US20060259610A1 - System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers - Google Patents

System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060259610A1
US20060259610A1 US11457980 US45798006A US2006259610A1 US 20060259610 A1 US20060259610 A1 US 20060259610A1 US 11457980 US11457980 US 11457980 US 45798006 A US45798006 A US 45798006A US 2006259610 A1 US2006259610 A1 US 2006259610A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
cluster
management
key
operations
tenant
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11457980
Inventor
Galen Hunt
Aamer Hydrie
Steven Levi
David Stutz
Bassam Tabbara
Robert Welland
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Original Assignee
Microsoft Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/04Architectural aspects of network management arrangements
    • H04L41/042Arrangements involving multiple distributed management centers cooperatively managing the network
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/06Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks involving management of faults or events or alarms
    • H04L41/0654Network fault recovery
    • H04L41/0659Network fault recovery by isolating the faulty entity
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/06Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks involving management of faults or events or alarms
    • H04L41/0654Network fault recovery
    • H04L41/0672Network fault recovery by re-configuring the faulty entity
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/40Techniques for recovering from a failure of a protocol instance or entity, e.g. failover routines, service redundancy protocols, protocol state redundancy or protocol service redirection in case of a failure or disaster recovery
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/06Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for supporting key management in a packet data network

Abstract

A multi-tiered server management architecture is employed including an application development tier, an application operations tier, and a cluster operations tier. In the application development tier, applications are developed for execution on one or more server computers. In the application operations tier, execution of the applications is managed and sub-boundaries within a cluster of servers can be established. In the cluster operations tier, operation of the server computers is managed without concern for what applications are executing on the one or more server computers and boundaries between clusters of servers can be established. The multi-tiered server management architecture can also be employed in co-location facilities where clusters of servers are leased to tenants, with the tenants implementing the application operations tier and the facility owner (or operator) implementing the cluster operations tier.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/987,229, filed Nov. 12, 2004, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein, and which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/695,812, filed Oct. 24, 2000, entitled “System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers”, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD
  • [0002]
    This invention relates to computer system management. More particularly, the invention relates to the distributed management of shared computers.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    The Internet and its use have expanded greatly in recent years, and this expansion is expected to continue. One significant way in which the Internet is used is the World Wide Web (also referred to as the “web”), which is a collection of documents (referred to as “web pages”) that users can view or otherwise render and which typically include links to one or more other pages that the user can access. Many businesses and individuals have created a presence on the web, typically consisting of one or more web pages describing themselves, describing their products or services, identifying other information of interest, allowing goods or services to be purchased, etc.
  • [0004]
    Web pages are typically made available on the web via one or more web servers, a process referred to as “hosting” the web pages. Sometimes these web pages are freely available to anyone that requests to view them (e.g., a company's advertisements) and other times access to the web pages is restricted (e.g., a password may be necessary to access the web pages). Given the large number of people that may be requesting to view the web pages (especially in light of the global accessibility to the web), a large number of servers may be necessary to adequately host the web pages (e.g., the same web page can be hosted on multiple servers to increase the number of people that can access the web page concurrently). Additionally, because the web is geographically distributed and has non-uniformity of access, it is often desirable to distribute servers to diverse remote locations in order to minimize access times for people in diverse locations of the world. Furthermore, people tend to view web pages around the clock (again, especially in light of the global accessibility to the web), so servers hosting web pages should be kept functional 24 hours per day.
  • [0005]
    Managing a large number of servers, however, can be difficult. A reliable power supply is necessary to ensure the servers can run. Physical security is necessary to ensure that a thief or other mischievous person does not attempt to damage or steal the servers. A reliable Internet connection is required to ensure that the access requests will reach the servers. A proper operating environment (e.g., temperature, humidity, etc.) is required to ensure that the servers operate properly. Thus, “co-location facilities” have evolved which assist companies in handling these difficulties.
  • [0006]
    A co-location facility refers to a complex that can house multiple servers. The co-location facility typically provides a reliable Internet connection, a reliable power supply, and proper operating environment. The co-location facility also typically includes multiple secure areas (e.g., cages) into which different companies can situate their servers. The collection of servers that a particular company situates at the co-location facility is referred to as a “server cluster”, even though in fact there may only be a single server at any individual co-location facility. The particular company is then responsible for managing the operation of the servers in their server cluster.
  • [0007]
    Such co-location facilities, however, also present problems. One problem is data security. Different companies (even competitors) can have server clusters at the same co-location facility. Care is required, in such circumstances, to ensure that data received from the Internet (or sent by a server in the server cluster) that is intended for one company is not routed to a server of another company situated at the co-location facility.
  • [0008]
    An additional problem is the management of the servers once they are placed in the co-location facility. Currently, a system administrator from a company is able to contact a co-location facility administrator (typically by telephone) and ask him or her to reset a particular server (typically by pressing a hardware reset button on the server, or powering off then powering on the server) in the event of a failure of (or other problem with) the server. This limited reset-only ability provides very little management functionality to the company. Alternatively, the system administrator from the company can physically travel to the co-location facility him/her-self and attend to the faulty server. Unfortunately, a significant amount of time can be wasted by the system administrator in traveling to the co-location facility to attend to a server. Thus, it would be beneficial to have an improved way to manage remote server computers at a co-location facility.
  • [0009]
    Another problem concerns the enforcement of the rights of both the operators of the servers in the co-location facility and the operators of the web service hosted on those servers. The operators of the servers need to be able to maintain their rights (e.g., re-possessing areas of the facility where servers are stored), even though the servers are owned by the operators of the web service. Additionally, the operators of the web service need to be assured that their data remains secure.
  • [0010]
    The invention described below addresses these disadvantages, improving the distributed management of shared computers in co-location facilities.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0011]
    Distributed management of shared computers is described herein.
  • [0012]
    According to one aspect, a multi-tiered management architecture is employed including an application development tier, an application operations tier, and a cluster operations tier. In the application development tier, applications are developed for execution on one or more server computers. In the application operations tier, execution of the applications is managed and sub-boundaries within a cluster of servers at a co-location facility may be established. In the cluster operations tier, operation of the server computers is managed without concern for what applications are executing on the one or more server computers, and server cluster boundaries at the co-location facility may be established.
  • [0013]
    According to another aspect, a co-location facility includes multiple server clusters, each corresponding to a different customer. For each server cluster, a cluster operations management console is implemented locally at the co-location facility to manage hardware operations of the cluster, and an application operations management console is implemented at a location remote from the co-location facility to manage software operations of the cluster. In the event of a hardware failure, the cluster operations management console takes corrective action (e.g., notifying an administrator at the co-location facility or attempting to correct the failure itself). In the event of a software failure, the application operations management console takes corrective action (e.g., notifying one of the customer's administrators or attempting to correct the failure itself).
  • [0014]
    According to another aspect, boundaries of a server cluster are established by a cluster operations management console. Establishment of the boundaries ensures that data is routed only to nodes within the server cluster, and not to other nodes at the co-location facility that are not part of the server cluster. Further sub-boundaries within a server cluster may be established by an application operations management console to ensure data is routed only to particular nodes within the server cluster.
  • [0015]
    According to another aspect, rights to multiple server computers to be located at a co-location facility are sold to a customer and a multiple-tiered management scheme is enforced on the server computers. According to the multiple-tiered management scheme, hardware operation of the server computers is managed locally at the co-location facility whereas software operation of the server computers is managed from a location remote from the co-location facility. The server computers can be either sold to the customer or leased to the customer.
  • [0016]
    According to another aspect, a landlord/tenant relationship is created using one or more server computers at a co-location facility. The operator of the co-location facility supplies the facility as well as the servers (and thus can be viewed as a “landlord”), while customers of the facility lease the use of the facility as well as servers at that facility (and thus can be viewed as “tenants”). This landlord/tenant relationship allows the landlord to establish clusters of computers for different tenants and establish boundaries between clusters so that a tenant's data does not pass beyond its cluster (and to another tenant's cluster). Additionally, encryption is employed in various manners to assure the tenant that information stored at the servers it leases cannot be viewed by anyone else, even if the tenant terminates its lease or returns to the landlord one of the servers it is leasing.
  • [0017]
    According to another aspect, a multi-tiered management architecture is employed in managing computers that are not part of a co-location facility. This multi-tiered architecture is used for managing computers (whether server computers or otherwise) in a variety of settings, such as businesses, homes, etc.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0018]
    The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings. The same numbers are used throughout the figures to reference like components and/or features.
  • [0019]
    FIG. 1 shows a client/server network system and environment such as may be used with certain embodiments of the invention.
  • [0020]
    FIG. 2 shows a general example of a computer that can be used in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention.
  • [0021]
    FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary co-location facility in more detail.
  • [0022]
    FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary multi-tiered management architecture.
  • [0023]
    FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary node in more detail in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention.
  • [0024]
    FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for encryption key generation and distribution in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention.
  • [0025]
    FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for the operation of a cluster operations management console in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention.
  • [0026]
    FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for the operation of an application operations management console in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0027]
    FIG. 1 shows a client/server network system and environment such as may be used with certain embodiments of the invention. Generally, the system includes multiple (n) client computers 102 and multiple (m) co-location facilities 104 each including multiple clusters of server computers (server clusters) 106. The servers and client computers communicate with each other over a data communications network 108. The communications network in FIG. 1 comprises a public network 108 such as the Internet. Other types of communications networks might also be used, in addition to or in place of the Internet, including local area networks (LANs), wide area networks (WANs), etc. Data communications network 108 can be implemented in any of a variety of different manners, including wired and/or wireless communications media.
  • [0028]
    Communication over network 108 can be carried out using any of a wide variety of communications protocols. In one implementation, client computers 102 and server computers in clusters 106 can communicate with one another using the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), in which web pages are hosted by the server computers and written in a markup language, such as the Hypertext Markup Language (HTML) or the eXtensible Markup Language (XML).
  • [0029]
    In the discussions herein, embodiments of the invention are described primarily with reference to implementation at a co-location facility (such as facility 104). The invention, however, is not limited to such implementations and can be used for distributed management in any of a wide variety of situations. For example, in situations where all of the servers at a facility are owned or leased to the same customer, in situations where a single computing device (e.g., a server or client) is being managed, in situations where computers (whether servers or otherwise) in a business or home environment are being managed, etc.
  • [0030]
    In the discussion herein, embodiments of the invention are described in the general context of computer-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by one or more conventional personal computers. Generally, program modules include routines, programs, objects, components, data structures, etc. that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types. Moreover, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various embodiments of the invention may be practiced with other computer system configurations, including hand-held devices, gaming consoles, Internet appliances, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based or programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputers, mainframe computers, and the like. In a distributed computer environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
  • [0031]
    Alternatively, embodiments of the invention can be implemented in hardware or a combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. For example, all or part of the invention can be implemented in one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or programmable logic devices (PLDs).
  • [0032]
    FIG. 2 shows a general example of a computer 142 that can be used in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention. Computer 142 is shown as an example of a computer that can perform the functions of a client computer 102 of FIG. 1, a computer or node in a co-location facility 104 of FIG. 1 or other location (e.g., node 248 of FIG. 5 below), or a local or remote management console as discussed in more detail below.
  • [0033]
    Computer 142 includes one or more processors or processing units 144, a system memory 146, and a bus 148 that couples various system components including the system memory 146 to processors 144. The bus 148 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. The system memory includes read only memory (ROM) 150 and random access memory (RAM) 152. A basic input/output system (BIOS) 154, containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computer 142, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 150.
  • [0034]
    Computer 142 further includes a hard disk drive 156 for reading from and writing to a hard disk, not shown, connected to bus 148 via a hard disk driver interface 157 (e.g., a SCSI, ATA, or other type of interface); a magnetic disk drive 158 for reading from and writing to a removable magnetic disk 160, connected to bus 148 via a magnetic disk drive interface 161; and an optical disk drive 162 for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk 164 such as a CD ROM, DVD, or other optical media, connected to bus 148 via an optical drive interface 165. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for computer 142. Although the exemplary environment described herein employs a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk 160 and a removable optical disk 164, it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer readable media which can store data that is accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, random access memories (RAMs) read only memories (ROM), and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment.
  • [0035]
    A number of program modules may be stored on the hard disk, magnetic disk 160, optical disk 164, ROM 150, or RAM 152, including an operating system 170, one or more application programs 172, other program modules 174, and program data 176. A user may enter commands and information into computer 142 through input devices such as keyboard 178 and pointing device 180. Other input devices (not shown) may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, scanner, or the like. These and other input devices are connected to the processing unit 144 through an interface 168 that is coupled to the system bus. A monitor 184 or other type of display device is also connected to the system bus 148 via an interface, such as a video adapter 186. In addition to the monitor, personal computers typically include other peripheral output devices (not shown) such as speakers and printers.
  • [0036]
    Computer 142 optionally operates in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers, such as a remote computer 188. The remote computer 188 may be another personal computer, a server, a router, a network PC, a peer device or other common network node, and typically includes many or all of the elements described above relative to computer 142, although only a memory storage device 190 has been illustrated in FIG. 2. The logical connections depicted in FIG. 2 include a local area network (LAN) 192 and a wide area network (WAN) 194. Such networking environments are commonplace in offices, enterprise-wide computer networks, intranets, and the Internet. In the described embodiment of the invention, remote computer 188 executes an Internet Web browser program (which may optionally be integrated into the operating system 170) such as the “Internet Explorer” Web browser manufactured and distributed by Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
  • [0037]
    When used in a LAN networking environment, computer 142 is connected to the local network 192 through a network interface or adapter 196. When used in a WAN networking environment, computer 142 typically includes a modem 198 or other component for establishing communications over the wide area network 194, such as the Internet. The modem 198, which may be internal or external, is connected to the system bus 148 via an interface (e.g., a serial port interface 168). In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the personal computer 142, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It is to be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
  • [0038]
    Generally, the data processors of computer 142 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer. Programs and operating systems are typically distributed, for example, on floppy disks or CD-ROMs. From there, they are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, they are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory. The invention described herein includes these and other various types of computer-readable storage media when such media contain instructions or programs for implementing the steps described below in conjunction with a microprocessor or other data processor. The invention also includes the computer itself when programmed according to the methods and techniques described below. Furthermore, certain sub-components of the computer may be programmed to perform the functions and steps described below. The invention includes such sub-components when they are programmed as described. In addition, the invention described herein includes data structures, described below, as embodied on various types of memory media.
  • [0039]
    For purposes of illustration, programs and other executable program components such as the operating system are illustrated herein as discrete blocks, although it is recognized that such programs and components reside at various times in different storage components of the computer, and are executed by the data processor(s) of the computer.
  • [0040]
    FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary co-location facility in more detail. Co-location facility 104 is illustrated including multiple nodes (also referred to as server computers) 210. Co-location facility 104 can include any number of nodes 210, and can easily include an amount of nodes numbering into the thousands.
  • [0041]
    The nodes 210 are grouped together in clusters, referred to as server clusters (or node clusters). For ease of explanation and to avoid cluttering the drawings, only a single cluster 212 is illustrated in FIG. 3. Each server cluster includes nodes 210 that correspond to a particular customer of co-location facility 104. The nodes 210 of a server cluster are physically isolated from the nodes 210 of other server clusters. This physical isolation can take different forms, such as separate locked cages or separate rooms at co-location facility 104. Physically isolating server clusters ensures customers of co-location facility 104 that only they can physically access their nodes (other customers cannot). Alternatively, server clusters may be logically, but not physically, isolated for each other (e.g., using cluster boundaries as discussed in more detail below).
  • [0042]
    A landlord/tenant relationship (also referred to as a lessor/lessee relationship) can also be established based on the nodes 210. The owner (and/or operator) of co-location facility 104 owns (or otherwise has rights to) the individual nodes 210, and thus can be viewed as a “landlord”. The customers of co-location facility 104 lease the nodes 210 from the landlord, and thus can be viewed as a “tenant”. The landlord is typically not concerned with what types of data or programs are being stored at the nodes 210 by the tenant, but does impose boundaries on the clusters that prevent nodes 210 from different clusters from communicating with one another, as discussed in more detail below.
  • [0043]
    The landlord/tenant relationship is discussed herein primarily with reference to only two levels: the landlord and the tenant. However, in alternate embodiments this relationship can be expanded to any number of levels. For example, the landlord may share its management responsibilities with one or more sub-landlords (each of which would have certain managerial control over one or more nodes 210), and the tenant may similarly share its management responsibilities with one or more sub-tenants (each of which would have certain managerial control over one or more nodes 210).
  • [0044]
    Although physically isolated, nodes 210 of different clusters are often physically coupled to the same transport medium (or media) 211 that enables access to network connection(s) 216, and possibly application operations management console 242, discussed in more detail below. This transport medium can be wired or wireless.
  • [0045]
    As each node 210 can be coupled to a shared transport medium 211, each node 210 is configurable to restrict which other nodes 210 data can be sent to or received from. Given that a number of different nodes 210 may be included in a tenant's server cluster, the tenant may want to be able to pass data between different nodes 210 within the cluster for processing, storage, etc. However, the tenant will typically not want data to be passed to other nodes 210 that are not in the server cluster. Configuring each node 210 in the cluster to restrict which other nodes 210 data can be sent to or received from allows a boundary for the server cluster to be established and enforced. Establishment and enforcement of such server cluster boundaries prevents tenant data from being erroneously or improperly forwarded to a node that is not part of the cluster.
  • [0046]
    These initial boundaries established by the landlord prevent communication between nodes 210 of different tenants, thereby ensuring that each tenant's data can be passed to other nodes 210 of that tenant. The tenant itself may also further define sub-boundaries within its cluster, establishing sub-clusters of nodes 210 that data cannot be communicated out of (or in to) either to or from other nodes in the cluster. The tenant is able to add, modify, remove, etc. such sub-cluster boundaries at will, but only within the boundaries defined by the landlord (that is, the cluster boundaries). Thus, the tenant is not able to alter boundaries in a manner that would allow communication to or from a node 210 to extend to another node 210 that is not within the same cluster.
  • [0047]
    Co-location facility 104 supplies reliable power 214 and reliable network connection(s) 216 to each of the nodes 210. Power 214 and network connection(s) 216 are shared by all of the nodes 210, although alternatively separate power 214 and network connection(s) 216 may be supplied to nodes 210 or groupings (e.g., clusters) of nodes. Any of a wide variety of conventional mechanisms for supplying reliable power can be used to supply reliable power 214, such as power received from a public utility company along with backup generators in the event of power failures, redundant generators, batteries, fuel cells, or other power storage mechanisms, etc. Similarly, any of a wide variety of conventional mechanisms for supplying a reliable network connection can be used to supply network connection(s) 216, such as redundant connection transport media, different types of connection media, different access points (e.g., different Internet access points, different Internet service providers (ISPs), etc.).
  • [0048]
    In certain embodiments, nodes 210 are leased or sold to customers by the operator or owner of co-location facility 104 along with the space (e.g., locked cages) and service (e.g., access to reliable power 214 and network connection(s) 216) at facility 104. In other embodiments, space and service at facility 104 may be leased to customers while one or more nodes are supplied by the customer.
  • [0049]
    Management of each node 210 is carried out in a multiple-tiered manner. FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary multi-tiered management architecture. The multi-tiered architecture includes three tiers: a cluster operations management tier 230, an application operations management tier 232, and an application development tier 234. Cluster operations management tier 230 is implemented locally at the same location as the server(s) being managed (e.g., at a co-location facility) and involves managing the hardware operations of the server(s). In the illustrated example, cluster operations management tier 230 is not concerned with what software components are executing on the nodes 210, but only with the continuing operation of the hardware of nodes 210 and establishing any boundaries between clusters of nodes.
  • [0050]
    The application operations management tier 232, on the other hand, is implemented at a remote location other than where the server(s) being managed are located (e.g., other than the co-location facility), but from a client computer that is still communicatively coupled to the server(s). The application operations management tier 232 involves managing the software operations of the server(s) and defining sub-boundaries within server clusters. The client can be coupled to the server(s) in any of a variety of manners, such as via the Internet or via a dedicated (e.g., dial-up) connection. The client can be coupled continually to the server(s), or alternatively sporadically (e.g., only when needed for management purposes).
  • [0051]
    The application development tier 234 is implemented on another client computer at a location other than the server(s) (e.g., other than at the co-location facility) and involves development of software components or engines for execution on the server(s). Alternatively, current software on a node 210 at co-location facility 104 could be accessed by a remote client to develop additional software components or engines for the node. Although the client at which application development tier 234 is implemented is typically a different client than that at which application operations management tier 232 is implemented, tiers 232 and 234 could be implemented (at least in part) on the same client.
  • [0052]
    Although only three tiers are illustrated in FIG. 4, alternatively the multi-tiered architecture could include different numbers of tiers. For example, the application operations management tier may be separated into two tiers, each having different (or overlapping) responsibilities, resulting in a 4-tiered architecture. The management at these tiers may occur from the same place (e.g., a single application operations management console may be shared), or alternatively from different places (e.g., two different operations management consoles).
  • [0053]
    Returning to FIG. 3, co-location facility 104 includes a cluster operations management console for each server cluster. In the example of FIG. 3, cluster operations management console 240 corresponds to cluster 212. Cluster operations management console 240 implements cluster operations management tier 230 (FIG. 4) for cluster 212 and is responsible for managing the hardware operations of nodes 210 in cluster 212. Cluster operations management console 240 monitors the hardware in cluster 212 and attempts to identify hardware failures. Any of a wide variety of hardware failures can be monitored for, such as processor failures, bus failures, memory failures, etc. Hardware operations can be monitored in any of a variety of manners, such as cluster operations management console 240 sending test messages or control signals to the nodes 210 that require the use of particular hardware in order to respond (no response or an incorrect response indicates failure), having messages or control signals that require the use of particular hardware to generate periodically sent by nodes 210 to cluster operations management console 240 (not receiving such a message or control signal within a specified amount of time indicates failure), etc. Alternatively, cluster operations management console 240 may make no attempt to identify what type of hardware failure has occurred, but rather simply that a failure has occurred.
  • [0054]
    Once a hardware failure is detected, cluster operations management console 240 acts to correct the failure. The action taken by cluster operations management console 240 can vary based on the hardware as well as the type of failure, and can vary for different server clusters. The corrective action can be notification of an administrator (e.g., a flashing light, an audio alarm, an electronic mail message, calling a cell phone or pager, etc.), or an attempt to physically correct the problem (e.g., reboot the node, activate another backup node to take its place, etc.).
  • [0055]
    Cluster operations management console 240 also establishes cluster boundaries within co-location facility 104. The cluster boundaries established by console 240 prevent nodes 210 in one cluster (e.g., cluster 212) from communicating with nodes in another cluster (e.g., any node not in cluster 212), while at the same time not interfering with the ability of nodes 210 within a cluster from communicating with other nodes within that cluster. These boundaries provide security for the tenants' data, allowing them to know that their data cannot be communicated to other tenants' nodes 210 at facility 104 even though network connection 216 may be shared by the tenants.
  • [0056]
    In the illustrated example, each cluster of co-location facility 104 includes a dedicated cluster operations management console. Alternatively, a single cluster operations management console may correspond to, and manage hardware operations of, multiple server clusters. According to another alternative, multiple cluster operations management consoles may correspond to, and manage hardware operations of, a single server cluster. Such multiple consoles can manage a single server cluster in a shared manner, or one console may operate as a backup for another console (e.g., providing increased reliability through redundancy, to allow for maintenance, etc.).
  • [0057]
    An application operations management console 242 is also communicatively coupled to co-location facility 104. Application operations management console 242 is located at a location remote from co-location facility 104 (that is, not within co-location facility 104), typically being located at the offices of the customer. A different application operations management console 242 corresponds to each server cluster of co-location facility 104, although alternatively multiple consoles 242 may correspond to a single server cluster, or a single console 242 may correspond to multiple server clusters. Application operations management console 242 implements application operations management tier 232 (FIG. 4) for cluster 212 and is responsible for managing the software operations of nodes 210 in cluster 212 as well as securing sub-boundaries within cluster 212.
  • [0058]
    Application operations management console 242 monitors the software in cluster 212 and attempts to identify software failures. Any of a wide variety of software failures can be monitored for, such as application processes or threads that are “hung” or otherwise non-responsive, an error in execution of application processes or threads, etc. Software operations can be monitored in any of a variety of manners (similar to the monitoring of hardware operations discussed above), such as application operations management console 242 sending test messages or control signals to particular processes or threads executing on the nodes 210 that require the use of particular routines in order to respond (no response or an incorrect response indicates failure), having messages or control signals that require the use of particular software routines to generate periodically sent by processes or threads executing on nodes 210 to application operations management console 242 (not receiving such a message or control signal within a specified amount of time indicates failure), etc. Alternatively, application operations management console 242 may make no attempt to identify what type of software failure has occurred, but rather simply that a failure has occurred.
  • [0059]
    Once a software failure is detected, application operations management console 242 acts to correct the failure. The action taken by application operations management console 242 can vary based on the hardware as well as the type of failure, and can vary for different server clusters. The corrective action can be notification of an administrator (e.g., a flashing light, an audio alarm, an electronic mail message, calling a cell phone or pager, etc.), or an attempt to correct the problem (e.g., reboot the node, re-load the software component or engine image, terminate and re-execute the process, etc.).
  • [0060]
    Thus, the management of a node 210 is distributed across multiple managers, regardless of the number of other nodes (if any) situated at the same location as the node 210. The multi-tiered management allows the hardware operations management to be separated from the application operations management, allowing two different consoles (each under the control of a different entity) to share the management responsibility for the node.
  • [0061]
    The multi-tiered management architecture can also be used in other situations to manage one or more computers from one or more remote locations, even if the computers are not part of a co-location facility. By way of example, a small business may purchase their own computers, but hire another company to manage the hardware operations of the computers, and possibly yet another company to manage the software operations of the computers.
  • [0062]
    In this example, the small business (the owner of the computers) is a first management tier. The owner then leases the computers to the outsourced hardware operator, which is the second management tier. The hardware operator can manage the hardware operation from a control console, either located locally at the small business along with the computers being managed or alternatively at some remote location, analogous to cluster operations management console 240. The hardware operator then leases the computers to an outsourced software operator, which is the third management tier. The software operator can manage the software operation from a control console, either located locally at the small business along with the computers being managed or alternatively at some remote location, analogous to application operations management console 242. The software operator then leases the computers back to their owner, so the owner becomes the “user” of the computers, which is the fourth management tier. During normal operation, the computer owner occupies this fourth management tier. However, the computer owner can exercise its first management tier rights to sever one or both of the leases to the software operator and the hardware operator, such as when the computer owner desires to change software or hardware operators.
  • [0063]
    FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary node in more detail in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention. Node 248 is an exemplary node managed by other devices (e.g., consoles 240 and 242 of FIG. 3) external to the node. Node 248 can be a node 210 of FIG. 3, or alternatively a node at another location (e.g., a computer in a business or home environment). Node 248 includes a monitor 250, referred to as the “BMonitor”, and a plurality of software components or engines 252, and is coupled to (or alternatively incorporates) a mass storage device 262. In the illustrated example, node 248 is a server computer having a processor(s) that supports multiple privilege levels (e.g., rings in an x86 architecture processor). In the illustrated example, these privilege levels are referred to as rings, although alternate implementations using different processor architectures may use different nomenclature. The multiple rings provide a set of prioritized levels that software can execute at, often including 4 levels (Rings 0, 1, 2, and 3). Ring 0 is typically referred to as the most privileged ring. Software processes executing in Ring 0 can typically access more features (e.g., instructions) than processes executing in less privileged Rings. Furthermore, a processor executing in a particular Ring cannot alter code or data in a higher priority ring. In the illustrated example, BMonitor 250 executes in Ring 0, while engines 252 execute in Ring 1 (or alternatively Rings 2 and/or 3). Thus, the code or data of BMonitor 250 (executing in Ring 0) cannot be altered directly by engines 252 (executing in Ring 1). Rather, any such alterations would have to be made by an engine 252 requesting BMonitor 250 to make the alteration (e.g., by sending a message to BMonitor 250, invoking a function of BMonitor 250, etc.). Implementing BMonitor 250 in Ring 0 protects BMonitor 250 from a rogue or malicious engine 252 that tries to bypass any restrictions imposed by BMonitor 250.
  • [0064]
    BMonitor 250 is the fundamental control module of node 248—it controls (and optionally includes) both the network interface card and the memory manager. By controlling the network interface card (which may be separate from BMonitor 250, or alternatively BMonitor 250 may be incorporated on the network interface card), BMonitor 250 can control data received by and sent by node 248. By controlling the memory manager, BMonitor 250 controls the allocation of memory to engines 252 executing in node 248 and thus can assist in preventing rogue or malicious engines from interfering with the operation of BMonitor 250.
  • [0065]
    Although various aspects of node 248 may be under control of BMonitor 250 (e.g., the network interface card), BMonitor 250 still makes at least part of such functionality available to engines 252 executing on the node 248. BMonitor 250 provides an interface (e.g., via controller 254 discussed in more detail below) via which engines 252 can request access to the functionality, such as to send data out to another node 248 or to the Internet. These requests can take any of a variety of forms, such as sending messages, calling a function, etc.
  • [0066]
    BMonitor 250 includes controller 254, network interface 256, one or more filters 258, and a Distributed Host Control Protocol (DHCP) module 260. Network interface 256 provides the interface between node 248 and the network (e.g., network connections 126 of FIG. 3) via the internal transport medium 211 of co-location facility 104. Filters 258 identify other nodes 248 (and/or other sources or targets (e.g., coupled to Internet 108 of FIG. 1) that data can (or alternatively cannot) be sent to and/or received from. The nodes or other sources/targets can be identified in any of a wide variety of manners, such as by network address (e.g., Internet Protocol (IP) address), some other globally unique identifier, a locally unique identifier (e.g., a numbering scheme proprietary or local to co-location facility 104), etc.
  • [0067]
    Filters 258 can fully restrict access to a node (e.g., no data can be received from or sent to the node), or partially restrict access to a node. Partial access restriction can take different forms. For example, a node may be restricted so that data can be received from the node but not sent to the node (or vice versa). By way of another example, a node may be restricted so that only certain types of data (e.g., communications in accordance with certain protocols, such as HTTP) can be received from and/or sent to the node. Filtering based on particular types of data can be implemented in different manners, such as by communicating data in packets with header information that indicate the type of data included in the packet.
  • [0068]
    Filters 258 can be added by application operations management console 242 or cluster operations management console 240. In the illustrated example, filters added by cluster operations management console 240 (to establish cluster boundaries) restrict full access to nodes (e.g., any access to another node can be prevented) whereas filters added by application operations management console 242 (to establish sub-boundaries within a cluster) can restrict either full access to nodes or partial access.
  • [0069]
    Controller 254 also imposes some restrictions on what filters can be added to filters 258. In the illustrated example, controller 254 allows cluster operations management console 240 to add any filters it desires (which will define the boundaries of the cluster). However, controller 254 restricts application operations management console 242 to adding only filters that are at least as restrictive as those added by console 240. If console 242 attempts to add a filter that is less restrictive than those added by console 240 (in which case the sub-boundary may extend beyond the cluster boundaries), controller 254 refuses to add the filter (or alternatively may modify the filter so that it is not less restrictive). By imposing such a restriction, controller 254 can ensure that the sub-boundaries established at the application operations management level do not extend beyond the cluster boundaries established at the cluster operations management level.
  • [0070]
    Controller 254, using one or more filters 258, operates to restrict data packets sent from node 248 and/or received by node 248. All data intended for an engine 252, or sent by an engine 252, to another node, is passed through network interface 256 and filters 258. Controller 254 applies the filters 258 to the data, comparing the target of the data (e.g., typically identified in a header portion of a packet including the data) to acceptable (and/or restricted) nodes (and/or network addresses) identified in filters 258. If filters 258 indicate that the target of the data is acceptable, then controller 254 allows the data to pass through to the target (either into node 248 or out from node 248). However, if filters 258 indicate that the target of the data is not acceptable, then controller 254 prevents the data from passing through to the target. Controller 254 may return an indication to the source of the data that the data cannot be passed to the target, or may simply ignore or discard the data.
  • [0071]
    The application of filters 258 to the data by controller 254 allows the boundary restrictions of a server cluster to be imposed. Filters 258 can be programmed (e.g., by application operations management console 242 of FIG. 3) with the node addresses of all the nodes within the server cluster (e.g., cluster 212). Controller 254 then prevents data received from any node not within the server cluster from being passed through to an engine 252, and similarly prevents any data being sent to a node other than one within the server cluster from being sent. Similarly, data received from Internet 108 (FIG. 1) can identify a target node 210 (e.g., by IP address), so that controller 254 of any node other than the target node will prevent the data from being passed through to an engine 252.
  • [0072]
    DHCP module 260 implements the Distributed Host Control Protocol, allowing BMonitor 250 (and thus node 210) to obtain an IP address from a DHCP server (e.g., cluster operations management console 240 of FIG. 3). During an initialization process for node 210, DHCP module 260 requests an IP address from the DHCP server, which in turn provides the IP address to module 260. Additional information regarding DHCP is available from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Wash.
  • [0073]
    Software engines 252 include any of a wide variety of conventional software components. Examples of engines 252 include an operating system (e.g., Windows NT®), a load balancing server component (e.g., to balance the processing load of multiple nodes 248), a caching server component (e.g., to cache data and/or instructions from another node 248 or received via the Internet), a storage manager component (e.g., to manage storage of data from another node 248 or received via the Internet), etc. In one implementation, each of the engines 252 is a protocol-based engine, communicating with BMonitor 250 and other engines 252 via messages and/or function calls without requiring the engines 252 and BMonitor 250 to be written using the same programming language.
  • [0074]
    Controller 254 is further responsible for controlling the execution of engines 252. This control can take different forms, including beginning execution of an engine 252, terminating execution of an engine 252, re-loading an image of an engine 252 from a storage device, debugging execution of an engine 252, etc. Controller 254 receives instructions from application operations management console 242 of FIG. 3 regarding which of these control actions to take and when to take them. Thus, the control of engines 252 is actually managed by the remote application operations management console 242, not locally at co-location facility 104. Controller 254 also provides an interface via which application operations management console 242 can identify filters to add (and/or remove) from filter set 258.
  • [0075]
    Controller 254 also includes an interface via which cluster operations management console 240 of FIG. 3 can communicate commands to controller 254. Different types of hardware operation oriented commands can be communicated to controller 254 by cluster operations management console 240, such as re-booting the node, shutting down the node, placing the node in a low-power state (e.g., in a suspend or standby state), changing cluster boundaries, changing encryption keys, etc.
  • [0076]
    Controller 254 further provides encryption support for BMonitor 250, allowing data to be stored securely on mass storage device 262 (e.g., a magnetic disk, an optical disk, etc.) and secure communications to occur between node 248 and an operations management console (e.g., console 240 or 242 of FIG. 3). Controller 254 maintains multiple encryption keys, including: one for the landlord (referred to as the “landlord key”) which accesses node 248 from cluster operations management console 240, one for the lessee of node 248 (referred to as the “tenant key”) which accesses node 248 from application operations management console 242, and keys that BMonitor 250 uses to securely store data on mass storage device 262 (referred to as the “disk key”).
  • [0077]
    BMonitor 250 makes use of public key cryptography to provide secure communications between node 248 and the management consoles (e.g., consoles 240 and 242). Public key cryptography is based on a key pair, including both a public key and a private key, and an encryption algorithm. The encryption algorithm can encrypt data based on the public key such that it cannot be decrypted efficiently without the private key. Thus, communications from the public-key holder can be encrypted using the public key, allowing only the private-key holder to decrypt the communications. Any of a variety of public key cryptography techniques may be used, such as the well-known RSA (Rivest, Shamir, and Adelman) encryption technique. For a basic introduction of cryptography, the reader is directed to a text written by Bruce Schneier and entitled “Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C,” published by John Wiley & Sons with copyright 1994 (or second edition with copyright 1996).
  • [0078]
    BMonitor 250 is initialized to include a public/private key pair for both the landlord and the tenant. These key pairs can be generated by BMonitor 250, or alternatively by some other component and stored within BMonitor 250 (with that other component being trusted to destroy its knowledge of the key pair). As used herein, U refers to a public key and R refers to a private key. The public/private key pair 264 for the landlord is referred to as (UL, RL), and the public/private key pair 266 for the tenant is referred to as (UT, RT). BMonitor 250 makes the public keys UL and UT available to the landlord, but keeps the private keys RL and RT secret. In the illustrated example, BMonitor 250 never divulges the private keys RL and RT, so both the landlord and the tenant can be assured that no entity other than the BMonitor 250 can decrypt information that they encrypt using their public keys (e.g., via cluster operations management console 240 and application operations management console 242 of FIG. 3, respectively).
  • [0079]
    Once the landlord has the public keys UL and UT, the landlord can assign node 210 to a particular tenant, giving that tenant the public key UT. Use of the public key UT allows the tenant to encrypt communications to BMonitor 250 that only BMonitor 250 can decrypt (using the private key RT). Although not required, a prudent initial step for the tenant is to request that BMonitor 250 generate a new public/private key pair (UT, RT). In response to such a request, a key generator 268 of BMonitor 250 generates a new public/private key pair in any of a variety of well-known manners, stores the new key pair as key pair 266, and returns the new public key UT to the tenant. By generating a new key pair, the tenant is assured that no other entity, including the landlord, is aware of the tenant public key UT. Additionally, the tenant may also have new key pairs generated at subsequent times.
  • [0080]
    BMonitor 250 enforces restrictions on what entities can request new public/private key pairs. The tenant is able to request new tenant public/private key pairs, but is not able to request new landlord public/private key pairs. The landlord, however, can request new landlord public/private key pairs as well as new tenant public/private key pairs. Whenever a request for a new public/private key pair is received, controller 254 verifies the identity of the requestor as the tenant or landlord (e.g., based on a remote log-in procedure, password verification, manner in which the requestor is communicating with or is coupled to node 248, etc.) before generating the new key pair.
  • [0081]
    In order to ensure bi-directional communication security between BMonitor 250 and the landlord and tenant control devices (e.g., operations management consoles 240 and 242, respectively), the landlord and tenant control devices may also generate (or otherwise be assigned) public/private key pairs. In this situation, consoles 240 and 242 can communicate their respective public keys to BMonitors 250 of nodes 248 they desire (or expect to desire) to communicate with securely. Once the public key of a console is known by a BMonitor 250, the BMonitor 250 can encrypt communications to that console using its public key, thereby preventing any other device except the console having the private key from reading the communication.
  • [0082]
    BMonitor 250 also maintains a disk key 270, which is generated based on one or more symmetric keys 272 and 274 (symmetric keys refer to secret keys used in secret key cryptography). Disk key 270, also a symmetric key, is used by BMonitor 250 to store information in mass storage device 262. BMonitor 250 keeps disk key 270 secure, using it only to encrypt data node 248 stores on mass storage device 262 and decrypt data node 248 retrieves from mass storage device 262 (thus there is no need for any other entities, including the landlord and tenant, to have knowledge of disk key 270). Alternatively, the landlord or tenant may be informed of disk key 270, or another key on which disk key 270 is based.
  • [0083]
    Use of disk key 270 ensures that data stored on mass storage device 262 can only be decrypted by the node 248 that encrypted it, and not any other node or device. Thus, for example, if mass storage device 262 were to be removed and attempts made to read the data on device 262, such attempts would be unsuccessful. BMonitor 250 uses disk key 270 to encrypt data to be stored on mass storage device 262 regardless of the source of the data. For example, the data may come from a client device (e.g., client 102 of FIG. 1) used by a customer of the tenant, from an operations management console (e.g., console 242 of FIG. 3), etc.
  • [0084]
    Disk key 270 is generated based on symmetric keys 272 and 274. As used herein, K refers to a symmetric key, so KL refers to a landlord symmetric key (key 272) and KT refers to a tenant symmetric key (key 274). The individual keys 272 and 274 can be generated in any of a wide variety of conventional manners (e.g., based on a random number generator). Disk key 270 is either the KL key alone, or alternatively is a combination of the KL and KT keys. In situations where the node 210 is not currently leased to a tenant, or in which the tenant has not established a KT key, then controller 254 maintains the KL key as disk key 270. However, in situations where the node 248 is leased to a tenant that establishes a KT key, then disk key 270 is a combination of the KL and KT keys. The KL and KT keys can be combined in a variety of different manners, and in one implementation are combined by using one of the keys to encrypt the other key, with the resultant encrypted key being disk key 270. Thus, the data stored on mass storage device 262 is always encrypted, even if the tenant does not establish a symmetric key KT. Additionally, in situations where the landlord and tenant are aware of their respective keys KL and KT, then the combination of the keys results in a key that can be used to encrypt the data so that neither the landlord nor the tenant can decrypt it individually.
  • [0085]
    In the illustrated example, a node 248 does not initially have symmetric keys KL and KT. When the landlord initializes the node 248, it requests a new key KL (e.g., via cluster operations management console 240 of FIG. 3), in response to which key generator 268 generates a new key and controller 254 maintains the newly generated key as key 272. Similarly, when a tenant initially leases a node 248 there is not yet a tenant symmetric key KT for node 248. The tenant can communicate a request for a new key KT (e.g., via application operations management console 242 of FIG. 3), in response to which key generator 268 generates a new key and controller 254 maintains the newly generated key as key 274. Additionally, each time a new key KT or KL is generated, then controller 254 generates a new disk key 270.
  • [0086]
    Although only a landlord and tenant key (KL and KT) are illustrated in FIG. 5, alternatively additional symmetric keys (e.g., from a sub-tenant, a sub-landlord, etc.) may be combined to generate disk key 270. For example, if there are three symmetric keys, then they can be combined by encrypting a first of the keys with a second of the keys, and then encrypting the result with the third of the keys to generate disk key 270. Additional symmetric keys may be used, for example, for a sub-tenant(s).
  • [0087]
    The landlord can also request new public/private key pairs from BMonitor 250, either tenant key pairs or landlord key pairs. Requesting new key pairs can allow, for example, the landlord to re-assign a node 248 from one tenant to another. By way of example, if a tenant no longer desires the node 248 (or does not make required lease payments for the node), then the landlord can communicate with BMonitor 250 (e.g., via console 240 of FIG. 3) to change the public/private key pairs of the tenant (thereby prohibiting any communications from the tenant from being decrypted by the BMonitor 250 because the tenant does not have the new key). Additionally, the landlord may also request a new public/private key pair for the landlord—this may be done at particular intervals or simply whenever the landlord desires a new key (e.g., for safety concerns).
  • [0088]
    In one implementation, BMonitor 250 discards both the disk key 270 and the landlord symmetric key KL, and generates a new key KL (and a new disk key 270) each time it generates a new landlord private key RL. By replacing the key KL and disk key 270 (and keeping no record of the old keys), the landlord can ensure that once it changes its key, any tenant data previously stored at the node 210 cannot be accessed. Thus, care should be taken by the landlord to generate a new public/private key pair only when the landlord wants to prevent the tenant from accessing the data previously stored at node 248.
  • [0089]
    Additionally, BMonitor 250 may also replace both the disk key 270 and the tenant symmetric key KT, with a newly generated key KT (and a new disk key 270) each time it generates a new tenant private key RT. This allows the tenant to increase the security of the data being stored at the node 248 because it can change how that data is encrypted as it desires. However, as BMonitor 250 discards the previous key KT and disk key 270, care should be exercised by the tenant to request a new tenant private key RT only when the data previously stored at node 210 is no longer needed (e.g., has been backed up elsewhere).
  • [0090]
    It should be noted that different nodes 248 will typically have different keys (keys 264, 266, and 270). Alternatively, attempts may be made to have multiple nodes use the same key (e.g., key 270). However, in such situations care should be taken to ensure that any communication of the keys (e.g., between nodes 248) is done in a secure manner so that the security is not compromised. For example, additional public/private key pairs may be used by BMonitors 250 of two nodes 248 to securely communicate information between one another.
  • [0091]
    A leased hardware environment having guaranteed and enforced rights can thus be established. Landlords can lease nodes to multiple different tenants and establish boundaries that prevent nodes leased by different tenants from communicating with one another. Tenants can be assured that nodes they lease are accessible for management only to them, not to others, and that data is stored at the nodes securely so that no one else can access it (even if the tenant leaves or reduces its hardware usages). Furthermore, landlords and tenants are both assured that the landlord can move equipment, change which nodes are assigned to individuals, remove hardware (e.g., mass storage devices), etc. without compromising the secure storage of data by any of the tenants.
  • [0092]
    FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for encryption key generation and distribution in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention. Initially, the computer (e.g., a node 248 of FIG. 5) identifies public/private key pairs for both the landlord and the tenant (act 280). This identification can be accessing previously generated key pairs, or alternatively generating a new key pair by the computer itself. The computer keeps both the landlord private key from the landlord key pair and the tenant private key from the tenant key pair secret, but forwards the landlord public key from the landlord key pair and the tenant public key from the tenant key pair to the landlord (act 282). In the illustrated example, the landlord is represented by cluster operations management console 240 of FIG. 3, although alternatively other devices or entities could represent the landlord.
  • [0093]
    The landlord then forwards the tenant public key to the tenant (act 284). In the illustrated example, the tenant is represented by application operations management console 242 of FIG. 3, although alternatively other devices or entities could represent the tenant. The tenant then communicates with the computer to generate a new tenant key pair (act 286). The computer keeps the tenant private key from the new key pair secret and forwards the tenant public key from the new key pair to the tenant (act 288). The tenant is then able to communicate secure messages (e.g., data, instructions, requests, etc.) to the computer using the new tenant public key (act 290), while the landlord is able to communicate secure messages to the computer using the landlord public key (act 292).
  • [0094]
    FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for the operation of a cluster operations management console in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention. The process of FIG. 7 is implemented by a cluster operations management console at a co-location faicility, and may be performed in software.
  • [0095]
    Initially, the cluster operations management console configures the nodes in the server cluster with the boundaries (if any) of the server cluster (act 300). This configuration is accomplished by the cluster operations management console communicating filters to the nodes in the server cluster(s).
  • [0096]
    Hardware operations within a server cluster are then continually monitored for a hardware falilure (acts 302 and 304). Once a hardware falilure is detected, corrective action is taken (act 306) and monitoring of the hardware operation continues. Any of a wide variety of corrective action can be taken, as discussed is above. Note that, based on the corrective action (or at other times), the nodes may be re-configured with new cluster boundaries (act 300).
  • [0097]
    FIG. 8 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary process for the operation of an application operations management console in accordance with certain embodiments of the invention. The process of FIG. 8 is implemented by an application operations management console located remotely from the co-location faicility, and may be performed in software.
  • [0098]
    Initially, the application operations management console configures the nodes in the server cluster with sub-boundaries (if any) of the server cluster (act 320). This configuration is accomplished by the application operations management console communicating filters to the nodes in the server cluster.
  • [0099]
    Software operations within the server cluster are then continually monitored until a software failure is detected (acts 322 and 324). This software failure could be failure of a particular software engine (e.g., the engine faills, but the other engines are still running), or alternatively failure of the entire node (e.g., the entire node is hung). Once a software failure is detected, corrective action is taken (act 326) and monitoring of the software operation continues. Any of a wide variety of corrective action can be taken, as discussed above. Note that, based on the corrective action (or at any other time during operation), the server computer may be re-configured with new sub-boundaries (act 320).
  • CONCLUSION
  • [0100]
    Although the description above uses language that is specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not limited to the specific features or acts described. Rather, the specific features and acts are disclosed as exemplary forms of implementing the invention.

Claims (20)

  1. 1. A computer comprising:
    a processor; and
    a memory, coupled to the processor, to store a plurality of instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the processor to perform acts comprising:
    allowing a tenant to which a cluster of one or more computers at a facility have been leased to communicate with the one or more computers, wherein the allowing comprises establishing secure communications channels between the one or more computers and a corresponding tenant operations management console;
    implementing cluster boundaries at the facility to prevent computers within the cluster from communicating with computers in another cluster, wherein the cluster boundaries are implemented at a first tier of a multi-tiered management architecture; and
    allowing the tenant operations management console, implemented in a second tier of the multi-tiered management architecture, to establish sub-boundaries within the cluster.
  2. 2. A computer as recited in claim 1, wherein the facility comprises a co-location facility.
  3. 3. A computer as recited in claim 1, wherein each of the sub-boundaries within the cluster prevents one or more computers in the cluster from communicating with one or more other computers in the cluster.
  4. 4. A computer as recited in claim 1, the plurality of instructions further causing the processor to perform acts comprising:
    performing at least some management of the one or more computers via a landlord operations management console; and
    establishing secure communications channels between each of the one or more computers and the landlord operations management console.
  5. 5. A computer as recited in claim 4, wherein the landlord operations management console is located at the facility.
  6. 6. A computer as recited in claim 1, wherein the cluster includes one or more additional computers that have not been leased to the tenant.
  7. 7. A computer as recited in claim 1, wherein the implementing cluster boundaries comprises adding one or more filters to each of the one or more computers in the cluster.
  8. 8. A computer as recited in claim 7, wherein the implementing cluster boundaries further comprises including, in filters of each of the one or more computers, the addresses of the other computers at the facility that are not in the cluster.
  9. 9. A computer as recited in claim 7, wherein the allowing the tenant operations management console to establish sub-boundaries comprises allowing the tenant operations management console to establish sub-boundaries within the cluster to prevent one or more computers in the cluster from communicating with one or more other computers in the cluster.
  10. 10. A computer as recited in claim 9, wherein the allowing the tenant operations management console to establish sub-boundaries comprises allowing the tenant operations management console to add one or more additional filters to one or more computers in the cluster, wherein each of the one or more additional filters is at least as restrictive as the one or more filters added in implementing the cluster boundaries.
  11. 11. A system comprising:
    means for allowing a tenant to which a cluster of one or more computers at a facility have been leased to communicate with the one or more computers, wherein the means for allowing comprises means for establishing secure communications channels between the one or more computers and a corresponding tenant operations management console;
    means for implementing cluster boundaries at the facility to prevent computers within the cluster from communicating with computers in another cluster, wherein the cluster boundaries are implemented at a first tier of a multi-tiered management architecture; and
    means for allowing the tenant operations management console, implemented in a second tier of the multi-tiered management architecture, to establish sub-boundaries within the cluster.
  12. 12. A system as recited in claim 11, wherein the facility comprises a co-location facility.
  13. 13. A system as recited in claim 11, wherein each of the sub-boundaries within the cluster prevents one or more computers in the cluster from communicating with one or more other computers in the cluster.
  14. 14. A system as recited in claim 11, further comprising:
    means for performing at least some management of the one or more computers via a landlord operations management console; and
    means for establishing secure communications channels between each of the one or more computers and the landlord operations management console.
  15. 15. A system as recited in claim 14, wherein the landlord operations management console is located at the facility.
  16. 16. A system as recited in claim 11, wherein the cluster includes one or more additional computers that have not been leased to the tenant.
  17. 17. A system as recited in claim 11, wherein the means for implementing cluster boundaries comprises means for adding one or more filters to each of the one or more computers in the cluster.
  18. 18. A system as recited in claim 17, wherein the means for implementing cluster boundaries further comprises means for including, in filters of each of the one or more computers, the addresses of the other computers at the facility that are not in the cluster.
  19. 19. A system as recited in claim 17, wherein the means for allowing the tenant operations management console to establish sub-boundaries comprises means for allowing the tenant operations management console to establish sub-boundaries within the cluster to prevent one or more computers in the cluster from communicating with one or more other computers in the cluster.
  20. 20. A system as recited in claim 19, wherein the means for allowing the tenant operations management console to establish sub-boundaries comprises means for allowing the tenant operations management console to add one or more additional filters to one or more computers in the cluster, wherein each of the one or more additional filters is at least as restrictive as the one or more filters added in implementing the cluster boundaries.
US11457980 2000-10-24 2006-07-17 System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers Abandoned US20060259610A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09695812 US7606898B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2000-10-24 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10987229 US7200655B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-12 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US11457980 US20060259610A1 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-07-17 System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11457980 US20060259610A1 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-07-17 System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060259610A1 true true US20060259610A1 (en) 2006-11-16

Family

ID=24794557

Family Applications (8)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09695812 Active 2026-06-07 US7606898B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2000-10-24 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10978873 Active US7406517B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-01 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10979565 Active 2024-09-13 US7711121B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-02 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10987404 Active 2020-12-06 US7370103B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-12 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10987405 Active 2023-12-24 US7739380B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-12 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10987229 Active 2021-03-25 US7200655B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-12 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US11457980 Abandoned US20060259610A1 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-07-17 System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers
US11457942 Abandoned US20060259609A1 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-07-17 System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers

Family Applications Before (6)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09695812 Active 2026-06-07 US7606898B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2000-10-24 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10978873 Active US7406517B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-01 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10979565 Active 2024-09-13 US7711121B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-02 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10987404 Active 2020-12-06 US7370103B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-12 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10987405 Active 2023-12-24 US7739380B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-12 System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US10987229 Active 2021-03-25 US7200655B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2004-11-12 System and method for distributed management of shared computers

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11457942 Abandoned US20060259609A1 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-07-17 System and Method for Distributed Management of Shared Computers

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (8) US7606898B1 (en)
EP (6) EP2424164B8 (en)
JP (5) JP4261096B2 (en)
ES (3) ES2643489T3 (en)

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050256935A1 (en) * 2004-05-06 2005-11-17 Overstreet Matthew L System and method for managing a network
US7669235B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2010-02-23 Microsoft Corporation Secure domain join for computing devices
US7684964B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Model and system state synchronization
US7689676B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Model-based policy application
US7711121B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2010-05-04 Microsoft Corporation System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US7778422B2 (en) 2004-02-27 2010-08-17 Microsoft Corporation Security associations for devices
US7792931B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-09-07 Microsoft Corporation Model-based system provisioning
US7797147B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2010-09-14 Microsoft Corporation Model-based system monitoring
US7941309B2 (en) 2005-11-02 2011-05-10 Microsoft Corporation Modeling IT operations/policies
US8489728B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2013-07-16 Microsoft Corporation Model-based system monitoring
US8549513B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2013-10-01 Microsoft Corporation Model-based virtual system provisioning

Families Citing this family (89)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6772333B1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2004-08-03 Dickens Coal Llc Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide id visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US7305492B2 (en) * 2001-07-06 2007-12-04 Juniper Networks, Inc. Content service aggregation system
US7200662B2 (en) 2001-07-06 2007-04-03 Juniper Networks, Inc. Integrated rule network management system
US8005926B2 (en) * 2001-07-26 2011-08-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Tiered web site with web-tier admission control based on utilization data generated on application tier
US8086720B2 (en) * 2002-01-31 2011-12-27 International Business Machines Corporation Performance reporting in a network environment
US7392421B1 (en) * 2002-03-18 2008-06-24 Symantec Operating Corporation Framework for managing clustering and replication
CA2377649C (en) * 2002-03-20 2009-02-03 Ibm Canada Limited-Ibm Canada Limitee Dynamic cluster database architecture
US7167547B2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2007-01-23 Bellsouth Intellectual Property Corporation Personal calendaring, schedules, and notification using directory data
JP4004839B2 (en) * 2002-04-15 2007-11-07 株式会社東芝 Communication device and a network system
US7412502B2 (en) * 2002-04-18 2008-08-12 International Business Machines Corporation Graphics for end to end component mapping and problem-solving in a network environment
FR2844370B1 (en) * 2002-09-05 2008-05-09 Canon Kk Electronic document description of an IT service
US7577730B2 (en) * 2002-11-27 2009-08-18 International Business Machines Corporation Semi-hierarchical system and method for administration of clusters of computer resources
US20040205184A1 (en) * 2003-03-06 2004-10-14 International Business Machines Corporation E-business operations measurements reporting
US7072807B2 (en) * 2003-03-06 2006-07-04 Microsoft Corporation Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications
US8527620B2 (en) * 2003-03-06 2013-09-03 International Business Machines Corporation E-business competitive measurements
US8539063B1 (en) 2003-08-29 2013-09-17 Mcafee, Inc. Method and system for containment of networked application client software by explicit human input
US8543566B2 (en) * 2003-09-23 2013-09-24 Salesforce.Com, Inc. System and methods of improving a multi-tenant database query using contextual knowledge about non-homogeneously distributed tenant data
US7529728B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2009-05-05 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Query optimization in a multi-tenant database system
US7840968B1 (en) 2003-12-17 2010-11-23 Mcafee, Inc. Method and system for containment of usage of language interfaces
US7783735B1 (en) 2004-03-22 2010-08-24 Mcafee, Inc. Containment of network communication
US20060031469A1 (en) * 2004-06-29 2006-02-09 International Business Machines Corporation Measurement, reporting, and management of quality of service for a real-time communication application in a network environment
EP1624615B1 (en) * 2004-08-02 2008-02-20 Alcatel Lucent Shared resources in a multi manager environment
US7873955B1 (en) 2004-09-07 2011-01-18 Mcafee, Inc. Solidifying the executable software set of a computer
WO2006096681A1 (en) * 2005-03-07 2006-09-14 Computer Associates Think, Inc. System and method for data manipulation
US7698634B2 (en) * 2005-03-07 2010-04-13 Computer Associates Think, Inc. System and method for data manipulation
US7840895B2 (en) * 2005-03-07 2010-11-23 Computer Associates Think, Inc. System and method for data manipulation
US7603552B1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2009-10-13 Mcafee, Inc. Piracy prevention using unique module translation
US7856661B1 (en) 2005-07-14 2010-12-21 Mcafee, Inc. Classification of software on networked systems
US7512677B2 (en) * 2005-10-20 2009-03-31 Uplogix, Inc. Non-centralized network device management using console communications system and method
US7596671B2 (en) * 2005-11-09 2009-09-29 Microsoft Corporation Pre-paid computer monitoring hardware
US7757269B1 (en) 2006-02-02 2010-07-13 Mcafee, Inc. Enforcing alignment of approved changes and deployed changes in the software change life-cycle
US7895573B1 (en) 2006-03-27 2011-02-22 Mcafee, Inc. Execution environment file inventory
US7870387B1 (en) 2006-04-07 2011-01-11 Mcafee, Inc. Program-based authorization
US8352930B1 (en) * 2006-04-24 2013-01-08 Mcafee, Inc. Software modification by group to minimize breakage
US20070260502A1 (en) * 2006-05-04 2007-11-08 Microsoft Corporation Project resource plans
US8555404B1 (en) 2006-05-18 2013-10-08 Mcafee, Inc. Connectivity-based authorization
US8185619B1 (en) * 2006-06-28 2012-05-22 Compuware Corporation Analytics system and method
US8095531B2 (en) * 2006-10-03 2012-01-10 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Methods and systems for controlling access to custom objects in a database
US20080086353A1 (en) * 2006-10-04 2008-04-10 Microsoft Corporation Server level summary information of resource utilization
US9424154B2 (en) 2007-01-10 2016-08-23 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for computer system state checks
US8332929B1 (en) 2007-01-10 2012-12-11 Mcafee, Inc. Method and apparatus for process enforced configuration management
US9081805B1 (en) * 2007-05-08 2015-07-14 Progress Software Corporation Tenant-aware database for software as a service
US8850035B1 (en) * 2007-05-16 2014-09-30 Yahoo! Inc. Geographically distributed real time communications platform
US7895400B2 (en) * 2007-09-28 2011-02-22 Oracle America, Inc. Hybrid cache coherence using fine-grained hardware message passing
US8055735B2 (en) * 2007-10-30 2011-11-08 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for forming a cluster of networked nodes
US8195931B1 (en) 2007-10-31 2012-06-05 Mcafee, Inc. Application change control
US8701189B2 (en) 2008-01-31 2014-04-15 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for computer system denial-of-service protection
US8122486B2 (en) * 2008-04-09 2012-02-21 Embarq Holdings Company Llc Method and system for secure management of co-located customer premises equipment
US8615502B2 (en) 2008-04-18 2013-12-24 Mcafee, Inc. Method of and system for reverse mapping vnode pointers
US7886021B2 (en) * 2008-04-28 2011-02-08 Oracle America, Inc. System and method for programmatic management of distributed computing resources
US8544003B1 (en) 2008-12-11 2013-09-24 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for managing virtual machine configurations
US20100228819A1 (en) * 2009-03-05 2010-09-09 Yottaa Inc System and method for performance acceleration, data protection, disaster recovery and on-demand scaling of computer applications
US8341627B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2012-12-25 Mcafee, Inc. Method and system for providing user space address protection from writable memory area in a virtual environment
US8381284B2 (en) 2009-08-21 2013-02-19 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for enforcing security policies in a virtual environment
US20110055899A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-03 Uplogix, Inc. Secure remote management of network devices with local processing and secure shell for remote distribution of information
US20110055367A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-03 Dollar James E Serial port forwarding over secure shell for secure remote management of networked devices
US8782047B2 (en) * 2009-10-30 2014-07-15 Hitachi Data Systems Corporation Fixed content storage within a partitioned content platform using namespaces
US9552497B2 (en) 2009-11-10 2017-01-24 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for preventing data loss using virtual machine wrapped applications
US8868764B2 (en) 2009-12-18 2014-10-21 Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc System and method for management of ethernet premise devices
US8925101B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2014-12-30 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for local protection against malicious software
US8938800B2 (en) 2010-07-28 2015-01-20 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for network level protection against malicious software
US8549003B1 (en) 2010-09-12 2013-10-01 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for clustering host inventories
US9015493B2 (en) * 2010-09-16 2015-04-21 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Multitenant-aware protection service
US9075993B2 (en) 2011-01-24 2015-07-07 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for selectively grouping and managing program files
DE102011009518B4 (en) * 2011-01-26 2013-09-12 Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg Circuit arrangement for connecting interface
US9112830B2 (en) 2011-02-23 2015-08-18 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US9342254B2 (en) * 2011-06-04 2016-05-17 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Sector-based write filtering with selective file and registry exclusions
US9594881B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2017-03-14 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for passive threat detection using virtual memory inspection
US8694738B2 (en) 2011-10-11 2014-04-08 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for critical address space protection in a hypervisor environment
US8973144B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2015-03-03 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US9069586B2 (en) 2011-10-13 2015-06-30 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for kernel rootkit protection in a hypervisor environment
US8713668B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-04-29 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for redirected firewall discovery in a network environment
US8800024B2 (en) 2011-10-17 2014-08-05 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for host-initiated firewall discovery in a network environment
US9559948B2 (en) * 2012-02-29 2017-01-31 Dell Products, Lp System and method for managing unknown flows in a flow-based switching device
CN103368859A (en) * 2012-03-28 2013-10-23 全球视讯系统股份有限公司 Data communication managing system and method thereof
US8739272B1 (en) 2012-04-02 2014-05-27 Mcafee, Inc. System and method for interlocking a host and a gateway
US9374228B2 (en) * 2012-10-12 2016-06-21 International Business Machines Corporation Verifying a geographic location of a virtual disk image executing at a data center server within a data center
KR20140062288A (en) * 2012-11-14 2014-05-23 한국전자통신연구원 Apparatus for processing error of robot component and method thereof
US8973146B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2015-03-03 Mcafee, Inc. Herd based scan avoidance system in a network environment
US9258234B1 (en) 2012-12-28 2016-02-09 Juniper Networks, Inc. Dynamically adjusting liveliness detection intervals for periodic network communications
US8953460B1 (en) 2012-12-31 2015-02-10 Juniper Networks, Inc. Network liveliness detection using session-external communications
US9787531B2 (en) * 2013-10-11 2017-10-10 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic notification of isolation
CN105580023A (en) 2013-10-24 2016-05-11 迈克菲股份有限公司 Agent assisted malicious application blocking in a network environment
US9411611B2 (en) 2014-05-02 2016-08-09 International Business Machines Corporation Colocation and anticolocation in colocation data centers via elastic nets
US20150381407A1 (en) * 2014-06-25 2015-12-31 A10 Networks, Incorporated Customizable high availability switchover control of application delivery controllers
US20160080490A1 (en) * 2014-09-15 2016-03-17 Microsoft Corporation Online data movement without compromising data integrity
US9769017B1 (en) 2014-09-26 2017-09-19 Juniper Networks, Inc. Impending control plane disruption indication using forwarding plane liveliness detection protocols
US20170359318A1 (en) * 2016-06-12 2017-12-14 Apple Inc. Diversification of Public Keys
US20170357822A1 (en) * 2016-06-12 2017-12-14 Apple Inc. Diversification of Public Keys

Citations (98)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5504921A (en) * 1990-09-17 1996-04-02 Cabletron Systems, Inc. Network management system using model-based intelligence
US5557774A (en) * 1993-03-22 1996-09-17 Hitachi, Ltd. Method for making test environmental programs
US5724508A (en) * 1995-03-09 1998-03-03 Insoft, Inc. Apparatus for collaborative computing
US5758351A (en) * 1995-03-01 1998-05-26 Sterling Software, Inc. System and method for the creation and use of surrogate information system objects
US5822531A (en) * 1996-07-22 1998-10-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for dynamically reconfiguring a cluster of computer systems
US5872928A (en) * 1995-02-24 1999-02-16 Cabletron Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for defining and enforcing policies for configuration management in communications networks
US5878220A (en) * 1994-11-21 1999-03-02 Oracle Corporation Method and apparatus for storing and transferring data on a network
US5930798A (en) * 1996-08-15 1999-07-27 Predicate Logic, Inc. Universal data measurement, analysis and control system
US6035405A (en) * 1997-12-22 2000-03-07 Nortel Networks Corporation Secure virtual LANs
US6047323A (en) * 1995-10-19 2000-04-04 Hewlett-Packard Company Creation and migration of distributed streams in clusters of networked computers
US6065058A (en) * 1997-05-09 2000-05-16 International Business Machines Corp. Dynamic push filtering based on information exchanged among nodes in a proxy hierarchy
US6134594A (en) * 1997-10-28 2000-10-17 Microsoft Corporation Multi-user, multiple tier distributed application architecture with single-user access control of middle tier objects
US6147995A (en) * 1995-11-15 2000-11-14 Cabletron Systems, Inc. Method for establishing restricted broadcast groups in a switched network
US6195355B1 (en) * 1997-09-26 2001-02-27 Sony Corporation Packet-Transmission control method and packet-transmission control apparatus
US6209099B1 (en) * 1996-12-18 2001-03-27 Ncr Corporation Secure data processing method and system
US6269079B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Systems, methods and computer program products for distributing connection information between ATM nodes
US20010020228A1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-09-06 International Business Machines Corporation Umethod, system and program for managing relationships among entities to exchange encryption keys for use in providing access and authorization to resources
US6305015B1 (en) * 1997-07-02 2001-10-16 Bull S.A. Information processing system architecture
US6304972B1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2001-10-16 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Secure software system and related techniques
US20020009079A1 (en) * 2000-06-23 2002-01-24 Jungck Peder J. Edge adapter apparatus and method
US20020010771A1 (en) * 2000-05-24 2002-01-24 Davide Mandato Universal QoS adaptation framework for mobile multimedia applications
US6377996B1 (en) * 1999-02-18 2002-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation System for seamless streaming of data stored on a network of distributed primary and target servers using segmentation information exchanged among all servers during streaming
US20020049573A1 (en) * 1998-05-13 2002-04-25 El Ata Nabil A. Abu Automated system and method for designing model based architectures of information systems
US6393485B1 (en) * 1998-10-27 2002-05-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for managing clustered computer systems
US20020075844A1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Hagen W. Alexander Integrating public and private network resources for optimized broadband wireless access and method
US20020082820A1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2002-06-27 Glenn Ferguson Data model for automated server configuration
US6438100B1 (en) * 1998-08-07 2002-08-20 Alcatel Canada Inc. Method and apparatus for routing server redundancy in a network having carrier scale internetworking
US6442557B1 (en) * 1998-02-27 2002-08-27 Prc Inc. Evaluation of enterprise architecture model including relational database
US6442713B1 (en) * 1999-03-30 2002-08-27 International Business Machines Corporation Cluster node distress signal
US6449650B1 (en) * 1999-02-01 2002-09-10 Redback Networks Inc. Methods and apparatus for deploying quality of service policies on a data communication network
US6466985B1 (en) * 1998-04-10 2002-10-15 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for providing quality of service using the internet protocol
US6470025B1 (en) * 1998-06-05 2002-10-22 3Com Technologies System for providing fair access for VLANs to a shared transmission medium
US20020161839A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2002-10-31 Colasurdo David B. Method and apparatus for maintaining session affinity across multiple server groups
US20030028642A1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2003-02-06 International Business Machines Corporation Managing server resources for hosted applications
US6539494B1 (en) * 1999-06-17 2003-03-25 Art Technology Group, Inc. Internet server session backup apparatus
US6542504B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2003-04-01 3Com Corporation Profile based method for packet header compression in a point to point link
US20030065743A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-03 Jenny Patrick Duncan Method and system for distributing requests for content
US6546553B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2003-04-08 Microsoft Corporation Service installation on a base function and provision of a pass function with a service-free base function semantic
US20030069369A1 (en) * 2001-10-10 2003-04-10 Belenkaya Bronislava G. Biodegradable absorbents and methods of preparation
US6549934B1 (en) * 1999-03-01 2003-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for remote access to computer devices via client managed server buffers exclusively allocated to the client
US20030074395A1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2003-04-17 Kave Eshghi Allowing requests of a session to be serviced by different servers in a multi-server data service system
US6564252B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2003-05-13 Microsoft Corporation Scalable storage system with unique client assignment to storage server partitions
US6574195B2 (en) * 2000-04-19 2003-06-03 Caspian Networks, Inc. Micro-flow management
US6597956B1 (en) * 1999-08-23 2003-07-22 Terraspring, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling an extensible computing system
US20030138105A1 (en) * 2002-01-18 2003-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation Storing keys in a cryptology device
US6601233B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2003-07-29 Accenture Llp Business components framework
US6651165B1 (en) * 2000-11-13 2003-11-18 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and apparatus for directly booting a RAID volume as the primary operating system memory
US6651240B1 (en) * 1999-02-17 2003-11-18 Fujitsu Limited Object-oriented software development support apparatus and development support method
US20030214908A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2003-11-20 Anurag Kumar Methods and apparatus for quality of service control for TCP aggregates at a bottleneck link in the internet
US6654796B1 (en) * 1999-10-07 2003-11-25 Cisco Technology, Inc. System for managing cluster of network switches using IP address for commander switch and redirecting a managing request via forwarding an HTTP connection to an expansion switch
US20040049509A1 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-03-11 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for managing dependencies in distributed systems
US20040049365A1 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-03-11 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for impact analysis and problem determination
US6718361B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2004-04-06 Network Appliance Inc. Method and apparatus for reliable and scalable distribution of data files in distributed networks
US20040068631A1 (en) * 2002-06-19 2004-04-08 Masaharu Ukeda Storage device
US6738736B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2004-05-18 Accenture Llp Method and estimator for providing capacacity modeling and planning
US6760775B1 (en) * 1999-03-05 2004-07-06 At&T Corp. System, method and apparatus for network service load and reliability management
US6760765B1 (en) * 1999-11-09 2004-07-06 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Cluster server apparatus
US6769060B1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2004-07-27 Ericsson Inc. Method of bilateral identity authentication
US6772333B1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2004-08-03 Dickens Coal Llc Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide id visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US6779016B1 (en) * 1999-08-23 2004-08-17 Terraspring, Inc. Extensible computing system
US6789090B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2004-09-07 Hitachi, Ltd. Virtual network displaying system
US6796269B2 (en) * 2001-12-05 2004-09-28 Hitchi High-Technologies Corporation Apparatus and method for monitoring plasma processing apparatus
US6801949B1 (en) * 1999-04-12 2004-10-05 Rainfinity, Inc. Distributed server cluster with graphical user interface
US20040208292A1 (en) * 2003-04-16 2004-10-21 Entrisphere, Inc. System and method for deploying new equipment and services in conjunction with a legacy provisioning system
US6813778B1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2004-11-02 General Instruments Corporation Method and system for downloading and managing the enablement of a list of code objects
US20050008001A1 (en) * 2003-02-14 2005-01-13 John Leslie Williams System and method for interfacing with heterogeneous network data gathering tools
US20050021742A1 (en) * 2003-03-31 2005-01-27 System Management Arts, Inc. Method and apparatus for multi-realm system modeling
US6868062B1 (en) * 2000-03-28 2005-03-15 Intel Corporation Managing data traffic on multiple ports
US20050102513A1 (en) * 2003-11-10 2005-05-12 Nokia Corporation Enforcing authorized domains with domain membership vouchers
US6928482B1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2005-08-09 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for scalable process flow load balancing of a multiplicity of parallel packet processors in a digital communication network
US6954930B2 (en) * 2002-02-19 2005-10-11 International Business Machines Corporation Remote validation of installation input data
US6968551B2 (en) * 2001-06-11 2005-11-22 John Hediger System and user interface for generation and processing of software application installation instructions
US6968535B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2005-11-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Service mapping method of enterprise application modeling and development for multi-tier service environments
US6968550B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2005-11-22 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for synchronizing software between computers
US20060048017A1 (en) * 2004-08-30 2006-03-02 International Business Machines Corporation Techniques for health monitoring and control of application servers
US7024451B2 (en) * 2001-11-05 2006-04-04 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for maintaining consistent independent server-side state among collaborating servers
US7028228B1 (en) * 2001-03-28 2006-04-11 The Shoregroup, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying problems in computer networks
US7035930B2 (en) * 2001-10-26 2006-04-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and framework for generating an optimized deployment of software applications in a distributed computing environment using layered model descriptions of services and servers
US7043407B2 (en) * 1997-03-10 2006-05-09 Trilogy Development Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for configuring systems
US7089530B1 (en) * 1999-05-17 2006-08-08 Invensys Systems, Inc. Process control configuration system with connection validation and configuration
US7103874B2 (en) * 2003-10-23 2006-09-05 Microsoft Corporation Model-based management of computer systems and distributed applications
US7103185B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2006-09-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for distributing and updating private keys of multicast group managers using directory replication
US20060232927A1 (en) * 2005-04-15 2006-10-19 Microsoft Corporation Model-based system monitoring
US7134122B1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2006-11-07 Oracle International Corporation One click deployment
US7162427B1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2007-01-09 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Structure and method of modeling integrated business and information technology frameworks and architecture in support of a business
US7181731B2 (en) * 2000-09-01 2007-02-20 Op40, Inc. Method, system, and structure for distributing and executing software and data on different network and computer devices, platforms, and environments
US7188335B1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2007-03-06 Trilogy Development Group, Inc. Product configuration using configuration patterns
US7191344B2 (en) * 2002-08-08 2007-03-13 Authenex, Inc. Method and system for controlling access to data stored on a data storage device
US7191429B2 (en) * 2001-09-28 2007-03-13 Manyeta Informatique Inc. System and method for managing architectural layers within a software model
US7197418B2 (en) * 2001-08-15 2007-03-27 National Instruments Corporation Online specification of a system which compares determined devices and installed devices
US7254634B1 (en) * 2002-03-08 2007-08-07 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Managing web tier session state objects in a content delivery network (CDN)
US20070192769A1 (en) * 2004-10-20 2007-08-16 Fujitsu Limited Program, method, and apparatus for managing applications
US7315801B1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2008-01-01 Secure Computing Corporation Network security modeling system and method
US7366755B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2008-04-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for affinity of users to application servers
US7376125B1 (en) * 2002-06-04 2008-05-20 Fortinet, Inc. Service processing switch
US7403901B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2008-07-22 Accenture Llp Error and load summary reporting in a health care solution environment
US7404175B2 (en) * 2000-10-10 2008-07-22 Bea Systems, Inc. Smart generator
US7406692B2 (en) * 2003-02-24 2008-07-29 Bea Systems, Inc. System and method for server load balancing and server affinity

Family Cites Families (415)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US626076A (en) * 1899-05-30 Fourth to corneal j
US4200770A (en) 1977-09-06 1980-04-29 Stanford University Cryptographic apparatus and method
US4218582A (en) 1977-10-06 1980-08-19 The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Public key cryptographic apparatus and method
US4405829A (en) 1977-12-14 1983-09-20 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Cryptographic communications system and method
US4424414A (en) 1978-05-01 1984-01-03 Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University Exponentiation cryptographic apparatus and method
DE3789215D1 (en) 1986-12-22 1994-04-07 American Telephone & Telegraph Controlled dynamic load balancing for a multiprocessor system.
US5031089A (en) 1988-12-30 1991-07-09 United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator, National Aeronautics And Space Administration Dynamic resource allocation scheme for distributed heterogeneous computer systems
US5396635A (en) 1990-06-01 1995-03-07 Vadem Corporation Power conservation apparatus having multiple power reduction levels dependent upon the activity of the computer system
US7058826B2 (en) 2000-09-27 2006-06-06 Amphus, Inc. System, architecture, and method for logical server and other network devices in a dynamically configurable multi-server network environment
JPH0488489A (en) 1990-08-01 1992-03-23 Internatl Business Mach Corp <Ibm> Device and method for recognizing character while using generalized hough transformation
US5287453A (en) * 1990-09-18 1994-02-15 Bull Hn Information Systems, Inc. Fast remote file access facility for distributing file access requests in a closely coupled computer system
JPH04287290A (en) 1990-11-20 1992-10-12 Imra America Inc Hough transformed picture processor
DE69228621D1 (en) 1991-02-25 1999-04-22 Hewlett Packard Co Object-oriented distributed computer system
EP0576549A4 (en) 1991-03-18 1994-02-02 Echelon Corporation
EP0576574B1 (en) 1991-03-18 2001-10-31 Echelon Corporation Programming language structures for use in a network for communicating, sensing and controlling information
US6115393A (en) 1991-04-12 2000-09-05 Concord Communications, Inc. Network monitoring
US5389484A (en) * 1991-04-16 1995-02-14 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Toner for developing electrostatic images, image forming apparatus, apparatus unit and facsimile apparatus
JPH05108523A (en) * 1991-10-15 1993-04-30 Hitachi Ltd Group server method
DE69227665D1 (en) 1991-10-31 1999-01-07 Ibm A method for operating a computer in a network
WO1993019555A1 (en) 1992-03-20 1993-09-30 At & T Corp. Remotely initiated telemetry calling system
US5371852A (en) 1992-10-14 1994-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for making a cluster of computers appear as a single host on a network
JPH076026A (en) 1993-05-28 1995-01-10 Xerox Corp Constitution management, method for guaranteeing interchangeability between constituents, and method for eliminating noninterchangeability between resident software and transfer software
US5686940A (en) 1993-12-24 1997-11-11 Rohm Co., Ltd. Display apparatus
JPH07219899A (en) * 1994-02-08 1995-08-18 Hitachi Ltd Method for setting program execution authority
US5628030A (en) 1994-03-24 1997-05-06 Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Virtual modem driver apparatus and method
US5668995A (en) 1994-04-22 1997-09-16 Ncr Corporation Method and apparatus for capacity planning for multiprocessor computer systems in client/server environments
JPH07306778A (en) * 1994-05-16 1995-11-21 Fujitsu Ltd Development management system in decentralized development environment of software
EP0715241B1 (en) 1994-10-27 2004-01-14 Mitsubishi Corporation Apparatus for data copyright management system
DE69535013D1 (en) 1994-10-27 2006-07-06 Intarsia Software Llc Copyright data management system
US5802590A (en) 1994-12-13 1998-09-01 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for providing secure access to computer resources
CA2138302C (en) 1994-12-15 1999-05-25 Michael S. Fortinsky Provision of secure access to external resources from a distributed computing environment
US6073183A (en) 1995-03-31 2000-06-06 Intel Corporation Transparent communication with multiple devices over a single serial or parallel port of a computer
US5774668A (en) 1995-06-07 1998-06-30 Microsoft Corporation System for on-line service in which gateway computer uses service map which includes loading condition of servers broadcasted by application servers for load balancing
US5895499A (en) 1995-07-03 1999-04-20 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Cross-domain data transfer using deferred page remapping
US5917730A (en) 1995-08-17 1999-06-29 Gse Process Solutions, Inc. Computer implemented object oriented visualization system and method
US5872914A (en) 1995-08-31 1999-02-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for an account managed object class model in a distributed computing environment
US5774689A (en) 1995-09-22 1998-06-30 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Network configuration management system for digital communication networks
US5793763A (en) * 1995-11-03 1998-08-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. Security system for network address translation systems
JPH09146898A (en) * 1995-11-22 1997-06-06 Hitachi Ltd Processor allocation control method
US5801970A (en) 1995-12-06 1998-09-01 Martin Marietta Corporation Model-based feature tracking system
GB9601559D0 (en) 1996-01-26 1996-03-27 Ibm Load balancing across the processors of a server computer
US5920705A (en) 1996-01-31 1999-07-06 Nokia Ip, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamically shifting between routing and switching packets in a transmission network
JPH09244940A (en) 1996-03-12 1997-09-19 Hitachi Ltd Method for managing distributed computer resource
US5768271A (en) 1996-04-12 1998-06-16 Alcatel Data Networks Inc. Virtual private network
US6085238A (en) 1996-04-23 2000-07-04 Matsushita Electric Works, Ltd. Virtual LAN system
US5748958A (en) * 1996-04-30 1998-05-05 International Business Machines Corporation System for utilizing batch requests to present membership changes to process groups
US5845124A (en) 1996-05-01 1998-12-01 Ncr Corporation Systems and methods for generating and displaying a symbolic representation of a network model
US6075776A (en) 1996-06-07 2000-06-13 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation VLAN control system and method
FR2749681B1 (en) 1996-06-10 1998-07-10 Bull Sa Circuit for transshipment of data between remote memories and computer comprising such a circuit
KR100204029B1 (en) 1996-06-19 1999-06-15 이계철 Allocation method of virtual link at atm switching system
US5796830A (en) 1996-07-29 1998-08-18 International Business Machines Corporation Interoperable cryptographic key recovery system
US5774660A (en) 1996-08-05 1998-06-30 Resonate, Inc. World-wide-web server with delayed resource-binding for resource-based load balancing on a distributed resource multi-node network
US5818937A (en) 1996-08-12 1998-10-06 Ncr Corporation Telephone tone security device
US5918017A (en) 1996-08-23 1999-06-29 Internatioinal Business Machines Corp. System and method for providing dynamically alterable computer clusters for message routing
US5948055A (en) 1996-08-29 1999-09-07 Hewlett-Packard Company Distributed internet monitoring system and method
US6236365B1 (en) 1996-09-09 2001-05-22 Tracbeam, Llc Location of a mobile station using a plurality of commercial wireless infrastructures
US5832529A (en) * 1996-10-11 1998-11-03 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Methods, apparatus, and product for distributed garbage collection
GB2318486B (en) 1996-10-16 2001-03-28 Ibm Data communications system
US5898830A (en) 1996-10-17 1999-04-27 Network Engineering Software Firewall providing enhanced network security and user transparency
US5790895A (en) 1996-10-18 1998-08-04 Compaq Computer Corporation Modem sharing
GB2318479B (en) 1996-10-21 2001-04-04 Northern Telecom Ltd Problem model for alarm correlation
US5784463A (en) 1996-12-04 1998-07-21 V-One Corporation Token distribution, registration, and dynamic configuration of user entitlement for an application level security system and method
US5938732A (en) 1996-12-09 1999-08-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Load balancing and failover of network services
US6061740A (en) * 1996-12-09 2000-05-09 Novell, Inc. Method and apparatus for heterogeneous network management
CA2274665C (en) 1996-12-13 2009-06-02 Walter Maves Method, system and data structures for computer software application development and execution
US5845277A (en) 1996-12-19 1998-12-01 Mci Communications Corporation Production of statistically-based network maps
US6272523B1 (en) 1996-12-20 2001-08-07 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed networking using logical processes
US6424992B2 (en) 1996-12-23 2002-07-23 International Business Machines Corporation Affinity-based router and routing method
US6112243A (en) 1996-12-30 2000-08-29 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for allocating tasks to remote networked processors
JPH10208056A (en) 1997-01-16 1998-08-07 Honda Motor Co Ltd Line detection method
DE19704438C1 (en) * 1997-02-06 1998-06-25 Aeg Elotherm Gmbh Induction hardening of camshaft
US5826015A (en) 1997-02-20 1998-10-20 Digital Equipment Corporation Method and apparatus for secure remote programming of firmware and configurations of a computer over a network
US6151688A (en) * 1997-02-21 2000-11-21 Novell, Inc. Resource management in a clustered computer system
US5958009A (en) 1997-02-27 1999-09-28 Hewlett-Packard Company System and method for efficiently monitoring quality of service in a distributed processing environment
US6067580A (en) 1997-03-11 2000-05-23 International Business Machines Corporation Integrating distributed computing environment remote procedure calls with an advisory work load manager
US5968126A (en) 1997-04-02 1999-10-19 Switchsoft Systems, Inc. User-based binding of network stations to broadcast domains
JP2001519120A (en) 1997-04-04 2001-10-16 アセンド コミュニケーションズ インコーポレイテッド Hierarchical Packet scheduling method and apparatus
CA2202572C (en) 1997-04-14 2004-02-10 Ka Lun Eddie Law A scaleable web server and method of efficiently managing multiple servers
US6266721B1 (en) * 1997-05-13 2001-07-24 Micron Electronics, Inc. System architecture for remote access and control of environmental management
US6167438A (en) 1997-05-22 2000-12-26 Trustees Of Boston University Method and system for distributed caching, prefetching and replication
US6578077B1 (en) 1997-05-27 2003-06-10 Novell, Inc. Traffic monitoring tool for bandwidth management
US6236729B1 (en) 1997-06-06 2001-05-22 Hitachi, Ltd. Key recovery method and system
US6070243A (en) 1997-06-13 2000-05-30 Xylan Corporation Deterministic user authentication service for communication network
JPH117702A (en) 1997-06-18 1999-01-12 Teac Corp Reproducer
US6108699A (en) 1997-06-27 2000-08-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for modifying membership in a clustered distributed computer system and updating system configuration
US6389464B1 (en) * 1997-06-27 2002-05-14 Cornet Technology, Inc. Device management system for managing standards-compliant and non-compliant network elements using standard management protocols and a universal site server which is configurable from remote locations via internet browser technology
US6049528A (en) 1997-06-30 2000-04-11 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Trunking ethernet-compatible networks
US6185308B1 (en) 1997-07-07 2001-02-06 Fujitsu Limited Key recovery system
DE19732675C2 (en) * 1997-07-29 1999-11-25 Siemens Ag Circuit for demand switching on and off of a consumer
US6144959A (en) 1997-08-18 2000-11-07 Novell, Inc. System and method for managing user accounts in a communication network
US6233610B1 (en) 1997-08-27 2001-05-15 Northern Telecom Limited Communications network having management system architecture supporting reuse
JPH11178076A (en) * 1997-08-29 1999-07-02 Matsushita Electric Works Ltd Information wiring system
US5960371A (en) 1997-09-04 1999-09-28 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of determining dips and azimuths of fractures from borehole images
US6141749A (en) 1997-09-12 2000-10-31 Lucent Technologies Inc. Methods and apparatus for a computer network firewall with stateful packet filtering
US6041054A (en) 1997-09-24 2000-03-21 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Efficient transport of internet protocol packets using asynchronous transfer mode adaptation layer two
US6490620B1 (en) * 1997-09-26 2002-12-03 Worldcom, Inc. Integrated proxy interface for web based broadband telecommunications management
US6065053A (en) * 1997-10-01 2000-05-16 Micron Electronics, Inc. System for resetting a server
EP0907145A3 (en) * 1997-10-03 2003-03-26 Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation Method and equipment for extracting image features from image sequence
US6427171B1 (en) 1997-10-14 2002-07-30 Alacritech, Inc. Protocol processing stack for use with intelligent network interface device
US6192401B1 (en) 1997-10-21 2001-02-20 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for determining cluster membership in a heterogeneous distributed system
US5999712A (en) * 1997-10-21 1999-12-07 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Determining cluster membership in a distributed computer system
US6047325A (en) * 1997-10-24 2000-04-04 Jain; Lalit Network device for supporting construction of virtual local area networks on arbitrary local and wide area computer networks
US6178529B1 (en) 1997-11-03 2001-01-23 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for resource monitoring of disparate resources in a server cluster
US6125447A (en) 1997-12-11 2000-09-26 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Protection domains to provide security in a computer system
US6269396B1 (en) * 1997-12-12 2001-07-31 Alcatel Usa Sourcing, L.P. Method and platform for interfacing between application programs performing telecommunications functions and an operating system
US6370584B1 (en) 1998-01-13 2002-04-09 Trustees Of Boston University Distributed routing
US6086618A (en) 1998-01-26 2000-07-11 Microsoft Corporation Method and computer program product for estimating total resource usage requirements of a server application in a hypothetical user configuration
US6182275B1 (en) 1998-01-26 2001-01-30 Dell Usa, L.P. Generation of a compatible order for a computer system
US6484261B1 (en) 1998-02-17 2002-11-19 Cisco Technology, Inc. Graphical network security policy management
US6496187B1 (en) 1998-02-17 2002-12-17 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Graphics system configured to perform parallel sample to pixel calculation
US6076108A (en) 1998-03-06 2000-06-13 I2 Technologies, Inc. System and method for maintaining a state for a user session using a web system having a global session server
US6208649B1 (en) 1998-03-11 2001-03-27 Cisco Technology, Inc. Derived VLAN mapping technique
US6691148B1 (en) 1998-03-13 2004-02-10 Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. Framework for providing quality of service requirements in a distributed object-oriented computer system
US6167515A (en) 1998-03-17 2000-12-26 Winbond Electronics Corp. Method and system for performing the transmission of private data over a public network
US6098093A (en) 1998-03-19 2000-08-01 International Business Machines Corp. Maintaining sessions in a clustered server environment
JPH11275068A (en) 1998-03-20 1999-10-08 Fujitsu Ltd Key management server, terminal equipment for chat system, chat system and recording medium
JP3974705B2 (en) * 1998-03-20 2007-09-12 富士通株式会社 Network service management system
US6393386B1 (en) 1998-03-26 2002-05-21 Visual Networks Technologies, Inc. Dynamic modeling of complex networks and prediction of impacts of faults therein
US6236901B1 (en) 1998-03-31 2001-05-22 Dell Usa, L.P. Manufacturing system and method for assembly of computer systems in a build-to-order environment
EP1068693B1 (en) * 1998-04-03 2011-12-21 Vertical Networks, Inc. System and method for transmitting voice and data using intelligent bridged tdm and packet buses
US6118785A (en) 1998-04-07 2000-09-12 3Com Corporation Point-to-point protocol with a signaling channel
US6059842A (en) 1998-04-14 2000-05-09 International Business Machines Corp. System and method for optimizing computer software and hardware
US6317438B1 (en) 1998-04-14 2001-11-13 Harold Herman Trebes, Jr. System and method for providing peer-oriented control of telecommunications services
US6208345B1 (en) 1998-04-15 2001-03-27 Adc Telecommunications, Inc. Visual data integration system and method
US6898791B1 (en) 1998-04-21 2005-05-24 California Institute Of Technology Infospheres distributed object system
US6167052A (en) 1998-04-27 2000-12-26 Vpnx.Com, Inc. Establishing connectivity in networks
US6311144B1 (en) 1998-05-13 2001-10-30 Nabil A. Abu El Ata Method and apparatus for designing and analyzing information systems using multi-layer mathematical models
FR2779018B1 (en) * 1998-05-22 2000-08-18 Activcard Terminal and system for implementing electronic transactions SECURE
US6269076B1 (en) 1998-05-28 2001-07-31 3Com Corporation Method of resolving split virtual LANs utilizing a network management system
US6947987B2 (en) 1998-05-29 2005-09-20 Ncr Corporation Method and apparatus for allocating network resources and changing the allocation based on dynamic workload changes
US6259448B1 (en) * 1998-06-03 2001-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Resource model configuration and deployment in a distributed computer network
US6311217B1 (en) * 1998-06-04 2001-10-30 Compaq Computer Corporation Method and apparatus for improved cluster administration
WO1999063439A1 (en) 1998-06-04 1999-12-09 Shunra Software Ltd. Apparatus and method for testing network applications
CN1166247C (en) * 1998-06-19 2004-09-08 杜松网络公司 Communi cation internet and method for transmitting signal therein
US6360265B1 (en) * 1998-07-08 2002-03-19 Lucent Technologies Inc. Arrangement of delivering internet protocol datagrams for multimedia services to the same server
US6427163B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2002-07-30 International Business Machines Corporation Highly scalable and highly available cluster system management scheme
US6226788B1 (en) 1998-07-22 2001-05-01 Cisco Technology, Inc. Extensible network management system
US6466932B1 (en) * 1998-08-14 2002-10-15 Microsoft Corporation System and method for implementing group policy
US6473791B1 (en) 1998-08-17 2002-10-29 Microsoft Corporation Object load balancing
US6266707B1 (en) * 1998-08-17 2001-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for IP network address translation and IP filtering with dynamic address resolution
US6336138B1 (en) 1998-08-25 2002-01-01 Hewlett-Packard Company Template-driven approach for generating models on network services
US6717949B1 (en) * 1998-08-31 2004-04-06 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for IP network address translation using selective masquerade
US6327622B1 (en) 1998-09-03 2001-12-04 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Load balancing in a network environment
US6311270B1 (en) 1998-09-14 2001-10-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for securing communication utilizing a security processor
US6324571B1 (en) 1998-09-21 2001-11-27 Microsoft Corporation Floating single master operation
US6167383A (en) 1998-09-22 2000-12-26 Dell Usa, Lp Method and apparatus for providing customer configured machines at an internet site
US6253230B1 (en) 1998-09-22 2001-06-26 International Business Machines Corporation Distributed scalable device for selecting a server from a server cluster and a switched path to the selected server
US6230312B1 (en) 1998-10-02 2001-05-08 Microsoft Corporation Automatic detection of per-unit location constraints
US6728885B1 (en) * 1998-10-09 2004-04-27 Networks Associates Technology, Inc. System and method for network access control using adaptive proxies
US6570875B1 (en) * 1998-10-13 2003-05-27 Intel Corporation Automatic filtering and creation of virtual LANs among a plurality of switch ports
CN1335956A (en) * 1998-10-16 2002-02-13 西尔弗斯特里姆软件公司 Connection concentrator for distributed object systems
US6038322A (en) 1998-10-20 2000-03-14 Cisco Technology, Inc. Group key distribution
CA2287813C (en) 1998-10-22 2005-03-29 At&T Corp. System and method for network load balancing
US6212559B1 (en) 1998-10-28 2001-04-03 Trw Inc. Automated configuration of internet-like computer networks
US6691165B1 (en) 1998-11-10 2004-02-10 Rainfinity, Inc. Distributed server cluster for controlling network traffic
JP3820777B2 (en) * 1998-11-12 2006-09-13 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Secret key escrow system and method
US6272522B1 (en) 1998-11-17 2001-08-07 Sun Microsystems, Incorporated Computer data packet switching and load balancing system using a general-purpose multiprocessor architecture
US6330605B1 (en) 1998-11-19 2001-12-11 Volera, Inc. Proxy cache cluster
US6078957A (en) * 1998-11-20 2000-06-20 Network Alchemy, Inc. Method and apparatus for a TCP/IP load balancing and failover process in an internet protocol (IP) network clustering system
US6154543A (en) 1998-11-25 2000-11-28 Hush Communications Anguilla, Inc. Public key cryptosystem with roaming user capability
US6393456B1 (en) * 1998-11-30 2002-05-21 Microsoft Corporation System, method, and computer program product for workflow processing using internet interoperable electronic messaging with mime multiple content type
US7058704B1 (en) 1998-12-01 2006-06-06 Network Appliance, Inc.. Method and apparatus for implementing a service-level agreement
US6108702A (en) 1998-12-02 2000-08-22 Micromuse, Inc. Method and apparatus for determining accurate topology features of a network
US6286052B1 (en) 1998-12-04 2001-09-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying network data traffic flows and for applying quality of service treatments to the flows
US6243746B1 (en) 1998-12-04 2001-06-05 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and implementation for using computer network topology objects
US6336171B1 (en) * 1998-12-23 2002-01-01 Ncr Corporation Resource protection in a cluster environment
US6393474B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2002-05-21 3Com Corporation Dynamic policy management apparatus and method using active network devices
US6570847B1 (en) 1998-12-31 2003-05-27 At&T Corp. Method and system for network traffic rate control based on fractional tokens
US7136926B1 (en) * 1998-12-31 2006-11-14 Pmc-Sierrra Us, Inc. Method and apparatus for high-speed network rule processing
US6260071B1 (en) * 1999-01-04 2001-07-10 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for automatic routing of circuit switched data connections based upon stored behavorial information
US6628671B1 (en) 1999-01-19 2003-09-30 Vtstarcom, Inc. Instant activation of point-to point protocol (PPP) connection using existing PPP state
US6438705B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2002-08-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for building and managing multi-clustered computer systems
US6470464B2 (en) 1999-02-23 2002-10-22 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for predicting computer system performance and for making recommendations for improving its performance
US6829770B1 (en) 1999-02-23 2004-12-07 Microsoft Corporation Object connectivity through loosely coupled publish and subscribe events
US6578144B1 (en) 1999-03-23 2003-06-10 International Business Machines Corporation Secure hash-and-sign signatures
US6341356B1 (en) 1999-03-25 2002-01-22 International Business Machines Corporation System for I/O path load balancing and failure which can be ported to a plurality of operating environments
US6510509B1 (en) * 1999-03-29 2003-01-21 Pmc-Sierra Us, Inc. Method and apparatus for high-speed network rule processing
US6782408B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2004-08-24 International Business Machines Corporation Controlling a number of instances of an application running in a computing environment
US6839348B2 (en) * 1999-04-30 2005-01-04 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for distributing multicasts in virtual local area networks
JP2000322288A (en) 1999-05-06 2000-11-24 Fujitsu Ltd Distributed object development system and computer readable recording medium for recording program for execution of distributed object development by computer
US6564261B1 (en) * 1999-05-10 2003-05-13 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Distributed system to intelligently establish sessions between anonymous users over various networks
US6757744B1 (en) 1999-05-12 2004-06-29 Unisys Corporation Distributed transport communications manager with messaging subsystem for high-speed communications between heterogeneous computer systems
US6971072B1 (en) 1999-05-13 2005-11-29 International Business Machines Corporation Reactive user interface control based on environmental sensing
US6470332B1 (en) * 1999-05-19 2002-10-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System, method and computer program product for searching for, and retrieving, profile attributes based on other target profile attributes and associated profiles
US6957186B1 (en) 1999-05-27 2005-10-18 Accenture Llp System method and article of manufacture for building, managing, and supporting various components of a system
US6631141B1 (en) * 1999-05-27 2003-10-07 Ibm Corporation Methods, systems and computer program products for selecting an aggregator interface
GB9912494D0 (en) 1999-05-28 1999-07-28 Hewlett Packard Co Configuring computer systems
JP2003502757A (en) 1999-06-10 2003-01-21 アルカテル・インターネツトワーキング・インコーポレイテツド Policy-based network architecture
US6968371B1 (en) 1999-06-23 2005-11-22 Clearwire Corporation Design for scalable network management systems
US6505244B1 (en) 1999-06-29 2003-01-07 Cisco Technology Inc. Policy engine which supports application specific plug-ins for enforcing policies in a feedback-based, adaptive data network
US6665714B1 (en) 1999-06-30 2003-12-16 Emc Corporation Method and apparatus for determining an identity of a network device
US6466984B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2002-10-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for policy-based management of quality of service treatments of network data traffic flows by integrating policies with application programs
US6367010B1 (en) 1999-07-02 2002-04-02 Postx Corporation Method for generating secure symmetric encryption and decryption
US6549516B1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2003-04-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Sending instructions from a service manager to forwarding agents on a need to know basis
US6823299B1 (en) 1999-07-09 2004-11-23 Autodesk, Inc. Modeling objects, systems, and simulations by establishing relationships in an event-driven graph in a computer implemented graphics system
US6480955B1 (en) 1999-07-09 2002-11-12 Lsi Logic Corporation Methods and apparatus for committing configuration changes to managed devices prior to completion of the configuration change
US6584499B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2003-06-24 Lsi Logic Corporation Methods and apparatus for performing mass operations on a plurality of managed devices on a network
US6820042B1 (en) 1999-07-23 2004-11-16 Opnet Technologies Mixed mode network simulator
US6466978B1 (en) * 1999-07-28 2002-10-15 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Multimedia file systems using file managers located on clients for managing network attached storage devices
EP1076279A1 (en) 1999-08-13 2001-02-14 Hewlett-Packard Company Computer platforms and their methods of operation
US6684335B1 (en) * 1999-08-19 2004-01-27 Epstein, Iii Edwin A. Resistance cell architecture
US7093005B2 (en) 2000-02-11 2006-08-15 Terraspring, Inc. Graphical editor for defining and creating a computer system
US6587876B1 (en) * 1999-08-24 2003-07-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company Grouping targets of management policies
US6370573B1 (en) * 1999-08-31 2002-04-09 Accenture Llp System, method and article of manufacture for managing an environment of a development architecture framework
US6256773B1 (en) 1999-08-31 2001-07-03 Accenture Llp System, method and article of manufacture for configuration management in a development architecture framework
US7139999B2 (en) 1999-08-31 2006-11-21 Accenture Llp Development architecture framework
JP3773716B2 (en) 1999-09-13 2006-05-10 富士通株式会社 Recording medium storing a program for causing a process in the graphical user interface display device and a device in the computer
US6598223B1 (en) 1999-10-06 2003-07-22 Dell Usa, L.P. Method and system for installing and testing build-to-order components in a defined configuration computer system
JP4001698B2 (en) 1999-10-14 2007-10-31 富士通株式会社 Load balancing system
US6654782B1 (en) 1999-10-28 2003-11-25 Networks Associates, Inc. Modular framework for dynamically processing network events using action sets in a distributed computing environment
US6487622B1 (en) 1999-10-28 2002-11-26 Ncr Corporation Quorum arbitrator for a high availability system
US6351685B1 (en) 1999-11-05 2002-02-26 International Business Machines Corporation Wireless communication between multiple intelligent pickers and with a central job queue in an automated data storage library
US6609148B1 (en) * 1999-11-10 2003-08-19 Randy Salo Clients remote access to enterprise networks employing enterprise gateway servers in a centralized data center converting plurality of data requests for messaging and collaboration into a single request
US7464147B1 (en) 1999-11-10 2008-12-09 International Business Machines Corporation Managing a cluster of networked resources and resource groups using rule - base constraints in a scalable clustering environment
US6829639B1 (en) 1999-11-15 2004-12-07 Netvision, Inc. Method and system for intelligent global event notification and control within a distributed computing environment
US6615256B1 (en) * 1999-11-29 2003-09-02 Microsoft Corporation Quorum resource arbiter within a storage network
WO2001044894A3 (en) 1999-12-06 2002-05-10 Warp Solutions Inc System and method for dynamic content routing
US6662219B1 (en) * 1999-12-15 2003-12-09 Microsoft Corporation System for determining at subgroup of nodes relative weight to represent cluster by obtaining exclusive possession of quorum resource
US6529953B1 (en) * 1999-12-17 2003-03-04 Reliable Network Solutions Scalable computer network resource monitoring and location system
US6862613B1 (en) * 2000-01-10 2005-03-01 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for managing operations of clustered computer systems
US6769008B1 (en) * 2000-01-10 2004-07-27 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and apparatus for dynamically altering configurations of clustered computer systems
US6493715B1 (en) 2000-01-12 2002-12-10 International Business Machines Corporation Delivery of configuration change in a group
US6754716B1 (en) * 2000-02-11 2004-06-22 Ensim Corporation Restricting communication between network devices on a common network
WO2001061969A3 (en) 2000-02-18 2002-01-31 Cedere Corp Auto control of network monitoring and simulation
DE60011990D1 (en) 2000-02-22 2004-08-12 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Method and device in a communication network
US6983317B1 (en) 2000-02-28 2006-01-03 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise management system
US6701363B1 (en) 2000-02-29 2004-03-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method, computer program product, and system for deriving web transaction performance metrics
US7155490B1 (en) 2000-03-01 2006-12-26 Freewebs Corporation System and method for providing a web-based operating system
US7506034B2 (en) 2000-03-03 2009-03-17 Intel Corporation Methods and apparatus for off loading content servers through direct file transfer from a storage center to an end-user
JP3790655B2 (en) * 2000-03-06 2006-06-28 富士通株式会社 Label switch network system
US6601101B1 (en) * 2000-03-15 2003-07-29 3Com Corporation Transparent access to network attached devices
US6678821B1 (en) 2000-03-23 2004-01-13 E-Witness Inc. Method and system for restricting access to the private key of a user in a public key infrastructure
US6748447B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2004-06-08 Network Appliance, Inc. Method and apparatus for scalable distribution of information in a distributed network
US6904458B1 (en) * 2000-04-26 2005-06-07 Microsoft Corporation System and method for remote management
US6640303B1 (en) 2000-04-28 2003-10-28 Ky Quy Vu System and method for encryption using transparent keys
US7054943B1 (en) * 2000-04-28 2006-05-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for dynamically adjusting resources assigned to plurality of customers, for meeting service level agreements (slas) with minimal resources, and allowing common pools of resources to be used across plural customers on a demand basis
WO2001084313A3 (en) 2000-05-02 2002-04-25 Sun Microsystems Inc Method and system for achieving high availability in a networked computer system
US6675308B1 (en) * 2000-05-09 2004-01-06 3Com Corporation Methods of determining whether a network interface card entry within the system registry pertains to physical hardware or to a virtual device
US6671699B1 (en) 2000-05-20 2003-12-30 Equipe Communications Corporation Shared database usage in network devices
US7222147B1 (en) 2000-05-20 2007-05-22 Ciena Corporation Processing network management data in accordance with metadata files
JP3457259B2 (en) 2000-05-30 2003-10-14 日本電信電話株式会社 Providers switchable communication method and apparatus
US6801937B1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2004-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method, system and program products for defining nodes to a cluster
US7418489B2 (en) * 2000-06-07 2008-08-26 Microsoft Corporation Method and apparatus for applying policies
US6742020B1 (en) 2000-06-08 2004-05-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for managing data flow and measuring service in a storage network
US6718379B1 (en) * 2000-06-09 2004-04-06 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. System and method for network management of local area networks having non-blocking network switches configured for switching data packets between subnetworks based on management policies
FR2811179B1 (en) 2000-06-30 2002-09-27 Thomson Csf frame routing Procede ip between users over a network variable graph
DK1297446T3 (en) 2000-07-05 2006-01-30 Ernst & Young Llp A method and apparatus for providing computer services
US6971063B1 (en) 2000-07-28 2005-11-29 Wireless Valley Communications Inc. System, method, and apparatus for portable design, deployment, test, and optimization of a communication network
US6609213B1 (en) * 2000-08-10 2003-08-19 Dell Products, L.P. Cluster-based system and method of recovery from server failures
US6823373B1 (en) 2000-08-11 2004-11-23 Informatica Corporation System and method for coupling remote data stores and mobile devices via an internet based server
EP1180886B1 (en) 2000-08-17 2006-10-11 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Load balancing method and system
US6820121B1 (en) 2000-08-24 2004-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation Methods systems and computer program products for processing an event based on policy rules using hashing
US6976269B1 (en) 2000-08-29 2005-12-13 Equinix, Inc. Internet co-location facility security system
JP2002084302A (en) 2000-09-06 2002-03-22 Nippon Telegr & Teleph Corp <Ntt> Method and apparatus for communication by network
US8250570B2 (en) 2000-10-31 2012-08-21 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Automated provisioning framework for internet site servers
US6973622B1 (en) 2000-09-25 2005-12-06 Wireless Valley Communications, Inc. System and method for design, tracking, measurement, prediction and optimization of data communication networks
JP2002108910A (en) 2000-09-27 2002-04-12 Nec Soft Ltd Enciphered filing system, enciphered file retrieving method and computer readable recording medium
US7272653B2 (en) 2000-09-28 2007-09-18 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for implementing a clustered load balancer
US7069204B1 (en) 2000-09-28 2006-06-27 Cadence Design System, Inc. Method and system for performance level modeling and simulation of electronic systems having both hardware and software elements
US6944759B1 (en) 2000-09-29 2005-09-13 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Automatic system configuration management
US6976079B1 (en) 2000-09-29 2005-12-13 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for upgrading software in a distributed computer system
WO2002030044A9 (en) 2000-10-05 2004-03-04 Wind River Systems Inc A system and method for implementing multi-level network drivers
US6886038B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2005-04-26 Microsoft Corporation System and method for restricting data transfers and managing software components of distributed computers
US6907395B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2005-06-14 Microsoft Corporation System and method for designing a logical model of a distributed computer system and deploying physical resources according to the logical model
US6915338B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2005-07-05 Microsoft Corporation System and method providing automatic policy enforcement in a multi-computer service application
US7093288B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-08-15 Microsoft Corporation Using packet filters and network virtualization to restrict network communications
US7606898B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2009-10-20 Microsoft Corporation System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US7113900B1 (en) 2000-10-24 2006-09-26 Microsoft Corporation System and method for logical modeling of distributed computer systems
US6853841B1 (en) 2000-10-25 2005-02-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Protocol for a remote control device to enable control of network attached devices
US6754816B1 (en) 2000-10-26 2004-06-22 Dell Products L.P. Scalable environmental data calculation method customized by system configuration
US7124289B1 (en) 2000-10-31 2006-10-17 Opsware Inc. Automated provisioning framework for internet site servers
US7003574B1 (en) 2000-11-01 2006-02-21 Microsoft Corporation Session load balancing and use of VIP as source address for inter-cluster traffic through the use of a session identifier
US6985956B2 (en) 2000-11-02 2006-01-10 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Switching system
US7089293B2 (en) 2000-11-02 2006-08-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Switching system method for discovering and accessing SCSI devices in response to query
US7313614B2 (en) 2000-11-02 2007-12-25 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Switching system
US7028307B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2006-04-11 Alcatel Data management framework for policy management
US20040073443A1 (en) 2000-11-10 2004-04-15 Gabrick John J. System for automating and managing an IP environment
US7027412B2 (en) * 2000-11-10 2006-04-11 Veritas Operating Corporation System for dynamic provisioning of secure, scalable, and extensible networked computer environments
US6785707B2 (en) 2000-11-14 2004-08-31 Bitfone Corp. Enhanced multimedia mobile content delivery and message system using cache management
US7046680B1 (en) * 2000-11-28 2006-05-16 Mci, Inc. Network access system including a programmable access device having distributed service control
US7272640B1 (en) 2000-12-08 2007-09-18 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Dynamic network session redirector
US6856591B1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2005-02-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for high reliability cluster management
US7421505B2 (en) 2000-12-21 2008-09-02 Noatak Software Llc Method and system for executing protocol stack instructions to form a packet for causing a computing device to perform an operation
US20030046615A1 (en) 2000-12-22 2003-03-06 Alan Stone System and method for adaptive reliability balancing in distributed programming networks
US7225441B2 (en) 2000-12-27 2007-05-29 Intel Corporation Mechanism for providing power management through virtualization
US6581000B2 (en) 2001-01-04 2003-06-17 Carnegie Mellon University Position location system and method
US20020090089A1 (en) 2001-01-05 2002-07-11 Steven Branigan Methods and apparatus for secure wireless networking
US7213231B1 (en) 2001-01-11 2007-05-01 Cisco Technology, Inc. Cross-spectrum application model for dynamic computing environments in software lifecycle
US6963981B1 (en) 2001-01-29 2005-11-08 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for remote installation of an operating system over a network connection
CN1368694A (en) 2001-02-01 2002-09-11 安德华科技股份有限公司 Method and system for dynamically discriminating job entity
US7383329B2 (en) 2001-02-13 2008-06-03 Aventail, Llc Distributed cache for state transfer operations
US20020152086A1 (en) 2001-02-15 2002-10-17 Smith Ned M. Method and apparatus for controlling a lifecycle of an electronic contract
EP1241447A1 (en) 2001-03-13 2002-09-18 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Information terminal and cartographic information providing system
JP2002271312A (en) 2001-03-14 2002-09-20 Hitachi Ltd Disclosed key managing method
US7069337B2 (en) 2001-03-20 2006-06-27 Mci, Inc. Policy-based synchronization of per-class resources between routers in a data network
US7050961B1 (en) 2001-03-21 2006-05-23 Unisys Corporation Solution generation method for thin client sizing tool
US7003562B2 (en) 2001-03-27 2006-02-21 Redseal Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for network wide policy-based analysis of configurations of devices
US7076633B2 (en) 2001-03-28 2006-07-11 Swsoft Holdings, Ltd. Hosting service providing platform system and method
US20020156900A1 (en) 2001-03-30 2002-10-24 Brian Marquette Protocol independent control module
US20020198995A1 (en) 2001-04-10 2002-12-26 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and methods for maximizing service-level-agreement profits
US7162634B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2007-01-09 Thomson Licensing Method for providing security on a powerline-modem network
US7231430B2 (en) * 2001-04-20 2007-06-12 Egenera, Inc. Reconfigurable, virtual processing system, cluster, network and method
US7152109B2 (en) 2001-04-20 2006-12-19 Opsware, Inc Automated provisioning of computing networks according to customer accounts using a network database data model
US6895534B2 (en) 2001-04-23 2005-05-17 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Systems and methods for providing automated diagnostic services for a cluster computer system
US7058858B2 (en) 2001-04-23 2006-06-06 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Systems and methods for providing automated diagnostic services for a cluster computer system
US6836750B2 (en) 2001-04-23 2004-12-28 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Systems and methods for providing an automated diagnostic audit for cluster computer systems
US7194439B2 (en) 2001-04-30 2007-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for correlating job accounting information with software license information
US6816897B2 (en) 2001-04-30 2004-11-09 Opsware, Inc. Console mapping tool for automated deployment and management of network devices
US7131123B2 (en) 2001-04-30 2006-10-31 Opsware Inc. Automated provisioning of computing networks using a network database model
US20030014644A1 (en) 2001-05-02 2003-01-16 Burns James E. Method and system for security policy management
US7013462B2 (en) 2001-05-10 2006-03-14 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method to map an inventory management system to a configuration management system
US20020184327A1 (en) 2001-05-11 2002-12-05 Major Robert Drew System and method for partitioning address space in a proxy cache server cluster
US20020171690A1 (en) 2001-05-15 2002-11-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for scaling a graphical user interface (GUI) widget based on selection pointer proximity
JP2002354006A (en) 2001-05-24 2002-12-06 Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd Network system for duplicate address
WO2002098526A1 (en) * 2001-06-04 2002-12-12 Playnet, Inc. System and method for distributing a multi-client game/application over a communications network
US6735596B2 (en) 2001-06-07 2004-05-11 Guy Charles Corynen Computer method and user interface for decision analysis and for global system optimization
US6944678B2 (en) 2001-06-18 2005-09-13 Transtech Networks Usa, Inc. Content-aware application switch and methods thereof
US6882613B2 (en) * 2001-06-21 2005-04-19 Hampton University Cylindrical medium for storing holographic data and methods and apparatus for manipulating data using the cylindrical medium
US6944606B2 (en) 2001-06-29 2005-09-13 National Instruments Corporation Measurements expert system and method for generating high-performance measurements software drivers
US7082464B2 (en) 2001-07-06 2006-07-25 Juniper Networks, Inc. Network management system
US20030009559A1 (en) 2001-07-09 2003-01-09 Naoya Ikeda Network system and method of distributing accesses to a plurality of server apparatus in the network system
US7409420B2 (en) 2001-07-16 2008-08-05 Bea Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for session replication and failover
US8005926B2 (en) * 2001-07-26 2011-08-23 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Tiered web site with web-tier admission control based on utilization data generated on application tier
US6922791B2 (en) 2001-08-09 2005-07-26 Dell Products L.P. Failover system and method for cluster environment
US20030041139A1 (en) * 2001-08-14 2003-02-27 Smartpipes, Incorporated Event management for a remote network policy management system
US7159125B2 (en) * 2001-08-14 2007-01-02 Endforce, Inc. Policy engine for modular generation of policy for a flat, per-device database
US7627860B2 (en) 2001-08-14 2009-12-01 National Instruments Corporation Graphically deployment of a program with automatic conversion of program type
FI20011651A (en) 2001-08-15 2003-02-16 Nokia Corp The service cluster load tasapainoittaminen
US7765283B2 (en) * 2001-08-15 2010-07-27 Cisco Technology, Inc. Network provisioning in a distributed network management architecture
US20030041159A1 (en) 2001-08-17 2003-02-27 David Tinsley Systems and method for presenting customizable multimedia presentations
US6823382B2 (en) 2001-08-20 2004-11-23 Altaworks Corporation Monitoring and control engine for multi-tiered service-level management of distributed web-application servers
US20030041142A1 (en) * 2001-08-27 2003-02-27 Nec Usa, Inc. Generic network monitoring tool
US7257584B2 (en) 2002-03-18 2007-08-14 Surgient, Inc. Server file management
US6990666B2 (en) 2002-03-18 2006-01-24 Surgient Inc. Near on-line server
US6880002B2 (en) 2001-09-05 2005-04-12 Surgient, Inc. Virtualized logical server cloud providing non-deterministic allocation of logical attributes of logical servers to physical resources
US6986135B2 (en) * 2001-09-06 2006-01-10 Cognos Incorporated Deployment manager for organizing and deploying an application in a distributed computing environment
US6973620B2 (en) 2001-09-06 2005-12-06 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for providing user support based on contextual information
US6980978B2 (en) 2001-09-07 2005-12-27 International Business Machines Corporation Site integration management system for operational support service in an internet data center
US7500069B2 (en) 2001-09-17 2009-03-03 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for providing secure access to network logical storage partitions
CN1568466A (en) 2001-09-26 2005-01-19 交互设备有限公司 System and method for communicating media signals
US7257817B2 (en) * 2001-10-16 2007-08-14 Microsoft Corporation Virtual network with adaptive dispatcher
EP1307018B1 (en) 2001-10-24 2006-10-11 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Load balancing unit and method of its operation
US7194616B2 (en) 2001-10-27 2007-03-20 International Business Machines Corporation Flexible temporary capacity upgrade/downgrade in a computer system without involvement of the operating system
US20030126464A1 (en) 2001-12-04 2003-07-03 Mcdaniel Patrick D. Method and system for determining and enforcing security policy in a communication session
US7305556B2 (en) 2001-12-05 2007-12-04 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Secure printing with authenticated printer key
US7188364B2 (en) * 2001-12-20 2007-03-06 Cranite Systems, Inc. Personal virtual bridged local area networks
US7506058B2 (en) * 2001-12-28 2009-03-17 International Business Machines Corporation Method for transmitting information across firewalls
US20030217263A1 (en) 2002-03-21 2003-11-20 Tsutomu Sakai System and method for secure real-time digital transmission
US7099936B2 (en) 2002-03-29 2006-08-29 International Business Machines Corporation Multi-tier service level agreement method and system
DE60318919D1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2008-03-20 Advics Co Ltd Vehicle control device with power steering
EP1495592A1 (en) 2002-04-12 2005-01-12 Nokia Corporation Policy-based qos management in multi-radio access networks
US7379982B2 (en) 2002-04-15 2008-05-27 Bassam Tabbara System and method for custom installation of an operating system on a remote client
US7120797B2 (en) 2002-04-24 2006-10-10 Microsoft Corporation Methods for authenticating potential members invited to join a group
US7117158B2 (en) 2002-04-25 2006-10-03 Bilcare, Inc. Systems, methods and computer program products for designing, deploying and managing interactive voice response (IVR) systems
US6681262B1 (en) * 2002-05-06 2004-01-20 Infinicon Systems Network data flow optimization
US8611363B2 (en) 2002-05-06 2013-12-17 Adtran, Inc. Logical port system and method
US7203911B2 (en) 2002-05-13 2007-04-10 Microsoft Corporation Altering a display on a viewing device based upon a user proximity to the viewing device
US20030225563A1 (en) 2002-05-30 2003-12-04 Gonos Dan G. Capacity planning
US6888807B2 (en) 2002-06-10 2005-05-03 Ipr Licensing, Inc. Applying session services based on packet flows
US20050193103A1 (en) 2002-06-18 2005-09-01 John Drabik Method and apparatus for automatic configuration and management of a virtual private network
US20040002878A1 (en) 2002-06-28 2004-01-01 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for user-determined authentication in a federated environment
US6801528B2 (en) * 2002-07-03 2004-10-05 Ericsson Inc. System and method for dynamic simultaneous connection to multiple service providers
US7210143B2 (en) 2002-07-17 2007-04-24 International Business Machines Corporation Deployment of applications in a multitier compute infrastructure
US20040078787A1 (en) * 2002-07-19 2004-04-22 Michael Borek System and method for troubleshooting, maintaining and repairing network devices
US7143420B2 (en) 2002-08-29 2006-11-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Strategic technology architecture roadmap
US7275156B2 (en) 2002-08-30 2007-09-25 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for establishing and using a secure credential infrastructure
US20040054791A1 (en) * 2002-09-17 2004-03-18 Krishnendu Chakraborty System and method for enforcing user policies on a web server
US7072822B2 (en) 2002-09-30 2006-07-04 Cognos Incorporated Deploying multiple enterprise planning models across clusters of application servers
US20040073795A1 (en) 2002-10-10 2004-04-15 Jablon David P. Systems and methods for password-based connection
US7644145B2 (en) 2002-10-16 2010-01-05 Xerox Corporation Integrated server platform for the autonomous provisioning of device services
EP1426919A1 (en) 2002-12-02 2004-06-09 Sony International (Europe) GmbH Method for operating a display device
US7933983B2 (en) 2002-12-17 2011-04-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for performing load balancing across control planes in a data center
US7436965B2 (en) 2003-02-19 2008-10-14 Microsoft Corporation Optical out-of-band key distribution
US7069553B2 (en) 2003-03-03 2006-06-27 Computer Associates Think, Inc. Universal deployment tool
US7152157B2 (en) 2003-03-05 2006-12-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for dynamic resource configuration using a dependency graph
US7890543B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2011-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications
US7765501B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-07-27 Microsoft Corporation Settings and constraints validation to enable design for operations
US7689676B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Model-based policy application
US8122106B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2012-02-21 Microsoft Corporation Integrating design, deployment, and management phases for systems
US7072807B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2006-07-04 Microsoft Corporation Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications
US7350186B2 (en) 2003-03-10 2008-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for managing computing deployment in presence of variable workload
US7386721B1 (en) 2003-03-12 2008-06-10 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for integrated provisioning of a network device with configuration information and identity certification
US7603442B2 (en) 2003-06-20 2009-10-13 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for maintaining service dependency relationships in a computer system
US7567504B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2009-07-28 Microsoft Corporation Network load balancing with traffic routing
US7636917B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2009-12-22 Microsoft Corporation Network load balancing with host status information
US7606929B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2009-10-20 Microsoft Corporation Network load balancing with connection manipulation
US7590736B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2009-09-15 Microsoft Corporation Flexible network load balancing
US7613822B2 (en) 2003-06-30 2009-11-03 Microsoft Corporation Network load balancing with session information
US7146353B2 (en) 2003-07-22 2006-12-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Resource allocation for multiple applications
US20050097146A1 (en) 2003-08-21 2005-05-05 Konstantinou Alexander V. Methods and systems for autonomously managing a network
US7127625B2 (en) 2003-09-04 2006-10-24 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Application management based on power consumption
US7313573B2 (en) 2003-09-17 2007-12-25 International Business Machines Corporation Diagnosis of equipment failures using an integrated approach of case based reasoning and reliability analysis
US20050080811A1 (en) 2003-10-10 2005-04-14 Cendura Corporation Configuration management architecture
US7237267B2 (en) 2003-10-16 2007-06-26 Cisco Technology, Inc. Policy-based network security management
US6968291B1 (en) 2003-11-04 2005-11-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Using and generating finite state machines to monitor system status
JP2005155729A (en) 2003-11-21 2005-06-16 Toyota Motor Corp Hydraulic control device for belt type continuously variable transmission
US20050138416A1 (en) 2003-12-19 2005-06-23 Microsoft Corporation Object model for managing firewall services
US7278273B1 (en) 2003-12-30 2007-10-09 Google Inc. Modular data center
US7231410B1 (en) 2004-03-10 2007-06-12 Qlogic, Corporation Revision control system for large-scale systems management
US7302608B1 (en) 2004-03-31 2007-11-27 Google Inc. Systems and methods for automatic repair and replacement of networked machines
US20050246529A1 (en) 2004-04-30 2005-11-03 Microsoft Corporation Isolated persistent identity storage for authentication of computing devies
US7484237B2 (en) 2004-05-13 2009-01-27 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and apparatus for role-based security policy management
US8095959B2 (en) 2004-05-27 2012-01-10 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and system for integrating policies across systems
US20060025984A1 (en) 2004-08-02 2006-02-02 Microsoft Corporation Automatic validation and calibration of transaction-based performance models
US7333000B2 (en) 2004-11-12 2008-02-19 Afco Systems Development, Inc. Tracking system and method for electrically powered equipment
US9043781B2 (en) 2004-12-03 2015-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation Algorithm for automated enterprise deployments
US7164616B2 (en) * 2004-12-20 2007-01-16 Intel Corporation Memory array leakage reduction circuit and method
US7730183B2 (en) * 2005-01-13 2010-06-01 Microsoft Corporation System and method for generating virtual networks
US20060161879A1 (en) 2005-01-18 2006-07-20 Microsoft Corporation Methods for managing standards
US7552208B2 (en) 2005-01-18 2009-06-23 Microsoft Corporation Methods for managing capacity
US7624086B2 (en) 2005-03-04 2009-11-24 Maxsp Corporation Pre-install compliance system
US20060235664A1 (en) 2005-04-15 2006-10-19 Microsoft Corporation Model-based capacity planning
US7350068B2 (en) 2005-04-22 2008-03-25 International Business Machines Corporation Server blade network boot method that minimizes required network bandwidth
US7805496B2 (en) 2005-05-10 2010-09-28 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic generation of hybrid performance models
US7941309B2 (en) 2005-11-02 2011-05-10 Microsoft Corporation Modeling IT operations/policies

Patent Citations (99)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5504921A (en) * 1990-09-17 1996-04-02 Cabletron Systems, Inc. Network management system using model-based intelligence
US5557774A (en) * 1993-03-22 1996-09-17 Hitachi, Ltd. Method for making test environmental programs
US5878220A (en) * 1994-11-21 1999-03-02 Oracle Corporation Method and apparatus for storing and transferring data on a network
US5872928A (en) * 1995-02-24 1999-02-16 Cabletron Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for defining and enforcing policies for configuration management in communications networks
US5758351A (en) * 1995-03-01 1998-05-26 Sterling Software, Inc. System and method for the creation and use of surrogate information system objects
US5724508A (en) * 1995-03-09 1998-03-03 Insoft, Inc. Apparatus for collaborative computing
US6047323A (en) * 1995-10-19 2000-04-04 Hewlett-Packard Company Creation and migration of distributed streams in clusters of networked computers
US6147995A (en) * 1995-11-15 2000-11-14 Cabletron Systems, Inc. Method for establishing restricted broadcast groups in a switched network
US5822531A (en) * 1996-07-22 1998-10-13 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for dynamically reconfiguring a cluster of computer systems
US5930798A (en) * 1996-08-15 1999-07-27 Predicate Logic, Inc. Universal data measurement, analysis and control system
US6209099B1 (en) * 1996-12-18 2001-03-27 Ncr Corporation Secure data processing method and system
US7043407B2 (en) * 1997-03-10 2006-05-09 Trilogy Development Group, Inc. Method and apparatus for configuring systems
US6065058A (en) * 1997-05-09 2000-05-16 International Business Machines Corp. Dynamic push filtering based on information exchanged among nodes in a proxy hierarchy
US6305015B1 (en) * 1997-07-02 2001-10-16 Bull S.A. Information processing system architecture
US6195355B1 (en) * 1997-09-26 2001-02-27 Sony Corporation Packet-Transmission control method and packet-transmission control apparatus
US6134594A (en) * 1997-10-28 2000-10-17 Microsoft Corporation Multi-user, multiple tier distributed application architecture with single-user access control of middle tier objects
US6269079B1 (en) * 1997-11-12 2001-07-31 International Business Machines Corporation Systems, methods and computer program products for distributing connection information between ATM nodes
US6035405A (en) * 1997-12-22 2000-03-07 Nortel Networks Corporation Secure virtual LANs
US6442557B1 (en) * 1998-02-27 2002-08-27 Prc Inc. Evaluation of enterprise architecture model including relational database
US6466985B1 (en) * 1998-04-10 2002-10-15 At&T Corp. Method and apparatus for providing quality of service using the internet protocol
US20020049573A1 (en) * 1998-05-13 2002-04-25 El Ata Nabil A. Abu Automated system and method for designing model based architectures of information systems
US6789090B1 (en) * 1998-05-29 2004-09-07 Hitachi, Ltd. Virtual network displaying system
US6470025B1 (en) * 1998-06-05 2002-10-22 3Com Technologies System for providing fair access for VLANs to a shared transmission medium
US6438100B1 (en) * 1998-08-07 2002-08-20 Alcatel Canada Inc. Method and apparatus for routing server redundancy in a network having carrier scale internetworking
US6546553B1 (en) * 1998-10-02 2003-04-08 Microsoft Corporation Service installation on a base function and provision of a pass function with a service-free base function semantic
US6393485B1 (en) * 1998-10-27 2002-05-21 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for managing clustered computer systems
US6449650B1 (en) * 1999-02-01 2002-09-10 Redback Networks Inc. Methods and apparatus for deploying quality of service policies on a data communication network
US6651240B1 (en) * 1999-02-17 2003-11-18 Fujitsu Limited Object-oriented software development support apparatus and development support method
US6377996B1 (en) * 1999-02-18 2002-04-23 International Business Machines Corporation System for seamless streaming of data stored on a network of distributed primary and target servers using segmentation information exchanged among all servers during streaming
US6549934B1 (en) * 1999-03-01 2003-04-15 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for remote access to computer devices via client managed server buffers exclusively allocated to the client
US6760775B1 (en) * 1999-03-05 2004-07-06 At&T Corp. System, method and apparatus for network service load and reliability management
US6564252B1 (en) * 1999-03-11 2003-05-13 Microsoft Corporation Scalable storage system with unique client assignment to storage server partitions
US6442713B1 (en) * 1999-03-30 2002-08-27 International Business Machines Corporation Cluster node distress signal
US6801949B1 (en) * 1999-04-12 2004-10-05 Rainfinity, Inc. Distributed server cluster with graphical user interface
US7089530B1 (en) * 1999-05-17 2006-08-08 Invensys Systems, Inc. Process control configuration system with connection validation and configuration
US6968550B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2005-11-22 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method for synchronizing software between computers
US6542504B1 (en) * 1999-05-28 2003-04-01 3Com Corporation Profile based method for packet header compression in a point to point link
US6539494B1 (en) * 1999-06-17 2003-03-25 Art Technology Group, Inc. Internet server session backup apparatus
US20010020228A1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2001-09-06 International Business Machines Corporation Umethod, system and program for managing relationships among entities to exchange encryption keys for use in providing access and authorization to resources
US6601233B1 (en) * 1999-07-30 2003-07-29 Accenture Llp Business components framework
US6813778B1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2004-11-02 General Instruments Corporation Method and system for downloading and managing the enablement of a list of code objects
US7162427B1 (en) * 1999-08-20 2007-01-09 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Structure and method of modeling integrated business and information technology frameworks and architecture in support of a business
US6597956B1 (en) * 1999-08-23 2003-07-22 Terraspring, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling an extensible computing system
US6779016B1 (en) * 1999-08-23 2004-08-17 Terraspring, Inc. Extensible computing system
US6772333B1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2004-08-03 Dickens Coal Llc Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide id visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US6738736B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2004-05-18 Accenture Llp Method and estimator for providing capacacity modeling and planning
US6654796B1 (en) * 1999-10-07 2003-11-25 Cisco Technology, Inc. System for managing cluster of network switches using IP address for commander switch and redirecting a managing request via forwarding an HTTP connection to an expansion switch
US6760765B1 (en) * 1999-11-09 2004-07-06 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Cluster server apparatus
US7103185B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2006-09-05 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for distributing and updating private keys of multicast group managers using directory replication
US6304972B1 (en) * 2000-01-03 2001-10-16 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Secure software system and related techniques
US7315801B1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2008-01-01 Secure Computing Corporation Network security modeling system and method
US6868062B1 (en) * 2000-03-28 2005-03-15 Intel Corporation Managing data traffic on multiple ports
US6718361B1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2004-04-06 Network Appliance Inc. Method and apparatus for reliable and scalable distribution of data files in distributed networks
US7403901B1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2008-07-22 Accenture Llp Error and load summary reporting in a health care solution environment
US6574195B2 (en) * 2000-04-19 2003-06-03 Caspian Networks, Inc. Micro-flow management
US20020010771A1 (en) * 2000-05-24 2002-01-24 Davide Mandato Universal QoS adaptation framework for mobile multimedia applications
US20020009079A1 (en) * 2000-06-23 2002-01-24 Jungck Peder J. Edge adapter apparatus and method
US6928482B1 (en) * 2000-06-29 2005-08-09 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for scalable process flow load balancing of a multiplicity of parallel packet processors in a digital communication network
US7366755B1 (en) * 2000-07-28 2008-04-29 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for affinity of users to application servers
US7181731B2 (en) * 2000-09-01 2007-02-20 Op40, Inc. Method, system, and structure for distributing and executing software and data on different network and computer devices, platforms, and environments
US7404175B2 (en) * 2000-10-10 2008-07-22 Bea Systems, Inc. Smart generator
US6769060B1 (en) * 2000-10-25 2004-07-27 Ericsson Inc. Method of bilateral identity authentication
US20020082820A1 (en) * 2000-10-31 2002-06-27 Glenn Ferguson Data model for automated server configuration
US6651165B1 (en) * 2000-11-13 2003-11-18 Lsi Logic Corporation Method and apparatus for directly booting a RAID volume as the primary operating system memory
US20020075844A1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Hagen W. Alexander Integrating public and private network resources for optimized broadband wireless access and method
US7069480B1 (en) * 2001-03-28 2006-06-27 The Shoregroup, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying problems in computer networks
US7028228B1 (en) * 2001-03-28 2006-04-11 The Shoregroup, Inc. Method and apparatus for identifying problems in computer networks
US20020161839A1 (en) * 2001-04-30 2002-10-31 Colasurdo David B. Method and apparatus for maintaining session affinity across multiple server groups
US7134122B1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2006-11-07 Oracle International Corporation One click deployment
US6968551B2 (en) * 2001-06-11 2005-11-22 John Hediger System and user interface for generation and processing of software application installation instructions
US20030028642A1 (en) * 2001-08-03 2003-02-06 International Business Machines Corporation Managing server resources for hosted applications
US7197418B2 (en) * 2001-08-15 2007-03-27 National Instruments Corporation Online specification of a system which compares determined devices and installed devices
US7191429B2 (en) * 2001-09-28 2007-03-13 Manyeta Informatique Inc. System and method for managing architectural layers within a software model
US20030065743A1 (en) * 2001-09-28 2003-04-03 Jenny Patrick Duncan Method and system for distributing requests for content
US20030069369A1 (en) * 2001-10-10 2003-04-10 Belenkaya Bronislava G. Biodegradable absorbents and methods of preparation
US20030074395A1 (en) * 2001-10-17 2003-04-17 Kave Eshghi Allowing requests of a session to be serviced by different servers in a multi-server data service system
US7035930B2 (en) * 2001-10-26 2006-04-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Method and framework for generating an optimized deployment of software applications in a distributed computing environment using layered model descriptions of services and servers
US7024451B2 (en) * 2001-11-05 2006-04-04 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for maintaining consistent independent server-side state among collaborating servers
US6796269B2 (en) * 2001-12-05 2004-09-28 Hitchi High-Technologies Corporation Apparatus and method for monitoring plasma processing apparatus
US7188335B1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2007-03-06 Trilogy Development Group, Inc. Product configuration using configuration patterns
US20030138105A1 (en) * 2002-01-18 2003-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation Storing keys in a cryptology device
US6954930B2 (en) * 2002-02-19 2005-10-11 International Business Machines Corporation Remote validation of installation input data
US7254634B1 (en) * 2002-03-08 2007-08-07 Akamai Technologies, Inc. Managing web tier session state objects in a content delivery network (CDN)
US20030214908A1 (en) * 2002-03-19 2003-11-20 Anurag Kumar Methods and apparatus for quality of service control for TCP aggregates at a bottleneck link in the internet
US6968535B2 (en) * 2002-03-21 2005-11-22 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Service mapping method of enterprise application modeling and development for multi-tier service environments
US7376125B1 (en) * 2002-06-04 2008-05-20 Fortinet, Inc. Service processing switch
US20040068631A1 (en) * 2002-06-19 2004-04-08 Masaharu Ukeda Storage device
US7191344B2 (en) * 2002-08-08 2007-03-13 Authenex, Inc. Method and system for controlling access to data stored on a data storage device
US20040049509A1 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-03-11 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for managing dependencies in distributed systems
US20040049365A1 (en) * 2002-09-11 2004-03-11 International Business Machines Corporation Methods and apparatus for impact analysis and problem determination
US20050008001A1 (en) * 2003-02-14 2005-01-13 John Leslie Williams System and method for interfacing with heterogeneous network data gathering tools
US7406692B2 (en) * 2003-02-24 2008-07-29 Bea Systems, Inc. System and method for server load balancing and server affinity
US20050021742A1 (en) * 2003-03-31 2005-01-27 System Management Arts, Inc. Method and apparatus for multi-realm system modeling
US20040208292A1 (en) * 2003-04-16 2004-10-21 Entrisphere, Inc. System and method for deploying new equipment and services in conjunction with a legacy provisioning system
US7103874B2 (en) * 2003-10-23 2006-09-05 Microsoft Corporation Model-based management of computer systems and distributed applications
US20050102513A1 (en) * 2003-11-10 2005-05-12 Nokia Corporation Enforcing authorized domains with domain membership vouchers
US20060048017A1 (en) * 2004-08-30 2006-03-02 International Business Machines Corporation Techniques for health monitoring and control of application servers
US20070192769A1 (en) * 2004-10-20 2007-08-16 Fujitsu Limited Program, method, and apparatus for managing applications
US20060232927A1 (en) * 2005-04-15 2006-10-19 Microsoft Corporation Model-based system monitoring

Cited By (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7711121B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2010-05-04 Microsoft Corporation System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US7739380B2 (en) 2000-10-24 2010-06-15 Microsoft Corporation System and method for distributed management of shared computers
US7890543B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2011-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Architecture for distributed computing system and automated design, deployment, and management of distributed applications
US7792931B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-09-07 Microsoft Corporation Model-based system provisioning
US7684964B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-03-23 Microsoft Corporation Model and system state synchronization
US7689676B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2010-03-30 Microsoft Corporation Model-based policy application
US8122106B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2012-02-21 Microsoft Corporation Integrating design, deployment, and management phases for systems
US7886041B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2011-02-08 Microsoft Corporation Design time validation of systems
US7890951B2 (en) 2003-03-06 2011-02-15 Microsoft Corporation Model-based provisioning of test environments
US7778422B2 (en) 2004-02-27 2010-08-17 Microsoft Corporation Security associations for devices
US7669235B2 (en) 2004-04-30 2010-02-23 Microsoft Corporation Secure domain join for computing devices
US20050256935A1 (en) * 2004-05-06 2005-11-17 Overstreet Matthew L System and method for managing a network
US7797147B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2010-09-14 Microsoft Corporation Model-based system monitoring
US8489728B2 (en) 2005-04-15 2013-07-16 Microsoft Corporation Model-based system monitoring
US8549513B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2013-10-01 Microsoft Corporation Model-based virtual system provisioning
US9317270B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2016-04-19 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Model-based virtual system provisioning
US9811368B2 (en) 2005-06-29 2017-11-07 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Model-based virtual system provisioning
US7941309B2 (en) 2005-11-02 2011-05-10 Microsoft Corporation Modeling IT operations/policies

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
JP2011078100A (en) 2011-04-14 application
US20050108381A1 (en) 2005-05-19 application
EP2424164B8 (en) 2017-11-22 grant
JP2002202951A (en) 2002-07-19 application
US20050097147A1 (en) 2005-05-05 application
EP2424165A1 (en) 2012-02-29 application
JP5140128B2 (en) 2013-02-06 grant
EP2442492B1 (en) 2018-01-03 grant
US20050097058A1 (en) 2005-05-05 application
ES2660543T3 (en) 2018-03-22 grant
EP2424166B1 (en) 2017-03-15 grant
ES2643489T3 (en) 2017-11-23 grant
EP1202175A2 (en) 2002-05-02 application
US7370103B2 (en) 2008-05-06 grant
ES2643488T3 (en) 2017-11-23 grant
JP2007305123A (en) 2007-11-22 application
EP2424165B8 (en) 2017-11-22 grant
US7406517B2 (en) 2008-07-29 grant
JP5140127B2 (en) 2013-02-06 grant
EP2424166A1 (en) 2012-02-29 application
US20050091078A1 (en) 2005-04-28 application
US20050097097A1 (en) 2005-05-05 application
US7739380B2 (en) 2010-06-15 grant
US7606898B1 (en) 2009-10-20 grant
EP1202175A3 (en) 2009-09-30 application
JP5343057B2 (en) 2013-11-13 grant
US7711121B2 (en) 2010-05-04 grant
EP2424164A1 (en) 2012-02-29 application
JP2011055523A (en) 2011-03-17 application
JP4261096B2 (en) 2009-04-30 grant
US7200655B2 (en) 2007-04-03 grant
EP2442492A1 (en) 2012-04-18 application
EP1202175B1 (en) 2014-01-01 grant
EP2424164B1 (en) 2017-07-19 grant
US20060259609A1 (en) 2006-11-16 application
EP2424165B1 (en) 2017-07-19 grant
JP2011003220A (en) 2011-01-06 application
JP4703600B2 (en) 2011-06-15 grant
EP2424167A1 (en) 2012-02-29 application
EP2424166B8 (en) 2017-11-29 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AlZain et al. Cloud computing security: from single to multi-clouds
US7076801B2 (en) Intrusion tolerant server system
US6996628B2 (en) Methods and systems for managing virtual addresses for virtual networks
US7028334B2 (en) Methods and systems for using names in virtual networks
US6757836B1 (en) Method and apparatus for resolving partial connectivity in a clustered computing system
US6631416B2 (en) Methods and systems for enabling a tunnel between two computers on a network
US6950874B2 (en) Method and system for management of resource leases in an application framework system
US5781737A (en) System for processing requests for notice of events
US7502861B1 (en) System and method for providing services for offline servers using the same network address
US6985944B2 (en) Distributing queries and combining query responses in a fault and performance monitoring system using distributed data gathering and storage
US7337473B2 (en) Method and system for network management with adaptive monitoring and discovery of computer systems based on user login
US7246159B2 (en) Distributed data gathering and storage for use in a fault and performance monitoring system
US8260893B1 (en) Method and system for automated management of information technology
US7159022B2 (en) Method and system for a set of network appliances which can be connected to provide enhanced collaboration, scalability, and reliability
US20030093692A1 (en) Global deployment of host-based intrusion sensors
US20020143942A1 (en) Storage area network resource management
US20030041167A1 (en) Method and system for managing secure geographic boundary resources within a network management framework
US20030041238A1 (en) Method and system for managing resources using geographic location information within a network management framework
US20020026503A1 (en) Methods and system for providing network services using at least one processor interfacing a base network
US20040088404A1 (en) Administering users in a fault and performance monitoring system using distributed data gathering and storage
US6904458B1 (en) System and method for remote management
US20030233431A1 (en) Method and system for model-based heterogeneous server configuration management
US6769008B1 (en) Method and apparatus for dynamically altering configurations of clustered computer systems
US20040088403A1 (en) System configuration for use with a fault and performance monitoring system using distributed data gathering and storage
US20030009540A1 (en) Method and system for presentation and specification of distributed multi-customer configuration management within a network management framework

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034766/0001

Effective date: 20141014