US20070018793A1 - Ramped interrogation power levels - Google Patents
Ramped interrogation power levels Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070018793A1 US20070018793A1 US11/186,494 US18649405A US2007018793A1 US 20070018793 A1 US20070018793 A1 US 20070018793A1 US 18649405 A US18649405 A US 18649405A US 2007018793 A1 US2007018793 A1 US 2007018793A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- reader
- power level
- signal
- devices
- tags
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
- G06K7/10—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
- G06K7/10009—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves
- G06K7/10019—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves resolving collision on the communication channels between simultaneously or concurrently interrogated record carriers.
- G06K7/10029—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves resolving collision on the communication channels between simultaneously or concurrently interrogated record carriers. the collision being resolved in the time domain, e.g. using binary tree search or RFID responses allocated to a random time slot
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
- G06K7/0008—General problems related to the reading of electronic memory record carriers, independent of its reading method, e.g. power transfer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06K—GRAPHICAL DATA READING; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
- G06K7/00—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns
- G06K7/10—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation
- G06K7/10009—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves
- G06K7/10316—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves using at least one antenna particularly designed for interrogating the wireless record carriers
- G06K7/10356—Methods or arrangements for sensing record carriers, e.g. for reading patterns by electromagnetic radiation, e.g. optical sensing; by corpuscular radiation sensing by radiation using wavelengths larger than 0.1 mm, e.g. radio-waves or microwaves using at least one antenna particularly designed for interrogating the wireless record carriers using a plurality of antennas, e.g. configurations including means to resolve interference between the plurality of antennas
Definitions
- the present invention relates to wireless communications systems, and more particularly, this invention relates to systems and methods for ramping power levels of an interrogator for improving communications between the interrogator and a plurality of wireless devices.
- Radio Frequency Identification technology employs a radio frequency (“RF”) wireless link and ultra-small embedded computer circuitry. RFID technology allows physical objects to be identified and tracked via these wireless “tags”. It functions like a bar code that communicates to the reader automatically without requiring manual line-of-sight scanning or singulation of the objects. RFID promises to radically transform the retail, pharmaceutical, military, and transportation industries.
- a basic RFID system 100 includes several tags 102 , a reader 104 , and an optional server 106 .
- Each tag 102 includes an integrated circuit (IC) chip and an antenna.
- the IC chip includes a digital decoder needed to execute the computer commands the tag 102 receives from the tag reader 104 .
- the IC chip also includes a power supply circuit to extract and regulate power from the RF reader; a detector to decode signals from the reader; a back-scattering modulator to send data back to the reader; anti-collision protocol circuits; and at least enough memory to store its EPC code.
- Communication begins with a reader 104 sending out signals to find the tag 102 .
- the reader 104 decodes the data programmed into the tag 102 .
- the information can then be passed to a server 106 for processing, storage, and/or propagation to another computing device.
- the system uses reflected or “backscattered” radio frequency (RF) waves to transmit information from the tag 102 to the reader 104 . Since passive (Class-1 and Class-2) tags get all of their power from the reader signal, the tags are only powered when in the beam of the reader 104 .
- RF radio frequency
- tags communicate with the reader by backscattering the carrier signal, those tags very close to a reader create a very strong backscatter that can interfere with communications between other tags and readers located far away.
- tag-1 generates so much backscatter that it can jam communications between tag-2 and Reader #2, even though both tag-2 and Reader #2 are located 200 meters away from tag-1.
- a is the extra distance necessary to provide a minimum “tag-2 to tag-1 signal to noise ratio” of at least 10 db (which is a typical minimum ratio that allows tag-2 to successfully communicate with Reader #1) [value can vary depending on system and environmental situation],
- d2 is the distance between tag-2 and Reader #2
- d1 is the distance between tag-1 and Reader #1.
- a method for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes transmitting a first signal at a first power level, interrogating RF devices responding to the first signal, instructing the responding RF devices to change state, and transmitting a second signal at a second power level higher than the first power level.
- the RF devices responding to the first signal do not respond to the second signal upon changing state.
- a method for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes transmitting a signal at a first power level, continuously increasing the signal to a second power level, interrogating RF devices responding to the signal, and instructing the responding RF devices to change state such that the RF devices do not respond to the signal upon changing state.
- RF radio frequency
- Another method for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes transmitting a series of signals, each sequential signal being transmitted at an increased power level, and, at each power level, singulating RF devices responding to the signal and instructing the responding RF devices to change to an unresponsive state.
- RF radio frequency
- a system for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes a first reader, a second reader spaced apart from the first reader, a plurality of first tags closer to the first reader than the second reader, and a plurality of second tags closer to the second reader than the first reader.
- the first reader uses a combination of varying a transmitting power level when communicating with the first tags and instructing the first tags to become nonresponsive such that backscatter signals from the first tags received by the second reader are always less than a minimum effective backscatter signal from any second tag at the second reader.
- Another system for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes a first reader having a first effective communication range, a second reader spaced apart from the first reader and having a second effective communication range, a plurality of first tags closer to the first reader than the second reader, and a plurality of second tags closer to the second reader than the first reader.
- the first reader uses a combination of varying a transmitting power level when communicating with the first tags and instructing the first tags to become nonresponsive such that the first reader and the second reader are operable in a same communications channel at a distance from each other of about 10 times the first effective communications range.
- the first reader uses a combination of varying a transmitting power level when communicating with the first tags and instructing the first tags to become nonresponsive such that the first reader and the second reader are operable in a same communications channel at a distance from each other of about 10 times the second effective communications range.
- a radio frequency (RF) system includes a plurality of RF readers, a plurality of RF tags in communication with the readers, and a reader network coordinator that controls and coordinates a multiplicity of RF readers to minimize backscatter and/or forward link jamming between the tags and the readers.
- FIG. 1 is a system diagram of an RFID system.
- FIG. 2 is a high level circuit diagram showing a circuit for implementation in a RF device according to one embodiment.
- FIG. 3 is a high level circuit diagram of a monolithic semiconductor integrated circuit that may form part of the circuit of FIG. 2 .
- FIG. 4 is a system diagram for an integrated circuit (IC) chip for implementation in an RFID tag.
- IC integrated circuit
- FIG. 5 is a process diagram of a method for ramping a power level.
- FIG. 6 is a system diagram depicting an RFID system in which an RFID reader ramps a power level to communicate with RFID tags.
- FIG. 7 illustrates a dock door RFID scenario
- FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of a method performed by a reader in a listen then talk mode.
- the following specification describes systems and methods for sequentially increasing a power level of an interrogator such as an RFID tag reader.
- an RFID system for example, system noise caused by “hot” tag backscatter and other background clutter can be considerably reduced by sequentially stepping or ramping the reader power to various levels instead of just going immediately to full power level.
- the reader will attempt to establish communication with the tags throughout each power ramping interval and will first singulate any tags that it detects nearby that are responding with adequate backscatter. These nearby tags are then put to sleep before the reader increases its power output level as necessary to interrogate more distant tags.
- RFID Radio Frequency Identification
- Examples of hardware include Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), printed circuits, monolithic circuits, reconfigurable hardware such as Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), etc.
- ASICs Application Specific Integrated Circuits
- FPGAs Field Programmable Gate Arrays
- the methodology disclosed herein can also be incorporated into a computer program product, such as a computer disc containing software. Further, such software need not be embodied on a readable medium, but can be downloadable or otherwise transferable from one computing device to another via network, nonvolatile memory device, resident on the device, etc.
- FIG. 2 illustrates a radio frequency data communication device 200 , e.g., RFID tag.
- the radio frequency data communication device 200 includes an integrated circuit 204 , a power source 206 connected to the integrated circuit 204 to supply power to the integrated circuit 204 , and at least one antenna 202 connected to the integrated circuit 204 for radio frequency transmission and reception by the integrated circuit 204 .
- integrated circuit and “circuit” shall be defined as a combination of interconnected circuit elements associated on or within a continuous substrate.
- the term “semiconductive substrate” is defined to mean any construction comprising semiconductive material, including, but not limited to, bulk semiconductive materials such as a semiconductive wafer (either alone or in assemblies comprising other materials thereon), and semiconductive material layers (either alone or in assemblies comprising other materials).
- substrate refers to any supporting structure, including, but not limited to, the semiconductive substrates described above as well as printed circuit boards (PCBs).
- the integrated circuit 204 is a monolithic integrated circuit.
- the term “monolithic integrated circuit” shall be defined as an integrated circuit wherein all circuit components are manufactured into or on top of a single chip of silicon or layer of a semiconductor.
- the integrated circuit 204 will be described in greater detail below.
- the power source 206 can be a battery and/or a power supply circuit that extracts and regulates power from the RF reader signal.
- the radio frequency data communication device 200 can be included in any appropriate housing or packaging, made of plastic or any other suitable material.
- the device 200 is of a small size that lends itself to applications employing small housings, such as cards, miniature tags, etc. Larger housings can also be employed.
- the device 200 housed in any appropriate housing, can be supported from or attached to an object in any desired manner; for example using double sided tape, glue, lanyards, leash, nails, staples, rivets, or any other fastener.
- the housing can be sewn on to an object, hung from an object, implanted in an object (hidden), etc.
- a description of illustrative RFID tags and interrogators, systems, and methods of use are disclosed in U.S. Patent Appl. Pub. No. 2004/0201457A1 to O'Toole et al., which is herein incorporated by reference.
- the integrated circuit 204 includes a receiver 300 and a transmitter 302 ( FIG. 3 ). In one embodiment, separate antennas 314 and 316 are provided for receiver and transmitter of the integrated circuit 204 . In another embodiment ( FIG. 2 ), a single antenna is shared by the receiver and transmitter sections. In one embodiment, the antenna is defined by conductive epoxy screened onto a card or housing. In the illustrated embodiment, the antenna is conductively bonded to the integrated circuit via bonding pads.
- that single antenna preferably comprises a folded dipole antenna defining a continuous conductive path, or loop, of microstrip.
- the antenna can be constructed as a continuous loop antenna.
- the capacitance can take any suitable form.
- the capacitance will be integrated into the monolithic integrated circuit.
- a battery or any other suitable power source can be employed.
- FIG. 3 is a high level circuit schematic of an integrated circuit 204 that can be utilized in the devices of FIG. 2 .
- the integrated circuit 204 is a monolithic integrated circuit. More particularly, in the illustrated embodiment, the integrated circuit 204 includes the receiver 300 , the transmitter 302 , a micro controller or microprocessor 304 , a wake up timer and logic circuit 306 , a clock recovery and data recovery circuit 308 , and a bias voltage and current generator 312 .
- a spread spectrum processing circuit 310 is also included in the integrated circuit 204 and formed relative to the single die.
- signals received by the receiver 300 are modulated spread spectrum signals.
- the modulation scheme for replies sent by the transmitter 302 is selectable.
- One of the available selections for replies sent by the transmitter 302 is modulated spread spectrum.
- FIG. 4 depicts a circuit layout of a Class-3 chip 400 according to an illustrative embodiment for implementation in an RFID tag.
- This Class-3 chip can form the core of RFID chips appropriate for many applications such as identification of pallets, cartons, containers, vehicles, or anything where a range of more than 2-3 meters is desired.
- the chip 400 includes several industry-standard circuits including a power generation and regulation circuit 402 , a digital command decoder and control circuit 404 , a sensor interface module 406 , a C1V2 interface protocol circuit 408 , and a power source (battery) 410 .
- a display driver module 412 can be added to drive a display.
- a battery activation circuit 414 is also present to act as a wake-up trigger. This circuit 414 is described in detail below.
- the battery activation circuit 414 includes an ultra-low-power, narrow-bandwidth preamplifier with a static current drain of only 50 nA.
- the battery activation circuit 414 also includes a self-clocking interrupt circuit and uses an innovative 16-bit user-programmable digital wake-up code. The battery activation circuit 414 draws less power during its sleeping state and is much better protected against both accidental and malicious false wake-up trigger events that otherwise would lead to pre-mature exhaustion of the Class-3 tag battery 410 .
- a battery monitor 415 monitors power usage in the device. The information collected can then be used to estimate a useful remaining life of the battery.
- a forward link AM decoder 416 uses a simplified phase-lock-loop oscillator that requires an absolute minimum amount of chip area.
- the circuit 416 requires only a minimum string of reference pulses.
- a backscatter modulator block 418 preferably increases the backscatter modulation depth to more than 50%.
- a pure, Fowler-Nordheim direct-tunneling-through-oxide mechanism 420 is present to reduce both the WRITE and ERASE currents to less than 0.1 ⁇ A/cell in the EEPROM memory array. Unlike any RFID tags built to date, this will permit designing of tags to operate at maximum range even when WRITE and ERASE operations are being performed.
- the module 400 may also incorporate a highly-simplified, yet very effective, security encryption circuit 422 .
- connection pads (not shown) are required for the chip 200 to function: Vdd to the battery, ground, plus two antenna leads to support multi-element omni-directional antennas. Sensors to monitor temperature, shock, tampering, etc. can be added by appending an industry-standard I2C interface to the core chip.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the general method 500 performed by a reader according to one embodiment.
- the reader selects a first power level.
- the reader singulates some or all tags of the nearby tags that are responding with adequate backscatter. Any desired communications with the tags are conducted in optional operation 506 .
- These nearby tags are then instructed to change state in operation 508 .
- the change in state can be from an active mode to a sleep or hibernate mode.
- the change in state can also be from a responsive state to a nonresponsive state. In the latter scenario, the tag can merely not respond, the antenna can be detached from the chip, etc.
- the tags will not actively backscatter in response to subsequent command, and so will not jam communications of other devices.
- the tags can remain in a particular state until instructed to again change state, receiving an activate command, etc.
- the tags can also automatically revert an active state after a period of time has elapsed, as described in copending and commonly owned US Patent Application entitled “ACCURATE PERSISTENT NODES”, filed May 6, 2005 under Ser. No. 11/124,485, and which is herein incorporated by reference.
- the reader then increases its power output level to interrogate more distant tags. Because the closest tags have already been put to sleep or otherwise commanded to be nonresponsive, the “hot tag” problem is not present. Operations 504 - 510 are repeated until and including when the reader reaches its full power, the maximum power allowed by law or regulation, or some other maximum desired level.
- the readers of passive Class-1 G-2 tags operate at 3 power output levels of 100 mW EIRP, 1 W EIRP, and 4 W EIRP.
- the time period that the reader remains at each level can be about uniform, or can vary from power level to power level. For instance, it may be advantageous to spend more time at the 1 W level than the 100 mW level, as the effective communication area at the 1 W level is greater than at the 100 mW level. Similarly, more time can be spent at the 4 W level than at the 1 W level.
- the time spent at each power level can also be dependent upon the number of responding tags or the result of its protocol search. For example, the reader may step to the next power level immediately or only upon communicating with each tag effectively responding at the current power level, rather than spending a fixed time at each level.
- the reader itself can select the power levels and/or how long to remain at each power level.
- a backend system can also instruct the reader as to which power levels to use and/or how long to remain at each power level based on a predetermined protocol or dynamic factors such as responses from one or more of the readers.
- the backend system can be a local or remote server for instance, and can be connected to one or more readers. Such servers are typically referred to reader network coordinators where several readers are in communication therewith.
- FIG. 6 illustrates an illustrative RFID system 600 .
- Reader #1 602 initiates communication with the tags 604 at the 100 mW output level. Since the typical tag requires less than 10 ⁇ W of power to operate and respond to the reader, Reader #1 602 will successfully select and singulate all of the close-in tags out to a range of about 1.5 meters, indicated by circle 606 . Reader #1 602 then puts all of these tags 604 to sleep (or moves them from the A-state to the B-state) to prevent them from responding to its subsequent interrogations.
- Reader #1's forward link interference to adjacent tags has also been reduced by a factor of 6 due to the lower transmission power. This is particularly beneficial where readers are in close proximity with each other. In this situation, the less time the reader is operating at full power, the better.
- Reader #1 602 raises it's output level to 1 W as necessary to successfully select and singulate all of the close-in tags 608 out to a range of about 5 meters, indicated by circle 610 . Note however, that since all tags closer 604 than 1.5 m have already been put to sleep, another tag located 1.5 m from Reader #1 backscatters no more energy even at 1 W than a tag would at 0.1 W at 0.5 m range. The jamming range to Reader #2 612 therefore remains reduced at 100 meters or less. Reader #1 602 then puts all of these tags 608 to sleep (or moves them from the A-state to the B-state) to prevent them from responding to its subsequent interrogations.
- Reader #1 602 uses its full 4 W effective power level to communicate with tags 614 at its maximum 10 m range, represented by circle 616 . Note however, that since all tags 604 , 608 closer than 5 m have already been put to sleep, another tag located 5 m from Reader #1 backscatters no more energy even at 4 W than a tag 604 did at 0.1 at 0.5 m range. The jamming range to Reader #2 612 therefore remains at 100 meters or less (10 ⁇ the maximum effective communication range of Reader #1 and Reader #2) compared to the 600 meter jamming and interference that would otherwise occur. Reader #1 602 then puts all of these tags to sleep or moves them from the A-state to the B-state as necessary to complete its inventory of the tags.
- the variation in backscattering power levels of the RF devices located within a maximum effective communication range of Reader #1 never exceeds a ratio of 100:1 maximum to minimum backscattering power level, and preferably is about 10:1 or less.
- the reader can thereby control and limit the strength of the tag backscatter to minimize the jamming effect this otherwise could have on nearby tags and readers operating within the same channel.
- This operating method has reduced the area over which readers will jam each other by more than 97%.
- Jamming of the forward link between other readers and tags has also been significantly reduced, typically by about 50% assuming that Reader #1 spends approximately equal time in each of its three different output power levels.
- a five-power-level Class-3 reader can operate at output power levels of, for example, 1 mW, 10 mW, 100 mW, 1 W, and 4 W. This in turn reduces the “hot-tag” backscatter jamming effect of tag-3 on tag-4 from a 60,000 m range to less than a 1000 m range in a system where Class-3 tag-3 is located 0.5 m from Reader #3 and a Class-3 tag-4 is located 100 meters from Reader #4.
- the optimal power level for talking to the tag can be chosen.
- problems such as overdriving and underdriving the tags can be avoided.
- the system can be programmed to communicate with any tag, regardless of protocol or manufacturer. Because power level selection can be performed on the reader in software, the tags do not have to be specifically designed to operate with the reader. Rather, the reader can find a power level best suited to communications with a particular tag by simply varying the power level until it finds a suitable communications level.
- the reader could also ramp its output power in a continuous analog manner instead of the series of discrete steps described herein.
- the reader preferably singulates tags as it encounters responses with adequate backscatter from them.
- the speed with which the reader ramps can be fixed.
- the speed can also be varied based on a number of responses being received.
- the speed that the power ramps up can also slow down as the power increases, as in a case where the ramping speed is slowed in proportion to the increase in effective communication area as the power increases.
- the reader can also perform a combination of continuous power ramping and stepping. For example, the reader can gradually and continuously ramp from a first to a second power level, then step to a third power level, then step to a fourth power level and gradually and continuously ramp to a fifth power level.
- An extension of the present invention useable in combination with the ramped interrogator power levels, or as a standalone feature, is what is referred to herein as “listen before talk.”
- RFID tag reader currently in development by the assignee hereof has a dynamic range of about 150 dB.
- Current readers have a dynamic range of only about 60 dB. Because the reception capability of the new generation of readers will be greatly improved, the chance for crosstalk interference is greater, even with a ramped power level scheme. The problem is exacerbated in high tag density or high reader density situations.
- FIG. 7 illustrates two such doors D 1 , and D 2 and associated RFID tag reader sets.
- Each reader set may include multiple readers 700 , 702 that communicate together, or that communicate independently of one another. Alternatively, each door may have only a single reader.
- RFID tag readers 700 , 702 are placed along both sides and along the top edge of the door frame in order to quickly scan pallets of tagged goods passing through the door.
- the readers 700 , 702 are all transmitting simultaneously, and so the signals overlap each other. Even if the readers transmit only periodically, there will be times when the signals overlap.
- the problem is that backscatter from tags passing through door D 1 will be picked up by the readers 702 on door D 2 . This will interfere with any communications that the readers 702 on door D 2 are trying to have, and the readers 702 on door D 2 may even think that the tags are passing through door D 2 . Further, backscatter from the readers 702 on door D 2 interfere with the readers 700 on door D 1 , perhaps making them unable to read the tags passing through door D 1 .
- the proposed solution is to implement a listen before talk mode.
- the readers 700 , 702 listen for any carrier signal being transmitted. If none is present, readers 700 send out a burst in an attempt to detect any nearby tags. If tags respond, the readers 700 read the tags. Any other readers 702 in the vicinity will detect the carrier signal of readers 700 and wait to transmit so that the signals do not overlap temporally.
- the readers can transmit their queries randomly. Because the queries are typically a fraction of a second, all readers in the vicinity should be able to query frequently enough to detect any tags passing thereby. In this way, multiple readers in the dock door scenario would be able to function semi-concurrently without having to be interconnected.
- FIG. 8 illustrates a general method 800 performed by a reader in a listen then talk mode.
- the reader listens for a signal that could potentially or is known to interfere with the reader's communications. Such signals typically would include signals from other readers and associated tag backscatter, but could also include other types of interfering signals such as walkie-talkie signals, etc. If such a signal is present, the reader waits for a period of time in operation 804 before listening again.
- the period of time can be preselected, such as 10 microseconds, 50 microseconds, etc.
- the period of time can also be randomly selected, such as based on a random number, but should be within some predetermined range, for example, less than about 1 second, 5 seconds, etc.
- a query burst is transmitted to determine if any tags are present. If there is no response, the reader again waits for a period of time (operation 804 ) prior to listening again (operation 802 ). If one or more tags respond, the power level can be adjusted in optional operation 808 . In operation 810 , the reader communicates with the tag(s). Then the process repeats.
- the readers can all be connected to a backend system such as a network coordinator that coordinates when the readers transmit query bursts and/or communicate with tags. Because the system coordinator knows when a reader is talking, the listen function need not be implemented. However, the system coordinator could merely indicate the period of time the readers should wait between queries. This system can ensure that all readers operate in an ordered or pseudo-random fashion, which may be desirable in a high reader density and/or high tag density situation where tags are rapidly moving past readers.
- a backend system such as a network coordinator that coordinates when the readers transmit query bursts and/or communicate with tags. Because the system coordinator knows when a reader is talking, the listen function need not be implemented. However, the system coordinator could merely indicate the period of time the readers should wait between queries. This system can ensure that all readers operate in an ordered or pseudo-random fashion, which may be desirable in a high reader density and/or high tag density situation where tags are rapidly moving past readers.
- the listen before talk mode can also include ramping the power levels of the readers.
- the sending of queries by a plurality of RFID interrogators can be coordinated such that the queries do not temporally overlap each other.
- the power level of one of the interrogators communicating with an RF device can be adjusted such that the communications do not interfere with simultaneously performed queries.
- the power level of any interrogators sending queries can be adjusted such that the queries do not interfere with the simultaneously performed communication between one of the interrogators and an RF device.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Toxicology (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Near-Field Transmission Systems (AREA)
- Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to wireless communications systems, and more particularly, this invention relates to systems and methods for ramping power levels of an interrogator for improving communications between the interrogator and a plurality of wireless devices.
- Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology employs a radio frequency (“RF”) wireless link and ultra-small embedded computer circuitry. RFID technology allows physical objects to be identified and tracked via these wireless “tags”. It functions like a bar code that communicates to the reader automatically without requiring manual line-of-sight scanning or singulation of the objects. RFID promises to radically transform the retail, pharmaceutical, military, and transportation industries.
- Several advantages of RFID technology are summarized in Table 1:
TABLE 1 Identification without visual contact Able to read/write Able to store information in tag Information can be renewed anytime Unique item identification Can withstand harsh environment Reusable High Flexibility/Value - As shown in
FIG. 1 , abasic RFID system 100 includesseveral tags 102, areader 104, and anoptional server 106. Eachtag 102 includes an integrated circuit (IC) chip and an antenna. The IC chip includes a digital decoder needed to execute the computer commands thetag 102 receives from thetag reader 104. The IC chip also includes a power supply circuit to extract and regulate power from the RF reader; a detector to decode signals from the reader; a back-scattering modulator to send data back to the reader; anti-collision protocol circuits; and at least enough memory to store its EPC code. - Communication begins with a
reader 104 sending out signals to find thetag 102. When the radio wave hits thetag 102 and thetag 102 recognizes the reader's signal, thereader 104 decodes the data programmed into thetag 102. The information can then be passed to aserver 106 for processing, storage, and/or propagation to another computing device. By tagging a variety of items, information about the nature and location of goods can be known instantly and automatically. - The system uses reflected or “backscattered” radio frequency (RF) waves to transmit information from the
tag 102 to thereader 104. Since passive (Class-1 and Class-2) tags get all of their power from the reader signal, the tags are only powered when in the beam of thereader 104. - The Auto ID Center EPC-Compliant tag classes are set forth below:
- Class-1
-
- Identity tags (RF user programmable, maximum range ˜3 m)
- Class-2
-
- Memory tags (8 bits to 128 Mbits programmable at maximum ˜3 m range)
- Security & privacy protection
- Class-3
-
- Battery tags (256 bits to 64 Kb)
- Self-Powered Backscatter (internal clock, sensor interface support)
- ˜100 meter range
- Class-4
-
- Active tags
- Active transmission (permits tag-speaks-first operating modes)
- Up to 30,000 meter range
- In RFID systems where passive receivers (i.e., Class-1 tags) are able to capture enough energy from the transmitted RF to power the device, no batteries are necessary. In systems where distance prevents powering a device in this manner, an alternative power source must be used. For these “alternate” systems (also known as active or semi-passive), batteries are the most common form of power. This greatly increases read range, and the reliability of tag reads, because the tag doesn't need power from the reader. Class-3 tags only need a 10 mV signal from the reader in comparison to the 500 mV that a Class-1 tag needs to operate. This 2,500:1 reduction in power requirement permits Class-3 tags to operate out to a distance of 100 meters or more compared with a Class-1 range of only about 3 meters.
- A problem frequently encountered is that of “hot” tags. Because tags communicate with the reader by backscattering the carrier signal, those tags very close to a reader create a very strong backscatter that can interfere with communications between other tags and readers located far away. Two types of interference, or “jamming”, are prevalent: forward link jamming and backscatter jamming. Consider a situation in which passive tag-1 is located 0.5 meters from
Reader # 1. The communications therebetween include the forward link from the reader to tag, and the backscatter signal from the tag to the reader. The maximum effective range ofReader # 1 is 10 m. Passive tag-2 is located 10 meters fromReader # 2.Readers # 1 and #2 are located 200 meters apart. A “hot” tag-1 located only 0.5 meter fromReader # 1 will generatebackscatter 400 times greater at 0.5 m than it would at the 10 m maximum range of the reader, as calculated by (max range/actual distance)2=(10/0.5)2=400×. As will soon become apparent, tag-1 generates so much backscatter that it can jam communications between tag-2 andReader # 2, even though both tag-2 andReader # 2 are located 200 meters away from tag-1. In fact, for acceptable communications,Reader # 2 would need to be located over 600 meters from tag-1 and/orReader # 1 based on square-law attenuation of RF energy over distance in free space, as calculated by the following equation:
D=a×b×(d2/d1)Equation 1
where: - D is the distance between
Reader # 1 andReader # 2, - a is the extra distance necessary to provide a minimum “tag-2 to tag-1 signal to noise ratio” of at least 10 db (which is a typical minimum ratio that allows tag-2 to successfully communicate with Reader #1) [value can vary depending on system and environmental situation],
- b is the maximum effective range of
Reader # 1, - d2 is the distance between tag-2 and
Reader # 2, and - d1 is the distance between tag-1 and
Reader # 1. - Performing the calculation, 3×10×(10/0.5)=600 meters. This is unacceptable in situations where multiple readers may be present in close proximity, as in a shopping mall. In the US, there are about 50 channels available to RFID systems. In Europe, there are currently only 10 channels. Accordingly, as RFID becomes more prevalent, readers will be using the same channels and will be using the same frequency, and the “hot tag” problem will become a serious issue that must be overcome.
- Using long-range Class-3 tags and readers makes this “hot tag” problem even worse. For example, a “hot” Class-3 tag-3 located 0.5 m from Reader #3 running at a full 4 Watt (W) Effective Incident Radiated Power (EIRP) power can jam a Class-3 tag-4 located 100 meters from Reader #4 at a range of 60,000 meters in free space, where D=3×100×(100/0.5)=60,000 meters. In English units, this “hot tag” can jam every reader operating in its channel at a range of up to 40 miles away (in free space).
- One proposed solution is to have the tag detect its own incident power. If the tag detects a strong signal, it will attenuate its own backscatter. However, this adds complexity and cost to each and every tag, making it cost prohibitive.
- What is needed is a cost effective and efficient way to both dramatically reduce the severity of the hot tag backscatter problem and also reduce reader-to-reader interference in the forward link as well.
- A method for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes transmitting a first signal at a first power level, interrogating RF devices responding to the first signal, instructing the responding RF devices to change state, and transmitting a second signal at a second power level higher than the first power level. The RF devices responding to the first signal do not respond to the second signal upon changing state.
- According to another embodiment, a method for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes transmitting a signal at a first power level, continuously increasing the signal to a second power level, interrogating RF devices responding to the signal, and instructing the responding RF devices to change state such that the RF devices do not respond to the signal upon changing state.
- Another method for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes transmitting a series of signals, each sequential signal being transmitted at an increased power level, and, at each power level, singulating RF devices responding to the signal and instructing the responding RF devices to change to an unresponsive state.
- A system for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices according to an embodiment includes a first reader, a second reader spaced apart from the first reader, a plurality of first tags closer to the first reader than the second reader, and a plurality of second tags closer to the second reader than the first reader. The first reader uses a combination of varying a transmitting power level when communicating with the first tags and instructing the first tags to become nonresponsive such that backscatter signals from the first tags received by the second reader are always less than a minimum effective backscatter signal from any second tag at the second reader.
- Another system for communicating with a plurality of radio frequency (RF) devices includes a first reader having a first effective communication range, a second reader spaced apart from the first reader and having a second effective communication range, a plurality of first tags closer to the first reader than the second reader, and a plurality of second tags closer to the second reader than the first reader. The first reader uses a combination of varying a transmitting power level when communicating with the first tags and instructing the first tags to become nonresponsive such that the first reader and the second reader are operable in a same communications channel at a distance from each other of about 10 times the first effective communications range. Alternatively, the first reader uses a combination of varying a transmitting power level when communicating with the first tags and instructing the first tags to become nonresponsive such that the first reader and the second reader are operable in a same communications channel at a distance from each other of about 10 times the second effective communications range.
- A radio frequency (RF) system according to another embodiment includes a plurality of RF readers, a plurality of RF tags in communication with the readers, and a reader network coordinator that controls and coordinates a multiplicity of RF readers to minimize backscatter and/or forward link jamming between the tags and the readers.
- Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, which, when taken in conjunction with the drawings, illustrate by way of example the principles of the invention.
- For a fuller understanding of the nature and advantages of the present invention, as well as the preferred mode of use, reference should be made to the following detailed description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a system diagram of an RFID system. -
FIG. 2 is a high level circuit diagram showing a circuit for implementation in a RF device according to one embodiment. -
FIG. 3 is a high level circuit diagram of a monolithic semiconductor integrated circuit that may form part of the circuit ofFIG. 2 . -
FIG. 4 is a system diagram for an integrated circuit (IC) chip for implementation in an RFID tag. -
FIG. 5 is a process diagram of a method for ramping a power level. -
FIG. 6 is a system diagram depicting an RFID system in which an RFID reader ramps a power level to communicate with RFID tags. -
FIG. 7 illustrates a dock door RFID scenario. -
FIG. 8 is a flow diagram of a method performed by a reader in a listen then talk mode. - The following description is the best embodiment presently contemplated for carrying out the present invention. This description is made for the purpose of illustrating the general principles of the present invention and is not meant to limit the inventive concepts claimed herein.
- The following specification describes systems and methods for sequentially increasing a power level of an interrogator such as an RFID tag reader. In an RFID system, for example, system noise caused by “hot” tag backscatter and other background clutter can be considerably reduced by sequentially stepping or ramping the reader power to various levels instead of just going immediately to full power level. The reader will attempt to establish communication with the tags throughout each power ramping interval and will first singulate any tags that it detects nearby that are responding with adequate backscatter. These nearby tags are then put to sleep before the reader increases its power output level as necessary to interrogate more distant tags.
- Many types of devices can take advantage of the embodiments disclosed herein, including but not limited to Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems and other wireless devices/systems; portable electronic devices; audio devices, and other electronic devices; smoke detectors; etc. To provide a context, and to aid in understanding the embodiments of the invention, much of the present description shall be presented in terms of an RFID system such as that shown in
FIG. 1 . It should be kept in mind that this is done by way of example only, and the invention is not to be limited to RFID systems, as one skilled in the art will appreciate how to implement the teachings herein into electronics devices in hardware and/or software. Examples of hardware include Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), printed circuits, monolithic circuits, reconfigurable hardware such as Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), etc. Further, the methodology disclosed herein can also be incorporated into a computer program product, such as a computer disc containing software. Further, such software need not be embodied on a readable medium, but can be downloadable or otherwise transferable from one computing device to another via network, nonvolatile memory device, resident on the device, etc. -
FIG. 2 illustrates a radio frequencydata communication device 200, e.g., RFID tag. The radio frequencydata communication device 200 includes anintegrated circuit 204, apower source 206 connected to theintegrated circuit 204 to supply power to theintegrated circuit 204, and at least oneantenna 202 connected to theintegrated circuit 204 for radio frequency transmission and reception by theintegrated circuit 204. For purposes of this disclosure, including the appended claims, the term “integrated circuit” and “circuit” shall be defined as a combination of interconnected circuit elements associated on or within a continuous substrate. For purposes of this disclosure, including the appended claims, the term “semiconductive substrate” is defined to mean any construction comprising semiconductive material, including, but not limited to, bulk semiconductive materials such as a semiconductive wafer (either alone or in assemblies comprising other materials thereon), and semiconductive material layers (either alone or in assemblies comprising other materials). For purposes of this disclosure, including the appended claims, the term “substrate” refers to any supporting structure, including, but not limited to, the semiconductive substrates described above as well as printed circuit boards (PCBs). In the illustrated embodiment, theintegrated circuit 204 is a monolithic integrated circuit. For purposes of this disclosure, including the appended claims, the term “monolithic integrated circuit” shall be defined as an integrated circuit wherein all circuit components are manufactured into or on top of a single chip of silicon or layer of a semiconductor. Theintegrated circuit 204 will be described in greater detail below. Thepower source 206 can be a battery and/or a power supply circuit that extracts and regulates power from the RF reader signal. - The radio frequency
data communication device 200 can be included in any appropriate housing or packaging, made of plastic or any other suitable material. Thedevice 200 is of a small size that lends itself to applications employing small housings, such as cards, miniature tags, etc. Larger housings can also be employed. Thedevice 200, housed in any appropriate housing, can be supported from or attached to an object in any desired manner; for example using double sided tape, glue, lanyards, leash, nails, staples, rivets, or any other fastener. The housing can be sewn on to an object, hung from an object, implanted in an object (hidden), etc. A description of illustrative RFID tags and interrogators, systems, and methods of use are disclosed in U.S. Patent Appl. Pub. No. 2004/0201457A1 to O'Toole et al., which is herein incorporated by reference. - Various configurations are possible for the
antenna 202. Theintegrated circuit 204 includes areceiver 300 and a transmitter 302 (FIG. 3 ). In one embodiment,separate antennas integrated circuit 204. In another embodiment (FIG. 2 ), a single antenna is shared by the receiver and transmitter sections. In one embodiment, the antenna is defined by conductive epoxy screened onto a card or housing. In the illustrated embodiment, the antenna is conductively bonded to the integrated circuit via bonding pads. - In an embodiment where a single antenna is employed, that single antenna preferably comprises a folded dipole antenna defining a continuous conductive path, or loop, of microstrip. Alternatively, the antenna can be constructed as a continuous loop antenna.
- If the
power source 206 is a capacitance, the capacitance can take any suitable form. Preferably, the capacitance will be integrated into the monolithic integrated circuit. Instead of using a capacitance, a battery or any other suitable power source can be employed. -
FIG. 3 is a high level circuit schematic of anintegrated circuit 204 that can be utilized in the devices ofFIG. 2 . In the embodiment shown inFIG. 3 , theintegrated circuit 204 is a monolithic integrated circuit. More particularly, in the illustrated embodiment, theintegrated circuit 204 includes thereceiver 300, thetransmitter 302, a micro controller ormicroprocessor 304, a wake up timer andlogic circuit 306, a clock recovery anddata recovery circuit 308, and a bias voltage andcurrent generator 312. - In one embodiment, a spread
spectrum processing circuit 310 is also included in theintegrated circuit 204 and formed relative to the single die. In this embodiment, signals received by thereceiver 300 are modulated spread spectrum signals. In an illustrated embodiment, the modulation scheme for replies sent by thetransmitter 302 is selectable. One of the available selections for replies sent by thetransmitter 302 is modulated spread spectrum. - Other embodiments of the present invention are implemented in a Class-3 or higher Class chip.
FIG. 4 depicts a circuit layout of a Class-3chip 400 according to an illustrative embodiment for implementation in an RFID tag. This Class-3 chip can form the core of RFID chips appropriate for many applications such as identification of pallets, cartons, containers, vehicles, or anything where a range of more than 2-3 meters is desired. As shown, thechip 400 includes several industry-standard circuits including a power generation andregulation circuit 402, a digital command decoder andcontrol circuit 404, asensor interface module 406, a C1V2interface protocol circuit 408, and a power source (battery) 410. Adisplay driver module 412 can be added to drive a display. - A
battery activation circuit 414 is also present to act as a wake-up trigger. Thiscircuit 414 is described in detail below. In brief, thebattery activation circuit 414 includes an ultra-low-power, narrow-bandwidth preamplifier with a static current drain of only 50 nA. Thebattery activation circuit 414 also includes a self-clocking interrupt circuit and uses an innovative 16-bit user-programmable digital wake-up code. Thebattery activation circuit 414 draws less power during its sleeping state and is much better protected against both accidental and malicious false wake-up trigger events that otherwise would lead to pre-mature exhaustion of the Class-3tag battery 410. - A
battery monitor 415 monitors power usage in the device. The information collected can then be used to estimate a useful remaining life of the battery. - A forward
link AM decoder 416 uses a simplified phase-lock-loop oscillator that requires an absolute minimum amount of chip area. Preferably, thecircuit 416 requires only a minimum string of reference pulses. - A
backscatter modulator block 418 preferably increases the backscatter modulation depth to more than 50%. - A pure, Fowler-Nordheim direct-tunneling-through-
oxide mechanism 420 is present to reduce both the WRITE and ERASE currents to less than 0.1 μA/cell in the EEPROM memory array. Unlike any RFID tags built to date, this will permit designing of tags to operate at maximum range even when WRITE and ERASE operations are being performed. - The
module 400 may also incorporate a highly-simplified, yet very effective,security encryption circuit 422. - Only four connection pads (not shown) are required for the
chip 200 to function: Vdd to the battery, ground, plus two antenna leads to support multi-element omni-directional antennas. Sensors to monitor temperature, shock, tampering, etc. can be added by appending an industry-standard I2C interface to the core chip. - Extremely low-cost Class-2 security devices can be built by simply disabling or removing the wake-up module, pre-amplifiers, and/and IF modules from the Class-3 chip core.
- Several embodiments are described below with reference to specific power levels, distances, etc. to exemplify the various embodiments of the present invention. It should be kept in mind that these are provided by way of example only, and any suitable power level, number of levels, effective distance, etc. can be used, as will be apparent to one skilled in the art.
- As mentioned above, RFID tag readers can significantly reduce system noise caused by “hot” tag backscatter and other background clutter by sequentially stepping or ramping the reader power to full FCC levels instead of just going immediately to a full power level.
FIG. 5 illustrates thegeneral method 500 performed by a reader according to one embodiment. Inoperation 502, the reader selects a first power level. Then, inoperation 504, the reader singulates some or all tags of the nearby tags that are responding with adequate backscatter. Any desired communications with the tags are conducted inoptional operation 506. These nearby tags are then instructed to change state inoperation 508. The change in state can be from an active mode to a sleep or hibernate mode. The change in state can also be from a responsive state to a nonresponsive state. In the latter scenario, the tag can merely not respond, the antenna can be detached from the chip, etc. When sleeping or in a nonresponsive state, the tags will not actively backscatter in response to subsequent command, and so will not jam communications of other devices. - The tags can remain in a particular state until instructed to again change state, receiving an activate command, etc. The tags can also automatically revert an active state after a period of time has elapsed, as described in copending and commonly owned US Patent Application entitled “ACCURATE PERSISTENT NODES”, filed May 6, 2005 under Ser. No. 11/124,485, and which is herein incorporated by reference.
- In
operation 510, the reader then increases its power output level to interrogate more distant tags. Because the closest tags have already been put to sleep or otherwise commanded to be nonresponsive, the “hot tag” problem is not present. Operations 504-510 are repeated until and including when the reader reaches its full power, the maximum power allowed by law or regulation, or some other maximum desired level. - In a preferred embodiment, the readers of passive Class-1 G-2 tags operate at 3 power output levels of 100 mW EIRP, 1 W EIRP, and 4 W EIRP. The time period that the reader remains at each level can be about uniform, or can vary from power level to power level. For instance, it may be advantageous to spend more time at the 1 W level than the 100 mW level, as the effective communication area at the 1 W level is greater than at the 100 mW level. Similarly, more time can be spent at the 4 W level than at the 1 W level. The time spent at each power level can also be dependent upon the number of responding tags or the result of its protocol search. For example, the reader may step to the next power level immediately or only upon communicating with each tag effectively responding at the current power level, rather than spending a fixed time at each level.
- The reader itself can select the power levels and/or how long to remain at each power level. A backend system can also instruct the reader as to which power levels to use and/or how long to remain at each power level based on a predetermined protocol or dynamic factors such as responses from one or more of the readers. The backend system can be a local or remote server for instance, and can be connected to one or more readers. Such servers are typically referred to reader network coordinators where several readers are in communication therewith.
-
FIG. 6 illustrates anillustrative RFID system 600. In this example,Reader # 1 602 initiates communication with thetags 604 at the 100 mW output level. Since the typical tag requires less than 10 μW of power to operate and respond to the reader,Reader # 1 602 will successfully select and singulate all of the close-in tags out to a range of about 1.5 meters, indicated bycircle 606.Reader # 1 602 then puts all of thesetags 604 to sleep (or moves them from the A-state to the B-state) to prevent them from responding to its subsequent interrogations. - Tag-1's backscatter has thus been reduced by the
Reader # 1 power ratio from 4 W to 0.1 W. Accordingly, in one embodiment, the backscatter is reduced from 400× the minimum operable backscatter level to 10×, as calculated by 400×/(4 Wmax/0.1 Wactual)=10×. This translates to a reduction in the jamming range toReader # 2 612 from 600 meters to only about 100 meters. -
Reader # 1's forward link interference to adjacent tags has also been reduced by a factor of 6 due to the lower transmission power. This is particularly beneficial where readers are in close proximity with each other. In this situation, the less time the reader is operating at full power, the better. - Next,
Reader # 1 602 raises it's output level to 1 W as necessary to successfully select and singulate all of the close-intags 608 out to a range of about 5 meters, indicated bycircle 610. Note however, that since all tags closer 604 than 1.5 m have already been put to sleep, another tag located 1.5 m fromReader # 1 backscatters no more energy even at 1 W than a tag would at 0.1 W at 0.5 m range. The jamming range toReader # 2 612 therefore remains reduced at 100 meters or less.Reader # 1 602 then puts all of thesetags 608 to sleep (or moves them from the A-state to the B-state) to prevent them from responding to its subsequent interrogations. - Finally
Reader # 1 602 uses its full 4 W effective power level to communicate withtags 614 at its maximum 10 m range, represented bycircle 616. Note however, that since alltags Reader # 1 backscatters no more energy even at 4 W than atag 604 did at 0.1 at 0.5 m range. The jamming range toReader # 2 612 therefore remains at 100 meters or less (10× the maximum effective communication range ofReader # 1 and Reader #2) compared to the 600 meter jamming and interference that would otherwise occur.Reader # 1 602 then puts all of these tags to sleep or moves them from the A-state to the B-state as necessary to complete its inventory of the tags. - Preferably, the variation in backscattering power levels of the RF devices located within a maximum effective communication range of
Reader # 1 never exceeds a ratio of 100:1 maximum to minimum backscattering power level, and preferably is about 10:1 or less. - The reader can thereby control and limit the strength of the tag backscatter to minimize the jamming effect this otherwise could have on nearby tags and readers operating within the same channel. This operating method has reduced the area over which readers will jam each other by more than 97%. Jamming of the forward link between other readers and tags has also been significantly reduced, typically by about 50% assuming that
Reader # 1 spends approximately equal time in each of its three different output power levels. - It should also be clear to those skilled in the art, that this technique will provide an even greater benefit in long-range battery-assisted Class-3 tag systems. For example, a five-power-level Class-3 reader can operate at output power levels of, for example, 1 mW, 10 mW, 100 mW, 1 W, and 4 W. This in turn reduces the “hot-tag” backscatter jamming effect of tag-3 on tag-4 from a 60,000 m range to less than a 1000 m range in a system where Class-3 tag-3 is located 0.5 m from Reader #3 and a Class-3 tag-4 is located 100 meters from Reader #4.
- Further, by being able to select the reader power level, the optimal power level for talking to the tag can be chosen. Thus, problems such as overdriving and underdriving the tags can be avoided.
- An additional benefit is that the system can be programmed to communicate with any tag, regardless of protocol or manufacturer. Because power level selection can be performed on the reader in software, the tags do not have to be specifically designed to operate with the reader. Rather, the reader can find a power level best suited to communications with a particular tag by simply varying the power level until it finds a suitable communications level.
- It is also clear to those skilled in the art that the reader could also ramp its output power in a continuous analog manner instead of the series of discrete steps described herein. In this case, the reader preferably singulates tags as it encounters responses with adequate backscatter from them. The speed with which the reader ramps can be fixed. The speed can also be varied based on a number of responses being received. The speed that the power ramps up can also slow down as the power increases, as in a case where the ramping speed is slowed in proportion to the increase in effective communication area as the power increases.
- The reader can also perform a combination of continuous power ramping and stepping. For example, the reader can gradually and continuously ramp from a first to a second power level, then step to a third power level, then step to a fourth power level and gradually and continuously ramp to a fifth power level.
- Listen Before Talk Mode
- An extension of the present invention, useable in combination with the ramped interrogator power levels, or as a standalone feature, is what is referred to herein as “listen before talk.”
- Modern systems have much higher dynamic range than earlier generations. For instance, one RFID tag reader currently in development by the assignee hereof has a dynamic range of about 150 dB. Current readers have a dynamic range of only about 60 dB. Because the reception capability of the new generation of readers will be greatly improved, the chance for crosstalk interference is greater, even with a ramped power level scheme. The problem is exacerbated in high tag density or high reader density situations.
- Assume the following scenario. A warehouse has 20 dock doors, each one 10 feet wide and spaced 10 feet apart.
FIG. 7 illustrates two such doors D1, and D2 and associated RFID tag reader sets. Each reader set may includemultiple readers - In this example,
RFID tag readers readers readers 702 on door D2. This will interfere with any communications that thereaders 702 on door D2 are trying to have, and thereaders 702 on door D2 may even think that the tags are passing through door D2. Further, backscatter from thereaders 702 on door D2 interfere with thereaders 700 on door D1, perhaps making them unable to read the tags passing through door D1. - The proposed solution is to implement a listen before talk mode. In one embodiment, described in terms of the example of
FIG. 7 , thereaders readers 700 send out a burst in an attempt to detect any nearby tags. If tags respond, thereaders 700 read the tags. Anyother readers 702 in the vicinity will detect the carrier signal ofreaders 700 and wait to transmit so that the signals do not overlap temporally. - The readers can transmit their queries randomly. Because the queries are typically a fraction of a second, all readers in the vicinity should be able to query frequently enough to detect any tags passing thereby. In this way, multiple readers in the dock door scenario would be able to function semi-concurrently without having to be interconnected.
-
FIG. 8 illustrates ageneral method 800 performed by a reader in a listen then talk mode. Inoperation 802, the reader listens for a signal that could potentially or is known to interfere with the reader's communications. Such signals typically would include signals from other readers and associated tag backscatter, but could also include other types of interfering signals such as walkie-talkie signals, etc. If such a signal is present, the reader waits for a period of time inoperation 804 before listening again. The period of time can be preselected, such as 10 microseconds, 50 microseconds, etc. The period of time can also be randomly selected, such as based on a random number, but should be within some predetermined range, for example, less than about 1 second, 5 seconds, etc. If no signal is detected, then, inoperation 806, a query burst is transmitted to determine if any tags are present. If there is no response, the reader again waits for a period of time (operation 804) prior to listening again (operation 802). If one or more tags respond, the power level can be adjusted inoptional operation 808. Inoperation 810, the reader communicates with the tag(s). Then the process repeats. - In another embodiment, the readers can all be connected to a backend system such as a network coordinator that coordinates when the readers transmit query bursts and/or communicate with tags. Because the system coordinator knows when a reader is talking, the listen function need not be implemented. However, the system coordinator could merely indicate the period of time the readers should wait between queries. This system can ensure that all readers operate in an ordered or pseudo-random fashion, which may be desirable in a high reader density and/or high tag density situation where tags are rapidly moving past readers.
- Again, the listen before talk mode can also include ramping the power levels of the readers. For example, in an extension of the embodiment of the previous paragraph, the sending of queries by a plurality of RFID interrogators can be coordinated such that the queries do not temporally overlap each other. The power level of one of the interrogators communicating with an RF device can be adjusted such that the communications do not interfere with simultaneously performed queries. Alternatively or in combination therewith, the power level of any interrogators sending queries can be adjusted such that the queries do not interfere with the simultaneously performed communication between one of the interrogators and an RF device.
- While various embodiments have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of a preferred embodiment should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.
Claims (54)
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/186,494 US8872633B2 (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2005-07-20 | Ramped interrogation power levels |
PCT/US2006/026022 WO2007018840A2 (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2006-06-20 | Ramped interrogation power levels |
EP06786240.9A EP1904948B1 (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2006-06-20 | Ramped interrogation power levels |
CN 200680024679 CN101218591A (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2006-06-20 | Ramped interrogation power levels |
ES06786240.9T ES2449742T3 (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2006-06-20 | Ramp Interrogation Power Levels |
TW095124214A TW200711344A (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2006-07-03 | Ramped interrogation power levels |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/186,494 US8872633B2 (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2005-07-20 | Ramped interrogation power levels |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070018793A1 true US20070018793A1 (en) | 2007-01-25 |
US8872633B2 US8872633B2 (en) | 2014-10-28 |
Family
ID=37102082
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/186,494 Active 2028-06-20 US8872633B2 (en) | 2005-07-20 | 2005-07-20 | Ramped interrogation power levels |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8872633B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1904948B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN101218591A (en) |
ES (1) | ES2449742T3 (en) |
TW (1) | TW200711344A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2007018840A2 (en) |
Cited By (33)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060175420A1 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2006-08-10 | Nec Electronics Corporation | Passive type RFID semiconductor device, IC tag, and control method |
US20070024444A1 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2007-02-01 | Sony Corporation | Radio communication system and wireless communication device |
US20070057057A1 (en) * | 2005-09-09 | 2007-03-15 | Assa Abloy Identification Technology Group Ab | Synchronization techniques in multi-technology/multi-frequency rfid reader arrays |
US20070176747A1 (en) * | 2006-01-17 | 2007-08-02 | Integrant Technologies Inc. | Reader for rfid and rfid system |
US20070200672A1 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2007-08-30 | Denso International America, Inc. | Apparatus for automatically initiating sequence of vehicle functions |
US20070205869A1 (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2007-09-06 | Fujitsu Limited | Tag communication device and tag communication method |
US20080100439A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Radio frequency identification (RFID) tag location systems and methods |
US20080136637A1 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-12 | Mehta Rish T | Low latency listen before talk triggers |
US20080266060A1 (en) * | 2007-04-26 | 2008-10-30 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Transmitter and wireless system using the same |
US20090002176A1 (en) * | 2007-06-28 | 2009-01-01 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Backscatter Limited Tags |
US20090045913A1 (en) * | 2007-08-16 | 2009-02-19 | Farpointe Data, Inc., A California Corporation | System and method for interrogation radio-frequency identification |
US20090045921A1 (en) * | 2007-08-16 | 2009-02-19 | Farpointe Data, Inc., A California Corporation | System and method for multi-protocol radio-frequency identification |
US20090093293A1 (en) * | 2007-10-05 | 2009-04-09 | Aruze Corp. | Game Device and Game System |
KR100915542B1 (en) * | 2007-09-12 | 2009-09-07 | 동국대학교 산학협력단 | Method and system for analyzing radio frequency identification zone |
US20100045436A1 (en) * | 2008-08-21 | 2010-02-25 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Method for associating and rfid tag with a known region |
US20100108008A1 (en) * | 2008-11-06 | 2010-05-06 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Methods and systems for remotely starting engines of vehicles |
US20100148985A1 (en) * | 2008-12-17 | 2010-06-17 | Lang Lin | Association Based Locationing for RFID |
US20100156613A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2010-06-24 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus for communicating with rfid tag |
US20100201494A1 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2010-08-12 | Byung Hoon Ryou | System and method for allowing multiple rfid reader devices to read rfid tags without collision |
US20100274570A1 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2010-10-28 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle charging authorization |
US20110316675A1 (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2011-12-29 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus for communicating wtih rfid tag |
DE102011052302A1 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2013-01-31 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Method for communicating between reader and transponder, involves automatically changing transmit signal level, and sending transmit signal to transmission signal level that differs from another transmission signal level |
US8410906B1 (en) * | 2008-09-05 | 2013-04-02 | Intelleflex Corporation | Battery assisted RFID system RF power control and interference mitigation methods |
US20130154801A1 (en) * | 2011-12-19 | 2013-06-20 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reading radio frequency identification tags with lowest power consumption |
US8816822B2 (en) * | 2011-03-21 | 2014-08-26 | Ge Aviation Systems Llc | Method and system for wireless communications in a waveguide environment |
US20150220761A1 (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2015-08-06 | Hand Held Products, Inc. | Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to adjust transmit power level |
US20170269202A1 (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2017-09-21 | Deere & Company | Device for implement localization on an agricultural tractor |
US9785806B2 (en) | 2015-01-09 | 2017-10-10 | Imsar Llc | Low-frequency receiving for radio frequency identification |
US20170308784A1 (en) * | 2006-11-18 | 2017-10-26 | Rfmicron, Inc. | Received power level for tag processing prioritization |
US10062024B1 (en) * | 2012-02-03 | 2018-08-28 | Dynamics Inc. | Systems and methods for spike suppression for dynamic magnetic stripe communications devices |
US20190197266A1 (en) * | 2013-02-07 | 2019-06-27 | Newport Digital Technologies Australia Pty Ltd | RFID Tracking |
WO2020025882A1 (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2020-02-06 | Safran Aircraft Engines | System for inspecting components of a turbojet engine using radiofrequency identification |
US12073272B2 (en) | 2006-11-18 | 2024-08-27 | Rfmicron, Inc. | Generating a response by a radio frequency identification (RFID) tag within a field strength shell of interest |
Families Citing this family (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI384248B (en) * | 2008-09-26 | 2013-02-01 | Mstar Semiconductor Inc | Item positioning system and method thereof |
CA2744625C (en) * | 2011-06-28 | 2018-02-06 | Kapsch Trafficcom Ag | Rf-link margin measurement method and system |
CN103116734A (en) * | 2013-03-19 | 2013-05-22 | 天津工业大学 | Anti-collision method of RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) system based on power control |
DE102014200037A1 (en) * | 2014-01-07 | 2015-07-09 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Communication device for identifying and / or locating an RFID transponder |
FI126437B (en) * | 2014-07-07 | 2016-11-30 | Metso Flow Control Oy | Additive RFID reader |
CN105303482A (en) * | 2015-06-26 | 2016-02-03 | 苏州木兰电子科技有限公司 | Semi active RFID-based hotel staff positioning and management system |
JP7021627B2 (en) * | 2018-11-12 | 2022-02-17 | オムロン株式会社 | RFID communication system and control method of RFID communication system |
DE102020200953B4 (en) | 2020-01-27 | 2021-09-16 | Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der angewandten Forschung eingetragener Verein | Optimized data transmission for UHF transponders |
CN114730358A (en) * | 2020-02-20 | 2022-07-08 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | Receiving method, receiving equipment and storage medium based on backscattering communication |
CN115398929B (en) * | 2020-07-10 | 2024-06-18 | Oppo广东移动通信有限公司 | Control method and communication device of Internet of things equipment |
Citations (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5854593A (en) * | 1996-07-26 | 1998-12-29 | Prince Corporation | Fast scan trainable transmitter |
US5963144A (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1999-10-05 | Single Chip Systems Corp. | Cloaking circuit for use in a radiofrequency identification and method of cloaking RFID tags to increase interrogation reliability |
US6212360B1 (en) * | 1997-04-09 | 2001-04-03 | Ge Capital Spacenet Services, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for controlling earth-station transmitted power in a VSAT network |
US6320509B1 (en) * | 1998-03-16 | 2001-11-20 | Intermec Ip Corp. | Radio frequency identification transponder having a high gain antenna configuration |
US6441719B1 (en) * | 1998-02-13 | 2002-08-27 | Philip Y. W. Tsui | Remote signaling device for a rolling code security system |
US20020149484A1 (en) * | 2001-04-11 | 2002-10-17 | Carrender Curtis Lee | Frequency-hopping RFID system |
US6486769B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2002-11-26 | Intermec Ip Corp. | Method and system for automatic adjustment and diagnosis of radio frequency identification systems using programmable checktags |
US6531957B1 (en) * | 1996-11-29 | 2003-03-11 | X-Cyte, Inc. | Dual mode transmitter-receiver and decoder for RF transponder tags |
US6535109B1 (en) * | 1998-12-01 | 2003-03-18 | Texas Instruments Sensors And Controls, Inc. | System and method for communicating with multiple transponders |
US20030104848A1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-05 | Raj Brideglall | RFID device, system and method of operation including a hybrid backscatter-based RFID tag protocol compatible with RFID, bluetooth and/or IEEE 802.11x infrastructure |
US6628957B1 (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2003-09-30 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Synchronization of transmit power level settings for soft-handoff in wireless systems by the use of level constraints |
US6661336B1 (en) * | 1997-05-14 | 2003-12-09 | Btg International Limited | Enhanced identification system |
US20040036575A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-26 | Patterson Hubert A. | Pulsed power method for increased read range for a radio frequency identification reader |
US6765484B2 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2004-07-20 | Savi Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for supplying commands to a tag |
US20040160309A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | Communications control in a security system |
US20040160322A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | RFID reader for a security system |
US20040198233A1 (en) * | 2002-10-02 | 2004-10-07 | Pratt Richard M. | Radio frequency identification devices, backscatter communication device wake-up methods, communication device wake-up methods and a radio frequency identification device wake-up method |
US20040201457A1 (en) * | 1996-05-13 | 2004-10-14 | O'toole James E. | Radio frequency data communications device |
US6806812B1 (en) * | 2000-04-26 | 2004-10-19 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Automated antenna trim for transmitting and receiving semiconductor devices |
US20050088284A1 (en) * | 2003-10-09 | 2005-04-28 | Zai Li-Cheng R. | Method and system of using a RFID reader network to provide a large operating area |
US20060038658A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Tagent Corporation | Product identification tag device and reader |
US7019664B2 (en) * | 2000-06-12 | 2006-03-28 | Supersensor (Proprietary) Limited | Reading protocol for transponders of electronic identification system |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5500651A (en) | 1994-06-24 | 1996-03-19 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | System and method for reading multiple RF-ID transponders |
JPH11344562A (en) | 1998-03-17 | 1999-12-14 | Supersensor Pty Ltd | Maximum output variable challenge responder |
-
2005
- 2005-07-20 US US11/186,494 patent/US8872633B2/en active Active
-
2006
- 2006-06-20 CN CN 200680024679 patent/CN101218591A/en active Pending
- 2006-06-20 ES ES06786240.9T patent/ES2449742T3/en active Active
- 2006-06-20 EP EP06786240.9A patent/EP1904948B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2006-06-20 WO PCT/US2006/026022 patent/WO2007018840A2/en active Search and Examination
- 2006-07-03 TW TW095124214A patent/TW200711344A/en unknown
Patent Citations (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040201457A1 (en) * | 1996-05-13 | 2004-10-14 | O'toole James E. | Radio frequency data communications device |
US5854593A (en) * | 1996-07-26 | 1998-12-29 | Prince Corporation | Fast scan trainable transmitter |
US6531957B1 (en) * | 1996-11-29 | 2003-03-11 | X-Cyte, Inc. | Dual mode transmitter-receiver and decoder for RF transponder tags |
US6212360B1 (en) * | 1997-04-09 | 2001-04-03 | Ge Capital Spacenet Services, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for controlling earth-station transmitted power in a VSAT network |
US6661336B1 (en) * | 1997-05-14 | 2003-12-09 | Btg International Limited | Enhanced identification system |
US5963144A (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1999-10-05 | Single Chip Systems Corp. | Cloaking circuit for use in a radiofrequency identification and method of cloaking RFID tags to increase interrogation reliability |
US6441719B1 (en) * | 1998-02-13 | 2002-08-27 | Philip Y. W. Tsui | Remote signaling device for a rolling code security system |
US6320509B1 (en) * | 1998-03-16 | 2001-11-20 | Intermec Ip Corp. | Radio frequency identification transponder having a high gain antenna configuration |
US6535109B1 (en) * | 1998-12-01 | 2003-03-18 | Texas Instruments Sensors And Controls, Inc. | System and method for communicating with multiple transponders |
US6628957B1 (en) * | 1999-07-16 | 2003-09-30 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Synchronization of transmit power level settings for soft-handoff in wireless systems by the use of level constraints |
US6486769B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2002-11-26 | Intermec Ip Corp. | Method and system for automatic adjustment and diagnosis of radio frequency identification systems using programmable checktags |
US6806812B1 (en) * | 2000-04-26 | 2004-10-19 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Automated antenna trim for transmitting and receiving semiconductor devices |
US7019664B2 (en) * | 2000-06-12 | 2006-03-28 | Supersensor (Proprietary) Limited | Reading protocol for transponders of electronic identification system |
US6765484B2 (en) * | 2000-09-07 | 2004-07-20 | Savi Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for supplying commands to a tag |
US20020149484A1 (en) * | 2001-04-11 | 2002-10-17 | Carrender Curtis Lee | Frequency-hopping RFID system |
US20030104848A1 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2003-06-05 | Raj Brideglall | RFID device, system and method of operation including a hybrid backscatter-based RFID tag protocol compatible with RFID, bluetooth and/or IEEE 802.11x infrastructure |
US6707376B1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-03-16 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Pulsed power method for increased read range for a radio frequency identification reader |
US20040036575A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-26 | Patterson Hubert A. | Pulsed power method for increased read range for a radio frequency identification reader |
US20040198233A1 (en) * | 2002-10-02 | 2004-10-07 | Pratt Richard M. | Radio frequency identification devices, backscatter communication device wake-up methods, communication device wake-up methods and a radio frequency identification device wake-up method |
US20040160309A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | Communications control in a security system |
US20040160322A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | RFID reader for a security system |
US20050088284A1 (en) * | 2003-10-09 | 2005-04-28 | Zai Li-Cheng R. | Method and system of using a RFID reader network to provide a large operating area |
US20060038658A1 (en) * | 2004-08-17 | 2006-02-23 | Tagent Corporation | Product identification tag device and reader |
Cited By (58)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070024444A1 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2007-02-01 | Sony Corporation | Radio communication system and wireless communication device |
US7986234B2 (en) * | 2003-08-11 | 2011-07-26 | Sony Corporation | Wireless communication system and wireless communication apparatus |
US20060175420A1 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2006-08-10 | Nec Electronics Corporation | Passive type RFID semiconductor device, IC tag, and control method |
US7806332B2 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2010-10-05 | Nec Electronics Corporation | Passive type RFID semiconductor device, IC tag, and control method |
US20070057057A1 (en) * | 2005-09-09 | 2007-03-15 | Assa Abloy Identification Technology Group Ab | Synchronization techniques in multi-technology/multi-frequency rfid reader arrays |
US8967476B2 (en) * | 2005-09-09 | 2015-03-03 | Assa Abloy Ab | Synchronization techniques in multi-technology/multi-frequency RFID reader arrays |
US20070176747A1 (en) * | 2006-01-17 | 2007-08-02 | Integrant Technologies Inc. | Reader for rfid and rfid system |
US20070200672A1 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2007-08-30 | Denso International America, Inc. | Apparatus for automatically initiating sequence of vehicle functions |
US8077011B2 (en) * | 2006-02-24 | 2011-12-13 | Denso International America, Inc. | Apparatus for automatically initiating sequence of vehicle functions |
US20070205869A1 (en) * | 2006-03-06 | 2007-09-06 | Fujitsu Limited | Tag communication device and tag communication method |
US8519823B2 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2013-08-27 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Radio frequency identification (RFID) tag location systems and methods |
US20080100439A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Radio frequency identification (RFID) tag location systems and methods |
US11475266B2 (en) * | 2006-11-18 | 2022-10-18 | Rfmicron, Inc. | Received power level for RF receiver circuit processing prioritization |
US20170308784A1 (en) * | 2006-11-18 | 2017-10-26 | Rfmicron, Inc. | Received power level for tag processing prioritization |
US12073272B2 (en) | 2006-11-18 | 2024-08-27 | Rfmicron, Inc. | Generating a response by a radio frequency identification (RFID) tag within a field strength shell of interest |
US10860912B2 (en) * | 2006-11-18 | 2020-12-08 | Rfmicron, Inc. | Received power level for tag processing prioritization |
US20080136637A1 (en) * | 2006-12-06 | 2008-06-12 | Mehta Rish T | Low latency listen before talk triggers |
US8542091B2 (en) * | 2007-04-26 | 2013-09-24 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Control of transmitter peak power and duty ratio in a wireless system to maintain average transmitter power and increase communication range |
US20080266060A1 (en) * | 2007-04-26 | 2008-10-30 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Transmitter and wireless system using the same |
US8237546B2 (en) * | 2007-06-28 | 2012-08-07 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Backscatter limited tags |
CN101796528A (en) * | 2007-06-28 | 2010-08-04 | 符号技术有限公司 | Backscatter limited tags |
US20090002176A1 (en) * | 2007-06-28 | 2009-01-01 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Backscatter Limited Tags |
US20090045913A1 (en) * | 2007-08-16 | 2009-02-19 | Farpointe Data, Inc., A California Corporation | System and method for interrogation radio-frequency identification |
US20090045921A1 (en) * | 2007-08-16 | 2009-02-19 | Farpointe Data, Inc., A California Corporation | System and method for multi-protocol radio-frequency identification |
US8624710B2 (en) * | 2007-08-16 | 2014-01-07 | Farpointe Data, Inc. | System and method for interrogation radio-frequency identification |
US8411764B2 (en) * | 2007-08-16 | 2013-04-02 | Farpointe Data, Inc. | System and method for multi-protocol radio-frequency identification |
KR100915542B1 (en) * | 2007-09-12 | 2009-09-07 | 동국대학교 산학협력단 | Method and system for analyzing radio frequency identification zone |
US20100201494A1 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2010-08-12 | Byung Hoon Ryou | System and method for allowing multiple rfid reader devices to read rfid tags without collision |
US8350676B2 (en) * | 2007-09-18 | 2013-01-08 | Emw Co., Ltd. | System and method for allowing multiple RFID reader devices to read RFID tags without collision |
US20100156613A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2010-06-24 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus for communicating with rfid tag |
US20090093293A1 (en) * | 2007-10-05 | 2009-04-09 | Aruze Corp. | Game Device and Game System |
US8449370B2 (en) * | 2007-10-05 | 2013-05-28 | Universal Entertainment Corporation | Game device and game system capable of detecting gaming media |
US20100045436A1 (en) * | 2008-08-21 | 2010-02-25 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Method for associating and rfid tag with a known region |
US8421627B2 (en) * | 2008-08-21 | 2013-04-16 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Method for associating and RFID tag with a known region |
US8410906B1 (en) * | 2008-09-05 | 2013-04-02 | Intelleflex Corporation | Battery assisted RFID system RF power control and interference mitigation methods |
US8421598B1 (en) * | 2008-09-05 | 2013-04-16 | Intelleflex Corporation | Battery assisted RFID system RF power and interference control |
US8952788B1 (en) | 2008-09-05 | 2015-02-10 | Intelleflex Corporation | Battery assisted RFID system RF power control and interference mitigation methods |
US20100108008A1 (en) * | 2008-11-06 | 2010-05-06 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Methods and systems for remotely starting engines of vehicles |
US7760108B2 (en) * | 2008-11-06 | 2010-07-20 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Methods and systems for remotely starting engines of vehicles |
US8456306B2 (en) | 2008-12-17 | 2013-06-04 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Association based locationing for RFID |
US20100148985A1 (en) * | 2008-12-17 | 2010-06-17 | Lang Lin | Association Based Locationing for RFID |
US20110316675A1 (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2011-12-29 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Apparatus for communicating wtih rfid tag |
US20100274570A1 (en) * | 2009-04-24 | 2010-10-28 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Vehicle charging authorization |
US8816822B2 (en) * | 2011-03-21 | 2014-08-26 | Ge Aviation Systems Llc | Method and system for wireless communications in a waveguide environment |
DE102011052302A1 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2013-01-31 | Infineon Technologies Ag | Method for communicating between reader and transponder, involves automatically changing transmit signal level, and sending transmit signal to transmission signal level that differs from another transmission signal level |
US8994501B2 (en) * | 2011-12-19 | 2015-03-31 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reading radio frequency identification tags with lowest power consumption |
US20130154801A1 (en) * | 2011-12-19 | 2013-06-20 | Symbol Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for reading radio frequency identification tags with lowest power consumption |
US10062024B1 (en) * | 2012-02-03 | 2018-08-28 | Dynamics Inc. | Systems and methods for spike suppression for dynamic magnetic stripe communications devices |
US9471813B2 (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2016-10-18 | Hand Held Products, Inc. | Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to adjust transmit power level |
US20150220761A1 (en) * | 2012-04-20 | 2015-08-06 | Hand Held Products, Inc. | Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to adjust transmit power level |
US10127414B2 (en) | 2012-04-20 | 2018-11-13 | Hand Held Products, Inc. | Portable encoded information reading terminal configured to adjust transmit power level |
US20190197266A1 (en) * | 2013-02-07 | 2019-06-27 | Newport Digital Technologies Australia Pty Ltd | RFID Tracking |
US9785806B2 (en) | 2015-01-09 | 2017-10-10 | Imsar Llc | Low-frequency receiving for radio frequency identification |
US10605909B2 (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2020-03-31 | Deere & Company | Device for implement localization on an agricultural tractor |
US20170269202A1 (en) * | 2016-03-17 | 2017-09-21 | Deere & Company | Device for implement localization on an agricultural tractor |
FR3084763A1 (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2020-02-07 | Safran Aircraft Engines | RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION PART CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A TURBOREACTOR |
WO2020025882A1 (en) * | 2018-07-31 | 2020-02-06 | Safran Aircraft Engines | System for inspecting components of a turbojet engine using radiofrequency identification |
US11371383B2 (en) | 2018-07-31 | 2022-06-28 | Safran Aircraft Engines | System for inspecting components of a turbojet engine using radio-frequency identification |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TW200711344A (en) | 2007-03-16 |
WO2007018840A2 (en) | 2007-02-15 |
US8872633B2 (en) | 2014-10-28 |
CN101218591A (en) | 2008-07-09 |
ES2449742T3 (en) | 2014-03-21 |
EP1904948B1 (en) | 2014-01-22 |
WO2007018840A3 (en) | 2007-06-07 |
EP1904948A2 (en) | 2008-04-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8872633B2 (en) | Ramped interrogation power levels | |
US8570172B2 (en) | RFID system with distributed transmitters | |
US7321290B2 (en) | Radio tag and system | |
EP2220595B1 (en) | Dual use rfid/eas device | |
US5850181A (en) | Method of transporting radio frequency power to energize radio frequency identification transponders | |
AU2010290085B2 (en) | RFID portal system with RFID tags having various read ranges | |
US7609163B2 (en) | Radio frequency ID Doppler motion detector | |
EP1010151B1 (en) | Radio frequency data communications device | |
US8026819B2 (en) | Radio tag and system | |
US7791453B2 (en) | System and method for varying response amplitude of radio transponders | |
US20110163857A1 (en) | Energy Harvesting for Low Frequency Inductive Tagging | |
US20110163882A1 (en) | Passive Low Frequency Inductive Tagging | |
US20090267737A1 (en) | Rfid system with distributed readers |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTELLEFLEX CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:STEWART, ROGER GREEN;BEMISS, WILLIAM R.;REEL/FRAME:017940/0324 Effective date: 20050720 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING IV, INC. AS AGENT, CALIF Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTELLEFLEX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020955/0628 Effective date: 20080422 Owner name: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING IV, INC. AS AGENT,CALIFO Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:INTELLEFLEX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020955/0628 Effective date: 20080422 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING V, INC., AS AGENT, CALIF Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:INTELLEFLEX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020960/0279 Effective date: 20080422 Owner name: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING V, INC., AS AGENT,CALIFO Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:INTELLEFLEX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:020960/0279 Effective date: 20080422 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ZEST LABS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:INTELLEFLEX CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:041678/0799 Effective date: 20161027 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551) Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |