US20050172132A1 - Secure key authentication and ladder system - Google Patents

Secure key authentication and ladder system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050172132A1
US20050172132A1 US10769173 US76917304A US2005172132A1 US 20050172132 A1 US20050172132 A1 US 20050172132A1 US 10769173 US10769173 US 10769173 US 76917304 A US76917304 A US 76917304A US 2005172132 A1 US2005172132 A1 US 2005172132A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
key
digitally signed
secure key
secure
digital signature
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10769173
Inventor
Sherman Chen
Steve Rodgers
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Avago Technologies General IP Singapore Pte Ltd
Original Assignee
Broadcom Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication
    • H04L9/08Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0816Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication
    • H04L9/08Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0816Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
    • H04L9/0819Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s)
    • H04L9/0822Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s) using key encryption key
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication
    • H04L9/08Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0816Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
    • H04L9/0819Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s)
    • H04L9/0825Key transport or distribution, i.e. key establishment techniques where one party creates or otherwise obtains a secret value, and securely transfers it to the other(s) using asymmetric-key encryption or public key infrastructure [PKI], e.g. key signature or public key certificates
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication
    • H04L9/08Key distribution or management, e.g. generation, sharing or updating, of cryptographic keys or passwords
    • H04L9/0816Key establishment, i.e. cryptographic processes or cryptographic protocols whereby a shared secret becomes available to two or more parties, for subsequent use
    • H04L9/0838Key agreement, i.e. key establishment technique in which a shared key is derived by parties as a function of information contributed by, or associated with, each of these
    • H04L9/0841Key agreement, i.e. key establishment technique in which a shared key is derived by parties as a function of information contributed by, or associated with, each of these involving Diffie-Hellman or related key agreement protocols
    • H04L9/0844Key agreement, i.e. key establishment technique in which a shared key is derived by parties as a function of information contributed by, or associated with, each of these involving Diffie-Hellman or related key agreement protocols with user authentication or key authentication, e.g. ElGamal, MTI, MQV-Menezes-Qu-Vanstone protocol or Diffie-Hellman protocols using implicitly-certified keys
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication
    • H04L9/32Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
    • H04L9/3247Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communication including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials involving digital signatures
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television, VOD [Video On Demand]
    • H04N21/20Servers specifically adapted for the distribution of content, e.g. VOD servers; Operations thereof
    • H04N21/25Management operations performed by the server for facilitating the content distribution or administrating data related to end-users or client devices, e.g. end-user or client device authentication, learning user preferences for recommending movies
    • H04N21/266Channel or content management, e.g. generation and management of keys and entitlement messages in a conditional access system, merging a VOD unicast channel into a multicast channel
    • H04N21/26606Channel or content management, e.g. generation and management of keys and entitlement messages in a conditional access system, merging a VOD unicast channel into a multicast channel for generating or managing entitlement messages, e.g. Entitlement Control Message [ECM] or Entitlement Management Message [EMM]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television, VOD [Video On Demand]
    • H04N21/40Client devices specifically adapted for the reception of or interaction with content, e.g. set-top-box [STB]; Operations thereof
    • H04N21/41Structure of client; Structure of client peripherals
    • H04N21/418External card to be used in combination with the client device, e.g. for conditional access
    • H04N21/4181External card to be used in combination with the client device, e.g. for conditional access for conditional access
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N21/00Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television, VOD [Video On Demand]
    • H04N21/60Selective content distribution, e.g. interactive television, VOD [Video On Demand] using Network structure or processes specifically adapted for video distribution between server and client or between remote clients; Control signaling specific to video distribution between clients, server and network components, e.g. to video encoder or decoder; Transmission of management data between server and client, e.g. sending from server to client commands for recording incoming content stream; Communication details between server and client
    • H04N21/63Control signaling related to video distribution between client, server and network components; Network processes for video distribution between server and clients or between remote clients, e.g. transmitting basic layer and enhancement layers over different transmission paths, setting up a peer-to-peer communication via Internet between remote STB's; Communication protocols; Addressing
    • H04N21/633Control signals issued by server directed to the network components or client
    • H04N21/6332Control signals issued by server directed to the network components or client directed to client
    • H04N21/6334Control signals issued by server directed to the network components or client directed to client for authorisation, e.g. by transmitting a key
    • H04N21/63345Control signals issued by server directed to the network components or client directed to client for authorisation, e.g. by transmitting a key by transmitting keys
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/16Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
    • H04N7/162Authorising the user terminal, e.g. by paying; Registering the use of a subscription channel, e.g. billing
    • H04N7/163Authorising the user terminal, e.g. by paying; Registering the use of a subscription channel, e.g. billing by receiver means only
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04NPICTORIAL COMMUNICATION, e.g. TELEVISION
    • H04N7/00Television systems
    • H04N7/16Analogue secrecy systems; Analogue subscription systems
    • H04N7/167Systems rendering the television signal unintelligible and subsequently intelligible
    • H04N7/1675Providing digital key or authorisation information for generation or regeneration of the scrambling sequence

Abstract

Method and system for secure key authentication and key ladder are provided herein. Aspects of the method for secure key authentication may include generating a digital signature of a secure key in order to obtain a digitally signed secure key and transmitting the digitally signed secure key from a first location to a second location. The digital signature may be generated by utilizing an asymmetric encryption algorithm and/or a symmetric encryption algorithm. The digitally signed secure key may be encrypted prior to transmission. The secure key may be a master key, a work key and/or a scrambling key. The digitally signed secure key may be received at the second location and the digitally signed secure key may be decrypted to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS/INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE
  • [Not Applicable]
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • Certain embodiments of the invention relate to conditional access and copy protection systems. More specifically, certain embodiments of the invention relate to a method and system for secure key authentication and key ladder.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The implementation of fee-based video broadcasting requires a conventional conditional access (CA) system to prevent non-subscribers and unauthorized users from receiving signal broadcasts. A complete CA system usually includes three main functions: a scrambling/descrambling function, an entitlement control function, and an entitlement management function.
  • The scrambling/descrambling function is designed to make the program incomprehensible for unauthorized receivers. Scrambling can be applied commonly or separately to the different elementary stream components of a program. For example, the video, audio and data stream components of a TV program may be scrambled in order to make these streams unintelligible. Scrambling may be achieved by applying various scrambling algorithms to the stream components. The scrambling algorithm usually utilizes a secret key, called a control word. Once the signal is received, the descrambling can be achieved by any receiver that holds the secret key, or the control word, used by the scrambling algorithm prior to transmission. Scrambling and descrambling operations, in general, do not cause any impairment on the quality of the signals. The commonly used algorithms for scrambling digital data in CA systems are symmetric key ciphers. The control word used by the scrambling algorithm is a secret parameter known only by the scrambler and the authorized descramblers. In order to preserve the integrity of the encryption process, the control word has to be changed frequently in order to avoid any exhaustive searches by an unauthorized user which is intended to discover the control word.
  • The rights and associated keys needed to descramble a program are called entitlements. The entitlement control function provides the conditions required to access a scrambled program together with the encrypted secret parameters enabling the signal descrambling process for the authorized receivers. This data is broadcasted as conditional access messages, called entitlement control messages (ECMs). The ECMs carry an encrypted form of the control words, or a means to recover the control words, together with access parameters, such as an identification of the service and of the conditions required for accessing this service. Upon receipt of an ECM, the receiver transmits the encrypted control word and the access characteristics to the security device, for example, a smart card. After it has been confirmed that a user is authorized to watch the specific program, the security device checks the origin and integrity of the control word and the access parameters before decrypting the control word and sending it to the descrambler.
  • The entitlement management function is associated with distributing the entitlements to the receivers. There are several kinds of entitlements matching the different means to “buy” a video program. These entitlements are also broadcasted as conditional access messages, called entitlement management messages (EMMs). The EMMs are used to convey entitlements or keys to users, or to invalidate or delete entitlements or keys. The entitlement control functions and the entitlement management functions require the use of secret keys and cryptographic algorithms. For example, most modern conditional access systems utilize a smart card to store secret keys and to run cryptographic algorithms safely.
  • Most CA systems scramble and/or randomize transmitted data bits so that unauthorized decoders cannot decode the transmitted data bits. Authorized decoders are delivered a key that initializes the circuit that inverts the data bit randomization. As used herein, the term scrambling may be associated with the pseudo-random inversion of data bits based on a key that is valid for a short period of time. In addition to scrambling, a key may also be transformed into an encrypted key in order to protect it from any unauthorized users. From a cryptographic point of view, this transformation of the key to an encrypted key is the only part of the system that protects the data from a highly motivated pirate or a hacker. As a result, the scrambling portion of the process alone, in the absence of an key encryption, can be easily defeated. A CA system is usually associated with a system that implements key encryption and distribution of the encrypted key. The general requirements that a CA system with scrambling and encryption functionality must meet for digital video delivery are as follows: protection against signal piracy, efficient scrambling, flexibility, variety of supported formats, and ease of implementation.
  • With regard to robust protection against signal piracy, it must be difficult for a third party to perform unauthorized reception. In addition, the scrambled signal content must not be understandable. Efficient scrambling of all kinds of signals, as in multimedia broadcasts for example, must be possible and quality must not deteriorate (perceptibly) when these signals are being restored (quality signal restoration). A CA system is also flexible as it can be exercised on an elementary stream-by-stream basis, including the ability to selectively scramble bit streams in a program, if it is desired. Further, various business formats, such as multi-channel services and billing schemes, may be supported with low operating costs, and a private encryption system may be used, for example, by each program provider that is part of the CA system. A CA system with scrambling and encryption functionality may be implemented in standard consumer instruments, which also ensures cost effective receivers.
  • With either a conditional access system or a copy protection system, private (secure) keys are nearly always used for scrambling and descrambiing high-value content or for protecting highly sensitive transactions. In a CA system, the content scrambling key must be protected. To ensure proper functionality, the CA system should perform scrambling according to the properties of the data for transmission. In addition, the CA system should change the key regularly to maintain the security of the scrambling system, and transmit the key information to the receiver in a secure manner using a hierarchical encryption system. Thirdly, for the purpose of operating fee-based broadcasting service, reception should be controlled according to the details of each user's subscription.
  • Such CA system can be achieved in various ways depending on types of services, required functions, and security. FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a conditional access system utilizing a conventional key ladder system. The configuration of the CA system 100 in FIG. 1 has been recommended by International Telecommunications Union-Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R). Referring to FIG. 1, there is shown a block diagram of an exemplary conditional access system 100, which may include a scrambler 102, a descrambler 108, encryptors 104 and 106, decryptors 110 and 112, a switch 115, and a viewing enable/disable circuit 114. On the transmit side of the diagram, TX, the compressed audio/video signal 116 may be scrambled by the scrambler 102, utilizing a scrambling key Ks 118, in order to obtain a scrambled broadcast signal 128. Program attribute information 120 may be encrypted by the encryptor 104, utilizing a work key Kw 122, to obtain the entitlement control messages 130. Program subscription information 124 may be encrypted by the encryptor 106, utilizing a master key 126, to obtain the entitlement management messages 132.
  • During signal scrambling in the CA system 100, the scrambling key Ks 118 determines the scrambling pattern. It is common to change the scrambling key at fixed intervals of time, such as every few seconds, to maintain a secure system. The scrambling key 118 must, therefore, be continuously transmitted to the subscriber's receiver. This is achieved in the CA system 100 by encrypting the scrambling key 118 by the encryptor 104 and transmitting it within the entitlement control messages 130. The ECM 130 may also include the program attribute information 120. The program attribute information 120 may be utilized, for example, for determining whether a subscriber is entitled to view a program on the basis of his or her subscription. To prevent the ECM 130, which includes the scrambling key 118, from being understood by a third party, the ECM 130 is encrypted by the encryptor 104 before transmission, by utilizing the work key Kw 122. The work key 122 may be updated on a monthly or yearly basis. The work key 122 is sent to the receiver through the entitlement management messages 132, together with the subscription information 124. The subscription information 124 may also contain any subscription updates for the specific subscriber.
  • Besides broadcast wave, the EMM 132 may be transmitted out-of-band utilizing other media like the Internet, telephone lines, a signaling network, or a smart card. Prior to transmission, the EMM 132 is encrypted by a master key Km 126. A master key is unique to each receiver and its security must be commonly managed among different broadcast operators that use the same type of receiver. This can normally be accomplished by setting up an organization for uniform key management. For example, in the CA system 100 illustrated in FIG. 1, the content scrambling key 118 is protected by the work key 122, which is in turn protected by the master key 126. This key protection “chain” is, sometimes, referred to as a key ladder.
  • On the receive side of the diagram, RX, the same key ladder is utilized in order to decrypt the necessary secure keys and scrambled broadcast audio/video signals 128. The master key 126 may be utilized with the decryptor 112 in order to decrypt the EMM 132 and the work key 122. As a result, the work key 122 is obtained as one of the outputs from the decryptor 112. The decrypted work key 122 may then be utilized by the decryptor 110 in order to decrypt the ECM 130 and the scrambling key 118. As a result, the scrambling key 118 is obtained as one of the outputs from the decryptor 110. The decrypted scrambling key 118 may then be utilized by the descrambler 108 in order to descramble the scrambled broadcast signal 128 and obtain the compressed audio/video output 140.
  • Access to the compressed audio/video output 140 by a user is determined in accordance with the user's subscription information 124 and the program attribute information 120. The decryptor 112 decrypts the EMM 132 to obtain decrypted subscription information 125. The decryptor 110 decrypts the ECM 130 to obtain decrypted program attribute information 120. The viewing enable/disable module 114 receives the decrypted subscription information 125 and the decrypted program attribute information and may then determine whether or not a user is entitled to receive the compressed audio/video output 140. If the user is entitled to receive the compressed audio/video output 140 (for example, the user has a valid subscription for a given programming channel), then the viewing enable/disable module 114 issues a control signal 134 activating the switch 115. Once the switch 115 is activated, this allows for the decrypted scrambling key 118 to be entered into the descrambler 108, which in turn allows for the descrambling of the compressed audio/video output 140.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating secure key unwrapping in a conventional key ladder system. Referring to FIG. 2, the key ladder system 200 may comprise a one time programmable (OTP) memory 202, a secure key generating module 204 and a key unwrapping module 206. The key unwrapping module 206 may comprise scramblers 208, 210, 212 and 214. Each of the scramblers 208, 210, 212 and 214 may utilize a symmetric encryption algorithm, for example a Data Encryption Standard (DES), a 3DES, or an Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) type of algorithm, in order to descramble an encrypted key input. The OTP memory 202 in the key ladder system 200 may be adapted to store a root key, for example a key such as the master key 126 in FIG. 1. The root key stored in the OTP memory 202 may be further protected by the secure key generating module 204. The secure key generating module 204 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to scramble, or otherwise further enhance the security of the root key stored in the OTP memory 202.
  • The key unwrapping module 206 may be adapted to “unwrap”, or descramble, various application keys, for example, application key 1, 228, and application key 2, 230. In order to achieve this, the key unwrapping module 206 may utilize several encrypted keys, for example, encrypted key 1, 216, encrypted key 2, 218, encrypted key 3, 220, and encrypted key 4, 222. Once the root key stored in the OTP memory 202 is scrambled by the secure key generating module 204, the scrambled root key 205 may be utilized by the scrambler 208 in order to decrypt the encrypted key 1, 216, and obtain a decrypted key 224. The decrypted key 224 may comprise, for example, a work key. The decrypted key 224 may be utilized by the scrambler 210 in order to decrypt encrypted key 2, 218, and obtain the decrypted key 226. The decrypted key 226 may comprise, for example, a scrambling key.
  • The decrypted key 226 may be utilized by the scrambler 212 in order to decrypt encrypted key 3, 220, and obtain the decrypted application key 1, 228. Similarly, the decrypted application key 228 may be utilized by the scrambler 214 in order to decrypt encrypted key 4, 222, and obtain the decrypted application key 2, 230. Decrypted application keys 228 and 230 may be further utilized for various functions, for example, for copy protection of broadcast signals. The key ladder in the key unwrapping module 206 may be adapted to have varying levels of protection by increasing the number of the encrypted keys and the corresponding scramblers, and by utilizing each previously decrypted application key in a subsequent decryption of a following encrypted key. The key ladder may be utilized to “unwrap” a master key, a work key and a scrambling key. The master key, work key and scrambling key may then be utilized to decrypt one or more application keys.
  • Even though the key unwrapping module 206 may provide increasing level of protection by increasing the number of scramblers and encrypted keys, it may be difficult to determine whether or not the received encrypted keys in the key ladder system 200 of FIG. 2 have been manipulated by unauthorized parties.
  • When encrypted data is transmitted over an insecure channel, the transmitting and/or the receiving party may need the ability to monitor such communication and obtain verification of the identity of the other party, and of the integrity and origin of the encrypted data that was transmitted. Referring now to FIG. 3, there is illustrated a flow diagram of a method 300 for conventional digital signature generation and verification process utilizing public key encryption. A transmitting entity may create a signature on a message 301 prior to transmission of the message.
  • In general, a signature s of a message m may be computed, for example, by applying an algorithm represented by the relationship s=SA(m), where SA is a signing function for the message m. Prior to creating the signature, the outgoing message 301 may be compressed by a compression algorithm 303. The compression algorithm 303 may be, for example, a secure hash algorithm. A digital signature algorithm 307 may then be applied to the compressed message or message digest 305. The digital signature algorithm may utilize a private key 309 in order to generate the digital signature 311. After generating the signature s, the pair (s;m) may be transmitted. The digital signature 311 may then be transmitted together with the message digest 305.
  • A receiving entity may then receive the digital signature 311 and the message digest 305 in a form of a received message 313. The receiving entity may then apply the same decompression algorithm used by the transmitting entity on the message 301. For example, a secure hash algorithm 315 may be applied in order to decompress the received message 313 and obtain the message digest 317. In order for the receiving entity to verify that the digital signature 311 on the received message 313 was created by the transmitting entity and not by a third outside party, a verification algorithm 319 may be applied to the message digest 317.
  • In general, to verify that a signature s on a message m was created by a transmitting entity A, a receiving entity B, referenced to as a verifier, may obtain the verification function VA of A and may compute a result u from applying the verification function, where the result u may be represented by the relationship u=VA(m, s). The signature s may be authenticated as created by A if u=true, and the signature may be rejected as unauthorized if u=false.
  • Similarly, the verification algorithm 319 may utilize a public key 321 together with the message digest 317 in order to authenticate the digital signature 311. If the result of the verification operation 323 is true, the digital signature 311 is authenticated, and if the result 323 is false, the digital signature 311 may be rejected as unauthorized.
  • There are several properties that may be required of the signing and verification functions, 307 and 319, respectively. The digital signature 311 is a valid signature of the message digest 305 if and only if the verification function 319 returns a true result. In addition, the signing function 307 and the verification function 319 are selected so that it is computationally infeasible for any entity, other than the transmitting and the receiving entities, to find, for any incoming message digest, a digital signature such that the verification function returns a true result.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating a conventional secure system for signature verification utilizing public key encryption. The conventional secure system 400 may comprise a transmitting entity A 402 and a receiving entity B 404. Entity A 402 may “sign” the message m 414 by first applying an encryption algorithm 406 to the message m, yielding signature s 416. The encryption algorithm 406 may comprise an asymmetric encryption algorithm Ee A (s), such as a public key encryption algorithm, in order to encrypt, or sign, the message m. The transmitting entity A 402 may then encrypt the signature s 416 by applying an encryption algorithm 408 to the signature s, yielding encrypted signed message c 421. The encryption algorithm 408 may comprise a symmetric encryption algorithm of the receiving entity B, Ee B (s), in order to encrypt the signature s 416. The encrypted signed message c 421 may then be transmitted over an unsecured public channel 422, where it may be exposed to attacks by an attacker 424.
  • After the receiving entity B 404 receives the encrypted signed message c 421, a decryption algorithm 410 may be applied to the encrypted signed message c 421 to obtain the decrypted signature s 418. The decryption algorithm 410 may comprise a symmetric encryption algorithm of the receiving entity B, Dd B (c), in order to decrypt the encrypted signed message c 421 to obtain the decrypted signature s 418. The signature s 418 may then be further decrypted, or verified, by the decryption algorithm 412 to obtain the decrypted message m 420. The decryption algorithm 412 may comprise an asymmetric encryption algorithm Dd A (m), in order to verify the signature s 418 and obtain the decrypted and verified message m 420. If the resulting message m 420 is an intelligible message, it may be concluded that the message m 420 must have been initiated by the transmitting entity A 402, since no one else could have known A's secret decryption key eA to form the signature s 416.
  • Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional and traditional approaches will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such systems with some aspects of the present invention as set forth in the remainder of the present application with reference to the drawings.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • Certain aspects of the invention may be found in a method and system for secure key authentication and key ladder. The method for secure key authentication may include generating a digital signature of a secure key in order to obtain a digitally signed secure key and transmitting the digitally signed secure key from a first location to a second location. The digital signature may be generated by utilizing an asymmetric encryption algorithm and/or a symmetric encryption algorithm. The digitally signed secure key may be encrypted prior to transmission. The secure key may be a master key, a work key and/or a scrambling key. The digitally signed secure key may be received at the second location and the digitally signed secure key may be decrypted to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key. If the secure key comprises a master key, a decrypted digitally signed master key may be utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed work key. If the secure key comprises a work key, a decrypted digitally signed work key may be utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed scrambling key. The authenticity of the digital signature of the digitally signed secure key may be verified by utilizing an asymmetric decryption algorithm and/or a symmetric decryption algorithm. The verification feature may be a user-selectable feature.
  • Another embodiment of the invention provides a machine-readable storage, having stored thereon a computer program having at least one code section for secure key authentication, the at least one code section executable by a machine for causing the machine to perform the steps as described above.
  • In another embodiment of the invention, a system for secure key authentication and key ladder may be provided. The system may include at least one processor for generating a digital signature of a secure key in order to obtain a digitally signed secure key; and transmitting the digitally signed secure key by the at least one processor from a first location to a second location. The digital signature may be generated by utilizing an asymmetric encryption algorithm and/or a symmetric encryption algorithm. The digitally signed secure key may be encrypted by the at least one processor prior to transmission. The secure key may be one of a master key, a work key and a scrambling key. The at least one processor may receive the digitally signed secure key at the second location and the digitally signed secure key may be decrypted by the at least one processor in order to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key. If the secure key comprises a master key, a decrypted digitally signed master key may be utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed work key. If the secure key comprises a work key, a decrypted digitally signed work key may be utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed scrambling key. The authenticity of the digital signature of the digitally signed secure key may be verified by utilizing an asymmetric decryption algorithm and/or a symmetric decryption algorithm. The at least one processor may determine whether to verify authenticity of the digital signature. The at least one processor may comprise one of a host processor, a microprocessor, and a microcontroller.
  • In yet another embodiment of the invention, a system for secure key authentication and key ladder may include a transmitter. The transmitter may comprise a generator that generates a digital signature of a secure key in order to obtain a digitally signed secure key, and the transmitter transmits the digitally signed secure key. The generator may generate the digital signature by utilizing an asymmetric encryption algorithm and/or a symmetric encryption algorithm. The digitally signed secure key may be encrypted by an encryptor prior to transmission, in order to obtain an encrypted digitally signed key. The secure key may be a master key, a work key and/or a scrambling key. The digitally signed secure key may be received by a receiver. The receiver may comprise a decryptor that decrypts the digitally signed secure key to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key. The decryptor may utilize a digitally signed master key to decrypt an encrypted digitally signed work key. The decryptor may also utilize a digitally signed work key to decrypt an encrypted digitally scrambling key. The receiver may comprise a verifier that verifies the authenticity of the digital signature of the digitally signed secure key. The verifier may utilize an asymmetric decryption algorithm and/or a symmetric decryption algorithm. The verifier may determine whether to verify authenticity of the digital signature.
  • These and other advantages, aspects and novel features of the present invention, as well as details of an illustrated embodiment thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating conditional access system utilizing a conventional key ladder system.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating secure key unwrapping in a conventional key ladder system.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating a method for conventional digital signature generation and verification process utilizing public key encryption.
  • FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating conventional secure system for signature verification utilizing public key encryption.
  • FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating secure key unwrapping and signature verification system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6A is a block diagram of an exemplary system for secure key generation, secure key signing and secure key encryption, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6B is a block diagram of an exemplary system for secure key decryption and secure key signature verification, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Certain aspects of the invention may be found in a method and system for secure key authentication and key ladder. The method for secure key authentication may include generating a digital signature of a secure key in order to obtain a digitally signed secure key; and transmitting the digitally signed secure key from a first location to a second location. The digital signature may be generated by utilizing an asymmetric encryption algorithm and/or a symmetric encryption algorithm. The digitally signed secure key may be encrypted prior to transmission. The secure key may be one of a master key, a work key and a scrambling key. The digitally signed secure key may be received at the second location and the digitally signed secure key may be decrypted to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key. If the secure key comprises a master key, a decrypted digitally signed master key may be utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed work key. If the secure key comprises a work key, a decrypted digitally signed work key may be utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed scrambling key. Some additional aspects of the invention may include verifying the authenticity of the digital signature of the digitally signed secure key. The authenticity of the digital signature may be verified by utilizing an asymmetric decryption algorithm and/or a symmetric decryption algorithm. The verification feature may be a user-selectable feature.
  • FIG. 5 shows a block diagram illustrating a secure key unwrapping and signature verification system, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 5, the key ladder system 500 may comprise a one time programmable (OTP) memory 502, a secure key generating module 504 and a key unwrapping and signature verification module 506. The key unwrapping and signature verification module 506 may be adapted to “unwrap”, or descramble, various application keys, for example, application key 1, 528, and application key 2, 530. In order to achieve this, the key unwrapping and signature verification module 506 may utilize several encrypted and signed keys, for example, encrypted and signed key 1, 516, encrypted and signed key 2, 518, encrypted and signed key 3, 520, and encrypted and signed key 4, 522. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the encrypted and signed keys 516, 518, 520 and 522 may have been initially signed by a transmitting entity utilizing an asymmetric encryption algorithm, such as a public key algorithm, for example a Rivest-Shamir-Adleman (RSA), a Digital Signature Algorithm (DSA), or an Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) type of algorithm. The signed keys may then have been encrypted utilizing a symmetric encryption algorithm, such as a DES, a 3DES, or an AES type of algorithm.
  • The key unwrapping and signature verification module 506 may comprise scrambler and signature verifiers 508, 510, 512 and 514. Each of the scrambler and signature verifiers 508, 510, 512 and 514 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to utilize a symmetric encryption algorithm, for example a DES, a 3DES, or an AES type of algorithm, in order to descramble an encrypted signed key input. Each of the scrambler and signature verifiers 508, 510, 512 and 514 may also be adapted to utilize a public key algorithm, for example an RSA, a DSA, or an EC type of algorithm, in order to verify a decrypted signed key.
  • The OTP memory 502 in the key ladder system 500 may be adapted to store a root key, for example a master key. The root key stored in the OTP memory 502 may be further protected by the secure key generating module 504. The secure key generating module 504 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to scramble, or otherwise further enhance the security of the root key stored in the OTP memory 502.
  • Once the root key stored in the OTP memory 502 is scrambled by the secure key generating module 504, the scrambled root key 505 may be utilized by the scrambler and signature verifier 508 in order to decrypt, and verify the signature of, the encrypted and signed key 1, 516. In this way, the generated decrypted key 524 is verified. The decrypted and verified key 524 may comprise, for example, a work key. The decrypted and verified key 524 may be utilized by the scrambler 510 in order to decrypt, and verify the signature of, encrypted and signed key 2, 518, and to obtain the decrypted and verified key 526. The decrypted and verified key 526 may comprise, for example, a scrambling key.
  • The decrypted and verified key 526 may be utilized by the scrambler 512 in order to decrypt, and verify the signature of, encrypted and signed key 3, 220, and to obtain the decrypted and verified application key 1, 528. Similarly, the decrypted and verified application key 528 may be utilized by the scrambler 514 in order to decrypt, and verify the signature of, encrypted and signed key 4, 522, and to obtain the decrypted and verified application key 2, 530. Decrypted and verified application keys 528 and 530 may be further utilized for various functions, for example, for copy protection of broadcast signals. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the key ladder in the key unwrapping and signature verification module 506 may be adapted to have varying levels of protection by increasing the number of the encrypted and signed keys and the corresponding scramblers, and by utilizing each previously decrypted and verified application key in a subsequent decryption of a following encrypted and signed key. The key ladder may be utilized to “unwrap” a signed and encrypted master key, a signed and encrypted work key and a signed and encrypted scrambling key. The master key, work key and scrambling key may then be utilized to decrypt one or more application keys.
  • FIG. 6A illustrates a block diagram of an exemplary system for secure key generation, secure key signing and secure key encryption, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 6A, the exemplary system 600 may comprise a key table 602, a transmit server database 612, a key signing module 614, an input register 616, a secure master key generating module 604, a selector 606, an encryptor 608, and intermediate destination registers 610.
  • The transmit server database 612 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to generate a plurality of secure keys, for example, master decryption keys 618. Master decryption keys 618 may comprise a master key K1620 and master key K2622. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the master decryption keys 618 may be utilized in the encryption and decryption of one or more secure keys, for example, a work key and/or a scrambling key.
  • Once master decryption keys 618 are generated by the transmit server database 612, the master decryption keys 618 may be stored in a key table 602. Each of the master decryption keys 620 and 622 may comprise an even number of bits. For example, master decryption keys 620 and 622 may each occupy two M-bit cells in the key table 602. The key table 602 may be part of a random access memory (RAM), such as a DRAM or SRAM, for example. The key table 602 may also be adapted to store a plurality of master decryption keys.
  • Once the master decryption keys are stored in the key table 602, the master decryption keys 618 may be sent to the secure master key generating module 604. The secure master key generating module 604 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to further enhance the security of master decryption keys K1620 and K2622. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the secure master key generating module 604 may comprise an encryptor or a scrambler. The secure master key generating module 604 may enhance the security of master decryption keys K1620 and K2622, and may generate a secure master decryption key K1 624 and a secure master decryption key K2 626.
  • The transmit server database 612 may also generate a plurality of secure keys 636, which may be communicated from the transmit server database 612 to the key signing module 614. The key signing module 614 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to “sign” the secure keys 636 and generate signed secure keys 638. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the key signing module may utilize a symmetric encryption algorithm and/or an asymmetric encryption algorithm to generate the signed secure keys 638. The signed secure keys 616 may then be stored in an input register 616, prior to being communicated to the encryptor 608.
  • The selector 606 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to select from one or more inputs and generate one or more outputs. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the selector 606 may be a 2:1 selector and may generate three outputs from any two received inputs. For example, the secure master decryption keys 624 and 626 may be utilized by the selector 606 as inputs to generate an output with the secure master decryption key 624 selected twice and the secure master decryption key 626 selected once.
  • The encryptor 608 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to encrypt any of the signed secure keys 638. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the encryptor 608 may comprise a 3DES-Encrypt-Decrypt-Encrypt (EDE) or Decrypt-Encrypt-Decrypt (DED) encryption engine. The encryptor 608 may utilize the secure master decryption key output from the selector 606 and encrypt the signed secure keys 638 to obtain encrypted and signed keys 632.
  • The encrypted and signed keys 632 may be copied to intermediate destination registers 610 and may be subsequently utilized by the selector 606 and the encryptor 608 for encryption of subsequent signed secure keys 638. For example, the secure master decryption keys 624 and 626 may be utilized by the selector 606 and the encryptor 608 only once, for the encryption of a first pair of signed secure keys received by the encryptor 608. The resulting encrypted and signed secure keys 628 and 630 may be stored in intermediate destination registers 610 prior to their utilization by the selector 606 and the encryptor 608 for the encryption of a second, subsequent pair of signed secure keys.
  • As the key generation, signing and encryption system 600 generates encrypted and signed keys 632, the secure key ladder protection increases since the number of generated encrypted and signed keys 632 increases. As the encrypted and signed keys 632 are generated, they may be transmitted from an output location 634.
  • Referring now to FIG. 6B, there is illustrated a block diagram of an exemplary system for secure key decryption and secure key signature verification in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. The exemplary system for secure key decryption and secure key signature verification 650 may comprise a one-time programmable non-volatile memory (OTP NVM) 652, a secure master key generating module 654, a CPU 653, an input register 672, a selector 656, a decryptor 658, an input register 660, a signature verification module 662, an intermediate destination register 664, a switch 668 and final destination registers 670.
  • The OTP NVM 652 may comprise a random access memory (RAM), such as a DRAM or SRAM, for example. The OTP NVM 652 may be adapted to store, for example, read-only data 674, keys 676, and an enable bit 678. The keys 676 may comprise master decryption keys 681 and 680. The master decryption keys 681 and 680 may each occupy, for example, an even number of bits in the OTP NVM 652. More specifically, the master decryption keys 680 and 681 may each occupy two M-bit cells in the OTP NVM 652. The read-only data 674 of the OTP NVM 652 may comprise chip identification information and other read-only information that may be accessed by the CPU 653. The CPU 653 may be, for example, a microprocessor, a microcontroller or other type of processor.
  • The master decryption keys 680 and 681 may be sent to the secure master key generating module 654. The secure master key generating module 654 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to further enhance the security of the master decryption keys 680 and 681. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the secure master key generating module 654 may comprise an encryptor, or a scrambler, that may receive master decryption keys 682 as input. Master decryption keys 682 may comprise master decryption key 680 and master decryption key 681. The secure master key generating module 654 may enhance the security of master decryption key 680 and master decryption key 681 and may generate a secure master decryption key K1 683 and secure master decryption key K2 684.
  • The selector 656 may comprise suitable logic circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to select from one or more inputs and generate one or more outputs. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the selector 656 may be a 2:1 selector and may generate three outputs from any two received inputs. For example, the secure master decryption keys K1 and K2, 683 and 684 respectively, may be utilized by the selector 656 as inputs to generate an output. For example, the secure master decryption key 683 may be selected twice and the secure master decryption selected once.
  • The secure key decryption and secure key signature verification system 650 may be adapted to receive encrypted and signed keys 646. The encrypted and signed keys 646 may be generated, for example, by a secure key generation, secure key signing and secure key encryption system, such as the system illustrated on FIG. 6A. Once received by the secure key decryption and secure key verification system 650, the encrypted and signed keys 646 may be stored in an input register 672. The encrypted and signed keys 646 may then be transmitted to the decryptor 658. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the encrypted and signed keys 646 may comprise multiples of 64-bits, and may include at least one of an encrypted key, a key destination and/or a key signature.
  • The decryptor 658 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code that may be adapted to decrypt any of the encrypted and signed keys 646. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the encryptor 658 may comprise a 3DES-Encrypt-Decrypt-Encrypt (EDE) and/or Decrypt-Encrypt-Decrypt (DED) decryption engine. The decryptor 658 may utilize the secure master decryption keys K1 and K2, 683 and 684 respectively, generated as an output of the selector 656. The decryptor 658 generates as output unwrapped decrypted keys 688 and signature bytes 690.
  • The unwrapped decrypted keys 688 may be communicated to the intermediate destination registers 664, and may subsequently be utilized by the selector 656 and the decryptor 658 for decryption of subsequent encrypted and signed keys 646. For example, the secure master decryption key K1 683 and the secure master decryption key K2 684 may be utilized by the selector 656 and the decryptor 658 only once, for the decryption of a first pair of encrypted and signed keys 646 that may be received by the decryptor 658. The resulting unwrapped decrypted keys K1 686 and K2 685 may be stored in the intermediate destination registers 664. The unwrapped decrypted keys 685 and 686 may then be utilized by the selector 656 and decryptor 658 for the decryption of a second subsequent pair of encrypted and signed keys 646 that may be received by the decryptor 658. This loop process may continue until all encrypted and signed keys of the received key ladder are unwrapped and decrypted.
  • After decryption of the encrypted and signed keys 646 by the decryptor 658, the signature bytes 690 of each of the encrypted and signed keys are generated as output from the decryptor 658. The signature bytes 690 may then be entered into the signature verification module 652. The signature verification module 652 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry and/or code but may be adapted to verify the authenticity of the signature bytes 690. In accordance with an aspect of the present invention, the signature verification module 662 may utilize an asymmetric encryption algorithm, such as a public key encryption algorithm, in order to verify the received signature bytes 690. A verification key 687 may be loaded by the CPU 653. A verification key 687 may comprise for example, a public key that may be utilized to verify the signature 690. The verification key 687 may be initially stored in an input register 660. The signature verification module 662 may utilize the verification key (public key) 687 in order to verify the received signature 690. As a result, an enabled/disabled signal 691 may be generated by the signature verification module 662. The enabled/disabled signal 691 may then be communicated to the switch 668.
  • The switch 668 may receive the unwrapped decrypted key 688 and may allow, or reject, a further transmission of the unlocked decrypted keys 688 through the final destination registers 670. If the command 691 comprises an enable command, the unwrapped decrypted key 688 may be transmitted to the final destination registers 670 for any further processing. If the command 691 comprises a disable command, then the unwrapped decrypted keys 688 may not be transmitted to the final destination registers 670. A disable command 691 may be generated, for example, if the signature verification module 690 ascertains that the signature 690 is not verified. The signature 690 may be unverifiable if, for example, the encrypted and signed keys 646 had been manipulated by an attacker during their transmission to the secure key decryption and secure key verification system 650. Verification of the signature 690 by the signature verification module 662 may be enabled or disabled with the help of the enable bit 678. The bit 678 may comprise a multi-stage programming (MSP) bit. For example, an enable bit 678 may be set to a predetermined value so that the signature verification module 662 is activated and the signature 690 may be verified.
  • Accordingly, the present invention may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present invention may be realized in a centralized fashion in at least one computer system, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computer systems. Any kind of computer system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A typical combination of hardware and software may be a general-purpose computer system with a computer program that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein.
  • The present invention may also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which when loaded in a computer system is able to carry out these methods. Computer program in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.
  • While the present invention has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the present invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present invention without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the present invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.

Claims (41)

  1. 1. A method for secure key authentication, the method comprising:
    generating at a first location a digital signature of a secure key to obtain a digitally signed secure key; and
    transmitting the digitally signed secure key from the first location.
  2. 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising generating the digital signature from at least one of an asymmetric encryption algorithm and a symmetric encryption algorithm.
  3. 3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising encrypting the digitally signed secure key prior to transmission to obtain an encrypted digitally signed key.
  4. 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the secure key comprises at least one of a master key, a work key and a scrambling key.
  5. 5. The method according to claim 4, further comprising:
    receiving the digitally signed secure key at a second location; and
    decrypting the digitally signed secure key to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key.
  6. 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein if the secure key comprises a work key then a decrypted digitally signed master key at the second location is utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed work key.
  7. 7. The method according to claim 5, wherein if the secure key comprises a scrambling key then a decrypted digitally signed work key at the second location is utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed scrambling key.
  8. 8. The method according to claim 5, further comprising verifying authenticity of the digital signature of the digitally signed secure key.
  9. 9. The method according to claim 8, further comprising verifying the authenticity of the digital signature utilizing at least one of an asymmetric decryption algorithm and a symmetric decryption algorithm.
  10. 10. The method according to claim 8, further comprising determining whether to verify authenticity of the digital signature.
  11. 11. A machine-readable storage having stored thereon, a computer program having at least one code section for secure key authentication, the at least one code section being executable by a machine for causing the machine to perform steps comprising:
    generating at a first location a digital signature of a secure key to obtain a digitally signed secure key; and
    transmitting the digitally signed secure key from the first location.
  12. 12. The machine-readable storage according to claim 11, further comprising code for generating the digital signature from at least one of an asymmetric encryption algorithm and a symmetric encryption algorithm.
  13. 13. The machine-readable storage according to claim 11, further comprising code for encrypting the digitally signed secure key prior to transmission to obtain an encrypted digitally signed key.
  14. 14. The machine-readable storage according to claim 13, wherein the secure key comprises at least one of a master key, a work key and a scrambling key.
  15. 15. The machine-readable storage according to claim 14, further comprising:
    code for receiving the digitally signed secure key at a second location; and
    code for decrypting the digitally signed secure key to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key.
  16. 16. The machine-readable storage according to claim 15, wherein if the secure key comprises a work key then a decrypted digitally signed master key at the second location is utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed work key.
  17. 17. The machine-readable storage according to claim 15, wherein if the secure key comprises a scrambling key then a decrypted digitally signed work key at the second location is utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed scrambling key.
  18. 18. The machine-readable storage according to claim 15, further comprising code for verifying authenticity of the digital signature of the digitally signed secure key.
  19. 19. The machine-readable storage according to claim 18, further comprising code for verifying the authenticity of the digital signature utilizing at least one of an asymmetric decryption algorithm and a symmetric decryption algorithm.
  20. 20. The machine-readable storage according to claim 18, further comprising code for determining whether to verify authenticity of the digital signature.
  21. 21. A system for secure key authentication, the system comprising:
    at least one processor for generating at a first location a digital signature of a secure key to obtain a digitally signed secure key; and
    the at least one processor transmitting the digitally signed secure key from the first location.
  22. 22. The system according to claim 21, the at least one processor generating the digital signature from at least one of an asymmetric encryption algorithm and a symmetric encryption algorithm.
  23. 23. The system according to claim 21, the at least one processor encrypting the digitally signed secure key prior to transmission to obtain an encrypted digitally signed key.
  24. 24. The system according to claim 23, wherein the secure key comprises at least one of a master key, a work key and a scrambling key.
  25. 25. The system according to claim 24, the at least one processor:
    receiving the digitally signed secure key at a second location; and
    decrypting the digitally signed secure key to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key.
  26. 26. The system according to claim 25, wherein a decrypted digitally signed master key at the second location is utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed work key.
  27. 27. The system according to claim 25, wherein a decrypted digitally signed work key at the second location is utilized for decrypting an encrypted digitally signed scrambling key.
  28. 28. The system according to claim 25, the at least one processor verifying authenticity of the digital signature of the digitally signed secure key.
  29. 29. The system according to claim 28, the at least one processor verifying the authenticity of the digital signature utilizing at least one of an asymmetric decryption algorithm and a symmetric decryption algorithm.
  30. 30. The system according to claim 28, the at least one processor determining whether to verify authenticity of the digital signature.
  31. 31. The system according to claim 21, wherein the at least one processor comprises at least one of a host processor, a microprocessor, and a microcontroller.
  32. 32. A system for secure key authentication, the system comprising:
    a transmitter;
    the transmitter comprises a generator that generates a digital signature of a secure key to obtain a digitally signed secure key; and
    the transmitter transmits the digitally signed secure key.
  33. 33. The system according to claim 32, wherein the generator generates the digital signature from at least one of an asymmetric encryption algorithm and a symmetric encryption algorithm.
  34. 34. The system according to claim 32, further comprising an encryptor that encrypts the digitally signed secure key prior to transmission to obtain an encrypted digitally signed key.
  35. 35. The system according to claim 34, wherein the secure key comprises at least one of a master key, a work key and a scrambling key.
  36. 36. The system according to claim 35, further comprising:
    a receiver that receives the digitally signed secure key; and
    the receiver comprising a decryptor that decrypts the digitally signed secure key to obtain a decrypted digitally signed secure key.
  37. 37. The system according to claim 36, wherein the receiver comprises a decryptor that utilizes a digitally signed master key to decrypt an encrypted digitally signed work key.
  38. 38. The system according to claim 36, wherein the decryptor utilizes a decrypted digitally signed work key to decrypt an encrypted digitally signed scrambling key.
  39. 39. The system according to claim 36, the receiver comprises a verifier that verifies authenticity of the digital signature of the digitally signed secure key.
  40. 40. The system according to claim 39, wherein the verifier utilizes at least one of an asymmetric decryption algorithm and a symmetric decryption algorithm.
  41. 41. The system according to claim 39, wherein the verifier determines whether to verify authenticity of the digital signature.
US10769173 2004-01-30 2004-01-30 Secure key authentication and ladder system Abandoned US20050172132A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10769173 US20050172132A1 (en) 2004-01-30 2004-01-30 Secure key authentication and ladder system

Applications Claiming Priority (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10769173 US20050172132A1 (en) 2004-01-30 2004-01-30 Secure key authentication and ladder system
EP20050000718 EP1560361B1 (en) 2004-01-30 2005-01-14 A secure key authentication and ladder system
DE200560019933 DE602005019933D1 (en) 2004-01-30 2005-01-14 Secure key authentication and Head System
CN 200510007190 CN1655503B (en) 2004-01-30 2005-01-28 A secure key authentication and ladder system
TW94102643A TWI271077B (en) 2004-01-30 2005-01-28 A secure key authentication and ladder system
US11743533 US9461825B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2007-05-02 Method and system for preventing revocation denial of service attacks
US13918612 US9608804B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2013-06-14 Secure key authentication and ladder system

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11743533 Continuation-In-Part US9461825B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2007-05-02 Method and system for preventing revocation denial of service attacks
US13918612 Continuation US9608804B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2013-06-14 Secure key authentication and ladder system

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050172132A1 true true US20050172132A1 (en) 2005-08-04

Family

ID=34654381

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10769173 Abandoned US20050172132A1 (en) 2004-01-30 2004-01-30 Secure key authentication and ladder system
US13918612 Active US9608804B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2013-06-14 Secure key authentication and ladder system

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13918612 Active US9608804B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2013-06-14 Secure key authentication and ladder system

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US20050172132A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1560361B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1655503B (en)
DE (1) DE602005019933D1 (en)

Cited By (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050273843A1 (en) * 2004-06-02 2005-12-08 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Encrypted communication method and system
US20060184796A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2006-08-17 Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc System and method for a variable key ladder
US20070239605A1 (en) * 2006-04-06 2007-10-11 Peter Munguia Supporting multiple key ladders using a common private key set
US20070297605A1 (en) * 2006-06-26 2007-12-27 Sony Corporation Memory access control apparatus and method, and communication apparatus
US20080086641A1 (en) * 2004-01-30 2008-04-10 Stephane Rodgers Method and system for preventing revocation denial of service attacks
US20090002322A1 (en) * 2007-06-29 2009-01-01 Sebastien Weitbruch Method for distributing display information to a remote display device, a corresponding display device, a system for distributing display information and a signal comprising display information
US20090190762A1 (en) * 2008-01-30 2009-07-30 Andrew Dellow Method and system for preventing generation of decryption keys via sample gathering
US20090323971A1 (en) * 2006-12-28 2009-12-31 Munguia Peter R Protecting independent vendor encryption keys with a common primary encryption key
WO2010089723A1 (en) * 2009-02-08 2010-08-12 Infinite Memories Ltd. A circuit, system, device and method of authenticating a communication session and encrypting data thereof
US20100254536A1 (en) * 2009-04-02 2010-10-07 Broadcom Corporation Authenticated mode control
US20110081017A1 (en) * 2008-06-23 2011-04-07 Hideki Matsushima Key migration device
US20140136855A1 (en) * 2008-09-05 2014-05-15 Vixs Systems, Inc. Secure key access with one-time programmable memory and applications thereof
US9064135B1 (en) * 2006-12-12 2015-06-23 Marvell International Ltd. Hardware implemented key management system and method
US9432184B2 (en) * 2008-09-05 2016-08-30 Vixs Systems Inc. Provisioning of secure storage for both static and dynamic rules for cryptographic key information
US9501429B2 (en) * 2008-09-05 2016-11-22 Vixs Systems Inc. Dynamic key and rule storage protection
US20170063538A1 (en) * 2014-12-24 2017-03-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Key ladder apparatus and method
US9608804B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2017-03-28 Avago Technologies General Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Secure key authentication and ladder system

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8082588B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2011-12-20 Nagravision S.A. Secured storage method of encrypted data on a personal digital recorder
US8438392B2 (en) 2002-06-20 2013-05-07 Krimmeni Technologies, Inc. Method and system for control of code execution on a general purpose computing device and control of code execution in a recursive security protocol
US7203844B1 (en) 2002-06-20 2007-04-10 Oxford William V Method and system for a recursive security protocol for digital copyright control
EP1768408B1 (en) * 2005-07-29 2010-07-07 STMicroelectronics (Research & Development) Limited Method of restricting use of decryption keys using encrypted digital signatures
US20070180538A1 (en) * 2006-02-01 2007-08-02 General Instrument Corporation Method and apparatus for limiting the ability of a user device to replay content
US20080019517A1 (en) * 2006-04-06 2008-01-24 Peter Munguia Control work key store for multiple data streams
US8781127B2 (en) 2008-09-05 2014-07-15 Vixs Systems, Inc. Device with privileged memory and applications thereof
CN101729251B (en) * 2008-10-21 2012-09-05 华为技术有限公司 Method and device of CGA signature verification
CN102131104A (en) * 2011-03-22 2011-07-20 中广传播集团有限公司 Method for scrambling service
CN102302829A (en) * 2011-05-10 2012-01-04 刘建国 Intelligent lifesaving device with early warning and escape guiding functions
JP2015511050A (en) 2012-03-20 2015-04-13 クリメニ テクノロジーズ, インコーポレイテッド Method and system for the process working set quarantine
US20160286395A1 (en) * 2015-03-24 2016-09-29 Intel Corporation Apparatus, system and method of securing communication between wireless devices
US20170033930A1 (en) * 2015-07-31 2017-02-02 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Techniques to secure computation data in a computing environment
US9735962B1 (en) * 2015-09-30 2017-08-15 EMC IP Holding Company LLC Three layer key wrapping for securing encryption keys in a data storage system
CN106060614A (en) * 2016-07-07 2016-10-26 四川长虹电器股份有限公司 File encryption and decryption method based on high-security chip in digital television

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6073237A (en) * 1997-11-06 2000-06-06 Cybercash, Inc. Tamper resistant method and apparatus
US20020001386A1 (en) * 2000-06-30 2002-01-03 Koichiro Akiyama Broadcast receiving method and apparatus and information distributing method and apparatus

Family Cites Families (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5309516A (en) 1990-12-07 1994-05-03 Hitachi, Ltd. Group cipher communication method and group cipher communication system
US20030037235A1 (en) 1998-08-19 2003-02-20 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System for signatureless transmission and reception of data packets between computer networks
GB9605472D0 (en) 1996-03-15 1996-05-15 Digi Media Vision Ltd A secure method and apparatus for data transmission in digital video broadcast data services
FR2750554B1 (en) 1996-06-28 1998-08-14 Thomson Multimedia Sa System has conditional access and smart card allowing such access
US6041408A (en) 1996-06-28 2000-03-21 Hitachi, Ltd. Key distribution method and system in secure broadcast communication
US6005938A (en) 1996-12-16 1999-12-21 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Preventing replay attacks on digital information distributed by network service providers
US5920626A (en) 1996-12-20 1999-07-06 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Analog/digital system for television services
US6144743A (en) 1997-02-07 2000-11-07 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Information recording medium, recording apparatus, information transmission system, and decryption apparatus
JP2001512842A (en) * 1997-08-01 2001-08-28 サイエンティフィック−アトランタ・インコーポレーテッド Ciphering apparatus used in the conditional access system
US7143438B1 (en) 1997-09-12 2006-11-28 Lucent Technologies Inc. Methods and apparatus for a computer network firewall with multiple domain support
JP3565715B2 (en) 1998-07-02 2004-09-15 松下電器産業株式会社 It broadcast transmitting and receiving device and the broadcast system
US6038322A (en) 1998-10-20 2000-03-14 Cisco Technology, Inc. Group key distribution
US6697489B1 (en) 1999-03-30 2004-02-24 Sony Corporation Method and apparatus for securing control words
US6760752B1 (en) 1999-06-28 2004-07-06 Zix Corporation Secure transmission system
US6985431B1 (en) 1999-08-27 2006-01-10 International Business Machines Corporation Network switch and components and method of operation
JP3570311B2 (en) 1999-10-07 2004-09-29 日本電気株式会社 The encryption key update system and update method of the wireless lan
US6931532B1 (en) 1999-10-21 2005-08-16 International Business Machines Corporation Selective data encryption using style sheet processing
EP1111923A1 (en) 1999-12-22 2001-06-27 Irdeto Access B.V. Method for operating a conditional access system for broadcast applications
US20020172366A1 (en) * 2000-10-26 2002-11-21 General Instrument, Inc. Initial viewing period for scalable authorization of streaming multimedia content
US7127069B2 (en) 2000-12-07 2006-10-24 Igt Secured virtual network in a gaming environment
US20020094089A1 (en) 2000-12-28 2002-07-18 Shigeki Kamiya Data delivery method and data delivery system
US7493662B2 (en) 2001-02-15 2009-02-17 Panasonic Corporation Data nullification device for nullifying digital content recorded on a recording medium, after the digital content has been reproduced, a predetermined time period has passed since the recording of the digital content, or the digital content has been moved to another recording medium
US20020184512A1 (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-05 Cardoso Augusto C. Method and apparatus for supporting remote configuration to facilitate subscriber management
US20030061405A1 (en) 2001-08-15 2003-03-27 Open Technologies Group, Inc. System, method and computer program product for protocol-independent processing of information in an enterprise integration application
US7317798B2 (en) 2001-09-21 2008-01-08 Sony Corporation Communication processing system, communication processing method, server and computer program
FR2831737B1 (en) 2001-10-29 2003-12-26 France Telecom A method and system of transmission with access control digital scrambled data in a data exchange network
US8312265B2 (en) 2001-12-11 2012-11-13 Pinder Howard G Encrypting received content
WO2003058948A3 (en) 2002-01-14 2003-10-16 Koninkl Philips Electronics Nv System for providing time dependent conditional access
US7861082B2 (en) 2002-05-24 2010-12-28 Pinder Howard G Validating client-receivers
US7181010B2 (en) 2002-05-24 2007-02-20 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. Apparatus for entitling remote client devices
EP1372317B1 (en) 2002-06-11 2008-08-27 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Authentication system
DE60202863T2 (en) 2002-08-30 2005-06-30 Errikos Pitsos A method, system and gateway for transmitting data between a network device in a public network and a network device in a private network
JP3742056B2 (en) 2002-12-19 2006-02-01 株式会社バッファロー Of wireless network access authentication technology
US20040177369A1 (en) 2003-03-06 2004-09-09 Akins Glendon L. Conditional access personal video recorder
US20050066355A1 (en) 2003-09-19 2005-03-24 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for satellite broadcasting and receiving encrypted television data signals
US7509674B2 (en) 2003-10-07 2009-03-24 Alcatel Lucent Access control listing mechanism for routers
CN1981527A (en) 2003-12-05 2007-06-13 美国电影协会 Secure video system for display adaptor
US9461825B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2016-10-04 Broadcom Corporation Method and system for preventing revocation denial of service attacks
US20050172132A1 (en) 2004-01-30 2005-08-04 Chen Sherman (. Secure key authentication and ladder system
US9094699B2 (en) 2004-02-05 2015-07-28 Broadcom Corporation System and method for security key transmission with strong pairing to destination client

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6073237A (en) * 1997-11-06 2000-06-06 Cybercash, Inc. Tamper resistant method and apparatus
US20020001386A1 (en) * 2000-06-30 2002-01-03 Koichiro Akiyama Broadcast receiving method and apparatus and information distributing method and apparatus

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9608804B2 (en) 2004-01-30 2017-03-28 Avago Technologies General Ip (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Secure key authentication and ladder system
US9461825B2 (en) * 2004-01-30 2016-10-04 Broadcom Corporation Method and system for preventing revocation denial of service attacks
US20080086641A1 (en) * 2004-01-30 2008-04-10 Stephane Rodgers Method and system for preventing revocation denial of service attacks
US20110197069A9 (en) * 2004-01-30 2011-08-11 Stephane Rodgers Method and system for preventing revocation denial of service attacks
US7913296B2 (en) * 2004-06-02 2011-03-22 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Encrypted communication method and system
US20050273843A1 (en) * 2004-06-02 2005-12-08 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Encrypted communication method and system
US20110145577A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2011-06-16 Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc System and Method for a Variable Key Ladder
US20060184796A1 (en) * 2005-02-16 2006-08-17 Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc System and method for a variable key ladder
US7933410B2 (en) * 2005-02-16 2011-04-26 Comcast Cable Holdings, Llc System and method for a variable key ladder
US20070239605A1 (en) * 2006-04-06 2007-10-11 Peter Munguia Supporting multiple key ladders using a common private key set
US20070297605A1 (en) * 2006-06-26 2007-12-27 Sony Corporation Memory access control apparatus and method, and communication apparatus
US9064135B1 (en) * 2006-12-12 2015-06-23 Marvell International Ltd. Hardware implemented key management system and method
US20090323971A1 (en) * 2006-12-28 2009-12-31 Munguia Peter R Protecting independent vendor encryption keys with a common primary encryption key
US20090002322A1 (en) * 2007-06-29 2009-01-01 Sebastien Weitbruch Method for distributing display information to a remote display device, a corresponding display device, a system for distributing display information and a signal comprising display information
US20090190762A1 (en) * 2008-01-30 2009-07-30 Andrew Dellow Method and system for preventing generation of decryption keys via sample gathering
US20110081017A1 (en) * 2008-06-23 2011-04-07 Hideki Matsushima Key migration device
US20140136855A1 (en) * 2008-09-05 2014-05-15 Vixs Systems, Inc. Secure key access with one-time programmable memory and applications thereof
US9501429B2 (en) * 2008-09-05 2016-11-22 Vixs Systems Inc. Dynamic key and rule storage protection
US9317449B2 (en) * 2008-09-05 2016-04-19 Vixs Systems, Inc. Secure key access with one-time programmable memory and applications thereof
US9432184B2 (en) * 2008-09-05 2016-08-30 Vixs Systems Inc. Provisioning of secure storage for both static and dynamic rules for cryptographic key information
WO2010089723A1 (en) * 2009-02-08 2010-08-12 Infinite Memories Ltd. A circuit, system, device and method of authenticating a communication session and encrypting data thereof
US20100254536A1 (en) * 2009-04-02 2010-10-07 Broadcom Corporation Authenticated mode control
US8160248B2 (en) * 2009-04-02 2012-04-17 Broadcom Corporation Authenticated mode control
US20170063538A1 (en) * 2014-12-24 2017-03-02 Cisco Technology, Inc. Key ladder apparatus and method
US9735956B2 (en) * 2014-12-24 2017-08-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Key ladder apparatus and method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US9608804B2 (en) 2017-03-28 grant
US20130279691A1 (en) 2013-10-24 application
CN1655503B (en) 2011-06-08 grant
EP1560361A1 (en) 2005-08-03 application
CN1655503A (en) 2005-08-17 application
EP1560361B1 (en) 2010-03-17 grant
DE602005019933D1 (en) 2010-04-29 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5144664A (en) Apparatus and method for upgrading terminals to maintain a secure communication network
US6985591B2 (en) Method and apparatus for distributing keys for decrypting and re-encrypting publicly distributed media
US6311270B1 (en) Method and apparatus for securing communication utilizing a security processor
US20050100167A1 (en) System and method for using DRM to control conditional access to broadband digital content
US5111504A (en) Information processing apparatus with replaceable security element
US20040151315A1 (en) Streaming media security system and method
US6385317B1 (en) Method for providing a secure communication between two devices and application of this method
US20080301437A1 (en) Method of Controlling Access to a Scrambled Content
US5485577A (en) Method and apparatus for incremental delivery of access rights
US20040083364A1 (en) Method of secure transmission of digital data from a source to a receiver
US6289455B1 (en) Method and apparatus for preventing piracy of digital content
US20030126457A1 (en) Information reproducing apparatus and secure module
US20050169468A1 (en) System and method for security processing media streams
US20040068659A1 (en) Method for secure distribution of digital data representing a multimedia content
US4864615A (en) Reproduction of secure keys by using distributed key generation data
US20100161966A1 (en) Mutual authentication apparatus and method in downloadable conditional access system
US20060184796A1 (en) System and method for a variable key ladder
US6409089B1 (en) Method for protecting the audio/visual data across the NRSS interface
US20040190721A1 (en) Renewable conditional access system
US7660986B1 (en) Secure control of security mode
US6550008B1 (en) Protection of information transmitted over communications channels
US6005938A (en) Preventing replay attacks on digital information distributed by network service providers
US6507907B1 (en) Protecting information in a system
US20040123125A1 (en) Video decoder system and method with enhanced digital rights management (DRM)
US6516414B1 (en) Secure communication over a link

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: BROADCOM CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHEN, SHERMAN (XUEMIN);RODGERS, STEVE;REEL/FRAME:014758/0483;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040123 TO 20040127

AS Assignment

Owner name: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT, NORTH

Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:BROADCOM CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:037806/0001

Effective date: 20160201

AS Assignment

Owner name: AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BROADCOM CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:041706/0001

Effective date: 20170120

AS Assignment

Owner name: BROADCOM CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS;ASSIGNOR:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT;REEL/FRAME:041712/0001

Effective date: 20170119