 2002-06-13 Davis Russell T. RDL search engine
US6901403B1 (en) * 2000-03-02 2005-05-31 Quovadx, Inc. XML presentation of general-purpose data sources
US6738767B1 (en) * 2000-03-20 2004-05-18 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for discovering schematic structure in hypertext documents
US20020065845A1 (en) * 2000-05-17 2002-05-30 Eiichi Naito Information retrieval system
US20030097357A1 (en) * 2000-05-18 2003-05-22 Ferrari Adam J. System and method for manipulating content in a hierarchical data-driven search and navigation system
US20020083039A1 (en) * 2000-05-18 2002-06-27 Ferrari Adam J. Hierarchical data-driven search and navigation system and method for information retrieval
US20020042707A1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-04-11 Gang Zhao Grammar-packaged parsing
US7162499B2 (en) * 2000-06-21 2007-01-09 Microsoft Corporation Linked value replication
US7003506B1 (en) * 2000-06-23 2006-02-21 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for creating an embedded search link document
US7493308B1 (en) * 2000-10-03 2009-02-17 A9.Com, Inc. Searching documents using a dimensional database
US7013308B1 (en) * 2000-11-28 2006-03-14 Semscript Ltd. Knowledge storage and retrieval system and method
US6693651B2 (en) * 2001-02-07 2004-02-17 International Business Machines Corporation Customer self service iconic interface for resource search results display and selection
US7216073B2 (en) * 2001-03-13 2007-05-08 Intelligate, Ltd. Dynamic natural language understanding
US20030018652A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2003-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Apparatus and accompanying methods for visualizing clusters of data and hierarchical cluster classifications
US7020662B2 (en) * 2001-05-29 2006-03-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for determining a directory entry's class of service based on the value of a specifier in the entry
US20070038610A1 (en) * 2001-06-22 2007-02-15 Nosa Omoigui System and method for knowledge retrieval, management, delivery and presentation
US7003552B2 (en) * 2001-06-25 2006-02-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Information processing apparatus and control method therefor
US20070016890A1 (en) * 2001-08-31 2007-01-18 Stephan Brunner Configurator using structure to provide a user interface
US20030058706A1 (en) * 2001-09-17 2003-03-27 Hiroyuki Okamoto Tree system diagram output method, computer program and recording medium
US20030069880A1 (en) * 2001-09-24 2003-04-10 Ask Jeeves, Inc. Natural language query processing
US20030078902A1 (en) * 2001-10-22 2003-04-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method, system, and program for maintaining a database of data objects
US7376895B2 (en) * 2001-11-09 2008-05-20 Wuxi Evermore Software, Inc. Data object oriented repository system
US7174504B2 (en) * 2001-11-09 2007-02-06 Wuxi Evermore Software, Inc. Integrated data processing system with links
US7325160B2 (en) * 2001-11-09 2008-01-29 Wuxi Evermore Software, Inc. Data processing system with data recovery
US7165024B2 (en) * 2002-02-22 2007-01-16 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Inferring hierarchical descriptions of a set of documents
US7043521B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2006-05-09 Rockwell Electronic Commerce Technologies, Llc Search agent for searching the internet
US20040003067A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Daniel Ferrin System and method for enabling a user interface with GUI meta data
US7363312B2 (en) * 2002-07-04 2008-04-22 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Combining data descriptions
US20060074824A1 (en) * 2002-08-22 2006-04-06 Jinyan Li Prediction by collective likelihood from emerging patterns
US20040059726A1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2004-03-25 Jeff Hunter Context-sensitive wordless search
US6886010B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2005-04-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery
US20040088292A1 (en) * 2002-10-31 2004-05-06 International Business Machines Corporation Global query correlation attributes
US20040122844A1 (en) * 2002-12-18 2004-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for use of metadata to create multidimensional cubes in a relational database
US20040122846A1 (en) * 2002-12-19 2004-06-24 Ibm Corporation Fact verification system
US20040123240A1 (en) * 2002-12-20 2004-06-24 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic completion of dates
US7194380B2 (en) * 2003-02-28 2007-03-20 Chordiant Software Europe Limited Classification using probability estimate re-sampling
US20060123046A1 (en) * 2003-03-07 2006-06-08 Microsoft Corporation System and method for unknown type serialization
US7051023B2 (en) * 2003-04-04 2006-05-23 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and methods for generating concept units from search queries
US20050076012A1 (en) * 2003-09-23 2005-04-07 Udi Manber Personalized searchable library with highlighting capabilities
US7158980B2 (en) * 2003-10-02 2007-01-02 Acer Incorporated Method and apparatus for computerized extracting of scheduling information from a natural language e-mail
US20070073768A1 (en) * 2003-10-15 2007-03-29 Goradia Gautam D Interactive system for building and sharing one's own databank of wisdom bytes, such as words of wisdom, basic truths and/or facts and and feats, in one or more languages
US20050086222A1 (en) * 2003-10-16 2005-04-21 Wang Ji H. Semi-automatic construction method for knowledge base of encyclopedia question answering system
US20050108630A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2005-05-19 Wasson Mark D. Extraction of facts from text
US20050125311A1 (en) * 2003-12-05 2005-06-09 Ghassan Chidiac System and method for automated part-number mapping
US20060047838A1 (en) * 2004-06-25 2006-03-02 Abhishek Chauhan Inferring server state in a stateless communication protocol
US20060036504A1 (en) * 2004-08-11 2006-02-16 Allocca William W Dynamically classifying items for international delivery
US20060074910A1 (en) * 2004-09-17 2006-04-06 Become, Inc. Systems and methods of retrieving topic specific information
US20060064411A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-23 William Gross Search engine using user intent
US20060085465A1 (en) * 2004-10-15 2006-04-20 Oracle International Corporation Method(s) for updating database object metadata
US20060112110A1 (en) * 2004-11-23 2006-05-25 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for automating data normalization using text analytics
US20070143282A1 (en) * 2005-03-31 2007-06-21 Betz Jonathan T Anchor text summarization for corroboration
US20070150800A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2007-06-28 Betz Jonathan T Unsupervised extraction of facts
US20070005639A1 (en) * 2005-06-29 2007-01-04 Xerox Corporation Categorization including dependencies between different category systems
US20070005593A1 (en) * 2005-06-30 2007-01-04 Microsoft Corporation Attribute-based data retrieval and association
US20070055656A1 (en) * 2005-08-01 2007-03-08 Semscript Ltd. Knowledge repository
US7493317B2 (en) * 2005-10-20 2009-02-17 Omniture, Inc. Result-based triggering for presentation of online content
US20070094246A1 (en) * 2005-10-25 2007-04-26 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for searching dates efficiently in a collection of web documents
US20070130123A1 (en) * 2005-12-02 2007-06-07 Microsoft Corporation Content matching
US7672971B2 (en) * 2006-02-17 2010-03-02 Google Inc. Modular architecture for entity normalization
US20090119255A1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2009-05-07 Metacarta, Inc. Methods of Systems Using Geographic Meta-Metadata in Information Retrieval and Document Displays

Cited By (47)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9208229B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2015-12-08 Google Inc. Anchor text summarization for corroboration
US8650175B2 (en) 2005-03-31 2014-02-11 Google Inc. User interface for facts query engine with snippets from information sources that include query terms and answer terms
US8682913B1 (en) 2005-03-31 2014-03-25 Google Inc. Corroborating facts extracted from multiple sources
US8996470B1 (en) 2005-05-31 2015-03-31 Google Inc. System for ensuring the internal consistency of a fact repository
US8719260B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2014-05-06 Google Inc. Identifying the unifying subject of a set of facts
US8078573B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2011-12-13 Google Inc. Identifying the unifying subject of a set of facts
US20110047153A1 (en) * 2005-05-31 2011-02-24 Betz Jonathan T Identifying the Unifying Subject of a Set of Facts
US9558186B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2017-01-31 Google Inc. Unsupervised extraction of facts
US8825471B2 (en) 2005-05-31 2014-09-02 Google Inc. Unsupervised extraction of facts
US9092495B2 (en) 2006-01-27 2015-07-28 Google Inc. Automatic object reference identification and linking in a browseable fact repository
US20070198597A1 (en) * 2006-02-17 2007-08-23 Betz Jonathan T Attribute entropy as a signal in object normalization
US7991797B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2011-08-02 Google Inc. ID persistence through normalization
US9710549B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2017-07-18 Google Inc. Entity normalization via name normalization
US8700568B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2014-04-15 Google Inc. Entity normalization via name normalization
US8682891B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2014-03-25 Google Inc. Automatic object reference identification and linking in a browseable fact repository
US8244689B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2012-08-14 Google Inc. Attribute entropy as a signal in object normalization
US8260785B2 (en) 2006-02-17 2012-09-04 Google Inc. Automatic object reference identification and linking in a browseable fact repository
US20070198600A1 (en) * 2006-02-17 2007-08-23 Betz Jonathan T Entity normalization via name normalization
US8751498B2 (en) 2006-10-20 2014-06-10 Google Inc. Finding and disambiguating references to entities on web pages
US8122026B1 (en) 2006-10-20 2012-02-21 Google Inc. Finding and disambiguating references to entities on web pages
US9760570B2 (en) 2006-10-20 2017-09-12 Google Inc. Finding and disambiguating references to entities on web pages
US8347202B1 (en) 2007-03-14 2013-01-01 Google Inc. Determining geographic locations for place names in a fact repository
US9892132B2 (en) 2007-03-14 2018-02-13 Google Llc Determining geographic locations for place names in a fact repository
US7739212B1 (en) * 2007-03-28 2010-06-15 Google Inc. System and method for updating facts in a fact repository
US8239350B1 (en) 2007-05-08 2012-08-07 Google Inc. Date ambiguity resolution
US7761473B2 (en) * 2007-05-18 2010-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Typed relationships between items
US20080288487A1 (en) * 2007-05-18 2008-11-20 Microsoft Corporation Typed Relationships between Items
US7966291B1 (en) 2007-06-26 2011-06-21 Google Inc. Fact-based object merging
US7970766B1 (en) * 2007-07-23 2011-06-28 Google Inc. Entity type assignment
US8738643B1 (en) 2007-08-02 2014-05-27 Google Inc. Learning synonymous object names from anchor texts
US8812435B1 (en) * 2007-11-16 2014-08-19 Google Inc. Learning objects and facts from documents
US20090307183A1 (en) * 2008-06-10 2009-12-10 Eric Arno Vigen System and Method for Transmission of Communications by Unique Definition Identifiers
US8645391B1 (en) 2008-07-03 2014-02-04 Google Inc. Attribute-value extraction from structured documents
US9286271B2 (en) 2010-05-26 2016-03-15 Google Inc. Providing an electronic document collection
US9292479B2 (en) 2010-05-26 2016-03-22 Google Inc. Providing an electronic document collection
US8775400B2 (en) * 2010-06-30 2014-07-08 Microsoft Corporation Extracting facts from social network messages
US20120005221A1 (en) * 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 Microsoft Corporation Extracting facts from social network messages
US9542374B1 (en) 2012-01-20 2017-01-10 Google Inc. Method and apparatus for applying revision specific electronic signatures to an electronically stored document
US9870554B1 (en) 2012-10-23 2018-01-16 Google Inc. Managing documents based on a user's calendar
US9529916B1 (en) 2012-10-30 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Managing documents based on access context
US9384285B1 (en) 2012-12-18 2016-07-05 Google Inc. Methods for identifying related documents
US9495341B1 (en) 2012-12-18 2016-11-15 Google Inc. Fact correction and completion during document drafting
US9514113B1 (en) 2013-07-29 2016-12-06 Google Inc. Methods for automatic footnote generation
US9842113B1 (en) 2013-08-27 2017-12-12 Google Inc. Context-based file selection
US9529791B1 (en) 2013-12-12 2016-12-27 Google Inc. Template and content aware document and template editing
US9703763B1 (en) 2014-08-14 2017-07-11 Google Inc. Automatic document citations by utilizing copied content for candidate sources
US9594554B2 (en) * 2015-07-30 2017-03-14 International Buisness Machines Corporation Extraction and transformation of executable online documentation

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
WO2006132793A3 (en) 2007-02-08 application
US9558186B2 (en) 2017-01-31 grant
EP1891557A2 (en) 2008-02-27 application
WO2006132793A2 (en) 2006-12-14 application
US7769579B2 (en) 2010-08-03 grant
US20070150800A1 (en) 2007-06-28 application
US8825471B2 (en) 2014-09-02 grant
CA2610208C (en) 2012-07-10 grant
US20060293879A1 (en) 2006-12-28 application
CN101253498B (en) 2010-12-08 grant
US20140372473A1 (en) 2014-12-18 application
CA2610208A1 (en) 2006-12-14 application
CN101253498A (en) 2008-08-27 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Dill et al. A case for automated large-scale semantic annotation
US7062507B2 (en) Indexing profile for efficient and scalable XML based publish and subscribe system
US7346629B2 (en) Systems and methods for search processing using superunits
US7092936B1 (en) System and method for search and recommendation based on usage mining
US7779002B1 (en) Detecting query-specific duplicate documents
US8122016B1 (en) Determining concepts associated with a query
US7636714B1 (en) Determining query term synonyms within query context
US7139977B1 (en) System and method for producing a virtual online book
US6505191B1 (en) Distributed computer database system and method employing hypertext linkage analysis
US6182066B1 (en) Category processing of query topics and electronic document content topics
US8977953B1 (en) Customizing information by combining pair of annotations from at least two different documents
US6944612B2 (en) Structured contextual clustering method and system in a federated search engine
Bar‐Ilan The use of Web search engines in information science research
US20060074980A1 (en) System for semantically disambiguating text information
US20070043761A1 (en) Semantic discovery engine
US20030033333A1 (en) Hot topic extraction apparatus and method, storage medium therefor
US20060026113A1 (en) Information nervous system
US6539376B1 (en) System and method for the automatic mining of new relationships
US20070250501A1 (en) Search result delivery engine
US20110047159A1 (en) System, method, and apparatus for multidimensional exploration of content items in a content store
Hotho et al. Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking
US6678681B1 (en) Information extraction from a database
US6651059B1 (en) System and method for the automatic recognition of relevant terms by mining link annotations
US20060047649A1 (en) Internet and computer information retrieval and mining with intelligent conceptual filtering, visualization and automation
US7454430B1 (en) System and method for facts extraction and domain knowledge repository creation from unstructured and semi-structured documents

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: GOOGLE INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOGUE, ANDREW;BETZ, JONATHAN;REEL/FRAME:017827/0428

Effective date: 20060601

AS Assignment

Owner name: GOOGLE LLC, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:GOOGLE INC.;REEL/FRAME:044142/0357

Effective date: 20170929