US20050010670A1 - Port proxy and system for server and client computers - Google Patents

Port proxy and system for server and client computers Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050010670A1
US20050010670A1 US10894671 US89467104A US2005010670A1 US 20050010670 A1 US20050010670 A1 US 20050010670A1 US 10894671 US10894671 US 10894671 US 89467104 A US89467104 A US 89467104A US 2005010670 A1 US2005010670 A1 US 2005010670A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
application
step
server
system
computer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10894671
Inventor
David Greschler
Owen Mysliwy
Stuart Schaefer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsoft Technology Licensing LLC
Softricity Inc
Original Assignee
Softricity Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F8/00Arrangements for software engineering
    • G06F8/60Software deployment

Abstract

A method and system for serving software applications to remote clients across the internet, for example, is disclosed that preferably utilizes standard, SMB (server message block), protocols, which are available in commercial operating systems. Further, an associated business method is described in which subscribing institutions can out-source the application serving to a third party institution, transparently. Finally, a port proxy system is provided that enables tunneling through firewalls that are configured to block communications from SMB ports.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • [0001]
    This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/531,121, filed on Mar. 17, 2000, which is a continuation-in-part and claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/456,181, filed on Dec. 7, 1999, which claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/128,828, filed on Apr. 12, 1999, all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    Internet or network delivery of application-program-style functionality has become increasingly important. The ubiquitous client-server platform typically requires that the application program code be loaded and installed on the client computers. This requirement, however, is viewed as substantially increasing the installation and maintenance costs associated with computer networks. Moreover, many client operating system platforms are deemed unstable. Network delivery of applications programs would enable the code to be maintained only on the server-side, rather than distributed throughout the network.
  • [0003]
    Additionally, there are a number of different business models that are pulling for network delivery of application program functionality. First, it can be used in software sales. A web-based software-sales institution can utilize the Internet, or other public network, to allow customers to “test-drive” the programs, and thereby increase sales. A second justification for deployment arises in the thin-client/network-computer model where the code required for the application-functionality and user data reside on the server. In this situation, when required at the thin client, the application code is provided by the server on an as-needed basis. These servers can even be off-site in an application service provider (ASP) environment. Another justification surrounds the possibility to “rent” programs to users. A large number of potential users may have only limited requirements for certain classes of application programs. Their individual requirements may not justify investment in the typically expensive programs or not justify the costs of client installation. The thought here is to enable these users to rent access to the application programs, preferably via the Internet, to generate new revenue streams for the application software companies.
  • [0004]
    One solution to providing application program functionality to the client computer via the network involves expanding the functionality of the browser. For example, the term “plug-in” is used to describe a browser code extension. ActiveX and Java are two of the most common code platforms for the browser.
  • [0005]
    While the solution to provide application program functionality via the browser is attractive in its simplicity, a number of problems exist under current technology. First, providing sophisticated ActiveX and/or Java functionality is still in its infancy and largely untried. Further, it ignores the wealth of existing, stable application programs that have been written and are being written to run directly on operating systems, such as Windows 95/98/NT/2000, Unix, Linux, and Mac OS's.
  • [0006]
    Related, but limited, solutions attempt to allow potential buyers, for example, to “test drive” the program over the Internet. Typically, one of two techniques have been used. First, the selling institution may allow the potential owner to download a trial-version of the program. This version may have reduced capabilities and/or a limited lifetime, where the program is disabled after it has been invoked a set number of times, or after a specified date. This process, however, is complex, often requiring a multi-step process in which the user must accept the download, pick a save-as location, watch the download, quit the browser, find the file on the hard drive, and run an installer, for example. Another technique is to extend the potential purchaser's browser in some fashion using, for example, a Java applet. This approach, however, shares the problems discussed previously relative to ActiveX and Java.
  • [0007]
    Against this backdrop, most modem computer/network operating systems allow for the execution of code that is stored remotely from the client computer. The systems allow a client computer to mount a physically remote drive, residing on a server or peer computer, and execute the application program residing there. Typically, however, these capabilities of the operating system are only utilized within an institution where an umbrella network management exercises control over both the clients and the servers to realize the necessary security levels, prevent corruption of data on the server side, and configure the client computers to access the server-stored code.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0008]
    Software players can be defined that will configure the client to communicate with remote storage assets across a network, automatically. The problem is, however, that security policies and institution firewalls may a priori block this remote access with these existing networking protocols. Thus, in many environments, they can not be used.
  • [0009]
    In general, according to one aspect, the present invention features a method for enabling remote networking functionality by port redirection. The method comprises executing a process requiring networking protocol and intercepting communications from the process to a port assigned to support the network protocol. The communications are then redirected over an open port.
  • [0010]
    In preferred embodiments, the step of executing the process comprises executing an application program on a remote storage asset using SMB networking protocols, with the communications being directed at port 139. This interception can be accomplished by addressing the communications to a local loop back.
  • [0011]
    To overcome even the most sophisticated firewall systems, the communications are preferably encapsulated an HTTP packet, and specifically a post data portion.
  • [0012]
    In general, according to another aspect, the invention can also be characterized in the context of a system for remote networking by port proxy. The system comprises an application program executing on a computer which is utilizing the SMB protocol to access a remote storage asset. A port proxy program intercepts communications from the program to a port assigned to support the SMB protocol and redirects the communications over an open port.
  • [0013]
    The above and other features of the invention including various novel details of construction and combinations of parts, and other advantages, will now be more particularly described with reference to the accompanying drawings and pointed out in the claims. It will be understood that the particular method and device embodying the invention are shown by way of illustration and not as a limitation of the invention. The principles and features of this invention may be employed in various and numerous embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0014]
    In the accompanying drawings, reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale; emphasis has instead been placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Of the drawings:
  • [0015]
    FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration showing the application serving system and specifically the interaction between the target client computer, the host Web server computer of the third-party subscribing institution, and the server system, according to the present invention;
  • [0016]
    FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating the method by which the serving of applications to the target computer is initiated at the third-party subscribing institution according to the present invention;
  • [0017]
    FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating the steps performed by the server system when the target computer requests an application;
  • [0018]
    FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing the launch process for the helper application, or software player, on the target client computer;
  • [0019]
    FIGS. 5A and 5B are flow diagrams showing the application launch process that is performed on the target client computer;
  • [0020]
    FIGS. 6A-6C are flow diagrams showing the steps associated with the application monitoring process according to the present invention;
  • [0021]
    FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating the application shutdown process according to the present invention;
  • [0022]
    FIG. 8 is a schematic block/communication stack diagram illustrating the operation of the SMB proxy application according to the present invention; and
  • [0023]
    FIG. 9 is a process diagram illustrating the operation of the port proxy.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0024]
    FIG. 1 shows an application serving system 100, which has been constructed according to the principles of the present invention.
  • [0025]
    Generally, the application serving system 100 comprises the user, target client computer 110 that connects to a server system 112 and subscribing institution host Web Server 130, over a network 114.
  • [0026]
    Client computer 110, Web server 130, and server system 112 implement a network protocol layer to communicate across the network. In a preferred embodiment, network 114 is the Internet, or other public or private network, and the network protocol layers are TCP/IP and NetBios. Other network configurations and network protocols layers, however, could be implemented in place or in addition to those associated with the Internet such as those provided in other public or private networks and internetwork systems.
  • [0027]
    The target, client computer 110 is a PC computer in one implementation. It operates Microsoft Windows 95/98/NT/2000/CE operating system or other OS providing compatible API's (application programming interfaces), on an Intel processor/IBM-compatible hardware platform. Other alternatives, however, are possible such as open source operating system platforms, such as Linux, or Apple MAC OS's or other operating systems that provide the API support for these operating systems. Still further alternatives include embedded OS platforms such as Windows CE and Palm OS's, or similar reduced code-footprint systems.
  • [0028]
    The target computer 110 preferably has preinstalled application programs. In the present implementation, a browser 134, such as the ubiquitous Netscape Navigator or Microsoft Explorer browsers, is installed. Additionally, the target computer also preferably has a helper application or software player 132. Such pre-installation can be performed typically at a website hosted by the institution that operates the server system 112 or also the subscribing institution 130.
  • [0029]
    Depending on the institution managing the target computer, a firewall 111 may be present between the target computer and the network 114.
  • [0030]
    The subscribing institution, which maintains the host web server 130, is typically a third party relative to the institution, which maintains the server system 112 in one anticipated business model. The subscribing institution has a requirement, or desires to provide, application programs and the related functionality to the user at the target computer 110, but, rather than providing this functionality itself, the subscribing institution outsources this to the institution operating the server system 112. Nonetheless, the subscribing institution typically has an Internet presence. Specifically, it typically maintains a website/websites that offer the application programs to users.
  • [0031]
    From one implementation, the server system 112 is maintained by an institution that provides application programs to users as a paid service to subscribing institutions. Nonetheless, it should be appreciated that the technology of the present invention also has applicability to the business model where the server system 112 and host Web server 120 are maintained by the same institution. In this context, the institution does not wish to out-source the work associated with the serving of the applications, but wishes to provide this functionality through in-house expertise.
  • [0032]
    Specifically the service institution's server system 112 maintains a log-in database 116, a customer database 118, an application database 120, and a current sessions database 122. The server system additionally executes a session ID generator 124, a load balancing process 126, and an encryption process 128.
  • [0033]
    FIG. 2 shows the steps performed by or at the target computer 110 to initiate the serving of an application from the server system 112. Specifically, a user at the target computer identifies a desired application to the target computer 110 in step 210. In the typical case, the browser 134 is executing on the target computer 110 and a link is displayed in the browser window. This link is identified and/or associated with the application that the user desires to execute on the target computer. The user, operating a graphical pointing device, such as a mouse, controls the target computer's graphical user interface to select or “click-on” the link for the desired application.
  • [0034]
    Selection of the link in step 210 causes the browser 134 to interrogate the target computer's operating system to determine whether the appropriate software player (SWP) has been installed on the target computer in step 212. This interrogation is performed in one embodiment by an application programming interface (API) call to check the operating system registry. Applets, ActiveX, or scripting, however, are other modalities for performing the interrogation.
  • [0035]
    If it is determined that the software player has not been installed on the target computer 110, an installation process is initiated in step 214. In the typical implementation, this installation process comprises either pointing the browser 134, or a new instantiation of the browser, with a new universal resource locator (URL), to website that supports the installation of the software player through a download, for example.
  • [0036]
    The install/download is simplified for ease of operation. In one implementation, a Java applet is used that allows installation and writing to the drive—if permission is provided. A download bar is displayed on the browser screen. When the player 132 has been installed, it begins to run and will launch the application that was initially requested by the user. As a result, the user at the client computer 110 observes the invocation of the application, rather than the software player alone.
  • [0037]
    Once there is an installed software player, the browser 134 is pointed with a URL to the server system 112, in step 216. The URL link contains: 1) a unique identifier, or number, associated by the server system 112 with the application requested (TitleId); 2) a unique session ID (SID); and 3) an identifier that identifies the subscribing institution (SubInstId). Typically, the subscribing institution is the company that operates the host Web server computer 130, which served the web page that originally contained the link associated with the application that was desired by the user of the target computer 110.
  • [0038]
    The SID is a unique session ID that is specific to the link and the specific session. A session ID that served as part of the original link provides a token from the web site that tells indicates that the subscribing institution has authenticated this specific session. This is important for the rental/subscription model where they will be authenticating users with credit cards or user names and passwords.
  • [0039]
    FIG. 3 shows the steps performed by the server system 112 when the target computer 110 requests an application by transmitting the URL containing the SID, Titleld, and Sublnstld to the server system 112 over the network 114.
  • [0040]
    Specifically, in step 310, the server system 112 receives the URL, SID, Titleld, and SubInstld. The server system then accesses the log-in database 116 to verify that: 1) the user at the target computer 110 is a valid user by reference to the session Id field (SID); and 2) the subscribing institution is a currently valid subscribing institution by reference to the Sublnstld field in step 312. If either the user or subscribing institution is invalid (step 314), an error is returned to the target computer 110 in the step 316 by the server system 112.
  • [0041]
    If the user and subscribing institution are verified, the server system 112 then proceeds to construct an application descriptor or data file that will coordinate the operation of the target computer 110 and the server system 112 across the network 114. In the present implementation, the application descriptor is a file that is named with a “.WOW” suffix, which is the MIME type.
  • [0042]
    Specifically, in step 318, the server system 112 accesses the customer database 118 using the SID to obtain information regarding the session.
  • [0043]
    Next, in step 320, the application database 120 is accessed. This contains information concerning the application, which was requested by the user. For example, the application database 120 contains information such as minimum system requirements (RAM, processing power, etc.) that are required by the application on the target computer 110 and the application's media weight or processing requirements on the server system 112 associated with each instantiation.
  • [0044]
    In step 322, the load balancing process 126 is executed. The server system 112 selects a host computer within the server system that will be primarily responsible for serving the application over the network 114 to the target computer 110. In the typical embodiment, the server system comprises multiple host Web and associated application servers. The selected host computer is co-located with the other host computers in one implementation; alternatively, components or servers of the server system are located in a server farm and/or geographically local to the target computer 110. In this last case, the load balancing process selects the host computer based on geographic proximity, in addition to load, to reduce latency.
  • [0045]
    Typically, the load balancing checks the current session's database 122 to determine which host server in the server system 112 has the least load. The list of servers serving the specific application is part of the title's application description. Determination of which server to use is based on the number of concurrent connections to each server and the media weight of each application and also the user's physical geographic location based on the IP address.
  • [0046]
    Next, in step 324, the current sessions database 122 is updated in step 324 with the current session being added. Specifically, the session ID, the user's IP (Internet protocol) address, the application title, the media weight, and the server assigned to the session is added. This database is used by the load balancing process 126, and by a watch dog process that watches the connections to each host server in the server system, to verify that all connections are from authorized users.
  • [0047]
    In step 326, the application descriptor is encrypted. Minimally, this application descriptor comprises the host address of the host computer of the server system 112, which was assigned by the load balancing process 126 along with a session ID assigned as part of the update of the current session database 122. Finally, the application descriptor is sent to the target computer 110 in step 328.
  • [0048]
    FIG. 4 shows the launch process for the helper application or software player 132.
  • [0049]
    Upon receiving the WOW application descriptor file, the client launches the software player 132 in step 409. This is a helper application that performs the bulk of the client-side application management.
  • [0050]
    In the preferred implementation, the receipt of the .WOW descriptor file automatically launches the software player. This is accomplished by configuration of MIME types during the software player's initial installation. In the Windows 95 operating system, MIME types are set in the registry, associating files with a specified suffix, here: WOW, that are to be opened with the software player 132.
  • [0051]
    Many of the methods used employ Windows API Functions to control the executed applications. In one embodiment of the invention, the Buddy API Xtra (a library of calls employed by programmers of Macromedia Director) is used to access Windows API functions. Specifically, the initial writing to the registry is done with the baWriteRegNumber and baWriteRegString commands in Buddy API.
  • [0052]
    In step 410, the registration status of the software player 132 with respect to the server system 112, or institution operating the system, is determined. If it has not been registered and/or properly licensed, a registration box is displayed on the graphical user interface of the target computer 110 in step 412. The user is either requested or required to complete the registration information box, depending on the implementation. Once completed, the registration information is sent, in step 414, to the server system 112 over network 114.
  • [0053]
    After registration, the status of any firewall proxy for firewall 111 is interrogated in step 416. If it is not valid, a proxy information dialog box is displayed in step 418, and the user is requested to complete it on the target computer 110. Once completed, the proxy information is updated in step 420.
  • [0054]
    Next, the status of the application descriptor, or WOW file is interrogated in step 422. If no application descriptor file is detected, a dialog is generated in step 424, on the target computer 110 for the user. The user is requested to enter a partner or subscribing institution. If it is determined that no institution has been entered in step 426, the process aborts. However, if a subscribing institution was entered, the process similarly aborts in step 430, but also points the browser 134 to the Web page for the subscribing institution in step 432.
  • [0055]
    Next, 434, it is interrogated as to whether the client is monitoring a similar process, i.e., the software player 132 is currently running on the client. If it is not running, the SWP window is created in step 436. Depending on the run mode, the window is either hidden or visible on the client interface. In step 438, any system clean-up is performed. Generally, the operating system registry is written to when applications 133 are run. The software player tracks those modifications, and any registry changes; these changes are undone when the application 133 and software player 132 are quit. However, if the software player 132 was terminated unexpectedly during its last operation, the registry clean-up may not have been performed. If not, the clean-up occurs in this step. Specifically, any modified registry settings are returned, icons are removed, folders in any disk drive are removed, and any new copies of applications on the desktop are removed. Next, the player is set up on the OS tray. Finally the port proxy application is started in step 442 prior to the application launch process in step 450 in the preferred embodiment.
  • [0056]
    Generally, the port proxy application is required because of the preferred embodiment of the present invention utilizes standard Microsoft Windows 95/98/NT/2000 operating system networking protocol implementation of SMB (server message block), the functionality of which is blocked on may client computers. This standard protocol operates over port 139. However, since it is a sharing protocol, it is deemed dangerous or non-secure, and communications through this port are blocked by many commercial, government, and/or corporate firewalls.
  • [0057]
    The use of the port proxy is not limited only systems using the SMB protocol, but is deploy in any environment where the port and or network communications protocol used by the player is blocked, or possibly blocked, on the client computer. Generally, the port proxy enables a protocol to be redirected to another port such as HTTP or web ports.
  • [0058]
    If it was determined that the SWP is currently monitoring a process and thus invoked, in step 444, the status of the target computer operating system is interrogated in step 444. If too many applications are currently running, a dialog is generated notifying the user in step 446 and the process aborts in step 448. However, if there is sufficient resources to run the application, the new launch application process is started in step 450.
  • [0059]
    FIGS. 5A and 5B show the application launch process.
  • [0060]
    Specifically, the software player 132 reads and decrypts the incoming application descriptor WOW file. To read in the encrypted data, the program uses the baCommandArgs command in the Buddy API. The decryption of the commands is done via the baDecryptText command in the Buddy API.
  • [0061]
    Once decrypted, the software player 132 checks to see if this is the first time it has been run on the client computer 110 by checking the computer's internal settings to see if a unique ID has been written to the settings. This is done via the baReadRegString command in Buddy API. If it finds the unique ID, it continues. If it does not find a unique ID, it asks the user for personal information that will be collected for a User Database, in one exemplary implementation.
  • [0062]
    It then creates a WOW data struct in step 510. The version of the application descriptor is then compared to the version of the software player 132 in step 512 to ensure compatibility. If there is no compatibility, a dialog is displayed in step 514 asking the user if they wish to upgrade to a new software player. If the user agrees to upgrade, the new dynamic link libraries (.DLL files) are downloaded from the server system 112 in step 516. The software player unloads the current dynamic link libraries and updates the DLL's in step 516.
  • [0063]
    In contrast, if the user chooses not to install the new software player in step 514, the process aborts in step 518, while simultaneously pointing the browser 134 with an upgrade URL to a site hosted by the server system 112 or hosted by another server in step 520.
  • [0064]
    If the process is not aborted, in step 518, the application requirements contained in the application description are compared to the target computer's configuration in step 522. If there are inadequate resources, the process aborts in step 524. Additionally, the browser 134 is pointed toward a web page hosted by the server system providing for maintenance. Specifically, the maintenance URL is passed to the browser in step 526. For example, a minimum or maximum screen depth, resolution, RAM requirements, processor requirements, sound board requirements, and video board requirements are assessed. These checks are supported by the following commands in Buddy API: baVersion(“os”), baVersion(“qt”), baVersion (“qt3”), baScreenInfo(“height”), baScreenInfo(“width”) and baScreenInfo(“depth”).
  • [0065]
    If the user system's resources are determined to be adequate in step 522, a message is sent from the target client computer 110 to the server system over the network 114 in step 528. The message contains the session ID, which was just received from the server system in the application descriptor file. Also, a start request message is sent to the server system. The receipt of the session ID identifies the session and implicitly notifies the server system 112 that the target computer has successfully decrypted the application descriptor file, which had been previously sent. The start request indicates that the target client computer is now ready to begin to execute the requested application.
  • [0066]
    Also, the software player 132 preferably determines, via the application descriptor, the transaction mode being used. This will impact the appearance of the player 134 on the screen or GUI of the computer 110. For example, if the application descriptor identifies itself as an advertisement-based transaction (noted as an “a” in the Application Descriptor), then the software player 132 will respond by positioning itself at the top level of the screen depth and begin to request advertisements from an advertisement server, within the server system 112, over the network 114. Conversely, if the application descriptor identifies itself as a subscription-based (noted as an “s” in the application descriptor), the software player 132 will hide itself, but continue to execute in the background. To hide itself the program uses the baWindowState command in Buddy API. The ads are obtains through hypertext transfer protocol (http) calls.
  • [0067]
    In step 530, the target client computer 112 then waits for a start request acknowledgment from the server system 112. If no acknowledgment is received after a predetermined time period, a dialog is displayed on the target client computer 110 to notify the user that the server system is currently unavailable in step 532.
  • [0068]
    If the start request is acknowledged in step 534 by the server system 112, a proxy socket is opened in the target computer 110 and the application server address is passed to the proxy in step 536.
  • [0069]
    Continuing onto FIG. 5B in step 538, the software player 132 determines if any files are required from the server system 112 to continue the launch process. If additional files are required, they can be obtained by initiating a remote drive mounting process in step 540. Alternatively, the files can be obtained using a local file installation and replace process in step 542. Additionally, both processes could be used if multiple files are required.
  • [0070]
    Certain applications require specific files at specific locations. For example, certain anti-virus programs require virus definitions to exist at specific path. Such hard coded path requirements are addressed in this initial configurations check. A file check is performed and any required files are shipped to the client computer before the application is launched.
  • [0071]
    With the remote drive mounting and possibly local file installation/replace, the target client computer 110 now has access to the files and specifically the code required to invoke the selected application. Next, in step 544, the directory is set to the local or remote drive and the run command is issued to the host server. In one embodiment, this occurs on port 139, the SMB port, from the perspective of the application, but is actually sent through port 80 by the proxy application. Specifically, standard Windows NT remote networking methods are used to attach to the server's directory using the Net Use command, which is part of the Windows Networking.
  • [0072]
    If the client computer is running the Windows 95-version operating system, there is an additional step taken here. Since Windows 95 computers need to have the name of the server they are attaching to in a file in the Windows directory called LMHOST; the software player 132 writes the name of the server to the LMHOST file using the FileI/O command in Macromedia Director.
  • [0073]
    The software player 132 then waits for the application window and the update of the stream display in step 548. The window status is acquired by reference to the operating system application programming interface. In the preferred embodiment, where it is operating on a Windows OS platform, the window status is obtained via the WIN API in step 550. The stream data size is obtained from the proxy application in step 552.
  • [0074]
    In step 554, it is interrogated as to whether or not the application window has opened. Until the window opens, the host server in the server system 112 is periodically pinged. The window timeout is reset as many as three times and as long as the server is responsive to the ping in step 558. If there is no server response to the ping as determined in step 556, the user is notified via the dialog in step 560 and the program aborts in step 562.
  • [0075]
    If, however, the window opens as determined in step 554, the user interface elements are activated that are specific to the application in step 564. The size and position of the software player and application windows are then set in step 566. At this stage, with the application running on the operating system of the target client computer 110, the process proceeds to an application monitoring in step 568.
  • [0076]
    In the preferred embodiment, there are six processes that are performed to monitor the application. Application window monitoring, tracking pulse monitoring, advertising updating, net traffic monitoring, count-down timing, and user event handling.
  • [0077]
    FIG. 6A illustrates the steps associated with application window monitor process and the tracking pulse process.
  • [0078]
    Specifically, while the selected application is executing, the client computer multitasks to also monitor the operation of the application. One of the processes is the application window monitor process 610. Specifically, the application window monitor process 610 periodically makes API calls to determine whether or not the application's window is still open in step 612. If the window is open, it continues to maintain and/or set the position and layer of the windows of the application 133 and the software player 132 with respect to each other in step 614 according to the transaction mode. However, if the application window monitor process 610 determines that the application window has closed, the software player 132 begins the execution of a shutdown process 616.
  • [0079]
    The tracking pulse process 618 periodically sends a pulse or a ping to the host server of the server system 112 in step 620. If it is determined that no pulse has been received in step 622, the target client computer 110 pings the host server of the server system in step 624. Based on the status of the ping, if it is determined that there is no connection to the server, a dialog is generated in step 626 and there is a forced shutdown of the application process in step 628, and again, the shutdown process is activated 616. If the ping is successfully sent to the server, but no response is received, a dialog is generated in step 628. Again, a “no response” dialog is generated in step 630 and the shut down process is activated in step 616.
  • [0080]
    In other implementations, tracking is not provided by sending pulses; instead, the application server monitors socket connections to determine if connections are still active. From the client side, instead of the server telling the client to shut down, the client gets its “total time to run” as part of the wow file and begins counting down—and eventually shuts down—once it hits zero time.
  • [0081]
    In contrast, if it is determined that the pulse is received in step 622, the message is analyzed. If it is determined that the message is to turn off the application in step 632, the application process is terminated in step 628 and the shut down process is activated, step 616.
  • [0082]
    If the message returned that the application must be terminated within n minutes, a dialog is generated in step 634, notifying the user of the remaining minutes of access to the application. A countdown timer is started in step 636. Finally, if the message returned is an all clear or o.k. message in step 632, process returns.
  • [0083]
    FIG. 6B shows the advertisement update process, net traffic monitoring process, and countdown timer process, which are additionally performed as part of the application monitoring.
  • [0084]
    Specifically, the ad update process periodically updates the ads displayed on the software player and any URL's required for the ad server in step 640. It then returns to the run mode of the ad process in step 642.
  • [0085]
    If the transaction mode is advertisement-based, the software player will maintain a +1 depth relationship with the application's window. This means that if the application 133 is brought to the front, the software player 132 will place itself in front of the application 133 so the application cannot hide the advertisements being served. If a different application or window, i.e., one not being hosted by the server system 112, is brought to the front, the software player 132 will not obscure the application or window. It will maintain its +1 depth relation to the application 133. This is accomplished via the baWindowDepth command in Buddy API. Also, the player is monitored so that it is not moved off the screen.
  • [0086]
    Step 644 monitors network activity and notifies the net traffic monitoring process in step 646. This allows the application monitor to determine if there are any problems associated with high traffic, which would impact the operation of the application.
  • [0087]
    In step 648, the display countdown timer is updated. This countdown timer notifies the user as to the time remaining in which the application is available. This is most relevant where the user has, for example, “rented” the application for a fixed period of time as indicated by the transaction mode. The countdown timer updates the countdown timer process 650 so that a shut down process is automatically activated when the timer has timed-out.
  • [0088]
    FIG. 6C illustrates event handling process 652 of the application monitoring processes. Specifically, if the bookmark is selected in step 654, the URL of the third-party application hosting institution and its server system 112 is added to the start menu folder of the browser 132.
  • [0089]
    Currently, the bookmarking feature is termed“Quick Launch”—instead of adding it to the start menu folder system, it gets book-marked as part of a screen in the player—the one that comes up if you click on Quick Launch. It remembers the location from where you initially clicked, thus guaranteeing the web site that they will still get ad revenue and a follow-up page each time the user clicks on the Quick Launch bookmark.
  • [0090]
    If the help button is selected in step 656, a help file is displayed. The browser 134 is pointed to a URL of a help file server in step 658. If the third party home is selected in step 660, the browser is pointed to the URL or a specified URL of the subscribing institution in step 662. If the home button is selected in step 664, the browser 134 is pointed to the home page of the third-party application hosting system in step 666. If the ad, which is displayed by the player, is selected in step 668, the browser is pointed to the URL of the advertising company in step 670. Finally, if the quit button is selected in step 672, the application is forced to terminate in step 674 and the shutdown process is started in step 676.
  • [0091]
    FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating the application shutdown process. Specifically, if the application 133 is desired to be shutdown or quit in step 710, a shutdown pulse or signal is sent from the client computer 110 to the host server of the server system 112 in step 712. Any remnants of the application program are then removed from the operating system 135 and local drives generally, in step 714. Specifically, any modified registry settings are returned, icons are removed, folders in any disk drive are removed, and any new copies of applications on desktop are removed. Next, the player 132 is set up on the OS tray.
  • [0092]
    Finally, in the preferred embodiment, a follow-up URL is sent to the browser 134 in step 718. In the preferred embodiment, this follow-up URL is for the subscribing institution and is typically hosted by the web server 130, allowing it to follow with a “sales pitch” or to solicit for further purchase of goods and/or services. This allows, in some implementations, the third-party application hosting to be transparent to the user at the target computer. Finally, any remaining monitoring processes are identified in step 720, and the monitoring processes are terminated in step 722.
  • [0093]
    Finally, in step 724, the proxy application is quit and the software player is shut down in step 726.
  • [0094]
    FIG. 8 illustrates the operation of the port proxy of the software player 132. According to the preferred embodiment, when the application 133, through the software player, makes request to server system 112, the request is directed to port 139 as a standard SMB communication by the application. This SMB communication is intercepted by the SMB proxy of the software player 132. The request is redirected, by the proxy, through port 80, which is the http, or web port or some other open port such as the FTP port.
  • [0095]
    The SMB protocol has been in use on corporate LAN's (local area networks) for nearly twenty years. In that time, it has become a popular vehicle for enabling simple networking. It is at the heart of Microsoft Networking and also in IBM's OS/2. For historical, practical, and security reasons, it has remained a LAN based, however.
  • [0096]
    Microsoft networking utilizes the SMB protocol to communicate between PC clients and servers to provide file sharing, print sharing, and basic network authentication. Most commonly this is wrapped in the NetBIOS protocol to enable plug and play networking for small, medium and large LANs. The NetBIOS protocol provides for auto-discovery of networks, machine addressing abstraction, and decentralized management of networks.
  • [0097]
    For ease of use reasons, NetBIOS has grown to be a common standard on corporate LAN's. However, this also presents a significant security risk. A hacker who has broken into or is seeking to break into a corporation's LAN can either wait and “sniff” to find addresses of machines on the LAN, or a smart hacker can broadcast spurious NetBIOS packets and discover the formation of the LAN automatically.
  • [0098]
    In addition, early implementations of SMB transmitted usernames and passwords without encryption or other security across the LAN. This has since, however, been discovered and patched.
  • [0099]
    As a result of these two situations, most corporations block traffic to and from the Internet which uses the NetBIOS protocol. This is typically accomplished at the firewall because the frames identify the port from which they originated. The firewall stops frames based upon their port origination.
  • [0100]
    According to request for comments (RFC) 1001/1002, TCP and UDP ports 137, 138 and 139 are used for enabling a NetBIOS-based service. Microsoft Networking is such a service, wrapping the SMB protocol with NetBIOS for name resolution and other services. Therefore, all Microsoft Networks behind firewalls or proxies most commonly block these ports to guard their LANs from intrusion. In addition, many ISP's today block this traffic as well, to protect their user's from malicious Internet hackers.
  • [0101]
    In addition, most corporations have by default blocked all traffic to and from the Internet with only minor exceptions like HTTP, FTP, SMTP and POP3, protocols, which have become a staple in job performance. Therefore, it can be expected that to guarantee provision of any service across corporate firewalls, the use of HTTP as a carrier is the only choice. Though there are many other options, such as SOCKS proxies, or HTTP tunneling, use of standard HTTP over port 80 is preferred.
  • [0102]
    The proxy of the software player 132 listens for requests for port 139. These are transferred using address 27.0.0.1, which is the address for a loopback. The client computer 110 then monitors this local-loopback address.
  • [0103]
    Generally, there are three levels of firewalls. Minimally, most firewalls do not route anything from port 139. As a result, if the transmissions are sent through port 80, they can pass through this type of firewall. Even in more secure firewalls, port 80 is typically open. In the most secure type, the firewall blocks port 80, but proxies communications on this port. To handle this last configuration, the SMB communication is preferably encapsulated within an http packet, HTTP(SMB packet). As a result, an http header is added, which comprises a request line followed by a post form-data tag. These types of headers are used when data from a form is typically sent to a script process. For the http post to be performed correctly, the content length, content type, and MIME type are also set.
  • [0104]
    At the other end of the network, a web server 810 of the server system 112 listens on the corresponding port for the communications. It received the http packet with the post data commands. It strips off the packet's header and then sends the post data to the application server as SMB packets. Thus, the SMB proxy allows to the application 133 to execute as if it were mounting a standard Window NT server using the SMB protocol. Communications, however, are actually occurring over port 80 of the client computer 110.
  • [0105]
    More specifically, the web server 810 receives and maintains the connection with the client computer over the network. Incoming upload HTTP communications are received and the post data stripped out. This data is then transferred to the application server 812 as SMB protocol communications. The download path is handled by the inverse process where the application server sends SMB packets to the web server, which encapsulates the packets into the post data section of an HTTP packet. The HTTP packet header is then established, and the packet is transmitted to port 80 of the client over the intervening networks.
  • [0106]
    Alternatively, the proxy application on the client can be rerouted through port 23 (FTP) with the server returning on port 21, also reserved for FTP transfer, in another embodiment, if those ports are open.
  • [0107]
    If the web server 810 is not used, the use of the SMB proxy and port 80 communications requires that the operating system of the host application server in the server system be non-standard. In the one implementation, the server code has been recompiled to support SMB communications over port 80 instead of port 139. This necessitates the use of open source operating systems that implement Standard Microsoft Windows 95/98/NT/2000 protocols.
  • [0108]
    FIG. 9 illustrates the port proxy process.
  • [0109]
    Client 110 computer will request a file from a server by making a request in the form of \\COMPUTERNAME\SHARENAME. The COMPUTERNAME is a 15 character mnemonic for some machine in the user's network. The client PC will then try to resolve the COMPUTERNAME into a MAC address /IP address for the destination computer. This is done through a series of measures. First, the client will check its name cache for a pre-existing entry. Then it will try to resolve the name via broadcast to the network for any machine responding to this name or response from a machine which has already resolved this name. As a last fallback, the computer will check a special file, the LMHOSTS file, for a hard coded address.
  • [0110]
    This process generates a small amount of LAN traffic, which if the remote computer is not on the local LAN, will most likely be blocked by the firewall. This traffic constitutes the requests on ports 137 and 138 TCP and UDP. In the present embodiment, the software player 132 uses the LMHOSTS file to preload the name cache of client computer to avoid the network requests for name resolution in step 910.
  • [0111]
    The next phase is called NetBIOS Session Setup in step 912. During this phase the PC client will establish a connection to the remote computer, COMPUTERNAME, using the default, pre-assigned port, 139. In the case of Microsoft Networking, SMB is then used to establish a connection to SHARENAME and gain the files requested.
  • [0112]
    The NetBIOS Session Setup request is retargeted. This means that a valid response to a NetBIOS Session Setup is the IP address and port of a different machine which serves the information sought by the client computer 110. Using a small program, an entry is made into the LMHOSTS file designating the local loopback interface, 127.0.0.1, be given the NetBIOS name SWOWREDIR, in step 914. All requests then to \\SWOWREDIR\SHARENAME are redirected on the fly to the machine designated by the software player 132. Also, the request can be retargeted to use the FTP control port, 21. This enables further penetration of many corporate firewalls.
  • [0113]
    The NetBIOS session is preferably proxied as described. Specifically, the port proxy of the player 132 listens again to the loopback interface under the name SWOWPROXY in step 916. Then any request to \\SWOWPROXY\SHARENAME are relayed to address of the server system 112 over port 21 in step 918.
  • [0114]
    First, however, the NetBIOS session is preferably wrapped in HTTP in step 917. The port proxy, rather than simply relaying packets, queues up a request until a predetermined point is reached. The current accumulated data is then sent to the server system in the form of an HTTP POST transaction.
  • [0115]
    In this final case, NetBIOS and SMB packets are not simply relayed. The port proxy of the player 132 assembles the SMB packets into requests. The proxy will queue up a request until it is complete, then forward it in its entirety to the other end of the HTTP connection, a server side HTTP proxy.
  • [0116]
    In the case of the client, the proxy will read the first four bytes of an SMB request. This determines the number of bytes which are to follow and the actual SMB/NetBIOS command. Each request is then read to completion and then transmitted using the HTTP protocol to the server side proxy. The format of this transmission follows an HTTP POST transaction as this example shows:
    Outgoing SMB request:
    0x85 0x00 0x00 0x00 (SMB Keep Alive)
    Proxy intercepts and resends as:
    POST /cgi-bin/send.cgi?123456789012 HTTP/1.0
    User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; SoftwareWow; 1.0)
    Accept: */*
    Accept-Encoding: gzip
    Accept-Language: en-us
    Pragma: no-cache
    Host: www.softwarewow.net:80
    Content-type: multipart/form-data; boundary=---------------------------
    YYYYMMDDHHMISS
    Content-length: 201
    -----------------------------YYYYMMDDHHMISS
    Content-Disposition: form-data; name=″″command″″; filename=″″
    Content-Type: application/octet-stream
    0x85 0x00 0x00 0x00
    -----------------------------YYYYMMDDHHMISS
  • [0117]
    In this above case, the code 1234567889012 represents a unique session identifier used by the server side proxy to track the HTTP connections between requests. The actual URL is irrelevant, but is used to detract hackers from prodding at the server. If a request is made for an alternate URL, a 404 Not Found response is sent by the server side proxy. The next 6 lines of HTTP are used solely to adhere to HTTP standards, without these lines many proxy servers will ignore the request, deeming our proxy not to be a valid web browser.
  • [0118]
    The next two lines, Content-type and Content-length identify that what is to follow is a series of MIME encoding postings that the web server will know how to deal with. The Content-length is vital, without it most proxies will delay the request, not knowing when it has ended. Additionally, YYYYDDHHMISS represents a time stamp used to simply increment and vary the boundary stamp used in the MIME encoding as per RFC requirements.
  • [0119]
    If the target computer 110 is behind an HTTP proxy/firewall, the first line will be rewritten as follows instead to accommodate the requirements of the HTTP proxy:
  • [0120]
    POST http://www.softwarewow.net/cgi-bin/send.cgi?123456789012 HTTP/1.0
  • [0121]
    The server side proxy on the web server 810 will parse this input and strip out the SMB Keep Alive packet, and transfer it to the SMB server 812 in step 922. Once a full packet is received from the SMB server in step 924, the HTTP server side proxy will transmit the response as follows:
  • [0122]
    HTTP/1.0 200 OK
  • [0123]
    Date: Mon, 13 Mar. 2000 20:50:15 GMT
  • [0124]
    Server: SoftwareWow 1.0
  • [0125]
    Connection: close
  • [0126]
    Content-type: application/octet-stream
  • [0127]
    Content-length: 4
  • [0128]
    0x85 0x00 0x00 0x00
  • [0129]
    This response identifies a return of an SMB Keep Alive to the client PC. The server must respond in the first line with a valid response code, 200 represents a valid transaction. Then the server will respond with MIME identification of the type and size of response. On the response, no MIME boundaries are required if the server is solely sending back one packet of type application/octet-stream, which identifies a binary object is being returned. The client SMB proxy will then parse the number of bytes specified in the Content-length header and return these to the true SMB client, closing its connection to the HTTP proxy server.
  • [0130]
    As HTTP connections are stateless and incur a full TCP setup time to establish, it is an often used practice to utilize an HTTP/1.1 feature called HTTP Keep Alive. As a further enhancement to the above protocol, the SMB proxy could maintain its connection with the HTTP proxy and send multiple requests down the socket. This practice is covered in the HTTP/1.1 RFC.
  • [0131]
    While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.

Claims (20)

  1. 1. A method for enabling remote networking functionality by port proxying, the method comprising:
    executing a process on requiring a networking protocol;
    on a local client computer, intercepting communications from the process to a port assigned to support the network protocol; and
    redirecting the communications over an open port on the client computer.
  2. 2. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the step of executing the process comprises executing an application program.
  3. 3. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the step of executing the process comprises executing an application program residing on a remote storage asset.
  4. 4. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the process utilizes SMB networking.
  5. 5. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the step of intercepting communications from the process comprises intercepting communications for port 139.
  6. 6. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the step of intercepting communications from the process comprises addressing the communications to an address assigned for local loop-back.
  7. 7. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the step of redirecting the communications over the open port comprises encapsulating the communications in an HTTP packet.
  8. 8. A method as described in claim 7, wherein the communications are located in a post data portion of the HTTP packet.
  9. 9. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the open port is an HTTP port.
  10. 10. A method as described in claim 1, wherein the open port is a FTP port.
  11. 11. A system for remote networking by port proxy, the system comprising:
    an application program executing on a client computer which is utilizing the SMB protocol to access a remote storage asset; and
    a port proxy program, running on the client computer, that intercepts communications from the program to a port assigned to support the SMB protocol and redirects the communications over an open port on the client computer.
  12. 12. A system as described in claim 11, wherein the open port is an HTTP port.
  13. 13. A system as described in claim 11, wherein the open port is an FTP port.
  14. 14. A system as described in claim 11, wherein the SMB port is port 139.
  15. 15. A system as described in claim 11, wherein the communications are addressed for local loop-back.
  16. 16. A system as described in claim 11, wherein port proxy program encapsulates the communications in an HTTP packet.
  17. 17. A system as described in claim 16, wherein the communications are located in a post data portion of the HTTP packet.
  18. 18. A method as described in claim 1, further comprising constructing an application descriptor file for coordinating actions between a client and a server.
  19. 19. A system as described in claim 11, further comprising an application descriptor file on a server for coordinating actions between a client and the server.
  20. 20. A system for enabling remote networking functionality by port proxying, comprising:
    a client computer having a processor that executes software instructions;
    a first client process, running on the client computer, that requires a networking protocol;
    a second client process, running on the client computer, that intercepts communications from the first client process to a port assigned to support the network protocol and redirects the communications over an open port on the client computer.
US10894671 1999-04-12 2004-07-20 Port proxy and system for server and client computers Abandoned US20050010670A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12882899 true 1999-04-12 1999-04-12
US45618199 true 1999-12-07 1999-12-07
US09531121 US6938096B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-03-17 Method and system for remote networking using port proxying by detecting if the designated port on a client computer is blocked, then encapsulating the communications in a different format and redirecting to an open port
US10894671 US20050010670A1 (en) 1999-04-12 2004-07-20 Port proxy and system for server and client computers

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10894671 US20050010670A1 (en) 1999-04-12 2004-07-20 Port proxy and system for server and client computers
US11264747 US8099758B2 (en) 1999-05-12 2005-10-31 Policy based composite file system and method

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09310294 Continuation-In-Part US7017188B1 (en) 1998-11-16 1999-05-12 Method and apparatus for secure content delivery over broadband access networks

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11264747 Continuation-In-Part US8099758B2 (en) 1998-11-16 2005-10-31 Policy based composite file system and method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050010670A1 true true US20050010670A1 (en) 2005-01-13

Family

ID=34864173

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09531121 Active US6938096B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-03-17 Method and system for remote networking using port proxying by detecting if the designated port on a client computer is blocked, then encapsulating the communications in a different format and redirecting to an open port
US10894671 Abandoned US20050010670A1 (en) 1999-04-12 2004-07-20 Port proxy and system for server and client computers

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09531121 Active US6938096B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2000-03-17 Method and system for remote networking using port proxying by detecting if the designated port on a client computer is blocked, then encapsulating the communications in a different format and redirecting to an open port

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US6938096B1 (en)

Cited By (57)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020169998A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2002-11-14 Kenneth Largman Computer with special-purpose subsystems
US20030004882A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2003-01-02 Holler Anne Marie Optimized server for streamed applications
US20030018834A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-01-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Server side execution of application modules in a client and server system
US20030196114A1 (en) * 2002-04-10 2003-10-16 International Business Machines Persistent access control of protected content
US20040210796A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2004-10-21 Kenneth Largman Computer system capable of supporting a plurality of independent computing environments
US20040236874A1 (en) * 2001-05-17 2004-11-25 Kenneth Largman Computer system architecture and method providing operating-system independent virus-, hacker-, and cyber-terror-immune processing environments
US20050010754A1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2005-01-13 Resonate Inc. Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide ID visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US20050021613A1 (en) * 1998-11-16 2005-01-27 Softricity, Inc. Method and apparatus for content protection in a secure content delivery system
US20060026165A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2006-02-02 Microsoft Corporation Remote file updates through remote protocol
US20060048136A1 (en) * 2004-08-25 2006-03-02 Vries Jeff D Interception-based resource detection system
US20060070030A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Laborczfalvi Lee G Method and apparatus for providing an aggregate view of enumerated system resources from various isolation layers
US20060070029A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing file-type associations to multiple applications
US20060074989A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Laborczfalvi Lee G Method and apparatus for virtualizing object names
US20060075381A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for isolating execution of software applications
US20060090171A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-27 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for virtualizing window information
US20060106770A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2006-05-18 Vries Jeffrey D System and method for predictive streaming
US20060123185A1 (en) * 2004-11-13 2006-06-08 De Vries Jeffrey Streaming from a media device
US20060143530A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2006-06-29 Self-Repairing Computers, Inc. Self-repairing computing device and method of monitoring and repair
US20060143514A1 (en) * 2001-05-21 2006-06-29 Self-Repairing Computers, Inc. Computer system and method of controlling communication port to prevent computer contamination by virus or malicious code
US20060150245A1 (en) * 2004-12-31 2006-07-06 Infopower Corporation System and method of automatically transforming instant message transmission modes on internet
US20060161813A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2006-07-20 Self-Repairing Computers, Inc. Computer system and method having isolatable storage for enhanced immunity to viral and malicious code infection
US7096253B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2006-08-22 Stream Theory, Inc. Method and apparatus for streaming software
US20060218165A1 (en) * 2005-03-23 2006-09-28 Vries Jeffrey De Explicit overlay integration rules
US20060230175A1 (en) * 2005-03-23 2006-10-12 De Vries Jeffrey System and method for tracking changes to files in streaming applications
US20060272023A1 (en) * 1998-11-16 2006-11-30 Yonah Schmeidler Method and apparatus for secure content delivery over broadband access networks
US20060271697A1 (en) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Data communication protocol
US20060272017A1 (en) * 2002-03-06 2006-11-30 Kenneth Largman Computer and method for safe usage of documents, email attachments and other content that may contain virus, spy-ware, or malicious code
US20060277433A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2006-12-07 Self Repairing Computers, Inc. Computer having special purpose subsystems and cyber-terror and virus immunity and protection features
US20070067321A1 (en) * 2005-09-19 2007-03-22 Bissett Nicholas A Method and system for locating and accessing resources
US20070083620A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Pedersen Bradley J Methods for selecting between a predetermined number of execution methods for an application program
US20070083610A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Treder Terry N Method and a system for accessing a plurality of files comprising an application program
US20070083501A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Pedersen Bradley J Method and system for accessing a remote file in a directory structure associated with an application program executing locally
US20070083522A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Nord Joseph H Method and a system for responding locally to requests for file metadata associated with files stored remotely
US20070106993A1 (en) * 2005-10-21 2007-05-10 Kenneth Largman Computer security method having operating system virtualization allowing multiple operating system instances to securely share single machine resources
US20080052779A1 (en) * 2006-08-11 2008-02-28 Airdefense, Inc. Methods and Systems For Wired Equivalent Privacy and Wi-Fi Protected Access Protection
US7359933B1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2008-04-15 Oracle International Corporation Providing remote access to network applications using a dual proxy
US20080109876A1 (en) * 2006-10-23 2008-05-08 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US20080178298A1 (en) * 2001-02-14 2008-07-24 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20080189361A1 (en) * 2000-03-17 2008-08-07 Softricity, Inc. Method for serviing third party software applications from servers to client computers
US20090106780A1 (en) * 2007-10-20 2009-04-23 Nord Joseph Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US7529778B1 (en) 2001-12-12 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing access to consistent point-in-time file versions
US20090119458A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-07 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US20090119644A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-07 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US20090172160A1 (en) * 2008-01-02 2009-07-02 Sepago Gmbh Loading of server-stored user profile data
WO2010028073A1 (en) * 2008-09-02 2010-03-11 Fuhu, Inc. A stable active x linux based operating environment
US7730169B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2010-06-01 Softricity, Inc. Business method and system for serving third party software applications
US20100281102A1 (en) * 2009-05-02 2010-11-04 Chinta Madhav Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8099758B2 (en) 1999-05-12 2012-01-17 Microsoft Corporation Policy based composite file system and method
US20140006481A1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-02 Clifford A. Frey Methods for exchanging network management messages using udp over http protocol
US8631277B2 (en) 2010-12-10 2014-01-14 Microsoft Corporation Providing transparent failover in a file system
US8775369B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2014-07-08 Vir2Us, Inc. Computer system architecture and method having isolated file system management for secure and reliable data processing
US8788579B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2014-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Clustered client failover
US20140244790A1 (en) * 2013-02-27 2014-08-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication apparatus, communication method and non-transitory computer readable medium
US8856582B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-10-07 Microsoft Corporation Transparent failover
US20150304278A1 (en) * 2014-04-21 2015-10-22 General Electric Company Systems and methods for secure network-based monitoring of electrical power generators
US9331955B2 (en) 2011-06-29 2016-05-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Transporting operations of arbitrary size over remote direct memory access
US20160253170A1 (en) * 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Lenovo (Singapore) Pte, Ltd. Efficient deployment of thin client applications to end user

Families Citing this family (34)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020083183A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-06-27 Sanjay Pujare Conventionally coded application conversion system for streamed delivery and execution
US20020087883A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2002-07-04 Curt Wohlgemuth Anti-piracy system for remotely served computer applications
US7984110B1 (en) * 2001-11-02 2011-07-19 Hewlett-Packard Company Method and system for load balancing
US7647422B2 (en) 2001-11-06 2010-01-12 Enterasys Networks, Inc. VPN failure recovery
EP1488333B1 (en) * 2002-03-01 2010-10-06 Enterasys Networks, Inc. Location aware data network
US7346672B2 (en) * 2002-03-12 2008-03-18 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Automatic TFTP firmware download
US7565413B1 (en) * 2002-08-05 2009-07-21 Cisco Technology, Inc. Content request redirection from a wed protocol to a file protocol
JP4311637B2 (en) * 2003-10-30 2009-08-12 株式会社日立製作所 Storage controller
US7945945B2 (en) 2004-08-06 2011-05-17 Enterasys Networks, Inc. System and method for address block enhanced dynamic network policy management
EP1869834A1 (en) * 2005-04-02 2007-12-26 Socket Communications, Inc. Dynamic management of communication ports, devices, and logical connections
US20060247338A1 (en) * 2005-05-02 2006-11-02 General Electric Company Poly(arylene ether) compositions with improved ultraviolet light stability, and related articles
US8086232B2 (en) 2005-06-28 2011-12-27 Enterasys Networks, Inc. Time synchronized wireless method and operations
CN102929659B (en) * 2005-10-07 2016-05-04 茨特里克斯系统公司 A method for performing the method between a predetermined number of applications of the selected
US7949714B1 (en) * 2005-12-05 2011-05-24 Google Inc. System and method for targeting advertisements or other information using user geographical information
EP1818822A1 (en) 2006-02-10 2007-08-15 France Telecom Method and server for the distribution of software components, and update method and corresponding terminal und computer program products
US20070239470A1 (en) * 2006-03-31 2007-10-11 Benzi Ronen Method and system for managing development component metrics
US8423954B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2013-04-16 Sap Ag Interactive container of development components and solutions
US8745583B2 (en) * 2006-03-31 2014-06-03 Sap Ag Method and system for managing development components
US7877507B2 (en) * 2008-02-29 2011-01-25 Red Hat, Inc. Tunneling SSL over SSH
US20110264559A1 (en) * 2010-04-27 2011-10-27 Barrientos Edward System and method for product identification and cataloging
US9003543B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2015-04-07 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Providing a security boundary
US9116728B2 (en) 2010-12-21 2015-08-25 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Providing a persona-based application experience
US9354852B2 (en) 2010-12-23 2016-05-31 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Satisfying application dependencies
US9176742B2 (en) 2010-12-27 2015-11-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Converting desktop applications to web applications
US8931037B2 (en) 2010-12-27 2015-01-06 Microsoft Corporation Policy-based access to virtualized applications
US9189308B2 (en) 2010-12-27 2015-11-17 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Predicting, diagnosing, and recovering from application failures based on resource access patterns
US8789138B2 (en) 2010-12-27 2014-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Application execution in a restricted application execution environment
US9223611B2 (en) 2010-12-28 2015-12-29 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Storing and resuming application runtime state
WO2013024342A1 (en) 2011-08-15 2013-02-21 Calgary Scientific Inc. Method for flow control and for reliable communication in a collaborative environment
RU2625525C2 (en) 2011-08-15 2017-07-14 Калгари Сайентифик Инк. Contactless remote access to software application
CA2865707A1 (en) 2012-03-02 2013-09-06 Calgary Scientific Inc. Remote control of an application using dynamic-linked library (dll) injection
US9729673B2 (en) 2012-06-21 2017-08-08 Calgary Scientific Inc. Method and system for providing synchronized views of multiple applications for display on a remote computing device
CN105765923A (en) 2013-11-29 2016-07-13 卡尔加里科技股份有限公司 Method for providing a connection of a client to an unmanaged service in a client-server remote access system
WO2016120730A1 (en) * 2015-01-30 2016-08-04 Calgary Scientific Inc. Highly scalable, fault tolerant remote access architecture and method of connecting thereto

Citations (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5572643A (en) * 1995-10-19 1996-11-05 Judson; David H. Web browser with dynamic display of information objects during linking
US5644718A (en) * 1994-11-10 1997-07-01 At&T Corporation Apparatus using circuit manager to associate a single circuit with each host application where the circuit is shared by a plurality of client applications
US5708709A (en) * 1995-12-08 1998-01-13 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for managing try-and-buy usage of application programs
US5737619A (en) * 1995-10-19 1998-04-07 Judson; David Hugh World wide web browsing with content delivery over an idle connection and interstitial content display
US5758074A (en) * 1994-11-04 1998-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation System for extending the desktop management interface at one node to a network by using pseudo management interface, pseudo component interface and network server interface
US5826014A (en) * 1996-02-06 1998-10-20 Network Engineering Software Firewall system for protecting network elements connected to a public network
US5900871A (en) * 1997-03-10 1999-05-04 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for managing multiple cultural profiles in an information handling system
US5930792A (en) * 1996-11-07 1999-07-27 Intervoice Limited Partnership Monitoring and directing flow of HTML documents for security and access
US5928330A (en) * 1996-09-06 1999-07-27 Motorola, Inc. System, device, and method for streaming a multimedia file
US5941959A (en) * 1995-12-20 1999-08-24 Tandem Computers Incorporated System for transferring a data stream to a requestor without copying data segments to each one of multiple data source/sinks during data stream building
US5941954A (en) * 1997-10-01 1999-08-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Network message redirection
US5941908A (en) * 1997-04-23 1999-08-24 Vascular Science, Inc. Artificial medical graft with a releasable retainer
US5978828A (en) * 1997-06-13 1999-11-02 Intel Corporation URL bookmark update notification of page content or location changes
US6002853A (en) * 1995-10-26 1999-12-14 Wegener Internet Projects Bv System for generating graphics in response to a database search
US6006252A (en) * 1996-10-08 1999-12-21 Wolfe; Mark A. System and method for communicating information relating to a network resource
US6012090A (en) * 1997-03-14 2000-01-04 At&T Corp. Client-side parallel requests for network services using group name association
US6076115A (en) * 1997-02-11 2000-06-13 Xaqti Corporation Media access control receiver and network management system
US6076951A (en) * 1996-10-16 2000-06-20 National University Of Singapore Frequency-domain adaptive controller
US6098067A (en) * 1997-05-02 2000-08-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Remote computer management system
US6101549A (en) * 1996-09-27 2000-08-08 Intel Corporation Proxy-based reservation of network resources
US6119165A (en) * 1997-11-17 2000-09-12 Trend Micro, Inc. Controlled distribution of application programs in a computer network
US6138162A (en) * 1997-02-11 2000-10-24 Pointcast, Inc. Method and apparatus for configuring a client to redirect requests to a caching proxy server based on a category ID with the request
US6151643A (en) * 1996-06-07 2000-11-21 Networks Associates, Inc. Automatic updating of diverse software products on multiple client computer systems by downloading scanning application to client computer and generating software list on client computer
US6163806A (en) * 1997-06-30 2000-12-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for transparent, global access to physical devices on a computer cluster
US6247013B1 (en) * 1997-06-30 2001-06-12 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Hyper text reading system
US6260066B1 (en) * 1997-03-17 2001-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for optimal rebasing of web page transmission using a plurality of different rebasing tests and a Cost-Effectiveness determination
US6272673B1 (en) * 1997-11-25 2001-08-07 Alphablox Corporation Mechanism for automatically establishing connections between executable components of a hypertext-based application
US6295639B1 (en) * 1998-09-01 2001-09-25 Aidministrator Nederland B.V. Securely accessing a file system of a remote server computer
US20010043215A1 (en) * 1997-09-11 2001-11-22 Thomas M. Middleton Efficient downloading of animated presentation files
US6324578B1 (en) * 1998-12-14 2001-11-27 International Business Machines Corporation Methods, systems and computer program products for management of configurable application programs on a network
US6360366B1 (en) * 1996-09-05 2002-03-19 Managesoft Corporation Systems and methods for automatic application version upgrading and maintenance
US6389462B1 (en) * 1998-12-16 2002-05-14 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for transparently directing requests for web objects to proxy caches
US6405111B2 (en) * 1997-05-16 2002-06-11 Snap-On Technologies, Inc. System and method for distributed computer automotive service equipment
US6412009B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2002-06-25 Wall Data Incorporated Method and system for providing a persistent HTTP tunnel
US6421726B1 (en) * 1997-03-14 2002-07-16 Akamai Technologies, Inc. System and method for selection and retrieval of diverse types of video data on a computer network
US6502137B1 (en) * 1997-10-09 2002-12-31 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for transferring information over a computer network
US6546554B1 (en) * 2000-01-21 2003-04-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Browser-independent and automatic apparatus and method for receiving, installing and launching applications from a browser on a client computer
US6578199B1 (en) * 1999-11-12 2003-06-10 Fujitsu Limited Automatic tracking system and method for distributable software

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5611049A (en) * 1992-06-03 1997-03-11 Pitts; William M. System for accessing distributed data cache channel at each network node to pass requests and data
US5793763A (en) * 1995-11-03 1998-08-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. Security system for network address translation systems
US5956483A (en) * 1996-06-28 1999-09-21 Microsoft Corporation System and method for making function calls from a web browser to a local application
US6125352A (en) * 1996-06-28 2000-09-26 Microsoft Corporation System and method for conducting commerce over a distributed network
US5919247A (en) * 1996-07-24 1999-07-06 Marimba, Inc. Method for the distribution of code and data updates
US6067582A (en) 1996-08-13 2000-05-23 Angel Secure Networks, Inc. System for installing information related to a software application to a remote computer over a network
US5867651A (en) * 1996-08-27 1999-02-02 International Business Machines Corporation System for providing custom functionality to client systems by redirecting of messages through a user configurable filter network having a plurality of partially interconnected filters
US5915119A (en) * 1996-10-01 1999-06-22 Ncr Corporation Proxy terminal for network controlling of power managed user terminals in suspend mode
US5987523A (en) * 1997-06-04 1999-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation Applet redirection for controlled access to non-orginating hosts
US6226680B1 (en) * 1997-10-14 2001-05-01 Alacritech, Inc. Intelligent network interface system method for protocol processing
US6212560B1 (en) * 1998-05-08 2001-04-03 Compaq Computer Corporation Dynamic proxy server
US6434620B1 (en) * 1998-08-27 2002-08-13 Alacritech, Inc. TCP/IP offload network interface device
US6356863B1 (en) * 1998-09-08 2002-03-12 Metaphorics Llc Virtual network file server

Patent Citations (38)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5758074A (en) * 1994-11-04 1998-05-26 International Business Machines Corporation System for extending the desktop management interface at one node to a network by using pseudo management interface, pseudo component interface and network server interface
US5644718A (en) * 1994-11-10 1997-07-01 At&T Corporation Apparatus using circuit manager to associate a single circuit with each host application where the circuit is shared by a plurality of client applications
US5737619A (en) * 1995-10-19 1998-04-07 Judson; David Hugh World wide web browsing with content delivery over an idle connection and interstitial content display
US5572643A (en) * 1995-10-19 1996-11-05 Judson; David H. Web browser with dynamic display of information objects during linking
US6002853A (en) * 1995-10-26 1999-12-14 Wegener Internet Projects Bv System for generating graphics in response to a database search
US5708709A (en) * 1995-12-08 1998-01-13 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for managing try-and-buy usage of application programs
US5941959A (en) * 1995-12-20 1999-08-24 Tandem Computers Incorporated System for transferring a data stream to a requestor without copying data segments to each one of multiple data source/sinks during data stream building
US5826014A (en) * 1996-02-06 1998-10-20 Network Engineering Software Firewall system for protecting network elements connected to a public network
US6151643A (en) * 1996-06-07 2000-11-21 Networks Associates, Inc. Automatic updating of diverse software products on multiple client computer systems by downloading scanning application to client computer and generating software list on client computer
US6360366B1 (en) * 1996-09-05 2002-03-19 Managesoft Corporation Systems and methods for automatic application version upgrading and maintenance
US5928330A (en) * 1996-09-06 1999-07-27 Motorola, Inc. System, device, and method for streaming a multimedia file
US6101549A (en) * 1996-09-27 2000-08-08 Intel Corporation Proxy-based reservation of network resources
US6006252A (en) * 1996-10-08 1999-12-21 Wolfe; Mark A. System and method for communicating information relating to a network resource
US6076951A (en) * 1996-10-16 2000-06-20 National University Of Singapore Frequency-domain adaptive controller
US5930792A (en) * 1996-11-07 1999-07-27 Intervoice Limited Partnership Monitoring and directing flow of HTML documents for security and access
US6138162A (en) * 1997-02-11 2000-10-24 Pointcast, Inc. Method and apparatus for configuring a client to redirect requests to a caching proxy server based on a category ID with the request
US6076115A (en) * 1997-02-11 2000-06-13 Xaqti Corporation Media access control receiver and network management system
US5900871A (en) * 1997-03-10 1999-05-04 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for managing multiple cultural profiles in an information handling system
US6421726B1 (en) * 1997-03-14 2002-07-16 Akamai Technologies, Inc. System and method for selection and retrieval of diverse types of video data on a computer network
US6012090A (en) * 1997-03-14 2000-01-04 At&T Corp. Client-side parallel requests for network services using group name association
US6260066B1 (en) * 1997-03-17 2001-07-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for optimal rebasing of web page transmission using a plurality of different rebasing tests and a Cost-Effectiveness determination
US5941908A (en) * 1997-04-23 1999-08-24 Vascular Science, Inc. Artificial medical graft with a releasable retainer
US6098067A (en) * 1997-05-02 2000-08-01 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Remote computer management system
US6405111B2 (en) * 1997-05-16 2002-06-11 Snap-On Technologies, Inc. System and method for distributed computer automotive service equipment
US5978828A (en) * 1997-06-13 1999-11-02 Intel Corporation URL bookmark update notification of page content or location changes
US6247013B1 (en) * 1997-06-30 2001-06-12 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Hyper text reading system
US6163806A (en) * 1997-06-30 2000-12-19 Sun Microsystems, Inc. System and method for transparent, global access to physical devices on a computer cluster
US20010043215A1 (en) * 1997-09-11 2001-11-22 Thomas M. Middleton Efficient downloading of animated presentation files
US5941954A (en) * 1997-10-01 1999-08-24 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Network message redirection
US6502137B1 (en) * 1997-10-09 2002-12-31 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for transferring information over a computer network
US6119165A (en) * 1997-11-17 2000-09-12 Trend Micro, Inc. Controlled distribution of application programs in a computer network
US6272673B1 (en) * 1997-11-25 2001-08-07 Alphablox Corporation Mechanism for automatically establishing connections between executable components of a hypertext-based application
US6295639B1 (en) * 1998-09-01 2001-09-25 Aidministrator Nederland B.V. Securely accessing a file system of a remote server computer
US6324578B1 (en) * 1998-12-14 2001-11-27 International Business Machines Corporation Methods, systems and computer program products for management of configurable application programs on a network
US6389462B1 (en) * 1998-12-16 2002-05-14 Lucent Technologies Inc. Method and apparatus for transparently directing requests for web objects to proxy caches
US6412009B1 (en) * 1999-03-15 2002-06-25 Wall Data Incorporated Method and system for providing a persistent HTTP tunnel
US6578199B1 (en) * 1999-11-12 2003-06-10 Fujitsu Limited Automatic tracking system and method for distributable software
US6546554B1 (en) * 2000-01-21 2003-04-08 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Browser-independent and automatic apparatus and method for receiving, installing and launching applications from a browser on a client computer

Cited By (138)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100023640A1 (en) * 1997-06-16 2010-01-28 Stream Theory, Inc. Software streaming system and method
US8509230B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2013-08-13 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Software streaming system and method
US9094480B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2015-07-28 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Software streaming system and method
US9578075B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2017-02-21 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Software streaming system and method
US7096253B2 (en) 1997-06-16 2006-08-22 Stream Theory, Inc. Method and apparatus for streaming software
US7707641B2 (en) 1998-11-16 2010-04-27 Softricity, Inc. Method and apparatus for secure content delivery over broadband access networks
US20050021613A1 (en) * 1998-11-16 2005-01-27 Softricity, Inc. Method and apparatus for content protection in a secure content delivery system
US20060272023A1 (en) * 1998-11-16 2006-11-30 Yonah Schmeidler Method and apparatus for secure content delivery over broadband access networks
US7690039B2 (en) 1998-11-16 2010-03-30 Softricity, Inc. Method and apparatus for content protection in a secure content delivery system
US8612514B2 (en) 1999-04-12 2013-12-17 Microsoft Corporation Serving software applications from servers to client computers
US7730169B1 (en) 1999-04-12 2010-06-01 Softricity, Inc. Business method and system for serving third party software applications
US8099758B2 (en) 1999-05-12 2012-01-17 Microsoft Corporation Policy based composite file system and method
US7900040B2 (en) * 1999-09-01 2011-03-01 Juergen Brendel Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide ID visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US20070094373A1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2007-04-26 Resonate Inc. Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide ID visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US20050010754A1 (en) * 1999-09-01 2005-01-13 Resonate Inc. Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide ID visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US7861075B2 (en) * 1999-09-01 2010-12-28 Juergen Brendel Atomic session-start operation combining clear-text and encrypted sessions to provide ID visibility to middleware such as load-balancers
US7797372B2 (en) 2000-03-17 2010-09-14 Softricity, Inc. Serving software applications from servers for client computers
US20080189361A1 (en) * 2000-03-17 2008-08-07 Softricity, Inc. Method for serviing third party software applications from servers to client computers
US20060277433A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2006-12-07 Self Repairing Computers, Inc. Computer having special purpose subsystems and cyber-terror and virus immunity and protection features
US20060143530A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2006-06-29 Self-Repairing Computers, Inc. Self-repairing computing device and method of monitoring and repair
US7577871B2 (en) 2000-05-19 2009-08-18 Vir2Us, Inc. Computer system and method having isolatable storage for enhanced immunity to viral and malicious code infection
US7571353B2 (en) 2000-05-19 2009-08-04 Vir2Us, Inc. Self-repairing computing device and method of monitoring and repair
US20060161813A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2006-07-20 Self-Repairing Computers, Inc. Computer system and method having isolatable storage for enhanced immunity to viral and malicious code infection
US20020169998A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2002-11-14 Kenneth Largman Computer with special-purpose subsystems
US7137034B2 (en) 2000-05-19 2006-11-14 Vir2Us, Inc. Self repairing computer having user accessible switch for modifying bootable storage device configuration to initiate repair
US8831995B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2014-09-09 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Optimized server for streamed applications
US9130953B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2015-09-08 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20030004882A1 (en) * 2000-11-06 2003-01-02 Holler Anne Marie Optimized server for streamed applications
US9654548B2 (en) 2000-11-06 2017-05-16 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20030018834A1 (en) * 2000-12-22 2003-01-23 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Server side execution of application modules in a client and server system
US7257615B2 (en) * 2000-12-22 2007-08-14 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Server side execution of application modules in a client and server system
US8893249B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2014-11-18 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US8438298B2 (en) 2001-02-14 2013-05-07 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20080178298A1 (en) * 2001-02-14 2008-07-24 Endeavors Technology, Inc. Intelligent network streaming and execution system for conventionally coded applications
US20040236874A1 (en) * 2001-05-17 2004-11-25 Kenneth Largman Computer system architecture and method providing operating-system independent virus-, hacker-, and cyber-terror-immune processing environments
US7392541B2 (en) 2001-05-17 2008-06-24 Vir2Us, Inc. Computer system architecture and method providing operating-system independent virus-, hacker-, and cyber-terror-immune processing environments
US7849360B2 (en) 2001-05-21 2010-12-07 Vir2Us, Inc. Computer system and method of controlling communication port to prevent computer contamination by virus or malicious code
US20060143514A1 (en) * 2001-05-21 2006-06-29 Self-Repairing Computers, Inc. Computer system and method of controlling communication port to prevent computer contamination by virus or malicious code
US7536598B2 (en) 2001-11-19 2009-05-19 Vir2Us, Inc. Computer system capable of supporting a plurality of independent computing environments
US20040210796A1 (en) * 2001-11-19 2004-10-21 Kenneth Largman Computer system capable of supporting a plurality of independent computing environments
US7529778B1 (en) 2001-12-12 2009-05-05 Microsoft Corporation System and method for providing access to consistent point-in-time file versions
US20060272017A1 (en) * 2002-03-06 2006-11-30 Kenneth Largman Computer and method for safe usage of documents, email attachments and other content that may contain virus, spy-ware, or malicious code
US7788699B2 (en) 2002-03-06 2010-08-31 Vir2Us, Inc. Computer and method for safe usage of documents, email attachments and other content that may contain virus, spy-ware, or malicious code
US20030196114A1 (en) * 2002-04-10 2003-10-16 International Business Machines Persistent access control of protected content
US7614077B2 (en) * 2002-04-10 2009-11-03 International Business Machines Corporation Persistent access control of protected content
US7359933B1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2008-04-15 Oracle International Corporation Providing remote access to network applications using a dual proxy
US20060026165A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2006-02-02 Microsoft Corporation Remote file updates through remote protocol
US7617256B2 (en) 2004-07-19 2009-11-10 Microsoft Corporation Remote file updates through remote protocol
US20060048136A1 (en) * 2004-08-25 2006-03-02 Vries Jeff D Interception-based resource detection system
US20060085789A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-20 Laborczfalvi Lee G Method and apparatus for moving processes between isolation environments
US7853947B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-12-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. System for virtualizing access to named system objects using rule action associated with request
US7752600B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-07-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing file-type associations to multiple applications
US8302101B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-10-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for accessing, by application programs, resources provided by an operating system
US20070067255A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2007-03-22 Bissett Nicholas A Method and system for accessing resources
US20060075381A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for isolating execution of software applications
US8171479B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing an aggregate view of enumerated system resources from various isolation layers
US20060074989A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-06 Laborczfalvi Lee G Method and apparatus for virtualizing object names
US20060070029A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for providing file-type associations to multiple applications
US7676813B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-03-09 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for accessing resources
US20060070030A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-03-30 Laborczfalvi Lee G Method and apparatus for providing an aggregate view of enumerated system resources from various isolation layers
US7680758B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2010-03-16 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for isolating execution of software applications
US8132176B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method for accessing, by application programs, resources residing inside an application isolation scope
US8117559B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2012-02-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for virtualizing window information
US20070094667A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2007-04-26 Bissett Nicholas A Method for accessing, by application programs, resources residing inside an application isolation environment
US8042120B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2011-10-18 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for moving processes between isolation environments
US20060090171A1 (en) * 2004-09-30 2006-04-27 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for virtualizing window information
US8352964B2 (en) 2004-09-30 2013-01-08 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for moving processes between isolation environments
US20060106770A1 (en) * 2004-10-22 2006-05-18 Vries Jeffrey D System and method for predictive streaming
US20060168294A1 (en) * 2004-11-13 2006-07-27 De Vries Jeff Hybrid local/remote streaming
US8949820B2 (en) 2004-11-13 2015-02-03 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Streaming from a media device
US20060123185A1 (en) * 2004-11-13 2006-06-08 De Vries Jeffrey Streaming from a media device
US8359591B2 (en) 2004-11-13 2013-01-22 Streamtheory, Inc. Streaming from a media device
US20060150245A1 (en) * 2004-12-31 2006-07-06 Infopower Corporation System and method of automatically transforming instant message transmission modes on internet
US20060230175A1 (en) * 2005-03-23 2006-10-12 De Vries Jeffrey System and method for tracking changes to files in streaming applications
US9781007B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2017-10-03 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8898391B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2014-11-25 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US9300752B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2016-03-29 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US9716609B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2017-07-25 Numecent Holdings, Inc. System and method for tracking changes to files in streaming applications
US20060218165A1 (en) * 2005-03-23 2006-09-28 Vries Jeffrey De Explicit overlay integration rules
US8527706B2 (en) 2005-03-23 2013-09-03 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8316129B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2012-11-20 Microsoft Corporation Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US9438696B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2016-09-06 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Data communication protocol
US8825885B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2014-09-02 Microsoft Corporation Data communication protocol
US8850025B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2014-09-30 Microsoft Corporation Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US9332089B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2016-05-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US9071661B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2015-06-30 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Data communication coordination with sequence numbers
US8332526B2 (en) 2005-05-25 2012-12-11 Microsoft Corporation Data communication protocol including negotiation and command compounding
US20060271697A1 (en) * 2005-05-25 2006-11-30 Microsoft Corporation Data communication protocol
US8095940B2 (en) 2005-09-19 2012-01-10 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for locating and accessing resources
US20070067321A1 (en) * 2005-09-19 2007-03-22 Bissett Nicholas A Method and system for locating and accessing resources
US20070083501A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Pedersen Bradley J Method and system for accessing a remote file in a directory structure associated with an application program executing locally
US20070083620A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Pedersen Bradley J Methods for selecting between a predetermined number of execution methods for an application program
US7779034B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2010-08-17 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for accessing a remote file in a directory structure associated with an application program executing locally
US20070083610A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Treder Terry N Method and a system for accessing a plurality of files comprising an application program
US8131825B2 (en) 2005-10-07 2012-03-06 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and a system for responding locally to requests for file metadata associated with files stored remotely
US20070083522A1 (en) * 2005-10-07 2007-04-12 Nord Joseph H Method and a system for responding locally to requests for file metadata associated with files stored remotely
US20070106993A1 (en) * 2005-10-21 2007-05-10 Kenneth Largman Computer security method having operating system virtualization allowing multiple operating system instances to securely share single machine resources
US20080052779A1 (en) * 2006-08-11 2008-02-28 Airdefense, Inc. Methods and Systems For Wired Equivalent Privacy and Wi-Fi Protected Access Protection
US8281392B2 (en) * 2006-08-11 2012-10-02 Airdefense, Inc. Methods and systems for wired equivalent privacy and Wi-Fi protected access protection
US9825957B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2017-11-21 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9054962B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2015-06-09 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US8782778B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2014-07-15 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US20080109876A1 (en) * 2006-10-23 2008-05-08 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9380063B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2016-06-28 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US8261345B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2012-09-04 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US8752128B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2014-06-10 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9054963B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2015-06-09 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9699194B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2017-07-04 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US9571501B2 (en) 2006-10-23 2017-02-14 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Rule-based application access management
US8775369B2 (en) 2007-01-24 2014-07-08 Vir2Us, Inc. Computer system architecture and method having isolated file system management for secure and reliable data processing
US20090106780A1 (en) * 2007-10-20 2009-04-23 Nord Joseph Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9009721B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9009720B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US8171483B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2012-05-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US9021494B2 (en) 2007-10-20 2015-04-28 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and system for communicating between isolation environments
US8024523B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2011-09-20 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US8892738B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2014-11-18 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US8661197B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2014-02-25 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US9436578B2 (en) 2007-11-07 2016-09-06 Numecent Holdings, Inc. Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US20090119458A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-07 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Opportunistic block transmission with time constraints
US20090119644A1 (en) * 2007-11-07 2009-05-07 Endeavors Technologies, Inc. Deriving component statistics for a stream enabled application
US20090172160A1 (en) * 2008-01-02 2009-07-02 Sepago Gmbh Loading of server-stored user profile data
WO2010028073A1 (en) * 2008-09-02 2010-03-11 Fuhu, Inc. A stable active x linux based operating environment
US20100070752A1 (en) * 2008-09-02 2010-03-18 Robb Fujioka Stable Active X Linux based operating environment
US20100281102A1 (en) * 2009-05-02 2010-11-04 Chinta Madhav Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8090797B2 (en) 2009-05-02 2012-01-03 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8326943B2 (en) 2009-05-02 2012-12-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Methods and systems for launching applications into existing isolation environments
US8631277B2 (en) 2010-12-10 2014-01-14 Microsoft Corporation Providing transparent failover in a file system
US9331955B2 (en) 2011-06-29 2016-05-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Transporting operations of arbitrary size over remote direct memory access
US9462039B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2016-10-04 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Transparent failover
US8856582B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2014-10-07 Microsoft Corporation Transparent failover
US8788579B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2014-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Clustered client failover
US9215131B2 (en) * 2012-06-29 2015-12-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods for exchanging network management messages using UDP over HTTP protocol
US20140006481A1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-02 Clifford A. Frey Methods for exchanging network management messages using udp over http protocol
US20140244790A1 (en) * 2013-02-27 2014-08-28 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Communication apparatus, communication method and non-transitory computer readable medium
US20150304278A1 (en) * 2014-04-21 2015-10-22 General Electric Company Systems and methods for secure network-based monitoring of electrical power generators
US20160253170A1 (en) * 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Lenovo (Singapore) Pte, Ltd. Efficient deployment of thin client applications to end user
US9785429B2 (en) * 2015-02-27 2017-10-10 Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. Efficient deployment of thin client applications to end user

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US6938096B1 (en) 2005-08-30 grant

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7092987B2 (en) Remote computer capabilities querying and certification
US6317777B1 (en) Method for web based storage and retrieval of documents
US7310516B1 (en) Method and system for providing advanced notice of cost to access web content
US6728884B1 (en) Integrating heterogeneous authentication and authorization mechanisms into an application access control system
US6711682B1 (en) Online service registration system and method
US7020687B2 (en) Providing access to a plurality of e-mail and voice message accounts from a single web-based interface
US7502994B2 (en) Web page link-tracking system
US7382879B1 (en) Digital rights management negotiation for streaming media over a network
US6954799B2 (en) Method and apparatus for integrating distributed shared services system
US6374359B1 (en) Dynamic use and validation of HTTP cookies for authentication
US6311278B1 (en) Method and system for extracting application protocol characteristics
US7099915B1 (en) Server load balancing method and system
US6832321B1 (en) Public network access server having a user-configurable firewall
US8332464B2 (en) System and method for remote network access
US6564243B1 (en) Method and system for injecting external content into computer network interactive sessions
US7606918B2 (en) Account creation via a mobile device
US7426750B2 (en) Network-based content distribution system
US6339423B1 (en) Multi-domain access control
US6804718B1 (en) Computing system and method for migrating a mobile computing environment
US20010037469A1 (en) Method and apparatus for authenticating users
US6253325B1 (en) Apparatus and method for securing documents posted from a web resource
US6976164B1 (en) Technique for handling subsequent user identification and password requests with identity change within a certificate-based host session
US20040250130A1 (en) Architecture for connecting a remote client to a local client desktop
US6351810B2 (en) Self-contained and secured access to remote servers
US20020124074A1 (en) Monitoring of remote data access on a public computer network

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SOFTRICITY, INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SOFTWAREWOW.COM, INC.;REEL/FRAME:015290/0873

Effective date: 20001027

Owner name: SOFTWAREWOW.COM, INC., MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GRESCHLER, DAVID M.;MYSLIWY, OWEN;SCHAEFER, STUART;REEL/FRAME:015290/0862

Effective date: 20000920

AS Assignment

Owner name: MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC, WASHINGTON

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MICROSOFT CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:034766/0509

Effective date: 20141014