US20060208171A1 - Light sensor with modulated radiant polychromatic source - Google Patents
Light sensor with modulated radiant polychromatic source Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060208171A1 US20060208171A1 US11/365,110 US36511006A US2006208171A1 US 20060208171 A1 US20060208171 A1 US 20060208171A1 US 36511006 A US36511006 A US 36511006A US 2006208171 A1 US2006208171 A1 US 2006208171A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- plant
- light
- red
- sensor
- chlorophyll
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 229930002875 chlorophyll Natural products 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 235000019804 chlorophyll Nutrition 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- ATNHDLDRLWWWCB-AENOIHSZSA-M chlorophyll a Chemical compound C1([C@@H](C(=O)OC)C(=O)C2=C3C)=C2N2C3=CC(C(CC)=C3C)=[N+]4C3=CC3=C(C=C)C(C)=C5N3[Mg-2]42[N+]2=C1[C@@H](CCC(=O)OC\C=C(/C)CCC[C@H](C)CCC[C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@H](C)C2=C5 ATNHDLDRLWWWCB-AENOIHSZSA-M 0.000 claims abstract description 33
- 238000000985 reflectance spectrum Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 14
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000000295 emission spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000855 fungicidal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000000417 fungicide Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 230000002363 herbicidal effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000004009 herbicide Substances 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000002917 insecticide Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 description 67
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 28
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 22
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 16
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 11
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 11
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 10
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 10
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 8
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 4
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- JBRZTFJDHDCESZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N AsGa Chemical compound [As]#[Ga] JBRZTFJDHDCESZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- JMASRVWKEDWRBT-UHFFFAOYSA-N Gallium nitride Chemical compound [Ga]#N JMASRVWKEDWRBT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000607479 Yersinia pestis Species 0.000 description 3
- MDPILPRLPQYEEN-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium arsenide Chemical compound [As]#[Al] MDPILPRLPQYEEN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 3
- 229910052738 indium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- APFVFJFRJDLVQX-UHFFFAOYSA-N indium atom Chemical compound [In] APFVFJFRJDLVQX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 2
- 208000005156 Dehydration Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 229910002601 GaN Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- GYHNNYVSQQEPJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Gallium Chemical compound [Ga] GYHNNYVSQQEPJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229910001218 Gallium arsenide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Phosphorus Chemical compound [P] OAICVXFJPJFONN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Silicon Chemical compound [Si] XUIMIQQOPSSXEZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 235000009754 Vitis X bourquina Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000012333 Vitis X labruscana Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 240000006365 Vitis vinifera Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000014787 Vitis vinifera Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- CRQQGFGUEAVUIL-UHFFFAOYSA-N chlorothalonil Chemical compound ClC1=C(Cl)C(C#N)=C(Cl)C(C#N)=C1Cl CRQQGFGUEAVUIL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000003086 colorant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052733 gallium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910052710 silicon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000010703 silicon Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007921 spray Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000000346 sugar Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 2
- IHGSAQHSAGRWNI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 1-(4-bromophenyl)-2,2,2-trifluoroethanone Chemical compound FC(F)(F)C(=O)C1=CC=C(Br)C=C1 IHGSAQHSAGRWNI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000219310 Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000005979 Hordeum vulgare Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007340 Hordeum vulgare Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001640023 Janusia Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000202240 Morone americana Species 0.000 description 1
- 229910002651 NO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 206010034972 Photosensitivity reaction Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 206010035148 Plague Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 235000021536 Sugar beet Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000209140 Triticum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000008042 Zea mays Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000005824 Zea mays ssp. parviglumis Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000002017 Zea mays subsp mays Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- MMDJDBSEMBIJBB-UHFFFAOYSA-N [O-][N+]([O-])=O.[O-][N+]([O-])=O.[O-][N+]([O-])=O.[NH6+3] Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O.[O-][N+]([O-])=O.[O-][N+]([O-])=O.[NH6+3] MMDJDBSEMBIJBB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003679 aging effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052785 arsenic Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsenic atom Chemical compound [As] RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- ONTQJDKFANPPKK-UHFFFAOYSA-L chembl3185981 Chemical group [Na+].[Na+].CC1=CC(C)=C(S([O-])(=O)=O)C=C1N=NC1=CC(S([O-])(=O)=O)=C(C=CC=C2)C2=C1O ONTQJDKFANPPKK-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009833 condensation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005494 condensation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003750 conditioning effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000005822 corn Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012272 crop production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002178 crystalline material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003292 diminished effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002019 doping agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005538 encapsulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003822 epoxy resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- HZXMRANICFIONG-UHFFFAOYSA-N gallium phosphide Chemical compound [Ga]#P HZXMRANICFIONG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036449 good health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- BHEPBYXIRTUNPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N hydridophosphorus(.) (triplet) Chemical compound [PH] BHEPBYXIRTUNPN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000010348 incorporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 1
- 150000002823 nitrates Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000000618 nitrogen fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000018343 nutrient deficiency Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000003715 nutritional status Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000036961 partial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005375 photometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036211 photosensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000029553 photosynthesis Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010672 photosynthesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000243 photosynthetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000049 pigment Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920000647 polyepoxide Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002310 reflectometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011896 sensitive detection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002352 surface water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003442 weekly effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01J—MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
- G01J3/00—Spectrometry; Spectrophotometry; Monochromators; Measuring colours
- G01J3/28—Investigating the spectrum
- G01J3/30—Measuring the intensity of spectral lines directly on the spectrum itself
- G01J3/36—Investigating two or more bands of a spectrum by separate detectors
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01J—MEASUREMENT OF INTENSITY, VELOCITY, SPECTRAL CONTENT, POLARISATION, PHASE OR PULSE CHARACTERISTICS OF INFRARED, VISIBLE OR ULTRAVIOLET LIGHT; COLORIMETRY; RADIATION PYROMETRY
- G01J3/00—Spectrometry; Spectrophotometry; Monochromators; Measuring colours
- G01J3/02—Details
- G01J3/10—Arrangements of light sources specially adapted for spectrometry or colorimetry
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/25—Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
- G01N21/31—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
- G01N21/35—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light
- G01N21/3563—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light for analysing solids; Preparation of samples therefor
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/17—Systems in which incident light is modified in accordance with the properties of the material investigated
- G01N21/25—Colour; Spectral properties, i.e. comparison of effect of material on the light at two or more different wavelengths or wavelength bands
- G01N21/31—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry
- G01N21/35—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light
- G01N21/359—Investigating relative effect of material at wavelengths characteristic of specific elements or molecules, e.g. atomic absorption spectrometry using infrared light using near infrared light
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/62—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light
- G01N21/63—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light optically excited
- G01N21/64—Fluorescence; Phosphorescence
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/62—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light
- G01N21/63—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light optically excited
- G01N2021/635—Photosynthetic material analysis, e.g. chrorophyll
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
- G01N21/84—Systems specially adapted for particular applications
- G01N2021/8466—Investigation of vegetal material, e.g. leaves, plants, fruits
Definitions
- This invention relates to a structure and a method for determining changes in the chlorophyll status of a plant via remote sensing of the plant's reflectance spectrum spanning from approximately 650 nm to 800 nm.
- producers and turf professionals need a way in which to measure and assess the health and performance of their landscapes. For example, the need to know when and how much fertilizer (nitrogen) and other nutrients to apply to a plant to elicit the appropriate growth response is primarily guess work to the producer. Because nitrogen is required by the plant in the greatest quantities and because nitrogen is rather mobile in soils, producers have practiced a one time application of nitrogen to cover the crops need for the entire growing season. However, over application of nitrogen on agricultural and commercial landscapes has resulted in the contamination of ground and surface waters. The primary vectors for water contamination are run-off and leaching. Nitrate-nitrogen is the most common contaminant found in U.S. groundwater.
- Nitrate contamination is increasing both in area and concentration, particularly beneath landscapes dominated by corn production. It is estimated that 1.8 ⁇ 10 9 kilograms of nitrates wash into the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River basin each year. Of this amount, 55% of the nitrogen released into the basin can be attributed to agricultural fertilizers with only a 3% contribution attributable to non-agricultural fertilizer application primarily on turf for lawns and recreational land (CAST, 1999).
- Techniques to remotely measure crop status include the use of a spectroradiometer and other instruments (Bausch et al. 1994; Chappel et al. 1992; Maas and Dunlap, 1989), aerial photography (Benton et al, 1976), and satellite imagery.
- nutrient deficiencies constitute only part of the management problem.
- the basic problem of determining or monitoring plant status with respect to stress whether it stems from nutrient, water, pest, disease, or otherwise is of primary concern.
- turf stress determination is of major concern for the turf manager. Earlier detection can protect the health of the grass but also reduce the cost of restoring the badly damaged turf to good health.
- Turf stress can be due to many causes such as water, pest, nutrient, heat, disease, and the like.
- By detecting changes in the turf landscape early turf quality can be maintained and costly restoration operations can be reduced or eliminated.
- being able to control the degree of stress is important for some producers. Grape producers, for example, like to control the degree of water stress prior to harvesting in order to control disease and increase the sugar content of the grape.
- the new sensor of the present invention overcomes the time-of-day and fair weather limitations of passive technologies by incorporating its own radiant source and by rejecting the influence of ambient light on the measured canopy reflectance. Unlike passive sensor technology, this sensor will be able to operate under completely dark or full sun conditions. Additionally, the new sensor apparatus is an improvement both in performance and cost over competing active-sensor technologies commercially available.
- the developed sensor would allow the producer to reduce the amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied to a crop or facilitate spoon-feeding the crop during the growing season, thus having the potential for lowering production costs and enhancing environmental quality. Also, by being able to determine the appropriate fertilizer needs of the crop at any given location in the field, the producer can apply only the fertilizer needed to prevent yield loss or degradation of product quality (i.e., protein content in wheat and barley or sugar content in sugar beets). Subsequently, decreased fertilizer rates will substantially lower nitrogen runoff and leaching losses, which will improve the health of our watersheds, waterways, lakes, and oceans.
- data produced by the sensor may be used to produce relative yield maps for forecasting crop production. As for turf grass applications, the sensor technology would allow turf managers to map changes occurring on turf landscapes or for monitoring the status of turf quality.
- structures and methods are provided for assessing plant status using the chlorophyll status changes and/or biomass properties of the plant remotely sensed, in the red-edge portion of the vegetative reflectance spectrum ( ⁇ 650 nm to ⁇ 800 nm), thereby allowing selective monitoring or treatment of individual plants.
- the present invention When incorporated into variable rate applicator and/or sprayers systems, the present invention significantly reduces the use of fertilizers by precisely applying agricultural products to individual plants to be treated or eliminated. Moreover, the present invention is operable under a wide variety of conditions including cloudy conditions, bright sunlight, artificial illumination, or even total darkness. The advantage to the producer is that field operations do not have to be timed to daytime sunlight hours for operation.
- the first method of use includes the application of the invention to handheld instrumentation.
- the invention is utilized to measure plant canopies held in hand by a producer, turf manager, researcher, and the like.
- the invention includes the use of GPS for geo-referencing data collected by the invention.
- a second method of use includes applications where the sensor is mounted a moving object such as a tractor, mower, center pivot/linear irrigator, or the like.
- data may be geo-referenced using GPS for mapping and data layer (GPS maps, soil maps, etc.) integration. Problem areas can be logged and reviewed later by the producer or land manager for analysis and site management decisions.
- An object of the invention is to provide a sensor for remotely sensing plant status using biophysical and biochemical properties of the plant thereby allowing selective monitoring, elimination, or treatment of individual plants.
- FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the effect of nitrogen rate on the plant reflectance curve over the visible and near infrared portion of the spectrum.
- FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of plant reflectance curves over the visible and near infrared portion of the spectrum with the red-edge portion of the spectrum emphasized.
- FIG. 3 is a side and bottom view of a sensor of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 5 is a diagram of a circuit used to generate a light source of the present invention.
- FIG. 6 shows diagrammatically a sensor based mapping system of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 shows diagrammatically a sensor based variable-rate applicator system of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 illustrates preferred sensor-to-spray nozzle separation for compensating for plant canopy periodicity and random leaf orientation.
- the following contains a description for a sensor that remotely measures plant canopy chlorophyll content independent of soil reflectance and ambient illumination levels.
- the sensor can be used in stand-alone instrumentation configurations or in a network of sensors mounted to a vehicle or moving apparatus for on-the-go remote sensing applications.
- the following description of the invention is meant to be illustrative and not limiting. Other embodiments will be obvious in view of this invention.
- leaf greenness and crop nitrogen (N) status means it should be possible to determine crop N requirements based on reflectance data collected from the crop canopy (Walberg et al., 1982; Girardin et al., 1985; Hinzman et al., 1986; Dwyer et al., 1991) and leaves (McMurtrey et al., 1994), see FIG. 2 . Plants with increased levels of N typically have more chlorophyll (Inada, 1965; Rodolfo and Peregrina, 1962; Al-Abbas et al., 1974; Wolfe et al., 1988) and greater rates of photosynthesis (Sinclair and Horie, 1989).
- plants that appear a darker green are perceived to be healthier than N deficient plants and as such healthier plants reflectance less light in the visible portion of the spectrum (400 to 700 nm) and reflect more light in the near infrared (>700 nm), see FIG. 1 .
- Chlorophyll in leaves absorbs strongly in the blue 3 and red 4 regions of the spectrum (460 nm and 670 nm) and as the wavelengths increase past 670 nm the leaves begin to strongly reflect infrared light, see FIG. 2 .
- the transition region between the photosynthetic portion 1 (400 nm to 670 nm) and the biomass portion 2 (>780 nm) of a plant's reflectance spectrum is sometimes referred to as the red-edge region 5 .
- the chlorophyll status as denoted by shifts in the red-edge inflection point is independent of the slope of the vegetative reflectance curve and has reduced sensitivity to soil and biomass reflectance characteristics. Shifts in the value of the inflection point are directly related to the chlorophyll status (and water content) of the plant with chlorophyll content being closely related to nutrient status.
- Another useful red edge parameter is the red well position 7 (RWP). This is the point on the vegetation reflectance curve that represents the plants minimum reflectance, i.e., the wavelength of maximum chlorophyll absorption. This parameter, like the REEP, is also useful in determining changes in a plant's chlorophyll status.
- the invention there are two general embodiments of the invention that can be utilized to measure red-edge reflectance.
- discrete monochromatic emitters providing coincident light beams; the beams are substantially in the red-edge portion of the vegetative reflectance spectrum (650 nm to 880 nm) and are sequenced on and off with respect to each other.
- the light source may be composed most preferably from two or more emitter banks having different wavelengths.
- the light beams illuminate a surface area on the plant's canopy, which may include bare ground and desired plants.
- the reflected light signals are then detected by a single photodetector.
- a chromatic or polychromatic emitter (a light source made up of multiple monochromatic emitters pulsed on/off in synchrony) and a spectrally sensitive detector array (e.g. four photodiodes fitted with 10 nm bandwidth interference filters having center wavelengths of 670 nm, 700 nm, 740nm and 780 nm).
- the light beam illuminates a surface area on the plant's canopy, which may include bare ground and desired plants.
- Each embodiment utilizes a controller for analyzing reflectance signals measured by the instruments and, assuming a plant is detected, responds by activating a device to take some action with respect to the plant or stores the analyzed signal with corresponding DGPS position in the controller's memory for later analysis.
- a number of actions may be taken by the controller. If the plant is a crop that is determined to be lacking in nutrient, the desired action may be to apply fertilizer. Additionally, if the plant under test is a turf landscape, such as found on golf courses and sporting fields, plant chlorophyll and/or biomass may be mapped and geo-located using GPS for later, comparative analysis.
- three or more light emitters provide selectively modulated monochromatic light beams of different wavelengths.
- the light beams would preferably have the emission wavelengths of along the red-edge portion of the plant's vegetative reflectance spectrum.
- the preferable wavelengths for the embodiment utilizing four monochromatic light sources include the following wavelengths: 670 nm, 700 nm 740 nm and 780 nm.
- Each of these light sources would preferably have a spectral-line half-widths of less than 15 nm.
- Each monochromatic light source is modulated such that each of the beams illumination time is non-overlapping with the other light beams or partially overlapping as occurs when the beams are staggered by a slight phase shift or modulated at harmonic frequencies.
- These light beams illuminate a small surface area on the ground, which, again, may be bare ground, desired plants or undesired weeds.
- a single detector senses portions of the monochromatic light beams reflected by the surface area and provides a quantitative signal indicative of the chlorophyll content of the plant.
- the signal produced can be integrated into a controller and processed as in the previous embodiment in order to determine plant chlorophyll content.
- the red visible wave bands (660 nm to 680 nm) and the long wave near infrared bands (760 nm to 880 nm) may be utilized to calculate classic biomass vegetative indexes such as normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI), simple ratio index (SRI), etc...
- NDVI normalized difference vegetative index
- SRI simple ratio index
- sensitive to chlorophyll can be formulated utilizing the wavebands along the red edge. For example, one could use a 730 nm LED and a 780 nm LED to illuminate the canopy in order to measure the a plant's chlorophyll content.
- the reflectance ratio of these two wavebands is proportional to the chlorophyll status of the plant. Albeit, this ratio may be somewhat sensitive to soil background interference, it will produce good data for canopies with LAI's greater than 2, that is, canopies that have more complete closure.
- Prior art cited in U.S. Pat. No. 3,910,701 teaches the use of multiple LED wavelengths for plant status determination. And the use of wavelength differentials (slopes) for comparative determination of plant status. This art, however, makes no distinction on the use the red-edge portion of a plant's reflectance spectrum for qualitative chlorophyll assessment.
- Prior art cited in U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,741 make no distinction with respect to chlorophyll content measurement but rather refer to changes in the slope of the vegetative reflectance spectrum as being indicative of the presence or absence of plant material as compared with soil background reflectivity. The resultant measurement made by the invention of '741 will be heavily influenced by soil background interference.
- this invention does not incorporate the spectral reflectances around the red-edge vegetative reflectance curve but rather detects slope changes as they deviate from the soil background line (but still heavily influenced by soil background interference); one slope calculated from 600 nm to 670 nm and the other from 670 nm to 780 nm.
- U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,741 offers little benefit over biomass calculation methodologies via data produced by prior art referenced in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,296,702, 5,389,781, 5,585,626 and 6,596,996
- FIG. 3 shows a diagram of the sensor enclosure.
- the enclosure facilitates the protection of the electronic circuitry while providing optical emission and reception ports for the light source and the light detector components, respectively, of the sensor.
- Port 30 in FIG. 3 is the emitter port of the sensor while port 31 is the detector port of the sensor.
- Port 30 and port 31 can facilitate various types of optical components to concentrate and collect optical energy.
- the type of optics used by the sensor can include lens, mirrors, optical flats, filters, and diffusers.
- the type of optics selected for the emitter and detector optics depends on the application; that is, the required field of view, the height the sensor will be operated above the plant canopy, the required cost of the sensor all may play a part in the design of the sensor's optical arrangement.
- the sensor can operate at a distance of 1 foot and up to 10 s of feet from the plant canopy or surface of interest but is not limited to this specific range.
- fore optics on the emission side and the detection side can take on many forms.
- a useful optically adaptation on the detector side of the optical arrangement would be to encapsulate the detector optics (filters and detectors).
- the outer optical surface would have a convex surface spaced from the plane of the photodiode so as to create an afocal or nearly afocal optical arrangement.
- This preferred mode of construction improves the optical energy collection performance of the filter/diode combination while sealing the optical path from dust and water vapor condensation.
- the emission side of the sensor there are a number of ways in which to shape and direct the light beam emitting from the sensor body. For instance, if one wishes to generate a line pattern from the sensors light source, preferably a bank of LEDs, one could place a cylindrical lens in front of this light source spaced appropriately so as to image a line of illumination in the field of view of the detection optics.
- the sensors light source preferably a bank of LEDs
- a circular or ellipsoidal area of irradiance can be produced using only the encapsulation optics of an array of LEDs.
- the beam pattern produced by the source is defined by the spatial irradiance distribution of each individual LED. No additional collimation or focusing optics is incorporated.
- Encapsulated LEDs can be purchased commercially that have spatial distribution angles of 4 degrees to almost 180 degrees. Most preferably, it is best to collimate the light emitted form an LED in order to maintain a light beam with relatively constant irradiance over distance. In this case the LED or LED array would be spaced an appropriate distance from a convex lens (or concave mirror) to form an afocal or nearly afocal optical system. The resulting optical system will produce a light beam that will be collimated along the optical axis of the light source resulting in areas of illumination with high radiance.
- FIG. 4 shows a system diagram typical for the many embodiments of the invention.
- the sensor is composed of optics to facilitate optical energy collimation and collection, a modulated light source 41 comprised of one or many banks of polychromatic LEDs and/or monochromatic LEDs with associated modulated driver and power control electronics 42 , single or multichannel photodetector array 43 , high-speed preamplifier(s) with ambient light cancellation 44 , a phase sensitive signal conditioning 45 and data acquisition circuitry 46 , and a microcontrol unit (MCU) or digital signal processor (DSP) 47 and an input/output interface 48 to communicate sensor data to an operator or controller.
- MCU microcontrol unit
- DSP digital signal processor
- the light source for the invention is most preferably composed of light emitting diodes.
- LEDs are convenient light sources for this type of invention for a number of reasons.
- First, LEDs are available in a number of colors useful for making plant biomass and pigment measurements. LEDs are readily available in colors spanning from deep violet (395 nm) to mid infrared (>4 um).
- Second, LEDs are extremely easy to use and can be modulated to megahertz frequencies. Relatively simple electronic driver circuits can be implemented and easily controlled by sensor controller electronics.
- Last, LEDs have long lifetimes and are rugged. The typical LED will operate between 80,000 and 100,000 hours depending on the quiescent device power and operating temperature range.
- LEDs are crystalline materials composed of various transition elements and dopants that include gallium, arsenic, phosphorous, aluminum, nitrogen and indium.
- Common material chemistries for LEDs are Gallium Arsenide (GaAs), Gallium Arsenide Phosphide (GaAsP), Gallium Aluminum Arsenide (GaAlAs), Indium Gallium Nitride (InGaN).
- Material chemistries that include GaN and InGaN are typically utilized to produce LEDs that emit blue (400 nm) and green (570 nm) light.
- InGaAlP chemistries emit light in the green (560 nm) to red (680 nm) region of the spectrum while GaAs and GaAlAs emit light in the red (660 nm) to near infrared (950 nm) region of the spectrum.
- LEDs can be purchased in encapsulated packages or in die form. Encapsulated packages have the benefit of providing mechanical robustness while reducing Fresnel losses associated with a die/air interface.
- LEDs are noncoherent light sources and their emission characteristic classified as being mostly monochromatic or quasi-monochromatic, that is, the frequencies composing the light are strongly peaked about a certain frequency.
- the spectral characteristic of an LED is defined by an emission band having a center wavelength (CWL) and a spectral-line half-width.
- the center wavelength defines the peak emission wavelength of the LED and the spectral-line half-width defines the spectral bandwidth of the LED.
- Two other types of LED emitters can be classified as either having polychromatic or chromatic emission characteristics.
- Polychromatic LED's have a spectral signatures that are defined by having two or more distinct emission peaks.
- An example of an LED having this characteristic is the TLYH160 manufactured by Toshiba Corporation (Tokyo, Japan).
- This device emits simultaneously at 595 nm and 880 nm.
- Another example would include the True White LED manufacutred by American Opto Plus (Pomona, Calif.).
- This particular device is an RGB LED that produces white light from the simultaneous emission of three different LED structures (red, green and blue) on the same LED die.
- LED's can also have chromatic emissions that produce a broad spectral emission signature.
- LED's of this type utilize a phosphor that is applied over an LED die and then encapsulated with a transparent epoxy resin.
- a blue light LED is utilized to stimulate the phosphor to emit a white or colored broadband light.
- the emitted light has a broad emission spectrum similar to that of fluorescent light.
- Both of the aforementioned LED types can be rapidly modulated to produce highly effective illumination signals for active light sensors.
- the LED sources In order to achieve good output stability with respect to thermal and aging effects, the LED sources should be adequately driven and monitored.
- the output intensity of LEDs is very temperature dependent. Depending on the material type, an LEDs output can drift between 0 . 4 %/C and 1 %/C. A decrease in output intensity, even if it is being monitored and corrected via calculation, can result in diminished signal to noise performance of the measurement.
- FIG. 5 shows schematically a circuit that provides active power control for the light source and an output intensity signal for monitoring and calibration.
- Control voltage 50 sets the output power of light source 51 .
- Photodiode 52 an Infineon SFH203 (Munich, Germany), samples part of the output intensity of light source 51 and feeds this signal via amplifier 53 to servo amplifier 54 . Modulation of the output signal is performed using transistor 55 .
- the output of amplifier 53 can be utilized to monitor the light source intensity for purposes of calibration and diagnostics.
- the performance of this circuit has provided output intensity control of approximately 0.05%/C over the operating range of the invention.
- the detectors used in the invention are most preferably silicon photodiodes however other detector technologies such as GaAsP and the like, may be utilized as well. Silicon detectors have a typical photosensitivity spanning from 200 nm (blue enhanced) to 1200 nm. Band shaping of the detectors is performed using filtering materials such as colored filter glass, interference filters or dichroic filters. Combinations of the aforementioned filter techniques can be combined in order to band-shape the radiation impinging on the photodetector surface. For example, an interference filter can be used to select a narrow bandwidth of light. In this situation, one could choose to use a 10 nm interference filters to select a band of interest along the red-edge portion of the vegetative reflectance spectrum.
- Utilizing an array of photodetectors fitted with interference filters would provide the wavelength selection needed to realize the invention of embodiment two that utilizes a polychromatic source for illumination.
- the incorporation of an long pass edge filter can be utilized to trim the photodiode response by blocking short wave light and subsequently improving the ambient light rejection of the associated preamplifier electronics.
- various optical filters can be utilized to shape and control the light impinging on a photodetector or photodetector array.
- a unique configuration petaining to embodiment two involves the use of linear diode array detector and diffraction grating (or linear variable filter (LVF) technology).
- the diffraction grating separates incoming, modulated light in to many wavelengths.
- a diffraction grating (or LVF)/linear array combination sensitive to the red edge region of the vegetative reflectance curve, plant chlorophyll concentrations can be measured independent of soil background interference.
- both embodiments of the invention utilize a phase sensitive detector subsystem (PSD) 45 and analog-to-digital converter 46 (ADC) after each photodetector.
- PSD phase sensitive detector subsystem
- ADC analog-to-digital converter
- the PSDs are utilized by the invention to extract and further amplify the very small signals detected and amplified by the photodetector preamplifier(s).
- PSDs are often used in applications where the signal to be measured is very small in amplitude and buried in noise. Detection is carried out synchronously with modulation of the light sources. Phase sensitive detection is one of many types of band narrowing techniques that can be utilized to measure small signals.
- phase sensitive acquisition component can be performed internally to a MCU or DSP by directly sampling the output of the photodiode amplifiers and performing the band pass and PSD functions digitally. By performing these operations in the digital domain, the temperature drift of the phase detector, common to analog techniques, can be eliminated.
- the invention performs the synchronous modulation/demodulation at a carrier frequency of 250 kHz. It should be noted that the operation of the invention is not limited to this particular modulation rate and can operate at other modulation frequencies as well with as much effectiveness. Additionally, this rate can be increased or decreased as dictated by the application.
- the MCU or DSP samples the output of a PSD 45 utilizing ADC 46 .
- the resolution of the ADC is most preferably 12 bits. Each channel can sampled using a dedicated ADC or one ADC can be utilized to sample all channels via a multiplexer.
- the MCU or DSP 47 can calculate chlorophyll content and/or a vegetative relationship based on the reflectance values sensed. Calculations for plant chlorophyll status based multiple red-edge reflectance spectra can be performed a number ways. For the situation where the instrumentation has been designed to measure four or more reflectance values along the red edge, polynomial fitting may be used to fit the curve represented by the reflectance points. Subsequently, the resulting polynomial may be differentiated to find the red-edge inflection point value. The resulting wavelength will be proportional to relative shifts in the chlorophyll status of the plant.
- a preferred method is the four-point interpolation method.
- ⁇ 1 , ⁇ 2 , ⁇ 3 and ⁇ 4 are wavelengths 670 nm, 700 nm, 740 nm and 780 nm, respectively
- ⁇ 1 , ⁇ 2 , ⁇ 3 and ⁇ 4 are reflectances at the corresponding wavelengths, respectively.
- red well position RWP another red edge parameter, the red well position RWP, may be calculated using these same wavebands.
- the RWP represent the wavelength position of a plants minimum reflectance in the red, or rather the position of maximum chlorophyll absorption.
- the RWP functions in a similar fashion as the REIP for predicting relative changes in plan chlorophyll status.
- a red polychromatic LED such as the one utilized in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/703256, and a monochromatic LED, with an emission wavelength in the red edge portion of a plant's vegetation reflectance spectra (680 nm to 760 nm), are utilized in a sensor that can distinguish between both plant nutrient and water stresses via the Canopy Chlorophyll Content Index (CCCI).
- CCCI Canopy Chlorophyll Content Index
- the sensor utilizes two particular vegetation indexes.
- NDRE Normalized Difference Red-Edge
- NDVI standard Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
- NDVI ⁇ 3 - ⁇ 1 ⁇ 3 - ⁇ 1
- ⁇ 1 , ⁇ 2 and ⁇ 3 reflectances at wavelengths 650 nm, 720 nm and 880 nm.
- the NDVI as an estimate of percent plant cover and the NDRE as an indicator of plant chlorophyll content.
- the CCCI formula utilizes both the NDVI and NDRE indexes to calculate the impact of water and nutrient on a crop or plant.
- the benefits of utilizing the polychromatic and monchromatic LED combination are many.
- Data calculated by the sensor's processing component is communicated to an operator or system controller via input/output interface 48 .
- the I/O interface may take the form of a keypad and display. If the invention is incorporated into a sprayer or mapping system having several sensors networked together, the I/O interface will most preferably be a networkable serial port such a as RS485 port or CAN 2.0b port.
- FIG. 6 show a block diagram of the invention incorporated into a system that is used to map plant status. Elements of the system include sensor array 60 , sensor controller 61 , and GPS 62 .
- the role of the sensor in this system is to measure the chlorophyll status and/or biomass properties of the plant being mapped.
- Data produced by the sensor are collected by the system controller for storage and later analysis. Each sensor point is geo-referenced using the GPS connected the system controller.
- mapping can be performed the system.
- the map collected by the system can be all-inclusive, that is, every data point measured by the sensor can be stored away in the controller's memory for later retrieval and analysis.
- the sensor/controller can be programmed with a defined set of rules so as to distinguish poor performing regions of a landscape from good or healthy regions and vice versa and store only the poor performing regions. This mode of operation saves storage space in the controller and reduces the amount of data processing that has to be performed.
- mapping systems could be mounted to the mower machinery for a golf course. When the course personnel perform their weekly mowing operations, the mapping systems would scout for problem areas of the turf. For turf management operations, this mode would be most useful because regions of turf that are suffering from stress (disease, water, nutrient, and so forth) or are beginning to suffer. The mapping systems would flag affected areas for the turf manager to scout out visually.
- FIG. 7 show a block diagram of the invention incorporated into a system that is used for applying an agricultural product. Elements of the system include sensor array 70 , sensor controller 71 , GPS 72 , fertilizer controller 73 , sprayer pumps/actuators 74 and ground speed sensor 75 .
- the agricultural product may be either in liquid or solid form and may be, but not limited to, a nutrient, mineral, herbicide or fungicide or a combination of the aforementioned materials.
- the variable rate control system can be mounted to a commercial sprayer or tractor mounted sprayer system. GPS can be incorporated in the system when a map is required of plant canopy characteristics for later analysis. In addition, to mapping plant characteristics, material dispensation rates can be mapped as well. GPS is also required when applying fertilizer referenced to an N sufficient reference strip. In this situation, a region of the field is given an N-rate that totally meets the needs of the crop to grow without loss of yield and apply a lower amount of pre-emergent fertilizer (only the amount to initially cause the crop to grow) to the remainder of the field.
- FIG. 8 shows an applicator example with the sensor stood-off from the spray nozzles.
- the separation distance D between the sensor and sprayer nozzles should most preferably be greater than 3 feet.
- the variable rate system will collect data for D feet and apply an agricultural product over D feet while sensing the next D separation distance.
- Another strength of a red-edge measurement sensor, as disclosed above, is that the measurement made by the instrument is relatively invariant with respect to varying plant population. This is critical for making N fertilizer recommendations on fields that have had crops planted utilizing variable rate seeding techniques. With a biomass sensor, a seed rate map would have to be utilized in conjunction with the variable rate application algorithm in order to compensate for changes in plant biomass resulting from the seeding operation.
- the benefits of a system such as the one just described are both economic and environmental. By using less fertilizer and only applying it where the crop needs it, the producer can lower his use of fertilizer and thus lower his production cost. Additionally, by using less fertilizer and only applying it where the crop needs it, reduced run-off and leaching into our watershed occurs. Because the present invention produces its own source of light, the measurements that it makes is not influenced by ambient light conditions. Applicator equipment fitted with sensors of this type can be operated around the clock at night and under full sun.
Abstract
An apparatus is described for assessing plant chlorophyll content remotely sensed by the invention thereby allowing selective monitoring or treatment of individual plants. In one preferred embodiment, a polychromatic emitter provides light beams substantially in the red edge portion of a plant's reflectance spectrum. This light beam illuminates a surface area on the plant, which may be bare ground or plants. The beam of light may be focused, collimated or non-focused. A detector array, usually composed of an array of spectrally sensitive detectors, detects portions of this polychromatic light beam reflected by the surface area and provides a signal indicative of the change in chlorophyll status by determining the wavelength of the red edge inflection point REIP. In another preferred embodiment of the invention, an array of sequentially pulsed monochromatic emitters provides light beams having wavelengths substantially along the red edge portion of a plant's reflectance spectrum. These light beams illuminate a surface area on the plant, which may be bare ground or plants. The beams of light may be focused, collimated or non-focused. A photodetector detects the light reflected by the surface area and provides a signal indicative of the change in chlorophyll status by determining the wavelength of the red edge inflection point REIP. In both embodiments, a controller analyzes the resulting REIP wavelength and responds by activating a device to take some action with respect to the plant or stores the analyzed signal with corresponding DGPS position in the controller's memory for later analysis.
Description
- This invention is a continuation in part to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/703,256
- 1. Field of the Invention
- This invention relates to a structure and a method for determining changes in the chlorophyll status of a plant via remote sensing of the plant's reflectance spectrum spanning from approximately 650 nm to 800 nm.
- 2. Description of Related Art
- In order to manage our natural resources in an efficient and cost-effective manner, producers and turf professionals need a way in which to measure and assess the health and performance of their landscapes. For example, the need to know when and how much fertilizer (nitrogen) and other nutrients to apply to a plant to elicit the appropriate growth response is primarily guess work to the producer. Because nitrogen is required by the plant in the greatest quantities and because nitrogen is rather mobile in soils, producers have practiced a one time application of nitrogen to cover the crops need for the entire growing season. However, over application of nitrogen on agricultural and commercial landscapes has resulted in the contamination of ground and surface waters. The primary vectors for water contamination are run-off and leaching. Nitrate-nitrogen is the most common contaminant found in U.S. groundwater. Nitrate contamination is increasing both in area and concentration, particularly beneath landscapes dominated by corn production. It is estimated that 1.8×109 kilograms of nitrates wash into the Gulf of Mexico from the Mississippi River basin each year. Of this amount, 55% of the nitrogen released into the basin can be attributed to agricultural fertilizers with only a 3% contribution attributable to non-agricultural fertilizer application primarily on turf for lawns and recreational land (CAST, 1999).
- Techniques to remotely measure crop status include the use of a spectroradiometer and other instruments (Bausch et al. 1994; Chappelle et al. 1992; Maas and Dunlap, 1989), aerial photography (Benton et al, 1976), and satellite imagery.
- The techniques listed above are not without their limitations. For example, early research by Resource21™ determined that during the optimal fly over times between 10 a.m. and 11 a.m. for satellite imaging, cloud cover had adverse affects on visibility. It was found that during the 10 am to 11 am time frame, fields in Colorado were visible approximately 80% of the time while eastern Nebraska fields were visible approximately 50% of the time. This trend in decreased visibility continued the farther east that data was collected. Also, spatial resolution for satellite imagery is poor (Landsat, 20 meter and panchromatic, 10 meter). Similar problems plague aerial photographic methods as well. While aerial imagery has better spatial resolution (typically less than 3 meters) than satellite imaging, partial cloud cover can shade sections of fields giving biased or incorrect reflectance measurements. Both techniques, however, suffer from the need for extensive data processing (performed by third party providers at high cost and long lead time) and geo-referencing issues. Even with spectroradiometric methods using sunlight as the ambient light source, cloud cover and time of day (8 a.m. to 8 p.m.) demands limit the mainstream acceptance of the technology for addressing the nitrogen rate over-loading problem. What is needed is an on-the-go type sensor that overcomes the time of day and fair-weather issues surrounding the aforementioned measurement techniques.
- In certain crops or plant varieties, nutrient deficiencies constitute only part of the management problem. In particular, the basic problem of determining or monitoring plant status with respect to stress whether it stems from nutrient, water, pest, disease, or otherwise is of primary concern. For instance, turf stress determination is of major concern for the turf manager. Earlier detection can protect the health of the grass but also reduce the cost of restoring the badly damaged turf to good health. Turf stress can be due to many causes such as water, pest, nutrient, heat, disease, and the like. By detecting changes in the turf landscape early, turf quality can be maintained and costly restoration operations can be reduced or eliminated. On the other hand, being able to control the degree of stress is important for some producers. Grape producers, for example, like to control the degree of water stress prior to harvesting in order to control disease and increase the sugar content of the grape.
- The new sensor of the present invention overcomes the time-of-day and fair weather limitations of passive technologies by incorporating its own radiant source and by rejecting the influence of ambient light on the measured canopy reflectance. Unlike passive sensor technology, this sensor will be able to operate under completely dark or full sun conditions. Additionally, the new sensor apparatus is an improvement both in performance and cost over competing active-sensor technologies commercially available.
- As discussed above, the invention presented here will be advantageous in a number of commercial applications. For site-specific agricultural applications, the developed sensor would allow the producer to reduce the amount of nitrogen fertilizer applied to a crop or facilitate spoon-feeding the crop during the growing season, thus having the potential for lowering production costs and enhancing environmental quality. Also, by being able to determine the appropriate fertilizer needs of the crop at any given location in the field, the producer can apply only the fertilizer needed to prevent yield loss or degradation of product quality (i.e., protein content in wheat and barley or sugar content in sugar beets). Subsequently, decreased fertilizer rates will substantially lower nitrogen runoff and leaching losses, which will improve the health of our watersheds, waterways, lakes, and oceans. In addition, data produced by the sensor may be used to produce relative yield maps for forecasting crop production. As for turf grass applications, the sensor technology would allow turf managers to map changes occurring on turf landscapes or for monitoring the status of turf quality.
- In accordance with the present invention, structures and methods are provided for assessing plant status using the chlorophyll status changes and/or biomass properties of the plant remotely sensed, in the red-edge portion of the vegetative reflectance spectrum (˜650 nm to ˜800 nm), thereby allowing selective monitoring or treatment of individual plants.
- When incorporated into variable rate applicator and/or sprayers systems, the present invention significantly reduces the use of fertilizers by precisely applying agricultural products to individual plants to be treated or eliminated. Moreover, the present invention is operable under a wide variety of conditions including cloudy conditions, bright sunlight, artificial illumination, or even total darkness. The advantage to the producer is that field operations do not have to be timed to daytime sunlight hours for operation.
- All embodiments of the invention can be used in two primary ways. The first method of use includes the application of the invention to handheld instrumentation. Here the invention is utilized to measure plant canopies held in hand by a producer, turf manager, researcher, and the like. The invention includes the use of GPS for geo-referencing data collected by the invention. A second method of use includes applications where the sensor is mounted a moving object such as a tractor, mower, center pivot/linear irrigator, or the like. Again, data may be geo-referenced using GPS for mapping and data layer (GPS maps, soil maps, etc.) integration. Problem areas can be logged and reviewed later by the producer or land manager for analysis and site management decisions.
- An object of the invention is to provide a sensor for remotely sensing plant status using biophysical and biochemical properties of the plant thereby allowing selective monitoring, elimination, or treatment of individual plants.
- This and other objects of the invention will be made apparent to those skilled in the art upon a review of this specification, the associated drawings and the appended claims.
-
FIG. 1 is a graphical representation of the effect of nitrogen rate on the plant reflectance curve over the visible and near infrared portion of the spectrum. -
FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of plant reflectance curves over the visible and near infrared portion of the spectrum with the red-edge portion of the spectrum emphasized. -
FIG. 3 is a side and bottom view of a sensor of the present invention. -
FIG. 4 is a functional block diagram of a preferred embodiment of the present invention. -
FIG. 5 is a diagram of a circuit used to generate a light source of the present invention. -
FIG. 6 shows diagrammatically a sensor based mapping system of the present invention. -
FIG. 7 shows diagrammatically a sensor based variable-rate applicator system of the present invention. -
FIG. 8 illustrates preferred sensor-to-spray nozzle separation for compensating for plant canopy periodicity and random leaf orientation. - The following contains a description for a sensor that remotely measures plant canopy chlorophyll content independent of soil reflectance and ambient illumination levels. The sensor can be used in stand-alone instrumentation configurations or in a network of sensors mounted to a vehicle or moving apparatus for on-the-go remote sensing applications. The following description of the invention is meant to be illustrative and not limiting. Other embodiments will be obvious in view of this invention.
- The positive relationship between leaf greenness and crop nitrogen (N) status means it should be possible to determine crop N requirements based on reflectance data collected from the crop canopy (Walberg et al., 1982; Girardin et al., 1985; Hinzman et al., 1986; Dwyer et al., 1991) and leaves (McMurtrey et al., 1994), see
FIG. 2 . Plants with increased levels of N typically have more chlorophyll (Inada, 1965; Rodolfo and Peregrina, 1962; Al-Abbas et al., 1974; Wolfe et al., 1988) and greater rates of photosynthesis (Sinclair and Horie, 1989). Hence, plants that appear a darker green are perceived to be healthier than N deficient plants and as such healthier plants reflectance less light in the visible portion of the spectrum (400 to 700 nm) and reflect more light in the near infrared (>700 nm), seeFIG. 1 . Chlorophyll in leaves absorbs strongly in the blue 3 and red 4 regions of the spectrum (460 nm and 670 nm) and as the wavelengths increase past 670 nm the leaves begin to strongly reflect infrared light, seeFIG. 2 . The transition region between the photosynthetic portion 1 (400 nm to 670 nm) and the biomass portion 2 (>780 nm) of a plant's reflectance spectrum is sometimes referred to as the red-edge region 5. It has been reported in literature that the wavelength where the maxima of the derivative 6 for the red-edge band occurs is strongly correlated to changes in the chlorophyll status of a plant. Guyot and Baret (1988) developed an algebraic relationship expressing the wavelength of the red-edge inflection point (REIP) 6, sometimes referred to as the red edge position (REP), using four reflectance bands spanning from 670 nm to 780 nm. The usefulness of measuring red-edge reflectance spectra, and subsequently determining the inflection point's wavelength position, is that the chlorophyll status of the plant can be measured independently of soil background interference. That is, the chlorophyll status as denoted by shifts in the red-edge inflection point is independent of the slope of the vegetative reflectance curve and has reduced sensitivity to soil and biomass reflectance characteristics. Shifts in the value of the inflection point are directly related to the chlorophyll status (and water content) of the plant with chlorophyll content being closely related to nutrient status. Another useful red edge parameter is the red well position 7 (RWP). This is the point on the vegetation reflectance curve that represents the plants minimum reflectance, i.e., the wavelength of maximum chlorophyll absorption. This parameter, like the REEP, is also useful in determining changes in a plant's chlorophyll status. - There are two general embodiments of the invention that can be utilized to measure red-edge reflectance. In the first embodiment of this invention, discrete monochromatic emitters providing coincident light beams; the beams are substantially in the red-edge portion of the vegetative reflectance spectrum (650 nm to 880 nm) and are sequenced on and off with respect to each other. The light source may be composed most preferably from two or more emitter banks having different wavelengths. The light beams illuminate a surface area on the plant's canopy, which may include bare ground and desired plants. The reflected light signals are then detected by a single photodetector. In a second embodiment, a chromatic or polychromatic emitter (a light source made up of multiple monochromatic emitters pulsed on/off in synchrony) and a spectrally sensitive detector array (e.g. four photodiodes fitted with 10 nm bandwidth interference filters having center wavelengths of 670 nm, 700 nm, 740nm and 780 nm). As in the previous embodiment, the light beam illuminates a surface area on the plant's canopy, which may include bare ground and desired plants. Each embodiment utilizes a controller for analyzing reflectance signals measured by the instruments and, assuming a plant is detected, responds by activating a device to take some action with respect to the plant or stores the analyzed signal with corresponding DGPS position in the controller's memory for later analysis. A number of actions may be taken by the controller. If the plant is a crop that is determined to be lacking in nutrient, the desired action may be to apply fertilizer. Additionally, if the plant under test is a turf landscape, such as found on golf courses and sporting fields, plant chlorophyll and/or biomass may be mapped and geo-located using GPS for later, comparative analysis.
- In an improvement on the first embodiment of this invention, three or more light emitters (preferably four) provide selectively modulated monochromatic light beams of different wavelengths. The light beams would preferably have the emission wavelengths of along the red-edge portion of the plant's vegetative reflectance spectrum. The preferable wavelengths for the embodiment utilizing four monochromatic light sources include the following wavelengths: 670 nm, 700 nm 740 nm and 780 nm. For example, one could fabricate a light source composed of discrete LED light sources having wavelengths of 660 nm, 700 nm, 740 nm and 780 nm. It will be apparent to one skilled in the art that other wavelengths along the red edge may be utilized in place of the four aforementioned wavelengths and that similar results will be obtained. Each of these light sources would preferably have a spectral-line half-widths of less than 15 nm. Each monochromatic light source is modulated such that each of the beams illumination time is non-overlapping with the other light beams or partially overlapping as occurs when the beams are staggered by a slight phase shift or modulated at harmonic frequencies. These light beams illuminate a small surface area on the ground, which, again, may be bare ground, desired plants or undesired weeds. A single detector senses portions of the monochromatic light beams reflected by the surface area and provides a quantitative signal indicative of the chlorophyll content of the plant. The signal produced can be integrated into a controller and processed as in the previous embodiment in order to determine plant chlorophyll content.
- In both of the above embodiments, the red visible wave bands (660 nm to 680 nm) and the long wave near infrared bands (760 nm to 880 nm) may be utilized to calculate classic biomass vegetative indexes such as normalized difference vegetative index (NDVI), simple ratio index (SRI), etc... Additionally other unique vegetative indices, sensitive to chlorophyll can be formulated utilizing the wavebands along the red edge. For example, one could use a 730 nm LED and a 780 nm LED to illuminate the canopy in order to measure the a plant's chlorophyll content. The reflectance ratio of these two wavebands is proportional to the chlorophyll status of the plant. Albeit, this ratio may be somewhat sensitive to soil background interference, it will produce good data for canopies with LAI's greater than 2, that is, canopies that have more complete closure.
- Prior art cited in U.S. Pat. No. 3,910,701 teaches the use of multiple LED wavelengths for plant status determination. And the use of wavelength differentials (slopes) for comparative determination of plant status. This art, however, makes no distinction on the use the red-edge portion of a plant's reflectance spectrum for qualitative chlorophyll assessment. Prior art cited in U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,741 make no distinction with respect to chlorophyll content measurement but rather refer to changes in the slope of the vegetative reflectance spectrum as being indicative of the presence or absence of plant material as compared with soil background reflectivity. The resultant measurement made by the invention of '741 will be heavily influenced by soil background interference. Furthermore, this invention does not incorporate the spectral reflectances around the red-edge vegetative reflectance curve but rather detects slope changes as they deviate from the soil background line (but still heavily influenced by soil background interference); one slope calculated from 600 nm to 670 nm and the other from 670 nm to 780 nm. As such, one trained in the art will note that data produced by this method (U.S. Pat. No. 5,789,741) offers little benefit over biomass calculation methodologies via data produced by prior art referenced in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,296,702, 5,389,781, 5,585,626 and 6,596,996
- While each of the two embodiments previously discussed have different modes of operation, the fundamental electronic instrumentation required to realize the two devices share many common features and in many ways are essentially the same. A discussion electro-optic elements required to realize each of the embodiments follows.
-
FIG. 3 shows a diagram of the sensor enclosure. The enclosure facilitates the protection of the electronic circuitry while providing optical emission and reception ports for the light source and the light detector components, respectively, of the sensor.Port 30 inFIG. 3 is the emitter port of the sensor whileport 31 is the detector port of the sensor.Port 30 andport 31 can facilitate various types of optical components to concentrate and collect optical energy. The type of optics used by the sensor can include lens, mirrors, optical flats, filters, and diffusers. The type of optics selected for the emitter and detector optics depends on the application; that is, the required field of view, the height the sensor will be operated above the plant canopy, the required cost of the sensor all may play a part in the design of the sensor's optical arrangement. The sensor can operate at a distance of 1 foot and up to 10 s of feet from the plant canopy or surface of interest but is not limited to this specific range. To those skilled in the art it should be readily apparent that fore optics on the emission side and the detection side can take on many forms. - For example, a useful optically adaptation on the detector side of the optical arrangement would be to encapsulate the detector optics (filters and detectors). The outer optical surface would have a convex surface spaced from the plane of the photodiode so as to create an afocal or nearly afocal optical arrangement. This preferred mode of construction improves the optical energy collection performance of the filter/diode combination while sealing the optical path from dust and water vapor condensation.
- On the emission side of the sensor, there are a number of ways in which to shape and direct the light beam emitting from the sensor body. For instance, if one wishes to generate a line pattern from the sensors light source, preferably a bank of LEDs, one could place a cylindrical lens in front of this light source spaced appropriately so as to image a line of illumination in the field of view of the detection optics.
- Alternately, a circular or ellipsoidal area of irradiance can be produced using only the encapsulation optics of an array of LEDs. In this instance, the beam pattern produced by the source is defined by the spatial irradiance distribution of each individual LED. No additional collimation or focusing optics is incorporated. Encapsulated LEDs can be purchased commercially that have spatial distribution angles of 4 degrees to almost 180 degrees. Most preferably, it is best to collimate the light emitted form an LED in order to maintain a light beam with relatively constant irradiance over distance. In this case the LED or LED array would be spaced an appropriate distance from a convex lens (or concave mirror) to form an afocal or nearly afocal optical system. The resulting optical system will produce a light beam that will be collimated along the optical axis of the light source resulting in areas of illumination with high radiance.
-
FIG. 4 shows a system diagram typical for the many embodiments of the invention. The sensor is composed of optics to facilitate optical energy collimation and collection, a modulatedlight source 41 comprised of one or many banks of polychromatic LEDs and/or monochromatic LEDs with associated modulated driver andpower control electronics 42, single ormultichannel photodetector array 43, high-speed preamplifier(s) with ambientlight cancellation 44, a phasesensitive signal conditioning 45 anddata acquisition circuitry 46, and a microcontrol unit (MCU) or digital signal processor (DSP) 47 and an input/output interface 48 to communicate sensor data to an operator or controller. These system elements will be discussed in the following. - The light source for the invention is most preferably composed of light emitting diodes. LEDs are convenient light sources for this type of invention for a number of reasons. First, LEDs are available in a number of colors useful for making plant biomass and pigment measurements. LEDs are readily available in colors spanning from deep violet (395 nm) to mid infrared (>4 um). Second, LEDs are extremely easy to use and can be modulated to megahertz frequencies. Relatively simple electronic driver circuits can be implemented and easily controlled by sensor controller electronics. Last, LEDs have long lifetimes and are rugged. The typical LED will operate between 80,000 and 100,000 hours depending on the quiescent device power and operating temperature range.
- LEDs are crystalline materials composed of various transition elements and dopants that include gallium, arsenic, phosphorous, aluminum, nitrogen and indium. Common material chemistries for LEDs are Gallium Arsenide (GaAs), Gallium Arsenide Phosphide (GaAsP), Gallium Aluminum Arsenide (GaAlAs), Indium Gallium Nitride (InGaN). Gallium nitride (GaN), Indium Gallium Aluminum Phosphide (InGaAlP), and Gallium Phosphide (GaP). Material chemistries that include GaN and InGaN are typically utilized to produce LEDs that emit blue (400 nm) and green (570 nm) light. InGaAlP chemistries emit light in the green (560 nm) to red (680 nm) region of the spectrum while GaAs and GaAlAs emit light in the red (660 nm) to near infrared (950 nm) region of the spectrum. LEDs can be purchased in encapsulated packages or in die form. Encapsulated packages have the benefit of providing mechanical robustness while reducing Fresnel losses associated with a die/air interface.
- LEDs are noncoherent light sources and their emission characteristic classified as being mostly monochromatic or quasi-monochromatic, that is, the frequencies composing the light are strongly peaked about a certain frequency. The spectral characteristic of an LED is defined by an emission band having a center wavelength (CWL) and a spectral-line half-width. The center wavelength defines the peak emission wavelength of the LED and the spectral-line half-width defines the spectral bandwidth of the LED. Two other types of LED emitters can be classified as either having polychromatic or chromatic emission characteristics. Polychromatic LED's have a spectral signatures that are defined by having two or more distinct emission peaks. An example of an LED having this characteristic is the TLYH160 manufactured by Toshiba Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). This device emits simultaneously at 595 nm and 880 nm. Another example would include the True White LED manufacutred by American Opto Plus (Pomona, Calif.). This particular device is an RGB LED that produces white light from the simultaneous emission of three different LED structures (red, green and blue) on the same LED die. As noted above, LED's can also have chromatic emissions that produce a broad spectral emission signature. LED's of this type utilize a phosphor that is applied over an LED die and then encapsulated with a transparent epoxy resin. A blue light LED is utilized to stimulate the phosphor to emit a white or colored broadband light. The emitted light has a broad emission spectrum similar to that of fluorescent light. Both of the aforementioned LED types can be rapidly modulated to produce highly effective illumination signals for active light sensors.
- In order to achieve good output stability with respect to thermal and aging effects, the LED sources should be adequately driven and monitored. The output intensity of LEDs is very temperature dependent. Depending on the material type, an LEDs output can drift between 0.4 %/C and 1 %/C. A decrease in output intensity, even if it is being monitored and corrected via calculation, can result in diminished signal to noise performance of the measurement.
-
FIG. 5 shows schematically a circuit that provides active power control for the light source and an output intensity signal for monitoring and calibration.Control voltage 50 sets the output power oflight source 51.Photodiode 52, an Infineon SFH203 (Munich, Germany), samples part of the output intensity oflight source 51 and feeds this signal viaamplifier 53 toservo amplifier 54. Modulation of the output signal is performed usingtransistor 55. Furthermore, the output ofamplifier 53 can be utilized to monitor the light source intensity for purposes of calibration and diagnostics. The performance of this circuit has provided output intensity control of approximately 0.05%/C over the operating range of the invention. Many techniques have been discussed in literature detailing methods on maintaining and stabilizing light sources for photometric type measurements including the method presented here. As those skilled in the will note, there are numerous techniques and methodologies for light source power monitor/stabilization for photometric measurements discussed in engineering and scientific literature. - The detectors used in the invention are most preferably silicon photodiodes however other detector technologies such as GaAsP and the like, may be utilized as well. Silicon detectors have a typical photosensitivity spanning from 200 nm (blue enhanced) to 1200 nm. Band shaping of the detectors is performed using filtering materials such as colored filter glass, interference filters or dichroic filters. Combinations of the aforementioned filter techniques can be combined in order to band-shape the radiation impinging on the photodetector surface. For example, an interference filter can be used to select a narrow bandwidth of light. In this situation, one could choose to use a 10 nm interference filters to select a band of interest along the red-edge portion of the vegetative reflectance spectrum. Utilizing an array of photodetectors fitted with interference filters would provide the wavelength selection needed to realize the invention of embodiment two that utilizes a polychromatic source for illumination. In the case of embodiment one that uses only a single photodetector, the incorporation of an long pass edge filter can be utilized to trim the photodiode response by blocking short wave light and subsequently improving the ambient light rejection of the associated preamplifier electronics. As one trained in the art will see, there are numerous ways in which various optical filters can be utilized to shape and control the light impinging on a photodetector or photodetector array. A unique configuration petaining to embodiment two involves the use of linear diode array detector and diffraction grating (or linear variable filter (LVF) technology). The diffraction grating (or LVF) separates incoming, modulated light in to many wavelengths. By configuring embodiment one with a diffraction grating (or LVF)/linear array combination sensitive to the red edge region of the vegetative reflectance curve, plant chlorophyll concentrations can be measured independent of soil background interference.
- Referring once again to
FIG. 4 , both embodiments of the invention utilize a phase sensitive detector subsystem (PSD) 45 and analog-to-digital converter 46 (ADC) after each photodetector. The PSDs, sometimes referred to as lock-in amplifiers, are utilized by the invention to extract and further amplify the very small signals detected and amplified by the photodetector preamplifier(s). PSDs are often used in applications where the signal to be measured is very small in amplitude and buried in noise. Detection is carried out synchronously with modulation of the light sources. Phase sensitive detection is one of many types of band narrowing techniques that can be utilized to measure small signals. As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, other methods include the use of averaging techniques, discriminators and direct digital conversion/processing. With respect to direct digital conversion/processing, the phase sensitive acquisition component can be performed internally to a MCU or DSP by directly sampling the output of the photodiode amplifiers and performing the band pass and PSD functions digitally. By performing these operations in the digital domain, the temperature drift of the phase detector, common to analog techniques, can be eliminated. The invention performs the synchronous modulation/demodulation at a carrier frequency of 250 kHz. It should be noted that the operation of the invention is not limited to this particular modulation rate and can operate at other modulation frequencies as well with as much effectiveness. Additionally, this rate can be increased or decreased as dictated by the application. The MCU or DSP samples the output of aPSD 45 utilizingADC 46. The resolution of the ADC is most preferably 12 bits. Each channel can sampled using a dedicated ADC or one ADC can be utilized to sample all channels via a multiplexer. - Once the detected optical signals are amplified, demodulated and quantified, the MCU or
DSP 47 can calculate chlorophyll content and/or a vegetative relationship based on the reflectance values sensed. Calculations for plant chlorophyll status based multiple red-edge reflectance spectra can be performed a number ways. For the situation where the instrumentation has been designed to measure four or more reflectance values along the red edge, polynomial fitting may be used to fit the curve represented by the reflectance points. Subsequently, the resulting polynomial may be differentiated to find the red-edge inflection point value. The resulting wavelength will be proportional to relative shifts in the chlorophyll status of the plant. When four reflectance values are measured, the four reflectances having the center wavelengths of 670 nm, 700 nm, 740 nm and 780 nm, a preferred method is the four-point interpolation method. This method has the following mathematical for
Where λ1, λ2, λ3 and λ4 are wavelengths 670 nm, 700 nm, 740 nm and 780 nm, respectively, and ρ1, ρ2, ρ3 and ρ4 are reflectances at the corresponding wavelengths, respectively. Additionally, another red edge parameter, the red well position RWP, may be calculated using these same wavebands. The RWP interpolation has the followingmathematical form
The RWP represent the wavelength position of a plants minimum reflectance in the red, or rather the position of maximum chlorophyll absorption. The RWP functions in a similar fashion as the REIP for predicting relative changes in plan chlorophyll status. - Other mathematical techniques for determining the REIP and RWP include Lagrangian interpolation, inverted-Gaussian modeling, regression modeling, etc. . . . As will be apparent to one skilled in the art, the list of the aforementioned methods is not exhaustive and other common approaches to determining the REIP and RWP wavelength positions may be formulated or found in literature.
- In another useful red-edge sensor embodiment, a red polychromatic LED, such as the one utilized in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/703256, and a monochromatic LED, with an emission wavelength in the red edge portion of a plant's vegetation reflectance spectra (680 nm to 760 nm), are utilized in a sensor that can distinguish between both plant nutrient and water stresses via the Canopy Chlorophyll Content Index (CCCI). The sensor utilizes two particular vegetation indexes. They are a Normalized Difference Red-Edge (NDRE) index which has the following mathematical form:
and a standard Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) which has the form:
Where ρ1, ρ2 and ρ3 are reflectances at wavelengths 650 nm, 720 nm and 880 nm. The NDVI as an estimate of percent plant cover and the NDRE as an indicator of plant chlorophyll content. The CCCI formula utilizes both the NDVI and NDRE indexes to calculate the impact of water and nutrient on a crop or plant. The benefits of utilizing the polychromatic and monchromatic LED combination are many. First, the use of the polychromatic LED reduces the number of LED banks from three to two. Second, because the number of LED banks have been reduced, the number of LEDs in a particular bank can be increased which subsequently enhancing the sensor' signal-to-noise performance. Third, because there are fewer banks to modulate, the modulation rate can be higher for the LED banks that are incorporated and subsequently enhancing the sensor's signal-to-noise performance. Last, easier temperature control and compensation can be performed with fewer LED banks. - Data calculated by the sensor's processing component is communicated to an operator or system controller via input/
output interface 48. In the case of a handheld instrument, the I/O interface may take the form of a keypad and display. If the invention is incorporated into a sprayer or mapping system having several sensors networked together, the I/O interface will most preferably be a networkable serial port such a as RS485 port or CAN 2.0b port. -
FIG. 6 show a block diagram of the invention incorporated into a system that is used to map plant status. Elements of the system includesensor array 60,sensor controller 61, andGPS 62. - The role of the sensor in this system is to measure the chlorophyll status and/or biomass properties of the plant being mapped. Data produced by the sensor are collected by the system controller for storage and later analysis. Each sensor point is geo-referenced using the GPS connected the system controller. There are two primary ways in which mapping can be performed the system. First, the map collected by the system can be all-inclusive, that is, every data point measured by the sensor can be stored away in the controller's memory for later retrieval and analysis. Second, the sensor/controller can be programmed with a defined set of rules so as to distinguish poor performing regions of a landscape from good or healthy regions and vice versa and store only the poor performing regions. This mode of operation saves storage space in the controller and reduces the amount of data processing that has to be performed. As an example, the mapping systems could be mounted to the mower machinery for a golf course. When the course personnel perform their weekly mowing operations, the mapping systems would scout for problem areas of the turf. For turf management operations, this mode would be most useful because regions of turf that are suffering from stress (disease, water, nutrient, and so forth) or are beginning to suffer. The mapping systems would flag affected areas for the turf manager to scout out visually.
-
FIG. 7 show a block diagram of the invention incorporated into a system that is used for applying an agricultural product. Elements of the system includesensor array 70,sensor controller 71,GPS 72,fertilizer controller 73, sprayer pumps/actuators 74 andground speed sensor 75. - The agricultural product may be either in liquid or solid form and may be, but not limited to, a nutrient, mineral, herbicide or fungicide or a combination of the aforementioned materials. The variable rate control system can be mounted to a commercial sprayer or tractor mounted sprayer system. GPS can be incorporated in the system when a map is required of plant canopy characteristics for later analysis. In addition, to mapping plant characteristics, material dispensation rates can be mapped as well. GPS is also required when applying fertilizer referenced to an N sufficient reference strip. In this situation, a region of the field is given an N-rate that totally meets the needs of the crop to grow without loss of yield and apply a lower amount of pre-emergent fertilizer (only the amount to initially cause the crop to grow) to the remainder of the field. At a time later in the growing season, the producer will apply a second treatment to the remainder of the field using the sensor readings for the N sufficient region of the field. Readings from the N insufficient parts of the field will be compared with readings from the N sufficient regions of the field. The controller will use the sensor measurements to calculate the appropriate rate of fertilizer to apply to the N insufficient portion of the field in order to prevent yield loss.
FIG. 8 shows an applicator example with the sensor stood-off from the spray nozzles. When designing variable rate application system, the obvious approach is to physically locate the sensor close or next to the sprayer nozzle. However, because of the random orientation of most plant canopies the sensor should be separated from the sprayer nozzles by a distance D 80. This allows the sensing instrument to collect data on a portion of the crop, so as to average the spatial variability, before applying an agricultural product. The separation distance D between the sensor and sprayer nozzles should most preferably be greater than 3 feet. In operation, the variable rate system will collect data for D feet and apply an agricultural product over D feet while sensing the next D separation distance. Another strength of a red-edge measurement sensor, as disclosed above, is that the measurement made by the instrument is relatively invariant with respect to varying plant population. This is critical for making N fertilizer recommendations on fields that have had crops planted utilizing variable rate seeding techniques. With a biomass sensor, a seed rate map would have to be utilized in conjunction with the variable rate application algorithm in order to compensate for changes in plant biomass resulting from the seeding operation. - The benefits of a system such as the one just described are both economic and environmental. By using less fertilizer and only applying it where the crop needs it, the producer can lower his use of fertilizer and thus lower his production cost. Additionally, by using less fertilizer and only applying it where the crop needs it, reduced run-off and leaching into our watershed occurs. Because the present invention produces its own source of light, the measurements that it makes is not influenced by ambient light conditions. Applicator equipment fitted with sensors of this type can be operated around the clock at night and under full sun.
- Although only a few exemplary embodiments of this invention have been described in detail above, those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible in the embodiments given without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of this invention. Accordingly, various modifications, adaptations, and combinations or various features of the described embodiments can be practiced without departing from the scope of the invention as set forth in the claims.
Claims (7)
1. Apparatus for assessing the status of plants in a plant canopy, comprising:
(a) a light source having an emission spectrum substantially in the red-edge portion of the plant's reflectance spectrum for illuminating the plant canopy;
(b) a detector for detecting portions of the emission spectrum reflected off of the plant canopy; and
(c) a processor for determining the wavelength of the red edge inflection point of the light collected by the detector.
2. Apparatus as defined in claim 1 , further comprising a processor for determining the chlorophyll content of the plant from the red edge inflection point.
3. Apparatus as defined in claim 1 , wherein the light source consists of a plurality of monochromatic light sources.
4. Apparatus as defined in claim 1 , wherein the light source consists of one or more polychromatic light sources.
5. Apparatus as defined in claim 1 , further comprising a mapping system for generating a map of the assessed plant status over a selected area.
6. Apparatus as defined in claim 1 , further comprising an applicator responsive to the processor to apply a horticultural material to the plant canopy in response to the assessed plant status.
7. Apparatus as defined in claim 6 , wherein the horticultural material is selected from the group consisting of fertilizer, herbicide, insecticide, fungicide, and combinations of such materials.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/365,110 US20060208171A1 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2006-03-01 | Light sensor with modulated radiant polychromatic source |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/703,256 US7408145B2 (en) | 2003-09-23 | 2003-11-07 | Light sensing instrument with modulated polychromatic source |
US11/365,110 US20060208171A1 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2006-03-01 | Light sensor with modulated radiant polychromatic source |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/703,256 Continuation-In-Part US7408145B2 (en) | 2003-09-23 | 2003-11-07 | Light sensing instrument with modulated polychromatic source |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060208171A1 true US20060208171A1 (en) | 2006-09-21 |
Family
ID=34551854
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/703,256 Active 2024-10-04 US7408145B2 (en) | 2003-09-23 | 2003-11-07 | Light sensing instrument with modulated polychromatic source |
US11/365,110 Abandoned US20060208171A1 (en) | 2003-11-07 | 2006-03-01 | Light sensor with modulated radiant polychromatic source |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/703,256 Active 2024-10-04 US7408145B2 (en) | 2003-09-23 | 2003-11-07 | Light sensing instrument with modulated polychromatic source |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7408145B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2487115A1 (en) |
Cited By (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060244962A1 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2006-11-02 | Bio-Chek Llc | Pesticide Detector and Method |
US20090101802A1 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2009-04-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Detection circuit for detecting movements of a movable object |
US20090101803A1 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2009-04-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Detection circuit for detecting movements of a movable object |
WO2010085736A1 (en) | 2009-01-23 | 2010-07-29 | University Of Maryland Baltimore County | Chlorophyll and turbidity sensor system |
US20100324830A1 (en) * | 2009-06-22 | 2010-12-23 | Solie John B | Handheld optical sensor for measuring the normalized difference vegetative index in plants |
WO2011015598A1 (en) | 2009-08-05 | 2011-02-10 | Georg Fritzmeier Gmbh & Co. Kg | Measuring device for determining a vegetation index value of plants |
CN101975764A (en) * | 2010-09-29 | 2011-02-16 | 中国农业大学 | Near infrared spectrum technology-based multiband soil nitrogen detection device and method |
WO2012104187A1 (en) | 2011-02-04 | 2012-08-09 | Georg Fritzmeier Gmbh & Co. Kg | Measurement device for determining a vegetation index value |
CN103837482A (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2014-06-04 | 四川农业大学 | Measurement device for measuring spectroscopic data of intercropping soybean canopy |
CN103913425A (en) * | 2014-04-17 | 2014-07-09 | 河南农业大学 | Method for predicting content of winter wheat grain protein based on coupling of spectral indexes and climatic factors, and method for establishing prediction model |
WO2016186523A1 (en) * | 2015-05-21 | 2016-11-24 | C-Dax Limited | Plant matter sensor |
CN106872383A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2017-06-20 | 南京农业大学 | A kind of paddy rice Reflectance position extracting method based on continuous wavelet analysis |
US20180188160A1 (en) * | 2015-07-10 | 2018-07-05 | Sony Corporation | Inspection apparatus, inspection method, and program |
CN108489906A (en) * | 2018-03-29 | 2018-09-04 | 河北省科学院地理科学研究所 | A kind of crop growing state multiple-angle thinking spectral detection device and its application method |
US11002670B2 (en) * | 2016-01-29 | 2021-05-11 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Device for observing water content, method for observing water content, and cultivation device |
SE2150678A1 (en) * | 2021-05-28 | 2022-11-29 | Husqvarna Ab | Optical vegetation sensor unit |
EP4163621A1 (en) | 2021-10-11 | 2023-04-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Optical vegetation index monitoring |
Families Citing this family (128)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7235766B2 (en) * | 2003-04-23 | 2007-06-26 | Sensor Electronic Technology, Incorporated | Electromagnetic radiation generation based on an object characteristic |
GB0404982D0 (en) * | 2004-03-05 | 2004-04-07 | Smart Light Devices Ireland Lt | Fluorometer |
US7157712B2 (en) * | 2004-09-29 | 2007-01-02 | Axsun Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for noise control in semiconductor spectroscopy system |
US7391512B2 (en) * | 2004-12-22 | 2008-06-24 | Avago Technologies General Ip Pte. Ltd. | Integrated optoelectronic system for measuring fluorescence or luminescence emission decay |
CN100462712C (en) * | 2005-08-03 | 2009-02-18 | 北京农业信息技术研究中心 | Non-destructive detecting method and detecting instrument for portable plant nitrogen and water content |
DE102005050302B4 (en) | 2005-10-17 | 2007-07-26 | Yara International Asa | Method and device for non-contact determination of the current nutritional status of a crop and for processing this information on fertilizer recommendations |
EP1952124A4 (en) * | 2005-11-21 | 2011-03-16 | Oregon State | Portable meter to measure chlorophyll, nitrogen and water and methods |
JP2008050348A (en) * | 2006-07-27 | 2008-03-06 | Fujitsu Ltd | Plant epidemic prevention agent, method for plant epidemic prevention and plant epidemic prevention system, plant and method for cultivating plant |
ATE551597T1 (en) * | 2006-08-01 | 2012-04-15 | Photonic Detection Systems Pty Ltd | OPTICAL PERCEPTION SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DIFFERENTIATION OF PLANTS |
DE102006042412B4 (en) * | 2006-09-06 | 2009-01-02 | Yara International Asa | A method for the non-contact determination of biophysical parameters of dew-wetted plant populations |
US7848865B2 (en) * | 2007-02-09 | 2010-12-07 | Tsd Integrated Controls, Llc | Method and system for applying materials to crops |
DE102007010879B4 (en) * | 2007-03-06 | 2009-04-23 | Institut für Gemüse & Zierpflanzenbau e.V. | Sensor and method for determining the oxygen supply in the root |
US8135178B2 (en) * | 2007-04-10 | 2012-03-13 | Deere & Company | Process for normalizing images or other data layers |
FR2916850B1 (en) * | 2007-06-01 | 2013-02-01 | Force A | PLANT VEGETABLE ANALYSIS APPARATUS, METHOD FOR MONITORING OR CARTOGRAPHY OF CONDITION OR EVOLUTION OF CULTURE, AND METHOD FOR MANAGING PLANT TREATMENT |
FR2920049B1 (en) * | 2007-08-13 | 2009-11-20 | Force A | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE RATIO OF THE CHLOROPHYLL CONTENT AND A CHROMOPHORE COMPOUND OF A PLANT TISSUE WITHOUT MEASURING INDEPENDENTLY THESE CONTENT |
FI20075622A0 (en) * | 2007-09-07 | 2007-09-07 | Valtion Teknillinen | Spectrometer and method for measuring a moving sample |
BRPI0818924B1 (en) * | 2007-11-02 | 2020-04-14 | Ceres Inc | method of formulating a nir model |
EP2214476B1 (en) | 2007-11-29 | 2018-05-02 | Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited | Apparatus for applying a pesticide to perennial crops |
CN101187657B (en) * | 2007-11-30 | 2011-04-20 | 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所 | Method for determining crop living body biomass variation |
CN101187658B (en) * | 2007-11-30 | 2011-06-15 | 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所 | Device for determining crop living body biomass variation |
GB2458951B (en) * | 2008-04-04 | 2012-09-19 | Environet Uk Ltd | Soil processing method and apparatus |
GB2473787A (en) * | 2008-08-07 | 2011-03-23 | Agilent Technologies Inc | Multi-wavelength light source |
JP5522913B2 (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2014-06-18 | 株式会社トプコン | Plant sensor device |
BRPI0805608B1 (en) * | 2008-12-15 | 2018-11-21 | Embrapa Pesquisa Agropecuaria | method, equipment and system for the diagnosis of stresses and diseases in higher plants |
US20100163759A1 (en) * | 2008-12-31 | 2010-07-01 | Stmicroelectronics S.R.L. | Radiation sensor with photodiodes being integrated on a semiconductor substrate and corresponding integration process |
WO2010099203A1 (en) * | 2009-02-24 | 2010-09-02 | Board Of Regents Of The University Of Nebraska | Methods and device for non-destructive measurement of relative water content in plants |
US8437879B2 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2013-05-07 | Deere & Company | System and method for providing prescribed resources to plants |
US8150554B2 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2012-04-03 | Deere & Company | Resource use management in yards and gardens |
US8321365B2 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2012-11-27 | Deere & Company | Horticultural knowledge base for managing yards and gardens |
US8028470B2 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2011-10-04 | Deere & Company | Robotic watering unit |
US9538714B2 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2017-01-10 | Deere & Company | Managing resource prescriptions of botanical plants |
US8247774B2 (en) * | 2009-04-29 | 2012-08-21 | Tyntek Corporation | Output ratio adjusting method for optic sensor |
US20110047088A1 (en) * | 2009-07-22 | 2011-02-24 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Method and System For Documenting And Validating Carbon Credits Associated With Crop Production |
CN102072882B (en) * | 2010-04-16 | 2013-07-24 | 姚孝明 | Method for quantitatively analyzing plant nutrient content index based on leaf image characteristics |
CN101839979B (en) * | 2010-04-22 | 2012-07-25 | 中国农业大学 | Method and device for measuring index number of canopy vegetation of crops |
AU2011256115B2 (en) * | 2010-05-18 | 2015-10-29 | Photonic Detection Systems Pty Ltd | A device for selecting specific matter |
US9117140B2 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2015-08-25 | Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas | System and method of in-season nitrogen measurement and fertilization of non-leguminous crops from digital image analysis |
US8391565B2 (en) | 2010-05-24 | 2013-03-05 | Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas | System and method of determining nitrogen levels from a digital image |
US20110299085A1 (en) * | 2010-06-04 | 2011-12-08 | Solum, Inc. | Rapid Tissue Analysis Technique |
US8321061B2 (en) | 2010-06-17 | 2012-11-27 | Deere & Company | System and method for irrigation using atmospheric water |
DE102010034603B4 (en) * | 2010-08-13 | 2013-01-31 | Franke Gmbh | Sensor system and method for determining an optical property of a plant |
US9357759B2 (en) | 2010-08-20 | 2016-06-07 | Deere & Company | Networked chemical dispersion system |
US8504234B2 (en) | 2010-08-20 | 2013-08-06 | Deere & Company | Robotic pesticide application |
US9076105B2 (en) | 2010-08-20 | 2015-07-07 | Deere & Company | Automated plant problem resolution |
CN101986139B (en) * | 2010-08-25 | 2012-06-20 | 浙江大学 | Method for inverting vegetation parameters by remote sensing based on reflection spectrum wavelet transform |
LT5858B (en) | 2010-10-20 | 2012-08-27 | Uab "Žemdirbių Konsultacijos" | Method and device for diagnosing of plant growing conditions |
JP5718153B2 (en) * | 2011-05-26 | 2015-05-13 | 株式会社トプコン | Plant sensor device |
US8564770B1 (en) | 2011-06-01 | 2013-10-22 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | System for in-situ detection of plant exposure to trichloroethylene (TCE) |
CN102565061B (en) * | 2012-01-16 | 2014-03-12 | 沈阳农业大学 | Crop biomass nondestructive testing image acquisition and processing device and testing method |
US8902413B2 (en) * | 2012-02-21 | 2014-12-02 | Trimble Navigation Limited | Cell phone NDVI sensor |
US9030549B2 (en) | 2012-03-07 | 2015-05-12 | Blue River Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for automated plant necrosis |
US9297749B2 (en) * | 2012-03-27 | 2016-03-29 | Innovative Science Tools, Inc. | Optical analyzer for identification of materials using transmission spectroscopy |
GB2501121B (en) | 2012-04-13 | 2018-05-23 | Mitchell David | Liquid delivery apparatus |
US9416959B2 (en) | 2012-05-17 | 2016-08-16 | Donald Spinner | Illuminated golf |
US20130308675A1 (en) * | 2012-05-18 | 2013-11-21 | Smartfield, Inc. | Optimum plant canopy temperature |
TWI684031B (en) * | 2012-07-16 | 2020-02-01 | 美商唯亞威方案公司 | Optical filter and sensor system |
US8754829B2 (en) * | 2012-08-04 | 2014-06-17 | Paul Lapstun | Scanning light field camera and display |
KR20140030775A (en) * | 2012-09-03 | 2014-03-12 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Apparatus and method for diagnosing non-destructive crop growth using terahertz wave |
US9451745B1 (en) * | 2012-09-21 | 2016-09-27 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Multi-band photodiode sensor |
US9717171B2 (en) | 2013-03-07 | 2017-08-01 | Blue River Technology Inc. | System and method for automated odometry calibration for precision agriculture systems |
US10327393B2 (en) | 2013-03-07 | 2019-06-25 | Blue River Technology Inc. | Modular precision agriculture system |
US20150027041A1 (en) | 2013-03-07 | 2015-01-29 | Blue River Technology, Inc. | System and method for plant cauterization |
US9147110B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2015-09-29 | Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. | Field and crop evaluation tool and methods of use |
US9866768B1 (en) * | 2013-04-29 | 2018-01-09 | The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture | Computer vision qualified infrared temperature sensor |
US20140346319A1 (en) * | 2013-05-21 | 2014-11-27 | Kyle H. Holland | Variable rate chemical management for agricultural landscapes using multiform growth response function |
EP3032946B1 (en) | 2013-07-11 | 2022-10-05 | Blue River Technology Inc. | Method for automatic phenotype measurement and selection |
EP2887053A1 (en) | 2013-12-18 | 2015-06-24 | Basf Se | Determination of a fungal infection of a plant by chlorophyll fluorescence induced by different excitation wavelengths |
US10785905B2 (en) | 2014-05-08 | 2020-09-29 | Precision Planting Llc | Liquid application apparatus comprising a seed firmer |
WO2015193822A1 (en) | 2014-06-17 | 2015-12-23 | Casella Macchine Agricole S.R.L. | Method and device for measuring vegetation cover on farmland |
JP2016003992A (en) * | 2014-06-18 | 2016-01-12 | 株式会社ミツトヨ | Image measurement device and image measurement method |
WO2016144795A1 (en) | 2015-03-06 | 2016-09-15 | Blue River Technology Inc. | Modular precision agriculture system |
JP6473664B2 (en) * | 2015-06-02 | 2019-02-20 | 株式会社トプコン | Wavelength sensor device for plants |
US10473580B2 (en) | 2016-01-14 | 2019-11-12 | Ramot At Tel-Aviv University Ltd. | Portable soil spectral probe |
US11209358B2 (en) | 2016-03-14 | 2021-12-28 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Blocking specular reflections |
US20170261427A1 (en) * | 2016-03-14 | 2017-09-14 | Analog Devices, Inc. | Optical measurements of chemical content |
US20170311553A1 (en) | 2016-05-02 | 2017-11-02 | Sensor Electronic Technology, Inc. | Ultraviolet Plant Illumination System |
CA3047779A1 (en) | 2016-12-19 | 2018-06-28 | The Climate Corporation | Systems, methods and apparatus for soil and seed monitoring |
CA3048310C (en) * | 2016-12-27 | 2022-05-10 | Yara International Asa | System and method for determining a plant status |
RU175411U1 (en) * | 2017-01-19 | 2017-12-04 | Федеральное государственное казенное военное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Военная академия материально-технического обеспечения имени генерала армии А.В. Хрулёва" Министерства обороны Российской Федерации | ELECTRONIC PHOTOMETER |
US11204508B2 (en) | 2017-01-19 | 2021-12-21 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Multiple band multiple polarizer optical device |
US20180209895A1 (en) * | 2017-01-20 | 2018-07-26 | Mark A. Carter | Chemical application detection system |
CN106645159A (en) * | 2017-03-22 | 2017-05-10 | 西南大学 | Trunk laser detector |
CN107314890B (en) * | 2017-08-08 | 2023-07-07 | 成都优博创通信技术股份有限公司 | Beam collimation detection assembly and detection method |
RU179117U1 (en) * | 2017-08-21 | 2018-04-26 | Федеральное государственное казенное военное образовательное учреждение высшего образования "Военная академия материально-технического обеспечения имени генерала армии А.В. Хрулёва" Министерства обороны Российской Федерации | DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE BRIGHTNESS OF SURFACES OF FOOD PRODUCTS, MATERIALS AND PRODUCTS |
JP7009126B2 (en) * | 2017-09-07 | 2022-01-25 | 株式会社トプコン | measuring device |
CN107976921B (en) * | 2017-11-01 | 2019-08-02 | 中国农业大学 | A kind of fertilizer apparatus and method |
US20190162885A1 (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2019-05-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Optical bandpass filter design |
US10591352B2 (en) * | 2018-01-10 | 2020-03-17 | X Development Llc | Sensor and system for plant canopy measurement |
CN108444935B (en) * | 2018-03-21 | 2023-10-10 | 南京信息工程大学 | Temperature compensation method and compensation device for non-spectroscopic infrared gas sensor |
JP7105150B2 (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2022-07-22 | 浜松ホトニクス株式会社 | Non-contact spectroscopic measurement device and non-contact spectroscopic measurement method |
US10789467B1 (en) | 2018-05-30 | 2020-09-29 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Polarization-based disturbed earth identification |
US10921189B2 (en) * | 2018-08-23 | 2021-02-16 | Trimble Inc. | Detecting the presence of plants on the ground |
US10656133B2 (en) * | 2018-10-19 | 2020-05-19 | Trimble Inc. | Controlling plant detection systems using phase delay analysis |
US11344022B2 (en) * | 2018-10-21 | 2022-05-31 | Global Neighbor, Inc. | Fast plant eradication using aimed unnatural low energy dual component indigo region and medium wavelength |
US11240961B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2022-02-08 | Deere & Company | Controlling a harvesting machine based on a geo-spatial representation indicating where the harvesting machine is likely to reach capacity |
US11672203B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2023-06-13 | Deere & Company | Predictive map generation and control |
US11641800B2 (en) | 2020-02-06 | 2023-05-09 | Deere & Company | Agricultural harvesting machine with pre-emergence weed detection and mitigation system |
US11178818B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2021-11-23 | Deere & Company | Harvesting machine control system with fill level processing based on yield data |
US11079725B2 (en) | 2019-04-10 | 2021-08-03 | Deere & Company | Machine control using real-time model |
US11467605B2 (en) | 2019-04-10 | 2022-10-11 | Deere & Company | Zonal machine control |
US11653588B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2023-05-23 | Deere & Company | Yield map generation and control system |
US11589509B2 (en) | 2018-10-26 | 2023-02-28 | Deere & Company | Predictive machine characteristic map generation and control system |
US10775299B2 (en) * | 2019-01-08 | 2020-09-15 | Trimble Inc. | Optical tuning for plant detection |
BR102019000530B1 (en) * | 2019-01-10 | 2020-01-07 | Eirene Projetos E Consultoria Ltda | DEVICE WITH A VISION AND IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM INSTALLED IN AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT |
US11234366B2 (en) | 2019-04-10 | 2022-02-01 | Deere & Company | Image selection for machine control |
US11778945B2 (en) | 2019-04-10 | 2023-10-10 | Deere & Company | Machine control using real-time model |
CA3157203A1 (en) * | 2019-10-07 | 2021-04-15 | Innopix, Inc. | Spectral imaging and analysis for remote and noninvasive detection of plant responses to herbicide treatments |
US11477940B2 (en) | 2020-03-26 | 2022-10-25 | Deere & Company | Mobile work machine control based on zone parameter modification |
US11871697B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-01-16 | Deere & Company | Crop moisture map generation and control system |
US11874669B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-01-16 | Deere & Company | Map generation and control system |
US11474523B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2022-10-18 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive speed map |
US11889788B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-02-06 | Deere & Company | Predictive biomass map generation and control |
US11927459B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-03-12 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11849672B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-12-26 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11844311B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-12-19 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11727680B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-08-15 | Deere & Company | Predictive map generation based on seeding characteristics and control |
US11711995B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-08-01 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11592822B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-02-28 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11895948B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-02-13 | Deere & Company | Predictive map generation and control based on soil properties |
US11825768B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-11-28 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11650587B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-05-16 | Deere & Company | Predictive power map generation and control system |
US11845449B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-12-19 | Deere & Company | Map generation and control system |
US11849671B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-12-26 | Deere & Company | Crop state map generation and control system |
US11675354B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-06-13 | Deere & Company | Machine control using a predictive map |
US11635765B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2023-04-25 | Deere & Company | Crop state map generation and control system |
US11889787B2 (en) | 2020-10-09 | 2024-02-06 | Deere & Company | Predictive speed map generation and control system |
US11917272B2 (en) | 2020-10-28 | 2024-02-27 | Semiconductor Components Industries, Llc | Imaging systems for multi-spectral imaging |
CN114047139A (en) * | 2021-11-10 | 2022-02-15 | 四川省农业科学院园艺研究所 | Standard curve color card for representing different nitrogen concentrations of leaves and preparation method and application thereof |
Citations (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3443072A (en) * | 1964-12-10 | 1969-05-06 | Abex Corp | Object identification systems |
US3910701A (en) * | 1973-07-30 | 1975-10-07 | George R Henderson | Method and apparatus for measuring light reflectance absorption and or transmission |
US4055768A (en) * | 1976-09-07 | 1977-10-25 | Bromberg Nathan S | Light measuring apparatus |
US4369886A (en) * | 1979-10-09 | 1983-01-25 | Ag-Electron, Inc. | Reflectance ratio sorting apparatus |
US4518253A (en) * | 1980-03-19 | 1985-05-21 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Distance measurement system |
US4628454A (en) * | 1982-07-13 | 1986-12-09 | Kubota, Ltd. | Automatic running work vehicle |
US4926170A (en) * | 1986-02-19 | 1990-05-15 | Auto-Sense, Ltd. | Object detection method and apparatus employing electro-optics |
US5025150A (en) * | 1988-10-14 | 1991-06-18 | Mk-Ferguson Company | Site survey method and apparatus |
US5144767A (en) * | 1988-06-22 | 1992-09-08 | The Minister For Agriculture & Rural Affairs For The State Of New South Wales | Controller for agricultural sprays |
US5296702A (en) * | 1992-07-28 | 1994-03-22 | Patchen California | Structure and method for differentiating one object from another object |
US5585626A (en) * | 1992-07-28 | 1996-12-17 | Patchen, Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining a distance to an object in a field for the controlled release of chemicals on plants, weeds, trees or soil and/or guidance of farm vehicles |
US5763873A (en) * | 1996-08-28 | 1998-06-09 | Patchen, Inc. | Photodetector circuit for an electronic sprayer |
US5789741A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1998-08-04 | Patchen, Inc. | Detecting plants in a field by detecting a change in slope in a reflectance characteristic |
US5809440A (en) * | 1997-02-27 | 1998-09-15 | Patchen, Inc. | Agricultural implement having multiple agents for mapping fields |
US5833144A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1998-11-10 | Patchen, Inc. | High speed solenoid valve cartridge for spraying an agricultural liquid in a field |
US6393927B1 (en) * | 1995-03-24 | 2002-05-28 | Li-Cor, Inc. | Method and apparatus for real-time determination and application of nitrogen fertilizer using rapid, non-destructive crop canopy measurements |
US6596996B1 (en) * | 2001-07-24 | 2003-07-22 | The Board Of Regents For Oklahoma State University | Optical spectral reflectance sensor and controller |
US7112806B2 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2006-09-26 | Robert Lussier | Bio-imaging and information system for scanning, detecting, diagnosing and optimizing plant health |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4986665A (en) * | 1987-08-06 | 1991-01-22 | Minolta Camera Kabushiki Kaisha | Optical density detector |
US6160902A (en) * | 1997-10-10 | 2000-12-12 | Case Corporation | Method for monitoring nitrogen status using a multi-spectral imaging system |
US7049597B2 (en) * | 2001-12-21 | 2006-05-23 | Andrew Bodkin | Multi-mode optical imager |
-
2003
- 2003-11-07 US US10/703,256 patent/US7408145B2/en active Active
-
2004
- 2004-11-08 CA CA002487115A patent/CA2487115A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2006
- 2006-03-01 US US11/365,110 patent/US20060208171A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3443072A (en) * | 1964-12-10 | 1969-05-06 | Abex Corp | Object identification systems |
US3910701A (en) * | 1973-07-30 | 1975-10-07 | George R Henderson | Method and apparatus for measuring light reflectance absorption and or transmission |
US4055768A (en) * | 1976-09-07 | 1977-10-25 | Bromberg Nathan S | Light measuring apparatus |
US4369886A (en) * | 1979-10-09 | 1983-01-25 | Ag-Electron, Inc. | Reflectance ratio sorting apparatus |
US4518253A (en) * | 1980-03-19 | 1985-05-21 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Distance measurement system |
US4628454A (en) * | 1982-07-13 | 1986-12-09 | Kubota, Ltd. | Automatic running work vehicle |
US4926170A (en) * | 1986-02-19 | 1990-05-15 | Auto-Sense, Ltd. | Object detection method and apparatus employing electro-optics |
US5144767A (en) * | 1988-06-22 | 1992-09-08 | The Minister For Agriculture & Rural Affairs For The State Of New South Wales | Controller for agricultural sprays |
US5025150A (en) * | 1988-10-14 | 1991-06-18 | Mk-Ferguson Company | Site survey method and apparatus |
US5389781A (en) * | 1992-07-28 | 1995-02-14 | Patchen California | Structure and method usable for differentiating a plant from soil in a field |
US5296702A (en) * | 1992-07-28 | 1994-03-22 | Patchen California | Structure and method for differentiating one object from another object |
US5585626A (en) * | 1992-07-28 | 1996-12-17 | Patchen, Inc. | Apparatus and method for determining a distance to an object in a field for the controlled release of chemicals on plants, weeds, trees or soil and/or guidance of farm vehicles |
US5837997A (en) * | 1992-07-28 | 1998-11-17 | Patchen, Inc. | Structure and method for detecting plants in a field using a light pipe |
US6393927B1 (en) * | 1995-03-24 | 2002-05-28 | Li-Cor, Inc. | Method and apparatus for real-time determination and application of nitrogen fertilizer using rapid, non-destructive crop canopy measurements |
US5833144A (en) * | 1996-06-17 | 1998-11-10 | Patchen, Inc. | High speed solenoid valve cartridge for spraying an agricultural liquid in a field |
US5763873A (en) * | 1996-08-28 | 1998-06-09 | Patchen, Inc. | Photodetector circuit for an electronic sprayer |
US5789741A (en) * | 1996-10-31 | 1998-08-04 | Patchen, Inc. | Detecting plants in a field by detecting a change in slope in a reflectance characteristic |
US5809440A (en) * | 1997-02-27 | 1998-09-15 | Patchen, Inc. | Agricultural implement having multiple agents for mapping fields |
US6596996B1 (en) * | 2001-07-24 | 2003-07-22 | The Board Of Regents For Oklahoma State University | Optical spectral reflectance sensor and controller |
US7112806B2 (en) * | 2001-09-27 | 2006-09-26 | Robert Lussier | Bio-imaging and information system for scanning, detecting, diagnosing and optimizing plant health |
Cited By (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7304741B2 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2007-12-04 | Bio-Chek Llc | Pesticide detector and method |
US20060244962A1 (en) * | 2005-02-18 | 2006-11-02 | Bio-Chek Llc | Pesticide Detector and Method |
US20090101802A1 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2009-04-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Detection circuit for detecting movements of a movable object |
US20090101803A1 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2009-04-23 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Detection circuit for detecting movements of a movable object |
US8654319B2 (en) | 2009-01-23 | 2014-02-18 | University Of Maryland, Baltimore County | Chlorophyll and turbidity sensor system |
WO2010085736A1 (en) | 2009-01-23 | 2010-07-29 | University Of Maryland Baltimore County | Chlorophyll and turbidity sensor system |
US20100324830A1 (en) * | 2009-06-22 | 2010-12-23 | Solie John B | Handheld optical sensor for measuring the normalized difference vegetative index in plants |
WO2010151535A1 (en) * | 2009-06-22 | 2010-12-29 | The Board Of Regents For Oklahoma State University | Handheld optical sensor for measuring the normalized difference vegetative index in plants |
US8823945B2 (en) | 2009-08-05 | 2014-09-02 | Georg Fritzmeier Gmbh & Co. Kg | Measuring device for determining a vegetation index value of plants |
WO2011015598A1 (en) | 2009-08-05 | 2011-02-10 | Georg Fritzmeier Gmbh & Co. Kg | Measuring device for determining a vegetation index value of plants |
EP2462426A1 (en) * | 2009-08-05 | 2012-06-13 | Georg Fritzmeier GmbH + Co. KG | Measuring device for determining a vegetation index value of plants |
CN102498383A (en) * | 2009-08-05 | 2012-06-13 | 格奥尔格弗里茨迈尔有限责任两合公司 | Measuring device for determining a vegetation index value of plants |
JP2013501230A (en) * | 2009-08-05 | 2013-01-10 | ゲオルグ フリッツマイヤー ゲーエムベーハー アンド カンパニー カーゲー | Measuring device for obtaining vegetation index values of plants |
DE102009052159A1 (en) | 2009-08-05 | 2011-02-10 | Georg Fritzmeier Gmbh & Co. Kg | Measuring device for determining a vegetation index value (REIP) of plants |
CN101975764A (en) * | 2010-09-29 | 2011-02-16 | 中国农业大学 | Near infrared spectrum technology-based multiband soil nitrogen detection device and method |
WO2012104187A1 (en) | 2011-02-04 | 2012-08-09 | Georg Fritzmeier Gmbh & Co. Kg | Measurement device for determining a vegetation index value |
DE102011003647A1 (en) | 2011-02-04 | 2012-08-09 | Georg Fritzmeier Gmbh & Co. Kg | Measuring device for determining a vegetation index value |
CN103837482A (en) * | 2014-03-18 | 2014-06-04 | 四川农业大学 | Measurement device for measuring spectroscopic data of intercropping soybean canopy |
CN103913425A (en) * | 2014-04-17 | 2014-07-09 | 河南农业大学 | Method for predicting content of winter wheat grain protein based on coupling of spectral indexes and climatic factors, and method for establishing prediction model |
WO2016186523A1 (en) * | 2015-05-21 | 2016-11-24 | C-Dax Limited | Plant matter sensor |
US10209181B2 (en) | 2015-05-21 | 2019-02-19 | C-Dax Limited | Plant matter sensor to determine health and/or nutritional content based on reflected signals at vertically displaced points on the plant matter |
US20180188160A1 (en) * | 2015-07-10 | 2018-07-05 | Sony Corporation | Inspection apparatus, inspection method, and program |
US11002670B2 (en) * | 2016-01-29 | 2021-05-11 | Panasonic Intellectual Property Management Co., Ltd. | Device for observing water content, method for observing water content, and cultivation device |
CN106872383A (en) * | 2017-03-31 | 2017-06-20 | 南京农业大学 | A kind of paddy rice Reflectance position extracting method based on continuous wavelet analysis |
CN108489906A (en) * | 2018-03-29 | 2018-09-04 | 河北省科学院地理科学研究所 | A kind of crop growing state multiple-angle thinking spectral detection device and its application method |
SE2150678A1 (en) * | 2021-05-28 | 2022-11-29 | Husqvarna Ab | Optical vegetation sensor unit |
EP4163621A1 (en) | 2021-10-11 | 2023-04-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Optical vegetation index monitoring |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7408145B2 (en) | 2008-08-05 |
US20050098713A1 (en) | 2005-05-12 |
CA2487115A1 (en) | 2005-05-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20060208171A1 (en) | Light sensor with modulated radiant polychromatic source | |
US9075008B2 (en) | Plant treatment based on a water invariant chlorophyll index | |
US20080291455A1 (en) | Active Light Sensor | |
US9585307B2 (en) | Optical real-time soil sensor and auto-calibration methods | |
Carter | Reflectance wavebands and indices for remote estimation of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in pine canopies | |
US8755049B2 (en) | Optical real-time soil sensor | |
US6393927B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for real-time determination and application of nitrogen fertilizer using rapid, non-destructive crop canopy measurements | |
CA2454827C (en) | Optical spectral reflectance sensor and controller | |
US9451745B1 (en) | Multi-band photodiode sensor | |
Sui et al. | Ground-based sensing system for cotton nitrogen status determination | |
US11519892B2 (en) | Precision agriculture support system and precision agriculture support method | |
Rahman et al. | NDVI derived sugarcane area identification and crop condition assessment | |
Reusch | Optimum waveband selection for determining the nitrogen uptake in winter wheat by active remote sensing | |
WO2003010535A1 (en) | Improved real time method for controlling applications of fertilizers and other yield improving agents to crops | |
Volterrani et al. | Effects of nitrogen nutrition on bermudagrass spectral reflectance | |
Bredemeier et al. | Laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence sensing to determine biomass and nitrogen uptake of winter wheat under controlled environment and field conditions | |
Pujar et al. | Remote sensing in fruit crops | |
Middleton et al. | Photosynthetic efficiency and vegetation stress | |
Ustin et al. | Remotely sensed estimates of crop water demand | |
Havránková | The evaluation of ground based remote sensing systems for canopy nitrogen management in winter wheat | |
Schneider et al. | BRDF Approximation of maize and canopy parameter retrieval by ProSail inversion | |
Sadeh et al. | Chickpea leaf water potential estimation from ground and VENµS satellite | |
Sui et al. | Plant health sensing system for in situ determination of cotton nitrogen status | |
Pujar et al. | Ph. D. Scholar, University of Horticultural Sciences, Bagalkot, Karnataka, India | |
Bach et al. | Multisensoral approach for the determination of plant parameters of corn |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |