US20030205376A1 - Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment - Google Patents

Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030205376A1
US20030205376A1 US10/249,523 US24952303A US2003205376A1 US 20030205376 A1 US20030205376 A1 US 20030205376A1 US 24952303 A US24952303 A US 24952303A US 2003205376 A1 US2003205376 A1 US 2003205376A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
devices
fracture
fracturing
proppant
elongated particles
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/249,523
Inventor
Joseph Ayoub
Stuart Jardine
Peter Fitzgerald
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Original Assignee
Schlumberger Technology Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Schlumberger Technology Corp filed Critical Schlumberger Technology Corp
Priority to US10/249,523 priority Critical patent/US20030205376A1/en
Assigned to SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION reassignment SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: AYOUB, JOSEPH, JARDINE, STUART, FITZGERALD, PETER
Publication of US20030205376A1 publication Critical patent/US20030205376A1/en
Priority to US11/064,990 priority patent/US7082993B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B49/00Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B43/00Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
    • E21B43/25Methods for stimulating production
    • E21B43/26Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/09Locating or determining the position of objects in boreholes or wells, e.g. the position of an extending arm; Identifying the free or blocked portions of pipes

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to the art of hydraulic fracturing in subterranean formations and more particularly to a method and means for assessing the fracture geometry during or after the hydraulic fracturing.
  • Hydraulic fracturing is a primary tool for improving well productivity by placing or extending cracks or channels from the wellbore to the reservoir. This operation is essentially performed by hydraulically injecting a fracturing fluid into a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation and forcing the fracturing fluid against the formation strata by pressure. The formation strata or rock is forced to crack, creating or enlarging one or more fractures. Proppant is placed in the fracture to prevent the fracture from closing and thus, provide improved flow of the recoverable fluid, i.e., oil, gas or water.
  • the recoverable fluid i.e., oil, gas or water.
  • the proppant is thus used to hold the walls of the fracture apart to create a conductive path to the wellbore after pumping has stopped. Placing the appropriate proppant at the appropriate concentration to form a suitable proppant pack is thus critical to the success of a hydraulic fracture treatment.
  • the geometry of the hydraulic fracture placed affects directly the efficiency of the process and the success of the operation. This geometry is generally inferred using models and data interpretation, but to date, no direct measurements are available.
  • the present invention is aimed at obtaining more direct measurements of the fracture geometry (e.g. length, height away from the wellbore).
  • the fracture geometry is often inferred through use of models and interpretation of pressure measurements. Occasionally, temperature logs and/or radioactive tracer logs are used to infer fracture height near the wellbore. Microseismic events generated in the vicinity of the created hydraulic fracture are recorded and interpreted to indicate the direction (azimuth) and length and height of the created fracture.
  • the fracture geometry is evaluated by placing inside the fracture small devices that, either actively or passively, give us measurements of the fracture geometry.
  • Fracture materials small objects with distinctive properties e.g. metal beads with very low resistivity
  • devices e.g. small electronic or acoustic transmitters
  • active devices are added into the fracturing fluid. These devices will actively transmit data that provide information on the device position and thereafter, can be associated with fracture geometry.
  • passive devices are added into the fracturing fluid.
  • these passive devices are also used as proppant.
  • Examples of “active” device include electronic microsensors, for example such as radio frequency transmitter, or acoustic transceivers. These “active” devices will be integrated with location tracking hardware to transmit their position as they flow with the fracture fluid/slurry inside the created fracture.
  • the microsensors can be pumped with the hydraulic fracturing fluids throughout the treatment or during selected strategic stage of the fracturing treatment (pad, forward portion of the proppant-loaded fluid, tail portion of the proppant-loaded fluid) to provide direct indication of the fracture length and height.
  • the microsensors would form a network using wireless links to neighboring microsensors and have location and positioning capability through for example local positioning algorithms.
  • Pressure and Temperature sensors could also be integrated with the above-mentioned active devices. The resulting pressure and temperature measurements would be used to better calibrate and advance the modeling techniques for hydraulic fracture propagation. They would also allow optimization of the fracturing fluids by indicating the actual conditions under which these fluids are expected to perform. In addition chemical sensors could also be integrated to allow monitoring of the fluid performance during the treatment.
  • the number of active devices required is small compared to the number of proppant grains, it is possible to use devices significantly bigger than the proppant pumped in the fracturing fluid.
  • the active devices could be added after the blending unit and slurry pump, for instance through a lateral by-pass.
  • Examples of such device include small wireless sensor networks that combine microsensor technology, low power distributed signal processing, and low cost wireless networking capability in a compact system as disclosed for instance in International Patent Application WO0126334, preferably using a data-handling protocol such as TinyOS, so that the devices organize themselves in a network by listening to one another, therefore allowing communication from the tip of the fracture to the well and on to the surface even if the signals are weak so that the signals are relayed from the farthest devices towards the devices still closest to the recorder to allow uninterrupted transmission and capture of data.
  • the sensors may be designed using MEMS technology or the spherical shaped semiconductor integrated circuit as known form U.S.
  • a recorder placed at surface or, downhole in the wellbore could capture and record/transmit the data sent by the devices to a computer for further processing and analysis.
  • the data could also be transmitted to offices in any part of the world using the Internet to allow remote participation in decisions affecting the hydraulic fracturing treatment outcome.
  • antennas could be deployed across the perforation tunnels. These antennas could be mounted on non-conductive spherical or ovoid balls slightly larger than the perforation diameter and designed to be pumped and to seat in some of the perforations and relay the signals across the metallic casing wall. An alternative method of deployment would be for the transmitter to trail an antenna wire while being pumped.
  • a further variant would cover the case where the measuring devices are optical fibers with a physical link to a recorder at surface or in the borehole that would be deployed through the perforations when the well is cased perforated or directly into the fracture in an open hole situation.
  • the optical fiber would allow length measurements as well as pressure and temperature.
  • An important alternative embodiment of this invention covers the use of materials with specific properties that would enable information on the fracture geometry to be obtained using an additional measurement device.
  • Passive materials include the use of metallic fibers or beads as proppant. These would replace some or all of the conventional proppant and may have sufficient compressive-strength to resist crushing at fracture closure. A tool to measure resistivity at varying depths of investigation would be deployed in the borehole of the fractured well. As the proppant is conductive with a significant contrast in resistivity compared to the surrounding formations, the resistance measurements would be interpreted to provide information on fracture geometry.
  • ferrous/magnetic fibers or beads are used. These would replace some or all of the conventional proppant and may have sufficient compressive strength to resist crushing at fracture closure.
  • a tool containing magnetometers would be deployed in the borehole of the fractured well. As the proppant generates a significant contrast in magnetic field compared to the surrounding formations, the magnetic field measurements would be interpreted to provide information on fracture geometry.
  • the measuring tools are deployed on the surface or in offset wells. More generally, tools such as resistivity tools, electromagnetic devices, and ultra long arrays of electrodes, can easily detect this proppant enabling fracture height, fracture width, and with processing, the propped fracture length to some extent can be determined.
  • a further step is covered whereby the information provided be the techniques described above would be used to calibrate parameters in a fracture propagation model to allow more accurate design and implementation of fractures in nearby wells in geological formations with similar properties and immediate action on the design of the fracture being placed to further the economic outcome.
  • the real time design tool would be re-calibrated and used to validate an extension of the pump schedule. This extension would incorporate injection of additional proppant laden slurry to achieve the tip screenout necessary for production performance, while not breaking through into the water zone.
  • the measurements would also indicate the success of special materials and pumping procedures that are utilized during a fracture treatment to keep the fracture confined away from a nearby water or gas zone. This knowledge would allow either proceeding with the treatment with confidence of its economic success, or taking additional actions, e.g. re-design or repeat the special pumping procedure and materials to ensure better success at staying away from the water zone.
  • metallic particles may be used. These particles may be added as a “filler” to the proppant or replaces part of the proppant.
  • metallic particles consisting of an elongated particulate metallic material, wherein individual particles of said particulate material have a shape with a lengthaspect ration greater than 5 are used both as proppant and “passive” materials.
  • the use of metallic fibers as proppant contributes to enhance proppant conductivity and is further compatible with techniques known to enhance proppant conductivity such as the use of conductivity enhancing materials (in particular the use of breakers) and the use of non-damaging fracturing based fluids such as gelled oils, viscoelastic surfactant based fluids, foamed fluids and emulsified fluids.
  • At least part of the proppant consists of metallic
  • at least part of the fracturing fluid comprises a proppant essentially consisting essentially of an elongated particulate metallic material
  • said individual particles of said particulate material have a shape with a lengthaspect ration greater than 5.
  • the elongated material is most commonly a wire segment, other shapes such as ribbon or fibers having a non-constant diameter may also be used, provided that the length to equivalent diameter is greater than 5, preferably greater than 8 and most preferably greater than 10.
  • the individual particles of said particulate material have a length ranging between about 1 mm and 25 mm, most preferably ranging between about 2 mm and about 15 mm, most preferably from about 5 mm to about 10 mm.
  • Preferred diameters typically range between about 0.1 mm and about 1 mm and most preferably between about 0.2 mm and about 0.5 mm. It must be understood that depending on the process of manufacturing, small variations of shapes, lengths and diameters are normally expected.
  • the elongated material is substantially metallic but can include an organic part for instance such as a resin-coating.
  • Preferred metal includes iron, ferrite, low carbon steel, stainless steel and iron-alloys.
  • “soft” alloys may be used though metallic wires having a hardness between about 45 and about 55 Rockwell C are usually preferred.
  • the wire-proppant of the invention can be used during the whole propping stage or to only prop part of the fracture.
  • the method of propping a fracture in a subterranean formation comprises two non-simultaneous steps of placing a first proppant consisting of an essentially spherical particulate non-metallic material and placing a second proppant consisting essentially of an elongated material having a length to equivalent diameter greater than 5.
  • spherical particulate non-metallic material By essentially spherical particulate non-metallic material it is meant hereby any conventional proppant, well known from those skilled in the art of fracturing, and consisting for instance of sand, silica, synthetic organic particles, glass microspheres, ceramics including alumino-silicates, sintered bauxite and mixtures thereof or deformable particulate material as described for instance in U.S. Pat. No. 6,330,916.
  • the wire-proppant is only added to a portion of the fracturing fluid, preferably the tail portion.
  • the wire-proppant of the invention is not blended with the conventional material and the fracture proppant material or if blended with, the conventional material makes up to no more than about 25% by weight of the total fracture proppant mixture, preferably no more than about 15% by weight.
  • the wire was about 1.6 mm diameter.
  • the conductivity is the product of the permeability (in milliDarcy) by the fracture gap (in feet).

Abstract

The present invention relates to methods of fracturing a subterranean formation including the step of pumping at least one device actively transmitting data that provide information on the device position, and further comprising the step of assessing the fracture geometry based on the positions of said at least one device or pumping metallic elements, preferably as proppant agents, and further locating the position of said metallic elements with a tool selected from the group consisting of magnetometers, resistivity tools, electromagnetic devices and ultra-long arrays of electrodes. The invention allows monitoring of the fracture geometry and proppant placement.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
  • This invention relates generally to the art of hydraulic fracturing in subterranean formations and more particularly to a method and means for assessing the fracture geometry during or after the hydraulic fracturing. [0001]
  • Hydraulic fracturing is a primary tool for improving well productivity by placing or extending cracks or channels from the wellbore to the reservoir. This operation is essentially performed by hydraulically injecting a fracturing fluid into a wellbore penetrating a subterranean formation and forcing the fracturing fluid against the formation strata by pressure. The formation strata or rock is forced to crack, creating or enlarging one or more fractures. Proppant is placed in the fracture to prevent the fracture from closing and thus, provide improved flow of the recoverable fluid, i.e., oil, gas or water. [0002]
  • The proppant is thus used to hold the walls of the fracture apart to create a conductive path to the wellbore after pumping has stopped. Placing the appropriate proppant at the appropriate concentration to form a suitable proppant pack is thus critical to the success of a hydraulic fracture treatment. [0003]
  • The geometry of the hydraulic fracture placed affects directly the efficiency of the process and the success of the operation. This geometry is generally inferred using models and data interpretation, but to date, no direct measurements are available. The present invention is aimed at obtaining more direct measurements of the fracture geometry (e.g. length, height away from the wellbore). [0004]
  • The fracture geometry is often inferred through use of models and interpretation of pressure measurements. Occasionally, temperature logs and/or radioactive tracer logs are used to infer fracture height near the wellbore. Microseismic events generated in the vicinity of the created hydraulic fracture are recorded and interpreted to indicate the direction (azimuth) and length and height of the created fracture. [0005]
  • However, these known methods are indirect measurement, and rely on interpretations that may be erroneous, and are difficult to use for real-time evaluation and optimization of the hydraulic fracture treatment. [0006]
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a new approach to evaluate the fracture geometry. [0007]
  • SUMMARY OF INVENTION
  • According to the present invention, the fracture geometry is evaluated by placing inside the fracture small devices that, either actively or passively, give us measurements of the fracture geometry. Fracture materials (small objects with distinctive properties e.g. metal beads with very low resistivity) or devices (e.g. small electronic or acoustic transmitters) are introduced into the fracture during the fracture treatment with the fracturing fluid. [0008]
  • According to a first embodiment of the present invention, active devices are added into the fracturing fluid. These devices will actively transmit data that provide information on the device position and thereafter, can be associated with fracture geometry. [0009]
  • According to another embodiment of the present invention, passive devices are added into the fracturing fluid. In the preferred embodiment, these passive devices are also used as proppant.[0010]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Examples of “active” device include electronic microsensors, for example such as radio frequency transmitter, or acoustic transceivers. These “active” devices will be integrated with location tracking hardware to transmit their position as they flow with the fracture fluid/slurry inside the created fracture. The microsensors can be pumped with the hydraulic fracturing fluids throughout the treatment or during selected strategic stage of the fracturing treatment (pad, forward portion of the proppant-loaded fluid, tail portion of the proppant-loaded fluid) to provide direct indication of the fracture length and height. The microsensors would form a network using wireless links to neighboring microsensors and have location and positioning capability through for example local positioning algorithms. [0011]
  • Pressure and Temperature sensors could also be integrated with the above-mentioned active devices. The resulting pressure and temperature measurements would be used to better calibrate and advance the modeling techniques for hydraulic fracture propagation. They would also allow optimization of the fracturing fluids by indicating the actual conditions under which these fluids are expected to perform. In addition chemical sensors could also be integrated to allow monitoring of the fluid performance during the treatment. [0012]
  • Since the number of active devices required is small compared to the number of proppant grains, it is possible to use devices significantly bigger than the proppant pumped in the fracturing fluid. The active devices could be added after the blending unit and slurry pump, for instance through a lateral by-pass. [0013]
  • Examples of such device include small wireless sensor networks that combine microsensor technology, low power distributed signal processing, and low cost wireless networking capability in a compact system as disclosed for instance in International Patent Application WO0126334, preferably using a data-handling protocol such as TinyOS, so that the devices organize themselves in a network by listening to one another, therefore allowing communication from the tip of the fracture to the well and on to the surface even if the signals are weak so that the signals are relayed from the farthest devices towards the devices still closest to the recorder to allow uninterrupted transmission and capture of data. The sensors may be designed using MEMS technology or the spherical shaped semiconductor integrated circuit as known form U.S. [0014]
  • A recorder placed at surface or, downhole in the wellbore, could capture and record/transmit the data sent by the devices to a computer for further processing and analysis. The data could also be transmitted to offices in any part of the world using the Internet to allow remote participation in decisions affecting the hydraulic fracturing treatment outcome. [0015]
  • Should the frequency range utilized by the electronic transmitters be such that the borehole metal casing would block its transmission from the formation behind the casing into the wellbore, antennas could be deployed across the perforation tunnels. These antennas could be mounted on non-conductive spherical or ovoid balls slightly larger than the perforation diameter and designed to be pumped and to seat in some of the perforations and relay the signals across the metallic casing wall. An alternative method of deployment would be for the transmitter to trail an antenna wire while being pumped. [0016]
  • A further variant would cover the case where the measuring devices are optical fibers with a physical link to a recorder at surface or in the borehole that would be deployed through the perforations when the well is cased perforated or directly into the fracture in an open hole situation. The optical fiber would allow length measurements as well as pressure and temperature. [0017]
  • An important alternative embodiment of this invention covers the use of materials with specific properties that would enable information on the fracture geometry to be obtained using an additional measurement device. [0018]
  • Specific examples of “passive” materials include the use of metallic fibers or beads as proppant. These would replace some or all of the conventional proppant and may have sufficient compressive-strength to resist crushing at fracture closure. A tool to measure resistivity at varying depths of investigation would be deployed in the borehole of the fractured well. As the proppant is conductive with a significant contrast in resistivity compared to the surrounding formations, the resistance measurements would be interpreted to provide information on fracture geometry. [0019]
  • Another example is the use of ferrous/magnetic fibers or beads. These would replace some or all of the conventional proppant and may have sufficient compressive strength to resist crushing at fracture closure. A tool containing magnetometers would be deployed in the borehole of the fractured well. As the proppant generates a significant contrast in magnetic field compared to the surrounding formations, the magnetic field measurements would be interpreted to provide information on fracture geometry. According to a variant of this example, the measuring tools are deployed on the surface or in offset wells. More generally, tools such as resistivity tools, electromagnetic devices, and ultra long arrays of electrodes, can easily detect this proppant enabling fracture height, fracture width, and with processing, the propped fracture length to some extent can be determined. [0020]
  • A further step is covered whereby the information provided be the techniques described above would be used to calibrate parameters in a fracture propagation model to allow more accurate design and implementation of fractures in nearby wells in geological formations with similar properties and immediate action on the design of the fracture being placed to further the economic outcome. [0021]
  • For example, if the measurements indicate that the fracture treatment is confined to only a portion of the formation interval being treated, real time design tools would validate suggested actions, e.g. increase rate and viscosity of the fluid or use of ball sealer to divert the fluid and treat the remainder of the interval of interest. [0022]
  • If the measurements indicate that the sought after tip screenout did not occur yet in a typical Frac and Pack treatment and that the fracture created is still at a safe distance from a nearby water zone, the real time design tool would be re-calibrated and used to validate an extension of the pump schedule. This extension would incorporate injection of additional proppant laden slurry to achieve the tip screenout necessary for production performance, while not breaking through into the water zone. [0023]
  • The measurements would also indicate the success of special materials and pumping procedures that are utilized during a fracture treatment to keep the fracture confined away from a nearby water or gas zone. This knowledge would allow either proceeding with the treatment with confidence of its economic success, or taking additional actions, e.g. re-design or repeat the special pumping procedure and materials to ensure better success at staying away from the water zone. [0024]
  • Among the “passive” materials, metallic particles may be used. These particles may be added as a “filler” to the proppant or replaces part of the proppant, In a most preferred embodiment, metallic particles consisting of an elongated particulate metallic material, wherein individual particles of said particulate material have a shape with a lengthaspect ration greater than 5 are used both as proppant and “passive” materials. [0025]
  • Advantageously, the use of metallic fibers as proppant contributes to enhance proppant conductivity and is further compatible with techniques known to enhance proppant conductivity such as the use of conductivity enhancing materials (in particular the use of breakers) and the use of non-damaging fracturing based fluids such as gelled oils, viscoelastic surfactant based fluids, foamed fluids and emulsified fluids. [0026]
  • Where at least part of the proppant consists of metallic In all embodiments of the disclosed invention, at least part of the fracturing fluid comprises a proppant essentially consisting essentially of an elongated particulate metallic material, said individual particles of said particulate material have a shape with a lengthaspect ration greater than 5. Though the elongated material is most commonly a wire segment, other shapes such as ribbon or fibers having a non-constant diameter may also be used, provided that the length to equivalent diameter is greater than 5, preferably greater than 8 and most preferably greater than 10. According to a preferred embodiment, the individual particles of said particulate material have a length ranging between about 1 mm and 25 mm, most preferably ranging between about 2 mm and about 15 mm, most preferably from about 5 mm to about 10 mm. Preferred diameters (or equivalent diameter where the base is not circular) typically range between about 0.1 mm and about 1 mm and most preferably between about 0.2 mm and about 0.5 mm. It must be understood that depending on the process of manufacturing, small variations of shapes, lengths and diameters are normally expected. [0027]
  • The elongated material is substantially metallic but can include an organic part for instance such as a resin-coating. Preferred metal includes iron, ferrite, low carbon steel, stainless steel and iron-alloys. Depending on the application, and more particularly of the closure stress expected to be encountered in the fracture, “soft” alloys may be used though metallic wires having a hardness between about 45 and about 55 Rockwell C are usually preferred. [0028]
  • The wire-proppant of the invention can be used during the whole propping stage or to only prop part of the fracture. In one embodiment, the method of propping a fracture in a subterranean formation comprises two non-simultaneous steps of placing a first proppant consisting of an essentially spherical particulate non-metallic material and placing a second proppant consisting essentially of an elongated material having a length to equivalent diameter greater than 5. By essentially spherical particulate non-metallic material it is meant hereby any conventional proppant, well known from those skilled in the art of fracturing, and consisting for instance of sand, silica, synthetic organic particles, glass microspheres, ceramics including alumino-silicates, sintered bauxite and mixtures thereof or deformable particulate material as described for instance in U.S. Pat. No. 6,330,916. In another embodiment, the wire-proppant is only added to a portion of the fracturing fluid, preferably the tail portion. In both cases, the wire-proppant of the invention is not blended with the conventional material and the fracture proppant material or if blended with, the conventional material makes up to no more than about 25% by weight of the total fracture proppant mixture, preferably no more than about 15% by weight. [0029]
  • Experiemental Methods: [0030]
  • A test was made to compare proppant made of metallic balls, made of stainless steel SS 302, having an average diameter of about 1.6 mm and wire proppant manufactured by cutting an uncoated iron wire of SS 302 stainless steel into segments approximately 7.6 mm long. The wire was about 1.6 mm diameter. [0031]
  • The proppant was deposited between two Ohio sandstone slabs in a fracture conductivity apparatus and subjected to a standard proppant pack conductivity test. The experiments were done at 100 ° F., 2 lb/ft proppant loading and 3 closure stresses, 3000, 6000 and 9000 psi (corresponding to about 20.6, 41.4 and 62 MPa). The permeability, fracture gap and conductivity results of steel balls and wires are shown in Table 1. [0032]
    Permeability · Fracture · Conductivity
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00801
    losure · Str- (darcy)
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    Gap
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00801
    · (inch)
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    (md-ft)
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    ess¶ (psi)
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    Ball
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    Wire
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    Ball
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    Wire
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    Ball
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    Wire
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    3000
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    3,703
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    10,335
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    0.085
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    0.119
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    26,232
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    102,398
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    6000
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    1,077
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    4,126
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    0.061
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    0.095
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    5,472
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    33,090
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    9000
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    705
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    1,304
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    0.064
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    0.076
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    3,174
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
    8,249
    Figure US20030205376A1-20031106-P00802
  • The conductivity is the product of the permeability (in milliDarcy) by the fracture gap (in feet). [0033]

Claims (27)

1. A method of fracturing a subterranean formation comprising injecting a fracturing fluid, into a hydraulic fracture created into a subterranean formation, wherein at least a portion of the fracturing fluid comprises at least one device actively transmitting data that provide information on the device position, and further comprising the step of assessing the fracture geometry based on the positions of said devices.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said devices are electronic devices.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said devices are radio frequency or other EM wave transmitters.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said devices are—acoustic devices.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein said devices are ultrasonic transceivers.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one device is pumped during the pad stage and at least one device is pumped during the tail portion.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein said devices also transmit information as to the temperature of the surrounding formation.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein said devices also transmit information as to the pressure.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein a plurality of devices is injected, said devices organized in a wireless network.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the devices are electronic transmitters and the method further includes the deployment of at least an antenna.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein antennas are mounted on non-conductive balls that are pumped with the fluid and seat in some of the perforations relaying the signals from sensors behind the casing wall.
12. The method of claim 10, wherein the antenna is trailed by the transmitter within the fracture while the transmitter is pumped.
13. The method of claim 1, where the device is an optical fiber deployed through the perforation.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the optical fiber is further deployed through the fracture.
15. A method of fracturing a subterranean formation comprising injecting a fracturing fluid, into a hydraulic fracture created into a subterranean formation, wherein at least a portion of the fracturing fluid comprises metallic elements and further comprising the step of locating the position of said metallic elements with a tool selected from the group consisting of magnetometers, resistivity tools, electromagnetic devices and ultra-long arrays of electrodes.
16. The method of claim 15 wherein said metallic material comprises elongated particles having a length to equivalent diameter greater than 5.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein said particles have a shape with a lengthaspect ration greater than 10.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein said elongated particles have a wire-segment shape.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein said elongated particles are in a material selected from the group consisting of iron, ferrite, low carbon steel, stainless steel and iron-alloys.
20. The method of claim 16, where said elongated particles consists of metallic wires having a hardness of between 45 and 55 Rockwell.
21. The method of claim 16, wherein said elongated particles are resin-coated.
22. The method of claim 16, wherein said elongated particles have a length of between 1 and 25 mm.
23. The method of claim 22, wherein said elongated particles have a length of between about 2 and about 15 mm.
24. The method of claim 16, wherein said elongated particles have a diameter of between about 0.1 mm and about 1 mm.
25. The method of claim 16, wherein said individual particles of said elongated particulate material have a diameter of between about 0.2 mm and about 0.5 mm.
26. The method of claim 1, wherein the geometry of the fracture is monitored in real-time during the hydraulic fracturing treatment.
27. The method of claim 15, wherein the geometry of the fracture is monitored in real-time during the hydraulic fracturing treatment.
US10/249,523 2002-04-19 2003-04-16 Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment Abandoned US20030205376A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/249,523 US20030205376A1 (en) 2002-04-19 2003-04-16 Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment
US11/064,990 US7082993B2 (en) 2002-04-19 2005-02-24 Means and method for assessing the geometry of a subterranean fracture during or after a hydraulic fracturing treatment

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US37421702P 2002-04-19 2002-04-19
US10/249,523 US20030205376A1 (en) 2002-04-19 2003-04-16 Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/064,990 Division US7082993B2 (en) 2002-04-19 2005-02-24 Means and method for assessing the geometry of a subterranean fracture during or after a hydraulic fracturing treatment

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030205376A1 true US20030205376A1 (en) 2003-11-06

Family

ID=29251160

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/249,523 Abandoned US20030205376A1 (en) 2002-04-19 2003-04-16 Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment
US11/064,990 Expired - Lifetime US7082993B2 (en) 2002-04-19 2005-02-24 Means and method for assessing the geometry of a subterranean fracture during or after a hydraulic fracturing treatment

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/064,990 Expired - Lifetime US7082993B2 (en) 2002-04-19 2005-02-24 Means and method for assessing the geometry of a subterranean fracture during or after a hydraulic fracturing treatment

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US20030205376A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2003224097A1 (en)
CA (1) CA2482943C (en)
EA (1) EA005808B1 (en)
MX (1) MXPA04010051A (en)
WO (1) WO2003089757A1 (en)

Cited By (71)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040016541A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2004-01-29 Emmanuel Detournay Interpretation and design of hydraulic fracturing treatments
US20040045705A1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2004-03-11 Gardner Wallace R. Downhole sensing with fiber in the formation
US20040047534A1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2004-03-11 Shah Vimal V. Downhole sensing with fiber in exterior annulus
US20040204856A1 (en) * 2002-12-14 2004-10-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for wellbore communication
US20050055162A1 (en) * 2003-09-05 2005-03-10 Li Gao Method and system for determining parameters inside a subterranean formation using data sensors and a wireless ad hoc network
US20050183858A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2005-08-25 Joseph Ayoub Means and method for assessing the geometry of a subterranean fracture during or after a hydraulic fracturing treatment
US20060102345A1 (en) * 2004-10-04 2006-05-18 Mccarthy Scott M Method of estimating fracture geometry, compositions and articles used for the same
US20070299632A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US20080042653A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-02-21 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US20080136421A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-06-12 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US20080149329A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 Iain Cooper Real-Time Automated Heterogeneous Proppant Placement
US20080202750A1 (en) * 2006-07-12 2008-08-28 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Proppant materials and methods
US20080209997A1 (en) * 2007-02-16 2008-09-04 William John Bailey System, method, and apparatus for fracture design optimization
US20080221797A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-09-11 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US20080236814A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2008-10-02 Roddy Craig W Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (mems) in well treatments
US20080277115A1 (en) * 2007-05-11 2008-11-13 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials
US20080283243A1 (en) * 2007-05-15 2008-11-20 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Reducing flow-back in well treating materials
US20090288820A1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2009-11-26 Oxane Materials, Inc. Method Of Manufacture And The Use Of A Functional Proppant For Determination Of Subterranean Fracture Geometries
US7665517B2 (en) 2006-02-15 2010-02-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of cleaning sand control screens and gravel packs
US20100051266A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2010-03-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US7673686B2 (en) 2005-03-29 2010-03-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of stabilizing unconsolidated formation for sand control
US7712531B2 (en) 2004-06-08 2010-05-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for controlling particulate migration
US20100147512A1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2010-06-17 Conocophillips Company Controlled source fracture monitoring
US7757768B2 (en) 2004-10-08 2010-07-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and composition for enhancing coverage and displacement of treatment fluids into subterranean formations
US7762329B1 (en) 2009-01-27 2010-07-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for servicing well bores with hardenable resin compositions
US20100194396A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2010-08-05 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US7819192B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2010-10-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Consolidating agent emulsions and associated methods
US7883740B2 (en) 2004-12-12 2011-02-08 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Low-quality particulates and methods of making and using improved low-quality particulates
US7926591B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2011-04-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Aqueous-based emulsified consolidating agents suitable for use in drill-in applications
US7934557B2 (en) 2007-02-15 2011-05-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of completing wells for controlling water and particulate production
US7963330B2 (en) 2004-02-10 2011-06-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Resin compositions and methods of using resin compositions to control proppant flow-back
FR2954563A1 (en) * 2010-03-22 2011-06-24 Commissariat Energie Atomique Data transferring method for e.g. natural hydrocarbon reservoir, involves establishing communication network between elements, and transferring data between elements through bias of acoustic waves
US20110187556A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110186290A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110192593A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110192598A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110192597A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110192592A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110192594A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110199228A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US8003214B2 (en) 2006-07-12 2011-08-23 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Well treating materials comprising coated proppants, and methods
US8017561B2 (en) 2004-03-03 2011-09-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Resin compositions and methods of using such resin compositions in subterranean applications
US8354279B2 (en) 2002-04-18 2013-01-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of tracking fluids produced from various zones in a subterranean well
US8376046B2 (en) 2010-04-26 2013-02-19 II Wayne F. Broussard Fractionation system and methods of using same
US8561696B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2013-10-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of placing ball sealers for fluid diversion
US8613320B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2013-12-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and applications of resins in treating subterranean formations
US8689872B2 (en) 2005-07-11 2014-04-08 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and compositions for controlling formation fines and reducing proppant flow-back
US20140174732A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2014-06-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and apparatus for evaluating downhole conditions through rfid sensing
US20140182848A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2014-07-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Algorithm for zonal fault detection in a well environment
US20140182845A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2014-07-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Timeline from slumber to collection of rfid tags in a well environment
US8797037B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2014-08-05 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean feature
US8841914B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2014-09-23 Baker Hughes Incorporated Electrolocation apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean feature
US20140367122A1 (en) * 2013-06-14 2014-12-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Flowable devices and methods of self-orienting the devices in a wellbore
US20140374091A1 (en) * 2013-06-20 2014-12-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Electromagnetic Imaging Of Proppant In Induced Fractures
US8931553B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2015-01-13 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically conductive proppant
US20150027692A1 (en) * 2009-01-22 2015-01-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Multi-Interval Wellbore Treatment Method
AU2011217960B2 (en) * 2010-02-20 2015-04-02 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean variables
US9175523B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2015-11-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Aligning inductive couplers in a well
US9194207B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2015-11-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Surface wellbore operating equipment utilizing MEMS sensors
US9200500B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2015-12-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of sensors coated with elastomer for subterranean operations
US9434875B1 (en) 2014-12-16 2016-09-06 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically-conductive proppant and methods for making and using same
US9494032B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2016-11-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and apparatus for evaluating downhole conditions with RFID MEMS sensors
US9551210B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2017-01-24 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Systems and methods for removal of electromagnetic dispersion and attenuation for imaging of proppant in an induced fracture
US9822631B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2017-11-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Monitoring downhole parameters using MEMS
US9879519B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2018-01-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and apparatus for evaluating downhole conditions through fluid sensing
US10012063B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-07-03 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Ring electrode device and method for generating high-pressure pulses
US10260328B2 (en) * 2014-04-24 2019-04-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture growth monitoring using EM sensing
US10358914B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2019-07-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and systems for detecting RFID tags in a borehole environment
US11008505B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2021-05-18 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant
US11078409B2 (en) 2013-05-17 2021-08-03 Conocophillips Company Electrically conductive proppant coating and related methods
US11499406B2 (en) * 2017-05-02 2022-11-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for predicting of hydraulic fracturing and associated risks

Families Citing this family (116)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102005045180B4 (en) 2005-09-21 2007-11-15 Center For Abrasives And Refractories Research & Development C.A.R.R.D. Gmbh Spherical corundum grains based on molten aluminum oxide and a process for their preparation
EP1946129B1 (en) * 2005-11-03 2018-06-27 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Continuous reservoir monitoring for fluid pathways using 3d microseismic data
US8573313B2 (en) * 2006-04-03 2013-11-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Well servicing methods and systems
US7676326B2 (en) * 2006-06-09 2010-03-09 Spectraseis Ag VH Reservoir Mapping
US7590491B2 (en) 2006-06-30 2009-09-15 Spectraseis Ag Signal integration measure for seismic data
US8562900B2 (en) 2006-09-01 2013-10-22 Imerys Method of manufacturing and using rod-shaped proppants and anti-flowback additives
US7598898B1 (en) * 2006-09-13 2009-10-06 Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. Method for using logging device with down-hole transceiver for operation in extreme temperatures
US7909096B2 (en) 2007-03-02 2011-03-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method and apparatus of reservoir stimulation while running casing
GB2463591B (en) * 2007-05-17 2012-04-11 Spectraseis Ag Seismic attributes for reservoir localization
GB2450707B (en) * 2007-07-03 2009-09-16 Schlumberger Holdings Method of locating a receiver in a well
US8006754B2 (en) * 2008-04-05 2011-08-30 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Proppants containing dispersed piezoelectric or magnetostrictive fillers or mixtures thereof, to enable proppant tracking and monitoring in a downhole environment
WO2009137565A1 (en) * 2008-05-08 2009-11-12 Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. Analysis of radar ranging data from a down hole radar ranging tool for determining width, height, and length of a subterranean fracture
US7852708B2 (en) * 2008-05-15 2010-12-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Sensing and actuating in marine deployed cable and streamer applications
US7942202B2 (en) * 2008-05-15 2011-05-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Continuous fibers for use in well completion, intervention, and other subterranean applications
US7926562B2 (en) * 2008-05-15 2011-04-19 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Continuous fibers for use in hydraulic fracturing applications
WO2009151891A2 (en) * 2008-05-19 2009-12-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Formation treatment using electromagnetic radiation
US8006755B2 (en) * 2008-08-15 2011-08-30 Sun Drilling Products Corporation Proppants coated by piezoelectric or magnetostrictive materials, or by mixtures or combinations thereof, to enable their tracking in a downhole environment
IT1391797B1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2012-01-27 Eni Spa METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING THE GEOMETRY OF UNDERGROUND FRACTURES
US9085975B2 (en) * 2009-03-06 2015-07-21 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of treating a subterranean formation and forming treatment fluids using chemo-mathematical models and process control
US9063252B2 (en) * 2009-03-13 2015-06-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company System, method, and nanorobot to explore subterranean geophysical formations
US9869613B2 (en) 2010-02-12 2018-01-16 Fluidion Sas Passive micro-vessel and sensor
WO2011100509A2 (en) * 2010-02-12 2011-08-18 Dan Angelescu Passive micro-vessel and sensor
US9389158B2 (en) 2010-02-12 2016-07-12 Dan Angelescu Passive micro-vessel and sensor
US10408040B2 (en) 2010-02-12 2019-09-10 Fluidion Sas Passive micro-vessel and sensor
US9772261B2 (en) 2010-02-12 2017-09-26 Fluidion Sas Passive micro-vessel and sensor
CN103250072B (en) 2010-04-27 2017-02-22 哈里伯顿能源服务公司 Fracture characterization by interferometric drillbit imaging, time reversal imaging of fractures using drill bit seismics, and monitoring of fracture generation via time reversed acoustics and electroseismics
RU2455665C2 (en) 2010-05-21 2012-07-10 Шлюмбергер Текнолоджи Б.В. Method of diagnostics of formation hydraulic fracturing processes on-line using combination of tube waves and microseismic monitoring
US8575548B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2013-11-05 William Marsh Rice University Analyzing the transport of plasmonic particles through mineral formations
US9134456B2 (en) 2010-11-23 2015-09-15 Conocophillips Company Electrical methods seismic interface box
WO2012074614A1 (en) * 2010-12-03 2012-06-07 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Double hydraulic fracturing methods
AU2011341389B2 (en) 2010-12-14 2015-06-11 Conocophillips Company Autonomous electrical methods node
CA2822361C (en) 2010-12-15 2016-10-18 Conocophillips Company Electrical methods fracture detection via 4d techniques
WO2012094134A1 (en) 2011-01-05 2012-07-12 Conocophillips Company Fracture detection via self-potential methods with an electrically reactive proppant
US9062539B2 (en) 2011-04-26 2015-06-23 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Hybrid transponder system for long-range sensing and 3D localization
US9187993B2 (en) * 2011-04-26 2015-11-17 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Methods of employing and using a hybrid transponder system for long-range sensing and 3D localizaton
US10767465B1 (en) 2011-08-09 2020-09-08 National Technology & Engineering Solutions Of Sandia, Llc Simulating current flow through a well casing and an induced fracture
WO2014004815A1 (en) * 2012-06-29 2014-01-03 Schlumberger Canada Limited Electromagnetic imaging of proppant in induced fractures
WO2014058425A1 (en) 2012-10-11 2014-04-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture sensing system and method
US10036238B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2018-07-31 U.S. Well Services, LLC Cable management of electric powered hydraulic fracturing pump unit
US10119381B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2018-11-06 U.S. Well Services, LLC System for reducing vibrations in a pressure pumping fleet
US10254732B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2019-04-09 U.S. Well Services, Inc. Monitoring and control of proppant storage from a datavan
US10407990B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2019-09-10 U.S. Well Services, LLC Slide out pump stand for hydraulic fracturing equipment
US9893500B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2018-02-13 U.S. Well Services, LLC Switchgear load sharing for oil field equipment
US10020711B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2018-07-10 U.S. Well Services, LLC System for fueling electric powered hydraulic fracturing equipment with multiple fuel sources
US9410410B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2016-08-09 Us Well Services Llc System for pumping hydraulic fracturing fluid using electric pumps
US9970278B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2018-05-15 U.S. Well Services, LLC System for centralized monitoring and control of electric powered hydraulic fracturing fleet
US11476781B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2022-10-18 U.S. Well Services, LLC Wireline power supply during electric powered fracturing operations
US11449018B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2022-09-20 U.S. Well Services, LLC System and method for parallel power and blackout protection for electric powered hydraulic fracturing
US9745840B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2017-08-29 Us Well Services Llc Electric powered pump down
US9995218B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2018-06-12 U.S. Well Services, LLC Turbine chilling for oil field power generation
US9650879B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2017-05-16 Us Well Services Llc Torsional coupling for electric hydraulic fracturing fluid pumps
US10232332B2 (en) 2012-11-16 2019-03-19 U.S. Well Services, Inc. Independent control of auger and hopper assembly in electric blender system
US10480308B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2019-11-19 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Apparatus and method for monitoring fluid flow in a wellbore using acoustic signals
WO2014100264A1 (en) 2012-12-19 2014-06-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Telemetry system for wireless electro-acoustical transmission of data along a wellbore
WO2014100274A1 (en) 2012-12-19 2014-06-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Apparatus and method for detecting fracture geometry using acoustic telemetry
US20150300159A1 (en) 2012-12-19 2015-10-22 David A. Stiles Apparatus and Method for Evaluating Cement Integrity in a Wellbore Using Acoustic Telemetry
US10100635B2 (en) 2012-12-19 2018-10-16 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Wired and wireless downhole telemetry using a logging tool
WO2014100276A1 (en) 2012-12-19 2014-06-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Electro-acoustic transmission of data along a wellbore
WO2015069639A1 (en) * 2013-11-08 2015-05-14 Board Of Regents, The University Of Texas System Fracture diagnosis using electromagnetic methods
US10132149B2 (en) 2013-11-26 2018-11-20 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Remotely actuated screenout relief valves and systems and methods including the same
US10422214B2 (en) 2014-03-05 2019-09-24 William Marsh Rice University Systems and methods for fracture mapping via frequency-changing integrated chips
US9932809B2 (en) * 2014-03-07 2018-04-03 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for hydraulic fracture geometry evaluation
GB2541818A (en) 2014-06-19 2017-03-01 Halliburton Energy Services Inc Forming facsimile formation core samples using three-dimensional printing
US10526884B2 (en) 2014-08-01 2020-01-07 William Marsh Rice University Systems and methods for monitoring cement quality in a cased well environment with integrated chips
CA2955381C (en) 2014-09-12 2022-03-22 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Discrete wellbore devices, hydrocarbon wells including a downhole communication network and the discrete wellbore devices and systems and methods including the same
US10442984B2 (en) 2014-12-03 2019-10-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Smart fracturing fluid
US10718883B2 (en) 2014-12-30 2020-07-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Subterranean formation characterization using microelectromechanical system (MEMS) devices
US9863222B2 (en) 2015-01-19 2018-01-09 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company System and method for monitoring fluid flow in a wellbore using acoustic telemetry
US10408047B2 (en) 2015-01-26 2019-09-10 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Real-time well surveillance using a wireless network and an in-wellbore tool
GB2552098B (en) * 2015-02-27 2020-12-23 Halliburton Energy Services Inc Determining drilling fluid loss in a wellbore
US10221649B2 (en) 2015-11-03 2019-03-05 Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc Systems and methods for intelligent diversion design and application
CA3003421A1 (en) * 2015-11-03 2017-05-11 Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc Systems and methods for evaluating and optimizing stimulation efficiency using diverters
US10962672B2 (en) 2016-04-22 2021-03-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Dual mode electromagnetic imaging of a borehole
WO2017205565A1 (en) 2016-05-25 2017-11-30 William Marsh Rice University Methods and systems related to remote measuring and sensing
US10465505B2 (en) 2016-08-30 2019-11-05 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Reservoir formation characterization using a downhole wireless network
US10487647B2 (en) 2016-08-30 2019-11-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Hybrid downhole acoustic wireless network
US10415376B2 (en) 2016-08-30 2019-09-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Dual transducer communications node for downhole acoustic wireless networks and method employing same
US10697287B2 (en) 2016-08-30 2020-06-30 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Plunger lift monitoring via a downhole wireless network field
US10344583B2 (en) 2016-08-30 2019-07-09 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Acoustic housing for tubulars
US10590759B2 (en) 2016-08-30 2020-03-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Zonal isolation devices including sensing and wireless telemetry and methods of utilizing the same
US10364669B2 (en) 2016-08-30 2019-07-30 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methods of acoustically communicating and wells that utilize the methods
US10526888B2 (en) 2016-08-30 2020-01-07 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Downhole multiphase flow sensing methods
US11181107B2 (en) 2016-12-02 2021-11-23 U.S. Well Services, LLC Constant voltage power distribution system for use with an electric hydraulic fracturing system
US10914163B2 (en) 2017-03-01 2021-02-09 Eog Resources, Inc. Completion and production apparatus and methods employing pressure and/or temperature tracers
US11193356B2 (en) 2017-03-31 2021-12-07 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of generating a fracturing design and method of hydraulic fracturing
WO2018195131A1 (en) 2017-04-20 2018-10-25 Seismos, Inc. Sand pack and gravel pack acoustic evaluation method and system
WO2019071086A1 (en) 2017-10-05 2019-04-11 U.S. Well Services, LLC Instrumented fracturing slurry flow system and method
US10837276B2 (en) 2017-10-13 2020-11-17 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and system for performing wireless ultrasonic communications along a drilling string
CN111201727B (en) 2017-10-13 2021-09-03 埃克森美孚上游研究公司 Method and system for hydrocarbon operations using a hybrid communication network
MX2020003298A (en) 2017-10-13 2020-07-28 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co Method and system for performing operations using communications.
AU2018347465B2 (en) 2017-10-13 2021-10-07 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and system for performing communications using aliasing
US10697288B2 (en) 2017-10-13 2020-06-30 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Dual transducer communications node including piezo pre-tensioning for acoustic wireless networks and method employing same
CN111201454B (en) 2017-10-13 2022-09-09 埃克森美孚上游研究公司 Method and system for performing operations with communications
WO2019075475A1 (en) 2017-10-13 2019-04-18 U.S. Well Services, LLC Automatic fracturing system and method
CA3080317A1 (en) 2017-10-25 2019-05-02 U.S. Well Services, LLC Smart fracturing system and method
AU2018367388C1 (en) 2017-11-17 2022-04-14 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and system for performing wireless ultrasonic communications along tubular members
US10690794B2 (en) 2017-11-17 2020-06-23 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and system for performing operations using communications for a hydrocarbon system
WO2019113147A1 (en) 2017-12-05 2019-06-13 U.S. Well Services, Inc. Multi-plunger pumps and associated drive systems
US10648311B2 (en) 2017-12-05 2020-05-12 U.S. Well Services, LLC High horsepower pumping configuration for an electric hydraulic fracturing system
US10844708B2 (en) 2017-12-20 2020-11-24 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Energy efficient method of retrieving wireless networked sensor data
MX2020005766A (en) 2017-12-29 2020-08-20 Exxonmobil Upstream Res Co Methods and systems for monitoring and optimizing reservoir stimulation operations.
US11156081B2 (en) 2017-12-29 2021-10-26 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methods and systems for operating and maintaining a downhole wireless network
CA3090408A1 (en) 2018-02-05 2019-08-08 U.S. Well Services, LLC Microgrid electrical load management
WO2019156966A1 (en) 2018-02-08 2019-08-15 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Methods of network peer identification and self-organization using unique tonal signatures and wells that use the methods
US11268378B2 (en) 2018-02-09 2022-03-08 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Downhole wireless communication node and sensor/tools interface
WO2019204242A1 (en) 2018-04-16 2019-10-24 U.S. Well Services, Inc. Hybrid hydraulic fracturing fleet
CA3103490A1 (en) 2018-06-15 2019-12-19 U.S. Well Services, LLC Integrated mobile power unit for hydraulic fracturing
WO2020056258A1 (en) 2018-09-14 2020-03-19 U.S. Well Services, LLC Riser assist for wellsites
CA3115669A1 (en) 2018-10-09 2020-04-16 U.S. Well Services, LLC Modular switchgear system and power distribution for electric oilfield equipment
US11293280B2 (en) 2018-12-19 2022-04-05 Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company Method and system for monitoring post-stimulation operations through acoustic wireless sensor network
US11401803B2 (en) 2019-03-15 2022-08-02 Saudi Arabian Oil Company Determining fracture surface area in a well
US11578577B2 (en) 2019-03-20 2023-02-14 U.S. Well Services, LLC Oversized switchgear trailer for electric hydraulic fracturing
WO2020231483A1 (en) 2019-05-13 2020-11-19 U.S. Well Services, LLC Encoderless vector control for vfd in hydraulic fracturing applications
CA3148987A1 (en) 2019-08-01 2021-02-04 U.S. Well Services, LLC High capacity power storage system for electric hydraulic fracturing
US11009162B1 (en) 2019-12-27 2021-05-18 U.S. Well Services, LLC System and method for integrated flow supply line
RU2741888C1 (en) * 2020-02-03 2021-01-29 Шлюмберже Текнолоджи Б.В. Method of evaluation of parameters of fractures of formation hydraulic fracturing for horizontal well

Citations (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3227211A (en) * 1962-12-17 1966-01-04 Phillips Petroleum Co Heat stimulation of fractured wells
US3239006A (en) * 1962-12-19 1966-03-08 Pan American Petroleum Corp Mixed props for high flow capacity fractures
US3760880A (en) * 1972-06-01 1973-09-25 Dow Chemical Co Consolidation of particulate materials located in earthen formations
US4340405A (en) * 1980-10-29 1982-07-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Apparatus and method for maintaining low temperatures about an object at a remote location
US4491796A (en) * 1982-03-18 1985-01-01 Shell Oil Company Borehole fracture detection using magnetic powder
US4550779A (en) * 1983-09-08 1985-11-05 Zakiewicz Bohdan M Dr Process for the recovery of hydrocarbons for mineral oil deposits
US4567945A (en) * 1983-12-27 1986-02-04 Atlantic Richfield Co. Electrode well method and apparatus
US5243190A (en) * 1990-01-17 1993-09-07 Protechnics International, Inc. Radioactive tracing with particles
US5322126A (en) * 1993-04-16 1994-06-21 The Energex Company System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment
US5358047A (en) * 1993-04-02 1994-10-25 Halliburton Company Fracturing with foamed cement
US5439055A (en) * 1993-04-05 1995-08-08 Dowell, A Division Of Schlumberger Technology Corp. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5501275A (en) * 1993-04-05 1996-03-26 Dowell, A Division Of Schlumberger Technology Corporation Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5871049A (en) * 1995-03-29 1999-02-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of fine particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5908073A (en) * 1997-06-26 1999-06-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Preventing well fracture proppant flow-back
US6059034A (en) * 1996-11-27 2000-05-09 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US6116342A (en) * 1998-10-20 2000-09-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of preventing well fracture proppant flow-back
US6330916B1 (en) * 1996-11-27 2001-12-18 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US20030196799A1 (en) * 2002-04-18 2003-10-23 Nguyen Philip D. Method of tracking fluids produced from various zones in subterranean wells
US6719053B2 (en) * 2001-04-30 2004-04-13 Bj Services Company Ester/monoester copolymer compositions and methods of preparing and using same
US6725930B2 (en) * 2002-04-19 2004-04-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Conductive proppant and method of hydraulic fracturing using the same

Family Cites Families (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA1201797A (en) 1983-01-20 1986-03-11 Frederick H.K. Rambow Circuit for controlling the magnitude of amplification of signals produced by a borehole televiewer
GB8520827D0 (en) * 1985-08-20 1985-09-25 York Ventures & Special Optica Fibre-optic sensing devices
US4848461A (en) * 1988-06-24 1989-07-18 Halliburton Company Method of evaluating fracturing fluid performance in subsurface fracturing operations
JP3048415B2 (en) 1991-05-28 2000-06-05 地熱技術開発株式会社 Crust fracture detection system
GB9315231D0 (en) * 1993-07-22 1993-09-08 York Ltd Optical time domain reflextometry
US5963508A (en) * 1994-02-14 1999-10-05 Atlantic Richfield Company System and method for determining earth fracture propagation
EP1355169B1 (en) * 1997-05-02 2010-02-10 Baker Hughes Incorporated Method and apparatus for controlling chemical injection of a surface treatment system
US6216783B1 (en) * 1998-11-17 2001-04-17 Golder Sierra, Llc Azimuth control of hydraulic vertical fractures in unconsolidated and weakly cemented soils and sediments
US6832251B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2004-12-14 Sensoria Corporation Method and apparatus for distributed signal processing among internetworked wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)
US6859831B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2005-02-22 Sensoria Corporation Method and apparatus for internetworked wireless integrated network sensor (WINS) nodes
WO2001026338A2 (en) 1999-10-06 2001-04-12 Sensoria Corporation Apparatus for remote access of vehicle components
US6826607B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2004-11-30 Sensoria Corporation Apparatus for internetworked hybrid wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)
US6735630B1 (en) * 1999-10-06 2004-05-11 Sensoria Corporation Method for collecting data using compact internetworked wireless integrated network sensors (WINS)
US6408943B1 (en) * 2000-07-17 2002-06-25 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and apparatus for placing and interrogating downhole sensors
US6834233B2 (en) * 2002-02-08 2004-12-21 University Of Houston System and method for stress and stability related measurements in boreholes
US20030205376A1 (en) 2002-04-19 2003-11-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Means and Method for Assessing the Geometry of a Subterranean Fracture During or After a Hydraulic Fracturing Treatment
US6776235B1 (en) * 2002-07-23 2004-08-17 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Hydraulic fracturing method
EA006928B1 (en) * 2002-08-15 2006-04-28 Шлюмбергер Текнолоджи Б.В. Use of distributed temperature sensors during wellbore treatments
US20040040707A1 (en) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-04 Dusterhoft Ronald G. Well treatment apparatus and method
US6978832B2 (en) * 2002-09-09 2005-12-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Downhole sensing with fiber in the formation
US7134492B2 (en) * 2003-04-18 2006-11-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Mapping fracture dimensions
RU2324813C2 (en) 2003-07-25 2008-05-20 Институт проблем механики Российской Академии наук Method and device for determining shape of cracks in rocks

Patent Citations (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3227211A (en) * 1962-12-17 1966-01-04 Phillips Petroleum Co Heat stimulation of fractured wells
US3239006A (en) * 1962-12-19 1966-03-08 Pan American Petroleum Corp Mixed props for high flow capacity fractures
US3760880A (en) * 1972-06-01 1973-09-25 Dow Chemical Co Consolidation of particulate materials located in earthen formations
US4340405A (en) * 1980-10-29 1982-07-20 The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy Apparatus and method for maintaining low temperatures about an object at a remote location
US4491796A (en) * 1982-03-18 1985-01-01 Shell Oil Company Borehole fracture detection using magnetic powder
US4550779A (en) * 1983-09-08 1985-11-05 Zakiewicz Bohdan M Dr Process for the recovery of hydrocarbons for mineral oil deposits
US4567945A (en) * 1983-12-27 1986-02-04 Atlantic Richfield Co. Electrode well method and apparatus
US5243190A (en) * 1990-01-17 1993-09-07 Protechnics International, Inc. Radioactive tracing with particles
US5358047A (en) * 1993-04-02 1994-10-25 Halliburton Company Fracturing with foamed cement
US5439055A (en) * 1993-04-05 1995-08-08 Dowell, A Division Of Schlumberger Technology Corp. Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5501275A (en) * 1993-04-05 1996-03-26 Dowell, A Division Of Schlumberger Technology Corporation Control of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US5322126A (en) * 1993-04-16 1994-06-21 The Energex Company System and method for monitoring fracture growth during hydraulic fracture treatment
US5871049A (en) * 1995-03-29 1999-02-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Control of fine particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6059034A (en) * 1996-11-27 2000-05-09 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US6330916B1 (en) * 1996-11-27 2001-12-18 Bj Services Company Formation treatment method using deformable particles
US5908073A (en) * 1997-06-26 1999-06-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Preventing well fracture proppant flow-back
US6116342A (en) * 1998-10-20 2000-09-12 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of preventing well fracture proppant flow-back
US6719053B2 (en) * 2001-04-30 2004-04-13 Bj Services Company Ester/monoester copolymer compositions and methods of preparing and using same
US20030196799A1 (en) * 2002-04-18 2003-10-23 Nguyen Philip D. Method of tracking fluids produced from various zones in subterranean wells
US20030196800A1 (en) * 2002-04-18 2003-10-23 Nguyen Philip D. Tracking of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6691780B2 (en) * 2002-04-18 2004-02-17 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Tracking of particulate flowback in subterranean wells
US6725930B2 (en) * 2002-04-19 2004-04-27 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Conductive proppant and method of hydraulic fracturing using the same

Cited By (120)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20060144587A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2006-07-06 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Interpretation and design of hydraulic fracturing treatments
US7111681B2 (en) * 2002-02-01 2006-09-26 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Interpretation and design of hydraulic fracturing treatments
US20040016541A1 (en) * 2002-02-01 2004-01-29 Emmanuel Detournay Interpretation and design of hydraulic fracturing treatments
US7377318B2 (en) 2002-02-01 2008-05-27 Emmanuel Detournay Interpretation and design of hydraulic fracturing treatments
US8354279B2 (en) 2002-04-18 2013-01-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of tracking fluids produced from various zones in a subterranean well
US20050183858A1 (en) * 2002-04-19 2005-08-25 Joseph Ayoub Means and method for assessing the geometry of a subterranean fracture during or after a hydraulic fracturing treatment
US7082993B2 (en) * 2002-04-19 2006-08-01 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Means and method for assessing the geometry of a subterranean fracture during or after a hydraulic fracturing treatment
US20040045705A1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2004-03-11 Gardner Wallace R. Downhole sensing with fiber in the formation
US20040047534A1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2004-03-11 Shah Vimal V. Downhole sensing with fiber in exterior annulus
US6847034B2 (en) 2002-09-09 2005-01-25 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Downhole sensing with fiber in exterior annulus
US6978832B2 (en) * 2002-09-09 2005-12-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Downhole sensing with fiber in the formation
US20040204856A1 (en) * 2002-12-14 2004-10-14 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for wellbore communication
US6993432B2 (en) * 2002-12-14 2006-01-31 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System and method for wellbore communication
US6898529B2 (en) * 2003-09-05 2005-05-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and system for determining parameters inside a subterranean formation using data sensors and a wireless ad hoc network
US20050055162A1 (en) * 2003-09-05 2005-03-10 Li Gao Method and system for determining parameters inside a subterranean formation using data sensors and a wireless ad hoc network
US7963330B2 (en) 2004-02-10 2011-06-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Resin compositions and methods of using resin compositions to control proppant flow-back
US8017561B2 (en) 2004-03-03 2011-09-13 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Resin compositions and methods of using such resin compositions in subterranean applications
US7712531B2 (en) 2004-06-08 2010-05-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for controlling particulate migration
EP1797281A2 (en) * 2004-10-04 2007-06-20 Hexion Specialty Chemicals Research Belgium S.A. Method of estimating fracture geometry, compositions and articles used for the same
US20060102345A1 (en) * 2004-10-04 2006-05-18 Mccarthy Scott M Method of estimating fracture geometry, compositions and articles used for the same
NO339477B1 (en) * 2004-10-04 2016-12-12 Hexion Res Belgium Sa A method for determining fracture geometry in a subsurface formation, and associated with proppant for use in the method.
EP1797281A4 (en) * 2004-10-04 2012-09-26 Momentive Specialty Chemicals Res Belgium Method of estimating fracture geometry, compositions and articles used for the same
US7424911B2 (en) 2004-10-04 2008-09-16 Hexion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. Method of estimating fracture geometry, compositions and articles used for the same
US7757768B2 (en) 2004-10-08 2010-07-20 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and composition for enhancing coverage and displacement of treatment fluids into subterranean formations
US7938181B2 (en) 2004-10-08 2011-05-10 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method and composition for enhancing coverage and displacement of treatment fluids into subterranean formations
US7883740B2 (en) 2004-12-12 2011-02-08 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Low-quality particulates and methods of making and using improved low-quality particulates
US7673686B2 (en) 2005-03-29 2010-03-09 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of stabilizing unconsolidated formation for sand control
US8689872B2 (en) 2005-07-11 2014-04-08 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and compositions for controlling formation fines and reducing proppant flow-back
US7819192B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2010-10-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Consolidating agent emulsions and associated methods
US8613320B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2013-12-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Compositions and applications of resins in treating subterranean formations
US7926591B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2011-04-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Aqueous-based emulsified consolidating agents suitable for use in drill-in applications
US8443885B2 (en) 2006-02-10 2013-05-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Consolidating agent emulsions and associated methods
US7665517B2 (en) 2006-02-15 2010-02-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of cleaning sand control screens and gravel packs
US9175523B2 (en) 2006-03-30 2015-11-03 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Aligning inductive couplers in a well
US20080221797A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-09-11 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US20080042653A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-02-21 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US8019547B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2011-09-13 Bryant Consultants, Inc. Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US20070299632A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2007-12-27 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US20080136421A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2008-06-12 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US7386402B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2008-06-10 Bryant Consultants, Inc. Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping structure subsurface geological anomalies
US20100194396A1 (en) * 2006-06-22 2010-08-05 John Bryant Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US7788049B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2010-08-31 Bryant Consultants, Inc. Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US7813883B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2010-10-12 Bryant Consultants, Inc. Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US8321160B2 (en) 2006-06-22 2012-11-27 Bryant Consultants, Inc. Remotely reconfigurable system for mapping subsurface geological anomalies
US8133587B2 (en) 2006-07-12 2012-03-13 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Proppant materials comprising a coating of thermoplastic material, and methods of making and using
US8003214B2 (en) 2006-07-12 2011-08-23 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Well treating materials comprising coated proppants, and methods
US20080202750A1 (en) * 2006-07-12 2008-08-28 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Proppant materials and methods
US20080149329A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-06-26 Iain Cooper Real-Time Automated Heterogeneous Proppant Placement
US7451812B2 (en) 2006-12-20 2008-11-18 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Real-time automated heterogeneous proppant placement
US7934557B2 (en) 2007-02-15 2011-05-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods of completing wells for controlling water and particulate production
US7908230B2 (en) 2007-02-16 2011-03-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation System, method, and apparatus for fracture design optimization
US20080209997A1 (en) * 2007-02-16 2008-09-04 William John Bailey System, method, and apparatus for fracture design optimization
EA017137B1 (en) * 2007-02-16 2012-10-30 Шлюмбергер Текнолоджи Б.В. System, method and apparatus for fracture design optimization
US20110192594A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US9394756B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2016-07-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Timeline from slumber to collection of RFID tags in a well environment
US20110192597A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110192592A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110192593A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20110199228A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US9732584B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2017-08-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in well treatments
US9822631B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2017-11-21 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Monitoring downhole parameters using MEMS
US7712527B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2010-05-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in well treatments
US9194207B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2015-11-24 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Surface wellbore operating equipment utilizing MEMS sensors
US20100051266A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2010-03-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US8162050B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2012-04-24 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in well treatments
US9394784B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2016-07-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Algorithm for zonal fault detection in a well environment
US9879519B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2018-01-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and apparatus for evaluating downhole conditions through fluid sensing
US8291975B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2012-10-23 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in well treatments
US20110186290A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US8297353B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2012-10-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in well treatments
US8297352B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2012-10-30 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in well treatments
US8302686B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2012-11-06 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in well treatments
US10358914B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2019-07-23 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and systems for detecting RFID tags in a borehole environment
US8316936B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2012-11-27 Halliburton Energy Services Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) in well treatments
US8342242B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2013-01-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems MEMS in well treatments
US20110187556A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-04 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US9394785B2 (en) * 2007-04-02 2016-07-19 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and apparatus for evaluating downhole conditions through RFID sensing
US20140182845A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2014-07-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Timeline from slumber to collection of rfid tags in a well environment
US20110192598A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2011-08-11 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) in Well Treatments
US20080236814A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2008-10-02 Roddy Craig W Use of micro-electro-mechanical systems (mems) in well treatments
US9200500B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2015-12-01 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Use of sensors coated with elastomer for subterranean operations
US9494032B2 (en) 2007-04-02 2016-11-15 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and apparatus for evaluating downhole conditions with RFID MEMS sensors
US20140174732A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2014-06-26 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods and apparatus for evaluating downhole conditions through rfid sensing
US20140182848A1 (en) * 2007-04-02 2014-07-03 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Algorithm for zonal fault detection in a well environment
US20080277115A1 (en) * 2007-05-11 2008-11-13 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials
US8058213B2 (en) 2007-05-11 2011-11-15 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Increasing buoyancy of well treating materials
WO2008144238A1 (en) * 2007-05-15 2008-11-27 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals, Llc Reducing flow-back in well treating materials
US20080283243A1 (en) * 2007-05-15 2008-11-20 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Reducing flow-back in well treating materials
US7754659B2 (en) 2007-05-15 2010-07-13 Georgia-Pacific Chemicals Llc Reducing flow-back in well treating materials
US8841914B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2014-09-23 Baker Hughes Incorporated Electrolocation apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean feature
US8797037B2 (en) 2008-04-11 2014-08-05 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean feature
US8168570B2 (en) 2008-05-20 2012-05-01 Oxane Materials, Inc. Method of manufacture and the use of a functional proppant for determination of subterranean fracture geometries
US20090288820A1 (en) * 2008-05-20 2009-11-26 Oxane Materials, Inc. Method Of Manufacture And The Use Of A Functional Proppant For Determination Of Subterranean Fracture Geometries
US9803135B2 (en) 2008-05-20 2017-10-31 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Method of manufacture and the use of a functional proppant for determination of subterranean fracture geometries
US8561696B2 (en) 2008-11-18 2013-10-22 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method of placing ball sealers for fluid diversion
US20100147512A1 (en) * 2008-12-12 2010-06-17 Conocophillips Company Controlled source fracture monitoring
AU2009324993B2 (en) * 2008-12-12 2014-03-20 Conocophillips Company Controlled source fracture monitoring
US8869888B2 (en) * 2008-12-12 2014-10-28 Conocophillips Company Controlled source fracture monitoring
US9725998B2 (en) * 2009-01-22 2017-08-08 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Multi-interval wellbore treatment method
US20150027692A1 (en) * 2009-01-22 2015-01-29 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Multi-Interval Wellbore Treatment Method
US7762329B1 (en) 2009-01-27 2010-07-27 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Methods for servicing well bores with hardenable resin compositions
US10087735B2 (en) * 2010-02-20 2018-10-02 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean variables
AU2011217960B2 (en) * 2010-02-20 2015-04-02 Baker Hughes Incorporated Apparatus and methods for providing information about one or more subterranean variables
FR2954563A1 (en) * 2010-03-22 2011-06-24 Commissariat Energie Atomique Data transferring method for e.g. natural hydrocarbon reservoir, involves establishing communication network between elements, and transferring data between elements through bias of acoustic waves
US8376046B2 (en) 2010-04-26 2013-02-19 II Wayne F. Broussard Fractionation system and methods of using same
US11162022B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2021-11-02 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically conductive proppant
US8931553B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2015-01-13 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically conductive proppant
US11008505B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2021-05-18 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant
US10538695B2 (en) 2013-01-04 2020-01-21 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically conductive proppant
US10077644B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-09-18 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Method and apparatus for generating high-pressure pulses in a subterranean dielectric medium
US10012063B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2018-07-03 Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Ring electrode device and method for generating high-pressure pulses
US11078409B2 (en) 2013-05-17 2021-08-03 Conocophillips Company Electrically conductive proppant coating and related methods
US20140367122A1 (en) * 2013-06-14 2014-12-18 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Flowable devices and methods of self-orienting the devices in a wellbore
US20140374091A1 (en) * 2013-06-20 2014-12-25 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Electromagnetic Imaging Of Proppant In Induced Fractures
US10260328B2 (en) * 2014-04-24 2019-04-16 Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. Fracture growth monitoring using EM sensing
US10514478B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2019-12-24 Carbo Ceramics, Inc Systems and methods for removal of electromagnetic dispersion and attenuation for imaging of proppant in an induced fracture
US9551210B2 (en) 2014-08-15 2017-01-24 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Systems and methods for removal of electromagnetic dispersion and attenuation for imaging of proppant in an induced fracture
US9434875B1 (en) 2014-12-16 2016-09-06 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically-conductive proppant and methods for making and using same
US10167422B2 (en) 2014-12-16 2019-01-01 Carbo Ceramics Inc. Electrically-conductive proppant and methods for detecting, locating and characterizing the electrically-conductive proppant
US11499406B2 (en) * 2017-05-02 2022-11-15 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Method for predicting of hydraulic fracturing and associated risks

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2003089757A1 (en) 2003-10-30
US20050183858A1 (en) 2005-08-25
CA2482943C (en) 2011-05-24
MXPA04010051A (en) 2005-10-18
AU2003224097A1 (en) 2003-11-03
EA005808B1 (en) 2005-06-30
US7082993B2 (en) 2006-08-01
EA200401406A1 (en) 2005-04-28
CA2482943A1 (en) 2003-10-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7082993B2 (en) Means and method for assessing the geometry of a subterranean fracture during or after a hydraulic fracturing treatment
US6898529B2 (en) Method and system for determining parameters inside a subterranean formation using data sensors and a wireless ad hoc network
US6408943B1 (en) Method and apparatus for placing and interrogating downhole sensors
US8047284B2 (en) Determining the use of stimulation treatments based on high process zone stress
CN112041539A (en) Simultaneous fracturing process
US20090125280A1 (en) Methods for geomechanical fracture modeling
CA3086529C (en) Methods and systems for monitoring and optimizing reservoir stimulation operations
US10436929B2 (en) Fracture sensing system and method
Zakhour et al. HFTS-2 Completions Design and State-of-the-Art Diagnostics Results
US7660670B2 (en) Sanding advisor
Hopkins et al. Estimating fracture geometry in the naturally fractured Antrim Shale
Hopkins et al. Characterization of an induced hydraulic fracture completion in a naturally fractured Antrim shale reservoir
CA2957931A1 (en) Method of treating an underground formation featuring single-point stimulation
Malhotra et al. Horizontal-Well Fracturing by Use of Coiled Tubing in the Belridge Diatomite: A Case History
US20200232318A1 (en) Wireless Link To Send Data Between Coil Tubing And The Surface
Ramadan et al. Formation Sampling in Ultra-Low Mobility Reservoirs with the Aid of Targeted Stimulation Utilizing Wireline Formation Testing Tool
Carpenter Use of Microseismic Monitoring To Compare Completion Designs
Stanley et al. Massive hydraulic fracture stimulation of early permian gas reservoirs, big lake field, cooper basin
Reader et al. A completion solution for the Paddy reservoir in northeast British Columbia: A case study
Carpenter North American Completion Technologies Unlock the Amin Tight Gas Formation
Bybee Geology and geometry: A review of factors affecting hydraulic-fracture effectiveness

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:AYOUB, JOSEPH;JARDINE, STUART;FITZGERALD, PETER;REEL/FRAME:013595/0199;SIGNING DATES FROM 20030411 TO 20030414

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION