US20060129423A1 - Vehicle lead generation system using byer criteria - Google Patents

Vehicle lead generation system using byer criteria Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060129423A1
US20060129423A1 US11337871 US33787106A US2006129423A1 US 20060129423 A1 US20060129423 A1 US 20060129423A1 US 11337871 US11337871 US 11337871 US 33787106 A US33787106 A US 33787106A US 2006129423 A1 US2006129423 A1 US 2006129423A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
vehicle
value
information
consumer
system
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11337871
Inventor
Michael Sheinson
Art Delaurier
Mike McFall
Santiago Ramirez
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Veretech LLC
Original Assignee
Veretech LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0207Discounts or incentives, e.g. coupons, rebates, offers or upsales
    • G06Q30/0239Online discounts or incentives
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0278Product appraisal
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes

Abstract

The invention is directed to a system for generating a lead by determining an estimated for a vehicle. The system may receive vehicle identifying information; receive seller identifying information; receive information for a sample of vehicles of the same make and model as the vehicle; determine a value for vehicle using the vehicle identifying information and the historical information, wholesale sales through auctions and at dealerships; (and also vehicle condition information if provided), and determine an estimated value, estimated value range, or offer price for the vehicle using predetermined buyer criteria and the determined value. This offer may then be transmitted to the seller in the form of a price certificate, appraisal report, etc., and the seller identifying information may be transmittal to the buyer as a sales lead.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/640,852 filed Aug. 14, 2003, which claims priority of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/403,272, filed on Aug. 14, 2002, which are herein incorporated in their entirety by reference.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The invention relates to a system for generating leads for the sale of vehicles. More particularly, the invention relates to a system for generating leads by determining an offer price for a vehicle using historical data, such as wholesale sales that occur at vehicle auctions and dealerships, and dealer selected buyer criteria. Even more particularly, the invention relates to an online system for generating leads by determining an offer price for a vehicle using this information.
  • BACKGROUND
  • [0003]
    In order to acquire a new vehicle, the consumer who intends to dispose of their current vehicle must complete at least three major processes. These operations can either be performed online, in the traditional fashion at the dealership, or through a combination of both the online and traditional settings.
  • [0004]
    For example, if the consumer is using the Internet to complete these operations, then they are completed as follows. The consumer first selects the new vehicle, either by browsing through the inventory of vehicles that the dealer currently has on hand, or by using configuration software to select the vehicle and the various options desired. Next, the consumer determines the value of the vehicle that he or she is currently driving, and ascertains how or if the value derived from that vehicle will contribute to the acquisition of the new vehicle. Finally the consumer considers how he/she will pay for or finance the remainder, once the value of the current vehicle is subtracted from the cost of the new one.
  • [0005]
    Each of these steps needs to be completed in order for the consumer to acquire a replacement vehicle. The steps do not necessarily have to be performed in a serial fashion, and thus, some customers will first ascertain how much their trade-in is worth, while others will want to understand if their credit rating is adequate for them to finance a new vehicle. Most consumers will select the new vehicle first, and will generally do that by accessing a Web site operated by an vehicle manufacturer, an portal, and/or a franchised dealer close to their home or place of work.
  • [0006]
    A number of systems exist in the prior art for determining the value of a used automobile. A number of these prior art systems also allow for this valuation to be conducted over the Internet. Examples include the National Automobile Dealers' Association (“NADA.”), which allows users to determine the value of a used vehicle through their Web site at www.nadaguides.com; and the Kelley Blue Book, which allows consumers to determine the value of a used car through their Web site at www.kbb.com.
  • [0007]
    However, these sites do not allow the consumer to obtain an actual offer on a vehicle from a dealer. As a result, other systems have been developed in the prior art that allow the consumer to obtain an actual offer for their used vehicle over the Internet using an interactive Web site. For example, one such site can be found at www.buyfigure.com. In order to obtain a price offer using this system, the consumer enters the VIN number for a particular vehicle and completes a questionnaire. This information is then submitted to the BuyFigure Web site where a price is determined for the vehicle. This price is returned to the user in the form of a demand certificate. This demand certificate can be used to sell the vehicle to any dealer that is franchised in the BuyFigure system.
  • [0008]
    Unfortunately, such systems have the significant disadvantage that they do not allow the dealer to customize an offer for the vehicle based upon dealer designated buying criteria. This is a significant disadvantage, since particular dealers may want to adjust their offer price based upon factors that are of importance to them specifically. Moreover, such sites do not refer the consumer (and generate leads) from the dealer's own Web site. This is a significant disadvantage as such systems can not readily be used as a lead generating engine for specific participating dealers.
  • [0009]
    Accordingly, a system is needed that serves both the consumer and the automobile dealer; and which enables a dealership to ascertain the actual wholesale value of the vehicle and to alter the offer price or other estimated value based upon the dealer's current buying criteria. The system may also enable consumers who are seeking to part with their current vehicle to secure a firm offer from a participating dealer, who is willing to purchase the vehicle. The system is preferably accessible via the Internet, served to the user via an existing Web site operated by the dealer or an automotive portal.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0010]
    Embodiments of the invention may incorporate a system for generating leads for the sale of vehicles. This may include a system for generating leads for the sale of a vehicle by determining an offer price by a buyer, typically a dealer, for a vehicle for sale by a seller, typically a consumer. The system is preferably accessed by the seller over the Internet, such as through the use of an interactive dealer Web site, but may also be used locally, such as by a customer and/or dealer in a dealer showroom.
  • [0011]
    The invention is preferably engaged when a consumer decides to obtain an offer for the value for a vehicle from a dealer. The value of the vehicle and/or a dealer's offer can be used as a credit toward the purchase of another vehicle. Through a connection to the Internet, the consumer can use a browser to access a local or remote Internet Web site and interact with the system. After supplying the necessary information, the consumer will receive an offer from the dealer that may be used in buying or trading-in the vehicle. This offer may take the form, for example, of a demand certificate, an appraisal report, an estimated value, and/or an estimated value range.
  • [0012]
    This may preferably be accomplished through the use of a series of forms that are provided by the user interface to the Web site. The information provided by the consumer is then preferably stored in a data source, although this is not required. A data source interface, which is in communication with the user interface and the data source, can then use this information to determine the current value of the vehicle. The data source interface can also access historical data, such as wholesale sales that occur at vehicle auctions and dealerships, and dealer specified buying criteria is preferably stored in a dealer profile if in the data source. This information can be used to generate the offer for the vehicle, which can then be refined by using specific buying criteria before being sent to the consumer.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0013]
    The foregoing and other aspects and advantages will be better understood from the following detailed description of the invention with reference to the drawings, in which:
  • [0014]
    FIG. 1 is a diagram of a preferred embodiment of the invention used over the Internet;
  • [0015]
    FIGS. 2(a)-(f), 3(a)-(g), and 4(a)-(e) are computer screen shots of preferred embodiments of Web page forms for submitting vehicle identification and condition information in accordance with the system of the invention;
  • [0016]
    FIGS. 2(g), 3(h), and 4(f) are computer screen shots of preferred embodiments of a Web page form for submitting seller identifying information in accordance with the system of the invention;
  • [0017]
    FIG. 2(h) is a computer screen shot of a preferred embodiment of a Web page demand certificate in accordance with the system of the invention.
  • [0018]
    FIGS. 3(g) and 4(i) are computer screen shots of a preferred embodiment of a Web page estimated value in accordance with the system of the invention.
  • [0019]
    FIGS. 3(h) and 4(j) are computer screen shots of a preferred embodiment of an email-based appraisal report in accordance with the system of the invention.
  • [0020]
    FIGS. 4(g)-(h) are computer screen shots of status message Web pages in accordance with the system of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • [0021]
    The invention will be understood more fully from the detailed description given below and from the accompanying drawings of preferred (but not exclusive) embodiments of the invention; which, however, should not be taken to limit the invention to a specific embodiment but are for explanation and understanding only.
  • [0022]
    FIG. 1 is a schematic demonstrating the typical components used in a preferred embodiment of the invention when used over the Internet. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the present invention, while described below in connection with its use over the Internet, is certainly not limited thereto.
  • [0023]
    As shown in FIG. 1, this embodiment of the invention includes Seller Access, which includes Document Viewer 1, Computer 2, and Network Connection 3 (described in more detail below), which allows sellers to access the system of the present invention. The seller is preferably a consumer but is not limited thereto and may be businesses, other dealers, etc. The present invention also preferably includes Buyer Access, which includes Document Viewer 4, Computer 5, and Network Connection 6.
  • [0024]
    Seller Access and Buyer Access communicate with each other and have their transaction facilitated by, Lead Generation System 7. Lead Generation System 7, preferably includes at least an Internet Web Server 8, a Data Source Interface 9, a Data Source 10, and an Email Server 11.
  • [0025]
    To input and extract information from Lead Generation System 7, an electronic document, such as a Web page, is loaded in a conventional manner into a Document Viewer. Each Document Viewer may be any software application capable of viewing electronic documents and loading additional electronic documents from within the original document, such as through the use of a hypertext link or form (although not limited thereto).
  • [0026]
    For example, the Document Viewer could include a Web browser, such as Navigator from Netscape Communications or Microsoft's Internet Explorer. The electronic document may be loaded automatically when the Document Viewer is first started, or may be opened into the viewer by the user from a file stored locally or at a remote address. For example, the user may load the document by typing the document's address into the Web browser's command line.
  • [0027]
    Each Document Viewer may be accessed by the user through any of a number of computer systems, such as through the use of a terminal connected to a mainframe system, from a personal computer, or over computer connected to a local computer network.
  • [0028]
    Each Document Viewer is connected to the Internet along with each respective Computer, through each Network Connection. The Network Connection is typically made through local telephone lines using an analog, ISDN, or DSL connection, though it can be over a direct network connection, such as an Ethernet network and leased line. Each Network Connection may be a computer network that routes any requests from each Document Viewer to the appropriate location on the Internet. This operation is well known to those of skill in the art. The Network Connection connects its Document Viewer to Web Server 8 in Lead Generation System 7 through any of a number of well-known connection schemes, such as through the use of leased lines.
  • [0029]
    Web Server 8 is typically a software application running on a computer that is capable of forwarding or processing requests from the Document Viewer. For example, Web Server 8 may include any one of a number of well-known server applications, such as the NSCA Web server, the Apache Web server, etc. Web Server 8 passes a document request from the Document Viewer to Data Source Interface 9 for accessing Data Source 10. Data Source 10 contains all of the information provided by the Seller or Buyer as described in more detail below.
  • [0030]
    After a document, such as an HTML form (or series of forms), is loaded into the Document Viewer, the Seller enters in the appropriate information and activates a hypertext link or form “Submit” button, generating a signal back to Data Source Interface 9, as described in more detail below. This is preferably in the form of an HTTP request sent over the Internet using TCP/IP and possibly a Secure Socket Layer (“SSL”). The request may be routed through the Network Connection and through Web Server 8 to Data Source Interface 9. It will be appreciated that the details of HTTP operation in conjunction with TCP/IP and SSL are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and will, therefore, not be elaborated on here.
  • [0031]
    When the HTTP request is received by Data Source Interface 9, it may access Data Source 10 to retrieve requested information based upon the signal from the Document Viewer, may store information received from the Document Viewer, may perform calculations using the received information, or any combination of these steps. In one embodiment of the invention, a common gateway interface (“CGI”) program, well known to those of skill in the art, may be used to parse the data from the Document Viewer. This program acts as an interface between the Web Server 8 and/or Data Interface 9 and Data Source 10 by executing a set of instructions. The interaction of Web servers and CGI programs and the sending of information therebetween is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • [0032]
    The CGI program may extract the document information from the information passed to it by the server and retrieve the appropriate information from Data Source 10. This may be accomplished in a number of ways known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, the CGI program may be a database access module of one of a number of commercial available relational database applications. Examples of such databases include Oracle, Sybase, SQL Server, and the like. It is also possible for these systems to be accessed directly by Web Server 8 using their own internal data engines.
  • [0033]
    Information is submitted to or extracted from Data Source 10, depending on the signal sent by the Document Viewer. Data Source Interface 9 then generates a signal back to the Document Viewer through Web Server 8. Email Server 11 may also be used to communicate with Buyer or Seller, preferably using a known transmission protocol, such as SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol) or by posting the information to a Web site where the recipient's application may process it further.
  • [0034]
    FIGS. 2(a)-( ), 3(a)-( ), and 4(a)-( ) illustrate preferred embodiments of Web page forms used to submit the vehicle identifying and condition information to Lead Generation System 7. As shown in the Figures, the first of these forms preferably describes how the process works, what is required by the Seller, and any industry specific disclaimers to deal with existing commercial codes that affect the retail sale of vehicles, such as automobiles.
  • [0035]
    As shown also shown in the figures, the Seller is then asked to provide the vehicle identification information, such as the vehicle identification number (VIN) in the case of an automobile. While the make, model, style, and year of the vehicle may also be provided, this identifying information can also be determined from the vehicle records for the vehicle under the VIN. This information may be obtained, for example, from the Black Book, well known in art, which contains a breakdown of each manufacturer's VIN information, and may be stored in Data Source 10. It is also possible for VIN related information to be maintained by the state department of motor vehicles for the state in which the vehicle is registered and obtained in any number of ways well known to those of ordinary skill in the art, such as through direct access to the department's online database.
  • [0036]
    The Seller may then be prompted to indicate the “trim level” of the vehicle, i.e. the optional equipment or option packages with which the vehicle was equipped when it left the factory. The Seller may also be prompted to provide the number of miles that the vehicle has been driven since new. Finally, the Seller may be prompted for his/her zip code. The seller's zip code may then be matched with a dealer, based upon the dealer's zip code (which may be stored in Data Source 10). The zip code of the dealer is often an important factor to consider in establishing an accurate value for a vehicle.
  • [0037]
    The Seller may also be presented with a list of options that are standard trim packages for the vehicle, as well as a number of the most common options that may have been added to the vehicle. This gives the Seller the ability to describe the components of the vehicle in the most comprehensive and accurate manner, and helps to ensure that all of the options installed on the vehicle are taken into account when its value is being calculated.
  • [0038]
    The Seller may then be prompted to record an observation of the condition of the vehicle on a questionnaire. The questionnaire electronically emulates the process of the used car appraisal that is traditionally performed in person at the dealership. All condition flaws are noted, whether physical or mechanical, that might reduce the current wholesale market value of the vehicle. As each portion of the vehicle is reviewed, the consumer is prompted to comment on its condition, such as being “like new”, “fair”, or “damaged”. If the Seller marks any item as being something other than “like new”, the questionnaire can be expanded to probe more thoroughly as to what the exact flawed component is, and to record its current condition in greater detail.
  • [0039]
    Once all of the vehicle identifying and condition information has been provided, Lead Generation System 7 may prompt the Seller for contact information, including name, street address, phone number, and email address. Valuation System 7 may also prompt the Seller to describe the new (or at least replacement) vehicle that the Seller is seeking. This information can also be used to generate the lead to the dealer. The Buyer (dealer) can contact the Seller in order to follow up on the Seller's interest and intent in disposing of the vehicle and procuring another one.
  • [0040]
    Once all of this information has been received by Lead Generation System 7, Valuation System 7 may access Auction Data Source 12 to obtain the relevant historical data, such as wholesale sales that occur at vehicle auctions and dealerships, for vehicles related to the vehicle that the Seller is offering or at least valuing for sale. Auction Data Source 12 may comprise a single database of auction records or may comprise multiple sources of auction related information. Of course, this information may be manually entered into Valuation System 7, as well. For example, this information may be obtained from a variety of industry sources, such as Manheim, ServNet, ADESA, and/or Digital Microworks.
  • [0041]
    Once the historical data has been received, it may be used, along with vehicle identifying and condition information by Lead Generation System 7 to calculate an estimated value for the vehicle in real time. For example, one manner in which the estimated value may be calculated is by taking the historical information to determine a base value, adding for optional equipment, subtracting for excess mileage, and subtracting for physical and mechanical condition flaws. Preferably, Lead Generation System 7 will calculate the current average wholesale value for each vehicle based on auction results of the last few weeks within the geographic region of the dealership (Buyer).
  • [0042]
    Alternatively, the information may be sent to the Buyer to separately calculate a value for the vehicle. This information may be transmitted to the Buyer through any of a number of conventional means, such by email using Email Server 11, or by a facsimile generated by Lead Generation System 7 in a manner well known to those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • [0043]
    Lead Generation System 7 may then generate an offer price or estimated value for the vehicle using the initially determined value. This offer price may then be submitted by the Buyer to Lead Generation System 7, such as through the use of a Web page in a Document Viewer using Web Server 8 or by an email using Email Server 11. Lead Generation System 7 may then transmit this offer price to the Seller, similarly through a Web page in the Document Viewer using Web Server 8, or by an email using Email Server 11. This offer price may take the form of a demand certificate that the Seller can print and take to the Buyer to accept the offer or to keep in the Seller's records. An example of a demand certificate is shown in FIG. 8.
  • [0044]
    In the preferred embodiment of the invention, however, before submitting the offer price to the Buyer, Lead Generation System 7 may refine the price using any of a number of buyer criteria. The buyer criteria are preferably stored in Data Source 10 in a profile for each participating Buyer (dealer). These buyer criteria may comprise a set of rules selected by the dealer when establishing his/her profile in Data Source 10. The dealer profile may be established using an interactive set of web page forms.
  • [0045]
    The actual buyer criteria may comprise an number of factors, such as the “black book” value, well known to those of ordinary skill in the art, or offsets to price determined by trade-in or inventory incentives, etc. These may be selected (and modified) by the dealer from a list of items provided through the interactive Web forms.
  • [0046]
    For example, the buyer criteria may include a price control option, wherein pricing is restricted to a maximum of some predetermined percentage (preferably 0 to 10%) above the average price provided in the Black Book, NADA, or Kelley Blue Book; or the average wholesale price. This is further illustrated in Table 1.
    TABLE 1
    Appraisal Value: Discount:
    From $5,000 to $10,000 reduce price by $500
    From $10,001 to $18,000 reduce price by $700
    From $18,001 to $25,000 reduce price by $1,000
    From $25,001 to $40,000 reduce price by $1,500
  • [0047]
    Vehicle specific buyer criteria may also be used. In other words, the average wholesale (auction) price on each vehicle may be reduced or increased a percentage based upon the Year, Make, Model, Style, and/or Color of the vehicle. These pricing rules will be used in addition to the general rules noted above.
  • [0048]
    Vehicles matching certain historical concerns may also be excluded from the aforementioned price adjustments, or even denied an offer/value altogether. Such historical concerns could include, for example, vehicles that have been used for commercial purposes, vehicles used by tradesmen, vehicles used to carry cargo, vehicles older than 1994 model year, vehicles with major damage or excessive condition flaws, vehicles with major hail damage or rust, vehicles that have sustained previous damage exceeding $2,500, vehicles with excessive mechanical problems, vehicles with faulty or inoperative odometers, and/or vehicles that have branded or salvage titles.
  • [0049]
    An offset for state sales tax may also be used as buyer criteria for modifying the offer to the Seller. For example, state tax tables can be used to show the difference between the tax on the purchase of a new car and the purchase of a used car. This difference may also be used to modify the offered value for the used vehicle accordingly. The estimated value may be provided, and the tax savings for that state may also be shown.
  • [0050]
    In one embodiment, such as is shown in FIG. 4(i), for example, this value may be presented to the Seller so as to clearly demonstrate that it is independently generated (i.e., not calculated by the dealer whose Web site the Seller has accessed or to whom the Seller may be in contact regarding the sale or disposition of the vehicle). This provides the significant advantage of greatly increasing the Seller's willingness to rely on the value provided and the perception that the value is fair, accurate, and/or unbiased. This, in turn, increases the chances that the Seller will approach that dealer.
  • [0051]
    Alternatively, however, the entire process may be done in a private labeling manner, so that the Seller is unaware that Lead Generation System 7 is calculating the estimated value independently of the dealer (if that is the case).
  • [0052]
    Once the lead is generated by Lead Generation System 7, it may then be provided to the Buyer (dealer) in any number of conventional manners (such as the systems described above), and stored locally by the Buyer in the dealer's own database. The lead is preferably transferred and stored in a format known and used by the industry and usable by known lead management software, such as Applied Virtual Vision, Sale Enhancer, DealerPoint, and/or Car Client.
  • [0053]
    As noted above, in one preferred embodiment, the system of the invention may calculate an estimated value for a vehicle without requiring the VIN from the Seller. The Seller need merely insert the Year, Make, Model, Trim, Mileage and/or Zip. With advanced data mining techniques, the invention can derive the value at the auction, just as accurately as it would have had the VIN been used. This is a significant advantage. Many consumer don't have their VIN handy or just considered using the VIN too laborious to bother with. By eliminating this step, many more consumers will be able to use the invention.
  • [0054]
    As also discussed above, the system of the invention may provide an estimated value rather than an actual offer from the dealer to buy the vehicle. This has the significant advantage that the dealer will feel more comfortable about what is expressed to the consumer. Because sales tax savings may be added to the estimated value of the vehicle in order to maximize the value expressed to the consumer, this value is preferably shown as an estimated trade allowance rather than an actual offer to purchase the vehicle.
  • [0055]
    In addition, it is possible that a consumer may be disappointed with a proposed trade-in value that reflects a lower, wholesale value, and they may decline to engage in a dialog with dealership sales personnel. For example, depreciation rates on 2000 and 2001 vehicles, particularly SUVs have been extremely steep. Many consumers find that they owe more than their vehicle is worth. To remedy this situation to some degree, the estimated value of the invention be expressed as a range of estimated value of the vehicle. The low end of the range can be the wholesale value that is derived from the auction data from wholesales sales that occur at auto auctions and/or dealerships. A range can then be set above that value (such as 8-10%, depending on the dealer's preference), and the high end of the range is calculated.
  • [0056]
    Thus, a vehicle whose wholesale value at the auction or automobile dealership is $16,000 might have an estimated value of “16,000 to $17,600”. This range serves the dealer by expressing the true wholesale value, and serves the consumer by stretching the value closer to what they desire from their trade. In practice, if a dealer is keeping the vehicle for his retail lot, he is more apt to make the offer closer to high end of the range. The vehicle, in this case, will probably be about $19,800 at the retail sale. There is still plenty of profit and the dealer makes two customers (the original seller and the subsequent buyer of the used vehicle) very happy. An example of how this pricing page is broken down is illustrated in FIG. 9.
  • [0057]
    Although this invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it will be appreciated that many variations may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of this invention. For example, while the present invention has been described in connection with lead generation from the valuation of automobiles, it is not limited thereto and may include any vehicle that is capable of being valued using historical sales data and specific vehicle history, such as motorcycles, mobile homes, boats and personal watercraft. Also the system of the present invention may be implemented over a local network or virtual private network or any internet worked system, and is not limited to the Internet.

Claims (32)

  1. 1. A method of generating sales leads as a service for one or more vehicle dealerships, the method comprising:
    maintaining a web site that is accessible over a computer network by a consumer who may be considering selling or trading in a first vehicle and potentially purchasing a second vehicle;
    offering to the consumer while the consumer is accessing the web site to provide the consumer with an estimated value of the first vehicle, wherein the consumer must provide the consumer's contact information before the estimated value is provided;
    maintaining one or more processors in association with the web site, the one or more processors performing the following steps
    (a) receiving information indicative of the first vehicle transmitted from the consumer over the computer network, the information indicative of the first vehicle comprising one or more selected from the group consisting of make, model, options and condition of the first vehicle,
    (b) receiving contact information of the consumer transmitted from the consumer over the computer network, and
    (c) actively transmitting the contact information of the consumer to the one or more vehicle dealerships as a sales lead;
    the one or more vehicle dealerships and consumer following up with one another about the one or more dealerships potentially purchasing the first vehicle from the consumer, or the consumer using the first vehicle as a trade in, and the one or more dealerships potentially selling the second vehicle or another vehicle to the consumer; and
    the one or more dealerships providing an estimated value of the first vehicle to the consumer in accordance with the prior offer given to the consumer.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining the estimated value of the first vehicle comprises considering buyer criteria selected from the group consisting of a price control option, vehicle specific criteria, historic vehicle issues, and a price offset for state sales tax.
  3. 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining the estimated value of the first vehicle comprises considering historical data, adding for optional equipment, subtracting for excess mileage, and subtracting for physical and/or mechanical condition flaws.
  4. 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said vehicle identifying information is used to generate an appraisal report.
  5. 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said estimated value is determined as an estimated value range.
  6. 6. The method of claim 5, wherein a low end of said range is a wholesale value derived from auction data from wholesales vehicle sales, and a high end is calculated as a percentage above said low end range.
  7. 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said percentage is between about 8 to 10 percent.
  8. 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said estimated value is provided as a trade-in allowance accounting for state sale tax.
  9. 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the consumer's contact information comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of name, street address, phone number, and email address.
  10. 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the estimated value of the first vehicle is determined by comparing the information indicative of the first vehicle received from the consumer against a database of vehicle value information contained in one or more data sources in communication with the one or more processors.
  11. 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the estimated value of the first vehicle is determined by the one or more dealerships.
  12. 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the one or more dealerships provide the estimated value to the consumer when the one or more vehicle dealerships and consumer following up with one another.
  13. 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the one or more dealerships determine the estimated value from one or both of the information indicative of the first vehicle received from the consumer or information obtained by an inspection of the first vehicle, which is compared against one or more data sources of vehicle value information available to the one or more dealerships.
  14. 14. The method of claim 13, wherein the data sources of vehicle value information is selected from the group comprising one or more of a reference book of vehicle value information, database of vehicle value information, Black Book, NADA, or Kelly Blue Book.
  15. 15. The method of claim 12, wherein the web site is maintained independently of the one or more dealerships, in order to communicate to the consumer that the web site is unaffiliated with the one or more dealerships.
  16. 16. The method of claim 12, wherein the web site is maintained without indicating to the consumer whether or not the web site is affiliated with the one or more vehicle dealerships.
  17. 17. A system of generating sales leads as a service for one or more vehicle dealerships, the method comprising:
    maintaining a web site that is accessible over a computer network by a consumer who may be considering selling or trading in a first vehicle and potentially purchasing a second vehicle;
    offering to the consumer while the consumer is accessing the web site to provide the consumer with an estimated value of the first vehicle, wherein the consumer must provide the consumer's contact information before the estimated value is provided;
    maintaining one or more processors in association with the web site, the one or more processors performing the following steps
    (a) receiving information indicative of the first vehicle transmitted from the consumer over the computer network, the information indicative of the first vehicle comprising one or more selected from the group consisting of make, model, options and condition of the first vehicle,
    (b) receiving contact information of the consumer transmitted from the consumer over the computer network, and
    (c) actively transmitting the contact information of the consumer to the one or more vehicle dealerships as a sales lead;
    the one or more vehicle dealerships and consumer following up with one another about the one or more dealerships potentially purchasing the first vehicle from the consumer, or the consumer using the first vehicle as a trade in, and the one or more dealerships potentially selling the second vehicle or another vehicle to the consumer; and
    the one or more dealerships providing an estimated value of the first vehicle to the consumer in accordance with the prior offer given to the consumer.
  18. 18. The system of claim 17, wherein the step of determining the estimated value of the first vehicle comprises considering buyer criteria selected from the group consisting of a price control option, vehicle specific criteria, historic vehicle issues, and a price offset for state sales tax.
  19. 19. The system of claim 17, wherein the step of determining the estimated value of the first vehicle comprises considering historical data, adding for optional equipment, subtracting for excess mileage, and subtracting for physical and/or mechanical condition flaws.
  20. 20. The system of claim 17, wherein said vehicle identifying information is used to generate an appraisal report.
  21. 21. The system of claim 18, wherein said estimated value is determined as an estimated value range.
  22. 22. The system of claim 21, wherein a low end of said range is a wholesale value derived from auction data from wholesales vehicle sales, and a high end is calculated as a percentage above said low end range.
  23. 23. The system of claim 22, wherein said percentage is between about 8 to 10 percent.
  24. 24. The system of claim 17, wherein said estimated value is provided as a trade-in allowance accounting for state sale tax.
  25. 25. The system of claim 17, wherein the consumer's contact information comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of name, street address, phone number, and email address.
  26. 26. The system of claim 17, wherein the estimated value of the first vehicle is determined by comparing the information indicative of the first vehicle received from the consumer against a database of vehicle value information contained in one or more data sources in communication with the one or more processors.
  27. 27. The system of claim 17, wherein the estimated value of the first vehicle is determined by the one or more dealerships.
  28. 28. The system of claim 27, wherein the one or more dealerships provide the estimated value to the consumer when the one or more vehicle dealerships and consumer following up with one another.
  29. 29. The system of claim 28, wherein the one or more dealerships determine the estimated value from one or both of the information indicative of the first vehicle received from the consumer or information obtained by an inspection of the first vehicle, which is compared against one or more data sources of vehicle value information available to the one or more dealerships.
  30. 30. The system of claim 29, wherein the data sources of vehicle value information is selected from the group comprising one or more of a reference book of vehicle value information, database of vehicle value information, Black Book, NADA, or Kelly Blue Book.
  31. 31. The system of claim 28, wherein the web site is maintained independently of the one or more dealerships, in order to communicate to the consumer that the web site is unaffiliated with the one or more dealerships.
  32. 32. The system of claim 28, wherein the web site is maintained without indicating to the consumer whether or not the web site is affiliated with the one or more vehicle dealerships.
US11337871 2002-08-14 2006-01-23 Vehicle lead generation system using byer criteria Abandoned US20060129423A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US40327202 true 2002-08-14 2002-08-14
US10640852 US7050982B2 (en) 2002-08-14 2003-08-14 Lead generation system using buyer criteria
US11337871 US20060129423A1 (en) 2002-08-14 2006-01-23 Vehicle lead generation system using byer criteria

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11337871 US20060129423A1 (en) 2002-08-14 2006-01-23 Vehicle lead generation system using byer criteria

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060129423A1 true true US20060129423A1 (en) 2006-06-15

Family

ID=32911978

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10640852 Active 2024-02-21 US7050982B2 (en) 2002-08-14 2003-08-14 Lead generation system using buyer criteria
US11337871 Abandoned US20060129423A1 (en) 2002-08-14 2006-01-23 Vehicle lead generation system using byer criteria

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10640852 Active 2024-02-21 US7050982B2 (en) 2002-08-14 2003-08-14 Lead generation system using buyer criteria

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US7050982B2 (en)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060095302A1 (en) * 2004-11-01 2006-05-04 Reza-Seyed Vahidi System and method for processing work products for vehicles via the world wide web
US20070282713A1 (en) * 2006-06-02 2007-12-06 Matthew Royce Ullman Source- and venue-specific inventory data processing and identification system
US20080201203A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine that uses margin scores
US20080201205A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to an opportunity distribution engine and distribution simulation
US20080201204A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine with quality assessment of lead sources
US20080201163A1 (en) * 2007-02-20 2008-08-21 Jolyon Barker Vehicle-Value Analyzing and Messaging Systems
US20080201202A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine that accommodates internal and imported destination relationships
US20080201184A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine that accommodates internal and imported destination exclusion rules
US20090171761A1 (en) * 2007-12-31 2009-07-02 Zag.Com, Inc., A Delaware Corporation Systems and Methods of Matching Purchase Requests with Consummated Sales
US20090187513A1 (en) * 2008-01-22 2009-07-23 Zag.Com Inc., A Delaware Corporation Systems and methods for upfront vehicle pricing
US20100070344A1 (en) * 2008-09-09 2010-03-18 TrueCar.com System and method for calculating and displaying price distributions based on analysis of transactions
US7827099B1 (en) 2003-11-25 2010-11-02 Autoalert, Inc. System and method for assessing and managing financial transactions
US20110022525A1 (en) * 2008-09-09 2011-01-27 Michael Swinson System and method for the utilization of pricing models in the aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US20110082720A1 (en) * 2009-10-02 2011-04-07 Michael Swinson System and method for the analysis of pricing data including a sustainable price range for vehicles and other commodities
US20110161206A1 (en) * 2009-12-30 2011-06-30 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for collection of data related to the sale of a vehicle
US20110161197A1 (en) * 2009-12-30 2011-06-30 Oded Noy System, method and computer program product for predicting value of lead
US20110313936A1 (en) * 2010-06-18 2011-12-22 Joseph Michael Sieger Method and apparatus for estimating value of a damaged vehicle
US20120158549A1 (en) * 2010-12-15 2012-06-21 Align Research Llc Computerized Methods To Facilitate Selective Communications Between And Among Motor Vehicle Purchasers, Dealers, And Salespeople
US20140278805A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Redbumper, Llc Pricing system for identifying prices for vehicles offered by vehicle dealerships and other entities
US8868480B2 (en) 2011-07-01 2014-10-21 Truecar, Inc. Method and system for selection, filtering or presentation of available sales outlets
US9811847B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2017-11-07 Truecar, Inc. System, method and computer program product for tracking and correlating online user activities with sales of physical goods
US9984401B2 (en) 2014-02-25 2018-05-29 Truecar, Inc. Mobile price check systems, methods and computer program products

Families Citing this family (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7050982B2 (en) * 2002-08-14 2006-05-23 Veretech, Llc Lead generation system using buyer criteria
US20040068442A1 (en) * 2002-10-04 2004-04-08 Ertle James P. Method and system of locating and selling pre-owned vehicles
US20040199441A1 (en) * 2003-04-03 2004-10-07 International Business Machines Corporation Minimizing the occurrence of retail pricing errors in electronic commerce
US7152778B2 (en) * 2003-06-23 2006-12-26 Bitstock Collecting and valuating used items for sale
US7418408B1 (en) * 2003-07-28 2008-08-26 Heppe George E Method for providing vehicle information at a live auction
US20060122892A1 (en) * 2004-12-01 2006-06-08 Fletcher Paul J Online offer system
US20070033112A1 (en) * 2005-01-04 2007-02-08 Nagle Patrick B Jr Internet textbook exchange
US20070016513A1 (en) * 2005-07-13 2007-01-18 Peter Kelly Real Time Bidding Systems and Methods with Question Interface
US8315921B2 (en) * 2006-03-03 2012-11-20 Openlane, Inc. Vehicle co-listing systems and methods
US8738472B2 (en) * 2006-03-10 2014-05-27 Openlane, Inc. Systems and methods for vehicle lifecycle management
US8095422B2 (en) * 2006-03-10 2012-01-10 Openlane, Inc. Systems and methods for vehicle information management
WO2008022289A3 (en) * 2006-08-17 2009-06-04 Experian Information Services System and method for providing a score for a used vehicle
US20080077542A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-03-27 Second Rotation Inc. Systems and methods for determining market price of merchandise
US20080177590A1 (en) * 2006-09-22 2008-07-24 Getautoappraise, Llc Vehicle-Lead Generating Systems
US8036979B1 (en) 2006-10-05 2011-10-11 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data
US8285656B1 (en) 2007-03-30 2012-10-09 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Systems and methods for data verification
WO2008147918A3 (en) 2007-05-25 2009-01-22 Experian Information Solutions System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets
WO2008145798A2 (en) * 2007-05-31 2008-12-04 Grey-Hen Oy A system and a method for assessing objects
WO2008157326A3 (en) * 2007-06-14 2009-02-26 Versata Dev Group Inc System and method for prime lead data commercialization
US20090018976A1 (en) * 2007-07-13 2009-01-15 Paulovich David W Method and system for providing price quotes for new and used vehicles
US9087254B2 (en) 2007-08-31 2015-07-21 Benjamin J. Kennedy Method of searching public information for sales leads
US20100042508A1 (en) * 2008-08-14 2010-02-18 Reza Bundy Method and Apparatus for Implementing a Peer to Peer Transaction System
US8560161B1 (en) 2008-10-23 2013-10-15 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. System and method for monitoring and predicting vehicle attributes
US20110022489A1 (en) * 2009-06-08 2011-01-27 Hallowell Zachary E Third-Party Inspection of Vehicles in an Electronic Marketplace System
US20100274571A1 (en) * 2009-04-24 2010-10-28 Veretech Holdings Inc. System and method for generating vehicle service leads and vehicle sales leads
US20100274631A1 (en) * 2009-04-24 2010-10-28 Veretech Holdings, Inc. System and Method For Generating Vehicle Sales Leads
WO2010132492A3 (en) 2009-05-11 2014-03-20 Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for providing anonymized user profile data
US20100332292A1 (en) 2009-06-30 2010-12-30 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. System and method for evaluating vehicle purchase loyalty
US8484067B2 (en) * 2009-06-30 2013-07-09 Adp, Inc. System, process, and computer program product for evaluating leads
US20110106643A1 (en) * 2009-09-28 2011-05-05 Berkowitz Ed Systems and Methods for Electronic Summary and Detail Performance Data of Equipment Sellers
US20110173086A1 (en) * 2009-12-14 2011-07-14 Berkowitz Ed Systems and Methods for Dynamic Pricing and Auction Adjudication During Online Auctions
US20110202360A1 (en) * 2010-02-18 2011-08-18 Mcgee Linda Supplier enrollment program
US9189615B2 (en) 2010-04-28 2015-11-17 Openlane, Inc. Systems and methods for system login and single sign-on
US9147042B1 (en) 2010-11-22 2015-09-29 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for data verification
US9147217B1 (en) 2011-05-02 2015-09-29 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for analyzing lender risk using vehicle historical data
WO2013016217A3 (en) * 2011-07-28 2014-05-01 Truecar, Inc. System and method for analysis and presentation of used vehicle pricing data
US8538828B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2013-09-17 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Consumer-to-business exchange auction
US8595082B2 (en) 2011-10-18 2013-11-26 Autotrader.Com, Inc. Consumer-to-business exchange marketplace
US20130339886A1 (en) * 2012-06-18 2013-12-19 Computer Pundits, Inc. Tools for dynamic database driven catalog building
US9697263B1 (en) 2013-03-04 2017-07-04 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Consumer data request fulfillment system
US9529851B1 (en) 2013-12-02 2016-12-27 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Server architecture for electronic data quality processing
US9576030B1 (en) 2014-05-07 2017-02-21 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Keeping up with the joneses

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5317503A (en) * 1992-03-27 1994-05-31 Isao Inoue Apparatus for calculating a repair cost of a damaged car
US5493490A (en) * 1992-05-05 1996-02-20 Clear With Computers, Inc. Electronic proposal preparation system for selling vehicles
US5521815A (en) * 1992-01-31 1996-05-28 K.L.E. Irrevocable Trust Uniform system for verifying and tracking articles of value
US5717595A (en) * 1995-01-12 1998-02-10 Cherrington; John K. Integrated automated vehicle analysis
US5797134A (en) * 1996-01-29 1998-08-18 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance
US5978776A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-11-02 Seretti; Harry Vehicular data exchange system and method therefor
US6041310A (en) * 1996-12-12 2000-03-21 Green Ford, Inc. Method and system for automobile transactions
US6052631A (en) * 1997-08-08 2000-04-18 Management Systems Data Service, Inc. ("Msds, Inc.") Method and system for facilitating vehicle inspection to detect previous damage and repairs
US6076064A (en) * 1992-01-31 2000-06-13 Rose, Jr.; R. Edward Uniform system for verifying and tracking the title of articles or objects of value
US20020065707A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2002-05-30 Glacier Advertising Ltd. Automobile customer information generation and transmission system
US20020099628A1 (en) * 2001-01-23 2002-07-25 Mazda Motor Corporation Estimated price providing apparatus, estimated price providing system, estimated price providing method, computer program, and computer readable storage medium
US20030130966A1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-07-10 Thompson Bruce T. Vehicle management, appraisal and auction system
US7050982B2 (en) * 2002-08-14 2006-05-23 Veretech, Llc Lead generation system using buyer criteria

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10222559A (en) * 1997-02-10 1998-08-21 Ryoichi Ino Used car trade-in estimation assessment processing method and used car trade-in estimation assessment processor

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6076064A (en) * 1992-01-31 2000-06-13 Rose, Jr.; R. Edward Uniform system for verifying and tracking the title of articles or objects of value
US5521815A (en) * 1992-01-31 1996-05-28 K.L.E. Irrevocable Trust Uniform system for verifying and tracking articles of value
US5317503A (en) * 1992-03-27 1994-05-31 Isao Inoue Apparatus for calculating a repair cost of a damaged car
US5493490A (en) * 1992-05-05 1996-02-20 Clear With Computers, Inc. Electronic proposal preparation system for selling vehicles
US5717595A (en) * 1995-01-12 1998-02-10 Cherrington; John K. Integrated automated vehicle analysis
US5797134A (en) * 1996-01-29 1998-08-18 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance
US6064970A (en) * 1996-01-29 2000-05-16 Progressive Casualty Insurance Company Motor vehicle monitoring system for determining a cost of insurance
US6041310A (en) * 1996-12-12 2000-03-21 Green Ford, Inc. Method and system for automobile transactions
US5978776A (en) * 1997-06-30 1999-11-02 Seretti; Harry Vehicular data exchange system and method therefor
US6052631A (en) * 1997-08-08 2000-04-18 Management Systems Data Service, Inc. ("Msds, Inc.") Method and system for facilitating vehicle inspection to detect previous damage and repairs
US20020065707A1 (en) * 2000-11-30 2002-05-30 Glacier Advertising Ltd. Automobile customer information generation and transmission system
US20020099628A1 (en) * 2001-01-23 2002-07-25 Mazda Motor Corporation Estimated price providing apparatus, estimated price providing system, estimated price providing method, computer program, and computer readable storage medium
US20030130966A1 (en) * 2001-12-20 2003-07-10 Thompson Bruce T. Vehicle management, appraisal and auction system
US7050982B2 (en) * 2002-08-14 2006-05-23 Veretech, Llc Lead generation system using buyer criteria

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Dallas M. Jackson, "Clipboard: How to Sell Your Car Yourself" (May 23, 1991) *
Reed, Philip, "Trading in Your Used Car", Edmunds.com (Jan. 16, 2002). *

Cited By (59)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7827099B1 (en) 2003-11-25 2010-11-02 Autoalert, Inc. System and method for assessing and managing financial transactions
US8095461B2 (en) 2003-11-25 2012-01-10 Autoalert, Inc. System and method for assessing and managing financial transactions
US20110173112A1 (en) * 2003-11-25 2011-07-14 Cotton Jeffrey S System and method for assessing and managing financial transactions
US20110173111A1 (en) * 2003-11-25 2011-07-14 Cotton Jeffrey S System and method for assessing and managing financial transactions
US8396791B2 (en) 2003-11-25 2013-03-12 Autoalert, Inc. System and method for assessing and managing financial transactions
US8086529B2 (en) 2003-11-25 2011-12-27 Autoalert, Inc. System and method for assessing and managing financial transactions
US8005752B1 (en) 2003-11-25 2011-08-23 Autoalert, Inc. System and method for assessing and managing financial transactions
US8725544B2 (en) 2004-11-01 2014-05-13 Audatex North America, Inc. System and method for processing work products for vehicles via the world wide web
US20060095302A1 (en) * 2004-11-01 2006-05-04 Reza-Seyed Vahidi System and method for processing work products for vehicles via the world wide web
US20110202374A1 (en) * 2004-11-01 2011-08-18 Reza-Sayed Vahidi System and method for processing work products for vehicles via the world wide web
US7912740B2 (en) * 2004-11-01 2011-03-22 Claims Services Group, Inc. System and method for processing work products for vehicles via the world wide web
US8275717B2 (en) * 2006-06-02 2012-09-25 Adp Dealer Services, Inc. Source- and venue-specific inventory data processing and identification system
US20070282713A1 (en) * 2006-06-02 2007-12-06 Matthew Royce Ullman Source- and venue-specific inventory data processing and identification system
US20080201202A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine that accommodates internal and imported destination relationships
US20080201184A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine that accommodates internal and imported destination exclusion rules
US8326676B2 (en) 2007-01-09 2012-12-04 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine that uses margin scores
US20080201203A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine that uses margin scores
US8321256B2 (en) 2007-01-09 2012-11-27 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to an opportunity distribution engine and distribution simulation
US8352306B2 (en) 2007-01-09 2013-01-08 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine with quality assessment of lead sources
US20080201204A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine with quality assessment of lead sources
US8255270B2 (en) 2007-01-09 2012-08-28 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to a lead distribution engine that accommodates internal and imported destination relationships
US20080201205A1 (en) * 2007-01-09 2008-08-21 Autobytel Inc. Systems and methods relating to an opportunity distribution engine and distribution simulation
US20080201163A1 (en) * 2007-02-20 2008-08-21 Jolyon Barker Vehicle-Value Analyzing and Messaging Systems
US8515817B2 (en) 2007-12-31 2013-08-20 Truecar, Inc. Systems and methods of matching purchase requests with consummated sales
US20090171761A1 (en) * 2007-12-31 2009-07-02 Zag.Com, Inc., A Delaware Corporation Systems and Methods of Matching Purchase Requests with Consummated Sales
US20090187513A1 (en) * 2008-01-22 2009-07-23 Zag.Com Inc., A Delaware Corporation Systems and methods for upfront vehicle pricing
US9111308B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2015-08-18 Truecar, Inc. System and method for calculating and displaying price distributions based on analysis of transactions
US9818140B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2017-11-14 Truecar, Inc. System and method for sales generation in conjunction with a vehicle data system
US7945483B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2011-05-17 TrueCar.com System and method for sales generation in conjunction with a vehicle data system
US20110191264A1 (en) * 2008-09-09 2011-08-04 TrueCar.com System and method for sales generation in conjunction with a vehicle data system
US8219464B2 (en) * 2008-09-09 2012-07-10 Truecar, Inc. System and method for sales generation in conjunction with a vehicle data system
US9904948B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2018-02-27 Truecar, Inc. System and method for calculating and displaying price distributions based on analysis of transactions
US9904933B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2018-02-27 Truecar, Inc. System and method for aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US9020844B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2015-04-28 Truecar, Inc. System and method for calculating and displaying price distributions based on analysis of transactions
US20110022525A1 (en) * 2008-09-09 2011-01-27 Michael Swinson System and method for the utilization of pricing models in the aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US9020843B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2015-04-28 Truecar, Inc. System and method for aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US9767491B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2017-09-19 Truecar, Inc. System and method for the utilization of pricing models in the aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US20100070343A1 (en) * 2008-09-09 2010-03-18 TrueCar.com System and method for aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US9129325B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2015-09-08 Truecar, Inc. System and method for aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US20100070382A1 (en) * 2008-09-09 2010-03-18 TrueCar.com System and method for sales generation in conjunction with a vehicle data system
US8521615B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2013-08-27 Truecar, Inc. System and method for sales generation in conjunction with a vehicle data system
WO2010030633A1 (en) * 2008-09-09 2010-03-18 TrueCar.com System and method for calculating and displaying price distributions based on analysis of transactions
US8612314B2 (en) * 2008-09-09 2013-12-17 Truecar, Inc. System and method for the utilization of pricing models in the aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US20100070344A1 (en) * 2008-09-09 2010-03-18 TrueCar.com System and method for calculating and displaying price distributions based on analysis of transactions
US9727904B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2017-08-08 Truecar, Inc. System and method for sales generation in conjunction with a vehicle data system
US9754304B2 (en) 2008-09-09 2017-09-05 Truecar, Inc. System and method for aggregation, analysis, presentation and monetization of pricing data for vehicles and other commodities
US8458012B2 (en) * 2009-10-02 2013-06-04 Truecar, Inc. System and method for the analysis of pricing data including a sustainable price range for vehicles and other commodities
US20110082720A1 (en) * 2009-10-02 2011-04-07 Michael Swinson System and method for the analysis of pricing data including a sustainable price range for vehicles and other commodities
US20130018804A1 (en) * 2009-10-02 2013-01-17 Truecar, Inc. System and Method for the Analysis of Pricing Data Including a Sustainable Price Range for Vehicles and Other Commodities
US20110161197A1 (en) * 2009-12-30 2011-06-30 Oded Noy System, method and computer program product for predicting value of lead
US20110161206A1 (en) * 2009-12-30 2011-06-30 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. System and method for collection of data related to the sale of a vehicle
US8589250B2 (en) 2009-12-30 2013-11-19 Truecar, Inc. System, method and computer program product for predicting value of lead
US20110313936A1 (en) * 2010-06-18 2011-12-22 Joseph Michael Sieger Method and apparatus for estimating value of a damaged vehicle
US20120158549A1 (en) * 2010-12-15 2012-06-21 Align Research Llc Computerized Methods To Facilitate Selective Communications Between And Among Motor Vehicle Purchasers, Dealers, And Salespeople
US8868480B2 (en) 2011-07-01 2014-10-21 Truecar, Inc. Method and system for selection, filtering or presentation of available sales outlets
US9189800B2 (en) 2011-07-01 2015-11-17 Truecar, Inc. Method and system for selection, filtering or presentation of available sales outlets
US9811847B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2017-11-07 Truecar, Inc. System, method and computer program product for tracking and correlating online user activities with sales of physical goods
US20140278805A1 (en) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Redbumper, Llc Pricing system for identifying prices for vehicles offered by vehicle dealerships and other entities
US9984401B2 (en) 2014-02-25 2018-05-29 Truecar, Inc. Mobile price check systems, methods and computer program products

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US20040172266A1 (en) 2004-09-02 application
US7050982B2 (en) 2006-05-23 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8265963B1 (en) Communication of insurance claim data
US7542922B2 (en) Online purchasing system supporting sellers with affordability screening
US6131087A (en) Method for automatically identifying, matching, and near-matching buyers and sellers in electronic market transactions
US6598026B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for brokering transactions
US7653583B1 (en) Method and apparatus for filtering and/or sorting responses to electronic requests for quote
US7577582B1 (en) Methods and apparatus for facilitating transactions
US20020002509A1 (en) Custom advertising and trade facilitation system for internet or e-mail implementation
US7499871B1 (en) System and method for procurement of products
US6901377B1 (en) Methods and systems for aviation parts, information and services
US20050267774A1 (en) Method and apparatus for obtaining and using vehicle sales price data in performing vehicle valuations
US20020123957A1 (en) Method and apparatus for marketing and communicating in the wine/spirits industry
US20080097767A1 (en) Method and System for Providing Real Estate Information Using a Computer Network, Such as the Internet
US20020052801A1 (en) Hosted asset procurement system and method
US20010044769A1 (en) Motor vehicle dealer e-tailing
US20050149397A1 (en) Method and system for word of mouth advertising via a communications network
US20060085283A1 (en) System and method for linking automobile buyers and sellers
US20020010643A1 (en) On-line motor vehicle sales
US6647373B1 (en) Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic reverse auction information
US20020107746A1 (en) Computerized commission based trading operations
US20010034656A1 (en) System and methods of online commerce for the efficient supply of parts or the like
US20080021767A1 (en) System and method for collecting and managing product information in a database
US20010025245A1 (en) E-registrar
US20050102185A1 (en) Event process handling
US20040068413A1 (en) System and method for rating plural products
US7072857B1 (en) Method for providing online submission of requests for proposals for forwarding to identified vendors