US20030085497A1 - Leaf spring - Google Patents
Leaf spring Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20030085497A1 US20030085497A1 US10/167,055 US16705502A US2003085497A1 US 20030085497 A1 US20030085497 A1 US 20030085497A1 US 16705502 A US16705502 A US 16705502A US 2003085497 A1 US2003085497 A1 US 2003085497A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- leaf spring
- leaf
- spring assembly
- full
- cantilever
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G11/00—Resilient suspensions characterised by arrangement, location or kind of springs
- B60G11/02—Resilient suspensions characterised by arrangement, location or kind of springs having leaf springs only
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F16—ENGINEERING ELEMENTS AND UNITS; GENERAL MEASURES FOR PRODUCING AND MAINTAINING EFFECTIVE FUNCTIONING OF MACHINES OR INSTALLATIONS; THERMAL INSULATION IN GENERAL
- F16F—SPRINGS; SHOCK-ABSORBERS; MEANS FOR DAMPING VIBRATION
- F16F1/00—Springs
- F16F1/02—Springs made of steel or other material having low internal friction; Wound, torsion, leaf, cup, ring or the like springs, the material of the spring not being relevant
- F16F1/18—Leaf springs
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2200/00—Indexing codes relating to suspension types
- B60G2200/40—Indexing codes relating to the wheels in the suspensions
- B60G2200/464—Caster angle
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2202/00—Indexing codes relating to the type of spring, damper or actuator
- B60G2202/10—Type of spring
- B60G2202/11—Leaf spring
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2206/00—Indexing codes related to the manufacturing of suspensions: constructional features, the materials used, procedures or tools
- B60G2206/01—Constructional features of suspension elements, e.g. arms, dampers, springs
- B60G2206/40—Constructional features of dampers and/or springs
- B60G2206/42—Springs
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to active components for suspension systems, and more particularly, to springs for such systems.
- a basic object of any suspension system in a vehicle is to suspend the vehicle body above the vehicle wheels.
- suspension systems are typically connected between the axle, or its housing, and the vehicle frame.
- Suspension systems typically include active components, such as springs and the like, to keep the sprung mass (vehicle body) suspended above the unsprung mass (vehicle wheels).
- a suspension system preferably permits a relatively smooth, yet stable, ride during acceleration, deceleration and cornering of the vehicle, and during jounce and rebound of the axle when the vehicle is driven over bumpy surfaces and the like.
- leaf springs In suspension systems, leaf springs often serve as the active components. In a variety of circumstances, concerns regarding vehicle packaging necessitate the use of an asymmetrical leaf spring. In asymmetrical leaf springs, one cantilever of the leaf spring is longer than the other cantilever. For instance, and referring to FIG. 1, in a typical asymmetrical leaf spring 10 , the front cantilever 12 (i.e., that portion of the leaf spring extending from one end 14 of the leaf spring to the center 16 of the axle seat portion 17 ) might be longer than the rear cantilever 18 (i.e., that portion of the leaf spring extending from the center 16 of the axle seat portion 17 to the opposite end of the leaf spring 20 ). This difference in length between cantilevers is what classifies a leaf spring as asymmetrical.
- leaf springs in general are designed such that they have the same stress level in each cantilever.
- this optimized design results in the shorter cantilever being stiffer than the longer cantilever. Stated differently, the shorter cantilever has a higher spring rate than the longer cantilever. Conversely, the longer cantilever is softer than the shorter cantilever, and it has a lower spring rate.
- the seat portion 16 of the spring translates vertically and rotates due to the differing spring rates of the respective cantilevers.
- This rotation of the seat portion applies torsion to the axle and causes it to rotate, producing a varying caster angle during vehicle movement.
- This varying caster angle is sometimes undesirable, and can serve as a drawback of asymmetrical leaf springs designed for optimum stress tolerances. Nevertheless, vehicle packaging concerns and the like often necessitate use of such asymmetrical leaf springs.
- the front and rear cantilevers 24 , 26 are substantially equal in length.
- the cantilevers When optimized for maximum stress tolerance, the cantilevers not only have equal stress levels, but also have equal spring rates to yield the equal stress levels.
- the seat portion does not rotate during spring deflection and the axle of associated with the spring maintains a constant caster angle during jounce and rebound.
- a caster wedge 28 is often positioned between the axle seat of the leaf spring and the axle to provide for the selected, fixed caster angle of the axle.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a conventional suspension system used for a front steering axle 30 .
- a vehicle frame 32 extends longitudinally and is suspended above axle 30 by a suspension system generally identified by reference numeral 34 .
- the suspension system 34 includes a leaf spring 36 pivotally connected at one end to a hanger 38 , which, in turn is fixedly mounted to frame 32 .
- leaf spring 36 is pivotally connected to a hanger 40 through a conventional shackle 42 .
- Hanger 40 is mounted to frame 32 .
- An air spring 44 is optionally mounted at its top side to an air spring mounting bracket 46 , which is fixedly mounted to frame 32 .
- Air spring 44 is seated on an axle attachment assembly 48 in alignment with axle 30 .
- the axle attachment assembly 48 includes a pair of guide plates 50 , 52 positioned on opposite sides of axle 30 , the caster wedge 28 , and a pair of U-bolts 54 , 56 to fasten the assembly components together.
- Caster wedge 28 causes axle 30 to rotate a fixed amount of degrees (either clockwise or counter-clockwise, depending on the orientation of the caster wedge) to accommodate the desired fixed caster angle for the axle.
- Use of extra suspension system components, such as caster wedge 28 adds weight to the suspension system and increases the costs associated with the design, assembly and service of such systems.
- suspension system components particularly leaf springs, that provide for the desired fixed caster angle of a vehicle axle.
- the present invention is directed to a leaf spring assembly for use as an active component in vehicle suspension systems.
- the leaf spring assembly includes a full leaf leaf spring component and a half leaf leaf spring component.
- the full leaf leaf spring extends substantially the entire length of the leaf spring assembly and the half leaf leaf spring extends substantially the entire length of one of the cantilevers.
- the half leaf leaf spring preferably also extends along the axle seat portion of the other cantilever and terminates at the end of the axle seat portion included within the other cantilever.
- the full leaf leaf spring and the half leaf leaf spring are preferably connected together by a fastener.
- the half leaf leaf spring extends substantially along the entire length of the shorter cantilever to soften that cantilever.
- the leaf spring assembly preferably has relatively uniform stress tolerance and provides for a constant caster angle for its associated axle during deflection of the assembly due to jounce and rebound.
- the half leaf leaf spring softens the cantilever along which it extends.
- the leaf spring assembly preferably has relatively uniform stress tolerance and provides for a varying caster angle for its associated axle during deflection of the assembly due to jounce and rebound.
- the axle seat portion of the full leaf leaf spring is designed such that it biases the position of the axle associated with the leaf spring assembly to a predetermined caster angle.
- one of the upper and lower surfaces of the full leaf leaf spring most preferably the lower surface, tapers throughout the axle seat portion in such a manner that the full leaf leaf spring is thicker at one end of its axle seat portion than it is at the other end of its axle seat portion.
- the upper and lower surfaces of the full leaf spring extend in intersecting planes.
- the full leaf leaf spring, and therefore the leaf spring assembly includes a built-in caster wedge that biases its associated axle to a predetermined caster angle.
- FIG. 1 is a side view of a conventional asymmetrical single leaf leaf spring
- FIG. 2 is a side view of a conventional symmetrical single leaf leaf spring
- FIG. 3 is a side view of a conventional suspension system incorporating a caster wedge
- FIG. 4 is a side view of a first preferred form of a leaf spring assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention
- FIG. 5 is a side view of a conventional suspension system incorporating the leaf spring assembly shown in FIG. 4;
- FIG. 6 is a side view of a second preferred form of a leaf spring assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- FIG. 7 is a side view of a third preferred form of a leaf spring assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- FIG. 8 is a side view of a fourth preferred form of a leaf spring assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a side view of a suspension system incorporating the leaf spring assembly shown in FIG. 8.
- FIGS. 4 and 6 illustrate a leaf spring assembly 60 having a full leaf leaf spring component 63 A (in FIG. 4), 63 B (in FIG. 6) and a half leaf leaf spring component 64 .
- the leaf spring assembly is divided into a front cantilever portion 66 and a rear cantilever portion 68 .
- An axle seat portion 70 extends through a midsection of leaf spring assembly 60 .
- Axle seat portion 70 has a centerpoint 72 , which is preferably in line with the lateral boundary that divides front cantilever portion 66 and rear cantilever portion 68 . In this arrangement, part of axle seat portion 70 is in front cantilever 66 and part of the axle seat portion is in rear cantilever 68 .
- the full leaf leaf spring component 63 A (FIG. 4), 63 B (FIG. 6) has an upper surface 61 A (FIG. 4), 61 B (FIG. 6) and a lower surface 62 A (FIG. 4), 62 B (FIG. 6).
- the distance between upper surface 61 A and lower surface 62 A through axle seat portion 70 is not uniform.
- lower surface 62 A tapers as it extends through axle seat portion 70 and, in effect, establishes a built-in caster angle feature for the leaf spring assembly 60 shown in FIG. 4.
- the distance between upper surface 61 B and lower surface 62 B through axle seat portion 70 is uniform so that the leaf spring assembly 60 shown in FIG. 6 has no built-in caster angle feature.
- the full leaf leaf spring component 62 includes eyes 74 , 76 at opposite ends thereof Eyes 74 , 76 are used for attachment to hangers, shackles or similar structures in vehicle suspension systems (see FIG. 5).
- the half leaf leaf spring component 64 includes a wrap 77 at its front end. Wrap 77 provides an additional safety feature to keep the connection intact even under the unlikely condition wherein eye 74 breaks.
- Half leaf leaf spring component 64 preferably extends along the substantial entire length of front cantilever 66 and through the axle seat portion 70 , preferably terminating at the end of the axle seat portion within rear cantilever 68 .
- Full leaf leaf spring component 62 and half leaf leaf spring component 64 are fastened together by a fastener 78 , preferably positioned so that it is aligned with the centerpoint 72 of axle seat portion 70 .
- leaf spring assembly 60 permits an asymmetrical leaf spring designed for maximum stress tolerance to function as a conventional symmetrical leaf spring likewise designed for maximum stress tolerance.
- the half leaf leaf spring component 64 softens the cantilever through which it extends (front cantilever 66 in FIG. 4), giving it a lower spring rate.
- the design of leaf spring assembly 60 can be optimized so that, when assembled in a suspension system, the axle associated with the leaf spring maintains a constant caster angle during deflection of the leaf spring due to jounce and rebound.
- leaf spring When it is symmetrical, however, the leaf spring can function as a conventional asymmetrical leaf spring. Again, the half leaf leaf spring component 64 softens the cantilever through which it extends (front cantilever 66 in FIG. 4), giving it a lower spring rate. Under these circumstances, the design of leaf spring assembly 60 can be optimized so that, when assembled in a suspension system, the caster angle of the associated axle is changed throughout its jounce and rebound movement.
- the leaf spring assembly 79 shown therein is designed like the one shown in FIG. 4. Accordingly, it includes a full leaf leaf spring component 80 having an upper surface 82 and a lower surface 84 .
- the distance between upper surface 82 and lower surface 84 at any given point of full leaf leaf spring component 80 defines the thickness of the component at that given point.
- the upper surface 82 and lower surface 84 of full leaf leaf spring component 80 extend in nonparallel (i.e., intersecting) planes.
- upper surface 82 extends substantially flat through axle seat portion 70
- lower surface 84 linearly tapers in a manner such that full leaf leaf spring component 80 is thicker at the rear end of the axle seat portion than it is at the front end of the axle seat portion.
- FIG. 5 illustrates the use of leaf spring assembly 79 in a suspension system.
- a longitudinally extending vehicle frame 86 is suspended above an axle 88 by a vehicle suspension system generally designated by reference numeral 90 .
- the suspension system includes leaf spring assembly 79 , which is pivotally connected at its proximal end to a hanger 92 , which, in turn, is fixedly mounted to frame 86 .
- Leaf spring assembly 79 is also connected at its distal end to a hanger 94 through a conventional shackle 96 , which permits movement of the distal end of the leaf spring assembly.
- Hanger 94 is fixedly mounted to frame 86 .
- An air spring 98 is mounted atop an axle attachment assembly 100 .
- the air spring is mounted to frame 86 by an air spring mounting bracket 102 .
- Leaf spring attachment assembly includes an upper guide plate 104 , a lower guide plate 106 and two U-bolts 108 , 110 .
- the U-bolts 108 , 110 are used to fasten the leaf spring assembly 79 to the axle 88 .
- Using the leaf spring assembly shown in FIG. 4 biases axle 88 in a position wherein it has a predetermined biased caster angle. If leaf spring assembly 79 functions like a symmetrical leaf spring, then the biased caster angle remains constant during jounce and rebound. If leaf spring assembly 79 functions like an asymmetrical leaf spring, then the biased caster angle will vary during jounce and rebound.
- the unique design of leaf spring assembly 79 permits it to establish a predetermined biased caster angle for its associated axle, and permits varying spring rates in the cantilevers of the leaf spring assembly.
- FIG. 7 illustrates a leaf spring assembly 160 having a full leaf leaf spring component 162 and a half leaf leaf spring component 164 .
- the leaf spring assembly 160 is in a form similar to a tapered convolute leaf spring, which serves the subject matter for U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,221, issued to Wilson, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
- the leaf spring assembly 160 is divided into a front cantilever portion 166 and a rear cantilever portion 168 .
- An axle seat portion 170 extends through a midsection of leaf spring assembly 160 .
- Axle seat portion 170 has a centerpoint 172 , which is preferably in line with the lateral boundary that divides front cantilever portion 166 and rear cantilever portion 168 . In this arrangement, part of axle seat portion 170 is in front cantilever 166 and part of the axle seat portion is in rear cantilever 168 .
- the full leaf leaf spring component 162 includes an eye 174 at one of its ends. Eye 174 is used for attachment to hangers, shackles or similar structures in vehicle suspension systems (see FIG. 9).
- the half leaf leaf spring component 164 includes a wrap 177 at the same end as eye 174 . Wrap 177 provides an additional safety feature to keep the connection intact even under the unlikely condition wherein eye 174 breaks.
- Half leaf leaf spring component 164 preferably extends along the substantial entire length of front cantilever 166 and through the axle seat portion 170 , preferably terminating at the end of the axle seat portion within rear cantilever 168 .
- Full leaf leaf spring component 162 and half leaf leaf spring component 164 are fastened together by a fastener 178 , preferably positioned so that it is aligned with the centerpoint 172 of axle seat portion 170 .
- leaf spring assembly 160 permits an asymmetrical leaf spring designed for maximum stress tolerance to function as a conventional symmetrical leaf spring likewise designed for maximum stress tolerance.
- the half leaf leaf spring component 164 softens the cantilever through which it extends (front cantilever 166 in FIG. 7), giving it a lower spring rate.
- the design of leaf spring assembly 160 can be optimized so that, when assembled in a suspension system, the axle associated with the leaf spring maintains a constant caster angle during deflection of the leaf spring due to jounce and rebound.
- leaf spring When it is symmetrical, however, the leaf spring can function as a conventional asymmetrical leaf spring. Again, the half leaf leaf spring component 164 softens the cantilever through which it extends (front cantilever 166 in FIG. 4), giving it a lower spring rate. Under these circumstances, the design of leaf spring assembly 160 can be optimized so that, when assembled in a suspension system, the caster angle of the associated axle is changed throughout its jounce and rebound movement.
- the leaf spring assembly 179 shown therein includes a full leaf leaf spring component 180 having an upper surface 182 and a lower surface 184 .
- the distance between upper surface 182 and lower surface 184 at any given point of full leaf leaf spring component 180 defines the thickness of the component at that given point.
- the upper surface 182 and lower surface 184 of full leaf leaf spring component 180 extend in nonparallel (i.e., intersecting) planes.
- upper surface 182 extends substantially flat through axle seat portion 170
- lower surface 184 linearly tapers in a manner such that full leaf leaf spring component 180 is thicker at the rear end of the axle seat portion than it is at the front end of the axle seat portion.
- leaf spring assembly 179 biases its associated axle so that it is positioned at a predetermined caster angle.
- the portion of full leaf leaf spring component 180 extending through axle seat portion 170 serves as a built-in caster wedge for leaf spring assembly 179 .
- FIG. 9 illustrates the leaf spring assembly 179 shown in FIG. 8, as incorporated in a suspension system 186 .
- suspension system 186 reference will be made to the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,221.
- attachment member 188 which is further disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,887,881, issued to Hatch, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
- attachment member 188 a different attachment member could be used, preferably one constructed in accordance with the principles of the invention disclosed in U.S. Ser. No. 09/040,570 (Dudding), filed Mar. 18, 1998, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Abstract
A leaf spring assembly for use as an active component in vehicle suspension systems is disclosed. The leaf spring assembly includes a full leaf leaf spring component and a half leaf leaf spring component connected thereto. The full leaf leaf spring extends substantially the entire length of the leaf spring assembly and the half leaf leaf spring extends substantially the entire length of one of the cantilevers. In a preferred form, when the leaf spring assembly has front and rear cantilevers of substantially unequal length, the leaf spring assembly provides for a constant caster angle for its associated axle during deflection of the assembly due to jounce and rebound. In another preferred form, when the leaf spring assembly has front and rear cantilevers of substantially equal length, the leaf spring assembly provides for a varying caster angle for its associated axle during deflection of the assembly due to jounce and rebound. In yet another preferred form, the axle seat portion of the full leaf leaf spring is designed such that it biases the position of the axle associated with the leaf spring assembly to a predetermined caster angle.
Description
- The present invention relates generally to active components for suspension systems, and more particularly, to springs for such systems.
- A basic object of any suspension system in a vehicle is to suspend the vehicle body above the vehicle wheels. To achieve this end, suspension systems are typically connected between the axle, or its housing, and the vehicle frame. Suspension systems typically include active components, such as springs and the like, to keep the sprung mass (vehicle body) suspended above the unsprung mass (vehicle wheels). A suspension system preferably permits a relatively smooth, yet stable, ride during acceleration, deceleration and cornering of the vehicle, and during jounce and rebound of the axle when the vehicle is driven over bumpy surfaces and the like.
- In suspension systems, leaf springs often serve as the active components. In a variety of circumstances, concerns regarding vehicle packaging necessitate the use of an asymmetrical leaf spring. In asymmetrical leaf springs, one cantilever of the leaf spring is longer than the other cantilever. For instance, and referring to FIG. 1, in a typical asymmetrical leaf spring10, the front cantilever 12 (i.e., that portion of the leaf spring extending from one
end 14 of the leaf spring to thecenter 16 of the axle seat portion 17) might be longer than the rear cantilever 18 (i.e., that portion of the leaf spring extending from thecenter 16 of theaxle seat portion 17 to the opposite end of the leaf spring 20). This difference in length between cantilevers is what classifies a leaf spring as asymmetrical. - Ordinarily, leaf springs in general, including asymmetrical leaf springs, are designed such that they have the same stress level in each cantilever. In the case of asymmetrical leaf springs, this optimized design results in the shorter cantilever being stiffer than the longer cantilever. Stated differently, the shorter cantilever has a higher spring rate than the longer cantilever. Conversely, the longer cantilever is softer than the shorter cantilever, and it has a lower spring rate. Given this optimized design, during deflection of the leaf spring (e.g., during jounce and rebound of the vehicle axle), the
seat portion 16 of the spring translates vertically and rotates due to the differing spring rates of the respective cantilevers. This rotation of the seat portion, in turn, applies torsion to the axle and causes it to rotate, producing a varying caster angle during vehicle movement. Those skilled in the art understand that this varying caster angle is sometimes undesirable, and can serve as a drawback of asymmetrical leaf springs designed for optimum stress tolerances. Nevertheless, vehicle packaging concerns and the like often necessitate use of such asymmetrical leaf springs. - In light of these deficiencies of stress tolerant asymmetrical leaf springs, it is desirable to design an asymmetrical leaf spring that has cantilevers with substantially equal spring rates so that the axle has constant caster during jounce and rebound.
- When packaging concerns are not present, it is often desirable to use symmetrical leaf springs, such as the
symmetrical leaf spring 22 shown in FIG. 2. In such springs, the front andrear cantilevers - Although constant caster is often desirable, in some instances varying caster is optimal. Those skilled in the art will recognize that in trailing arm suspensions varying caster is often desirable in those instances when the axle, or its housing, is generally resistant to torsion. In those cases, by varying the caster angle of the axle during jounce and rebound, roll stability for the vehicle is increased. Therefore, the use of auxiliary roll stabilizers might be unnecessary. Elimination thereof reduces the cost and weight associated with those suspension systems.
- In light of the aforementioned deficiencies of stress tolerant symmetrical leaf springs, it is desirable to design a symmetrical leaf spring that has cantilevers with substantially different spring rates so that the axle has varying caster during jounce and rebound.
- As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, vehicles often optimally have a biased, fixed caster for each of its axles. Different axles often have different desirable biased, fixed caster angles. In conventional suspension systems, and referring to FIG. 3, a caster wedge28 is often positioned between the axle seat of the leaf spring and the axle to provide for the selected, fixed caster angle of the axle.
- FIG. 3 illustrates a conventional suspension system used for a
front steering axle 30. As shown therein, avehicle frame 32 extends longitudinally and is suspended aboveaxle 30 by a suspension system generally identified byreference numeral 34. Thesuspension system 34 includes aleaf spring 36 pivotally connected at one end to ahanger 38, which, in turn is fixedly mounted toframe 32. At its other end,leaf spring 36 is pivotally connected to ahanger 40 through aconventional shackle 42.Hanger 40 is mounted toframe 32. Anair spring 44 is optionally mounted at its top side to an airspring mounting bracket 46, which is fixedly mounted toframe 32.Air spring 44 is seated on anaxle attachment assembly 48 in alignment withaxle 30. Theaxle attachment assembly 48 includes a pair ofguide plates 50, 52 positioned on opposite sides ofaxle 30, the caster wedge 28, and a pair ofU-bolts - Caster wedge28 causes
axle 30 to rotate a fixed amount of degrees (either clockwise or counter-clockwise, depending on the orientation of the caster wedge) to accommodate the desired fixed caster angle for the axle. Use of extra suspension system components, such as caster wedge 28, adds weight to the suspension system and increases the costs associated with the design, assembly and service of such systems. - In light of the foregoing, it is desirable to design suspension system components, particularly leaf springs, that provide for the desired fixed caster angle of a vehicle axle.
- As an object of the present invention, it is desirable to produce an optimally designed asymmetrical leaf spring that maintains a constant caster angle for its associated axle during jounce and rebound.
- As another object, it is desirable to produce an optimally designed symmetrical leaf spring that produces a varying caster angle for its associated axle during jounce and rebound.
- It is also desirable to reduce the expense associated with suspension systems used in vehicles.
- It is further desirable to eliminate the necessity of including additional components in such suspension systems.
- It is yet further desirable to design a leaf spring having built-in features to produce a select biased caster angle for its associated axle.
- These and other objects of the preferred forms of the invention will become apparent from the following description. It will be understood, however, that an apparatus could still appropriate the invention claimed herein without accomplishing each and every one of these objects, including those gleaned from the following description. The appended claims, not the objects, define the subject matter of this invention. Any and all objects are derived from the preferred forms of the invention, not necessarily the invention in general.
- The present invention is directed to a leaf spring assembly for use as an active component in vehicle suspension systems. The leaf spring assembly includes a full leaf leaf spring component and a half leaf leaf spring component. The full leaf leaf spring extends substantially the entire length of the leaf spring assembly and the half leaf leaf spring extends substantially the entire length of one of the cantilevers. The half leaf leaf spring preferably also extends along the axle seat portion of the other cantilever and terminates at the end of the axle seat portion included within the other cantilever. The full leaf leaf spring and the half leaf leaf spring are preferably connected together by a fastener.
- In a preferred form, when the leaf spring assembly has front and rear cantilevers of substantially unequal length, the half leaf leaf spring extends substantially along the entire length of the shorter cantilever to soften that cantilever. Under such circumstances, the leaf spring assembly preferably has relatively uniform stress tolerance and provides for a constant caster angle for its associated axle during deflection of the assembly due to jounce and rebound.
- In another preferred form, when the leaf spring assembly has front and rear cantilevers of substantially equal length, the half leaf leaf spring softens the cantilever along which it extends. Under these circumstances, the leaf spring assembly preferably has relatively uniform stress tolerance and provides for a varying caster angle for its associated axle during deflection of the assembly due to jounce and rebound.
- In yet another preferred form, the axle seat portion of the full leaf leaf spring is designed such that it biases the position of the axle associated with the leaf spring assembly to a predetermined caster angle. In that regard, one of the upper and lower surfaces of the full leaf leaf spring, most preferably the lower surface, tapers throughout the axle seat portion in such a manner that the full leaf leaf spring is thicker at one end of its axle seat portion than it is at the other end of its axle seat portion. In particular, throughout the axle seat portion, the upper and lower surfaces of the full leaf leaf spring extend in intersecting planes. As such, the full leaf leaf spring, and therefore the leaf spring assembly, includes a built-in caster wedge that biases its associated axle to a predetermined caster angle.
- In the following detailed description, reference will frequently be made to the following drawings, in which like reference numerals refer to like components, and in which:
- FIG. 1 is a side view of a conventional asymmetrical single leaf leaf spring;
- FIG. 2 is a side view of a conventional symmetrical single leaf leaf spring;
- FIG. 3 is a side view of a conventional suspension system incorporating a caster wedge;
- FIG. 4 is a side view of a first preferred form of a leaf spring assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
- FIG. 5 is a side view of a conventional suspension system incorporating the leaf spring assembly shown in FIG. 4;
- FIG. 6 is a side view of a second preferred form of a leaf spring assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
- FIG. 7 is a side view of a third preferred form of a leaf spring assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention;
- FIG. 8 is a side view of a fourth preferred form of a leaf spring assembly constructed in accordance with the principles of the present invention; and
- FIG. 9 is a side view of a suspension system incorporating the leaf spring assembly shown in FIG. 8.
- FIGS. 4 and 6 illustrate a
leaf spring assembly 60 having a full leafleaf spring component 63A (in FIG. 4), 63B (in FIG. 6) and a half leafleaf spring component 64. The leaf spring assembly is divided into afront cantilever portion 66 and arear cantilever portion 68. Anaxle seat portion 70 extends through a midsection ofleaf spring assembly 60.Axle seat portion 70 has a centerpoint 72, which is preferably in line with the lateral boundary that dividesfront cantilever portion 66 andrear cantilever portion 68. In this arrangement, part ofaxle seat portion 70 is infront cantilever 66 and part of the axle seat portion is inrear cantilever 68. - The full leaf
leaf spring component 63A (FIG. 4), 63B (FIG. 6) has anupper surface 61A (FIG. 4), 61B (FIG. 6) and alower surface 62A (FIG. 4), 62B (FIG. 6). In FIG. 4, the distance betweenupper surface 61 A andlower surface 62A throughaxle seat portion 70 is not uniform. In particular,lower surface 62A tapers as it extends throughaxle seat portion 70 and, in effect, establishes a built-in caster angle feature for theleaf spring assembly 60 shown in FIG. 4. On the other hand, in FIG. 6, the distance between upper surface 61 B andlower surface 62B throughaxle seat portion 70 is uniform so that theleaf spring assembly 60 shown in FIG. 6 has no built-in caster angle feature. - The full leaf leaf spring component62 includes
eyes Eyes leaf spring component 64 includes awrap 77 at its front end.Wrap 77 provides an additional safety feature to keep the connection intact even under the unlikely condition whereineye 74 breaks. Half leafleaf spring component 64 preferably extends along the substantial entire length offront cantilever 66 and through theaxle seat portion 70, preferably terminating at the end of the axle seat portion withinrear cantilever 68. Full leaf leaf spring component 62 and half leafleaf spring component 64 are fastened together by afastener 78, preferably positioned so that it is aligned with the centerpoint 72 ofaxle seat portion 70. - It will be understood by those skilled in the art that this unique construction of
leaf spring assembly 60 permits an asymmetrical leaf spring designed for maximum stress tolerance to function as a conventional symmetrical leaf spring likewise designed for maximum stress tolerance. In particular, the half leafleaf spring component 64 softens the cantilever through which it extends (front cantilever 66 in FIG. 4), giving it a lower spring rate. Under these circumstances, the design ofleaf spring assembly 60 can be optimized so that, when assembled in a suspension system, the axle associated with the leaf spring maintains a constant caster angle during deflection of the leaf spring due to jounce and rebound. - When it is symmetrical, however, the leaf spring can function as a conventional asymmetrical leaf spring. Again, the half leaf
leaf spring component 64 softens the cantilever through which it extends (front cantilever 66 in FIG. 4), giving it a lower spring rate. Under these circumstances, the design ofleaf spring assembly 60 can be optimized so that, when assembled in a suspension system, the caster angle of the associated axle is changed throughout its jounce and rebound movement. - Referring now to FIG. 5, the leaf spring assembly79 shown therein is designed like the one shown in FIG. 4. Accordingly, it includes a full leaf
leaf spring component 80 having anupper surface 82 and alower surface 84. The distance betweenupper surface 82 andlower surface 84 at any given point of full leafleaf spring component 80 defines the thickness of the component at that given point. For the leaf spring assembly 79 shown in FIG. 5, through itsaxle seat portion 70, theupper surface 82 andlower surface 84 of full leafleaf spring component 80 extend in nonparallel (i.e., intersecting) planes. In the embodiment shown,upper surface 82 extends substantially flat throughaxle seat portion 70, whilelower surface 84 linearly tapers in a manner such that full leafleaf spring component 80 is thicker at the rear end of the axle seat portion than it is at the front end of the axle seat portion. As a result of this construction, when assembled, leaf spring assembly 79 biases its associated axle so that it is positioned at a predetermined caster angle. In effect, the portion of full leafleaf spring component 80 extending throughaxle seat portion 70 serves as a built-in caster wedge for leaf spring assembly 79. - FIG. 5 illustrates the use of leaf spring assembly79 in a suspension system. A longitudinally extending vehicle frame 86 is suspended above an
axle 88 by a vehicle suspension system generally designated byreference numeral 90. The suspension system includes leaf spring assembly 79, which is pivotally connected at its proximal end to ahanger 92, which, in turn, is fixedly mounted to frame 86. Leaf spring assembly 79 is also connected at its distal end to ahanger 94 through aconventional shackle 96, which permits movement of the distal end of the leaf spring assembly.Hanger 94 is fixedly mounted to frame 86. - An
air spring 98 is mounted atop an axle attachment assembly 100. The air spring is mounted to frame 86 by an airspring mounting bracket 102. - Leaf spring attachment assembly includes an
upper guide plate 104, alower guide plate 106 and two U-bolts 108, 110. The U-bolts 108, 110 are used to fasten the leaf spring assembly 79 to theaxle 88. Using the leaf spring assembly shown in FIG. 4biases axle 88 in a position wherein it has a predetermined biased caster angle. If leaf spring assembly 79 functions like a symmetrical leaf spring, then the biased caster angle remains constant during jounce and rebound. If leaf spring assembly 79 functions like an asymmetrical leaf spring, then the biased caster angle will vary during jounce and rebound. As explained above, the unique design of leaf spring assembly 79 permits it to establish a predetermined biased caster angle for its associated axle, and permits varying spring rates in the cantilevers of the leaf spring assembly. - FIG. 7 illustrates a
leaf spring assembly 160 having a full leaf leaf spring component 162 and a half leafleaf spring component 164. Theleaf spring assembly 160 is in a form similar to a tapered convolute leaf spring, which serves the subject matter for U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,221, issued to Wilson, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Theleaf spring assembly 160 is divided into afront cantilever portion 166 and a rear cantilever portion 168. Anaxle seat portion 170 extends through a midsection ofleaf spring assembly 160.Axle seat portion 170 has a centerpoint 172, which is preferably in line with the lateral boundary that dividesfront cantilever portion 166 and rear cantilever portion 168. In this arrangement, part ofaxle seat portion 170 is infront cantilever 166 and part of the axle seat portion is in rear cantilever 168. - The full leaf leaf spring component162 includes an
eye 174 at one of its ends.Eye 174 is used for attachment to hangers, shackles or similar structures in vehicle suspension systems (see FIG. 9). The half leafleaf spring component 164 includes awrap 177 at the same end aseye 174.Wrap 177 provides an additional safety feature to keep the connection intact even under the unlikely condition whereineye 174 breaks. Half leafleaf spring component 164 preferably extends along the substantial entire length offront cantilever 166 and through theaxle seat portion 170, preferably terminating at the end of the axle seat portion within rear cantilever 168. Full leaf leaf spring component 162 and half leafleaf spring component 164 are fastened together by afastener 178, preferably positioned so that it is aligned with thecenterpoint 172 ofaxle seat portion 170. - It will be understood by those skilled in the art that this unique construction of
leaf spring assembly 160 permits an asymmetrical leaf spring designed for maximum stress tolerance to function as a conventional symmetrical leaf spring likewise designed for maximum stress tolerance. In particular, the half leafleaf spring component 164 softens the cantilever through which it extends (front cantilever 166 in FIG. 7), giving it a lower spring rate. Under these circumstances, the design ofleaf spring assembly 160 can be optimized so that, when assembled in a suspension system, the axle associated with the leaf spring maintains a constant caster angle during deflection of the leaf spring due to jounce and rebound. - When it is symmetrical, however, the leaf spring can function as a conventional asymmetrical leaf spring. Again, the half leaf
leaf spring component 164 softens the cantilever through which it extends (front cantilever 166 in FIG. 4), giving it a lower spring rate. Under these circumstances, the design ofleaf spring assembly 160 can be optimized so that, when assembled in a suspension system, the caster angle of the associated axle is changed throughout its jounce and rebound movement. - Referring now to FIG. 8, the
leaf spring assembly 179 shown therein includes a full leafleaf spring component 180 having anupper surface 182 and a lower surface 184. The distance betweenupper surface 182 and lower surface 184 at any given point of full leafleaf spring component 180 defines the thickness of the component at that given point. For theleaf spring assembly 179 shown in FIG. 8, through itsaxle seat portion 170, theupper surface 182 and lower surface 184 of full leafleaf spring component 180 extend in nonparallel (i.e., intersecting) planes. In the embodiment shown,upper surface 182 extends substantially flat throughaxle seat portion 170, while lower surface 184 linearly tapers in a manner such that full leafleaf spring component 180 is thicker at the rear end of the axle seat portion than it is at the front end of the axle seat portion. As a result of this construction, when assembled,leaf spring assembly 179 biases its associated axle so that it is positioned at a predetermined caster angle. In effect, the portion of full leafleaf spring component 180 extending throughaxle seat portion 170 serves as a built-in caster wedge forleaf spring assembly 179. - FIG. 9 illustrates the
leaf spring assembly 179 shown in FIG. 8, as incorporated in asuspension system 186. For reference to thesuspension system 186, reference will be made to the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 5,938,221. It will be noted that the distal end ofleaf spring assembly 179 is connected to its associated frame hanger via anattachment member 188, which is further disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,887,881, issued to Hatch, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. In lieu ofattachment member 188, a different attachment member could be used, preferably one constructed in accordance with the principles of the invention disclosed in U.S. Ser. No. 09/040,570 (Dudding), filed Mar. 18, 1998, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. - While this invention has been described with reference to an illustrative embodiment, it will be understood that this description shall not be construed in a limiting sense. Rather, various changes and modifications can be made to the illustrative embodiment without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the following claims. Furthermore, it will be appreciated that any such changes and modifications would be recognized by those skilled in the art as an equivalent to one element or more of the following claims, and shall be covered by such claims to the fullest extent permitted by law.
Claims (15)
1. A leaf spring assembly for use as an active component in vehicle suspension systems, comprising:
a first cantilever portion;
a second cantilever portion adjacent to said first cantilever portion;
a full leaf leaf spring component extending substantially along said first and second cantilever portions;
a half leaf leaf spring component connected to said full leaf leaf spring component and extending substantially along said first cantilever portion.
2. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 1 wherein said half leaf leaf spring component extends along at least part of said second cantilever portion.
3. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 1 wherein one of said full leaf leaf spring and half leaf leaf spring components includes an eye in said first cantilever portion.
4. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 1 wherein said full leaf leaf spring component includes an eye in said first cantilever portion and said half leaf leaf spring component includes a wrap in said first cantilever portion.
5. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 1 wherein said first cantilever portion and said second cantilever portion are substantially equal in length.
6. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 1 wherein said first cantilever portion and said second cantilever portion are substantially unequal in length.
7. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 1 further comprising an axle seat portion having a first end and a second end.
8. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 1 wherein said full leaf leaf spring component includes a full leaf upper surface and a full leaf lower surface, wherein said half leaf leaf spring component includes a half leaf upper surface and a half leaf lower surface, and wherein in said axle seat portion the upper and lower surfaces for one of said full leaf leaf spring and said half leaf leaf spring components extend in nonparallel planes.
9. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 8 wherein said lower surface for said one of said full leaf leaf spring and said half leaf leaf spring components tapers continuously through substantially all of said axle seat portion so that said one of said full leaf leaf spring and said half leaf leaf spring components is thicker at said second end of said axle seat portion than it is at said first end of said axle seat portion.
10. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 9 wherein said one of said full leaf leaf spring and said half leaf leaf spring components is said full leaf leaf spring component.
11. A leaf spring assembly for use as an active component in vehicle suspension systems, comprising:
a first cantilever portion;
a second cantilever portion adjacent to said first cantilever portion;
an axle seat portion having a first end in said first cantilever portion and a second end in said second cantilever portion;
a full leaf leaf spring component extending substantially along said first and second cantilever portions, said full leaf leaf spring having an upper surface and a lower surface and being constructed so that said upper surface and said lower surface extend in nonparallel planes through said axle seat portion of said leaf spring assembly;
a half leaf leaf spring component connected to said full leaf leaf spring component and extending substantially along said first cantilever portion.
12. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 11 wherein said half leaf leaf spring component extends along at least part of said second cantilever portion.
13. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 11 wherein said first cantilever portion and said second cantilever portion are substantially equal in length.
14. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 1 wherein said first cantilever portion and said second cantilever portion are substantially unequal in length.
15. The leaf spring assembly as defined by claim 11 wherein said lower surface of said full leaf leaf spring component tapers continuously through substantially all of said axle seat portion so that said full leaf leaf spring component is thicker at said second end of said axle seat portion than it is at said first end of said axle seat portion.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/167,055 US20030085497A1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2002-06-11 | Leaf spring |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/522,585 US6406007B1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2000-03-10 | Leaf spring assembly having full-leaf leaf spring component and half-leaf leaf spring component |
US10/167,055 US20030085497A1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2002-06-11 | Leaf spring |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/522,585 Continuation US6406007B1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2000-03-10 | Leaf spring assembly having full-leaf leaf spring component and half-leaf leaf spring component |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20030085497A1 true US20030085497A1 (en) | 2003-05-08 |
Family
ID=24081457
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/522,585 Expired - Lifetime US6406007B1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2000-03-10 | Leaf spring assembly having full-leaf leaf spring component and half-leaf leaf spring component |
US10/167,055 Abandoned US20030085497A1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2002-06-11 | Leaf spring |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US09/522,585 Expired - Lifetime US6406007B1 (en) | 2000-03-10 | 2000-03-10 | Leaf spring assembly having full-leaf leaf spring component and half-leaf leaf spring component |
Country Status (11)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US6406007B1 (en) |
EP (2) | EP1278971B1 (en) |
AT (2) | ATE323850T1 (en) |
AU (3) | AU5382101A (en) |
BR (1) | BR0109124B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2402049A1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE60118903T2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2262643T3 (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA02008829A (en) |
NZ (4) | NZ556398A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2001069103A1 (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050287923A1 (en) * | 2004-05-12 | 2005-12-29 | Marrell Haney | Cat mobile, a battery powered playground car |
US20070145706A1 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2007-06-28 | Paccar Inc | Vehicle front end suspension |
WO2007092502A2 (en) * | 2006-02-07 | 2007-08-16 | Toyota Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Insert pin for leaf spring suspension |
US20070262547A1 (en) * | 2006-05-09 | 2007-11-15 | International Truck Intellectual Property Company, Llc | Leaf spring with high auxiliary roll stiffness |
CN103057370A (en) * | 2013-02-28 | 2013-04-24 | 湖南大学 | Suspension of frame-shaped steel plate spring of automobile |
US20150145227A1 (en) * | 2012-05-30 | 2015-05-28 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Energy Storing Suspension Components Having Retention Recesses |
US9662950B2 (en) | 2013-01-10 | 2017-05-30 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Multi-tapered suspension component |
US11345207B2 (en) | 2019-04-16 | 2022-05-31 | Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems Llc | Electrically controlled suspension |
Families Citing this family (32)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6406007B1 (en) * | 2000-03-10 | 2002-06-18 | The Boler Company | Leaf spring assembly having full-leaf leaf spring component and half-leaf leaf spring component |
US20030038445A1 (en) * | 2001-08-01 | 2003-02-27 | Sutton Anthony D. | Symbiotic elastomeric non-linear spring device for mobile vehicle suspension system |
US6607206B2 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2003-08-19 | Louie Petit | Air cushion suspension assembly for use with over the road trucks |
US6659482B2 (en) * | 2002-01-03 | 2003-12-09 | Meritor Light Vehicle Technology, Llc | Composite spring and control arm |
US6739608B2 (en) * | 2002-06-17 | 2004-05-25 | International Truck Intellectual Property Company, Llc | Suspension system for a vehicle |
JP2004098874A (en) * | 2002-09-10 | 2004-04-02 | Horikiri:Kk | Stabilizer and air leaf suspension using the same |
US7210673B2 (en) * | 2003-04-10 | 2007-05-01 | Arvinmeritor Technology, Llc | Method for relieving spring seat mounting stresses |
MXPA06003550A (en) * | 2003-10-01 | 2006-06-05 | Dana Corp | Steer axle suspension. |
US7445220B2 (en) * | 2004-02-06 | 2008-11-04 | Daimler Trucks North America Llc | Vehicle axle apparatus |
US7052001B2 (en) * | 2004-02-12 | 2006-05-30 | Brian James Hitt | Dual rate leaf spring suspension for utility vehicle |
US7188850B2 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2007-03-13 | Dana Corporation | Beam axle suspension with diagonal link |
US20060103103A1 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2006-05-18 | Land Jonathan L | Lightweight, low part-count, suspension system for wheeled vehicles |
SE529758C2 (en) * | 2005-07-20 | 2007-11-20 | Volvo Lastvagnar Ab | Individual wheel suspension |
CA2655432C (en) * | 2006-06-16 | 2014-10-28 | Rassini, S.A. De C.V. | Dual leaf suspension for vehicle drive arrangement |
US7581741B2 (en) * | 2006-08-24 | 2009-09-01 | Arvinmeritor Technology, Llc | Suspension brake torque reactor |
US20080061535A1 (en) * | 2006-09-08 | 2008-03-13 | Everard Stephen M | Airbag sleeve |
US7581713B1 (en) | 2006-11-21 | 2009-09-01 | Voss Francis D | Jack and safety stand |
WO2009027710A1 (en) * | 2007-09-01 | 2009-03-05 | Robert Gerrard | Leaf spring suspension system |
US20090085318A1 (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | Brian Scott Guthrie | Vehicle leaf spring suspension with radius arms |
US7744105B2 (en) | 2008-04-15 | 2010-06-29 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Isolated spring clamp group |
US20110127753A1 (en) * | 2009-11-04 | 2011-06-02 | Jack Griffin | Leaf spring assembly and tandem suspension system |
RU2457373C1 (en) * | 2010-12-07 | 2012-07-27 | Открытое акционерное общество "Чусовской металлургический завод" | Leaf spring |
DE102010056388A1 (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2012-06-28 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Vehicle with a leaf spring element for suspension of the vehicle |
RU2457119C1 (en) * | 2011-01-20 | 2012-07-27 | Государственное образовательное учреждение высшего профессионального образования "Южно-Российский государственный университет экономики и сервиса" (ГОУ ВПО "ЮРГУЭС") | Flexible suspension with nonlinear characteristics |
US9050873B2 (en) * | 2012-08-06 | 2015-06-09 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Suspension system having a leaf spring |
EP3044080A1 (en) * | 2013-09-10 | 2016-07-20 | Clark Equipment Company | Undercarriage for a power machine |
DE102014202581A1 (en) * | 2014-02-12 | 2015-08-13 | Muhr Und Bender Kg | Leaf spring and leaf spring arrangement |
US9446646B1 (en) | 2015-05-29 | 2016-09-20 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Spring seats and vehicle suspension systems incorporating such spring seats |
US10286743B2 (en) * | 2016-09-13 | 2019-05-14 | Continental Automotive Systems, Inc. | Vehicle axle suspension arrangement |
JP6914599B2 (en) * | 2017-10-10 | 2021-08-04 | 日野自動車株式会社 | Leaf suspension device |
CN110978928B (en) * | 2019-12-30 | 2023-05-16 | 山东雷帕得汽车技术股份有限公司 | Less asymmetric plate spring for truck |
US11745556B2 (en) | 2021-09-06 | 2023-09-05 | Wheel Pros Llc | Easily retrofittable air suspension brackets, method of making and method of using |
Citations (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1229109A (en) * | 1913-02-21 | 1917-06-05 | Standard Parts Co | Vehicle-spring. |
US1557237A (en) * | 1922-10-21 | 1925-10-13 | Hawkeye Inv Co | Spring device |
US1744489A (en) * | 1928-01-28 | 1930-01-21 | Howard M Leonard | Spring structure |
US2815945A (en) * | 1955-12-13 | 1957-12-10 | Green Gabriel | Vehicle spring accessory |
US3168300A (en) * | 1961-04-05 | 1965-02-02 | Cambria Spring Co | Auxiliary spring for automotive vehicles |
US3250546A (en) * | 1964-10-16 | 1966-05-10 | Ford Motor Co | Leaf spring suspension system for motor vehicles |
US3365190A (en) * | 1965-09-27 | 1968-01-23 | White Motor Corp | Spring construction |
US3430976A (en) * | 1965-05-25 | 1969-03-04 | Berliet Automobiles | Leaf-spring suspension for automobile vehicles and the like,especially for industrial vehicles |
US3434707A (en) * | 1966-06-02 | 1969-03-25 | John E Raidel | Suspensions |
US3578355A (en) * | 1969-01-29 | 1971-05-11 | Carl E Oeder | Air suspension system |
US3674249A (en) * | 1970-07-13 | 1972-07-04 | H & H Equipment Co | Pneumatic suspension axle return device |
US3802718A (en) * | 1971-12-30 | 1974-04-09 | F Schaeff | Spring suspension for motor vehicle axles |
US3877718A (en) * | 1972-09-29 | 1975-04-15 | Twm Mfg Co | High strength auxiliary axle suspension system |
US3933367A (en) * | 1974-07-03 | 1976-01-20 | Dura Corporation | Dual leaf spring suspension |
US4282945A (en) * | 1980-01-31 | 1981-08-11 | Grand Rapids Spring Service Co. | Suspension modifying device for leaf spring suspensions |
US4637594A (en) * | 1981-10-29 | 1987-01-20 | Horikiri Spring Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Leaf spring construction |
US4919399A (en) * | 1989-04-10 | 1990-04-24 | Navistar International Transportation Corp. | Suspension brake torque reaction leaf |
US4946190A (en) * | 1987-09-05 | 1990-08-07 | Otto Sauer, Achsenfabrik Keilberg | Suspension for the vehicle wheel axle |
US5209518A (en) * | 1991-03-11 | 1993-05-11 | Detroit Steel Products Co., Inc. | Dual-stage tapered leaf spring for a trailer |
US5228665A (en) * | 1991-03-06 | 1993-07-20 | Mercedes-Benz Ag | Leaf-spring assemblies |
US5362095A (en) * | 1991-07-25 | 1994-11-08 | Nicholas Eveley | Resiliently mounted cantilever spring supported air spring suspension |
US5938221A (en) * | 1997-12-08 | 1999-08-17 | The Boler Company | Tapered convolute leaf spring for truck suspensions |
US6158773A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 2000-12-12 | Groep Stevens International, Nv | Frame for a vehicle |
US6406007B1 (en) * | 2000-03-10 | 2002-06-18 | The Boler Company | Leaf spring assembly having full-leaf leaf spring component and half-leaf leaf spring component |
US6527287B2 (en) * | 1998-08-14 | 2003-03-04 | Lenk Mfg., Ltd. | Direct acting air suspension system |
Family Cites Families (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US103041A (en) * | 1870-05-17 | Improvement in thorough-brace spring | ||
US156122A (en) * | 1874-10-20 | Improvement in carriage-springs | ||
US1747727A (en) * | 1927-01-19 | 1930-02-18 | Sterling Spring Company | Spring attachment |
US1824295A (en) * | 1929-10-02 | 1931-09-22 | Albert M J Pohl | Overload vehicle spring |
US3062526A (en) * | 1959-08-24 | 1962-11-06 | John A Roehrig | Vehicle leaf spring suspension |
DE2100048C2 (en) | 1971-01-02 | 1981-12-17 | Friedrich 6142 Bensheim Schaeff | Suspension for vehicle wheel axles |
US4178015A (en) * | 1977-12-12 | 1979-12-11 | Merriman Products, Inc. | Inflated vehicle spring and lift |
GB8617540D0 (en) * | 1986-07-17 | 1986-08-28 | British Petroleum Co Plc | Leaf spring |
NL9001739A (en) * | 1990-08-01 | 1992-03-02 | Weweler Nv | AIR VEHICLE SYSTEM FOR VEHICLES WITH VEHICLES FOR VEHICLES. |
US5123672A (en) * | 1991-01-25 | 1992-06-23 | Eaton Corporation | Vehicle suspension with auxiliary leaf spring with roll control system |
DE9200350U1 (en) * | 1992-01-14 | 1992-02-27 | Karl Kaessbohrer Fahrzeugwerke Gmbh, 7900 Ulm, De |
-
2000
- 2000-03-10 US US09/522,585 patent/US6406007B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
2001
- 2001-02-23 AT AT01927363T patent/ATE323850T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-02-23 AU AU5382101A patent/AU5382101A/en active Pending
- 2001-02-23 NZ NZ556398A patent/NZ556398A/en unknown
- 2001-02-23 WO PCT/US2001/040170 patent/WO2001069103A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-02-23 DE DE60118903T patent/DE60118903T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-02-23 NZ NZ535707A patent/NZ535707A/en unknown
- 2001-02-23 EP EP01927363A patent/EP1278971B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-02-23 DE DE60141924T patent/DE60141924D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-02-23 AT AT06075895T patent/ATE465354T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-02-23 MX MXPA02008829A patent/MXPA02008829A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2001-02-23 NZ NZ521809A patent/NZ521809A/en unknown
- 2001-02-23 EP EP06075895A patent/EP1693592B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-02-23 BR BRPI0109124-7A patent/BR0109124B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-02-23 ES ES01927363T patent/ES2262643T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2001-02-23 AU AU2001253821A patent/AU2001253821B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2001-02-23 NZ NZ546243A patent/NZ546243A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2001-02-23 CA CA002402049A patent/CA2402049A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2002
- 2002-06-11 US US10/167,055 patent/US20030085497A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2005
- 2005-03-01 AU AU2005200929A patent/AU2005200929B2/en not_active Ceased
Patent Citations (25)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1229109A (en) * | 1913-02-21 | 1917-06-05 | Standard Parts Co | Vehicle-spring. |
US1557237A (en) * | 1922-10-21 | 1925-10-13 | Hawkeye Inv Co | Spring device |
US1744489A (en) * | 1928-01-28 | 1930-01-21 | Howard M Leonard | Spring structure |
US2815945A (en) * | 1955-12-13 | 1957-12-10 | Green Gabriel | Vehicle spring accessory |
US3168300A (en) * | 1961-04-05 | 1965-02-02 | Cambria Spring Co | Auxiliary spring for automotive vehicles |
US3250546A (en) * | 1964-10-16 | 1966-05-10 | Ford Motor Co | Leaf spring suspension system for motor vehicles |
US3430976A (en) * | 1965-05-25 | 1969-03-04 | Berliet Automobiles | Leaf-spring suspension for automobile vehicles and the like,especially for industrial vehicles |
US3365190A (en) * | 1965-09-27 | 1968-01-23 | White Motor Corp | Spring construction |
US3434707A (en) * | 1966-06-02 | 1969-03-25 | John E Raidel | Suspensions |
US3578355A (en) * | 1969-01-29 | 1971-05-11 | Carl E Oeder | Air suspension system |
US3674249A (en) * | 1970-07-13 | 1972-07-04 | H & H Equipment Co | Pneumatic suspension axle return device |
US3802718A (en) * | 1971-12-30 | 1974-04-09 | F Schaeff | Spring suspension for motor vehicle axles |
US3877718A (en) * | 1972-09-29 | 1975-04-15 | Twm Mfg Co | High strength auxiliary axle suspension system |
US3933367A (en) * | 1974-07-03 | 1976-01-20 | Dura Corporation | Dual leaf spring suspension |
US4282945A (en) * | 1980-01-31 | 1981-08-11 | Grand Rapids Spring Service Co. | Suspension modifying device for leaf spring suspensions |
US4637594A (en) * | 1981-10-29 | 1987-01-20 | Horikiri Spring Mfg. Co., Ltd. | Leaf spring construction |
US4946190A (en) * | 1987-09-05 | 1990-08-07 | Otto Sauer, Achsenfabrik Keilberg | Suspension for the vehicle wheel axle |
US4919399A (en) * | 1989-04-10 | 1990-04-24 | Navistar International Transportation Corp. | Suspension brake torque reaction leaf |
US5228665A (en) * | 1991-03-06 | 1993-07-20 | Mercedes-Benz Ag | Leaf-spring assemblies |
US5209518A (en) * | 1991-03-11 | 1993-05-11 | Detroit Steel Products Co., Inc. | Dual-stage tapered leaf spring for a trailer |
US5362095A (en) * | 1991-07-25 | 1994-11-08 | Nicholas Eveley | Resiliently mounted cantilever spring supported air spring suspension |
US6158773A (en) * | 1996-06-14 | 2000-12-12 | Groep Stevens International, Nv | Frame for a vehicle |
US5938221A (en) * | 1997-12-08 | 1999-08-17 | The Boler Company | Tapered convolute leaf spring for truck suspensions |
US6527287B2 (en) * | 1998-08-14 | 2003-03-04 | Lenk Mfg., Ltd. | Direct acting air suspension system |
US6406007B1 (en) * | 2000-03-10 | 2002-06-18 | The Boler Company | Leaf spring assembly having full-leaf leaf spring component and half-leaf leaf spring component |
Cited By (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050287923A1 (en) * | 2004-05-12 | 2005-12-29 | Marrell Haney | Cat mobile, a battery powered playground car |
US20070145706A1 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2007-06-28 | Paccar Inc | Vehicle front end suspension |
US7712754B2 (en) | 2005-12-28 | 2010-05-11 | Paccar Inc | Vehicle front end suspension |
WO2007092502A2 (en) * | 2006-02-07 | 2007-08-16 | Toyota Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. | Insert pin for leaf spring suspension |
WO2007092502A3 (en) * | 2006-02-07 | 2008-11-20 | Toyota Eng & Mfg North America | Insert pin for leaf spring suspension |
US20070262547A1 (en) * | 2006-05-09 | 2007-11-15 | International Truck Intellectual Property Company, Llc | Leaf spring with high auxiliary roll stiffness |
US9796231B2 (en) | 2012-05-30 | 2017-10-24 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Energy storing suspension components having retention recesses |
US20150145227A1 (en) * | 2012-05-30 | 2015-05-28 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Energy Storing Suspension Components Having Retention Recesses |
US9415654B2 (en) * | 2012-05-30 | 2016-08-16 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Energy storing suspension components having retention recesses |
US9662950B2 (en) | 2013-01-10 | 2017-05-30 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Multi-tapered suspension component |
US9855810B2 (en) | 2013-01-10 | 2018-01-02 | Hendrickson Usa, L.L.C. | Multi-tapered suspension component |
CN103057370A (en) * | 2013-02-28 | 2013-04-24 | 湖南大学 | Suspension of frame-shaped steel plate spring of automobile |
US11345207B2 (en) | 2019-04-16 | 2022-05-31 | Bendix Commercial Vehicle Systems Llc | Electrically controlled suspension |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE60118903T2 (en) | 2007-04-12 |
AU5382101A (en) | 2001-09-24 |
ATE465354T1 (en) | 2010-05-15 |
BR0109124A (en) | 2004-02-17 |
NZ556398A (en) | 2009-04-30 |
ATE323850T1 (en) | 2006-05-15 |
EP1278971B1 (en) | 2006-04-19 |
DE60141924D1 (en) | 2010-06-02 |
EP1693592B1 (en) | 2010-04-21 |
BR0109124B1 (en) | 2011-11-16 |
DE60118903D1 (en) | 2006-05-24 |
US6406007B1 (en) | 2002-06-18 |
AU2001253821B2 (en) | 2005-03-10 |
NZ535707A (en) | 2006-07-28 |
WO2001069103A1 (en) | 2001-09-20 |
AU2005200929A1 (en) | 2005-03-17 |
MXPA02008829A (en) | 2003-02-10 |
ES2262643T3 (en) | 2006-12-01 |
NZ521809A (en) | 2004-10-29 |
EP1278971A4 (en) | 2003-07-09 |
AU2005200929B2 (en) | 2008-08-28 |
EP1278971A1 (en) | 2003-01-29 |
EP1693592A1 (en) | 2006-08-23 |
CA2402049A1 (en) | 2001-09-20 |
NZ546243A (en) | 2007-10-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6406007B1 (en) | Leaf spring assembly having full-leaf leaf spring component and half-leaf leaf spring component | |
AU2001253821A1 (en) | Leaf spring assembly having full leaf leaf spring component and half leaf leaf spring component | |
US8434747B2 (en) | Truck suspensions incorporating asymmetric leaf springs | |
EP1037756B1 (en) | Tapered convolute leaf spring for truck suspensions | |
US6135470A (en) | Transverse stabilizer for wheel axle suspension system | |
AU2001261435A1 (en) | Truck suspensions incorporating asymmetric leaf springs | |
CA2150718A1 (en) | Suspension system for vehicle | |
CA2290589A1 (en) | Dual trailing arm vehicle suspension | |
US5507516A (en) | Vehicle suspension | |
EP1404535B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for suspending a vehicular wheel assembly | |
AU2008207413B2 (en) | Leaf spring assembly having full leaf leaf spring component and half leaf leaf spring component | |
US20040046350A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for suspending a vehicular wheel assembly | |
AU724085C (en) | Dual trailing arm vehicle suspension |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |