US20060294100A1 - Ranking search results using language types - Google Patents

Ranking search results using language types Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060294100A1
US20060294100A1 US11412723 US41272306A US2006294100A1 US 20060294100 A1 US20060294100 A1 US 20060294100A1 US 11412723 US11412723 US 11412723 US 41272306 A US41272306 A US 41272306A US 2006294100 A1 US2006294100 A1 US 2006294100A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
document
language
query
search
ranking
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US11412723
Other versions
US7792833B2 (en )
Inventor
Dmitriy Meyerzon
Hugo Zaragoza
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30861Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
    • G06F17/30864Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems
    • G06F17/30867Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems with filtering and personalisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/3061Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F17/30699Filtering based on additional data, e.g. user or group profiles

Abstract

Search results of a search query on a network are ranked according to an additional ranking function for the prior probability of relevance of a document based on document property. The ranking function can be adjusted based on a comparison of the language that a document is written in and the language that is associated with a search query. Both query-independent values and query-dependent values can be used to rank the document.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCING TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    The present disclosure is a continuation-in-part of and claims the benefit under 15 USC §120 of the filing of patent application having Ser. No. 11/073,381, entitled, “System and Method for Ranking Search Results Using File Types,” filed Mar. 3, 2005. The present disclosure is related to patent applications having Ser. No. 10/955,462, entitled, “System and Method for Incorporating Anchor Text into Ranking Search Results”, filed Sep. 30, 2004; Ser. No. 10/955,983, entitled, “System and Method for Ranking Search Results Using Click Distance”, filed Sep. 30, 2004; Ser. No. 10/804,326, entitled “Field Weighting in Text Document Searching”, filed on Mar. 18, 2004. The related applications are assigned to the assignee of the present patent application and are hereby incorporated by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    In a text document search, a user typically enters a query into a search engine. The search engine evaluates the query against a database of indexed documents and returns a ranked list of documents that best satisfy the query. A score, representing a measure of how well the document satisfies the query, is algorithmically generated by the search engine. Commonly-used scoring algorithms rely on splitting the query up into search terms and using statistical information about the occurrence of individual terms in the body of text documents to be searched. The documents are listed in rank order according to their corresponding scores so the user can see the best matching search results at the top of the search results list.
  • [0003]
    Another evaluation that certain search engines may employ to improve the quality of the results is to modify the rank of the results by a selected ranking function. One exemplary prior art ranking function determines that when one page links to another page, it is effectively casting a vote for the other page. The more votes that are cast for a page, the more important the page. The ranking function can also take into account who cast the vote. The more important the page, the more important their vote. These votes are accumulated and used as a component of the ratings of the pages on the network.
  • [0004]
    A ranking function is used to improve the quality of the ranking. Ranking functions can rely on combination of content in the document (such as terms contained in the body or metadata of the document), or data contained in other documents about this document (such as anchor text), measures of importance obtained by analyzing the URL graph and other query independent measures of relevance.
  • [0005]
    Typically, when evaluating the performance of a ranking function a set of users are asked to make relevance judgments on the top N (e.g., 10) documents returned by the search engine with a given ranking function for a given set of evaluation queries. The document corpus and the set of queries are kept fixed, so that performance of different ranking functions may be compared side-by-side eliminating all other variables from the equation. This is typically done in a prototyping (research) environment. A set of relevance judgments may also be obtained from a live system by asking users to volunteer relevance judgments for the search results on an arbitrary set of queries. Relying on relevance judgments to measure the performance allows a ranking function to be optimized by iteratively varying ranking parameters and measuring performance.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0006]
    Embodiments of the present invention are related to a system and method for ranking search results according to language. The ranking function comprises a feature to penalize documents that do not match the language of the query, independently of other ranking features.
  • [0007]
    The language of the document is identified by performing statistical analysis of the character distribution and comparing it to trained language character distribution. The language of the document is detected (instead of relying on the metadata of the document such as language tags in html) because language detection is a relatively straightforward procedure with high precision, and the metadata is often ambiguous or wrong, or missing. Language detection is typically performed during the indexing process.
  • [0008]
    At query time the language of the query is obtained, for example, from the browser request headers or a client application. The query language is compared with the candidate document language. The language is considered matching if the document and query language match at least by primary language (for example, a German-Swiss query will typically be considered to match a German-German document), or if the document's primary language is English. Thus, documents written in a language that the user can't read are penalized, with the exception of English documents because of the assumption that most people that use the Internet can read English or understand different flavors of English.
  • [0009]
    The ranking function is modified with a language type feature that is used to adjust the ranking of documents based on the language types of files and the query language, thus improving the overall precision of the search engine. The weight of relevancy associated with each language type comparison is derived from the set of relevance judgments obtained from previous queries and feedback. In addition, by optimizing the weight, the weight may be treated as a ranking function parameter, and the behavior of the performance measure on different values of the weight may be observed.
  • [0010]
    Once the language type comparison is performed for a page, the file type is incorporated into the score for the page. The page's score incorporating the language type comparison determines the page's rank among the other pages within the search results.
  • [0011]
    Additionally, other document properties may affect the relevance of a document independent of the query. These document properties include the file type and the size of the file. Values may be associated with these document properties and incorporated into a scoring function to affect the rank of a document.
  • [0012]
    In one aspect, the network is first “crawled” to generate a table of properties associated with the links and pages of the network. “Crawling” refers to automatically collecting several documents (or any analogous discrete unit of information) into a database referred to as an index. Crawling traverses multiple documents on the network by following document reference links within certain documents, and then processing each document as found. The documents are processed by identifying key words or general text in the documents to create an index.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0013]
    FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary computing device that may be used in one exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • [0014]
    FIG. 2 illustrates a system for ranking search results according to file types in accordance with the present invention.
  • [0015]
    FIG. 3 illustrates a functional block diagram of an exemplary system for gathering properties of documents during searching in accordance with the present invention.
  • [0016]
    FIG. 4 illustrates a logical flow diagram of an exemplary process for using the file type in ranking search results in accordance with the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0017]
    The present disclosure comprises embodiments that are described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof, and which show, by way of illustration, specific exemplary embodiments. Among other things, the various embodiments described herein may be embodied as methods, devices, or a combination thereof. Likewise, the various embodiments may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
  • [0000]
    Illustrative Operating Environment
  • [0018]
    With reference to FIG. 1, one exemplary system for implementing the invention includes a computing device, such as computing device 100. Computing device 100 may be configured as a client, a server, mobile device, or any other computing device. In a very basic configuration, computing device 100 typically includes at least one processing unit 102 and system memory 104. Depending on the exact configuration and type of computing device, system memory 104 may be volatile (such as RAM), non-volatile (such as ROM, flash memory, etc.) or some combination of the two. System memory 104 typically includes an operating system 105, one or more applications 106, and may include program data 107. In one embodiment, application 106 includes a search ranking application. This basic configuration is illustrated in FIG. 1 by those components within dashed line 108.
  • [0019]
    Computing device 100 may have additional features or functionality. For example, computing device 100 may also include additional data storage devices (removable and/or non-removable) such as, for example, magnetic disks, optical disks, or tape. Such additional storage is illustrated in FIG. 1 by removable storage 109 and non-removable storage 110. Computer storage media may include volatile and nonvolatile, removable and non-removable media implemented in any method or technology for storage of information, such as computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data. System memory 104, removable storage 109 and non-removable storage 110 are all examples of computer storage media. Computer storage media includes, but is not limited to, RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memory or other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disks (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which can be used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by computing device 100. Any such computer storage media may be part of device 100. Computing device 100 may also have input device(s) 112 such as keyboard, mouse, pen, voice input device, touch input device, etc. Output device(s) 114 such as a display, speakers, printer, etc. may also be included.
  • [0020]
    Computing device 100 also contains communication connections 116 that allow the device to communicate with other computing devices 118, such as over a network. Communication connection 116 is one example of communication media. Communication media may typically be embodied by computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signal, such as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes any information delivery media. The term “modulated data signal” means a signal that has one or more of its characteristics set or changed in such a manner as to encode information in the signal. By way of example, and not limitation, communication media includes wired media such as a wired network or direct-wired connection, and wireless media such as acoustic, RF, infrared and other wireless media. The term computer readable media as used herein includes both storage media and communication media.
  • Illustrative Embodiments for Ranking Using Language Type Comparisons
  • [0021]
    Embodiments are related to a ranking function for a search engine. The quality of a search engine is typically determined by the relevance of the documents according to the ranks assigned by the ranking function. The ranking function may be based on multiple features. Some of these features may depend on the query, while others are considered query-independent. Language type comparisons are a query-dependent measure of relevance referred to as language comparison type prior. The language type of the file and the query language are compared to generate a language-based prior to rank the search results. A language prior refers to a prior probability of belief that a document should be relevant given its language One method for establishing type-base priors is through the use of relevance judgments to weigh the language types according to their relevance.
  • [0022]
    FIG. 2 illustrates a system for ranking search results according to file types in accordance with the present invention. The search engine 200 receives a query containing multiple query terms. Each query term may include multiple component terms, such as when the query term is a phrase (e.g., the phrase “document management system” may be considered a single query term). In addition, a query may include one or more operators, such as Boolean operators, constraints, etc., which are commonly supported by known search engines.
  • [0023]
    A plurality of documents on a distributed network, represented by documents 210, 212, 214, and 216, are available for searching. In practice, a search engine may search any number of documents and typically search collections containing large numbers (e.g., millions) of documents. The volume of documents may be reduced from the Internet setting to the intranet setting, but the reduction is usually from billions to millions so that the relative number of documents is still quite large. An indexing module (not shown) generates individual document attributes (e.g., file type) and associated statistics (e.g., term frequencies) (218, 220, 222, and 224) for each document. The document attributes and statistics are stored in an index 226.
  • [0024]
    Search engine 200 consults index 226 to determine a search score 228 for each document based on the query and the corresponding document attributes and statistics. One of the document attributes included is the language type of the document. The file type is a query-independent attribute that is combined with other query-independent attributes and statistics and query-dependent attributes and statistics to form a document's final score. Typically, document scores 228 are then ranked in descending order to give the user a list of documents that are considered by the search algorithm to be most relevant to the query.
  • [0025]
    In the illustrated system, the search engine 200 represents a language type rated search engine, which considers the language type of a document in determining the document's search score. Language type rating of a document leverages the relevance judgments associated with each of the language types and the query language. A language-based prior is a query-dependent relevance measure because it rates the document's importance based on a comparison of the document language with the query language. (Another example of a query-dependent ranking function would be counting the number of times a search term appears in a document.)
  • [0026]
    FIG. 3 illustrates a functional block diagram of an exemplary system for gathering properties of documents during searching in accordance with the present invention. System 300 includes index 310, pipeline 320, document interface 330, client interface 340, gathering plugin 350, indexing plugin 360, and property store 270.
  • [0027]
    Index 310 includes records that correspond to index keys and other document properties. The records of index 310 are used in providing results to client queries. In one embodiment, index 310 corresponds to multiple databases that collectively provide the storage for the index records.
  • [0028]
    Pipeline 320 is an illustrative representation of the gathering mechanism for obtaining the documents or records of the documents for indexing. Pipeline 320 allows for filtering of data by various plugins (e.g., gathering plugin 350) before the records corresponding to the data are entered into index 310.
  • [0029]
    Document interface 330 provides the protocols, network access points, and database access points for retrieving documents across multiple databases and network locations. For example, document interface 330 may provide access to the Internet while also providing access to a database of a local server and access to a database on the current computing device. Other embodiments may access other document locations using a variety of protocols without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention.
  • [0030]
    Client Interface 340 provides access by a client to define and initiate a search. The search may be defined according to keywords and/or other keys.
  • [0031]
    Gathering plugin 350 is one of several gatherer pipeline plugins. Gathering plugin 350 identifies properties that are included in a document, such as the text from the title or body, and the file type associated with the document. The properties are gathered by gathering plugin 350 as the documents provided through document interface 330 are crawled. In one embodiment, the functionality of gathering plugin 350 identifies all the fields of a document and their associated properties including the language type of the document.
  • [0032]
    Indexing plugin 360 is another plugin connected to pipeline 320. Indexing plugin 360 provides the mechanism for generating, partitioning, and updating index 310. In one embodiment, indexing plugin 360 provides the word lists that temporarily cache the keywords and other keys generated from crawled documents before flushing these results to index 310. The records of index 310 are populated from the crawl results included in these word lists.
  • [0033]
    Property store 370 includes the anchor properties that have been gathered by gathering plugin 350. For a particular document, property store 370 includes a record of the file type that is associated with the document. For example, a record in property store 370 may include a document ID that identifies the document and the file type in separate fields. In other embodiments, other fields may be included in property store 370 that are related to a particular document.
  • [0034]
    Despite the illustration in system 300 of one-way and two-way communications between functional blocks, any of these communication types may be changed to another type without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention (e.g., all communications may have an acknowledgment message requiring two-way rather than one-way communication).
  • [0035]
    FIG. 4 illustrates a logical flow diagram of an exemplary process for using language type comparison in ranking search results in accordance with the present invention. Process 400 starts at block 402 where a query has been requested and the query-independent values corresponding to the file types have been calculated. In one embodiment, the language type for each document is recorded within a pseudo-key and stored within an index.
  • [0036]
    The language information about each document is typically stored as an inverted index called query independent rank storage (“QIR”). QIR storage is used for storing associated values that can be used at query time for searching each document. A value is normally stored only once. The QIR storage can be logically viewed as an array of values indexed by document identifiers. In some embodiments, the QIR storage can be a compressed array, because many documents can have the same values stored in the QIR storage, and the default values need not be stored.
  • [0037]
    For example, the entire score for the values for Click Distance, URL depth, File Types, static features, and the like, can be pre-computed at index time and a single value is stored in the QIR storage associated with each document. Language priors need not stored in this way, because language matching is not strictly query independent. Instead, the original detected language of the document can be stored in a separate QIR storage. In addition, a default language (such as English, or unknown) is not normally stored, so a majority of the documents need not be represented in the language storage. In another embodiment, a value can be repeated in the index for every occurrence of a document (which can create redundancy in storage).
  • [0038]
    At the end of a crawl, the static ranking features are typically computed and stored in the QIR storage. The detected language is also retrieved from the pseudo keys and stored in its own storage (language storage) to allow quick access to the detected language of the document by document ID at query time.
  • [0039]
    For example, when the language on an HTML page is determined to be Dutch, the language of the HTML page that is stored in the index can be Dutch or, for example, German, because it can be assumed that German readers can read Dutch. Thus, in an embodiment, classes of languages can be utilized such that a document is not penalized when the document has a language that is in the class as the query language. The query language can be determined via character integration that the query sends such as which languages the browser has been configured to use. With the query received and the language type values calculated, processing continues at block 404.
  • [0040]
    At block 404, the language type value for each of the documents is merged with the other document statistics (see FIG. 2) in the index. Merging the file type values with the other document statistics computes the correct scores for each of the documents. Once the merge is complete, processing moves to block 406.
  • [0041]
    At block 406, a scoring function is populated with the set of document statistics, including the component corresponding to the prior probability of relevance based on the file type. The scoring function calculates a score for a particular document. The language type component provides a query-independent factor to the scoring function. The other portion of the scoring function corresponds to other query-independent factors and the query-dependent or content-related portion of the scoring function. In one embodiment, the scoring function is a sum of query-dependent (QD) and query-independent (QID) scoring functions:
    Score=QD(doc, query)+QID(doc)   (1)
  • [0042]
    The QD function can be any document scoring function. In one embodiment, the QD scoring function corresponds to the field weighted scoring function described in patent application Ser. No. 10/804,326, entitled “Field Weighting in Text Document Searching”, filed on Mar. 18, 2004 and hereby incorporated by reference. As provided by the Ser. No. 10/804,326 patent application, the following is a representation of the field weighted scoring function: QD ( doc , query ) = wtf ( k 1 + 1 ) k 1 ( ( 1 - b ) + b wdl avwdl ) + wtf × log ( N n ) ( 2 )
  • [0043]
    Wherein the terms are defined as follows: wtf is the weighted term frequency or sum of term frequencies of a given term multiplied by weights across all properties; wdl is the weighted document length; avwdl is the average weighted document length; N is the number of documents on the network (i.e., the number of documents crawled); n is the number of documents containing the given query term; and k1 and b are constants. These terms and the equation above are described in detail in the Ser. No. 10/804,326 patent application.
  • [0044]
    The QID function can be any transformation of document properties or statistics such as the file type component, click-distance, and other document statistics (such as URL depth). In one embodiment this function for click distance and URL depth is as follows: QID ( doc ) = w cd 1 k cd + b cd CD + b ud UD b cd + b ud ( 3 )
  • [0045]
    Wherein the terms for the function are defined as follows: Wcd is the weight of the query-independent component; bcd is the weight of the click distance; bud is the weight of the URL depth; CD is the Click Distance; UD is the URL Depth; and kcd is the click distance saturation constant. The weighted terms (wcd, bcd, and bud) assist in defining the importance of each of their related terms and ultimately the shape of the scoring functions. The URL depth (UD) is an addition to the query-independent component to smooth the effect of the click distance on the scoring function. In some cases, a document that is not very important (i.e., has a large URL depth) may have a short click distance. The two functions of (2) and (3) and the file type component (W(t)) can be added together to yield a scoring function (Score), such that the new scoring function becomes: Score = wtf ( k 1 + 1 ) k 1 ( ( 1 - b ) + b wdl avwdl ) + wtf × log ( N n ) + w cd 1 k cd + b cd CD + b ud UD b cd + b ud + W ( t ) ( 4 )
  • [0046]
    The score can be adjusted (i.e., documents can be penalized) for having a language that is different than the query language. The language prior weight provides an estimate of the log-odds ratio of probability of relevance given language match over probability of non-relevance given language match: W ( l d , I q ) = log P ( r l d , l q ) P ( r _ l d , l q )
    where r is relevance of the document to any query, ld is the document language, and lq is the query language and W(ld, lq) is the weight of the prior probability of relevance based on a language match. In an embodiment, a language can be determined as a Boolean language match (where “1” indicates a match, and “0” indicates no match). The weight can be then be multiplied by the determined Boolean value. The weight itself can be a single global weight, or it can be a matrix for all possible pairs of languages.
  • [0047]
    The language prior weight can be added to (4) to provide: wtf ( k 1 + 1 ) k 1 ( ( 1 - b ) + b wdl avwdl ) + wtf × log ( N n ) + w cd 1 k cd + b cd CD + b ud UD b cd + b ud + W ( t ) + W ( l d , l q ) ( 5 )
    In an embodiment, the weight of the language prior can be considered as part of the static rank of the document, similar to file type priors, but in fact depends on the query, because the feature itself is a function of both query and document language. This creates an implementation detail, where instead of pre-computing the actual static score and storing it in the index as a value for each document, the original detected language of the document is stored, and the feature determined at query time in response to a comparison of the query language and the document language match. Once scoring function (5) is populated with the document statistics for a particular document, processing proceeds to block 408.
  • [0048]
    At block 408, the scoring function is executed and the relevance score for the document is calculated. Once the relevance score is calculated, it is stored in memory and associated with that particular document. Processing then moves to decision block 410.
  • [0049]
    At decision block 410, a determination is made whether relevance scores for all the documents corresponding to the search query have been calculated according to scoring function (5). The scores may be calculated serially as shown or in parallel. If all the scores have not been calculated, processing returns to block 406 where the scoring function is populated with the next set of document statistics. However, if all the scores have been calculated, processing continues to block 412.
  • [0050]
    At block 412, the search results of the query are ranked according to their associated scores. The scores now take into account the language type of each of the documents. Accordingly, the ranking of the documents has been refined so that documents of a particular language type that is in the same language class as the query language (for example) are ranked higher than other documents having language types that are different from the query language. Once the search results are ranked, processing proceeds to block 414, where process 400 ends.
  • [0051]
    After process 400 is complete, the ranked documents may be returned to the user by the various operations associated with the transmission and display of results by a search engine. The documents corresponding to the higher precision results may then be selected and viewed at the user's discretion.
  • [0052]
    The above specification, examples and data provide a complete description of the manufacture and use of the composition of the invention. Since many embodiments of the invention can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, the invention resides in the claims hereinafter appended.

Claims (20)

  1. 1. A computer-implemented method for ranking search results, comprising:
    determining a first property associated with each document in a collection of documents; wherein the first property is a language type associated with the document;
    determining a query language of a search query;
    estimating a ranking value corresponding to properties for each document, wherein the ranking value corresponds to a measure of the relevance of each document based on the search query; and
    ranking each document that is responsive to the search query to obtain the search results, wherein each document is ranked based on the estimated ranking value and a comparison of the query language with the first property value.
  2. 2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the comparison lowers the ranking of the document when the query language is different from the document language.
  3. 3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the comparison lowers the ranking of the document when the query language class is different from the document language class.
  4. 4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the comparison lowers the ranking of the document when the query language is different from the document language except when the document language is English.
  5. 5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the comparison lowers the ranking of the document when the query language is different from the document language except, when the document language is English, the comparison lowers the ranking of the document to a lesser extent than if the document language is a different language other than English.
  6. 6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the document language is performed during an indexing process of the documents for searching.
  7. 7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the query language is determined from a language setting that is derived from a browser used to initiate the search query.
  8. 8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein ranking each document based on the query-independent value further comprises using a component corresponding to the first property in a scoring function for determining a relevance score for each of the documents.
  9. 9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, wherein the first property for a document is stored within a pseudo-key that associates the first property with the document in the index.
  10. 10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1, further comprising ranking the documents according to a scoring function (score) that is determined according to at least: the weight of the prior probability of relevance based on a language match.
  11. 11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10, wherein the scoring function (score) is further determined according to: a computed click distance (CD), a weight of a query-independent component (wcd), a weight of the click distance (bcd), a weight of a URL depth (bud), the URL depth (UD), a click distance saturation constant (Kcd), the weight of the prior probability of relevance based on a language match (W(ld, lq)), and file type priors.
  12. 12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11, wherein the scoring function (score) is further determined according to: a weighted term frequency (wtf), a weighted document length (wdl), an average weighted document length (avwdl), a number of documents on the network (N); a number of documents containing a query term (n), and other constants (k1, b).
  13. 13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12, wherein the scoring function (score) is given by:
    wtf ( k 1 + 1 ) k 1 ( ( 1 - b ) + b wdl avwdl ) + wtf × log ( N n ) + w cd 1 k cd + b cd CD + b ud UD b cd + b ud + W ( t ) + W ( l d , l q )
  14. 14. A system for ranking search results, comprising:
    a search engine included on a computing device, the search engine configured to execute computer-executable instructions, the computer-executable instructions comprising:
    determining a first property associated with each document in a collection of documents; wherein the first property is a language type associated with the document, wherein the language type is stored in a separate QIR (Query Independent Rank) storage;
    determining a query language of a search query;
    estimating a ranking value corresponding to properties for each document, wherein the ranking value corresponds to a measure of the relevance of each document based on the search query; and
    ranking each document that is responsive to the search query to obtain the search results, wherein each document is ranked based on the estimated ranking value and a comparison of the query language with the first property value.
  15. 15. The system of claim 14, wherein the computer-executable instructions further comprise ranking the documents according to a scoring function (score) that is determined according to at least: the first property (W(ld, lq)).
  16. 16. The system of claim 15, wherein the scoring function (score) is further determined according to: a computed click distance (CD), a weight of a query-independent component (wcd), a weight of the click distance (bcd), a weight of a URL depth (bud), the URL depth (UD), a click distance saturation constant (Kcd), a weighted term frequency (wtf), a weighted document length (wdl), an average weighted document length (avwdl), a number of documents on the network (N); a number of documents containing a query term (n), and other constants (kl, b), the weight of the prior probability of relevance based on a language match (W(ld, lq)), and the scoring function (score) is given by:
    wtf ( k 1 + 1 ) k 1 ( ( 1 - b ) + b wdl avwdl ) + wtf × log ( N n ) + w cd 1 k cd + b cd CD + b ud UD b cd + b ud + W ( t ) + W ( l d , l q )
  17. 17. A computer-readable medium that includes computer-executable instructions for ranking search results, the computer-executable instructions comprising:
    determining a first property associated with each document in a collection of documents; wherein the first property is a language type associated with the document;
    determining a query language of a search query;
    estimating a ranking value corresponding to properties for each document, wherein the ranking value corresponds to a measure of the relevance of each document based on the search query; and
    ranking each document that is responsive to the search query to obtain the search results, wherein each document is ranked based on the estimated ranking value and a comparison of the query language with the first property value.
  18. 18. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the comparison lowers the ranking of the document when the query language is different from the document language.
  19. 19. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, wherein the comparison lowers the ranking of the document when the query language class is different from the document language class when the document language is English.
  20. 20. The computer-readable medium of claim 17, further comprising adjusting the query-independent value for each document, as additional search queries are performed and a relevance measure of the search results based on the file types is made.
US11412723 2005-03-03 2006-04-26 Ranking search results using language types Active 2025-09-07 US7792833B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11073381 US20060200460A1 (en) 2005-03-03 2005-03-03 System and method for ranking search results using file types
US11412723 US7792833B2 (en) 2005-03-03 2006-04-26 Ranking search results using language types

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11412723 US7792833B2 (en) 2005-03-03 2006-04-26 Ranking search results using language types

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060294100A1 true true US20060294100A1 (en) 2006-12-28
US7792833B2 US7792833B2 (en) 2010-09-07

Family

ID=46324355

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11412723 Active 2025-09-07 US7792833B2 (en) 2005-03-03 2006-04-26 Ranking search results using language types

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US7792833B2 (en)

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070288450A1 (en) * 2006-04-19 2007-12-13 Datta Ruchira S Query language determination using query terms and interface language
US20080208922A1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2008-08-28 Claudine Melissa Wolas-Shiva Image metadata action tagging
US20090187550A1 (en) * 2008-01-17 2009-07-23 Microsoft Corporation Specifying relevance ranking preferences utilizing search scopes
US20100162093A1 (en) * 2008-12-18 2010-06-24 Google Inc. Identifying comments to show in connection with a document
US20100169323A1 (en) * 2008-12-29 2010-07-01 Microsoft Corporation Query-Dependent Ranking Using K-Nearest Neighbor
US7840569B2 (en) * 2007-10-18 2010-11-23 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise relevancy ranking using a neural network
EP2289007A1 (en) * 2008-04-11 2011-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Search results ranking using editing distance and document information
US20120109970A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-05-03 Apple Inc. Methods for indexing and searching based on language locale
US8359309B1 (en) 2007-05-23 2013-01-22 Google Inc. Modifying search result ranking based on corpus search statistics
US8738635B2 (en) 2010-06-01 2014-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Detection of junk in search result ranking
US8806455B1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2014-08-12 Verint Systems Ltd. Systems and methods for text nuclearization
US8843486B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2014-09-23 Microsoft Corporation System and method for scoping searches using index keys
US9098582B1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2015-08-04 Google Inc. Identifying relevant document languages through link context
WO2015153511A1 (en) * 2014-03-29 2015-10-08 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Improved method, system and software for searching, identifying, retrieving and presenting electronic documents
US9208231B1 (en) * 2010-12-01 2015-12-08 Google Inc. Identifying languages relevant to resources
US9348912B2 (en) 2007-10-18 2016-05-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Document length as a static relevance feature for ranking search results
US9495462B2 (en) 2012-01-27 2016-11-15 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Re-ranking search results
US9727605B1 (en) 2006-04-19 2017-08-08 Google Inc. Query language identification

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8661029B1 (en) 2006-11-02 2014-02-25 Google Inc. Modifying search result ranking based on implicit user feedback
US8498974B1 (en) * 2009-08-31 2013-07-30 Google Inc. Refining search results
US8972391B1 (en) 2009-10-02 2015-03-03 Google Inc. Recent interest based relevance scoring
US9623119B1 (en) 2010-06-29 2017-04-18 Google Inc. Accentuating search results
US9348846B2 (en) 2012-07-02 2016-05-24 Google Inc. User-navigable resource representations

Citations (94)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5222236A (en) * 1988-04-29 1993-06-22 Overdrive Systems, Inc. Multiple integrated document assembly data processing system
US5594660A (en) * 1994-09-30 1997-01-14 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Programmable audio-video synchronization method and apparatus for multimedia systems
US5606609A (en) * 1994-09-19 1997-02-25 Scientific-Atlanta Electronic document verification system and method
US5893092A (en) * 1994-12-06 1999-04-06 University Of Central Florida Relevancy ranking using statistical ranking, semantics, relevancy feedback and small pieces of text
US6012053A (en) * 1997-06-23 2000-01-04 Lycos, Inc. Computer system with user-controlled relevance ranking of search results
US6032196A (en) * 1995-12-13 2000-02-29 Digital Equipment Corporation System for adding a new entry to a web page table upon receiving a web page including a link to another web page not having a corresponding entry in the web page table
US6041323A (en) * 1996-04-17 2000-03-21 International Business Machines Corporation Information search method, information search device, and storage medium for storing an information search program
US6070191A (en) * 1997-10-17 2000-05-30 Lucent Technologies Inc. Data distribution techniques for load-balanced fault-tolerant web access
US6070158A (en) * 1996-08-14 2000-05-30 Infoseek Corporation Real-time document collection search engine with phrase indexing
US6182085B1 (en) * 1998-05-28 2001-01-30 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative team crawling:Large scale information gathering over the internet
US6185558B1 (en) * 1998-03-03 2001-02-06 Amazon.Com, Inc. Identifying the items most relevant to a current query based on items selected in connection with similar queries
US6202058B1 (en) * 1994-04-25 2001-03-13 Apple Computer, Inc. System for ranking the relevance of information objects accessed by computer users
US6208988B1 (en) * 1998-06-01 2001-03-27 Bigchalk.Com, Inc. Method for identifying themes associated with a search query using metadata and for organizing documents responsive to the search query in accordance with the themes
US6216123B1 (en) * 1998-06-24 2001-04-10 Novell, Inc. Method and system for rapid retrieval in a full text indexing system
US6240408B1 (en) * 1998-06-08 2001-05-29 Kcsl, Inc. Method and system for retrieving relevant documents from a database
US6240407B1 (en) * 1998-04-29 2001-05-29 International Business Machines Corp. Method and apparatus for creating an index in a database system
US6263364B1 (en) * 1999-11-02 2001-07-17 Alta Vista Company Web crawler system using plurality of parallel priority level queues having distinct associated download priority levels for prioritizing document downloading and maintaining document freshness
US6351467B1 (en) * 1997-10-27 2002-02-26 Hughes Electronics Corporation System and method for multicasting multimedia content
US6351755B1 (en) * 1999-11-02 2002-02-26 Alta Vista Company System and method for associating an extensible set of data with documents downloaded by a web crawler
US6360215B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2002-03-19 Inktomi Corporation Method and apparatus for retrieving documents based on information other than document content
US6385602B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2002-05-07 E-Centives, Inc. Presentation of search results using dynamic categorization
US20020055940A1 (en) * 2000-11-07 2002-05-09 Charles Elkan Method and system for selecting documents by measuring document quality
US6389436B1 (en) * 1997-12-15 2002-05-14 International Business Machines Corporation Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks
US20020062323A1 (en) * 2000-11-20 2002-05-23 Yozan Inc Browser apparatus, server apparatus, computer-readable medium, search system and search method
US20020078045A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2002-06-20 Rabindranath Dutta System, method, and program for ranking search results using user category weighting
US6418433B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2002-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for focussed web crawling
US6418453B1 (en) * 1999-11-03 2002-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Network repository service for efficient web crawling
US6418452B1 (en) * 1999-11-03 2002-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Network repository service directory for efficient web crawling
US20020099694A1 (en) * 2000-11-21 2002-07-25 Diamond Theodore George Full-text relevancy ranking
US20030037074A1 (en) * 2001-05-01 2003-02-20 Ibm Corporation System and method for aggregating ranking results from various sources to improve the results of web searching
US20030055810A1 (en) * 2001-09-18 2003-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Front-end weight factor search criteria
US20030053084A1 (en) * 2001-07-19 2003-03-20 Geidl Erik M. Electronic ink as a software object
US6539376B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2003-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for the automatic mining of new relationships
US20030061201A1 (en) * 2001-08-13 2003-03-27 Xerox Corporation System for propagating enrichment between documents
US20030065706A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2003-04-03 Smyth Barry Joseph Intelligent internet website with hierarchical menu
US6546388B1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2003-04-08 International Business Machines Corporation Metadata search results ranking system
US6549897B1 (en) * 1998-10-09 2003-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for calculating phrase-document importance
US6549896B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2003-04-15 Nec Usa, Inc. System and method employing random walks for mining web page associations and usage to optimize user-oriented web page refresh and pre-fetch scheduling
US6547829B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2003-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for detecting duplicate documents in web crawls
US20030074368A1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2003-04-17 Hinrich Schuetze System and method for quantitatively representing data objects in vector space
US6594682B2 (en) * 1997-10-28 2003-07-15 Microsoft Corporation Client-side system for scheduling delivery of web content and locally managing the web content
US6598051B1 (en) * 2000-09-19 2003-07-22 Altavista Company Web page connectivity server
US6598047B1 (en) * 1999-07-26 2003-07-22 David W. Russell Method and system for searching text
US20040003028A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2004-01-01 David Emmett Automatic display of web content to smaller display devices: improved summarization and navigation
US20040006559A1 (en) * 2002-05-29 2004-01-08 Gange David M. System, apparatus, and method for user tunable and selectable searching of a database using a weigthted quantized feature vector
US6701318B2 (en) * 1998-11-18 2004-03-02 Harris Corporation Multiple engine information retrieval and visualization system
US6718365B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2004-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for ordering search results using an importance weighting
US20040093328A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2004-05-13 Aditya Damle Methods and systems for automated semantic knowledge leveraging graph theoretic analysis and the inherent structure of communication
US6738764B2 (en) * 2001-05-08 2004-05-18 Verity, Inc. Apparatus and method for adaptively ranking search results
US20040111408A1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2004-06-10 Science Applications International Corporation Method and system of ranking and clustering for document indexing and retrieval
US6766422B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2004-07-20 Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc. Method and system for web caching based on predictive usage
US20040148278A1 (en) * 2003-01-22 2004-07-29 Amir Milo System and method for providing content warehouse
US20050033742A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2005-02-10 Kamvar Sepandar D. Methods for ranking nodes in large directed graphs
US6859800B1 (en) * 2000-04-26 2005-02-22 Global Information Research And Technologies Llc System for fulfilling an information need
US20050044071A1 (en) * 2000-06-08 2005-02-24 Ingenuity Systems, Inc. Techniques for facilitating information acquisition and storage
US20050055347A9 (en) * 2000-12-08 2005-03-10 Ingenuity Systems, Inc. Method and system for performing information extraction and quality control for a knowledgebase
US20050055340A1 (en) * 2002-07-26 2005-03-10 Brainbow, Inc. Neural-based internet search engine with fuzzy and learning processes implemented by backward propogation
US20050060311A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2005-03-17 Simon Tong Methods and systems for improving a search ranking using related queries
US20050060304A1 (en) * 2002-11-19 2005-03-17 Prashant Parikh Navigational learning in a structured transaction processing system
US20050060186A1 (en) * 2003-08-28 2005-03-17 Blowers Paul A. Prioritized presentation of medical device events
US6871202B2 (en) * 2000-10-25 2005-03-22 Overture Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for ranking web page search results
US20050071328A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Lawrence Stephen R. Personalization of web search
US20050071741A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Anurag Acharya Information retrieval based on historical data
US6883135B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2005-04-19 Microsoft Corporation Proxy server using a statistical model
US20050086192A1 (en) * 2003-10-16 2005-04-21 Hitach, Ltd. Method and apparatus for improving the integration between a search engine and one or more file servers
US20050086206A1 (en) * 2003-10-15 2005-04-21 International Business Machines Corporation System, Method, and service for collaborative focused crawling of documents on a network
US6886010B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2005-04-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery
US6910029B1 (en) * 2000-02-22 2005-06-21 International Business Machines Corporation System for weighted indexing of hierarchical documents
US20050144162A1 (en) * 2003-12-29 2005-06-30 Ping Liang Advanced search, file system, and intelligent assistant agent
US20050154746A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2005-07-14 Yahoo!, Inc. Content presentation and management system associating base content and relevant additional content
US20050165781A1 (en) * 2004-01-26 2005-07-28 Reiner Kraft Method, system, and program for handling anchor text
US6990628B1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2006-01-24 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring similarity among electronic documents
US20060036598A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-16 Jie Wu Computerized method for ranking linked information items in distributed sources
US20060047649A1 (en) * 2003-12-29 2006-03-02 Ping Liang Internet and computer information retrieval and mining with intelligent conceptual filtering, visualization and automation
US7016540B1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2006-03-21 Nec Corporation Method and system for segmentation, classification, and summarization of video images
US7028029B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2006-04-11 Google Inc. Adaptive computation of ranking
US7051023B2 (en) * 2003-04-04 2006-05-23 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and methods for generating concept units from search queries
US7072888B1 (en) * 1999-06-16 2006-07-04 Triogo, Inc. Process for improving search engine efficiency using feedback
US7076483B2 (en) * 2001-08-27 2006-07-11 Xyleme Sa Ranking nodes in a graph
US20060161534A1 (en) * 2005-01-18 2006-07-20 Yahoo! Inc. Matching and ranking of sponsored search listings incorporating web search technology and web content
US20070038622A1 (en) * 2005-08-15 2007-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Method ranking search results using biased click distance
US20070038616A1 (en) * 2005-08-10 2007-02-15 Guha Ramanathan V Programmable search engine
US7197497B2 (en) * 2003-04-25 2007-03-27 Overture Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for machine learning a document relevance function
US20070073748A1 (en) * 2005-09-27 2007-03-29 Barney Jonathan A Method and system for probabilistically quantifying and visualizing relevance between two or more citationally or contextually related data objects
US20070106659A1 (en) * 2005-03-18 2007-05-10 Yunshan Lu Search engine that applies feedback from users to improve search results
US7231399B1 (en) * 2003-11-14 2007-06-12 Google Inc. Ranking documents based on large data sets
US20070150473A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2007-06-28 Microsoft Corporation Search By Document Type And Relevance
US7346604B1 (en) * 1999-10-15 2008-03-18 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method for ranking hypertext search results by analysis of hyperlinks from expert documents and keyword scope
US7356530B2 (en) * 2001-01-10 2008-04-08 Looksmart, Ltd. Systems and methods of retrieving relevant information
US7386527B2 (en) * 2002-12-06 2008-06-10 Kofax, Inc. Effective multi-class support vector machine classification
US7519529B1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2009-04-14 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of results in response to questions posed to an automated information-retrieval or question-answering service
US20090106223A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise relevancy ranking using a neural network
US20090106221A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Microsoft Corporation Ranking and Providing Search Results Based In Part On A Number Of Click-Through Features
US20090106235A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Microsoft Corporation Document Length as a Static Relevance Feature for Ranking Search Results

Family Cites Families (94)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5257577A (en) 1991-04-01 1993-11-02 Clark Melvin D Apparatus for assist in recycling of refuse
US5933851A (en) 1995-09-29 1999-08-03 Sony Corporation Time-stamp and hash-based file modification monitor with multi-user notification and method thereof
US6314420B1 (en) 1996-04-04 2001-11-06 Lycos, Inc. Collaborative/adaptive search engine
US5745890A (en) 1996-08-09 1998-04-28 Digital Equipment Corporation Sequential searching of a database index using constraints on word-location pairs
CN1107291C (en) 1996-10-02 2003-04-30 日本电信电话株式会社 Method and apparatus for graphically displaying hierarchical structure
US6285999B1 (en) 1997-01-10 2001-09-04 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Method for node ranking in a linked database
US5920859A (en) 1997-02-05 1999-07-06 Idd Enterprises, L.P. Hypertext document retrieval system and method
US5960383A (en) 1997-02-25 1999-09-28 Digital Equipment Corporation Extraction of key sections from texts using automatic indexing techniques
US5848404A (en) 1997-03-24 1998-12-08 International Business Machines Corporation Fast query search in large dimension database
US6256675B1 (en) 1997-05-06 2001-07-03 At&T Corp. System and method for allocating requests for objects and managing replicas of objects on a network
JPH1125104A (en) 1997-06-30 1999-01-29 Canon Inc Information processor and its method
JPH1125119A (en) 1997-06-30 1999-01-29 Canon Inc Hypertext reference system
US5983216A (en) 1997-09-12 1999-11-09 Infoseek Corporation Performing automated document collection and selection by providing a meta-index with meta-index values indentifying corresponding document collections
US6182113B1 (en) 1997-09-16 2001-01-30 International Business Machines Corporation Dynamic multiplexing of hyperlinks and bookmarks
US6128701A (en) 1997-10-28 2000-10-03 Cache Flow, Inc. Adaptive and predictive cache refresh policy
US5987457A (en) 1997-11-25 1999-11-16 Acceleration Software International Corporation Query refinement method for searching documents
US6473752B1 (en) 1997-12-04 2002-10-29 Micron Technology, Inc. Method and system for locating documents based on previously accessed documents
US6145003A (en) 1997-12-17 2000-11-07 Microsoft Corporation Method of web crawling utilizing address mapping
US6151624A (en) 1998-02-03 2000-11-21 Realnames Corporation Navigating network resources based on metadata
KR100285265B1 (en) 1998-02-25 2001-01-02 윤덕용 Db management system and inverted index storage structure using sub-index and large-capacity object
US6125361A (en) 1998-04-10 2000-09-26 International Business Machines Corporation Feature diffusion across hyperlinks
US6151595A (en) 1998-04-17 2000-11-21 Xerox Corporation Methods for interactive visualization of spreading activation using time tubes and disk trees
US6098064A (en) 1998-05-22 2000-08-01 Xerox Corporation Prefetching and caching documents according to probability ranked need S list
US6285367B1 (en) 1998-05-26 2001-09-04 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for displaying and navigating a graph
US6006225A (en) 1998-06-15 1999-12-21 Amazon.Com Refining search queries by the suggestion of correlated terms from prior searches
US6638314B1 (en) 1998-06-26 2003-10-28 Microsoft Corporation Method of web crawling utilizing crawl numbers
CN1324464A (en) 1998-08-26 2001-11-28 西姆泰克有限公司 Method and devices for mapping data files
US6628304B2 (en) 1998-12-09 2003-09-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus providing a graphical user interface for representing and navigating hierarchical networks
US6167369A (en) * 1998-12-23 2000-12-26 Xerox Company Automatic language identification using both N-gram and word information
US6862710B1 (en) 1999-03-23 2005-03-01 Insightful Corporation Internet navigation using soft hyperlinks
US6510406B1 (en) 1999-03-23 2003-01-21 Mathsoft, Inc. Inverse inference engine for high performance web search
US6763496B1 (en) 1999-03-31 2004-07-13 Microsoft Corporation Method for promoting contextual information to display pages containing hyperlinks
US6304864B1 (en) 1999-04-20 2001-10-16 Textwise Llc System for retrieving multimedia information from the internet using multiple evolving intelligent agents
US6327590B1 (en) 1999-05-05 2001-12-04 Xerox Corporation System and method for collaborative ranking of search results employing user and group profiles derived from document collection content analysis
US7835943B2 (en) 1999-05-28 2010-11-16 Yahoo! Inc. System and method for providing place and price protection in a search result list generated by a computer network search engine
US6973490B1 (en) 1999-06-23 2005-12-06 Savvis Communications Corp. Method and system for object-level web performance and analysis
US7181438B1 (en) 1999-07-21 2007-02-20 Alberti Anemometer, Llc Database access system
US6442606B1 (en) 1999-08-12 2002-08-27 Inktomi Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying spoof documents
US6636853B1 (en) 1999-08-30 2003-10-21 Morphism, Llc Method and apparatus for representing and navigating search results
WO2001031500A1 (en) * 1999-10-29 2001-05-03 British Telecommunications Public Limited Company Method and apparatus for processing queries
US6886129B1 (en) 1999-11-24 2005-04-26 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for trawling the World-wide Web to identify implicitly-defined communities of web pages
US7240067B2 (en) 2000-02-08 2007-07-03 Sybase, Inc. System and methodology for extraction and aggregation of data from dynamic content
US6931397B1 (en) 2000-02-11 2005-08-16 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for automatic generation of dynamic search abstracts contain metadata by crawler
US6516312B1 (en) 2000-04-04 2003-02-04 International Business Machine Corporation System and method for dynamically associating keywords with domain-specific search engine queries
US6633867B1 (en) 2000-04-05 2003-10-14 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for providing a session query within the context of a dynamic search result set
DE10029644B4 (en) 2000-06-16 2008-02-07 Deutsche Telekom Ag A process for the relevance rating for indexing of hypertext documents by means of search engine
JP3573688B2 (en) 2000-06-28 2004-10-06 松下電器産業株式会社 Similar document search apparatus and associated keyword extracting device
US6601075B1 (en) 2000-07-27 2003-07-29 International Business Machines Corporation System and method of ranking and retrieving documents based on authority scores of schemas and documents
US6633868B1 (en) 2000-07-28 2003-10-14 Shermann Loyall Min System and method for context-based document retrieval
US7080073B1 (en) 2000-08-18 2006-07-18 Firstrain, Inc. Method and apparatus for focused crawling
US20030217052A1 (en) 2000-08-24 2003-11-20 Celebros Ltd. Search engine method and apparatus
US6959326B1 (en) 2000-08-24 2005-10-25 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for gathering indexable metadata on content at a data repository
US6622140B1 (en) 2000-11-15 2003-09-16 Justsystem Corporation Method and apparatus for analyzing affect and emotion in text
US8402068B2 (en) 2000-12-07 2013-03-19 Half.Com, Inc. System and method for collecting, associating, normalizing and presenting product and vendor information on a distributed network
US6778997B2 (en) 2001-01-05 2004-08-17 International Business Machines Corporation XML: finding authoritative pages for mining communities based on page structure criteria
US20020103798A1 (en) 2001-02-01 2002-08-01 Abrol Mani S. Adaptive document ranking method based on user behavior
US20020107886A1 (en) 2001-02-07 2002-08-08 Gentner Donald R. Method and apparatus for automatic document electronic versioning system
US7269545B2 (en) 2001-03-30 2007-09-11 Nec Laboratories America, Inc. Method for retrieving answers from an information retrieval system
US20020169770A1 (en) 2001-04-27 2002-11-14 Kim Brian Seong-Gon Apparatus and method that categorize a collection of documents into a hierarchy of categories that are defined by the collection of documents
US6944609B2 (en) 2001-10-18 2005-09-13 Lycos, Inc. Search results using editor feedback
US7428695B2 (en) 2001-10-22 2008-09-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System for automatic generation of arbitrarily indexed hyperlinked text
US6763362B2 (en) 2001-11-30 2004-07-13 Micron Technology, Inc. Method and system for updating a search engine
JP3871201B2 (en) 2002-01-29 2007-01-24 ソニー株式会社 Content provided acquisition system
US6829606B2 (en) 2002-02-14 2004-12-07 Infoglide Software Corporation Similarity search engine for use with relational databases
US6934714B2 (en) 2002-03-04 2005-08-23 Intelesis Engineering, Inc. Method and system for identification and maintenance of families of data records
US7246128B2 (en) 2002-06-12 2007-07-17 Jordahl Jena J Data storage, retrieval, manipulation and display tools enabling multiple hierarchical points of view
US7152059B2 (en) 2002-08-30 2006-12-19 Emergency24, Inc. System and method for predicting additional search results of a computerized database search user based on an initial search query
US7013458B2 (en) 2002-09-09 2006-03-14 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for associating metadata attributes with program elements
US7020648B2 (en) 2002-12-14 2006-03-28 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for identifying and utilizing a secondary index to access a database using a management system without an internal catalogue of online metadata
US20040181515A1 (en) 2003-03-13 2004-09-16 International Business Machines Corporation Group administration of universal resource identifiers with members identified in search result
US6947930B2 (en) 2003-03-21 2005-09-20 Overture Services, Inc. Systems and methods for interactive search query refinement
US7451129B2 (en) * 2003-03-31 2008-11-11 Google Inc. System and method for providing preferred language ordering of search results
US7451130B2 (en) 2003-06-16 2008-11-11 Google Inc. System and method for providing preferred country biasing of search results
US7308643B1 (en) 2003-07-03 2007-12-11 Google Inc. Anchor tag indexing in a web crawler system
US7693827B2 (en) 2003-09-30 2010-04-06 Google Inc. Personalization of placed content ordering in search results
US7392278B2 (en) 2004-01-23 2008-06-24 Microsoft Corporation Building and using subwebs for focused search
US7310632B2 (en) 2004-02-12 2007-12-18 Microsoft Corporation Decision-theoretic web-crawling and predicting web-page change
US7281002B2 (en) 2004-03-01 2007-10-09 International Business Machine Corporation Organizing related search results
US7584221B2 (en) 2004-03-18 2009-09-01 Microsoft Corporation Field weighting in text searching
US7343374B2 (en) 2004-03-29 2008-03-11 Yahoo! Inc. Computation of page authority weights using personalized bookmarks
US7693825B2 (en) 2004-03-31 2010-04-06 Google Inc. Systems and methods for ranking implicit search results
US20050251499A1 (en) 2004-05-04 2005-11-10 Zezhen Huang Method and system for searching documents using readers valuation
US7257577B2 (en) 2004-05-07 2007-08-14 International Business Machines Corporation System, method and service for ranking search results using a modular scoring system
US7260573B1 (en) 2004-05-17 2007-08-21 Google Inc. Personalizing anchor text scores in a search engine
US20050283473A1 (en) 2004-06-17 2005-12-22 Armand Rousso Apparatus, method and system of artificial intelligence for data searching applications
US7428530B2 (en) 2004-07-01 2008-09-23 Microsoft Corporation Dispersing search engine results by using page category information
US7363296B1 (en) 2004-07-01 2008-04-22 Microsoft Corporation Generating a subindex with relevant attributes to improve querying
US7702599B2 (en) 2004-10-07 2010-04-20 Bernard Widrow System and method for cognitive memory and auto-associative neural network based pattern recognition
US7689615B2 (en) 2005-02-25 2010-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Ranking results using multiple nested ranking
US7574436B2 (en) 2005-03-10 2009-08-11 Yahoo! Inc. Reranking and increasing the relevance of the results of Internet searches
US20060206460A1 (en) 2005-03-14 2006-09-14 Sanjay Gadkari Biasing search results
US20060282455A1 (en) 2005-06-13 2006-12-14 It Interactive Services Inc. System and method for ranking web content
US7627564B2 (en) 2005-06-21 2009-12-01 Microsoft Corporation High scale adaptive search systems and methods
US7685091B2 (en) 2006-02-14 2010-03-23 Accenture Global Services Gmbh System and method for online information analysis

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5222236A (en) * 1988-04-29 1993-06-22 Overdrive Systems, Inc. Multiple integrated document assembly data processing system
US6202058B1 (en) * 1994-04-25 2001-03-13 Apple Computer, Inc. System for ranking the relevance of information objects accessed by computer users
US5606609A (en) * 1994-09-19 1997-02-25 Scientific-Atlanta Electronic document verification system and method
US5594660A (en) * 1994-09-30 1997-01-14 Cirrus Logic, Inc. Programmable audio-video synchronization method and apparatus for multimedia systems
US5893092A (en) * 1994-12-06 1999-04-06 University Of Central Florida Relevancy ranking using statistical ranking, semantics, relevancy feedback and small pieces of text
US6032196A (en) * 1995-12-13 2000-02-29 Digital Equipment Corporation System for adding a new entry to a web page table upon receiving a web page including a link to another web page not having a corresponding entry in the web page table
US6041323A (en) * 1996-04-17 2000-03-21 International Business Machines Corporation Information search method, information search device, and storage medium for storing an information search program
US6070158A (en) * 1996-08-14 2000-05-30 Infoseek Corporation Real-time document collection search engine with phrase indexing
US6012053A (en) * 1997-06-23 2000-01-04 Lycos, Inc. Computer system with user-controlled relevance ranking of search results
US6070191A (en) * 1997-10-17 2000-05-30 Lucent Technologies Inc. Data distribution techniques for load-balanced fault-tolerant web access
US6351467B1 (en) * 1997-10-27 2002-02-26 Hughes Electronics Corporation System and method for multicasting multimedia content
US6594682B2 (en) * 1997-10-28 2003-07-15 Microsoft Corporation Client-side system for scheduling delivery of web content and locally managing the web content
US6389436B1 (en) * 1997-12-15 2002-05-14 International Business Machines Corporation Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks
US6185558B1 (en) * 1998-03-03 2001-02-06 Amazon.Com, Inc. Identifying the items most relevant to a current query based on items selected in connection with similar queries
US6240407B1 (en) * 1998-04-29 2001-05-29 International Business Machines Corp. Method and apparatus for creating an index in a database system
US6182085B1 (en) * 1998-05-28 2001-01-30 International Business Machines Corporation Collaborative team crawling:Large scale information gathering over the internet
US6208988B1 (en) * 1998-06-01 2001-03-27 Bigchalk.Com, Inc. Method for identifying themes associated with a search query using metadata and for organizing documents responsive to the search query in accordance with the themes
US6240408B1 (en) * 1998-06-08 2001-05-29 Kcsl, Inc. Method and system for retrieving relevant documents from a database
US6216123B1 (en) * 1998-06-24 2001-04-10 Novell, Inc. Method and system for rapid retrieval in a full text indexing system
US6549897B1 (en) * 1998-10-09 2003-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for calculating phrase-document importance
US6385602B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2002-05-07 E-Centives, Inc. Presentation of search results using dynamic categorization
US6360215B1 (en) * 1998-11-03 2002-03-19 Inktomi Corporation Method and apparatus for retrieving documents based on information other than document content
US6701318B2 (en) * 1998-11-18 2004-03-02 Harris Corporation Multiple engine information retrieval and visualization system
US20030074368A1 (en) * 1999-01-26 2003-04-17 Hinrich Schuetze System and method for quantitatively representing data objects in vector space
US6418433B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2002-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for focussed web crawling
US6990628B1 (en) * 1999-06-14 2006-01-24 Yahoo! Inc. Method and apparatus for measuring similarity among electronic documents
US7072888B1 (en) * 1999-06-16 2006-07-04 Triogo, Inc. Process for improving search engine efficiency using feedback
US6547829B1 (en) * 1999-06-30 2003-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for detecting duplicate documents in web crawls
US6598047B1 (en) * 1999-07-26 2003-07-22 David W. Russell Method and system for searching text
US7346604B1 (en) * 1999-10-15 2008-03-18 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method for ranking hypertext search results by analysis of hyperlinks from expert documents and keyword scope
US6351755B1 (en) * 1999-11-02 2002-02-26 Alta Vista Company System and method for associating an extensible set of data with documents downloaded by a web crawler
US6263364B1 (en) * 1999-11-02 2001-07-17 Alta Vista Company Web crawler system using plurality of parallel priority level queues having distinct associated download priority levels for prioritizing document downloading and maintaining document freshness
US6418453B1 (en) * 1999-11-03 2002-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Network repository service for efficient web crawling
US6418452B1 (en) * 1999-11-03 2002-07-09 International Business Machines Corporation Network repository service directory for efficient web crawling
US6539376B1 (en) * 1999-11-15 2003-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for the automatic mining of new relationships
US7016540B1 (en) * 1999-11-24 2006-03-21 Nec Corporation Method and system for segmentation, classification, and summarization of video images
US6546388B1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2003-04-08 International Business Machines Corporation Metadata search results ranking system
US6718324B2 (en) * 2000-01-14 2004-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation Metadata search results ranking system
US7328401B2 (en) * 2000-01-28 2008-02-05 Microsoft Corporation Adaptive web crawling using a statistical model
US6883135B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2005-04-19 Microsoft Corporation Proxy server using a statistical model
US20050086583A1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2005-04-21 Microsoft Corporation Proxy server using a statistical model
US6910029B1 (en) * 2000-02-22 2005-06-21 International Business Machines Corporation System for weighted indexing of hierarchical documents
US6549896B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2003-04-15 Nec Usa, Inc. System and method employing random walks for mining web page associations and usage to optimize user-oriented web page refresh and pre-fetch scheduling
US6718365B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2004-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system, and program for ordering search results using an importance weighting
US6859800B1 (en) * 2000-04-26 2005-02-22 Global Information Research And Technologies Llc System for fulfilling an information need
US20050044071A1 (en) * 2000-06-08 2005-02-24 Ingenuity Systems, Inc. Techniques for facilitating information acquisition and storage
US6598051B1 (en) * 2000-09-19 2003-07-22 Altavista Company Web page connectivity server
US6871202B2 (en) * 2000-10-25 2005-03-22 Overture Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for ranking web page search results
US20020055940A1 (en) * 2000-11-07 2002-05-09 Charles Elkan Method and system for selecting documents by measuring document quality
US20020062323A1 (en) * 2000-11-20 2002-05-23 Yozan Inc Browser apparatus, server apparatus, computer-readable medium, search system and search method
US20020099694A1 (en) * 2000-11-21 2002-07-25 Diamond Theodore George Full-text relevancy ranking
US20050055347A9 (en) * 2000-12-08 2005-03-10 Ingenuity Systems, Inc. Method and system for performing information extraction and quality control for a knowledgebase
US20020078045A1 (en) * 2000-12-14 2002-06-20 Rabindranath Dutta System, method, and program for ranking search results using user category weighting
US7356530B2 (en) * 2001-01-10 2008-04-08 Looksmart, Ltd. Systems and methods of retrieving relevant information
US6766316B2 (en) * 2001-01-18 2004-07-20 Science Applications International Corporation Method and system of ranking and clustering for document indexing and retrieval
US20040111408A1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2004-06-10 Science Applications International Corporation Method and system of ranking and clustering for document indexing and retrieval
US20040093328A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2004-05-13 Aditya Damle Methods and systems for automated semantic knowledge leveraging graph theoretic analysis and the inherent structure of communication
US20030037074A1 (en) * 2001-05-01 2003-02-20 Ibm Corporation System and method for aggregating ranking results from various sources to improve the results of web searching
US6738764B2 (en) * 2001-05-08 2004-05-18 Verity, Inc. Apparatus and method for adaptively ranking search results
US20030065706A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2003-04-03 Smyth Barry Joseph Intelligent internet website with hierarchical menu
US7519529B1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2009-04-14 Microsoft Corporation System and methods for inferring informational goals and preferred level of detail of results in response to questions posed to an automated information-retrieval or question-answering service
US7039234B2 (en) * 2001-07-19 2006-05-02 Microsoft Corporation Electronic ink as a software object
US20030053084A1 (en) * 2001-07-19 2003-03-20 Geidl Erik M. Electronic ink as a software object
US20030061201A1 (en) * 2001-08-13 2003-03-27 Xerox Corporation System for propagating enrichment between documents
US7076483B2 (en) * 2001-08-27 2006-07-11 Xyleme Sa Ranking nodes in a graph
US20030055810A1 (en) * 2001-09-18 2003-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Front-end weight factor search criteria
US6766422B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2004-07-20 Siemens Information And Communication Networks, Inc. Method and system for web caching based on predictive usage
US20040003028A1 (en) * 2002-05-08 2004-01-01 David Emmett Automatic display of web content to smaller display devices: improved summarization and navigation
US20040006559A1 (en) * 2002-05-29 2004-01-08 Gange David M. System, apparatus, and method for user tunable and selectable searching of a database using a weigthted quantized feature vector
US20050055340A1 (en) * 2002-07-26 2005-03-10 Brainbow, Inc. Neural-based internet search engine with fuzzy and learning processes implemented by backward propogation
US6886010B2 (en) * 2002-09-30 2005-04-26 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method for data and text mining and literature-based discovery
US20050060304A1 (en) * 2002-11-19 2005-03-17 Prashant Parikh Navigational learning in a structured transaction processing system
US7386527B2 (en) * 2002-12-06 2008-06-10 Kofax, Inc. Effective multi-class support vector machine classification
US20040148278A1 (en) * 2003-01-22 2004-07-29 Amir Milo System and method for providing content warehouse
US20050033742A1 (en) * 2003-03-28 2005-02-10 Kamvar Sepandar D. Methods for ranking nodes in large directed graphs
US7028029B2 (en) * 2003-03-28 2006-04-11 Google Inc. Adaptive computation of ranking
US7051023B2 (en) * 2003-04-04 2006-05-23 Yahoo! Inc. Systems and methods for generating concept units from search queries
US7197497B2 (en) * 2003-04-25 2007-03-27 Overture Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for machine learning a document relevance function
US20050060186A1 (en) * 2003-08-28 2005-03-17 Blowers Paul A. Prioritized presentation of medical device events
US20050060311A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2005-03-17 Simon Tong Methods and systems for improving a search ranking using related queries
US20050071328A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Lawrence Stephen R. Personalization of web search
US20050071741A1 (en) * 2003-09-30 2005-03-31 Anurag Acharya Information retrieval based on historical data
US20050086206A1 (en) * 2003-10-15 2005-04-21 International Business Machines Corporation System, Method, and service for collaborative focused crawling of documents on a network
US20050086192A1 (en) * 2003-10-16 2005-04-21 Hitach, Ltd. Method and apparatus for improving the integration between a search engine and one or more file servers
US7231399B1 (en) * 2003-11-14 2007-06-12 Google Inc. Ranking documents based on large data sets
US20050144162A1 (en) * 2003-12-29 2005-06-30 Ping Liang Advanced search, file system, and intelligent assistant agent
US20060047649A1 (en) * 2003-12-29 2006-03-02 Ping Liang Internet and computer information retrieval and mining with intelligent conceptual filtering, visualization and automation
US20050154746A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2005-07-14 Yahoo!, Inc. Content presentation and management system associating base content and relevant additional content
US20050165781A1 (en) * 2004-01-26 2005-07-28 Reiner Kraft Method, system, and program for handling anchor text
US20060036598A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-16 Jie Wu Computerized method for ranking linked information items in distributed sources
US20060161534A1 (en) * 2005-01-18 2006-07-20 Yahoo! Inc. Matching and ranking of sponsored search listings incorporating web search technology and web content
US20070106659A1 (en) * 2005-03-18 2007-05-10 Yunshan Lu Search engine that applies feedback from users to improve search results
US20070038616A1 (en) * 2005-08-10 2007-02-15 Guha Ramanathan V Programmable search engine
US20070038622A1 (en) * 2005-08-15 2007-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Method ranking search results using biased click distance
US20070073748A1 (en) * 2005-09-27 2007-03-29 Barney Jonathan A Method and system for probabilistically quantifying and visualizing relevance between two or more citationally or contextually related data objects
US20070150473A1 (en) * 2005-12-22 2007-06-28 Microsoft Corporation Search By Document Type And Relevance
US20090106235A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Microsoft Corporation Document Length as a Static Relevance Feature for Ranking Search Results
US20090106223A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise relevancy ranking using a neural network
US20090106221A1 (en) * 2007-10-18 2009-04-23 Microsoft Corporation Ranking and Providing Search Results Based In Part On A Number Of Click-Through Features

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8843486B2 (en) 2004-09-27 2014-09-23 Microsoft Corporation System and method for scoping searches using index keys
US9727605B1 (en) 2006-04-19 2017-08-08 Google Inc. Query language identification
US8762358B2 (en) * 2006-04-19 2014-06-24 Google Inc. Query language determination using query terms and interface language
US20070288450A1 (en) * 2006-04-19 2007-12-13 Datta Ruchira S Query language determination using query terms and interface language
US7788267B2 (en) * 2007-02-26 2010-08-31 Seiko Epson Corporation Image metadata action tagging
US20080208922A1 (en) * 2007-02-26 2008-08-28 Claudine Melissa Wolas-Shiva Image metadata action tagging
US8359309B1 (en) 2007-05-23 2013-01-22 Google Inc. Modifying search result ranking based on corpus search statistics
US8756220B1 (en) 2007-05-23 2014-06-17 Google Inc. Modifying search result ranking based on corpus search statistics
US7840569B2 (en) * 2007-10-18 2010-11-23 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise relevancy ranking using a neural network
US9348912B2 (en) 2007-10-18 2016-05-24 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Document length as a static relevance feature for ranking search results
US7917503B2 (en) 2008-01-17 2011-03-29 Microsoft Corporation Specifying relevance ranking preferences utilizing search scopes
US20090187550A1 (en) * 2008-01-17 2009-07-23 Microsoft Corporation Specifying relevance ranking preferences utilizing search scopes
EP2289007A1 (en) * 2008-04-11 2011-03-02 Microsoft Corporation Search results ranking using editing distance and document information
EP2289007A4 (en) * 2008-04-11 2012-10-31 Microsoft Corp Search results ranking using editing distance and document information
US8812493B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2014-08-19 Microsoft Corporation Search results ranking using editing distance and document information
US8806455B1 (en) * 2008-06-25 2014-08-12 Verint Systems Ltd. Systems and methods for text nuclearization
US8656266B2 (en) * 2008-12-18 2014-02-18 Google Inc. Identifying comments to show in connection with a document
US20100162093A1 (en) * 2008-12-18 2010-06-24 Google Inc. Identifying comments to show in connection with a document
US20100169323A1 (en) * 2008-12-29 2010-07-01 Microsoft Corporation Query-Dependent Ranking Using K-Nearest Neighbor
US9098582B1 (en) * 2009-04-10 2015-08-04 Google Inc. Identifying relevant document languages through link context
US8738635B2 (en) 2010-06-01 2014-05-27 Microsoft Corporation Detection of junk in search result ranking
KR101510973B1 (en) 2010-10-27 2015-04-10 애플 인크. Methods for indexing and searching based on language locale
US9020951B2 (en) 2010-10-27 2015-04-28 Apple Inc. Methods for indexing and searching based on language locale
US8577891B2 (en) * 2010-10-27 2013-11-05 Apple Inc. Methods for indexing and searching based on language locale
CN103282900A (en) * 2010-10-27 2013-09-04 苹果公司 Methods for indexing and searching based on language locale
US20120109970A1 (en) * 2010-10-27 2012-05-03 Apple Inc. Methods for indexing and searching based on language locale
US9208231B1 (en) * 2010-12-01 2015-12-08 Google Inc. Identifying languages relevant to resources
US9495462B2 (en) 2012-01-27 2016-11-15 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Re-ranking search results
WO2015153511A1 (en) * 2014-03-29 2015-10-08 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Improved method, system and software for searching, identifying, retrieving and presenting electronic documents
GB2541566A (en) * 2014-03-29 2017-02-22 Thomson Reuters Global Resources Improved method, system and software for searching, identifying, retrieving and presenting electronic documents
US9971771B2 (en) 2014-03-29 2018-05-15 Camelot Uk Bidco Limited Method, system and software for searching, identifying, retrieving and presenting electronic documents

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US7792833B2 (en) 2010-09-07 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Haveliwala Topic-sensitive pagerank: A context-sensitive ranking algorithm for web search
US7567959B2 (en) Multiple index based information retrieval system
US7702618B1 (en) Information retrieval system for archiving multiple document versions
US5835905A (en) System for predicting documents relevant to focus documents by spreading activation through network representations of a linked collection of documents
US5895470A (en) System for categorizing documents in a linked collection of documents
US6377945B1 (en) Search system and method for retrieval of data, and the use thereof in a search engine
US7505964B2 (en) Methods and systems for improving a search ranking using related queries
US6212517B1 (en) Keyword extracting system and text retrieval system using the same
US6738678B1 (en) Method for ranking hyperlinked pages using content and connectivity analysis
US7536408B2 (en) Phrase-based indexing in an information retrieval system
US7580921B2 (en) Phrase identification in an information retrieval system
US7599914B2 (en) Phrase-based searching in an information retrieval system
US7711679B2 (en) Phrase-based detection of duplicate documents in an information retrieval system
US7580929B2 (en) Phrase-based personalization of searches in an information retrieval system
US5404514A (en) Method of indexing and retrieval of electronically-stored documents
US6507841B2 (en) Methods of and apparatus for refining descriptors
US20070094285A1 (en) Question answering over structured content on the web
US20070067304A1 (en) Search using changes in prevalence of content items on the web
US20070185871A1 (en) Document similarity scoring and ranking method, device and computer program product
US20030014399A1 (en) Method for organizing records of database search activity by topical relevance
US5926812A (en) Document extraction and comparison method with applications to automatic personalized database searching
US6944612B2 (en) Structured contextual clustering method and system in a federated search engine
US7426507B1 (en) Automatic taxonomy generation in search results using phrases
US7584175B2 (en) Phrase-based generation of document descriptions
US20030120654A1 (en) Metadata search results ranking system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MEYERZON, DMITRIY;ZARAGOZA, HUGO;REEL/FRAME:018334/0599;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060501 TO 20060828

Owner name: MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MEYERZON, DMITRIY;ZARAGOZA, HUGO;SIGNING DATES FROM 20060501 TO 20060828;REEL/FRAME:018334/0599

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034542/0001

Effective date: 20141014

FEPP

Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.)