US20040078277A1 - Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors - Google Patents

Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20040078277A1
US20040078277A1 US10/058,490 US5849002A US2004078277A1 US 20040078277 A1 US20040078277 A1 US 20040078277A1 US 5849002 A US5849002 A US 5849002A US 2004078277 A1 US2004078277 A1 US 2004078277A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
vendor
data
bid
buyer
invitation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/058,490
Inventor
William Gindlesperger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/058,490 priority Critical patent/US20040078277A1/en
Publication of US20040078277A1 publication Critical patent/US20040078277A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/06Buying, selling or leasing transactions
    • G06Q30/0601Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q40/00Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
    • G06Q40/04Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L9/00Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
    • H04L9/32Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
    • H04L9/3297Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials involving time stamps, e.g. generation of time stamps

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to an apparatus and method for creating a database representing print and other information product vendor pools for one or more subscribing buyers, and for selecting the lowest bidder from the databases represented vendor pool on a per-job basis and, more particularly, for creating and maintaining a database representing a vendor pool for each subscribing buyer of printing and other customized print information product goods and services, the database further representing capabilities of said vendors, receiving invitations-for-bid from buyers, extracting vendor qualification criteria data from said invitations-for-bid, transmitting invitations to bid on said invitations-for-bid to qualified ones of said vendors, based on said vendor qualification criteria data, and selecting from among the responding vendors based on the response price and other factors.
  • Print and other customized information product goods and services such as business cards and forms, envelopes, labels, pamphlets, CD ROMS, notepads, transparencies, brochures, and bound books differs from non-custom manufactured goods or services in that print and other information product goods and services are generally not pre-stocked as “off-the-shelf” items but, instead, must be specifically manufactured or provided to meet the buyer's particular requirements. Consequently, print and other information product goods and services frequently cannot be purchased “off-the-shelf” at fixed prices appearing on standard price lists.
  • the terms “printer” and “print vendor” are interchangeable and are defined as an entity which manufactures or sells traditional forms of printing or other non-traditional types of information product goods or services, which are or which consist of any tangible medium for communicating or displaying text, images, or other graphical or pictorial information, including, but not limited to, business forms, labels, pamphlets, books, flyers, brochures, transparencies, CD ROMs, stickers, business cards, envelopes, and note pads.
  • the terms “print information product” and “print information goods” are interchangeable and defined to include all of the above-identified goods and services.
  • the printer then reviews the buyer's product manufacturing and delivery specifications or requirements contained in the order, IFB, RFQ, or RFP including physical specifications, characteristics of style, quantities, mode of shipment, delivery schedule, and quality level required to perform individual jobs or estimated job requirement over a given period of time and, based on or extrapolating from previous experiences, provides an estimated price or bid to the buyer.
  • the buyer will provide the order, invitation-for-bid, request-for-quote, or request-for-proposal to a single or very limited number of print vendors, and award the contract to the single or lowest bidder.
  • This problem is heightened by great elasticity in the so-called “market” price of printing or other customized information product goods or services, which can vary widely from vendor to vendor and from week to week.
  • This elasticity results from the fact that pricing of such customized goods or services greatly depends on (1) the level of service and quality desired; (2) the labor and equipment required to produce the job or provide the service; (3) the amount time involved in producing the job or providing the service; (4) whether the job or service can be engineered or designed in a cost-effective way; and (5) whether the customer order can be included in the print vendor's production schedule to comply with the required delivery date.
  • the printing industry addresses the problem of maximizing machine utilization without compromising its relationship with preferred customers through sales and marketing efforts which, in turn, increase the cost of each print job and which, ultimately, the print vendor passes to the print buyer through higher prices.
  • the need to maximize factory floor and machine utilization is in no way unique to the printing industry. It is a major concern in many other customized manufacturing operations.
  • the present invention provides a system and method for selecting a printing vendor from a plurality of printing vendors, comprising steps of receiving, at a central, conventional database server termed herein as “the PrintProSys SM server”, an initial vendor pool data set from each of a plurality of buyers, the initial vendor data set identifying an initial vendor pool for that buyer, entering the initial vendor pool data set into a vendor database within the “PrintProSys SM server”, transmitting an invitation to subscribe to each vendor in the initial vendor pool, receiving a vendor capability data from a sub-plurality of the vendors in the initial vendor pool, the vendor capability data describing each vendor's print capabilities, entering the vendor capability data into the vendor database, receiving at the PrintProSys SM server a buyer's invitation-for-bid describing a customized print or other information product or service that the buyer wishes to procure or obtain bids for, calculating or extracting a vendor selection criteria data from the buyer's invitation-for-bid, the vendor selection criteria data defining the values that a vendor
  • the method of the present invention compares and correlates the vendor selection criteria data to the vendor capability data field of each vendor data record in the buyer's vendor pool database.
  • the PintProSys SM server then transmits a vendor's invitation-for-bid data to each vendor in the buyer's vendor pool whose vendor capability data field meets the vendor selection criteria data extracted from the buyer's invitation-for-bid data.
  • the PrintProSys SM server receives a plurality of responding bid data, each being from a corresponding one of the plurality of vendors to whom a vendor invitation-for-bid data was transmitted, and each representing the transmitting vendor's price for the particular print information goods or services requested.
  • the PrintProSys SM server selects the responding bid data having the lowest represented vendor price and generates information identifying the buyer of the identity of the selected vendor.
  • the PrintProSys SM server Upon the PrintProSys SM server's receipt of an approval data from the buyer, it issues an order to the selected vendor for the purchase of the at least one printed item. In addition, the PrintProSys SM server's transmits to the remaining non-selected vendors in the vendor pool a bidding result data representing the identity of the selected vendor, and the rank order value of the bid data submitted by all other selection pool vendors.
  • the PrintProSys SM server of the invention has the further ability to maintain multiple vendor pools for each of a plurality of buyers, the multiple vendor pools for a particular buyer corresponding to multiple print product or service types that the buyer procures.
  • a still further embodiment transmits a data representing the bid price of all received bids, to all vendors who submitted bids.
  • a further embodiment of the invention assigns a preferred vendor flag to each vendor record and then selects vendors for receiving vendors' invitation-for-bid based on the flag value.
  • a still further embodiment of the invention automatically generates a set of project milestone data for use in monitoring the winning vendor's progress on the buyer's requested print job or service.
  • a still further embodiment of the invention receives an invoice data from the winning print vendor upon completion of the job, and generates a corresponding buyer's invoice in response.
  • the system receives a fund transfer from the buyer based on the buyer's invoice and deposits the fund into an escrow account.
  • the system subtracts a system fee from the deposited amount, transfers that system fee to a system administration account, and transmits the remainder from the escrow to the winning print vendor.
  • FIG. 1 is a general flow chart showing the steps associated with a preferred first embodiment of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a tabulated format of information fields submitted by potential subscribing print vendors for the pre-qualification step of creating a database of a buyer's pool of print vendor;
  • FIG. 3 is a general flow chart showing steps of a second embodiment of the invention, using a preferred vendor flag as a selection criteria for receiving invitations-for-bid;
  • FIG. 4 is a general flow chart of another embodiment of the invention, having a milestone generation feature.
  • the index “i” identifies the particular vendor
  • the index “j” identifies a particular buyer
  • VR ij is the vendor record of the i th vendor in the j th buyer's vendor pool or, equivalently, a vendor record of a vendor “i” that is a approved by buyer “j” for receiving bids on that buyer's jobs;
  • K j is the number of vendors in the j th buyer's vendor pool or, equivalently, the number of vendors having vendor records VR ij indicating approval by buyer “j” for receiving bids on that buyer's jobs;
  • the process begins at step 2 by inputting for each of J buyers, each identified by the index j, a plurality of K j vendor records VR ij into the memory of a conventional network server running under Windows NT or any of the equivalent server operating systems that are well-known in the art.
  • the server is termed the PrintProSys SM server for purposes of this description.
  • the vendor capability attribute data, VA ij represents the manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities of the i th or submitting vendor.
  • the vendor capability attributes VA ij are in terms of understandable descriptor words, having specific value tables determined by the particular implementation of the system.
  • An example set of vendor capability attributes VA ij is shown on FIG. 2, and includes the vendor's ability to generate various quantity ranges of: Books, including loose-leaf, side-stitched and perfect bound; Books, Smyth-sown, case-bound; Books, saddle stitched; Books, paste on fold; Binders Only; Print Composition, including CD ROM, general, magnetic media, variable imaging, master and replication; Die Cutting and Letterpress capabilities; Four-Color Process capabilities; Cut Sheets capabilities; Business Form Specialties; Continuous Form capabilities; Snap Apart Sets capability; capability for Flexography, Labels, Decal and Screen Process On Labels; capability for Screen Printing and Printing of Plastic, Mylar and Acetate; Miscellaneous Printing Processes, including thermography, engraving, foil stamping and embossing; capabilities for various Specialty Items, including tabloids, microfiches, negatives, lamination, engineering drawings, tags, expansion file folders, 3-ring binders and advertising specialties; and envelopes.
  • Print Composition including CD ROM
  • the vendor capability attributes VA ij are transmitted to, received by and stored by the PrintProSys SM server.
  • the vendor capability attribute data VA ij may be submitted by the vendor over the Internet, via an interactive data entry terminal, e.g., a conventional personal computer, as is known in the art.
  • the vendor may supply the quantified vendor capability attributes VA ij by paper form (not shown), the data from which is then entered into the PrintProSys SM server storage by manual means.
  • the vendor can supply the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij by magnetic data storage media, or optical data storage media, or equivalent transportable media of the types that are well known in the data storage arts.
  • the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij field of the vendor records VR ij for which no was received are null entries.
  • any of the J buyers may now proceed to step 10 and transmit a buyer's invitation for bid specification BIFB to the PrintProSys SM server.
  • the PrintProSys SM server goes to step 12 and calculates or extracts a vendor capability criteria CC from the BIFB, which defines the values that the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij field of a vendor record VR ij must have to qualify for bidding on the job defined by the buyer's invitation for bid specification BIFB.
  • the method proceeds to step 14 where the PrintProSys SM server compares or correlates the extracted a vendor capability criteria CC against the vendor capability attribute data VA ij of each vendor record VR ij in, or having a j value representing of it being in, the j th Buyer's Vendor Pool BVP j .
  • the PrintProSys SM server reformats the BIFB into a vendors' invitation for bid VIFB, and transmits the VIFB to the print vendor based on the name and address field of the vendor record VR ij .
  • the vendor's invitation for bid VIFB specifies the print information product or service in a consistent, standardized format so that each receiving vendor will understand clearly all product, delivery and other requirements for the print information item or service that is being placed out for bids by the buyer. This arrangement ensures that the bids are comparable and that mistakes as to the requirements of the buyer are minimized, while enabling each vendor to prepare a more precise calculation of its responding bid B i .
  • step 18 one or more of the vendors receiving the vendor's invitation for bid VIFB submits a bid B i to the system, where the index “i” identifies the submitting vendor.
  • the bid is received by and input to the PrintProSys SM data server.
  • the PrintProSys SM data server detects the lowest price bid and at step 22 transmits to the buyer a data, WIN, informing of the identity of that lowest price vendor.
  • the PrintProSys SM server awaits receipt of approval data APP from the buyer and, upon receipt, issues an order data ORDER to the selected vendor for purchase of the print item or procurement of the printing service at the bid price.
  • step 24 does not receive the approval data APP no order data ORDER is transmitted.
  • step 26 the PrintProSys SM data server generates BIDINFORM data representing the remaining non-selected vendors in the vendor selection pool VSP jk and the identity and the bid price of the bids B i received from all of the responding vendors, and this data is then transmitted to all of the vendors.
  • step 2 inputs a vendor record VR ij for each i vendor which make up an initial vendor pool for each buyer j, and steps 6 and 8 then quantify and input a vendor capability attribute VA ij into one or more of the vendor records VR ij .
  • the above-described step 12 then calculates or extracts a vendor capability criteria CC from the invitation for bid BIFB, which defines the values that the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij must have to qualify the i th vendor for bidding on the j th buyer's BIFB.
  • Step 14 selects the vendors that receive the vendor's invitation-for-bid VIFB, based on comparing the vendor capability criteria CC to the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij for each the j th buyer's vendors i.
  • each vendor record VR ij has a preferred vendor flag PV ij .
  • the preferred vendor flag has logical values of “yes” and “no”, which represent whether the i th vendor is a preferred vendor for the j th buyer.
  • the value of PV ij can be set at step 40 , when the vendor record VR ij is entered. Step 40 is otherwise identical to step 2 of FIG. 1.
  • This embodiment does not enter vendor capability attributes VC ij and does not extract a capability criteria CC from a received buyer's invitation-for-bid. Instead, after receipt of a BIFB at step 10 , vendors are selected at step 42 to receive vendor's invitations-for-bid VIFB solely on whether or not the vendor is a preferred vendor of the j th buyer.
  • FIG. 4 comprises the above-described steps for the FIG. 1 first embodiment, and an additional step 28 at which the PrintsroSys SM generates a milestone data set MSTONE representing a set of job milestones calculated from the schedule, quantity and product or service descriptors corresponding to the awarded bid.
  • Example milestones values represented by MSTONE include, but are not limited to, paper and supply availability, scheduling and finishing of prep, proofing, pre-press, press sheet inspections, press work, bindery, special finishing and shipping and delivery.
  • a still further embodiment which is not depicted, combines the above-described step 28 of generating a milestone data set MSTONE with the above-described embodiment of FIG. 3.
  • Another embodiment of the invention combines embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 3, and selects vendors for receipt of vendors' invitation-for-bid VIFB based on either of the two described selection criteria being met, i.e., if the extracted vendor capability criteria CC is met by the vendor capability data VC ij , or if the vendor has a preferred vendor PV ij flag value of “yes”.
  • Yet another embodiment of the invention receives an invoice data from the winning print vendor upon completion of the job, and generates a corresponding buyer's invoice in response.
  • the system receives a fund transfer from the buyer based on the buyer's invoice and deposits the fund into an escrow account.
  • the system subtracts a system fee from the deposited amount, transfers that system fee to a system administration account, and transmits the remainder from the escrow to the winning print vendor.
  • the invention quantifies both the buyer's needs and the vendors, attributes in a database system that matches objective print information product or service specifications with pre-determined vendor quality levels and manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities.
  • the invention creates multiple vendor pools for each buyer, each vendor pool being for a particular type of print information product or services. As a result, the print buyer has a large pool of qualified vendors to which each invitation-for-bid can be distributed.
  • the buyer is no longer dependent on an individual print vendor's specialized knowledge and, instead, is able to obtain competitive pricing based on objective specifications that reflect the buyer's requirements rather than one particular vendor's existing backlog, manufacturing, production, or provider preferences.
  • print vendors can calculate more precisely, and hence more competitively, the pricing in their bids due to availability of complete objective specifications.
  • the buyer is virtually assured of receiving “contribution pricing” from at least one responding vendor on each and every job.
  • the print buyer sets the parameters for both vendor pool selection and for the bidding and award process.
  • the parameters are set in such a way, however, that vendor quality and responsibility is determined at the time each vendor pool is established and only the responsiveness of each vendor's bid is reviewed at the time of award.
  • the buyer can create and manage large vendor pools without having to assess the quality of each bidder each time an individual job is bid
  • the bidding and award process is standardized so as to make the dissemination of invitations for bid, the receipt of bids, and the award of the job to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder virtually automatic and without the need for additional procurement staff or the expenditure of related out-of pocket administrative costs.
  • the invention creates a system of “no-holds barred” competitive bidding. Once approved for a vendor bidding pool, the printing vendor no longer has to expend additional costs on sales or marketing to obtain future jobs from the same buyer, and from other buyers with pre-qualification requirements met by the vendor's capability attributes. The printing vendor is thereby assured access to future bidding opportunities that match the vendor's quantified quality level and/or manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities. In addition, knowing beforehand that the award will go to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, each participating vendor will have an incentive to submit their lowest bid upfront, rather than hold back their lowest bid, as they would otherwise be inclined to do if the award was still going to be negotiated after bid opening.
  • the invention further provides that all bids are released to all bidders after award, thereby creating a “ratcheting down” effect as each vendor learns how low the price range is likely to be on similar jobs in the future.
  • buyers who use the invention will benefit from consistently low prices from selected quality vendors, while enabling their purchasing personnel to focus on budget planning, job preparation, internal customer service needs, and production quality and compliance.

Abstract

A system and method for competitive bid selection from a plurality print and other customized information product vendors based on a database of vendor records, each record identifying a vendor, one or more buyers who approves the vendor for receipt of invitations to bid, and a vendor capability data representing production and economic capabilities of the vendor. A buyer's invitation for bid data is received, representing a specific print and other customized information product or service and an invitation to bid on that product or service, and a data identifying vendor requirements for producing the product is calculated. An vendor's invitation to bid is transmitted to the vendors from among those approved by the buyer associated with the buyer's invitation for bid having a vendor capability data meeting the calculated vendor requirements. Responding bids from the vendors are input into the database and ranked in order of price. The lowest price bid is identified and an order is issued to the selected vendor. Further, a bid information data is transmitted to each of the non-selected vendors, representing the identity of the selected vendor and the rank order value of the bids.

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention generally relates to an apparatus and method for creating a database representing print and other information product vendor pools for one or more subscribing buyers, and for selecting the lowest bidder from the databases represented vendor pool on a per-job basis and, more particularly, for creating and maintaining a database representing a vendor pool for each subscribing buyer of printing and other customized print information product goods and services, the database further representing capabilities of said vendors, receiving invitations-for-bid from buyers, extracting vendor qualification criteria data from said invitations-for-bid, transmitting invitations to bid on said invitations-for-bid to qualified ones of said vendors, based on said vendor qualification criteria data, and selecting from among the responding vendors based on the response price and other factors. [0001]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Purchase of print and other customized information product goods and services, such as business cards and forms, envelopes, labels, pamphlets, CD ROMS, notepads, transparencies, brochures, and bound books differs from non-custom manufactured goods or services in that print and other information product goods and services are generally not pre-stocked as “off-the-shelf” items but, instead, must be specifically manufactured or provided to meet the buyer's particular requirements. Consequently, print and other information product goods and services frequently cannot be purchased “off-the-shelf” at fixed prices appearing on standard price lists. Instead, most print and other information product goods and services are customized to some extent and, accordingly, their prices are established when the specific goods or services are themselves identified, either by an actual order, invitation-for-bid (“IFB”), request-for-quote (“RFQ”), or request-for-proposal (“RFP”); only then can the manufacturer or service provider assess the precise quality and manufacturing or service specifications required to perform the job. [0002]
  • The general procedure used in the prior are of procurement of print and other customized information product goods and services is that the buyer provides the actual order, or the IFB, RFQ, or RFP to one or more printers with whom, in general, the buyer has had sufficient previous experience to know what type of product or level of service can be provided. For purposes of this description, the terms “printer” and “print vendor” are interchangeable and are defined as an entity which manufactures or sells traditional forms of printing or other non-traditional types of information product goods or services, which are or which consist of any tangible medium for communicating or displaying text, images, or other graphical or pictorial information, including, but not limited to, business forms, labels, pamphlets, books, flyers, brochures, transparencies, CD ROMs, stickers, business cards, envelopes, and note pads. For purposes of this description the terms “print information product” and “print information goods” are interchangeable and defined to include all of the above-identified goods and services. The printer then reviews the buyer's product manufacturing and delivery specifications or requirements contained in the order, IFB, RFQ, or RFP including physical specifications, characteristics of style, quantities, mode of shipment, delivery schedule, and quality level required to perform individual jobs or estimated job requirement over a given period of time and, based on or extrapolating from previous experiences, provides an estimated price or bid to the buyer. Generally the buyer will provide the order, invitation-for-bid, request-for-quote, or request-for-proposal to a single or very limited number of print vendors, and award the contract to the single or lowest bidder. [0003]
  • In following this general procedure in the prior art, however, buyers of printing and other customized information product goods or services confront the so-called “iron triangle” of quality, timeliness, and cost. Buyers want a product or service that is good, fast, and cheap, but what they discover is that traditional procurements methods will, at best, only achieve two of these three ideals on any given job. Thus, a buyer might demand and receive top quality on a “rush” order, but only at a high cost. Conversely, negotiating a lower price may achieve cost savings, but also compromise quality and timeliness. [0004]
  • This problem is heightened by great elasticity in the so-called “market” price of printing or other customized information product goods or services, which can vary widely from vendor to vendor and from week to week. This elasticity results from the fact that pricing of such customized goods or services greatly depends on (1) the level of service and quality desired; (2) the labor and equipment required to produce the job or provide the service; (3) the amount time involved in producing the job or providing the service; (4) whether the job or service can be engineered or designed in a cost-effective way; and (5) whether the customer order can be included in the print vendor's production schedule to comply with the required delivery date. [0005]
  • This last factor is particularly crucial. Most print vendors are “hard-iron” manufacturers with high overhead and labor costs. As a result, idle equipment and labor can be devastating to a print vendor's profit margin. At the same time, print vendors must be ready to service their regular customers on short notice, which means planning for downtime in the production schedule to ensure that their machinery is available for “rush” orders. Managing customer job orders in a way that minimizes these “holes” in the production schedule is frequently what distinguishes the profitable print vendor from the insolvent one. [0006]
  • As a result of this tension between the cost of idle equipment and labor and the need to preserve downtime for regular customers, print vendors are constantly seeking short-turnaround jobs to fill their production “holes” when their regular orders do not materialize. To obtain these short-turnaround jobs, many print vendors will resort to extremely low pricing, provided that they can do so without undermining their regular customer relations. This pricing strategy is called “contribution pricing”. “Contribution” pricing is the practice of bidding out work at below normal profit margins because any income above out-of-pocket costs “contributes”, 100%, to the print vendor's bottom line in comparison to cost of letting its labor and machinery remain idle. In current printing markets, “contribution” pricing on a regular basis is found only in federal and state government procurements of print information products. [0007]
  • In both public and private sector print information product markets, however, traditional procurement methods and prior art devices have failed to solve this “iron triangle” because of their inability to take advantage of “contribution” pricing without incurring prohibitive administrative costs or sacrificing quality or timeliness. There are many reasons for this failure. First, the purchase or procurement of printing and other customized information product goods and services frequently requires specialized knowledge and expertise in finding the right print vendor for each job. Most businesses, however, hire purchasing officials with general procurement knowledge who are then given responsibility for a wide range of purchases. As a result, the purchasing official is forced to rely on the print vendor's expertise in designing or engineering a print job, which too often results in the most expensive (and most profitable for the print vendor) design, engineering, or production process. [0008]
  • Second, in order to find the manufacturer or service provider who is willing to offer the lowest “contribution” pricing on any given job, the buyer must often request price quotations from dozens or even hundreds of vendors. In the actual business environment, however, there are difficulties which makes selection of a print vendor willing to offer “contribution” pricing difficult for the buyer. There are also difficulties and tradeoffs which make preparation of responding bids difficult for the print vendors. For example, from the buyers perspective, a first difficulty is identifying the pool of print vendors to whom it should send its IFB or RFQ. A larger vendor pool would, in theory, be desirable because it usually means a lower bid can be received. This is well-known in the general business world. However, identifying such a large vendor pool is generally not practical. A main reason is that gathering and maintaining information about a large number of current and potential print vendors is time consuming and expensive. Few companies have the time, money, or inclination to maintain a large, up-to-date database on such potential vendors, particularly when soliciting dozens of bids or quotations will itself require staff and administrative time that costs more than the savings generated from competitive bidding. This disparity is heightened by the fact that most print jobs involve relatively low dollar purchases or procurements. [0009]
  • In addition, even if a buyer were willing to absorb the administrative costs associated with keeping a large database of vendors to improve the competitive bidding, the buyer is often reluctant to do so because quality control becomes more difficult as the vendor pool increases. Part of quality control is to monitor the quality and dependability of goods and services output by each vendor in the vendor pool. This is difficult not due only to the volume of the information, but also to the fact that the buyer must generally obtain such information from its own dealings with the vendor. The reason is that reliability, price history, and quality of a print vendor's work for other buyers may not be obtainable. This is another reason that buyers will not seek goods or services from new vendors because negative information on their reliability or quality may then be learned first hand. [0010]
  • In the pubic sector, where federal and state agencies are often required by law to make bid opportunities available to large numbers of vendors, procurements of print information products typically result in poor quality control and relatively high administrative costs that must be subsidized by the taxpayer. In contrast, traditional procurement methods and prior art devices in the private sector have emphasized quality control by limiting the vendor pool for print information goods and services to a small number of reliable vendors with which it has previously done business. However, as the present inventor has discovered, there is a significant cost problem associated with limiting of the vendor pool to a small number. The problem is that the limited competition results in vendors offering, and charging, higher prices, being undisciplined by a more competitive market. Such prior art methods are typically based on direct negotiation with preferred vendors in established commercial relationships, often resulting in controlled term pricing that lumps procurements together in the hope of enhancing the print buyer's buying power within a narrow pool of vendors; and “best buy” or “best value” procurement practices (which are now being adopted increasingly in the public sector) that are largely creative user or quality control driven. [0011]
  • Because of the limitations of traditional procurement methods, print vendors are often left not only with unscheduled holes in their production schedules, but also unable to fill downtime purposefully set aside for last minute “rush” orders from regular customers. Moreover, even those print vendors who would gain, in an immediate sense, from contribution pricing are frequently unwilling to offer that pricing to their regular customers. The reason is that the regular customer, after once receiving a contribution pricing from its vendor due to the vendor then facing idle machine time, would expect to pay the same low prices for its future print jobs. The regular customer would even expect the vendor to give contribution pricing at times when the vendor lacks idle production capacity. As a result, the vendor would have to displace more profitable work to accept the lower paying work, in order maintain the goodwill of its customer. [0012]
  • The printing industry addresses the problem of maximizing machine utilization without compromising its relationship with preferred customers through sales and marketing efforts which, in turn, increase the cost of each print job and which, ultimately, the print vendor passes to the print buyer through higher prices. The need to maximize factory floor and machine utilization is in no way unique to the printing industry. It is a major concern in many other customized manufacturing operations. [0013]
  • As a consequence of the foregoing, there has been a long felt need for a system and method of competitive pricing for custom printed goods and printing services that: (1) identifies and manages large vendor pool to obtain the benefit of enhanced pricing competition, without imposing relatively high administrative costs or causing a loss of quality control; (2) offers vendors an inexpensive, cost effective and reliable system for obtaining access to print jobs and specifications without added marketing costs and sales commissions; and (3) does not rely on the vendors' product expertise to establish price, but rather allows each vendor to bid high, bid low, or not bid at all based, strictly, on their production capabilities and need to fill available time in their production schedules. [0014]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention provides a system and method for selecting a printing vendor from a plurality of printing vendors, comprising steps of receiving, at a central, conventional database server termed herein as “the PrintProSys[0015] SM server”, an initial vendor pool data set from each of a plurality of buyers, the initial vendor data set identifying an initial vendor pool for that buyer, entering the initial vendor pool data set into a vendor database within the “PrintProSysSM server”, transmitting an invitation to subscribe to each vendor in the initial vendor pool, receiving a vendor capability data from a sub-plurality of the vendors in the initial vendor pool, the vendor capability data describing each vendor's print capabilities, entering the vendor capability data into the vendor database, receiving at the PrintProSysSM server a buyer's invitation-for-bid describing a customized print or other information product or service that the buyer wishes to procure or obtain bids for, calculating or extracting a vendor selection criteria data from the buyer's invitation-for-bid, the vendor selection criteria data defining the values that a vendor's capability data must meet to qualify for, and to receive, a vendor's invitation-for-bid requesting a bid response corresponding to the buyer's invitation-for-bid.
  • The method of the present invention then compares and correlates the vendor selection criteria data to the vendor capability data field of each vendor data record in the buyer's vendor pool database. The PintProSys[0016] SM server then transmits a vendor's invitation-for-bid data to each vendor in the buyer's vendor pool whose vendor capability data field meets the vendor selection criteria data extracted from the buyer's invitation-for-bid data. Next, the PrintProSysSM server receives a plurality of responding bid data, each being from a corresponding one of the plurality of vendors to whom a vendor invitation-for-bid data was transmitted, and each representing the transmitting vendor's price for the particular print information goods or services requested. The PrintProSysSM server then selects the responding bid data having the lowest represented vendor price and generates information identifying the buyer of the identity of the selected vendor.
  • Upon the PrintProSys[0017] SM server's receipt of an approval data from the buyer, it issues an order to the selected vendor for the purchase of the at least one printed item. In addition, the PrintProSysSM server's transmits to the remaining non-selected vendors in the vendor pool a bidding result data representing the identity of the selected vendor, and the rank order value of the bid data submitted by all other selection pool vendors.
  • The PrintProSys[0018] SM server of the invention has the further ability to maintain multiple vendor pools for each of a plurality of buyers, the multiple vendor pools for a particular buyer corresponding to multiple print product or service types that the buyer procures.
  • A still further embodiment transmits a data representing the bid price of all received bids, to all vendors who submitted bids. [0019]
  • A further embodiment of the invention assigns a preferred vendor flag to each vendor record and then selects vendors for receiving vendors' invitation-for-bid based on the flag value. [0020]
  • A still further embodiment of the invention automatically generates a set of project milestone data for use in monitoring the winning vendor's progress on the buyer's requested print job or service. [0021]
  • A still further embodiment of the invention receives an invoice data from the winning print vendor upon completion of the job, and generates a corresponding buyer's invoice in response. The system then receives a fund transfer from the buyer based on the buyer's invoice and deposits the fund into an escrow account. Next, the system subtracts a system fee from the deposited amount, transfers that system fee to a system administration account, and transmits the remainder from the escrow to the winning print vendor. This embodiment provides a single source accounting for buyers dealing with a plurality of vendors. [0022]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • These features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully disclosed in, or rendered obvious by, the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts and further wherein: [0023]
  • FIG. 1 is a general flow chart showing the steps associated with a preferred first embodiment of the present invention; [0024]
  • FIG. 2 is a tabulated format of information fields submitted by potential subscribing print vendors for the pre-qualification step of creating a database of a buyer's pool of print vendor; [0025]
  • FIG. 3 is a general flow chart showing steps of a second embodiment of the invention, using a preferred vendor flag as a selection criteria for receiving invitations-for-bid; and [0026]
  • FIG. 4 is a general flow chart of another embodiment of the invention, having a milestone generation feature.[0027]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • The method and apparatus of the present invention will be better understood by a description of its operation in reference to the attached figures. [0028]
  • For purposes of this description tile following definitions apply: [0029]
  • The index “i” identifies the particular vendor; [0030]
  • The index “j” identifies a particular buyer; [0031]
  • The value “J” is the number of buyers; [0032]
  • VR[0033] ij is the vendor record of the ith vendor in the jth buyer's vendor pool or, equivalently, a vendor record of a vendor “i” that is a approved by buyer “j” for receiving bids on that buyer's jobs;
  • K[0034] j is the number of vendors in the jth buyer's vendor pool or, equivalently, the number of vendors having vendor records VRij indicating approval by buyer “j” for receiving bids on that buyer's jobs;
  • BVP[0035] j is the Buyer's Vendor Pool of the jth buyer, referencing all of the Kj vendor records VRij associated with the jth buyer; the plurality of Kj vendor records VRi, in the server database is the Buyer's Vendor Pool BVPj, for j=1 to J.
  • Other definitions are recited where appropriate. [0036]
  • Referring to FIG. 1, the process begins at [0037] step 2 by inputting for each of J buyers, each identified by the index j, a plurality of Kj vendor records VRij into the memory of a conventional network server running under Windows NT or any of the equivalent server operating systems that are well-known in the art. The server is termed the PrintProSysSM server for purposes of this description.
  • The method then proceeds to step [0038] 4 where an invitation-to-subscribe ITSij, for i=1 to Kj, is generated for each of the Kj vendors identified by the jth buyer, for each of the J buyers.
  • Next, at [0039] step 6, a vendor capability attribute data, VAij, for i=1 to Lj is quantified by each of a plurality of Lj vendors, where Lj is the number of vendors from the quantity Kj of vendors in the jth Buyer's Vendor Pool BVPj from whom a vendor capability attribute data is received. For each jth buyer the value of Lj can range from zero to Kj. The vendor capability attribute data, VAij represents the manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities of the ith or submitting vendor. The vendor capability attributes VAij are in terms of understandable descriptor words, having specific value tables determined by the particular implementation of the system. An example set of vendor capability attributes VAij is shown on FIG. 2, and includes the vendor's ability to generate various quantity ranges of: Books, including loose-leaf, side-stitched and perfect bound; Books, Smyth-sown, case-bound; Books, saddle stitched; Books, paste on fold; Binders Only; Print Composition, including CD ROM, general, magnetic media, variable imaging, master and replication; Die Cutting and Letterpress capabilities; Four-Color Process capabilities; Cut Sheets capabilities; Business Form Specialties; Continuous Form capabilities; Snap Apart Sets capability; capability for Flexography, Labels, Decal and Screen Process On Labels; capability for Screen Printing and Printing of Plastic, Mylar and Acetate; Miscellaneous Printing Processes, including thermography, engraving, foil stamping and embossing; capabilities for various Specialty Items, including tabloids, microfiches, negatives, lamination, engineering drawings, tags, expansion file folders, 3-ring binders and advertising specialties; and envelopes.
  • At [0040] step 8 the vendor capability attributes VAij are transmitted to, received by and stored by the PrintProSysSM server. The vendor capability attribute data VAij may be submitted by the vendor over the Internet, via an interactive data entry terminal, e.g., a conventional personal computer, as is known in the art.
  • In an alternative embodiment, the vendor may supply the quantified vendor capability attributes VA[0041] ij by paper form (not shown), the data from which is then entered into the PrintProSysSM server storage by manual means. As yet another alternative, the vendor can supply the quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij by magnetic data storage media, or optical data storage media, or equivalent transportable media of the types that are well known in the data storage arts.
  • Upon completion of [0042] step 8 the PrintProSysSM server contains J of the above-identified Buyer's Vendor Pools BVPj, for j=1 to J, each consisting of Kj vendor records VRij, each vendor record having the received quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij. The quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij field of the vendor records VRij for which no was received are null entries.
  • Referring to FIG. 1, any of the J buyers, for example the j[0043] th buyer, may now proceed to step 10 and transmit a buyer's invitation for bid specification BIFB to the PrintProSysSM server. In response to receiving the BIFB from the jth buyer, the PrintProSysSM server goes to step 12 and calculates or extracts a vendor capability criteria CC from the BIFB, which defines the values that the quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij field of a vendor record VRij must have to qualify for bidding on the job defined by the buyer's invitation for bid specification BIFB.
  • Referring again to FIG. 1, the method proceeds to step [0044] 14 where the PrintProSysSM server compares or correlates the extracted a vendor capability criteria CC against the vendor capability attribute data VAij of each vendor record VRij in, or having a j value representing of it being in, the jth Buyer's Vendor Pool BVPj. Next, at step 16, for each, if any, of the vendor records VRij having a vendor capability attribute data VAij meeting the vendor capability criteria CC, the PrintProSysSM server reformats the BIFB into a vendors' invitation for bid VIFB, and transmits the VIFB to the print vendor based on the name and address field of the vendor record VRij. The vendor's invitation for bid VIFB specifies the print information product or service in a consistent, standardized format so that each receiving vendor will understand clearly all product, delivery and other requirements for the print information item or service that is being placed out for bids by the buyer. This arrangement ensures that the bids are comparable and that mistakes as to the requirements of the buyer are minimized, while enabling each vendor to prepare a more precise calculation of its responding bid Bi.
  • Referring to FIG. 1, at [0045] step 18 one or more of the vendors receiving the vendor's invitation for bid VIFB submits a bid Bi to the system, where the index “i” identifies the submitting vendor. The bid is received by and input to the PrintProSysSM data server. Then, at step 20 the PrintProSysSM data server detects the lowest price bid and at step 22 transmits to the buyer a data, WIN, informing of the identity of that lowest price vendor. At step 24 the PrintProSysSM server awaits receipt of approval data APP from the buyer and, upon receipt, issues an order data ORDER to the selected vendor for purchase of the print item or procurement of the printing service at the bid price. If step 24 does not receive the approval data APP no order data ORDER is transmitted. At step 26 the PrintProSysSM data server generates BIDINFORM data representing the remaining non-selected vendors in the vendor selection pool VSPjk and the identity and the bid price of the bids Bi received from all of the responding vendors, and this data is then transmitted to all of the vendors.
  • A minor variation of the above-described first embodiment, which is not shown, omits the [0046] step 4 generation of the invitation-to-subscribe ITSij, for i=1 to Kj.
  • A first embodiment of the invention, and variations thereof, have been described in reference to FIG. 1. In the FIG. 1 embodiment, [0047] step 2 inputs a vendor record VRij for each i vendor which make up an initial vendor pool for each buyer j, and steps 6 and 8 then quantify and input a vendor capability attribute VAij into one or more of the vendor records VRij. The above-described step 12 then calculates or extracts a vendor capability criteria CC from the invitation for bid BIFB, which defines the values that the quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij must have to qualify the ith vendor for bidding on the jth buyer's BIFB. Step 14 then selects the vendors that receive the vendor's invitation-for-bid VIFB, based on comparing the vendor capability criteria CC to the quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij for each the jth buyer's vendors i.
  • Referring to FIG. 3, an alternative embodiment is depicted, with like blocks having like labels compared to FIG. 1. In the FIG. 3 embodiment, each vendor record VR[0048] ij has a preferred vendor flag PVij. The preferred vendor flag has logical values of “yes” and “no”, which represent whether the ith vendor is a preferred vendor for the jth buyer. The value of PVij can be set at step 40, when the vendor record VRij is entered. Step 40 is otherwise identical to step 2 of FIG. 1. This embodiment does not enter vendor capability attributes VCij and does not extract a capability criteria CC from a received buyer's invitation-for-bid. Instead, after receipt of a BIFB at step 10, vendors are selected at step 42 to receive vendor's invitations-for-bid VIFB solely on whether or not the vendor is a preferred vendor of the jth buyer.
  • Referring to FIG. 4, an example of a still further embodiment of the invention will be described. The example FIG. 4 embodiment comprises the above-described steps for the FIG. 1 first embodiment, and an [0049] additional step 28 at which the PrintsroSysSM generates a milestone data set MSTONE representing a set of job milestones calculated from the schedule, quantity and product or service descriptors corresponding to the awarded bid. Example milestones values represented by MSTONE include, but are not limited to, paper and supply availability, scheduling and finishing of prep, proofing, pre-press, press sheet inspections, press work, bindery, special finishing and shipping and delivery.
  • A still further embodiment, which is not depicted, combines the above-described [0050] step 28 of generating a milestone data set MSTONE with the above-described embodiment of FIG. 3.
  • Another embodiment of the invention combines embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 3, and selects vendors for receipt of vendors' invitation-for-bid VIFB based on either of the two described selection criteria being met, i.e., if the extracted vendor capability criteria CC is met by the vendor capability data VC[0051] ij, or if the vendor has a preferred vendor PVij flag value of “yes”.
  • Yet another embodiment of the invention receives an invoice data from the winning print vendor upon completion of the job, and generates a corresponding buyer's invoice in response. The system then receives a fund transfer from the buyer based on the buyer's invoice and deposits the fund into an escrow account. Next, the system subtracts a system fee from the deposited amount, transfers that system fee to a system administration account, and transmits the remainder from the escrow to the winning print vendor. This embodiment provides a single source accounting for buyers dealing with a plurality of vendors. [0052]
  • As can be readily determined by one of ordinary skill in the art of print procurement, there are numerous advantages obtained with the present described invention. First, the invention quantifies both the buyer's needs and the vendors, attributes in a database system that matches objective print information product or service specifications with pre-determined vendor quality levels and manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities. The invention creates multiple vendor pools for each buyer, each vendor pool being for a particular type of print information product or services. As a result, the print buyer has a large pool of qualified vendors to which each invitation-for-bid can be distributed. Further, the buyer is no longer dependent on an individual print vendor's specialized knowledge and, instead, is able to obtain competitive pricing based on objective specifications that reflect the buyer's requirements rather than one particular vendor's existing backlog, manufacturing, production, or provider preferences. At the same time, print vendors can calculate more precisely, and hence more competitively, the pricing in their bids due to availability of complete objective specifications. Most importantly, given a sufficiently large vendor pool for each job, combined with the fact that each vendor can bid high, bid low, or not bid at all without concern for loss of the buyer's good will, the buyer is virtually assured of receiving “contribution pricing” from at least one responding vendor on each and every job. [0053]
  • In addition, by employing the invention, the print buyer sets the parameters for both vendor pool selection and for the bidding and award process. The parameters are set in such a way, however, that vendor quality and responsibility is determined at the time each vendor pool is established and only the responsiveness of each vendor's bid is reviewed at the time of award. In this manner, the buyer can create and manage large vendor pools without having to assess the quality of each bidder each time an individual job is bid Moreover, the bidding and award process is standardized so as to make the dissemination of invitations for bid, the receipt of bids, and the award of the job to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder virtually automatic and without the need for additional procurement staff or the expenditure of related out-of pocket administrative costs. [0054]
  • Moreover, the invention creates a system of “no-holds barred” competitive bidding. Once approved for a vendor bidding pool, the printing vendor no longer has to expend additional costs on sales or marketing to obtain future jobs from the same buyer, and from other buyers with pre-qualification requirements met by the vendor's capability attributes. The printing vendor is thereby assured access to future bidding opportunities that match the vendor's quantified quality level and/or manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities. In addition, knowing beforehand that the award will go to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, each participating vendor will have an incentive to submit their lowest bid upfront, rather than hold back their lowest bid, as they would otherwise be inclined to do if the award was still going to be negotiated after bid opening. The invention further provides that all bids are released to all bidders after award, thereby creating a “ratcheting down” effect as each vendor learns how low the price range is likely to be on similar jobs in the future. As result, buyers who use the invention will benefit from consistently low prices from selected quality vendors, while enabling their purchasing personnel to focus on budget planning, job preparation, internal customer service needs, and production quality and compliance. [0055]
  • It is to be understood that the present invention is described above in reference to specific embodiments which are for purposes of example only, and that the invention is not limited to the specific arrangement, order of processing, or hardware for carrying out the steps as described hereinabove or shown in the drawings, but also comprises the various modifications readily apparent to one skilled in the art upon reading this specification, as defined by the broadest scope of the appended claims. [0056]

Claims (15)

What is claimed is:
1. A method for competitive bidding by print information product vendors comprising steps of:
inputting a plurality of vendor records into a storage of a general purpose computer, each of said vendor records having a data field identifying a print information product vendor and a buyer identification data field identifying a buyer that said vendor is associated with;
inputting a buyer's invitation-for-bid data into said general purpose computer, said buyer's invitation-for-bid data having a buyer identification data, and having an invitation for bid on a print information product job from said buyer;
identifying at least one vendor record as qualified, based on a match of said buyer identification data and the buyer identification data field of said at least one vendor record;
transmitting a vendor's invitation-for-bid data to said at least one vendor;
inputting into said general purpose computer a plurality of bid data, each from one of said plurality of vendors to which said vendor's invitation-for-bid data was transmitted, each of said bid data representing a bid price;
identifying a bid data from said received bid data having the lowest represented bid price;
outputting a selected vendor data representing the identity of the vendor corresponding to the bid data identified by said identifying step; and
transmitting an order to the vendor represented by said selected vendor data.
2. A method according to claim 1 further comprising a step of:
inserting a vendor capability data into at least one of said vendor records, said vendor capability data representing a set of vendor manufacturing capabilities of the print information product vendor identified by said record;
calculating a vendor requirement data from said buyer's invitation-for-bid data, said vendor requirement data representing a set vendor manufacturing capabilities required for performing said print information product job; and
comparing said vendor requirement data to the print information product records associated with the buyer from which said buyer's information-for-bid was received,
wherein said step of identifying at least one vendor record as qualified is based on said comparing and said match of said buyer identification data and the data field of said at least one vendor record identifying a buyer that said vendor is associated.
3. A method according to claim 1 further comprising steps of:
ranking said received bid data according to said represented bid price; and
transmitting an information data from said general purpose computer to other vendors identifying said selected vendor and the rank order value of said received bid data.
4. A method according to claim 2 further comprising steps of:
ranking said received bid data according to said represented bid price; and
transmitting an information data from said general purpose computer to other vendors identifying said selected vendor and the rank order value of said received bid data.
5. A method according to claim 2, wherein said vendor capability data represents the identified vendor's capability to manufacture each of a plurality of different types of print information products.
6. A method according to claim 2, further comprising steps of:
transmitting a request for vendor capability data to said at least one vendor associated with at least one of said buyers;
receiving a first formatted vendor capability data from said at least one vendor; and
converting said first formatted vendor capability data into said vendor capability data,
wherein said step of inputting a vendor capability data inputs said converted data.
7. A method according to claim 2 wherein said vendor capability data input for each of a plurality of printing vendors represents a set of vendor capabilities relating to objective and subjective parameters for each of a plurality of types of print information products.
8. A method according to claim 1, further comprising steps of:
inputting into said central data server a completion of job data;
transmitting from said central data server to said buyer an invoice for payment of said bid price;
inputting a payment from said buyer into an escrow account via electronic fund transfer;
subtracting a system access fee data and a licensing fee data from a data representing said payment deposited into said escrow account to generate a remainder payment data; and
transferring a payment from said escrow account to an account of said vendor corresponding to said remainder payment data.
9. A method according to claim 2, further comprising steps of:
inputting into said central data server a completion of job data;
transmitting from said central data server to said buyer an invoice for payment of said bid price;
inputting a payment from said buyer into an escrow account via electronic fund transfer;
subtracting a system access fee data and a licensing fee data from a data representing said payment deposited into said escrow account to generate a remainder payment data; and
transferring a payment from said escrow account to an account of said vendor corresponding to said remainder payment data.
10. A method according to claim 1, further comprising a step of:
calculating a job milestone data based on said buyer's invitation-for-bid data.
11. A method according to claim 10 further comprising steps of:
generating a job progress verification request based on said job milestone data; and
entering a data into said central data server representing a job progress corresponding to said job progress verification request.
12. A method according to claim 2, further comprising a step of:
calculating a job milestone data based on said buyer's invitation-for-bid data.
13. A method according to claim 12 further comprising steps of:
generating a job progress verification request based on said job milestone data; and
entering a data into said central data server representing a job progress corresponding to said job progress verification request.
14. A system for competitive bidding by print information product vendors comprising:
means for inputting a plurality of vendor records into a storage of a general purpose computer, each of said vendor records having a data field identifying a print information product vendor and a buyer identification data field identifying a buyer that said vendor is associated with;
means for inputting a buyer's invitation-for-bid data into said general purpose computer, said buyer's invitation-for-bid data having a buyer identification data, and having an invitation for bid on a print information product job from said buyer;
means for identifying at least one vendor record as qualified, based on a match of said buyer identification data and the buyer identification data field of said at least one vendor record;
means for transmitting a vendor's invitation-for-bid data to said at least one vendors;
means for inputting into said general purpose computer a plurality of bid data, each from one of said plurality of vendors to which said vendor's invitation-for-bid data was transmitted, each of said bid data representing a bid price;
means for identifying a bid data from said received bid data having the lowest represented bid price;
means for outputting a selected vendor data representing the identity of the vendor corresponding to the bid data identified by said identifying means; and
means for transmitting an order to the vendor represented by said selected vendor data.
15. A system according to claim 14 further comprising:
means for inserting a vendor capability data into at least one of said vendor records, said vendor capability data representing a set of vendor manufacturing capabilities of the print information product vendor identified by said record;
means for calculating a vendor requirement data from said buyer's invitation-for-bid data, said vendor requirement data representing a set vendor manufacturing capabilities required for performing said print information product job; and
means for comparing said vendor requirement data to the print information product records associated with the buyer from which said buyer's information-for-bid was received,
wherein said means for identifying at least one vendor record as qualified performs said identifying based on a result of said comparing means and a match of said buyer identification data and the buyer identification data field of said at least one vendor record.
US10/058,490 1998-08-26 2002-01-28 Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors Abandoned US20040078277A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/058,490 US20040078277A1 (en) 1998-08-26 2002-01-28 Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US9797298P 1998-08-26 1998-08-26
US09/383,371 US6397197B1 (en) 1998-08-26 1999-08-26 Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors
US10/058,490 US20040078277A1 (en) 1998-08-26 2002-01-28 Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/383,371 Continuation US6397197B1 (en) 1998-08-26 1999-08-26 Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20040078277A1 true US20040078277A1 (en) 2004-04-22

Family

ID=26793830

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/383,371 Expired - Fee Related US6397197B1 (en) 1998-08-26 1999-08-26 Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors
US10/058,490 Abandoned US20040078277A1 (en) 1998-08-26 2002-01-28 Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors
US10/376,249 Active 2025-03-05 US7383434B2 (en) 1998-08-26 2003-03-03 System and method of looking up and validating a digital certificate in one pass

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09/383,371 Expired - Fee Related US6397197B1 (en) 1998-08-26 1999-08-26 Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/376,249 Active 2025-03-05 US7383434B2 (en) 1998-08-26 2003-03-03 System and method of looking up and validating a digital certificate in one pass

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US6397197B1 (en)

Cited By (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20010032162A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2001-10-18 Alsberg Peter A. Methods and systems for market clearance
US20010049652A1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2001-12-06 Koichi Nakajima Auction system
US20020077954A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2002-06-20 Slaight Thomas H. Sourcing system and method
US20030225474A1 (en) * 2002-05-31 2003-12-04 Gustavo Mata Specialization of active software agents in an automated manufacturing environment
US20040059637A1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2004-03-25 Dohyun Jung System and method of auction
US20060155640A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2006-07-13 Christopher Kennedy Product optimizer
US20060259408A1 (en) * 2003-08-04 2006-11-16 Levy Douglas A Method and system for facilitating purchasing of advertising via electronic auction
US20080275582A1 (en) * 2004-11-19 2008-11-06 Nettles Steven C Scheduling AMHS pickup and delivery ahead of schedule
WO2009081347A1 (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-07-02 Umesh Pai A distributed purchasing system
US20100268567A1 (en) * 2009-04-21 2010-10-21 Snow Lewis S Automated direct mail procurement system
US20100268608A1 (en) * 2009-04-21 2010-10-21 Xerox Corporation Campaign management of direct mail
US20110047034A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Xerox Corporation System and method for processing print jobs
US20110145085A1 (en) * 2009-12-15 2011-06-16 Araz Khachatrian System for assessing environmental impact of processing print jobs
US20110251915A1 (en) * 2010-04-09 2011-10-13 Lutnick Howard W Multi-system distributed processing of delivery services
US20120239525A1 (en) * 2011-03-18 2012-09-20 Hewlett-Packard Company System and method for generating quantitative guideline for print order
US20130006797A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2013-01-03 Altisource Solutions S.A R.L Methods and systems for vendor assurance
US20130054307A1 (en) * 2011-08-26 2013-02-28 Daphoria, Inc. Labor and Materials Purchasing System for the Construction Industry
US20130107313A1 (en) * 2011-10-31 2013-05-02 Xerox Corporation Evaluating and managing image quality performance and improving service effectiveness of groups of production printers
US20130163034A1 (en) * 2011-12-27 2013-06-27 Xerox Corporation Vendor selection method and system for wide format printing
WO2016007859A1 (en) * 2014-07-11 2016-01-14 Kleermail Corporation Methods, apparatuses, and systems for facilitating management and/or automation of direct mail campaigns and other bulk/high volume mailings
WO2016033129A1 (en) * 2014-08-29 2016-03-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Three-dimensional printing
US10019743B1 (en) 2014-09-19 2018-07-10 Altisource S.á r.l. Methods and systems for auto expanding vendor selection
US10672053B1 (en) 2013-08-19 2020-06-02 Michael J. Clemmens Systems, manufactures, and methods for comparative bid analysis and purchase order preparation

Families Citing this family (250)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8732457B2 (en) 1995-10-02 2014-05-20 Assa Abloy Ab Scalable certificate validation and simplified PKI management
US7822989B2 (en) 1995-10-02 2010-10-26 Corestreet, Ltd. Controlling access to an area
US8015597B2 (en) 1995-10-02 2011-09-06 Corestreet, Ltd. Disseminating additional data used for controlling access
US7716486B2 (en) 1995-10-02 2010-05-11 Corestreet, Ltd. Controlling group access to doors
US7600129B2 (en) * 1995-10-02 2009-10-06 Corestreet, Ltd. Controlling access using additional data
US7337315B2 (en) * 1995-10-02 2008-02-26 Corestreet, Ltd. Efficient certificate revocation
US8261319B2 (en) 1995-10-24 2012-09-04 Corestreet, Ltd. Logging access attempts to an area
US6397197B1 (en) * 1998-08-26 2002-05-28 E-Lynxx Corporation Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors
US6647373B1 (en) * 1998-12-24 2003-11-11 John Carlton-Foss Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic reverse auction information
JP3204317B2 (en) * 1998-12-28 2001-09-04 日本電気株式会社 Electronic bidding system
US6910017B1 (en) 1999-03-05 2005-06-21 Profitlogic, Inc. Inventory and price decision support
US7840476B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2010-11-23 Ariba, Inc. Transformation bidding with tooling requirements
GB2349715B (en) * 1999-05-05 2003-10-01 Mitel Corp Quotation mechanism for service environments
US7587336B1 (en) * 1999-06-09 2009-09-08 Electronics For Imaging, Inc. Iterative constraint collection scheme for preparation of custom manufacturing contracts
US8494917B2 (en) 1999-06-29 2013-07-23 Priceplay.Com, Inc. Systems and methods for transacting business over a global communications network such as the internet
US8050982B2 (en) * 1999-06-29 2011-11-01 Priceplay, Inc. Systems and methods for transacting business over a global communications network such as the internet
US20060036511A1 (en) * 1999-06-29 2006-02-16 Lin Wayne W Y Systems and methods for transacting business over a global communications network such as the internet
US7330826B1 (en) 1999-07-09 2008-02-12 Perfect.Com, Inc. Method, system and business model for a buyer's auction with near perfect information using the internet
US6950801B2 (en) * 1999-07-28 2005-09-27 Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. Method and apparatus for coordinating services
US7720743B1 (en) * 1999-10-27 2010-05-18 Marks Jeffrey S Methods and apparatus for online auctions and market-places utilizing program terms
US8251702B2 (en) * 1999-10-27 2012-08-28 Marks Jeffrey S Methods and apparatus for online auctions and market-places utilizing program terms
US8545229B2 (en) 2000-10-27 2013-10-01 Jeffrey S. Marks Methods and apparatus for online auctions and market-places utilizing program terms
US6876991B1 (en) 1999-11-08 2005-04-05 Collaborative Decision Platforms, Llc. System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform
US20020099577A1 (en) * 1999-12-01 2002-07-25 Stuart Black Virtual production link system
US7260715B1 (en) * 1999-12-09 2007-08-21 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Method and apparatus for revocation list management
US7200566B1 (en) * 2000-01-11 2007-04-03 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for local wireless commerce
US20010025267A1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2001-09-27 Stephen Janiszewski System and method for facilitating bidding transactions and conducting project management utilizing software metric collection
US20060206412A1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2006-09-14 Van Luchene Andrew S Systems and methods for facilitating a transaction by matching seller information and buyer information
US20010034631A1 (en) * 2000-01-21 2001-10-25 Kiselik Daniel R. Method and apparatus for the automatic selection of parties to an arrangement between a requestor and a satisfier of selected requirements
AU2001231078A1 (en) * 2000-01-25 2001-08-07 Vistaprint Usa, Inc. Managing print jobs
FR2804231B1 (en) * 2000-01-25 2002-11-08 Vistaprint Usa Inc CENTRALIZED PRINTING OF LOW-VOLUME COMMERCIAL DOCUMENTS ON MACHINES PREVIOUSLY LIMITED TO VERY LARGE PRINTS
WO2001057614A2 (en) * 2000-02-01 2001-08-09 Digital Freight Exchange, Inc. Method and system for negotiating transportation contracts via a global computer network
JP2001222584A (en) * 2000-02-08 2001-08-17 Omron Corp Transaction mediation system, print mediation system using the transaction mediation system and transaction mediation network generation method
US8046269B2 (en) * 2000-02-17 2011-10-25 Fedbid, Inc. Auction based procurement system
US7272579B1 (en) * 2000-02-17 2007-09-18 Fedbid, Inc. Auction based procurement system
US8531276B2 (en) 2000-03-15 2013-09-10 Logitech Europe S.A. State-based remote control system
US20010033243A1 (en) 2000-03-15 2001-10-25 Harris Glen Mclean Online remote control configuration system
US6784805B2 (en) 2000-03-15 2004-08-31 Intrigue Technologies Inc. State-based remote control system
DE60117424T2 (en) * 2000-03-21 2006-08-24 Brother Kogyo K.K., Nagoya System and method for providing output data
US20010037281A1 (en) * 2000-04-13 2001-11-01 Jason French Request for quote (RFQ) system and method
US7016865B1 (en) * 2000-04-14 2006-03-21 Deluxe Corporation Personalization format converter system and method
US7216092B1 (en) * 2000-04-14 2007-05-08 Deluxe Corporation Intelligent personalization system and method
US7277865B1 (en) 2000-04-17 2007-10-02 Accenture Llp Information portal in a contract manufacturing framework
US7353180B1 (en) * 2000-04-17 2008-04-01 Accenture Llp Supply chain/workflow services in a contract manufacturing framework
US7519544B1 (en) 2000-04-24 2009-04-14 Ncr Corporation Material browser
US20020023046A1 (en) * 2000-05-19 2002-02-21 Professor Mac, Llc System for automating business purchasing functions via a global computer network
JP3544510B2 (en) * 2000-06-07 2004-07-21 本田技研工業株式会社 Supplier comprehensive power judgment system
US7430523B1 (en) * 2000-06-12 2008-09-30 Tariq Khalidi Automated competitive bidding system and process
US20010056406A1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2001-12-27 Kenji Nagoya Information processing apparatus and storage medium storing programs for controlling the apparatus
JP2004505351A (en) * 2000-07-21 2004-02-19 ヒューレット・パッカード・カンパニー Method and apparatus for automatic online printing service
EP1182542A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-02-27 Hewlett Packard Company, a Delaware Corporation On-line selection of print service provider in distributed print on demand service
US6965872B1 (en) * 2000-08-02 2005-11-15 Zipandshop Llc Systems, methods and computer program products for facilitating the sale of commodity-like goods/services
US20020040333A1 (en) * 2000-10-04 2002-04-04 Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha System for selling unique information indicating products over transmission network
JP2002189678A (en) * 2000-10-10 2002-07-05 Sony Corp Web page making support system, web page making support server, web page making support method, computer program and recording medium
CA2434251A1 (en) 2001-01-09 2002-07-18 Topcoder, Inc. Systems and methods for coding competitions
JP2002269400A (en) * 2001-03-12 2002-09-20 Juken Sangyo Co Ltd On-line order placement/receipt processing method and system
US7788399B2 (en) * 2001-03-26 2010-08-31 Salesforce.Com, Inc. System and method for mapping of services
US7689711B2 (en) 2001-03-26 2010-03-30 Salesforce.Com, Inc. System and method for routing messages between applications
US9948644B2 (en) 2001-03-26 2018-04-17 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Routing messages between applications
US7516191B2 (en) * 2001-03-26 2009-04-07 Salesforce.Com, Inc. System and method for invocation of services
US7305454B2 (en) * 2001-03-30 2007-12-04 Minor Ventures, Llc. Apparatus and methods for provisioning services
US7006981B2 (en) 2001-04-04 2006-02-28 Profitlogic, Inc. Assortment decisions
US20020152183A1 (en) * 2001-04-17 2002-10-17 A.T. Kearney, Inc. Print supply marketplace using pricing model
US7349869B2 (en) * 2001-06-05 2008-03-25 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Use of a job ticket service to store bid information
EP1410296A2 (en) 2001-06-12 2004-04-21 Research In Motion Limited Method for processing encoded messages for exchange with a mobile data communication device
CA2450584C (en) 2001-06-12 2011-01-04 Research In Motion Limited Certificate management and transfer system and method
JP3926792B2 (en) * 2001-06-12 2007-06-06 リサーチ イン モーション リミテッド System and method for compressing secure email for exchange with mobile data communication devices
US20030004854A1 (en) * 2001-06-27 2003-01-02 International Business Machines Corporation RFP decomposition and collaboration
US7085734B2 (en) * 2001-07-06 2006-08-01 Grant D Graeme Price decision support
US20040205248A1 (en) * 2001-07-10 2004-10-14 Herbert A Little System and method for secure message key caching in a mobile communication device
DE60229645D1 (en) * 2001-08-06 2008-12-11 Research In Motion Ltd METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING CODED MESSAGES
US6834266B2 (en) * 2001-10-11 2004-12-21 Profitlogic, Inc. Methods for estimating the seasonality of groups of similar items of commerce data sets based on historical sales data values and associated error information
US20030085267A1 (en) * 2001-11-02 2003-05-08 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Internet enabled tag processing terminal for facilitating commercial transactions
US7536362B2 (en) * 2001-11-07 2009-05-19 Ariba, Inc. Method for selecting an optimal balance between direct cost and a number of suppliers
US6960135B2 (en) 2001-12-05 2005-11-01 Profitlogic, Inc. Payout distributions for games of chance
US20030149654A1 (en) * 2002-01-16 2003-08-07 Harrington Kevin F. Interactive security brokerage system
US6990465B1 (en) * 2002-01-25 2006-01-24 Accenture Global Services Gmbh Establishment of preferred business partners using a vendor certification program
US7236947B2 (en) * 2002-01-25 2007-06-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Providing highly automated procurement services
US7660741B2 (en) * 2002-03-04 2010-02-09 I2 Technologies Us, Inc. Sourcing under quantity pricing rules
AU2003216478A1 (en) * 2002-03-05 2003-09-22 Fireventures Llc Sytem and method for information exchange
US8423763B2 (en) * 2002-03-20 2013-04-16 Research In Motion Limited System and method for supporting multiple certificate status providers on a mobile communication device
ATE385118T1 (en) * 2002-03-20 2008-02-15 Research In Motion Ltd APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING MULTIPLE CERTIFICATION STATUS PROVIDERS ON A MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE
US7778866B2 (en) * 2002-04-08 2010-08-17 Topcoder, Inc. Systems and methods for software development
AU2003224850A1 (en) * 2002-04-08 2003-10-27 Topcoder, Inc. System and method for soliciting proposals for software development services
US20060248504A1 (en) * 2002-04-08 2006-11-02 Hughes John M Systems and methods for software development
US8776042B2 (en) * 2002-04-08 2014-07-08 Topcoder, Inc. Systems and methods for software support
US9400589B1 (en) 2002-05-30 2016-07-26 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Circular rotational interface for display of consumer credit information
US9710852B1 (en) 2002-05-30 2017-07-18 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Credit report timeline user interface
US7251615B2 (en) * 2002-06-07 2007-07-31 Oracle International Corporation Markdown management
US20040030633A1 (en) * 2002-07-31 2004-02-12 Gavin Austin T. Systems and methods for school districts and municipalities to maximize interest earnings on their investments
US7565137B2 (en) * 2002-10-25 2009-07-21 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Delivery of network services
US20040102981A1 (en) * 2002-11-22 2004-05-27 Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. Web-based vendor management system
JP4248913B2 (en) * 2003-03-31 2009-04-02 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ Terminal device, program, and communication system
KR20030074491A (en) * 2003-04-24 2003-09-19 성도헌 System and method for electronic auction
US20040220848A1 (en) * 2003-04-28 2004-11-04 Leventhal Jeffrey P. System and method for managing requests for services
US7856406B2 (en) * 2003-04-28 2010-12-21 Onforce, Inc. System and method for managing accounts payable and accounts receivable
US7657751B2 (en) 2003-05-13 2010-02-02 Corestreet, Ltd. Efficient and secure data currentness systems
US7694330B2 (en) * 2003-05-23 2010-04-06 Industrial Technology Research Institute Personal authentication device and system and method thereof
US20050021954A1 (en) * 2003-05-23 2005-01-27 Hsiang-Tsung Kung Personal authentication device and system and method thereof
CA2527720A1 (en) * 2003-06-04 2005-01-06 Profitlogic, Inc. Methods and apparatus for retail inventory budget optimization and gross profit maximization
EP1636682A4 (en) 2003-06-24 2009-04-29 Corestreet Ltd Access control
EP1642188A2 (en) * 2003-07-08 2006-04-05 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Information input/output system
CA2527796A1 (en) 2003-07-15 2005-02-03 Vishwamitra S. Ramakrishnan Methods and apparatus for inventory allocation and pricing
US8453196B2 (en) 2003-10-14 2013-05-28 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Policy management in an interoperability network
US7904882B2 (en) * 2003-10-16 2011-03-08 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Managing virtual business instances within a computer network
CN101124765B (en) 2003-11-19 2013-08-07 科尔街有限公司 Distributed delegated path discovery and validation
CN1985460B (en) * 2004-01-09 2012-12-12 科尔街有限公司 Communication-efficient real time credentials for OCSP and distributed OCSP
WO2005067672A2 (en) * 2004-01-09 2005-07-28 Corestreet, Ltd. Batch ocsp and batch distributed ocsp
US20050154878A1 (en) * 2004-01-09 2005-07-14 David Engberg Signature-efficient real time credentials for OCSP and distributed OCSP
US7406691B2 (en) * 2004-01-13 2008-07-29 International Business Machines Corporation Minimizing complex decisions to allocate additional resources to a job submitted to a grid environment
US7562143B2 (en) * 2004-01-13 2009-07-14 International Business Machines Corporation Managing escalating resource needs within a grid environment
US7552437B2 (en) * 2004-01-14 2009-06-23 International Business Machines Corporation Maintaining application operations within a suboptimal grid environment
US7739351B2 (en) 2004-03-23 2010-06-15 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Synchronous interface to asynchronous processes
US7590685B2 (en) * 2004-04-07 2009-09-15 Salesforce.Com Inc. Techniques for providing interoperability as a service
US7266547B2 (en) * 2004-06-10 2007-09-04 International Business Machines Corporation Query meaning determination through a grid service
WO2006002288A2 (en) * 2004-06-23 2006-01-05 Swallows, Llc Method and system for recruiting for employee positions and employees bidding for the same
US8606875B1 (en) * 2004-06-30 2013-12-10 Oracle America, Inc. Method and system for automatic distribution and installation of a client certificate in a secure manner
US7725605B2 (en) * 2004-08-06 2010-05-25 Salesforce.Com, Inc. Providing on-demand access to services in a wide area network
US20060036849A1 (en) * 2004-08-09 2006-02-16 Research In Motion Limited System and method for certificate searching and retrieval
US9094429B2 (en) * 2004-08-10 2015-07-28 Blackberry Limited Server verification of secure electronic messages
US8924247B2 (en) * 2004-08-19 2014-12-30 LoadPoint, Inc Ranking system using instant post-transaction surveying of transaction judges
US7631183B2 (en) * 2004-09-01 2009-12-08 Research In Motion Limited System and method for retrieving related certificates
US7549043B2 (en) 2004-09-01 2009-06-16 Research In Motion Limited Providing certificate matching in a system and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US7640428B2 (en) 2004-09-02 2009-12-29 Research In Motion Limited System and method for searching and retrieving certificates
US20060080210A1 (en) * 2004-09-23 2006-04-13 Pricegrabber.Com, Inc. System and network for obtaining competitive quotes on user-configured articles
US9645712B2 (en) 2004-10-01 2017-05-09 Grand Central Communications, Inc. Multiple stakeholders for a single business process
US7721328B2 (en) 2004-10-01 2010-05-18 Salesforce.Com Inc. Application identity design
US8051052B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2011-11-01 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Method for creating control structure for versatile content control
US8601283B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2013-12-03 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Method for versatile content control with partitioning
US8504849B2 (en) 2004-12-21 2013-08-06 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Method for versatile content control
US7590623B2 (en) * 2005-01-06 2009-09-15 International Business Machines Corporation Automated management of software images for efficient resource node building within a grid environment
US7571120B2 (en) * 2005-01-12 2009-08-04 International Business Machines Corporation Computer implemented method for estimating future grid job costs by classifying grid jobs and storing results of processing grid job microcosms
US7562035B2 (en) * 2005-01-12 2009-07-14 International Business Machines Corporation Automating responses by grid providers to bid requests indicating criteria for a grid job
US7472079B2 (en) * 2005-01-12 2008-12-30 International Business Machines Corporation Computer implemented method for automatically controlling selection of a grid provider for a grid job
US7467196B2 (en) * 2005-01-12 2008-12-16 International Business Machines Corporation Managing network errors communicated in a message transaction with error information using a troubleshooting agent
DE102006018238A1 (en) 2005-04-20 2007-03-29 Logitech Europe S.A. Remote control system for home theater system, analyzes log of events stored by remote controller to identify patterns of interest in logged use of remote controller
US7748031B2 (en) * 2005-07-08 2010-06-29 Sandisk Corporation Mass storage device with automated credentials loading
KR100902627B1 (en) * 2005-10-14 2009-06-15 리서치 인 모션 리미티드 System and method for protecting master encryption keys
CN101454796A (en) * 2006-01-20 2009-06-10 托普科德公司 System and method for design development
US20070220479A1 (en) * 2006-03-14 2007-09-20 Hughes John M Systems and methods for software development
JP2007274060A (en) * 2006-03-30 2007-10-18 Brother Ind Ltd Communication apparatus and program
US20070250378A1 (en) * 2006-04-24 2007-10-25 Hughes John M Systems and methods for conducting production competitions
US20070255641A1 (en) * 2006-04-28 2007-11-01 Harrington Kevin F Computer interface for trading bonds
US10783458B2 (en) * 2006-05-01 2020-09-22 Topcoder, Inc. Systems and methods for screening submissions in production competitions
US20080052146A1 (en) * 2006-05-01 2008-02-28 David Messinger Project management system
US7814161B2 (en) * 2006-06-23 2010-10-12 Research In Motion Limited System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches
US20080010449A1 (en) * 2006-07-07 2008-01-10 Michael Holtzman Content Control System Using Certificate Chains
US8140843B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2012-03-20 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Content control method using certificate chains
US8639939B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2014-01-28 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Control method using identity objects
US8266711B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2012-09-11 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Method for controlling information supplied from memory device
US8245031B2 (en) * 2006-07-07 2012-08-14 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Content control method using certificate revocation lists
US8613103B2 (en) 2006-07-07 2013-12-17 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Content control method using versatile control structure
US20080040141A1 (en) * 2006-07-20 2008-02-14 Torrenegra Alex H Method, System and Apparatus for Matching Sellers to a Buyer Over a Network and for Managing Related Information
US20080040129A1 (en) * 2006-08-08 2008-02-14 Capital One Financial Corporation Systems and methods for providing a vehicle service management service
US20080046330A1 (en) * 2006-08-16 2008-02-21 Louay Daoud Method for an online community of a purchasing management system
JP4915182B2 (en) * 2006-09-12 2012-04-11 コニカミノルタホールディングス株式会社 Information management method and information processing apparatus
US8036979B1 (en) 2006-10-05 2011-10-11 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data
US20080133375A1 (en) * 2006-12-01 2008-06-05 Alex Henriquez Torrenegra Method, System and Apparatus for Facilitating Selection of Sellers in an Electronic Commerce System
US7882550B2 (en) * 2006-12-29 2011-02-01 International Business Machines Corporation Customized untrusted certificate replication
US20080167960A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2008-07-10 Topcoder, Inc. System and Method for Collective Response Aggregation
JP5130722B2 (en) * 2007-01-19 2013-01-30 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Authentication apparatus and method
US20080180729A1 (en) 2007-01-25 2008-07-31 Hubcast, Inc. Method and apparatus for printing in a distributed communications network
US20080196000A1 (en) * 2007-02-14 2008-08-14 Fernandez-Lvern Javier System and method for software development
US20080222055A1 (en) * 2007-03-07 2008-09-11 Hughes John M System and Method for Creating Musical Works
US8073792B2 (en) * 2007-03-13 2011-12-06 Topcoder, Inc. System and method for content development
BR122015028427B1 (en) * 2007-03-30 2016-06-21 Dow Agrosciences Llc synergistic herbicide mixture, composition comprising it, as well as method for controlling undesirable vegetation
US8285656B1 (en) 2007-03-30 2012-10-09 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Systems and methods for data verification
US20080294540A1 (en) 2007-05-25 2008-11-27 Celka Christopher J System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets
EP2168068B1 (en) * 2007-06-11 2015-08-26 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (publ) Method and arrangement for certificate handling
US20090192849A1 (en) * 2007-11-09 2009-07-30 Hughes John M System and method for software development
US9990674B1 (en) 2007-12-14 2018-06-05 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Card registry systems and methods
US8127986B1 (en) 2007-12-14 2012-03-06 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Card registry systems and methods
US20090171743A1 (en) * 2008-01-02 2009-07-02 Dana Spiegel Service request system with natural service provider profiling and methods thereof
WO2009089447A1 (en) * 2008-01-11 2009-07-16 Topcoder, Inc. System and method for conducting competitions
US8538788B1 (en) 2008-04-02 2013-09-17 Onforce, Inc. System for work order refinement prior to acceptance and methods thereof
US8539225B2 (en) * 2008-04-30 2013-09-17 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Method and device for dynamic deployment of trust bridges in an ad hoc wireless network
US20090287596A1 (en) * 2008-05-15 2009-11-19 Alex Henriquez Torrenegra Method, System, and Apparatus for Facilitating Transactions Between Sellers and Buyers for Travel Related Services
US8312033B1 (en) 2008-06-26 2012-11-13 Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for providing an integrated identifier
US8924714B2 (en) * 2008-06-27 2014-12-30 Microsoft Corporation Authentication with an untrusted root
EP2148216B1 (en) * 2008-07-14 2013-01-09 Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) Time of flight estimation method using beamforming for acoustic tomography
US9256904B1 (en) 2008-08-14 2016-02-09 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze
JP4600544B2 (en) * 2008-08-22 2010-12-15 ソニー株式会社 Information processing apparatus, disk, information processing method, and program
US8060424B2 (en) 2008-11-05 2011-11-15 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. On-line method and system for monitoring and reporting unused available credit
US9104618B2 (en) 2008-12-18 2015-08-11 Sandisk Technologies Inc. Managing access to an address range in a storage device
US8327424B2 (en) * 2009-12-22 2012-12-04 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for selecting a certificate authority
US9652802B1 (en) 2010-03-24 2017-05-16 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Indirect monitoring and reporting of a user's credit data
US9231768B2 (en) 2010-06-22 2016-01-05 International Business Machines Corporation Utilizing a deterministic all or nothing transformation in a dispersed storage network
EP2410481A1 (en) 2010-07-16 2012-01-25 Druck und Werte GmbH System and method for controlling and allocating orders
US8566596B2 (en) * 2010-08-24 2013-10-22 Cisco Technology, Inc. Pre-association mechanism to provide detailed description of wireless services
US8930262B1 (en) 2010-11-02 2015-01-06 Experian Technology Ltd. Systems and methods of assisted strategy design
US8627065B2 (en) * 2010-11-09 2014-01-07 Cleversafe, Inc. Validating a certificate chain in a dispersed storage network
US9147042B1 (en) 2010-11-22 2015-09-29 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for data verification
EP3462317A1 (en) 2011-02-18 2019-04-03 CSidentity Corporation System and methods for identifying compromised personally identifiable information on the internet
US9558519B1 (en) 2011-04-29 2017-01-31 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Exposing reporting cycle information
US9665854B1 (en) 2011-06-16 2017-05-30 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Authentication alerts
US8850208B1 (en) * 2011-06-24 2014-09-30 Emc Corporation Certificate crosschecking by multiple certificate authorities
US9483606B1 (en) 2011-07-08 2016-11-01 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Lifescore
US9106691B1 (en) 2011-09-16 2015-08-11 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Systems and methods of identity protection and management
US8738516B1 (en) 2011-10-13 2014-05-27 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Debt services candidate locator
US11030562B1 (en) 2011-10-31 2021-06-08 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Pre-data breach monitoring
US8806196B2 (en) * 2011-11-04 2014-08-12 Motorola Solutions, Inc. Method and apparatus for authenticating a digital certificate status and authorization credentials
US9853959B1 (en) 2012-05-07 2017-12-26 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Storage and maintenance of personal data
US9654541B1 (en) 2012-11-12 2017-05-16 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Aggregating user web browsing data
US9916621B1 (en) 2012-11-30 2018-03-13 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Presentation of credit score factors
US10255598B1 (en) 2012-12-06 2019-04-09 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Credit card account data extraction
US9697263B1 (en) 2013-03-04 2017-07-04 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Consumer data request fulfillment system
US9406085B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-08-02 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting
US8812387B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2014-08-19 Csidentity Corporation System and method for identifying related credit inquiries
US10102570B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-10-16 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Account vulnerability alerts
US9870589B1 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-01-16 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Credit utilization tracking and reporting
US10685398B1 (en) 2013-04-23 2020-06-16 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Presenting credit score information
US9544153B1 (en) * 2013-08-07 2017-01-10 Google Inc. Compression of cryptographic chaining certificates
US9443268B1 (en) 2013-08-16 2016-09-13 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Bill payment and reporting
DE102013222503A1 (en) * 2013-11-06 2015-05-07 Siemens Aktiengesellschaft A client device and method for embossing a client device to at least one server device
US10325314B1 (en) 2013-11-15 2019-06-18 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Payment reporting systems
US10102536B1 (en) 2013-11-15 2018-10-16 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Micro-geographic aggregation system
US9477737B1 (en) 2013-11-20 2016-10-25 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules
US9529851B1 (en) 2013-12-02 2016-12-27 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Server architecture for electronic data quality processing
US9229674B2 (en) 2014-01-31 2016-01-05 Ebay Inc. 3D printing: marketplace with federated access to printers
US10262362B1 (en) 2014-02-14 2019-04-16 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Automatic generation of code for attributes
USD759690S1 (en) 2014-03-25 2016-06-21 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
USD760256S1 (en) 2014-03-25 2016-06-28 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
USD759689S1 (en) 2014-03-25 2016-06-21 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface
US9892457B1 (en) 2014-04-16 2018-02-13 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Providing credit data in search results
US9576030B1 (en) 2014-05-07 2017-02-21 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Keeping up with the joneses
US10339527B1 (en) 2014-10-31 2019-07-02 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. System and architecture for electronic fraud detection
US9595037B2 (en) 2014-12-16 2017-03-14 Ebay Inc. Digital rights and integrity management in three-dimensional (3D) printing
US10242019B1 (en) 2014-12-19 2019-03-26 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. User behavior segmentation using latent topic detection
US9686081B2 (en) * 2015-07-01 2017-06-20 Cisco Technology, Inc. Detecting compromised certificate authority
US11151468B1 (en) 2015-07-02 2021-10-19 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Behavior analysis using distributed representations of event data
US10708256B1 (en) * 2015-10-13 2020-07-07 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Identification of trusted certificates
US10757154B1 (en) 2015-11-24 2020-08-25 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Real-time event-based notification system
JP6728706B2 (en) * 2016-01-21 2020-07-22 富士ゼロックス株式会社 Information processing system, information processing apparatus, and information processing program
US10678894B2 (en) 2016-08-24 2020-06-09 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Disambiguation and authentication of device users
WO2018144612A1 (en) 2017-01-31 2018-08-09 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Massive scale heterogeneous data ingestion and user resolution
US10432595B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2019-10-01 Bank Of America Corporation Secure session creation system utililizing multiple keys
US10361852B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2019-07-23 Bank Of America Corporation Secure verification system
US10374808B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2019-08-06 Bank Of America Corporation Verification system for creating a secure link
US10425417B2 (en) 2017-03-08 2019-09-24 Bank Of America Corporation Certificate system for verifying authorized and unauthorized secure sessions
US10735183B1 (en) 2017-06-30 2020-08-04 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Symmetric encryption for private smart contracts among multiple parties in a private peer-to-peer network
US10699028B1 (en) 2017-09-28 2020-06-30 Csidentity Corporation Identity security architecture systems and methods
TWI639971B (en) * 2017-10-19 2018-11-01 慈濟學校財團法人慈濟科技大學 Reality photograph-incorporated cognitive therapy method, computer program product and system
US10896472B1 (en) 2017-11-14 2021-01-19 Csidentity Corporation Security and identity verification system and architecture
US10880313B2 (en) 2018-09-05 2020-12-29 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Database platform for realtime updating of user data from third party sources
US10963434B1 (en) 2018-09-07 2021-03-30 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Data architecture for supporting multiple search models
US11315179B1 (en) 2018-11-16 2022-04-26 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. Methods and apparatuses for customized card recommendations
US11620403B2 (en) 2019-01-11 2023-04-04 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for secure data aggregation and computation
US11238656B1 (en) 2019-02-22 2022-02-01 Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. System and method for an augmented reality experience via an artificial intelligence bot
US20210321255A1 (en) * 2020-04-10 2021-10-14 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for verifying mobile device communications
US11880377B1 (en) 2021-03-26 2024-01-23 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. Systems and methods for entity resolution

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5765138A (en) * 1995-08-23 1998-06-09 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing interactive evaluation of potential vendors
US6014644A (en) * 1996-11-22 2000-01-11 Pp International, Inc. Centrally coordinated communication systems with multiple broadcast data objects and response tracking
US6397197B1 (en) * 1998-08-26 2002-05-28 E-Lynxx Corporation Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5592375A (en) 1994-03-11 1997-01-07 Eagleview, Inc. Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers
US5664115A (en) 1995-06-07 1997-09-02 Fraser; Richard Interactive computer system to match buyers and sellers of real estate, businesses and other property using the internet
US5745574A (en) * 1995-12-15 1998-04-28 Entegrity Solutions Corporation Security infrastructure for electronic transactions
US5862325A (en) * 1996-02-29 1999-01-19 Intermind Corporation Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure
US5903882A (en) * 1996-12-13 1999-05-11 Certco, Llc Reliance server for electronic transaction system
US7127741B2 (en) * 1998-11-03 2006-10-24 Tumbleweed Communications Corp. Method and system for e-mail message transmission
US6092202A (en) * 1998-05-22 2000-07-18 N*Able Technologies, Inc. Method and system for secure transactions in a computer system
US6321333B1 (en) * 1998-10-14 2001-11-20 Wave Systems Corporation Efficient digital certificate processing in a data processing system
US6701415B1 (en) * 1999-03-31 2004-03-02 America Online, Inc. Selecting a cache for a request for information
US6567784B2 (en) * 1999-06-03 2003-05-20 Ework Exchange, Inc. Method and apparatus for matching projects and workers
CA2369122C (en) * 1999-06-04 2008-01-22 Rex J. Crookshanks Building construction bid and contract management system, internet-based method and computer program therefor
EA200200305A1 (en) * 1999-10-01 2002-10-31 Веллоджикс Инк. METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENSURING AGREEMENT BETWEEN BUYERS AND SELLERS OF GOODS AND / OR SERVICES
GB2366013B (en) * 2000-08-17 2002-11-27 Sun Microsystems Inc Certificate validation mechanism
US20020078347A1 (en) * 2000-12-20 2002-06-20 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for using with confidence certificates issued from certificate authorities
US6970862B2 (en) * 2001-05-31 2005-11-29 Sun Microsystems, Inc. Method and system for answering online certificate status protocol (OCSP) requests without certificate revocation lists (CRL)
US8195933B2 (en) * 2002-01-10 2012-06-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for computing digital certificate trust paths using transitive closures

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5765138A (en) * 1995-08-23 1998-06-09 Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. Apparatus and method for providing interactive evaluation of potential vendors
US6014644A (en) * 1996-11-22 2000-01-11 Pp International, Inc. Centrally coordinated communication systems with multiple broadcast data objects and response tracking
US6397197B1 (en) * 1998-08-26 2002-05-28 E-Lynxx Corporation Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors

Cited By (39)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7895117B2 (en) 1999-12-06 2011-02-22 Alsberg Peter A Methods and systems for market clearance
US8442898B2 (en) 1999-12-06 2013-05-14 Aggregation Commerce, Llc Methods and systems for market clearance
US20010032162A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2001-10-18 Alsberg Peter A. Methods and systems for market clearance
US7349879B2 (en) * 1999-12-06 2008-03-25 Alsberg Peter A Methods and systems for market clearance
US20110119172A1 (en) * 1999-12-06 2011-05-19 Alsberg Peter A Methods and Systems for Market Clearance
US20020077954A1 (en) * 1999-12-29 2002-06-20 Slaight Thomas H. Sourcing system and method
US20010049652A1 (en) * 2000-05-31 2001-12-06 Koichi Nakajima Auction system
US20040059637A1 (en) * 2000-06-20 2004-03-25 Dohyun Jung System and method of auction
US20030225474A1 (en) * 2002-05-31 2003-12-04 Gustavo Mata Specialization of active software agents in an automated manufacturing environment
US20060259408A1 (en) * 2003-08-04 2006-11-16 Levy Douglas A Method and system for facilitating purchasing of advertising via electronic auction
US20060155640A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2006-07-13 Christopher Kennedy Product optimizer
US20130006797A1 (en) * 2003-09-12 2013-01-03 Altisource Solutions S.A R.L Methods and systems for vendor assurance
US20080275582A1 (en) * 2004-11-19 2008-11-06 Nettles Steven C Scheduling AMHS pickup and delivery ahead of schedule
US20100274682A1 (en) * 2007-12-20 2010-10-28 Umesh Pai distributed purchasing system
WO2009081347A1 (en) * 2007-12-20 2009-07-02 Umesh Pai A distributed purchasing system
US8812335B2 (en) * 2009-04-21 2014-08-19 Xerox Corporation Automated direct mail procurement system
US8494898B2 (en) 2009-04-21 2013-07-23 Xerox Corporation Campaign management of direct mail
US8341001B2 (en) * 2009-04-21 2012-12-25 Xerox Corporation Campaign management of direct mail
US8341000B2 (en) * 2009-04-21 2012-12-25 Xerox Corporation Automated direct mail procurement system
US20100268567A1 (en) * 2009-04-21 2010-10-21 Snow Lewis S Automated direct mail procurement system
US20130066668A1 (en) * 2009-04-21 2013-03-14 Xerox Corporation Automated direct mail procurement system
US20100268608A1 (en) * 2009-04-21 2010-10-21 Xerox Corporation Campaign management of direct mail
US20110047034A1 (en) * 2009-08-18 2011-02-24 Xerox Corporation System and method for processing print jobs
US20110145085A1 (en) * 2009-12-15 2011-06-16 Araz Khachatrian System for assessing environmental impact of processing print jobs
US8676666B2 (en) * 2009-12-15 2014-03-18 Xerox Corporation System for assessing environmental impact of processing print jobs
US20110251915A1 (en) * 2010-04-09 2011-10-13 Lutnick Howard W Multi-system distributed processing of delivery services
US8407101B2 (en) * 2010-04-09 2013-03-26 Cfph, Llc Multi-system distributed processing of delivery services
US20120239525A1 (en) * 2011-03-18 2012-09-20 Hewlett-Packard Company System and method for generating quantitative guideline for print order
US20130054307A1 (en) * 2011-08-26 2013-02-28 Daphoria, Inc. Labor and Materials Purchasing System for the Construction Industry
US20130107313A1 (en) * 2011-10-31 2013-05-02 Xerox Corporation Evaluating and managing image quality performance and improving service effectiveness of groups of production printers
US9069494B2 (en) * 2011-10-31 2015-06-30 Xerox Corporation Evaluating and managing image quality performance and improving service effectiveness of groups of production printers
US20130163034A1 (en) * 2011-12-27 2013-06-27 Xerox Corporation Vendor selection method and system for wide format printing
US10672053B1 (en) 2013-08-19 2020-06-02 Michael J. Clemmens Systems, manufactures, and methods for comparative bid analysis and purchase order preparation
WO2016007859A1 (en) * 2014-07-11 2016-01-14 Kleermail Corporation Methods, apparatuses, and systems for facilitating management and/or automation of direct mail campaigns and other bulk/high volume mailings
WO2016033129A1 (en) * 2014-08-29 2016-03-03 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Three-dimensional printing
CN106575316A (en) * 2014-08-29 2017-04-19 微软技术许可有限责任公司 Three-dimensional printing
US9862149B2 (en) 2014-08-29 2018-01-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Print bureau interface for three-dimensional printing
US10618221B2 (en) 2014-08-29 2020-04-14 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Print bureau interface for three-dimensional printing
US10019743B1 (en) 2014-09-19 2018-07-10 Altisource S.á r.l. Methods and systems for auto expanding vendor selection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20030212888A1 (en) 2003-11-13
US6397197B1 (en) 2002-05-28
US7383434B2 (en) 2008-06-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6397197B1 (en) Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors
US8682743B2 (en) System and method for competitive pricing and procurement of customized goods and services
US7499871B1 (en) System and method for procurement of products
US7003486B1 (en) Net-value creation and allocation in an electronic trading system
US20020128953A1 (en) Price discovery and negotiations and related processes
US8046265B2 (en) Systems and methods for facilitating a transaction by matching seller information and buyer information
US7346562B2 (en) System for placing orders using customer-specific electronic catalog
US7330833B1 (en) System and method for auctioning services over an information exchange network
US8595076B2 (en) Method and system for purchase of a product or service using a communication network site
KR102261344B1 (en) Method for Manufacturing and Transactions of Advertisement Printed Matter Using Integrated Services Platform
US8738428B2 (en) Managing retail promotion events
WO2008091259A1 (en) Search engine for facilitating the sale, transfer, and/or assignment of intellectual property
US7796283B2 (en) System and method for utilizing excess printing capability
JP2001312619A (en) Method and system for carrying out computerized commerce
US20050177468A1 (en) Request for quote system and method
EP1228475A1 (en) A system for competitive pricing procurement of customized goods and services
Crawford et al. Business and legal forms for graphic designers
KR102261343B1 (en) Method for Shopping Advertisement Printed Matter Using Integrated Services Platform
Garusing Arachchige Application of Marketing mix elements (4Ps) in the Library sector
US20050071176A1 (en) Solicitation plans
EP1224599A1 (en) A system and method for competitive pricing and procurement of customized goods and services
Chambersburg PRICING AND PROCUREMENT OF CUSTOMIZED GOODS AND SERVICES
KR20020000901A (en) System and method of electronic commerce for electric power industry
Facente An overview of American publishing for librarians
Scheer Effective marketing methods in export management companies

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION