US20030133473A1 - Power line communication system - Google Patents
Power line communication system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030133473A1 US20030133473A1 US10/211,759 US21175902A US2003133473A1 US 20030133473 A1 US20030133473 A1 US 20030133473A1 US 21175902 A US21175902 A US 21175902A US 2003133473 A1 US2003133473 A1 US 2003133473A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- carriers
- frequencies
- range
- frequency
- source
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
- H04L5/02—Channels characterised by the type of signal
- H04L5/06—Channels characterised by the type of signal the signals being represented by different frequencies
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
- H04B3/54—Systems for transmission via power distribution lines
- H04B3/542—Systems for transmission via power distribution lines the information being in digital form
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04B—TRANSMISSION
- H04B2203/00—Indexing scheme relating to line transmission systems
- H04B2203/54—Aspects of powerline communications not already covered by H04B3/54 and its subgroups
- H04B2203/5404—Methods of transmitting or receiving signals via power distribution lines
- H04B2203/5416—Methods of transmitting or receiving signals via power distribution lines by adding signals to the wave form of the power source
Definitions
- the invention relates to communication systems using radio frequency carriers and, particularly, to communication systems in which electrical power lines, i.e., electrical conductors which transmit electrical energy in the voltage range of 100-300 rms volts at frequencies from 20-100 cycles per second to energize home appliances such as lights, heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment (HVAC), refrigerators, television sets, etc., also are at least part of the transmission medium for the information to be communicated, e.g., the digital signal output of communication apparatus.
- electrical power lines i.e., electrical conductors which transmit electrical energy in the voltage range of 100-300 rms volts at frequencies from 20-100 cycles per second to energize home appliances such as lights, heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment (HVAC), refrigerators, television sets, etc.
- a “legacy” system is another communication system, usually pre-existing, which uses power lines as the transmission medium.
- Power line communication is not a new concept, and there have been various methods and technologies that have been developed to allow for reliable communication.
- One such method that can be used for broadband communication is OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing). This allows for the use of a large number of closely spaced carriers to transmit data across the line.
- OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing
- a problem may arise, however, in this arena where there exists a legacy system in place, operating in a certain frequency range, and there is a desire to add communication on another network segment.
- the legacy system may have to disable some of its carriers to allow for bandwidth allocated to the new system, thus diminishing its own bandwidth.
- the legacy system may not allow for this. It is also conceivable that the legacy system could be shifted up or shifted down in frequency to accommodate, but this would most likely require a change to the hardware and also would no longer allow it to communicate with other units of the same type.
- the goal of this invention is to solve this problem without sacrificing use of legacy system and preserving its bandwidth as much as possible.
- This invention overcomes the problems associated with the following scenario: (1) there exists a plurality of devices connected to adjacent network segments operating within the same or adjacent frequency ranges, and (2) there exists a number of legacy devices that may encroach the frequency range of new adjacent segment devices, and (3) there is a desire to communicate using the legacy system protocol without sacrificing substantial bandwidth and still allowing for non-interference with the new adjacent segment devices.
- the basic concept of this invention is the ability to re-map a number of carriers in an existent OFDM or other multi-carrier system to another area of available frequency range, thus allowing for the availability of a certain frequency range to another adjacent network, while still preserving the bandwidth of the existent system to invention enabled devices, as well as the ability to still communicate with other compliant devices.
- a modification to this invention overcomes the main issues associated with designing an analog front end for a broadband communication system in which: (1) there exists a number of frequencies or frequency bands in the overall frequency range that would need to be filtered out from transmitting or receiving due to other devices operating in these frequencies, and (2) there exists power spectral density limits that must be complied with both at the operating limits for the frequency band as well as at the filtered notches, and (3) there is a desire to reduce the complexity and the cost of the analog front end as much as possible.
- the basic concept of this invention is the idea of increasing the sampling rate of the analog front end above what the communication protocol may be designed to. This, in many cases, will allow the filtering designs to be simplified and cost reduced, as well as allowing for greater resolution on the received signals.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a typical power line network with adjacent segments
- FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of a prior art, power line, communication system of the type developed by Enikia, Inc.;
- FIG. 3 is a graph of the carrier frequency range of a prior art legacy OFDM system
- FIG. 4 is a graph of an adjacent network carrier frequency range in relation to the graph of FIG. 3;
- FIG. 5 is a graph of the available frequency range in relation to the legacy OFDM system
- FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the re-mapping of certain carriers into the available frequency range
- FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the possible operation modes in relation to carriers used for invention enabled devices
- FIGS. 8 and 9 are block diagrams illustrating modifications of the prior art system of FIG. 2 for the purposes of the invention.
- FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating an example of a transmit spectrum mask for a broadband communication system
- FIG. 11 is a table showing the power spectral density limits for the spectrum illustrated in FIG. 10.
- FIGS. 12 and 13 are simplified block diagrams illustrating modifications of the transmitter and receiver systems illustrated in FIG. 2 for the purposes of the invention.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a typical electrical distribution network showing its three (3) main network segments.
- the access star network and in-home network are deemed to be the areas where the preferred embodiment of this invention would be utilized. It is in this situation where the two network segments can likely see, and therefore interfere with, each other if communication devices should happen to be using the same frequency range to transmit data.
- This problem is also possible if there exist legacy devices installed on one segment of the network, and then at some point later communication devices are installed on the adjacent segment that may utilize a portion of the legacy frequency bandwith. There would normally be an electrical meter separating the two segments, however it would be very likely that signals transmitted on one network segment can be seen on the opposing side.
- FIG. 2 There exists prior art of an OFDM system as shown in FIG. 2.
- This system consists of a processing chain in the transmitter that transforms the raw data (bits) at the input into an OFDM format that will be transmitted across the power line.
- the receiver takes the OFDM transmission off of the medium and transforms it back into the original raw data.
- This particular OFDM system has two data paths, in which the data is prepared differently for transmission.
- One path is known as the frame control path, which carries control information, as well as information about the data being sent.
- the receiver basically uses this information to prepare itself to receive the actual data that will follow correctly.
- the other path is for the actual data that is to be transmitted across the power line.
- the major processing block pairs (the block in the transmitter and the block in the receiver that perform the opposite functions) will be described further below.
- the scrambler 108 basically helps to give the data a random distribution. This aids in distributing the data and therefore the transmitted power across the band.
- the descrambler 125 works to reorganize the data back to its original form.
- Puncturing 111 can be used as an option to take out extra bits of redundancy in the data inserted by the FEC encoders to reduce the number of bits that need to be transmitted. This can serve to decrease the overhead incurred by the error correction modules if desired. Depuncturing 122 restores the extra bits for proper decoding by the FEC modules in the receiver.
- the encoder is part of the FEC (Forward Error Correction) process.
- the encoder basically arranges the data bits so that any errors that may occur during transmission can be corrected by the decoder.
- Some OFDM systems use several different types of FEC processes, as with this system, with an encoder and a decoder for each.
- This system consists of a reed-solomon encoder 109 with a reed-solomon decoder 124 , as well as a convolutional encoder 110 with a viterbi decoder 123 .
- FEC methods can work on a block of data, or can work on the data in a serial format (1 bit at a time). Use of multiple types of FEC will increase the robustness of a communication system.
- the decoder can normally correct a number of errors in a transmission, but does have a maximum limit.
- the interleaver and deinterleaver pair work to assign and extract respectfully, the data bits to and from the OFDM carriers.
- the data is effectively distributed to all of the available carriers of the system.
- This OFDM system uses two different interleavers/deinterleavers, depending on the desired transmission type. Only one is used for each transmission.
- the ROBO interleaver 109 , ROBO deinterleaver 121 pair is used when the channel is difficult to communicate across, for it transmits data at a lower bits per carrier rate with increased redundancy of data.
- the bit interleaver 112 /deinterleaver 120 pair is used when a cleaner channel is present, and performs higher orders of modulation.
- Frame Control Encoder 101 /Decoder 127 Interleaver 102 /Deinterleaver 126 .
- These modules perform the same tasks as described in the data path, however there is more replication and redundancy performed here to increase the robustness of the frame control transmission.
- the mapper 103 actually maps the carriers that will be used for a transmission to the frequencies that will be modulated.
- the block of data bits is converted to vectors of complex numbers.
- the mapper Based on the modulation method of all the carriers (ROBO, BPSK, QPSK), the mapper maps the data bits onto the constellation points for each carrier. The result is a complete set of vectors for an OFDM symbol.
- the demodulator 117 On the receiver side the demodulator 117 will convert the vectors back to a set of bits.
- the IFFT block 104 then performs the actual modulation of the constellation points onto the carrier waveforms. Basically vectors in the frequency domain are converted to a waveform in the time domain. After the IFFT is performed, the cyclic prefix is added and digital waveform is converted to an analog signal for transmission. At the other end the receiver will sample the medium until it detects the proper waveforms, and then convert these waveforms to digital samples that an FFT 115 is performed on. A synchronization block 118 is normally used to line up the FFT 115 to the correct set of samples for conversion back to the frequency domain to demodulate. A channel estimation block 119 is also used in the receiver to determine the channel quality at any point in time. This information is then relayed back to a requesting transmitter to determine what modulation method is possible to that receiver for future data transmissions. The AFE 114 (analog front end) is used to convert digital to analog and back again, as well as provide filtering.
- the assumed scenario for this invention is that there is a different frequency band allocated for each network segment. Additionally, the assumption is that the newly installed communication devices comply with this allocation but the legacy system devices may or may not comply or may comply by disabling a number of carriers that would be interfering.
- FIG. 3 shows a carrier frequency band that a legacy device would be using to transmit and receive data. This frequency range is shown to be between frequency F1 and frequency F2.
- FIG. 4 it is shown that there is a frequency range allocated to the adjacent network segment that is between frequency F3 and frequency F4. It can be seen that there are a number of carriers between F1 and F4 that are being used by the legacy device but are allocated to the adjacent network segment.
- the mapper 103 would need to support two modes, based on the current configuration of the network.
- the first mode would be for the legacy system where there is no interference from an adjacent network segment.
- the second mode would be the invention enabled mode where carriers that are in the same frequency range as the adjacent network is using would be remapped to a higher frequency range.
- the OFDM demodulator 127 would need to have a demapper block added. The demapper would basically have two modes as well.
- the demapper would decide whether to be in legacy mode, where the usable carriers are fed through directly to the deinterleavers, or to be in invention enabled mode, where the appropriate carriers would be remapped before sending to the deinterleavers.
- the modified OFDM demodulator 127 is shown an FIG. 8, with the demapper 128 added.
- a legacy system uses two functions in the system to disable use of specific carriers.
- One function is known as the Tonemask, which designates carriers that will never be used for transmission in a particular system.
- Table 2 also shows which carriers will be masked out of the system.
- the second function is known as the Tonemap, which designates which carriers to be used for each transmission on the power line based on a channel quality assessment of the channel.
- the frequency allocation for the legacy device network segment is between frequency F4 and frequency F5. Therefore there is additional available frequency bandwidth that can be used in the legacy device network segment. Rather than shift up in frequency all of the carriers that would not allow communication with legacy devices, the carriers that are located in the overlapping band are re-mapped to the other available frequencies allocated to this network segment. This is illustrated in FIG. 6.
- FIG. 7 The substantial benefits of this invention are illustrated in FIG. 7.
- the original bandwidth available to legacy devices is preserved as much as possible in invention enabled devices.
- these invention enabled devices can communicate in an alternate mode with other compliant devices residing on the same network segment.
- Other compliant devices may able to disable the conflicting carriers, but will suffer a loss of available bandwidth that may be substantial.
- carriers 0 to 16 can be remapped to the frequencies for carriers 88 to 104 Car 13 enable_vector shown in Table 3 will be used to determine which carriers to transmit on.
- the carriers for which Car_enable_vector 0, are multiplied by zero.
- FIG. 9 shows a subset of the system, along with detail on the mapper 103 and the demapper 128 .
- This Tonemap will be used for ROBO mode transmissions, however, for other modulation modes the Tonemap will be negotiated between two communicating units. Based upon the channel quality assessment, additional carriers may not be used.
- the control and decision making for the mapper and the demapper is handled by the software MAC 129.
- the Medium Access Controller will determine what mode to operate in and what carriers to ultimately use.
- a broadband communication system will often have the need for substantial filtering requirements to comply with power radiation requirements as well as allowing for non-interference with other communication devices that may occupy areas of the communication spectrum. This often requires the use of complex filter designs which are large in size and costly. This invention resolves these issues while at the same time often allows for reduced complexity in the filter designs, therefore decreasing size and cost, as well as increased resolution of the received signal.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a possible transmit spectrum mask requirement for a broadband communication system. It can be seen that there are various notches throughout the spectrum, as well as steep roll offs at the upper and lower limits of the spectrum. The power spectral density limits for the various filtering requirements are listed in the table of FIG. 11. It can be seen that steep notches are evident, which would require high-order notch filters to be used.
- FIG. 12 shows a possible design for the transmit path on an analog front end device. It can be seen that the normal sample rate defined by the communication protocol is being interpolated up to allow for simpler and smaller filters to be used. Interpolators are also used on the receive side, as shown in FIG. 13. Although the interpolators will add size to the design, this is outweighed by the reduction in size by being able to simplify the filter designs, as well as being able to meet the power spectral density limit requirements.
- an interpolator 134 is added between the RC shaping 107 and the AFE 114 .
- the interpolator detail is shown in FIG. 12.
- the complex output (having both real and imaginary parts) from the RC shaping 107 with a 50 MHz sampling rate is converted to a complex output with a 60 MHz sampling rate by the interpolating filter 130 .
- This complex output is then combined to a real output by the cosine/sine 131 and the notches required are filtered out by the amateur bandstop filters 132 .
- This output is then interpolated up to 120 MHz ( 133 ) and sent to the AFE.
- decimator 139 For the receiver side, there is a decimator 139 added between the AFE 114 and the FFT 115 .
- This block is detailed in FIG. 13.
- the samples taken of the Powerline at 60 MHz will be converted to a complex output by the cosine/sine 135 .
- the input signal is also shifted in frequency ( 135 ).
- Each path will then be upsampled by 5 ( 136 ), put through a low pass filter ( 137 ), and then decimated by 6 ( 138 ) to arrive at an output sampled at 50 MHz for input into the FFT 115 .
- Decoupling of the frequency spacing and sampling rate from the protocol timing allows for adjustments of the frequency range used, carrier frequency spacing, and number of carriers used.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Power Engineering (AREA)
- Cable Transmission Systems, Equalization Of Radio And Reduction Of Echo (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The benefit of priority of Provisional Patent Application Nos. 60/310,300 and 60/310,132, both filed on Aug. 4, 2001 in the names of the inventors named herein, is claimed.
- The invention relates to communication systems using radio frequency carriers and, particularly, to communication systems in which electrical power lines, i.e., electrical conductors which transmit electrical energy in the voltage range of 100-300 rms volts at frequencies from 20-100 cycles per second to energize home appliances such as lights, heating, ventilating and air conditioning equipment (HVAC), refrigerators, television sets, etc., also are at least part of the transmission medium for the information to be communicated, e.g., the digital signal output of communication apparatus.
- As used herein, the acronyms and abbreviations have the following meanings:
AFE Analog Front End BPSK Binary Phase Shift Keying FEC Forward Error Correction FFT Fast Fourier Transform IFFT Inverse Fast Fourier Transform LPF Low Pass Filter LV Low Voltage MAC Media Access Controller OFDM Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing QPSK Quadrature Phase Shift Keying ROBO Robust Ofdm (Modulation and Encoding Technique) - A “legacy” system is another communication system, usually pre-existing, which uses power lines as the transmission medium.
- Although the principles of the invention can be used in connection with other communication systems, the invention will be described in connection with the power line communication systems of the type developed by Enikia, Inc. in New Jersey and described at pages 100-107 of the publication entitled “The Essential Guide to Home Networking Technologies” published in 2001 by Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, N.J., described in copending applications filed Jun. 28, 2000 and entitled Method for Changing Signal Modulation Based on an Analysis of Powerline Conditions, and Method for Selecting and Changing Gears in Powerlines Networks, the disclosures of the copending applications being incorporated herein by reference.
- Numerous powerline communication systems are described in the patents identified in the copending U.S. application No. 09/290,255.
- There exist today many forms and types of networks, both wired and wireless, that allow for high speed data communication. The common thrust of all of these networks is to provide communication between devices, as well as access the Internet. On the other hand, the common problem with many of these networks is that they have to be deployed, which can be very costly and time consuming just to set up the network infrastructure. In recent years there has been substantial interest in coming up with a way of communicating at high speeds and at high data rates over AC power lines. Power lines are advantageous because the network is already in place and is available to almost every home and business in the world.
- However, power lines and power transmission networks suffer from some other significant problems, most notably noise and inconsistent impedance. Power line communication is not a new concept, and there have been various methods and technologies that have been developed to allow for reliable communication. One such method that can be used for broadband communication is OFDM (Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing). This allows for the use of a large number of closely spaced carriers to transmit data across the line. This carrier multiplexing along with the use of data interleaving and FEC coding provide a robust and reliable communication method to overcome the inherent problems of a power line.
- When looking at a common power transmission network, it can be broken up into three (3) main segments. From a standard power substation, there is commonly a “distribution” network of medium voltage power lines, configured in a loop and several miles in length, that feed out to an area of homes and businesses. Then at various points on the loop there exist step down transformers that provide a series of 110 -240 V “access” lines depending on the country to a small number of homes and/or businesses. At the end of each one of these lines there is typically a meter or meters present for each electricity customer served by that line. Then on the other side of each meter there exists a typical “in-home” electricity distribution network inside a home or business.
- It can be seen that all three of the network segments could possibly be used to transmit data across. However, it can be said that the “access” and “in-home” segments of this network are adjacent networks, with only an electricity meter in between. Also, it is very likely that the data transmitted on each of these segments will be for different purposes and have different destinations. For example, data transmitted on the access network segment could have multiple destinations or could be available to all end points, whereas data on an in-home network would likely be internal to that home or business. Therefore it would seem advantageous to logically separate these network segments to allow for separation and protection of data traveling on each segment. One possible method of accomplishing this would be to allocate different frequency ranges for each segment. This would allow for separation and also non-interference between segments.
- A problem may arise, however, in this arena where there exists a legacy system in place, operating in a certain frequency range, and there is a desire to add communication on another network segment. In this case the legacy system may have to disable some of its carriers to allow for bandwidth allocated to the new system, thus diminishing its own bandwidth. However the legacy system may not allow for this. It is also conceivable that the legacy system could be shifted up or shifted down in frequency to accommodate, but this would most likely require a change to the hardware and also would no longer allow it to communicate with other units of the same type. There is also the possibility of using blocking filters to isolate the network segments, but this would add extra expense and installation cost and may not be advantageous for many applications. The goal of this invention is to solve this problem without sacrificing use of legacy system and preserving its bandwidth as much as possible.
- There exist today a number of communication networks that operate over a broad band and at high speeds. These networks may operate on different mediums and different frequency ranges, but they all must comply to a certain radiation limit as well as other limits that may be imposed based on other devices or networks operating in the same frequency range. Due to the broadband nature of these networks, it is likely that there will be areas of the frequency band that cannot be used due to other communication devices occupying these areas. A common example of this would be amateur radio bands that occupy certain frequencies throughout the RF radio spectrum. This may require filtering notches to be put in place throughout a broadband communication system's operating frequency range. Another common requirement at the edges of this range is to have a steep roll off in transmitted power and be able to comply to a certain power spectral density limit beyond the edges of the operating frequency range. This often contributes to additional high-order filters being added to the design.
- These high-order filter requirements can make the design of an analog front end very complicated, very large, and therefore very costly. In order to keep these issues in check, and to still satisfy the filtering requirements, it may be advantageous to increase the sampling frequency of the analog front end. This will often allow for simplifying of the filter designs as well as improved resolution on the received signal.
- This invention overcomes the problems associated with the following scenario: (1) there exists a plurality of devices connected to adjacent network segments operating within the same or adjacent frequency ranges, and (2) there exists a number of legacy devices that may encroach the frequency range of new adjacent segment devices, and (3) there is a desire to communicate using the legacy system protocol without sacrificing substantial bandwidth and still allowing for non-interference with the new adjacent segment devices.
- The basic concept of this invention is the ability to re-map a number of carriers in an existent OFDM or other multi-carrier system to another area of available frequency range, thus allowing for the availability of a certain frequency range to another adjacent network, while still preserving the bandwidth of the existent system to invention enabled devices, as well as the ability to still communicate with other compliant devices.
- A modification to this invention overcomes the main issues associated with designing an analog front end for a broadband communication system in which: (1) there exists a number of frequencies or frequency bands in the overall frequency range that would need to be filtered out from transmitting or receiving due to other devices operating in these frequencies, and (2) there exists power spectral density limits that must be complied with both at the operating limits for the frequency band as well as at the filtered notches, and (3) there is a desire to reduce the complexity and the cost of the analog front end as much as possible. The basic concept of this invention is the idea of increasing the sampling rate of the analog front end above what the communication protocol may be designed to. This, in many cases, will allow the filtering designs to be simplified and cost reduced, as well as allowing for greater resolution on the received signals.
- The present invention will be subsequently described ftuther with reference to the accompanying diagrams in which:
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a typical power line network with adjacent segments;
- FIG. 2 is a simplified block diagram of a prior art, power line, communication system of the type developed by Enikia, Inc.;
- FIG. 3 is a graph of the carrier frequency range of a prior art legacy OFDM system;
- FIG. 4 is a graph of an adjacent network carrier frequency range in relation to the graph of FIG. 3;
- FIG. 5 is a graph of the available frequency range in relation to the legacy OFDM system;
- FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the re-mapping of certain carriers into the available frequency range;
- FIG. 7 is a graph illustrating the possible operation modes in relation to carriers used for invention enabled devices;
- FIGS. 8 and 9 are block diagrams illustrating modifications of the prior art system of FIG. 2 for the purposes of the invention;
- FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating an example of a transmit spectrum mask for a broadband communication system;
- FIG. 11 is a table showing the power spectral density limits for the spectrum illustrated in FIG. 10; and
- FIGS. 12 and 13 are simplified block diagrams illustrating modifications of the transmitter and receiver systems illustrated in FIG. 2 for the purposes of the invention.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a typical electrical distribution network showing its three (3) main network segments. The access star network and in-home network are deemed to be the areas where the preferred embodiment of this invention would be utilized. It is in this situation where the two network segments can likely see, and therefore interfere with, each other if communication devices should happen to be using the same frequency range to transmit data. This problem is also possible if there exist legacy devices installed on one segment of the network, and then at some point later communication devices are installed on the adjacent segment that may utilize a portion of the legacy frequency bandwith. There would normally be an electrical meter separating the two segments, however it would be very likely that signals transmitted on one network segment can be seen on the opposing side.
- There exists prior art of an OFDM system as shown in FIG. 2. This system consists of a processing chain in the transmitter that transforms the raw data (bits) at the input into an OFDM format that will be transmitted across the power line. At the other side, the receiver takes the OFDM transmission off of the medium and transforms it back into the original raw data. This particular OFDM system has two data paths, in which the data is prepared differently for transmission. One path is known as the frame control path, which carries control information, as well as information about the data being sent. The receiver basically uses this information to prepare itself to receive the actual data that will follow correctly. The other path is for the actual data that is to be transmitted across the power line. The major processing block pairs (the block in the transmitter and the block in the receiver that perform the opposite functions) will be described further below.
- Scrambler/Descrambler
- The
scrambler 108 basically helps to give the data a random distribution. This aids in distributing the data and therefore the transmitted power across the band. Thedescrambler 125 works to reorganize the data back to its original form. - Puncturing/Depuncturing
- Puncturing111 can be used as an option to take out extra bits of redundancy in the data inserted by the FEC encoders to reduce the number of bits that need to be transmitted. This can serve to decrease the overhead incurred by the error correction modules if desired.
Depuncturing 122 restores the extra bits for proper decoding by the FEC modules in the receiver. - Encoder/Decoder Pairs
- The encoder is part of the FEC (Forward Error Correction) process. The encoder basically arranges the data bits so that any errors that may occur during transmission can be corrected by the decoder. Some OFDM systems use several different types of FEC processes, as with this system, with an encoder and a decoder for each. This system consists of a reed-
solomon encoder 109 with a reed-solomon decoder 124, as well as a convolutional encoder 110 with aviterbi decoder 123. FEC methods can work on a block of data, or can work on the data in a serial format (1 bit at a time). Use of multiple types of FEC will increase the robustness of a communication system. The decoder can normally correct a number of errors in a transmission, but does have a maximum limit. - Interleaver/Deinterleaver
- The interleaver and deinterleaver pair work to assign and extract respectfully, the data bits to and from the OFDM carriers. The data is effectively distributed to all of the available carriers of the system. This OFDM system uses two different interleavers/deinterleavers, depending on the desired transmission type. Only one is used for each transmission. The
ROBO interleaver 109,ROBO deinterleaver 121 pair is used when the channel is difficult to communicate across, for it transmits data at a lower bits per carrier rate with increased redundancy of data. The bit interleaver 112/deinterleaver 120 pair is used when a cleaner channel is present, and performs higher orders of modulation.Frame Control Encoder 101/Decoder 127,Interleaver 102/Deinterleaver 126. These modules perform the same tasks as described in the data path, however there is more replication and redundancy performed here to increase the robustness of the frame control transmission. - Mapper/Demodulator
- The
mapper 103 actually maps the carriers that will be used for a transmission to the frequencies that will be modulated. The block of data bits is converted to vectors of complex numbers. Based on the modulation method of all the carriers (ROBO, BPSK, QPSK), the mapper maps the data bits onto the constellation points for each carrier. The result is a complete set of vectors for an OFDM symbol. On the receiver side thedemodulator 117 will convert the vectors back to a set of bits. - IFFT/FFT and Remaining Modules
- The
IFFT block 104 then performs the actual modulation of the constellation points onto the carrier waveforms. Basically vectors in the frequency domain are converted to a waveform in the time domain. After the IFFT is performed, the cyclic prefix is added and digital waveform is converted to an analog signal for transmission. At the other end the receiver will sample the medium until it detects the proper waveforms, and then convert these waveforms to digital samples that anFFT 115 is performed on. Asynchronization block 118 is normally used to line up theFFT 115 to the correct set of samples for conversion back to the frequency domain to demodulate. Achannel estimation block 119 is also used in the receiver to determine the channel quality at any point in time. This information is then relayed back to a requesting transmitter to determine what modulation method is possible to that receiver for future data transmissions. The AFE 114 (analog front end) is used to convert digital to analog and back again, as well as provide filtering. - The assumed scenario for this invention is that there is a different frequency band allocated for each network segment. Additionally, the assumption is that the newly installed communication devices comply with this allocation but the legacy system devices may or may not comply or may comply by disabling a number of carriers that would be interfering. FIG. 3 shows a carrier frequency band that a legacy device would be using to transmit and receive data. This frequency range is shown to be between frequency F1 and frequency F2. In FIG. 4 it is shown that there is a frequency range allocated to the adjacent network segment that is between frequency F3 and frequency F4. It can be seen that there are a number of carriers between F1 and F4 that are being used by the legacy device but are allocated to the adjacent network segment.
- In order to enable this OFDM system for the invention, only minor changes are required. The only functionality that would need to be added relates to the mapper block and OFDM demodulator section of the system shown in FIG. 2. The
mapper 103 would need to support two modes, based on the current configuration of the network. The first mode would be for the legacy system where there is no interference from an adjacent network segment. The second mode would be the invention enabled mode where carriers that are in the same frequency range as the adjacent network is using would be remapped to a higher frequency range. On the receiver side, theOFDM demodulator 127 would need to have a demapper block added. The demapper would basically have two modes as well. Based on the signals received out of the demodulator, along with the control data present, the demapper would decide whether to be in legacy mode, where the usable carriers are fed through directly to the deinterleavers, or to be in invention enabled mode, where the appropriate carriers would be remapped before sending to the deinterleavers. The modifiedOFDM demodulator 127 is shown an FIG. 8, with thedemapper 128 added. - For a legacy system, a listing of the carrier numbers and frequencies are shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1 HomePlug Carrier Frequencies Center Center Carrier Frequency Carrier Frequency Carrier Center Number MHz Number MHz Number Frequency 0 4.4921875 28 9.9609375 56 15.4296875 1 4.6875 29 10.15625 57 15.625 2 4.8828125 30 10.3515625 58 15.8203125 3 5.078125 31 10.546875 59 16.015625 4 5.2734375 32 10.7421875 60 16.2109375 5 5.46875 33 10.9375 61 16.40625 6 5.6640625 34 11.1328125 62 16.6015625 7 5.859375 35 11.328125 63 16.796875 8 6.0546875 36 11.5234375 64 16.9921875 9 6.25 37 11.71875 65 17.1875 10 6.4453125 38 11.9140625 66 17.3828125 11 6.640625 39 12.109375 87 17.578125 12 6.8359375 40 12.3046875 68 17.7734375 13 7.03125 41 12.5 69 17.96875 14 7.2265625 42 12.6953125 70 18.1640625 15 7.421875 43 12.890625 71 18.359375 16 7.6171875 44 13.0859375 72 18.5546875 17 7.8125 45 13.28125 73 18.75 18 8.0078125 46 13.4765625 74 18.9453125 19 8.203125 47 13.671875 75 19.140625 20 8.3984375 48 13.8671875 76 19.3359375 21 8.59375 49 14.0625 77 19.53125 22 8.7890625 50 14.2578125 78 19.7265625 23 8.984375 51 14.453125 79 19.921875 24 9.1796875 52 14.6484375 80 20.1171875 25 9.375 53 14.84375 81 20.3125 26 9.5703125 54 15.0390625 82 20.5078125 27 9.765625 55 15.234375 83 20.703125 - By extending the frequency range, we can come up with additional carriers that can be used above a legacy system, as shown it Table 2.
TABLE 2 Adding Carriers Above the Legacy Frequency Range Carrier # Center Freq. Tonemask 0 4.4922 1 4.6875 2 4.8828 3 5.0781 4 5.2734 5 5.4688 6 5.6641 7 5.8594 8 6.0547 9 6.2500 10 6.4453 11 6.6406 12 6.8359 13 7.0313 X 14 7.2266 X 15 7.4219 16 7.6172 17 7.8125 18 8.0078 19 8.2031 20 8.3984 21 8.5938 22 8.7891 23 8.9844 24 9.1797 25 9.3750 26 9.5703 27 9.7656 28 9.9609 29 10.1563 X 30 10.3516 31 10.5469 32 10.7422 33 10.9375 34 11.1328 35 11.3281 36 11.5234 37 11.7188 38 11.9141 39 12.1094 40 12.3047 41 12.5000 42 12.6953 43 12.8906 44 13.0859 45 13.2813 46 13.4766 47 13.6719 48 13.8672 49 14.0625 X 50 14.2578 X 51 14.4531 X 52 14.6484 53 14.8438 54 15.0391 55 15.2344 56 15.4297 57 15.6250 58 15.8203 59 16.0156 60 16.2109 61 16.4063 62 16.6016 63 16.7969 64 16.9922 65 17.1875 66 17.3828 67 17.5781 68 17.7734 59 17.9688 X 70 18.1641 X 71 18.3594 72 18.5547 73 18.7500 74 18.9453 75 19.1406 76 19.3359 77 19.5313 78 19.7266 79 19.9219 80 20.1172 81 20.3125 82 20.5078 83 20.7031 84 20.8984 X 85 21.0938 X 86 21.2891 X 87 21.4844 X 88 21.6797 89 21.8750 90 22.0703 91 22.2656 92 22.4609 93 22.6563 94 22.8516 95 23.0469 96 23.2422 97 23.4375 98 23.6328 99 23.8281 100 24.0234 101 24.2188 102 24.4141 103 24.6094 104 24.8047 - A legacy system uses two functions in the system to disable use of specific carriers. One function is known as the Tonemask, which designates carriers that will never be used for transmission in a particular system. Table 2 also shows which carriers will be masked out of the system. The second function is known as the Tonemap, which designates which carriers to be used for each transmission on the power line based on a channel quality assessment of the channel. For the invention enabled mapper103, we have two modes for carrier allocation:
TABLE 3 Carrier Mapping Table Legacy Carrier Invention Carrier Car enable vector in Number Number Invention 0 88 1 1 89 1 2 90 1 3 91 1 4 92 1 5 93 1 6 94 1 7 95 1 8 96 1 9 97 1 10 98 1 11 99 1 12 100 1 13 13 0 14 14 0 15 101 1 16 102 1 17 103 1 18 104 1 19 19 0 20 20 0 21 21 0 22 22 0 23 23 0 24 24 0 25 25 0 26 26 0 27 27 0 28 28 0 29 29 0 30 30 0 31 31 0 32 32 0 33 33 0 34 34 1 35 35 1 36 36 1 37 37 1 38 38 1 39 39 1 40 40 1 41 41 1 42 42 1 43 43 1 44 44 1 45 45 1 46 46 1 47 47 1 48 48 1 49 49 1 50 50 1 51 51 1 52 52 1 53 53 1 54 54 1 55 55 1 56 56 1 57 57 1 58 58 1 59 59 1 60 60 1 61 61 1 62 62 1 63 63 1 64 64 1 65 65 1 66 66 1 67 67 1 68 68 1 69 69 1 70 70 1 71 71 1 72 72 1 73 73 1 74 74 1 75 75 1 76 76 1 77 77 1 78 78 1 79 79 1 80 80 1 81 81 1 82 82 1 83 83 1 - In FIG. 4 it is shown that the frequency allocation for the legacy device network segment is between frequency F4 and frequency F5. Therefore there is additional available frequency bandwidth that can be used in the legacy device network segment. Rather than shift up in frequency all of the carriers that would not allow communication with legacy devices, the carriers that are located in the overlapping band are re-mapped to the other available frequencies allocated to this network segment. This is illustrated in FIG. 6.
- The substantial benefits of this invention are illustrated in FIG. 7. By re-mapping the conflicting carriers to other available frequencies, the original bandwidth available to legacy devices is preserved as much as possible in invention enabled devices. In addition, these invention enabled devices can communicate in an alternate mode with other compliant devices residing on the same network segment. Other compliant devices may able to disable the conflicting carriers, but will suffer a loss of available bandwidth that may be substantial.
- For this system,
carriers 0 to 16 can be remapped to the frequencies for carriers 88 to 104 Car13 enable_vector shown in Table 3 will be used to determine which carriers to transmit on. The carriers for which Car_enable_vector=0, are multiplied by zero. - On the receiver side, the same method will be used by the demapper block. FIG. 9 shows a subset of the system, along with detail on the
mapper 103 and thedemapper 128. This Tonemap will be used for ROBO mode transmissions, however, for other modulation modes the Tonemap will be negotiated between two communicating units. Based upon the channel quality assessment, additional carriers may not be used. The control and decision making for the mapper and the demapper is handled by thesoftware MAC 129. The Medium Access Controller will determine what mode to operate in and what carriers to ultimately use. - It should be noted that the number used in the mapper and demapper are examples. The ToneMask, mapper table, and enable_vector may change depending on the environment.
- A broadband communication system will often have the need for substantial filtering requirements to comply with power radiation requirements as well as allowing for non-interference with other communication devices that may occupy areas of the communication spectrum. This often requires the use of complex filter designs which are large in size and costly. This invention resolves these issues while at the same time often allows for reduced complexity in the filter designs, therefore decreasing size and cost, as well as increased resolution of the received signal.
- FIG. 10 illustrates a possible transmit spectrum mask requirement for a broadband communication system. It can be seen that there are various notches throughout the spectrum, as well as steep roll offs at the upper and lower limits of the spectrum. The power spectral density limits for the various filtering requirements are listed in the table of FIG. 11. It can be seen that steep notches are evident, which would require high-order notch filters to be used. FIG. 12 shows a possible design for the transmit path on an analog front end device. It can be seen that the normal sample rate defined by the communication protocol is being interpolated up to allow for simpler and smaller filters to be used. Interpolators are also used on the receive side, as shown in FIG. 13. Although the interpolators will add size to the design, this is outweighed by the reduction in size by being able to simplify the filter designs, as well as being able to meet the power spectral density limit requirements.
- Taking the system diagram in FIG. 2 as a basis, there are changes made to both the transmitter and receiver portions to enable the invention. For the transmitter, an
interpolator 134 is added between the RC shaping 107 and theAFE 114. The interpolator detail is shown in FIG. 12. The complex output (having both real and imaginary parts) from the RC shaping 107 with a 50 MHz sampling rate is converted to a complex output with a 60 MHz sampling rate by the interpolatingfilter 130. This complex output is then combined to a real output by the cosine/sine 131 and the notches required are filtered out by the amateur bandstop filters 132. This output is then interpolated up to 120 MHz (133) and sent to the AFE. For the receiver side, there is a decimator 139 added between theAFE 114 and theFFT 115. This block is detailed in FIG. 13. The samples taken of the Powerline at 60 MHz will be converted to a complex output by the cosine/sine 135. To prevent aliasing of the input signals at frequencies between 20 and 25 MHz, the input signal is also shifted in frequency (135). Each path will then be upsampled by 5 (136), put through a low pass filter (137), and then decimated by 6 (138) to arrive at an output sampled at 50 MHz for input into theFFT 115. - Decoupling of the frequency spacing and sampling rate from the protocol timing allows for adjustments of the frequency range used, carrier frequency spacing, and number of carriers used.
Claims (15)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/211,759 US20030133473A1 (en) | 2001-08-04 | 2002-08-02 | Power line communication system |
PCT/US2002/024665 WO2004014056A1 (en) | 2001-08-04 | 2002-08-02 | Power line communication system |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US31013201P | 2001-08-04 | 2001-08-04 | |
US31030001P | 2001-08-04 | 2001-08-04 | |
US10/211,759 US20030133473A1 (en) | 2001-08-04 | 2002-08-02 | Power line communication system |
PCT/US2002/024665 WO2004014056A1 (en) | 2001-08-04 | 2002-08-02 | Power line communication system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20030133473A1 true US20030133473A1 (en) | 2003-07-17 |
Family
ID=32398189
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/211,759 Abandoned US20030133473A1 (en) | 2001-08-04 | 2002-08-02 | Power line communication system |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20030133473A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004014056A1 (en) |
Cited By (71)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20020048368A1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2002-04-25 | Gardner Steven Holmsen | Method and apparatus for medium access control in powerline communication network systems |
US20030078029A1 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2003-04-24 | Statsignal Systems, Inc. | System and method for transmitting an emergency message over an integrated wireless network |
US20040160306A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | Device enrollment in a security system |
US20040160309A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | Communications control in a security system |
US20040160322A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | RFID reader for a security system |
US20040212503A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-10-28 | Stilp Louis A. | Communications architecture for a security network |
US20050037722A1 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2005-02-17 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Communication apparatus |
US20050116814A1 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2005-06-02 | Rodgers Barry N. | Intelligent power management control system |
US20050169363A1 (en) * | 2002-08-19 | 2005-08-04 | Oleg Logvinov | Method and system for maximizing data throughput rate in a power line communications system by modifying payload symbol length |
US20050232137A1 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2005-10-20 | Srinath Hosur | Versatile system for dual carrier transformation in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing |
US20050286509A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Ryuichi Iwamura | Audio/video network interface |
US20060132303A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-22 | Stilp Louis A | Component diversity in a RFID security network |
US20060132301A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-22 | Stilp Louis A | Fixed part-portable part communications network for a security network |
US20060132302A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-22 | Stilp Louis A | Power management of transponders and sensors in an RFID security network |
US20060145842A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-07-06 | Stilp Louis A | Multi-level meshed security network |
US7079012B2 (en) | 2004-01-21 | 2006-07-18 | Evans Wetmore | System and method for distributing broadband communication signals over power lines |
US20060165117A1 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2006-07-27 | Ryuichi Iwamura | Configurable frequency band elimination for powerline network |
US7088232B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2006-08-08 | Evans Wetmore | System and method for reducing radiation when distributing broadband communication signals over power lines |
US20070061861A1 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2007-03-15 | Yeshayahu Strull | Device, system, and method of discriminately handling a wideband transmission in a communication network |
US20070064589A1 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2007-03-22 | Joseph Fruhauf | Method for transmitting data by means of a carrier current |
US20070075843A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-04-05 | Riveiro Juan C | Multi-Wideband Communications over Power Lines |
US20070076666A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-04-05 | Riveiro Juan C | Multi-Wideband Communications over Power Lines |
US20070183460A1 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2007-08-09 | Thorsten Enders | Method for establishing a user of a data network as a pilot master |
US20070229231A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-10-04 | Hurwitz Jonathan E D | Multi-Wideband Communications over Multiple Mediums within a Network |
US20080001734A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2008-01-03 | Stilp Louis A | Portable telephone in a security network |
US20080008081A1 (en) * | 2006-07-06 | 2008-01-10 | Gigle Semiconductor Inc. | Adaptative multi-carrier code division multiple access |
US20080043992A1 (en) * | 2006-07-25 | 2008-02-21 | Gigle Semiconductor Inc. | Feedback impedance control for driving a signal |
US20080101483A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | System and method for reducing edge effect |
US20080117896A1 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2008-05-22 | Veronica Romero | Network repeater |
US20080130640A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2008-06-05 | Jonathan Ephraim David Hurwitz | Multi-Wideband Communications over Multiple Mediums |
US20080153430A1 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2008-06-26 | Intellon Corporation | Selecting carriers for modulating signals in a communication network |
US20080159358A1 (en) * | 2007-01-02 | 2008-07-03 | David Ruiz | Unknown Destination Traffic Repetition |
US20080266077A1 (en) * | 2007-04-30 | 2008-10-30 | Brian James Cagno | Fault Tolerant Closed System Control Using Power Line Communication |
US20090072953A1 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2009-03-19 | Brian James Cagno | Reliable Redundant Data Communication Through Alternating Current Power Distribution System |
US20090110096A1 (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2009-04-30 | Panasonic Corporation | Communication apparatus, communication method and integrated circuit |
US20090232286A1 (en) * | 2008-03-14 | 2009-09-17 | Gigle Semiconductor, Ltd. | Coupling signal processing circuitry with a wireline communications medium |
US7602220B1 (en) | 2008-06-24 | 2009-10-13 | Gigle Semiconductor, Ltd. | Resistor-input transconductor including common-mode compensation |
US7650425B2 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2010-01-19 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices associated with remote devices in an automated monitoring system |
US7697492B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2010-04-13 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling remote devices |
US7715534B2 (en) | 2000-03-20 | 2010-05-11 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Telephone outlet for implementing a local area network over telephone lines and a local area network using such outlets |
US20100117734A1 (en) * | 2008-10-13 | 2010-05-13 | Jonathan Ephraim David Hurwitz | Programmable Gain Amplifier and Transconductance Compensation System |
US7756086B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2010-07-13 | Sipco, Llc | Method for communicating in dual-modes |
US7795973B2 (en) | 2008-10-13 | 2010-09-14 | Gigle Networks Ltd. | Programmable gain amplifier |
US7852874B2 (en) | 1998-07-28 | 2010-12-14 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Local area network of serial intelligent cells |
US7873058B2 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2011-01-18 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Outlet with analog signal adapter, a method for use thereof and a network using said outlet |
US7876767B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2011-01-25 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Network combining wired and non-wired segments |
US7881462B2 (en) | 2004-02-16 | 2011-02-01 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Outlet add-on module |
US20110043340A1 (en) * | 2009-08-19 | 2011-02-24 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Concatenated Repetition Code with Convolutional Code |
US20110164514A1 (en) * | 2010-01-04 | 2011-07-07 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Transmit Power Control |
US20110183642A1 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2011-07-28 | Panasonic Cororation | Power line communication apparatus and power line communication method |
US7990908B2 (en) | 2002-11-13 | 2011-08-02 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Addressable outlet, and a network using the same |
US8000314B2 (en) | 1996-12-06 | 2011-08-16 | Ipco, Llc | Wireless network system and method for providing same |
US8013732B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2011-09-06 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling remote devices |
US8031650B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2011-10-04 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for monitoring remote devices with a dual-mode wireless communication protocol |
US20110280261A1 (en) * | 2010-05-11 | 2011-11-17 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Interleaver Design and Header Structure For ITU G.hnem |
US8064412B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2011-11-22 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring conditions |
US8171136B2 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2012-05-01 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for transmitting pollution information over an integrated wireless network |
US8175190B2 (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2012-05-08 | Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. | Managing spectra of modulated signals in a communication network |
US8410931B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2013-04-02 | Sipco, Llc | Mobile inventory unit monitoring systems and methods |
US20130148746A1 (en) * | 2011-12-12 | 2013-06-13 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Scheduling for Charger and Electric Vehicle Communication in Power Line Communication System |
WO2013096134A1 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Digital signal processing for plc communications having communication frequencies |
US8489063B2 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2013-07-16 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for providing emergency messages to a mobile device |
US8654635B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2014-02-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Medium access control layer that encapsulates data from a plurality of received data units into a plurality of independently transmittable blocks |
US20140139350A1 (en) * | 2012-11-20 | 2014-05-22 | II William Charles Cook | System and method for providing broadband communications over power cabling |
US8787246B2 (en) | 2009-02-03 | 2014-07-22 | Ipco, Llc | Systems and methods for facilitating wireless network communication, satellite-based wireless network systems, and aircraft-based wireless network systems, and related methods |
US9439126B2 (en) | 2005-01-25 | 2016-09-06 | Sipco, Llc | Wireless network protocol system and methods |
US9568967B2 (en) | 2011-04-12 | 2017-02-14 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Data and digital control communication over power |
US9667318B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 | 2017-05-30 | Texas Instruments Corporation | Device and frame structure for powerline communications |
US10270491B2 (en) | 2017-08-31 | 2019-04-23 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Power-line communication systems AMD methods having location-extendable collector for end-point data |
US10340980B1 (en) | 2018-05-07 | 2019-07-02 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Time synchronization apparatuses and methods for power-distribution systems and the like |
CN111771362A (en) * | 2018-01-24 | 2020-10-13 | Lg电子株式会社 | Method and apparatus for transmitting OFDM signal and method and apparatus for receiving OFDM signal |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP1682159A4 (en) | 2003-10-16 | 2010-07-21 | Stephen John Ralph | Immunomodulating compositions and uses therefor |
Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4479215A (en) * | 1982-09-24 | 1984-10-23 | General Electric Company | Power-line carrier communications system with interference avoidance capability |
US5185591A (en) * | 1991-07-12 | 1993-02-09 | Abb Power T&D Co., Inc. | Power distribution line communication system for and method of reducing effects of signal cancellation |
US5189683A (en) * | 1989-03-23 | 1993-02-23 | Echelon Corporation | Transceiver providing selectable frequencies and spreading sequences |
US5504774A (en) * | 1992-12-24 | 1996-04-02 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Data transmitting and receiving apparatus |
US5553072A (en) * | 1995-01-30 | 1996-09-03 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Communication apparatus and method |
US5777545A (en) * | 1995-05-09 | 1998-07-07 | Elcom Technologies Corporation | Remote control apparatus for power line communications system |
US6005477A (en) * | 1997-04-17 | 1999-12-21 | Abb Research Ltd. | Method and apparatus for information transmission via power supply lines |
US6128335A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2000-10-03 | Integrated Telecom Express | Software rate adaptable modem with forward compatible and expandable functionality and method of operation |
US6151296A (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2000-11-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Bit interleaving for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing in the transmission of digital signals |
US6373377B1 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2002-04-16 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | Power supply with digital data coupling for power-line networking |
US20020102937A1 (en) * | 1995-02-06 | 2002-08-01 | Mark J. Dapper | Communication system with multicarrier telephony transport |
US6442129B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2002-08-27 | Intellon Corporation | Enhanced channel estimation |
-
2002
- 2002-08-02 WO PCT/US2002/024665 patent/WO2004014056A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-08-02 US US10/211,759 patent/US20030133473A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4479215A (en) * | 1982-09-24 | 1984-10-23 | General Electric Company | Power-line carrier communications system with interference avoidance capability |
US5189683A (en) * | 1989-03-23 | 1993-02-23 | Echelon Corporation | Transceiver providing selectable frequencies and spreading sequences |
US5185591A (en) * | 1991-07-12 | 1993-02-09 | Abb Power T&D Co., Inc. | Power distribution line communication system for and method of reducing effects of signal cancellation |
US5504774A (en) * | 1992-12-24 | 1996-04-02 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Data transmitting and receiving apparatus |
US5553072A (en) * | 1995-01-30 | 1996-09-03 | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Communication apparatus and method |
US20020102937A1 (en) * | 1995-02-06 | 2002-08-01 | Mark J. Dapper | Communication system with multicarrier telephony transport |
US5777545A (en) * | 1995-05-09 | 1998-07-07 | Elcom Technologies Corporation | Remote control apparatus for power line communications system |
US6005477A (en) * | 1997-04-17 | 1999-12-21 | Abb Research Ltd. | Method and apparatus for information transmission via power supply lines |
US6151296A (en) * | 1997-06-19 | 2000-11-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Bit interleaving for orthogonal frequency division multiplexing in the transmission of digital signals |
US6128335A (en) * | 1997-06-30 | 2000-10-03 | Integrated Telecom Express | Software rate adaptable modem with forward compatible and expandable functionality and method of operation |
US6442129B1 (en) * | 1999-12-06 | 2002-08-27 | Intellon Corporation | Enhanced channel estimation |
US6373377B1 (en) * | 2000-10-05 | 2002-04-16 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | Power supply with digital data coupling for power-line networking |
Cited By (166)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8233471B2 (en) | 1996-12-06 | 2012-07-31 | Ipco, Llc | Wireless network system and method for providing same |
US8000314B2 (en) | 1996-12-06 | 2011-08-16 | Ipco, Llc | Wireless network system and method for providing same |
US8982856B2 (en) | 1996-12-06 | 2015-03-17 | Ipco, Llc | Systems and methods for facilitating wireless network communication, satellite-based wireless network systems, and aircraft-based wireless network systems, and related methods |
US8625496B2 (en) | 1996-12-06 | 2014-01-07 | Ipco, Llc | Wireless network system and method for providing same |
US9129497B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2015-09-08 | Statsignal Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring conditions |
US7697492B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2010-04-13 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling remote devices |
US8212667B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2012-07-03 | Sipco, Llc | Automotive diagnostic data monitoring systems and methods |
US8013732B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2011-09-06 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling remote devices |
US8964708B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2015-02-24 | Sipco Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling remote devices |
US8223010B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2012-07-17 | Sipco Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring vehicle parking |
US8064412B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2011-11-22 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring conditions |
US9430936B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2016-08-30 | Sipco Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling remote devices |
US8410931B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2013-04-02 | Sipco, Llc | Mobile inventory unit monitoring systems and methods |
US9571582B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2017-02-14 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring and controlling remote devices |
US9691263B2 (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2017-06-27 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for monitoring conditions |
US8885659B2 (en) | 1998-07-28 | 2014-11-11 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Incorporated | Local area network of serial intelligent cells |
US8885660B2 (en) | 1998-07-28 | 2014-11-11 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Incorporated | Local area network of serial intelligent cells |
US7978726B2 (en) | 1998-07-28 | 2011-07-12 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Local area network of serial intelligent cells |
US8867523B2 (en) | 1998-07-28 | 2014-10-21 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Incorporated | Local area network of serial intelligent cells |
US8908673B2 (en) | 1998-07-28 | 2014-12-09 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Incorporated | Local area network of serial intelligent cells |
US7852874B2 (en) | 1998-07-28 | 2010-12-14 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Local area network of serial intelligent cells |
US7650425B2 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2010-01-19 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices associated with remote devices in an automated monitoring system |
US8930571B2 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2015-01-06 | Sipco, LLP | Systems and methods for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices |
US8924588B2 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2014-12-30 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices |
US8924587B2 (en) | 1999-03-18 | 2014-12-30 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for controlling communication between a host computer and communication devices |
US8855277B2 (en) | 2000-03-20 | 2014-10-07 | Conversant Intellectual Property Managment Incorporated | Telephone outlet for implementing a local area network over telephone lines and a local area network using such outlets |
US7715534B2 (en) | 2000-03-20 | 2010-05-11 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Telephone outlet for implementing a local area network over telephone lines and a local area network using such outlets |
US8363797B2 (en) | 2000-03-20 | 2013-01-29 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Telephone outlet for implementing a local area network over telephone lines and a local area network using such outlets |
US8873586B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2014-10-28 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Incorporated | Network combining wired and non-wired segments |
US7876767B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2011-01-25 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Network combining wired and non-wired segments |
US8848725B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2014-09-30 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Incorporated | Network combining wired and non-wired segments |
US8873575B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2014-10-28 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Incorporated | Network combining wired and non-wired segments |
US8867506B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2014-10-21 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Incorporated | Network combining wired and non-wired segments |
US8982904B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2015-03-17 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Inc. | Network combining wired and non-wired segments |
US8982903B2 (en) | 2000-04-19 | 2015-03-17 | Conversant Intellectual Property Management Inc. | Network combining wired and non-wired segments |
US6854059B2 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2005-02-08 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for medium access control in powerline communication network systems |
US20020048368A1 (en) * | 2000-06-07 | 2002-04-25 | Gardner Steven Holmsen | Method and apparatus for medium access control in powerline communication network systems |
US9615226B2 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2017-04-04 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for transmitting an emergency message over an integrated wireless network |
US9282029B2 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2016-03-08 | Sipco, Llc. | System and method for transmitting an emergency message over an integrated wireless network |
US8489063B2 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2013-07-16 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for providing emergency messages to a mobile device |
US10149129B2 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2018-12-04 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for providing emergency messages to a mobile device |
US20030078029A1 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2003-04-24 | Statsignal Systems, Inc. | System and method for transmitting an emergency message over an integrated wireless network |
US7480501B2 (en) * | 2001-10-24 | 2009-01-20 | Statsignal Ipc, Llc | System and method for transmitting an emergency message over an integrated wireless network |
US10687194B2 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2020-06-16 | Sipco, Llc | Systems and methods for providing emergency messages to a mobile device |
US8666357B2 (en) | 2001-10-24 | 2014-03-04 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for transmitting an emergency message over an integrated wireless network |
US9111240B2 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2015-08-18 | Sipco, Llc. | System and method for transmitting pollution information over an integrated wireless network |
US9515691B2 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2016-12-06 | Sipco, Llc. | System and method for transmitting pollution information over an integrated wireless network |
US8171136B2 (en) | 2001-10-30 | 2012-05-01 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for transmitting pollution information over an integrated wireless network |
US7193506B2 (en) * | 2002-08-19 | 2007-03-20 | Arkados, Inc. | Method and system for maximizing data throughput rate in a power line communications system by modifying payload symbol length |
US20050169363A1 (en) * | 2002-08-19 | 2005-08-04 | Oleg Logvinov | Method and system for maximizing data throughput rate in a power line communications system by modifying payload symbol length |
US7990908B2 (en) | 2002-11-13 | 2011-08-02 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Addressable outlet, and a network using the same |
US20060145842A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-07-06 | Stilp Louis A | Multi-level meshed security network |
US20060132302A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-22 | Stilp Louis A | Power management of transponders and sensors in an RFID security network |
US20040160322A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | RFID reader for a security system |
US20060132301A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-22 | Stilp Louis A | Fixed part-portable part communications network for a security network |
US20060132303A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-22 | Stilp Louis A | Component diversity in a RFID security network |
US20040212503A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-10-28 | Stilp Louis A. | Communications architecture for a security network |
US7057512B2 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2006-06-06 | Ingrid, Inc. | RFID reader for a security system |
US20040212497A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-10-28 | Stilp Louis A. | Multi-controller security network |
US20040160309A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | Communications control in a security system |
US20040160306A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2004-08-19 | Stilp Louis A. | Device enrollment in a security system |
US20080001734A1 (en) * | 2003-02-03 | 2008-01-03 | Stilp Louis A | Portable telephone in a security network |
US7746763B2 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2010-06-29 | Spidcom Technologies | Method for transmitting data by means of a carrier current |
US20070064589A1 (en) * | 2003-04-30 | 2007-03-22 | Joseph Fruhauf | Method for transmitting data by means of a carrier current |
US20050037722A1 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2005-02-17 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Communication apparatus |
US20080095253A1 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2008-04-24 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Communication apparatus |
US7725081B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2010-05-25 | Panasonic Corporation | Communication apparatus |
US8086194B2 (en) | 2003-08-07 | 2011-12-27 | Panasonic Corporation | Communication apparatus |
US7680152B2 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2010-03-16 | Robert Bosch Gmbh | Method for establishing a user of a data network as a pilot master |
US20070183460A1 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2007-08-09 | Thorsten Enders | Method for establishing a user of a data network as a pilot master |
US7302240B2 (en) * | 2003-08-07 | 2007-11-27 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Communication apparatus |
US20050116814A1 (en) * | 2003-10-24 | 2005-06-02 | Rodgers Barry N. | Intelligent power management control system |
US8654635B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2014-02-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Medium access control layer that encapsulates data from a plurality of received data units into a plurality of independently transmittable blocks |
US9013989B2 (en) | 2003-11-24 | 2015-04-21 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Medium access control layer that encapsulates data from a plurality of received data units into a plurality of independently transmittable blocks |
US7079012B2 (en) | 2004-01-21 | 2006-07-18 | Evans Wetmore | System and method for distributing broadband communication signals over power lines |
US7881462B2 (en) | 2004-02-16 | 2011-02-01 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Outlet add-on module |
US8031650B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2011-10-04 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for monitoring remote devices with a dual-mode wireless communication protocol |
US8379564B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2013-02-19 | Sipco, Llc | System and method for monitoring remote devices with a dual-mode wireless communication protocol |
US8446884B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2013-05-21 | Sipco, Llc | Dual-mode communication devices, methods and systems |
US7756086B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2010-07-13 | Sipco, Llc | Method for communicating in dual-modes |
US7088232B2 (en) | 2004-03-03 | 2006-08-08 | Evans Wetmore | System and method for reducing radiation when distributing broadband communication signals over power lines |
US20050232137A1 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2005-10-20 | Srinath Hosur | Versatile system for dual carrier transformation in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing |
US7668075B2 (en) * | 2004-04-06 | 2010-02-23 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Versatile system for dual carrier transformation in orthogonal frequency division multiplexing |
US7792106B2 (en) | 2004-06-08 | 2010-09-07 | Sony Corporation | Audio/video network interface |
US20050286509A1 (en) * | 2004-06-08 | 2005-12-29 | Ryuichi Iwamura | Audio/video network interface |
US7873058B2 (en) | 2004-11-08 | 2011-01-18 | Mosaid Technologies Incorporated | Outlet with analog signal adapter, a method for use thereof and a network using said outlet |
US20060165117A1 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2006-07-27 | Ryuichi Iwamura | Configurable frequency band elimination for powerline network |
US8081934B2 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2011-12-20 | Sony Corporation | Configurable frequency band elimination for powerline network |
US7689175B2 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2010-03-30 | Sony Corporation | Configurable frequency band elimination for powerline network |
US20110143694A1 (en) * | 2005-01-21 | 2011-06-16 | Ryuichi Iwamura | Configurable Frequency Band Elimination For Powerline Network |
US9860820B2 (en) | 2005-01-25 | 2018-01-02 | Sipco, Llc | Wireless network protocol systems and methods |
US9439126B2 (en) | 2005-01-25 | 2016-09-06 | Sipco, Llc | Wireless network protocol system and methods |
US10356687B2 (en) | 2005-01-25 | 2019-07-16 | Sipco, Llc | Wireless network protocol systems and methods |
US11039371B2 (en) | 2005-01-25 | 2021-06-15 | Sipco, Llc | Wireless network protocol systems and methods |
US8081950B2 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2011-12-20 | Panasonic Corporation | Power line communication apparatus and power line communication method |
US20110183642A1 (en) * | 2005-04-08 | 2011-07-28 | Panasonic Cororation | Power line communication apparatus and power line communication method |
US8175190B2 (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2012-05-08 | Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. | Managing spectra of modulated signals in a communication network |
EP2611040A3 (en) * | 2005-07-27 | 2014-08-06 | Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. | Managing spectra of modulated signals in a communication network |
US8416887B2 (en) | 2005-07-27 | 2013-04-09 | Qualcomm Atheros, Inc | Managing spectra of modulated signals in a communication network |
US20070061861A1 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2007-03-15 | Yeshayahu Strull | Device, system, and method of discriminately handling a wideband transmission in a communication network |
WO2007031994A2 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2007-03-22 | Xtend Networks Ltd. | Device, system, and method of discriminately handling a wideband transmission in a communication network |
WO2007031994A3 (en) * | 2005-09-12 | 2007-07-12 | Xtend Networks Ltd | Device, system, and method of discriminately handling a wideband transmission in a communication network |
US7725096B2 (en) | 2005-10-03 | 2010-05-25 | Gigle Semiconductor Sl | Multi-wideband communications over power lines |
US20070229231A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-10-04 | Hurwitz Jonathan E D | Multi-Wideband Communications over Multiple Mediums within a Network |
US20070075843A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-04-05 | Riveiro Juan C | Multi-Wideband Communications over Power Lines |
US20070076666A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-04-05 | Riveiro Juan C | Multi-Wideband Communications over Power Lines |
WO2007039723A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2007-04-12 | Gigle Simiconductor Ltd | Multi-wideband communications over power lines |
US7899436B2 (en) | 2005-10-03 | 2011-03-01 | Juan Carlos Riveiro | Multi-wideband communications over power lines |
US20090252209A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2009-10-08 | Juan Carlos Riveiro | Power Line Communication Networks and Methods employing Multiple Widebands |
US7877078B2 (en) | 2005-10-03 | 2011-01-25 | Juan Carlos Riveiro | Power line communication networks and methods employing multiple widebands |
US8406239B2 (en) | 2005-10-03 | 2013-03-26 | Broadcom Corporation | Multi-wideband communications over multiple mediums |
US8213895B2 (en) | 2005-10-03 | 2012-07-03 | Broadcom Europe Limited | Multi-wideband communications over multiple mediums within a network |
US20080130640A1 (en) * | 2005-10-03 | 2008-06-05 | Jonathan Ephraim David Hurwitz | Multi-Wideband Communications over Multiple Mediums |
US20080008081A1 (en) * | 2006-07-06 | 2008-01-10 | Gigle Semiconductor Inc. | Adaptative multi-carrier code division multiple access |
US7860146B2 (en) | 2006-07-06 | 2010-12-28 | Gigle Networks, Inc. | Adaptative multi-carrier code division multiple access |
US8885814B2 (en) | 2006-07-25 | 2014-11-11 | Broadcom Europe Limited | Feedback impedance control for driving a signal |
US20080043992A1 (en) * | 2006-07-25 | 2008-02-21 | Gigle Semiconductor Inc. | Feedback impedance control for driving a signal |
US7684504B2 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2010-03-23 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | System and method for reducing edge effect |
US20080101483A1 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2008-05-01 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | System and method for reducing edge effect |
US7808985B2 (en) | 2006-11-21 | 2010-10-05 | Gigle Networks Sl | Network repeater |
US20080117896A1 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2008-05-22 | Veronica Romero | Network repeater |
US7904021B2 (en) | 2006-12-21 | 2011-03-08 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Selecting carriers for modulating signals in a communication network |
US20080153430A1 (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2008-06-26 | Intellon Corporation | Selecting carriers for modulating signals in a communication network |
US20080159358A1 (en) * | 2007-01-02 | 2008-07-03 | David Ruiz | Unknown Destination Traffic Repetition |
US8130084B2 (en) * | 2007-04-30 | 2012-03-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Fault tolerant closed system control using power line communication |
US20080266077A1 (en) * | 2007-04-30 | 2008-10-30 | Brian James Cagno | Fault Tolerant Closed System Control Using Power Line Communication |
US8421614B2 (en) | 2007-09-19 | 2013-04-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reliable redundant data communication through alternating current power distribution system |
US20090072953A1 (en) * | 2007-09-19 | 2009-03-19 | Brian James Cagno | Reliable Redundant Data Communication Through Alternating Current Power Distribution System |
US20090110096A1 (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2009-04-30 | Panasonic Corporation | Communication apparatus, communication method and integrated circuit |
WO2009054547A3 (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2009-07-30 | Panasonic Corp | Communication apparatus, communication method and integrated circuit |
US8442130B2 (en) | 2007-10-25 | 2013-05-14 | Panasonic Corporation | Communication apparatus, communication method and integrated circuit |
CN101836391A (en) * | 2007-10-25 | 2010-09-15 | 松下电器产业株式会社 | Communication apparatus, communication method and integrated circuit |
US20090232286A1 (en) * | 2008-03-14 | 2009-09-17 | Gigle Semiconductor, Ltd. | Coupling signal processing circuitry with a wireline communications medium |
US8213582B2 (en) | 2008-03-14 | 2012-07-03 | Broadcom Europe Limited | Coupling signal processing circuitry with a wireline communications medium |
US7602220B1 (en) | 2008-06-24 | 2009-10-13 | Gigle Semiconductor, Ltd. | Resistor-input transconductor including common-mode compensation |
US7795973B2 (en) | 2008-10-13 | 2010-09-14 | Gigle Networks Ltd. | Programmable gain amplifier |
US20100117734A1 (en) * | 2008-10-13 | 2010-05-13 | Jonathan Ephraim David Hurwitz | Programmable Gain Amplifier and Transconductance Compensation System |
US7956689B2 (en) | 2008-10-13 | 2011-06-07 | Broadcom Corporation | Programmable gain amplifier and transconductance compensation system |
US8787246B2 (en) | 2009-02-03 | 2014-07-22 | Ipco, Llc | Systems and methods for facilitating wireless network communication, satellite-based wireless network systems, and aircraft-based wireless network systems, and related methods |
US20110043340A1 (en) * | 2009-08-19 | 2011-02-24 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Concatenated Repetition Code with Convolutional Code |
EP2467987A4 (en) * | 2009-08-19 | 2017-06-07 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Concatenated repetition code with convolutional code |
US20110164514A1 (en) * | 2010-01-04 | 2011-07-07 | Atheros Communications, Inc. | Transmit Power Control |
US8537705B2 (en) | 2010-01-04 | 2013-09-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Transmit power control |
US11791862B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 | 2023-10-17 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Data encoder for power line communications |
US9667318B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 | 2017-05-30 | Texas Instruments Corporation | Device and frame structure for powerline communications |
US11005530B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 | 2021-05-11 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Data encoder for power line communications |
US9819392B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 | 2017-11-14 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Data encoder for power line communications |
US9112753B2 (en) * | 2010-05-11 | 2015-08-18 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Interleaver design and header structure for ITU G.hnem |
US10541727B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 | 2020-01-21 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Data encoder for power line communications |
US10141978B2 (en) | 2010-05-11 | 2018-11-27 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Data encoder for power line communications |
US20110280261A1 (en) * | 2010-05-11 | 2011-11-17 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Interleaver Design and Header Structure For ITU G.hnem |
US9568967B2 (en) | 2011-04-12 | 2017-02-14 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp | Data and digital control communication over power |
US20130148746A1 (en) * | 2011-12-12 | 2013-06-13 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Scheduling for Charger and Electric Vehicle Communication in Power Line Communication System |
US9698866B2 (en) * | 2011-12-12 | 2017-07-04 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Scheduling for charger and electric vehicle communication in power line communication system |
WO2013096134A1 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2013-06-27 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Digital signal processing for plc communications having communication frequencies |
US9503157B2 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2016-11-22 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Digital signal processing for PLC communications having communication frequencies |
US8737555B2 (en) | 2011-12-22 | 2014-05-27 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Digital signal processing for PLC communications having communication frequencies |
US20140314161A1 (en) * | 2011-12-22 | 2014-10-23 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Digital signal processing for plc communications having communication frequencies |
US20140139350A1 (en) * | 2012-11-20 | 2014-05-22 | II William Charles Cook | System and method for providing broadband communications over power cabling |
US10001008B2 (en) * | 2012-11-20 | 2018-06-19 | Trinity Solutions | System and method for providing broadband communications over power cabling |
US10270491B2 (en) | 2017-08-31 | 2019-04-23 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Power-line communication systems AMD methods having location-extendable collector for end-point data |
US10999821B2 (en) | 2018-01-24 | 2021-05-04 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and device for transmitting OFDM signal, and method and device for receiving OFDM signal |
CN111771362A (en) * | 2018-01-24 | 2020-10-13 | Lg电子株式会社 | Method and apparatus for transmitting OFDM signal and method and apparatus for receiving OFDM signal |
US11611463B2 (en) | 2018-01-24 | 2023-03-21 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and device for transmitting OFDM signal, and method and device for receiving OFDM signal |
US11973628B2 (en) | 2018-01-24 | 2024-04-30 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Method and device for transmitting OFDM signal, and method and device for receiving OFDM signal |
US10340980B1 (en) | 2018-05-07 | 2019-07-02 | Landis+Gyr Technologies, Llc | Time synchronization apparatuses and methods for power-distribution systems and the like |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2004014056A1 (en) | 2004-02-12 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20030133473A1 (en) | Power line communication system | |
US11824597B2 (en) | Robust mode for power line communications | |
US6430148B1 (en) | Multidirectional communication systems | |
KR100972593B1 (en) | Method of and system for power line carrier communications | |
US8680706B2 (en) | Communicating over power distribution media | |
AU2009201983B2 (en) | New frame and signalling pattern structure for multi-carrier systems | |
US7986711B2 (en) | System and method for data communication over power lines | |
US8675754B1 (en) | Hybrid modulation schemes used in data communication | |
EP2493085B1 (en) | Coexistence in communication system | |
US20110043340A1 (en) | Concatenated Repetition Code with Convolutional Code | |
US20020118658A1 (en) | Modulation/demodulation of a pilot carrier, and means to perform the modulation/demodulation | |
EA005957B1 (en) | Digital point-to-multipoint data transmission system on an electric network and method therefor | |
US7904021B2 (en) | Selecting carriers for modulating signals in a communication network | |
US6985531B2 (en) | Dual domain differential encoder/decoder | |
JP2000078062A (en) | Method and device for bidirectional data exchange on low and medium voltage power lines | |
US20160277070A1 (en) | Optimized phy frame structure for ofdm based narrowband plc | |
CN107566013B (en) | MAC period alignment method, node and system for adjacent network coordination | |
US6542460B1 (en) | Relating to multidirectional communication systems | |
Zhang et al. | FFT-based OFDM in broadband-PLC and narrowband-PLC |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MILETOS, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: BILL OF SALE;ASSIGNOR:ENIKIA, LLC;REEL/FRAME:014608/0163 Effective date: 20040323 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: ARKADOS, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:MILETOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:015042/0804 Effective date: 20040521 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BUSHIDO CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LP, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: GAMMA OPPOURTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP CLASS A, N Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: GAMMA OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP CLASS C, NE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: CRUCIAN TRANSITION, INC., NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: CARGO HOLDINGS LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: TYPALDOS, ANDREAS, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: ANDREAS TYPALDOS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, NEW Y Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: TYPALDOS, KATHRYN, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: SOMMER, HERBERT, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: SCHNEIDER, JOEL C, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: VENDOME, GENNARO, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: CARSON, WILLIAM H, TEXAS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: BCMF TRUSTEES, LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: ACMSPV LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: CFRR HOLDINGS LLC, NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: RABMAN, RALPH, SOUTH AFRICA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: PIERCE DIVERSIFIED STRATEGY MASTER FUND LLC SERIES Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: BUSHIDO CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LP,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: GAMMA OPPOURTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP CLASS A,NE Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: GAMMA OPPORTUNITY CAPITAL PARTNERS, LP CLASS C,NEW Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: CRUCIAN TRANSITION, INC.,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: CARGO HOLDINGS LLC,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: TYPALDOS, ANDREAS,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: ANDREAS TYPALDOS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,NEW YO Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: TYPALDOS, KATHRYN,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: SOMMER, HERBERT,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: SCHNEIDER, JOEL C,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: VENDOME, GENNARO,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: CARSON, WILLIAM H,TEXAS Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: BCMF TRUSTEES, LLC,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: ACMSPV LLC,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: CFRR HOLDINGS LLC,NEW YORK Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 Owner name: RABMAN, RALPH,SOUTH AFRICA Free format text: SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:ARKADOS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:022416/0682 Effective date: 20051228 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: THE ARKADOS GROUP (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CDKNET.COM, I Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:BUSHIDO CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LP;PIERCE DIVERSIFIED STRATEGY MASTER FUND LLC SERIES BUS;CRUCIAN TRANSITION, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:026554/0550 Effective date: 20110624 Owner name: ARKADOS, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:BUSHIDO CAPITAL MASTER FUND, LP;PIERCE DIVERSIFIED STRATEGY MASTER FUND LLC SERIES BUS;CRUCIAN TRANSITION, INC.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:026554/0550 Effective date: 20110624 Owner name: ARKADOS, INC., NEW JERSEY Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:ANDREAS TYPALDOS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;CARGO HOLDINGS LLC;TYPALDOS, ANDREAS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:026554/0322 Effective date: 20110624 Owner name: THE ARKADOS GROUP (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CDKNET.COM, I Free format text: RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY;ASSIGNORS:ANDREAS TYPALDOS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP;CARGO HOLDINGS LLC;TYPALDOS, ANDREAS;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:026554/0322 Effective date: 20110624 |