US20060258588A1 - Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders - Google Patents

Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060258588A1
US20060258588A1 US11/487,874 US48787406A US2006258588A1 US 20060258588 A1 US20060258588 A1 US 20060258588A1 US 48787406 A US48787406 A US 48787406A US 2006258588 A1 US2006258588 A1 US 2006258588A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
igf
method
cartilage
mg
articular
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/487,874
Inventor
Marilyn Pike
Grushenka Wolfgang
Sharon Chen
Ralph Owen
Lynn Seely
Hans-Peter Guler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc
Original Assignee
Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to US8068398P priority Critical
Priority to US28555499A priority
Priority to US10/199,449 priority patent/US7141545B2/en
Application filed by Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc filed Critical Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Inc
Priority to US11/487,874 priority patent/US20060258588A1/en
Publication of US20060258588A1 publication Critical patent/US20060258588A1/en
Application status is Abandoned legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • A61K38/16Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/17Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from animals; from humans
    • A61K38/22Hormones
    • A61K38/30Insulin-like growth factors (Somatomedins), e.g. IGF-1, IGF-2

Abstract

A method for treating mammalian articular cartilage disorders, more particularly osteoarthritis, and trauma-related cartilage injuries using insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is provided. The method comprises increasing the amount of IGF-I at the diseased or injured articular site to a therapeutically effective level that is capable of maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage, which is beneficial to the long-term treatment of osteoarthritis and trauma-related injuries to cartilage tissues. In one embodiment of the invention, single doses of at least 0.01 mg of pharmaceutically effective IGF-I are administered intermittently such that the duration of time off of therapy is greater than the time on therapy, more preferably with a frequency of administration of about once per week or less.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/199,449, filed Jul. 19, 2002; which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/285,554, filed Apr. 2, 1999; which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/080,683, filed Apr. 3, 1998, the contents of which are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • This invention relates to methods for long-term treatment of mammalian articular cartilage disorders. These methods use therapeutic agents that preserve existing cartilage tissues or stimulate regeneration of cartilage to counteract the degenerative effects of the cartilage disorder or injury.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Articular cartilage plays an essential role in the movement of mammalian joints. While synovial fluid within the joint cavity serves as a lubricant, the articular cartilage provides a superior smooth surface between adjacent bones, allowing for near-frictionless motion of joints. It is the articular cartilage that spreads compressive stresses over the articular plate surfaces of the joint, thus protecting weight-bearing bones from shattering.
  • Articular cartilage is composed of chondrocytes embedded in an extracellular matrix of proteoglycans, collagen, and small molecular weight glycoproteins. Proteoglycans are essential in maintaining strength of the cartilage tissue so that it can withstand compression. Collagen provides the tissue with tensile strength and resistance to shear. In a healthy joint, the extracellular matrix is maintained by a balance between the synthesis and secretion of these macromolecules by chondrocytes and their subsequent degradation by proteolytic enzymes such as proteoglycanases and metalloproteinases, which are also synthesized and secreted by chondrocytes. Damage to the articular surface can disrupt this equilibrium, such that degradation exceeds the ability of chondrocytes to synthesize macromolecules necessary for repair of the cartilage tissues. This disequilibrium results in loss of extracellular matrix or alteration of the material properties of the cartilage tissue. Moreover, with trauma-related injuries, chondrocytes do not regenerate and are incapable of repairing focal defects or cartilage tears. The range of motion for ajoint sustaining such an injury can be severely affected.
  • Chronic disruption of the equilibrium between synthesis and degradation of cartilage matrix macromolecules is associated with the development of osteoarthritis, the most common of the arthritic disorders in humans. As osteoarthritis progresses, the cushioning surface of the affected joint thins as the cartilage softens. Vertical clefts develop, and the integrity of the surface is breached. Cartilage ulcers, appositional bone growth, and osteophytes may appear and restrict movement. When left untreated, continued excessive degradation of proteoglycans and collagens by proteases ultimately leads to total loss of cartilage and ebumation of bone.
  • Historically, treatment of osteoarthritis and articular cartilage injuries has been limited to pain relief, reduction of joint loading, physical therapy, and orthopedic surgery, all of which are aimed at symptomatic relief rather than treatment of the underlying pathologic disorder. More recently, osteoarthritis research has concentrated on development of “chondroprotective” methods. Such methods involve long-term therapeutic treatment aimed at preserving or stimulating cartilage formation (see Rogachefsky et al. (1993) Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 1:105-114; Issebelcher et al. (eds.) Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine (13th ed.; McGraw-Hill Inc., 1994), pp. 1692-1697).
  • A number of studies have focused on the physiological role of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) on chondrocytes and the generation of extracellular matrix of normal articular cartilage. IGF-I has been shown to stimulate in vitro chondrocyte cell proliferation (see, for example, Osborne et al. (1989) J. Orthop. Res. 7: 35-42; and Trippel et al. (1989) Pediatr. Res. 25: 76-82), and it stimulates proteoglycan and collagen synthesis by chondrocytes of normal articular cartilage in both in vitro and ex vivo explant studies (see, for example, Guenther et al. (1982) Experientia 38: 979-981; Willis and Liberti (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 844: 72-80; McQuillan et al. (1986) Biochem. J. 240: 423-430; and Tesch et al. (1992) J. Orthop. Res. 10: 14-22). These stimulatory actions are mediated through the IGF-I receptor in chondrocyte cells (see Taylor et al. (1988) FEBS Lett. 236: 33-38).
  • Recent studies have examined the physiological function of IGF-I in the etiopathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Expression level of IGF-I apparently increases with the advancement of osteoarthritis pathology (see Middleton and Tyler (1992) Ann. Rheum. Dis. 51: 40-447); Middleton et al. (1996) J. Histochem. Cytochem. 44: 133-141; and Keyszer et al. (1995) J. Rheumatology 22: 275-281). However, articular cartilage responsiveness to IGF-I has been shown to decrease in an experimental arthritis model (see Joosten et al. (1989) Agents Actions 26: 193-195). This lack of responsiveness may be associated with decreased synthesis of the IGF-I receptor (see Joosten et al. (1989), increased degradation of IGF-I and/or its receptor (Schalkwijk et al. (1989) Arthritis Rheum. 82: 66-71) by extracellular proteolytic enzymes, or by the presence of IGF-I binding proteins at the chondrocyte cell surface or by nonspecific binding of IGF-I to the cartilage matrix thereby blocking access of IGF-I to its receptor sites and negating any potential benefit of increased synthesis of IGF-I and/or its receptor (Dore et al. (1994) Arthritis and Rheumatism 37: 253-263).
  • Parenteral administration of IGF-I has been referred to as a method for enhancing muscle mass of atrophied skeletal muscle in a joint having reduced function due to disease, such as osteoarthritis, or trauma-related injuries (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,444,047).
  • Recently, IGF-I has been evaluated in vivo for its therapeutic effect in the treatment of osteoarthritis (Rogachefsky et al. (1993) Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 1:
  • 105-114). In this study, dogs subjected to anterior cruciate ligament transection were subsequently examined for symptoms of osteoarthritis. Three weeks after transection, 1.0 μg of human recombinant IGF-I was administered intra-articularly 3 times per week for 3 weeks. Results of this study showed that intra-articular administration of IGF-I alone was ineffective in treating osteoarthritis, as cartilage in treated animals was not different from cartilage in untreated animals.
  • Clearly better methods for treating cartilage disorders or injuries are needed.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • A method for treating mammalian articular cartilage disorders, more particularly osteoarthritis, and trauma-related cartilage injuries using insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) as the therapeutic agent is provided. The method of the present invention comprises increasing the total amount of IGF-I present at the site of the articular disorder or injury to a therapeutically effective level that enables maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage. Increases in the amount of IGF-I at the affected articular site may be obtained via administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of IGF-I. Alternatively, or additionally, the level of naturally produced IGF-I may be regulated by gene therapy or by disruption of IGF-I binding to IGF-I binding proteins, whose binding to IGF-I decreases availability of free IGF-I. The present invention can be used in treating osteoarthritis and trauma-related injuries, wherein cartilage of joints is damaged, by promoting maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows the time course of IGF-I stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis in chondrocytes obtained from a human patient having osteoarthritis.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a method for treating mammalian articular cartilage disorders, more particularly osteoarthritis, and trauma-related cartilage injuries. This method comprises increasing the total amount of IGF-I present at the diseased or injured articular site to a level that is capable of achieving a desired positive effect on cartilage. By “desired positive effect” is intended the maintenance and/or the regeneration of cartilage. By “maintenance” is intended preservation of cartilage, which encompasses cartilage existing at the onset of treatment and any newly formed cartilage following onset of treatment, including any transplanted chondrocytes or stem cells. By “regeneration” is intended formation of new cartilage, which adds to the existing cartilage at the onset of treatment and which may serve to replace cartilage lost prior to onset of treatment. Maintenance and regeneration of cartilage encompass maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage components, including, but not limited to, chondrocytes and extracellular matrix molecules. Maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage is beneficial to the long-term treatment of osteoarthritis and trauma-related injuries to cartilage tissues.
  • The method of the present invention is effective for long-term treatment of osteoarthritis, a degenerative joint disease wherein a movable synovial-lined joint is eventually rendered nonfunctional. The method can be used for the treatment of localized and generalized idiopathic osteoarthritis, as well as secondary osteoarthritis. Examples of localized idiopathic osteoarthritis include, but are not limited to, afflictions to hands (e.g., Heberden's and Bouchard's nodes, erosive interphalangeal arthritis, and carpal-1st metacarpal), feet (e.g., hallux valgus, hallus rigidus, contracted toes, and talonavicular), knee, hip, shoulder, and spine (e.g., synovial-lined joints of vertebral column, including apophyseal, costovertebral, intervertebral, median atlantoaxial, transitional lumbosacral, and sacroiliac articulations; hyperostosis; Forestier's disease; and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis).
  • Examples of secondary osteoarthritis include, but are not limited to, osteoarthritis caused by or associated with the following underlying problems: acute or chronic trauma-related injuries to articular cartilage, which may be incurred during an occupational or recreational activity; congenital or developmental disorders such as slipped epiphysis, hypermobility syndromes, and bone dysplasias; metabolic disorders such as ochronosis, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease, and Gaucher's disease; endocrine disorders such as acromegaly, hyperparathyroidism, diabetes mellitus, obesity, and hypothyroidism; calcium deposition diseases such as calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition and apatite arthropathy; and bone and joint diseases such as fractures, avascular necrosis, infection, gout, rheumatoid arthritis, Paget's disease, osteopetrosis, and osteochondritis.
  • The present invention should be generally applicable to osteoarthritis caused by or associated with all of the above disorders. The disclosed method is also effective for treatment of degenerative disk disease, whereby cartilagenous tissue in the intervertebral disks breaks down. Osteoarthritis and degenerative disk disease are common causes of sustained back pain, and hence the method of the invention provides a means for alleviating this symptom by treatment of the underlying cause.
  • It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the method of the present invention can also be used in the treatment of trauma-related articular cartilage injuries, via the same mechanism as for osteoarthritis, i.e., by promoting maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage. By “trauma-related articular cartilage injuries” is intended damage caused to the chondrocytes, extracellular matrix, or other components of articular cartilage as a result of a traumatic event such that normal joint movement is impaired or is at risk of being adversely affected. Such injuries can be either acute or chronic, and include occupation-related, accident-related, sports-related, or violence-related injuries. When left untreated, serious articular cartilage injuries can eventually lead to development of osteoarthritis.
  • By “treatment” is intended both therapeutic treatment of an existing articular cartilage disorder, more particularly osteoarthritis, or trauma-related articular cartilage injury, and preventive or prophylactic procedures performed before the occurrence of the disorder or injury. Thus, the mammal to be treated may already have the disorder or injury or may be prone to having the disorder or injury. Risk factors known to predispose an individual to osteoarthritis can be taken into account when determining whether preventive treatment is desirable. For example, it is generally known that the risk of osteoarthritis increases with age and repetitive stress, such as vocational-related stress. It also has been observed that individuals suffering from major joint trauma, obesity, congenital or developmental defects, metabolic or endocrine disorders, and prior inflammatory joint diseases are more prone to osteoarthritis. Thus, it may be desirable to apply the method of the present invention for preventive purposes in these cases.
  • The method of the present invention may be used with any mammal. Exemplary mammals include, but are not limited to, cats, dogs, horses, cows, sheep, pigs, and more preferably humans.
  • Increases in the amount of IGF-I at the diseased or injured articular site to a therapeutically effective level may be obtained via administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I. By “therapeutically effective dose” is intended a dose of IGF-I that achieves the desired goal of increasing the amount of IGF-I at the articular site to a therapeutically effective level enabling cartilage maintenance and/or regeneration. Such administration may be achieved directly at the site, as with intra-articular injection, or with a delivery system as with sustained release from a biodegradable matrix implanted in proximity to the diseased or injured joint. Alternatively, other modes of administration, such as systemic injections, may be used, as long as they increase the amount of IGF-I at the diseased or injured articular site to a therapeutically effective level that is comparable to that of administering modes that deliver the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I directly to the diseased or injured articular site.
  • The term “IGF-I” as used herein refers to insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), a single chain peptide having 70 amino acids and a molecular weight of about 7,600 daltons. Insulin-like growth factor I stimulates mitosis and growth processes associated with cell development.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, increasing in the amount of IGF-I to a therapeutically effective level is achieved via administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effect dose. The IGF-I to be administered can be from any animal species including, but not limited to, avian, canine, bovine, porcine, equine, and human. Preferably the IGF-I is from a mammalian species, and more preferably is from a mammal of the same species as the mammal undergoing treatment.
  • Biologically active variants of IGF-I are also encompassed by the method of the present invention. Such variants should retain IGF-I activities, particularly the ability to bind to IGF-I receptor sites. IGF-I activity may be measured using standard IGF-I bioassays. Representative assays include known radioreceptor assays using placental membranes (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,324,639; Hall et al. (1974) J. Clin. Endocrinol. and Metab. 39:973-976; and Marshall et al. (1974) J. Clin. Endocrinol. and Metab. 39:283-292), a bioassay that measures the ability of the molecule to enhance incorporation of tritiated thymidine, in a dose-dependent manner, into the DNA of BALB/c 3T3 fibroblasts (see, e.g., Tamura et al. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 262:5616-5621), and the like; herein incorporated by reference. Preferably, the variant has at least the same activity as the native molecule.
  • Suitable biologically active variants can be IGF-I fragments, analogues, and derivatives. By “IGF-I fragment” is intended a protein consisting of only a part of the intact IGF-I sequence and structure, and can be a C-terminal deletion or N-terminal deletion of IGF-I. By “analogue” is intended an analogue of either IGF-I or an IGF-I fragment that comprise a native IGF-I sequence and structure having one or more amino acid substitutions, insertions, or deletions. Peptides having one or more peptoids (peptide mimics) are also encompassed by the term analogue (see International Publication No. WO 91/04282). By “derivative” is intended any suitable modification of IGF-I, IGF-I fragments, or their respective analogues, such as glycosylation, phosphorylation, or other addition of foreign moieties, so long as the IGF-I activity is retained. Methods for making IGF-I fragments, analogues, and derivatives are available in the art. See generally U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,738,921, 5,158,875, and 5,077,276; International Publication Nos. WO 85/00831, WO 92/04363, WO 87/01038, and WO 89/05822; and European Patent Nos. EP 135094, EP 123228, and EP 128733; herein incorporated by reference.
  • IGF-I variants will generally have at least 70%, preferably 80%, more preferably 85%, even more preferably 90% to 95% or more, and most preferably 98% or more amino acid sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of the reference IGF-I molecule. A variant may, for example, differ by as few as 1 to 10 amino acid residues, such as 6-10, as few as 5, as few as 4, 3, 2, or even 1 amino acid residue.
  • By “sequence identity” is intended the same amino acid residues are found within the variant sequence and a reference sequence when a specified, contiguous segment of the amino acid sequence of the variant is aligned and compared to the amino acid sequence of the reference sequence. Methods for sequence alignment and for determining identity between sequences are well known in the art. See, for example, Ausubel et al., eds. (1995) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Chapter 19 (Greene Publishing and Wiley-Interscience, New York); and the ALIGN program (Dayhoff (1978) in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure 5: Suppl. 3 (National Biomedical Research Foundation, Washington, D.C.). A number of algorithms are available for aligning sequences and determining sequence identity and include, for example, the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman et al. (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 48:443; the local homology algorithm of Smith et al. (1981) Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482; the search for similarity method of Pearson et al. (1988) Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 85:2444; the Smith-Waterman algorithm (Meth. Mol. Biol. 70:173-187 (1997); and BLASTP, BLASTN, and BLASTX algorithms (see Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410). Computerized programs using these algorithms are also available, and include, but are not limited to: GAP, BESTFIT, BLAST, FASTA, and TFASTA, available in the Genetics Computing Group (GCG) package, Version 8, Madison, Wis., USA; and CLUSTAL in the PC/Gene program by Intelligenetics, Mountain View, Calif. Preferably, the sequence identity is determined using the default parameters determined by the program.
  • With respect to optimal alignment of two amino acid sequences, the contiguous segment of the variant amino acid sequence may have additional amino acid residues or deleted amino acid residues with respect to the reference amino acid sequence. The contiguous segment used for comparison to the reference amino acid sequence will comprise at least 20 contiguous amino acid residues, and may be 30, 40, 50, or more amino acid residues. Corrections for increased sequence identity associated with inclusion of gaps in the variant's amino acid sequence can be made by assigning gap penalties.
  • When considering percentage of amino acid sequence identity, some amino acid residue positions may differ as a result of conservative amino acid substitutions, which do not affect properties of protein function. In these instances, percent sequence identity may be adjusted upwards to account for the similarity in conservatively substituted amino acids. Such adjustments are well known in the art. See, for example, Meyers & Miller (1988) Computer Applic. Biol. Sci. 4:11-17.
  • The art provides substantial guidance regarding the preparation and use of such IGF-I variants, as discussed further below. A fragment of IGF-I will generally include at least about 10 contiguous amino acid residues of the full-length molecule, preferably about 15-25 contiguous amino acid residues of the full-length molecule, and most preferably about 20-50 or more contiguous amino acid residues of full-length IGF-I.
  • Several IGF-I analogues and fragments are known in the art and include those described in, for example, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83 (1986) 4904-4907; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 149 (1987) 398-404; J. Biol. Chem. 263 (1988) 6233-6239; Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 165 (1989) 766-771; Forsbert et al. (1990) Biochem. J. 271:357-363; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,876,242 and 5,077,276; and International Publication Nos. WO 87/01038 and WO 89/05822. Representative analogues include one with a deletion of Glu-3 of the mature molecule, analogues with up to 5 amino acids truncated from the N-terminus, an analogue with a truncation of the first 3 N-terminal amino acids (referred to as des(1-3)-IGF-I, des-IGF-I, tIGF-I, or brain IGF), and an analogue including the first 17 amino acids of the B chain of human insulin in place of the first 16 amino acids of human IGF-I.
  • The IGF-I used in the present invention can be in its substantially purified, native, recombinantly produced, or chemically synthesized forms. IGF-I can be isolated and purified from serum or plasma (see Phillips (1980) New Eng J Med. 302: 371-380, and European Patent No. EP 123,228). IGF-I can also be chemically synthesized by the solid phase method (see Li et al. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 2216-2220). These references are herein incorporated by reference.
  • Genetic engineering by recombinant DNA techniques can be the most efficient way of producing IGF-I. The human DNA sequence encoding IGF-I is known and can be introduced into host cells for expression. IGF-I can be produced by recombinant DNA techniques in E. coli, yeast, insect, and mammalian cells. Secreted IGF-I can be made by adding a signal sequence to the DNA sequence encoding IGF-I. In addition, the DNA sequence encoding IGF-I can be manipulated to make IGF-I fragments, analogues, or derivatives. Such recombinant DNA techniques are generally available in the art. See, for example, International Publication No. WO 96/07424, where recombinant human IGF-I protein is produced in yeast.
  • The pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I may contain other components that enhance the therapeutic treatment with IGF-I. Such components include IGF-I binding proteins, IGF-I receptors, and the acid-labile subunit of the IGF-I binding complex. It is generally known that IGF-I action in cartilage is modulated by IGF-I binding proteins, at least six of which (IGFBP-1 through IGFBP-6) have been isolated (see Baxer et al. (1989) Prog. Growth Factors Res. 1: 49-68; and Rechler et al. (1992) Growth Regul. 2: 55-68). Of these, IGFBP-3 is the primary binding protein for IGF-I. Its presence may enhance the stimulatory effect of IGF-I on proteoglycan synthesis (see Chevalier et al. (1996) British J. Rheumat. 35: 515-522). In addition, an acid labile glycoprotein also has been shown to be associated with the protein complex formed by IGF-I and its binding proteins. Thus, the therapeutically effective pharmaceutical composition may contain such acid-labile glycoprotein and IGF-I binding proteins, when proven to facilitate the desired effect of IGF-I on cartilage maintenance and/or regeneration. The amount of IGFBPs to be administered with IGF-I can be determined according to the molar ratio between IGF-I and IGFBPs. This molar ratio can range from about 0.5:1 to about 3:1, preferably about 1:1 (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,187,151).
  • Alternatively, agents that disrupt IGF-I binding to IGFBPs may be effective in increasing the amount of IGF-I present in the diseased or injured articular site to a therapeutically effective level. Thus, the pharmaceutical composition comprising IGF-I may additionally include agents that effectively disrupt formation of the IGF-I-IGFBP binding complex.
  • The composition may also include other components such as viscoscity enhancing agents, such as hyaluronic acid; antioxidants; and stimulants of synovial cells. All such references to components facilitating IGF-I-promoted maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage are herein incorporated by reference.
  • In addition to these components, the pharmaceutical composition comprising IGF-I may include one or more protease inhibitors. An exemplary protease inhibitor is sodium pentosan polysulfate (PPS), a polysulfated polysaccharide. This protease inhibitor has efficacy in treating osteoarthritis in combination with low dosages of IGF-I (1 μg IGF-I intra-articularly 3 times per week) (Rogachefsky et al. (1993) Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 1: 105-114). Such a protease inhibitor can be administered by other routes, such as intramuscularly, during administration of the effective IGF-I dose.
  • The pharmaceutical composition in accordance with the present invention may further comprise one or more other therapeutic agents that are effective in treating other disorders in the individual, as long as the biochemical actions of the additional therapeutic agents do not interfere with the efficacy of intended action of the IGF-I treatment. Examples of such agents include, but are not limited to, antibiotics, anti-inflammatory agents, and the like.
  • A pharmaceutically acceptable carrier should be mixed with the IGF-I and other components in the pharmaceutical composition. By “pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” is intended a carrier that is conventionally used in the art to facilitate the storage, administration, and/or the healing effect of the therapeutic ingredients. A carrier may also reduce any undesirable side effects of the IGF-I. A suitable carrier should be stable, i.e., incapable of reacting with other ingredients in the formulation. It should not produce significant local or systemic adverse effect in recipients at the dosages and concentrations employed for treatment. Such carriers are generally known in the art. Suitable carriers for this invention are those conventionally used large stable macromolecules such as albumin, gelatin, collagen, polysaccharide, monosaccarides, polyvinylpyrrolidone, polylactic acid, polyglycolic acid, polymeric amino acids, fixed oils, ethyl oleate, liposomes, glucose, sucrose, lactose, mannose, dextrose, dextran, cellulose, mannitol, sorbitol, polyethylene glycol (PEG), and the like. Slow-release carriers, such as hyaluronic acid, may also be suitable. See particularly Prisell et al. (1992) Int. J. Pharmaceu. 85:51-56 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,331. Inclusion of hyaluronic acid and other polymers may have an additional beneficial effect on osteoarthritis. See particularly Bragantini (1987) Clin. Trials J. 24(4):333-340; Dougados et al. (1993) Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 1:97-103; and Lussier et al. (1996) J. Rheum. 23:1579-1585; herein incorporated by reference. Other acceptable components in the composition include, but are not limited to, buffers that enhance isotonicity such as water, saline, phosphate, citrate, succinate, acetic acid, and other organic acids or their salts.
  • Preferred pharmaceutical compositions may incorporate buffers having reduced local pain and irritation resulting from injection of IGF-I compositions. Such buffers include, but are not limited to, low phosphate buffers and succinate buffers. For example, International Publication No. WO 94/15584 describes isotonic IGF-I solution at pH 5.5 to 6.5 with phosphate buffer present in an amount less than 50 mmol/L, which are reported to result in reduced pain upon injection. As another example, the pharmaceutical composition may comprise a succinate buffer with pH in the range of about 4.0 to about 7.5, and succinate in the range of 0.5 mM up to about 100 mM, preferably a range less than about 50 mM, as in the formulation disclosed in the copending application entitled “Injectible Formulation Containing Succinate,” U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/080,008, filed Apr. 3, 1998. In one embodiment, the IGF-I pharmaceutical composition may be formulated in a 10 mM sodium succinate buffer, pH 6.0, sodium chloride solution.
  • The pharmaceutical composition may additionally comprise a solubilizing compound, which for purposes of the present invention refers to a compound that includes a guanidinium group and that is capable of enhancing the solubility of IGF-I or an IGF-I analogue. Examples of such solubilizing compounds include the amino acid arginine, as well as amino acid analogs of arginine that retain the ability to enhance solubility of IGF-I at pH 5.5 or greater. Such analogs include, without limitation, dipeptides and tripeptides that contain arginine. By “enhancing the solubility” of IGF-I is intended increasing the amount of IGF-I that can be dissolved in solution at pH 5.5 or greater in the presence of a guanidinium-containing compound compared to the amount of IGF-I that can be dissolved at pH 5.5 or greater in a solution with the same components but lacking the guanidinium-containing compound. The ability of a guanidinium-containing compound to enhance the solubility of IGF-I can be determined using methods well known in the art. In general, the concentration of the solubilizing compound present in the composition will be from about 10 mM to about 1 M, and, for example, in the case of the compound arginine, in a concentration range of about 20 mM to about 200 mM, as disclosed in the copending application entitled “Compositions Providingfor Increased IGF-I Solubility,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/188,051, filed Nov. 6, 1998.
  • For the purposes of this invention, the pharmaceutical composition comprising IGF-I should be formulated in a unit dosage and in an injectable or infusible form such as solution, suspension, or emulsion. It can also be in the form of lyophilized powder, which can be converted into solution, suspension, or emulsion before administration. The pharmaceutical composition having IGF-I is preferably sterilized by membrane filtration and is stored in unit-dose or multi-dose containers such as sealed vials or ampules.
  • The method for formulating a pharmaceutical composition is generally known in the art. A thorough discussion of formulation and selection of pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, stabilizers, and isomolytes can be found in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences (18th ed.; Mack Publishing Company, Eaton, Pa., 1990), herein incorporated by reference.
  • The IGF-I of the present invention can also be formulated in a sustained-release form to prolong the presence of the pharmaceutically active IGF-I in the treated mammal, generally for longer than one day. Many methods of preparation of a sustained-release formulation are known in the art and are disclosed in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences (18th ed.; Mack Publishing Company, Eaton, Pa., 1990), herein incorporated by reference. Generally, the IGF-I can be entrapped in semipermeable matrices of solid hydrophobic polymers. The matrices can be shaped into films or microcapsules. Examples of such matrices include, but are not limited to, polyesters, copolymers of L-glutamic acid and gamma ethyl-L-glutamate (Sidman et al. (1983) Biopolymers 22: 547-556), polylactides (U.S. Pat. No. 3,773,919 and EP 58,481), polylactate polyglycolate (PLGA) such as polylactide-co-glycolide (see, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,767,628 and 5,654,008), hydrogels (see, for example, Langer et al. (1981) J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 15: 167-277; Langer (1982) Chem. Tech. 12: 98-105; and U.S. Patent No.), non-degradable ethylene-vinyl acetate, degradable lactic acid-glycolic acid copolyers such as the Lupron Depot™, poly-D-(−)-3-hydroxybutyric acid (EP 133,988), and hyaluronic acid gels (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,524). Suitable microcapsules can also include hydroxymethylcellulose or gelatin-microcapsules and polymethyl methacrylate microcapsules prepared by coacervation techniques or by interfacial polymerization. In addition, microemulsions or colloidal drug delivery systems such as liposomes and albumin microspheres, may also be used. See Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences (18th ed.; Mack Publishing Company Co., Eaton, Pa., 1990).
  • One such sustained-release formulation is Depo IGF-I (Depofoam), wherein recombinant human IGF-I is encapsulated in multivesicular liposomes, as disclosed in the copending application entitled “High and Low Load Formulations of IGF-I in Multivesicular Liposomes,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/925,531, filed Sep. 8, 1997, herein incorporated by reference. The mean residence time of IGF-I in the joint is approximately two-fold longer with Depo IGF-I than with free IGF-I (8.4 hours versus 4.1 hours, respectively). By “residence time” is intended the amount of time during which the concentration of IGF-I remains high enough above baseline to be therapeutically effective. See also the copending application entitled “Method for Producing Sustained-release Formulations,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/187,780, filed Nov. 6, 1998, wherein IGF-I is encapsulated in PLGA microspheres, herein incorporated by reference.
  • The method for treating articular cartilage disorders comprising administering a pharmaceutical composition containing a therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I is based on the unexpected discovery that a sufficiently high dose of IGF-I alone is effective in promoting cartilage maintenance and/or regeneration in vivo. Thus, concentration of IGF-I in an administered dose in accordance with the present invention is effective in the treatment of articular cartilage disorders, particularly osteoarthritis, and trauma-related cartilage injuries.
  • According to this embodiment of the invention, the total amount of pharmaceutically effective IGF-I administered per dose per joint should be in the range of at least about 0.002 mg to about 50.0 mg, about 0.003 mg to about 45.0 mg, about 0.004 mg to about 40.0 mg, about 0.005 mg to about 35.0 mg, about 0.01 mg to about 30.0 mg, preferably about 0.10 mg to about 20.0 mg, more preferably about 0.50 mg to about 10.0 mg, still more preferably about 1.0 mg to about 10.0 mg, even more preferably about 2.0 mg to about 10.0 mg, still more preferably about 1.0 mg to about 5.0 mg, most preferably about 2.0 mg to about 5.0 mg per intra-articular injection. In some regimens, the total amount of IGF-I administered to a joint to achieve a therapeutically effective dose is about 0.01 mg to about 10.0 mg, including about 0.02, 0.03, 0.04, 0.05, 0.06, 0.07, 0.08, 0.09, 0.10 mg or greater. In other regimens, the total amount of IGF-I administered per dose per joint is about 0.10 mg to about 10.0 mg, including about 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, 0.60, 0.65, 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.85, 0.90, 0.95, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0, 9.5 mg or greater per dose per joint, preferably in the range of about 0.10 mg to about 5.0 mg, more preferably in the range of about 0.20 mg to about 4.0 mg, still more preferably in the range of about 0.30 mg to about 3.0 mg. The pharmaceutical composition having a unit dose of IGF-I can be in the form of solution, suspension, or emulsion. The total volume of one dose of the pharmaceutical composition for one joint can range from about 10 μl to about 10 ml, preferably from about 100 μl to about 5 ml, more preferably from about 0.5 ml to about 2 ml. It is apparent that the suitable volume can vary with factors such as the size of the joint treated and the solubility of the components in the composition.
  • It is recognized that the total amount of IGF-I administered as a unit dose to a particular joint will depend upon the type of pharmaceutical composition being administered, that is whether the composition is in the form of, for example, a solution, a suspension, an emulsion, or a sustained-release formulation. For example, where the pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective amount of IGF-I is a sustained-release formulation, IGF-I is administered at a higher concentration. Thus, using a sustained-release formulation, the amount of IGF-I administered per dose per joint is in the range of about 0.10 mg to about 50.0 mg, about 0.20 mg to about 45.0 mg, about 0.30 mg to about 40.0 mg, about 0.40 mg to about 35.0 mg, about 0.50 mg to about 30.0 mg, about 0.60 mg to about 25.0 mg, about 0.70 mg to about 20.0 mg, about 0.80 mg to about 19.0 mg, about 0.90 mg to about 18.0 mg, about 1.0 mg to about 17.0 mg, including about 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5, 5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5, 9.0, 9.5, 10.0, 10.5, 11.0, 11.5, 12.0, 12.5, 13.0, 13.5, 14.0, 14.5, 15.0, 15.5, 16.0, 16.5 mg or greater.
  • Administration of the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I may be achieved directly at the site, as with intra-articular injection, or with a sustained-release device or delivery system, such as a biodegradable matrix comprising a therapeutically effective dose, as described below. Alternatively, other modes of administration, such as systemic injections, may be used, as long as they increase the amount of IGF-I at the articular site to a therapeutically effective level that is comparable to that of administering modes that deliver the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I directly to the diseased or injured articular site.
  • In one embodiment of the invention, the means of administration of the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I will result in localized delivery of IGF-I to the area of the affected joint. In this embodiment, the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I is administered intra-articularly to the mammal needing treatment. By “intra-articularly” is intended direct administration into the cavity enclosing the movable joint having osteoarthritis or other cartilage injuries, so that substantial direct contact between the administered IGF-I and articular cartilage is achieved. This can be done by injection or infusion. A single short-term administration of the therapeutically effective dose of IGI-I is used with each delivery of IGF-I to the affected joint. By “short-term administration” is intended completion of administration of the dose within about 3 hours, preferably within about 1.5 hours. More preferably for this embodiment of the invention, administration of the dose is rapid by direct injection into the affected joint.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, the pharmaceutical composition comprising the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I is administered intra-articularly intermittently. By “intermittent administration” is intended administration of a therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I, followed by a time period of discontinuance, which is then followed by another administration of a therapeutically effective dose, and so forth. Administration of the therapeutically effective dose may be achieved in a continuous manner, as for example with a sustained-release formulation, or it may be achieved according to a desired daily dosage regimen, as for example with one, two, three or more injections per day. By “time period of discontinuance” is intended a discontinuing of the continuous sustained-released or daily administration of IGF-I. The time period of discontinuance may be longer or shorter than the period of continuous sustained-release or daily administration. During the time period of discontinuance, the IGF-I level in the synovial fluid is substantially below the maximum level obtained during the treatment. The preferred length of the discontinuance period depends on the concentration of the effective dose and the form of IGF-I used. Where the administration comprises intra-articular injection, the discontinuance period is at least 2 days, preferably is at least 4 days, more preferably is at least 1 week and generally does not exceed a period of 4 weeks. For example, when the effective dose is about 1.0 mg, preferably the IGF-I is administered about once per week, as discussed in the example below. When a sustained-release formulation is used, the discontinuance period must be extended to account for the greater residence time of IGF-I at the site of injury. Alternatively, the frequency of administration of the effective dose of the sustained-release formulation can be decreased accordingly. An intermittent schedule of administration of IGF-I to the diseased or injured joint may continue until the desired therapeutic effect of maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage, and ultimately treatment of the disorder or injury, is achieved.
  • In yet another embodiment, intermittent intra-articular administration of the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I is cyclic. By “cyclic” is intended intermittent administration accompanied by breaks in the administration, with cycles ranging from about 1 month to about 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 months, more preferably about 3 months to about 6 months. For example, the administration schedule might be intermittent administration of the effective dose of IGF-I by intra-articular injection, wherein a single short-term dose is given once per week for 4 weeks, followed by a break in intermittent administration for a period of 3 months, followed by intermittent administration by intra-articular administration of a single short-term dose given once per week for 4 weeks, followed by a break in intermittent administration for a period of 3 months, and so forth. As another example, a single short-term dose may be given once per week for 2 weeks, followed by a break in intermittent administration for a period of 1 month, followed by a single short-term dose given once per week for 2 weeks, followed by a break in intermittent administration for a period of 1 month, and so forth. A cyclic intermittent schedule of intra-articular administration of IGF-I to the diseased or injured joint may continue until the desired therapeutic effect of maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage, and ultimately treatment of the disorder or injury, is achieved.
  • Alternatively, administration of the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I may be achieved directly at the site with a sustained-release device or delivery system. Such devices are well known in the art (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,206,023). For example, a biodegradable matrix comprising a therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I in a sustained-release form may be implanted within the diseased or injured joint. Such a device would allow for sustained release of IGF-I such that the level of IGF-I at the diseased or injured articular site is maintained at a therapeutically effective level. As the matrix degrades, the therapeutically effective level of IGF-I promotes maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage within the afflicted joint.
  • It should be apparent to a person skilled in the art that variations may be acceptable with respect to the therapeutically effective dose and frequency of the administration of IGF-I in this embodiment of the invention. The amount of the IGF-I administered will be inversely correlated with the frequency of administration. Hence, an increase in the concentration of IGF-I in a single administered dose, or an increase in the mean residence time in the case of a sustained release form of IGF-I, generally will be coupled with a decrease in the frequency of administration.
  • In the practice of the present invention, additional factors should be taken into consideration when determining the therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I and frequency of its administration. Such factors include, for example, the size of the joint, the area of the surface of the cartilage affected, the severity of the cartilage injury or osteoarthritis, and the age, height, weight, health, and physical condition of the individual to be treated. Generally, a higher dosage is preferred if the joint is larger or the disorder or injury is more severe.
  • Some minor degree of experimentation may be required to determine the most effective dose and frequency of dose administration, this being well within the capability of one skilled in the art once apprised of the present disclosure.
  • Thus, the amount of IGF-I present at the site of the articular disorder or injury may be manipulated to a therapeutically effective level via administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a therapeutically effective dose of IGF-I. In addition, methods for manipulating the level of naturally produced IGF-I are also encompassed by the present invention. Thus, the level of naturally produced IGF-I may be regulated by gene therapy, whereby production of IGF-I in the diseased or injured articular site is enhanced to a therapeutically effective level. Alternatively, therapeutically effective levels of naturally produced IGF-I may be achieved by disruption of IGF-I binding to IGF-I binding proteins, whose binding to IGF-I decreases availability of free IGF-I, thereby influencing IGF-I's normal physiological role in cartilage maintenance and regeneration.
  • The interest in gene therapy as a means of treating inherited or acquired diseases has led to the development of methods for transferring genetic information, more particularly for delivering nucleotide sequences encoding human genes using viral-mediated gene transfer systems. Such viral-mediated gene transfer systems enable delivery of desired genetic information, in this case a nucleotide sequence encoding IGF-I, to a selected cell or tissue and its subsequent expression there under the direction of the viral promoter. Viral-mediated gene transfer systems are known in the art. See, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,707,618; 5,714,353; and 5,672,344. In this manner, increases in the amount of IGF-I to a therapeutically effective level can be achieved in vivo by increasing production of IGF-I.
  • Efficacy of a particular IGF-I dose for any particular means of administration, including intra-articular injection, release at the site from a sustained release device or delivery system, and systemic injection, or for methods aimed at manipulating the level of naturally produced IGF-I, such as gene therapy and disruption of IGF-I binding to IGF-I binding proteins, may be measured in accordance with their ability to promote the desired positive effect of maintenance and/or regeneration of cartilage within the diseased or injured joint, and ultimately treatment of the articular cartilage disorder or trauma-related injury. For example, efficacy of a particular dosage and dosing schedule, or regimen, for treatment of a disease such as osteoarthritis may be measured based on several variables, including, but not limited to, ability to improve pain and/or function within the diseased joint, to slow structural deterioration within the diseased joint, and/or to delay time to surgical replacement of the diseased joint. Efficacy for improving pain may be measured with any validated pain scale, such as a Likert scale, more preferably a 10 cm VAS measurement. Improvement in an afflicted joint may be measured with any validated knee or hip osteoarthritis function measurement, such as that obtained with the Lequesne knee and hip instruments and with the WOMAC. Structural improvements may be validated with a comparison of baseline and final radiographic scores for joint space narrowing (JSN), such as JSN of an osteoarthritic knee or hip.
  • The present invention also encompasses a method for monitoring proteoglycan and collagen levels in an articular site. A sample of synovial fluid is withdrawn from a subject, preferably using an 18- or 21 -gauge needle. A separate aliquot of the sample is centrifuged to obtain a sediment pellet that is then prepared as a paraffin cell block for further analysis. Methods for preparing such cell blocks are known in the art. See, for example, Bratthauer (1994) Meth. Mol. Biol. 34:81-87. In one embodiment, the pellet is prepared as a mini-cell block as described in Leung and Bedard (1993) Mod. Pathol. 6(5):630-632. The cell block is then sectioned and prepared slides are stained with Safranin O to reveal proteoglycan, and with Picrosirius Red following papain digestion to remove proteoglycan and thus unmask and stain the collagen framework. The slides can then be evaluated and scored for degree of Safranin O staining of the particulate extracellular matrix and of cartilage fragments if identified, and for degree of Picrosirius Red staining of extracellular matrix following papain digestion. The degree of staining is then compared to similarly stained slides obtained from a reference synovial fluid sample.
  • This synovial-fluid histology method is useful as a means of monitoring effects of a drug therapy on articular cartilage, more particularly for monitoring the effects of a drug therapy on a diseased or injured articular site. It is recognized that the method could be used to monitor therapy of any drug administered to any articular site. Thus, in one embodiment of the invention, this histology method may be used to monitor the effect of IGF-I therapy administered in accordance with the present invention, that is where a therapeutically effective amount of IGF-I is administered to an articular site, resulting in a positive effect on cartilage of that site. In this manner, following administering of IGF-I in accordance with the disclosed method of administration, a sample of synovial fluid can be withdrawn from a treated articular site and analyzed for proteoglycan and collagen structure using the synovial-fluid histology method of the invention.
  • Additional effects of drug therapy on an articular site can be determined from further analysis of the synovial fluid sample. In this manner, the supernatant obtained from the centrifuged aliquot of synovial fluid sample can be analyzed for viscosity using a Mucin Clot Test. Another aliquot of the synovial fluid sample may be analyzed for crystals using a wet smear technique, and for cell assessment and differential count using a stained smear technique. Such cytology techniques are well known in the art. Thus, in the case of IGF-I therapy, values for viscosity, crystals, cell assessment, and differential count would be similar between synovial fluid collected from a normal articular site and from an afflicted articular site undergoing administration of therapeutically effective doses of IGF-I in accordance with the dosing regimen of the invention.
  • The following experiments are offered by way of illustration and not by way of limitation.
  • EXPERIMENTAL EXAMPLE 1 Use of IGF-I in a Model of Canine Osteoarthritis
  • A canine study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular administration of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) and a sustained-release formulation of rhIGF-I, referred to as Depo IGF-I, in a model of canine osteoarthritis (OA).
  • Fifty-six dogs underwent surgical transection of the right anterior cruciate ligament by the method of Pond and Nuki (Ann. Rheum. Dis. 32 (1973):887-888). Such transection induces joint instability, leading to production of erosions in the articular cartilage similar to those seen with human osteoarthritis. The animals were premedicated with atropine (0.02 mg/kg, intramuscular (IM)) and acetylpromazine (0.2 mg/kg, IM) prior to induction of anesthesia. Animals were anesthetized with methohexital (7-12 mg/kg, intravenous (IV)), then intubated and maintained in anesthesia with isoflurane inhalant anesthetic delivered through a volume-regulated respirator. The ETCO2 was maintained within individual physiological ranges. An intravenous catheter was placed in a peripheral vessel for administration of lactated Ringer's solution (10 ml/kg/hr). Procaine/benzamine penicillin G (300,000 IU/4.5 kg, IM) and flunixine meglumine (1 mg/kg, IV) were administered preoperatively.
  • The animals were placed in lateral recumbency and prepared and draped accordingly for aseptic surgery. An ophthalmic ointment was administered to each eye. The right hind leg was clipped of all hair, up to the midline, and just cranial to the iliac crest. The animal was positioned in left lateral recumbency, and the right hind leg taped to an IV pole to allow its preparation for aseptic surgery. The operative area was cleaned with three alternating scrubs of povidone-iodine scrub solution and 70% isopropyl alcohol, with a final application of povidone-iodine solution that was allowed to dry. The leg was draped accordingly for aseptic surgery.
  • The joint was exposed through an incision in the lateral intermuscular septum to expose the femur by anterior retraction of the vastus lateralis and posterior retraction of the biceps femoris. Care was taken to not disrupt the tendon of origin of the long digital extensor as it originates from the lateral femoral condyle. The lateral geniculate vessels may have been cauterized during this procedure. The joint capsule was opened, the patella was luxated medially, and the joint held in full flexion. The fat pad and synovium surrounding the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were removed in order to identify the cranial tibial ligaments of the lateral and medial menisci, and to facilitate later arthrocentesis. Care was taken to not disrupt these ligaments. The ACL was then incised first from under the medial meniscal ligament, along the tibial plateau, and then from under the lateral meniscal ligament. Its origin was then incised from the medial side of the lateral femoral condyle. The wound was closed in layers, and the skin closed with absorbable suture material in a subcuticular pattern. The dogs were then detubated and returned to their USDA-approved housing units, where they were provided with ample standard laboratory chow and water. Dogs were individually housed in either pens or raised-flooring cages. As much as possible, the type of housing was similar among groups intended for comparison. All dogs in Groups 6-8 were housed in pens and, with the exception of one Group 1 female dog No. 1101, all Group 1-5 dogs were housed in raised-flooring cases. Raised-flooring cages, specifically designed for large dogs, provided equivalent square footage as the pens and mobility, and activity of the dogs within cages and pens appeared similar. Cages and pens were large enough to allow for free activity all day.
  • After surgery, flunixine meglumine (1 mg/kg) was administered by subcutaneous injection once daily for 3 days for relief of postoperative discomfort. Beginning the day after surgery, at least once daily, dogs were allowed out of their pens or cages and encouraged to exercise within the study room.
  • Approximately 4 weeks after surgery, dogs were randomly assigned into eight groups of 4 males and 3 females per group, and given weekly or biweekly intra-articular administrations of rhIGF-I, rhIGF-I placebo, Depo IGF-I, or Depo IGF-I placebo for 13 weeks as indicated in Table 1. IGF-I for use in these experiments was recombinantly produced in the yeast strain Pichia pastoris and purified essentially as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,324,639, 5,324,660, and 5,650,496 and International Publication No. WO 96/40776. Following isolation, IGF-I was formulated with arginine using dialysis or diafiltration as follows.
  • By dialysis, bulk rhIGF-I was placed in dialysis tubing with a molecular weight cutoff of 1,000 to 3,000 daltons and dialyzed against three 20-fold volume changes of formulation buffer containing arginine at a concentration of 50 mM, 10 mM sodium citrate, and 90 mM sodium chloride, pH 6.0. Each 20-fold volume change was dialyzed for not less than 3 hours and preferably more than 12 hours. Dialysis was done at 4° C. or at room temperature.
  • By diafiltration, bulk IGF-I was diafiltered against 10 volumes of formulation buffer containing arginine using a membrane with a molecular weight cutoff of 1,000 to 3,000 daltons, and diafiltered against three 20-fold volume changes of formulation buffer containing arginine at a concentration of 50 mM, 10 mM sodium citrate, and 90 mM sodium chloride. Diafiltration was performed at 4° C. or at room temperature.
  • The resulting compositions obtained by either dialysis or diafiltration contained IGF-I at a concentration of about 12 mg/ml.
  • The sustained-release formulation Depo IGF-I was made in accordance with the methods outlined in detail in the copending application entitled “High and Low Load Formulations of IGF-I in Multivesicular Liposomes,” U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/925,531, filed Sep. 8, 1997, herein incorporated by reference.
    TABLE 1
    Study Design
    Number Treatment Administration
    of Dose
    Grp Animals Level Route; Scheduled
    No. % & Substance (mg) Dosing Regimena Dose Volume Euthanasia
    1 4 3 Depo Placebo 0 Weekly for 13 Intra-articular; Week 17
    2 4 3 Depo IGF-I 1 doses; 2 mL/joint/dose
    3 4 3 Depo IGF-I 10  Weeks 4-16
    4 4 3 Depo Placebo 0 Every 2 weeks for 6 Intra-articular;
    5 4 3 Depo IGF-I 20  doses; 4 mL/joint/dose
    Weeks 4, 6, 8, 10,
    12 and 14
    6 4 3 rhIGF-I Placebo 0 Weekly for 13 Intra-articular;
    7 4 3 rhIGF-I 1 doses; 2 mL/joint/dose
    8 4 3 rhIGF-I 5b Weeks 4-16 (1 mL/joint/dose for
    Group 8 on Weeks
    5-16)

    aAll dogs underwent unilateral (right knee) transection of the ACL. The day on which surgery was performed was considered to occur during Week 0, so that Week 4 occurred approximately 28 days after surgery.

    bDose for Group 8 on Week 4 was 10 mg rhIGF-I in dose volume of 2 mL/joint/dose.
  • At week 17, the dogs were euthanized. The joints were dissected and examined by observation and histologic study of the cartilage, articular plate, and synovium. In addition, samples of articular cartilage and subchondral bone were removed for further studies. Paraffin sections were made and stained with H & E, Safranin O, and sirius red. Mankin scores based on the traditional Mankin score criteria (Schedule I) and a modified Mankin score substituting osteophyte values for cartilage as an indicator of disruption of joint structure were recorded. Synovial scores were also recorded according to Schedule II. See Mankin et al. (1971) Bone and Joint Surgery 53A:523-537 and Gahunia et al. (1995) Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 3:169-180 for details of these scoring schedules.
  • In scoring histological features, the score was based on the most advanced histological feature observed, even if the feature was only focally present. If any bias was introduced by this methodology, it is a bias for an increased score for disease progression and a bias against therapeutic effectiveness.
  • The changes in cartilage were further studied using morphometry to assess the structural features of cartilage and lesions within cartilage in Groups 6, 7, and 8. The collagen framework of cartilage was assessed using the Picrosirius Red stain after papain digestion. Pretreatment with papain facilitates loss of proteoglycan thereby unmasking the collagen framework.
  • The articular collagen was assessed in the superficial layer, the upper perichondronal layer, the deep perichondronal layer, and the uncalcified cartilage adjacent to the tidemark using a semi-quantitative scale devised by Dr. Kenneth Pritzker (Schedule III). Higher scores reflect increased staining for collagen. This is indicative of the matrix changes toward decreased proteoglycan quantity or quality and/or collagen condensation on neoformation. These features are recognized as osteoarthritic changes.
  • The safety of the test articles was evaluated by performing physical and opthalmic examinations and clinical observations, recording blood pressure and ECG readings, determining body weights and food consumption, monitoring clinical pathology (hematology, coagulation, serum and urine chemistry and urinalysis) parameters, performing comprehensive gross necropsy, determining organ weights and by comprehensive histopathology on all animals. Blood glucose was monitored pre-and post-dosing. Synovial fluid analysis (cell count, differential, protein concentration) was also performed.
    Schedule I
    Osteoarthritis: Articular Cartilage Histopathologic Features-
    Scoring Method
    Mankin Score I + II + III + IV
    I. Structure
    Normal (intact surface) 0
    Surface irregularities 1
    Pannus and surface irregularities 2
    Clefts to transitional layer 3
    Clefts to radial layer/varied regions of cartilage 4
    thickening or thinning
    Clefts to calcified layer 5
    Complete disorganization 6
    II. Cells
    Normal (½ cells/lacuna) 0
    Diffuse/slight hypercellularity 1
    Regions of hypercellularity and cloning 2
    Hypocellularity 3
    III. Safranin O Staining
    Normal (uniformally stained matrix) 0
    Slight reduction particularly superficial layer 1
    Moderate reduction extending up to mid layer 2
    Severe reduction entire cartilage thickness 3
    No dye noted 4
    IV. Tidemark Integrity
    Intact/single intact tidemark 0
    Crossed by vessels/reduplication of tidemark 1

    A cumulative score of below 5 is considered normal cartilage.

    A cumulative score of 5 and above is considered osteoarthritic cartilage.
  • Schedule II
    Osteoarthritis: Synovial Histopathology Reaction
    Score
    Synovial Lining 0 Normal
    1 Synovial Lining Cells 1-2
    2 Synovial Lining Cells >2
    3 Villous Hyperplasia
    Edema 0 Nil
    1 Focal
    2 Focal, Villous and Flat Surface
    3 Generalized
    Lymphocytes 0 Not Seen
    1 Scattered
    2 Aggregates
    3 Follicules
    Plasma Cells 0 Not Seen
    1 Scattered
    2 Aggregates
    3 Follicules
    Hemosiderin 0 Absent
    1 Slight
    2 Moderate
    3 Abundant
    Fibrosis 0 Nil
    1 Focal, Villous
    2 Focal, Villous and Flat Surface
    3 Generalized
  • Schedule III
    Assessment of Articular Cartilage Collagen - Scoring Method
    I. Structural “Intact Cartilage”
    I.1 Superficial Layer
    0 - normal
    1 - slight increase in thickness
    2 - marked increase in thickness
    I.2 Upper Layer Perichondronal Collagen
    0 - normal
    1 - slight increase
    2 - marked increase
    3 - confluence of perichondronal collagen
    I.3 Lower Layer Perichondronal Collagen
    0 - normal
    1 - slight increase
    2 - marked increase
    3 - confluence of perichondronal collagen
    I.4 Collagen Adjacent to Tidemark
    0 - normal
    1 - slight increase
    2 - marked increase
    3 - confluence of perichondronal collagen
    II. Osteoarthritic Lesions
    II.1 Collagen Adjacent to Osteoarthritic Fissures (OA lesions only)
    0 - normal
    1 - slight increase
    2 - marked increase
    3 - confluence of perichondronal collagen
    4 - confluence and condensation of perichondronal collagen

    Safety Results
  • There were no test-article-related effects on food consumption, body weights, physical examination findings, ophthalmic examination findings, electrocardiograms, indirect blood pressures and heart rate, or hematology, serum chemistry (except blood glucose), coagulation profile, urinalysis, urine chemistry, and synovial fluid parameter values. There were no adverse test-article-related macroscopic or microscopic alterations.
  • Intra-articular administration of 5 mg rhIGF-I weekly, 10 mg Depo IGF-I weekly, or 20 mg Depo IGF-I biweekly was associated with significantly lower blood glucose values at 3 hours post-dosing on virtually all weeks of treatment. The test-article-related hypoglycemia was most pronounced (lowest blood glucose values) in dogs receiving 5 (initially 10) mg rhIGF-I and was associated with delayed recovery from anesthesia and lethargy. Hypoglycemia was managed with feeding of canned food and administration of intravenous dextrose solution as needed.
  • On the basis of anatomic pathology data, a no observable effect level for systemic toxicity after intra-articular injection was determined to be >10 mg Depo IGF-I weekly, >20 mg Depo IGF-I biweekly, and >5 mg rhIGF-I weekly. However, on the basis of blood glucose values, a no observable effect level for hypoglycemia was determined to be >1 mg for both Depo IGF-I and rhIGF-I weekly. Hypoglycemia is an expected pharmacological effect of rhIGF-I therapy.
  • Results
  • The anterior cruciate ligament transection model used in this study produced osteoarthritis in the animals within the time frame of the study. In the untreated control group (Group 6), the lesions observed were most frequent and severe in the tibial plateau with lesser changes observed in the medial femoral condyle inferior, femoral condyle, and femoral trochlear notch areas.
  • The traditional Mankin scores for the four sections studied are presented in Table 2. Table 3 summarizes the histological features of the cartilage and the articular plate. Table 4 summarizes the histological features of the synovium by synovial score criteria. Reduced Mankin scores were observed in the tibial plateau and the medial femoral condyle inferior sites in dogs receiving 1.0 and 5.0 mg rhIGF-I (Groups 7 and 8). The qualitative and semi-quantitative evidence suggested IGF-I serves principally to increase the proportion of matrix that is rich in proteoglycans. Other effects noted in the IGF-I treated groups included enlargement of the chondrons and alterations in the grouping of chondrocytes. These are suggestive of matrix elaboration.
    TABLE 2
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Osteoarthritis Histopathology: Modified Mankin Scores
    Score Using Cartilage Values (Traditional Mankin Score)
    Medial
    Trochlear Femoral Femoral
    Notch Condyles Tibial Condyle
    SD Central Plateau Inferior
    Group # Mean (±) Mean SD(±) Mean SD(±) Mean SD(±)
    1 4.9 1.1 6.4 0.5 7.6 1.1 7.7 1.5
    2 5.3 0.8 6.9 0.4 8.1 0.4 8.6 1.5
    3 5.0 0.8 6.0 0.8 7.6 0.8 6.3 0.8
    4 4.9 0.7 5.7 0.8 7.3 0.8 8.0 1.3
    5 4.7 0.8 5.9 0.4 7.4 0.8 7.0 2.0
    6 4.9 0.7 5.3 0.5 9.0 1.0 8.0 1.3
    7 4.7 0.5 5.0 1.0 6.6 0.5 6.3 1.0
    8 5.0 0.6 6.6 1.0 7.1 0.7 7.3 2.6
  • TABLE 3
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Osteoarthritis Histopathology: Mankin Grading Scoresheet
    Features
    1 Cartilage 2 Cells
    Medial Medial
    Femoral Femoral Femoral Femoral
    Group Trochlear Condyles Tibial Condyle Trochlear Condyle Tibial Condyle
    # Notch Central Plateau Inferior Notch Central Plateau Inferior
    1 1.9 2 2.9 2.4 1.6 2 2 2.4
    2 2 2 3.1 2.9 1.6 2 2 2.6
    3 2 2 3 2.1 1.6 2 2 2
    4 2 2 2.4 2.6 1.6 2 2 2.6
    5 2 2 2.9 2.4 2 2 2 2.3
    6 2 2 3.3 3 1.6 2 2 2.1
    7 2 2.3 2.3 1.9 2 2 2 2
    8 2 2.1 2.1 3 2 2 2 2.1
    Features
    3 Safranin O 4 Tidemark
    Metachromatic Stain Integrity
    Medial Medial
    Femoral Femoral Femoral Femoral
    Group Trochlear Condyles Tibial Condyle Trochlear Condyles Tibial Condyle
    # Notch Central Plateau Inferior Notch Central Plateau Inferior
    1 1.3 2 1.9 1.9 0.1 0.4 0.9 1
    2 1.6 1.9 2 2.1 0.1 1 1 1
    3 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 0 0.6 1 0.6
    4 1.3 1.4 2 1.9 0 0.3 0.9 1
    5 0.6 1 1.6 1.9 0.1 0.9 1 0.4
    6 1.3 0.9 2.7 2.1 0 0.4 1 0.7
    7 0.7 0.1 1.3 1.9 0 0.6 1 0.6
    8 0.9 1.4 2 1.7 0.1 1 1 0.4
  • TABLE 4
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Synovium: Histologic Features
    Features
    Synovial Plasma
    Lining Edema Lymphs Cells Hemosiderin Fibrosis
    Group # Medial Lateral Medial Lateral Medial Lateral Medial Lateral Medial Lateral Medial Lateral
    1 1.6 1.9 0.4 0 1.3 0.7 1.1 1.1 1 0.9 1.1 1.3
    2 3 2.1 0 0.4 1.4 1 1.6 1.3 1 1 1 1
    3 2.4 3 0 0.6 1 1 1.4 1.7 1.1 1 1.3 1
    4 2 1.3 0 0.6 1.6 0.9 1.1 1.1 1.1 1 1 1
    5 2 1.4 0.1 0.1 1.1 1 2 1.6 1 1 1 1
    6 2.9 1.3 0.1 0 2.1 1 1.9 1.1 1 1 1 1
    7 2 2.3 0.6 0 1.9 1 1.4 1.3 1.3 1 1 1
    8 2.7 1.7 0.4 0 2.7 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.3 1 1 1
  • Preliminary cartilage structural morphometry demonstrated cartilage depth (thickness): tibia>femoral condyle, femoral condyle, inferior, trochlear notch (Tables 5-8). In the tibial plateau, femoral condyle, and trochlear notch, the percent of the cartilage area depleted of proteoglycans was markedly reduced in the treated animals (Groups 7 and 8) compared to controls. This is further reflected in the reduced distance from the surface to the proteoglycan rich matrix observed in Groups 7 and 8 compared to Group 6. Osteoarthritic changes were most evident in the tibial plateau. These observations are further extended to evaluation of the changes within osteoarthritic lesions in which fibrillation or fibrillation plus erosion were absent. In both cases, there was a decrease in the portion of surface and area occupied by these lesions in Groups 7 and 8 compared to Group 6. Further, the distance from the surface to the proteoglycan rich areas within the lesions was also reduced in Groups 7 and 8 compared to Group 6. Moreover, there was less cartilage erosion in the cartilage lesions in Groups 7 and 8 compared to Group 6.
  • It should be noted that other parameters measured including uncalcified cartilage area and calcified cartilage area were similar amongst the three groups. Further, an indication of disruption of the articular plate namely the percentage of penetration of the calcified cartilage length was similar in all three groups. This latter data indicates that no increase in activation of bone resorption of the subchondral plate could be demonstrated.
  • Preliminary collagen assessment (Tables 9 and 10) demonstrated that Group 6 (controls) had higher scores than Group 7 or Group 8. Similar to the Safranin O assessment and the cartilage morphometry assessment, collagen of the tibial plateau was more severely affected than the medial femoral condyle inferior>distal femoral condyle>distal trochlear notch. The key observation included the exposure of more perichondronal collagen in the upper layers of Group 6 compared to Groups 7 and 8.
    TABLE 5
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage Structural Morphometry Assessment
    Site: Trochlear Notch
    File: TDST4.doc
    Group 6 Group 7 Group 8 Mean
    Mean (SD) Mean (SD) (SD)
    Areas (sq mm)
    I. Intact Cartilage Structural Feature
    Uncalcified Cartilage Area 11.3 (3.0) 10.7 (1.9) 10.5 (2.5)
    % Proteoglycan Depleted Area  5.8 (1.9)  3.5 (1.7)  4.3 (3.4)
    % Proteoglycan Area 94.2 (1.9) 96.5 (1.7) 95.7 (3.4)
    Calcified Cartilage Area  1.3 (0.2)  1.2 (0.2)  1.2 (0.2)
    Lengths (mm)
    Cartilage Surface Length 17.9 (1.7) 16.3 (1.6) 15.9 (2.0)
    Calcified Cartilage Base Length 16.4 (2.5) 15.7 (1.2) 15.0 (1.5)
    % Penetration Calcified Cartilage Length 12.1 (5.3) 13.7 (6.3) 12.0 (3.3)
    Mean Length of Penetration (μm)  79.2 (17.7)  82.8 (22.5)  89.0 (18.2)
    # Penetrations of Calcified Cartilage Length
    Depths (μm)
    Uncalcified Cartilage Depth  624.7 (137.6)  659.8 (132.5)  667.0 (113.0)
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth 40.2 (8.0)  48.6 (13.1)  58.1 (14.8)
    Calcified Cartilage Depth 80.0 (8.6)  84.9 (13.0) 79.7 (9.7)
    Lesions
    II. Lesions Structural Feature
    % Total Lesion Surface Length
    % Lesion Surface Type I Length
    % Lesion Surface Type II Length
    % Lesion Surface Type III Length
    % Total Lesion Area
    % Lesion Area Type I
    % Lesion Area Type II
    % Lesion Area Type III
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth Type II (μm)
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth Type III (μm)
    Erosion Depth Type II (μm)
    Erosion Depth Type III (μm)
    Erosion Length Type II (μm)
    Erosion Length Type III (μm)
    % Pannus Medial 4.6 11.1 (7.3)
    % Pannus Lateral  7.0 (3.5) 10.1 (2.0)
  • TABLE 6
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage Structural Morphometry Assessment
    Site: Femoral Condyles, Central
    File: CDST4.doc
    Group 6 Group 7 Group 8
    Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
    Areas (sq mm)
    I. Intact Cartilage Structural Feature
    Uncalcified Cartilage Area 23.4 (4.6)  29.3 (4.8)  28.6 (6.5) 
    % Proteoglycan Depleted Area 11.0 (4.7)  8.0 (1.8) 7.2 (3.9)
    % Proteoglycan Area 89.0 (4.7)  92.0 (1.8)  92.8 (3.9) 
    Calcified Cartilage Area 1.8 (0.6) 2.2 (0.2) 2.2 (0.3)
    Lengths (mm)
    Cartilage Surface Length 27.1 (3.7)  29.9 (2.4)  30.1 (1.8) 
    Calcified Cartilage Base Length 23.5 (3.1)  25.6 (1.8)  25.3 (0.8) 
    % Penetration Calcified Cartilage Length 6.8 (2.4) 7.1 (3.0) 6.8 (2.0)
    Mean Length of Penetration (μm) 74.4 (17.5) 80.2 (21.6) 76.9 (14.8)
    # Penetrations of Calcified Cartilage Length
    Depths (μm)
    Uncalcified Cartilage Depth 880.8 (75.5)  1020.8 (123.8)  1024.7 (224.4) 
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth 97.4 (32.5) 86.0 (20.7) 82.7 (21.1)
    Calcified Cartilage Depth 77.4 (11.6) 81.2 (8.4)  87.7 (10.9)
    Lesions
    II. Lesions Structural Feature
    % Total Lesion Surface Length (n = # of animals) — (—) 19.0 (—), n = 1 — (—)
    % Lesion Surface Type I Length — (—) 12.8 (—)   — (—)
    % Lesion Surface Type II Length — (—) 6.2 (—)  — (—)
    % Lesion Surface Type III Length — (—) — (—) — (—)
    % Total Lesion Area — (—) 18.3 (—)   — (—)
    % Lesion Area Type I — (—) 11.9 (—)   — (—)
    % Lesion Area Type II — (—) 6.4 (—)  — (—)
    % Lesion Area Type III — (—) — (—) — (—)
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth Type II (μm) — (—) 65.3 (—)   — (—)
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth Type III (μm) — (—) — (—) — (—)
    Erosion Depth Type II (μm) — (—) 87.4 (—)   — (—)
    Erosion Depth Type III (μm) — (—) — (—) — (—)
    Erosion Length Type II (μm) — (—) 1638.2 (—)    — (—)
    Erosion Length Type III (μm) — (—) — (—) — (—)
    % Pannus Medial 6.3 (2.0) 5.6 (1.0) 8.1 (4.1)
    % Pannus Lateral 3.0 (1.3) 4.8 (—)  4.6 (1.6)
  • TABLE 7
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage Structural Morphometry Assessment
    Site: Medial Femoral Condyle, Inferior
    File: MFCST4.doc
    Group 6 Mean Group 7 Group 8 Mean
    (SD) Mean (SD) (SD)
    Areas (sq mm)
    I. Intact Cartilage Structural Feature
    Uncalcified Cartilage Area 6.3 (1.3) 7.2 (1.8) 7.9 (1.1)
    % Proteoglycan Depleted Area 14.8 (9.8)  12.6 (4.7)  14.0 (4.3) 
    % Proteoglycan Area 85.2 (9.8)  87.4 (4.7)  86.0 (4.3) 
    Calcified Cartilage Area 0.6 (0.1) 0.5 (0.1) 0.7 (0.2)
    Lengths (mm)
    Cartilage Surface Length 9.8 (0.6) 10.3 (1.4)  10.8 (1.2) 
    Calcified Cartilage Base Length 8.7 (0.5) 9.1 (1.3) 9.3 (1.2)
    % Penetration Calcified Cartilage Length 8.8 (7.3) 6.6 (4.7) 5.0 (3.6)
    Mean Length of Penetration (μm) 78.4 (27.4) 78.8 (13.2) 69.4 (35.1)
    # Penetrations of Calcified Cartilage Length
    Depths (μm)
    Uncalcified Cartilage Depth 655.9 (127.6) 737.8 (159.7) 804.1 (114.1)
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth 82.6 (39.9) 71.2 (23.9) 87.8 (31.8)
    Calcified Cartilage Depth 62.5 (9.4)  56.5 (10.4) 72.1 (16.4)
    Lesions
    II. Lesions Structural Feature
    % Total Lesion Surface Length (n = # of animals) — (—) 30.9 (—), n = 1 12.9 (5.6), n = 4
    % Lesion Surface Type I Length — (—) 30.9 (—)   6.1 (—) 
    % Lesion Surface Type II Length — (—) — (—) — (—)
    % Lesion Surface Type III Length — (—) — (—) 15.2 (4.0) 
    % Total Lesion Area — (—) 28.0 (—)   14.1 (8.4) 
    % Lesion Area Type I — (—) 28.0 (—)   6.3 (—) 
    % Lesion Area Type II — (—) — (—) — (—)
    % Lesion Area Type III — (—) — (—) 16.7 (8.2) 
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth Type II (μm) — (—) — (—) — (—)
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth Type III (μm) — (—) — (—) 122.0 (59.0) 
    Erosion Depth Type II (μm) — (—) — (—) — (—)
    Erosion Depth Type III (μm) — (—) — (—) 123.2 (37.9) 
    Erosion Length Type II (μm) — (—) — (—) — (—)
    Erosion Length Type III (μm) — (—) — (—) 1569.8 (267.0) 
    % Pannus Medial 15.6 (4.0)  16.8 (7.1)  12.6 (3.0) 
    % Pannus Lateral 10.8 (7.0)  20.3 (6.4)  13.5 (11.0)
  • TABLE 8
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage Structural Morphometry Assessment
    Site: Tibial Plateau
    File: CPST4.doc
    Group 6 Mean Group 7 Mean Group 8 Mean
    (SD) (SD) (SD)
    Areas (sq mm)
    I. Intact Cartilage Structural Feature
    Uncalcified Cartilage Area 27.5 (6.9)  30.9 (9.1)  28.6 (8.3) 
    % Proteoglycan Depleted Area 11.7 (5.6)  6.0 (1.6) 6.9 (1.9)
    % Proteoglycan Area 88.3 (5.6)  94.0 (1.6)  93.1 (1.9) 
    Calcified Cartilage Area 2.2 (0.6) 2.2 (0.7) 2.1 (0.6)
    Lengths (mm)
    Cartilage Surface Length 25.1 (4.4)  26.1 (4.6)  25.1 (3.3) 
    Calcified Cartilage Base Length 24.8 (4.0)  26.1 (4.4)  24.5 (3.5) 
    % Penetration Calcified Cartilage Length 6.1 (2.1) 6.0 (3.4) 6.2 (3.1)
    Mean Length of Penetration (μm) 54.6 (12.7) 57.5 (7.4)  58.7 (12.8)
    # Penetrations of Calcified Cartilage Length
    Depths (μm)
    Uncalcified Cartilage Depth 1093.6 (212.1)  1165.1 (142.8)  1161.2 (241.0) 
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth 90.4 (27.6) 56.8 (15.0) 64.9 (11.4)
    Calcified Cartilage Depth 84.3 (11.3) 83.2 (11.2) 80.6 (12.7)
    Lesions
    II. Lesions Structural Feature
    % Total Lesion Surface Length (n = # of animals) 15.7 (7.2), n = 6 9.9 (7.2), n = 6 10.8 (9.0), n = 5
    % Lesion Surface Type I Length 12.3 (6.0)  7.4 (5.3) 5.1 (1.3) 
    % Lesion Surface Type II Length 7.1 (—)  10.8 (—)   20.9 (—)  
    % Lesion Surface Type III Length 12.7 (2.9)  9.4 (8.7) 5.9 (1.4)
    % Total Lesion Area 16.0 (8.9)  8.3 (7.0) 9.9 (6.9)
    % Lesion Area Type I 16.0 (7.6)  7.8 (5.5) 8.8 (2.7)
    % Lesion Area Type II 3.7 (—)  6.7 (—)  11.5 (—)  
    % Lesion Area Type III 9.4 (1.5) 5.9 (6.0) 3.9 (1.8)
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth Type II (μm) 409.4 (—)   86.7 (—)   205.8 (—)  
    Surface to Proteoglycan Depth Type III (μm) 250.2 (6.7)  123.0 (59.0)  129.7 (47.3) 
    Erosion Depth Type II (μm) 129.5 (—)   156.1 (—)   539.0 (—)  
    Erosion Depth Type III (μm) 158.7 (47.9)  135.1 (103.7) 80.8 (5.3) 
    Erosion Length Type II (μm) 1443.8 (—)    1813.4 (—)    2439.6 (—)   
    Erosion Length Type III (μm) 1967.7 (749.5)  1508.7 (656.6)  1487.5 (362.3) 
    % Pannus Medial 12.2 (—)   10.0 (—)   7.2 (—) 
    % Pannus Lateral 10.2 (3.7)  — (—) 7.8 (—) 
  • TABLE 9
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Osteoarthritis Histopathology: Articular Cartilage Collagen Assessment
    Total Score
    Medial
    Femoral Femoral
    Trochlear Condyles Tibial Condyle Cumulative
    Group # Notch Central Plateau Inferior Score
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6 6.1 ± 0.7 6.0 ± 1.0 7.4 ± 1.1 8.4 ± 1.5
    7 5.7 ± 0.5 5.3 ± 1.1 6.1 ± 1.5 6.4 ± 1.3
    8 4.9 ± 0.9 4.7 ± 0.8 5.7 ± 1.1 6.0 ± 0.8
  • For collagen changes, the specific osteoarthritic lesions were assessed separately from the cartilage as a whole. The osteoarthritic lesions in Group 6 showed much more collagen condensation (and possibly collagen neoformation) than did the lesions in Group 7 or Group 8. Further, in cartilage subjacent to pannus, which is a known feature of this model, the unmasking of collagen was much greater in Group 6 than in Groups 7 and 8.
  • The synovial reaction was relatively mild with a trend to higher scores in the medial synovial sample. There was very mild synovial cell hyperplasia. The inflammatory cell infiltrate was mixed consisting of lymphocytes and macrophages (Table 11 and 4).
    TABLE 10
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Osteoarthritis Histopathology: Articular Cartilage Collagen Assessment
    Features
    Upper Layer
    Superficial Layer Perichondronal
    Collagen Collagen
    Medial Medial
    Femoral Femoral Femoral Femoral
    Trochlear Condyles Tibial Condyle Trochlear Condyles Tibial Condyle
    Group # Notch Central Plateau Inferior Notch Central Plateau Inferior
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6 2 1.9 ± 0.4 2 2 0 1.3 ± 0.8 1.1 ± 0.9 1.9 ± 1.1
    7 1.9 ± 0.4 2 1.7 ± 0.5 1.9 ± 0.4 0.1 ± 0.4 0.4 ± 0.8 0.3 ± 0.8 0.7 ± 1.0
    8 1.4 ± 0.5 2 1.6 ± 0.5 1.9 ± 0.4 0 0.1 ± 0.4 0 0
    Features
    Lower Layer
    Perichondronal Deep Layer
    Collagen Collagen
    Medial Medial
    Femoral Femoral Femoral Femoral
    Trochlear Condyles Tibial Condyle Trochlear Condyles Tibial Condyle
    Group # Notch Central Plateau Inferior Notch Central Plateau Inferior
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6 2.9 ± 0.4 2.1 ± 1.2 1.7 ± 0.5 2.9 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 1.3 2.6 ± 0.5 1.7 ± 0.5
    7 2.7 ± 0.5 2.3 ± 1.1 1.6 ± 0.8 2.4 ± 1.0 1 0.6 ± 1.1 2.6 ± 0.5 1.4 ± 0.8
    8 2.4 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.7 1.4 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.5 1 0.4 ± 1.1 2.7 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.8
  • TABLE 11
    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
    Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Canada
    Synovium: Histologic Features
    Synovium Score
    Group # Medial Lateral
    1 6.6 5.9
    2 8.0 6.9
    3 7.3 8.3
    4 6.9 5.9
    5 7.3 6.1
    6 9.0 5.4
    7 8.1 6.6
    8 10.0 6.6
    Mean Score 7.9 6.4

    Note:

    In all except Group 3, the lateral side has the lower scores.

    Discussion
  • The ACLT model produces sufficient distinctive osteoarthritic lesions to allow discrimination of therapeutic effects between the controls and the test animals. These effects were most readily seen in the tibial plateau. Safranin O stained semi-qualitative assessment by Mankin scoring as well as cartilage structural morphometry indicated that compared to the control group 6, the groups treated with rhIGF-I (Groups 7 and 8) demonstrated less severe lesions and more retention of proteoglycan. The retention of proteoglycan was evident in both the areas of intact cartilage and areas of osteoarthritic lesions which showed fibrillation and erosion.
  • With regard to the assessment of the collagen framework, more collagen became unmasked in the control group 6 compared to the treated groups (Groups 7 and 8). As the collagen becomes exposed by the proteoglycan depletion by the action of the papain staining, the lack of exposure of collagen reflects the retention of proteoglycans. The retention of proteoglycans may result from either alteration in the proteoglycan composition or an increase in the proteoglycan concentration within the cartilage.
  • Of great interest were the collagen changes in the osteoarthritic lesions. In the untreated control group 6, the osteoarthritic lesions invariably demonstrated collagen condensation with some evidence for collagen neoformation. In contrast, the treated animals, Groups 7 and 8, had shallower lesions, and very much more variable and less exposure of the collagen. This lack of unmasking of the collagen framework and reduced lesion extent appears to be related to the retention of proteoglycans within the cartilage and to the relative resistance of cartilage proteoglycans to degradation by papain compared to cartilage matrix in Group 6.
  • Treatment with rhIGF-I also impacted the cellularity of the cartilage. These effects, including chondrocyte relative preservation (decreased loss of chondrocyte density) within the lesions and relative preservation (decreased loss) of chondron density within the lesions, are seen most clearly at sites of structural osteoarthritic lesions. This can be interpreted as a chondroprotective effect (less loss of chondrons and chondrocytes). There is a suggestion for chondroregenerative effects (increased cell density, % clustered chondrons) even in intact cartilage in the test animals.
  • The synovial reaction was relatively mild and is consistent with repeated intra-articular injections.
  • Conclusions
  • The results from the assessment of osteoarthritis using the Mankin scale, the assessment of proteoglycan retention using Safranin O staining, the morphometric assessment of articular cartilage and osteoarthritic lesions, and the semi-qualitative scoring of the collagen framework in osteoarthritis all demonstrate that the osteoarthritic lesions are attenuated in the rhIGF-I treated groups (Groups 7 and 8) compared to the control (Group 6). This effect appears to be related to either an increase in proteoglycans or beneficial alteration in proteoglycan composition in the treated groups or a combination of these two factors. Further, rhIGF-I treatment appears to retard or prevent collagen condensation in osteoarthritic lesions. At the very least, these effects are chondroprotective. Additionally, they strongly suggest the possibility of chondroregeneration from this agent.
  • The histologic and histomorphometric assessment of cartilage also demonstrated that in the cartilage domains unaffected by specific osteoarthritic lesions, the cartilage remained intact comparable to the control animals. Further, there was no increased resorption of bone in the articular plate in the treated animals compared to the controls.
  • These studies indicate that IGF-I can act as a chondroprotective agent in osteoarthritis principally by acting as an anabolic agent and possibly as an anticatabolic agent for matrix components such as proteoglycans. These data also suggest that IGF-I can act as a chondroregenerative agent. Importantly, no adverse effects of IGF-I were demonstrated by either histology or histomorphometry.
  • In summary, the data disclosed herein demonstrate clearly that IGF-I could be effective in reducing the severity of osteoarthritis and in stimulating cartilage repair to a significant degree, but at higher doses than had previously been known. IGF-I treatment in the methods disclosed above proved that Group 3 (10 mg/week of Depo IGF-I), Group 7 (1 mg/week of rhIGF-I), and Group 8 (5 mg/week of rhIGF-I) showed definite positive therapeutic effects. In addition, Group 5 (20 mg of Depo IGF-I biweekly) also showed some positive therapeutic effects as reflected in the lower Mankin scores in this group. The safety data, including macroscopic and microscopic pathology, indicated the doses of rhIGF-I described in the dog study were well tolerated. Hypoglycemia, a known pharmacological effect of rhIGF-I, was the only adverse event observed, and this effect can be easily monitored and managed.
  • EXAMPLE 2 IGF-I Stimulation of Proteoglycan in Cell Culture
  • Chondrocytes were obtained from a human with osteoarthritis. Cells in suspension (alginate beads) were exposed to 100 ng/ml or 1,000 ng/ml rhIGF-I for 10 days. The IGF-I response (35S incorporation into proteoglycan) was assessed on days 3, 7, and 10. rhIGF-I was then removed from the media, and the IGF-I response was assessed again on days 14 and 21. Proteoglycan was measured in the media, the cell pellet, and in the alginate.
  • The subject's cells showed IGF-I stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis during the first 10 days as compared to the control cells, which were not exposed to rhIGF-I (FIG. 1). Further, chondrocytes continued to demonstrate enhanced proteoglycan synthesis from day 10 to day 14, four days after removal of IGF-I. These data provide additional evidence for the benefit of intermittent dosing in the treatment of osteoarthritis.
  • Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.
  • All publications and patent applications mentioned in the specification are indicative of the level of those skilled in the art to which this invention pertains. All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Claims (20)

1. A method for treating an articular cartilage disorder at an articular site in a mammal, said method comprising increasing IGF-I at said articular site to a therapeutically effective level that is capable of promoting a desired positive effect on cartilage of said articular site, said articular site being selected from the group consisting of a hand joint, a foot joint, a knee joint, a shoulderjoint, a hip joint, and ajoint within the spine, wherein said increasing is achieved by delivering to said articular site a therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or biologically active variant thereof, wherein said dose is about 0.01 mg to about 50.0 mg, wherein said variant is a polypeptide having IGF-I activity and having at least 70% sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of said human IGF-I, and wherein said IGF-I activity is stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or variant thereof is about 0.1 mg to about 20.0 mg.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein said method comprises administering said therapeutically effective dose directly to said articular site.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein said administering is by intra-articular injection.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein said articular cartilage disorder is osteoarthritis.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein said osteoarthritis is localized idiopathic osteoarthritis.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein said osteoarthritis is secondary osteoarthritis.
8. The method of claim 4, wherein said articular cartilage disorder results from a trauma-related injury.
9. The method of claim 4, wherein said mammal is a human and wherein human IGF-I is administered.
10. The method of claim 3, wherein said therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or variant thereof is administered intermittently.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein said intermittent administration comprises an administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising said therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or variant thereof followed by a time period of discontinuance, wherein said period of discontinuance is longer than the residence time of said pharmaceutical composition at said site, and repetition of the pattern of administration followed by discontinuance for as long as necessary to achieve said treatment of said articular cartilage disorder.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein said therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or variant thereof is selected from the group consisting of 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, and 3.0 mg.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said human IGF-I or variant thereof is administered as a sustained-release formulation.
14. A method for treating degenerative disk disease at an articular site within a spine of a mammal, said method comprising increasing IGF-I at said articular site to a therapeutically effective level that is capable of promoting a desired positive effect on cartilage of said articular site, wherein said increasing is achieved by delivering to said articular site a therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or biologically active variant thereof, wherein said dose is about 0.01 mg to about 50.0 mg, wherein said variant is a polypeptide having IGF-I activity and having at least 70% sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of said human IGF-I, and wherein said IGF-I activity is stimulation of proteoglycan synthesis.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein said method comprises administering said therapeutically effective dose directly to said articular site.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein said administering is by intra-articular injection.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein said mammal is a human and wherein human IGF-I is administered.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein said therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or variant thereof is administered intermittently.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein said intermittent administration comprises an administration of a pharmaceutical composition comprising said therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or variant thereof followed by a time period of discontinuance, wherein said period of discontinuance is longer than the residence time of said pharmaceutical composition at said site, and repetition of the pattern of administration followed by discontinuance for as long as necessary to achieve said treatment of said articular cartilage disorder.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein said therapeutically effective dose of human IGF-I or variant thereof is selected from the group consisting of 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, and3.0 mg.
US11/487,874 1998-04-03 2006-07-17 Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders Abandoned US20060258588A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US8068398P true 1998-04-03 1998-04-03
US28555499A true 1999-04-02 1999-04-02
US10/199,449 US7141545B2 (en) 1998-04-03 2002-07-19 Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders
US11/487,874 US20060258588A1 (en) 1998-04-03 2006-07-17 Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/487,874 US20060258588A1 (en) 1998-04-03 2006-07-17 Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/199,449 Continuation US7141545B2 (en) 1998-04-03 2002-07-19 Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060258588A1 true US20060258588A1 (en) 2006-11-16

Family

ID=22158951

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/199,449 Expired - Fee Related US7141545B2 (en) 1998-04-03 2002-07-19 Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders
US11/487,874 Abandoned US20060258588A1 (en) 1998-04-03 2006-07-17 Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/199,449 Expired - Fee Related US7141545B2 (en) 1998-04-03 2002-07-19 Compositions and methods for treating articular cartilage disorders

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (2) US7141545B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1067959A2 (en)
JP (1) JP2002510646A (en)
AU (1) AU3548999A (en)
WO (1) WO1999051262A2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2052721A1 (en) * 2007-10-22 2009-04-29 DSMIP Assets B.V. Use of carnosol for cartilage repair
US8277459B2 (en) 2009-09-25 2012-10-02 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating a structural bone and joint deformity
US8652141B2 (en) 2010-01-21 2014-02-18 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating hallux valgus
US8696719B2 (en) 2010-06-03 2014-04-15 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating hallux valgus
US8870876B2 (en) 2009-02-13 2014-10-28 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating hallux valgus
US9486468B2 (en) * 2008-12-31 2016-11-08 Lanny Leo Johnson Compositions including anthocyanin or anthocyanidin for the prevention or treatment of articular cartilage-associated conditions
US9968623B2 (en) 2013-08-29 2018-05-15 Lanny Leo Johnson Prepackaged sterile syringe or containers with various substance concentrations with or without bioactive reagent

Families Citing this family (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK1141014T3 (en) 1999-01-06 2005-04-11 Genentech Inc Insulin-like growth factor (IGF) in the mutant variant
EP1099443A1 (en) 1999-11-11 2001-05-16 Sulzer Orthopedics Ltd. Transplant/implant device and method for its production
DK1265630T3 (en) * 2000-03-24 2006-10-09 Genentech Inc The use of insulin for the treatment of cartilaginous disorders
AT389416T (en) 2000-05-16 2008-04-15 Genentech Inc Treatment of cartilage diseases
JP2004534075A (en) * 2001-06-14 2004-11-11 ノボ ノルディスク アクティーゼルスカブNovo Nordisk Aktie Selsxab Mucosal repair by Tff dimer peptide
WO2004075940A1 (en) * 2003-02-26 2004-09-10 Zimmer Orthobiologics, Inc. Preparation for repairing cartilage tissue, especially articular cartilage defects
US20040229878A1 (en) * 2003-05-13 2004-11-18 Depuy Spine, Inc. Transdiscal administration of specific inhibitors of P38 kinase
US8273347B2 (en) * 2003-05-13 2012-09-25 Depuy Spine, Inc. Autologous treatment of degenerated disc with cells
US7429378B2 (en) * 2003-05-13 2008-09-30 Depuy Spine, Inc. Transdiscal administration of high affinity anti-MMP inhibitors
US7344716B2 (en) * 2003-05-13 2008-03-18 Depuy Spine, Inc. Transdiscal administration of specific inhibitors of pro-inflammatory cytokines
US8361467B2 (en) * 2003-07-30 2013-01-29 Depuy Spine, Inc. Trans-capsular administration of high specificity cytokine inhibitors into orthopedic joints
US7553827B2 (en) * 2003-08-13 2009-06-30 Depuy Spine, Inc. Transdiscal administration of cycline compounds
US8895540B2 (en) * 2003-11-26 2014-11-25 DePuy Synthes Products, LLC Local intraosseous administration of bone forming agents and anti-resorptive agents, and devices therefor
US20090226552A1 (en) * 2004-07-22 2009-09-10 Colorado State University Research Foundation Agents and methods for diagnosing osteoarthritis
US20060045904A1 (en) * 2004-08-20 2006-03-02 Barry Aronson Joint therapy
US8697139B2 (en) 2004-09-21 2014-04-15 Frank M. Phillips Method of intervertebral disc treatment using articular chondrocyte cells
EP1764117A1 (en) 2005-09-20 2007-03-21 Zimmer GmbH Implant for the repair of a cartilage defect and method for manufacturing the implant
US20070071840A1 (en) * 2005-09-27 2007-03-29 Sridevi Dhanaraj Method for treatment of cartilage disorders with centella extract
ES2327480B1 (en) * 2007-06-15 2010-08-10 Bioiberica, S.A. "Disaccharides for the treatment of tendons, ligaments and bones."
US20090162351A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Depuy Spine, Inc. Transdiscal administration of inhibitors of p38 MAP kinase
US8986696B2 (en) * 2007-12-21 2015-03-24 Depuy Mitek, Inc. Trans-capsular administration of p38 map kinase inhibitors into orthopedic joints
EP2237770A4 (en) * 2007-12-26 2011-11-09 Gel Del Technologies Inc Biocompatible protein particles, particle devices and methods thereof
WO2010138095A1 (en) * 2009-05-28 2010-12-02 Общество С Ограниченной Ответственностью "Иhctиtуt Гиaлуaль" Medicinal agent
US20120142628A1 (en) * 2010-12-07 2012-06-07 Allergan, Inc. Methods for treating crepitus
US8455436B2 (en) 2010-12-28 2013-06-04 Depuy Mitek, Llc Compositions and methods for treating joints
US8524662B2 (en) 2010-12-28 2013-09-03 Depuy Mitek, Llc Compositions and methods for treating joints
US8398611B2 (en) 2010-12-28 2013-03-19 Depuy Mitek, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating joints
US8623839B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-01-07 Depuy Mitek, Llc Compositions and methods for stabilized polysaccharide formulations
US9682099B2 (en) 2015-01-20 2017-06-20 DePuy Synthes Products, Inc. Compositions and methods for treating joints
US20190000874A1 (en) * 2015-08-13 2019-01-03 Newven Sprl Composition for the Treatment of Joint Conditions

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4642120A (en) * 1983-03-23 1987-02-10 Ramot University Authority For Applied Research And Industrial Development Ltd. Repair of cartilage and bones
US5206023A (en) * 1991-01-31 1993-04-27 Robert F. Shaw Method and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage
US5374620A (en) * 1990-06-07 1994-12-20 Genentech, Inc. Growth-promoting composition and its use
US5407913A (en) * 1992-12-03 1995-04-18 Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method and composition for systemic treatment of tissue injury
US5444047A (en) * 1994-06-16 1995-08-22 Dipasquale; Gene Treatment of arthritic and post-surgical orthopedic conditions with Insulin-like Growth Factor-I
US5597802A (en) * 1990-06-07 1997-01-28 Genentech, Inc. Method of formulating IGF-I with growth hormone
US5643867A (en) * 1992-08-26 1997-07-01 Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method for treating catabolic conditions
US5655546A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-08-12 Halpern; Alan A. Method for cartilage repair
US5712249A (en) * 1994-09-08 1998-01-27 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Use of insulin-like growth factors I and II for inhibition of inflammatory response
US5853746A (en) * 1991-01-31 1998-12-29 Robert Francis Shaw Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone using functional barrier
US5942499A (en) * 1996-03-05 1999-08-24 Orquest, Inc. Method of promoting bone growth with hyaluronic acid and growth factors
US6645945B1 (en) * 1996-03-05 2003-11-11 Depuy Acromed, Inc. Method of treating diseased, injured or abnormal cartilage with hyaluronic acid and growth factors

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH02268190A (en) 1989-04-07 1990-11-01 Fujisawa Pharmaceut Co Ltd Conjugate from medical compound and diphosphonic acid derivative
ZA9010332B (en) 1989-12-22 1991-08-28 Ciba Geigy Method of reducing or preventing adverse effect of steroid therapy and compositions therefor
AU6048294A (en) 1992-11-25 1994-06-22 Amgen Boulder Inc. Modified insulin-like growth factors
JPH06312931A (en) 1993-05-06 1994-11-08 Teijin Ltd Agent for treatment of cartilage dysbolism
JPH10500693A (en) 1994-05-24 1998-01-20 アムジエン・ブルダー・インコーポレーテツド Modified insulin-like growth factor
CA2195474A1 (en) * 1994-07-20 1996-02-01 Cedo Martin Bagi Igf/igfbp complex for promoting bone formation and for regulating bone remodeling
US5622932A (en) * 1995-05-05 1997-04-22 Eli Lilly And Company IGF-1 superagonists
US5741776A (en) 1995-05-22 1998-04-21 Genentech, Inc. Method of administration of IGF-I
DE69714035T2 (en) 1997-08-14 2003-03-06 Sulzer Innotec Ag Composition and apparatus for the repair of cartilage tissue in vivo comprising nanocapsules with osteoinductive and / or chondroinductive factors
AU1384799A (en) * 1997-11-07 1999-05-31 Chiron Corporation Novel igf-i composition and its use

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4642120A (en) * 1983-03-23 1987-02-10 Ramot University Authority For Applied Research And Industrial Development Ltd. Repair of cartilage and bones
US5374620A (en) * 1990-06-07 1994-12-20 Genentech, Inc. Growth-promoting composition and its use
US5597802A (en) * 1990-06-07 1997-01-28 Genentech, Inc. Method of formulating IGF-I with growth hormone
US5853746A (en) * 1991-01-31 1998-12-29 Robert Francis Shaw Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone using functional barrier
US5206023A (en) * 1991-01-31 1993-04-27 Robert F. Shaw Method and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage
US5643867A (en) * 1992-08-26 1997-07-01 Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method for treating catabolic conditions
US5407913A (en) * 1992-12-03 1995-04-18 Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method and composition for systemic treatment of tissue injury
US5444047A (en) * 1994-06-16 1995-08-22 Dipasquale; Gene Treatment of arthritic and post-surgical orthopedic conditions with Insulin-like Growth Factor-I
US5712249A (en) * 1994-09-08 1998-01-27 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Use of insulin-like growth factors I and II for inhibition of inflammatory response
US5728676A (en) * 1994-09-08 1998-03-17 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Use of insulin-like growth factors I and II for inhibition of inflammatory response
US5843899A (en) * 1994-09-08 1998-12-01 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Use of insulin-like growth factors I and II for inhibition of inflammatory response
US5655546A (en) * 1995-06-07 1997-08-12 Halpern; Alan A. Method for cartilage repair
US5942499A (en) * 1996-03-05 1999-08-24 Orquest, Inc. Method of promoting bone growth with hyaluronic acid and growth factors
US6645945B1 (en) * 1996-03-05 2003-11-11 Depuy Acromed, Inc. Method of treating diseased, injured or abnormal cartilage with hyaluronic acid and growth factors

Cited By (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2052721A1 (en) * 2007-10-22 2009-04-29 DSMIP Assets B.V. Use of carnosol for cartilage repair
US9987296B2 (en) 2008-12-31 2018-06-05 Lanny Johnson Compositions including anthocyanin or anthocyanidin for the prevention or treatment of Articular cartilage-associated conditions
US9486468B2 (en) * 2008-12-31 2016-11-08 Lanny Leo Johnson Compositions including anthocyanin or anthocyanidin for the prevention or treatment of articular cartilage-associated conditions
US8870876B2 (en) 2009-02-13 2014-10-28 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating hallux valgus
US8277459B2 (en) 2009-09-25 2012-10-02 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating a structural bone and joint deformity
US8795286B2 (en) 2009-09-25 2014-08-05 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating a structural bone and joint deformity
US8652141B2 (en) 2010-01-21 2014-02-18 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating hallux valgus
US8696719B2 (en) 2010-06-03 2014-04-15 Tarsus Medical Inc. Methods and devices for treating hallux valgus
US9968623B2 (en) 2013-08-29 2018-05-15 Lanny Leo Johnson Prepackaged sterile syringe or containers with various substance concentrations with or without bioactive reagent

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7141545B2 (en) 2006-11-28
JP2002510646A (en) 2002-04-09
US20030134792A1 (en) 2003-07-17
EP1067959A2 (en) 2001-01-17
WO1999051262A3 (en) 1999-12-09
WO1999051262A2 (en) 1999-10-14
AU3548999A (en) 1999-10-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Schmoekel et al. Bone repair with a form of BMP‐2 engineered for incorporation into fibrin cell ingrowth matrices
Moskowitz Role of collagen hydrolysate in bone and joint disease
AU669133B2 (en) Formulations of blood clot-polymer matrix for delivery of osteogenic proteins
DE69735998T2 (en) Compositions for the treatment and recovery of cartilage defects with functional barrier layer
AU657888B2 (en) Methods and compositions for the treatment and repair of defects or lesions in cartilage or bone
US7119062B1 (en) Methods and compositions for improved articular surgery using collagen
KR100235391B1 (en) Growth factor containing matrix for the treatment of lesions in cartilage
ES2325573T3 (en) Porous beta tricalcium phosphate granules and methods for production thereof.
Holland et al. Degradable hydrogel scaffolds for in vivo delivery of single and dual growth factors in cartilage repair
CA2085750C (en) Osteoinductive pharmaceutical formulations
ES2389555T3 (en) GDF-5 for use in the repair of a cartilage defect in articular not an intervertebral disc
EP0639079B1 (en) Methods for treating interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor mediated diseases
AU673161B2 (en) Wound healing and treatment of fibrotic disorders
Hunziker et al. Repair of partial-thickness defects in articular cartilage: cell recruitment from the synovial membrane
Schmidt et al. A review of the effects of insulin-like growth factor and platelet derived growth factor on in vivo cartilage healing and repair
EP1465558B1 (en) Use of cross-linked collagen for intervertebral disc treatment
Radomsky et al. Novel formulation of fibroblast growth factor‐2 in a hyaluronan gel accelerates fracture healing in nonhuman primates
RU2155042C2 (en) Parathormone and raloxifen used for bone mass increase, pharmaceutical composition and method of osseous mass increase
JP2961708B2 (en) The combination of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 is to enhance the growth
Harry et al. Comparison of the healing of open tibial fractures covered with either muscle or fasciocutaneous tissue in a murine model
Bax et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-2 increases the rate of callus formation after fracture of the rabbit tibia
US5470829A (en) Pharmaceutical preparation
US5422340A (en) TGF-βformulation for inducing bone growth
US20050187162A1 (en) Novel peptide with osteogenic activity
KR100989109B1 (en) Use of a mixture of sodium hyaluronate and chondroitin sulfate for the treatment of osteoarthritis