US20050131984A1 - Method for transmitting data from applications with different quality - Google Patents

Method for transmitting data from applications with different quality Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050131984A1
US20050131984A1 US10497964 US49796404A US2005131984A1 US 20050131984 A1 US20050131984 A1 US 20050131984A1 US 10497964 US10497964 US 10497964 US 49796404 A US49796404 A US 49796404A US 2005131984 A1 US2005131984 A1 US 2005131984A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
data
communication
application
time
transmission
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10497964
Inventor
Jens Hofmann
Jens Schneider
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Siemens AG
Original Assignee
Siemens AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control or resource allocation
    • H04L47/80Actions related to the nature of the flow or the user
    • H04L47/805QOS or priority aware
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/15Flow control or congestion control in relation to multipoint traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/18End to end
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/24Flow control or congestion control depending on the type of traffic, e.g. priority or quality of service [QoS]
    • H04L47/2416Real time traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/24Flow control or congestion control depending on the type of traffic, e.g. priority or quality of service [QoS]
    • H04L47/2425Service specification, e.g. SLA
    • H04L47/2433Allocation of priorities to traffic types
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control or resource allocation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control or resource allocation
    • H04L47/72Reservation actions
    • H04L47/724Reservation actions involving intermediate nodes, e.g. RSVP
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control or resource allocation
    • H04L47/80Actions related to the nature of the flow or the user
    • H04L47/801Real time traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control or resource allocation
    • H04L47/80Actions related to the nature of the flow or the user
    • H04L47/803Application aware

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for transmitting data of applications with different quality requirements in a packet-oriented data communication network that comprises communication nodes. The inventive method comprises the following steps: a) limiting the data of every application to a defined bit rate in a communication node to be passed during transmission of the data of the respective application; b) generating and storing application-specific contexts in all communication nodes to be passed during transmission of the data of the respective application; c) reserving, in line with the application-specific contexts, transmission resources in all communication nodes to be passed during transmission of the data of the respective application; d) forwarding, in line with the application-specific contexts, the data of every application from a communication node to be passed by the respective application to another communication node to be passed.

Description

    CLAIM FOR PRIORITY
  • [0001]
    This application claims priority to International Application No. PCT/DE01/04724 which was published in the German language on Jul. 3, 2003, and filed in the German language on Dec. 10, 2001.
  • TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    The present invention relates to a method for transmitting data from applications with different requirements in terms of the quality of a transmission service in a packet switched data communication network.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0003]
    A fundamental feature of packet switched data communication networks is that data transmission takes place not via dedicatedly connected data paths, but rather via virtual data paths according to the principle of random multiplexing. In this context, multiplexing is understood to mean the simultaneous transmission of a plurality of information items via the same transmission path on the basis of the random distribution of the various information items over time. The data which are usually transmitted in such networks are distinguished by a “burst” characteristic, i.e. by fluctuations in their bandwidth over time. In order to be able to transmit the data effectively, they are generally aggregated between communication nodes in the packet switched data communication network, and statistical assumptions are used to transmit them together from communication node to communication node via existing transport paths, i.e. via virtual data paths. There is no exclusive provision of transmission resources for individual applications on an “end to end” basis. The random multiplexing makes effective use of the existing transmission resources. In contrast, in circuit switched data communication networks, each application is provided with a dedicated path through the data communication network, on which both the transmission time and the bandwidth are guaranteed. If data are transmitted at a variable bit rate in this case, the available bandwidth is not exhausted in the case of pauses or periods in which the transmission rate is low.
  • [0004]
    Any application in a mobile packet switched data communication network demands particular resources for the transfer capacity from the data communication network for the duration of the application, in order to allow “end to end” communication. In mobile packet switched data communication networks, this is done by applying a “context” with an appropriate set of parameters at every affected communication node which needs to be encountered. A context contains all of the relevant information which provides an adequate description of the service required for transmitting the data. In particular, each application requires a particular transmission service in a particular quality (QoS—Quality of Service) from the data communication network. This requirement is characterized by “QoS parameters”, such as a maximum bit rate, a guaranteeable bit rate and a maximum permissible delay. When a context is created, each communication node negotiates these QoS parameters in line with its existing resources, with the parameters each being negotiated in stages. The respective application's data are then transmitted on the basis of these negotiated and stored QoS parameters, which are the same at all of the communication nodes which are to be encountered.
  • [0005]
    To date, the problem of transmitting data from applications with different requirements in terms of the quality of transmission has been solved in different ways.
  • [0006]
    There is a QoS architecture from the 3GPP (TS 23.107) which describes particular QoS functions for 3rd generation (UMTS) mobile radio networks. Implementation at individual communication nodes is not specified in more detail, however. In addition, there are approaches which describe methods for transmitting data from applications with different QoS requirements in a data communication network.
  • [0007]
    A first approach involves providing each data packet with information about the demanded transmission quality. In this case, particular quality classes, which provide a suitable reflection of the transmission requirements, are defined in a data communication network. These classes are then called Quality of Service classes. Each data packet is assigned to a QoS class and is provided with corresponding information. Each communication node (which forwards data in such a data communication network) which is to be encountered prioritizes the forwarding of a data packet on the basis of the QoS information which each data packet contains. In this case, the usual treatment is to distribute packets in appropriate queues according to the QoS information these packets contain. These queues are emptied and forwarded at different speeds according to their QoS class. This approach statistically increases the probability of a high priority data packet being routed through the data communication network much more quickly than a data packet with low priority. A drawback of this approach is that there is no guaranteed transmission time and transmission rate within the data communication network. Other drawbacks are that data packets requiring transmission in real time are buffer stored in every queue and are thus delayed. Another drawback is that the information about the association with a QoS class needs to be contained in every data packet and that the format of this information needs to be the same throughout the data communication network. This approach is described, by way of example, in the RFC 2474 standard from IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force).
  • [0008]
    A second approach to solving the problem described above involves setting up different data paths within the data communication network for each QoS class. If a communication node is able to associate a data packet with a QoS class, this data packet is forwarded on a data path which corresponds to this QoS class.
  • [0009]
    A drawback of this method is the costs for setting up and operating a large number of different paths of different quality between different communication nodes. The setup of different paths in different QoS classes has been defined in various standards, for example in the Traffic Management Specification, also called AF-TM-0121.000 by the ATM forum.
  • [0010]
    A third approach involves limiting the total traffic at the access node into the data communication network, an “edge node”, to a predefined traffic level. This traffic level will then not differ again within the data communication network, since it is presupposed that the data communication network has adequate dimensions. The drawback of this approach is the lack of any guarantee with regard to transmission time and transmission rate. This approach is specified by the IETF's Service Level Agreement Working Group, for example.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0011]
    The present invention relates to a method for transmitting data from applications with different requirements in terms of the quality of a transmission service in a packet switched data communication network. In packet switched data communication networks with, by way of example, IP based transmission mechanisms, different data types from various applications are transmitted from a source to a destination via a network. In this context, the requirements in terms of the manner of transmission between various applications vary greatly. This applies particularly to the transmission of data from applications which require transmission in real time and/or using a guaranteed bit rate, as compared with transmission of data which are not subject to stringent requirements in terms of transmission in real time and/or in terms of a guaranteed bit rate. Applications requiring transmissions in real time and with a guaranteed bit rate are, by way of example, voice telephony, online radio and video transmission. By contrast, electronic mail services or Internet applications, such as web surfing, have no comparable requirements in terms of transmission.
  • [0012]
    The present invention provides a method which can be used to transmit data from applications with different transmission requirements within the data communication network as efficiently as possible and avoiding the above drawbacks.
  • [0013]
    In one embodiment of the invention, there is a method for transmitting data from applications with different transmission requirements in a packet switched data communication network containing communication nodes, including:
      • a. each application's data are limited to a prescribed bit rate at a communication node which is to be encountered when a respective application's data are transmitted,
      • b. application specific contexts are created and stored at the communication nodes which are to be encountered when a respective application's data are transmitted,
      • c. transmission resources are reserved at the communication nodes which are to be encountered when a respective application's data are transmitted, in line with the application specific contexts,
      • d. each application's data are forwarded from a communication node which is to be encountered by the respective application to a further communication node which is to be encountered, in line with the application specific contexts.
  • [0018]
    In one preferred embodiment of the invention, (a) is performed at an access communication node (edge node) to the packet switched data communication network. An incoming stream of data from an application is limited to a prescribed, preferably to a maximum permissible bit rate which is determined by the resources existing in the data communication network. This ensures that there is no longer any possibility of impermissible excess at the subsequent communication nodes which are to be encountered in the data communication network.
  • [0019]
    Preferably, each application's data are limited to a prescribed bit rate by measuring the volume of a respective application's data over a settable time interval in parallel with the forwarding of these data and comparing it with the volume of data which corresponds to the prescribed bit rate. This means that, over a particular interval of time (measurement interval), the size of incoming data packets is summed in parallel with their forwarding. This value reflects the volume of data within this time interval. If, by way of example, the maximum permissible volume of data corresponding to the maximum bit rate is now reached in this time interval, then this information may be used to decide whether subsequent data packets are rejected or are possibly transported further, since the communication node's total resources permit this. At the start of the subsequent measurement interval, the size of the data packets starts to be summed again, this summation also being able to start from a start value which is not equal to zero, for example in order to take into account previous bursts. Hence, firstly any delay in the data packets is minimized and secondly the negotiated data rate is prevented from being exceeded at the subsequent communication nodes. At the same time, all other communication nodes in the data communication network which are to be encountered on this data path no longer need to monitor the maximum permissible bit rate.
  • [0020]
    In one preferred embodiment of the invention, each communication node which is to be encountered by a respective application's data uses a guaranteed bit rate, required by the respective application, and a maximum supportable bit rate to derive a bandwidth value for a transmission resource which is to be reserved, and reserves this transmission resource.
  • [0021]
    In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the method is performed for data from applications which require transmission in real time. This means that, when setting up a context for an application requiring real-time transmission (real-time application), each communication node which is to be encountered takes a requested guaranteed bit rate and the maximum supportable bit rate and derives a particular bandwidth value for a resource (BRealAppl) which is to be reserved and reserves this bandwidth for this application. The calculation of the bit rate which is to be reserved can also take into account measurements relating to the actual resource requirement of applications which are active and which have been active. In general, a particular share of the resources (BSumReal) in the total transmission width Btotal is reserved for the total real-time traffic at the communication node. This means that the bandwidth value (BRealAppl) ascertained for the application is taken from the share BSumReal which is reserved for the real-time traffic. This means that the application has the bandwidth BRealAppl at the communication node available. When the application has ended, these reserved resources are released again. The share BSumReal reserved for real-time traffic is preferably chosen to be smaller than the total bandwidth at the communication node. This ensure that firstly a particular share of the resources is available for applications which do not require real-time transmission (nonrealtime application), and secondly brief excesses over the reserved bandwidth (bursts) can likewise be transmitted for realtime applications. For applications which do not require real-time transmission and without a guaranteed bit rate, no bandwidth is reserved for a single application. Instead, the unreserved share BSumNonReal of the total resources is reserved for such applications (BSumNonReal=Btotal−BSumReal). At the same time, applications which do not require real-time transmission are also able to use the resources which are reserved for real-time applications but are temporarily not being used for these. Random multiplexing can be used to transport data from this application with a particular probability. If the actual volume of data in the non-real-time traffic exceeds the bandwidth which is available for the traffic, this traffic is delayed or rejected. The actual sum of data to be transported for the real-time applications may exceed the resources reserved therefor. This is the case, for example, when data streams having the maximum bit rate arrive at the communication node at the same time for all or a large number of real-time applications, and a smaller bandwidth has been reserved for these services. When this case arises, portions of the resources provided for non-real-time applications are used concurrently for transporting the real-time applications' data. A correspondingly smaller amount of resources is then available for the data transmission for non-real-time applications. The share of reserved resources BSumReal and the calculation algorithm for the bandwidth which is to be reserved govern the extent to which the real-time applications' data may exceed the reserved resources and how high the probability is that data from non-real-time applications will be transported. In this case, the number of randomly multiplexed data streams for the applications, inter alia, may also be of significance. The larger the reserved share for real-time applications, the lower the probability that temporary excesses (bursts) over the reserved bandwidth will be able to be transmitted. The larger the share of the reserved share for real-time applications, the lower the probability that data from non-real-time applications will be transported.
  • [0022]
    In one preferred embodiment of the invention, this behavior can be influenced when activating a context, i.e. when negotiating the QoS parameters. When the application specific contexts are created at each communication node, the ratio of a guaranteed bit rate required by the respective application and a maximum supportable bit rate can preferably be varied and hence restricted.
  • [0023]
    In line with the invention, under particular assumptions, it is also possible to transmit data for real-time applications up to the maximum guaranteed bit rate BmaxRealAppl at each communication node without jams forming or data packets being rejected when these data and the guaranteed bit rate are transmitted. Firstly, bursts, i.e. brief transmission at high bit rates, should occur in randomly distributed form. There will then be a high probability that the sum of the reserved bandwidth BSumReal will not be exceeded. In the event of excesses, a portion of the resources which has been reserved for non-real-time applications will be used concurrently. In this case, the sum of the maximum bit rate for all contexts the total resources at a communication node must not exceed a measure determined on the basis of ordinary proportioning methods.
  • [0024]
    In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the method involves the applications' data being classified into at least two categories in line with the application specific contexts and being forwarded in line with these categories. These two categories advantageously represent at least the classification into real-time applications and non-real-time applications. This categorization is preferably performed at each communication node and, as already mentioned, takes place on the basis of the contexts which exist at the communication node. Each data packet which has been assigned to a real-time application is forwarded to the next communication node immediately without buffer storage. Packets without any real-time requirement can be buffer stored in queues and can be forwarded from the queue in line with a particular reading mechanism. This reading mechanism is able, by way of example, to distribute the available transfer resources for the total non-real-time traffic or for portions thereof according to a predefined scheme or is able to implement simple prioritization for the queues. In this case, the available transfer resources for the non-real-time data are dependent on the instantaneous data volume in the real-time data.
  • [0025]
    One particular advantage of the present invention is that by combining the mechanisms described, such as reservation of transfer resources, limiting of data streams for individual applications to the maximum data rate, and prioritization of various categories of aggregated data streams when handling and transporting these data streams, it is possible to ensure transmission which is as effective as possible and is aligned with the individual requirements of a wide variety of applications.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0026]
    Further advantages of the invention are presented with the aid of the figures below, in which:
  • [0027]
    FIG. 1 shows a block diagram for illustrating an embodiment of the invention.
  • [0028]
    FIG. 2 shows a block diagram for illustrating another embodiment of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • [0029]
    FIG. 1 shows a block diagram to describe a possible way of limiting data for an application to a prescribed bit rate. An application's data reach the data communication network 1 via an access node (edge node) 2. To achieve the shortest possible delay at the edge node 2 and to dispense with buffer storage for the purpose of ascertaining the bit rate of the incoming data, this behavior can be produced in the following manner: over a particular interval of time (measurement interval), the size of incoming data packets is summed in parallel with their forwarding, as indicated by the “uplink” direction arrow, this situation being shown in graph 3. This value reflects the volume of data in this time interval. If the maximum permissible volume of data corresponding to the maximum bit rate Bmax is reached within this interval, then this information can be used to decide whether subsequent data are rejected, as shown in graph 4, or are possibly transported further, since the total resources at the edge node 2 allow this. The same mechanism is effected in the opposite direction, i.e. in the “downlink” direction. At the start of a subsequent time interval or measurement interval, the size of the data packet is summed again, with this summation also being able to start from a start value which is not equal to zero, for example in order to take bursts into account. This firstly minimizes the delay for the data packets and secondly prevents the negotiated data rate from being exceeded at subsequent communication nodes 5. At the same time, all other communication nodes 5 which are to be encountered no longer need to monitor the maximum bit rate Bmax.
  • [0030]
    FIG. 2 shows a block diagram for schematically illustrating step d. in an embodiment of the inventive method. It shows data packets 6 from various applications being forwarded through a data communication network 1 which comprises a plurality of communication nodes 7. When an application is requested, the communication nodes 7 in the data communication network 1 which are to be encountered by the requested application's data or data packets 6 create a context which contains, inter alia, the transmission quality (QoS) which is to be requested for the application. This requirement is determined by various parameters. These include, inter alia, a maximum bit rate, a guaranteed bit rate and a maximum permissible delay. A data packet 6 arriving in the data communication network 1 from an application is now assigned to one of two categories 8, 9 at the communication nodes 7 which are to be encountered, in line with the context created and stored at the respective communication nodes 7. In the example shown, the two categories 8, 9 correspond to a classification into real-time applications (black stripe) 8 and non-real-time applications (gray stripe) 9. This categorization is performed at each communication node 7 which is to be encountered. Each data packet 6 which has been assigned to a real-time application is forwarded to the next communication node 7 immediately without buffer storage. Data packets 6 without any real-time requirement can be buffer stored in queues and forwarded from the queue in line with a particular reading mechanism. This reading mechanism can distribute the available resources for the total data packets 6 from non-real-time applications or for portions thereof according to a predefined scheme or can implement simple prioritization for the queues. In this case, the available resources for the data packets 6 from non-real-time applications are dependent on the instantaneous data volume for the real-time applications.

Claims (10)

  1. 1. A method for transmitting data from applications having different transmission requirements in a packet switched data communication network including communication nodes comprising:
    limiting each application's data to a prescribed bit rate at a communication node which is to be encountered when a respective application's data are transmitted;
    creating and storing application specific contexts at the communication nodes which are to be encountered when a respective application's data are transmitted;
    reserving transmission resources at the communication nodes which are to be encountered when a respective application's data are transmitted, in line with the application specific contexts; and
    forwarding each application's data the communication node which is to be encountered by a respective application to a further communication node which is to be encountered, in line with the application specific contexts.
  2. 2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein limiting is performed at an access communication node into the packet switched data communication network.
  3. 3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein each application's data are limited to a prescribed bit rate by measuring a volume of the respective application's data over a settable time interval in parallel with forwarding of the data and comparing it with the volume of data which corresponds to the prescribed bit rate.
  4. 4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein reserving is performed for data from applications which require transmission in real time.
  5. 5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein reserving involves each communication node which is to be encountered by a respective application's data using a guaranteed bit rate, required by the respective application, and a maximum supportable bit rate to derive a bandwidth value for a transmission resource which is to be reserved, and reserving the transmission resource.
  6. 6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein when the application specific contexts are created at each communication node, the ratio of a guaranteed bit rate required by the respective application and a maximum supportable bit rate can be varied.
  7. 7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a particular share of transmission resources from total transmission resources is reserved for data from applications which respectively require transmission in real time.
  8. 8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the share of transmission resources which is reserved for data from applications which respectively require transmission in real time is chosen to be smaller than a total quantity of transmission resources.
  9. 9. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein forwarding includes the applications' data being classified into at least two categories in line with the application specific contexts and being forwarded in line with these categories.
  10. 10. The method as claimed in claim 9,
    wherein the two categories correspond to classification into real-time applications and non-real-time applications.
US10497964 2001-12-10 2001-12-10 Method for transmitting data from applications with different quality Abandoned US20050131984A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/DE2001/004724 WO2003055154A1 (en) 2001-12-10 2001-12-10 Method for transmitting data of applications with different quality

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050131984A1 true true US20050131984A1 (en) 2005-06-16

Family

ID=5648326

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10497964 Abandoned US20050131984A1 (en) 2001-12-10 2001-12-10 Method for transmitting data from applications with different quality

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20050131984A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1451980B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2005513917A (en)
KR (1) KR100632529B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1293733C (en)
DE (2) DE50115595D1 (en)
ES (1) ES2350516T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2003055154A1 (en)

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040258031A1 (en) * 2003-06-19 2004-12-23 Zabawskyj Bohdan Konstantyn Method for implemening a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) gateway system
US20070054695A1 (en) * 2005-06-20 2007-03-08 Airplay Network, Inc. Method of and system for managing client resources and assets for activates on computing devices
US20080059635A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-06 Redknee Inc. Policy services
US20080318603A1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2008-12-25 Shailesh Lakhani Method and System for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) Rating and Billing
US20090133114A1 (en) * 2003-01-23 2009-05-21 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing an internet protocol (ip) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system
US20110002230A1 (en) * 2009-07-02 2011-01-06 Research In Motion Limited Quality of Service Parameter Relaxation for Non-Conversational Voice Calls Over a Packet-Switched Network
US20110082779A1 (en) * 2007-09-13 2011-04-07 Redknee Inc. Billing profile manager
US20110116443A1 (en) * 2009-11-13 2011-05-19 Jungji Yu Apparatus for ethernet traffic aggregation of radio links
US20110167127A1 (en) * 2008-09-29 2011-07-07 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Measurement in data forwarding storage
US20110179131A1 (en) * 2008-07-10 2011-07-21 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Media delivery in data forwarding storage network
US8002618B1 (en) 2006-01-10 2011-08-23 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US8149530B1 (en) 2006-04-12 2012-04-03 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US8307111B1 (en) * 2010-04-13 2012-11-06 Qlogic, Corporation Systems and methods for bandwidth scavenging among a plurality of applications in a network
US8376855B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2013-02-19 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US8396075B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2013-03-12 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing an open charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system
US8428186B1 (en) 2007-12-27 2013-04-23 Exalt Communications Incorporated Decision directed DC offset removal
US8452844B2 (en) 2008-05-07 2013-05-28 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Deletion in data file forwarding framework
CN103297349A (en) * 2013-05-30 2013-09-11 北京蓝汛通信技术有限责任公司 Method and device for adjusting network resource provision modes
US8705195B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2014-04-22 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US8813112B1 (en) 2007-10-23 2014-08-19 Winview, Inc. Method of and apparatus for utilizing SMS while running an application on a mobile device controlling a viewer's participation with a broadcast
US8870639B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2014-10-28 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US8909738B2 (en) 2008-03-20 2014-12-09 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Redundant data forwarding storage
US9056251B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2015-06-16 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9059871B2 (en) 2007-12-27 2015-06-16 Redknee Inc. Policy-based communication system and method
US9203928B2 (en) 2008-03-20 2015-12-01 Callahan Cellular L.L.C. Data storage and retrieval
US9511287B2 (en) 2005-10-03 2016-12-06 Winview, Inc. Cellular phone games based upon television archives
US9716918B1 (en) 2008-11-10 2017-07-25 Winview, Inc. Interactive advertising system
US9919210B2 (en) 2005-10-03 2018-03-20 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5046316B2 (en) * 2006-03-10 2012-10-10 富士通株式会社 Network management method, program and system
JP4951486B2 (en) * 2007-12-13 2012-06-13 株式会社日立産機システム Information processing apparatus and information processing method
CN101621457B (en) 2008-07-01 2012-05-23 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 Multi-service scheduling method and system
CN101772010B (en) 2008-12-30 2012-09-05 联芯科技有限公司 Abnormal processing method for terminal and network for packet switching service district refreshment

Citations (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5675573A (en) * 1995-03-22 1997-10-07 Lucent Technologies Inc. Delay-minimizing system with guaranteed bandwidth delivery for real-time traffic
US5996013A (en) * 1997-04-30 1999-11-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for resource allocation with guarantees
US6154776A (en) * 1998-03-20 2000-11-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Quality of service allocation on a network
US6212200B1 (en) * 1997-04-30 2001-04-03 Fujitsu Limited Dynamic control system for bandwidth restriction value of non-real time communications
US6222841B1 (en) * 1997-01-08 2001-04-24 Digital Vision Laboratories Corporation Data transmission system and method
US6282561B1 (en) * 1995-12-07 2001-08-28 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for resource management with independent real-time applications on a common set of machines
US20010025310A1 (en) * 2000-02-04 2001-09-27 Srikanth Krishnamurthy System for pricing-based quality of service (PQoS) control in networks
US6473793B1 (en) * 1994-06-08 2002-10-29 Hughes Electronics Corporation Method and apparatus for selectively allocating and enforcing bandwidth usage requirements on network users
US6690678B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2004-02-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system in a packet switching network for dynamically adjusting the bandwidth of a continuous bit rate virtual path connection according to the network load
US6782429B1 (en) * 1997-04-28 2004-08-24 Intel Corporation Dynamic communication path selection for data transmission between computers
US20050262263A1 (en) * 2001-07-06 2005-11-24 Juniper Networks, Inc. Bandwidth allocation for a data path

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7149222B2 (en) * 1999-12-21 2006-12-12 Converged Access, Inc. Integrated access point network device

Patent Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6473793B1 (en) * 1994-06-08 2002-10-29 Hughes Electronics Corporation Method and apparatus for selectively allocating and enforcing bandwidth usage requirements on network users
US5675573A (en) * 1995-03-22 1997-10-07 Lucent Technologies Inc. Delay-minimizing system with guaranteed bandwidth delivery for real-time traffic
US20020007389A1 (en) * 1995-12-07 2002-01-17 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for resource management with independent real-time applications on a common set of machines
US6282561B1 (en) * 1995-12-07 2001-08-28 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for resource management with independent real-time applications on a common set of machines
US6222841B1 (en) * 1997-01-08 2001-04-24 Digital Vision Laboratories Corporation Data transmission system and method
US6782429B1 (en) * 1997-04-28 2004-08-24 Intel Corporation Dynamic communication path selection for data transmission between computers
US6212200B1 (en) * 1997-04-30 2001-04-03 Fujitsu Limited Dynamic control system for bandwidth restriction value of non-real time communications
US5996013A (en) * 1997-04-30 1999-11-30 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for resource allocation with guarantees
US6154776A (en) * 1998-03-20 2000-11-28 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Quality of service allocation on a network
US6690678B1 (en) * 1998-11-10 2004-02-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system in a packet switching network for dynamically adjusting the bandwidth of a continuous bit rate virtual path connection according to the network load
US20010025310A1 (en) * 2000-02-04 2001-09-27 Srikanth Krishnamurthy System for pricing-based quality of service (PQoS) control in networks
US20050262263A1 (en) * 2001-07-06 2005-11-24 Juniper Networks, Inc. Bandwidth allocation for a data path

Cited By (75)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8396075B2 (en) 2002-12-02 2013-03-12 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing an open charging (OC) middleware platform and gateway system
US8244859B2 (en) 2003-01-23 2012-08-14 Redknee, Inc. Method for implementing an internet protocol (IP) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system
US20090133114A1 (en) * 2003-01-23 2009-05-21 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing an internet protocol (ip) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system
US7644158B2 (en) 2003-01-23 2010-01-05 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing an internet protocol (IP) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system
US20100067537A1 (en) * 2003-01-23 2010-03-18 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing an internet protocol (ip) charging and rating middleware platform and gateway system
US8542676B2 (en) 2003-06-16 2013-09-24 Redknee Inc. Method and system for multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing
US20080318603A1 (en) * 2003-06-16 2008-12-25 Shailesh Lakhani Method and System for Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) Rating and Billing
US8027334B2 (en) 2003-06-16 2011-09-27 Redknee, Inc. Method and system for multimedia messaging service (MMS) rating and billing
US20040258031A1 (en) * 2003-06-19 2004-12-23 Zabawskyj Bohdan Konstantyn Method for implemening a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) gateway system
US20110078060A1 (en) * 2003-06-19 2011-03-31 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing a wireless local area network (wlan) gateway system
US8331902B2 (en) 2003-06-19 2012-12-11 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing a wireless local area network (WLAN) gateway system
US7873347B2 (en) 2003-06-19 2011-01-18 Redknee Inc. Method for implementing a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) gateway system
US9908053B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2018-03-06 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US8376855B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2013-02-19 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US8870639B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2014-10-28 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US9526991B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2016-12-27 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US9821233B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2017-11-21 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US9504922B2 (en) 2004-06-28 2016-11-29 Winview, Inc. Methods and apparatus for distributed gaming over a mobile device
US20070054695A1 (en) * 2005-06-20 2007-03-08 Airplay Network, Inc. Method of and system for managing client resources and assets for activates on computing devices
US8738694B2 (en) * 2005-06-20 2014-05-27 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for managing client resources and assets for activities on computing devices
US9270789B2 (en) 2005-06-20 2016-02-23 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for managing client resources and assets for activities on computing devices
US9919210B2 (en) 2005-10-03 2018-03-20 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US9511287B2 (en) 2005-10-03 2016-12-06 Winview, Inc. Cellular phone games based upon television archives
US9919221B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2018-03-20 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9501904B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2016-11-22 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9233293B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2016-01-12 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9067143B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2015-06-30 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9498724B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2016-11-22 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9056251B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2015-06-16 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US8622798B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2014-01-07 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9314701B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2016-04-19 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9652937B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2017-05-16 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US8002618B1 (en) 2006-01-10 2011-08-23 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US9314686B2 (en) 2006-01-10 2016-04-19 Winview, Inc. Method of and system for conducting multiple contests of skill with a single performance
US8149530B1 (en) 2006-04-12 2012-04-03 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US8837072B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2014-09-16 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9662576B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2017-05-30 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9662577B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2017-05-30 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US8717701B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2014-05-06 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US8705195B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2014-04-22 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US9258601B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2016-02-09 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9672692B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2017-06-06 Winview, Inc. Synchronized gaming and programming
US9687739B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2017-06-27 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9919211B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2018-03-20 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9687738B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2017-06-27 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9724603B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2017-08-08 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9744453B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2017-08-29 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with an online broadcast
US9901820B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2018-02-27 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9878243B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2018-01-30 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9457272B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2016-10-04 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US9604140B2 (en) 2006-04-12 2017-03-28 Winview, Inc. Methodology for equalizing systemic latencies in television reception in connection with games of skill played in connection with live television programming
US8775621B2 (en) * 2006-08-31 2014-07-08 Redknee Inc. Policy services
US20080059635A1 (en) * 2006-08-31 2008-03-06 Redknee Inc. Policy services
US20110082779A1 (en) * 2007-09-13 2011-04-07 Redknee Inc. Billing profile manager
US9205339B2 (en) 2007-10-23 2015-12-08 Winview, Inc. Method of and apparatus for utilizing SMS while running an application on a mobile device controlling a viewer's participation with a broadcast
US8813112B1 (en) 2007-10-23 2014-08-19 Winview, Inc. Method of and apparatus for utilizing SMS while running an application on a mobile device controlling a viewer's participation with a broadcast
US8935715B2 (en) 2007-10-23 2015-01-13 Winview, Inc. Method of and apparatus for utilizing SMS while running an application on a mobile device controlling a viewer's participation with a broadcast
US8428186B1 (en) 2007-12-27 2013-04-23 Exalt Communications Incorporated Decision directed DC offset removal
US9059871B2 (en) 2007-12-27 2015-06-16 Redknee Inc. Policy-based communication system and method
US8909738B2 (en) 2008-03-20 2014-12-09 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Redundant data forwarding storage
US9203928B2 (en) 2008-03-20 2015-12-01 Callahan Cellular L.L.C. Data storage and retrieval
US9961144B2 (en) 2008-03-20 2018-05-01 Callahan Cellular L.L.C. Data storage and retrieval
US8452844B2 (en) 2008-05-07 2013-05-28 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Deletion in data file forwarding framework
US20110179131A1 (en) * 2008-07-10 2011-07-21 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Media delivery in data forwarding storage network
US8599678B2 (en) * 2008-07-10 2013-12-03 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Media delivery in data forwarding storage network
US8554866B2 (en) 2008-09-29 2013-10-08 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Measurement in data forwarding storage
US20110167127A1 (en) * 2008-09-29 2011-07-07 Tajitshu Transfer Limited Liability Company Measurement in data forwarding storage
US9716918B1 (en) 2008-11-10 2017-07-25 Winview, Inc. Interactive advertising system
US20110002230A1 (en) * 2009-07-02 2011-01-06 Research In Motion Limited Quality of Service Parameter Relaxation for Non-Conversational Voice Calls Over a Packet-Switched Network
US8611356B2 (en) * 2009-11-13 2013-12-17 Exalt Communications Incorporated Apparatus for ethernet traffic aggregation of radio links
US20110116443A1 (en) * 2009-11-13 2011-05-19 Jungji Yu Apparatus for ethernet traffic aggregation of radio links
US9655004B2 (en) 2009-11-13 2017-05-16 Exalt Wireless, Inc. Apparatus for Ethernet traffic aggregation of radio links
US8307111B1 (en) * 2010-04-13 2012-11-06 Qlogic, Corporation Systems and methods for bandwidth scavenging among a plurality of applications in a network
US9003038B1 (en) * 2010-04-13 2015-04-07 Qlogic, Corporation Systems and methods for bandwidth scavenging among a plurality of applications in a network
CN103297349A (en) * 2013-05-30 2013-09-11 北京蓝汛通信技术有限责任公司 Method and device for adjusting network resource provision modes

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
CN1579069A (en) 2005-02-09 application
JP2005513917A (en) 2005-05-12 application
DE10197195D2 (en) 2004-10-28 grant
ES2350516T3 (en) 2011-01-24 grant
WO2003055154A1 (en) 2003-07-03 application
EP1451980B1 (en) 2010-08-11 grant
KR20040059493A (en) 2004-07-05 application
EP1451980A1 (en) 2004-09-01 application
CN1293733C (en) 2007-01-03 grant
KR100632529B1 (en) 2006-10-11 grant
DE50115595D1 (en) 2010-09-23 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kumar et al. Beyond best effort: router architectures for the differentiated services of tomorrow's Internet
White RSVP and integrated services in the Internet: A tutorial
El-Gendy et al. Evolution of the Internet QoS and support for soft real-time applications
US6934249B1 (en) Method and system for minimizing the connection set up time in high speed packet switching networks
Babiarz et al. Configuration guidelines for DiffServ service classes
Georgiadis et al. Efficient support of delay and rate guarantees in an internet
US5787071A (en) Hop-by-hop flow control in an ATM network
US6092115A (en) Method for supporting per-connection queuing for feedback-controlled traffic
US6674718B1 (en) Unified method and system for scheduling and discarding packets in computer networks
US6990113B1 (en) Adaptive-weighted packet scheduler for supporting premium service in a communications network
US20040125815A1 (en) Packet transmission apparatus and method thereof, traffic conditioner, priority control mechanism and packet shaper
US5629928A (en) Dynamic fair queuing to support best effort traffic in an ATM network
US20020145982A1 (en) Method and system for quality of service provisioning for IP virtual private networks
US20030088690A1 (en) Active queue management process
US20040125797A1 (en) Flow labels
US20040260796A1 (en) Method and arrangement in an ip network
US6934250B1 (en) Method and apparatus for an output packet organizer
US6757249B1 (en) Method and apparatus for output rate regulation and control associated with a packet pipeline
US6977896B1 (en) IP communications network system and QoS guaranteeing apparatus
US6657987B1 (en) Scheduling methodology for connections with quality of service (QoS) constraints in a polling based media access control (MAC)
US6519263B1 (en) Process for transmitting data packets of predefinable priority classes using ethernet from a first device to at least one other device
US7525994B2 (en) Packet data flow identification for multiplexing
US6882642B1 (en) Method and apparatus for input rate regulation associated with a packet processing pipeline
US20030033467A1 (en) Method and apparatus for resource allocation in network router and switch
US20030123392A1 (en) Packet flow control method and device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOFMANN, JENS;SCHNEIDER, JENS;REEL/FRAME:016900/0550

Effective date: 20040426