BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
- INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE OF SEQUENCE LISTING SUBMITTED ON A COMPACT DISC
This application claims the priority of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/714,779, filed Sep. 7, 2005; and U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/722,493, filed Sep. 30, 2005; each of the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The Sequence Listing is submitted on one compact disc (Copy 1), together with a duplicate thereof (Copy 2), each created on Sep. 7, 2006, and each containing one—79 kb file entitled “MSUT015U.S.APP.TXT.” The material contained on the compact disc is specifically incorporated herein by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of plant breeding and molecular biology. In particular, the invention relates to agronomically elite soybean varieties with increased beta-conglycinin content and materials for making such plants.
2. Description of Related Art
Glycinin and β-Conglycinin are two major storage proteins in soybeans, accounting for approximately 70% of total proteins or 40% of total seed weight. The glycinin (11s globulin) is composed of five different subunits, designated A1aB2, A2B1a, A1bB1b, A5A4B3. A3B4, respectively. Each subunit is composed of two polypeptides, one acidic and one basic, covalently linked through a disulfide bond. The two polypeptide chains result from post-translational cleavage of proglycinin precursors, a step that occurs after the precursor enters the protein bodies (Chrispeels et al., 1982). Five major genes have been identified to encode these polypeptide subunits. They are designated as Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4 and Gy5, respectively (Nielsen et al., 1997). In addition, a pseudogene, gy6, and minor gene, Gy7, were also reported (Beilinson et al., 2002). Genetic mapping of these genes has been reported by various groups (Diers et al., 1993, Chen and Shoemaker 1998, Beilinson et al., 2002). Gy1 and Gy2 were located 3 kb apart and mapped to linkage group N (Nielsen et al., 1989), Gy3 was mapped to linkage group L (Beilinson et al., 2002). Gy4 and Gy5 were mapped to linkage groups O and F, respectively. All of these genes were mapped using RFLP probes on Southern Blots.
β-conglycinin, on the other hand, is composed of a (˜67 kda), α′ (˜71 kDa) and β (˜50 kDa) subunits and each subunit is processed by co- and post-translational modifications (Ladin et al., 1987; Utsumi, 1992). The β-conglycinin subunits are encoded by the genes Cgy1, Cgy2 and Cgy3, respectively. Genetic analysis indicated that Cgy2 is tightly linked to Cgy3, whereas Cgy1 segregates independently of the other two. The β-conglycinin gene family contains at least 15 members divided into two major groups, which encode the 2.5 kb and 1.7 kb embryo mRNA, respectively (Harada et al., 1989).
Soybean plants with increased β-conglycinin levels and decreased glycinin levels would provide substantial benefit. One reason for this is that β-conglycinin is a soluble protein whereas glycinin is much less soluble. It has also been found that β-conglycinin, especially the α′ subunit, has significantly higher nutritional value and a positive impact on human health as compared to glycinin (Baba et al., 2004). A number of experiments using animal models have indicated that α′ subunit from soybean β-conglycinin could lower plasma triglycerides, and also increase LDL (“bad” cholesterol) removal from blood (Duranti et al., 2004, Moriyama et al., 2004, Adams et al., 2004, Nishi et al., 2003). Therefore, soybean varieties with an increased β-conglycinin content will have higher value than traditional varieties and will be suitable for use in nutrition drinks and other food products.
Interestingly, mutations in the glycinin genes have a direct impact on β-conglycinin content in soybean seeds. Mutant soybean plants with decreased glycinin content have increased β-conglycinin content. However, since multiple glycinin alleles are involved in glycinin subunit production, breeding plants with reduced expression from multiple Gy subunits has proved difficult since such plants have other attributes, such as low yield, excessive lodging and green seed that render them commercially nonviable. Previous methods for determining the inheritance of mutations resulting in decreased glycinin content did not enable high-throughput techniques required to select for these phenotypes while introducing agronomically superior characteristics. For example, previous assessment of Gy inheritance was dependent upon analysis of protein expression, which is costly, labor intensive and cannot track the inheritance of recessive mutations. The possibility of producing such plants regardless of labor was also unknown, due to additional complications such as linkage drag and epistasis associated with attempts to introgress a mutant Gy allele. The combination of alleles are also unpredictable with respect to the phenotype obtained. Thus, there is a longstanding but unfilled need in the art for agronomically elite soybean plants with reduced expression of multiple Gy protein subunits and methods for production of such plants.
Lipoxygenases are enzymes that catalyze the dioxygenation of polyunsaturated fatty acids. Soybean seeds contain three lipoxygenase isozymes—lipoxygenases 1, 2, and 3. These isozymes contribute to the production of unpleasant flavors in soybean seeds. The unpleasant flavors are absent or less pronounced in seeds deficient in these isozymes, particularly those lacking lipoxygenase-2. Accordingly, soybean seeds lacking one or more lipoxygenase isozymes are desirable for use in making drink and food products. Genetic studies of Lipoxygenase 1, 2, and 3 deficient lines demonstrated that the absence of each was due to single recessive alleles—lx1, lx2, and lx3, respectively. The loci defined by lx1 and lx2 are closely linked and are not genetically linked to lx3 (Kitamura, 1984; Kitamura et al, 1985; Hajika et al., 1992; Hildebrand et al., 1982). The structural genes encoding Lipoxygenases 1, 2, and 3 have been cloned and designated Lox1, Lox2, and Lox3, respectively (Shibata et al., 1987; Shibata et al., 1988; Yenofsky et al., 1988).
- SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Kunitz Trypsin inhibitor (KTI) is an antinutritional and allergenic factor in soybeans that interferes with digestion and absorption of proteins when present in a diet. Thus, soybean varieties with a KTI-null mutant trait have a higher commercial value than traditional varieties. Genetic and biochemical studies of KTI production in soybean lines have been carried out (e.g. de Moraes et al., 2006; Natarajan et al., 2006), and three related genes have been identified, with KTI3 encoding the predominant Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitor Protein in cultivated soybean genotypes (Natarajan et al., 2006). Some specific DNA markers associated with loss of KTI production in certain soybean lines have been reported (de Moraes et al., 2006).
The current invention provides, in one embodiment, a plant of an agronomically elite soybean variety with an increased seed β-conglycinin content, comprising non-transgenic mutations providing a null phenotype of at least two of the glycinin subunits selected from the group consisting of Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4, and Gy5. An increased seed β-conglycinin content may be measured, for example, with respect to a plant of the same genotype as said plant but lacking the mutations. In specific embodiments, the non-transgenic mutations may confer a Gy3, and Gy4 null phenotype and increased seed β-conglycinin content. Thus, the plants of the current invention comprise, in one aspect, seeds with low glycinin content and high β-conglycinin content. In certain embodiments, the seed β-conglycinin content for plants of the invention is about or at least about 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 percent or more of the total protein content. In some embodiments, a plant of the invention has a seed glycinin content of about or less than about 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, or 0 percent of the total protein. In some cases, plants of the invention may comprise a mutant Gy4 allele. For example, a mutant Gy4 allele may comprise a point mutation at nucleotide 682, such that the translation initiation codon is abrogated. In still further embodiments, plants provided by the invention may comprise Gy1 and Gy2 null alleles. In one embodiment of the invention, one or more of any of the Gy1, Gy2, Gy3 and/or Gy4 alleles may be the same as the null alleles in line B2G2, a representative sample of seed of which have been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6893.
In certain embodiments of the invention, soybean plants are provided that further comprise a mutation that confers reduced levels of Gy1/Gy2 protein. As used herein “reduced levels of Gy1/Gy2 protein” means seed from plants comprising the non-transgenic mutation have reduced Gy1/Gy2 protein levels as compared to plants with an identical genetic background that lack the mutation. For example plants comprising a non-transgenic mutation that confers reduced Gy1/Gy2 may have a Gy1/Gy2 protein content of less than about 3.1% of total seed protein. In certain cases, the mutation conferring reduced Gy1/Gy2 protein content may be a non-transgenic mutation. In some aspects of the invention, a plant of the invention comprises a mutant Gy1 allele. For example, the mutant Gy1 allele may comprise a deletion spanning the upstream promoter region, exon I and intron I.
In certain embodiments, a plant of the invention may further comprise mutations conferring reduced Gy5 protein levels. In certain cases, the mutation conferring reduced Gy5 protein content is a non-transgenic mutation. Thus in some aspects, plants of the invention comprise mutations conferring reduced Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4 and Gy5 protein levels. In certain aspects, plants of the invention may comprise non-transgenic mutations conferring a decreased Gy1, Gy2 Gy3, Gy4, and Gy5 phenotype. The seed of these plants may have a glycinin content of about or less than about 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, or 0 percent of the total protein. Thus plants of the invention comprising a decreased Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4 and Gy5 phenotype may comprise seed with a β-conglycinin content of about or at least about 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 percent or greater of the total protein content.
In certain embodiments, a plant of the invention may further comprise mutations conferring a lx1, lx2, and/or lx3 phenotype. In certain cases, the mutation conferring the lx1, lx2, and/or lx3 phenotype is a non-transgenic mutation. Thus in some aspects, plants of the invention comprise mutations conferring a reduced Gy3 and Gy4 phenotype and mutations conferring of one or more of a lx1, lx2, and/or lx3 phenotype. In one embodiment of the invention, such plants may further comprise mutations conferring a reduced Gy1, Gy2 Gy3, and Gy5 phenotype.
Plant parts are also provided by the invention. Parts of a plant of the invention include, but are not limited to, pollen, ovules, meristems, cells, and seed. Cells of the invention may further comprise, regenerable cells, such as embryos meristematic cells, pollen, leaves, roots, root tips, and flowers. Thus, these cells could be used to regenerate plants of the invention.
Also provided herein are parts of the seeds of a plant according to the invention. Thus, crushed seed, and meal or flour made from seed according to the invention is also provided as part of the invention. The invention further comprises, a method for making soy meal or flour comprising crushing or grinding seed according to the invention. Such soy flour or meal according to the invention may comprise genomic material of plants of the invention. In one embodiment, the food may be defined as comprising the genome of such a plant. In further embodiments soy meal or flour of the invention may be defined as comprising increased β-conglycinin and decreased glycinin content, as compared to meal or flour made form seeds of a plant with an identical genetic background, but not comprising the non-transgenic, mutant Gy3 and Gy4 null alleles.
In yet a further aspect of the invention there is provided a method for producing a soybean seed, comprising crossing the plant of the invention with itself or with a second soybean plant. Thus, this method may comprise preparing a hybrid soybean seed by crossing a plant of the invention with a second, distinct, soybean plant.
Still yet another aspect of the invention is a method of producing a food product for human or animal consumption comprising: (a) obtaining a plant of the invention; (b) cultivating the plant to maturity; and (c) preparing a food product from the plant. In certain embodiments of the invention, the food product may be protein concentrate, protein isolate, meal, oil, flour or soybean hulls. In some embodiments, the food product may comprise beverages such as soymilk and other nutritional beverages, infused foods, sauces, condiments, salad dressings, fruit juices, syrups, desserts, icings and fillings, soft frozen products, confections or intermediate foods. Foods produced from the plants of the invention may comprise increased β-conglycinin content and thus be of greater nutritional value foods made with typical soybean varieties. Additionally, plants of the invention comprising decreased glycinin content may be used in food compositions requiring low amounts of insoluble protein.
In further embodiments, a plant of the invention may further comprise a transgene. For example, a plant may comprise transgenes conferring herbicide tolerance, disease resistance, insect and pest resistance, altered fatty acid, protein or carbohydrate metabolism, increased grain yield, altered plant maturity and/or altered morphological characteristics. For example, a herbicide tolerance transgene may comprise a glyphosate resistance gene.
In certain embodiments, a plant of the invention may be defined as prepared by a method wherein a plant comprising non-transgenic mutations conferring a Gy3, and Gy4 null phenotype and increased β-conglycinin content is crossed with a plant comprising agronomically elite characteristics. The progeny of this cross may be assayed for agronomically elite characteristics and Gy3 and Gy4 protein content, and progeny plants selected based on these characteristics, thereby generating the plant of the invention. Thus in certain embodiments, a plant of the invention may be produced by crossing a selected starting variety with a second soybean plant comprising agronomically elite characteristics. In some embodiments, a plant of the invention may be defined as prepared by a method wherein a plant comprising a non-transgenic mutation conferring a lx1, lx2, and/or lx3 phenotype is crossed with a plant comprising reduced Gy3 and Gy4 protein content, and increased β-conglycinin content.
The current invention also provides a method of plant breeding wherein a plant is assayed for the presence of a polymorphism in a soybean plant genomic region associated with Gy1/Gy2 and Gy4 alleles, comprising selecting the plant and crossing the plant with a second soybean plant to produce progeny. In some embodiments, the method of the invention may comprise selecting a progeny plant by assaying the plant for a polymorphism associated with a decreased Gy1/Gy2 or Gy4 phenotype and crossing the plant with a second soybean plant to produce further progeny plants. In certain embodiments of the invention, the second soybean plant may comprise agronomically elite characteristics. The method of the invention may also further comprise selecting a soybean plant comprising the polymorphism and agronomically elite characteristics. Thus, the invention enables the introduction of non-transgenic mutations conferring a Gy1/Gy2 and/or Gy4 phenotype and increased seed β-conglycinin content into agronomically elite soybean plants. A method of the invention may be repeated 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, or more times as desired to select agronomically elite progeny with polymorphisms indicative of non-transgenic mutations at Gy1/Gy2 and/or Gy4 alleles at each step. In certain embodiments of invention, the first soybean plant may be a plant of line B2G2, a representative sample of seed of which have been deposited under ATCC Accession No. PTA-6893. In a further embodiment, a method of the invention may further comprise selecting a plant comprising polymorphisms indicative of a non-transgenic mutation in Gy1/Gy2 and Gy4 alleles.
In some embodiments, a method of the invention may further comprise selecting plants with markers indicative of reduced Gy3 and/or Gy5 content. Thus, methods of marker assisted plant breeding according to the invention may be used to breed soybeans that have reduced Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4, and Gy5 content.
In some embodiments of the current invention, non-transgenic mutations conferring a decreased Gy1, Gy2 or Gy4 phenotype may comprise mutations in Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, or Gy4 alleles. In certain embodiments, the mutant Gy alleles are detected using genetic markers comprising polymorphisms within 50 cM of a Gy allele. In further, aspects of the invention, plants with a decreased Gy1/Gy2 phenotype comprise a mutant Gy1 allele. In some cases, the mutant Gy1 allele comprises a deletion, such as a deletion of the promoter region, exon I and intron I. In other embodiments, mutant Gy1 alleles can be detected using markers NS0199002 or NS0199008. In certain aspects of the invention, mutant Gy1 alleles may be detected with markers of Gy2, since the two genes are closely linked. Thus, in other aspects of the invention, mutant Gy2 alleles may be detected with markers to Gy1. It is shown herein that plants with mutant Gy1,2 alleles also may have a decreased Gy3 phenotype. Thus, in some aspects of the invention, plants comprising a reduced Gy3 phenotype may be selected with markers for Gy1 or Gy2, since these markers have been shown to associate with a reduced Gy3 phenotype in B2G2 derived plants. Therefore, markers of Gy1 or Gy2, for example NS0199002 or NS0199008, may be used to determine the presence of mutant Gy1, Gy2, and Gy3 alleles. In certain embodiments of the invention, phenotypically Gy4 null plants comprise mutant Gy4 alleles. In further embodiments, mutant Gy4 alleles comprise point mutations such as an SNP that abrogates the translation initiation codon. In additional aspects of the invention, the Gy4 null allele may be detected with the NS0199003 marker. SNP markers may be detected, for example using fluorescently labeled oligonucleotides.
In some embodiments, a method of the invention may further comprise selecting plants with markers indicative of reduced lipoxygenase 1, 2, and/or 3 content. Thus, methods of marker assisted plant breeding according to the invention may be used to produce soybeans that have reduced lipoxygenase 1, 2, and/or 3 content.
In particular embodiments of the invention, non-transgenic mutations conferring a lx1, lx2, and/or lx3 phenotype may comprise mutations in Lox1, Lox2, and/or Lox3 alleles. In one embodiment of the invention, the mutant alleles conferring a lx1, lx2, and/or lx3 phenotype are detected using genetic markers comprising polymorphisms within 50 cM of a Lox allele. In certain embodiments, lx1 alleles are detected using one or more of INDEL 178-180, SNP 326, SNP 363, SNP 380, SNP 713, SNP 1196, SNP 1253, SNP 1372, SNP 1388, SNPR 1527, SNP 1554, SNP 2267, SNP 3088, SNP 3125, SNP 3139, INDEL 3832-3905, SNP 4043, SNP 4057, SNP 4193, SNP 4225, SNP 4247, SNP 4267, or SNP 4439 as shown below in Table 14. In some embodiments, lx2 alleles can be detected using one or more of SNP 323, SNP 439, SNP 1390, SNP 1431, SNP 1458, INDEL 2486-87, or SNP 2542 as shown below in Table 15. SNP 2542 is also referred to as the NS0203296 marker.
In some embodiments, a method of the invention may further comprise selecting plants with markers indicative of a KTI-null or KTI-reduced trait. Thus, methods of marker assisted plant breeding according to the invention may be used to produce soybeans that have reduced or undetectable Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitor content.
In certain embodiments of the invention, mutations conferring a KTI-null phenotype may comprise mutations in a gene encoding KTI. In a particular embodiment, mutations conferring a KTI-null phenotype comprise mutations in the KTI3 gene, also termed “KTIA”. In one embodiment of the invention, the mutant alleles conferring a KTI-null phenotype are detected using genetic markers comprising polymorphisms within 50 cM of a KTI allele. In certain embodiments, KTI alleles are detected using one or more INDELs or SNPs located within the KTI3 gene, for instance as shown below in Table 18. Such selection may thus be based on marker information (plant genotype) rather than on enzymatic analysis of Trypsin activity or analysis of KTI content.
Embodiments discussed in the context of a method and/or composition of the invention may be employed with respect to any other method or composition described herein. Thus, an embodiment pertaining to one method or composition may be applied to other methods and compositions of the invention as well.
As used in the specification or claims, “a” or “an” may mean one or more. As used herein in the claim(s), when used in conjunction with the word “comprising”, the words “a” or “an” may mean one or more than one. As used herein “another” may mean at least a second or more.
- BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The following drawings form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the present invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these drawings in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein.
FIG. 1: Protein extracted from the seed of indicated soybean varieties was resolved by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Coomassie staining. The mobility of acidic glycinin subunits encoded by each gene is indicated. Gel resolution was insufficient to separate Gy1 from Gy2 encoded protein subunits.
FIG. 2A-B: Progeny plants comprising mutant Gy1 and Gy2 alleles are distributed in two phenotypic groups based Gy1 and Gy2 encoded protein content of seed. FIG. 2A. Graph shows the number of F2 plants (y axis) compared to the percentage of total protein that is constituted by Gy1 and Gy2 encoded acidic proteins (x axis) FIG. 2B. Data from F2 progeny plants indicates that mutant Gy1 and Gy2 alleles, from B2G2 soybeans, are recessive. The number of progeny plants with Gy1 and Gy2 encoded protein levels in the two classes were subjected to chi square analysis and probability values were determined in each case.
FIG. 3A-B: Progeny of “11S null” plants are distributed into two populations based on the percentage of total protein in the seed that is Gy3. FIG. 3A. Graph shows the number of F2 plants (y axis) compared to the percentage of total protein that is constituted by Gy3 encoded proteins (x axis). FIG. 3B. Data from progeny plants indicates that the mutant Gy3 allele from B2G2 soybeans is recessive. The number of progeny plants with Gy3 encoded protein levels in the two classes were subjected to chi square analysis and probability values were determined in each case.
FIG. 4: The amount of Gy3 encoded protein is positively correlated with the amount of Gy1 and Gy2 encoded protein. FIG. 4A. Graph plots the observed amount of Gy1 and Gy2 encoded acidic protein (x axis) versus the amount of Gy3 encoded protein (y axis). FIG. 4B. Table shows correlation coefficients between the expression levels of the Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4 and Gy5 encoded proteins.
FIG. 5: Progeny of 11S null plants are distributed into two populations based on the percentage of total protein in the seed that is Gy4. FIG. 5A. Graph shows the number of F2 plants (y axis) compared to the percentage of total protein that is constituted by Gy4 encoded acidic protein (x axis). FIG. 5B. Data from progeny plants indicates that the mutant Gy4 allele from B2G2 soybeans is recessive. The number of progeny plants with Gy4 encoded protein levels in the two classes were subjected to chi square analysis and probability values were determined in each case.
FIG. 6A-B: Decreased expression of glycinin in soybean seed correlates with increased expression of β-conglycinin. FIG. 6A. Graph plots the percentage of total protein encoded by Gy alleles (x axis) versus the percentage of total protein encoded by Cgy alleles (y axis). FIG. 6B. Table shows the correlation coefficients between expression of Gy encoded proteins and the expression of Cgy1-4 encoded proteins.
FIG. 7A-B: Genomic Gy markers effectively selected conventional plants that produce seed with high β-conglycinin expression. FIG. 7A. Graph plots total β-conglycinin protein content of seed (y axis) versus total seed glycinin content (x axis). Diamonds indicate plants selected by protein analysis of glycinin subunits. FIG. 7B. Graph is the same as in FIG. 7A, however diamonds indicate plants selected by markers NS0199002, NS0199003, and NS0199008.
FIG. 8: Allelogram for the Taqman assay designed for the SNP at position 2542 (Marker NS0203296). As shown in FIG. 8, this marker allowed a clear distinction between the “A” allele from the lx2 mutant and the “T” allele from wild type as described in Example 13 and Table 15.
- DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 9: Alignment of sequences for Kunitz Trypsin inhibitor showing deletion/insertion in Kunitz null mutant lines.
The present invention provides plants and methods for producing plants comprising non-transgenic mutations that confer a Gy3, and Gy4 null phenotype and agronomically elite characteristics. These mutations confer low glycinin and high β-conglycinin content to seed of mutant plants. Thus, plants of the invention will be of great value as β-conglycinin provides improved nutritional characteristics and solubility as compared to glycinin. Additionally, plants provided herein comprise agronomically elite characteristics, enabling a commercially significant yield of high β-conglycinin, low glycinin, soybeans. In certain aspects of the invention, plants with increased β-conglycinin contents comprise non-transgenic null alleles for Gy3, and/or Gy4 and therefore have the additional advantage of reduced governmental regulation as compared to soybean varieties containing corresponding transgenic alleles at these loci. Also provided are plants that further comprise non-transgenic Gy1 and Gy2 null alleles and also provide such benefits.
The invention also provides plants and methods for producing plants comprising non-transgenic mutations that confer a lipoxygenase-2 null phenotype. The combination of a lipoxygenase-2 null and glycinin null phenotype provides an increased content of the highly functional and healthful β-conglycinin protein. β-conglycinin in particular contains bioactive peptides that are responsible for cholesterol-lowering and weight management (through satiety effects and reduction in fat deposits) benefits.
Another valuable combination in accordance with the invention is a lipoxygenase-2 null and mid-oleic content (e.g., 40-65% oleic). This soybean will produce low levels of off-flavors because it lacks the main catalyst of lipid oxidation (lipoxygenase-2) and has much lower levels of the substrate (linoleic acid). In addition, such soybeans will have an improved (lower) ratio of omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acids, a benefit for cardiovascular health.
Also provided herein is a method for breeding soybean plants that comprise non-transgenic mutations conferring a decreased Gy1, Gy2, Gy3 and Gy4 phenotype and agronomically elite characteristics. Studies detailed below identify polymorphisms that can be used to identify plants with decreased Gy1, Gy2, Gy3 and Gy4 protein content. Three of the markers identified herein, NS0199002, NS0199003, and NS0199008, can be used to accurately predict a decreased Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, and Gy4 phenotype of soybean plants. As demonstrated below, the inheritance of Gy1 and Gy2 is genetically linked, thus markers to either Gy1 (NS0199008) or Gy2 (NS0199002) may be used to track the inheritance of the decreased Gy1 and Gy2 phenotype. Additionally, as shown in FIG. 4 the reduced Gy1,2 phenotype closely correlates with a decreased Gy3 phenotype. Thus, markers to Gy1,2 (such as NS0199008 and NS0199002) may additionally be used to select for the decreased Gy3 phenotype of progeny plants. It is also shown that markers can be used to identify plants that are phenotypically null for Gy4 encoded proteins. For example, the NS0199003 marker was used in studies to accurately determine the Gy4 phenotype of soybean plants. Thus, by use of a Gy1,2,3 marker in combination with a Gy4 genetic marker the invention enables the high throughput screening and marker assisted breeding of plants with non-transgenic mutations conferring a decreased Gy1, Gy2, Gy3 and Gy4 phenotype, and high seed β-conglycinin content. Sequencing studies were also undertaken herein that have identified markers that may be used to determine the inheritance of the decreased Gy5 phenotype and to directly select for a decreased Gy3 phenotype.
- I. PLANTS OF THE INVENTION
Also provided is a method for breeding soybean plants comprising non-transgenic mutations conferring a decreased lipoxygenase-2 phenotype. For example, studies described below identified sequence variations associated with the lipoxygenase-2 null (lx2) phenotype in soybeans. Molecular markers have been developed out of these sequence variations for the lx2 phenotypes. Using these markers associated with lipoxygenase-2 null trait, breeders can make selections based on marker information, or genotypes, rather than on lipoxygenase analysis by SDS-PAGE. Marker data is more cost effective, faster and reliable, enabling one to test greater numbers and identify elite lines with multiple traits (e.g. Lipoxygenase-2 null and glycinin-null).
The invention provides, for the first time, plants and derivatives thereof of soybean varieties that combine non-transgenic mutations conferring a Gy3, and Gy4 null phenotype and increased β-conglycinin content with an agronomically elite phenotype. In some embodiments such plants may further comprise non-transgenic Gy1 and Gy2 null alleles. Such plants may be defined as having a commercially significant yield, for example, that is defined as a yield of at least 103% of the check lines AG2703 and DKB23-51. In certain further embodiments, plants are provided comprising the non-transgenic Gy1-4 mutant alleles and increased beta-conglycinin content and a grain yield of at least about 90%, 94%, 98%, 100%, 105% or about 110% of these lines. Such plants may be defined, in certain embodiments of the invention, as having a yield a yield in excess of about 35, 37, 39, 41, 43 or 45 bushels per acre over at least 10 environments. In certain embodiments, the β-conglycinin content of the seeds of plants of the invention may be greater than about 34%, 35%, 36%, 37%, 38%, 39%, 40%, 41%, 42%, 43%, 44%, 45%, 46%, 47%, 48%, 49%, or even 50% or any range derivable therein. In certain embodiments, the plants of the invention may further comprise mutations conferring a lx1, lx2, and/or lx3 phenotype.
- II. MARKER ASSISTED SELECTION FOR PRODUCTION OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES WITH NON-TRANSGENIC MUTANT GY ALLELES AND AN AGRONOMICALLY ELITE PHENOTYPE
One aspect of the current invention is therefore directed to the aforementioned plants and parts thereof and methods for using these plants and plant parts. Plant parts include, but are not limited to, pollen, an ovule and a cell. The invention further provides tissue cultures of regenerable cells of these plants, which cultures regenerate soybean plants capable of expressing all the physiological and morphological characteristics of the starting variety. Such regenerable cells may include embryos, meristematic cells, pollen, leaves, roots, root tips or flowers, or protoplasts or callus derived therefrom. Also provided by the invention are soybean plants regenerated from such a tissue culture, wherein the plants are capable of expressing all the physiological and morphological characteristics of the starting plant variety from which the regenerable cells were obtained.
The current invention provides genetic markers and methods for the introduction of non-transgenic, mutant Gy alleles into agronomically elite soybean plants. The invention therefore allows, for the first time, the creation of plants that combine these mutant Gy alleles that confer high seed β-conglycinin content with a commercially significant yield and an agronomically elite genetic background. Using the methods of the invention, loci conferring the “11S null” phenotype may be introduced into a desired soybean genetic background, for example, in the production of new varieties with commercially significant yield and high seed β-conglycinin content.
Marker assisted introgression involves the transfer of a chromosome region defined by one or more markers from one germplasm to a second germplasm. The initial step in that process is the localization of the trait by gene mapping, which is the process of determining the position of a gene relative to other genes and genetic markers through linkage analysis. The basic principle for linkage mapping is that the closer together two genes are on the chromosome, the more likely they are to be inherited together. Briefly, a cross is generally made between two genetically compatible but divergent parents relative to traits under study. Genetic markers can then be used to follow the segregation of traits under study in the progeny from the cross, often a backcross (BC1), F2, or recombinant inbred population.
The term quantitative trait loci, or QTL, is used to describe regions of a genome showing quantitative or additive effects upon a phenotype. The Gy loci represent exemplary QTL since multiple mutant Gy alleles result in increasing reduction in total seed glycinin content and important concomitant increases in β-conglycinin content. Herein identified are genetic markers for non-transgenic, mutant Gy alleles that enable breeding of soybean plants comprising the non-transgenic, mutant Gy alleles with agronomically superior plants, and selection of progeny that inherited the mutant Gy alleles. Thus, the invention allows the use of molecular tools to combine these QTLs with desired agronomic characteristics.
Also identified are genetic markers for non-transgenic, mutant lx1 and lx2 alleles that enable the breeding of soybean plants comprising one or both of the non-transgenic, mutant lx1 and lx2 alleles, and selection of progeny that inherited the mutant lx allele or alleles. Soybean plants having reduced lipoxygenase are useful in themselves and are useful in combination with other agronomic characteristics. For example, reduced lipoxygenase and reduced glycinin is a valuable trait combination. Another valuable combination is reduced lipoxygenase and mid-oleic content (e.g., 40-65% oleic). Thus, the invention allows the use of molecular tools to combine lx alleles with, for example, mutant Gy alleles in agronomically superior plants as described above.
A. Development and Use of Linked Genetic Markers
A sample first plant population may be genotyped for an inherited genetic marker to form a genotypic database. As used herein, an “inherited genetic marker” is an allele at a single locus. A locus is a position on a chromosome, and allele refers to conditions of genes; that is, different nucleotide sequences, at those loci. The marker allelic composition of each locus can be either homozygous or heterozygous. In order for information to be gained from a genetic marker in a cross, the marker must be polymorphic; that is, it must exist in different forms so that the chromosome carrying the mutant gene can be distinguished from the chromosome with the normal gene by the form of the marker it also carries.
Formation of a phenotypic database can be accomplished by making direct observations of one or more traits on progeny derived from artificial or natural self-pollination of a sample plant or by quantitatively assessing the combining ability of a sample plant. By way of example, a plant line may be crossed to, or by, one or more testers. Testers can be inbred lines, single, double, or multiple cross hybrids, or any other assemblage of plants produced or maintained by controlled or free mating, or any combination thereof. For some self-pollinating plants, direct evaluation without progeny testing is preferred.
The marker genotypes may be determined in the testcross generation and the marker loci mapped. To map a particular trait by the linkage approach, it is necessary to establish a positive correlation in inheritance of a specific chromosomal locus with the inheritance of the trait. In the case of complex inheritance, such as with quantitative traits, including specifically glycinin content and yield, linkage will generally be much more difficult to discern. In this case, statistical procedures may be needed to establish the correlation between phenotype and genotype. This may further necessitate examination of many offspring from a particular cross, as individual loci may have small contributions to an overall phenotype.
Coinheritance, or genetic linkage, of a particular trait and a marker suggests that they are physically close together on the chromosome. Linkage is determined by analyzing the pattern of inheritance of a gene and a marker in a cross. The unit of genetic map distance is the centimorgan (cM), which increases with increasing recombination. Two markers are one centimorgan apart if they recombine in meiosis about once in every 100 opportunities that they have to do so. The centimorgan is a genetic measure, not a physical one. Those markers located less then 50 cM from a second locus are said to be genetically linked, because they are not inherited independently of one another. Thus, the percent of recombination observed between the loci per generation will be less than 50%. In particular embodiments of the invention, a marker used may be defined as located less than about 45, 35, 25, 15, 10, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 or less cM apart from a locus. In certain embodiments of the invention, markers may be used for detecting polymorphisms within the contributing loci themselves and thus located at 0 cM respective to the loci, for example, comprising a mutation within a Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy3, Gy4, or Gy5 coding sequence or regulatory element.
During meiosis, pairs of homologous chromosomes come together and exchange segments in a process called recombination. The further a marker is from a gene, the more chance there is that there will be recombination between the gene and the marker. In a linkage analysis, the coinheritance of marker and gene or trait are followed in a particular cross. The probability that their observed inheritance pattern could occur by chance alone, i.e., that they are completely unlinked, is calculated. The calculation is then repeated assuming a particular degree of linkage, and the ratio of the two probabilities (no linkage versus a specified degree of linkage) is determined. This ratio expresses the odds for (and against) that degree of linkage, and because the logarithm of the ratio is used, it is known as the logarithm of the odds, e.g. an lod score. A lod score equal to or greater than 3, for example, is taken to confirm that gene and marker are linked. This represents 1000:1 odds that the two loci are linked. Calculations of linkage is greatly facilitated by use of statistical analysis employing programs.
The genetic linkage of marker molecules can be established by a gene mapping model such as, without limitation, the flanking marker model reported by Lander and Botstein (1989), and the interval mapping, based on maximum likelihood methods described by Lander and Botstein (1989), and implemented in the software package MAPMAKER/QTL. Additional software includes Qgene, Version 2.23 (1996) (Department of Plant Breeding and Biometry, 266 Emerson Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.).
B. Inherited Markers
Genetic markers comprise detected differences (polymorphisms) in the genetic information carried by two or more plants. Genetic mapping of a locus with genetic markers typically requires two fundamental components: detectably polymorphic alleles and recombination or segregation of those alleles. In plants, the recombination measured is virtually always meiotic, and therefore, the two inherent requirements of plant gene mapping are polymorphic genetic markers and one or more plants in which those alleles are segregating.
Markers are preferably inherited in codominant fashion so that the presence of both alleles at a diploid locus is readily detectable, and they are free of environmental variation, i.e., their heritability is 1. A marker genotype typically comprises two marker alleles at each locus in a diploid organism such as soybeans. The marker allelic composition of each locus can be either homozygous or heterozygous. Homozygosity is a condition where both alleles at a locus are characterized by the same nucleotide sequence. Heterozygosity refers to different conditions of the gene at a locus.
A number of different marker types are available for use in genetic mapping. Exemplary genetic marker types for use with the invention include, but are not limited to, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), simple sequence length polymorphisms (SSLPs), amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), nucleotide insertions and/or deletions (INDELs) and isozymes. Polymorphisms comprising as little as a single nucleotide change can be assayed in a number of ways. For example, detection can be made by electrophoretic techniques including a single strand conformational polymorphism (Orita et al., 1989), denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (Myers et al., 1985), or cleavage fragment length polymorphisms (Life Technologies, Inc., Gathersberg, Md. 20877), but the widespread availability of DNA sequencing machines often makes it easier to just sequence amplified products directly. Once the polymorphic sequence difference is known, rapid assays can be designed for progeny testing, typically involving some version of PCR amplification of specific alleles (PASA, Sommer, et al., 1992), or PCR amplification of multiple specific alleles (PAMSA, Dutton and Sommer, 1991).
One method for detection of SNPs in DNA samples is by use of PCR in combination with fluorescent probes for the polymorphism, as described in Livak et al., 1995 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,099, incorporated herein by reference. Briefly, two probe oligonucleotides, one of which anneals to the SNP site and the other which anneals to the wild type sequence, are synthesized. It is preferable that the site of the SNP be near the 5′ terminus of the probe oligonucleotides. Each probe is then labeled on the 3′ end with a non-fluorescent quencher and a minor groove binding moiety which lower background fluorescence and lower the Tm of the oligonucleotide, respectively. The 5′ ends of each probe are labeled with a different fluorescent dye wherein fluorescence is dependent upon the dye being cleaved from the probe. Some non-limiting examples of such dyes include VIC™ and 6-FAM™. DNA suspected of comprising a given SNP is then subjected to PCR using a polymerase with 5′-3′ exonuclease activity and flanking primers. PCR is performed in the presence of both probe oligonucleotides. If the probe is bound to a complimentary sequence in the test DNA then exonuclease activity of the polymerase releases a fluorescent label activating its fluorescent activity. Therefore, test DNA that contains only wild type sequence will exhibit fluorescence associated with the label on the wild type probe. On the other hand, DNA containing only the SNP sequence will have fluorescent activity from the label on the SNP probe. However, in the case that the DNA is from heterogeneous sources, significant fluorescence of both labels will be observed. This type of indirect genotyping at known SNP sites enables high throughput, inexpensive screening of DNA samples. Thus such a system is ideal for the identification of progeny soybean plants comprising mutant Gy alleles.
Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) are genetic differences detectable by DNA fragment lengths, typically revealed by agarose gel electrophoresis, after restriction endonuclease digestion of DNA. There are large numbers of restriction endonucleases available, characterized by their nucleotide cleavage sites and their source, e.g., EcoRI. RFLPs result from both single-bp polymorphisms within restriction site sequences and measurable insertions or deletions within a given restriction fragment. RFLPs are easy and relatively inexpensive to generate (require a cloned DNA, but no sequence) and are co-dominant. RFLPs have the disadvantage of being labor-intensive in the typing stage, although this can be alleviated to some extent by multiplexing many of the tasks and reutilization of blots. Most RFLP are biallelic and of lesser polymorphic content than microsatellites. For these reasons, the use of RFLP in plant genetic maps has waned.
One of skill in the art would recognize that many types of molecular markers are useful as tools to monitor genetic inheritance and are not limited to RFLPs, SSRs and SNPs, and one of skill would also understand that a variety of detection methods may be employed to track the various molecular markers. One skilled in the art would also recognize that markers of different types may be used for mapping, especially as technology evolves and new types of markers and means for identification are identified.
For purposes of convenience, inherited marker genotypes may be converted to numerical scores, e.g., if there are 2 forms of an SNP, or other marker, designated A and B, at a particular locus using a particular enzyme, then diploid complements may be converted to a numerical score, for example, are AA=2, AB=1, and BB=0; or AA=1, AB=0 and BB=−1. The absolute values of the scores are not important. What is important is the additive nature of the numeric designations. The above scores relate to codominant markers. A similar scoring system can be given that is consistent with dominant markers.
C. Marker Assisted Selection
The invention provides soybean plants with increased β-conglycinin content in combination with a commercially significant yield and agronomically elite characteristics. Such plants may be produced in accordance with the invention by marker assisted selection methods comprising assaying genomic DNA for the presence of markers that are genetically linked to the non-transgenic, mutant Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4, or Gy5 alleles, including all possible combinations thereof. The invention also provides soybean plants with reduced lipoxygenase content. Such plants may be produced in accordance with the invention by marker assisted selection methods comprising assaying genomic DNA for the presence of markers that are genetically linked to the non-transgenic, mutant Lox1, Lox2, or Lox3 alleles, including all possible combinations thereof.
In certain embodiments of the invention, it may be desired to obtain additional markers linked to Gy alleles. This may be carried out, for example, by first preparing an F2 population by selfing an F1, hybrid produced by crossing inbred varieties only one of which comprises mutant Gy allele conferring decreased glycinin content. Recombinant inbred lines (RIL) (genetically related lines; usually >F5, developed from continuously selfing F2 lines towards homozygosity) can then be prepared and used as a mapping population. Information obtained from dominant markers can be maximized by using RIL because all loci are homozygous or nearly so. It may also be desired to obtain additional markers linked to Lox alleles. This may be carried out, for example, by first preparing an F2 population by selfing an F1 hybrid produced by crossing inbred varieties only one of which comprises a mutant Lox allele conferring decreased lipoxygenase content. As above, recombinant inbred lines can then be prepared and used as a mapping population, and information obtained from dominant markers can be maximized by using RIL because all loci are homozygous or nearly so.
The invention also provides soybean plants with reduced content of KTI, such as a KTI-null trait, which may be obtained by marker assisted selection and provided in combination with commercially significant yield and agronomically elite characteristics. Such plants may be defined, in certain embodiments of the invention, as having a yield in excess of about 35, 37, 39, 41, 43 or 45 bushels per acre over at least 10 environments. In certain embodiments of the invention, the markers used for such marker assisted selection may include SNPs or INDELs. In specific embodiments of the invention, the one or more INDEL(s) may be found in a gene encoding Kunitz Trypsin inhibitor. In one embodiment of the invention, the marker may comprise a deletion at position 622-623 and/or an insertion at position 664 in a gene encoding Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitor (SEQ ID NO:167) as shown in FIG. 9, and the plants may be produced in accordance with the invention by marker assisted selection methods comprising assaying genomic DNA for the presence of such markers.
Backcross populations (e.g., generated from a cross between a desirable variety (recurrent parent) and another variety (donor parent)) carrying a trait not present in the former can also be utilized as a mapping population. A series of backcrosses to the recurrent parent can be made to recover most of its desirable traits. Thus a population is created consisting of individuals similar to the recurrent parent but each individual carries varying amounts of genomic regions from the donor parent. Backcross populations can be useful for mapping dominant markers if all loci in the recurrent parent are homozygous and the donor and recurrent parent have contrasting polymorphic marker alleles (Reiter et al., 1992).
Useful populations for mapping purposes are near-isogenic lines (NIL). NILs are created by many backcrosses to produce an array of individuals that are nearly identical in genetic composition except for the desired trait or genomic region can be used as a mapping population. In mapping with NILs, only a portion of the polymorphic loci are expected to map to a selected region. Mapping may also be carried out on transformed plant lines.
D. Plant Breeding Methods
Certain aspects of the invention provide methods for marker assisted breeding of plants that enable the introduction of non-transgenic, mutant Gy alleles into a heterologous soybean genetic background. Certain aspects of the invention also provide methods for marker assisted breeding of plants that enable the introduction of non-transgenic, mutant Lox alleles into a heterologous soybean genetic background. In general, breeding techniques take advantage of a plant's method of pollination. There are two general methods of pollination: self-pollination which occurs if pollen from one flower is transferred to the same or another flower of the same plant, and cross-pollination which occurs if pollen comes to it from a flower on a different plant. Plants that have been self-pollinated and selected for type over many generations become homozygous at almost all gene loci and produce a uniform population of true breeding progeny, homozygous plants.
In development of suitable varieties, pedigree breeding may be used. The pedigree breeding method for specific traits involves crossing two genotypes. Each genotype can have one or more desirable characteristics lacking in the other; or, each genotype can complement the other. If the two original parental genotypes do not provide all of the desired characteristics, other genotypes can be included in the breeding population. Superior plants that are the products of these crosses are selfed and are again advanced in each successive generation. Each succeeding generation becomes more homogeneous as a result of self-pollination and selection. Typically, this method of breeding involves five or more generations of selfing and selection: S1→S2; S2→S3; S3→S4; S4→S5, etc. A selfed generation (S) may be considered to be a type of filial generation (F) and may be named F as such. After at least five generations, the inbred plant is considered genetically pure.
Each breeding program should include a periodic, objective evaluation of the efficiency of the breeding procedure. Evaluation criteria vary depending on the goal and objectives. Promising advanced breeding lines are thoroughly tested and compared to appropriate standards in environments representative of the commercial target area(s) for generally three or more years. Identification of individuals that are genetically superior is difficult because genotypic value can be masked by confounding plant traits or environmental factors. One method of identifying a superior plant is to observe its performance relative to other experimental plants and to one or more widely grown standard varieties. Single observations can be inconclusive, while replicated observations provide a better estimate of genetic worth.
Mass and recurrent selections can be used to improve populations of either self-or cross-pollinating crops. A genetically variable population of heterozygous individuals is either identified or created by intercrossing several different parents. The best plants are selected based on individual superiority, outstanding progeny, or excellent combining ability. The selected plants are intercrossed to produce a new population in which further cycles of selection are continued. Descriptions of other breeding methods that are commonly used for different traits and crops can be found in one of several reference books (e.g., Allard, 1960; Simmonds, 1979; Sneep et al., 1979; Fehr, 1987 a, b).
The effectiveness of selecting for genotypes with traits of interest (e.g., high yield, disease resistance, fatty acid profile) in a breeding program will depend upon: 1) the extent to which the variability in the traits of interest of individual plants in a population is the result of genetic factors and is thus transmitted to the progenies of the selected genotypes; and 2) how much the variability in the traits of interest among the plants is due to the environment in which the different genotypes are growing. The inheritance of traits ranges from control by one major gene whose expression is not influenced by the environment (i.e., qualitative characters) to control by many genes whose effects are greatly influenced by the environment (i.e., quantitative characters). Breeding for quantitative traits such as yield is further characterized by the fact that: 1) the differences resulting from the effect of each gene are small, making it difficult or impossible to identify them individually; 2) the number of genes contributing to a character is large, so that distinct segregation ratios are seldom if ever obtained; and 3) the effects of the genes may be expressed in different ways based on environmental variation. Therefore, the accurate identification of transgressive segregates or superior genotypes with the traits of interest is extremely difficult and its success is dependent on the plant breeder's ability to minimize the environmental variation affecting the expression of the quantitative character in the population.
The likelihood of identifying a transgressive segregant is greatly reduced as the number of traits combined into one genotype is increased. For example, if a cross is made between cultivars differing in three complex characters, such as yield, β-conglycinin content and at least a first agronomic trait, it is extremely difficult without molecular tools to recover simultaneously by recombination the maximum number of favorable genes for each of the three characters into one genotype. Consequently, all the breeder can generally hope for is to obtain a favorable assortment of genes for the first complex character combined with a favorable assortment of genes for the second character into one genotype in addition to a selected gene.
Backcrossing is an efficient method for transferring specific desirable traits. This can be accomplished, for example, by first crossing a superior variety inbred (A) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (non-recurrent parent), which carries the appropriate gene(s) for the trait in question (Fehr, 1987). The progeny of this cross are then mated back to the superior recurrent parent (A) followed by selection in the resultant progeny for the desired trait to be transferred from the non-recurrent parent. Such selection can be based on genetic assays, as mentioned below, or alternatively, can be based on the phenotype of the progeny plant. After five or more backcross generations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny are heterozygous for loci controlling the characteristic being transferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost all other genes. The last generation of the backcross is selfed, or sibbed, to give pure breeding progeny for the gene(s) being transferred, for example, loci providing the plant with decreased seed glycinin content.
In one embodiment of the invention, the process of backcross conversion may be defined as a process including the steps of:
- (a) crossing a plant of a first genotype containing one or more desired gene, DNA sequence or element, such as mutant Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4, and/or Gy5 alleles associated with decreased seed glycinin content, to a plant of a second genotype lacking said desired gene, DNA sequence or element;
- (b) selecting one or more progeny plant(s) containing the desired gene, DNA sequence or element;
- (c) crossing the progeny plant to a plant of the second genotype; and
- (d) repeating steps (b) and (c) for the purpose of transferring said desired gene, DNA sequence or element from a plant of a first genotype to a plant of a second genotype.
Introgression of a particular DNA element or set of elements into a plant genotype is defined as the result of the process of backcross conversion. A plant genotype into which a DNA sequence has been introgressed may be referred to as a backcross converted genotype, line, inbred, or hybrid. Similarly a plant genotype lacking the desired DNA sequence may be referred to as an unconverted genotype, line, inbred, or hybrid. During breeding, the genetic markers linked to decreased glycinin content may be used to assist in breeding for the purpose of producing soybean plants with decreased glycinin content and preferably increased β-conglycinin content. Backcrossing and marker assisted selection in particular can be used with the present invention to introduce the decreased glycinin content trait in accordance with the current invention into any variety by conversion of that variety with non-transgenic, mutant Gy1, Gy2, Gy3, Gy4, and/or Gy5 alleles associated.
The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step for a successful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol is to alter or substitute a trait or characteristic in the original inbred. To accomplish this, one or more loci of the recurrent inbred is modified or substituted with the desired gene from the nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all of the rest of the desired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological and morphological, constitution of the original inbred. The choice of the particular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of the backcross, which in the case of the present invention may be to add one or more allele(s) conferring decreased glycinin content. The exact backcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic or trait being altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. Although backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being transferred is a dominant allele, a recessive allele may also be transferred. In this instance it may be necessary to introduce a test of the progeny to determine if the desired characteristic has been successfully transferred. In the case of the present invention, one may test the glycinin content of progeny lines generated during the backcrossing program, for example by SDS-PAGE/Coomassie staining as well as using the marker system described herein to select lines based upon markers rather than visual traits.
Soybean plants (Glycine max L.) can be crossed by either natural or mechanical techniques (see, e.g., Fehr, 1980). Natural pollination occurs in soybeans either by self pollination or natural cross pollination, which typically is aided by pollinating organisms. In either natural or artificial crosses, flowering and flowering time are an important consideration. Soybean is a short-day plant, but there is considerable genetic variation for sensitivity to photoperiod (Hamner, 1969; Criswell and Hume, 1972). The critical day length for flowering ranges from about 13 h for genotypes adapted to tropical latitudes to 24 h for photoperiod-insensitive genotypes grown at higher latitudes (Shibles et al., 1975). Soybeans seem to be insensitive to day length for 9 days after emergence. Photoperiods shorter than the critical day length are required for 7 to 26 days to complete flower induction (Borthwick and Parker, 1938; Shanmugasundaram and Tsou, 1978).
Either with or without emasculation of the female flower, hand pollination can be carried out by removing the stamens and pistil with a forceps from a flower of the male parent and gently brushing the anthers against the stigma of the female flower. Access to the stamens can be achieved by removing the front sepal and keel petals, or piercing the keel with closed forceps and allowing them to open to push the petals away. Brushing the anthers on the stigma causes them to rupture, and the highest percentage of successful crosses is obtained when pollen is clearly visible on the stigma. Pollen shed can be checked by tapping the anthers before brushing the stigma. Several male flowers may have to be used to obtain suitable pollen shed when conditions are unfavorable, or the same male may be used to pollinate several flowers with good pollen shed.
Genetic male sterility is available in soybeans and may be useful to facilitate hybridization in the context of the current invention, particularly for recurrent selection programs (Brim and Stuber, 1973). The distance required for complete isolation of a crossing block is not clear; however, outcrossing is less than 0.5% when male-sterile plants are 12 m or more from a foreign pollen source (Boerma and Moradshahi, 1975). Plants on the boundaries of a crossing block probably sustain the most outcrossing with foreign pollen and can be eliminated at harvest to minimize contamination.
- III. TRAITS FOR MODIFICATION AND IMPROVEMENT OF SOYBEAN VARIETIES
Once harvested, pods are typically air-dried at not more than 38° C. until the seeds contain 13% moisture or less, then the seeds are removed by hand. Seed can be stored satisfactorily at about 25° C. for up to a year if relative humidity is 50% or less. In humid climates, germination percentage declines rapidly unless the seed is dried to 7% moisture and stored in an air-tight container at room temperature. Long-term storage in any climate is best accomplished by drying seed to 7% moisture and storing it at 110° C. or less in a room maintained at 50% relative humidity or in an air-tight container.
In certain embodiments, a soybean plant provided by the invention may comprise one or more transgene(s). One example of such a transgene confers herbicide resistance. Common herbicide resistance genes include an EPSPS gene conferring glyphosate resistance, a neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene conferring resistance to kanamycin (Fraley et al., 1983), a hygromycin phosphotransferase gene conferring resistance to the antibiotic hygromycin (Vanden Elzen et al., 1985), genes conferring resistance to glufosinate or broxynil (Comai et al., 1985; Gordon-Kamm et al., 1990; Stalker et al., 1988) such as dihydrofolate reductase and acetolactate synthase (Eichholtz et al., 1987, Shah et al., 1986, Charest et al., 1990). Further examples include mutant ALS and AHAS enzymes conferring resistance to imidazalinone or a sulfonylurea (Lee et al., 1988; Miki et al., 1990), a phosphinothricin-acetyl-transferase gene conferring phosphinothricin resistance (European Appln. 0 242 246), genes conferring resistance to phenoxy proprionic acids and cycloshexones, such as sethoxydim and haloxyfop (Marshall et al., 1992); and genes conferring resistance to triazine (psbA and gs+genes) and benzonitrile (nitrilase gene) (Przibila et al., 1991).
A plant of the invention may also comprise a gene that confers resistance to insect, pest, viral or bacterial attack. For example, a gene conferring resistance to a pest, such as soybean cyst nematode was described in PCT Application WO96/30517 and PCT Application WO93/19181. Jones et al., (1994) describe cloning of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to Cladosporium fulvum); Martin et al., (1993) describe a tomato Pto gene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. and Mindrinos et al., (1994) describe an Arabidopsis RSP2 gene for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae. Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxins may also be used for insect resistance. (See, for example, Geiser et al., (1986). A vitamin-binding protein such as avidin may also be used as a larvicide (PCT application US93/06487).
The use of use of viral coat proteins in transformed plant cells is known to impart resistance to viral infection and/or disease development affected by the virus from which the coat protein gene is derived, as well as by related viruses. (See Beachy et al., 1990). Coat protein-mediated resistance has been conferred upon transformed plants against alfalfa mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus, tobacco streak virus, potato virus X, potato virus Y, tobacco etch virus, tobacco rattle virus and tobacco mosaic virus. Id. Developmental-arrestive proteins produced in nature by a pathogen or a parasite may also be used. For example, Logemann et al., (1992), have shown that transgenic plants expressing the barley ribosome-inactivating gene have an increased resistance to fungal disease.
Transgenes may also be used conferring increased nutritional value or another value-added trait. One example is modified fatty acid metabolism, for example, by transforming a plant with an antisense gene of stearoyl-ACP desaturase to increase stearic acid content of the plant. (See Knutzon et al., 1992). A sense desaturase gene may also be introduced to alter fatty acid content. Phytate content may be modified by introduction of a phytase-encoding gene to enhance breakdown of phytate, adding more free phosphate to the transformed plant. Modified carbohydrate composition may also be affected, for example, by transforming plants with a gene coding for an enzyme that alters the branching pattern of starch. (See Shiroza et al., 1988) (nucleotide sequence of Streptococcus mutans fructosyltransferase gene); Steinmetz et al., (1985) (nucleotide sequence of Bacillus subtilis levansucrase gene); Pen et al., (1992) (production of transgenic plants that express Bacillus licheniformis α-amylase); Elliot et al., (1993) (nucleotide sequences of tomato invertase genes); Søgaard et al., (1993) (site-directed mutagenesis of barley α-amylase gene); and Fisher et al., (1993) (maize endosperm starch branching enzyme II)).
Transgenes may also be used to alter protein metabolism. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,545 describes lysine-insensitive maize dihydrodipicolinic acid synthase (DHPS), which is substantially resistant to concentrations of L-lysine which otherwise inhibit the activity of native DHPS. Similarly, EP 0640141 describes sequences encoding lysine-insensitive aspartokinase (AK) capable of causing a higher than normal production of threonine, as well as a subfragment encoding anti sense lysine ketoglutarate reductase for increasing lysine.
In another embodiment, a transgene may be employed that alters plant carbohydrate metabolism. For example, fructokinase genes are known for use in metabolic engineering of fructokinase gene expression in transgenic plants and their fruit (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,031,154). A further example of transgenes that may be used are genes that alter grain yield. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,486,383 describes modification of starch content in plants with subunit proteins of adenosine diphosphoglucose pyrophosphorylase (“ADPG PPase”). In EP0797673, transgenic plants are discussed in which the introduction and expression of particular DNA molecules results in the formation of easily mobilized phosphate pools outside the vacuole and an enhanced biomass production and/or altered flowering behavior. Still further known are genes for altering plant maturity. U.S. Pat. No. 6,774,284 describes DNA encoding a plant lipase and methods of use thereof for controlling senescence in plants. U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,085 discusses FCA genes for altering flowering characteristics, particularly timing of flowering. U.S. Pat. No. 5,637,785 discusses genetically modified plants having modulated flower development such as having early floral meristem development and comprising a structural gene encoding the LEAFY protein in its genome.
Genes for altering plant morphological characteristics are also known and may be used in accordance with the invention. U.S. Pat. No. 6,184,440 discusses genetically engineered plants which display altered structure or morphology as a result of expressing a cell wall modulation transgene. Examples of cell wall modulation transgenes include a cellulose binding domain, a cellulose binding protein, or a cell wall modifying protein or enzyme such as endoxyloglucan transferase, xyloglucan endo-transglycosylase, an expansin, cellulose synthase, or a novel isolated endo-1,4-β-glucanase.
Methods for introduction of a transgene are well known in the art and include biological and physical, plant transformation protocols. See, for example, Miki et al. (1993).
- IV. TISSUE CULTURES AND IN VITRO REGENERATION OF SOYBEAN PLANTS
Once a transgene is introduced into a variety it may readily be transferred by crossing. By using backcrossing, essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of a variety are recovered in addition to the locus transferred into the variety via the backcrossing technique. Backcrossing methods can be used with the present invention to improve or introduce a characteristic into a plant (Poehlman et al., 1995; Fehr, 1987 a, b).
A further aspect of the invention relates to tissue cultures of a soybean variety of the invention. As used herein, the term “tissue culture” indicates a composition comprising isolated cells of the same or a different type or a collection of such cells organized into parts of a plant. Exemplary types of tissue cultures are protoplasts, calli and plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, flowers, leaves, roots, root tips, anthers, and the like. In a preferred embodiment, the tissue culture comprises embryos, protoplasts, meristematic cells, pollen, leaves or anthers.
Exemplary procedures for preparing tissue cultures of regenerable soybean cells and regenerating soybean plants therefrom, are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,992,375; U.S. Pat. No. 5,015,580; U.S. Pat. No. 5,024,944, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,011, each of the disclosures of which is specifically incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
An important ability of a tissue culture is the capability to regenerate fertile plants. This allows, for example, transformation of the tissue culture cells followed by regeneration of transgenic plants. For transformation to be efficient and successful, DNA must be introduced into cells that give rise to plants or germ-line tissue.
Soybeans typically are regenerated via two distinct processes; shoot morphogenesis and somatic embryogenesis (Finer, 1996). Shoot morphogenesis is the process of shoot meristem organization and development. Shoots grow out from a source tissue and are excised and rooted to obtain an intact plant. During somatic embryogenesis, an embryo (similar to the zygotic embryo), containing both shoot and root axes, is formed from somatic plant tissue. An intact plant rather than a rooted shoot results from the germination of the somatic embryo.
Shoot morphogenesis and somatic embryogenesis are different processes and the specific route of regeneration is primarily dependent on the explant source and media used for tissue culture manipulations. While the systems are different, both systems show variety-specific responses where some lines are more responsive to tissue culture manipulations than others. A line that is highly responsive in shoot morphogenesis may not generate many somatic embryos. Lines that produce large numbers of embryos during an ‘induction’ step may not give rise to rapidly-growing proliferative cultures. Therefore, it may be desired to optimize tissue culture conditions for each soybean line. These optimizations may readily be carried out by one of skill in the art of tissue culture through small-scale culture studies. In addition to line-specific responses, proliferative cultures can be observed with both shoot morphogenesis and somatic embryogenesis. Proliferation is beneficial for both systems, as it allows a single, transformed cell to multiply to the point that it will contribute to germ-line tissue.
Shoot morphogenesis was first reported by Wright et al. (1986) as a system whereby shoots were obtained de novo from cotyledonary nodes of soybean seedlings. The shoot meristems were formed subepidermally and morphogenic tissue could proliferate on a medium containing benzyl adenine (BA). This system can be used for transformation if the subepidermal, multicellular origin of the shoots is recognized and proliferative cultures are utilized. The idea is to target tissue that will give rise to new shoots and proliferate those cells within the meristematic tissue to lessen problems associated with chimerism. Formation of chimeras, resulting from transformation of only a single cell in a meristem, are problematic if the transformed cell is not adequately proliferated and does not give rise to germ-line tissue. Once the system is well understood and reproduced satisfactorily, it can be used as one target tissue for soybean transformation.
Somatic embryogenesis in soybean was first reported by Christianson et al. (1983) as a system in which embryogenic tissue was initially obtained from the zygotic embryo axis. These embryogenic cultures were proliferative but the repeatability of the system was low and the origin of the embryos was not reported. Later histological studies of a different proliferative embryogenic soybean culture showed that proliferative embryos were of apical or surface origin with a small number of cells contributing to embryo formation. The origin of primary embryos (the first embryos derived from the initial explant) is dependent on the explant tissue and the auxin levels in the induction medium (Hartweck et al., 1988). With proliferative embryonic cultures, single cells or small groups of surface cells of the ‘older’ somatic embryos form the ‘newer’ embryos.
- V. UTILIZATION OF SOYBEAN PLANTS
Embryogenic cultures can also be used successfully for regeneration, including regeneration of transgenic plants, if the origin of the embryos is recognized and the biological limitations of proliferative embryogenic cultures are understood. Biological limitations include the difficulty in developing proliferative embryogenic cultures and reduced fertility problems (culture-induced variation) associated with plants regenerated from long-term proliferative embryogenic cultures. Some of these problems are accentuated in prolonged cultures. The use of more recently cultured cells may decrease or eliminate such problems.
A soybean plant provided by the invention may be used for any purpose deemed of value. Common uses include the preparation of food for human consumption, feed for non-human animal consumption and industrial uses. As used herein, “industrial use” or “industrial usage” refers to non-food and non-feed uses for soybeans or soy-based products.
Soybeans are commonly processed into two primary products, soybean protein (meal) and crude soybean oil. Both of these products are commonly further refined for particular uses. Refined oil products can be broken down into glycerol, fatty acids and sterols. These can be for food, feed or industrial usage. Edible food product use examples include coffee creamers, margarine, mayonnaise, pharmaceuticals, salad dressings, shortenings, bakery products, and chocolate coatings.
Soy protein products (e.g., meal), can be divided into soy flour concentrates and isolates which have both food/feed and industrial use. Soy flour and grits are often used in the manufacturing of meat extenders and analogs, pet foods, baking ingredients and other food products. Food products made from soy flour and isolate include baby food, candy products, cereals, food drinks, noodles, yeast, beer, ale, etc. Soybean meal in particular is commonly used as a source of protein in livestock feeding, primarily swine and poultry. Feed uses thus include, but are not limited to, aquaculture feeds, bee feeds, calf feed replacers, fish feed, livestock feeds, poultry feeds and pet feeds, etc.
Whole soybean products can also be used as food or feed. Common food usage includes products such as the seed, bean sprouts, baked soybean, full fat soy flour used in various products of baking, roasted soybean used as confectioneries, soy nut butter, soy coffee, and other soy derivatives of oriental foods. For feed usage, hulls are commonly removed from the soybean and used as feed.
Soybeans additionally have many industrial uses. One common industrial usage for soybeans is the preparation of binders that can be used to manufacture composites. For example, wood composites may be produced using modified soy protein, a mixture of hydrolyzed soy protein and PF resins, soy flour containing powder resins, and soy protein containing foamed glues. Soy-based binders have been used to manufacture common wood products such as plywood for over 70 years. Although the introduction of urea-formaldehyde and phenol-formaldehyde resins has decreased the usage of soy-based adhesives in wood products, environmental concerns and consumer preferences for adhesives made from a renewable feedstock have caused a resurgence of interest in developing new soy-based products for the wood composite industry.
Preparation of adhesives represents another common industrial usage for soybeans. Examples of soy adhesives include soy hydrolyzate adhesives and soy flour adhesives. Soy hydrolyzate is a colorless, aqueous solution made by reacting soy protein isolate in a 5 percent sodium hydroxide solution under heat (120° C.) and pressure (30 psig). The resulting degraded soy protein solution is basic (pH 11) and flowable (approximately 500 cps) at room temperature. Soy flour is a finely ground, defatted meal made from soybeans. Various adhesive formulations can be made from soy flour, with the first step commonly requiring dissolving the flour in a sodium hydroxide solution. The strength and other properties of the resulting formulation will vary depending on the additives in the formulation. Soy flour adhesives may also potentially be combined with other commercially available resins.
Soybean oil may find application in a number of industrial uses. Soybean oil is the most readily available and one of the lowest-cost vegetable oils in the world. Common industrial uses for soybean oil include use as components of anti-static agents, caulking compounds, disinfectants, fungicides, inks, paints, protective coatings, wallboard, anti-foam agents, alcohol, margarine, paint, ink, rubber, shortening, cosmetics, etc. Soybean oils have also for many years been a major ingredient in alkyd resins, which are dissolved in carrier solvents to make oil-based paints. The basic chemistry for converting vegetable oils into an alkyd resin under heat and pressure is well understood to those of skill in the art.
Soybean oil in its commercially available unrefined or refined, edible-grade state, is a fairly stable and slow-drying oil. Soybean oil can also be modified to enhance its reactivity under ambient conditions or, with the input of energy in various forms, to cause the oil to copolymerize or cure to a dry film. Some of these forms of modification have included epoxidation, alcoholysis or tranesterification, direct esterification, metathesis, isomerization, monomer modification, and various forms of polymerization, including heat bodying. The reactive linoleic-acid component of soybean oil with its double bonds may be more useful than the predominant oleic- and linoleic-acid components for many industrial uses.
- VI. DEPOSIT INFORMATION
Solvents can also be prepared using soy-based ingredients. For example, methyl soyate, a soybean-oil based methyl ester, is gaining market acceptance as an excellent solvent replacement alternative in applications such as parts cleaning and degreasing, paint and ink removal, and oil spill remediation. It is also being marketed in numerous formulated consumer products including hand cleaners, car waxes and graffiti removers. Methyl soyate is produced by the transesterification of soybean oil with methanol. It is commercially available from numerous manufacturers and suppliers. As a solvent, methyl soyate has important environmental- and safety-related properties that make it attractive for industrial applications. It is lower in toxicity than most other solvents, is readily biodegradable, and has a very high flash point and a low level of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The compatibility of methyl soyate is excellent with metals, plastics, most elastomers and other organic solvents. Current uses of methyl soyate include cleaners, paint strippers, oil spill cleanup and bioremediation, pesticide adjuvants, corrosion preventives and biodiesel fuels additives.
- VII. KITS
Deposits of at least 2500 seeds of the soybean lines B2G2 and Pedigree 3 disclosed herein have been made with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110-2209 USA on Jul. 28, 2005. The deposits were assigned ATCC Accession Nos. PTA-6893, and PTA-6892, respectively. The seeds were deposited with the ATCC. Access to this deposit will be available during the pendency of the application in accordance with the Budapest Treaty. The deposits will be maintained in the ATCC Depository, which is a public depository, for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the most recent request, or for the enforceable life of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced if it becomes nonviable during that period.
Any of the compositions described herein may be comprised in a kit. In a non-limiting example, a composition for the detection of a polymorphism as described herein and/or additional agents, may be comprised in a kit. The kits may thus comprise, in suitable container means, a probe or primer for detection of the polymorphism and/or an additional agent of the present invention. In specific embodiments, the kit will allow detection of at least one non-transgenic Gy null allele, and may further provide for the detection of a lipoxygenase and/or KTI null allele, for example, by detection of polymorphisms in such alleles and/or otherwise in linkage disequilibrium with the allele(s).
The kits may comprise a suitably aliquoted agent composition(s) of the present invention, whether labeled or unlabeled for any assay format desired to detect such alleles. The components of the kits may be packaged either in aqueous media or in lyophilized form. The container means of the kits will generally include at least one vial, test tube, flask, bottle, syringe or other container means, into which a component may be placed, and preferably, suitably aliquoted. Where there are more than one component in the kit, the kit also will generally contain a second, third or other additional container into which the additional components may be separately placed. However, various combinations of components may be comprised in a vial. The kits of the present invention also will typically include a means for containing the detection composition and any other reagent containers in close confinement for commercial sale. Such containers may include injection or blow-molded plastic containers into which the desired vials are retained.
When the components of the kit are provided in one and/or more liquid solutions, the liquid solution may be an aqueous solution, with a sterile aqueous solution being particularly preferred. However, the components of the kit may be provided as dried powder(s). When reagents and/or components are provided as a dry powder, the powder can be reconstituted by the addition of a suitable solvent. It is envisioned that the solvent may also be provided in another container means. The container means will generally include at least one vial, test tube, flask, bottle, syringe and/or other container means, into which the composition for detecting a null allele are placed, preferably, suitably allocated. The kits may also comprise a second container means for containing a sterile buffer and/or other diluent.
- VIII. DEFINITIONS
The kits of the present invention will also typically include a means for containing the vials in close confinement for commercial sale, such as, e.g., injection and/or blow-molded plastic containers into which the desired vials are retained. Irrespective of the number and/or type of containers, the kits of the invention may also comprise, and/or be packaged with, an instrument for assisting with the use of the detection compositions.
In the description and tables which follow, a number of terms are used. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, the following definitions are provided:
A: When used in conjunction with the word “comprising” or other open language in the claims, the words “a” and “an” denote “one or more.”
Agronomically Elite: As used herein, means a genotype that has a culmination of many distinguishable traits such as seed yield, emergence, vigor, vegetative vigor, disease resistance, seed set, standability and threshability which allows a producer to harvest a product of commercial significance.
Allele: Any of one or more alternative forms of a gene locus, all of which alleles relate to a trait or characteristic. In a diploid cell or organism, the two alleles of a given gene occupy corresponding loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes.
Backcrossing: A process in which a breeder repeatedly crosses hybrid progeny, for example a first generation hybrid (F1), back to one of the parents of the hybrid progeny. Backcrossing can be used to introduce one or more single locus conversions from one genetic background into another.
Commercially Significant Yield: A yield of grain having commercial significance to the grower represented by an actual grain yield of at least 95% of the check lines AG2703 and DKB23-51 when grown under the same conditions.
Crossing: The mating of two parent plants.
Cross-pollination: Fertilization by the union of two gametes from different plants.
Down-regulatory mutation: For the purposes of this application a down regulatory mutation is defined as a mutation that reduces the expression levels of a protein from a given gene. Thus a down-regulatory mutation comprises null mutations.
F1, Hybrid: The first generation progeny of the cross of two nonisogenic plants.
Genotype: The genetic constitution of a cell or organism.
INDEL: Genetic mutations resulting from insertion or deletion of nucleotide sequence.
Industrial use: A non-food and non-feed use for a soybean plant. The term “soybean plant” includes plant parts and derivatives of a soybean plant.
Linkage: A phenomenon wherein alleles on the same chromosome tend to segregate together more often than expected by chance if their transmission was independent.
Marker: A readily detectable phenotype, preferably inherited in codominant fashion (both alleles at a locus in a diploid heterozygote are readily detectable), with no environmental variance component, i.e., heritability of 1.
Non-transgenic mutation: A mutation that is naturally occurring, or induced by conventional methods (e.g. exposure of plants to radiation or mutagenic compounds), not including mutations made using recombinant DNA techniques.
Null phenotype: A null phenotype as used herein means that a given protein is not expressed at levels that can be detected. In the case of the Gy subunits, expression levels are determined by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining.
Phenotype: The detectable characteristics of a cell or organism, which characteristics are the manifestation of gene expression.
Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL): Quantitative trait loci (QTL) refer to genetic loci that control to some degree numerically representable traits that are usually continuously distributed.
SNP: Refers to single nucleotide polymorphisms, or single nucleotide mutations when comparing two homologous sequences.
Stringent Conditions: Refers to nucleic acid hybridization conditions of 5×SSC, 50% formamide and 42° C.
Substantially Equivalent: A characteristic that, when compared, does not show a statistically significant difference (e.g., p=0.05) from the mean.
Tissue Culture: A composition comprising isolated cells of the same or a different type or a collection of such cells organized into parts of a plant.
- IX. EXAMPLES
Transgene: A genetic locus comprising a sequence which has been introduced into the genome of a soybean plant by transformation.
- Example 1
Soybean Varieties Used in Studies
The following examples are included to demonstrate preferred embodiments of the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the examples which follow represent techniques discovered by the inventor to function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments which are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
- Example 2
Design of Markers for Gy Alleles
The B2G2 or “11S null” soybean variety has a unique seed composition including high level of β-conglycinin and low amount of glycinin. However, the B2G2 variety exhibits agronomically inferior characteristics such as low yield, excessive lodging and green seed. A number of breeding lines were developed, which carried all or parts of the mutations present in the B2G2 lines. Fifteen such lines together with B2G2 lines were used as mutant lines in resequencing panel. Eight wild types were used for comparison in this study. Table 1 lists all the lines used in the sequencing panel.
|TABLE 1 |
|Line || |
|Name or |
|Symbol ||Pedigree |
|JB1 ||AH_(A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0042.0006.@. |
|JB2 ||AH_(A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0064.0001.)/DKB19-51:@.0232.0002.@. |
|JB3 ||AH_(A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0064.0001.)/DKB19-51:@.0228.0015.@. |
|JB4 ||AH_(A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0011.)/DAK2501A0R:@.0314.0009.@. |
|JB5 ||AH_(A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0042.0012.@. |
|JB6 ||AH_(A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0011.0008.)/AG2402:@.0028.0010.@. |
|JB7 ||AH_(A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0008.0016.)/DBL3201A0X:@.0256.0014.@. |
|JB8 ||AH_(A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0234.0019.@. |
| ||AH_704416- |
|JB9 ||24/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0005.):@.0067.0016. |
|JB10 ||AH_704416-24/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0005.):@.0067.0007. |
|JB11 ||AH_704416-24/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0005.):@.0067.0003. |
|JB12 ||AH_704416-24/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0005.):@.0067.0002. |
|JB13 ||AH_DAK2301A1R/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0013.):@.0018.0001. |
|JB14 ||AH_DAK2301A1R/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0013.):@.0114.0011. |
|JB15 ||AH_DAK2301A1R/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500C0R:@.0013.):@.0130.0001. |
|A1923 ||A1923 |
|A3244 ||A3244 |
|AG2403 ||AG2403 |
|AG2703 ||AG2703 |
|AG3201 ||AG3201 |
|AG3202 ||AG3202 |
|DKB17-51 ||DKB17-51 |
|DKB19-51 ||DKB19-51 |
DNA sequences for all the glycinin genes are available in GenBank (NCBI). These sequences were used as queries to blast against a Monsanto sequence database. Using “blastn” programs, a number of high score hits were obtained. The resulting sequences from the blast search were aligned to provide a high quality consensus sequences for use in primer design. Nested primers were designed to completely cover the entire gene at each locus and amplicons were generated from different lines. Sequences of these amplicons were aligned to identify SNPs and INDELs associated with high β-conglycinin phenotypes. Initially 10 pairs of primers were designed for Gy1, 7 pairs each for Gy2 and Gy3, 14 pairs for Gy4, 10 pairs for Gy5 and 11 pairs for Gy7. Additional primers were designed once their sequences were known from this study. Table 2 lists the primers used in the study.
DNA was isolated with Qiagen Plant DNA kits, and PCR was performed with KOD protocol (EMD Biosciences, Inc, Madison, Wis.). The reaction mix included 3.4 μl 5M Betaine, 2 μl 10×KOD buffer, 2 μl of 2 mM dNTPs, 0.8 μl 25 mM MgSO4, 0.2 μl KOD enzyme (1 U/μl), 1.6 μl primers (5 μM) and 10 μl DNA template (2 ng/μl). PCR cycles were as follows: 94° C. 5 mins; 8 cycles of 94° C. 40 sec, 62° C. 40 sec, 72° C. 1 min, 94° C. 40 sec, 60° C. 40 sec, 72° C. 1 min, 94° C. 40 sec, 58° C. 40 sec, 72° C. 1 min, 94° C. 40 sec, 56° C. 40 sec, 72° C. 1 min; 3 cycles of 94° C. 40 sec, 55° C. 40 sec, 72° C. 1 min; hold at 72° C. for 7 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gels. For sequencing, 5 μl PCR products were removed to a new tube and 1 μl Exonuclease I (1:10 diluted) and 1 μl Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (1:100 diluted). The mix was incubated at 37° C. for 20 min and then 80° C. for 20 min to inactivate the enzyme. 40 μl H2O was added and 6 μl were used as template with 1 μl sequencing primer. Sequencing was performed using a Capillary Sequencer ABI3730. Sequences were assembled and aligned using SeqMan II program of the DNAStar™ (LaserGene).
- Example 3
Methods for Gy Expression Analysis
End point SNP/Taqman® assays, were designed and manufactured by Applied Biosystems based on the SNPs sequences provided to them. SNP detection was carried out according to supplied instructions (Applied Biosystems). Taqman® assays, or Real Time PCR, detect the accumulation of a specific PCR product by hybridization and cleavage of a double-labeled fluorogenic probe during the amplification reaction. A Taqman assay includes four oligonucleotides, two of which serve as PCR primers and generate a PCR product encompassing the polymorphism to be detected. The other two are allele-specific fluorescence-resonance-energy-transfer (FRET) probes; each probe has a unique fluorophore that is released upon probe degradation by Taq DNA polymerase, effectively signalling the amount of each allele present in the sample.
|TABLE 2 |
|Primer || || || |
|Name ||Forward Primer ||Reverse Primer |
|Gy1_1 ||SEQ ID NO:1 ||SEQ ID NO:2 || |
| ||GCCTAAGTACGTACTCAAAATGCCAA ||CTACACCTCATGAAGTTCATGGTGTGA |
|Gy1_2 ||SEQ ID NO:3 ||SEQ ID NO:4 |
| ||CCATGCATGGTCCCCTCGTCATCACGA ||CCCTCATTTATCAAACCCTTAAACATATT |
|Gy1_3 ||SEQ ID NO:5 ||SEQ ID NO:6 |
| ||GAACTTCATGAGGTGTAGCACCCAAGGCTT ||GATTATGTTACGTCATATGGAAGAAATCAA |
|Gy1_4 ||SEQ ID NO:7 ||SEQ ID NO:8 |
| ||CCATATGACGTAACATAATCATATCATTGAT ||GAATTATAATATCTAATATTGCTATGTGGC |
|Gy1_5 ||SEQ ID NO:9 ||SEQ ID NO:10 |
| ||CTCAACAAAGAGGACAAAGCAGCAGACCA ||GATGACCTCCTTGCTCTTGCTGATATTT |
|Gy1_6 ||SEQ ID NO:11 ||SEQ ID NO:12 |
| ||CACCCTGGAATTCTTGGAACATGCATTCA ||GGAGAGATCCAAACTCAGCACTGAGTC |
|Gy1_7 ||SEQ ID NO:13 ||SEQ ID NO:14 |
| ||GCGTGGACAAGCAGATAGCGAA ||CTTGCGGAGAGATCCAAACTCA |
|Gy1_8 ||SEQ ID NO:15 ||SEQ ID NO:16 |
| ||GAGGATGAGAAGCCACAGTGCAAGGG ||GTATGTTGATCTTTGATGAATGATGTACGTA |
|Gy1_9 ||SEQ ID NO:17 ||SEQ ID NO:18 |
| ||GGATGAATTTGTTGTGACTCTTGCATGCA ||CTGAGACTCCTGAGGTGGAACCAGGAACT |
|Gy1_10 ||SEQ ID NO:19 ||SEQ ID NO:20 |
| ||GCAGATAAAGAACAACAACCCTTTCAAG ||CAACACTTCCTAAAGATATCATCGATCAA |
|Gy2_1 ||SEQ ID NO:21 ||SEQ ID NO:22 |
| ||GCAATTGCATGCAATACAAACACACTT ||GCCACAGTTTCAATCAATTTTACTAACAA |
|Gy2_2 ||SEQ ID NO:23 ||SEQ ID NO:24 |
| ||CCATGAACTTAATGAGGTGTAACACACAA ||AAGATAGGTTGGACGGTTAAGAAGAA |
|Gy2_3 ||SEQ ID NO:25 ||SEQ ID NO:26 |
| ||ACCGTCCAACCTATCTTATATATTCAA ||CACCCTCTCTGAAGCGATGTACCTTT |
|Gy2_4 ||SEQ ID NO:27 ||SEQ ID NO:28 |
| ||CCTAGCACTTATCAAGAGCCGCAAGAAT ||CTGCATGTTCACGCCGAACGCTTCTTT |
|Gy2_5 ||SEQ ID NO:29 ||SEQ ID NO:30 |
| ||ATATCAGCAGCAGCAGCAAGGAGGTTCC ||GCAAGTGCTAAGATAACTTTGTCGTCA |
|Gy2_6 ||SEQ ID NO:31 ||SEQ ID NO:32 |
| ||CTTGAAAGAAGCGTTCGGCGTGAACAT ||GCAAGTGCTAAGATAACTTTGTCGTCA |
|Gy2_7 ||SEQ ID NO:33 ||SEQ ID NO:34 |
| ||GGATGAATAACATGTTGTGATTAACGTA ||CAAGGAAGCTGAAAGGGTTGTTGTTCTTC |
|Gy3_1 ||SEQ ID NO:35 ||SEQ ID NO:36 |
| ||CACCATTAACTTAATAGTGTAAGACAG ||CCTTGTTGAATAAAGGTTGTAAGTTGGATT |
|Gy3_2 ||SEQ ID NO:37 ||SEQ ID NO:38 |
| ||GATTCCGAAGCCACCTTACACCATTAACTTA ||GGATAAAATGAACCTTGTTGAATAAAGGTT |
|Gy3_3 ||SEQ ID NO:39 ||SEQ ID NO:40 |
| ||GTCTTAAGCTCAGCACCCCACTTCTGAGT ||GGATAAAATGAACCTTGTTGAATAAAGGTT |
|Gy3_4 ||SEQ ID NO:41 ||SEQ ID NO:42 |
| ||CCTCAAGAGTAACGTTAAGGACATCGATA ||CAGTTATTTAAAGTGATTTCACCACGAGG |
|Gy3_5 ||SEQ ID NO:43 ||SEQ ID NO:44 |
| ||AAGAAATTGGACAACGTTGTAACATGCA ||CAATGTTTGTCTTTCTCGTCACAATCTGG |
|Gy3_6 ||SEQ ID NO:45 ||SEQ ID NO:46 |
| ||AAGAAATTGGACAACGTTGTAACATGCA ||GCTTTTATAACATGAATTAATGATGTAAGTA |
|Gy3_7 ||SEQ ID NO:47 ||SEQ ID NO:48 |
| ||GATTAACGTACACTTGATGTATGGTGCA ||GCATAGGTACTTGAGTGACTCATTACACAA |
|Gy4_1 ||SEQ ID NO:49 ||SEQ ID NO:50 |
| ||GCACAGTAAAACAGTTCAAATTGAGAA ||CATTCTTCACCTTGCATGGCTATTGTT |
|Gy4_2 ||SEQ ID NO:51 ||SEQ ID NO:52 |
| ||GCAAGGTGAAGAATGTCACAAACTCAGCAA ||GGTGACAAATGGATTAATATACACTGAGAA |
|Gy4_3 ||SEQ ID NO:53 ||SEQ ID NO:54 |
| ||GGATGATCATCATCGCCCAAGGTAAT ||CTGGTGACTGTCCTGTAGCTGCTGCTT |
|Gy4_4 ||SEQ ID NO:55 ||SEQ ID NO:56 |
| ||TCAAGGTCGCAGAAGCAGCAGCTACAG ||TGAGAGGGAATTTGTTCATCTTCATCAT |
|Gy4_5 ||SEQ ID NO:57 ||SEQ ID NO:58 |
| ||GATGATGAAGATGAACAAATTCCCTCTCAC ||GTAGAGGACAACATATTGGGCACTGAGTTG |
|Gy4_6 ||SEQ ID NO:59 ||SEQ ID NO:60 |
| ||CACCCTCCCAGCCCTCCGCCAATTCCA ||GTCACATAGATCACACTGTTTGCATTCAGA |
|Gy4_7 ||SEQ ID NO:61 ||SEQ ID NO:62 |
| ||TTACTCTCCACATTGGAATCTGAATGCA ||GCCACTCAGATATAAACATAGGCTCGCTG |
|Gy4_8 ||SEQ ID NO:63 ||SEQ ID NO:64 |
| ||CATAAATGACAAGCATGATGGTGTGAGGA ||CCAGTAAACATATAATCAGTATTACTCATTT |
|Gy4_9 ||SEQ ID NO:65 ||SEQ ID NO:66 |
| ||AGCCATGCAAGGTGAAGAATGTCACAAA ||AAGAGTATCACCAGCATTTCTCAGTGT |
|Gy4_10 ||SEQ ID NO:67 ||SEQ ID NO:68 |
| ||CTTTGTTGACATATCAATCACCTTAA ||GTGAAAGAATTAACAAGTAAGGAGAACA |
|Gy4_11 ||SEQ ID NO:69 ||SEQ ID NO:70 |
| ||GTTCTCCTTACTTGTTAATTCTTTCACTT ||GTCCTGGTCCTGGTCTTGTTCACGCTT |
|Gy4_12 ||SEQ ID NO:71 ||SEQ ID NO:72 |
| ||GAAGATCAACCTCGCAAGAGCCGCGAAT ||CAACTACCCCTAGAGAATCACTAAAGAAT |
|Gy4_13 ||SEQ ID NO:73 ||SEQ ID NO:74 |
| ||GTCAGTAAGTATGTTGTAGGGTTGGATT ||CCATCATGCTTGTCATTTATGCGACTTT |
|Gy4_14 ||SEQ ID NO:75 ||SEQ ID NO:76 |
| ||CAAGGCTCACCCCGTGTTAAAGTCGCAT ||GAATAAAGACAAAACGTGAAGACTGACAT |
|Gy5_1 ||SEQ ID NO:77 ||SEQ ID NO:78 |
| ||CTCCTTCAAACTTATTAACACTTT ||CCTTGAACGACAATGATCATTT |
|Gy5_2 ||SEQ ID NO:79 ||SEQ IDNO:80 |
| ||CTCAAGGTCGCAGCAGCAACTACAA ||GAGGGAGTTTGTTCATATTCTTCG |
|Gy5_3 ||SEQ ID NO:81 ||SEQ ID NO:82 |
| ||GAAGAATATGAACAAACTCCCTCTT ||GGACAACATATTGGGCACTGAGTCC |
|Gy5_4 ||SEQ ID NO:83 ||SEQ ID NO:84 |
| ||CTCCCAGCCCTCCGCCAATTCGG ||CACATAGATCACACTGTTCGCGTTCAAG |
|Gy5_5 ||SEQ ID NO:85 ||SEQ ID NO:86 |
| ||TACTCTCCACATTGGAACTTGAACGCG ||CACTCAGATATTAACATAGGCTGGGTC |
|Gy5_6 ||SEQ ID NO:87 ||SEQ ID NO:88 |
| ||GGCCCTTTGGTCAACCCATAAATAA ||AAGACTGACATTTTATTAAGGCGATTC |
|Gy5_7 ||SEQ ID NO:89 ||SEQ ID NO:90 |
| ||CATGGAACTCTCAACACCCTGAGCTGCAA ||CCTCTAGATATAAGATAGTGTTCTTCAA |
|Gy5_8 ||SEQ ID NO:91 ||SEQ ID NO:92 |
| ||GTCACTGTTTCCAAACGCACCCTCAA ||GGGTTCCCAGCAAGGTAAAATACCTT |
|Gy5_9 ||SEQ ID NO:93 ||SEQ ID NO:94 |
| ||GTGTTCCTTACTGGACCTATAACACT ||GGGTGATCAGGACGAGGTTGATCTT |
|Gy5_10 ||SEQ ID NO:95 ||SEQ ID NO:96 |
| ||GTCACTGCATAGTATCATACACACTT ||GTCTGACATCCTCTTCCACGTGGTT |
|Gy7_1 ||SEQ ID NO:97 ||SEQ ID NO:98 |
| ||CGAGAACAATAGAAATAGACCATCAGG ||CCTCTTCACACAATGATCCAAACTC |
|Gy7_2 ||SEQ ID NO:99 ||SEQ ID NO:100 |
| ||GTCCAGGGTCCATGTTATCGTCT ||CATTGTCCTTTCCTTACTGATTCTCC |
|Gy7_3 ||SEQ ID NO:101 ||SEQ ID NO:102 |
| ||TGACTGCATGTATCATGTATGTGAAAG ||GATTCGATGAGGTTGTCAGGTTTC |
|Gy7_4 ||SEQ ID NO:103 ||SEQ ID NO:104 |
| ||CGGAGAATCAGTAAGGAAAGGACAA ||TGAGGTTGTTGGATACCTTGGAGTA |
|Gy7_5 ||SEQ ID NO:105 ||SEQ ID NO:106 |
| ||ACCATTCTGCGCTCCATTATTATTT ||AGTTTCGTCACAACCAGGAATTACA |
|Gy7_6 ||SEQ ID NO:107 ||SEQ ID NO:108 |
| ||GTTTAACCATTCTGCGCTCCATTAT ||GAATATGTCACCCTGCTTCAGGTAA |
|Gy7_7 ||SEQ ID NO:109 ||SEQ ID NO:110 |
| ||TGTAATTCCTGGTTGTGACGAAACT ||GTGGCCTGATAATGCTAAGACCTTT |
|Gy7_8 ||SEQ ID NO:111 ||SEQ ID NO:112 |
| ||CGTTACCTGAAGCAGGGTGACATA ||CACCTCTTCTTCTCCTTCTCCTTCTT |
|Gy7_9 ||SEQ ID NO:113 ||SEQ ID NO:114 |
| ||CTTGGAACACGAAGTTAGAGAAGCA ||CGGTTATTGTGGTTGTAAGTGTGGT |
|Gy7_10 ||SEQ ID NO:115 ||SEQ ID NO:116 |
| ||CCCAATGGGTTAAACTCTACAAGGT ||ATTATTCTTGAGCTCGCTCACTTCC |
|Gy7_11 ||SEQ ID NO:117 ||SEQ ID NO:118 |
| ||GTGGTGAACTCCCAGGGAAAGT ||GAGGAAAGTACAAATAGCAACTGACAA |
|Gy1_473 ||SEQ ID NO:119 ||SEQ ID NO:120 |
| ||CGAAGCCACCTCACACCATGAACTTCAT ||CAGAAGTAGGGTGCTGAGCTTGAGACATT |
|Gy1_579 ||SEQ ID NO:121 ||SEQ ID NO:122 |
| ||GTCCCTCATTCACCTTCCTCTCTTCCCTAT ||GCTTGGCCATGGTGATGACTGATGAGTGT |
|Gy1_794 ||SEQ ID NO:123 ||SEQ ID NO:124 |
| ||CTCAATGCCCTCAAACCGGATAACCGTA ||CAACACCGGCACACTGGAATGGCTTGTT |
|Gy3_1264 ||SEQ ID NO:125 ||SEQ ID NO:126 |
| ||GCATGATATTCCCGGGTTGTCCTAGCACAT ||CCCTCTCTGAAGTGATAGATCTTCTGGTGA |
|Gy3_1356 ||SEQ ID NO:127 ||SEQ ID NO:128 |
| ||CACTTCAGAGAGGGTGATTTGATTGCAGT ||GTTCTGGAAGCTGTTGGTGTCAATAAGAGA |
Genetic conformation of the Gy markers was carried out in two F2 populations designated JB0305602 and JB0305605, which were derived from the crosses between AAH3504TOC/AH0209439-130 and AAH2104JOC/AH0209439-130, respectively. Four hundred F2 individual plants were sampled and 372 plants were genotyped with SNP markers.
- Example 4
Mutations in Gy1 and Gy2
Protein analysis was carried out as follows: Eight soybean seeds were pooled and ground using the CAT Mega-Grinder (SOP Asci-01-0002). Ground samples were stored at 4° C. For analysis, ˜30 mg of flour from each was weighed into one well of a 96 well 2 ml microtiter plate. Protein was extracted for 1 hour with shaking in 1.0 ml 1X Laemmli SDS buffer pH 6.8 containing 0.1M dithiothreitol (DTT) as a reductant. Following centrifugation, a portion of each extract was further diluted in SDS buffer to yield 0.2-0.5 μg/μL total protein, heated to 90-100° C. for 10 min, and cooled. For each sample, 1-2 μg total protein was loaded using a 12 channel pipet onto a 26 lane 15% T gradient Tris/HCl Criterion gel. Molecular weight standards and a parental control were included in two of the lanes in each gel. The gels were electrophoresed until the tracking dye reached the bottom of the gel ˜1.2 hrs, then stained overnight in Colloidal Coomassie Blue G-250, destained in DI water, and imaged using the GS800 Calibrated Densitometer. An exemplary image of a stained gel is shown in FIG. 1 and the protein bands associated with Gy alleles are indicated to the left of the figure. Quantitation was performed using Bio-Rad Quantity One™ Software. The software was used to determine the relative quantity of each band in the sample lane. The percent acidic glycinin and percent β-conglycinin protein sub-unit bands are reported as the relative percent of the total protein in the lane. The sample identities and weights are tracked using Master LIMS™.
F2 progeny plants were analyzed for total content of Gy1 and Gy2 encoded protein. As shown in FIG. 2, the plants were distributed into two phenotypic groups, one group with less than 3% Gy1,2 encoded protein and another with 3.1% greater Gy1,2 encoded protein. Chi square analysis (FIG. 2B) was consistent with the linked mutant Gy1,2 alleles as recessive traits.
Good sequence coverage was obtained in most parts of the Gy1 gene. Two small gaps exist due to the failures of two primer pairs. The consensus sequence is listed as SEQ ID NO: 163. The allelic scores at some selected nucleotide positions in Gy1 are given in Table 3. There are three SNPs at positions 643, 835 and 839 between JB7/JB8 and other lines. Because no sequence was recovered from B2G2 lines at these positions, it was not determined if the SNPs were inherited from the B2G2 mutant line. No amplicon or sequence at the 5′end of the Gy1 gene were obtained from mutant line B2G2 and its derived lines JB3, JB4, JB13, JB14 and JB15, indicating a possible sequence deletion in the mutant lines. Additional PCR reactions were carried out with the first three pairs of primers and consistent results were obtained. This confirmed the deletion in the mutant lines. The deletion spans the upstream promoter regions, Exon I and Intron I. The junctions of the deletion have not yet been precisely determined. A dominant marker was designed on the deletion for use as diagnostic marker for Gy1 locus.
- Example 5
Mutations in Gy3
Sequencing of the Gy2 gene indicated only three identifiable SNPs and the rare allele all came from JB7 line. All other lines were identical. Because of high sequence homology among Gy1, Gy2 and Gy3, occasional cross contaminations do occur even with locus specific primers, thus other variations may exist that were not identified.
| ||TABLE 3 |
| || |
| || |
| ||Position/Allele |
|Lines ||195 ||450 ||600 ||643 ||800 ||835 ||839 ||1000 ||1300 ||2762 ||27703 |
|JB1 || || ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T ||C ||G ||G |
|JB2 || ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T || ||G ||G |
|JB3 || || || || || || || || || || ||G |
|JB5 ||A || ||C ||T || || || || || ||G ||G |
|JB6 ||A ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T ||C |
|JB7 || || ||C ||A ||G ||T ||T ||T || || ||G |
|JB8 || || || ||A || ||T ||T |
|JB9 || || || ||A ||G ||A ||C ||T || ||A/G ||A/G |
|JB10 ||A ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T || ||G ||G |
|JB11 || || || || || || || || || ||G ||G |
|JB12 ||A || ||C ||T ||G ||A || ||T || ||G ||G |
|JB13 || || || || || || || || || ||G ||G |
|JB14 || || || || || || || || || ||G ||G |
|JB15 || || || || || || || || || ||G ||G |
|A1923 || || ||C ||N ||G ||A ||C ||T || ||G ||G |
|A3244 ||A ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T ||C ||G |
|AG2403 ||A ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T ||C ||G ||G |
|AG2703 ||A ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T ||C ||G ||G |
|AG3201 || ||N ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T ||C |
|AG3202 ||A ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T ||C ||G ||G |
|DKB17-51 || ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T ||C |
|DKB19-51 || ||C ||C ||T ||G ||A ||C ||T || ||G ||G |
|B2G2 || || || || || || || || ||C ||G ||G |
F2 progeny plants were analyzed for total content of Gy3 encoded protein. As shown in FIG. 3, the plants were distributed into two phenotypic groups, one group with less than 1% Gy3 encoded protein and another with 1.1% or greater Gy3 encoded protein. Chi square analysis (FIG. 3B) was consistent with the reduced Gy3 expression as a recessive trait.
When the expression levels of Gy1,2 and Gy3 subunits were compared (FIG. 4) it was found that expression of the Gy1,2 encoded proteins positively correlated with expression of Gy3 encoded protein, with a correlation coefficient of 0.88, see FIG. 4B. This data indicated that expression of low Gy3 encoded protein levels could be determined based upon the Gy1, and/or Gy2 genotype.
- Example 6
Mutations in Gy4
DNA sequence variations at the Gy3 locus were determined by resequencing of the entire gene on multiples lines. The consensus sequence obtained is listed as SEQ ID NO: 164. Allelic scores of polymorphisms at this locus are given in Table 4. Five SNPs and two INDELs were detected among mutants and wild types. The original mutant line, B2G2, carried an insertion (TGAT) at positions 848-851 while all other lines carried a deletion at this location. B2G2 also carried rare alleles on three SNPs at position 1083, 1120 and 1866 while all other lines carried the abundant allele. The data indicated that these SNPs and INDEL were in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with the low expression of Gy3 encoded protein. Three sequence variations at the 3′ end of the gene, position 2504-2505, 2574 and 3189, however, did not seem to be in LD with the low expression of Gy3 encoded protein, because rare alleles were detected not only on B2G2 but also in wild types AG2703 and DKB19-51. None of the B2G2 derived lines used in this study inherited the B2G2 alleles at Gy3 locus.
| ||TABLE 4 |
| || |
| || |
| ||Position/Allele |
|Lines ||234 ||1318 ||1600 ||1866 ||2200 ||2504-2505 ||2574 ||2850 ||3189 |
|JB1 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A ||— ||G || ||C |
|JB2 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A || || ||G ||C |
|JB3 ||A ||A ||A ||C || ||— ||G ||G |
|JB4 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A || || ||G ||C |
|JB5 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A || || ||G ||C |
|JB6 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A ||— ||G ||G ||C |
|JB7 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A || || ||G ||C |
|JB8 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A || || ||G ||C |
|JB9 ||A || || || || || || ||G ||C |
|JB10 ||A ||A ||A ||C |
|JB11 ||A ||A ||A ||C || || || ||G |
|JB12 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A || || ||G ||C |
|JB13 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A |
|JB14 ||A ||A ||A ||C || || || ||G |
|JB15 ||A ||A ||A ||C || || || ||G |
|A1923 ||A ||A ||A ||C || || || ||G |
|A3244 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A ||— ||G || ||C |
|AG2403 ||A ||A ||A ||C || || || ||G |
|AG2703 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A ||AT ||A ||G ||T |
|AG3201 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A ||— ||G |
|AG3202 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A || || ||G ||C |
|DKB17-51 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A ||— ||G |
|DKB19-51 ||A ||A ||A ||C ||A || || ||G ||T |
|B2G2 ||A || || ||A ||A || || ||G |
Progeny plants were subjected to protein analysis to determine the amount of Gy4 encoded polypeptides that were expressed. As shown in FIG. 5, the plants were distributed in two phenotypic groups, one group that was null for Gy4 and another group that demonstrated expression of Gy4 encoded polypeptides. Chi square analysis (FIG. 5B) was consistent with the Gy4 null allele as a recessive trait.
Sequence analysis of the Gy4 alleles revealed a mutation at the translation initiation codon in mutant line B2G2 and its derived lines (Table 5, position 682, SEQ ID NO:165). The mutation changes ATG to ATA. Since the translation initiation codon was lost, the peptide subunit encoded by this gene is most likely unable to translate. This SNP is ideal for use as molecular marker indicative of Gy4 loss. The sequence obtained was used to design primers for detection of this marker, termed NS0199003 (see Table 8).
- Example 7
Mutations in Gy5
Additional polymorphisms at position 1620 and 1632 were also observed in some sequence reads from B2G2 and certain progeny lines, but these did not correlate with the loss of the Gy4 encoded protein subunits. Thus, these inconsistencies may be caused by nonspecific amplification with the primers at this region.
| ||TABLE 5 |
| || |
| || |
| ||Position/Allele |
| ||Lines ||682 ||1620 ||1632 |
| || |
| ||JB1 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||JB2 ||A ||C ||T/C |
| ||JB3 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||JB4 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||JB5 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||JB6 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||JB7 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||JB8 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||JB9 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||JB10 ||A ||C ||T/C |
| ||JB11 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||JB12 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||JB13 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||JB14 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||JB15 ||A ||C ||T |
| ||A1923 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||A3244 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||AG2403 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||AG2703 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||AG3201 |
| ||AG3202 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||DKB17-51 |
| ||DKB19-51 ||G ||C ||T |
| ||B2G2 ||A ||T/C ||T/C |
| || |
- Example 8
Development of Gy mutation Markers
Sequence analysis of the Gy5 alleles indicated there are two SNPs (positions 363 and 612 on SEQ ID NO: 166) and two INDELs (positions 447-453, 519-524) in B2G2 plants as compared to other parental varieties (Table 6). Additionally, a SNP was identified at position 752 in Exon II which changes the amino acid residue from Serine to Asparagine. All five SNPs or INDELs form into two haplotypes in the lines tested. Mutant line B2G2 and its derived lines JB1, JB5 and JB8 shared one haplotype while others lines shares another haplotype. These SNPs/INDELs appear to be in linkage disequilibrium and are associated with the “11s null” phenotypes. It is still unknown if these SNPs or INDELs actually caused the loss of A3 subunit in B2G2 as shown on FIG. 1
. Since these are all sequence variations detected in the coding region there may be some other variations residing in the promoter regions which caused the loss of the A3 band as seen on the protein gel.
| ||TABLE 6 |
| || |
| || |
| ||Position/Allele |
|Lines ||363 ||447-453 ||519-524 ||612 ||752 |
|JB1 ||C ||******* ||****** ||A ||A |
|JB2 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB3 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB4 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB5 ||C ||******* ||******* ||A ||A |
|JB7 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB8 ||C ||******* ||******* ||A ||A |
|JB9 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB10 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB11 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB13 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB14 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|JB15 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|A1923 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T |
|A3244 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|AG2403 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|AG3201 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|AG3202 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|DKB17-51 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|DKB19-51 ||G ||TTTTTAG ||TAATAA ||T ||G |
|B2G2 ||C ||******* ||******* ||A ||A |
- Example 9
High Correspondence Between Gy Markers and Protein Subunits
PCR analyses, such as Taqman® assays, were designed for the SNPs or INDELs identified above. Table 7 lists the primer and probe sequences of each assay as well as the marker name assigned to each marker. Two assays were designed for Gy1 and Gy3 respectively using SNPs at different positions. These assays were first run on the standard panel used in resequencing in this study and then used in segregating populations.
|TABLE 7 |
| ||Marker || ||Descrip- || || |
|Gene ||Name ||Assays ||tion ||Sequence |
|Gy1 ||NS0199008 ||GY1_conA- ||Forward ||SEQ ID NO:129 || |
| || ||644 ||Primer ||AATAACCACGCCTCAGGT |
| || || || ||TCTC |
|Gy1 ||NS0199008 ||GY1_conA- ||Reverse ||SEQ ID NO:130 |
| || ||644 ||Primer ||GAGTGTTTAAGGACCAAT |
| || || || ||GGAGAGA |
|Gy1 ||NS0199008 ||GY1_conA- ||Vic ||SEQ ID NO:131 |
| || ||644 ||Probe ||CTTCACAACTCAAACAT |
|Gy1 ||NS0199008 ||GY1_conA- ||FAM ||SEQ ID NO:132 |
| || ||644 ||Probe ||TTCACAACACAAACAT |
|Gy1 ||NS0199009 ||GY1_conB- ||Forward ||SEQ ID NO:133 |
| || ||839 ||Primer ||CCCTCAAACCGGATAACC |
| || || || ||GTATAG |
|Gy1 ||NS0199009 ||GY1_conB- ||Reverse ||SEQ ID NO:134 |
| || ||839 ||Primer ||CACTGGAATGGCTTGTTG |
| || || || ||TTAGG |
|Gy1 ||NS0199009 ||GY1_conB- ||Vic ||SEQ ID NO:135 |
| || ||839 ||Probe ||ATGTCTCAATGAGCCC |
|Gy1 ||NS0199009 ||GY1_conB- ||FAM ||SEQ ID NO:136 |
| || ||839 ||Probe ||ATGTCTCAATGAACCC |
|Gy2 ||NS0199002 ||GY2-102 ||Forward ||SEQ ID NO:137 |
| || || ||Primer ||CGTACATCATACATGTTA |
| || || || ||TAAATTAAGCTCAACAA |
|Gy2 ||NS0199002 ||GY2-102 ||Reverse ||SEQ ID NO:138 |
| || || ||Primer ||GCATATGCAAGTGCTAAG |
| || || || ||ATAACTTTGT |
|Gy2 ||NS0199002 ||GY2-102 ||Vic ||SEQ ID NO:139 |
| || || ||Probe ||ACACATTTTAATTACTAT |
| || || || ||ATATAACT |
|Gy2 ||NS0199002 ||GY2-102 ||FAM ||SEQ ID NO:140 |
| || || ||Probe ||CACATTTTAATTACTATA |
| || || || ||TATAGCT |
|Gy3 ||NS0199004 ||GY3-89 ||Forward ||SEQ ID NO:141 |
| || || ||Primer ||AGAGCCCTTTTTGCATGT |
| || || || ||GCTA |
|Gy3 ||NS0199004 ||GY3-89 ||Reverse ||SEQ ID NO:142 |
| || || ||Primer ||TCGTTCTTATTTATTGCT |
| || || || ||ACGCACACT |
|Gy3 ||NS0199004 ||GY3-89 ||Vic ||SEQ ID NO:143 |
| || || ||Probe ||CAAAAGGACAAAAGTGT |
|Gy3 ||NS0199004 ||GY3-89 ||FAM ||SEQ ID NO:144 |
| || || ||Probe ||AAAAGGACGAAAGTGT |
|Gy3 ||NS0199010 ||GY3_conA- ||Forward ||SEQ ID NO:145 |
| || ||1866 ||Primer ||GGAACCAAGAGCAAGAGT |
| || || || ||TTCTACA |
|Gy3 ||NS0199010 ||GY3_conA- ||Reverse ||SEQ ID NO:146 |
| || ||1866 ||Primer ||CGCTTTCCTTTCTGGCT |
| || || || ||TTGAGTA |
|Gy3 ||NS0199010 ||GY3_conA- ||Vic ||SEQ ID NO:147 |
| || ||1866 ||Probe ||CTCCTTGCTGCTTCT |
|Gy3 ||NS0199010 ||GY3_conA- ||FAM ||SEQ ID NO:148 |
| || ||1866 ||Probe ||CCTCCTTTCTGCTTCT |
|Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||GY4-93 ||Forward ||SEQ ID NO:149 |
| || || ||Primer ||TCCAATTCACCAACTCCT |
| || || || ||TCAAACT |
|Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||GY4-93 ||Reverse ||SEQ ID NO:150 |
| || || ||Primer ||CAAAGGGAAGAAAGAGAG |
| || || || ||AGAGTGA |
|Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||GY4-93 ||Vic ||SEQ ID NO:151 |
| || || ||Probe ||CTTCCTTAGTTCAATATA |
| || || || ||GG |
|Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||GY4-93 ||FAM ||SEQ ID NO:152 |
| || || ||Probe ||TCCTTAGTTCAATATGGG |
|Gy7 ||NS0199001 ||GY7-72 ||Forward ||SEQ ID NO:153 |
| || || ||Primer ||CATAGGAGAACACGAGGG |
| || || || ||ATGTG |
|Gy7 ||NS0199001 ||GY7-72 ||Reverse ||SEQ ID NO:154 |
| || || ||Primer ||GGCTTCTACTTTGCTCTT |
| || || || ||CCTCTT |
|Gy7 ||NS0199001 ||GY7-72 ||Vic ||SEQ ID NO:155 |
| || || ||Probe ||AATGCGAAGATAAAG |
|Gy7 ||NS0199001 ||GY7-72 ||FAM ||SEQ ID NO:156 |
| || || ||Probe ||ATGCGAAAATAAAG |
F1 progeny plants were analyzed to determine total content of the glycinin and beta-conglycinin protein. The graph in FIG. 6A shows total glycinin protein versus total beta-conglycinin protein for each plant. The data indicates that lower expression of glycinin correlates with higher expression of beta-conglycinin (Cgy) subunits (FIG. 6B).
- Example 10
Variation in Protein Expression in Gy3 and Gy4 Null Soybean Plants
Genetic correlation between molecular markers and their corresponding glycinin subunits was carried out in two F2 segregating populations, JB0305602 and JB0305605. To establish which genetic markers were indicative of the mutant Gy alleles, all the individuals of the two populations were analyzed for protein content on SDS-PAGE and genotyped with SNP markers developed in this study together with a number of markers selected throughout the genome. As indicated above and in FIG. 1
, protein bands for Gy1 and Gy2 were clustered together and thus they were measured as one unit. Table 8 shows that segregation of protein bands, expressed as percentage of total protein, is highly correlated with the SNP markers. For example, plants with the mutant allele at Gy1 always contain lower glycinin A1a, A1b and A2 subunits, 2.5 and 2.4%, respectively in both populations while those with “TT” allele contain higher glycinin A1a, A1b and A2 subunits, 7.6 and 8.1% respectively. The correlation is highly significant (P-values of 1.7×10−55
respectively) and a similar correlation was observed in the case of Gy2. At the Gy4 locus, individuals carrying “AA” alleles contain lower glycinin subunits A4B3A5, 0.6% and 0.1% in their respective populations, while heterozygotes (“AG”) contain 1.8% in both populations and those with “GG” contain highest glycinin subunits A4B3A5, 2.9% and 3.3% in their respective populations. The correlation is highly significant, with P-values of 2.3×10−40
respectively. Data indicated that the NS0199008, NS0199002 and NS0199003 marker in particular correlated well with reduced expression of indicated glycinin subunits, and could be used to predict a reduced glycinin phenotype.
|TABLE 8 |
| || ||Marker || ||Protein ||#of F2 || || || |
|Population ||Gene ||Name ||Allele ||Mean (%) ||Plants ||DF ||ProbF ||Rsquare |
|JB0305605 ||Gy1 ||NS0199008 ||** ||2.5 ||103 ||1 ||1.70E−55 ||0.49 |
| ||Gy1 ||NS0199008 ||TT ||7.6 ||269 ||1 |
| ||Gy2 ||NS0199002 ||** ||2.8 ||109 ||1 ||1.00E−49 ||0.45 |
| ||Gy2 ||NS0199002 ||TT ||7.6 ||263 |
|JB0305602 ||Gy1 ||NS0199008 ||** ||2.4 ||89 ||1 ||4.10E−62 ||0.49 |
| ||Gy1 ||NS0199008 ||TT ||8.1 ||283 ||1 |
| ||Gy2 ||NS0199002 ||** ||3 ||102 ||1 ||2.70E−54 ||0.48 |
| ||Gy2 ||NS0199002 ||TT ||8.1 ||270 |
|JB0305605 ||Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||AA ||0.6 ||112 ||2 ||2.30E−40 ||0.43 |
| ||Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||AG ||1.8 ||128 |
| ||Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||GG ||2.9 ||92 |
|JB0305602 ||Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||AA ||0.1 ||93 ||2 ||2.30E−69 ||0.62 |
| ||Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||AG ||1.8 ||149 |
| ||Gy4 ||NS0199003 ||GG ||3.3 ||88 |
Agronomically elite soybean plants comprising non-transgenic mutations conferring a null Gy3 and Gy4 phenotype and a reduced Gy1/Gy2 phenotype were analyzed for total content of various glycinin and β-conglycinin subunits. Three distinct lines, Pedigree 1 (AH_DAK2301A1R/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500COR:@. 0013.):@.0114.0008.@); Pedigree 2 (AH_DAK2301A1R/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500COR:@. 0013.):@.0096.0007.@); and Pedigree 3 (AH_DAK2301A1R/((A3244/(B2G2/A1923:.077.):0001.0097.0015.)/DJW2500COR:@. 0013.):@.0105.0006.@) (deposited as ATCC Accession No. PTA-6892) were studied and data for each is presented in Tables 9, 10 and 11 respectively.
In the case of each line, plants grown in various locations, during the 2004-2005 season were analyzed. Data presented in these tables indicates the total content of Gy1/Gy2, Gy5, α′ BC, α′ BC and β BC protein subunits as a percentage of the total seed protein content. Also indicated is the total content of acidic glycinin subunits and total β-conglycinin content. For each of the three pedigrees the average data (Avg.) and standard deviation from the mean (St. Dev.) is indicated in the last two rows of each table. Values were calculated using the methods described above, in Example 3. In no case was detectable Gy3 or Gy4 encoded protein observed.
The studies outlined in Tables 9-11 indicated that the content of various glycinin and beta-conglycinin protein subunits was variable both between the three plant lines tested (e.g effects from differing genomic backgrounds) and in plants grown in different environments conditions (at different locations). These data highlight the advantage of selection of Gy mutant plants by the use polymorphism markers, since detection of these markers will not be subject to variability based on genomic background and environmental conditions.
|TABLE 9 |
| || || || || || || ||β- |
|Pedigree ||Gy1, 2 ||Gy5 ||α′ BC ||α BC ||β BC ||Acidic Glycinins ||Conglycinins |
|1 ||1.98 ||4.36 ||12.300 ||15.630 ||7.00 ||6.34 ||34.93 |
|1 ||2.46 ||6.83 ||12.276 ||14.274 ||9.91 ||9.29 ||36.46 |
|1 ||3.01 ||6.12 ||12.375 ||16.158 ||7.19 ||9.13 ||35.72 |
|1 ||2.98 ||6.69 ||12.63 ||16.731 ||6.79 ||9.67 ||36.15 |
|1 ||2.35 ||4.94 ||12.693 ||15.393 ||4.94 ||7.29 ||33.03 |
|1 ||2.48 ||4.97 ||11.906 ||14.579 ||9.06 ||7.45 ||35.55 |
|Avg. 1 ||2.54 ||5.65 ||12.36 ||15.46 ||7.48 ||8.20 ||35.31 |
|St. Dev. 1 ||0.39 ||1.03 ||0.28 ||0.93 ||1.77 ||1.35 ||1.23 |
- Example 11
Gy Genomic Markers can be Used to Select Low Glycinin Soybean Plants
Segregation of Gy1(NS0199008), Gy2(NS0199002) and Gy4(NS0199003) markers was analyzed on two F2 populations. As shown in Table 9, both Gy1 and Gy2 are dominant markers, and each segregates in a 3:1 ratio. Gy4 is a co-dominant marker.
- Example 12
Color Analysis of Soybean Seeds of Low Glycinin Soybean Plants Produced
The three identified markers can be used to identify plants with low glycinin and high β-conglycinin seed content. FIG. 7 illustrates the glycinin and β-conglycinin content of F2 plants. Plants were selected based on either protein analysis of subunit expression (FIG. 7A) or using the three mutant Gy markers (FIG. 7B). The data shows that the selection based on markers misidentified less than 1% ( 7/754) F2 plants.
Green seed color is often viewed as less desirable by soybean farmers and consumers. Eliminating the green seed color of a line would therefore be desirable. An analysis was carried out on low glycinin soybeans produced as described herein to analyze the extent to which the green seed color was eliminated. Color analysis was carried out on whole soybeans using the ColorFlex™ Reflectance Spectrophotometer (Model 45/0). The spectrometer was standardized using black glass and white tile. The standardization was checked using a green tile having color values certified by the manufacturer, Hunter Associates Laboratory, Inc. (Reston, Va., USA).
The spectrophotometer measures the CIE Tristimulus Color Scale Values X, Y and Z and from these values and calculates the CIELAB Color Scale Values L*, a* and b*. The CIELAB Color Scale allows the specification of color perception in terms of three-dimensional space (CIE, Colorimetry, Publication 15.2, Second Edition, Vienna, 1986), with a CIELAB Color Space organized in a cube. The L*-axis runs from top to bottom and is known as the lightness value, which extends from 0 (black) to 100 (white). The a* and the b*axes have no specific numerical limits. The coordinate a* represents redness when positive, gray when zero and greenness when negative. The coordinate b* represents yellowness when positive, gray when zero and blueness when negative.
A multi-layer of whole soybeans filled the 35×10 mm style polystyrene tissue culture dish with the lid on the bottom of the dish in order to protect the reading surface. The lid was removed from the bottom of the tissue culture dish before it was placed on the spectrophotometer port. The tissue culture dish with the whole soybeans was placed on the spectrometer port with the side to be measured towards the port. The light trap was placed over the sample in order to restrict any external light interference.
The CIE Tristimulus Color Scale screen was displayed on the ColorFlex. The Read Key was pressed and the CIE Tristimulus Color Scale Values were measured for the whole soybean sample. The color capture program recorded the values into an Excel spread-sheet. The view was toggled to the CIELAB Color Scale screen, the Read Key was pressed, and the spectrophotometer was used to calculate the CIELAB Color Scale Values L*, a* and b* for the whole soybean sample.
- Example 13
Sequence Variations in Lipoxygenase Genes
Five replicates of whole soybeans in a multi-layer arrangement were measured for each sample. The same whole soybeans were repacked four times in order to achieve five color measurements. The results of the color analysis can be summarized in Table 12 as follows.
| ||TABLE 12 |
| || |
| || |
| || ||a* ||stdev ||L* ||stdev |
| || |
|Commercial control ||Commercial control ||7.08 ||0.3 ||54.55 ||1 |
|(AG1901) ||(Ag1901) |
|B2G2 ||B2G2 ||1.91 ||0.28 ||51.65 ||1.34 |
|JB5 ||HBC Line segregating ||3.73 ||0.59 ||53.65 ||0.76 |
| ||for color |
|AJB2002KOC ||HBC line retaining ||7.36 ||0.25 ||52.39 ||1.69 |
|(A3244/ ||some off-color |
|Pedigree 3 ||Elite HBC variety ||7.34 ||0.2 ||57.66 ||0.84 |
Elite = a* >5 and L* >54
The Lox2 sequence from GenBank, G1505137, was used as a query to blast against a Monsanto sequence database. Sixty high hits were downloaded and assembled using the SeqMan program (DNASTAR, INC, Madison, Wis.). Two distinct transcripts were identified in the Monsanto DNA sequence collection. One of the transcripts corresponded to a lipoxygenase-1 (Lox1) gene in GenBank and was thus named lx1 (SEQ ID NO:157), and the other corresponded to the Lox2 (lx2) gene (SEQ ID NO:158). Gene-specific primers were designed and used to generate amplicons from a panel of eight lines. The panel consisted of six mutants and two wild types. Table 13 lists the lines used in the sequencing panel.
|TABLE 13 |
|Pos ||Variety ||Pedigree ||Alleles |
|A ||PI86023 || ||lx2lx2 |
|B ||L2-3 (aka ||Century × PI86023 ||lx2lx2 |
| ||PI561405) |
|C ||IA2025 || ||lx1lx1lx2lx2lx3lx3 |
|D ||IA2032 || ||lx1lx1lx2lx2lx3lx3 |
|E ||PI408251 || ||lx1lx1Lx2Lx2Lx3Lx3 |
|F ||PI417458 || ||LX1LX1LX2LX2LX3LX3 |
|G ||A3469 || ||LX2LX2 |
|H ||A2247 || ||LX2LX2 |
Amplicon sequencing revealed that there were 27 polymorphisms among eight lines on the Lox1 locus, including 21 SNPs and 6 INDELs (Table 14). Out of these polymorphisms, 10 were located in exons. Based on the allelic scores at all these polymorphisms, eight lines in the sequence panel fall into six haplotypes. Both wild types A3469 and A2247 belong to the same haplotype while other mutants are of different haplotypes. A 74 bp deletion was detected in IA2025, IA2032 and PI408251. The deletion appears to be associated with lx1 mutant phenotypes (Table 13).
|TABLE 14 |
| || ||EX ||INT ||INT ||INT ||INT ||EX ||INT ||INT ||INT ||INT ||EX ||INT ||INT |
|Variety ||Haplo ||178-180 ||326 ||363 ||380 ||713 ||1196 ||1253 ||1372 ||1388 ||1527 ||1554 ||2267 ||3055] |
|PI86023 || ||— ||— ||— ||— ||— ||A ||T ||T ||T ||A ||A ||G ||C |
|L2-3 ||Hap2 ||GCG ||* ||C ||A ||A ||A ||T ||T ||T ||A ||A ||G ||C |
|IA2025 ||Hap5 ||*** ||A ||T ||* ||G ||A ||T ||T ||T ||A ||A ||C ||A |
|IA2032 ||Hap6 ||GCG ||* ||C ||A ||A ||A ||T ||T ||T ||A ||A ||C ||A |
|PI408251 ||Hap4 ||*** ||A ||T ||* ||G ||T ||A ||G ||C ||T ||C ||C ||A |
|PI417458 ||Hap1 ||GCG ||* ||C ||A ||A ||T ||A ||G ||C ||T ||C ||C ||A |
|A3469 ||Hap3 ||*** ||A ||T ||* ||G ||T ||A ||G ||C ||T ||C ||C ||A |
|A2247 ||Hap3 ||*** ||A ||T ||* ||G ||T ||A ||G ||C ||T ||C ||C ||A |
| || || || ||INT ||EX ||INT ||EX ||INT ||INT ||EX ||EX ||EX ||EX ||EX ||EX |
|Variety ||Haplo ||3088 ||3125 ||3139 ||3204 ||3278 ||3832-3905 ||4043 ||4057 ||4193 ||4225 ||4247 ||4267 ||4430 ||4439 |
|PI86023 || ||T ||* ||T ||C ||C ||GATC# ||A ||* ||C ||T ||A ||C ||A ||G |
|L2-3 ||Hap2 ||T ||* ||T ||C ||C ||GATC ||A ||* ||C ||T ||A ||C ||A ||G |
|IA2025 ||Hap5 ||G ||G ||A ||G ||A ||**** ||C ||A ||G ||C ||G ||T ||C ||A |
|IA2032 ||Hap6 ||G ||G ||A ||G ||A ||**** ||C ||A ||G ||C ||G ||T ||C ||A |
|PI408251 ||Hap4 ||G ||G ||A ||G ||A ||**** ||C ||A ||G ||C ||G ||T ||C ||A |
|PI417458 ||Hap1 ||G ||G ||A ||G ||A ||GATC ||C ||A ||G ||C ||G ||T ||C ||A |
|A3469 ||Hap3 ||G ||G ||A ||G ||A ||GATC ||C ||A ||G ||C ||G ||T ||C ||A |
|A2247 ||Hap3 ||G ||G ||A ||G ||A ||GATC ||C ||A ||G ||C ||G ||T ||C ||A |
#GATC represents the 74 bp sequence deleted in IA2025, IA2032, and PI408251.
Polymorphisms at the Lox2 locus are shown on Table 15. Six SNPs and a 2 bp INDEL were detected and two distinct haplotypes are formed in these eight lines. The haplotypes are clearly associated with lx2 phenotypes (Table 13). All of these polymorphisms except the one at position 2542 are located in introns. The SNP at position 2542 is a missense mutation, causing a change in genetic codon from CAT encoding for Histidine to CAA encoding for Glutamine.
|TABLE 15 |
| ||Hap- || || || || || || || |
| ||lo- || || || || || || || |
|Variety ||type ||323 ||439 ||1390 ||1431 ||1458 ||2486-87 ||2542 |
|PI86023 || ||C ||A ||A ||C ||G ||** ||A |
|L2-3 ||Hap1 ||C ||A ||A ||C ||G ||** ||A |
|IA2025 ||Hap1 ||C ||A ||A ||C ||G ||** ||A |
|IA2032 ||Hap1 ||C ||A ||A ||C ||G ||** ||A |
|PI408251 ||Hap2 ||T ||G ||G ||T ||T ||AT ||T |
|PI417458 ||Hap2 ||T ||G ||G ||T ||T ||AT ||T |
|A3469 ||Hap2 ||T ||G ||G ||T ||T ||AT ||T |
|A2247 ||Hap2 ||T ||G ||G ||T ||T ||AT ||T |
- Example 14
Sequence Variations Associated with Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitor Null Phenotype in Soybeans
A Taqman assay was designed from the SNP at position 2542. The assay information is given in Table 16. The allelogram of this assay is shown on FIG. 8
. This marker allowed a clear distinction between the “A” allele from the mutant at Lox2 and the “T” allele from wild type.
| ||TABLE 16 |
| || |
| || |
| ||Marker ||NS0203296 || |
| || |
| ||Gene ||Lox2 |
| || |
| ||SNP ||203296 |
| || |
| ||AssayID ||1915582-19230-203296 |
| || |
| ||Fwd Primer ||GCTATCATCAACTCATGAGCCATTG |
| || ||(SEQ ID NO:159) |
| || |
| ||Rev Primer ||GTGTCGGTTTGTTGCTATGATGAAT |
| || ||(SEQ ID NO:160) |
| || |
| ||VicProbe ||CAATCACCGCTTGAGTAT |
| || ||(SEQ ID NO:161) |
| || |
| ||VicAllele ||A |
| || |
| ||FamProbe ||AATCACCGCATGAGTAT |
| || ||(SEQ ID NO:162) |
| || |
| ||FamAllele ||T |
| || |
Candidate sequences encoding the Kunitz Trypsin Inhibitor Protein (KTI) of soybean were identified from four candidate sequences encoding KTI in soybeans. One candidate sequence, KTIA (SEQ ID NO:167) was utilized as a template to design primers for subsequent PCR amplification reactions. Locus specific primers were designed from the candidate sequence, and PCR amplicons were generated from 5 KTI-null mutant lines and 7 wild-type lines (Table 17). Alignment of sequences from these amplicons allowed identification of nucleotide variations that are associated with the Kunitz phenotypes (FIG. 9
). A 2-bp deletion at position 622-623 and one base mutation at position 624 (see FIG. 9
) were detected in all Kunitz null mutants while a “GAG” was present in all the wild types in the same positions. The deletion/insertion is a nonsense mutation, causing the protein to terminate prematurely, explaining the phenotype of the mutant lines, which display the Kunitz null phenotype. This INDEL can be used as a genetic marker for marker-assisted selections for Kunitz null soybean lines and varieties.
| ||TABLE 17 |
| || |
| || |
| ||Line ||Genotypes |
| || |
| ||PI542044 ||Titi |
| ||PI157440 ||Titi |
| ||IS206-17 ||Titi |
| ||PI547656 ||Titi |
| ||PI547816 ||Titi |
| ||PI518671 ||TiTi |
| ||A3935 ||TiTi |
| ||DKB19-15 ||TiTi |
| ||AG2703 ||TiTi |
| ||AG3302 ||TiTi |
| ||AG2403 ||TiTi |
| || |
A PCR-based TAQMAN marker-assisted assay employing primers (e.g. SEQ ID NOs: 168-171) was utilized to allow identification of the KTI-null trait (Table 18), and validation of the assay showed that the KTI-null marker segregated with the KTI-null phenotype.
|TABLE 18 |
|KTI Assay information. Marker Name: NS0201535 |
| ||Primer1 ||32_1-1F ||GAGAACAAAGATGCAATGGATGGTT || |
| || || ||(SEQ ID NO:168) |
| || |
| ||Primer2 ||32_1-1R ||GCTGTGGACAGAACACAAGCTTATA |
| || || ||(SEQ ID NO:169) |
| || |
| ||Vic_probe ||32_1-1V2 ||AGAAACTCTCTCAAGTCT |
| || || ||(SEQ ID NO:170) |
| || |
| ||FAM_probe ||32_1-1M2 ||CATCAGAAACTCTAAGTCT |
| || || ||(SEQ ID NO:171) |
| || |
| ||KTI_Null || ||*** |
| || |
| ||Wild Type || ||GAG |
| || |
All of the compositions and methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the method described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents which are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are specifically incorporated herein by reference.
- U.S. Pat. No. 4,992,375
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,015,580
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,024,944
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,416,011
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,545,545
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,099
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,637,785
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,031,154
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,085
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,184,440
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,486,383
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,774,284
- Adams et al., J. Nutr., 134(3):511-516, 2004.
- Allard, In: Principles of plant Breeding, John Wiley & Sons, NY, 50-98, 1960.
- Baba et al., J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo), 50(1):26-31, 2004.
- Beachy et al., Ann. rev. Phytopathol. 28:451 (1990
- Beilinson et al., Theor. Appl. Genet., 104(6-7):1132-1140, 2002.
- Boerma and Moradshahi, Crop Sci., 15:858-861, 1975.
- Borthwick and Parker, Bot. Gaz., 100:374-387, 1938.
- Brim and Stuber, Crop Sci., 13:528-530, 1973.
- Charest et al., Plant Cell Rep. 8:643 (1990
- Chen and Shoemaker, J. Hered., 89:211-215, 1998.
- Chrispeels et al., J. Cell Biol., 93:306-313, 1982.
- Christianson et al., Science, 222:632-634, 1983.
- Comai et al., Nature 317:741-744 (1985)
- Criswell and Hume, Crop Sci., 12:657-660, 1972.
- de Moraes et al., Euphytica 149 :221-226, 2006.
- Diers et al., Theor, Appl. Genet., 89:297-304, 1993.
- Duranti et al., J. Nutr., 134(6):1334-1339, 2004.
- Dutton and Sommer, Biotechniques, 11(6):700-7002, 1991.
- Eichholtz et al., Somatic Cell Mol. Genet. 13:67 (1987)
- Elliot et al., Plant Molec. Biol. 21:515 (1993
- European Appln. 0 242 246
- European Appln. 0640141
- European Appln. 0797673
- Fehr, In: Theory and Technique, and Crop Species Soybean, Iowa State Univ., Macmillian Pub. Co., NY, (1)(2):360-376, 1987 b.
- Fehr, In: Soybeans: Improvement, Production and Uses, 2nd Edition, Manograph., 16:249, 1987 a.
- Fehr, In: Hybridization of Crop Plants, Fehr and Hadley (Eds.), Am. Soc. Agron. and Crop Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, Wis., 90-599, 1980.
- Finer et al., In: Soybean: Genetics, Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, CAB Intl., Verma and Shoemaker (ed), Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 250-251, 1996.
- Fisher et al., Plant Physiol., 102(3):1045-1046, 1993.
- Fraley et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80:4803, 1983.
- Geiser et al., Gene, 48:109, 1986.
- Gordon-Kamm et al., Plant Cell, 2:603-618, 1990.
- Hajika et al, Jpn. J. Breed., 42:787-792, 1992.
- Hamner, In: The Induction of Flowering: Some Case Histories, Evans (ed), Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, N.Y., 62-89, 1969.
- Harada et al., Japan J. Breed., 33:23-30, 1983.
- Hartweck et al., In Vitro Cell. Develop. Bio., 24:821-828, 1988.
- Hildebrand et al., Crop Sci., 22:851-853, 1982.
- Jones et al., Science, 266:789, 1994.
- Kitamura et al, Jpn. J. Breed., 35:413-420, 1985.
- Kitamura, Agric. Biol. Chem., 27:234-239, 1984.
- Knutzon et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89:2624, 1992.
- Ladin et al., Plant Physil., 84:35-41, 1987.
- Lander and Botstein, Genetics, 121(1):185-199, 1989.
- Lee et al., EMBO J., 7:1241, 1988.
- Livak et al., Nat. Gen., 9:341-342, 1995.
- Logemann et al., Bio/Technology, 10:305, 1992.
- Marshall et al., Theor. Appl. Genet., 83:435, 1992.
- Martin et al., Science, 262:1432, 1993.
- Miki et al., Theor. Appl. Genet., 80:449, 1990.
- Mindrinos et al., Cell, 78:1089, 1994.
- Moriyama et al., Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 68(2):352-359, 2004.
- Myers, EPO 0273085
- Natarajan et al., J. Pl. Physiol. (in press).
- Nielsen et al., In: Cellular and molecular biology of plant seed development, Larkins and Vasil I K (Eds)., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 151-220, 1997.
- Nielsen et al., Plant Cell., 1:313-328, 1989.
- Nishi et al., J. Nutr., 133(2):352-357, 2003.
- Orita et al., Genomics, 8(2):271-278, 1990.
- PCT Appln. US93/06487
- PCT Appln. WO93/19181
- PCT Appln. WO96/30517
- Pen et al., Bio/Technology, 10:292, 1992.
- Poehlman and Sleper, In: Breeding Field Crops, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1995.
- Przibila et al., Plant Cell, 3:169, 1991.
- Reiter et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89(4):1477-1481, 1992.
- Shah et al., Science, 233:478, 1986.
- Shanmugasundaram and Tsou, Crop Sci., 18:598-601, 1978.
- Shibata et al., J. Biol. Chem., 262:10080-10085, 1987.
- Shibata et al., J. Biol. Chem., 263:6816-6821, 1988.
- Shibles et al., In: Crop Physiology, Some Case Histories, Evans (ed), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, 51-189, 1975.
- Shiroza et al., J. Bacteol., 170:810, 1988.
- Simmonds, In: Principles of crop improvement, Longman, Inc., NY, 369-399, 1979.
- Sneep and Hendriksen, In: Plant breeding perspectives, Wageningen (ed), Center for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, 1979.
- Søgaard et al., J. Biol. Chem., 268(30):22480-22484, 1993.
- Sommer et al., Biotechniques, 12(1):82-87, 1992.
- Stalker et al., Science, 242:419-423, 1988.
- Steinmetz et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 20:220, 1985.
- Utsumi, In: Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, Kinsella (Ed.), 36:89-208, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif., 1992.
- Vanden Elzen et al., Plant Mol. Biol., 5:299, 1985.
- Wright et al., Plant Cell Reports, 5:150-154, 1986.
- Yenofsky et al., Mol. Gen. Genet., 211:215-222, 1988.