New! View global litigation for patent families

US20050248808A1 - Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability - Google Patents

Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050248808A1
US20050248808A1 US11170301 US17030105A US2005248808A1 US 20050248808 A1 US20050248808 A1 US 20050248808A1 US 11170301 US11170301 US 11170301 US 17030105 A US17030105 A US 17030105A US 2005248808 A1 US2005248808 A1 US 2005248808A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
text
handwritten
machine
printed
printing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11170301
Inventor
Yue Ma
Jinhong Guo
Original Assignee
Yue Ma
Guo Jinhong K
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06KRECOGNITION OF DATA; PRESENTATION OF DATA; RECORD CARRIERS; HANDLING RECORD CARRIERS
    • G06K9/00Methods or arrangements for reading or recognising printed or written characters or for recognising patterns, e.g. fingerprints
    • G06K9/62Methods or arrangements for recognition using electronic means
    • G06K9/68Methods or arrangements for recognition using electronic means using sequential comparisons of the image signals with a plurality of references in which the sequence of the image signals or the references is relevant, e.g. addressable memory
    • G06K9/6807Dividing the references in groups prior to recognition, the recognition taking place in steps; Selecting relevant dictionaries
    • G06K9/6814Dividing the references in groups prior to recognition, the recognition taking place in steps; Selecting relevant dictionaries according to the graphical properties
    • G06K9/6835Discrimination between machine-print, hand-print and cursive writing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N1/00Scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, e.g. facsimile transmission; Details thereof
    • H04N1/38Circuits or arrangements for blanking or otherwise eliminating unwanted parts of pictures
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N1/00Scanning, transmission or reproduction of documents or the like, e.g. facsimile transmission; Details thereof
    • H04N1/40Picture signal circuits
    • H04N1/40062Discrimination between different image types, e.g. two-tone, continuous tone

Abstract

A system and method for identifying and separating handwritten text from machine printed text in a document having a combination of handwritten text and machine printed text. In one embodiment, the present invention is installed as an intelligent printing control interface in a conventional computer and allows any document generated by any application to be selectively processed to remove any handwritten text prior to printing of the document, under the control of the user. In an alternative embodiment, the present invention is installed as an intelligent printing control interface in a conventional digital copy machine, which allows any document being copied to be selectively processed to remove any handwritten text prior to printing of the document, under the control of the user. The present invention employs a handwriting separation method which uses Hidden Markov Models to identify regions as either handwritten text or machine printed text.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/781,529, filed on Feb. 9, 2001, now ______.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The invention relates generally to a system and method for processing images having a mixture of machine printed text and handwritten annotations to remove such handwritten notations.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    It is common for a document that has been sent to a printer and/or placed in a copier for copying to contain a mixture of contents, i.e., machine-printed text and add-on information overlaid over the original contents. Examples of add-on information include handwritten notes, signatures, stamps, etc. (collectively “handwritten annotations”). In many cases, a user may intentionally want to print only the original contents, e.g., a letter for review without handwritten notes. However, until now it has been difficult to print such documents without including the annotations.
  • [0004]
    In a conventional computer system, as shown in FIG. 1, most printing jobs from a user application 100 are performed through a graphics device interface (GDI) 110, a printer driver 120, and a print spooler 130. In this method, an application 100 creates a document and outputs a print request. GDI 110 is an operating system component, which converts graphic calls to a format that the printer drivers understand. GDI 110 receives requests from the various user applications and sends these requests to the corresponding driver of the printer chosen by the application. From an application's point of view, there are no differences among the various printers, which simply appear as output devices. GDI 110 supports text, bitmap and graphics rendering (i.e., drawing lines, curves arcs, rectangles and color fill). This printing methodology allows applications 100 to send device independent printing commands to render text and graphics. These printing commands are then sent to printer driver 120 via GDI 110. Printer driver 120 converts the standard graphics request to those commands that a printer understands and send them to spooler 130 Finally, a printer receives the printing commands through spooler 130 and port monitor 140. Spooler 130 manages the print jobs and allocates resources for printing from the computer's CPU without interrupting any current operation. Likewise, conventional digital copying machines include similar subsystems, albeit in a more closed environment where the subsystems are fixed and not generally accessible to the user.
  • [0005]
    The prior art is limited in its ability to remove handwritten annotations from a document having machine printed text and annotations. In a first method, a marker or template is placed on the document being processed to assist in locating the handwritten annotation, see e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,631,9084 which places a magnetic ink character recognition line on a bank check for use in locating the handwritten signature. The first method requires special apparatus to locate the marker or template. In a second method, handwritten annotations are identified and separated from machine printed text for separate processing. However, the prior art is limited in its ability to handle complex cases where a document contains a mixture of machine printed text and handwritten annotations, and where the handwritten annotations are mixed with the machine printed text, i.e., where the handwritten annotations do not appear only in regions of white space in the original document such as margins.
  • [0006]
    Hidden Markov Models (HMM) have use in many applications. One of the most successful applications is speech recognition, but it has also been applied to optical character recognition and keyword identification. In summary, as an overview of HMM theory, it is important to note that in natural language, there is an embodied Markovian structure. For example, the probability of seeing a letter “u” after letter “q” is usually greater than seeing “u” after any of the other letters. A process that has a property that the conditional probability of a current event giving past and present events depends only on the most recent event is a Markov process. In a discrete Markov process, each state corresponds to an observable deterministic event. But in a Hidden Markov Model, the output of each state corresponds to an output probability distribution. The method of the present invention is based on the theory of Hidden Markov Models (HMM). The unknown OCR knowledge is treated as hidden states and a decision is made based upon the observation sequences that come from these states.
  • [0007]
    It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a system and method for the automatic separation of handwritten annotations from machine printed text.
  • [0008]
    It is an additional object of this invention to provide a system and method for the automatic separation of handwritten annotations from machine printed text that is based on a Hidden Markov Model.
  • [0009]
    It is a further object of this invention to provide a system and method for the automatic separation of handwritten annotations from machine printed text embodied within a conventional digital copy machine.
  • [0010]
    It is another object of this invention to provide a method for the automatic separation of handwritten annotations from machine printed text within documents sent for printing on a conventional printer.
  • [0011]
    Various other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become readily apparent from the ensuing detailed description and the novel features will be particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0012]
    These and other objectives are realized by the present invention, which is a system and method for printing or copying documents having a mixture of handwritten text and machine printed text such that the printed document contains only machine printed text. In particular, the first embodiment of the present invention comprises means for generating digital documents having handwritten text and machine printed text and for generating a request to print at least one of the digital documents, an intelligent printing control interface connected to the means for generating which receives the request and selectively processes the request to remove the handwritten text, and means connected to the intelligent printing control interface for printing the selectively processed request. The intelligent printing control interface further comprises a virtual printer driver for receiving the request, a printing control panel for determining whether to process the request, and a handwriting separation module for selectively processing the request, under control of the printing control panel, to remove the handwritten text. Further, the handwriting separation module processes the request by segmenting the digital image into a plurality of text blocks, computing an observation sequence for each of the text blocks, computing a first probability for each of the text blocks that the observation sequence would appear in a predetermined Hidden Markov Model for machine printed text, computing a second probability for each of the text blocks that the observation sequence would appear in a predetermined Hidden Markov Model for handwritten text, comparing the first probability and the second probability for each of the text blocks, marking the text block as machine printed text if the first probability is greater than the second probability, marking the text block as handwritten text if the second probability is greater than the first probability, and removing the marked handwritten text.
  • [0013]
    In an alternative embodiment, the present invention comprises a system for copying documents, comprising a scanner for generating a digital document having handwritten text and machine printed text and for generating a request to print the digital document, an intelligent printing control interface connected to the scanner which receives the request and selectively processes the request to remove the handwritten text, and a printer connected to the intelligent printing control interface for printing the selectively processed request.
  • [0014]
    The present invention also comprises a method for separating handwritten text from machine printed text in a digital image containing a mixture of handwritten text and machine printed text comprises the steps of segmenting the digital image into a plurality of text blocks, computing an observation sequence for each of the text blocks, computing a first probability for each of the text blocks that the observation sequence would appear in a predetermined Hidden Markov Model for machine printed text, computing a second probability for each of the text blocks that the observation sequence would appear in a predetermined Hidden Markov Model for handwritten text, comparing the first probability and the second probability for each of the text blocks, marking the text block as machine printed text if the first probability is greater than the second probability, and marking the text block as handwritten text if the second probability is greater than the first probability. The handwriting separation method of the present invention further comprises the step of post-processing the digital image after each of the text blocks are marked as either machine printed text or handwritten text to correct single errors.
  • [0015]
    In particular, the segmenting step of the handwriting separation method comprises the steps of generating connecting components within the digital image, and grouping the connected components into a plurality of text blocks. Further, the grouping step of the handwriting separation method comprises the steps of determining if each pair of neighboring connected components are on the same line, then for a given pair of neighboring connected components on the same line, determining if the pair of neighboring connected components are adjacent to each other. Next, for a given pair of neighboring connected components adjacent to each other, the method determines if the pair of neighboring connected components have the same height, and if the pair of neighboring connected components have the same height, the pair of neighboring connected components are merged together into a single text block.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0016]
    The following detailed description, given by way of example and not intended to limit the present invention solely thereto, will best be understood in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
  • [0017]
    FIG. 1 is a diagram demonstrating how a conventional computer processes a print request;
  • [0018]
    FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the elements of the intelligent printing control interface of the present invention embodied in a computer system;
  • [0019]
    FIG. 3 is diagram of the intelligent printing control interface of the present invention embodied in a printer/copier system;
  • [0020]
    FIG. 4 is a flowchart showing the operational steps of the present invention;
  • [0021]
    FIG. 5A is a projection profile for the machine printed letter “M” and
  • [0022]
    FIG. 5B is a projection profile for the handwritten letter “M”;
  • [0023]
    FIG. 6 is a flowchart of the handwriting separation method of the present invention;
  • [0024]
    FIG. 7 is a machine printed text training sheet for use in the handwriting separation method of the present invention;
  • [0025]
    FIG. 8 is a handwritten text training sheet for use in the handwriting separation method of the present invention;
  • [0026]
    FIG. 9 is a sample document having a mixture of handwriting and machine printed text;
  • [0027]
    FIG. 10 is a document showing the output of the machine text identification step of the handwriting separation method of the present invention; and
  • [0028]
    FIG. 11 is a document showing the output of the handwritten text identification step of the handwriting separation method of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0029]
    Referring now to the drawings and in particular FIG. 2, an intelligent printing control interface (IPCI) 295 is configured to create a printing/copying device having special image processing functions, i.e., the capability to separate handwritten annotations. This printing/copying device may be implemented within a general purpose computer system or within a dedicated printer/copier. IPCI 295 includes a virtual printer driver 290, a printing control panel 280 and a handwriting separation module 275. When a document generated by a user application 200 is to be printed, printing commands associated with that document are passed to graphics device interface (GDI) 210. GDI 210 conventionally processes those commands and passes them to IPCI 295 (instead of printer driver 220). IPCI 295, under the control of printing control panel 280, processes the printing commands to remove any handwritten annotations in the document, and passes the processed printing commands to printer driver 220 for printing in a conventional manner using spooler 230, port monitor 240 and printer 250, in the same manner as described above with respect to the first embodiment. Two types of documents are contemplated: (1) scanned documents having handwritten annotations added to an original document after being printed; and (2) a digital document having handwritten annotations generated using an on-line annotation tool.
  • [0030]
    When installed in a computer system, IPCI 295 may be installed so that its operations are known to the user (i.e., the IPCI “aware” mode) or so that its operations are invisible to the user (i.e., the IPCI “blind” mode). In the “aware” mode, the user must select a dedicated “IPCI Printer” to take advantage of the handwriting separation capabilities. In the “blind” mode, the user selects any of the available printers and then configures the handwriting separation capabilities using the printer preferences for the selected printer.
  • [0031]
    As discussed above, virtual printer driver 290 accepts print commands from GDI 210 and passes them to the destination device (i.e., third party printer driver 220, spooler 230, port monitor 240 and printer 250). In addition, virtual printer driver 290 removes handwritten annotations in the document being printed. For speed of performance and to simplify implementation, this is done by overlaying the original document content with a blank bitmap at detected handwriting regions.
  • [0032]
    Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 3, the handwriting separation method of the present invention may be implemented in a special purpose computer within a dedicated printer/copier 300 (e.g., a digital copy machine or a multi-function peripheral). Dedicated printer/copier 300 includes a scanning engine 310, a handwriting separation module 320, and a printing module 330. In operation dedicated printer/copier 300 has two modes of operation. In the first mode (i.e., the “print mode”), a print request is generated by an external user at an external computer 340 and sent to dedicated printer/copier 300. The print request is supplied to handwriting separation module 320 for processing to remove any handwritten annotations, and then the modified print request is supplied to print engine 330 for printing. In the second mode (i.e., the “copy mode”), a document is scanned using scanning module 310 and the resulting digital image is supplied o handwriting separation module 320 for processing to remove any handwritten annotations. Then the modified scanned image is supplied to print engine 330 for printing.
  • [0033]
    FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the steps performed by virtual printer driver 290 to remove the annotations. For both types of documents generated by a user application (i.e., scanned or digitally generated), the process of removing the handwritten annotations is the same, the image is simply printed using either an IPCI Printer (“aware” mode) or any one of the possible printers (“blind” mode). As shown in FIG. 4, the first step is to load the third party's printer driver (step 400), and obtain the capabilities of that printer driver (step 410). Next, the image to be printed is rendered in memory using the information obtained from GDI 210 (FIG. 2) (step 420). At step 430, the handwriting separation algorithm discussed in detail below is applied to the image in memory, and, at step 440, all of the regions which include handwriting are identified. Then, the original information obtained from GDI 210 is passed to third party printer driver 220, without any change (step 450). Finally, blank bitmaps are rendered at each of the identified regions containing handwriting, and this additional information is passed to third party printer driver 220 (step 460), which causes the handwritten annotations to be masked out during printing.
  • [0034]
    User interface control panel 280 provides a user an interface to configure the operation of IPCI 295 when necessary. For example, a user may want to enable or disable the handwriting separation capability of the system. When used in conjunction with a computer system, user interface control panel 280 can be an add-on property sheet to an existing third party printer user interface. It can be invoked when configuring an IPCI printer (i.e., in the “aware” mode), or configuring the operation of any third party printers with IPCI installed (i.e., the “blind” mode). When used in conjunction with a printer/copier system, user interface control panel 280 is controlled through the user interface of the system in a conventional manner (e.g., the printer/copier includes configuration menus that are accessed through a display screen and a keypad/mouse or a touchscreen interface).
  • [0035]
    To identify handwritten annotations, the statistical variations of appropriate features are considered. The projection profile for a letter is defined as a vertical projection of image pixels within its bounding box. Examples of projection profiles are shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B. Machine printed text produces a large number of regularities on a projection profile because of regularities in machine printed text. On the other hand, handwritten annotations tend to vary by style and appear irregularly, therefore, their projection profile is smoother. The difference between the projection profiles of machine printed text and handwritten annotations are demonstrated by a comparison of FIGS. 5A and 5B. FIG. 5 a shows a projection profile for the machine printed letter “M” that includes steep and abrupt changes in magnitude, while FIG. 5B shows a projection profile for the handwritten letter “M” that includes more gradual changes in magnitude. Discrimination is performed at the word level, since it is not necessary to descend to the character level because a single word (or string) is typically uniform with respect to style. The method of the present invention is based on the theory of Hidden Markov Models (HMM). The unknown OCR knowledge is treated as hidden states and a decision is made based upon the observation sequences that come from these states.
  • [0036]
    When analyzing a projection profile, for example, if the projection along neighboring characters is computed, the changes in projection along the neighboring characters in a machine printed character can be considered as a Markov chain. However, since a similar projection profile may arise from one of a large number of letters, it is not possible to simply use Markov models. In a hidden Markov model, the observation is a probabilistic function of the state. The HMM is a doubly embedded stochastic process with an underlying stochastic process that is hidden, namely the identity of the character.
  • [0037]
    For example, let N be the number of states in the model and M the number of distinct observation symbols per state. A is the state transition probability matrix, where
    a ij =P[q t+1 =S j |q t =S i], 1≦i, j≦N  (1)
      • so that aij is the probability that state Si at time t change to state Sj at time t+1. B is the observation symbol probability matrix, where
        b j(k)=P[v k at t|q t =S j], 1≦j≦N, 1≦k≦M  (2)
      • bj(k) is the probability that one observes symbol vk at time t given that the state is Sj at time t.π is the initial state distribution, i.e.,
        πi =P[q 1 =S i], 1≦i≦N  (3)
      • is the probability of being at state Si at time t=1.
  • [0041]
    Given the observation sequence O=O1O2. OT and the Markov model λ=A, B, π, the probability P(O|λ) is to be computed. The procedure used is the so-called Forward-Backward Procedure. If the forward variable is set as at(i)=P(O=O1O2 . . . Ot, qt=Si|λ), i.e., at(i) is the probability of the partial observation sequence, O=O1O2 . . . Ot, (until time t) and the state at t is Si, given the model λ. The forward procedure is as follows:
  • [0042]
    Initialization
    α1(i)=πi b i(O 1), 1≦i≦N  (4)
  • [0043]
    Induction α t + 1 ( j ) = [ i = 1 N α t ( i ) a ij ] b j ( O t + 1 ) , 1 t T - 1 , 1 j N ( 5 )
  • [0044]
    Termination P ( O λ ) = i = 1 N α T ( i ) ( 6 )
  • [0045]
    From induction, it is clear that at decreases as αt increases. If the observation sequence is too long, the a would go beyond the capacity of the machine. So scaling is applied in real application. Although not discussed in specific detail here, scaling within a Hidden Markov Model is well understood to one of ordinary skill in the art.
  • [0046]
    The handwriting separation method of the present invention relies on the identification and segmentation of text blocks in the image in order for HMM to work on the word level. A number of algorithms for segmentation of text blocks are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. However, in the present invention, connected components are first generated. Then, a simple grouping method is used, as follows: Given two connected components represented by their bounding boxes (x1_min, x1_max, y1_min, y1_max) and (x2_min, x2_max, y2_min, y2_max) respectively, where x represents the horizontal coordinates and y represents the vertical coordinates in a coordinate system where the origin is in the upper left corner, (x_min, y_min) represent top left corner of the bounding box and (x_max, y_max) represent the lower right corner. The following three conditions are checked:
      • 1. Is |y1_min−y2_min| is less than a pre-defined threshold T0?
      • 2. Is |x1_max−x2_min| or |x2_max−x1| min less than a pre-defined threshold T1?
      • 3. Is |(y1_max−y1_min)−(y2_max−y2_min)| less than a pre-defined threshold T2?
  • [0050]
    The first condition is for grouping bounding boxes on the “same” line. The second condition is for adjacency and the third ensures that two bounding boxes have the “same” height. Here, “same” stands for a certain degree of closeness, which is set by the predetermined thresholds T0, T1, and T2. If the above conditions are met, the two components are merged and the resulting coordinates of the newly merged box become:
    x_min=min(x1_min, x2_min)
    x_max=max(x1_max, x2_max)
    y_min=min(y1_min, y2_min)
    y_max=max(y1_max, y2_max)
  • [0051]
    In segmentation, small components (e.g., a dash) are eliminated before grouping.
  • [0052]
    At the word level, a segmented word may consist of several individual letters that are represented by bounding boxes. An observation sequence is obtained at the word level by concatenating projection profiles from individual letters that are within the word.
  • [0053]
    In the model used for the handwriting separation method of the present invention, 62 hidden states are used that correspond to the 52 upper and lower case Latin characters and to the 10 numerical digits, and 10 symbols are used which correspond to 10 levels of projection values in observation sequences. Thus, the states are the unknown letters and the observation sequence is a probabilistic function of the states. In this model, element αij of the state transition probability matrix A is the transition probability between two neighboring letters within a word; i.e., element bj of B is the probability of a symbol occurring in a given letter or digit, and element πi of π is the probability that the word starts with that letter or digit.
  • [0054]
    FIG. 6 is a flowchart demonstrating the classification process of the handwriting separation method of the present invention. An image is first segmented into N text strings (words) as discussed above (step 600). An index i is initialized to 1 (step 610). Then, processing loops for each word, under the control of decision box 620 and index increment step 690. During each processing loop, the projections of each letter within a word are computed and concatenated to generate the observation sequence of that word (step 650). Of course, as one of ordinary skill will readily recognize, there are numerous other ways of computing an observation sequence for a word. Next, the probabilities of observing the sequence given the models (P(O |λ)) are computed for each word given a particular model, currently machine printed text (steps 645 and 655) or handwritten text (steps 660 and 665). The model that yields the highest probability is selected as the result (steps 670 and 680). As evident, two models are generated for classification: (1) a machine model or (2) a handwriting model. The method used to obtain hidden Markov models is described below. Once all of the identified words are classified, a post-processing step 630 is utilized in order to improve the accuracy, as described below, and thereafter processing ends (step 640).
  • [0055]
    Once all words within the document are classified independently from the HMMs, some error may remain, i.e., handwritten text may be classified as machine printed text and vice versa. Thus, in handwritten annotation method of the present invention, post-processing may optionally be applied to correct single errors, based on the majority of classification results. First, for each classified word, three numbers are computed, as follows:
      • 1. MN—the number of machine words that are in its neighbor (mainly left and right sides);
      • 2. HN—the number of handwritten words in its neighbor; and
      • 3. ML—the number of machine words that are approximately on the same line.
  • [0059]
    The following rules are then developed based on the values of MN, HN, and ML:
      • 1. If current word is classified as handwriting, it resides along a machine printed text line (ML>1) and there is at least one machine word neighbor (MN>0), reverse current word to “machine printed text”.
      • 2. If current word is classified as machine printed text, and if two or more handwriting words are in its neighbor (HN>1), reverse to “handwritten annotation”. If the current word is residing along a machine text line (ML>1) and there is at least a machine neighbor (MN>0), it remains “machine printed text”. If the current word has one handwriting word neighbor (HN=1), and one or zero machine word neighbor (MN<=1), it is difficult to decide and mark the current word as “unknown”.
  • [0062]
    In all other cases considered during postprocessing, the status of the word being considered remains the same.
  • [0063]
    Training is used to obtain the HMM model for machine printed text (λ1) and handwritten text (λ2). The computation of models can be done only once in the training process. In training, the probability matrices A and π are obtained from samples of ASCII text. The matrix B is computed from a set of scanned bitmap images of various styles of letters and digits. The matrices A and π are the same for both machine and handwriting models. Matrix B has to be computed separately for machine and handwriting. FIGS. 7 and 8 depict samples of training matrices B for machine text and handwritten annotations, respectively.
  • [0064]
    In training Matrix B, several samples of the same letter (state) are obtained. For every sample of each letter, an observation sequence is calculated and the probability is computed on an averaging basis. As seen in FIG. 7, several font styles are used for each machine printed letter (state). For handwritten letters, samples from different users should be collected for each handwritten letter, as seen in FIG. 8. The use of multiple samples takes into account the various font styles for machine printed text and the individuals differences in handwriting. The selection of large training samples will ensure the invariance of our discriminator over various document styles and different writers. In addition, the method of computing the observation sequence is font size independent. All training samples for computing Matrix B are printed on a 600 dpi printer and scanned at 300 dpi. But different printing and scanning resolutions may not affect the training.
  • [0065]
    The results of testing the handwriting separation method of the present invention are shown in FIGS. 9-11. All of the original documents were printed at 600 dpi and scanned at 300 dpi. The handwritten annotations were made using a medium point ballpoint pen. FIG. 9 is a document 900 having a combination of handwritten annotations and machine printed text. FIG. 10 shows a processed version 910 of document 900 of FIG. 9 which demonstrates the results of the word segmentation step and subsequent classification step results in identifying the machine printed text graphically by the bounding boxes overlaid on the original document contents (e.g., box 915). FIG. 11 shows a processed version 920 of document 900 of FIG. 9 which demonstrates the results of the word segmentation step and subsequent classification step results in identifying the handwritten annotations graphically by the bounding boxes overlaid on the original document contents (e.g., box 925). As demonstrated by FIGS. 9-11, the method of the present invention is capable of identifying handwritten annotations even when directly overlaid over machine printed text.
  • [0066]
    In the preferred embodiment of the handwriting separation method of the present invention, the classification step is performed on a word-by-word basis, and is thus robust and efficient in terms of processing time. Further, this method does not require global information of the contents of a page, and can operate even when the machine printed text varies in font style and size and the handwriting appears anywhere on within document.
  • [0067]
    Various applications exist for the method of the present invention, which detects handwritten annotations on a document consisting of machine printed text and such annotations. One such application is document recognition. The handwritten annotations and machine printed text within the same document are separated and passed to appropriate recognition engines such as OCR for the machine printed text and ICR for the handwritten annotations, for efficient recognition. Another application for the separation of handwritten annotations is form processing and bank check processing where only the handwritten annotation is of interest. Other applications include automatic version control where changes made to the original document are tracked, the secure transmission and printing of original document content, and efficient archiving of documents based on document content, in which original content is stored initially and only incremental changes to the document (such as add-on handwritten annotations) are saved thereafter.
  • [0068]
    While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments and various aspects thereof, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is intended that the appended claims be interpreted as including the embodiments described herein, the alternatives mentioned above, and all equivalents thereto.

Claims (27)

  1. 1. (canceled)
  2. 2. (canceled)
  3. 3. (canceled)
  4. 4. (canceled)
  5. 5. (canceled)
  6. 6. (canceled)
  7. 7. (canceled)
  8. 8. (canceled)
  9. 9. (canceled)
  10. 10. (canceled)
  11. 11. (canceled)
  12. 12. (canceled)
  13. 13. (canceled)
  14. 14. (canceled)
  15. 15. (canceled)
  16. 16. In a system for printing documents comprising means for generating a request to print a digitized version of a document that includes handwritten text and machine printed text and means for printing said request, the improvement comprising:
    an intelligent printing control interface coupled between said means for generating and said means for printing which receives said request, selectively processes said request to remove said handwritten text, and transmits said processed request to said means for printing.
  17. 17. The system of claim 16, wherein said intelligent printing control interface further comprises:
    a virtual printer driver for receiving said request;
    a printing control panel having settings for specifying whether to process said request to print to remove said handwritten text; and
    a handwriting separation module for selectively processing said request, under control of said printing control panel, to remove said handwritten text.
  18. 18. In a system for copying documents comprising a scanner for generating a digitized version of a document including handwritten text and machine printed text, means for generating a request to print said digitized document, and a printer, the improvement comprising:
    an intelligent printing control interface coupled between said means for generating and said printer which receives said request and selectively processes said request to remove said handwritten text.
  19. 19. The system of claim 18, wherein said intelligent printing control interface further comprises:
    a virtual printer driver for receiving said request;
    a printing control panel having settings for specifying whether to process said request; and
    a handwriting separation module for selectively processing said request, under control of said printing control panel, to remove said handwritten text.
  20. 20. A method for copying and printing documents, comprising the steps of:
    generating a digitized image of a document having both handwritten text and machine printed text;
    generating a print request to print said digitized image;
    processing said print request to selectively remove said handwritten text; and
    transmitting said selectively processed request to a printer for printing thereof.
  21. 21. An intelligent printing control interface for coupling between a means for generating a print request of a digitized document including handwritten text and machine text and a printer, comprising:
    a handwriting separation module coupled to receive said print request and which, in response thereto, selectively processes said print request to remove said handwritten text to create a modified version of said print request including only machine text, and thereafter couples said modified version of said print request to said printer.
  22. 22. The interface of claim 21, further comprising:
    a printing control panel having settings for specifying whether to process said print request to remove said handwritten text.
  23. 23. The interface of claim 21, in which said handwriting separation module loads a third party printer driver and obtains information about said third party printer driver during said selective processing of said print request.
  24. 24. The interface of claim 21, in which said handwriting separation module obtains said print request from a graphics device interface and then applies a handwriting separation algorithm to said print request to identify portions of said print request that include handwriting during said selective processing of said print request.
  25. 25. The interface of claim 24, in which said handwriting separation module, after identifying said portions of said print request that include handwriting, passes said print request in unmodified form to a printer driver and generates and passes a mask image to said third party printer driver that allows said printer driver to print said print request without said portions of said print request that include handwriting.
  26. 26. The interface of claim 22, in which said printing control panel allows a user to configure said intelligent printing control interface to operate as a separate dedicated printer.
  27. 27. The interface of claim 22, in which said printing control panel allows a user to configure said intelligent printing control interface to intercept print requests intended for an existing printer.
US11170301 2001-02-09 2005-06-28 Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability Abandoned US20050248808A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09781529 US6940617B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2001-02-09 Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability
US11170301 US20050248808A1 (en) 2001-02-09 2005-06-28 Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11170301 US20050248808A1 (en) 2001-02-09 2005-06-28 Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050248808A1 true true US20050248808A1 (en) 2005-11-10

Family

ID=25123028

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09781529 Expired - Fee Related US6940617B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2001-02-09 Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability
US11170301 Abandoned US20050248808A1 (en) 2001-02-09 2005-06-28 Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09781529 Expired - Fee Related US6940617B2 (en) 2001-02-09 2001-02-09 Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (2) US6940617B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1231558A2 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080147687A1 (en) * 2005-02-17 2008-06-19 Naohiro Furukawa Information Management System and Document Information Management Method
US20080239362A1 (en) * 2005-10-25 2008-10-02 Fujitsu Limited Computer-readable recording medium storing print image generating program and print image generating method
US20090086258A1 (en) * 2007-10-01 2009-04-02 Curtis Gold System and method of document reproduction

Families Citing this family (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6940617B2 (en) * 2001-02-09 2005-09-06 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability
US20030004991A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 Keskar Dhananjay V. Correlating handwritten annotations to a document
US7013029B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2006-03-14 Intel Corporation Incorporating handwritten notations into an electronic document
US7120299B2 (en) 2001-12-28 2006-10-10 Intel Corporation Recognizing commands written onto a medium
US7573598B2 (en) * 2002-01-16 2009-08-11 Infoprint Solutions Company, Llc Method and apparatus for selectively copying documents with handwritten notations
US7072514B1 (en) * 2003-02-06 2006-07-04 The United States Of America As Represented By The National Security Agency Method of distinguishing handwritten and machine-printed images
US20050200913A1 (en) * 2004-03-11 2005-09-15 International Business Machines Corporation Systems and methods for identifying complex text in a presentation data stream
US7352899B2 (en) * 2004-10-12 2008-04-01 Loeb Enterprises, Llc Realistic machine-generated handwriting with personalized fonts
US7327884B2 (en) * 2004-10-12 2008-02-05 Loeb Enterprises, Llc Realistic machine-generated handwriting
US8787706B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2014-07-22 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Acquisition of a user expression and an environment of the expression
US8340476B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2012-12-25 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Electronic acquisition of a hand formed expression and a context of the expression
US8229252B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2012-07-24 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Electronic association of a user expression and a context of the expression
US8102383B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2012-01-24 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Performing an action with respect to a hand-formed expression
US7791593B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2010-09-07 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Machine-differentiatable identifiers having a commonly accepted meaning
US7809215B2 (en) 2006-10-11 2010-10-05 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Contextual information encoded in a formed expression
US7873243B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2011-01-18 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Decoding digital information included in a hand-formed expression
US8823636B2 (en) 2005-03-18 2014-09-02 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Including environmental information in a manual expression
JP4420877B2 (en) * 2005-09-22 2010-02-24 シャープ株式会社 Image processing method, image processing apparatus, and the image output device
JP4254775B2 (en) * 2005-10-24 2009-04-15 コニカミノルタビジネステクノロジーズ株式会社 Writing the image acquisition device, the write information extraction method, and computer program
JP4886312B2 (en) * 2006-02-09 2012-02-29 キヤノン株式会社 The information processing apparatus, a method of controlling an information processing apparatus, and program
US8265345B2 (en) * 2006-11-20 2012-09-11 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing method, image processing apparatus, image forming apparatus, and image reading apparatus
US7903877B2 (en) 2007-03-06 2011-03-08 Microsoft Corporation Radical-based HMM modeling for handwritten East Asian characters
US8457448B2 (en) * 2008-02-04 2013-06-04 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Removing inserted text from an image using extrapolation for replacement pixels after optical character recognition
EP2228751A3 (en) * 2009-03-10 2017-12-20 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image processing apparatus, image processing method, and program
US8351700B2 (en) * 2009-04-08 2013-01-08 Gracious Eloise, Inc. Variable glyph system and method
JP4875723B2 (en) * 2009-04-24 2012-02-15 シャープ株式会社 Image forming apparatus
US8379801B2 (en) 2009-11-24 2013-02-19 Sorenson Communications, Inc. Methods and systems related to text caption error correction
US8832853B2 (en) * 2009-12-07 2014-09-09 Dst Technologies, Inc. Managed virtual point to point communication service having verified directory, secure transmission and controlled delivery
US8600173B2 (en) 2010-01-27 2013-12-03 Dst Technologies, Inc. Contextualization of machine indeterminable information based on machine determinable information
US8948535B2 (en) * 2010-01-27 2015-02-03 Dst Technologies, Inc. Contextualizing noisy samples by substantially minimizing noise induced variance
US8824785B2 (en) 2010-01-27 2014-09-02 Dst Technologies, Inc. Segregation of handwritten information from typographic information on a document
US9432671B2 (en) * 2014-05-22 2016-08-30 Xerox Corporation Method and apparatus for classifying machine printed text and handwritten text
KR20170037424A (en) * 2015-09-25 2017-04-04 엘지전자 주식회사 Mobile terminal and method for controlling the same

Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4910787A (en) * 1987-04-20 1990-03-20 Nec Corporation Discriminator between handwritten and machine-printed characters
US5029223A (en) * 1990-02-02 1991-07-02 International Business Machines Corporation Constraint driven-on line recognition of handwritten characters and symbols
US5048099A (en) * 1990-05-21 1991-09-10 Eastman Kodak Company Polygon-based method for automatic extraction of selected text in a digitized document
US5063600A (en) * 1990-05-14 1991-11-05 Norwood Donald D Hybrid information management system for handwriting and text
US5181255A (en) * 1990-12-13 1993-01-19 Xerox Corporation Segmentation of handwriting and machine printed text
US5442715A (en) * 1992-04-06 1995-08-15 Eastman Kodak Company Method and apparatus for cursive script recognition
US5544259A (en) * 1990-10-31 1996-08-06 Environmental Research Institute Of Michigan Apparatus and method for separating handwritten characters by line and word
US5561720A (en) * 1990-09-27 1996-10-01 Cgk Computer Gesellschaft Konstanz Mbh Method for extracting individual characters from raster images of a read-in handwritten or typed character sequence having a free pitch
US5570435A (en) * 1989-12-08 1996-10-29 Xerox Corporation Segmentation of text styles
US5631984A (en) * 1993-12-09 1997-05-20 Ncr Corporation Method and apparatus for separating static and dynamic portions of document images
US5812697A (en) * 1994-06-10 1998-09-22 Nippon Steel Corporation Method and apparatus for recognizing hand-written characters using a weighting dictionary
US5953451A (en) * 1997-06-19 1999-09-14 Xerox Corporation Method of indexing words in handwritten document images using image hash tables
US5970170A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-10-19 Kodak Limited Character recognition system indentification of scanned and real time handwritten characters
US6043823A (en) * 1995-07-17 2000-03-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Document processing system which can selectively extract and process regions of a document
US6108444A (en) * 1997-09-29 2000-08-22 Xerox Corporation Method of grouping handwritten word segments in handwritten document images
US6567548B2 (en) * 1999-01-29 2003-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Handwriting recognition system and method using compound characters for improved recognition accuracy
US6598087B1 (en) * 1999-09-08 2003-07-22 Ge Capital Commercial Finance, Inc. Methods and apparatus for network-enabled virtual printing
US6636631B2 (en) * 1998-06-04 2003-10-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Optical character reading method and system for a document with ruled lines and its application
US6643401B1 (en) * 1998-12-16 2003-11-04 Fujitsu Limited Apparatus and method for recognizing character
US6909805B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2005-06-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Detecting and utilizing add-on information from a scanned document image
US6940617B2 (en) * 2001-02-09 2005-09-06 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability
US7042594B1 (en) * 2000-03-07 2006-05-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for saving handwriting as an annotation in a scanned document
US7293234B2 (en) * 2000-02-24 2007-11-06 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Method and system for capturing a note-taking session using sensor with identifier

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP3436025B2 (en) * 1995-12-27 2003-08-11 ミノルタ株式会社 Fix and image reading apparatus reading the image

Patent Citations (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4910787A (en) * 1987-04-20 1990-03-20 Nec Corporation Discriminator between handwritten and machine-printed characters
US5570435A (en) * 1989-12-08 1996-10-29 Xerox Corporation Segmentation of text styles
US5029223A (en) * 1990-02-02 1991-07-02 International Business Machines Corporation Constraint driven-on line recognition of handwritten characters and symbols
US5063600A (en) * 1990-05-14 1991-11-05 Norwood Donald D Hybrid information management system for handwriting and text
US5048099A (en) * 1990-05-21 1991-09-10 Eastman Kodak Company Polygon-based method for automatic extraction of selected text in a digitized document
US5561720A (en) * 1990-09-27 1996-10-01 Cgk Computer Gesellschaft Konstanz Mbh Method for extracting individual characters from raster images of a read-in handwritten or typed character sequence having a free pitch
US5544259A (en) * 1990-10-31 1996-08-06 Environmental Research Institute Of Michigan Apparatus and method for separating handwritten characters by line and word
US5181255A (en) * 1990-12-13 1993-01-19 Xerox Corporation Segmentation of handwriting and machine printed text
US5442715A (en) * 1992-04-06 1995-08-15 Eastman Kodak Company Method and apparatus for cursive script recognition
US5631984A (en) * 1993-12-09 1997-05-20 Ncr Corporation Method and apparatus for separating static and dynamic portions of document images
US5812697A (en) * 1994-06-10 1998-09-22 Nippon Steel Corporation Method and apparatus for recognizing hand-written characters using a weighting dictionary
US5970170A (en) * 1995-06-07 1999-10-19 Kodak Limited Character recognition system indentification of scanned and real time handwritten characters
US6043823A (en) * 1995-07-17 2000-03-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Document processing system which can selectively extract and process regions of a document
US5953451A (en) * 1997-06-19 1999-09-14 Xerox Corporation Method of indexing words in handwritten document images using image hash tables
US6108444A (en) * 1997-09-29 2000-08-22 Xerox Corporation Method of grouping handwritten word segments in handwritten document images
US6636631B2 (en) * 1998-06-04 2003-10-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Optical character reading method and system for a document with ruled lines and its application
US6643401B1 (en) * 1998-12-16 2003-11-04 Fujitsu Limited Apparatus and method for recognizing character
US6567548B2 (en) * 1999-01-29 2003-05-20 International Business Machines Corporation Handwriting recognition system and method using compound characters for improved recognition accuracy
US6598087B1 (en) * 1999-09-08 2003-07-22 Ge Capital Commercial Finance, Inc. Methods and apparatus for network-enabled virtual printing
US7293234B2 (en) * 2000-02-24 2007-11-06 Silverbrook Research Pty Ltd Method and system for capturing a note-taking session using sensor with identifier
US7042594B1 (en) * 2000-03-07 2006-05-09 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method for saving handwriting as an annotation in a scanned document
US6909805B2 (en) * 2001-01-31 2005-06-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Detecting and utilizing add-on information from a scanned document image
US6940617B2 (en) * 2001-02-09 2005-09-06 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Printing control interface system and method with handwriting discrimination capability

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20080147687A1 (en) * 2005-02-17 2008-06-19 Naohiro Furukawa Information Management System and Document Information Management Method
US20080239362A1 (en) * 2005-10-25 2008-10-02 Fujitsu Limited Computer-readable recording medium storing print image generating program and print image generating method
US7894092B2 (en) * 2005-10-25 2011-02-22 Fujitsu Limited Computer-readable recording medium storing print image generating program and print image generating method
US20090086258A1 (en) * 2007-10-01 2009-04-02 Curtis Gold System and method of document reproduction
US9277090B2 (en) * 2007-10-01 2016-03-01 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. System and method of document reproduction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
EP1231558A2 (en) 2002-08-14 application
US20020135786A1 (en) 2002-09-26 application
JP2002352191A (en) 2002-12-06 application
US6940617B2 (en) 2005-09-06 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Haralick Document image understanding: Geometric and logical layout
US5729637A (en) Method and apparatus for producing a hybrid data structure for displaying a raster image
US6535293B1 (en) Printing system, printing control method, data processing apparatus and method, and storage medium therefor
US5452374A (en) Skew detection and correction of a document image representation
US4933979A (en) Data reading apparatus for reading data from form sheet
US5524065A (en) Method and apparatus for pattern recognition
US6377704B1 (en) Method for inset detection in document layout analysis
US7203903B1 (en) System and methods for spacing, storing and recognizing electronic representations of handwriting, printing and drawings
US5491760A (en) Method and apparatus for summarizing a document without document image decoding
US5999649A (en) Method and apparatus for producing a hybrid data structure for displaying a raster image
US5613019A (en) System and methods for spacing, storing and recognizing electronic representations of handwriting, printing and drawings
US6654509B2 (en) Image processing apparatus, method, and system
US5818965A (en) Consolidation of equivalence classes of scanned symbols
US20060072830A1 (en) Method for automated image indexing and retrieval
US20070192687A1 (en) Document content and structure conversion
US6337924B1 (en) System and method for accurately recognizing text font in a document processing system
US6069978A (en) Method and apparatus for improving a text image by using character regeneration
US5465304A (en) Segmentation of text, picture and lines of a document image
US6411733B1 (en) Method and apparatus for separating document image object types
Yanikoglu et al. Pink Panther: a complete environment for ground-truthing and benchmarking document page segmentation
US20020064308A1 (en) System and methods for spacing, storing and recognizing electronic representations of handwriting printing and drawings
US7646921B2 (en) High resolution replication of document based on shape clustering
US6351559B1 (en) User-enclosed region extraction from scanned document images
US7650035B2 (en) Optical character recognition based on shape clustering and multiple optical character recognition processes
US7697758B2 (en) Shape clustering and cluster-level manual identification in post optical character recognition processing