US20070027865A1 - System and method for determining semantically related term - Google Patents

System and method for determining semantically related term Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070027865A1
US20070027865A1 US11432585 US43258506A US2007027865A1 US 20070027865 A1 US20070027865 A1 US 20070027865A1 US 11432585 US11432585 US 11432585 US 43258506 A US43258506 A US 43258506A US 2007027865 A1 US2007027865 A1 US 2007027865A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
terms
term
seed
url
webpage
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11432585
Inventor
Kevin Bartz
Robert Collins
Vijay Murthi
Shaji Sebastian
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Oath Inc
Original Assignee
Yahoo! Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/20Handling natural language data
    • G06F17/27Automatic analysis, e.g. parsing
    • G06F17/2785Semantic analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/3061Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F17/30731Creation of semantic tools
    • G06F17/30737Thesaurus
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0242Determination of advertisement effectiveness
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0242Determination of advertisement effectiveness
    • G06Q30/0243Comparative campaigns
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0242Determination of advertisement effectiveness
    • G06Q30/0244Optimization
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0247Calculate past, present or future revenues
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0255Targeted advertisement based on user history
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0255Targeted advertisement based on user history
    • G06Q30/0256User search
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0257User requested
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0261Targeted advertisement based on user location
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0263Targeted advertisement based upon Internet or website rating
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0269Targeted advertisement based on user profile or attribute
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0251Targeted advertisement
    • G06Q30/0269Targeted advertisement based on user profile or attribute
    • G06Q30/0271Personalized advertisement
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0273Fees for advertisement
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0241Advertisement
    • G06Q30/0273Fees for advertisement
    • G06Q30/0275Auctions

Abstract

Methods and systems for determining semantically related terms are disclosed. Generally, seed terms are received from a user. One or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms are determined based on vectors comprising entries regarding a plurality of terms, a plurality of universal resource locators (“URLs”) associated with each term of the plurality of terms, and for each URL in a search log, a number of times that one or more users searched for each of the terms in the search log and clicked on the URL. At least a portion of the potential terms is then suggested to the user.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • The present patent document claims the benefit of the filing date under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of Provisional U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/703,904, filed Jul. 29, 2005, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND
  • When advertising using an online advertisement service provider such as Yahoo! Search Marketing or performing a search using an internet search engine such as Yahoo!, users often wish to determine semantically related words. Two words or phrases are semantically related if the words or phrases are related in meaning in a language or in logic. Obtaining semantically related words allows or phrases advertisers to broaden or focus their online advertisements to relevant potential customers and allows searchers to broaden or focus their internet searches in order to obtain more relevant search results. Thus, it is desirable to develop a system and method for reliably providing users with semantically related words.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a system for the creation and dissemination of online advertisements.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a pod of an advertisement campaign management system;
  • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a model for the maintenance of advertisement campaign information according to the advertisement campaign management system of FIG. 2;
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart of one embodiment of a method for discovering semantically related terms based an advertisement data from an advertisement campaign management system;
  • FIGS. 5 a and 5 b are a flow chart of another embodiment of a method for discovering semantically related terms based on advertisement data from an advertisement campaign management system;
  • FIG. 6 is a flow chart of one embodiment of a method for discovering semantically related terms based on search engine logs;
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart of another embodiment of a method for discovering semantically related terms based on search engine logs; and
  • FIG. 8 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method for discovering a set of seed terms for suggesting semantically related terms.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The present disclosure is directed to systems and methods for discovering semantically related terms. The present disclosure describes systems and methods for discovering semantically related terms based on advertisement data of an advertisement campaign management system and based on search logs of an internet search engine. Further, the present disclosure describes systems and methods for obtaining seed terms and semantically related terms based on website content.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a system for the creation and dissemination of online advertisements. The system 100 comprises a plurality of advertisers 102, an advertisement campaign management system 104, an advertisement service provider 106, a search engine 108, a website provider 110, and a plurality of Internet users 112. Generally, an advertiser 102 creates an advertisement by interacting with the advertisement campaign management system 104. The advertisement may be a banner advertisement that appears on a website viewed by Internet users 112, an advertisement that is served to an Internet user 108 in response to a search performed at a search engine, or any other type of online advertisement known in the art.
  • When an Internet user 112 performs a search at a search engine 106, or views a website served by the website provider 108, the advertisement service provider 106 serves one or more advertisements created using the advertisement campaign management system 104 to the Internet user 112 based on search terms or keywords provided by the internet user or obtained from a website. Additionally, the advertisement campaign management system 104 and advertisement service provider 106 typically record and process information associated with the served advertisement. For example, the advertisement campaign management system 104 and advertisement service provider 106 may record the search terms that caused the advertisement service provider 106 to serve the advertisement; whether the Internet user 112 clicked on a URL associated with the served advertisement; what additional advertisements the advertisement service provider 106 served with the advertisement; a rank or position of an advertisement when the Internet user 112 clicked on an advertisement; or whether an Internet user 112 clicked on a URL associated with a different advertisement. It will be appreciated that when an advertiser 102 later edits an advertisement, or creates a new advertisement, the advertiser 102 may wish to have the advertisement campaign management system 104 provide the advertiser 102 with suggested terms that would cause the advertisement service provider to serve the advertisement based on information associated with served advertisement or advertisements related to the served advertisement as collected by an advertisement service provider or an internet search engine.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a pod of an advertisement (“ad”) campaign management system. Pod 200 comprises a plurality of software components and data for facilitating the planning, management, optimization, delivery, communication, and implementation of advertisements and ad campaigns, as well as for storing and managing user accounts. In one embodiment, a pod 200 comprises a campaign data store (“CDS”) 205 that stores user account information. Application Program Interfaces (“APIs”) 210 and User Interfaces (“UI”) 215 are used for reading data from and writing data to the campaign data store 205. Internal APIs 230 provide shared code and functions between the API and UI, as well as facilitate interface with the campaign data store 205. A keyword suggestion component 220 may assist users in searching for available search terms. An editorial processing system (“EPS”) 225 may be provided to review content of all new ads. A pod collection server (“PCS”) 235 determines which pod the collected ad campaign performance data should go to. A script server 240 provides scripts for collection of data indicative of the customer browsing sessions. An image server 245 receives and processes data indicative of the customer browsing sessions from the customer web browsers.
  • The pod may further comprise a channel server 250 operative to receive data from one or more advertising channels. A business information group (“BIG”) 255 may provide analysis and filtering of raw click data coming from the advertising channels through the channel server 250. An account monitoring component 260 monitors budgets allocated for each ad campaign. A financial component 265 may be provided for planning and budgeting ad campaign expenses. A weight optimizer 270 operative to optimize individual ad performance. A campaign optimizer 275 may be provided to optimize performance of the ad campaign. A third-party analytical feed component 280 is provided to handle the incoming ad performance data from the third-party sources. A quality score component 285 provides yet another metric for measuring individual ad performance. A forecast component 290 is an analytical tool for predicting keywords trends. Finally, an online sign-up (“OLS”) component 295 provides heightened security services for online transactions involving exchange of moneys.
  • The CDS 205 is the main data store of pod 200. In one embodiment, CDS 205 stores ad campaign account data, including account access and permission lists, user information, advertisements, data collected from advertiser websites indicative of customer browsing sessions, raw click data received from the advertising channels, third party analytical feeds, ad campaign performance data generated by the system, ad campaign optimization data, including budgets and business rules, etc. In various embodiments of the invention, CDS 205 stores one or more account data structures as illustrated in FIG. 3 and described in greater detail below.
  • Data in the CDS 205 may be stored and accessed according to various formats, such as a relational format or flat-file format. CDS 205 can be managed using various known database management techniques, such as, for example, SQL-based and Object-based. At the physical level, the CDS 205 is implemented using combinations of one or more of magnetic, optical or tape drives. Furthermore, in one embodiment of the invention, CDS 205 has one or more back up databases that can be used to serve Pod 200 during downtime of CDS 205.
  • In one embodiment, a pod 200 exposes one or more APIs 210 and UIs 215 which are utilized by the system users, such as advertisers and agencies, to access services of the ad campaign management system, such as for reading data from and writing data to the campaign data store 205. The APIs 210 and UIs 215 may be also provided through a distro component described in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/324,129, titled “System and Method for Advertisement Management”, filed Dec. 30, 2005, the entirety of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. The advertisers and their agencies may use the APIs 210, which in one embodiment includes XML-based APIs, to allow access to the ad campaign management system and data contained therein. In one embodiment, the UI 215 comprises a website or web application(s) for enabling user access to the ad campaign management system. The pod 200 utilizes internal APIs 230, which are shared code and functions between the APIs 210 and UI 215, to facilitate interaction with campaign data store 205.
  • According to some embodiments, the above-described user and application program interfaces are used to facilitate management and optimization of ad campaigns, which include, but are not limited to, management of listings associated with an auction-based search-term related sponsored search results listings marketplace. For example, advertisers use these interfaces to access ad campaign information and ad campaign performance information saved in the ad campaign data store 205, search the information, analyze the information, obtain reports, summaries, etc. Advertisers may also change listings or bidding strategies using these interfaces, which changes are updated in the campaign data store 205. Furthermore, these interfaces may be used to perform comparisons of the performance of components of ad campaigns, such as performance of particular listings, search terms, creatives, channels, tactics, etc.
  • While functionality and use of application program interfaces of the pod is described with reference to an auction-based search term-related sponsored listings context, it is to be understood that, in some embodiments, these interfaces may be used with regard to off-line or non-sponsored search ad campaigns and ad campaign performance, or combinations of on-line and off-line ad campaigns information, as well.
  • A keyword suggestion component 220 provides for keyword suggestion through interfaces 210, 215 for assisting users with ad campaign management. In one embodiment of the invention, the keyword suggestion component 220 assists users to search for available search terms. As described above, in an auction-based system or marketplace, advertisers bid for search terms or groups of terms, which, when used in a search by customers, will cause display advertisement listings or links among the search results. The keyword suggestion component 220 provides suggestions to advertisers regarding terms they should be bidding. In one embodiment, the keyword suggestion component 220 may look at actual searches conducted in the last month and provide a suggestion based upon previous searches. In another embodiment, the keyword suggestion component 220 may look at the terms other advertisers of similar products or services are bidding on and suggest these terms to the advertiser. In yet another embodiment, the keyword suggestion component 220 may determine terms that customers who bought similar products or services use in their searches and suggest these terms to the advertiser. In another embodiment, the keyword suggestion component 220 may maintain a table of terms divided into several categories of products and services and allow an advertiser to browse through and to pick the available terms. In other embodiments, the keyword suggestion component 220 may use other techniques for assisting advertisers in the term selection process, such as suggesting a new term to the advertiser if the advertised products and services are unique.
  • The editorial processing system (EPS) 225 ensures relevance and mitigates risks of advertisers' listings before a listing can participate in the auction. In general, the EPS 225 reviews new or revised ads. In one embodiment, the EPS 225 applies a set of business rules that determines accuracy and relevance of the advertiser listings. These rules may be applied automatically by the EPS 225 or through a human editorial review. The EPS 225 may, for example, detect inappropriate content in the advertiser listings or illegally used trademark terms. In one, EPS 225 responds with an annotation such as rejected, approved, rejected but suggested changes, etc.
  • In one embodiment, EPS 225 may comprise a quick check component. The quick check component performs a preliminary or a “quick check” to determine whether to reject ad automatically before it is submitted to a human editor and stored in the campaign data store 205. In one embodiment, either API 210 or a UI 215 invokes the quick check component service so that advertiser can receive instant feedback. For example, use of prohibited words, such as “best” in the submitted advertisement, may be quickly detected by the quick check component and, obviating the need for human editorial review. In contrast, using words such as gambling, adult services, etc., the quick check component might determine that the ad requires a more thorough editorial review. One of the benefits of the quick check component is the rapid provision of feedback to the advertiser, which enables the advertiser to revise the listing right away and thus to expedite review by the human editor.
  • Again with reference to FIG. 2, according to one embodiment, the pod 100 may further comprise a channel server 250, which is operable to receive and process data received from an advertising channel, such as Google.com and MSN.com. This data may include but is not limited to the customer profiles, historical user behavior information, raw impressions, cost, clicks, etc. Additional description of user information and its uses can be found in U.S. Patent Application Ser. Nos. 60/546,699 and 10/783,383, the entirety of which are both hereby incorporated by reference. The channel server 250 may further be operable to re-format the received data into a format supported by the ad campaign management system and to store the reformatted data into the campaign data store 205.
  • In one embodiment, pod 200 may further comprise a business information group (BIG) component 255. BIG 255 is operable to receive cost, click, and impression data that is coming into the pod 200 from various sources including the channel server 250, pod collection server 235 and third-party analytics feeds component 280. BIG 255 assures that this data is received in a correct and timely manner. In one embodiment, BIG 255 may also perform aggregation and filtering on raw data impressions that are coming into the pod 100. BIG 255 may be further operable to store the collected and processed data into the Campaign Data Store 205. In other embodiments, BIG 255 may also perform internal reporting, such as preparing business reports and financial projections according to teaching known to those of skill in the art. To that end, in one embodiment, BIG 255 is operable to communicate with the Account Monitoring component 260, which will be described in more detail next.
  • In one embodiment, the pod 200 may further comprise an account monitoring component 260. This component 260 may be operable to perform budgeting and campaign asset allocation. For example, the account monitoring component 260 may determine how much money is left in a given advertiser's account and how much can be spent on a particular ad campaign. In one embodiment, the account monitoring component 260 may employ a budgeting functionality to provide efficient campaign asset allocation. For example, an advertiser may set an ad campaign budget for a month to $500. The account monitoring component 260 may implement an ad bidding scheme that gets actual spending for that month as close to $500 as possible. One example of a bidding scheme employed by the account monitoring component 260 would be to lower the advertiser's bids to reduce how often the advertiser's ads are displayed, thereby decreasing how much the advertiser spends per month, which may be performed dynamically. Another example of budgeting by the account monitoring component 260 is to throttle the rate at which advertisements are being served (e.g., a fraction of the time it is served) without changing the advertiser's bid (whereas in the previous example the bid was changed, not the rate at which advertisements were served). Another example of throttling is to not serve an ad as often as possible but put it out according to a rotation.
  • In one embodiment, the pod 200 may further comprise a financial component 265, which may be an accounting application for planning and budgeting ad campaign expenses. Using the financial component 265 advertisers may specify budgets and allocate campaign assets. The financial component 265 provides an advertiser with the ability to change distribution of campaign budget and to move money between different campaigns. The financial component 265 may also present advertisers with information on how much money is left in the account and how much can be spent on a particular ad campaign. In some embodiments, the financial component 265 may further be operable to provide advertisers with information regarding profitability, revenue, and expenses of their ad campaigns. The financial component 265 may, for example, be implemented using one or more financial suites from Oracle Corporation, SAP AG, Peoplesoft Inc., or any other financial software developer.
  • In one embodiment, pod 200 may further comprise an online sign-up (OLS) component 295. The OLS component 295 may be operable to provide advertisers with a secure online sign-up environment, in which secure information, such as credit card information, can be exchanged. The secure connection between the advertiser computer and the OLS component 295 may be established, for example, using Secure Hypertext Transfer Protocol (“SHTTP”), Secure Sockets Layer (“SSL”) or any other public-key cryptographic techniques.
  • In one embodiment, the pod 200 may further comprise a quality score component 285. A quality score is one of the ad performance parameters that may be used by the search serving components, such as advertising channels and search engines, to qualify the relative quality of the displayed ads. Thus the quality score is calculated by the search serving components and fed into the ad campaign management system through the quality score component 285 in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention. In some embodiments, the quality score is displayed to the advertiser, so that the advertiser may revise the ad to improve its quality score. For example, if an ad has a high quality score, then the advertiser knows not to try to spend money and time trying to perfect the ad. However, if an ad has a low quality score, it may be revised to improve ad's quality score.
  • In one embodiment, the pod 200 further comprises a forecasting component 290, which is an analytical tool for assisting the advertiser with keyword selection. In some embodiments, the forecasting component is operable to predict keywords trends, forecast volume of visitor traffic based on the ad's position, as well as estimating bid value for certain ad positions.
  • In one embodiment, the forecasting component 290 is operable to analyze past performance and to discover search term trends in the historical data. For example, the term “iPod” did not even exist several years ago, while now it is a very common term. In another embodiment, the forecasting component 290 performs macro-trending, which may include forecasting to determine terms that are popular in a particular region, for example, California, or with particular demographic, such as males. In yet another embodiment, the forecasting component 290 provides event-related macro- and micro-trending. Such events may include, for example, Mother's Day, Christmas, etc. To perform event-related trending for terms related to, for example, Mother's Day or Christmas, the forecasting component 290 looks at search patterns on flower-related terms or wrapping paper terms. In other embodiments, the forecasting component 290 analyzes the historic data to predict the number of impressions or clicks that may be expected for an ad having a particular rank. In another embodiment, the forecasting component 290 is operable to predict a bid value necessary to place the ad in a particular position.
  • In one embodiment, the pod 200 further comprises a weight optimizer 270, which may adjust the weights (relative display frequency) for rotating elements as part of alternative ad (“A/B”) functionality that may be provided by the ad campaign management system in some embodiments of the present invention. The A/B testing feature allows an advertiser to specify multiple variants of an attribute of an ad. These elements may include creative (title, description and display URL), destination (landing URL) and perhaps other elements such as promotions and display prices. More specifically, when an end-user performs a search, the ad campaign management system assembles one of the possible variants of the relevant ad and provides it to the advertising channel for display to the end-user. The ad campaign management system may also attach tracking codes associated with the ad, indicating which variant of each attribute of the ad was actually served. The behavior of the end-user then may be observed and the tracking codes may be used to provide feedback on the performance of each variant of each attribute of the ad.
  • In determining the weight for a particular element, the weight optimizer component 270 may look at actual performance of ads to determine optimal ads for delivery. The weight optimizer component 270 operates in multiple modes. For example, in Optimize mode the weight (frequency of display) of each variant is changed over time, based on the measured outcomes associated with each variant. Thus, the weight optimizer component 270 is responsible for changing the weights based on the measured outcomes. The weight optimizer component may also operate according to Static mode, in which the weights (frequency of display) of each variant are not changed by the system. This mode may provide data pertaining to measured outcomes to the advertiser. The advertiser may have the option to manually change the weights.
  • The pod 200 may further comprise a campaign optimizer component 275, which facilitates ad campaign optimization to meet specific ad campaign strategies, such as increasing number of conversions from displayed ads while minimizing the cost of the campaign. To that end, in some embodiments, campaign optimizer component 275 uses data received from the channel server 250, forecasting component 290, third party analytics feed component 290, quality score component 285, and BIG 255 to determine how much to bid on which ads, how to allocate the budget across different ads, how to spend money over the entire period of the campaign, etc. Furthermore, campaign optimization not only focuses on executing ads efficiently, but also performing arbitrage between ads across various channels and tactics to determine where the limited ad campaign budget is most effective.
  • In one embodiment, the campaign optimizer component 275 analyzes the obtained analytics data, including ad campaign information, ad campaign performance information, as well as potentially other information, such as user information, to facilitate determining, or to determine, an optimal ad campaign strategy. Herein, an “optimal” ad campaign strategy includes any ad campaign strategy that is determined to be optimal or superior to other strategies, determined to be likely to be optimal, forecasted or anticipated to be optimal or likely to be optimal, etc. In some embodiments, optimizing is performed with respect to parameters, or a combination of parameters, specified by an advertiser, supplied automatically or partially automatically by the ad campaigns facilitation program, or in other ways.
  • In addition to the foregoing, ad campaign strategy may include any course of action (including, for example, changing or not changing current settings or strategy) or conduct, or aspects or components thereof, relating to an ad campaign. An ad campaign strategy may include a recommendation regarding a course of action regarding one or more aspects or parameters of an ad campaign, and may include an immediate course of action or set of parameters, or a course of action or set of parameters for a specified window of time. For example, an optimal ad campaign strategy in the context of an auction-based search result listings situation, may include recommendations relating to bidding and bid hiding rates in connection with an auction or marketplace relating to search term or group of terms in connection with sponsored listings.
  • In some embodiments, the campaign optimizer component 275 may be operable to analyze ad campaign performance information to determine an optimal ad campaign strategy. Ad campaign performance information may include a variety of information pertaining to historical performance of an ad campaign, channel, tactic, or ad or group of ads. Ad campaign performance information can include many types of information indicating or providing a suggestion of how effectively ads, or ads presented though a particular channel, etc., influence or are likely to influence user or consumer behavior. For example, an advertising channel such as Yahoo! may collect performance information with respect to a particular sponsored search result listing. The information may include a number or percentage of viewers who clicked on the link, or who shopped at or purchased a product at the advertisers Web site as a result of the listing, etc.
  • The campaign optimizer component 275 may be operable to analyze ad campaign information to determine an optimal ad campaign strategy. Ad campaign information may include campaign objectives or budget-related conditions or constraints, or can include information specifying, defining, or describing ads themselves, channels, tactics, etc. With regard to auction-based sponsored search result listings, ad campaign information can include bidding parameters such as maximum or minimum bids or bidding positions (rankings or prominence of listings) associated with a term or term cluster, for instance, as further described below. Such ad campaign information can also include campaign objectives, quotas or goals expressed, for example in metrics such as ROAS (return on ad spend), CPI (clicks per impression), or in other metrics, and with respect to individual ads, terms or term groups, channels, tactics, etc.
  • The campaign optimizer component 275 may further include bid optimization functionality, which may be used by the system to determine a desirable or optimal bid for a listing, such as a paid search result. The bid optimization functionality of the campaign optimizer component 275 may be used to constrain the set targets and constraints on the bids set by an advertiser. The constraints may include a maximum bid and a minimum bid. The targets may be associated with the listing and can be specified in terms of one or more metrics related to the performance of the listing. The campaign optimizer component 275 may analyze recent past analytics in connection with the metric and specify a bid recommendation forecasted by the bid optimizer functionality to achieve the target or get as close to the target as possible. In some embodiments, the campaign optimizer component 275 can also provide a recommendation for a listing, which may include a maximum bid and an update period, which update period can be a time between maximum bid hiding updates.
  • To facilitate ad campaign management and optimization, the pod 100 is further operable to collect visitor state data from the advertiser websites in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the ad campaign management system. To that end, the pod 200 utilized pod collection server 235, script server 240, and image server 245 to collect visitor state data and to store the same in the campaign data store 205. The collected visitor state data may then be used by various components of the pod 200 including, but not limited to, campaign optimizer component 275, forecasting component 290, and BIG 255 to generate ad campaign performance data in accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure.
  • The various methods of data collection in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention may include, but are not limited to, full analytic, campaign only, conversion counter and sampling. In one embodiment, full analytics collection provides the most robust collection method. The full analytics collection collects marketing-based and free search-based leads. As a result, the advertiser may see a complete picture of how leads and conversions are generated. Primarily, the full analytics collection method provides a full funnel report that will provide a key view into how visitors of the advertiser website go from being a lead through to browser, shopper, and finally a paying customer. Visitor state storage on Campaign Data Store 205 may also allow for repeat and return customer report data and for a full suite of accreditation methods.
  • In another embodiment, a campaign only analytics collection method is much like full analytic but only paid marketing events are tracked and result events generated from free search are ignored or discarded. This has the advantage of providing funnel and repeating visitor reports as well as a reduced data collection and storage rate. The campaign only analytics method provides a balance of rich report data and reduced collection, processing, and storage cost.
  • In yet another embodiment, the conversion counter method is the most simple analytics data collection available. With conversion counter analytics, the advertiser only places a tag on pages where revenue is generated. The image server 245 places the lead “stack” in a cookie, which may be used to accredit the proper term/creative to the conversion event. This data collection mechanism generates enough data to provide optimization on creative weighting. It should be further noted that in one embodiment a direct accreditation method may be applied to the conversion counter method. In the conversion counter approach, no visitor state storage is needed and only conversion events are received. Thus, this approach has a minimal effect on pod 200 load and data storage requirements. In another embodiment, a sampling method is utilized. In accordance with this method, only a random number of unique visitors, for example, 10%, are tracked, which reduces data collection and storage.
  • In order to allow for accreditation of the lead generation source to a conversion event, the state of the customer session on the advertiser's website may be maintained. Accreditation is the process by which all the marketing events are tied to a specific, or set of specific, marketing activities. There are two known approaches that may be utilized for storage of visitor state: client-side cookies and server-side database.
  • In one embodiment, cookies may be used as an exemplary client-side visitor state storage. When cookies are used to store visitor state one of two methods may be used to store visitor state. A redirection server used on the lead generating event may add the visitor state to the cookie at the click event. Alternatively a collection server may set the cookie at the time of a lead event. While visitor state in the cookie approach is the most cost effective it has several disadvantages. Generally, cookies have low storage requirements and thus an active search user (typically, most valuable users because they generate the most revenue) could lose accreditation information as their lead stack grows and causes some older events to be pushed out. As a result, a conversion event could occur where the lead information was lost in the stack and thus the accreditation is lost. Furthermore, cookie-off users are essentially invisible to the system. Moreover, efficacy is reduced due to the additional time needed to parse the collection server request when the cookie is set, which may cause end users to click away from the lead page before the cookie can be completed. Finally, cookie based visitor state storage prevents any internal analysis of user behavior.
  • In another embodiment, server-side database, such as the CDS 205, may be used to store visitor state. Using server side storage in a database offers the high efficacy rates but at the additional cost of the storage. Using server side storage of visitor state allows the ad campaign management system to have more advanced accreditation models, which could allow for assist-based accreditation. Efficacy rates over cookie based visitor state storage are increased due to many factors. Primarily the system is no longer limited in the amount of visitor state storage a single user can have so no lead loss would occur. Cookies off users can still be traced as unique visitors so they can still be tracked (although at a reduced rate of accuracy) and thus are able to be included. Collection event processing latency is greatly reduced because the event can be just logged and then actually processed later. With the cookie approach lead accreditation has to occur at the time the event is received because the cookie must be evaluated before the request is returned by the beacon servers. Furthermore, with visitor state stored in the campaign data store, valuable marketing data can be collected and analyzed for internal use.
  • In one embodiment, the ad campaign management system utilizes a combination of the above-described client-side cookies and server-side database techniques to collect and maintain visitor state data. In particular, as indicated above the pod 200 utilizes pod collection server 235, script server 240, and image server 245 to collect visitor state data and to store the same in the campaign data store 205. In one embodiment, the pod collection server 235, script server 240 and image server 245 may be implemented, for example, as Java servlets.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram of one embodiment of a model for the maintenance of ads according to the ad campaign management system of FIG. 2. As depicted, an ad campaign management system comprises a data store 300 that facilitates hierarchical storage of ad campaign data, providing advertisers with multiple levels of structure for control of advertisement content. In particular, an advertiser utilizing services of the ad campaign management system may be provided with a master account 305 for receiving aggregated analytics relating to the master account 305 and managing or optimizing Web properties 310 and advertisements within the master account 305 based on the aggregated analytics. A Web property 310 may include a website, or a combination of related websites and pages for which the advertiser is advertising. Furthermore, within master account 305, an advertiser may create several accounts 320 to separately manage ad campaigns, as well as to collect ad performance information.
  • To facilitate tracking and collection of ad performance data from Web properties 310, data store 300 further maintains custom tags, program code, navigation code, etc. 315. According to one embodiment, a tag 315 may comprise a piece of code that is created by the system and placed on relevant Web pages of a given website to allow automatic tracking and collection of data indicative of customer session on the advertiser website. For example, a tag may be used to track user visits, interaction, or purchases from a website to which a user navigates as a result of clicking on an advertisement link associated with the website. Depending on specific needs and business objective of a given advertiser, tags may be coded to collect specific information about the customer session that is of interest to the advertiser. Thus, some tags may enable collection of data on numbers of raw clicks on the advertiser website, while others tags may track numbers of clicks that resulted in conversions, e.g., purchase of a product or service from the advertiser website. Those of skill in the art will recognize that data collection may be limited to other portions of the customer session.
  • Some embodiments utilize, or may be combined with, features or technologies, such as, for example, HTML tagging, data tracking, and related technologies, as described in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/832,434 and 09/587,236, the entirety of which are both hereby incorporated herein by reference.
  • In one embodiment, within a master account 305, an advertiser may maintain one or more accounts 320, which may be used to receive analytics related to a specific account 320 and manage ad campaign spending associated with individual Web properties 310. Thus, accounts 320 allow advertisers to distribute their advertising funding between different Web properties 310 and between separate ad campaigns 325. A given ad campaign 325 may include a set of one or more advertising activities or conduct directed to accomplishing a common advertising goal, such as the marketing or sales of a particular product, service, or content, or group of products, services or content. Two ad campaigns may be considered disparate when the ad campaigns are directed to different advertising goals. For example, an advertiser may wish to advertise a product for sale and a service associated with this product. Thus, the advertiser may store separate ad campaigns 325 for advertising the product and the service.
  • In one embodiment, storage of an ad campaign 325 may be further subdivided into several ad groups 330. An ad Group 330 may be thought of as a conceptual compartment or container that includes ads and ad parameters for ads that are going to be handled in a similar manner. An ad group 330 may allow for micro-targeting, e.g., grouping ads targeted to a given audience, a demographic group, or a family of products. For example, an ad group may be related to a given manufacturer's products, such as Sony, Microsoft, etc. or a family of high-end electronics, such as TVs, DVDs, etc. There is a number of ways in which a given group of ads may be managed in a similar manner. For example, an advertiser may specify that there be a certain markup (e.g., 50%) on items in a given ad group, may want to distribute all those ads in a certain way, or may want to spend a certain amount of its budget on those advertisements. Further, an ad group 330 provides a convenient tool for an advertiser to move a large group of ads and ad parameters from one ad campaign 325 to another ad campaign 325, or to clone a large group of ads and ad parameters from one ad campaign 325 to another ad campaign 325
  • In one embodiment, changes made to the parameters of a given ad group 330 may apply to all ads within the given ad group. For example, one such parameter may be pricing. For a sponsored search, an advertiser may set the default price for the whole ad group but may override the price on each individual term. Similarly, an advertiser may further specify that certain terms are low value, but decide to increase the amount spent on another term uniformly across all ads in a given ad group. Thus, storage according to one or more ad groups 330 enables advertisers to bridge the gap between ad campaigns and the individual ads comprising a given ad campaign.
  • A given ad may contain one or more items of advertising content that are used to create ads/terms in an ad group, including, but not limited to, creatives (e.g., titles, descriptions) and destination URLs (plus associated URL tracking codes). Optionally, a given ad may contain a {KEYWORD} token for substitution in the title, description, or other ad component. Furthermore, ads may exist as a template in an ad library (not pictured) that can be reused across ad groups or a local ad that is used and stored only within a specific ad group. The ad library, which may be provided by the ad campaign management system, allows advertisers to store ad templates, sharing and reusing them across campaigns and ad groups. Ads in the ad library may be shared within an account, e.g., each account has its own library.
  • An ad group 330 may utilize numerous tactics for achieving advertising goals. The term “tactic” includes a particular form or type of advertising. For example, in on-line advertising, tactics may include sponsored search result listings 335, banner advertisements 355, content match 370, etc. In off-line advertising, tactics may include television commercials, radio commercials, newspaper advertisements, etc. In different embodiments, tactics may include subsets or supersets of the listed examples or other examples. For instance, on-line advertising is an example of a broader tactic than the narrower tactic of sponsored search result listings. Furthermore, the advertiser may utilize multiple advertising channels for different tactics. For example, the advertiser may utilize sponsored search listings in several websites or portals, such as Yahoo!, Google.com, MSN.com, etc. In one embodiment, a user may set parameters within the ad group 330 to place a spend limit for each type of advertising tactic comprising the ad group 330.
  • One example of an advertising tactic is sponsored search 335. According to one embodiment, sponsored search 335 operates as follows: an auction-based system or marketplace is used by advertisers to bid for search terms or groups of terms, which, when used in a search, causes the display of a given advertiser's ad listings or links among the display results. Advertisers may further bid for position or prominence of their listings in the search results. With regard to auction-based sponsored search 335, a given advertiser may provide a uniform resource locator (URL) 340 to the webpage to which the ad should take the customer if clicked on, as well as the text of the advertisement 345 that should be displayed. Advertiser may further identify one or more terms 350 that should be associated with the advertisement 345.
  • Another example of advertising tactic is content match 370. Storage of content match advertisements 380 may be used by the advertiser to complement, or as alternative to, the sponsored search tactic 335. Ads stored according to the content match tactic 370 are displayed alongside relevant articles, product reviews, etc, presented to the customers. For the content match tactic 370, data store 300 stores one or more URLs 375 identifying the address of a webpage where given ad should take the customer if clicked on, as well as the text, image, video or other type of multimedia comprising the creative portion of the advertisement 380.
  • Yet another example of an advertising tactic is banner ad 355. Banner ad tactic 355 may be used by the advertiser to complement, or as alternative to, the sponsored search tactic 335 and content match tactic 370. In contrast to the sponsored search tactic and content match tactic, which are usually based on a pay-per-click payment scheme, an advertiser pays for every display of the banner ad 365, referred to as an impression. Alternatively, if the banner ad displays a phone number, advertiser may only be billed when a user calls the phone number associated with the advertisement. Thus, for the banner ad tactic, the data store 300 maintains a URL 360 to the webpage where the ad should take the customer if clicked on, as well as the creative that comprises the banner ad 365.
  • The data store 300 of the ad campaign management system may further store various parameters for each ad group. Such parameters may include, for example, maximum or minimum bids or bidding positions (rankings or prominence of listings) associated with a term or term cluster for the particular ad group or ads within a given ad group. As described above, in embodiments of an auction-based sponsored search result listings environment, prominence or rank of listings is closely related to ad performance, and therefore a useful parameter in ad campaign management. The rank of a given ad determines the quality of the placement of the ad on pages that are displayed to customers. Although details vary by advertising channel, top-ranked listings typically appear at the top of a page, the next listings appear in the right rail and additional listings appear at the bottom of the page. Listings ranked below the top five or so will appear on subsequent search results pages.
  • There is a correlation between rank and both number of impressions and click-through rate (clicks per impression), which provides an opportunity for advertisers to pay more per click (get a higher rank) in order to get more visitors to their web site. The result is that an advertiser may determine, how much the advertiser should be willing to bid for each listing based on the advertiser's business objectives and the quality of the traffic on their web site that is generated by the listing. This information may also be stored for a given ad group 330 in the data store 300 of the ad campaign management system of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 4-8 describe different methods and systems that may be used to suggest semantically related terms to users such as in the keyword suggestion component 220 described above. The systems and method used below may determine semantically related terms based on information such as advertisement data from an advertisement campaign management system, search engine logs, or webpage content.
  • FIG. 4 is a flow chart of one embodiment of a method for discovering semantically related terms based on advertisement data from an advertisement campaign management system. Generally, an advertisement campaign management system creates one or more indexes based at least in part on information associated with advertisers who are currently, or have previously, advertised with the advertisement campaign management system. In one implementation, the advertisement campaign management system creates a first index and a second index. The first index associates, for each term currently available or previously available to bid on at the advertisement campaign management system, all of the Uniform Resource Locators (“URLs”) that are currently or have been previously associated with each term at the advertisement campaign management system. The second index associates, for each URL that is currently, or has been previously, associated with an advertiser at an advertisement campaign management system, all of the terms that are currently or have been previously associated with each URL at the advertisement campaign management system. In other implementations, the advertisement campaign management system may combine the first and second index into a single index, or expand the first and second index into any number of indexes.
  • After the advertisement campaign management system creates one or more indexes, an advertiser submits one or more seed terms to the advertisement campaign management system. The advertisement campaign management system uses the first index to determine one or more webpages associated with the seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system then uses the second index to determine one or more potential terms associated with the webpages associated with the seed terms.
  • The advertisement campaign management system suggests a portion of the potential terms to the user. Typically, the advertisement campaign management system receives an indication from the advertiser regarding the relevance of one or more of the suggested terms to the advertiser. The advertisement campaign management system may adjust the seed terms to incorporate one or more of the suggested terms to create a new set of seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system then repeats the above process using the new set of seed terms to determine a new set of potential terms. Modifying the seed terms to incorporate one or more of the suggested terms allows the advertisement campaign management system to continue to provide relevant and precise suggested terms to an advertiser as the interest or focus of the advertiser changes. It will be appreciated that this process may continue any number of times desired by the advertiser.
  • The method 400 begins with an advertisement campaign management system creating one or more indexes based at least in part on information associated with advertisers advertising with the advertisement campaign management system. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system creates a first index 402 and creates a second index 404. The first index relates for each term currently or previously available for an advertiser to bid on at the advertisement campaign management system, all of the webpages currently or previously associated with the term at the advertisement campaign management system. Conceptually, the first index can be thought of as a table where a user can determine all of the webpages currently or previously associated with a term. The second index 404 relates for each webpage currently or previously associated with an advertiser at the advertisement campaign management system, all of the terms currently or previously associated with the webpage. Conceptually, the second index can be thought of as a table wherein a user can determine all of the terms currently or previously associated with a webpage.
  • The advertisement campaign management system receives one or more seed terms from an advertiser 406. Each of the seed terms may be a single word or a phrase. Further, each of the seed terms may be a positive seed term or a negative seed term. A positive seed term is a term that represents the type of keywords an advertiser would like to bid on to have the advertisement campaign management system serve an advertisement. A negative seed term is a term that represents the type of keyword an advertiser would not like to bid on to have the advertisement campaign management system serve an advertisement. In other words, an advertiser uses a keyword suggestion tool to receive more keywords like a positive seed terms, while avoiding keywords like a negative seed term.
  • The advertisement campaign management system uses the first index to determine a plurality of webpages associated with the seed terms 408. It will be appreciated that if the advertisement campaign management system receives more than one seed term, the advertisement campaign management system may implement an algorithm to determine a plurality of webpages that is most relevant to all of the received seed terms. Further, it will be appreciated that if the advertisement campaign management system receives both positive and negative seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system may implement an algorithm to determine a plurality of webpages that is most relevant to the positive seed terms while avoiding webpages associated with the negative seed terms.
  • In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system first assigns a score to each webpage relating to the webpage's association with one of the seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system then totals the scores of each webpage relating to each of the seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system examines the total score of each webpage, and based on the webpages having the highest score, determines a plurality of webpages that is most relevant to all of the seed terms.
  • The advertisement campaign management system uses the second index to determine a plurality of potential terms associated with the webpages associated with the seed terms 410. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system first assigns a score to each term relating to the term's association with one of the webpages relating to the seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system then totals the scores of each term relating to each webpage associated with the seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system examines the total score of each term, and based on the terms having the highest score, determines a plurality of potential terms that is most relevant to the webpages associated with the seed terms.
  • The advertisement campaign management system may rank the plurality of potential terms 412 and suggest a portion of the potential terms to an advertiser 414. In one implementation, the advertisement campaign management system ranks the plurality of potential terms based on the total score of each term relating to each webpage associated with the seed terms as described above.
  • After receiving the suggested terms, a user may choose whether to accept one or more of the suggested terms 416, send an indication to the advertisement campaign management system regarding the relevance of one or more of the suggested terms to the advertiser 418, and/or request additional suggested terms 420.
  • If the advertiser chooses to accept one or more of the suggested terms 416 or indicates a relevance of one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 418, the advertisement campaign management system adjusts the set of seed terms 422. The advertisement campaign management system may adjust the set of seed terms by including one or more terms that the advertiser has accepted or by including one or more terms that the advertiser has indicated the relevance of. With respect to suggested terms the advertiser has indicated the relevance of, the advertisement campaign management system my add one or more terms that the advertiser has indicated are relevant to the advertiser as positive seed terms and/or add one or more terms that the advertiser has indicated are not relevant to the advertiser as negative seed terms. Further, the advertisement campaign management system may adjust the set of seed terms by removing any seed terms currently in the set of seed terms or ensuring that certain seed terms such as negative seed terms remain in the set of seed terms.
  • In one implementation, the advertisement campaign management system maintains a set of seed terms including a predetermined maximum number of seed terms such as fifty. When the advertisement campaign management system adjusts the set of seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system maintains any negative seed terms. Further, the advertisement campaign management system includes one or more terms the advertiser has indicated are not relevant to the advertiser as negative seed terms. Additionally, the advertisement campaign management system includes one or more terms the advertiser has indicated are relevant to the advertiser as positive seed terms. If after adding the new positive and negative seed terms to the set of seed terms, the number of seed terms in the set of seed terms is more than the predetermined maximum number of seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system may remove seed terms from the set of seed terms. Therefore, after adjusting the set of seed terms, the set of seed terms may or may not include any of the seed terms the advertiser originally sent to the advertisement campaign management system.
  • If the advertiser requests additional terms 420 and the advertisement campaign management system has not adjusted the set of seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system loops 424 and may present additional potential terms 414 as previously determined in step 410.
  • If the advertiser request additional terms 420 and the advertisement campaign management system has adjusted the set of seed terms 422, the advertisement campaign management system loops 426 to step 408. The advertisement campaign management system uses the first index to determine a plurality of webpages associated with the new set of seed terms and the above-described process is repeated.
  • The Advertisement campaign management system may continue to suggest terms to a user and allow the user to choose whether to accept one or more of the suggested terms 416, send an indication to the advertisement campaign management system regarding the relevance of one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 418, and/or request additional suggested terms 420 until the user instructs the advertisement campaign management system to stop suggesting terms.
  • As more users complete the method described above with respect to FIG. 4, the advertisement service provider may calculate continuous degrees of relevance between terms and webpages, or between terms and other terms, based on all users who complete the system above. Calculating a continuous degree of relevance between terms and webpages or terms and other terms allows the advertisement campaign management to build an index that includes reliable degrees of relevance for accurately suggesting semantically related terms to users.
  • To build the index, each time the advertisement campaign management system suggests a set of terms and receives an indication of relevance to the advertiser, the advertisement campaign management system may reweigh a degree of relevance between a term and one or more webpages, or between a term and one or more other terms. For example, if an advertiser indicates a suggested term is relevant to the advertiser, the advertisement campaign management system may increase a degree of relevance to the seed terms associated with each webpage associated with both the seed terms and the relevant suggested term and/or increase a degree of relevance to the seed term for each term associated with both the seed terms and the relevant suggested term. Additionally, the advertisement campaign management system may decrease the degree of relevance to the seed terms associated with each webpage that is not associated with both the seed terms and the relevant suggested term and/or decrease a degree of relevance to the seed terms for each term not associated with both the seed terms and the relevant suggested term.
  • Similarly, if an advertiser indicates a suggested term is not relevant to the advertiser, the advertisement campaign management system may decrease a degree of relevance to the seed terms associated with each webpage associated with both the seed terms and the irrelevant suggested term and/or may decrease a degree of relevance to the seed terms associated with each term associated with both the seed terms and the irrelevant suggested term. Additionally, the advertisement campaign management system may increase the degree of relevance to the seed terms associated with each webpage that is not associated with both the seed terms and the irrelevant suggested term and/or may increase the degree of relevance to the seed terms associated with each term not associated with both the seed terms and the irrelevant suggested term.
  • In one embodiment, an advertiser may simply indicate that a suggested term is relevant to the advertiser or is not relevant to the advertiser. However in other embodiments, an advertiser may indicate that a suggested term is relevant to the advertiser or not relevant to the advertiser on a scale, such as 1 to 10. If an advertiser indicates a relevance of a suggested term to the advertiser on a scale, the advertisement campaign management system may weigh degrees of relevance in proportion to the indicated degree of relevance on a scale.
  • FIGS. 5 a and 5 b are another embodiment of a method for determining semantically related terms. The method 500 begins with an advertisement campaign management system creating a first set of vectors 502 associating for each webpage currently or previously bid on at the advertisement campaign management system, whether each term at the advertisement campaign management system is currently or has been previously associated with the webpage. In one implementation, each entry in the first set of vectors will comprise a positive non-zero number if the term of the entry is associated with the relevant webpage and the number zero if the term of the entry is not associated with the relevant webpage.
  • The advertisement campaign management system additionally creates a second set of vectors 504. The advertisement campaign management system creates the second set of vectors by weighing the entries of the first set of vectors based on one or more factors. The advertisement campaign management system may weight the entries of the first set of vectors to create the second set of vectors based on factors such as a number of webpages associated with each term at the advertisement campaign management system or a click-through rate for a webpage after a search for a term. In one implementation, the advertisement campaign management system weighs each entry of the first set of vectors to create the second set of vectors by multiplying each entry of the first set of vectors by the logarithm of the quantity the total number of webpages at the advertisement campaign management system over the total number of webpages associated with the term of the entry.
  • The advertisement campaign management system may additionally normalize the second set of vectors 506 so that the magnitude of each vector of the second set of vectors is one. Normalizing the second set of vectors adjusts the weight of each entry of the second set of vectors so that entries in the second set of vectors for webpages associated with more terms have less value that entries in the second set of vectors for webpages associated with fewer terms.
  • The advertisement campaign management system receives one or more seed terms from a user such as an advertiser 508. As discussed above, each of the seed terms may be a single word or a phrase. Additionally, each seed term may be a positive seed term or a negative seed term. The campaign advertisement management system creates a seed term vector based on the received seed terms 510. In one implementation, the seed term vector comprises a value for each term at the advertisement campaign management system, where the value of the entry is a positive non-zero number if the term is a positive seed term, the value of the entry a negative non-zero number if the term is a negative seed term, and the value of the entry is zero if the term is not a seed term.
  • The advertisement campaign management system may weigh each entry of the seed term vector 512 based on how may websites each seed term is associated with or the click-through rate of each website after searching for the seed term. The advertisement campaign management system may additionally normalize the seed term vector 514 so that the magnitude of the seed term vector is one.
  • The advertisement campaign management system calculates a weighted average 516 over a number of webpages at the advertisement campaign management system to determine a plurality of potential terms semantically related to the seed terms. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system calculates the weighted average 516 over all webpages at the advertisement campaign management system. However, in other embodiments, the advertisement campaign management system calculates the weighted average 516 over a number of webpages that is less than the total number of webpages at the advertisement campaign management system. For example, the advertisement campaign management system may determine a number of webpages, such as 10,000 webpages, that are closest to the seed terms based on the entries in the second set of vectors. The advertisement campaign management system then calculates the weighted average of the predetermined number of webpages that the advertisement campaign management system determined are closest to the seed terms.
  • Specifically, the advertisement campaign management system calculates a weighted average as a function of the first and second set of vectors and the seed term vector. In one embodiment, the weighted average is calculated using the function:
    T=Sum of (V1*cosine(V2, S)),
    wherein V1*cosine(V2,S) is calculated for a number of webpages at the advertisement campaign management system; V1 is the relevant vector of the first set of vectors indicating for each term at the advertisement campaign management system, whether a term at the advertisement campaign management system is associated with the relevant webpage; V2 is the relevant vector of the second set of vectors including for each term at the advertisement campaign management system, an entry indicating a weight of a term associated with the webpage; and S is the seed term vector indicating for each term at the advertisement campaign management system, whether the term is one of the seed terms received by a user.
  • As discussed above, the advertisement campaign management system may calculate the sum of (V1*cosine(V2,S)) for all webpages at the advertisement campaign management system. However, in other implementations, the advertisement campaign management system may calculate V1*cosine(V2,S) for all webpages at the advertisement campaign management system but only sum the result V1*cosine(V2,S) for a limited number of webpages to create the vector T. In this implementation, the advertisement campaign management system examines the result of V1*cosine(V2,S) for all webpages to determine a number of webpages that are closest to the seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system then sums the result of V1*cosine(V2,S) for the webpages that-the advertisement campaign management system determines are closest to the seed terms to create the vector T. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system may sum the result of V1*cosine(V2,S) for the top 10,000 webpages that are closest to the seed terms to create the vector T, but the advertisement campaign management system may sum the result of V1*cosine(V2,S) over any number of webpages to create the vector T.
  • After calculating the sum of (V1*cosine(V2,S)), T will comprise a vector having a value for each term at the advertisement campaign management system. The advertisement campaign management system exams the resulting vector T to determine the terms having the highest corresponding entries after the weighted average 518. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system may determine the top ten terms having the highest value in the resulting vector T after the weighted average, but the advertisement campaign management system may determine any number of top terms. The advertisement campaign management system then suggests 520 at least a portion of the terms determined in step 518 to the user.
  • After receiving the suggested terms, a user may choose whether to accept one or more of the suggested terms 522, send an indication to the advertisement campaign management system regarding the relevance of one or more of the suggested terms to the advertiser 524, and/or request additional suggested terms 526.
  • If the advertiser chooses to accept one or more of the suggested terms 522 or indicates a relevance of one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 524, the advertisement campaign management system adjusts the set of seed terms 528 as described above.
  • If the advertiser requests additional terms 526 and the advertisement campaign management system has not adjusted the set of seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system loops 530 and may present additional potential terms 520 as previously determined in step 518.
  • If the advertiser request additional terms 526 and the advertisement campaign management system has adjusted the set of seed terms 528, the advertisement campaign management system loops 532 to step 510. The advertisement campaign management system creates a seed term vector based on the new set of seed terms created in step 528 and the above-described process is repeated.
  • The advertisement campaign management system may continue to suggest terms to a user and allow the user to choose whether to accept one or more of the suggested terms 522, send an indication to the advertisement campaign management system regarding the relevance of one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 524, and/or request additional suggested terms 526 until the user instructs the advertisement campaign management system to stop suggesting search terms.
  • In addition to determining semantically related terms based on advertisement data from an advertisement campaign management system, an advertisement campaign management system may determine semantically related terms based on search engine logs. FIG. 6 is a flow chart of one embodiment of a method for discovering semantically related terms based on search engine logs. Generally, an advertisement campaign management system creates one or more indexes based at least in part on search engine logs. A search engine log may include information such as terms entered at a search engine by a user, the URLs that are displayed in search results in response to each term, the order that the URLs appear in when displayed to a user, the URLs that a user clicked on when using a term, and the number of times a user clicked on each URL.
  • In one implementation, the advertisement campaign management system creates one index based on the search engine logs. However, in other implementations the index may be expanded into any number of indexes. The advertisement campaign management system creates an index that associates for each term in the search logs, all of the other terms in the search logs which resulted in a searcher clicking on a URL that the same or different searcher also clicked on when searching a second term. In other words, the index establishes a relationship between a first term and a second term if at some point in the search logs, a search for the first term and a search for the second term both resulted in the same or different searcher clicking on the same URL.
  • After the index is created, the advertisement campaign management system may receive one or more seed terms. As described above, each seed term may be a positive seed term or a negative seed term, and each seed term may be a single word or a phrase. The advertisement campaign management system uses the index to determine a plurality of potential terms that resulted in a searcher clicking on a URL which the same or different searcher also clicked on when searching for the seed terms. At least a portion of the plurality of potential terms is suggested to the advertiser and the advertisement campaign management system receives an indication from the advertiser regarding the relevance of one or more suggested terms to the advertiser. The advertisement campaign management system may adjust the set of seed terms to incorporate one or more of the suggested terms to create a new set of seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system then repeats the above process using the new set of seed terms to determine a new set of potential terms. It will be appreciated that the advertisement campaign management system may repeat this process any number of times as requested by the advertiser.
  • The method 600 begins with the advertisement campaign management system creating one or more indexes 602 based on the search logs of an internet advertisement service provider or an internet search engine. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system creates an index that relates terms from the search logs that resulted in the same or different searcher clicking on the same URL.
  • The advertisement campaign management system receives one or more seed terms from a user such as an advertiser 604. As discussed above, each of the seed terms may be a single word or a phrase. Additionally, each of the seed terms may be a positive seed term indicating a type of term the user would like to receive semantically related words to or be a negative seed term indicating a type of term the user would like to avoid.
  • The advertisement campaign management system uses the index to determine a plurality of potential terms that resulted in a searcher clicking on the same URL that the same or different searcher clicked on when searching for the seed terms 606.
  • In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system first assigns a score to each term relating to the term's association with one of the seed terms as evidenced by the search engine logs. The advertisement campaign management system then totals the scores of each term relating to each of the seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system examines the total score of each term, and based on the terms having the highest score, determines a plurality of potential terms that is most relevant to the seed terms.
  • The advertisement campaign management system ranks the potential terms 608 based on the determined score, and suggests at least a portion of the potential terms to the advertiser 610. A user may then choose to accept one or more of the suggested terms 612, send an indication to the advertisement campaign management system regarding the relevance of one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 614, and/or request additional suggested terms 616.
  • If the user accepts one or more of the suggested terms 612 and/or sends an indication to the advertisement campaign management system regarding the relevance of one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 614, the advertisement campaign management system adjusts the set of seed terms 618. The advertisement campaign management system may adjust the set of seed terms by including one or more terms that the advertiser has accepted or by including one more terms that the advertiser has indicated the relevance of. With respect to suggested terms the advertiser has indicated the relevance of, the advertisement campaign management system may add one or more terms that the advertiser has indicated are relevant to the advertiser as positive seed terms and/or add one or more terms that the advertiser has indicated are not relevant to the advertiser as negative seed terms. Further, the advertisement campaign management system may adjust the set of seed terms by removing any seed terms currently in the set of seed terms or ensuring that certain seed terms such as negative seed terms remain in the set of seed terms.
  • In one implementation, the advertisement campaign management system maintains a set of seed terms including a predetermined maximum number of seed terms such as fifty. When the advertisement campaign management system adjusts the set of seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system maintains any negative seed terms. Further, the advertisement campaign management system includes one or more terms the advertiser has indicated are not relevant to the advertiser as negative seed terms. Additionally, the advertisement campaign management system includes one or more terms the advertiser has indicated are relevant to the advertiser as positive seed terms. If after adding the new positive and negative seed terms to the set of seed terms, the number of seed terms in the set of seed terms is more than the predetermined maximum number of seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system may remove seed terms from the set of seed terms. Therefore, after adjusting the set of seed terms, the set of seed terms may or may not include any of the seed terms the advertiser originally sent to the advertisement campaign management system.
  • If the user requests additional suggested terms 616 and advertisement campaign management system did not adjust the seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system loops 620 to step 610 and may present additional potential terms as determined in step 608.
  • If the user requests additional suggested terms 616 and the advertisement campaign management system has adjusted the seed terms 618, the advertisement campaign management system loops 622 to step 606 and the above-described process is repeated. At step 606, the advertisement campaign management system uses the index to determine a plurality of potential terms that resulted in a searcher clicking on the same URL that the same or different searcher clicked on when searching for the new set of seed terms.
  • The user may continue to choose whether to accept one or more of the suggested terms 612, send an indication to the advertisement campaign management system regarding the relevance of one or more of the suggested terms to the advertiser 614, and/or request additional suggested terms 616 until the user instructs the advertisement campaign management system to stop suggesting terms.
  • Similar to the method of FIG. 4, the advertisement service provider may calculate continuous degrees of relevance between each term in the search logs based on all users who complete the method of FIG. 6. Calculating a continuous degree of relevance of relevance between terms in the search logs allows the advertisement campaign management system to build an index that includes reliable degrees of relevance for accurately suggesting semantically related terms to users.
  • To build the index, each time the advertisement campaign management system suggests a set of terms and receives an indication of relevance to the advertiser, the advertisement campaign management system may reweigh a degree of relevance terms in the search logs. For example, if an advertiser indicates a suggested term is relevant to the advertiser, the advertisement campaign management system may increase a degree of relevance to the seed term of at least one term where at some point in the search logs, searches for the relevant suggested term, the seed terms, and the term resulted in the same or different searcher clicking on the same URL. In contrast, if an advertiser indicates a suggested term is not relevant to the seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system may decrease the degree of relevance to the seed terms of all terms where at some point in the search logs, searches for the irrelevant suggested term, the seed terms, and the term resulted in the same or different searcher clicking on the same URL. In one embodiment, the advertiser may simply indicate that a suggested term is relevant to the advertiser or not relevant to the advertiser. However in other embodiments, the advertiser may indicate that a suggested term is relevant to the advertiser or not relevant to the advertiser on a scale, such as 1 to 10.
  • In addition to building an index including reliable degrees of relevance between terms in a search engine log based on interactions with users, the advertisement campaign management system may use supervised machine learning algorithms or function learning algorithms to develop an index after the index is initially built according to the method of FIG. 6 based on the search engine logs. The advertisement campaign management system may run the supervised machine learning algorithm or function learning algorithm on an index that has been at least partially built by users to predict a degree of relevance between the terms in the search logs based on data from the search engine logs. Generally, the advertisement campaign management system may begin using the supervised machine learning algorithm or function learning algorithm to further develop the index at any point after minimal associations have been established in the index relating different terms in the search logs. However, the more developed the index is before the advertisement campaign management system applies the supervised machine learning algorithm or the function learning algorithm, the more accurate the supervised machine learning algorithm or function learning algorithm will be in predicting degrees of relevance between terms.
  • In one embodiment, the machine learning algorithm or function learning algorithm learns a function based on how closely a potential term relates to the seed terms in the search engine logs as evidence by the number of seed terms associated with the potential term by a webpage; how prominently the potential term appears in the search engine logs as evidence by the average rank, weighted by click frequency, of the clicks on a URL associated with a potential term; how often the potential term leads to any webpage based on the total click frequency of a potential term; the specificity of a term evidenced by the number of distinct webpages a searcher clicked on after searching the term; the specificity of a term as evidenced by a number of clicks on a linked term; the specificity of a webpage as evidenced by the number of terms associated with the webpage; the lexical similarity of potential terms and the seed terms as evidenced by the Levenhstein distance, average edit distance or average word edit distance of the seed terms from a potential term; any special characters such as numbers or domain names associated with a potential term; and the relationships between potential terms that are stems of other potential terms.
  • FIG. 7 is a flow chart of another embodiment of a method for discovering semantically related terms based on search engine logs. Generally, an advertisement campaign management system creates one or more vectors based at least in part on search engine logs. A search engine log may include one or more terms entered by a user at an Internet search engine, the URLs that are displayed in response to a term, the order that the URLs are displayed in search listings in response to a term, the URLs that a user clicked on when using a term, and the number of times a user clicked on a URL when using a term. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system creates a set of URL vectors associating for each URL in the search log, a number of times a user searched for each term in the search log and clicked on the relevant URL. The advertisement campaign management system then determines a plurality of suggested terms based on one or more seed terms and the set of URL vectors.
  • The method 700 begins with an advertisement campaign management system creating a set of URL vectors based on the search logs 702. The set of URL vectors associates for each URL in the search log, a number of times a user searched for each search term in the search logs and clicked on the relevant URL. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system weighs each term in the set of URL vectors 704 based on factors such as how frequently a user searched for the term and clicked on a URL. In one implementation, the advertisement campaign management system weights each term in the set of URL vectors so that webpages that were clicked on more frequently are weighted less than webpages that were clicked on less frequently. For example, each entry in the set of URL vectors may be weighed by multiplying the entry by the logarithm of the quantity of the total number of distinct URLs in the search log over the number of distinct URLs in the search log associated with the term of the entry.
  • The advertisement campaign management system additional creates a set of query vectors based on the search logs 706. The set of query vectors associates for each URL in the search log, whether a user searched for each term in the search log and clicked on the URL. In one implementation, each entry in the set of query vectors will include a positive non-zero number if the search logs evidence a user searched for a term and clicked on the relevant URL and will include the number zero if a searcher did not search for a term and click on the relevant URL.
  • After creating the set of URL vectors and the set of query vectors, the advertisement campaign management system receives one or more seed terms from a user such as an advertiser 708. As discussed above, each of the seed terms may be a single word or a phrase. Additionally, each seed term may be a positive seed term or a negative seed term. The campaign advertisement management system creates a seed term vector based on the received seed terms 710. In one implementation, the seed term vector includes a value for each term in the search logs, where the value of the entry is a positive non-zero number if the term is a positive seed terms, the value of the entry is a negative non-zero number if the term is a negative seed terms, and the value of the entry is zero if the term is not a seed term.
  • Typically, the set of URL vectors, set of query vectors, and seed term vectors are each normalized 712 so that the magnitude of each vector is one. The advertisement campaign management system then calculates a weighted average 714 over a number URLs in the search logs as a function of the set of URL vectors, set of query vectors, and seed term vector 710 to determine the terms that are closest to the seed terms. In one implementation, the weighted average may be calculated over every URL in the search log. However, in other embodiments, the weighted average may be calculated over a predetermined number of URLs in the search logs that are closest to the seed terms as determined by the advertisement campaign management system.
  • In one embodiment, the weighted average is calculated using the function:
    T=Sum of (V1*cosine(V2, S)),
    wherein V1*cosine(V2,S) is calculated for each URL in the search log; V1 is the relevant query vector indicating for each term in the search log, whether a user searched for a term and clicked on the relevant URL; V2 is the relevant URL vector indicating for each term in the search logs, a number of times a user searched for the term and clicked on the relevant URL; and S is the seed term vector indicating for each term in the search log, whether the term is one of the seed terms received by a user. As discussed above, the sum of (V1*cosine(V2,S)) may be calculated for all URLs in the search logs or the sum of (V1*cosine(V2,S)) may be calculated for a number of URLs that is less than the total number of URLs in the search logs.
  • After calculating the sum of (V1*cosine(V2,S)), T will comprise a vector having a value for each term in the search logs. The advertisement campaign management system examines the resulting vector T to determine the terms having the highest value in the resulting vector T after the weighted average 716. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system may determine the top ten terms having the highest value in the resulting vector T after the weighted average, but the advertisement campaign management system may determine any number of top terms. The advertisement campaign management system then suggests at least a portion of the terms having the highest value in the resulting vector T to the user 718.
  • After receiving the terms, the advertiser may accept one or more of the suggested terms 720, indicate a degree of relevance of the one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 722, and/or request additional suggested terms 724.
  • If the user accepts one or more of the suggested terms 720 or sends an indication to the advertisement campaign management system regarding the relevance of one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 722, the advertisement campaign management system adjusts the set of seed terms 723 as discussed above.
  • If the user requests additional suggested terms 724 and the advertisement campaign management system has not adjusted the set of seed terms, the advertisement campaign management system loops 726 to step 718 and may present additional potential terms as determined in step 716.
  • If the user requests additional suggested terms 724 and the advertisement campaign management system has adjusted the set of seed terms 723, the advertisement campaign management system loops 728 to step 710. At step 710, the advertisement campaign management system creates a seed term vector based on the new set of seed terms and the above-described process is repeated.
  • The user may continue to choose whether to accept one or more of the suggested terms 720, indicate a degree of relevance of the one or more suggested terms to the advertiser 722, and/or request additional suggested terms 724 until the user instructs the advertisement campaign management system to stop suggesting terms.
  • It should be appreciated that while each of the methods of FIGS. 4-7 have been described as separate method, in some embodiments it may be possible to string the method of FIGS. 4-7 together. For example, an advertisement campaign management system may receive a set of seed terms and use the method of FIG. 4 for a first iteration to suggest one or more semantically related terms. After a user indicates a degree of relevance of the suggested terms to the seed terms, if the user requests additional suggested search terms, the advertisement campaign management system may use the relevant suggested terms as seed terms in the method of FIG. 6 for a second iteration to suggest one or more semantically related terms. In other words, the methods of FIGS. 4-7 may be placed end-to-end in any order such that an advertisement campaign management system may use the suggested terms obtained using one method to determine semantically related terms as the seed terms for another method to determine semantically related terms.
  • Further, while the methods of FIG. 4-7 have been described with a user supplying a set of seed terms, it will be appreciated that an advertisement campaign management system may also automatically create a set of seed terms for a user. For example, in one embodiment, a user may supply an online advertising account number to the advertisement campaign management system. In response, the advertisement campaign management system determines based on advertisement campaign information in the supplied account, what terms an advertiser has previously, or is currently, bidding on. The advertisement campaign management system then uses the determined terms as seed terms in the methods described above with respect to FIGS. 4-7.
  • An advertisement campaign management system may additionally determine seed terms from the content of a webpage. FIG. 8 is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method for discovering a set of seed terms for suggesting semantically related terms. In contrast to the method described above with respect to FIG. 4-7 where an advertiser sends only one or more seed terms to an advertisement campaign management system, in the method of FIG. 8, an advertiser sends a URL of a webpage to an advertisement campaign management system in place of, or in addition to, one or more seed terms. The advertisement campaign management system then determines one or more seed terms for an advertiser based on the webpage content. The advertisement campaign management system may additionally suggest the determined seed terms themselves as terms to the user.
  • Generally, the advertisement campaign management system receives at least a URL address from an advertiser and determines one or more seed terms from webpage content at the URL address. The advertisement campaign management system may suggest the one or more seed terms as terms to an advertiser or the advertisement campaign management system may use the seed terms in one of the methods for determining semantically related terms described above. The method 800 begins with an advertisement campaign management system receiving a URL address from a user 802. In response to receiving the URL address, the advertisement campaign system retrieves the content of the URL 804 and strips out any code from the webpage content 806. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system may strip out HTML code, Java script, style sheets, or any other type of code other than the text of the URL content.
  • The advertisement campaign management system associates different weights for each term in the URL content 808. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system may associate a weight with a term based on factors such as where the term was located on a webpage, how frequently the term appears on the webpage, whether a term is a multi-word term, or based on a ratio of the number of words in a term to the number of words in a text segment in the webpage content where the term came from. For example, with respect to location on a webpage, the advertisement campaign management system may assign a greater weight to a term that is located in a heading of a webpage rather than a term that is located in a body of a webpage. With respect to frequency, the advertisement campaign management system may weight a term that appears multiple times on a webpage higher than a term that appears once on a webpage.
  • The advertisement campaign management system normalizes the text from the webpage 810. In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system normalizes the text by performing actions such as removing functional words that do not affect the meaning of a term, changing the order of any multiple-word term, paraphrasing a term, stemming a term, changing whether a terms is plural or singular, changing or removing punctuation in the term, or any other function to normalize a term as known in the art.
  • After weighting 808 and normalizing 810 the webpage content, the advertisement campaign management system pulls terms from the text of URL content having a highest weight 812. In one implementation, the advertisement campaign management system may pull the top ten terms having a highest weight, but in other embodiments the advertisement campaign management system may pull any number of terms from the webpage content.
  • In one embodiment, the advertisement campaign management system suggests at least a portion of the terms pulled from the URL content to a user 814 and allows the user to choose whether to use the suggested terms 816 and/or to use the suggested terms as seed terms 818 in a method to determine semantically related terms such as those described above with respect to FIGS. 4-7. However, in other embodiments, the advertisement campaign management system may automatically 820 use the terms as seed terms 814 in a method to determine semantically related terms such as those described above with respect to FIGS. 4-7.
  • The above disclosure describes systems and methods for discovering semantically related terms based on advertisement data of advertisement campaign management systems, search logs of internet search engines, and the content of actual webpages. It should be appreciated that while the above methods and systems describe discovering semantically related words for purposes of bidding on online advertisements, these same methods and systems could be used to assist a searcher performing research at an internet search engine. For example, a searcher may send one or more terms to a search engine. The search engine may use the terms as seed terms and suggest semantically related words related to the terms either with the search results generated in response to the terms, or independent of any search results. Providing the searcher with semantically related terms allows the searcher to broaden or focus any future searches so that the search engine provides more relevant search results to the searcher.
  • Further, it should be appreciated that an online advertisement service provider may use the disclosed methods and systems in a campaign optimizer component 275 (FIG. 2) as described above or to determine semantically related terms to match advertisements to terms received from a search engine. Using semantically related terms allows an online advertisement service provider to serve an advertisement if the term that an advertiser bid on is semantically related to a term sent to a search engine rather than only serving an advertisement when a term sent to a search engine exactly matches a term that an advertiser has bid on. Providing the ability to serve an advertisement based on semantically related terms when authorized by an advertiser provides increased relevance and efficiency to an advertiser so that an advertiser does not have to determine every possible word combination where the advertiser would like their advertisement served to a potential customer.
  • Additionally, it should be appreciated that while the above methods and systems describe determining semantically related terms based on information related to websites, the same methods and systems could be used to determine semantically related terms based on information related to a combination of websites and/or ad groups. As described above, an ad group is a group of advertisements defined by a user that will be handled by an advertisement campaign management system in a similar manner. For example, users may group advertisements by a search tactic, performance parameter, demographic of a user, family of products, or almost any other parameter desired by the user. Allowing users to define their own ad groups allows the advertisement campaign management system to provide more useful information in a manner most relevant to the user.
  • It is therefore intended that the foregoing detailed description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting, and that it be understood that it is the following claims, including all equivalents, that are intended to define the spirit and scope of this invention.

Claims (41)

  1. 1. A method for determining semantically related terms, comprising:
    receiving one or more seed terms;
    determining one or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on one or more vectors comprising entries regarding a plurality of terms, a plurality of universal resource locators (“URLs”) associated with each term of the plurality of terms, and for each URL in a search log, a number of times that one or more users searched for each of the terms of the plurality of terms in the search log and clicked on the URL; and
    suggesting at least a portion of the determined potential terms.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining one or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on one or more vectors comprises:
    creating a set of URL vectors representing for each URL in the search log, a number of times that one or more users searched for each of the terms in the search log and clicked on the URL;
    creating a set of query vectors representing for each URL in the search log, whether a user searched for each of the terms in the search log and clicked on the URL; and
    determining one or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on the set of URL vectors, set of query vectors, and at least one seed term.
  3. 3. The method of claim 2, wherein determining one or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on one or more vectors further comprises:
    weighing each entry in the set of URL vectors and the set of query vectors based on a number of times a URL and a term appears in the search log; and
    normalizing the set of URL vectors and the set of query vectors.
  4. 4. The method of claim 2, wherein determining one or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on one or more vectors further comprises:
    determining a weighted average over each URL in the search logs as a function of the set of URL vectors, the set of query vectors, and the at least one seed term.
  5. 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the weighted average is calculated using the formula:

    T=Sum of (V1*cosine(V2,S)),
    wherein V1*cosine(V2,S) is calculated for each URL in the search log; V1 is the relevant query vector indicating for each term in the search log, whether a searcher searched for the term and clicked on the relevant URL; V2 is the relevant URL vector indicating for each term in the search log, a number of times a user searched for the term and clicked on the relevant URL; S is a seed term vector indicating for each term in the search log, whether the term is one of the seed terms; and T is a vector indicating for each term in the search log, how relevant the term is to the seed terms.
  6. 6. The method of claim 1, wherein receiving one or more search terms comprises:
    receiving a location of a webpage; and
    pulling one or more terms from the content of the webpage.
  7. 7. The method of claim 6, further comprising:
    suggesting at least one term of the terms pulled from the content of the webpage.
  8. 8. The method of claim 6, wherein pulling one or more terms from the content of the webpage comprises:
    retrieving the content of the webpage from the location of the webpage;
    stripping code from the content of the webpage;
    pulling one or more terms from the content of the webpage; and
    weighing each term of the terms pulled from the content of the webpage based on a location of where the term was located on the webpage.
  9. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the seed terms comprise at least one term sent to an internet search engine.
  10. 10. A computer-readable storage medium comprising a set of instructions for determining semantically related terms, the set of instructions to direct a computer system to perform the acts of:
    receiving one or more seed terms;
    determining one or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on one or more vectors comprising entries regarding a plurality of terms, a plurality of universal resource locators (“URLs”) associated with each term of the plurality of terms, and for each URL in a search log, a number of times that one or more users searched for each of the terms of the plurality of terms in the search log and clicked on the URL; and
    suggesting at least a portion of the determined potential terms.
  11. 11. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein determining one or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on one or more vectors comprises:
    creating a set of URL vectors representing for each URL in the search log, a number of times that one or more users searched for each of the terms in the search log and clicked on the URL;
    creating a set of query vectors representing for each URL in the search log, whether a user searched for each of the terms in the search log and clicked on the URL; and
    determining one or more potential terms semantically related-to the seed terms based on the set of URL vectors, set of query vectors, and at least one seed term.
  12. 12. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 11, wherein determining one or more potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on one or more vectors further comprises:
    weighing each entry in the set of URL vectors and the set of query vectors based on a number of times a URL and a term appears in the search log; and
    normalizing the set of URL vectors and the set of query vectors.
  13. 13. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 12, wherein the weighted average is calculated using the formula:

    T=Sum of (V1*cosine(V2,S)),
    wherein V1*cosine(V2,S) is calculated for each URL in the search log; V1 is the relevant query vector indicating for each term in the search log, whether a searcher searched for the term and clicked on the relevant URL; V2 is the relevant URL vector indicating for each term in the search log, a number of times a user searched for the term and clicked on the relevant URL; S is a seed term vector indicating for each term in the search log, whether the term is one of the seed terms; and T is a vector indicating for each term in the search log, how relevant the term is to the seed terms.
  14. 14. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein receiving one or more search terms comprises:
    receiving a location of a webpage;
    retrieving the content of the webpage from the location of the webpage;
    stripping code from the content of the webpage;
    pulling one or more terms from the content of the webpage; and
    weighing each term of the terms pulled from the content of the webpage based on a location of where the term was located on the webpage.
  15. 15. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 10, wherein the seed terms comprises at least one term sent to an internet search engine.
  16. 16. A system for determining semantically related words comprising:
    at least one database comprising:
    a set of universal resource locators (“URL”) vectors representing for each URL in a search log, a number of times that one or more users searched for each of the terms in the search log and clicked on the URL; and
    a set of query vectors representing for each URL in the search log, whether a user searched for each of the terms in the search log and clicked on the URL; and
    at least one server operative to access the set of URL vectors and set of query vectors of the at least one database, the at least one server configured to:
    receive one or more seed terms;
    determine a plurality of potential terms semantically related to the seed terms based on the set of URL vectors, set of query vectors, and the seed terms; and
    suggest at least a portion of the plurality of potential terms.
  17. 17. The system of claim 16, wherein to receive one or more seed terms, the at least one server is further configured to:
    receive a location of a webpage;
    retrieve the content of the webpage from the location of the webpage;
    strip code from the content of the webpage;
    pull one or more terms from the content of the webpage; and
    weigh each term of the terms pulled from the content of the webpage based on a location of where the term was located on the webpage.
  18. 18. The system of claim 16, wherein the seed terms comprise at least one term sent to an internet search engine.
  19. 19. A method for determining semantically related terms, comprising:
    receiving one or more seed terms;
    searching an index to determine a plurality of potential terms semantically related to the seed terms, the index comprising associations between terms regarding which terms in a search log resulted in one or more searchers clicking on the same universal resource locator (“URL”); and
    suggesting at least a first term of the plurality of potential terms.
  20. 20. The method of claim 19, further comprising:
    receiving an indication of relevance of the first term to a user; and
    modifying the terms which comprise the seed terms based at least in part on the received indication of relevance.
  21. 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the indication of relevance to the user is an indication of relevance to the user on a scale.
  22. 22. The method of claim 20, wherein modifying the terms which comprise the seed terms comprises:
    receiving an indication that a first term is relevant to the user; and
    modifying the seed terms to comprise the first term as a positive seed term.
  23. 23. The method of claim 22, wherein modifying the terms which comprise the seed terms comprises:
    receiving an indication that a second term is not relevant to the user; and
    modifying the seed terms to comprise the second term as a negative seed term.
  24. 24. The method of claim 20, further comprising:
    searching the index to determine a second plurality of potential terms semantically related to the modified seed terms; and
    suggesting at least one term of the second plurality of potential terms.
  25. 25. The method of claim 20, further comprising:
    examining, with a function learning algorithm, the associations in the index between terms regarding at least which terms in the search log resulted in the same or different searcher clicking on the same URL; and
    predicting a degree of relevance between two terms based on the algorithm learned by the function learning algorithm in examining the index.
  26. 26. The method of claim 20, wherein receiving one or more seed terms comprises:
    receiving a location of a webpage;
    retrieving the content of the webpage from the location of the webpage;
    stripping code from the content of the webpage;
    pulling one or more terms from the content of the webpage; and
    weighing each term of the terms pulled from the content of the webpage based on a location of where the term was located on the webpage.
  27. 27. The method of claim 20, wherein the seed terms comprise at least one term sent to an internet search engine.
  28. 28. A computer-readable storage medium storing a set of instructions for determine semantically related terms, the set of instructions to direct a computer system to perform acts of:
    receiving one or more seed terms;
    searching an index to determine a plurality of potential terms semantically related to the seed terms, the index comprising associations between terms regarding which terms in a search log resulted in one or more searchers clicking on the same universal resource locator (“URL”); and
    suggesting at least a first term of the plurality of potential terms.
  29. 29. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 28, further comprising a set of instructions to direct the computer system to perform acts of:
    receiving an indication of relevance of the first term to a user; and
    modifying the terms which comprise the seed terms based at least in part on the received indication of relevance.
  30. 30. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 29, wherein the indication of relevance to the seed terms is an indication of relevance to the seed terms on a scale.
  31. 31. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 28, further comprising a set of instructions to direct the computer system to perform acts of:
    examining, with a function learning algorithm, the associations in the index between terms regarding at least which terms in the search log resulted in the same or different searcher clicking on the same URL; and
    predicting a degree of relevance between two terms based on the algorithm learned by the function learning algorithm in examining the index.
  32. 32. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 28, wherein receiving at least one search term comprises:
    receiving a location of a webpage;
    retrieving the content of the webpage from the location of the webpage;
    stripping code from the content of the webpage;
    pulling one or more terms from the content of the webpage; and
    weighing each term of the terms pulled from the content of the webpage based on a location of where the term was located on the webpage.
  33. 33. The computer-readable storage medium of claim 28, wherein the seed terms comprise at least one search term sent to an internet search engine.
  34. 34. A system for determining semantically related terms comprising:
    a database comprising an index comprising associations between terms regarding which terms in a search log resulted in one or more searchers clicking on the same universal resource locator (“URL”);
    at least one server operative to access the index, the at least one server configured to:
    receive one or more seed terms;
    search the index to determine a plurality of potential terms semantically related to the seed terms; and
    suggest at least a first term of the plurality of potential terms.
  35. 35. The system of claim 34, wherein the at least one server is further configured to:
    receiving an indication of relevance of the first term to a user; and
    modifying the terms which comprise the seed terms based at least in part on the received indication of relevance.
  36. 36. The system of claim 34, wherein the indication of relevance to the user is an indication of relevance to the seed terms on a scale.
  37. 37. The system of claim 34, wherein the at least one server is further configured to:
    examine, with a function learning algorithm, the associations in the index between terms regarding which terms in the search log resulted in one or more searchers clicking on the same URL; and
    predict a degree of relevance between two terms based on the algorithm learned by the function learning algorithm in examining the index.
  38. 38. The system of claim 34, wherein to receive the one or more seed terms, the at least one server is further configured to:
    receive a location of a webpage;
    retrieve the content of the webpage from the location of the webpage;
    strip code from the content of the webpage;
    pull one or more terms from the content of the webpage; and
    weigh each term of the terms pulled from the content of the webpage based on a location of where the term was located on the webpage.
  39. 39. The system of claim 34, wherein the seed terms comprise at least one term sent to an internet search engine.
  40. 40. The system of claim 34, wherein the first term of the plurality of potential terms is suggested via a user interface of an advertisement campaign management system.
  41. 41. The system of claim 34, wherein the first term of the plurality of potential terms is suggested via an application program interface of an advertisement campaign management system.
US11432585 2005-07-29 2006-05-11 System and method for determining semantically related term Abandoned US20070027865A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US70390405 true 2005-07-29 2005-07-29
US11432585 US20070027865A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-05-11 System and method for determining semantically related term

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11432585 US20070027865A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-05-11 System and method for determining semantically related term

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070027865A1 true true US20070027865A1 (en) 2007-02-01

Family

ID=39898991

Family Applications (14)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11281940 Abandoned US20070027751A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-11-16 Positioning advertisements on the bases of expected revenue
US11281919 Active 2027-07-24 US7739708B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-11-16 System and method for revenue based advertisement placement
US11281917 Active 2027-04-12 US7840438B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-11-16 System and method for discounting of historical click through data for multiple versions of an advertisement
US11321888 Active 2027-10-22 US7685019B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-12-28 System and method for optimizing the delivery of advertisements
US11321729 Active 2028-04-24 US7949562B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-12-28 System and method for optimizing advertisement campaigns using a limited budget
US11413539 Pending US20070027762A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 System and method for creating and providing a user interface for optimizing advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413535 Active 2028-04-27 US8321274B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Advertiser alerting system and method in a networked database search system
US11413383 Abandoned US20070027758A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 System and method for creating and providing a user interface for managing advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413221 Abandoned US20070027756A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Application program interface for optimizing advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413465 Pending US20070027759A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Application program interface for managing advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413536 Abandoned US20070027761A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Application program interface for customizing reports on advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413222 Abandoned US20070027757A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 System and method for creating and providing a user interface for customizing reports on advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413699 Active 2029-02-13 US8321275B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Advertiser reporting system and method in a networked database search system
US11432585 Abandoned US20070027865A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-05-11 System and method for determining semantically related term

Family Applications Before (13)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11281940 Abandoned US20070027751A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-11-16 Positioning advertisements on the bases of expected revenue
US11281919 Active 2027-07-24 US7739708B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-11-16 System and method for revenue based advertisement placement
US11281917 Active 2027-04-12 US7840438B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-11-16 System and method for discounting of historical click through data for multiple versions of an advertisement
US11321888 Active 2027-10-22 US7685019B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-12-28 System and method for optimizing the delivery of advertisements
US11321729 Active 2028-04-24 US7949562B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2005-12-28 System and method for optimizing advertisement campaigns using a limited budget
US11413539 Pending US20070027762A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 System and method for creating and providing a user interface for optimizing advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413535 Active 2028-04-27 US8321274B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Advertiser alerting system and method in a networked database search system
US11413383 Abandoned US20070027758A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 System and method for creating and providing a user interface for managing advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413221 Abandoned US20070027756A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Application program interface for optimizing advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413465 Pending US20070027759A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Application program interface for managing advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413536 Abandoned US20070027761A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Application program interface for customizing reports on advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413222 Abandoned US20070027757A1 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 System and method for creating and providing a user interface for customizing reports on advertiser defined groups of advertisement campaign information
US11413699 Active 2029-02-13 US8321275B2 (en) 2005-07-29 2006-04-28 Advertiser reporting system and method in a networked database search system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (14) US20070027751A1 (en)
CN (2) CN101233537A (en)

Cited By (71)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070027864A1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2007-02-01 Collins Robert J System and method for determining semantically related terms
US20070083468A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Wetherell Christopher J Content feed user interface with gallery display of same-type items
US20070083520A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Shellen Jason H Personalized content feed suggestions page
US20070157229A1 (en) * 2006-01-04 2007-07-05 Wayne Heathcock Analytic advertising system and method of employing the same
US20070220040A1 (en) * 2006-03-14 2007-09-20 Nhn Corporation Method and system for matching advertising using seed
US20070271255A1 (en) * 2006-05-17 2007-11-22 Nicky Pappo Reverse search-engine
US20080077585A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Microsoft Corporation Recommending keywords based on bidding patterns
US20080082477A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Key phrase extraction from query logs
US20080082673A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-03 Michael Dynin Bookmark-Based Access to Content Feeds
US20080082941A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-03 Goldberg Steven L Content Feed User Interface
US20080086755A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Darnell Benjamin G Recursive Subscriptions to Content Feeds
US20080148192A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Toolbox pagination
US20080147634A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Toolbox order editing
US20080147708A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Preview window with rss feed
US20080148164A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Toolbox minimizer/maximizer
US20080148178A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Independent scrolling
US20080147653A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Search suggestions
US20080147606A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Category-based searching
US20080147709A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Search results from selected sources
US20080148188A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Persistent preview window
US20080147670A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Persistent interface
US20080183558A1 (en) * 2007-01-31 2008-07-31 Yahoo!Inc. System and method for automatically determining an advertisement type of a digital advertisement
US20080189267A1 (en) * 2006-08-09 2008-08-07 Radar Networks, Inc. Harvesting Data From Page
US20080249855A1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2008-10-09 Yahoo! Inc. System for generating advertising creatives
US20080256056A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Yahoo! Inc. System for building a data structure representing a network of users and advertisers
US20080256444A1 (en) * 2007-04-13 2008-10-16 Microsoft Corporation Internet Visualization System and Related User Interfaces
US20080306959A1 (en) * 2004-02-23 2008-12-11 Radar Networks, Inc. Semantic web portal and platform
US20090030982A1 (en) * 2002-11-20 2009-01-29 Radar Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for semantically managing offers and requests over a network
US20090037239A1 (en) * 2007-08-02 2009-02-05 Daniel Wong Method For Improving Internet Advertising Click-Through Rates through Time-Dependent Keywords
US20090037399A1 (en) * 2007-07-31 2009-02-05 Yahoo! Inc. System and Method for Determining Semantically Related Terms
US20090076887A1 (en) * 2007-09-16 2009-03-19 Nova Spivack System And Method Of Collecting Market-Related Data Via A Web-Based Networking Environment
US20090106307A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Nova Spivack System of a knowledge management and networking environment and method for providing advanced functions therefor
US20090204478A1 (en) * 2008-02-08 2009-08-13 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Identifying and Measuring Trends in Consumer Content Demand Within Vertically Associated Websites and Related Content
US20100004975A1 (en) * 2008-07-03 2010-01-07 Scott White System and method for leveraging proximity data in a web-based socially-enabled knowledge networking environment
US20100010959A1 (en) * 2008-07-09 2010-01-14 Broder Andrei Z Systems and methods for query expansion in sponsored search
US20100057815A1 (en) * 2002-11-20 2010-03-04 Radar Networks, Inc. Semantically representing a target entity using a semantic object
US20100121860A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2010-05-13 Lei Pan Method and Apparatus of Generating Update Parameters and Displaying Correlated Keywords
US20100121691A1 (en) * 2008-11-11 2010-05-13 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for utilizing non-compete advertisement tags in an advertisement serving system
US20100169353A1 (en) * 2008-12-31 2010-07-01 Ebay, Inc. System and methods for unit of measurement conversion and search query expansion
US7761473B2 (en) 2007-05-18 2010-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Typed relationships between items
US20100268702A1 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Evri, Inc. Generating user-customized search results and building a semantics-enhanced search engine
US20100268596A1 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Evri, Inc. Search-enhanced semantic advertising
US20100268720A1 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Radar Networks, Inc. Automatic mapping of a location identifier pattern of an object to a semantic type using object metadata
US20100268700A1 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Evri, Inc. Search and search optimization using a pattern of a location identifier
US20100325250A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2010-12-23 Verisign, Inc. Characterizing unregistered domain names
US20110022623A1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2011-01-27 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US20110040604A1 (en) * 2009-08-13 2011-02-17 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Providing Targeted Content
EP2313839A2 (en) * 2008-06-23 2011-04-27 Google, Inc. Query identification and association
US20110099059A1 (en) * 2009-10-27 2011-04-28 Yahoo! Inc. Index-based technique friendly ctr prediction and advertisement selection
US20110161091A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2011-06-30 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Connecting Entities Through Content
US20110161162A1 (en) * 2008-06-13 2011-06-30 Google Inc. Achieving Advertising Campaign Goals
US20110161479A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2011-06-30 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Presenting Content
US20110197137A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2011-08-11 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Rating Content
US20110202827A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2011-08-18 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Curating Content
US20110282741A1 (en) * 2007-12-27 2011-11-17 Nhn Business Platform Corporation Method for offering advertisement according to search intention segmentation and system for executing the method
US20120109758A1 (en) * 2007-07-16 2012-05-03 Vanessa Murdock Method For Matching Electronic Advertisements To Surrounding Context Based On Their Advertisement Content
US20120158505A1 (en) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-21 Sreenivasulu Jaladanki Blending Advertiser Data With Ad Network Data In Order To Serve Finely Targeted Ads
US8255812B1 (en) * 2007-03-15 2012-08-28 Google Inc. Embedding user-selected content feed items in a webpage
US20120259831A1 (en) * 2011-04-05 2012-10-11 Microsoft Corporation User Information Needs Based Data Selection
US8306962B1 (en) * 2009-06-29 2012-11-06 Adchemy, Inc. Generating targeted paid search campaigns
US20130311271A1 (en) * 2012-05-17 2013-11-21 Microsoft Corporation Structured relevant keyword and intent suggestion with bid and other auction parameters based on advertiser specific context
US8606786B2 (en) 2009-06-22 2013-12-10 Microsoft Corporation Determining a similarity measure between queries
US20140025664A1 (en) * 2009-05-22 2014-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Identifying terms associated with queries
US8725566B2 (en) * 2011-12-27 2014-05-13 Microsoft Corporation Predicting advertiser keyword performance indicator values based on established performance indicator values
US8732151B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2014-05-20 Microsoft Corporation Enhanced query rewriting through statistical machine translation
US8745161B2 (en) 2007-09-26 2014-06-03 Google Inc. Determining and displaying a count of unread items in content feeds
US8768906B2 (en) 2007-03-28 2014-07-01 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Method and system of displaying related keywords
US9195647B1 (en) * 2012-08-11 2015-11-24 Guangsheng Zhang System, methods, and data structure for machine-learning of contextualized symbolic associations
US9767196B1 (en) * 2013-11-20 2017-09-19 Google Inc. Content selection
US9984159B1 (en) 2014-08-12 2018-05-29 Google Llc Providing information about content distribution
US10025871B2 (en) 2007-09-27 2018-07-17 Google Llc Setting and displaying a read status for items in content feeds

Families Citing this family (548)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7774715B1 (en) * 2000-06-23 2010-08-10 Ecomsystems, Inc. System and method for computer-created advertisements
US7996310B1 (en) 2000-07-19 2011-08-09 Globys, Inc. Electronic financial management and analysis system and related methods
US7904595B2 (en) 2001-01-18 2011-03-08 Sdl International America Incorporated Globalization management system and method therefor
US9633505B2 (en) 2007-09-07 2017-04-25 Veritone, Inc. System and method for on-demand delivery of audio content for use with entertainment creatives
US20090024409A1 (en) * 2002-02-06 2009-01-22 Ryan Steelberg Apparatus, system and method for a brand affinity engine using positive and negative mentions
US20090018922A1 (en) * 2002-02-06 2009-01-15 Ryan Steelberg System and method for preemptive brand affinity content distribution
US20100131085A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-05-27 Ryan Steelberg System and method for on-demand delivery of audio content for use with entertainment creatives
US8590013B2 (en) 2002-02-25 2013-11-19 C. S. Lee Crawford Method of managing and communicating data pertaining to software applications for processor-based devices comprising wireless communication circuitry
US7343564B2 (en) * 2003-08-11 2008-03-11 Core Mobility, Inc. Systems and methods for displaying location-based maps on communication devices
US20060236258A1 (en) 2003-08-11 2006-10-19 Core Mobility, Inc. Scheduling of rendering of location-based content
US20050055269A1 (en) * 2003-09-04 2005-03-10 Alex Roetter Systems and methods for determining user actions
US20050160002A1 (en) * 2003-09-04 2005-07-21 Alex Roetter Systems and methods for determining user actions
US8706551B2 (en) * 2003-09-04 2014-04-22 Google Inc. Systems and methods for determining user actions
EP1738289A4 (en) * 2004-03-26 2007-10-24 Alex Mashinsky Exchange of newly-added information over the internet
US7596571B2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2009-09-29 Technorati, Inc. Ecosystem method of aggregation and search and related techniques
WO2006081577A3 (en) * 2005-01-27 2009-04-09 Matrix Tv Dynamic mosaic extended electronic programming guide for television program selection and display
US9110985B2 (en) * 2005-05-10 2015-08-18 Neetseer, Inc. Generating a conceptual association graph from large-scale loosely-grouped content
US7958120B2 (en) 2005-05-10 2011-06-07 Netseer, Inc. Method and apparatus for distributed community finding
US8527510B2 (en) 2005-05-23 2013-09-03 Monster Worldwide, Inc. Intelligent job matching system and method
EP1894386B1 (en) 2005-06-01 2018-08-08 Google LLC Media play optimization
US8099326B2 (en) * 2005-06-01 2012-01-17 Google Inc. Traffic estimator
US8099327B2 (en) * 2005-06-01 2012-01-17 Google Inc. Auctioneer
US8908846B2 (en) * 2005-06-22 2014-12-09 Viva Group, Llc System to capture communication information
DE102005030073A1 (en) * 2005-06-27 2006-12-28 Airbus Deutschland Gmbh Communication data transmission system for passenger aircraft, has terminals interconnected with shunt connection so that data is transmitted from one to another terminal,if all terminals are interconnected and connection is interrupted
US8875196B2 (en) 2005-08-13 2014-10-28 Webtuner Corp. System for network and local content access
US7774335B1 (en) * 2005-08-23 2010-08-10 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Method and system for determining interest levels of online content navigation paths
US7966395B1 (en) 2005-08-23 2011-06-21 Amazon Technologies, Inc. System and method for indicating interest of online content
US8620748B1 (en) * 2005-09-06 2013-12-31 GLAM.Media, Inc. Multi-dimensional method for optimized delivery of targeted on-line brand advertisements
US8260777B1 (en) * 2005-09-09 2012-09-04 A9.Com, Inc. Server system and methods for matching listings to web pages and users
US20070288427A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-12-13 Jorey Ramer Mobile pay-per-call campaign creation
US20110313853A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2011-12-22 Jorey Ramer System for targeting advertising content to a plurality of mobile communication facilities
US10038756B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2018-07-31 Millenial Media LLC Managing sponsored content based on device characteristics
US20090234711A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2009-09-17 Jorey Ramer Aggregation of behavioral profile data using a monetization platform
US9471925B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2016-10-18 Millennial Media Llc Increasing mobile interactivity
US7702318B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2010-04-20 Jumptap, Inc. Presentation of sponsored content based on mobile transaction event
US20070100653A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2007-05-03 Jorey Ramer Mobile website analyzer
US8238888B2 (en) 2006-09-13 2012-08-07 Jumptap, Inc. Methods and systems for mobile coupon placement
US8989718B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2015-03-24 Millennial Media, Inc. Idle screen advertising
US20080214153A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Mobile User Profile Creation based on User Browse Behaviors
US8688671B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-04-01 Millennial Media Managing sponsored content based on geographic region
US8503995B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2013-08-06 Jumptap, Inc. Mobile dynamic advertisement creation and placement
US20070061245A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Location based presentation of mobile content
US8302030B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-10-30 Jumptap, Inc. Management of multiple advertising inventories using a monetization platform
US8175585B2 (en) 2005-11-05 2012-05-08 Jumptap, Inc. System for targeting advertising content to a plurality of mobile communication facilities
US20090029687A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2009-01-29 Jorey Ramer Combining mobile and transcoded content in a mobile search result
US9076175B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2015-07-07 Millennial Media, Inc. Mobile comparison shopping
US7660581B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2010-02-09 Jumptap, Inc. Managing sponsored content based on usage history
US8660891B2 (en) 2005-11-01 2014-02-25 Millennial Media Interactive mobile advertisement banners
US20070061247A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Expected value and prioritization of mobile content
US20070100652A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2007-05-03 Jorey Ramer Mobile pay per call
US20070061246A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Mobile campaign creation
US8666376B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2014-03-04 Millennial Media Location based mobile shopping affinity program
US20070060109A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Managing sponsored content based on user characteristics
US8156128B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2012-04-10 Jumptap, Inc. Contextual mobile content placement on a mobile communication facility
US20090240569A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2009-09-24 Jorey Ramer Syndication of a behavioral profile using a monetization platform
US7912458B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2011-03-22 Jumptap, Inc. Interaction analysis and prioritization of mobile content
US20080214155A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Integrating subscription content into mobile search results
US20080215623A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Mobile communication facility usage and social network creation
US20070061317A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Mobile search substring query completion
US20070239724A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-10-11 Jorey Ramer Mobile search services related to direct identifiers
US20070198485A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-08-23 Jorey Ramer Mobile search service discovery
US20080214152A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Methods and systems of mobile dynamic content presentation
US20070060114A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Predictive text completion for a mobile communication facility
US20070100806A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2007-05-03 Jorey Ramer Client libraries for mobile content
US8364540B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2013-01-29 Jumptap, Inc. Contextual targeting of content using a monetization platform
US20070073722A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-29 Jorey Ramer Calculation and presentation of mobile content expected value
US20100121705A1 (en) * 2005-11-14 2010-05-13 Jumptap, Inc. Presentation of Sponsored Content Based on Device Characteristics
US7752209B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2010-07-06 Jumptap, Inc. Presenting sponsored content on a mobile communication facility
US20070168354A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2007-07-19 Jorey Ramer Combined algorithmic and editorial-reviewed mobile content search results
US7676394B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2010-03-09 Jumptap, Inc. Dynamic bidding and expected value
US7577665B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2009-08-18 Jumptap, Inc. User characteristic influenced search results
US9201979B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2015-12-01 Millennial Media, Inc. Syndication of a behavioral profile associated with an availability condition using a monetization platform
US8229914B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-07-24 Jumptap, Inc. Mobile content spidering and compatibility determination
US20080215429A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Using a mobile communication facility for offline ad searching
US20070100650A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-05-03 Jorey Ramer Action functionality for mobile content search results
US8103545B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-01-24 Jumptap, Inc. Managing payment for sponsored content presented to mobile communication facilities
US7769764B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2010-08-03 Jumptap, Inc. Mobile advertisement syndication
US7603360B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2009-10-13 Jumptap, Inc. Location influenced search results
US8832100B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2014-09-09 Millennial Media, Inc. User transaction history influenced search results
US7860871B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2010-12-28 Jumptap, Inc. User history influenced search results
US8290810B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2012-10-16 Jumptap, Inc. Realtime surveying within mobile sponsored content
US20080214151A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Methods and systems for mobile coupon placement
US20080214154A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Associating mobile and non mobile web content
US20070073717A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-29 Jorey Ramer Mobile comparison shopping
US8819659B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-08-26 Millennial Media, Inc. Mobile search service instant activation
US20070118533A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-05-24 Jorey Ramer On-off handset search box
US20070061211A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Preventing mobile communication facility click fraud
US8195133B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-06-05 Jumptap, Inc. Mobile dynamic advertisement creation and placement
US8209344B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-06-26 Jumptap, Inc. Embedding sponsored content in mobile applications
US8131271B2 (en) * 2005-11-05 2012-03-06 Jumptap, Inc. Categorization of a mobile user profile based on browse behavior
US20080270220A1 (en) * 2005-11-05 2008-10-30 Jorey Ramer Embedding a nonsponsored mobile content within a sponsored mobile content
US20080215557A1 (en) * 2005-11-05 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Methods and systems of mobile query classification
US20070061303A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Mobile search result clustering
US8364521B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2013-01-29 Jumptap, Inc. Rendering targeted advertisement on mobile communication facilities
US20070073718A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-29 Jorey Ramer Mobile search service instant activation
US20070061198A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Mobile pay-per-call campaign creation
US20070061242A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Implicit searching for mobile content
US8805339B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-08-12 Millennial Media, Inc. Categorization of a mobile user profile based on browse and viewing behavior
US7548915B2 (en) * 2005-09-14 2009-06-16 Jorey Ramer Contextual mobile content placement on a mobile communication facility
US9703892B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2017-07-11 Millennial Media Llc Predictive text completion for a mobile communication facility
US20090234745A1 (en) * 2005-11-05 2009-09-17 Jorey Ramer Methods and systems for mobile coupon tracking
US8509750B2 (en) 2005-11-05 2013-08-13 Jumptap, Inc. System for targeting advertising content to a plurality of mobile communication facilities
US8311888B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2012-11-13 Jumptap, Inc. Revenue models associated with syndication of a behavioral profile using a monetization platform
US8812526B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2014-08-19 Millennial Media, Inc. Mobile content cross-inventory yield optimization
US20070100651A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2007-05-03 Jorey Ramer Mobile payment facilitation
US20110143731A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2011-06-16 Jorey Ramer Mobile Communication Facility Usage Pattern Geographic Based Advertising
US20080242279A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2008-10-02 Jorey Ramer Behavior-based mobile content placement on a mobile communication facility
US20070060173A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Managing sponsored content based on transaction history
US9058406B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2015-06-16 Millennial Media, Inc. Management of multiple advertising inventories using a monetization platform
US20070192318A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-08-16 Jorey Ramer Creation of a mobile search suggestion dictionary
US20080214148A1 (en) * 2005-11-05 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Targeting mobile sponsored content within a social network
US20090240568A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2009-09-24 Jorey Ramer Aggregation and enrichment of behavioral profile data using a monetization platform
US20080214204A1 (en) * 2005-11-01 2008-09-04 Jorey Ramer Similarity based location mapping of mobile comm facility users
US20070061334A1 (en) * 2005-09-14 2007-03-15 Jorey Ramer Search query address redirection on a mobile communication facility
US8027879B2 (en) * 2005-11-05 2011-09-27 Jumptap, Inc. Exclusivity bidding for mobile sponsored content
US8615719B2 (en) 2005-09-14 2013-12-24 Jumptap, Inc. Managing sponsored content for delivery to mobile communication facilities
US8676781B1 (en) * 2005-10-19 2014-03-18 A9.Com, Inc. Method and system for associating an advertisement with a web page
US20070118392A1 (en) * 2005-10-28 2007-05-24 Richard Zinn Classification and Management of Keywords across Multiple Campaigns
US8595633B2 (en) * 2005-10-31 2013-11-26 Yahoo! Inc. Method and system for displaying contextual rotating advertisements
US8972281B2 (en) * 2005-11-03 2015-03-03 Wigglewireless, Llc Media marketing system and method
US8571999B2 (en) 2005-11-14 2013-10-29 C. S. Lee Crawford Method of conducting operations for a social network application including activity list generation
US20070129999A1 (en) * 2005-11-18 2007-06-07 Jie Zhou Fraud detection in web-based advertising
US7603619B2 (en) * 2005-11-29 2009-10-13 Google Inc. Formatting a user network site based on user preferences and format performance data
JP5143013B2 (en) * 2005-12-08 2013-02-13 マイバイズ インコーポレイテッド Apparatus and method for providing marketing services
US20090063281A1 (en) * 2006-12-06 2009-03-05 Haldeman Randolph M In-call enterprise advertisement
US20090037255A1 (en) * 2006-12-06 2009-02-05 Leo Chiu Behavior aggregation
US20080189153A1 (en) * 2006-12-06 2008-08-07 Haldeman Randolph M Advertisement exchange system and method
JP2007179276A (en) * 2005-12-27 2007-07-12 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> Conformity judgment method, device, and program
US7827060B2 (en) * 2005-12-30 2010-11-02 Google Inc. Using estimated ad qualities for ad filtering, ranking and promotion
US20070156887A1 (en) * 2005-12-30 2007-07-05 Daniel Wright Predicting ad quality
US8065184B2 (en) * 2005-12-30 2011-11-22 Google Inc. Estimating ad quality from observed user behavior
WO2007084616A3 (en) * 2006-01-18 2008-04-17 Behnam Attaran-Rezael System and method for context-based knowledge search, tagging, collaboration, management and advertisement
US8825657B2 (en) 2006-01-19 2014-09-02 Netseer, Inc. Systems and methods for creating, navigating, and searching informational web neighborhoods
US20070174118A1 (en) * 2006-01-24 2007-07-26 Elan Dekel Facilitating client-side management of online advertising information, such as advertising account information
US20070208611A1 (en) * 2006-02-17 2007-09-06 Derek Collison Determining one or more performance metrics related to ads enabled for manual insertion into a document for distribution, and/or using such performance metric or metrics
KR100688245B1 (en) * 2006-02-22 2007-02-22 엔에이치엔(주) Method and system for generating list using dynamic adjustment of advertising-domain
US20070239543A1 (en) * 2006-02-24 2007-10-11 Ammas. Com Limited Promotional system
US8843434B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2014-09-23 Netseer, Inc. Methods and apparatus for visualizing, managing, monetizing, and personalizing knowledge search results on a user interface
US8972379B1 (en) 2006-08-25 2015-03-03 Riosoft Holdings, Inc. Centralized web-based software solution for search engine optimization
US8943039B1 (en) 2006-08-25 2015-01-27 Riosoft Holdings, Inc. Centralized web-based software solution for search engine optimization
US20070233566A1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2007-10-04 Dema Zlotin System and method for managing network-based advertising conducted by channel partners of an enterprise
US20070216098A1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2007-09-20 William Santiago Wizard blackjack analysis
US7676521B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2010-03-09 Microsoft Corporation Keyword search volume seasonality forecasting engine
KR100850848B1 (en) * 2006-04-19 2008-08-06 주식회사 인터파크지마켓 Method of providing advertisement and event optimized for web user and system thereof
KR100785352B1 (en) * 2006-04-21 2007-12-18 엔에이치엔(주) Method and system for creating search-result-list
US20070256095A1 (en) * 2006-04-27 2007-11-01 Collins Robert J System and method for the normalization of advertising metrics
US20070255690A1 (en) * 2006-04-28 2007-11-01 Chi-Chao Chang System and method for forecasting the performance of advertisements
US20070282813A1 (en) * 2006-05-11 2007-12-06 Yu Cao Searching with Consideration of User Convenience
WO2007134310A3 (en) * 2006-05-12 2008-01-31 Monster California Inc System and method for advertisement generation
US20070288885A1 (en) * 2006-05-17 2007-12-13 The Mathworks, Inc. Action languages for unified modeling language model
US8631314B2 (en) * 2006-05-18 2014-01-14 Interpols Network Incorporated Systems and methods for delivery of multiple online advertising units to communicate and interact on the same webpage
US20070276813A1 (en) * 2006-05-23 2007-11-29 Joshua Rosen Online Advertisement Selection and Delivery Based on Search Listing Collections
US9110979B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2015-08-18 Apple Inc. Search of sources and targets based on relative expertise of the sources
US9280597B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2016-03-08 Apple Inc. System and method for customizing search results from user's perspective
US8892541B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2014-11-18 Topsy Labs, Inc. System and method for query temporality analysis
US9454586B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2016-09-27 Apple Inc. System and method for customizing analytics based on users media affiliation status
US9129017B2 (en) 2009-12-01 2015-09-08 Apple Inc. System and method for metadata transfer among search entities
US7814112B2 (en) 2006-06-09 2010-10-12 Ebay Inc. Determining relevancy and desirability of terms
US9449322B2 (en) 2007-02-28 2016-09-20 Ebay Inc. Method and system of suggesting information used with items offered for sale in a network-based marketplace
US9898627B2 (en) * 2006-06-22 2018-02-20 Google Inc. Secure and extensible pay per action online advertising
US9558505B2 (en) * 2006-07-18 2017-01-31 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for prepaid rewards
US9934537B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2018-04-03 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for providing offers through a social media channel
US9767467B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2017-09-19 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for providing coupon-less discounts based on a user broadcasted message
US20110264490A1 (en) 2006-07-18 2011-10-27 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for administering marketing programs
US9542690B2 (en) 2006-07-18 2017-01-10 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for providing international coupon-less discounts
US9430773B2 (en) * 2006-07-18 2016-08-30 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Loyalty incentive program using transaction cards
US9613361B2 (en) * 2006-07-18 2017-04-04 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for E-mail based rewards
US20080021818A1 (en) * 2006-07-20 2008-01-24 Fish Robert D Peer-To-Peer Electronic Marketplace For Advertising
US7945660B2 (en) * 2006-07-26 2011-05-17 Yahoo! Inc. Time slicing web based advertisements
GB2435565B (en) * 2006-08-09 2008-02-20 Cvon Services Oy Messaging system
US8650066B2 (en) * 2006-08-21 2014-02-11 Csn Stores, Inc. System and method for updating product pricing and advertising bids
US20080052278A1 (en) * 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Semdirector, Inc. System and method for modeling value of an on-line advertisement campaign
US20080059285A1 (en) * 2006-09-01 2008-03-06 Admob, Inc. Assessing a fee for an ad
US20080065620A1 (en) * 2006-09-11 2008-03-13 Puneet Chopra Recommending advertising key phrases
US20080065474A1 (en) * 2006-09-12 2008-03-13 Abhinay Sharma Secure conversion tracking
US20080082415A1 (en) * 2006-09-20 2008-04-03 Vishwanath Shastry Listing generation and advertising management utilizing catalog information
US8825677B2 (en) 2006-09-20 2014-09-02 Ebay Inc. Listing generation utilizing catalog information
US8112312B2 (en) * 2006-10-19 2012-02-07 Johannes Ritter Multivariate testing optimization method
US20080103955A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Accounting for trusted participants in an online advertising exchange
US20080103795A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Lightweight and heavyweight interfaces to federated advertising marketplace
US20080103792A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Decision support for tax rate selection
US20080103902A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Orchestration and/or exploration of different advertising channels in a federated advertising network
US8788343B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2014-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Price determination and inventory allocation based on spot and futures markets in future site channels for online advertising
US7698166B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2010-04-13 Microsoft Corporation Import/export tax to deal with ad trade deficits
US20080103896A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Specifying, normalizing and tracking display properties for transactions in an advertising exchange
US8589233B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2013-11-19 Microsoft Corporation Arbitrage broker for online advertising exchange
US20080103898A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Specifying and normalizing utility functions of participants in an advertising exchange
US20080103897A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Normalizing and tracking user attributes for transactions in an advertising exchange
US8533049B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2013-09-10 Microsoft Corporation Value add broker for federated advertising exchange
US20080103900A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Sharing value back to distributed information providers in an advertising exchange
US20080103837A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Risk reduction for participants in an online advertising exchange
US20080103953A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Tool for optimizing advertising across disparate advertising networks
US20080103952A1 (en) * 2006-10-25 2008-05-01 Microsoft Corporation Specifying and normalizing utility functions of participants in an advertising exchange
EP2095313A4 (en) 2006-10-27 2011-11-02 Cvon Innovations Ltd Method and device for managing subscriber connection
US9817902B2 (en) * 2006-10-27 2017-11-14 Netseer Acquisition, Inc. Methods and apparatus for matching relevant content to user intention
US20080115161A1 (en) * 2006-10-30 2008-05-15 Google Inc. Delivering user-selected video advertisements
US8914729B2 (en) * 2006-10-30 2014-12-16 Yahoo! Inc. Methods and systems for providing a customizable guide for navigating a corpus of content
WO2008053062A2 (en) * 2006-11-01 2008-05-08 Cvon Innovations Ltd Optimization of advertising campaigns on mobile networks
US20080120165A1 (en) * 2006-11-20 2008-05-22 Google Inc. Large-Scale Aggregating and Reporting of Ad Data
GB0623571D0 (en) * 2006-11-27 2007-01-03 Cvon Innovations Ltd System for authentication of network usage
KR20080048185A (en) * 2006-11-28 2008-06-02 엔에이치엔(주) Method for managing advertisement offered on wire or wireless network and system for executing the method
US20080140508A1 (en) * 2006-12-12 2008-06-12 Shubhasheesh Anand System for optimizing the performance of a smart advertisement
US7769786B2 (en) * 2006-12-19 2010-08-03 Yahoo! Inc. Propensity-to-click targeting and modeling
US20080270164A1 (en) * 2006-12-21 2008-10-30 Kidder David S System and method for managing a plurality of advertising networks
KR100871761B1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-12-05 박민호 Method for determining a position of information based on an intention of a party concerned
GB2440990B (en) 2007-01-09 2008-08-06 Cvon Innovations Ltd Message scheduling system
US7904316B2 (en) * 2007-01-18 2011-03-08 Brescia Bonnie A System and method for gathering, managing, and analyzing patient recruitment
US8423407B2 (en) * 2007-02-02 2013-04-16 Andrew Llc System and method for an adaptive scheduling system architecture
US8326685B2 (en) * 2007-02-02 2012-12-04 Harris Corporation System and method for an adaptive scheduling system architecture
US7685084B2 (en) * 2007-02-09 2010-03-23 Yahoo! Inc. Term expansion using associative matching of labeled term pairs
US20080215290A1 (en) * 2007-03-01 2008-09-04 Seesaw Networks, Inc. Determining a location based advertising campaign
US7685200B2 (en) * 2007-03-01 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corp Ranking and suggesting candidate objects
US20080215422A1 (en) * 2007-03-01 2008-09-04 Seesaw Networks, Inc. Coordinating a location based advertising campaign
US20080215421A1 (en) * 2007-03-01 2008-09-04 Seesaw Networks, Inc. Distributing a location based advertising campaign
US7899819B2 (en) * 2007-03-02 2011-03-01 Ehud Ben-Reuven Financial line data-base
GB2445630B (en) * 2007-03-12 2008-11-12 Cvon Innovations Ltd Dynamic message allocation system and method
EP3361438A1 (en) * 2007-03-19 2018-08-15 Marketshare Partners Llc Automatically prescribing total budget for marketing and sales resources and allocation across spending categories
US7774348B2 (en) * 2007-03-28 2010-08-10 Yahoo, Inc. System for providing geographically relevant content to a search query with local intent
US7805450B2 (en) * 2007-03-28 2010-09-28 Yahoo, Inc. System for determining the geographic range of local intent in a search query
US7788252B2 (en) * 2007-03-28 2010-08-31 Yahoo, Inc. System for determining local intent in a search query
KR100892845B1 (en) * 2007-03-29 2009-04-10 엔에이치엔(주) System and method for displaying title and description
CN101802856A (en) * 2007-03-30 2010-08-11 秋千网络公司 Measuring a location based advertising campaign
US20080243613A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2008-10-02 Microsoft Corporation Optimization of pay per click advertisements
US20100235219A1 (en) * 2007-04-03 2010-09-16 Google Inc. Reconciling forecast data with measured data
US20080249850A1 (en) * 2007-04-03 2008-10-09 Google Inc. Providing Information About Content Distribution
US20080249854A1 (en) * 2007-04-06 2008-10-09 Yahoo! Inc. Monetizing low value clickers
WO2008134012A8 (en) * 2007-04-27 2008-12-18 Navic Systems Inc Negotiated access to promotional insertion opportunity
US8290973B2 (en) * 2007-04-30 2012-10-16 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Determining influencers
US8712837B2 (en) * 2007-04-30 2014-04-29 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Rewarding independent influencers
US8793155B2 (en) * 2007-04-30 2014-07-29 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Collecting influence information
US20080270552A1 (en) * 2007-04-30 2008-10-30 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Determining influencers
US20080270620A1 (en) * 2007-04-30 2008-10-30 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Reporting influence on a person by network-available content
US9135657B2 (en) * 2007-07-27 2015-09-15 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Rewarding independent influencers
US20080270473A1 (en) * 2007-04-30 2008-10-30 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Determining an influence on a person by web pages
US20080270474A1 (en) * 2007-04-30 2008-10-30 Searete Llc Collecting influence information
US8001004B2 (en) * 2007-08-18 2011-08-16 Traffiq, Inc. System and method for brokering the sale of internet advertisement inventory
US8099328B2 (en) * 2007-05-01 2012-01-17 Traffiq, Inc. System and method for brokering the sale of internet advertisement inventory as discrete traffic blocks of segmented internet traffic
US8073738B2 (en) * 2007-05-01 2011-12-06 Traffiq, Inc. System and method for brokering the sale of internet advertisement inventory as discrete traffic blocks of segmented internet traffic
US8296179B1 (en) * 2007-05-02 2012-10-23 Monster Worldwide, Inc. Targeted advertisement placement based on explicit and implicit criteria matching
US20080275775A1 (en) * 2007-05-04 2008-11-06 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for using sampling for scheduling advertisements in an online auction
JP5168537B2 (en) * 2007-05-16 2013-03-21 楽天株式会社 The advertisement server device, advertisement displaying method, and the ad server program
GB2440408B (en) * 2007-05-16 2008-06-25 Cvon Innovations Ltd Method and system for scheduling of messages
US20080288310A1 (en) * 2007-05-16 2008-11-20 Cvon Innovation Services Oy Methodologies and systems for mobile marketing and advertising
US20080288347A1 (en) * 2007-05-18 2008-11-20 Technorati, Inc. Advertising keyword selection based on real-time data
US8538800B2 (en) * 2007-05-21 2013-09-17 Microsoft Corporation Event-based analysis of business objectives
US8935718B2 (en) 2007-05-22 2015-01-13 Apple Inc. Advertising management method and system
WO2009037567A3 (en) * 2007-05-23 2009-05-22 Cvon Innovations Ltd A method and a system for providing mobile communications services
US20080301114A1 (en) * 2007-05-31 2008-12-04 Hibbets Jason S Method and system for a professional social network
US7860859B2 (en) * 2007-06-01 2010-12-28 Google Inc. Determining search query statistical data for an advertising campaign based on user-selected criteria
US9195661B2 (en) * 2007-06-07 2015-11-24 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Method and system for click-thru capability in electronic media
GB0711527D0 (en) * 2007-06-14 2007-07-25 Cvon Innovations Ltd A method and a system for delivering messages
US8788335B2 (en) * 2007-06-15 2014-07-22 Social Mecca, Inc. Content distribution system including cost-per-engagement based advertising
US8788334B2 (en) * 2007-06-15 2014-07-22 Social Mecca, Inc. Online marketing platform
US7577433B2 (en) * 2007-06-18 2009-08-18 Cvon Innovations Limited Method and system for managing delivery of communications
GB2450387B (en) * 2007-06-18 2009-07-08 Cvon Innovations Ltd Method and system for managing delivery of communications
GB2448957B (en) * 2007-06-20 2009-06-17 Cvon Innovations Ltd Mehtod and system for identifying content items to mobile terminals
CA2693803A1 (en) * 2007-07-13 2009-01-22 Spot Runner, Inc. Methods and systems for performing media searches, media creation and for secure distribution of media
US9727877B2 (en) * 2007-07-27 2017-08-08 Paypal, Inc. Method and system for dynamic messaging
US8799285B1 (en) 2007-08-02 2014-08-05 Google Inc. Automatic advertising campaign structure suggestion
KR100785075B1 (en) * 2007-08-10 2007-12-12 (주)이즈포유 System for managing customized advertisement using indicator on webpage
KR100901938B1 (en) * 2007-08-14 2009-06-10 엔에이치엔비즈니스플랫폼 주식회사 Method and system for revising click through rate
US20090055734A1 (en) * 2007-08-21 2009-02-26 Brian Paul Channell Method and System of Displaying More Relevant Internet Ads
KR100847870B1 (en) * 2007-09-05 2008-07-23 이종헌 Advertisemnet providing system and method thereof
GB0721863D0 (en) * 2007-09-05 2007-12-19 Cvon Innovations Ltd Systems, methods, network elements and applications for modifying messages
US20100106601A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-04-29 Ryan Steelberg System and method for distributing text content for use in one or more creatives
US20110040648A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2011-02-17 Ryan Steelberg System and Method for Incorporating Memorabilia in a Brand Affinity Content Distribution
US20100114693A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-05-06 Ryan Steelberg System and method for developing software and web based applications
US20110078003A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2011-03-31 Ryan Steelberg System and Method for Localized Valuations of Media Assets
US20100131357A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-05-27 Ryan Steelberg System and method for controlling user and content interactions
US7809603B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-10-05 Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. Advertising request and rules-based content provision engine, system and method
US20090299837A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-12-03 Ryan Steelberg System and method for brand affinity content distribution and optimization
US20100131337A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-05-27 Ryan Steelberg System and method for localized valuations of media assets
US20100114701A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-05-06 Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. System and method for brand affinity content distribution and optimization with charitable organizations
US20100114703A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-05-06 Ryan Steelberg System and method for triggering development and delivery of advertisements
US8452764B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2013-05-28 Ryan Steelberg Apparatus, system and method for a brand affinity engine using positive and negative mentions and indexing
US20100114719A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-05-06 Ryan Steelberg Engine, system and method for generation of advertisements with endorsements and associated editorial content
US20100274644A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-10-28 Ryan Steelberg Engine, system and method for generation of brand affinity content
US20100318375A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-12-16 Ryan Steelberg System and Method for Localized Valuations of Media Assets
US8725563B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2014-05-13 Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. System and method for searching media assets
US20110047050A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2011-02-24 Ryan Steelberg Apparatus, System And Method For A Brand Affinity Engine Using Positive And Negative Mentions And Indexing
US8751479B2 (en) * 2007-09-07 2014-06-10 Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. Search and storage engine having variable indexing for information associations
US8285700B2 (en) 2007-09-07 2012-10-09 Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. Apparatus, system and method for a brand affinity engine using positive and negative mentions and indexing
US20100217664A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-08-26 Ryan Steelberg Engine, system and method for enhancing the value of advertisements
US20100114690A1 (en) * 2007-09-07 2010-05-06 Ryan Steelberg System and method for metricizing assets in a brand affinity content distribution
US8682724B2 (en) * 2007-09-10 2014-03-25 Yahoo! Inc. System and method using sampling for scheduling advertisements in slots of different quality in an online auction with budget and time constraints
US8666813B2 (en) * 2007-09-10 2014-03-04 Yahoo! Inc. System and method using sampling for scheduling advertisements in an online auction with budget and time constraints
US8176070B2 (en) * 2007-09-13 2012-05-08 Google Inc. Media plan managing
US20090094104A1 (en) * 2007-10-04 2009-04-09 Microsoft Corporation Advertisements for Products in Media Content
US20090100051A1 (en) * 2007-10-10 2009-04-16 Yahoo! Inc. Differentiated treatment of sponsored search results based on search context
US9195700B1 (en) 2007-10-10 2015-11-24 United Services Automobile Association (Usaa) Systems and methods for storing time-series data
US9251279B2 (en) * 2007-10-10 2016-02-02 Skyword Inc. Methods and systems for using community defined facets or facet values in computer networks
US8909655B1 (en) * 2007-10-11 2014-12-09 Google Inc. Time based ranking
US20090099932A1 (en) * 2007-10-11 2009-04-16 Cvon Innovations Ltd. System and method for searching network users
GB0803273D0 (en) * 2007-10-15 2008-04-02 Cvon Innovations Ltd System, method and computer program for modifying communications
US20090112700A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Ryan Steelberg System and method for brand affinity content distribution and optimization
US20090112715A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Ryan Steelberg Engine, system and method for generation of brand affinity content
US9294727B2 (en) * 2007-10-31 2016-03-22 Veritone, Inc. System and method for creation and management of advertising inventory using metadata
US20090112717A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Ryan Steelberg Apparatus, system and method for a brand affinity engine with delivery tracking and statistics
US20100082598A1 (en) * 2008-02-07 2010-04-01 Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. Engine, system and method for generation of brand affinity content
US20090112692A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Ryan Steelberg Engine, system and method for generation of brand affinity content
US20090112698A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Ryan Steelberg System and method for brand affinity content distribution and optimization
US20100076866A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2010-03-25 Ryan Steelberg Video-related meta data engine system and method
US20090112714A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Ryan Steelberg Engine, system and method for generation of brand affinity content
US20110106632A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2011-05-05 Ryan Steelberg System and method for alternative brand affinity content transaction payments
US20090112718A1 (en) * 2007-10-31 2009-04-30 Ryan Steelberg System and method for distributing content for use with entertainment creatives
US20090132346A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-21 Google Inc. Modifying Broadcast Media Ad Campaigns
US9756004B2 (en) * 2007-11-08 2017-09-05 Skype Message delivery system and method
US20090164296A1 (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-06-25 Yahoo! Inc. Scheduling transient online advertisements
GB0802989D0 (en) * 2008-01-07 2008-03-26 Cvon Innovations Ltd System, method and computer program for selecting an information provider
US8135613B2 (en) * 2008-01-15 2012-03-13 Google Inc. Ringback advertising
EP2257919A4 (en) * 2008-02-07 2012-12-12 Brand Affinity Tech Inc Qualitative and quantitative method for rating a brand using keywords
US20090240567A1 (en) * 2008-02-21 2009-09-24 Micronotes, Llc Interactive marketing system
US20090228354A1 (en) * 2008-03-05 2009-09-10 Ryan Steelberg Engine, system and method for generation of brand affinity content
WO2009145970A1 (en) * 2008-03-31 2009-12-03 Google Inc. Managing accounts such as advertising accounts
US20090248513A1 (en) * 2008-04-01 2009-10-01 Google Inc. Allocation of presentation positions
US20090259646A1 (en) * 2008-04-09 2009-10-15 Yahoo!, Inc. Method for Calculating Score for Search Query
US20090259519A1 (en) * 2008-04-14 2009-10-15 Microsoft Corporation Advertisements Targeted to Social Groups that Establish Program Popularity
US20090265227A1 (en) * 2008-04-16 2009-10-22 Yahoo! Inc. Methods for Advertisement Display Policy Exploration
US8244551B1 (en) 2008-04-21 2012-08-14 Monster Worldwide, Inc. Apparatuses, methods and systems for advancement path candidate cloning
US8402387B1 (en) * 2008-04-24 2013-03-19 Google Inc. Advertising based on user models
US20090281900A1 (en) * 2008-05-06 2009-11-12 Netseer, Inc. Discovering Relevant Concept And Context For Content Node
US20090307003A1 (en) * 2008-05-16 2009-12-10 Daniel Benyamin Social advertisement network
US8671011B1 (en) * 2008-05-29 2014-03-11 Yodle, Inc. Methods and apparatus for generating an online marketing campaign
US20090300009A1 (en) * 2008-05-30 2009-12-03 Netseer, Inc. Behavioral Targeting For Tracking, Aggregating, And Predicting Online Behavior
US20090299854A1 (en) * 2008-06-03 2009-12-03 Jonathan Olawski Means for tracking costs associated with sales lead solicitation
US20090307058A1 (en) * 2008-06-04 2009-12-10 Brand Thunder, Llc End user interface customization and end user behavioral metrics collection and processing
US20090307053A1 (en) * 2008-06-06 2009-12-10 Ryan Steelberg Apparatus, system and method for a brand affinity engine using positive and negative mentions
WO2009151611A1 (en) * 2008-06-12 2009-12-17 Ryan Steelberg Barcode advertising
US20090313126A1 (en) * 2008-06-17 2009-12-17 Microsoft Corporation Layerable auction mechanisms
US8150734B2 (en) * 2008-06-24 2012-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Estimating advertising prices for an incumbent content provider
US20090327029A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2009-12-31 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and Methods for Utilizing Normalized Impressions To Optimize Digital Ads
US20090327028A1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2009-12-31 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and Methods for Utilizing Assist Data to Optimize Digital Ads
US20090327075A1 (en) * 2008-06-27 2009-12-31 Nokia Corporation Optimizing Advertisement Campaign Servicing
US20100030746A1 (en) * 2008-07-30 2010-02-04 Ryan Steelberg System and method for distributing content for use with entertainment creatives including consumer messaging
US9098839B2 (en) * 2008-08-01 2015-08-04 Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC Incentivizing commerce by regionally localized broadcast signal in conjunction with automatic feedback or filtering
WO2010027739A3 (en) * 2008-08-27 2014-12-11 Globys, Inc. Targeted customer offers based on predictive analytics
US20100057545A1 (en) * 2008-08-28 2010-03-04 Daniel Jean System and method for sending sponsored message data in a communications network
US8549163B2 (en) 2008-09-18 2013-10-01 Jonathan M. Urdan Passive parameter based demographics generation
US20110131141A1 (en) * 2008-09-26 2011-06-02 Ryan Steelberg Advertising request and rules-based content provision engine, system and method
JP2012503830A (en) * 2008-09-26 2012-02-09 ブランド・アフィニティー・テクノロジーズ・インコーポレイテッドBrand Affinity Technologies,Inc. Engine for the content provider based on the ad request and rules, systems and methods
US20100114692A1 (en) * 2008-09-30 2010-05-06 Ryan Steelberg System and method for brand affinity content distribution and placement
WO2010039974A1 (en) * 2008-10-01 2010-04-08 Ryan Steelberg On-site barcode advertising
US20100094673A1 (en) * 2008-10-14 2010-04-15 Ebay Inc. Computer-implemented method and system for keyword bidding
CA2739582A1 (en) * 2008-10-14 2010-04-22 Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. Apparatus, system and method for a brand affinity engine using positive and negative mentions and indexing
KR20100042792A (en) * 2008-10-17 2010-04-27 엔에이치엔비즈니스플랫폼 주식회사 Method and system for providing advertisement effect report
WO2010044629A3 (en) * 2008-10-17 2010-07-29 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Apparatus and method for managing advertisement application
US9002729B2 (en) * 2008-10-21 2015-04-07 Accenture Global Services Limited System and method for determining sets of online advertisement treatments using confidences
CA2741437C (en) * 2008-10-24 2018-02-13 Cardlytics, Inc. System and methods for delivering targeted marketing offers to consumers via an online portal
US8417695B2 (en) * 2008-10-30 2013-04-09 Netseer, Inc. Identifying related concepts of URLs and domain names
US20100121702A1 (en) * 2008-11-06 2010-05-13 Ryan Steelberg Search and storage engine having variable indexing for information associations and predictive modeling
WO2010056866A1 (en) * 2008-11-14 2010-05-20 Brand Affinity Technologies, Inc. System and method for brand affinity content distribution and optimization
WO2010065111A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-10 Topsy Labs, Inc. Ranking and selecting enitities based on calculated reputation or influence scores
US20100153185A1 (en) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-17 Topsy Labs, Inc. Mediating and pricing transactions based on calculated reputation or influence scores
JP5604441B2 (en) * 2008-12-01 2014-10-08 トプシー ラブズ インコーポレイテッド The estimation of the degree of influence
US8768759B2 (en) * 2008-12-01 2014-07-01 Topsy Labs, Inc. Advertising based on influence
US8396742B1 (en) * 2008-12-05 2013-03-12 Covario, Inc. System and method for optimizing paid search advertising campaigns based on natural search traffic
US20100169198A1 (en) * 2008-12-30 2010-07-01 Ebay Inc. Billing a lister for leads received from potential renters within a lead threshold
US8112329B2 (en) * 2008-12-30 2012-02-07 Ebay Inc. Consolidating leads received from potential renters for billing a lister
US8255827B2 (en) * 2009-01-26 2012-08-28 Microsoft Corporation Dynamic feature presentation based on vision detection
US20100198685A1 (en) * 2009-01-30 2010-08-05 Microsoft Corporation Predicting web advertisement click success by using head-to-head ratings
KR101021400B1 (en) * 2009-02-10 2011-03-14 엔에이치엔비즈니스플랫폼 주식회사 System and method for determining value of data registered free
US8315908B1 (en) 2009-02-27 2012-11-20 Google Inc. Generating a proposed bid
US20100251291A1 (en) * 2009-03-24 2010-09-30 Pino Jr Angelo J System, Method and Computer Program Product for Processing Video Data
US20100250365A1 (en) * 2009-03-25 2010-09-30 Yahoo! Inc. Ad groups for using advertisements across placements
US20100257175A1 (en) * 2009-04-02 2010-10-07 Yahoo!, Inc., a Delaware corporation Method, system, or apparatus for joining one or more events
WO2010117443A1 (en) * 2009-04-06 2010-10-14 Kinetic Method and apparatus for displaying search results while preparing a media plan
US20100262484A1 (en) * 2009-04-08 2010-10-14 Google Inc. Integrated campaign performance reporting and management
US20100262497A1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2010-10-14 Niklas Karlsson Systems and methods for controlling bidding for online advertising campaigns
US20100262499A1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2010-10-14 Platform-A, Inc. Systems and methods for controlling initialization of advertising campaigns
US20100262455A1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2010-10-14 Platform-A, Inc. Systems and methods for spreading online advertising campaigns
WO2010125579A8 (en) * 2009-04-28 2011-01-20 Vubites India Private Limited Method and apparatus for planning a schedule of multimedia advertisements in a broadcasting channel
US8234259B2 (en) * 2009-05-08 2012-07-31 Raytheon Company Method and system for adjudicating text against a defined policy
US20100285818A1 (en) * 2009-05-08 2010-11-11 Crawford C S Lee Location based service for directing ads to subscribers
US9842347B2 (en) 2009-06-03 2017-12-12 Dex Media, Inc. Method and system for managing delivery of leads and bidding
US20100312638A1 (en) * 2009-06-08 2010-12-09 Microsoft Corporation Internet-based advertisement management
US20100318531A1 (en) * 2009-06-10 2010-12-16 Microsoft Corporation Smoothing clickthrough data for web search ranking
CN101930438B (en) 2009-06-19 2016-08-31 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Results of searching for information search system and method for generating
US20100324988A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2010-12-23 Verizon New Jersey Inc. Systems and methods for aggregating and reporting multi-platform advertising performance data
US9760910B1 (en) * 2009-07-01 2017-09-12 Quantifind, Inc. Automated advertising agency apparatuses, methods and systems
EP2452308A4 (en) * 2009-07-08 2013-01-16 Trada Inc Creating, managing and optimizing online advertising
US20110022460A1 (en) * 2009-07-22 2011-01-27 Yahoo! Inc. Explicit online advertising exposure terms
US9841282B2 (en) 2009-07-27 2017-12-12 Visa U.S.A. Inc. Successive offer communications with an offer recipient
US20110047026A1 (en) * 2009-08-21 2011-02-24 Microsoft Corporation Using auction to vary advertisement layout
US20110054960A1 (en) * 2009-08-25 2011-03-03 Yahoo! Inc., A Delaware Corporation Dynamic web page creation
US9721272B2 (en) * 2009-09-10 2017-08-01 Google Inc. Determining advertisement channel mixture ratios
EP2486532A4 (en) 2009-10-05 2013-08-21 Callspace Inc Contextualized telephony message management
US20110087519A1 (en) * 2009-10-09 2011-04-14 Visa U.S.A. Inc. Systems and Methods for Panel Enhancement with Transaction Data
US9342835B2 (en) 2009-10-09 2016-05-17 Visa U.S.A Systems and methods to deliver targeted advertisements to audience
US9031860B2 (en) 2009-10-09 2015-05-12 Visa U.S.A. Inc. Systems and methods to aggregate demand
US8595058B2 (en) 2009-10-15 2013-11-26 Visa U.S.A. Systems and methods to match identifiers
US20110093324A1 (en) 2009-10-19 2011-04-21 Visa U.S.A. Inc. Systems and Methods to Provide Intelligent Analytics to Cardholders and Merchants
US8676639B2 (en) 2009-10-29 2014-03-18 Visa International Service Association System and method for promotion processing and authorization
US8266006B2 (en) * 2009-11-03 2012-09-11 Ebay Inc. Method, medium, and system for keyword bidding in a market cooperative
US8626705B2 (en) 2009-11-05 2014-01-07 Visa International Service Association Transaction aggregator for closed processing
US8352303B2 (en) * 2009-11-23 2013-01-08 Sap Ag Computer implemented method for integrating services in a calendar application via meeting request e-mails
US20110125565A1 (en) * 2009-11-24 2011-05-26 Visa U.S.A. Inc. Systems and Methods for Multi-Channel Offer Redemption
US8296266B2 (en) * 2009-12-04 2012-10-23 Sap Ag Computer implemented method for integrating services in a calendar application via web services
US8554854B2 (en) * 2009-12-11 2013-10-08 Citizennet Inc. Systems and methods for identifying terms relevant to web pages using social network messages
US8126903B2 (en) * 2009-12-21 2012-02-28 Sap Ag Computer implemented method for allocating drivers and passengers sharing a trip
US20110161135A1 (en) * 2009-12-30 2011-06-30 Teradata Us, Inc. Method and systems for collateral processing
US9047380B1 (en) * 2009-12-31 2015-06-02 Intuit Inc. Technique for determining keywords for a document
US20110191315A1 (en) * 2010-02-04 2011-08-04 Yahoo! Inc. Method for reducing north ad impact in search advertising
US20110191168A1 (en) * 2010-02-04 2011-08-04 Yahoo! Inc. Multiple cascading auctions in search advertising
US20110196748A1 (en) * 2010-02-05 2011-08-11 Ilan Caron Generating Advertising Account Entries Using Variables
US20110231241A1 (en) * 2010-03-18 2011-09-22 Yahoo! Inc. Real-time personalization of sponsored search based on predicted click propensity
CA2794040A1 (en) * 2010-03-23 2011-09-29 Google Inc. Conversion path performance measures and reports
US20110238490A1 (en) * 2010-03-25 2011-09-29 Microsoft Corporation Auction flighting
US8922559B2 (en) * 2010-03-26 2014-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Graph clustering
US10049391B2 (en) 2010-03-31 2018-08-14 Mediamath, Inc. Systems and methods for providing a demand side platform
US20120173519A1 (en) * 2010-04-07 2012-07-05 Google Inc. Performing pre-aggregation and re-aggregation using the same query language
US20110258039A1 (en) * 2010-04-14 2011-10-20 Microsoft Corporation Evaluating preferences of users engaging with advertisements
US20110258050A1 (en) * 2010-04-16 2011-10-20 Bread Labs Inc. A Delaware Corporation Social advertising platform
US20110264507A1 (en) * 2010-04-27 2011-10-27 Microsoft Corporation Facilitating keyword extraction for advertisement selection
US8898217B2 (en) 2010-05-06 2014-11-25 Apple Inc. Content delivery based on user terminal events
US20120004959A1 (en) * 2010-05-07 2012-01-05 CitizenNet, Inc. Systems and methods for measuring consumer affinity and predicting business outcomes using social network activity
US8583483B2 (en) 2010-05-21 2013-11-12 Microsoft Corporation Online platform for web advertisement competition
US8751305B2 (en) 2010-05-24 2014-06-10 140 Proof, Inc. Targeting users based on persona data
US8370330B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2013-02-05 Apple Inc. Predicting content and context performance based on performance history of users
US8504419B2 (en) 2010-05-28 2013-08-06 Apple Inc. Network-based targeted content delivery based on queue adjustment factors calculated using the weighted combination of overall rank, context, and covariance scores for an invitational content item
US20110295678A1 (en) * 2010-05-28 2011-12-01 Google Inc. Expanding Ad Group Themes Using Aggregated Sequential Search Queries
US8412726B2 (en) * 2010-06-03 2013-04-02 Microsoft Corporation Related links recommendation
US9338121B2 (en) * 2010-06-04 2016-05-10 Exacttarget, Inc. System and method for managing a messaging campaign within an enterprise
US8468051B2 (en) 2010-06-04 2013-06-18 Microsoft Corporation Selecting and delivering personalized content
US8983859B2 (en) * 2010-06-18 2015-03-17 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc User centric real-time advertisement bidding
US20110153423A1 (en) * 2010-06-21 2011-06-23 Jon Elvekrog Method and system for creating user based summaries for content distribution
CN101873185B (en) 2010-06-24 2014-11-05 惠州Tcl移动通信有限公司 Sensitivity testing method, device and detection equipment of GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications) communication terminal
US8990103B2 (en) * 2010-08-02 2015-03-24 Apple Inc. Booking and management of inventory atoms in content delivery systems
US8996402B2 (en) * 2010-08-02 2015-03-31 Apple Inc. Forecasting and booking of inventory atoms in content delivery systems
US8510658B2 (en) 2010-08-11 2013-08-13 Apple Inc. Population segmentation
US8521774B1 (en) 2010-08-20 2013-08-27 Google Inc. Dynamically generating pre-aggregated datasets
US8983978B2 (en) 2010-08-31 2015-03-17 Apple Inc. Location-intention context for content delivery
US8640032B2 (en) 2010-08-31 2014-01-28 Apple Inc. Selection and delivery of invitational content based on prediction of user intent
US8510309B2 (en) 2010-08-31 2013-08-13 Apple Inc. Selection and delivery of invitational content based on prediction of user interest
US20140365298A1 (en) * 2010-09-28 2014-12-11 Google Inc. Smart budget recommendation for a local business advertiser
US8612293B2 (en) 2010-10-19 2013-12-17 Citizennet Inc. Generation of advertising targeting information based upon affinity information obtained from an online social network
CN102455786B (en) * 2010-10-25 2014-09-03 三星电子(中国)研发中心 System and method for optimizing Chinese sentence input method
CN102075557B (en) * 2010-10-26 2014-03-19 百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司 Method, equipment and system for providing service information according to user related information
US9226042B1 (en) 2010-10-29 2015-12-29 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Selecting advertising for presentation with digital content
US8423405B1 (en) * 2010-11-01 2013-04-16 Google Inc. Advertisement selection
CN102004772A (en) * 2010-11-15 2011-04-06 百度在线网络技术(北京)有限公司 Method and equipment for sequencing search results according to terms
CN102024027B (en) * 2010-11-17 2013-03-20 北京健康在线网络技术有限公司 Method for establishing medical database
CN102004782A (en) * 2010-11-25 2011-04-06 北京搜狗科技发展有限公司 Search result sequencing method and search result sequencer
US9497154B2 (en) * 2010-12-13 2016-11-15 Facebook, Inc. Measuring social network-based interaction with web content external to a social networking system
US9904930B2 (en) 2010-12-16 2018-02-27 Excalibur Ip, Llc Integrated and comprehensive advertising campaign management and optimization
US9009065B2 (en) * 2010-12-17 2015-04-14 Google Inc. Promoting content from an activity stream
US20120158456A1 (en) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-21 Xuerui Wang Forecasting Ad Traffic Based on Business Metrics in Performance-based Display Advertising
US8490125B2 (en) * 2010-12-22 2013-07-16 General Instrument Corporation Video content navigation with revenue maximization
US20120179537A1 (en) * 2010-12-23 2012-07-12 Benjamin Ceranowski System and method for reserving customer leads within a campaign management system
US20120166267A1 (en) * 2010-12-24 2012-06-28 Clover Network, Inc. Web and mobile device advertising
US8620745B2 (en) 2010-12-27 2013-12-31 Yahoo! Inc. Selecting advertisements for placement on related web pages
US20120316953A1 (en) * 2011-01-06 2012-12-13 Jayant Ramchandani Reader Network System for Presence Management in a Physical Retail Environment
US10007915B2 (en) 2011-01-24 2018-06-26 Visa International Service Association Systems and methods to facilitate loyalty reward transactions
WO2012102732A1 (en) 2011-01-28 2012-08-02 Empire Technology Development Llc Associating ad results with purchases made via mobile devices
US9547626B2 (en) 2011-01-29 2017-01-17 Sdl Plc Systems, methods, and media for managing ambient adaptability of web applications and web services
US20120197732A1 (en) * 2011-01-31 2012-08-02 Microsoft Corporation Action-aware intent-based behavior targeting
US9489680B2 (en) 2011-02-04 2016-11-08 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Systems and methods for providing location based coupon-less offers to registered card members
GB201315674D0 (en) 2011-02-23 2013-10-16 Bottlenose Inc System and method for analyzing messages in a network or across networks
US20120221407A1 (en) * 2011-02-25 2012-08-30 Davina Erasmus Systems, Methods, and Media for Executing and Optimizing Online Marketing Initiatives
CN102693226A (en) * 2011-03-21 2012-09-26 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 Automatic webpage enabling and disabling method and device
US20120253899A1 (en) * 2011-04-01 2012-10-04 Microsoft Corporation Table approach for determining quality scores
US20120253927A1 (en) * 2011-04-01 2012-10-04 Microsoft Corporation Machine learning approach for determining quality scores
US9063927B2 (en) 2011-04-06 2015-06-23 Citizennet Inc. Short message age classification
CN102163228B (en) * 2011-04-13 2014-10-08 北京百度网讯科技有限公司 A method for determining the sort result candidates of the resource, apparatus and equipment
CN102256242B (en) * 2011-04-14 2015-06-03 中兴通讯股份有限公司 System and method for processing service application
US9679307B2 (en) * 2011-04-21 2017-06-13 Hoostopia.com Inc. System and method for search engine campaign management
US20120284111A1 (en) * 2011-05-02 2012-11-08 Microsoft Corporation Multi-metric trending storyboard
EP2710752A4 (en) 2011-05-17 2014-10-22 Webtuner Corp System and method for scalable, high accuracy, sensor and id based audience measurement system
KR20140035424A (en) 2011-05-24 2014-03-21 웹튜너 코포레이션 System and method to increase efficiency and speed of analytics report generation in audience measurement systems
KR20140043406A (en) 2011-05-26 2014-04-09 웹튜너 코포레이션 Highly scalable audience measurement system with client event pre-processing
US20120303443A1 (en) * 2011-05-27 2012-11-29 Microsoft Corporation Ad impact testing
US20120316969A1 (en) * 2011-06-13 2012-12-13 Metcalf Iii Otis Rudy System and method for advertisement ranking and display
US9002892B2 (en) 2011-08-07 2015-04-07 CitizenNet, Inc. Systems and methods for trend detection using frequency analysis
US20130041732A1 (en) * 2011-08-08 2013-02-14 Bloomspot, Inc. Method and system for managing a customer loyalty award program
US9292361B1 (en) * 2011-08-19 2016-03-22 Google Inc. Application program interface script caching and batching
US20130054349A1 (en) * 2011-08-29 2013-02-28 Yahoo! Inc. Integrated and comprehensive advertising campaign remap
US9335883B2 (en) * 2011-09-08 2016-05-10 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Presenting search result items having varied prominence
US8849699B2 (en) * 2011-09-26 2014-09-30 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Systems and methods for targeting ad impressions
US20150142565A1 (en) * 2011-10-14 2015-05-21 Xuefu Wang Targeting Content Based On Local Queries
US9189797B2 (en) 2011-10-26 2015-11-17 Apple Inc. Systems and methods for sentiment detection, measurement, and normalization over social networks
US20130111519A1 (en) * 2011-10-27 2013-05-02 James C. Rice Exchange Value Engine
US9754279B2 (en) 2011-10-27 2017-09-05 Excalibur Ip, Llc Advertising campaigns utilizing streaming analytics
US9767465B2 (en) * 2011-10-28 2017-09-19 Excalibur Ip, Llc Methods and systems for facilitating caching of advertisements
US9009318B2 (en) 2011-11-03 2015-04-14 Microsoft Corporation Offline resource allocation algorithms
WO2013106195A3 (en) * 2012-01-09 2015-06-18 Catch Media, Inc. Campaign manager
US9569787B2 (en) 2012-01-27 2017-02-14 Aol Advertising Inc. Systems and methods for displaying digital content and advertisements over electronic networks
US8832092B2 (en) 2012-02-17 2014-09-09 Bottlenose, Inc. Natural language processing optimized for micro content
US20130246176A1 (en) 2012-03-13 2013-09-19 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Systems and Methods Determining a Merchant Persona
US20130246300A1 (en) 2012-03-13 2013-09-19 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Systems and Methods for Tailoring Marketing
US20140289036A1 (en) * 2012-03-21 2014-09-25 Pearce Aurigemma Marketing Prediction, Analysis, and Optimization
US9361629B2 (en) 2012-03-27 2016-06-07 International Business Machines Corporation Controlling simultaneous execution of multiple telecom campaigns
US9430449B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2016-08-30 Sdl Plc Systems, methods, and media for managing editable previews of webpages
US9053497B2 (en) 2012-04-27 2015-06-09 CitizenNet, Inc. Systems and methods for targeting advertising to groups with strong ties within an online social network
US9773270B2 (en) 2012-05-11 2017-09-26 Fredhopper B.V. Method and system for recommending products based on a ranking cocktail
US20130325572A1 (en) * 2012-05-29 2013-12-05 Trustedad, Inc. Viral rewarding in a peer compensated advertising system
US9183562B2 (en) 2012-06-08 2015-11-10 Visual Iq, Inc. Method and system for determining touchpoint attribution
US20180005261A9 (en) * 2012-06-08 2018-01-04 Anto Chittilappilly A method , computer readable medium and system for determining touchpoint attribution
US20170300959A9 (en) * 2012-06-08 2017-10-19 Anto Chittilappilly Method, computer readable medium and system for determining true scores for a plurality of touchpoint encounters
WO2013184588A1 (en) * 2012-06-08 2013-12-12 Visual Iq, Inc. Method and system for determining touchpoint attribution
US9141504B2 (en) 2012-06-28 2015-09-22 Apple Inc. Presenting status data received from multiple devices
CN103578010A (en) * 2012-07-26 2014-02-12 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 Method and device generating flow quality comparison parameters and advertisement billing method
US9009126B2 (en) 2012-07-31 2015-04-14 Bottlenose, Inc. Discovering and ranking trending links about topics
US20140040016A1 (en) * 2012-08-03 2014-02-06 Vanya Amla Real-time targeted dynamic advertising in moving vehicles
US20140040011A1 (en) * 2012-08-06 2014-02-06 Wordstream, Inc. Web based pay per click performance grader
US9715700B2 (en) 2012-09-07 2017-07-25 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. Marketing campaign application for multiple electronic distribution channels
US8868444B2 (en) 2012-09-16 2014-10-21 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for rewarding in channel accomplishments
JP6362602B2 (en) * 2012-09-25 2018-07-25 ビズダイナミクス・プロプライエタリー・リミテッドVizdynamics Pty Ltd Systems and methods for processing digital traffic metrics
US20140143032A1 (en) * 2012-10-29 2014-05-22 Rare Crowds, Inc. System and method for generating 'rare crowd' inventory for advertising
US20140143049A1 (en) * 2012-11-20 2014-05-22 Samuel W. Gilberd Systems and methods for an integrated and frictionless call tracking service
US20140149201A1 (en) * 2012-11-29 2014-05-29 Bank Of America Corporation User dashboard
US20140156785A1 (en) * 2012-12-04 2014-06-05 Bank Of America Corporation Method and Apparatus for Generating User Notifications
US20150213486A1 (en) * 2012-12-28 2015-07-30 Corbis Corporation Method and Device For Placing Branded Products As Advertisements Within Media
US20140188631A1 (en) * 2013-01-01 2014-07-03 Bank Of America Corporation Bid system for advertisement offerings
US9280523B2 (en) * 2013-01-23 2016-03-08 Go Daddy Operating Company, LLC System for conversion of website content
JP5718386B2 (en) * 2013-02-05 2015-05-13 ヤフー株式会社 The advertisement distribution management apparatus and advertisement distribution management method
US20140236706A1 (en) * 2013-02-20 2014-08-21 Datalogix Inc. System and method for measuring advertising effectiveness
US8762302B1 (en) 2013-02-22 2014-06-24 Bottlenose, Inc. System and method for revealing correlations between data streams
US20140278944A1 (en) * 2013-03-13 2014-09-18 Microsoft Corporation Utilizing a reserve price for ranking
US9465522B2 (en) * 2013-03-28 2016-10-11 Linkedin Corporation Providing a personalized navigation experience in a mobile application
US20140324533A1 (en) * 2013-04-24 2014-10-30 Demand Media, Inc. Systems and methods for predicting revenue for web-based content
US9460451B2 (en) 2013-07-01 2016-10-04 Yahoo! Inc. Quality scoring system for advertisements and content in an online system
US8788338B1 (en) * 2013-07-01 2014-07-22 Yahoo! Inc. Unified marketplace for advertisements and content in an online system
US9043425B2 (en) * 2013-07-29 2015-05-26 Google Inc. Resource locator remarketing
US20150051970A1 (en) * 2013-08-15 2015-02-19 Spanish Quotes, Inc. Methods and systems for detecting fraudulent advertisements in pay-per-call advertising
US20150100413A1 (en) * 2013-10-09 2015-04-09 Google Inc. Generating and using entity selection criteria
US9305285B2 (en) 2013-11-01 2016-04-05 Datasphere Technologies, Inc. Heads-up display for improving on-line efficiency with a browser
US9449231B2 (en) 2013-11-13 2016-09-20 Aol Advertising Inc. Computerized systems and methods for generating models for identifying thumbnail images to promote videos
US9367583B1 (en) * 2013-11-21 2016-06-14 Google Inc. Systems and methods of generating content performance metrics
CA2834272A1 (en) * 2013-11-25 2014-02-04 Mobi724 Solutions Inc. Mobile couponing system and method
US20150170205A1 (en) * 2013-12-16 2015-06-18 Torsten Scholl Location-based Products and Services Promotion System
US20150170196A1 (en) * 2013-12-18 2015-06-18 Kenshoo Ltd. Trend Detection in Online Advertising
US20150178790A1 (en) * 2013-12-20 2015-06-25 Yahoo! Inc. User Engagement-Based Dynamic Reserve Price for Non-Guaranteed Delivery Advertising Auction
US10019726B2 (en) * 2014-01-15 2018-07-10 Apple Inc. Supplemental analysis module for invitational content
US20150206087A1 (en) * 2014-01-17 2015-07-23 VSK Ventures, LLC Synchronous Location-Based Matching of Merchant Offers with High Propensity Consumers
US20150220977A1 (en) * 2014-01-31 2015-08-06 Apple Inc. Campaign budget controls via user configurable line specifications
US20150269606A1 (en) * 2014-03-24 2015-09-24 Datasphere Technologies, Inc. Multi-source performance and exposure for analytics
US20150278879A1 (en) * 2014-03-25 2015-10-01 Horizon Media, Inc. Interactive Kiosk for Displaying Different Types of Content Platforms and Related Technology
US20150278353A1 (en) * 2014-03-31 2015-10-01 Linkedln Corporation Methods and systems for surfacing content items based on impression discounting
US20160078470A1 (en) * 2014-09-17 2016-03-17 Facebook, Inc. Execution Engine for Generating Reports for Measuring Effectiveness of Advertising Campaigns
US9699502B1 (en) 2015-01-16 2017-07-04 Optimized Markets, Inc. Automated allocation of media campaign assets to time and program in digital media delivery systems
US10009432B1 (en) * 2015-01-16 2018-06-26 Thy Tang Intelligent real-time lead management systems, methods and architecture
US20160307202A1 (en) * 2015-04-14 2016-10-20 Sugarcrm Inc. Optimal sales opportunity visualization
US9691085B2 (en) 2015-04-30 2017-06-27 Visa International Service Association Systems and methods of natural language processing and statistical analysis to identify matching categories
US9980011B2 (en) 2015-07-24 2018-05-22 Videoamp, Inc. Sequential delivery of advertising content across media devices
CN108476334A (en) 2015-07-24 2018-08-31 安普视频有限公司 Advertising multi-screen optimization
US20170061473A1 (en) * 2015-08-31 2017-03-02 Linkedin Corporation Managing online ad serving
US20170098252A1 (en) * 2015-10-02 2017-04-06 Wideorbit Inc. Systems, methods and articles to facilitate interoperability between advertising inventory channels
CN105335493B (en) * 2015-10-21 2017-08-29 广州神马移动信息科技有限公司 A method and apparatus for document layered filter
WO2017100717A1 (en) * 2015-12-10 2017-06-15 Max2 Inc. Integrated system of search, commerce and analytics engines supported by beacons

Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5920859A (en) * 1997-02-05 1999-07-06 Idd Enterprises, L.P. Hypertext document retrieval system and method
US6216123B1 (en) * 1998-06-24 2001-04-10 Novell, Inc. Method and system for rapid retrieval in a full text indexing system
US6347313B1 (en) * 1999-03-01 2002-02-12 Hewlett-Packard Company Information embedding based on user relevance feedback for object retrieval
US20030055816A1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2003-03-20 Mark Paine Recommending search terms using collaborative filtering and web spidering
US20030069877A1 (en) * 2001-08-13 2003-04-10 Xerox Corporation System for automatically generating queries
US6578022B1 (en) * 2000-04-18 2003-06-10 Icplanet Corporation Interactive intelligent searching with executable suggestions
US20030126139A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 Lee Timothy A. System and method for loading commercial web sites
US6675159B1 (en) * 2000-07-27 2004-01-06 Science Applic Int Corp Concept-based search and retrieval system
US20050015366A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-01-20 Carrasco John Joseph M. Disambiguation of search phrases using interpretation clusters
US20050187818A1 (en) * 2004-02-20 2005-08-25 Zito David D. Computerized advertising offer exchange
US6981040B1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2005-12-27 Utopy, Inc. Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US20060010105A1 (en) * 2004-07-08 2006-01-12 Sarukkai Ramesh R Database search system and method of determining a value of a keyword in a search
US20060041607A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2006-02-23 Miller David J Point of law search system and method
US20060064411A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-23 William Gross Search engine using user intent
US20070027754A1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2007-02-01 Collins Robert J System and method for advertisement management
US20080077570A1 (en) * 2004-10-25 2008-03-27 Infovell, Inc. Full Text Query and Search Systems and Method of Use

Family Cites Families (88)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5283731A (en) * 1992-01-19 1994-02-01 Ec Corporation Computer-based classified ad system and method
DE69431306D1 (en) * 1993-12-16 2002-10-10 Open Market Inc Data network aided payment system and method for use of such a system
US5768521A (en) * 1994-05-16 1998-06-16 Intel Corporation General purpose metering mechanism for distribution of electronic information
US5826241A (en) * 1994-09-16 1998-10-20 First Virtual Holdings Incorporated Computerized system for making payments and authenticating transactions over the internet
US5724521A (en) * 1994-11-03 1998-03-03 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for providing electronic advertisements to end users in a consumer best-fit pricing manner
US5717923A (en) * 1994-11-03 1998-02-10 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamically customizing electronic information to individual end users
US5752238A (en) * 1994-11-03 1998-05-12 Intel Corporation Consumer-driven electronic information pricing mechanism
US5659732A (en) * 1995-05-17 1997-08-19 Infoseek Corporation Document retrieval over networks wherein ranking and relevance scores are computed at the client for multiple database documents
US5748954A (en) * 1995-06-05 1998-05-05 Carnegie Mellon University Method for searching a queued and ranked constructed catalog of files stored on a network
US5794210A (en) * 1995-12-11 1998-08-11 Cybergold, Inc. Attention brokerage
US5778367A (en) * 1995-12-14 1998-07-07 Network Engineering Software, Inc. Automated on-line information service and directory, particularly for the world wide web
US5724524A (en) * 1995-12-15 1998-03-03 Pitney Bowes, Inc. Method and system for listing, brokering, and exchanging carrier capacity
WO1997022066A1 (en) 1995-12-15 1997-06-19 The Softpages, Inc. Method for computer aided advertisement
WO1997026729A2 (en) * 1995-12-27 1997-07-24 Robinson Gary B Automated collaborative filtering in world wide web advertising
US5848397A (en) * 1996-04-19 1998-12-08 Juno Online Services, L.P. Method and apparatus for scheduling the presentation of messages to computer users
US5848396A (en) * 1996-04-26 1998-12-08 Freedom Of Information, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining behavioral profile of a computer user
JP3108015B2 (en) * 1996-05-22 2000-11-13 松下電器産業株式会社 Hypertext retrieval device
US5864846A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-01-26 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Method for facilitating world wide web searches utilizing a document distribution fusion strategy
US5864845A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-01-26 Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. Facilitating world wide web searches utilizing a multiple search engine query clustering fusion strategy
US5862223A (en) * 1996-07-24 1999-01-19 Walker Asset Management Limited Partnership Method and apparatus for a cryptographically-assisted commercial network system designed to facilitate and support expert-based commerce
US5852820A (en) * 1996-08-09 1998-12-22 Digital Equipment Corporation Method for optimizing entries for searching an index
US5920854A (en) * 1996-08-14 1999-07-06 Infoseek Corporation Real-time document collection search engine with phrase indexing
US5996006A (en) * 1996-11-08 1999-11-30 Speicher; Gregory J. Internet-audiotext electronic advertising system with enhanced matching and notification
US5903882A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-05-11 Certco, Llc Reliance server for electronic transaction system
US6285987B1 (en) * 1997-01-22 2001-09-04 Engage, Inc. Internet advertising system
US6421675B1 (en) 1998-03-16 2002-07-16 S. L. I. Systems, Inc. Search engine
US6125361A (en) * 1998-04-10 2000-09-26 International Business Machines Corporation Feature diffusion across hyperlinks
US6006197A (en) * 1998-04-20 1999-12-21 Straightup Software, Inc. System and method for assessing effectiveness of internet marketing campaign
US6078866A (en) * 1998-09-14 2000-06-20 Searchup, Inc. Internet site searching and listing service based on monetary ranking of site listings
US6301567B1 (en) * 1998-10-16 2001-10-09 The Chase Manhattan Bank Lockbox browser system
US6658485B1 (en) * 1998-10-19 2003-12-02 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic priority-based scheduling in a message queuing system
US7010512B1 (en) * 1998-11-09 2006-03-07 C/Base, Inc. Transfer instrument
US6487538B1 (en) * 1998-11-16 2002-11-26 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for local advertising
US6560578B2 (en) * 1999-03-12 2003-05-06 Expanse Networks, Inc. Advertisement selection system supporting discretionary target market characteristics
EP1171828A1 (en) 1999-01-08 2002-01-16 Micro-Integration Corporation Search engine database and interface
US6304850B1 (en) * 1999-03-17 2001-10-16 Netmarket Group, Inc. Computer-implemented system and method for booking airline travel itineraries
US7801775B1 (en) 1999-03-29 2010-09-21 Amazon.Com, Inc. Method and system for authenticating users when conducting commercial transactions using a computer
US6907566B1 (en) * 1999-04-02 2005-06-14 Overture Services, Inc. Method and system for optimum placement of advertisements on a webpage
US7035812B2 (en) * 1999-05-28 2006-04-25 Overture Services, Inc. System and method for enabling multi-element bidding for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US7835943B2 (en) 1999-05-28 2010-11-16 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for providing place and price protection in a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US7065500B2 (en) * 1999-05-28 2006-06-20 Overture Services, Inc. Automatic advertiser notification for a system for providing place and price protection in a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US6269361B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2001-07-31 Goto.Com System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
WO2001001217A3 (en) 1999-06-29 2001-04-26 Colorstamps Inc Electronic market maker of electronic attention
EP1067731B1 (en) 1999-07-06 2006-06-21 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha System for searching device on network
JP2001195491A (en) 1999-11-02 2001-07-19 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Selling support method for commodity associated with living space, method and system for charging the same and recording medium
US7031932B1 (en) * 1999-11-22 2006-04-18 Aquantive, Inc. Dynamically optimizing the presentation of advertising messages
US6804659B1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2004-10-12 Ricoh Company Ltd. Content based web advertising
US20020004735A1 (en) * 2000-01-18 2002-01-10 William Gross System and method for ranking items
JP3398704B2 (en) 2000-02-16 2003-04-21 エヌイーシーアクセステクニカ株式会社 Mobile communication terminal and the information notification method
US6763104B1 (en) * 2000-02-24 2004-07-13 Teltronics, Inc. Call center IVR and ACD scripting method and graphical user interface
US6757661B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2004-06-29 Netzero High volume targeting of advertisements to user of online service
WO2002011037A1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2002-02-07 Zyman Marketing Group, Inc Strategic marketing planning processes, marketing effectiveness tools and systems, and marketing investment management
WO2002021292A9 (en) 2000-09-01 2004-03-04 Search123 Com Inc Auction-based search engine
US7962604B1 (en) * 2000-10-17 2011-06-14 Aol Inc Displaying advertisements in a computer network environment
US20020103698A1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2002-08-01 Christian Cantrell System and method for enabling user control of online advertising campaigns
US20020077880A1 (en) * 2000-11-27 2002-06-20 Gordon Donald F. Method and apparatus for collecting and reporting consumer trend data in an information distribution system
US20020077998A1 (en) * 2000-12-08 2002-06-20 Brian Andrews Web based system and method for managing sales deals
US20020082914A1 (en) 2000-12-26 2002-06-27 Gil Beyda Hybrid network based advertising system and method
US20030144907A1 (en) * 2001-03-05 2003-07-31 American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. System and method for administering incentive offers
US20040133468A1 (en) * 2002-04-12 2004-07-08 Varghese Kivin G. Method and system for providing interactive adversing cross reference to related application
US7188169B2 (en) * 2001-06-08 2007-03-06 Fair Isaac Corporation System and method for monitoring key performance indicators in a business
US20040068435A1 (en) 2001-07-09 2004-04-08 Scot Braunzell Method of automated Ad campaign management
US7043471B2 (en) 2001-08-03 2006-05-09 Overture Services, Inc. Search engine account monitoring
US20030115099A1 (en) * 2001-11-01 2003-06-19 Burns Stanley S. Method of automated online media planning and buying
US6826572B2 (en) 2001-11-13 2004-11-30 Overture Services, Inc. System and method allowing advertisers to manage search listings in a pay for placement search system using grouping
US7136871B2 (en) * 2001-11-21 2006-11-14 Microsoft Corporation Methods and systems for selectively displaying advertisements
US7567953B2 (en) * 2002-03-01 2009-07-28 Business Objects Americas System and method for retrieving and organizing information from disparate computer network information sources
US20030229536A1 (en) * 2002-03-14 2003-12-11 House Sandra Miller Media planning and buying system and method
US7370002B2 (en) * 2002-06-05 2008-05-06 Microsoft Corporation Modifying advertisement scores based on advertisement response probabilities
US20040044571A1 (en) * 2002-08-27 2004-03-04 Bronnimann Eric Robert Method and system for providing advertising listing variance in distribution feeds over the internet to maximize revenue to the advertising distributor
US7844493B1 (en) * 2002-11-08 2010-11-30 Google, Inc. Automated price maintenance for use with a system in which advertisements are rendered with relative preference based on performance information and price information
US7467206B2 (en) * 2002-12-23 2008-12-16 Microsoft Corporation Reputation system for web services
US7792121B2 (en) * 2003-01-03 2010-09-07 Microsoft Corporation Frame protocol and scheduling system
US7042483B2 (en) * 2003-03-10 2006-05-09 Eastman Kodak Company Apparatus and method for printing using a light emissive array
US8595071B2 (en) * 2003-06-30 2013-11-26 Google Inc. Using enhanced ad features to increase competition in online advertising
US7363302B2 (en) * 2003-06-30 2008-04-22 Googole, Inc. Promoting and/or demoting an advertisement from an advertising spot of one type to an advertising spot of another type
US20050027594A1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2005-02-03 Elliot Yasnovsky Self-service platform for selling advertising
US7346615B2 (en) * 2003-10-09 2008-03-18 Google, Inc. Using match confidence to adjust a performance threshold
US20050096980A1 (en) * 2003-11-03 2005-05-05 Ross Koningstein System and method for delivering internet advertisements that change between textual and graphical ads on demand by a user
US20050267803A1 (en) * 2004-05-25 2005-12-01 Arvin Patel Advertising management structure and method for correlating campaigns with consumer interest
US20060020506A1 (en) * 2004-07-20 2006-01-26 Brian Axe Adjusting or determining ad count and/or ad branding using factors that affect end user ad quality perception, such as document performance
US20060074748A1 (en) * 2004-10-01 2006-04-06 Reachlocal, Inc. Method and apparatus for generating advertisement information for performing a marketing campaign
US7689458B2 (en) * 2004-10-29 2010-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Systems and methods for determining bid value for content items to be placed on a rendered page
US7433931B2 (en) * 2004-11-17 2008-10-07 Raytheon Company Scheduling in a high-performance computing (HPC) system
US20060173744A1 (en) * 2005-02-01 2006-08-03 Kandasamy David R Method and apparatus for generating, optimizing, and managing granular advertising campaigns
US7428555B2 (en) * 2005-04-07 2008-09-23 Google Inc. Real-time, computer-generated modifications to an online advertising program
US8412575B2 (en) * 2005-06-30 2013-04-02 Google Inc. Determining and/or managing offers such as bids for advertising
US7827052B2 (en) * 2005-09-30 2010-11-02 Google Inc. Systems and methods for reputation management

Patent Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5920859A (en) * 1997-02-05 1999-07-06 Idd Enterprises, L.P. Hypertext document retrieval system and method
US6216123B1 (en) * 1998-06-24 2001-04-10 Novell, Inc. Method and system for rapid retrieval in a full text indexing system
US6347313B1 (en) * 1999-03-01 2002-02-12 Hewlett-Packard Company Information embedding based on user relevance feedback for object retrieval
US20030055816A1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2003-03-20 Mark Paine Recommending search terms using collaborative filtering and web spidering
US6981040B1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2005-12-27 Utopy, Inc. Automatic, personalized online information and product services
US6578022B1 (en) * 2000-04-18 2003-06-10 Icplanet Corporation Interactive intelligent searching with executable suggestions
US6675159B1 (en) * 2000-07-27 2004-01-06 Science Applic Int Corp Concept-based search and retrieval system
US20030069877A1 (en) * 2001-08-13 2003-04-10 Xerox Corporation System for automatically generating queries
US20030126139A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-07-03 Lee Timothy A. System and method for loading commercial web sites
US20050015366A1 (en) * 2003-07-18 2005-01-20 Carrasco John Joseph M. Disambiguation of search phrases using interpretation clusters
US20050187818A1 (en) * 2004-02-20 2005-08-25 Zito David D. Computerized advertising offer exchange
US20060010105A1 (en) * 2004-07-08 2006-01-12 Sarukkai Ramesh R Database search system and method of determining a value of a keyword in a search
US20060041607A1 (en) * 2004-08-23 2006-02-23 Miller David J Point of law search system and method
US20060064411A1 (en) * 2004-09-22 2006-03-23 William Gross Search engine using user intent
US20080077570A1 (en) * 2004-10-25 2008-03-27 Infovell, Inc. Full Text Query and Search Systems and Method of Use
US20070027754A1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2007-02-01 Collins Robert J System and method for advertisement management

Cited By (132)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8527533B2 (en) 1999-05-28 2013-09-03 Yahoo! Inc. Keyword suggestion system for a computer network search engine
US20110022623A1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2011-01-27 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US20090192976A1 (en) * 2002-11-20 2009-07-30 Radar Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for creating a semantic object
US20100057815A1 (en) * 2002-11-20 2010-03-04 Radar Networks, Inc. Semantically representing a target entity using a semantic object
US8161066B2 (en) 2002-11-20 2012-04-17 Evri, Inc. Methods and systems for creating a semantic object
US8190684B2 (en) 2002-11-20 2012-05-29 Evri Inc. Methods and systems for semantically managing offers and requests over a network
US10033799B2 (en) 2002-11-20 2018-07-24 Essential Products, Inc. Semantically representing a target entity using a semantic object
US20090030982A1 (en) * 2002-11-20 2009-01-29 Radar Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for semantically managing offers and requests over a network
US8965979B2 (en) 2002-11-20 2015-02-24 Vcvc Iii Llc. Methods and systems for semantically managing offers and requests over a network
US9020967B2 (en) 2002-11-20 2015-04-28 Vcvc Iii Llc Semantically representing a target entity using a semantic object
US20090192972A1 (en) * 2002-11-20 2009-07-30 Radar Networks, Inc. Methods and systems for creating a semantic object
US20080306959A1 (en) * 2004-02-23 2008-12-11 Radar Networks, Inc. Semantic web portal and platform
US9189479B2 (en) 2004-02-23 2015-11-17 Vcvc Iii Llc Semantic web portal and platform
US8275796B2 (en) 2004-02-23 2012-09-25 Evri Inc. Semantic web portal and platform
US20090198684A1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2009-08-06 Yahoo! Inc. System and Method for Determining Semantically Related Terms
US7548929B2 (en) * 2005-07-29 2009-06-16 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for determining semantically related terms
US20070027864A1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2007-02-01 Collins Robert J System and method for determining semantically related terms
US20070083468A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Wetherell Christopher J Content feed user interface with gallery display of same-type items
US8190997B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2012-05-29 Google Inc. Personalized content feed suggestions page
US8949154B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2015-02-03 Google Inc. Content feed user interface with gallery display of same-type items
US20070083520A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Shellen Jason H Personalized content feed suggestions page
US20070157229A1 (en) * 2006-01-04 2007-07-05 Wayne Heathcock Analytic advertising system and method of employing the same
US8234281B2 (en) * 2006-03-14 2012-07-31 Nhn Business Platform Corporation Method and system for matching advertising using seed
US20070220040A1 (en) * 2006-03-14 2007-09-20 Nhn Corporation Method and system for matching advertising using seed
US20070271255A1 (en) * 2006-05-17 2007-11-22 Nicky Pappo Reverse search-engine
US8924838B2 (en) 2006-08-09 2014-12-30 Vcvc Iii Llc. Harvesting data from page
US20080189267A1 (en) * 2006-08-09 2008-08-07 Radar Networks, Inc. Harvesting Data From Page
US7689548B2 (en) * 2006-09-22 2010-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Recommending keywords based on bidding patterns
US20080077585A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Microsoft Corporation Recommending keywords based on bidding patterns
US8230361B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2012-07-24 Google Inc. Content feed user interface
US8645497B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2014-02-04 Google Inc. Bookmark-based access to content feeds
US20080082673A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-03 Michael Dynin Bookmark-Based Access to Content Feeds
US20080082941A1 (en) * 2006-09-28 2008-04-03 Goldberg Steven L Content Feed User Interface
US9075505B2 (en) 2006-09-28 2015-07-07 Google Inc. Content feed user interface
US20080082477A1 (en) * 2006-09-29 2008-04-03 Microsoft Corporation Key phrase extraction from query logs
US7577643B2 (en) * 2006-09-29 2009-08-18 Microsoft Corporation Key phrase extraction from query logs
US8694607B2 (en) 2006-10-06 2014-04-08 Google Inc. Recursive subscriptions to content feeds
US20080086755A1 (en) * 2006-10-06 2008-04-10 Darnell Benjamin G Recursive Subscriptions to Content Feeds
US20080148188A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Persistent preview window
US20080147670A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Persistent interface
US20080147653A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Search suggestions
US8601387B2 (en) 2006-12-15 2013-12-03 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Persistent interface
US20080148164A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Toolbox minimizer/maximizer
US20080148192A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Toolbox pagination
US20080147606A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Category-based searching
US20080147634A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Toolbox order editing
US20080148178A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Independent scrolling
US20080147708A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Preview window with rss feed
US20080147709A1 (en) * 2006-12-15 2008-06-19 Iac Search & Media, Inc. Search results from selected sources
US20080183558A1 (en) * 2007-01-31 2008-07-31 Yahoo!Inc. System and method for automatically determining an advertisement type of a digital advertisement
US9105049B2 (en) * 2007-01-31 2015-08-11 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for automatically determining an advertisement type of a digital advertisement
US8255812B1 (en) * 2007-03-15 2012-08-28 Google Inc. Embedding user-selected content feed items in a webpage
US8768906B2 (en) 2007-03-28 2014-07-01 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Method and system of displaying related keywords
US20080249855A1 (en) * 2007-04-04 2008-10-09 Yahoo! Inc. System for generating advertising creatives
US20100121860A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2010-05-13 Lei Pan Method and Apparatus of Generating Update Parameters and Displaying Correlated Keywords
US9135370B2 (en) 2007-04-10 2015-09-15 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Method and apparatus of generating update parameters and displaying correlated keywords
US8676811B2 (en) 2007-04-10 2014-03-18 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Method and apparatus of generating update parameters and displaying correlated keywords
US20080255937A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Yahoo! Inc. System for optimizing the performance of online advertisements using a network of users and advertisers
US20080256039A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Yahoo! Inc. System for determining the quality of query suggestion systems using a network of users and advertisers
US20080256059A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Yahoo! Inc. System for generating query suggestions using a network of users and advertisers
US8874588B2 (en) 2007-04-10 2014-10-28 Alibaba Group Holding Limited Method and apparatus of generating update parameters and displaying correlated keywords
US20080256060A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Yahoo! Inc. System for determining the quality of query suggestions using a network of users and advertisers
US20080256056A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Yahoo! Inc. System for building a data structure representing a network of users and advertisers
US20080256061A1 (en) * 2007-04-10 2008-10-16 Yahoo! Inc. System for generating query suggestions by integrating valuable query suggestions with experimental query suggestions using a network of users and advertisers
US7921107B2 (en) 2007-04-10 2011-04-05 Yahoo! Inc. System for generating query suggestions using a network of users and advertisers
US7849080B2 (en) 2007-04-10 2010-12-07 Yahoo! Inc. System for generating query suggestions by integrating valuable query suggestions with experimental query suggestions using a network of users and advertisers
US7873904B2 (en) 2007-04-13 2011-01-18 Microsoft Corporation Internet visualization system and related user interfaces
US20080256444A1 (en) * 2007-04-13 2008-10-16 Microsoft Corporation Internet Visualization System and Related User Interfaces
US7761473B2 (en) 2007-05-18 2010-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Typed relationships between items
US20120109758A1 (en) * 2007-07-16 2012-05-03 Vanessa Murdock Method For Matching Electronic Advertisements To Surrounding Context Based On Their Advertisement Content
US20090037399A1 (en) * 2007-07-31 2009-02-05 Yahoo! Inc. System and Method for Determining Semantically Related Terms
US20090037239A1 (en) * 2007-08-02 2009-02-05 Daniel Wong Method For Improving Internet Advertising Click-Through Rates through Time-Dependent Keywords
US20090077124A1 (en) * 2007-09-16 2009-03-19 Nova Spivack System and Method of a Knowledge Management and Networking Environment
US8868560B2 (en) 2007-09-16 2014-10-21 Vcvc Iii Llc System and method of a knowledge management and networking environment
US8438124B2 (en) 2007-09-16 2013-05-07 Evri Inc. System and method of a knowledge management and networking environment
US20090077062A1 (en) * 2007-09-16 2009-03-19 Nova Spivack System and Method of a Knowledge Management and Networking Environment
US20090076887A1 (en) * 2007-09-16 2009-03-19 Nova Spivack System And Method Of Collecting Market-Related Data Via A Web-Based Networking Environment
US8745161B2 (en) 2007-09-26 2014-06-03 Google Inc. Determining and displaying a count of unread items in content feeds
US10025871B2 (en) 2007-09-27 2018-07-17 Google Llc Setting and displaying a read status for items in content feeds
US20090106307A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Nova Spivack System of a knowledge management and networking environment and method for providing advanced functions therefor
US20110282741A1 (en) * 2007-12-27 2011-11-17 Nhn Business Platform Corporation Method for offering advertisement according to search intention segmentation and system for executing the method
US20090204478A1 (en) * 2008-02-08 2009-08-13 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Identifying and Measuring Trends in Consumer Content Demand Within Vertically Associated Websites and Related Content
US8117067B2 (en) * 2008-06-13 2012-02-14 Google Inc. Achieving advertising campaign goals
US20110161162A1 (en) * 2008-06-13 2011-06-30 Google Inc. Achieving Advertising Campaign Goals
US8631003B2 (en) 2008-06-23 2014-01-14 Google Inc. Query identification and association
EP2313839A4 (en) * 2008-06-23 2012-12-19 Google Inc Query identification and association
EP2313839A2 (en) * 2008-06-23 2011-04-27 Google, Inc. Query identification and association
US20100004975A1 (en) * 2008-07-03 2010-01-07 Scott White System and method for leveraging proximity data in a web-based socially-enabled knowledge networking environment
US20100010959A1 (en) * 2008-07-09 2010-01-14 Broder Andrei Z Systems and methods for query expansion in sponsored search
US8521731B2 (en) 2008-07-09 2013-08-27 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and methods for query expansion in sponsored search
US20100121691A1 (en) * 2008-11-11 2010-05-13 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for utilizing non-compete advertisement tags in an advertisement serving system
US8504582B2 (en) 2008-12-31 2013-08-06 Ebay, Inc. System and methods for unit of measurement conversion and search query expansion
US20100169353A1 (en) * 2008-12-31 2010-07-01 Ebay, Inc. System and methods for unit of measurement conversion and search query expansion
US20100268700A1 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Evri, Inc. Search and search optimization using a pattern of a location identifier
WO2010120934A3 (en) * 2009-04-15 2011-01-13 Evri Inc. Search enhanced semantic advertising
US9607089B2 (en) 2009-04-15 2017-03-28 Vcvc Iii Llc Search and search optimization using a pattern of a location identifier
US9037567B2 (en) 2009-04-15 2015-05-19 Vcvc Iii Llc Generating user-customized search results and building a semantics-enhanced search engine
US8862579B2 (en) 2009-04-15 2014-10-14 Vcvc Iii Llc Search and search optimization using a pattern of a location identifier
US8200617B2 (en) 2009-04-15 2012-06-12 Evri, Inc. Automatic mapping of a location identifier pattern of an object to a semantic type using object metadata
US9613149B2 (en) 2009-04-15 2017-04-04 Vcvc Iii Llc Automatic mapping of a location identifier pattern of an object to a semantic type using object metadata
US20100268702A1 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Evri, Inc. Generating user-customized search results and building a semantics-enhanced search engine
US20100268596A1 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Evri, Inc. Search-enhanced semantic advertising
US20100268720A1 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Radar Networks, Inc. Automatic mapping of a location identifier pattern of an object to a semantic type using object metadata
WO2010120934A2 (en) * 2009-04-15 2010-10-21 Evri Inc. Search enhanced semantic advertising
US9652537B2 (en) * 2009-05-22 2017-05-16 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Identifying terms associated with queries
US20140025664A1 (en) * 2009-05-22 2014-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Identifying terms associated with queries
US20100325250A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2010-12-23 Verisign, Inc. Characterizing unregistered domain names
US9148334B2 (en) 2009-06-22 2015-09-29 Verisign, Inc. Characterizing unregistered domain names
US8224923B2 (en) 2009-06-22 2012-07-17 Verisign, Inc. Characterizing unregistered domain names
WO2010151483A1 (en) * 2009-06-22 2010-12-29 Verisign, Inc. Characterizing unregistered domain names
US8606786B2 (en) 2009-06-22 2013-12-10 Microsoft Corporation Determining a similarity measure between queries
US8306962B1 (en) * 2009-06-29 2012-11-06 Adchemy, Inc. Generating targeted paid search campaigns
US8311997B1 (en) * 2009-06-29 2012-11-13 Adchemy, Inc. Generating targeted paid search campaigns
US20110040604A1 (en) * 2009-08-13 2011-02-17 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Providing Targeted Content
US8380570B2 (en) * 2009-10-27 2013-02-19 Yahoo! Inc. Index-based technique friendly CTR prediction and advertisement selection
US20110099059A1 (en) * 2009-10-27 2011-04-28 Yahoo! Inc. Index-based technique friendly ctr prediction and advertisement selection
US20110161091A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2011-06-30 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Connecting Entities Through Content
US20110161479A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2011-06-30 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Presenting Content
US20110202827A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2011-08-18 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Curating Content
US9396485B2 (en) 2009-12-24 2016-07-19 Outbrain Inc. Systems and methods for presenting content
US20110197137A1 (en) * 2009-12-24 2011-08-11 Vertical Acuity, Inc. Systems and Methods for Rating Content
US20120158505A1 (en) * 2010-12-20 2012-06-21 Sreenivasulu Jaladanki Blending Advertiser Data With Ad Network Data In Order To Serve Finely Targeted Ads
US9536250B2 (en) * 2010-12-20 2017-01-03 Excalibur Ip, Llc Blending advertiser data with ad network data in order to serve finely targeted ads
US8732151B2 (en) 2011-04-01 2014-05-20 Microsoft Corporation Enhanced query rewriting through statistical machine translation
US20120259831A1 (en) * 2011-04-05 2012-10-11 Microsoft Corporation User Information Needs Based Data Selection
US9589056B2 (en) * 2011-04-05 2017-03-07 Microsoft Technology Licensing Llc User information needs based data selection
US8725566B2 (en) * 2011-12-27 2014-05-13 Microsoft Corporation Predicting advertiser keyword performance indicator values based on established performance indicator values
US20130311271A1 (en) * 2012-05-17 2013-11-21 Microsoft Corporation Structured relevant keyword and intent suggestion with bid and other auction parameters based on advertiser specific context
US9195647B1 (en) * 2012-08-11 2015-11-24 Guangsheng Zhang System, methods, and data structure for machine-learning of contextualized symbolic associations
US9880998B1 (en) * 2012-08-11 2018-01-30 Guangsheng Zhang Producing datasets for representing terms and objects based on automated learning from text contents
US9767196B1 (en) * 2013-11-20 2017-09-19 Google Inc. Content selection
US9984159B1 (en) 2014-08-12 2018-05-29 Google Llc Providing information about content distribution

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US20070027761A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US8321275B2 (en) 2012-11-27 grant
US20070027757A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US20070027744A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US20070027756A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US20070027751A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US7685019B2 (en) 2010-03-23 grant
US20070027743A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US7739708B2 (en) 2010-06-15 grant
US7949562B2 (en) 2011-05-24 grant
US20070033104A1 (en) 2007-02-08 application
CN101233513A (en) 2008-07-30 application
US20070027753A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
CN101233537A (en) 2008-07-30 application
US20070027758A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US20070028263A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US20070033103A1 (en) 2007-02-08 application
US8321274B2 (en) 2012-11-27 grant
US7840438B2 (en) 2010-11-23 grant
US20070027759A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application
US20070027762A1 (en) 2007-02-01 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7668950B2 (en) Automatically updating performance-based online advertising system and method
US7110993B2 (en) System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US8417569B2 (en) System and method of evaluating content based advertising
US7734503B2 (en) Managing on-line advertising using metrics such as return on investment and/or profit
US20050216335A1 (en) System and method for providing on-line user-assisted Web-based advertising
US20070214048A1 (en) Method and system for developing and managing a computer-based marketing campaign
US20060026071A1 (en) Targeted advertisements using time-dependent key search terms
US6978263B2 (en) System and method for influencing a position on a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US20070150353A1 (en) System and method for creation, distribution and tracking of advertising via electronic networks
US20060026064A1 (en) Platform for advertising data integration and aggregation
US20120059708A1 (en) Mapping Advertiser Intents to Keywords
US20070027850A1 (en) Methods and systems for developing and managing a computer-based marketing campaign
US7752190B2 (en) Computer-implemented method and system for managing keyword bidding prices
US20100198694A1 (en) Advertisement Slot Configuration
US20040267611A1 (en) Method, system and apparatus for targeting an offer
US20040199397A1 (en) Integrated dynamic pricing and procurement support for e-commerce advertising channels
US20060212350A1 (en) Enhanced online advertising system
US20060026063A1 (en) System and method for advertising campaign strategy development and optimization
US20100088152A1 (en) Predicting user response to advertisements
US20100138291A1 (en) Adjusting Bids Based on Predicted Performance
US20090172021A1 (en) Recommendations based on actions performed on multiple remote servers
US20020165849A1 (en) Automatic advertiser notification for a system for providing place and price protection in a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US20090171754A1 (en) Widget-assisted detection and exposure of cross-site behavioral associations
US20090172551A1 (en) Behavior-based selection of items to present on affiliate sites
US20080140524A1 (en) System for generating a smart advertisement based on a dynamic file and a configuration file

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: YAHOO| INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BARTZ, KEVIN;COLLINS, ROBERT J.;MURTHI, VIJAY;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018143/0820;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060713 TO 20060718

AS Assignment

Owner name: YAHOO HOLDINGS, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:YAHOO| INC.;REEL/FRAME:042963/0211

Effective date: 20170613

AS Assignment

Owner name: OATH INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:YAHOO HOLDINGS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:045240/0310

Effective date: 20171231