US20040078277A1 - Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors - Google Patents
Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20040078277A1 US20040078277A1 US10/058,490 US5849002A US2004078277A1 US 20040078277 A1 US20040078277 A1 US 20040078277A1 US 5849002 A US5849002 A US 5849002A US 2004078277 A1 US2004078277 A1 US 2004078277A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- vendor
- data
- bid
- buyer
- invitation
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/0601—Electronic shopping [e-shopping]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L9/00—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols
- H04L9/32—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials
- H04L9/3297—Cryptographic mechanisms or cryptographic arrangements for secret or secure communications; Network security protocols including means for verifying the identity or authority of a user of the system or for message authentication, e.g. authorization, entity authentication, data integrity or data verification, non-repudiation, key authentication or verification of credentials involving time stamps, e.g. generation of time stamps
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to an apparatus and method for creating a database representing print and other information product vendor pools for one or more subscribing buyers, and for selecting the lowest bidder from the databases represented vendor pool on a per-job basis and, more particularly, for creating and maintaining a database representing a vendor pool for each subscribing buyer of printing and other customized print information product goods and services, the database further representing capabilities of said vendors, receiving invitations-for-bid from buyers, extracting vendor qualification criteria data from said invitations-for-bid, transmitting invitations to bid on said invitations-for-bid to qualified ones of said vendors, based on said vendor qualification criteria data, and selecting from among the responding vendors based on the response price and other factors.
- Print and other customized information product goods and services such as business cards and forms, envelopes, labels, pamphlets, CD ROMS, notepads, transparencies, brochures, and bound books differs from non-custom manufactured goods or services in that print and other information product goods and services are generally not pre-stocked as “off-the-shelf” items but, instead, must be specifically manufactured or provided to meet the buyer's particular requirements. Consequently, print and other information product goods and services frequently cannot be purchased “off-the-shelf” at fixed prices appearing on standard price lists.
- the terms “printer” and “print vendor” are interchangeable and are defined as an entity which manufactures or sells traditional forms of printing or other non-traditional types of information product goods or services, which are or which consist of any tangible medium for communicating or displaying text, images, or other graphical or pictorial information, including, but not limited to, business forms, labels, pamphlets, books, flyers, brochures, transparencies, CD ROMs, stickers, business cards, envelopes, and note pads.
- the terms “print information product” and “print information goods” are interchangeable and defined to include all of the above-identified goods and services.
- the printer then reviews the buyer's product manufacturing and delivery specifications or requirements contained in the order, IFB, RFQ, or RFP including physical specifications, characteristics of style, quantities, mode of shipment, delivery schedule, and quality level required to perform individual jobs or estimated job requirement over a given period of time and, based on or extrapolating from previous experiences, provides an estimated price or bid to the buyer.
- the buyer will provide the order, invitation-for-bid, request-for-quote, or request-for-proposal to a single or very limited number of print vendors, and award the contract to the single or lowest bidder.
- This problem is heightened by great elasticity in the so-called “market” price of printing or other customized information product goods or services, which can vary widely from vendor to vendor and from week to week.
- This elasticity results from the fact that pricing of such customized goods or services greatly depends on (1) the level of service and quality desired; (2) the labor and equipment required to produce the job or provide the service; (3) the amount time involved in producing the job or providing the service; (4) whether the job or service can be engineered or designed in a cost-effective way; and (5) whether the customer order can be included in the print vendor's production schedule to comply with the required delivery date.
- the printing industry addresses the problem of maximizing machine utilization without compromising its relationship with preferred customers through sales and marketing efforts which, in turn, increase the cost of each print job and which, ultimately, the print vendor passes to the print buyer through higher prices.
- the need to maximize factory floor and machine utilization is in no way unique to the printing industry. It is a major concern in many other customized manufacturing operations.
- the present invention provides a system and method for selecting a printing vendor from a plurality of printing vendors, comprising steps of receiving, at a central, conventional database server termed herein as “the PrintProSys SM server”, an initial vendor pool data set from each of a plurality of buyers, the initial vendor data set identifying an initial vendor pool for that buyer, entering the initial vendor pool data set into a vendor database within the “PrintProSys SM server”, transmitting an invitation to subscribe to each vendor in the initial vendor pool, receiving a vendor capability data from a sub-plurality of the vendors in the initial vendor pool, the vendor capability data describing each vendor's print capabilities, entering the vendor capability data into the vendor database, receiving at the PrintProSys SM server a buyer's invitation-for-bid describing a customized print or other information product or service that the buyer wishes to procure or obtain bids for, calculating or extracting a vendor selection criteria data from the buyer's invitation-for-bid, the vendor selection criteria data defining the values that a vendor
- the method of the present invention compares and correlates the vendor selection criteria data to the vendor capability data field of each vendor data record in the buyer's vendor pool database.
- the PintProSys SM server then transmits a vendor's invitation-for-bid data to each vendor in the buyer's vendor pool whose vendor capability data field meets the vendor selection criteria data extracted from the buyer's invitation-for-bid data.
- the PrintProSys SM server receives a plurality of responding bid data, each being from a corresponding one of the plurality of vendors to whom a vendor invitation-for-bid data was transmitted, and each representing the transmitting vendor's price for the particular print information goods or services requested.
- the PrintProSys SM server selects the responding bid data having the lowest represented vendor price and generates information identifying the buyer of the identity of the selected vendor.
- the PrintProSys SM server Upon the PrintProSys SM server's receipt of an approval data from the buyer, it issues an order to the selected vendor for the purchase of the at least one printed item. In addition, the PrintProSys SM server's transmits to the remaining non-selected vendors in the vendor pool a bidding result data representing the identity of the selected vendor, and the rank order value of the bid data submitted by all other selection pool vendors.
- the PrintProSys SM server of the invention has the further ability to maintain multiple vendor pools for each of a plurality of buyers, the multiple vendor pools for a particular buyer corresponding to multiple print product or service types that the buyer procures.
- a still further embodiment transmits a data representing the bid price of all received bids, to all vendors who submitted bids.
- a further embodiment of the invention assigns a preferred vendor flag to each vendor record and then selects vendors for receiving vendors' invitation-for-bid based on the flag value.
- a still further embodiment of the invention automatically generates a set of project milestone data for use in monitoring the winning vendor's progress on the buyer's requested print job or service.
- a still further embodiment of the invention receives an invoice data from the winning print vendor upon completion of the job, and generates a corresponding buyer's invoice in response.
- the system receives a fund transfer from the buyer based on the buyer's invoice and deposits the fund into an escrow account.
- the system subtracts a system fee from the deposited amount, transfers that system fee to a system administration account, and transmits the remainder from the escrow to the winning print vendor.
- FIG. 1 is a general flow chart showing the steps associated with a preferred first embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a tabulated format of information fields submitted by potential subscribing print vendors for the pre-qualification step of creating a database of a buyer's pool of print vendor;
- FIG. 3 is a general flow chart showing steps of a second embodiment of the invention, using a preferred vendor flag as a selection criteria for receiving invitations-for-bid;
- FIG. 4 is a general flow chart of another embodiment of the invention, having a milestone generation feature.
- the index “i” identifies the particular vendor
- the index “j” identifies a particular buyer
- VR ij is the vendor record of the i th vendor in the j th buyer's vendor pool or, equivalently, a vendor record of a vendor “i” that is a approved by buyer “j” for receiving bids on that buyer's jobs;
- K j is the number of vendors in the j th buyer's vendor pool or, equivalently, the number of vendors having vendor records VR ij indicating approval by buyer “j” for receiving bids on that buyer's jobs;
- the process begins at step 2 by inputting for each of J buyers, each identified by the index j, a plurality of K j vendor records VR ij into the memory of a conventional network server running under Windows NT or any of the equivalent server operating systems that are well-known in the art.
- the server is termed the PrintProSys SM server for purposes of this description.
- the vendor capability attribute data, VA ij represents the manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities of the i th or submitting vendor.
- the vendor capability attributes VA ij are in terms of understandable descriptor words, having specific value tables determined by the particular implementation of the system.
- An example set of vendor capability attributes VA ij is shown on FIG. 2, and includes the vendor's ability to generate various quantity ranges of: Books, including loose-leaf, side-stitched and perfect bound; Books, Smyth-sown, case-bound; Books, saddle stitched; Books, paste on fold; Binders Only; Print Composition, including CD ROM, general, magnetic media, variable imaging, master and replication; Die Cutting and Letterpress capabilities; Four-Color Process capabilities; Cut Sheets capabilities; Business Form Specialties; Continuous Form capabilities; Snap Apart Sets capability; capability for Flexography, Labels, Decal and Screen Process On Labels; capability for Screen Printing and Printing of Plastic, Mylar and Acetate; Miscellaneous Printing Processes, including thermography, engraving, foil stamping and embossing; capabilities for various Specialty Items, including tabloids, microfiches, negatives, lamination, engineering drawings, tags, expansion file folders, 3-ring binders and advertising specialties; and envelopes.
- Print Composition including CD ROM
- the vendor capability attributes VA ij are transmitted to, received by and stored by the PrintProSys SM server.
- the vendor capability attribute data VA ij may be submitted by the vendor over the Internet, via an interactive data entry terminal, e.g., a conventional personal computer, as is known in the art.
- the vendor may supply the quantified vendor capability attributes VA ij by paper form (not shown), the data from which is then entered into the PrintProSys SM server storage by manual means.
- the vendor can supply the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij by magnetic data storage media, or optical data storage media, or equivalent transportable media of the types that are well known in the data storage arts.
- the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij field of the vendor records VR ij for which no was received are null entries.
- any of the J buyers may now proceed to step 10 and transmit a buyer's invitation for bid specification BIFB to the PrintProSys SM server.
- the PrintProSys SM server goes to step 12 and calculates or extracts a vendor capability criteria CC from the BIFB, which defines the values that the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij field of a vendor record VR ij must have to qualify for bidding on the job defined by the buyer's invitation for bid specification BIFB.
- the method proceeds to step 14 where the PrintProSys SM server compares or correlates the extracted a vendor capability criteria CC against the vendor capability attribute data VA ij of each vendor record VR ij in, or having a j value representing of it being in, the j th Buyer's Vendor Pool BVP j .
- the PrintProSys SM server reformats the BIFB into a vendors' invitation for bid VIFB, and transmits the VIFB to the print vendor based on the name and address field of the vendor record VR ij .
- the vendor's invitation for bid VIFB specifies the print information product or service in a consistent, standardized format so that each receiving vendor will understand clearly all product, delivery and other requirements for the print information item or service that is being placed out for bids by the buyer. This arrangement ensures that the bids are comparable and that mistakes as to the requirements of the buyer are minimized, while enabling each vendor to prepare a more precise calculation of its responding bid B i .
- step 18 one or more of the vendors receiving the vendor's invitation for bid VIFB submits a bid B i to the system, where the index “i” identifies the submitting vendor.
- the bid is received by and input to the PrintProSys SM data server.
- the PrintProSys SM data server detects the lowest price bid and at step 22 transmits to the buyer a data, WIN, informing of the identity of that lowest price vendor.
- the PrintProSys SM server awaits receipt of approval data APP from the buyer and, upon receipt, issues an order data ORDER to the selected vendor for purchase of the print item or procurement of the printing service at the bid price.
- step 24 does not receive the approval data APP no order data ORDER is transmitted.
- step 26 the PrintProSys SM data server generates BIDINFORM data representing the remaining non-selected vendors in the vendor selection pool VSP jk and the identity and the bid price of the bids B i received from all of the responding vendors, and this data is then transmitted to all of the vendors.
- step 2 inputs a vendor record VR ij for each i vendor which make up an initial vendor pool for each buyer j, and steps 6 and 8 then quantify and input a vendor capability attribute VA ij into one or more of the vendor records VR ij .
- the above-described step 12 then calculates or extracts a vendor capability criteria CC from the invitation for bid BIFB, which defines the values that the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij must have to qualify the i th vendor for bidding on the j th buyer's BIFB.
- Step 14 selects the vendors that receive the vendor's invitation-for-bid VIFB, based on comparing the vendor capability criteria CC to the quantified vendor capability attribute data VA ij for each the j th buyer's vendors i.
- each vendor record VR ij has a preferred vendor flag PV ij .
- the preferred vendor flag has logical values of “yes” and “no”, which represent whether the i th vendor is a preferred vendor for the j th buyer.
- the value of PV ij can be set at step 40 , when the vendor record VR ij is entered. Step 40 is otherwise identical to step 2 of FIG. 1.
- This embodiment does not enter vendor capability attributes VC ij and does not extract a capability criteria CC from a received buyer's invitation-for-bid. Instead, after receipt of a BIFB at step 10 , vendors are selected at step 42 to receive vendor's invitations-for-bid VIFB solely on whether or not the vendor is a preferred vendor of the j th buyer.
- FIG. 4 comprises the above-described steps for the FIG. 1 first embodiment, and an additional step 28 at which the PrintsroSys SM generates a milestone data set MSTONE representing a set of job milestones calculated from the schedule, quantity and product or service descriptors corresponding to the awarded bid.
- Example milestones values represented by MSTONE include, but are not limited to, paper and supply availability, scheduling and finishing of prep, proofing, pre-press, press sheet inspections, press work, bindery, special finishing and shipping and delivery.
- a still further embodiment which is not depicted, combines the above-described step 28 of generating a milestone data set MSTONE with the above-described embodiment of FIG. 3.
- Another embodiment of the invention combines embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 3, and selects vendors for receipt of vendors' invitation-for-bid VIFB based on either of the two described selection criteria being met, i.e., if the extracted vendor capability criteria CC is met by the vendor capability data VC ij , or if the vendor has a preferred vendor PV ij flag value of “yes”.
- Yet another embodiment of the invention receives an invoice data from the winning print vendor upon completion of the job, and generates a corresponding buyer's invoice in response.
- the system receives a fund transfer from the buyer based on the buyer's invoice and deposits the fund into an escrow account.
- the system subtracts a system fee from the deposited amount, transfers that system fee to a system administration account, and transmits the remainder from the escrow to the winning print vendor.
- the invention quantifies both the buyer's needs and the vendors, attributes in a database system that matches objective print information product or service specifications with pre-determined vendor quality levels and manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities.
- the invention creates multiple vendor pools for each buyer, each vendor pool being for a particular type of print information product or services. As a result, the print buyer has a large pool of qualified vendors to which each invitation-for-bid can be distributed.
- the buyer is no longer dependent on an individual print vendor's specialized knowledge and, instead, is able to obtain competitive pricing based on objective specifications that reflect the buyer's requirements rather than one particular vendor's existing backlog, manufacturing, production, or provider preferences.
- print vendors can calculate more precisely, and hence more competitively, the pricing in their bids due to availability of complete objective specifications.
- the buyer is virtually assured of receiving “contribution pricing” from at least one responding vendor on each and every job.
- the print buyer sets the parameters for both vendor pool selection and for the bidding and award process.
- the parameters are set in such a way, however, that vendor quality and responsibility is determined at the time each vendor pool is established and only the responsiveness of each vendor's bid is reviewed at the time of award.
- the buyer can create and manage large vendor pools without having to assess the quality of each bidder each time an individual job is bid
- the bidding and award process is standardized so as to make the dissemination of invitations for bid, the receipt of bids, and the award of the job to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder virtually automatic and without the need for additional procurement staff or the expenditure of related out-of pocket administrative costs.
- the invention creates a system of “no-holds barred” competitive bidding. Once approved for a vendor bidding pool, the printing vendor no longer has to expend additional costs on sales or marketing to obtain future jobs from the same buyer, and from other buyers with pre-qualification requirements met by the vendor's capability attributes. The printing vendor is thereby assured access to future bidding opportunities that match the vendor's quantified quality level and/or manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities. In addition, knowing beforehand that the award will go to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, each participating vendor will have an incentive to submit their lowest bid upfront, rather than hold back their lowest bid, as they would otherwise be inclined to do if the award was still going to be negotiated after bid opening.
- the invention further provides that all bids are released to all bidders after award, thereby creating a “ratcheting down” effect as each vendor learns how low the price range is likely to be on similar jobs in the future.
- buyers who use the invention will benefit from consistently low prices from selected quality vendors, while enabling their purchasing personnel to focus on budget planning, job preparation, internal customer service needs, and production quality and compliance.
Abstract
A system and method for competitive bid selection from a plurality print and other customized information product vendors based on a database of vendor records, each record identifying a vendor, one or more buyers who approves the vendor for receipt of invitations to bid, and a vendor capability data representing production and economic capabilities of the vendor. A buyer's invitation for bid data is received, representing a specific print and other customized information product or service and an invitation to bid on that product or service, and a data identifying vendor requirements for producing the product is calculated. An vendor's invitation to bid is transmitted to the vendors from among those approved by the buyer associated with the buyer's invitation for bid having a vendor capability data meeting the calculated vendor requirements. Responding bids from the vendors are input into the database and ranked in order of price. The lowest price bid is identified and an order is issued to the selected vendor. Further, a bid information data is transmitted to each of the non-selected vendors, representing the identity of the selected vendor and the rank order value of the bids.
Description
- The present invention generally relates to an apparatus and method for creating a database representing print and other information product vendor pools for one or more subscribing buyers, and for selecting the lowest bidder from the databases represented vendor pool on a per-job basis and, more particularly, for creating and maintaining a database representing a vendor pool for each subscribing buyer of printing and other customized print information product goods and services, the database further representing capabilities of said vendors, receiving invitations-for-bid from buyers, extracting vendor qualification criteria data from said invitations-for-bid, transmitting invitations to bid on said invitations-for-bid to qualified ones of said vendors, based on said vendor qualification criteria data, and selecting from among the responding vendors based on the response price and other factors.
- Purchase of print and other customized information product goods and services, such as business cards and forms, envelopes, labels, pamphlets, CD ROMS, notepads, transparencies, brochures, and bound books differs from non-custom manufactured goods or services in that print and other information product goods and services are generally not pre-stocked as “off-the-shelf” items but, instead, must be specifically manufactured or provided to meet the buyer's particular requirements. Consequently, print and other information product goods and services frequently cannot be purchased “off-the-shelf” at fixed prices appearing on standard price lists. Instead, most print and other information product goods and services are customized to some extent and, accordingly, their prices are established when the specific goods or services are themselves identified, either by an actual order, invitation-for-bid (“IFB”), request-for-quote (“RFQ”), or request-for-proposal (“RFP”); only then can the manufacturer or service provider assess the precise quality and manufacturing or service specifications required to perform the job.
- The general procedure used in the prior are of procurement of print and other customized information product goods and services is that the buyer provides the actual order, or the IFB, RFQ, or RFP to one or more printers with whom, in general, the buyer has had sufficient previous experience to know what type of product or level of service can be provided. For purposes of this description, the terms “printer” and “print vendor” are interchangeable and are defined as an entity which manufactures or sells traditional forms of printing or other non-traditional types of information product goods or services, which are or which consist of any tangible medium for communicating or displaying text, images, or other graphical or pictorial information, including, but not limited to, business forms, labels, pamphlets, books, flyers, brochures, transparencies, CD ROMs, stickers, business cards, envelopes, and note pads. For purposes of this description the terms “print information product” and “print information goods” are interchangeable and defined to include all of the above-identified goods and services. The printer then reviews the buyer's product manufacturing and delivery specifications or requirements contained in the order, IFB, RFQ, or RFP including physical specifications, characteristics of style, quantities, mode of shipment, delivery schedule, and quality level required to perform individual jobs or estimated job requirement over a given period of time and, based on or extrapolating from previous experiences, provides an estimated price or bid to the buyer. Generally the buyer will provide the order, invitation-for-bid, request-for-quote, or request-for-proposal to a single or very limited number of print vendors, and award the contract to the single or lowest bidder.
- In following this general procedure in the prior art, however, buyers of printing and other customized information product goods or services confront the so-called “iron triangle” of quality, timeliness, and cost. Buyers want a product or service that is good, fast, and cheap, but what they discover is that traditional procurements methods will, at best, only achieve two of these three ideals on any given job. Thus, a buyer might demand and receive top quality on a “rush” order, but only at a high cost. Conversely, negotiating a lower price may achieve cost savings, but also compromise quality and timeliness.
- This problem is heightened by great elasticity in the so-called “market” price of printing or other customized information product goods or services, which can vary widely from vendor to vendor and from week to week. This elasticity results from the fact that pricing of such customized goods or services greatly depends on (1) the level of service and quality desired; (2) the labor and equipment required to produce the job or provide the service; (3) the amount time involved in producing the job or providing the service; (4) whether the job or service can be engineered or designed in a cost-effective way; and (5) whether the customer order can be included in the print vendor's production schedule to comply with the required delivery date.
- This last factor is particularly crucial. Most print vendors are “hard-iron” manufacturers with high overhead and labor costs. As a result, idle equipment and labor can be devastating to a print vendor's profit margin. At the same time, print vendors must be ready to service their regular customers on short notice, which means planning for downtime in the production schedule to ensure that their machinery is available for “rush” orders. Managing customer job orders in a way that minimizes these “holes” in the production schedule is frequently what distinguishes the profitable print vendor from the insolvent one.
- As a result of this tension between the cost of idle equipment and labor and the need to preserve downtime for regular customers, print vendors are constantly seeking short-turnaround jobs to fill their production “holes” when their regular orders do not materialize. To obtain these short-turnaround jobs, many print vendors will resort to extremely low pricing, provided that they can do so without undermining their regular customer relations. This pricing strategy is called “contribution pricing”. “Contribution” pricing is the practice of bidding out work at below normal profit margins because any income above out-of-pocket costs “contributes”, 100%, to the print vendor's bottom line in comparison to cost of letting its labor and machinery remain idle. In current printing markets, “contribution” pricing on a regular basis is found only in federal and state government procurements of print information products.
- In both public and private sector print information product markets, however, traditional procurement methods and prior art devices have failed to solve this “iron triangle” because of their inability to take advantage of “contribution” pricing without incurring prohibitive administrative costs or sacrificing quality or timeliness. There are many reasons for this failure. First, the purchase or procurement of printing and other customized information product goods and services frequently requires specialized knowledge and expertise in finding the right print vendor for each job. Most businesses, however, hire purchasing officials with general procurement knowledge who are then given responsibility for a wide range of purchases. As a result, the purchasing official is forced to rely on the print vendor's expertise in designing or engineering a print job, which too often results in the most expensive (and most profitable for the print vendor) design, engineering, or production process.
- Second, in order to find the manufacturer or service provider who is willing to offer the lowest “contribution” pricing on any given job, the buyer must often request price quotations from dozens or even hundreds of vendors. In the actual business environment, however, there are difficulties which makes selection of a print vendor willing to offer “contribution” pricing difficult for the buyer. There are also difficulties and tradeoffs which make preparation of responding bids difficult for the print vendors. For example, from the buyers perspective, a first difficulty is identifying the pool of print vendors to whom it should send its IFB or RFQ. A larger vendor pool would, in theory, be desirable because it usually means a lower bid can be received. This is well-known in the general business world. However, identifying such a large vendor pool is generally not practical. A main reason is that gathering and maintaining information about a large number of current and potential print vendors is time consuming and expensive. Few companies have the time, money, or inclination to maintain a large, up-to-date database on such potential vendors, particularly when soliciting dozens of bids or quotations will itself require staff and administrative time that costs more than the savings generated from competitive bidding. This disparity is heightened by the fact that most print jobs involve relatively low dollar purchases or procurements.
- In addition, even if a buyer were willing to absorb the administrative costs associated with keeping a large database of vendors to improve the competitive bidding, the buyer is often reluctant to do so because quality control becomes more difficult as the vendor pool increases. Part of quality control is to monitor the quality and dependability of goods and services output by each vendor in the vendor pool. This is difficult not due only to the volume of the information, but also to the fact that the buyer must generally obtain such information from its own dealings with the vendor. The reason is that reliability, price history, and quality of a print vendor's work for other buyers may not be obtainable. This is another reason that buyers will not seek goods or services from new vendors because negative information on their reliability or quality may then be learned first hand.
- In the pubic sector, where federal and state agencies are often required by law to make bid opportunities available to large numbers of vendors, procurements of print information products typically result in poor quality control and relatively high administrative costs that must be subsidized by the taxpayer. In contrast, traditional procurement methods and prior art devices in the private sector have emphasized quality control by limiting the vendor pool for print information goods and services to a small number of reliable vendors with which it has previously done business. However, as the present inventor has discovered, there is a significant cost problem associated with limiting of the vendor pool to a small number. The problem is that the limited competition results in vendors offering, and charging, higher prices, being undisciplined by a more competitive market. Such prior art methods are typically based on direct negotiation with preferred vendors in established commercial relationships, often resulting in controlled term pricing that lumps procurements together in the hope of enhancing the print buyer's buying power within a narrow pool of vendors; and “best buy” or “best value” procurement practices (which are now being adopted increasingly in the public sector) that are largely creative user or quality control driven.
- Because of the limitations of traditional procurement methods, print vendors are often left not only with unscheduled holes in their production schedules, but also unable to fill downtime purposefully set aside for last minute “rush” orders from regular customers. Moreover, even those print vendors who would gain, in an immediate sense, from contribution pricing are frequently unwilling to offer that pricing to their regular customers. The reason is that the regular customer, after once receiving a contribution pricing from its vendor due to the vendor then facing idle machine time, would expect to pay the same low prices for its future print jobs. The regular customer would even expect the vendor to give contribution pricing at times when the vendor lacks idle production capacity. As a result, the vendor would have to displace more profitable work to accept the lower paying work, in order maintain the goodwill of its customer.
- The printing industry addresses the problem of maximizing machine utilization without compromising its relationship with preferred customers through sales and marketing efforts which, in turn, increase the cost of each print job and which, ultimately, the print vendor passes to the print buyer through higher prices. The need to maximize factory floor and machine utilization is in no way unique to the printing industry. It is a major concern in many other customized manufacturing operations.
- As a consequence of the foregoing, there has been a long felt need for a system and method of competitive pricing for custom printed goods and printing services that: (1) identifies and manages large vendor pool to obtain the benefit of enhanced pricing competition, without imposing relatively high administrative costs or causing a loss of quality control; (2) offers vendors an inexpensive, cost effective and reliable system for obtaining access to print jobs and specifications without added marketing costs and sales commissions; and (3) does not rely on the vendors' product expertise to establish price, but rather allows each vendor to bid high, bid low, or not bid at all based, strictly, on their production capabilities and need to fill available time in their production schedules.
- The present invention provides a system and method for selecting a printing vendor from a plurality of printing vendors, comprising steps of receiving, at a central, conventional database server termed herein as “the PrintProSysSM server”, an initial vendor pool data set from each of a plurality of buyers, the initial vendor data set identifying an initial vendor pool for that buyer, entering the initial vendor pool data set into a vendor database within the “PrintProSysSM server”, transmitting an invitation to subscribe to each vendor in the initial vendor pool, receiving a vendor capability data from a sub-plurality of the vendors in the initial vendor pool, the vendor capability data describing each vendor's print capabilities, entering the vendor capability data into the vendor database, receiving at the PrintProSysSM server a buyer's invitation-for-bid describing a customized print or other information product or service that the buyer wishes to procure or obtain bids for, calculating or extracting a vendor selection criteria data from the buyer's invitation-for-bid, the vendor selection criteria data defining the values that a vendor's capability data must meet to qualify for, and to receive, a vendor's invitation-for-bid requesting a bid response corresponding to the buyer's invitation-for-bid.
- The method of the present invention then compares and correlates the vendor selection criteria data to the vendor capability data field of each vendor data record in the buyer's vendor pool database. The PintProSysSM server then transmits a vendor's invitation-for-bid data to each vendor in the buyer's vendor pool whose vendor capability data field meets the vendor selection criteria data extracted from the buyer's invitation-for-bid data. Next, the PrintProSysSM server receives a plurality of responding bid data, each being from a corresponding one of the plurality of vendors to whom a vendor invitation-for-bid data was transmitted, and each representing the transmitting vendor's price for the particular print information goods or services requested. The PrintProSysSM server then selects the responding bid data having the lowest represented vendor price and generates information identifying the buyer of the identity of the selected vendor.
- Upon the PrintProSysSM server's receipt of an approval data from the buyer, it issues an order to the selected vendor for the purchase of the at least one printed item. In addition, the PrintProSysSM server's transmits to the remaining non-selected vendors in the vendor pool a bidding result data representing the identity of the selected vendor, and the rank order value of the bid data submitted by all other selection pool vendors.
- The PrintProSysSM server of the invention has the further ability to maintain multiple vendor pools for each of a plurality of buyers, the multiple vendor pools for a particular buyer corresponding to multiple print product or service types that the buyer procures.
- A still further embodiment transmits a data representing the bid price of all received bids, to all vendors who submitted bids.
- A further embodiment of the invention assigns a preferred vendor flag to each vendor record and then selects vendors for receiving vendors' invitation-for-bid based on the flag value.
- A still further embodiment of the invention automatically generates a set of project milestone data for use in monitoring the winning vendor's progress on the buyer's requested print job or service.
- A still further embodiment of the invention receives an invoice data from the winning print vendor upon completion of the job, and generates a corresponding buyer's invoice in response. The system then receives a fund transfer from the buyer based on the buyer's invoice and deposits the fund into an escrow account. Next, the system subtracts a system fee from the deposited amount, transfers that system fee to a system administration account, and transmits the remainder from the escrow to the winning print vendor. This embodiment provides a single source accounting for buyers dealing with a plurality of vendors.
- These features and advantages of the present invention will be more fully disclosed in, or rendered obvious by, the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts and further wherein:
- FIG. 1 is a general flow chart showing the steps associated with a preferred first embodiment of the present invention;
- FIG. 2 is a tabulated format of information fields submitted by potential subscribing print vendors for the pre-qualification step of creating a database of a buyer's pool of print vendor;
- FIG. 3 is a general flow chart showing steps of a second embodiment of the invention, using a preferred vendor flag as a selection criteria for receiving invitations-for-bid; and
- FIG. 4 is a general flow chart of another embodiment of the invention, having a milestone generation feature.
- The method and apparatus of the present invention will be better understood by a description of its operation in reference to the attached figures.
- For purposes of this description tile following definitions apply:
- The index “i” identifies the particular vendor;
- The index “j” identifies a particular buyer;
- The value “J” is the number of buyers;
- VRij is the vendor record of the ith vendor in the jth buyer's vendor pool or, equivalently, a vendor record of a vendor “i” that is a approved by buyer “j” for receiving bids on that buyer's jobs;
- Kj is the number of vendors in the jth buyer's vendor pool or, equivalently, the number of vendors having vendor records VRij indicating approval by buyer “j” for receiving bids on that buyer's jobs;
- BVPj is the Buyer's Vendor Pool of the jth buyer, referencing all of the Kj vendor records VRij associated with the jth buyer; the plurality of Kj vendor records VRi, in the server database is the Buyer's Vendor Pool BVPj, for j=1 to J.
- Other definitions are recited where appropriate.
- Referring to FIG. 1, the process begins at
step 2 by inputting for each of J buyers, each identified by the index j, a plurality of Kj vendor records VRij into the memory of a conventional network server running under Windows NT or any of the equivalent server operating systems that are well-known in the art. The server is termed the PrintProSysSM server for purposes of this description. - The method then proceeds to step4 where an invitation-to-subscribe ITSij, for i=1 to Kj, is generated for each of the Kj vendors identified by the jth buyer, for each of the J buyers.
- Next, at
step 6, a vendor capability attribute data, VAij, for i=1 to Lj is quantified by each of a plurality of Lj vendors, where Lj is the number of vendors from the quantity Kj of vendors in the jth Buyer's Vendor Pool BVPj from whom a vendor capability attribute data is received. For each jth buyer the value of Lj can range from zero to Kj. The vendor capability attribute data, VAij represents the manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities of the ith or submitting vendor. The vendor capability attributes VAij are in terms of understandable descriptor words, having specific value tables determined by the particular implementation of the system. An example set of vendor capability attributes VAij is shown on FIG. 2, and includes the vendor's ability to generate various quantity ranges of: Books, including loose-leaf, side-stitched and perfect bound; Books, Smyth-sown, case-bound; Books, saddle stitched; Books, paste on fold; Binders Only; Print Composition, including CD ROM, general, magnetic media, variable imaging, master and replication; Die Cutting and Letterpress capabilities; Four-Color Process capabilities; Cut Sheets capabilities; Business Form Specialties; Continuous Form capabilities; Snap Apart Sets capability; capability for Flexography, Labels, Decal and Screen Process On Labels; capability for Screen Printing and Printing of Plastic, Mylar and Acetate; Miscellaneous Printing Processes, including thermography, engraving, foil stamping and embossing; capabilities for various Specialty Items, including tabloids, microfiches, negatives, lamination, engineering drawings, tags, expansion file folders, 3-ring binders and advertising specialties; and envelopes. - At
step 8 the vendor capability attributes VAij are transmitted to, received by and stored by the PrintProSysSM server. The vendor capability attribute data VAij may be submitted by the vendor over the Internet, via an interactive data entry terminal, e.g., a conventional personal computer, as is known in the art. - In an alternative embodiment, the vendor may supply the quantified vendor capability attributes VAij by paper form (not shown), the data from which is then entered into the PrintProSysSM server storage by manual means. As yet another alternative, the vendor can supply the quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij by magnetic data storage media, or optical data storage media, or equivalent transportable media of the types that are well known in the data storage arts.
- Upon completion of
step 8 the PrintProSysSM server contains J of the above-identified Buyer's Vendor Pools BVPj, for j=1 to J, each consisting of Kj vendor records VRij, each vendor record having the received quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij. The quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij field of the vendor records VRij for which no was received are null entries. - Referring to FIG. 1, any of the J buyers, for example the jth buyer, may now proceed to step 10 and transmit a buyer's invitation for bid specification BIFB to the PrintProSysSM server. In response to receiving the BIFB from the jth buyer, the PrintProSysSM server goes to step 12 and calculates or extracts a vendor capability criteria CC from the BIFB, which defines the values that the quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij field of a vendor record VRij must have to qualify for bidding on the job defined by the buyer's invitation for bid specification BIFB.
- Referring again to FIG. 1, the method proceeds to step14 where the PrintProSysSM server compares or correlates the extracted a vendor capability criteria CC against the vendor capability attribute data VAij of each vendor record VRij in, or having a j value representing of it being in, the jth Buyer's Vendor Pool BVPj. Next, at
step 16, for each, if any, of the vendor records VRij having a vendor capability attribute data VAij meeting the vendor capability criteria CC, the PrintProSysSM server reformats the BIFB into a vendors' invitation for bid VIFB, and transmits the VIFB to the print vendor based on the name and address field of the vendor record VRij. The vendor's invitation for bid VIFB specifies the print information product or service in a consistent, standardized format so that each receiving vendor will understand clearly all product, delivery and other requirements for the print information item or service that is being placed out for bids by the buyer. This arrangement ensures that the bids are comparable and that mistakes as to the requirements of the buyer are minimized, while enabling each vendor to prepare a more precise calculation of its responding bid Bi. - Referring to FIG. 1, at
step 18 one or more of the vendors receiving the vendor's invitation for bid VIFB submits a bid Bi to the system, where the index “i” identifies the submitting vendor. The bid is received by and input to the PrintProSysSM data server. Then, atstep 20 the PrintProSysSM data server detects the lowest price bid and atstep 22 transmits to the buyer a data, WIN, informing of the identity of that lowest price vendor. Atstep 24 the PrintProSysSM server awaits receipt of approval data APP from the buyer and, upon receipt, issues an order data ORDER to the selected vendor for purchase of the print item or procurement of the printing service at the bid price. Ifstep 24 does not receive the approval data APP no order data ORDER is transmitted. Atstep 26 the PrintProSysSM data server generates BIDINFORM data representing the remaining non-selected vendors in the vendor selection pool VSPjk and the identity and the bid price of the bids Bi received from all of the responding vendors, and this data is then transmitted to all of the vendors. - A minor variation of the above-described first embodiment, which is not shown, omits the
step 4 generation of the invitation-to-subscribe ITSij, for i=1 to Kj. - A first embodiment of the invention, and variations thereof, have been described in reference to FIG. 1. In the FIG. 1 embodiment,
step 2 inputs a vendor record VRij for each i vendor which make up an initial vendor pool for each buyer j, and steps 6 and 8 then quantify and input a vendor capability attribute VAij into one or more of the vendor records VRij. The above-describedstep 12 then calculates or extracts a vendor capability criteria CC from the invitation for bid BIFB, which defines the values that the quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij must have to qualify the ith vendor for bidding on the jth buyer's BIFB.Step 14 then selects the vendors that receive the vendor's invitation-for-bid VIFB, based on comparing the vendor capability criteria CC to the quantified vendor capability attribute data VAij for each the jth buyer's vendors i. - Referring to FIG. 3, an alternative embodiment is depicted, with like blocks having like labels compared to FIG. 1. In the FIG. 3 embodiment, each vendor record VRij has a preferred vendor flag PVij. The preferred vendor flag has logical values of “yes” and “no”, which represent whether the ith vendor is a preferred vendor for the jth buyer. The value of PVij can be set at
step 40, when the vendor record VRij is entered.Step 40 is otherwise identical to step 2 of FIG. 1. This embodiment does not enter vendor capability attributes VCij and does not extract a capability criteria CC from a received buyer's invitation-for-bid. Instead, after receipt of a BIFB atstep 10, vendors are selected atstep 42 to receive vendor's invitations-for-bid VIFB solely on whether or not the vendor is a preferred vendor of the jth buyer. - Referring to FIG. 4, an example of a still further embodiment of the invention will be described. The example FIG. 4 embodiment comprises the above-described steps for the FIG. 1 first embodiment, and an
additional step 28 at which the PrintsroSysSM generates a milestone data set MSTONE representing a set of job milestones calculated from the schedule, quantity and product or service descriptors corresponding to the awarded bid. Example milestones values represented by MSTONE include, but are not limited to, paper and supply availability, scheduling and finishing of prep, proofing, pre-press, press sheet inspections, press work, bindery, special finishing and shipping and delivery. - A still further embodiment, which is not depicted, combines the above-described
step 28 of generating a milestone data set MSTONE with the above-described embodiment of FIG. 3. - Another embodiment of the invention combines embodiments of FIGS. 1 and 3, and selects vendors for receipt of vendors' invitation-for-bid VIFB based on either of the two described selection criteria being met, i.e., if the extracted vendor capability criteria CC is met by the vendor capability data VCij, or if the vendor has a preferred vendor PVij flag value of “yes”.
- Yet another embodiment of the invention receives an invoice data from the winning print vendor upon completion of the job, and generates a corresponding buyer's invoice in response. The system then receives a fund transfer from the buyer based on the buyer's invoice and deposits the fund into an escrow account. Next, the system subtracts a system fee from the deposited amount, transfers that system fee to a system administration account, and transmits the remainder from the escrow to the winning print vendor. This embodiment provides a single source accounting for buyers dealing with a plurality of vendors.
- As can be readily determined by one of ordinary skill in the art of print procurement, there are numerous advantages obtained with the present described invention. First, the invention quantifies both the buyer's needs and the vendors, attributes in a database system that matches objective print information product or service specifications with pre-determined vendor quality levels and manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities. The invention creates multiple vendor pools for each buyer, each vendor pool being for a particular type of print information product or services. As a result, the print buyer has a large pool of qualified vendors to which each invitation-for-bid can be distributed. Further, the buyer is no longer dependent on an individual print vendor's specialized knowledge and, instead, is able to obtain competitive pricing based on objective specifications that reflect the buyer's requirements rather than one particular vendor's existing backlog, manufacturing, production, or provider preferences. At the same time, print vendors can calculate more precisely, and hence more competitively, the pricing in their bids due to availability of complete objective specifications. Most importantly, given a sufficiently large vendor pool for each job, combined with the fact that each vendor can bid high, bid low, or not bid at all without concern for loss of the buyer's good will, the buyer is virtually assured of receiving “contribution pricing” from at least one responding vendor on each and every job.
- In addition, by employing the invention, the print buyer sets the parameters for both vendor pool selection and for the bidding and award process. The parameters are set in such a way, however, that vendor quality and responsibility is determined at the time each vendor pool is established and only the responsiveness of each vendor's bid is reviewed at the time of award. In this manner, the buyer can create and manage large vendor pools without having to assess the quality of each bidder each time an individual job is bid Moreover, the bidding and award process is standardized so as to make the dissemination of invitations for bid, the receipt of bids, and the award of the job to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder virtually automatic and without the need for additional procurement staff or the expenditure of related out-of pocket administrative costs.
- Moreover, the invention creates a system of “no-holds barred” competitive bidding. Once approved for a vendor bidding pool, the printing vendor no longer has to expend additional costs on sales or marketing to obtain future jobs from the same buyer, and from other buyers with pre-qualification requirements met by the vendor's capability attributes. The printing vendor is thereby assured access to future bidding opportunities that match the vendor's quantified quality level and/or manufacturing, production, or provider capabilities. In addition, knowing beforehand that the award will go to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, each participating vendor will have an incentive to submit their lowest bid upfront, rather than hold back their lowest bid, as they would otherwise be inclined to do if the award was still going to be negotiated after bid opening. The invention further provides that all bids are released to all bidders after award, thereby creating a “ratcheting down” effect as each vendor learns how low the price range is likely to be on similar jobs in the future. As result, buyers who use the invention will benefit from consistently low prices from selected quality vendors, while enabling their purchasing personnel to focus on budget planning, job preparation, internal customer service needs, and production quality and compliance.
- It is to be understood that the present invention is described above in reference to specific embodiments which are for purposes of example only, and that the invention is not limited to the specific arrangement, order of processing, or hardware for carrying out the steps as described hereinabove or shown in the drawings, but also comprises the various modifications readily apparent to one skilled in the art upon reading this specification, as defined by the broadest scope of the appended claims.
Claims (15)
1. A method for competitive bidding by print information product vendors comprising steps of:
inputting a plurality of vendor records into a storage of a general purpose computer, each of said vendor records having a data field identifying a print information product vendor and a buyer identification data field identifying a buyer that said vendor is associated with;
inputting a buyer's invitation-for-bid data into said general purpose computer, said buyer's invitation-for-bid data having a buyer identification data, and having an invitation for bid on a print information product job from said buyer;
identifying at least one vendor record as qualified, based on a match of said buyer identification data and the buyer identification data field of said at least one vendor record;
transmitting a vendor's invitation-for-bid data to said at least one vendor;
inputting into said general purpose computer a plurality of bid data, each from one of said plurality of vendors to which said vendor's invitation-for-bid data was transmitted, each of said bid data representing a bid price;
identifying a bid data from said received bid data having the lowest represented bid price;
outputting a selected vendor data representing the identity of the vendor corresponding to the bid data identified by said identifying step; and
transmitting an order to the vendor represented by said selected vendor data.
2. A method according to claim 1 further comprising a step of:
inserting a vendor capability data into at least one of said vendor records, said vendor capability data representing a set of vendor manufacturing capabilities of the print information product vendor identified by said record;
calculating a vendor requirement data from said buyer's invitation-for-bid data, said vendor requirement data representing a set vendor manufacturing capabilities required for performing said print information product job; and
comparing said vendor requirement data to the print information product records associated with the buyer from which said buyer's information-for-bid was received,
wherein said step of identifying at least one vendor record as qualified is based on said comparing and said match of said buyer identification data and the data field of said at least one vendor record identifying a buyer that said vendor is associated.
3. A method according to claim 1 further comprising steps of:
ranking said received bid data according to said represented bid price; and
transmitting an information data from said general purpose computer to other vendors identifying said selected vendor and the rank order value of said received bid data.
4. A method according to claim 2 further comprising steps of:
ranking said received bid data according to said represented bid price; and
transmitting an information data from said general purpose computer to other vendors identifying said selected vendor and the rank order value of said received bid data.
5. A method according to claim 2 , wherein said vendor capability data represents the identified vendor's capability to manufacture each of a plurality of different types of print information products.
6. A method according to claim 2 , further comprising steps of:
transmitting a request for vendor capability data to said at least one vendor associated with at least one of said buyers;
receiving a first formatted vendor capability data from said at least one vendor; and
converting said first formatted vendor capability data into said vendor capability data,
wherein said step of inputting a vendor capability data inputs said converted data.
7. A method according to claim 2 wherein said vendor capability data input for each of a plurality of printing vendors represents a set of vendor capabilities relating to objective and subjective parameters for each of a plurality of types of print information products.
8. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising steps of:
inputting into said central data server a completion of job data;
transmitting from said central data server to said buyer an invoice for payment of said bid price;
inputting a payment from said buyer into an escrow account via electronic fund transfer;
subtracting a system access fee data and a licensing fee data from a data representing said payment deposited into said escrow account to generate a remainder payment data; and
transferring a payment from said escrow account to an account of said vendor corresponding to said remainder payment data.
9. A method according to claim 2 , further comprising steps of:
inputting into said central data server a completion of job data;
transmitting from said central data server to said buyer an invoice for payment of said bid price;
inputting a payment from said buyer into an escrow account via electronic fund transfer;
subtracting a system access fee data and a licensing fee data from a data representing said payment deposited into said escrow account to generate a remainder payment data; and
transferring a payment from said escrow account to an account of said vendor corresponding to said remainder payment data.
10. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising a step of:
calculating a job milestone data based on said buyer's invitation-for-bid data.
11. A method according to claim 10 further comprising steps of:
generating a job progress verification request based on said job milestone data; and
entering a data into said central data server representing a job progress corresponding to said job progress verification request.
12. A method according to claim 2 , further comprising a step of:
calculating a job milestone data based on said buyer's invitation-for-bid data.
13. A method according to claim 12 further comprising steps of:
generating a job progress verification request based on said job milestone data; and
entering a data into said central data server representing a job progress corresponding to said job progress verification request.
14. A system for competitive bidding by print information product vendors comprising:
means for inputting a plurality of vendor records into a storage of a general purpose computer, each of said vendor records having a data field identifying a print information product vendor and a buyer identification data field identifying a buyer that said vendor is associated with;
means for inputting a buyer's invitation-for-bid data into said general purpose computer, said buyer's invitation-for-bid data having a buyer identification data, and having an invitation for bid on a print information product job from said buyer;
means for identifying at least one vendor record as qualified, based on a match of said buyer identification data and the buyer identification data field of said at least one vendor record;
means for transmitting a vendor's invitation-for-bid data to said at least one vendors;
means for inputting into said general purpose computer a plurality of bid data, each from one of said plurality of vendors to which said vendor's invitation-for-bid data was transmitted, each of said bid data representing a bid price;
means for identifying a bid data from said received bid data having the lowest represented bid price;
means for outputting a selected vendor data representing the identity of the vendor corresponding to the bid data identified by said identifying means; and
means for transmitting an order to the vendor represented by said selected vendor data.
15. A system according to claim 14 further comprising:
means for inserting a vendor capability data into at least one of said vendor records, said vendor capability data representing a set of vendor manufacturing capabilities of the print information product vendor identified by said record;
means for calculating a vendor requirement data from said buyer's invitation-for-bid data, said vendor requirement data representing a set vendor manufacturing capabilities required for performing said print information product job; and
means for comparing said vendor requirement data to the print information product records associated with the buyer from which said buyer's information-for-bid was received,
wherein said means for identifying at least one vendor record as qualified performs said identifying based on a result of said comparing means and a match of said buyer identification data and the buyer identification data field of said at least one vendor record.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/058,490 US20040078277A1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2002-01-28 | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US9797298P | 1998-08-26 | 1998-08-26 | |
US09/383,371 US6397197B1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 1999-08-26 | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
US10/058,490 US20040078277A1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2002-01-28 | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/383,371 Continuation US6397197B1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 1999-08-26 | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20040078277A1 true US20040078277A1 (en) | 2004-04-22 |
Family
ID=26793830
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/383,371 Expired - Fee Related US6397197B1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 1999-08-26 | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
US10/058,490 Abandoned US20040078277A1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2002-01-28 | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
US10/376,249 Active 2025-03-05 US7383434B2 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2003-03-03 | System and method of looking up and validating a digital certificate in one pass |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/383,371 Expired - Fee Related US6397197B1 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 1999-08-26 | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/376,249 Active 2025-03-05 US7383434B2 (en) | 1998-08-26 | 2003-03-03 | System and method of looking up and validating a digital certificate in one pass |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (3) | US6397197B1 (en) |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20010032162A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2001-10-18 | Alsberg Peter A. | Methods and systems for market clearance |
US20010049652A1 (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2001-12-06 | Koichi Nakajima | Auction system |
US20020077954A1 (en) * | 1999-12-29 | 2002-06-20 | Slaight Thomas H. | Sourcing system and method |
US20030225474A1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-12-04 | Gustavo Mata | Specialization of active software agents in an automated manufacturing environment |
US20040059637A1 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2004-03-25 | Dohyun Jung | System and method of auction |
US20060155640A1 (en) * | 2003-09-12 | 2006-07-13 | Christopher Kennedy | Product optimizer |
US20060259408A1 (en) * | 2003-08-04 | 2006-11-16 | Levy Douglas A | Method and system for facilitating purchasing of advertising via electronic auction |
US20080275582A1 (en) * | 2004-11-19 | 2008-11-06 | Nettles Steven C | Scheduling AMHS pickup and delivery ahead of schedule |
WO2009081347A1 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2009-07-02 | Umesh Pai | A distributed purchasing system |
US20100268567A1 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2010-10-21 | Snow Lewis S | Automated direct mail procurement system |
US20100268608A1 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2010-10-21 | Xerox Corporation | Campaign management of direct mail |
US20110047034A1 (en) * | 2009-08-18 | 2011-02-24 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for processing print jobs |
US20110145085A1 (en) * | 2009-12-15 | 2011-06-16 | Araz Khachatrian | System for assessing environmental impact of processing print jobs |
US20110251915A1 (en) * | 2010-04-09 | 2011-10-13 | Lutnick Howard W | Multi-system distributed processing of delivery services |
US20120239525A1 (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2012-09-20 | Hewlett-Packard Company | System and method for generating quantitative guideline for print order |
US20130006797A1 (en) * | 2003-09-12 | 2013-01-03 | Altisource Solutions S.A R.L | Methods and systems for vendor assurance |
US20130054307A1 (en) * | 2011-08-26 | 2013-02-28 | Daphoria, Inc. | Labor and Materials Purchasing System for the Construction Industry |
US20130107313A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Xerox Corporation | Evaluating and managing image quality performance and improving service effectiveness of groups of production printers |
US20130163034A1 (en) * | 2011-12-27 | 2013-06-27 | Xerox Corporation | Vendor selection method and system for wide format printing |
WO2016007859A1 (en) * | 2014-07-11 | 2016-01-14 | Kleermail Corporation | Methods, apparatuses, and systems for facilitating management and/or automation of direct mail campaigns and other bulk/high volume mailings |
WO2016033129A1 (en) * | 2014-08-29 | 2016-03-03 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Three-dimensional printing |
US10019743B1 (en) | 2014-09-19 | 2018-07-10 | Altisource S.á r.l. | Methods and systems for auto expanding vendor selection |
US10672053B1 (en) | 2013-08-19 | 2020-06-02 | Michael J. Clemmens | Systems, manufactures, and methods for comparative bid analysis and purchase order preparation |
Families Citing this family (250)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8732457B2 (en) | 1995-10-02 | 2014-05-20 | Assa Abloy Ab | Scalable certificate validation and simplified PKI management |
US7822989B2 (en) | 1995-10-02 | 2010-10-26 | Corestreet, Ltd. | Controlling access to an area |
US8015597B2 (en) | 1995-10-02 | 2011-09-06 | Corestreet, Ltd. | Disseminating additional data used for controlling access |
US7716486B2 (en) | 1995-10-02 | 2010-05-11 | Corestreet, Ltd. | Controlling group access to doors |
US7600129B2 (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 2009-10-06 | Corestreet, Ltd. | Controlling access using additional data |
US7337315B2 (en) * | 1995-10-02 | 2008-02-26 | Corestreet, Ltd. | Efficient certificate revocation |
US8261319B2 (en) | 1995-10-24 | 2012-09-04 | Corestreet, Ltd. | Logging access attempts to an area |
US6397197B1 (en) * | 1998-08-26 | 2002-05-28 | E-Lynxx Corporation | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
US6647373B1 (en) * | 1998-12-24 | 2003-11-11 | John Carlton-Foss | Method and system for processing and transmitting electronic reverse auction information |
JP3204317B2 (en) * | 1998-12-28 | 2001-09-04 | 日本電気株式会社 | Electronic bidding system |
US6910017B1 (en) | 1999-03-05 | 2005-06-21 | Profitlogic, Inc. | Inventory and price decision support |
US7840476B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2010-11-23 | Ariba, Inc. | Transformation bidding with tooling requirements |
GB2349715B (en) * | 1999-05-05 | 2003-10-01 | Mitel Corp | Quotation mechanism for service environments |
US7587336B1 (en) * | 1999-06-09 | 2009-09-08 | Electronics For Imaging, Inc. | Iterative constraint collection scheme for preparation of custom manufacturing contracts |
US8494917B2 (en) | 1999-06-29 | 2013-07-23 | Priceplay.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods for transacting business over a global communications network such as the internet |
US8050982B2 (en) * | 1999-06-29 | 2011-11-01 | Priceplay, Inc. | Systems and methods for transacting business over a global communications network such as the internet |
US20060036511A1 (en) * | 1999-06-29 | 2006-02-16 | Lin Wayne W Y | Systems and methods for transacting business over a global communications network such as the internet |
US7330826B1 (en) | 1999-07-09 | 2008-02-12 | Perfect.Com, Inc. | Method, system and business model for a buyer's auction with near perfect information using the internet |
US6950801B2 (en) * | 1999-07-28 | 2005-09-27 | Ppg Industries Ohio, Inc. | Method and apparatus for coordinating services |
US7720743B1 (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2010-05-18 | Marks Jeffrey S | Methods and apparatus for online auctions and market-places utilizing program terms |
US8251702B2 (en) * | 1999-10-27 | 2012-08-28 | Marks Jeffrey S | Methods and apparatus for online auctions and market-places utilizing program terms |
US8545229B2 (en) | 2000-10-27 | 2013-10-01 | Jeffrey S. Marks | Methods and apparatus for online auctions and market-places utilizing program terms |
US6876991B1 (en) | 1999-11-08 | 2005-04-05 | Collaborative Decision Platforms, Llc. | System, method and computer program product for a collaborative decision platform |
US20020099577A1 (en) * | 1999-12-01 | 2002-07-25 | Stuart Black | Virtual production link system |
US7260715B1 (en) * | 1999-12-09 | 2007-08-21 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for revocation list management |
US7200566B1 (en) * | 2000-01-11 | 2007-04-03 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for local wireless commerce |
US20010025267A1 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2001-09-27 | Stephen Janiszewski | System and method for facilitating bidding transactions and conducting project management utilizing software metric collection |
US20060206412A1 (en) * | 2000-01-14 | 2006-09-14 | Van Luchene Andrew S | Systems and methods for facilitating a transaction by matching seller information and buyer information |
US20010034631A1 (en) * | 2000-01-21 | 2001-10-25 | Kiselik Daniel R. | Method and apparatus for the automatic selection of parties to an arrangement between a requestor and a satisfier of selected requirements |
AU2001231078A1 (en) * | 2000-01-25 | 2001-08-07 | Vistaprint Usa, Inc. | Managing print jobs |
FR2804231B1 (en) * | 2000-01-25 | 2002-11-08 | Vistaprint Usa Inc | CENTRALIZED PRINTING OF LOW-VOLUME COMMERCIAL DOCUMENTS ON MACHINES PREVIOUSLY LIMITED TO VERY LARGE PRINTS |
WO2001057614A2 (en) * | 2000-02-01 | 2001-08-09 | Digital Freight Exchange, Inc. | Method and system for negotiating transportation contracts via a global computer network |
JP2001222584A (en) * | 2000-02-08 | 2001-08-17 | Omron Corp | Transaction mediation system, print mediation system using the transaction mediation system and transaction mediation network generation method |
US8046269B2 (en) * | 2000-02-17 | 2011-10-25 | Fedbid, Inc. | Auction based procurement system |
US7272579B1 (en) * | 2000-02-17 | 2007-09-18 | Fedbid, Inc. | Auction based procurement system |
US8531276B2 (en) | 2000-03-15 | 2013-09-10 | Logitech Europe S.A. | State-based remote control system |
US20010033243A1 (en) | 2000-03-15 | 2001-10-25 | Harris Glen Mclean | Online remote control configuration system |
US6784805B2 (en) | 2000-03-15 | 2004-08-31 | Intrigue Technologies Inc. | State-based remote control system |
DE60117424T2 (en) * | 2000-03-21 | 2006-08-24 | Brother Kogyo K.K., Nagoya | System and method for providing output data |
US20010037281A1 (en) * | 2000-04-13 | 2001-11-01 | Jason French | Request for quote (RFQ) system and method |
US7016865B1 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2006-03-21 | Deluxe Corporation | Personalization format converter system and method |
US7216092B1 (en) * | 2000-04-14 | 2007-05-08 | Deluxe Corporation | Intelligent personalization system and method |
US7277865B1 (en) | 2000-04-17 | 2007-10-02 | Accenture Llp | Information portal in a contract manufacturing framework |
US7353180B1 (en) * | 2000-04-17 | 2008-04-01 | Accenture Llp | Supply chain/workflow services in a contract manufacturing framework |
US7519544B1 (en) | 2000-04-24 | 2009-04-14 | Ncr Corporation | Material browser |
US20020023046A1 (en) * | 2000-05-19 | 2002-02-21 | Professor Mac, Llc | System for automating business purchasing functions via a global computer network |
JP3544510B2 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2004-07-21 | 本田技研工業株式会社 | Supplier comprehensive power judgment system |
US7430523B1 (en) * | 2000-06-12 | 2008-09-30 | Tariq Khalidi | Automated competitive bidding system and process |
US20010056406A1 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2001-12-27 | Kenji Nagoya | Information processing apparatus and storage medium storing programs for controlling the apparatus |
JP2004505351A (en) * | 2000-07-21 | 2004-02-19 | ヒューレット・パッカード・カンパニー | Method and apparatus for automatic online printing service |
EP1182542A1 (en) * | 2000-07-21 | 2002-02-27 | Hewlett Packard Company, a Delaware Corporation | On-line selection of print service provider in distributed print on demand service |
US6965872B1 (en) * | 2000-08-02 | 2005-11-15 | Zipandshop Llc | Systems, methods and computer program products for facilitating the sale of commodity-like goods/services |
US20020040333A1 (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2002-04-04 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | System for selling unique information indicating products over transmission network |
JP2002189678A (en) * | 2000-10-10 | 2002-07-05 | Sony Corp | Web page making support system, web page making support server, web page making support method, computer program and recording medium |
CA2434251A1 (en) | 2001-01-09 | 2002-07-18 | Topcoder, Inc. | Systems and methods for coding competitions |
JP2002269400A (en) * | 2001-03-12 | 2002-09-20 | Juken Sangyo Co Ltd | On-line order placement/receipt processing method and system |
US7788399B2 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2010-08-31 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System and method for mapping of services |
US7689711B2 (en) | 2001-03-26 | 2010-03-30 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System and method for routing messages between applications |
US9948644B2 (en) | 2001-03-26 | 2018-04-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Routing messages between applications |
US7516191B2 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2009-04-07 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System and method for invocation of services |
US7305454B2 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2007-12-04 | Minor Ventures, Llc. | Apparatus and methods for provisioning services |
US7006981B2 (en) | 2001-04-04 | 2006-02-28 | Profitlogic, Inc. | Assortment decisions |
US20020152183A1 (en) * | 2001-04-17 | 2002-10-17 | A.T. Kearney, Inc. | Print supply marketplace using pricing model |
US7349869B2 (en) * | 2001-06-05 | 2008-03-25 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Use of a job ticket service to store bid information |
EP1410296A2 (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2004-04-21 | Research In Motion Limited | Method for processing encoded messages for exchange with a mobile data communication device |
CA2450584C (en) | 2001-06-12 | 2011-01-04 | Research In Motion Limited | Certificate management and transfer system and method |
JP3926792B2 (en) * | 2001-06-12 | 2007-06-06 | リサーチ イン モーション リミテッド | System and method for compressing secure email for exchange with mobile data communication devices |
US20030004854A1 (en) * | 2001-06-27 | 2003-01-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | RFP decomposition and collaboration |
US7085734B2 (en) * | 2001-07-06 | 2006-08-01 | Grant D Graeme | Price decision support |
US20040205248A1 (en) * | 2001-07-10 | 2004-10-14 | Herbert A Little | System and method for secure message key caching in a mobile communication device |
DE60229645D1 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2008-12-11 | Research In Motion Ltd | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR PROCESSING CODED MESSAGES |
US6834266B2 (en) * | 2001-10-11 | 2004-12-21 | Profitlogic, Inc. | Methods for estimating the seasonality of groups of similar items of commerce data sets based on historical sales data values and associated error information |
US20030085267A1 (en) * | 2001-11-02 | 2003-05-08 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Internet enabled tag processing terminal for facilitating commercial transactions |
US7536362B2 (en) * | 2001-11-07 | 2009-05-19 | Ariba, Inc. | Method for selecting an optimal balance between direct cost and a number of suppliers |
US6960135B2 (en) | 2001-12-05 | 2005-11-01 | Profitlogic, Inc. | Payout distributions for games of chance |
US20030149654A1 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2003-08-07 | Harrington Kevin F. | Interactive security brokerage system |
US6990465B1 (en) * | 2002-01-25 | 2006-01-24 | Accenture Global Services Gmbh | Establishment of preferred business partners using a vendor certification program |
US7236947B2 (en) * | 2002-01-25 | 2007-06-26 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Providing highly automated procurement services |
US7660741B2 (en) * | 2002-03-04 | 2010-02-09 | I2 Technologies Us, Inc. | Sourcing under quantity pricing rules |
AU2003216478A1 (en) * | 2002-03-05 | 2003-09-22 | Fireventures Llc | Sytem and method for information exchange |
US8423763B2 (en) * | 2002-03-20 | 2013-04-16 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for supporting multiple certificate status providers on a mobile communication device |
ATE385118T1 (en) * | 2002-03-20 | 2008-02-15 | Research In Motion Ltd | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR SUPPORTING MULTIPLE CERTIFICATION STATUS PROVIDERS ON A MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE |
US7778866B2 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2010-08-17 | Topcoder, Inc. | Systems and methods for software development |
AU2003224850A1 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2003-10-27 | Topcoder, Inc. | System and method for soliciting proposals for software development services |
US20060248504A1 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2006-11-02 | Hughes John M | Systems and methods for software development |
US8776042B2 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2014-07-08 | Topcoder, Inc. | Systems and methods for software support |
US9400589B1 (en) | 2002-05-30 | 2016-07-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Circular rotational interface for display of consumer credit information |
US9710852B1 (en) | 2002-05-30 | 2017-07-18 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit report timeline user interface |
US7251615B2 (en) * | 2002-06-07 | 2007-07-31 | Oracle International Corporation | Markdown management |
US20040030633A1 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2004-02-12 | Gavin Austin T. | Systems and methods for school districts and municipalities to maximize interest earnings on their investments |
US7565137B2 (en) * | 2002-10-25 | 2009-07-21 | At&T Mobility Ii Llc | Delivery of network services |
US20040102981A1 (en) * | 2002-11-22 | 2004-05-27 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Web-based vendor management system |
JP4248913B2 (en) * | 2003-03-31 | 2009-04-02 | 株式会社エヌ・ティ・ティ・ドコモ | Terminal device, program, and communication system |
KR20030074491A (en) * | 2003-04-24 | 2003-09-19 | 성도헌 | System and method for electronic auction |
US20040220848A1 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2004-11-04 | Leventhal Jeffrey P. | System and method for managing requests for services |
US7856406B2 (en) * | 2003-04-28 | 2010-12-21 | Onforce, Inc. | System and method for managing accounts payable and accounts receivable |
US7657751B2 (en) | 2003-05-13 | 2010-02-02 | Corestreet, Ltd. | Efficient and secure data currentness systems |
US7694330B2 (en) * | 2003-05-23 | 2010-04-06 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Personal authentication device and system and method thereof |
US20050021954A1 (en) * | 2003-05-23 | 2005-01-27 | Hsiang-Tsung Kung | Personal authentication device and system and method thereof |
CA2527720A1 (en) * | 2003-06-04 | 2005-01-06 | Profitlogic, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for retail inventory budget optimization and gross profit maximization |
EP1636682A4 (en) | 2003-06-24 | 2009-04-29 | Corestreet Ltd | Access control |
EP1642188A2 (en) * | 2003-07-08 | 2006-04-05 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Information input/output system |
CA2527796A1 (en) | 2003-07-15 | 2005-02-03 | Vishwamitra S. Ramakrishnan | Methods and apparatus for inventory allocation and pricing |
US8453196B2 (en) | 2003-10-14 | 2013-05-28 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Policy management in an interoperability network |
US7904882B2 (en) * | 2003-10-16 | 2011-03-08 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Managing virtual business instances within a computer network |
CN101124765B (en) | 2003-11-19 | 2013-08-07 | 科尔街有限公司 | Distributed delegated path discovery and validation |
CN1985460B (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2012-12-12 | 科尔街有限公司 | Communication-efficient real time credentials for OCSP and distributed OCSP |
WO2005067672A2 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2005-07-28 | Corestreet, Ltd. | Batch ocsp and batch distributed ocsp |
US20050154878A1 (en) * | 2004-01-09 | 2005-07-14 | David Engberg | Signature-efficient real time credentials for OCSP and distributed OCSP |
US7406691B2 (en) * | 2004-01-13 | 2008-07-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Minimizing complex decisions to allocate additional resources to a job submitted to a grid environment |
US7562143B2 (en) * | 2004-01-13 | 2009-07-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing escalating resource needs within a grid environment |
US7552437B2 (en) * | 2004-01-14 | 2009-06-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Maintaining application operations within a suboptimal grid environment |
US7739351B2 (en) | 2004-03-23 | 2010-06-15 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Synchronous interface to asynchronous processes |
US7590685B2 (en) * | 2004-04-07 | 2009-09-15 | Salesforce.Com Inc. | Techniques for providing interoperability as a service |
US7266547B2 (en) * | 2004-06-10 | 2007-09-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Query meaning determination through a grid service |
WO2006002288A2 (en) * | 2004-06-23 | 2006-01-05 | Swallows, Llc | Method and system for recruiting for employee positions and employees bidding for the same |
US8606875B1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2013-12-10 | Oracle America, Inc. | Method and system for automatic distribution and installation of a client certificate in a secure manner |
US7725605B2 (en) * | 2004-08-06 | 2010-05-25 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Providing on-demand access to services in a wide area network |
US20060036849A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-16 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for certificate searching and retrieval |
US9094429B2 (en) * | 2004-08-10 | 2015-07-28 | Blackberry Limited | Server verification of secure electronic messages |
US8924247B2 (en) * | 2004-08-19 | 2014-12-30 | LoadPoint, Inc | Ranking system using instant post-transaction surveying of transaction judges |
US7631183B2 (en) * | 2004-09-01 | 2009-12-08 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for retrieving related certificates |
US7549043B2 (en) | 2004-09-01 | 2009-06-16 | Research In Motion Limited | Providing certificate matching in a system and method for searching and retrieving certificates |
US7640428B2 (en) | 2004-09-02 | 2009-12-29 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for searching and retrieving certificates |
US20060080210A1 (en) * | 2004-09-23 | 2006-04-13 | Pricegrabber.Com, Inc. | System and network for obtaining competitive quotes on user-configured articles |
US9645712B2 (en) | 2004-10-01 | 2017-05-09 | Grand Central Communications, Inc. | Multiple stakeholders for a single business process |
US7721328B2 (en) | 2004-10-01 | 2010-05-18 | Salesforce.Com Inc. | Application identity design |
US8051052B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2011-11-01 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Method for creating control structure for versatile content control |
US8601283B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2013-12-03 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Method for versatile content control with partitioning |
US8504849B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2013-08-06 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Method for versatile content control |
US7590623B2 (en) * | 2005-01-06 | 2009-09-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated management of software images for efficient resource node building within a grid environment |
US7571120B2 (en) * | 2005-01-12 | 2009-08-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer implemented method for estimating future grid job costs by classifying grid jobs and storing results of processing grid job microcosms |
US7562035B2 (en) * | 2005-01-12 | 2009-07-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automating responses by grid providers to bid requests indicating criteria for a grid job |
US7472079B2 (en) * | 2005-01-12 | 2008-12-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer implemented method for automatically controlling selection of a grid provider for a grid job |
US7467196B2 (en) * | 2005-01-12 | 2008-12-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing network errors communicated in a message transaction with error information using a troubleshooting agent |
DE102006018238A1 (en) | 2005-04-20 | 2007-03-29 | Logitech Europe S.A. | Remote control system for home theater system, analyzes log of events stored by remote controller to identify patterns of interest in logged use of remote controller |
US7748031B2 (en) * | 2005-07-08 | 2010-06-29 | Sandisk Corporation | Mass storage device with automated credentials loading |
KR100902627B1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2009-06-15 | 리서치 인 모션 리미티드 | System and method for protecting master encryption keys |
CN101454796A (en) * | 2006-01-20 | 2009-06-10 | 托普科德公司 | System and method for design development |
US20070220479A1 (en) * | 2006-03-14 | 2007-09-20 | Hughes John M | Systems and methods for software development |
JP2007274060A (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2007-10-18 | Brother Ind Ltd | Communication apparatus and program |
US20070250378A1 (en) * | 2006-04-24 | 2007-10-25 | Hughes John M | Systems and methods for conducting production competitions |
US20070255641A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-01 | Harrington Kevin F | Computer interface for trading bonds |
US10783458B2 (en) * | 2006-05-01 | 2020-09-22 | Topcoder, Inc. | Systems and methods for screening submissions in production competitions |
US20080052146A1 (en) * | 2006-05-01 | 2008-02-28 | David Messinger | Project management system |
US7814161B2 (en) * | 2006-06-23 | 2010-10-12 | Research In Motion Limited | System and method for handling electronic mail mismatches |
US20080010449A1 (en) * | 2006-07-07 | 2008-01-10 | Michael Holtzman | Content Control System Using Certificate Chains |
US8140843B2 (en) | 2006-07-07 | 2012-03-20 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Content control method using certificate chains |
US8639939B2 (en) | 2006-07-07 | 2014-01-28 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Control method using identity objects |
US8266711B2 (en) | 2006-07-07 | 2012-09-11 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Method for controlling information supplied from memory device |
US8245031B2 (en) * | 2006-07-07 | 2012-08-14 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Content control method using certificate revocation lists |
US8613103B2 (en) | 2006-07-07 | 2013-12-17 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Content control method using versatile control structure |
US20080040141A1 (en) * | 2006-07-20 | 2008-02-14 | Torrenegra Alex H | Method, System and Apparatus for Matching Sellers to a Buyer Over a Network and for Managing Related Information |
US20080040129A1 (en) * | 2006-08-08 | 2008-02-14 | Capital One Financial Corporation | Systems and methods for providing a vehicle service management service |
US20080046330A1 (en) * | 2006-08-16 | 2008-02-21 | Louay Daoud | Method for an online community of a purchasing management system |
JP4915182B2 (en) * | 2006-09-12 | 2012-04-11 | コニカミノルタホールディングス株式会社 | Information management method and information processing apparatus |
US8036979B1 (en) | 2006-10-05 | 2011-10-11 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and method for generating a finance attribute from tradeline data |
US20080133375A1 (en) * | 2006-12-01 | 2008-06-05 | Alex Henriquez Torrenegra | Method, System and Apparatus for Facilitating Selection of Sellers in an Electronic Commerce System |
US7882550B2 (en) * | 2006-12-29 | 2011-02-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Customized untrusted certificate replication |
US20080167960A1 (en) * | 2007-01-08 | 2008-07-10 | Topcoder, Inc. | System and Method for Collective Response Aggregation |
JP5130722B2 (en) * | 2007-01-19 | 2013-01-30 | セイコーエプソン株式会社 | Authentication apparatus and method |
US20080180729A1 (en) | 2007-01-25 | 2008-07-31 | Hubcast, Inc. | Method and apparatus for printing in a distributed communications network |
US20080196000A1 (en) * | 2007-02-14 | 2008-08-14 | Fernandez-Lvern Javier | System and method for software development |
US20080222055A1 (en) * | 2007-03-07 | 2008-09-11 | Hughes John M | System and Method for Creating Musical Works |
US8073792B2 (en) * | 2007-03-13 | 2011-12-06 | Topcoder, Inc. | System and method for content development |
BR122015028427B1 (en) * | 2007-03-30 | 2016-06-21 | Dow Agrosciences Llc | synergistic herbicide mixture, composition comprising it, as well as method for controlling undesirable vegetation |
US8285656B1 (en) | 2007-03-30 | 2012-10-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
US20080294540A1 (en) | 2007-05-25 | 2008-11-27 | Celka Christopher J | System and method for automated detection of never-pay data sets |
EP2168068B1 (en) * | 2007-06-11 | 2015-08-26 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (publ) | Method and arrangement for certificate handling |
US20090192849A1 (en) * | 2007-11-09 | 2009-07-30 | Hughes John M | System and method for software development |
US9990674B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2018-06-05 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US8127986B1 (en) | 2007-12-14 | 2012-03-06 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Card registry systems and methods |
US20090171743A1 (en) * | 2008-01-02 | 2009-07-02 | Dana Spiegel | Service request system with natural service provider profiling and methods thereof |
WO2009089447A1 (en) * | 2008-01-11 | 2009-07-16 | Topcoder, Inc. | System and method for conducting competitions |
US8538788B1 (en) | 2008-04-02 | 2013-09-17 | Onforce, Inc. | System for work order refinement prior to acceptance and methods thereof |
US8539225B2 (en) * | 2008-04-30 | 2013-09-17 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method and device for dynamic deployment of trust bridges in an ad hoc wireless network |
US20090287596A1 (en) * | 2008-05-15 | 2009-11-19 | Alex Henriquez Torrenegra | Method, System, and Apparatus for Facilitating Transactions Between Sellers and Buyers for Travel Related Services |
US8312033B1 (en) | 2008-06-26 | 2012-11-13 | Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for providing an integrated identifier |
US8924714B2 (en) * | 2008-06-27 | 2014-12-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Authentication with an untrusted root |
EP2148216B1 (en) * | 2008-07-14 | 2013-01-09 | Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) | Time of flight estimation method using beamforming for acoustic tomography |
US9256904B1 (en) | 2008-08-14 | 2016-02-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Multi-bureau credit file freeze and unfreeze |
JP4600544B2 (en) * | 2008-08-22 | 2010-12-15 | ソニー株式会社 | Information processing apparatus, disk, information processing method, and program |
US8060424B2 (en) | 2008-11-05 | 2011-11-15 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | On-line method and system for monitoring and reporting unused available credit |
US9104618B2 (en) | 2008-12-18 | 2015-08-11 | Sandisk Technologies Inc. | Managing access to an address range in a storage device |
US8327424B2 (en) * | 2009-12-22 | 2012-12-04 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting a certificate authority |
US9652802B1 (en) | 2010-03-24 | 2017-05-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Indirect monitoring and reporting of a user's credit data |
US9231768B2 (en) | 2010-06-22 | 2016-01-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Utilizing a deterministic all or nothing transformation in a dispersed storage network |
EP2410481A1 (en) | 2010-07-16 | 2012-01-25 | Druck und Werte GmbH | System and method for controlling and allocating orders |
US8566596B2 (en) * | 2010-08-24 | 2013-10-22 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Pre-association mechanism to provide detailed description of wireless services |
US8930262B1 (en) | 2010-11-02 | 2015-01-06 | Experian Technology Ltd. | Systems and methods of assisted strategy design |
US8627065B2 (en) * | 2010-11-09 | 2014-01-07 | Cleversafe, Inc. | Validating a certificate chain in a dispersed storage network |
US9147042B1 (en) | 2010-11-22 | 2015-09-29 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for data verification |
EP3462317A1 (en) | 2011-02-18 | 2019-04-03 | CSidentity Corporation | System and methods for identifying compromised personally identifiable information on the internet |
US9558519B1 (en) | 2011-04-29 | 2017-01-31 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Exposing reporting cycle information |
US9665854B1 (en) | 2011-06-16 | 2017-05-30 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Authentication alerts |
US8850208B1 (en) * | 2011-06-24 | 2014-09-30 | Emc Corporation | Certificate crosschecking by multiple certificate authorities |
US9483606B1 (en) | 2011-07-08 | 2016-11-01 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Lifescore |
US9106691B1 (en) | 2011-09-16 | 2015-08-11 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods of identity protection and management |
US8738516B1 (en) | 2011-10-13 | 2014-05-27 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Debt services candidate locator |
US11030562B1 (en) | 2011-10-31 | 2021-06-08 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Pre-data breach monitoring |
US8806196B2 (en) * | 2011-11-04 | 2014-08-12 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Method and apparatus for authenticating a digital certificate status and authorization credentials |
US9853959B1 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2017-12-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Storage and maintenance of personal data |
US9654541B1 (en) | 2012-11-12 | 2017-05-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Aggregating user web browsing data |
US9916621B1 (en) | 2012-11-30 | 2018-03-13 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Presentation of credit score factors |
US10255598B1 (en) | 2012-12-06 | 2019-04-09 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit card account data extraction |
US9697263B1 (en) | 2013-03-04 | 2017-07-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Consumer data request fulfillment system |
US9406085B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-08-02 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and methods for credit dispute processing, resolution, and reporting |
US8812387B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2014-08-19 | Csidentity Corporation | System and method for identifying related credit inquiries |
US10102570B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-10-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Account vulnerability alerts |
US9870589B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2018-01-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Credit utilization tracking and reporting |
US10685398B1 (en) | 2013-04-23 | 2020-06-16 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Presenting credit score information |
US9544153B1 (en) * | 2013-08-07 | 2017-01-10 | Google Inc. | Compression of cryptographic chaining certificates |
US9443268B1 (en) | 2013-08-16 | 2016-09-13 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Bill payment and reporting |
DE102013222503A1 (en) * | 2013-11-06 | 2015-05-07 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | A client device and method for embossing a client device to at least one server device |
US10325314B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2019-06-18 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Payment reporting systems |
US10102536B1 (en) | 2013-11-15 | 2018-10-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Micro-geographic aggregation system |
US9477737B1 (en) | 2013-11-20 | 2016-10-25 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Systems and user interfaces for dynamic access of multiple remote databases and synchronization of data based on user rules |
US9529851B1 (en) | 2013-12-02 | 2016-12-27 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Server architecture for electronic data quality processing |
US9229674B2 (en) | 2014-01-31 | 2016-01-05 | Ebay Inc. | 3D printing: marketplace with federated access to printers |
US10262362B1 (en) | 2014-02-14 | 2019-04-16 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Automatic generation of code for attributes |
USD759690S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD760256S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-28 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
USD759689S1 (en) | 2014-03-25 | 2016-06-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Display screen or portion thereof with graphical user interface |
US9892457B1 (en) | 2014-04-16 | 2018-02-13 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Providing credit data in search results |
US9576030B1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2017-02-21 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Keeping up with the joneses |
US10339527B1 (en) | 2014-10-31 | 2019-07-02 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | System and architecture for electronic fraud detection |
US9595037B2 (en) | 2014-12-16 | 2017-03-14 | Ebay Inc. | Digital rights and integrity management in three-dimensional (3D) printing |
US10242019B1 (en) | 2014-12-19 | 2019-03-26 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | User behavior segmentation using latent topic detection |
US9686081B2 (en) * | 2015-07-01 | 2017-06-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Detecting compromised certificate authority |
US11151468B1 (en) | 2015-07-02 | 2021-10-19 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Behavior analysis using distributed representations of event data |
US10708256B1 (en) * | 2015-10-13 | 2020-07-07 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Identification of trusted certificates |
US10757154B1 (en) | 2015-11-24 | 2020-08-25 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Real-time event-based notification system |
JP6728706B2 (en) * | 2016-01-21 | 2020-07-22 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Information processing system, information processing apparatus, and information processing program |
US10678894B2 (en) | 2016-08-24 | 2020-06-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Disambiguation and authentication of device users |
WO2018144612A1 (en) | 2017-01-31 | 2018-08-09 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Massive scale heterogeneous data ingestion and user resolution |
US10432595B2 (en) | 2017-03-08 | 2019-10-01 | Bank Of America Corporation | Secure session creation system utililizing multiple keys |
US10361852B2 (en) | 2017-03-08 | 2019-07-23 | Bank Of America Corporation | Secure verification system |
US10374808B2 (en) | 2017-03-08 | 2019-08-06 | Bank Of America Corporation | Verification system for creating a secure link |
US10425417B2 (en) | 2017-03-08 | 2019-09-24 | Bank Of America Corporation | Certificate system for verifying authorized and unauthorized secure sessions |
US10735183B1 (en) | 2017-06-30 | 2020-08-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Symmetric encryption for private smart contracts among multiple parties in a private peer-to-peer network |
US10699028B1 (en) | 2017-09-28 | 2020-06-30 | Csidentity Corporation | Identity security architecture systems and methods |
TWI639971B (en) * | 2017-10-19 | 2018-11-01 | 慈濟學校財團法人慈濟科技大學 | Reality photograph-incorporated cognitive therapy method, computer program product and system |
US10896472B1 (en) | 2017-11-14 | 2021-01-19 | Csidentity Corporation | Security and identity verification system and architecture |
US10880313B2 (en) | 2018-09-05 | 2020-12-29 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Database platform for realtime updating of user data from third party sources |
US10963434B1 (en) | 2018-09-07 | 2021-03-30 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Data architecture for supporting multiple search models |
US11315179B1 (en) | 2018-11-16 | 2022-04-26 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for customized card recommendations |
US11620403B2 (en) | 2019-01-11 | 2023-04-04 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for secure data aggregation and computation |
US11238656B1 (en) | 2019-02-22 | 2022-02-01 | Consumerinfo.Com, Inc. | System and method for an augmented reality experience via an artificial intelligence bot |
US20210321255A1 (en) * | 2020-04-10 | 2021-10-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for verifying mobile device communications |
US11880377B1 (en) | 2021-03-26 | 2024-01-23 | Experian Information Solutions, Inc. | Systems and methods for entity resolution |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5765138A (en) * | 1995-08-23 | 1998-06-09 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Apparatus and method for providing interactive evaluation of potential vendors |
US6014644A (en) * | 1996-11-22 | 2000-01-11 | Pp International, Inc. | Centrally coordinated communication systems with multiple broadcast data objects and response tracking |
US6397197B1 (en) * | 1998-08-26 | 2002-05-28 | E-Lynxx Corporation | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
Family Cites Families (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5592375A (en) | 1994-03-11 | 1997-01-07 | Eagleview, Inc. | Computer-assisted system for interactively brokering goods or services between buyers and sellers |
US5664115A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1997-09-02 | Fraser; Richard | Interactive computer system to match buyers and sellers of real estate, businesses and other property using the internet |
US5745574A (en) * | 1995-12-15 | 1998-04-28 | Entegrity Solutions Corporation | Security infrastructure for electronic transactions |
US5862325A (en) * | 1996-02-29 | 1999-01-19 | Intermind Corporation | Computer-based communication system and method using metadata defining a control structure |
US5903882A (en) * | 1996-12-13 | 1999-05-11 | Certco, Llc | Reliance server for electronic transaction system |
US7127741B2 (en) * | 1998-11-03 | 2006-10-24 | Tumbleweed Communications Corp. | Method and system for e-mail message transmission |
US6092202A (en) * | 1998-05-22 | 2000-07-18 | N*Able Technologies, Inc. | Method and system for secure transactions in a computer system |
US6321333B1 (en) * | 1998-10-14 | 2001-11-20 | Wave Systems Corporation | Efficient digital certificate processing in a data processing system |
US6701415B1 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2004-03-02 | America Online, Inc. | Selecting a cache for a request for information |
US6567784B2 (en) * | 1999-06-03 | 2003-05-20 | Ework Exchange, Inc. | Method and apparatus for matching projects and workers |
CA2369122C (en) * | 1999-06-04 | 2008-01-22 | Rex J. Crookshanks | Building construction bid and contract management system, internet-based method and computer program therefor |
EA200200305A1 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2002-10-31 | Веллоджикс Инк. | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ENSURING AGREEMENT BETWEEN BUYERS AND SELLERS OF GOODS AND / OR SERVICES |
GB2366013B (en) * | 2000-08-17 | 2002-11-27 | Sun Microsystems Inc | Certificate validation mechanism |
US20020078347A1 (en) * | 2000-12-20 | 2002-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for using with confidence certificates issued from certificate authorities |
US6970862B2 (en) * | 2001-05-31 | 2005-11-29 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and system for answering online certificate status protocol (OCSP) requests without certificate revocation lists (CRL) |
US8195933B2 (en) * | 2002-01-10 | 2012-06-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and system for computing digital certificate trust paths using transitive closures |
-
1999
- 1999-08-26 US US09/383,371 patent/US6397197B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-01-28 US US10/058,490 patent/US20040078277A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2003
- 2003-03-03 US US10/376,249 patent/US7383434B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5765138A (en) * | 1995-08-23 | 1998-06-09 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Apparatus and method for providing interactive evaluation of potential vendors |
US6014644A (en) * | 1996-11-22 | 2000-01-11 | Pp International, Inc. | Centrally coordinated communication systems with multiple broadcast data objects and response tracking |
US6397197B1 (en) * | 1998-08-26 | 2002-05-28 | E-Lynxx Corporation | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors |
Cited By (39)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7895117B2 (en) | 1999-12-06 | 2011-02-22 | Alsberg Peter A | Methods and systems for market clearance |
US8442898B2 (en) | 1999-12-06 | 2013-05-14 | Aggregation Commerce, Llc | Methods and systems for market clearance |
US20010032162A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2001-10-18 | Alsberg Peter A. | Methods and systems for market clearance |
US7349879B2 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2008-03-25 | Alsberg Peter A | Methods and systems for market clearance |
US20110119172A1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2011-05-19 | Alsberg Peter A | Methods and Systems for Market Clearance |
US20020077954A1 (en) * | 1999-12-29 | 2002-06-20 | Slaight Thomas H. | Sourcing system and method |
US20010049652A1 (en) * | 2000-05-31 | 2001-12-06 | Koichi Nakajima | Auction system |
US20040059637A1 (en) * | 2000-06-20 | 2004-03-25 | Dohyun Jung | System and method of auction |
US20030225474A1 (en) * | 2002-05-31 | 2003-12-04 | Gustavo Mata | Specialization of active software agents in an automated manufacturing environment |
US20060259408A1 (en) * | 2003-08-04 | 2006-11-16 | Levy Douglas A | Method and system for facilitating purchasing of advertising via electronic auction |
US20060155640A1 (en) * | 2003-09-12 | 2006-07-13 | Christopher Kennedy | Product optimizer |
US20130006797A1 (en) * | 2003-09-12 | 2013-01-03 | Altisource Solutions S.A R.L | Methods and systems for vendor assurance |
US20080275582A1 (en) * | 2004-11-19 | 2008-11-06 | Nettles Steven C | Scheduling AMHS pickup and delivery ahead of schedule |
US20100274682A1 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2010-10-28 | Umesh Pai | distributed purchasing system |
WO2009081347A1 (en) * | 2007-12-20 | 2009-07-02 | Umesh Pai | A distributed purchasing system |
US8812335B2 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2014-08-19 | Xerox Corporation | Automated direct mail procurement system |
US8494898B2 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2013-07-23 | Xerox Corporation | Campaign management of direct mail |
US8341001B2 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2012-12-25 | Xerox Corporation | Campaign management of direct mail |
US8341000B2 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2012-12-25 | Xerox Corporation | Automated direct mail procurement system |
US20100268567A1 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2010-10-21 | Snow Lewis S | Automated direct mail procurement system |
US20130066668A1 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2013-03-14 | Xerox Corporation | Automated direct mail procurement system |
US20100268608A1 (en) * | 2009-04-21 | 2010-10-21 | Xerox Corporation | Campaign management of direct mail |
US20110047034A1 (en) * | 2009-08-18 | 2011-02-24 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for processing print jobs |
US20110145085A1 (en) * | 2009-12-15 | 2011-06-16 | Araz Khachatrian | System for assessing environmental impact of processing print jobs |
US8676666B2 (en) * | 2009-12-15 | 2014-03-18 | Xerox Corporation | System for assessing environmental impact of processing print jobs |
US20110251915A1 (en) * | 2010-04-09 | 2011-10-13 | Lutnick Howard W | Multi-system distributed processing of delivery services |
US8407101B2 (en) * | 2010-04-09 | 2013-03-26 | Cfph, Llc | Multi-system distributed processing of delivery services |
US20120239525A1 (en) * | 2011-03-18 | 2012-09-20 | Hewlett-Packard Company | System and method for generating quantitative guideline for print order |
US20130054307A1 (en) * | 2011-08-26 | 2013-02-28 | Daphoria, Inc. | Labor and Materials Purchasing System for the Construction Industry |
US20130107313A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Xerox Corporation | Evaluating and managing image quality performance and improving service effectiveness of groups of production printers |
US9069494B2 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2015-06-30 | Xerox Corporation | Evaluating and managing image quality performance and improving service effectiveness of groups of production printers |
US20130163034A1 (en) * | 2011-12-27 | 2013-06-27 | Xerox Corporation | Vendor selection method and system for wide format printing |
US10672053B1 (en) | 2013-08-19 | 2020-06-02 | Michael J. Clemmens | Systems, manufactures, and methods for comparative bid analysis and purchase order preparation |
WO2016007859A1 (en) * | 2014-07-11 | 2016-01-14 | Kleermail Corporation | Methods, apparatuses, and systems for facilitating management and/or automation of direct mail campaigns and other bulk/high volume mailings |
WO2016033129A1 (en) * | 2014-08-29 | 2016-03-03 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Three-dimensional printing |
CN106575316A (en) * | 2014-08-29 | 2017-04-19 | 微软技术许可有限责任公司 | Three-dimensional printing |
US9862149B2 (en) | 2014-08-29 | 2018-01-09 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Print bureau interface for three-dimensional printing |
US10618221B2 (en) | 2014-08-29 | 2020-04-14 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Print bureau interface for three-dimensional printing |
US10019743B1 (en) | 2014-09-19 | 2018-07-10 | Altisource S.á r.l. | Methods and systems for auto expanding vendor selection |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20030212888A1 (en) | 2003-11-13 |
US6397197B1 (en) | 2002-05-28 |
US7383434B2 (en) | 2008-06-03 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6397197B1 (en) | Apparatus and method for obtaining lowest bid from information product vendors | |
US8682743B2 (en) | System and method for competitive pricing and procurement of customized goods and services | |
US7499871B1 (en) | System and method for procurement of products | |
US7003486B1 (en) | Net-value creation and allocation in an electronic trading system | |
US20020128953A1 (en) | Price discovery and negotiations and related processes | |
US8046265B2 (en) | Systems and methods for facilitating a transaction by matching seller information and buyer information | |
US7346562B2 (en) | System for placing orders using customer-specific electronic catalog | |
US7330833B1 (en) | System and method for auctioning services over an information exchange network | |
US8595076B2 (en) | Method and system for purchase of a product or service using a communication network site | |
KR102261344B1 (en) | Method for Manufacturing and Transactions of Advertisement Printed Matter Using Integrated Services Platform | |
US8738428B2 (en) | Managing retail promotion events | |
WO2008091259A1 (en) | Search engine for facilitating the sale, transfer, and/or assignment of intellectual property | |
US7796283B2 (en) | System and method for utilizing excess printing capability | |
JP2001312619A (en) | Method and system for carrying out computerized commerce | |
US20050177468A1 (en) | Request for quote system and method | |
EP1228475A1 (en) | A system for competitive pricing procurement of customized goods and services | |
Crawford et al. | Business and legal forms for graphic designers | |
KR102261343B1 (en) | Method for Shopping Advertisement Printed Matter Using Integrated Services Platform | |
Garusing Arachchige | Application of Marketing mix elements (4Ps) in the Library sector | |
US20050071176A1 (en) | Solicitation plans | |
EP1224599A1 (en) | A system and method for competitive pricing and procurement of customized goods and services | |
Chambersburg | PRICING AND PROCUREMENT OF CUSTOMIZED GOODS AND SERVICES | |
KR20020000901A (en) | System and method of electronic commerce for electric power industry | |
Facente | An overview of American publishing for librarians | |
Scheer | Effective marketing methods in export management companies |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |