US20040193494A1 - System and method for collecting and analyzing competitive rewards data - Google Patents

System and method for collecting and analyzing competitive rewards data Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040193494A1
US20040193494A1 US10822920 US82292004A US2004193494A1 US 20040193494 A1 US20040193494 A1 US 20040193494A1 US 10822920 US10822920 US 10822920 US 82292004 A US82292004 A US 82292004A US 2004193494 A1 US2004193494 A1 US 2004193494A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
data
competitive rewards
competitive
entity
database
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US10822920
Other versions
US7418446B2 (en )
Inventor
Eric Zitaner
Susan Haslett
Kathy Bensky
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TOWERS PERRIN CAPITAL CORP
Original Assignee
Towers Perrin Forster Crosby Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor ; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30861Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
    • G06F17/3089Web site content organization and management, e.g. publishing, automatic linking or maintaining pages
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063Operations research or analysis
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis
    • G06Q10/06393Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
    • G06Q10/063Operations research or analysis
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis
    • G06Q10/06398Performance of employee with respect to a job function
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • G06Q30/0207Discounts or incentives, e.g. coupons, rebates, offers or upsales
    • G06Q30/0217Giving input on a product or service or expressing a customer desire in exchange for an incentive or reward
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99931Database or file accessing
    • Y10S707/99933Query processing, i.e. searching
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99943Generating database or data structure, e.g. via user interface
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S707/00Data processing: database and file management or data structures
    • Y10S707/99941Database schema or data structure
    • Y10S707/99944Object-oriented database structure
    • Y10S707/99945Object-oriented database structure processing

Abstract

The invention concerns a system and method for implementing and/or administering a competitive rewards database. Member data is received from at least one member computer via a data feed. The (raw) member data is automatically mapped and incorporated into the competitive rewards database. A data capture tool, preferably coupled to a data network, is operable to adjust the mapping of member data. A rewards workbench, preferably coupled to a data network, is generally operable to query the competitive rewards database.

Description

  • The present invention relates to the field of computer database systems and in particular relates to a competitive rewards benchmarking system and method. [0001]
  • Many business entities find it necessary to obtain, analyze and interpret worker rewards market data to better recruit and retain workers or “talent”. Often, market pressures require business organizations to identify and retain the best qualified talent available, and ensure they are properly recognized and rewarded. However, several difficulties arise in carrying out this task. [0002]
  • Some business entities benchmark worker rewards against various competitors in such areas as: salary ranges, salary increases, paid/unpaid leave, retirement programs; medical, dental, vision care, insurance programs, alternate work schedules and the like. Effective benchmarking requires relatively large amounts of up to date and accurate data. For example, competitive rewards data is preferably gathered from multiple business organizations via surveys and the like for incorporation into a database. In general, surveys are quite labor intensive to administer and can include data gathered and compiled on a local, national or global basis. [0003]
  • Competitive rewards data can be compiled in-house or can be obtained from a variety of sources (out-sourced). A typical competitive rewards database contains: base salary information, incentives and total cash compensation as well as other factors such as use of overtime, stock plans and cash awards (like performance bonuses and profit sharing). Reports generated from such data can contain global or national salary information as well as breakouts based on numerous criteria, including sales revenue, geographic region, industry type, company size and the like. [0004]
  • Often, access to out-sourced data requires a business entity to pay a fee and also commit at least a portion of its resources to compile and submit its data regarding its workers. The preparation and submission of this information is also quite labor intensive. However, out-sourcing is advantageous in that the actual compilation, maintenance and administration of the database are handled by a third party. [0005]
  • The consistency and accuracy of the compiled data can be affected by various factors. For example, various worker roles may not be defined consistently between business organizations. The geographic location of various businesses may affect the magnitude and form of worker compensation packages. Country specific rewards and translating across currencies and cultures can add further inconsistencies in the data. Survey inconsistencies may also affect the accuracy of the gathered data. [0006]
  • What is needed in the art and provided by the invention are improved systems and methods for providing current competitive rewards data. [0007]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention concerns a system and method for implementing and/or administering a competitive rewards database. Member data is received from at least one ember computer via a data feed. The (raw) member data is automatically mapped and incorporated into the competitive rewards database. [0008]
  • In a preferred embodiment, the competitive rewards database contains at least one of base pay data, long term incentive pay data and annual incentive pay data. Other data elements can include any human resource management system data element, incentive data, perquisite data and/or benefit plan provision data. The competitive rewards database can also contain at least one calculated data value. [0009]
  • A preferred aspect of the invention is direct to a data capture tool operable to adjust the mapping of member data. Preferably, the data capture tool is coupled to a data network and is operable to provide remote access to at least a portion of the competitive rewards database. [0010]
  • Another aspect of the invention is directed to a rewards workbench operable to query the competitive rewards database. Preferably, the rewards workbench is coupled to a data network and is operable to provide remote access to at least a portion of the competitive rewards database (e.g., compiled statistics summarizing the data received from multiple members). In a preferred embodiment, the rewards workbench is operable to automate data feeds to at least one third party human resources management system. [0011]
  • The invention is also directed to a competitive rewards database system. The system has a competitive rewards database subsystem having a competitive rewards database and a data communications channel. The system has mapping data for automatically mapping member data prior to incorporation into the competitive rewards database. The system also includes at least one member computer system having a data feed coupled to the data communications channel. [0012]
  • In a preferred embodiment the system also has a data capture tool operable to adjust the mapping of member data. Preferably, the data capture tool is coupled to a data network and is operable to provide remote access to at least a portion of the competitive rewards database. [0013]
  • Another preferred aspect of the system provides a rewards workbench operable to query the competitive rewards database. Preferably, the rewards workbench is coupled to a data network and is operable to provide remote access to at least a portion of the competitive rewards database. The rewards workbench can optionally be operable to automate data feeds to at least one third party human resources management system. [0014]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a general block diagram showing the basic components of computer system in accordance with the invention; [0015]
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the basic components of the competitive rewards database subsystem in accordance with the invention; [0016]
  • FIG. 3 is flow chart illustrates operation of a computer system with respect to member data feeds in accordance with the invention; and [0017]
  • FIG. 4 is an exemplary data mapping table in accordance with the invention.[0018]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • Definitions [0019]
  • The following terms shall have, for the purposes of this application, the respective meanings set forth below. [0020]
  • Database: means a collection of information stored for later retrieval. Traditional databases are organized by fields, records, and files. A field is a single piece of information; a record is one complete set of fields; and a file is a collection of records. The term “database” is used herein in its broadest sense (i.e., a collection of information) and is not limited to any particular structure or implementation. [0021]
  • Data network: means a group of two or more computer systems linked together in data communication. The term “data network” encompasses any type of wired or wireless computer network, independent of protocol, including local-area networks (LANs), wide-area networks (WANs) and networks of networks including the an intranet, extranet and the Internet. [0022]
  • HTML: is an acronym for Hyper-Text Markup Language, the authoring language used to create documents on the World Wide Web. HTML defines the structure and layout of a Web document by using a variety of tags and attributes. [0023]
  • Link: means an HTML element that provides a Hyper-Text link. For example an HTML element supporting the HREF attribute which specifies a Hyper-Text link to another resource, such as an HTML document, image or the like. [0024]
  • Server: means a program running on a computer that provides some service to other (e.g., client) programs. [0025]
  • The invention concerns a competitive rewards database system and method of administration. The system is operable to receive member data from at least one member computer via a data feed and automatically map the member data prior to incorporation into the competitive rewards database. The system is preferably coupled to a plurality of member human resources management systems (i.e., computer systems) and receives automatic data feeds of raw member data on a regular basis. [0026]
  • The term “member computer system” as used herein refers to a member's human resources management systems (HRMS). A typical member HRMS is implemented with a proprietary software package and one or more computer. The implementation, configuration, maintenance and operation of a computer based HRMS is well known to those skilled in the art. [0027]
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a computer system in accordance with the invention. The computer system has a competitive rewards database subsystem [0028] 10 (associated with at least one computer) operable store data such as base pay data, long term incentive pay data and annual incentive pay data. Other data elements can include any human resource management system data element, incentive data, perquisite data and/or benefit plan provision data and the like. Mapping data 20 provides a mechanism for automatically mapping raw member data prior to incorporation into the competitive rewards database as discussed in more detail below. Mapping data 20 is generally coupled to the competitive rewards database subsystem 10 as shown generally by arrow 22 (e.g., via Lan, Wan, intranet, extranet or the like).
  • The competitive rewards database subsystem [0029] 10 is preferably coupled to at least one member computer system. See blocks 30, 32, 34 and 36. Data communication (e.g., data feeds) between member computer systems 30, 32, 34 and 36 and the competitive rewards database subsystem 10 are shown generally by arrows 40. Data communications in association with database reporting functions are shown generally by arrows 70. Data communications in association with data capture tool 52 is shown generally by arrow 52. Data communications between various portions of the system are preferably carried out via a data network such as the Internet. It is understood that other data network configurations are compatible with the invention (e.g., Lan, Wan, intranet, extranet or the like). It is also understood that enhanced security can be provided via firewalls, secure servers and the like.
  • In the case of the Internet, data communications often traverse a series of intermediate network nodes prior to reaching the desired destination. Arrows [0030] 40, 52 and 70 do not suggest a direct physical connection between the member computer systems and the competitive rewards database subsystem and encompass typical Internet communications (a connectionless, best-efforts packet-based system).
  • It is understood that other components may be required to fully implement communications between the member computer systems [0031] 30, 32, 34 and 36 and the competitive rewards database subsystem such as firewalls, routers, policy servers, Web servers, application servers, enterprise management systems, data communications channels (e.g. communications equipment, leased data lines and the like), switches, encryption products and/or gateways and the like. Configuration of the required hardware and software to implement data communication in accordance with the invention is well known to those skilled in the art.
  • A data capture tool [0032] 50 is coupled to the competitive rewards database subsystem. The data capture tool is preferably an Internet World Wide Web based “smart” tool to capture HR and Line Manager input on benchmark global job matches. Preferably, the data capture tool is populated with appropriate employee data (based on data in the competitive rewards database) according to reporting relationships. Line Managers can then advantageously review data for each employee they supervise.
  • A rewards workbench is [0033] 60 is coupled to the competitive rewards database subsystem. The rewards workbench is an analytic tool to access to data contained in the competitive rewards database subsystem. The rewards workbench is preferably operable to query the competitive rewards database and provide various reports relevant to competitive rewards analysis, total compensation planning, data mining and performance based analysis.
  • The data capture tool [0034] 50 and rewards workbench 60 are preferably implemented via with one or more HTML servers hosting an Internet Web site. There are many varieties of commercially or publicly available World Wide Web server software packages which are compatible with the invention (e.g., Apache, IBM WebSphere products, NETSCAPE Enterprise, Microsoft Windows IIS Server and the like) all of which can be implemented with commonly available hardware from vendors such as IBM, Hewlett Packard, Compaq, Dell, Sun and numerous others that are known to those skilled in the art.
  • Members wishing to access the data capture tool [0035] 50 or rewards workbench 60 will typically use a network processing device (not shown) coupled to the external data network (e.g., the Internet). Two or more network devices (e.g., a network processing device and competitive rewards database subsystem 10) as disclosed herein are “coupled” so long as data communication between the devices is possible (e.g., hard wired data communication, wireless data communications and the like). Typical network processing devices include, but are not limited to, personal computers (portable or desktop), personal digital assistants (PDA), Browser phones, 2-way pagers or the like. Network processing devices also include browser software or the like for providing a user interface and enabling communication with the external data network (e.g., Microsoft Internet Explorer, Netsacape Communicator, mini-browsers or the like).
  • In the context of the Internet, the network processing device and the competitive rewards database subsystem [0036] 10 communicate via TCP/IP protocol (Transmission Control Protocol over Internet Protocol). Each is network addressable in that it has a specific IP address (e.g., a 32-bit address defined by the Internet Protocol usually represented in dotted decimal notation) which is used to route data between the devices. It is also understood that other data networks using various network protocols are suitable for use in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 shows a block diagram of the competitive rewards database subsystem [0037] 10. Competitive rewards database 12 is generally operable to store data acquired from the member systems. However, raw data from the member computer systems must be mapped, in accordance with mapping data 20, prior to incorporation into the competitive rewards database 12 as discussed in more detail below. Computer(s)/server(s) 14 are generally operable to communication with the member computer systems via communications hardware/software 16. The interconnection of computers, servers, communication equipment and the like in accordance with the invention is well within the grasp of those skilled in the art. For example, the competitive rewards database subsystem 10 can be implemented via a Lan, Wan, intranet, extranet or the like.
  • FIG. 3 generally illustrates operation of a computer system with respect to member data feeds in accordance with the invention. Preferably, each of the member computer systems [0038] 30, 32, 34 and 36 are configured to automatically transfer raw data on a somewhat regular or periodic basis (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly . . . ). In the alternative, the competitive rewards database system 10 can be configured to poll each of the member computer systems. Raw data can be transferred via any communication protocol, including but not limited to HTTP, FTP, GOPHER, NEWS, NNTP, MAILTO and the like.
  • The invention contemplates integration with a plurality of proprietary HRMS. Each member computer system may have a different raw data format. Preferably, each member has associated data map stored in the competitive rewards database subsystem. See FIGS. 1 and 2, block [0039] 20. The data map generally correlates each data element in the raw data with corresponding locations in competitive rewards database. Some of the raw data may be directly copied into the competitive rewards database. Other portions of the raw data may be translated, scaled, re-formatted, re-calculated and/or adjusted as necessary for compatibility with the format of the competitive rewards database. Once the raw data is mapped, it is stored in the competitive rewards database.
  • FIG. 4 shows an exemplary portion of a data mapping table (incorporated into mapping data [0040] 20). It is generally understood that raw member data from a member's HRMS will contain a plurality of records. FIG. 4 shows the data mapping for an excerpt of a HRMS database record including information related to a single employee.
  • In a preferred embodiment, all of the raw data is mapped to a corresponding field in the competitive rewards database. In an alternate embodiment, some of the raw data can be omitted from the competitive rewards database (e.g., employee name, social security number and the like). [0041]
  • Some portions of the raw data are simply mapped into appropriate locations in the competitive rewards database. As stated above some of the raw data may be translated, scaled, re-formatted, re-calculated and/or adjusted as necessary for compatibility with the format of the competitive rewards database. For example, some HRMS may specify a given employee position by a text string (e.g., ASCII code). The competitive rewards database may be advantageously implemented with a plurality of numeric codes (i.e., job codes). Translation of text strings to numeric codes as well as general implementation of a data mapping table in accordance with the invention based on the foregoing disclosure is well within the scope of those skilled in the art. [0042]
  • In operation, each of the member computer systems transmits raw data to the competitive rewards database system. The raw data is mapped and re-formatted as necessary and is incorporated into the competitive rewards database. Data capture tool [0043] 50 can then be used by members (e.g., HR Managers, Line Managers) to view portions of the competitive rewards database populated with appropriate employee data according to reporting relationships. The Manager can then review data for each employee they supervise. Preferably, menu-driven options are provided thereby enabling the Manager to “tag” employees—by function, discipline, level, and scope—and flag high-performers. Preferably, on-line help is available to guide managers through the matching process. In a preferred aspect of the invention, HR and Line Managers can review and update the mapping and competitive rewards database information as part of on-going HR processes.
  • Thus, the invention advantageously provides an up-to-date mapping of employees to benchmarks established by all members of the competitive rewards database system (e.g., function, discipline, level). This promotes Manager acceptance of market data and ensures robust, high-quality data. [0044]
  • Rewards workbench [0045] 60 provides members with a comprehensive analytic tool operable to access data contained in the competitive rewards database subsystem. The rewards workbench is preferably operable to: query prevalence of reward practices and plan provisions, compare member reward values to specific comparator groups, develop market reference data from the competitive rewards database, model and develop base pay structure, analyze cost implications, conduct data mining analyses on member's own data, and generate other custom real-time analyses on the competitive rewards database. The generation of various reports and analysis based on competitive rewards database information is well within the scope of those skilled in the art.
  • In a preferred embodiment, the rewards workbench provides for the formatting and export of formatted member data for submission to surveys. This information can be automatically transmitted to a third party HRMS. See FIG. 1, reference number [0046] 80.
  • Rewards workbench [0047] 60, advantageously provides direct access to a robust data source to conduct a wide range of sophisticated analyses. This improves efficiency of survey submission process by leveraging initial benchmark matching and validation efforts (using the data capture tool). Rewards workbench 60 also allows electronic feed of competitive rewards data to other specialized human resources systems.
  • It is understood that some of the data contained in the competitive rewards database is not available to all users. For example, each member preferably can access all of data contained in the competitive rewards database derived from their raw data. Each member can also access a subset of the data contained in the competitive rewards database derived from other member raw data (e.g., compiled statistics summarizing the data received from multiple members). However, individual employee names, social security numbers, personal data, billing information are not made available to other members. In general, access to member data is restricted as needed for compliance with international, federal, state and local regulations (e.g., the timing of release of new data, the level of detail of the data released, and the release of data with respect to various geographic regions). [0048]
  • While this invention has been described with an emphasis upon preferred embodiments, it will be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art that variations in the preferred devices and methods may be used and that it is intended that the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims that follow. [0049]

Claims (31)

  1. 1-16. (Cancelled).
  2. 17. A competitive rewards database system comprising:
    a) a competitive rewards database operative to receive raw competitive rewards data comprising competitive rewards data for employees of an entity and competitive rewards data from a plurality of sources other than the entity;
    b) data mapping table for automatically mapping the raw competitive rewards data prior to incorporation into the competitive rewards database by mapping the raw competitive rewards data to benchmarks comprising job function, discipline or scope;
    c) a computer system, coupled to the competitive rewards database via a data communications channel, operative to provide the competitive rewards data for employees of the entity to the competitive rewards database on behalf of the entity; and
    e) a rewards workbench operable to query the competitive rewards database in support of analysis of the mapped competitive rewards data.
  3. 18. The system of claim 17 wherein the competitive rewards data for the entity comprises employment data for the employees of the entity, the employment data comprising at least one of base pay data, long term incentive pay data and annual incentive pay data.
  4. 19. The system of claim 18 wherein the competitive rewards data contains at least one calculated data value.
  5. 20. The system of claim 17 further comprising a data capture tool operable to provide remote access to at least a portion of the competitive rewards database.
  6. 21. The system of claim 17 wherein the rewards workbench is coupled to a data network and is operable to provide remote access to at least a portion of the competitive rewards database.
  7. 22. The system of claim 17 wherein the rewards workbench is operable to automate data feeds from the competitive rewards database to at least one third party human resources management system.
  8. 23. A method for administering a competitive rewards database comprising:
    a) receiving raw competitive rewards data comprising competitive rewards data for employees of an entity and competitive rewards data from a plurality of sources other than the entity;
    b) automatically mapping the raw competitive rewards data for incorporation into the competitive rewards database by mapping the raw competitive rewards data to benchmarks comprising job function, discipline, or scope;
    c) incorporating the mapped competitive rewards data into the records of the competitive rewards database; and
    d) analyzing the mapped competitive rewards data by performing a competitive rewards analysis for one or more of the employees of the entity.
  9. 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the competitive rewards data for employees of the entity comprises human resources (HR) management system data.
  10. 25. The method of claim 23 wherein the competitive rewards data for the entity comprises employment data for the employees of the entity, the employment data comprising at least one of base pay data, long term incentive pay data, annual incentive pay data, incentive data and benefit plan provision data.
  11. 26. The method of claim 23 wherein the step of mapping the raw competitive rewards data comprises translating, scaling, reformatting or calculating portions of the raw competitive rewards data for compatibility with the benchmarks.
  12. 27. The method of claim 23 further comprising the step of using a data capture tool to adjust the mapping of the raw competitive rewards data.
  13. 28. The method of claim 23 further comprising the step of using a rewards workbench to query the competitive rewards database in support of analyses of the mapped competitive rewards data, the analyses comprising at least one selected from a group comprising evaluation of prevalence of reward practices and plan provisions, comparison of member reward values to specific comparator groups, development of market reference data, model and development of base pay structure, analyses of competitive rewards cost implications, and data mining analyses.
  14. 29. The method of claim 23 further comprising the step of using a rewards workbench to automate a data feed between the competitive rewards database and at least one third party human resources management system that is not associated with the entity, thereby supporting a submission of certain mapped competitive rewards data in the form of a survey to the third party human resources management system.
  15. 30. The method of claim 23 wherein the step of analyzing the mapped competitive rewards data comprises a competitive rewards analysis, a total compensation planning analysis or a performance-based analysis.
  16. 31. The method of claim 23, wherein the step of receiving the raw competitive rewards data comprises receiving the raw competitive rewards data at the competitive rewards database on a periodic basis.
  17. 32. The method of claim 23, wherein the step of receiving the raw competitive rewards data comprises:
    sending a polling signal from the competitive rewards database to a computer system operated on behalf of the entity; and
    responsive to the polling signal, transmitting the competitive rewards data for the employees of the entity from the computer system to the competitive rewards database.
  18. 33. The method of claim 23, wherein the data mapping step comprises using a data mapping table to map without manual intervention the raw competitive reward data based on benchmark global job matches.
  19. 34. The method of claim 23 further comprising the step of generating a report in response to completing the analysis of the competitive rewards data.
  20. 35. The method of claim 23, wherein the step of analyzing the mapped competitive rewards data generates an up-to-date mapping for competitive rewards data of the employees for the entity to at least one of the benchmarks.
  21. 36. The method of claim 23, wherein the step of analyzing the mapped competitive rewards data comprises a comparison of the competitive rewards data for the employees of the entity to one of the benchmarks maintained by the competitive rewards database.
  22. 37. A method for managing competitive rewards data for an entity, comprising:
    obtaining the raw competitive rewards data for incorporation in a database, the raw competitive rewards data comprising competitive rewards data for employees of the entity and competitive rewards data from a plurality of sources other than entity;
    using a data mapping table to automatically map the raw competitive rewards data for incorporation into the database by mapping the raw competitive rewards data to a plurality of employment-related benchmarks;
    storing the mapped competitive rewards data in a plurality of records of the database;
    completing an analysis of the mapped competitive rewards data for one or more of the employees of the entity based on a selected one of the benchmarks; and
    generating a report presenting results of the analysis.
  23. 38. The method of claim 37, wherein the competitive rewards data for employees comprises employment data for the employees of the entity, the employment data comprising at least one of fixed pay data and incentive compensation data.
  24. 39. The method of claim 37 wherein the competitive rewards data for employees of the entity comprises human resources (HR) management system data.
  25. 40. The method of claim 37, where the step of completing an analysis comprises performing at least one of a group comprising evaluation of prevalence of reward practices and plan provisions, comparison of member reward values to specific comparator groups, development of market reference data, model and development of base pay structure, analyses of competitive rewards cost implications, and data mining analyses.
  26. 41. The method of claim 37 further comprising the step of providing a data feed between the database and at least one third party human resources management system that is not associated with the entity, thereby supporting a submission of certain mapped competitive rewards data in the form of a survey to the third party human resources management system.
  27. 42. The method of claim 37 wherein the step of completing an analysis of the mapped competitive rewards data comprises a competitive rewards analysis, a total compensation planning analysis or a performance-based analysis.
  28. 43. The method of claim 37, wherein the step of obtaining the raw competitive rewards data comprises receiving the raw competitive rewards data at the database on a periodic basis.
  29. 44. The method of claim 37, wherein the step of obtaining the competitive rewards data for the employees of the entity comprises:
    sending a polling signal from the database to a computer system operated on behalf of the entity; and
    responsive to the polling signal, transmitting the competitive rewards data for the employees of the entity from the computer system to the database.
  30. 45. The method of claim 37, wherein the data mapping step comprises using a data mapping table to map without manual intervention the raw competitive reward data based on benchmark global job matches.
  31. 46. The method of claim 37, wherein the step of analyzing the mapped competitive rewards data comprises a comparison of the competitive rewards data for the entity to a selected one of the benchmarks.
US10822920 2000-08-29 2004-04-13 System and method for collecting and analyzing competitive rewards data Expired - Fee Related US7418446B2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09650039 US6741993B1 (en) 2000-08-29 2000-08-29 Competitive rewards benchmarking system and method
US10822920 US7418446B2 (en) 2000-08-29 2004-04-13 System and method for collecting and analyzing competitive rewards data

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10822920 US7418446B2 (en) 2000-08-29 2004-04-13 System and method for collecting and analyzing competitive rewards data
US12229315 US8015197B2 (en) 2000-08-29 2008-08-21 Competitive rewards benchmarking system and method

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09650039 Continuation US6741993B1 (en) 2000-08-29 2000-08-29 Competitive rewards benchmarking system and method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040193494A1 true true US20040193494A1 (en) 2004-09-30
US7418446B2 US7418446B2 (en) 2008-08-26

Family

ID=24607209

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09650039 Expired - Fee Related US6741993B1 (en) 2000-08-29 2000-08-29 Competitive rewards benchmarking system and method
US10822920 Expired - Fee Related US7418446B2 (en) 2000-08-29 2004-04-13 System and method for collecting and analyzing competitive rewards data
US12229315 Expired - Fee Related US8015197B2 (en) 2000-08-29 2008-08-21 Competitive rewards benchmarking system and method

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09650039 Expired - Fee Related US6741993B1 (en) 2000-08-29 2000-08-29 Competitive rewards benchmarking system and method

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12229315 Expired - Fee Related US8015197B2 (en) 2000-08-29 2008-08-21 Competitive rewards benchmarking system and method

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (3) US6741993B1 (en)
EP (1) EP1330701A4 (en)
JP (1) JP2004507831A (en)
KR (1) KR100751120B1 (en)
CN (1) CN1462385A (en)
CA (1) CA2424625A1 (en)
WO (1) WO2002019091A1 (en)

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050183064A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2005-08-18 Marcus Wefer Method, software application and system for exchanging benchmark data
US20050210368A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2005-09-22 Marcus Wefers Method, software application and system for creating benchmark data
US20050216479A1 (en) * 2001-12-05 2005-09-29 Marcus Wefers Method, software application and system for incorporating benchmark data into a business software application
US20060074920A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2006-04-06 Marcus Wefers Method, software application and system for providing benchmarks
US20070118291A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2007-05-24 David Carttar System and method for producing a flexible geographical grid
US20070179970A1 (en) * 2006-01-31 2007-08-02 Carli Connally Methods and apparatus for storing and formatting data
US20080052101A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2008-02-28 Richard Ziade Apparatuses, Methods, and Systems for Building A Risk Evaluation Product
US20080065426A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2008-03-13 Richard Ziade Apparatuses, Methods, and Systems for a Reconfigurable Insurance Quoting Engine
US20090198572A1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2009-08-06 Wachovia Corporation System and method for rewards optimization in a computer system
US20090199094A1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2009-08-06 Wachovia Corporation System and method for rewards integration in a computer system
US7707050B2 (en) 2004-03-11 2010-04-27 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for determining concentrations of exposure
US7848947B1 (en) 1999-08-03 2010-12-07 Iex Corporation Performance management system
US20110238452A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2011-09-29 Richard Ziade Apparatuses, methods, and systems for providing a risk scoring engine user interface
US8635140B2 (en) 2006-07-31 2014-01-21 Insight Catastrophe Group, Llc Apparatuses, methods, and systems for providing a reconfigurable insurance quote generator user interface

Families Citing this family (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20020082871A1 (en) * 2000-10-30 2002-06-27 Ted Younger System and method for providing online insurance information
US8121871B2 (en) * 2001-01-26 2012-02-21 Genworth Financial, Inc. System, method and software application for accessing and processing information
US7185022B2 (en) * 2001-01-26 2007-02-27 Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd. Work data management system and work data management method
US7953636B2 (en) * 2001-02-21 2011-05-31 Genworth Financial, Inc. System and method for providing customized sales-related data over a network
US8595055B2 (en) * 2001-03-27 2013-11-26 Points.Com Apparatus and method of facilitating the exchange of points between selected entities
US20020188542A1 (en) * 2001-04-13 2002-12-12 Yong Zhang Compensation-data processing
EP1454206A4 (en) * 2001-06-15 2004-11-24 Salary Com Compensation data prediction
US7197541B1 (en) 2001-06-18 2007-03-27 Palm, Inc. Method and apparatus for automated personality transfer for a wireless enabled handheld device
US20030004790A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for improved performance reviews
US7324954B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2008-01-29 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for organizational risk based on personnel planning factors
US7069266B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2006-06-27 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for personnel management collaboration
US7082404B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2006-07-25 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for improved matrix management of personnel planning factors
US20030004736A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for integrated management of personnel planning factors
US20030004847A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for improved personnel compensation planning factors
US7213046B2 (en) * 2001-07-31 2007-05-01 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for providing efficient and secure data exchange using strip information elements
US20030088443A1 (en) * 2001-11-08 2003-05-08 Majikes Matthew George System and method for personalizing and delivering insurance or financial services-related content to a user
US7620654B2 (en) * 2002-01-25 2009-11-17 Theodore Turnasella System and method providing user definable on-line wage and salary reports
US20040064390A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-01 Wagewatch, Inc. User customizable statistical information system
US20040128171A1 (en) * 2002-12-31 2004-07-01 Rees Timothy E. Systems and methods for processing insurance information
US7353373B2 (en) * 2003-03-31 2008-04-01 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Intelligent printer installation
US20050075930A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2005-04-07 Azhar Hussain Methods and system for allocation of rewards and mapping activity within organizations
US20070011036A1 (en) * 2005-07-11 2007-01-11 Yeh-Chyn Lo System, method and computer program product for analyzing salary
US8930204B1 (en) 2006-08-16 2015-01-06 Resource Consortium Limited Determining lifestyle recommendations using aggregated personal information
US7689682B1 (en) 2006-08-16 2010-03-30 Resource Consortium Limited Obtaining lists of nodes of a multi-dimensional network
US7574444B2 (en) * 2006-11-15 2009-08-11 Palm, Inc. Device-side data de-duping
GB201006891D0 (en) * 2007-09-25 2010-06-09 Carlton Group Ltd Computer implemented system for self-managed incentive program
US20090089154A1 (en) * 2007-09-29 2009-04-02 Dion Kenneth W System, method and computer product for implementing a 360 degree critical evaluator
WO2009149127A1 (en) * 2008-06-02 2009-12-10 Salary.Com, Inc. Job competency modeling
US8244567B2 (en) * 2008-12-31 2012-08-14 Synnex Corporation Business goal incentives using gaming rewards
US20110087504A1 (en) * 2009-10-13 2011-04-14 Lawrence Koa System and method for aggregating data of multiple lead providers
US20120035983A1 (en) * 2010-08-09 2012-02-09 Ceridian Corporation Method and system to compare business metrics
US20130096988A1 (en) * 2011-10-05 2013-04-18 Mastercard International, Inc. Nomination engine
US20130297520A1 (en) * 2012-05-02 2013-11-07 Mercer (US) Inc. Position Modeling Systems

Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US587832A (en) * 1897-08-10 Garment-supporting loop
US5600554A (en) * 1994-09-29 1997-02-04 Crucible Materials Corporation Methods and apparatus for securing, integrating, and manipulating employee payroll and human resource information
US5734838A (en) * 1995-05-04 1998-03-31 American Savings Bank, F.A. Database computer architecture for managing an incentive award program and checking float of funds at time of purchase
US5819231A (en) * 1996-05-01 1998-10-06 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Compensation planning tool and method
US5819213A (en) * 1996-01-31 1998-10-06 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Speech encoding and decoding with pitch filter range unrestricted by codebook range and preselecting, then increasing, search candidates from linear overlap codebooks
US5909669A (en) * 1996-04-01 1999-06-01 Electronic Data Systems Corporation System and method for generating a knowledge worker productivity assessment
US5924072A (en) * 1997-01-06 1999-07-13 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Knowledge management system and method
US5926794A (en) * 1996-03-06 1999-07-20 Alza Corporation Visual rating system and method
US6055511A (en) * 1998-11-30 2000-04-25 Breault Research Organization, Inc. Computerized incentive compensation
US6061660A (en) * 1997-10-20 2000-05-09 York Eggleston System and method for incentive programs and award fulfillment
US20010032195A1 (en) * 2000-03-30 2001-10-18 Graichen Catherine Mary System and method for identifying productivity improvements in a business organization
US20010032185A1 (en) * 2000-04-14 2001-10-18 Kazunori Masaki Providing pay services over a network
US6308177B1 (en) * 1996-10-25 2001-10-23 Vijaya S. Israni System and method for use and storage of geographic data on physical media
US6341267B1 (en) * 1997-07-02 2002-01-22 Enhancement Of Human Potential, Inc. Methods, systems and apparatuses for matching individuals with behavioral requirements and for managing providers of services to evaluate or increase individuals' behavioral capabilities
US20020022987A1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2002-02-21 Mahmood Syed Ashfaq Common database system for sales and marketing process
US6385620B1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2002-05-07 Psisearch,Llc System and method for the management of candidate recruiting information
US20020059264A1 (en) * 1996-03-04 2002-05-16 Maureen Fleming Method and system for the display of business data from multiple sources
US6411939B1 (en) * 1999-05-17 2002-06-25 Offshore Benefits, Llc Computer-aided method, machine, and products produced thereby, for illustrating a replacement of a benefit plan that is viable at one location but not viable at the location of the replacement
US6434533B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2002-08-13 Market Data Systems, Inc. Method for the exchange, analysis, and reporting of performance data in businesses with time-dependent inventory
US20020188542A1 (en) * 2001-04-13 2002-12-12 Yong Zhang Compensation-data processing
US6505183B1 (en) * 1999-02-04 2003-01-07 Authoria, Inc. Human resource knowledge modeling and delivery system
US20030055717A1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2003-03-20 Badugu Ujwal Rao Promotion system and method

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6587832B1 (en) 2000-03-16 2003-07-01 Compensate.Com Llc Market pay system

Patent Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US587832A (en) * 1897-08-10 Garment-supporting loop
US5600554A (en) * 1994-09-29 1997-02-04 Crucible Materials Corporation Methods and apparatus for securing, integrating, and manipulating employee payroll and human resource information
US5734838A (en) * 1995-05-04 1998-03-31 American Savings Bank, F.A. Database computer architecture for managing an incentive award program and checking float of funds at time of purchase
US5819213A (en) * 1996-01-31 1998-10-06 Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba Speech encoding and decoding with pitch filter range unrestricted by codebook range and preselecting, then increasing, search candidates from linear overlap codebooks
US20020059264A1 (en) * 1996-03-04 2002-05-16 Maureen Fleming Method and system for the display of business data from multiple sources
US5926794A (en) * 1996-03-06 1999-07-20 Alza Corporation Visual rating system and method
US5909669A (en) * 1996-04-01 1999-06-01 Electronic Data Systems Corporation System and method for generating a knowledge worker productivity assessment
US5819231A (en) * 1996-05-01 1998-10-06 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Compensation planning tool and method
US6308177B1 (en) * 1996-10-25 2001-10-23 Vijaya S. Israni System and method for use and storage of geographic data on physical media
US5924072A (en) * 1997-01-06 1999-07-13 Electronic Data Systems Corporation Knowledge management system and method
US6341267B1 (en) * 1997-07-02 2002-01-22 Enhancement Of Human Potential, Inc. Methods, systems and apparatuses for matching individuals with behavioral requirements and for managing providers of services to evaluate or increase individuals' behavioral capabilities
US6061660A (en) * 1997-10-20 2000-05-09 York Eggleston System and method for incentive programs and award fulfillment
US6055511A (en) * 1998-11-30 2000-04-25 Breault Research Organization, Inc. Computerized incentive compensation
US6505183B1 (en) * 1999-02-04 2003-01-07 Authoria, Inc. Human resource knowledge modeling and delivery system
US6411939B1 (en) * 1999-05-17 2002-06-25 Offshore Benefits, Llc Computer-aided method, machine, and products produced thereby, for illustrating a replacement of a benefit plan that is viable at one location but not viable at the location of the replacement
US6385620B1 (en) * 1999-08-16 2002-05-07 Psisearch,Llc System and method for the management of candidate recruiting information
US6434533B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2002-08-13 Market Data Systems, Inc. Method for the exchange, analysis, and reporting of performance data in businesses with time-dependent inventory
US20010032195A1 (en) * 2000-03-30 2001-10-18 Graichen Catherine Mary System and method for identifying productivity improvements in a business organization
US20010032185A1 (en) * 2000-04-14 2001-10-18 Kazunori Masaki Providing pay services over a network
US20020022987A1 (en) * 2000-08-08 2002-02-21 Mahmood Syed Ashfaq Common database system for sales and marketing process
US20020188542A1 (en) * 2001-04-13 2002-12-12 Yong Zhang Compensation-data processing
US20030055717A1 (en) * 2001-05-18 2003-03-20 Badugu Ujwal Rao Promotion system and method

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7848947B1 (en) 1999-08-03 2010-12-07 Iex Corporation Performance management system
US20050216479A1 (en) * 2001-12-05 2005-09-29 Marcus Wefers Method, software application and system for incorporating benchmark data into a business software application
US20050183064A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2005-08-18 Marcus Wefer Method, software application and system for exchanging benchmark data
US20050210368A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2005-09-22 Marcus Wefers Method, software application and system for creating benchmark data
US20060074920A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2006-04-06 Marcus Wefers Method, software application and system for providing benchmarks
US20050210037A1 (en) * 2002-02-13 2005-09-22 Marcus Wefers Method, software application and system for incorporating benchmarks into a business software application
US8650053B2 (en) 2004-03-11 2014-02-11 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for determining concentrations of exposure
US8380545B2 (en) 2004-03-11 2013-02-19 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for determining concentrations of exposure
US20100205016A1 (en) * 2004-03-11 2010-08-12 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. Systems And Methods For Determining Concentrations Of Exposure
US7707050B2 (en) 2004-03-11 2010-04-27 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for determining concentrations of exposure
US8229766B2 (en) 2004-07-30 2012-07-24 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. System and method for producing a flexible geographical grid
US8620694B2 (en) 2004-07-30 2013-12-31 Risk Management Solutions, Inc. System and method for producing a flexible geographical grid
US20070118291A1 (en) * 2004-07-30 2007-05-24 David Carttar System and method for producing a flexible geographical grid
US20070179970A1 (en) * 2006-01-31 2007-08-02 Carli Connally Methods and apparatus for storing and formatting data
US20080052101A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2008-02-28 Richard Ziade Apparatuses, Methods, and Systems for Building A Risk Evaluation Product
US8090600B2 (en) 2006-07-31 2012-01-03 Insight Catastrophe Solutions Apparatuses, methods, and systems for building a risk evaluation product
US20080065426A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2008-03-13 Richard Ziade Apparatuses, Methods, and Systems for a Reconfigurable Insurance Quoting Engine
US8635140B2 (en) 2006-07-31 2014-01-21 Insight Catastrophe Group, Llc Apparatuses, methods, and systems for providing a reconfigurable insurance quote generator user interface
US20110238452A1 (en) * 2006-07-31 2011-09-29 Richard Ziade Apparatuses, methods, and systems for providing a risk scoring engine user interface
US8682772B2 (en) 2006-07-31 2014-03-25 Insight Catastrophe Group, Llc Apparatuses, methods, and systems for providing a risk scoring engine user interface
US20090199094A1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2009-08-06 Wachovia Corporation System and method for rewards integration in a computer system
US20090198572A1 (en) * 2008-02-05 2009-08-06 Wachovia Corporation System and method for rewards optimization in a computer system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US6741993B1 (en) 2004-05-25 grant
KR20030078857A (en) 2003-10-08 application
WO2002019091A1 (en) 2002-03-07 application
KR100751120B1 (en) 2007-08-22 grant
EP1330701A1 (en) 2003-07-30 application
EP1330701A4 (en) 2007-01-10 application
US7418446B2 (en) 2008-08-26 grant
CA2424625A1 (en) 2002-03-07 application
US8015197B2 (en) 2011-09-06 grant
CN1462385A (en) 2003-12-17 application
US20090070202A1 (en) 2009-03-12 application
JP2004507831A (en) 2004-03-11 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7082427B1 (en) Text indexing system to index, query the archive database document by keyword data representing the content of the documents and by contact data associated with the participant who generated the document
US7848972B1 (en) Electronic bill presentment and payment systems and processes
US5832497A (en) Electronic automated information exchange and management system
US6768994B1 (en) Web based data mining and location data reporting and system
US6662227B2 (en) System and method for analyzing remote traffic data in a distributed computing environment
Raymond Organizational characteristics and MIS success in the context of small business
US7398219B1 (en) System and method for displaying messages using a messages table
Zur Muehlen et al. Workflow-based process monitoring and controlling-technical and organizational issues
US7330850B1 (en) Text mining system for web-based business intelligence applied to web site server logs
US6279033B1 (en) System and method for asynchronous control of report generation using a network interface
US6301574B1 (en) System for providing business information
US6421724B1 (en) Web site response measurement tool
US6442611B1 (en) System and method for executing a request from a client application
US20010054046A1 (en) Automatic forms handling system
US7085739B1 (en) Method and system for facilitating, coordinating and managing a competitive marketplace
US20040049436A1 (en) Payroll automation system
US7222293B1 (en) Professional time tracking and reporting system
US20040034857A1 (en) System and method for simulating a discrete event process using business system data
US20040143464A1 (en) Integrated system and method for insurance products
US20020029272A1 (en) Method and system for assigning and distributing work over a computer network
US7580862B1 (en) Method and system to select, schedule and purchase home services
US6934687B1 (en) Computer architecture and method for supporting and analyzing electronic commerce over the world wide web for commerce service providers and/or internet service providers
US20040230404A1 (en) System and method for optimizing simulation of a discrete event process using business system data
US20050114828A1 (en) Method and structure for efficient assessment and planning of software project efforts involving existing software
US20070094110A1 (en) System and method for improved time reporting and billing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: TOWERS PERRIN CAPITAL CORP., DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:TOWERS WATSON PENNSYLVANIA INC.;REEL/FRAME:034611/0212

Effective date: 20150101

REMI Maintenance fee reminder mailed
LAPS Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees
FP Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee

Effective date: 20160826