US20040187429A1 - Drag reducing rotatable fairing usable on poles, posts and other structures - Google Patents
Drag reducing rotatable fairing usable on poles, posts and other structures Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040187429A1 US20040187429A1 US10/810,752 US81075204A US2004187429A1 US 20040187429 A1 US20040187429 A1 US 20040187429A1 US 81075204 A US81075204 A US 81075204A US 2004187429 A1 US2004187429 A1 US 2004187429A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- elongate
- support member
- fairing
- sleeve
- aerodynamic drag
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
- E04H12/00—Towers; Masts or poles; Chimney stacks; Water-towers; Methods of erecting such structures
- E04H12/22—Sockets or holders for poles or posts
- E04H12/2292—Holders used for protection, repair or reinforcement of the post or pole
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01F—ADDITIONAL WORK, SUCH AS EQUIPPING ROADS OR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PLATFORMS, HELICOPTER LANDING STAGES, SIGNS, SNOW FENCES, OR THE LIKE
- E01F9/00—Arrangement of road signs or traffic signals; Arrangements for enforcing caution
- E01F9/60—Upright bodies, e.g. marker posts or bollards; Supports for road signs
- E01F9/623—Upright bodies, e.g. marker posts or bollards; Supports for road signs characterised by form or by structural features, e.g. for enabling displacement or deflection
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to a rotatable fairing configured to reduce aerodynamic drag forces on a stationary object.
- a rotatable fairing apparatus comprises a vertical support member anchored in a foundation and subjected to an aerodynamic drag force.
- the rotatable fairing apparatus further comprises a hollow elongate fairing sleeve that covers at least a portion of the vertical support member.
- the hollow elongate fairing sleeve is rotatably secured to the vertical support member.
- the hollow elongate sleeve has a shape configured to reduce the aerodynamic drag force acting on the vertical support member.
- an apparatus comprises an elongate support member and an elongate fairing sleeve.
- the elongate fairing sleeve has a first axis, and covers at least a portion of the elongate support member. Additionally, the elongate fairing sleeve is configured to rotate around the elongate support member on the elongate fairing sleeve first axis.
- the elongate fairing sleeve is also substantially shaped to reduce an aerodynamic drag force acting on the elongate support member.
- an apparatus comprises an elongate support member and an elongate fairing sleeve.
- the elongate fairing sleeve has a longitudinal axis, and covers at least a portion of the elongate support member.
- the apparatus further comprises means for attaching the elongate support structure to the elongate fairing device, such that the elongate fairing device can rotate around the elongate support member on the elongate fairing sleeve longitudinal axis.
- an apparatus comprises first and second elongate support members and first and second elongate fairing sleeves.
- the first elongate support member is attached to the second elongate support member.
- the first elongate fairing sleeve covers at least a portion of the first elongate support member, and is configured to rotate around the first elongate support member.
- the second elongate fairing sleeve covers at least a portion of the second elongate support member, and is configured to rotate around the second elongate support member.
- a method comprises providing an elongate object having a first aerodynamic drag coefficient.
- the method further comprises mounting a rotatable cover having a second aerodynamic drag coefficient on the elongate object.
- the second aerodynamic drag coefficient is less than the first aerodynamic drag coefficient.
- FIG. 1 is an elevation view of a pole equipped with an elongate rotatable fairing to reduce an aerodynamic drag force acting on the pole.
- FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the pole illustrated in FIG. 1 taken along line 2 - 2 .
- FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the elongate rotatable fairing illustrated in FIG. 1 taken along line 3 - 3 .
- FIG. 4 is an elevation view of a traffic signal equipped with horizontal and vertical elongate rotatable fairings.
- FIG. 5 is an elevation view of a pole equipped with an elongate rotatable fairing and a safety shield.
- FIG. 6 is a partial elevation view of a light fixture illustrating a preferred means of rotatably securing an elongate rotatable fairing to a pole.
- FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of the light fixture illustrated in FIG. 6 taken along line 7 - 7 .
- FIG. 8A is a cross-sectional view of the elongate rotatable fairing of FIG. 6 taken along line 8 - 8 .
- FIG. 8B is a cross-sectional view of an elongate rotatable fairing configured for use with a square support member.
- FIG. 8C is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of an elongate rotatable fairing.
- FIG. 9 is an elevation view of a pole equipped to support an elongate rotatable fairing at a pivot point.
- FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the pole 100 subject to aerodynamic drag force ⁇ right arrow over (F) ⁇ p .
- the elongate rotatable fairing 110 comprises a lightweight material such as a plastic, although in alternative embodiments, other materials may be used, such as rubber, aluminum or fabric. Such materials permit the pole 100 to withstand strong aerodynamic drag forces at lower cost, and using lighter materials, than would otherwise be possible using conventional design techniques.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a traffic signal assembly 130 having a horizontal support member 132 and a vertical support member 134 , each at least partially covered by an elongate rotatable fairing 110 .
- the support members that are at least partially surrounded by an elongate rotatable fairing 110 need not have a cylindrical cross section, but can also have other cross-sectional shapes, such as ovals, rectangles or other polygons.
- a stationary safety shield 140 is positioned below the elongate rotatable fairing 110 .
- the stationary safety shield 140 comprises a cylindrical disk.
- the stationary safety shield 140 is configured to prevent the elongate rotatable fairing 110 from striking objects placed below the elongate rotatable fairing 110 .
- the elongate rotatable fairing 110 may rotate suddenly, creating the risk of collision with an object having a height greater than h, such as a bystander's head. The presence of stationary safety shield 140 reduces the risk of such collision.
- FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate a preferred technique for rotatably attaching the elongate rotatable fairing 110 to the pole 100 .
- a stationary support plate 150 is secured to the pole 100 at the height h at which the elongate rotatable fairing 110 is to be rotatably attached to the pole 100 .
- a plurality of ball bearings 152 are disposed around the circumference of the stationary support plate 150 .
- An elongate rotatable fairing 110 equipped with a lower closed end plate 112 is then positioned atop the stationary support plate 150 , such that the lower closed end plate 112 rests on the plurality of ball bearings 152 .
- the elongate rotatable fairing 110 can freely rotate around the pole 100 on the ball bearings 152 .
- the weight of the elongate rotatable fairing 110 is supported by the stationary support plate 150 .
- FIG. 8A illustrates a cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment of the elongate rotatable fairing 110 shown in FIG. 6 taken along line 8 - 8 .
- the elongate rotatable fairing 110 further comprises a plurality of optional interior support members 114 .
- Interior support members 114 preferably prevent the elongate rotatable fairing 110 from buckling or otherwise being distorted when subjected to large aerodynamic drag forces ⁇ right arrow over (F) ⁇ f .
- FIG. 8A illustrates that in certain embodiments, a gap 116 exists between the pole 100 and an interior surface 118 of the elongate rotatable fairing 110 .
- gap 116 is preferably filled with a lubricant to reduce friction between the interior surface 118 of the elongate rotatable fairing 110 and the pole 100 .
- FIG. 8B illustrates that the elongate rotatable fairing 110 can be used in embodiments in which the pole 100 has a non-circular cross-sectional shape.
- the stationary circular adapter 119 has a diameter that is less than the diameter of the interior surface 118 of the elongate rotatable fairing 110 .
- the elongate rotatable fairing 110 can freely rotate around the pole 100 , despite the fact that the pole 110 has a non-circular cross-sectional shape.
- FIG. 8C is a cross-sectional illustration of an alternative embodiment of an elongate rotatable fairing 110 .
- the elongate rotatable fairing 110 further comprises a plurality of internal guides 160 .
- Each of the internal guides 160 preferably comprises a series of ball bearings configured to rotate along the surface of the pole 100 . This configuration preferably prevents the elongate rotatable fairing 110 from buckling or otherwise being distorted when subjected to large aerodynamic drag forces ⁇ right arrow over (F) ⁇ f .
- the presence of the internal guides 160 further promotes free rotation of the elongate rotatable fairing 110 around the pole 100 .
- FIG. 9 illustrates another technique for rotatably securing the elongate rotatable fairing 110 to the pole 100 .
- the elongate rotatable fairing 110 preferably further comprises an upper closed end plate 113 .
- This configuration allows the elongate rotatable fairing 110 to be slid over the pole 100 , which preferably comprises a pivot point 106 .
- the pivot point supports the interior side of the upper closed end plate 113 , thereby allowing the elongate rotatable fairing 110 to rotate around the pole 100 .
- the interior side of the upper closed end plate 113 further comprises a cupped support receptacle configured to receive the pivot point 106 of the pole 100 .
- Such embodiments allow the elongate rotatable fairing 100 to rotate around the pole 100 with reduced frictional losses.
Abstract
In one aspect of the invention, a rotatable fairing apparatus comprises a vertical support member anchored in a foundation and subjected to an aerodynamic drag force. The rotatable fairing apparatus further comprises a hollow elongate fairing sleeve that covers at least a portion of the vertical support member. The hollow elongate fairing sleeve is rotatably secured to the vertical support member. Additionally, the hollow elongate sleeve has a shape configured to reduce the aerodynamic drag force acting on the vertical support member.
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/459,009, filed 28 Mar. 2003, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates generally to a rotatable fairing configured to reduce aerodynamic drag forces on a stationary object.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- Objects placed in outdoor environments are often subjected to a wide variety of adverse meteorological conditions, such as extreme temperatures, heavy precipitation, and strong winds. Although all of these conditions can be harmful, strong winds can be especially damaging. In particular, not only can strong winds directly damage an exposed object, such as by toppling or breaking the object, but an object that has toppled or that has become airborne can create a significant safety hazard. Therefore, while winds can unquestionably damage large outdoor objects (for example, skyscrapers or automobiles), smaller outdoor objects such as poles, road signs, and raised light fixtures can be particularly dangerous during a windstorm. Specifically, such smaller outdoor objects not only can be directly damaged by the wind, but can also inflict damage upon other people or objects if they topple or become airborne.
- Therefore, to minimize recurring maintenance costs and to reduce the dangers associated with toppling or airborne debris during windstorms, smaller outdoor objects such as poles, road signs and raised light fixtures are generally designed to withstand strong winds. However, conventional designs have necessitated the use of heavy sidewalls and strong foundations to achieve strong wind resistance. Heavy sidewalls and strong foundations are expensive to construct, and can cause increased damage in the event of structural failure.
- Thus, it is desired to develop outdoor objects such as poles, road signs and raised light fixtures that can withstand strong winds without necessitating the use of heavy sidewalls and strong foundations. Certain embodiments of the present invention address these desires, advantageously allowing the weight and expense of outdoor objects such as poles, road signs and raised light fixtures to be reduced without sacrificing ability to withstand strong winds. Specifically, placement of a rotatable fairing on at least a portion of the pole, road sign or raised light fixture reduces the aerodynamic drag force acting thereon, thereby making the object able to withstand stronger winds.
- In one aspect of the invention, a rotatable fairing apparatus comprises a vertical support member anchored in a foundation and subjected to an aerodynamic drag force. The rotatable fairing apparatus further comprises a hollow elongate fairing sleeve that covers at least a portion of the vertical support member. The hollow elongate fairing sleeve is rotatably secured to the vertical support member. Additionally, the hollow elongate sleeve has a shape configured to reduce the aerodynamic drag force acting on the vertical support member.
- In another aspect of the invention, an apparatus comprises an elongate support member and an elongate fairing sleeve. The elongate fairing sleeve has a first axis, and covers at least a portion of the elongate support member. Additionally, the elongate fairing sleeve is configured to rotate around the elongate support member on the elongate fairing sleeve first axis. The elongate fairing sleeve is also substantially shaped to reduce an aerodynamic drag force acting on the elongate support member.
- In yet another aspect of the invention, an apparatus comprises an elongate support member and an elongate fairing sleeve. The elongate fairing sleeve has a longitudinal axis, and covers at least a portion of the elongate support member. The apparatus further comprises means for attaching the elongate support structure to the elongate fairing device, such that the elongate fairing device can rotate around the elongate support member on the elongate fairing sleeve longitudinal axis.
- In yet another aspect of the invention, an apparatus comprises first and second elongate support members and first and second elongate fairing sleeves. The first elongate support member is attached to the second elongate support member. The first elongate fairing sleeve covers at least a portion of the first elongate support member, and is configured to rotate around the first elongate support member. Likewise, the second elongate fairing sleeve covers at least a portion of the second elongate support member, and is configured to rotate around the second elongate support member.
- In still another aspect of the invention, a method comprises providing an elongate object having a first aerodynamic drag coefficient. The method further comprises mounting a rotatable cover having a second aerodynamic drag coefficient on the elongate object. The second aerodynamic drag coefficient is less than the first aerodynamic drag coefficient.
- Having thus summarized the general nature of the invention, certain preferred embodiments and modifications thereof will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art from the detailed description herein having reference to the figures that follow.
- FIG. 1 is an elevation view of a pole equipped with an elongate rotatable fairing to reduce an aerodynamic drag force acting on the pole.
- FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the pole illustrated in FIG. 1 taken along line2-2.
- FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the elongate rotatable fairing illustrated in FIG. 1 taken along line3-3.
- FIG. 4 is an elevation view of a traffic signal equipped with horizontal and vertical elongate rotatable fairings.
- FIG. 5 is an elevation view of a pole equipped with an elongate rotatable fairing and a safety shield.
- FIG. 6 is a partial elevation view of a light fixture illustrating a preferred means of rotatably securing an elongate rotatable fairing to a pole.
- FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of the light fixture illustrated in FIG. 6 taken along line7-7.
- FIG. 8A is a cross-sectional view of the elongate rotatable fairing of FIG. 6 taken along line8-8.
- FIG. 8B is a cross-sectional view of an elongate rotatable fairing configured for use with a square support member.
- FIG. 8C is a cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of an elongate rotatable fairing.
- FIG. 9 is an elevation view of a pole equipped to support an elongate rotatable fairing at a pivot point.
- As discussed above, it is desired to develop outdoor objects such as poles, road signs and raised light fixtures that can withstand strong winds. However, it is also desired to construct such outdoor objects without necessitating the use of heavy sidewalls and strong foundations. Certain embodiments of the present invention described herein address these desires, advantageously allowing the weight and expense of outdoor objects such as poles, road signs and raised light fixtures to be reduced without sacrificing ability to withstand strong winds. In particular, placement of a rotatable fairing on at least a portion of the object reduces the aerodynamic drag force acting thereon, thereby making the object able to withstand stronger winds.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a
pole 100 anchored in theground 102 at afoundation 104. The presence of any wind around thepole 100 will cause an aerodynamic drag force {right arrow over (F)}p to act on thepole 100. Therefore, if thepole 100 is placed in an outdoor environment, it will often be subject to the aerodynamic drag force {right arrow over (F)}p. The magnitude of the aerodynamic drag force {right arrow over (F)}p depends on, among other things, the velocity of the wind, the cross-sectional area of thepole 100, the shape of thepole 100, and the drag coefficient Cd. The drag coefficient Cd is given by the following expression: - wherein D is the drag, r is the density of air, A is the reference area, and v is the velocity of the wind. FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the
pole 100 subject to aerodynamic drag force {right arrow over (F)}p. - Still referring to the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the
pole 100 is at least partially covered by an elongaterotatable fairing 110. The elongaterotatable fairing 110 is optionally displaced from the ground by a height h. As shown in the cross-section illustrated in FIG. 3, the elongaterotatable fairing 110 has a streamlined shape that is preferably configured to reduce the aerodynamic drag force {right arrow over (F)}p acting upon thepole 100. Examples of such streamlined shapes include a teardrop shape or an airfoil shape, although other shapes may also be used to reduce the aerodynamic drag force {right arrow over (F)}p acting upon thepole 100. - Therefore, in the regions of the
pole 100 covered by the elongaterotatable fairing 110, a reduced aerodynamic drag force {right arrow over (F)}f acts on the elongaterotatable fairing 110. Because the elongaterotatable fairing 110 is freely rotatable, the aerodynamic drag force {right arrow over (F)}p can be reduced regardless of the direction of the wind. In a preferred embodiment, the elongaterotatable fairing 110 comprises a lightweight material such as a plastic, although in alternative embodiments, other materials may be used, such as rubber, aluminum or fabric. Such materials permit thepole 100 to withstand strong aerodynamic drag forces at lower cost, and using lighter materials, than would otherwise be possible using conventional design techniques. - Although the
pole 100 illustrated in FIG. 1 supports alight fixture 120, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the elongaterotatable fairing 110 can be used in conjunction with an unlimited variety of other outdoor objects, such as sign posts, traffic signals, stakes, and horizontal members. For example, FIG. 4 illustrates atraffic signal assembly 130 having ahorizontal support member 132 and avertical support member 134, each at least partially covered by an elongaterotatable fairing 110. Furthermore, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the support members that are at least partially surrounded by an elongaterotatable fairing 110 need not have a cylindrical cross section, but can also have other cross-sectional shapes, such as ovals, rectangles or other polygons. - In certain embodiments, such as illustrated in FIG. 5, a
stationary safety shield 140 is positioned below the elongaterotatable fairing 110. In one preferred embodiment, thestationary safety shield 140 comprises a cylindrical disk. In such embodiments, thestationary safety shield 140 is configured to prevent the elongaterotatable fairing 110 from striking objects placed below the elongaterotatable fairing 110. Specifically, if the wind direction changes abruptly, the elongaterotatable fairing 110 may rotate suddenly, creating the risk of collision with an object having a height greater than h, such as a bystander's head. The presence ofstationary safety shield 140 reduces the risk of such collision. - FIGS. 6 and 7 illustrate a preferred technique for rotatably attaching the elongate
rotatable fairing 110 to thepole 100. In such embodiments, astationary support plate 150 is secured to thepole 100 at the height h at which the elongaterotatable fairing 110 is to be rotatably attached to thepole 100. Preferably, a plurality ofball bearings 152 are disposed around the circumference of thestationary support plate 150. An elongaterotatable fairing 110 equipped with a lowerclosed end plate 112 is then positioned atop thestationary support plate 150, such that the lowerclosed end plate 112 rests on the plurality ofball bearings 152. In such embodiments, the elongaterotatable fairing 110 can freely rotate around thepole 100 on theball bearings 152. Furthermore, the weight of the elongaterotatable fairing 110 is supported by thestationary support plate 150. - FIG. 8A illustrates a cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment of the elongate
rotatable fairing 110 shown in FIG. 6 taken along line 8-8. In such embodiments, the elongaterotatable fairing 110 further comprises a plurality of optionalinterior support members 114.Interior support members 114 preferably prevent the elongaterotatable fairing 110 from buckling or otherwise being distorted when subjected to large aerodynamic drag forces {right arrow over (F)}f. Additionally, FIG. 8A illustrates that in certain embodiments, agap 116 exists between thepole 100 and aninterior surface 118 of the elongaterotatable fairing 110. In such embodiments,gap 116 is preferably filled with a lubricant to reduce friction between theinterior surface 118 of the elongaterotatable fairing 110 and thepole 100. - FIG. 8B illustrates that the elongate
rotatable fairing 110 can be used in embodiments in which thepole 100 has a non-circular cross-sectional shape. In such embodiments, at least a portion of the covered portion of thepole 100 is fitted with a stationarycircular adapter 119. Preferably, the stationarycircular adapter 119 has a diameter that is less than the diameter of theinterior surface 118 of the elongaterotatable fairing 110. In such embodiments, the elongaterotatable fairing 110 can freely rotate around thepole 100, despite the fact that thepole 110 has a non-circular cross-sectional shape. - FIG. 8C is a cross-sectional illustration of an alternative embodiment of an elongate
rotatable fairing 110. In such embodiments, the elongaterotatable fairing 110 further comprises a plurality ofinternal guides 160. Each of theinternal guides 160 preferably comprises a series of ball bearings configured to rotate along the surface of thepole 100. This configuration preferably prevents the elongaterotatable fairing 110 from buckling or otherwise being distorted when subjected to large aerodynamic drag forces {right arrow over (F)}f. Additionally, the presence of theinternal guides 160 further promotes free rotation of the elongaterotatable fairing 110 around thepole 100. - FIG. 9 illustrates another technique for rotatably securing the elongate
rotatable fairing 110 to thepole 100. In such embodiments, the elongaterotatable fairing 110 preferably further comprises an upperclosed end plate 113. This configuration allows the elongaterotatable fairing 110 to be slid over thepole 100, which preferably comprises apivot point 106. Thus, the pivot point supports the interior side of the upperclosed end plate 113, thereby allowing the elongaterotatable fairing 110 to rotate around thepole 100. In other embodiments, the interior side of the upperclosed end plate 113 further comprises a cupped support receptacle configured to receive thepivot point 106 of thepole 100. Such embodiments allow the elongaterotatable fairing 100 to rotate around thepole 100 with reduced frictional losses. - One of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that other suitable means of rotatably securing the elongate
rotatable fairing 110 to thepole 100 exist. Such means include, but are not limited to, bearing joints and sliding joints. Such alternative means of rotatable attachments are fully compatible with the rotatable fairing described herein. - The various embodiments described herein permit outdoor objects such as poles, signs and raised light fixtures to withstand strong aerodynamic drag forces. Specifically, covering at least a portion of such objects with an elongate rotatable fairing reduces the aerodynamic force acting upon such objects. This allows such objects to be manufactured at lower cost, and using lighter materials, than would otherwise be possible using conventional design techniques. Additionally, reduction of the aerodynamic drag force acting on such objects increases the safety of such objects by reducing the likelihood of such objects toppling or becoming airborne.
- The above presents a description of various preferred embodiments of a rotatable fairing, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains to make and use such a rotatable fairing. This rotatable fairing is, however, susceptible to modifications and alternate constructions from that discussed above which are fully equivalent. Consequently, it is not the intention to limit this rotatable fairing to the particular embodiments disclosed. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications and alternate constructions coming within the spirit and scope of the rotatable fairing as generally expressed by the following claims, which particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter of the rotatable fairing.
Claims (29)
1. A rotatable fairing apparatus comprising:
a vertical support member anchored in a foundation, wherein the vertical support member is subjected to an aerodynamic drag force; and
a hollow elongate fairing sleeve covering at least a portion of the vertical support member and rotatably secured to the vertical support member, the hollow elongate sleeve having a shape configured to reduce the aerodynamic drag force acting on the vertical support member.
2. The rotatable fairing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the hollow elongate fairing sleeve is rotatably secured to the vertical support member by at least one bearing joint.
3. The rotatable fairing apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the hollow elongate fairing sleeve further comprises a first end, a second end opposite the first end, and bearing joints positioned at the first and second ends.
4. The rotatable fairing apparatus of claim 2 , further comprising a lateral support structure disposed on an interior side of the hollow elongate fairing sleeve, the lateral support structure comprising a plurality of bearings configured to facilitate rotation of the hollow elongate fairing sleeve around the vertical support structure during subjection of the aerodynamic drag force.
5. The rotatable fairing apparatus of claim 1 , wherein:
the vertical support member further comprises a tapered end structure; and
the hollow elongate fairing sleeve further comprises a cupped support receptacle disposed within an interior side, the cupped support receptacle configured to receive the tapered end structure.
6. An apparatus comprising:
an elongate support member; and
an elongate fairing sleeve having a first axis, the elongate fairing sleeve covering at least a portion of the elongate support member, configured to rotate around the elongate support member on the elongate fairing sleeve first axis, and substantially shaped to reduce an aerodynamic drag force acting on the elongate support member.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein:
the elongate support member further comprises a tapered end structure; and
the elongate fairing sleeve further comprises a cupped support receptacle disposed within an interior side, the cupped support receptacle configured to receive the tapered end structure.
8. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the covered portion of the elongate support member has an first aerodynamic drag coefficient that is greater than a second aerodynamic drag coefficient of the elongate fairing sleeve.
9. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the elongate support member is oriented vertically, and is anchored in a foundation structure.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the elongate fairing sleeve has an upper end and a lower end opposite the upper end, such that the lower end is displaced from the foundation structure by a first height.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 , further comprising a safety shield attached to the elongate support member and displaced from the foundation structure by a second height, such that the second height is less than the first height.
12. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the elongate support member has a circular cross-sectional profile.
13. The apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the elongate support member has a rectangular cross-sectional profile.
14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the elongate support member has a square cross-sectional profile.
15. The rotatable fairing apparatus of claim 6 , wherein the hollow elongate fairing sleeve is rotatably secured to the vertical support member by at least one bearing joint.
16. The rotatable fairing apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the hollow elongate fairing sleeve further comprises a first end, a second end opposite the first end, and bearing joints positioned at the first and second ends.
17. The rotatable fairing apparatus of claim 15 , further comprising a lateral support structure disposed on an interior side of the hollow elongate fairing sleeve, the lateral support structure comprising a plurality of bearings configured to facilitate rotation of the hollow elongate fairing sleeve around the vertical support structure during subjection of the aerodynamic drag force.
18. An apparatus comprising:
an elongate support member;
an elongate fairing sleeve having a longitudinal axis and covering at least a portion of the elongate support member; and
means for attaching the elongate support structure to the elongate fairing device, such that the elongate fairing device can rotate around the elongate support member on the elongate fairing sleeve longitudinal axis.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the covered portion of the elongate support member has an first aerodynamic drag coefficient that is greater than a second aerodynamic drag coefficient of the elongate fairing sleeve.
20. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the elongate support member has a rectangular cross-sectional profile.
21. The apparatus of claim 20 , wherein the elongate support member has a square cross-sectional profile.
22. The apparatus of claim 18 , wherein the elongate support member is oriented vertically, and is anchored in a foundation structure.
23. The apparatus of claim 22 , wherein the elongate fairing sleeve has an upper end and a lower end opposite the upper end, such that the lower end is displaced from the foundation structure by a first height.
24. The apparatus of claim 23 , further comprising a safety shield attached to the elongate support member and displaced from the foundation structure by a second height, such that the second height is less than the first height.
25. An apparatus comprising:
a first elongate support member;
a second elongate support member that is attached to the first elongate support member;
a first elongate fairing sleeve covering at least a portion of the first elongate support member, and configured to rotate around the first elongate support member; and
a second elongate fairing sleeve covering at least a portion of the second elongate support member, and configured to rotate around the second elongate support member.
26. A method comprising:
providing an elongate object having a first aerodynamic drag coefficient; and
mounting a rotatable cover having a second aerodynamic drag coefficient on the elongate object, wherein the second aerodynamic drag coefficient is less than the first aerodynamic drag coefficient.
27. The method of claim 26 , further comprising orienting the elongate object vertically, and anchoring the elongate object in a foundation structure.
28. The method of claim 27 , wherein the elongate object has an upper end and a lower end opposite the upper end, such that the lower end is displaced from the foundation structure by a first height.
29. The method of claim 28 , further comprising attaching a safety shield to the elongate object such that the safety shield is displaced from the foundation structure by a second height, wherein the second height is less than the first height.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/810,752 US20040187429A1 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2004-03-26 | Drag reducing rotatable fairing usable on poles, posts and other structures |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US45900903P | 2003-03-28 | 2003-03-28 | |
US10/810,752 US20040187429A1 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2004-03-26 | Drag reducing rotatable fairing usable on poles, posts and other structures |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040187429A1 true US20040187429A1 (en) | 2004-09-30 |
Family
ID=32995008
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/810,752 Abandoned US20040187429A1 (en) | 2003-03-28 | 2004-03-26 | Drag reducing rotatable fairing usable on poles, posts and other structures |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20040187429A1 (en) |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050261603A1 (en) * | 2004-05-20 | 2005-11-24 | Wittenberg Gregory P | Transparent biopsy punch |
US20090289148A1 (en) * | 2008-05-23 | 2009-11-26 | Makani Power, Inc. | Faired tether for wind power generation systems |
US20110266395A1 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2011-11-03 | Bevirt Joeben | Tether sheaths and aerodynamic tether assemblies |
CN107642462A (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-01-30 | 新疆金风科技股份有限公司 | Fairing, tower and wind power generating set |
CN114809779A (en) * | 2022-03-30 | 2022-07-29 | 山东电力工程咨询院有限公司 | Active downwind type strong wind resistant chimney enclosure structure and operation method |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2738039A (en) * | 1951-04-17 | 1956-03-13 | Hamilton Archibald Milne | Masts, towers, or like structure |
US3917205A (en) * | 1974-04-08 | 1975-11-04 | Southwestern Electric Company | Connector for traffic signal lights |
US4171674A (en) * | 1976-10-08 | 1979-10-23 | Hale Neville E | Fairing for pipes |
US4216632A (en) * | 1978-10-11 | 1980-08-12 | Reynolds International, Inc. | Support member and method of manufacture |
US4398487A (en) * | 1981-06-26 | 1983-08-16 | Exxon Production Research Co. | Fairing for elongated elements |
US4637331A (en) * | 1984-11-28 | 1987-01-20 | Jackson Gregg B | Sail and sailing rig |
US5266006A (en) * | 1993-02-25 | 1993-11-30 | Tsui I Hua | Windmill with removable wind vane plates arranged in multi-rows-and-lines |
US5398478A (en) * | 1990-01-31 | 1995-03-21 | Musco Corporation | Means and method for rigidly elevating a structure |
US5481846A (en) * | 1995-03-27 | 1996-01-09 | Valmont Industries, Inc. | Support pole having a bell-shaped lower end |
US6048136A (en) * | 1996-07-19 | 2000-04-11 | Shell Oil Company | Vortex induced vibration protection for deepwater drilling risers |
-
2004
- 2004-03-26 US US10/810,752 patent/US20040187429A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2738039A (en) * | 1951-04-17 | 1956-03-13 | Hamilton Archibald Milne | Masts, towers, or like structure |
US3917205A (en) * | 1974-04-08 | 1975-11-04 | Southwestern Electric Company | Connector for traffic signal lights |
US4171674A (en) * | 1976-10-08 | 1979-10-23 | Hale Neville E | Fairing for pipes |
US4216632A (en) * | 1978-10-11 | 1980-08-12 | Reynolds International, Inc. | Support member and method of manufacture |
US4398487A (en) * | 1981-06-26 | 1983-08-16 | Exxon Production Research Co. | Fairing for elongated elements |
US4637331A (en) * | 1984-11-28 | 1987-01-20 | Jackson Gregg B | Sail and sailing rig |
US5398478A (en) * | 1990-01-31 | 1995-03-21 | Musco Corporation | Means and method for rigidly elevating a structure |
US5266006A (en) * | 1993-02-25 | 1993-11-30 | Tsui I Hua | Windmill with removable wind vane plates arranged in multi-rows-and-lines |
US5481846A (en) * | 1995-03-27 | 1996-01-09 | Valmont Industries, Inc. | Support pole having a bell-shaped lower end |
US6048136A (en) * | 1996-07-19 | 2000-04-11 | Shell Oil Company | Vortex induced vibration protection for deepwater drilling risers |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050261603A1 (en) * | 2004-05-20 | 2005-11-24 | Wittenberg Gregory P | Transparent biopsy punch |
US20090289148A1 (en) * | 2008-05-23 | 2009-11-26 | Makani Power, Inc. | Faired tether for wind power generation systems |
WO2009142762A1 (en) * | 2008-05-23 | 2009-11-26 | Makani Power, Inc. | Faired tether for wind power generation systems |
US20110266395A1 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2011-11-03 | Bevirt Joeben | Tether sheaths and aerodynamic tether assemblies |
CN107642462A (en) * | 2017-09-18 | 2018-01-30 | 新疆金风科技股份有限公司 | Fairing, tower and wind power generating set |
CN114809779A (en) * | 2022-03-30 | 2022-07-29 | 山东电力工程咨询院有限公司 | Active downwind type strong wind resistant chimney enclosure structure and operation method |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US4949525A (en) | Rotatable, flexible flagpole arrangement | |
US4910898A (en) | Rotatable sign carrying device | |
US20090223164A1 (en) | Vertical rotating aerodynamic tower | |
WO2006095082A1 (en) | Captive balloon mobile in a tower | |
CA2233379C (en) | Self-righting street sign | |
US6053657A (en) | Portable safety marker | |
US20040187429A1 (en) | Drag reducing rotatable fairing usable on poles, posts and other structures | |
US20080086924A1 (en) | Breakaway banner support assembly | |
US9468275B2 (en) | Wind resistant beach umbrella | |
WO1998007937A1 (en) | Shading apparatus | |
EP1885590B1 (en) | Pneumatic or hydraulic telescopic system for pylons or chair lift stations, gondola lifts and the like | |
KR200464951Y1 (en) | Prefabricated cabstand structure which has a aerodynamic roof | |
US10354565B2 (en) | Outdoor advertising structure with a tilting, lowerable screen | |
FR2882985A1 (en) | Captive ascensional balloon assembly for e.g. shopping center, has balloon placed captive in tower including walls and reinforcement arranged near balloon`s equator, where envelope is filled with helium or hot air | |
US5172891A (en) | Safe road railing | |
US4915293A (en) | Sheltered and repositionably mounted enclosure | |
US20080229638A1 (en) | Weather protection system for signage | |
US3916815A (en) | Collapsible marker | |
CN213740602U (en) | Adjustable stay cable construction platform of outer attaches wall of tower | |
US4360175A (en) | Aircraft weather vane mooring device | |
KR100837678B1 (en) | A guide sign for prevent a damage | |
CN210896528U (en) | Strong wind resistant outdoor billboard advertising frame | |
KR200275079Y1 (en) | Car using national flag pole | |
CN110644391B (en) | Municipal transportation bumping post | |
JP3629768B2 (en) | Windbreak snow fence |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: IDEALAB, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GROSS, WILLIAM;REEL/FRAME:015159/0177 Effective date: 20040319 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |