US20030069898A1 - Data processing system - Google Patents

Data processing system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030069898A1
US20030069898A1 US10/208,606 US20860602A US2003069898A1 US 20030069898 A1 US20030069898 A1 US 20030069898A1 US 20860602 A US20860602 A US 20860602A US 2003069898 A1 US2003069898 A1 US 2003069898A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
data
store
tag
item
acquisition unit
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/208,606
Inventor
Athena Christodoulou
Richard Taylor
Christopher Tofts
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hewlett Packard Development Co LP
Original Assignee
HP Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority to GB0118603A priority Critical patent/GB2378275B/en
Priority to GB0118603.0 priority
Application filed by HP Inc filed Critical HP Inc
Assigned to HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY reassignment HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HEWLETT-PACKARD LIMITED
Publication of US20030069898A1 publication Critical patent/US20030069898A1/en
Assigned to HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L.P. reassignment HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L.P. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
Application status is Abandoned legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of unstructured textual data
    • G06F16/38Retrieval characterised by using metadata, e.g. metadata not derived from the content or metadata generated manually

Abstract

A data processing system is provided in which a data acquisition unit includes a data tag generator for generating data tags associated with acquired data items. The generated data tags are transmitted to a data store.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • It is well known to provide data bases for the storage of individual data items. The data items may, for example, be individual photographs or other images, text documents, items of music or other audio information, personnel records, or any other such data items. The purpose of such data bases is to provide both storage for the data items and also to provide the facility to search through the stored data items in accordance with one or more criteria. [0001]
  • To allow such searching to be executed, the individual data items are indexed in some manner. Early systems of indexing were relatively simple and included such schemes as grouping a number of data items together within a single category, such that when a search was performed for items within that category the relevant data items could be retrieved. [0002]
  • However, in time, more advanced indexing schemes have been developed, with one such scheme involving the use of metadata. Metadata describes data, that is, it is data about data. The metadata associated with a data item may be as simple as a set of natural language comments referring to one or more elements of the data item. Alternatively, the metadata may equally be much more complex comments, or tags, that may refer to the structure of the data. For example, the metadata associated with a text document may include a reference to the subject matter of the document, its author, the number of words, the size of the data item etc. As a further example, metadata associated with a graphical image such as a photograph may include tags identifying different elements of the image i.e. that the image is a sunrise/sunset, it includes peoples faces, it is a landscape, and so on. [0003]
  • The metadata that is generated for each data item stored within a database is ordinarily much more compact than the raw data itself. An analogy would be the use of classification cards in a public library. Each card represents a book stored in the library and contains certain items of information about the book, for example author and title. The cards themselves occupy a relevantly small amount of space compared to the space occupied by the complete library and by searching the cards a set of books, for example by the same author, can be identified. [0004]
  • However, the metadata may in some circumstances be much more sizeable than the original data item. Maintaining the library analogy, a single novel, such as ‘Pride and Prejudice’, may have a number of books analysing it associated with it. These volumes of analysis are analogous to the metadata to the original novel, yet would take up more shelf space than the novel itself. [0005]
  • Powerful search tools that exploit metadata are used to augment conventional search tools. [0006]
  • The increased functionality of databases and their associated search engines is one of the factors in their increased usage. Another factor is the increased usage of networked systems with local or remote network stations being linked to a central database. The link may be provided by a dedicated transmission cable or a shared transmission cable or wireless connection, or other such connection means. The quality and/or speed of the connection may pose a serious restriction on the amount of data that can be transmitted between the central database and the remote stations. It is therefore a problem to provide a large database with powerful search facilities, especially when dealing with non-textual data, that is easily and quickly accessible from remote stations. It may be equally problematic for data items to be exchanged between the database and the remote stations. [0007]
  • A further problem is the cost in processing terms required to generate the metadata. A large centralised database may require a prohibitive amount of processing power to deal with the generation of increasing amounts of metadata. Equally, local computers, such as domestic PC's, or portable devices such as personal digital assistants or cameras may not ordinarily have the processing power available to perform the metadata generation under all circumstances or in acceptable time frames. [0008]
  • At least some of the above problems apply to locally held databases. The consideration then is whether to perform the metadata generation locally or request an additional remote facility to do it even though there is no requirement or intention to transmit either the generated metadata or data item to a centralised database. [0009]
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • According to the present invention there is provided a data processing system comprising at least one data item acquisition unit and at least one data store, the data item acquisition unit including a data tag generator for generating a data tag associated with each data item, and the data item acquisition unit being arranged to transmit at least the data tag to the data store. [0010]
  • The data item acquisition unit may also transmit the data item itself to the at least one data store. [0011]
  • Additionally, the at least one data store may also include a data tag generator. [0012]
  • Each data store may be connected to one or more other data stores so as to provide a hierarchical arrangement of data stores. [0013]
  • The data item acquisition units may include a decision module that evaluates if the data tag should be generated at the data acquisition unit or if the data item should be sent to the data store and the data tag generated there. The evaluation may take into consideration the size and complexity of the data item and hence the processing power required to generate the data tag, and may also include an evaluation of the efficiency of transmitting the data item to the data store for data processing based on the size of the data item and the quality and/or speed of the connection between data acquisition unit and data store. The evaluation may also take into consideration any previously stipulated privacy requirements. [0014]
  • A use of the metadata is to preserve the privacy of the original data item. If the data item includes elements that it is desired to keep secret, only the metadata associated with the remaining elements need be transmitted to the data store. In a similar manner, a search query may be transmitted to the data store with only the metadata essential for the search without transmitting the original data item itself. [0015]
  • The data tag generator at the data acquisition unit is preferably arranged to detect a failure to generate a data tag for a data item. A failure to generate the metadata may occur due to one or more of a number of reasons. It is normal practice not to limit the amount of system memory required during metadata generation. There is therefore the possibility for a failure to occur due to the data acquisition unit running out of memory. Equally, the processing power required to generate the metadata may be greater than that available at the data acquisition unit at that time. A further cause of failure may be that the data acquisition unit is not appropriately configured with the relevant contextual data for the data item being presented. [0016]
  • The failure may be a ‘hard’ failure, in which case no metadata is generated and the data acquisition unit may transmit the data item to the data store, the data tag (metadata) generation then occurring at the data store. Alternatively, appropriate configuration information held by the data tag generator at the data store may be transmitted to the data acquisition unit to allow successful data tag generation to occur at the data acquisition unit. The failure may alternatively be a ‘soft’ failure, in which case the metadata generated prior to the failure occurring may be transmitted to the data store, or equally simplified metadata may be generated instead and transmitted to the data store. [0017]
  • Alternatively or additionally, the data acquisition unit may be arranged such that new data tag configuration information may be defined in relation to a presented data item and the new data tag configuration information transmitted to the data store for inclusion in the data tag generator located therein. [0018]
  • According to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of processing data, the method comprising generating a data tag associated with a data item, said data tag generation occurring at a data acquisition unit, and transmitting at least said data tag to a data store. [0019]
  • Advantageously the data item may also be transmitted to the data store. Data tag generation may also occur at the data store. [0020]
  • The method may further include evaluating if it is appropriate to generate the data tags at the or each acquisition unit or to transmit the data item to a data store for data tag generation to occur there. The evaluation procedure may include determining the size and complexity of the data item to be processed, providing an estimate of the processing power required to generate the associated data tag in response to the determination, comparing the estimated processing power with the processing power of the available data tag generator, and in response to the comparison either generating the data tag locally or transmitting the data item to a data store. [0021]
  • The method may further comprise transmitting configuration information from a data store to a data acquisition device and configuring a data tag generator located at the data acquisition device in accordance with the configuration information. [0022]
  • Additionally or alternatively, data tag generator configuration information may be transmitted from a data item acquisition device to a data store, said configuration information being defined in relation to a user presented data item. [0023]
  • According to a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a data item acquisition device comprising a data tag generator and being arranged to transmit a generated data tag associated with an acquired data item to a data store. [0024]
  • The data item acquisition may device further comprise an evaluation module that is arranged to determine the processing power required to generate a data tag for a data item, compare the required processing power to the processing power available at the data tag generator, and in response to the comparison either enable the data tag generator to generate the data tag or enable the transmission of the data item to a data store. [0025]
  • The data item acquisition device may form an integral or peripheral part of a personal computer. Additionally one or more data capture devices, for example an electronic camera, scanner or microphone, may be connected to an input of the data acquisition device. Alternatively the data acquisition unit may be integrated within a data capture or data storage device. [0026]
  • According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a data store arranged to store a plurality of data tags associated with respective data items, and arranged to export, upon request, a data tag generator configuration information for use by data tag generators. [0027]
  • Preferably the data store is arranged to store the respective data items associated with the data tags. The data store may additionally comprise a data tag generator for generating data tags associated with data items input to the store. [0028]
  • Additionally the data store may comprise a search engine arranged to locate data tags conforming to a user search request and cause the data items associated with the located data tags to be output from the data store. [0029]
  • Preferably the data store is connected to one or more other data stores. Additionally the data store may further comprise an evaluation module that is arranged to determine the processing power required to generate a data tag for a data item, compare the required processing power to the processing power available at the data tag generator, and in response to the comparison either enable the data tag generator to generate the data tag or enable the transmission of the data item to a data store. [0030]
  • According to a fifth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer program product for causing a data processor to execute the method according to the second aspect of the present invention.[0031]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which: [0032]
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic representation of a data processing system according to an embodiment of the present invention connected to a number of data input devices: and [0033]
  • FIG. 2 shows a further embodiment of the present invention having a multi-layer structure.[0034]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • FIG. 1 shows a data acquisition device or unit [0035] 2 connected to a data store 4. The data acquisition unit 2 is connected to one or more data input devices. Examples of data input devices that are shown are a discrete data storage unit 6, for example a hard disk, a digital camera 8, and a document scanner 10. Other input devices such as video or sound recorders could also be provided. Located in the data acquisition unit 2 is a datatag generator 12 also known as a metadata generator. The metadata generator is arranged to process data items input from one or more of the data input devices to generate datatags or metadata for each data item. A data store 4 is connected to the data acquisition unit 2. The data store unit includes one or more data storage devices 14, such as known hard disk drives. Connected to the data storage devices 14 is a data query and/or indexing unit that is arranged to perform conventional data searching procedures. The data storage devices 14 are arranged to store either a plurality of data tags, a plurality of individual data items, or both data items and their associated datatags. The data acquisition unit 2 and data store 4 are connected by any suitable data transmission channel, for example by fibre optic cable, or by wireless connections.
  • In use, data items will be input to the data acquisition unit [0036] 2 from one of the data input devices 6-10. On receipt of the data items the metadata generator 12 will perform data processing to generate metadata associated with the input data items. The metadata may then be transmitted from the data acquisition unit 2 to the data store 4, together with, for example, a request from the data acquisition unit for the data store 4 to provide further data items that have similar metadata associated with them. This method of operation has the advantage that metadata generation is performed locally at the data acquisition unit 2 and not at the data store 4, thus freeing resources at the data store 4 that may be applied more efficiently to searching the contents of the data store 4 for requested data items. Additionally, having generated the associated metadata at the data acquisition unit 2, both the metadata and the associated data item may be transmitted to the data store 4 to be added to the data items and metadata stored there. In this way a database that is stored at the data store 4 may be expanded and updated relying solely on metadata and data items provided by remote stations without utilising the central resources at the central data store.
  • In a further embodiment of the present invention the data acquisition unit [0037] 2 may include a decision unit 18 connected to the metadata generator 12. The function of the decision unit 18 is to perform an evaluation of whether generation of the metadata for an input data item would be better performed either locally at the data acquisition unit 2 or centrally at the store 4. In these embodiments, the data storage unit 4 also includes a metadata generator 20. The evaluation of where to perform the metadata processing may take into account a number of parameters, for example the size and complexity of the data item(s) and therefore the processing power required to perform the metadata processing, or the size of the data item(s) in comparison with the transmission abilities of the connection between the data acquisition unit 2 and the data store 4. The evaluation may also take into consideration any stipulated privacy requirements. For example, it may be stipulated by a user that the author or originator of a data item(s) is not included in the metadata. This will have an impact on the complexity of the generated metadata. As a further example, if the connection between the data acquisition unit 2 and the data store 4 is of limited capacity, the decision unit 18 may evaluate that it is more efficient to generate the metadata locally at the data acquisition unit 2 using the metadata generator 12 rather than attempt to transmit the relatively large amount of data down the restricted transmission capacity of the connection between the data acquisition unit 2 and the central store 4. Alternatively, an evaluation may be made that it is more efficient to transmit the data item(s) unprocessed to the data store 4 to be processed by the more powerful data generator processor 20 located at the data store 4.
  • In certain embodiments of the present invention the metadata generator [0038] 12 located at the data acquisition unit 2 is arranged to report any failures to generate metadata for data items. A failure to generate metadata for a data item may occur due to the metadata generator 12 located at the data acquisition unit 2 not being configured to with appropriate contextual data generate metadata for a particular kind of data item. Alternative or additional causes of failure may include running out of memory during generation of the metadata or insufficient processing resources being available. The available processing resources may vary depending on other tasks being performed by the data acquisition unit at any given time. When such a failure occurs, the decision unit 18 may either transmit the particular data item to the data store 4 in order for the metadata generator 20 located at the data store 4 to generate the metadata, request revised configuration information from the metadata generator 20 located at the data store 4 to enable the metadata generator unit 12 located at the data acquisition unit 2 to be reconfigured to enable metadata to be generated for the data item at the data acquisition unit 2, generate simplified metadata that requires less system resources or configuration information, or simply transmit to the data store 4 the metadata that had been successfully generated prior to the failure occurring.
  • It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the data acquisition unit [0039] 2 may be a dedicated processing unit or may be integrated as either hardware or software within a general personal computer or the like. In the latter case, the decision unit 18 may also take into account the demands on the computer's processor when evaluating whether to generate metadata at the data acquisition unit or not. It will be appreciated that metadata processing may be performed at the data acquisition unit 2 during what would otherwise be “idle” processing periods.
  • FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of the present invention utilising a multi-layered, hierarchical arrangement of data storage units. A number of “first layer” data stores [0040] 4 are provided. Each data store includes a metadata generator 20. Connected to each first layer data stores 4 are one or more data acquisition units 2. In FIG. 2 the data acquisition units 2 are schematically shown as being connected to different data input sources. The sources shown include a digital camera 30, a document source 32, audio source 34 and video source 36. Each data acquisition unit 2 also includes a metadata processor 12. The data acquisition units 2 are arranged to operate in the same manner as those described in FIG. 1.
  • Each of the first layer data stores [0041] 4 is connected to a second layer data store 38. Preferably, but not necessarily, the second layer data store 38 has increased storage capacity in comparison to the first layer data stores 4. Although only two layers of data stores are shown in FIG. 2, it will be appreciated that any number of layers can be used. In use, the decision making process that occurs at the data acquisition units 2, as described with reference to FIG. 1, also takes place at each of the levels of data stores. Thus the system is flexible enough to perform the metadata processing at whichever layer is deemed most appropriate.
  • In further embodiments, the data input sources, for example the digital camera [0042] 30 shown in FIG. 2, may themselves include a metadata generator. This allows a further sub-layer of metadata processing and decision making to be performed.
  • By providing metadata generators at the various different layers of the system the processing is distributed throughout the system. This provides the advantage that both processing power throughout the system and the use of transmission connections can be optimised. The processing power of the metadata generators at the different layers may either be identical, or may increase towards the highest layer. In the latter case, only the more complex or large data items would need to be processed by the more powerful metadata generators, with the simpler data items being processed at lower levels by individual metadata generators. [0043]
  • In the same manner as described with relation to FIG. 1, the lower level metadata generators may be “updated” with new configuration information provided by metadata generators in the higher levels. [0044]

Claims (41)

1. A data processing system comprising at least one data item acquisition unit and at least one data store, the data item acquisition unit comprising a data tag generator for generating a data tag associated with each data item, and the data item acquisition unit being arranged to transmit at least the data tag to the data store.
2. A data processing system according to claim 1, wherein said data item acquisition unit is further arranged to transmit the data item to the at least one data store.
3. A data processing system according to claim 2, wherein the at least one data store comprises a further data tag generator.
4. A data processing system according to claim 3, wherein said data item acquisition unit comprises a decision module arranged to evaluate if the data tag should be generated at the data acquisition unit or if the data item should be sent to the data store and the data tag generated there.
5. A data processing system according to claim 4, wherein said decision module is arranged to utilise data item size and complexity information to generate an estimate of the processing power required to generate an associated data tag and determine if said estimated processing power exceeds the processing power available.
6. A data processing system according to claim 5, wherein said processing power available at said data item acquisition unit is variable.
7. A data processing system according to claim 5, wherein said decision module is further arranged to evaluate the efficiency of transmitting the data item to the data store for data processing based on the size of the data item and the quality and/or speed of the connection between the data acquisition unit and the data store.
8. A data processing system according to claim 5, wherein said decision module is further arranged to include one or more restrictions on data to be included in said data tag in said evaluation.
9. A data processing system according to claim 1, wherein said data tag generator is arranged to detect a failure to generate a data tag for a data item.
10. A data processing system according to claim 9, wherein in response to said failure the data item is transmitted to the data store with a request for the data tag to be generated therein.
11. A data processing system according to claim 9, wherein in response to said failure any portion of said data tag generated prior to said failure is transmitted to said data store.
12. A data processing system according to claim 9, wherein in response to said failure said data tag generator attempts to generate a simplified data tag.
13. A data processing system according to claim 9, wherein further configuration information held by the data tag generator at the data store is transmitted to the data acquisition unit to allow successful data tag generation to occur.
14. A data processing system according to claim 1, wherein said data tag generator is arranged such that data tag configuration information is defined in relation to a presented data item and the data tag configuration information is transmitted to the data store for inclusion in the data tag generator located therein.
15. A data processing system according to claim 1, wherein said data store is connected to one or more other data stores so as to provide a hierarchical arrangement of data stores.
16. A method of processing data including the step of generating a data tag associated with a data item at a data acquisition unit and transmitting at least said data tag to a data store.
17. A method of processing data according to claim 16, wherein the data item is also transmitted to the data store.
18. A method of processing data according to claim 17, wherein said data tag generation can also occur at the data store.
19. A method of processing data according to claim 18, wherein said method includes an evaluation step for evaluating if it is appropriate to generate the data tags at the or each acquisition unit or to transmit the data item to a data store for data tag generation to occur there.
20. A method of processing data according to claim 19, wherein the evaluation step includes determining the size and complexity of the data item to be processed, providing an estimate of the processing power required to generate the associated data tag in response to the determination, comparing the estimated processing power with the processing power of the available data tag generator, and in response to the comparison either generating the data tag locally or transmitting the data item to a data store.
21. A method of processing data according to claim 19, wherein said evaluation step includes evaluating the efficiency of transmitting the data item to the data store for data processing based on the size of the data item and the quality and/or speed of the connection between the data acquisition unit and data store.
22. A method of processing data according to claim 16, wherein the method further includes transmitting configuration information from a data store to a data acquisition device and configuring a data tag generator located at the data acquisition device in accordance with the configuration information.
23. A method of processing data according to claim 16, wherein data tag generation configuration information is transmitted from a data item acquisition device to a data store, said configuration information being defined in relation to a user presented data item.
24. A method of processing data according to claim 19, wherein said data store is connected to at least one further data store and said evaluation step is performed at least one of said data stores.
25. A data item acquisition device comprising a data tag generator and arranged to transmit a generated data tag associated with an acquired data item to a data store.
26. A data item acquisition device according to claim 25 further comprising an evaluation module arranged to perform the evaluation procedure of claim 19.
27. A data item acquisition device according to claim 25, wherein said data item acquisition device forms an integral part of a personal computing apparatus.
28. A data item acquisition device according to claim 25, wherein one or more data capture devices selected from a list including an electronic camera, scanner and microphone is connected to an input of the data acquisition device.
29. A data item acquisition device according to claim 25, wherein the data acquisition unit is integrated within a data capture or data storage device.
30. A data store arranged to store a plurality of data tags associated with respective data items, and arranged to export, upon request, data tag generator configuration information for use by data tag generators.
31. A data store according to claim 30, wherein said data store is arranged to store the respective data items associated with the data tags.
32. A data store according to claim 30, wherein said data store comprises a data tag generator for generating data tags associated with data items input to the store.
33. A data store according to claim 30, wherein said data store comprises a search engine arranged to locate data tags conforming to a user search request and cause the data items associated with the located data tags to be output from the data store.
34. A data store according to claim 30, wherein said data store is connected to one or more other data stores.
35. A data store according to claim 30, wherein said data store further comprises an evaluation module that is arranged to determine the processing power required to generate a data tag for a data item, compare the required processing power to the processing power available at the data tag generator, and in response to the comparison either enable the data tag generator to generate the data tag or enable the transmission of the data item to a data store.
36. A computer program product arranged to cause a data processor to execute the method according to claim 16.
37. A distributed metadata processing system comprising at least one data capture device and at least one remote data store in communication with the data capture device, the data capture device comprising metadata generation means for generating metadata associated with a captured data item, the data capture unit further comprising communication means for sending the metadata to the at least one remote data store.
38. A data processing system comprising at least one data item acquisition unit and at least one remote data store, and in which both the data item acquisition unit and the remote data store include a metadata generator for generating metadata associated with acquired data, the data item acquisition unit further including a decision module arranged to evaluate if the metadata is most efficiently generated at the data acquisition unit or at the remote data store, the data acquisition unit being arranged to transmit at least the either the generated metadata or the data item to the remote data store in response to said evaluation.
39. A data processing system comprising at least one data item acquisition unit and at least one remote data store, the data item acquisition unit comprising a data tag generator for generating a data tag associated with each data item, and the data item acquisition unit being arranged to transmit at least the data tag to the remote data store, wherein said data tag generator is arranged to detect a failure to generate a data tag for a data item and in response to said failure to request the transmission of further configuration information held at the remote data store to allow successful data tag generation to occur.
40. A method of generating a data tag associated with a data item, the method including the steps of:
acquiring the data item using a data capture unit;
evaluating whether to generate the data tag at the data capture unit or at a data store in communication with the data capture unit; and
in response to the evaluation, communicating either the data item or generated data tag to the data store.
41. A method of generating metadata associated with a data item, the method including:
acquiring a data item at a data acquisition unit having a metadata generator;
determining if the metadata generator has sufficient configuration information to successfully generate the metadata for the data item; and
if the outcome of said determination is negative, requesting the transmission of further configuration information from a data store in communication with the data acquisition unit.
US10/208,606 2001-07-31 2002-07-30 Data processing system Abandoned US20030069898A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0118603A GB2378275B (en) 2001-07-31 2001-07-31 Distributed metadata processing system
GB0118603.0 2001-07-31

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030069898A1 true US20030069898A1 (en) 2003-04-10

Family

ID=9919502

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/208,606 Abandoned US20030069898A1 (en) 2001-07-31 2002-07-30 Data processing system

Country Status (2)

Country Link
US (1) US20030069898A1 (en)
GB (1) GB2378275B (en)

Cited By (48)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20040078578A1 (en) * 2002-07-05 2004-04-22 Harsch Khandelwal System and method for the capture, storage and manipulation of remote information
US20060174204A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-03 Jung Edward K Shared image device resolution transformation
US20060173972A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Audio sharing
US20060187230A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-24 Searete Llc Peripheral shared image device sharing
US20060187228A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-24 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Sharing including peripheral shared image device
US20060221197A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-05 Jung Edward K Image transformation estimator of an imaging device
US20060274154A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Searete, Lcc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Data storage usage protocol
US20060274157A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Enhanced video/still image correlation
US20060274153A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Third party storage of captured data
US20060274165A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Levien Royce A Conditional alteration of a saved image
US20060279643A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-14 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Storage access technique for captured data
US20060285150A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-12-21 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Regional proximity for shared image device(s)
US20070008326A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-01-11 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Dual mode image capture technique
US20070097215A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Degradation/preservation management of captured data
US20070100533A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of State Of Delaware Preservation and/or degradation of a video/audio data stream
US20070097214A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Preservation/degradation of video/audio aspects of a data stream
US20070100860A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Preservation and/or degradation of a video/audio data stream
US20070098348A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Degradation/preservation management of captured data
US20070109411A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-05-17 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Composite image selectivity
US20070120980A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-31 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Preservation/degradation of video/audio aspects of a data stream
US20070120981A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-05-31 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Storage access technique for captured data
US20070139529A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-06-21 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Dual mode image capture technique
US20070200934A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Imagery processing
US20070203595A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Data management of an audio data stream
US20070222865A1 (en) * 2006-03-15 2007-09-27 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Enhanced video/still image correlation
US20070236505A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2007-10-11 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Resampling of transformed shared image techniques
US20070274563A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-11-29 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of State Of Delaware Capturing selected image objects
US20080043108A1 (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-21 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Capturing selected image objects
US20080219589A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2008-09-11 Searete LLC, a liability corporation of the State of Delaware Estimating shared image device operational capabilities or resources
US20100271490A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2010-10-28 Assignment For Published Patent Application, Searete LLC, a limited liability corporation of Regional proximity for shared image device(s)
US7872675B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2011-01-18 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Saved-image management
US7876357B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2011-01-25 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Estimating shared image device operational capabilities or resources
US20110069196A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2011-03-24 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Viewfinder for shared image device
US7920169B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2011-04-05 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Proximity of shared image devices
US20130054356A1 (en) * 2011-08-31 2013-02-28 Jason Richman Systems and methods for contextualizing services for images
US8606383B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2013-12-10 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Audio sharing
US20140184828A1 (en) * 2012-12-27 2014-07-03 Brent Chartrand Enabling a metadata storage subsystem
US8902320B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2014-12-02 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image device synchronization or designation
US8988537B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2015-03-24 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image devices
US9082456B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2015-07-14 The Invention Science Fund I Llc Shared image device designation
US9093121B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2015-07-28 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Data management of an audio data stream
US9124729B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2015-09-01 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image device synchronization or designation
US9244694B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2016-01-26 Intel Corporation Executing a command within a transport mechanism based on a get and set architecture
US9325781B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2016-04-26 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Audio sharing
US20160364385A1 (en) * 2013-05-13 2016-12-15 Facebook, Inc. Hybrid, Offline/Online Speech Translation System
US9910341B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2018-03-06 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image device designation
US9942511B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2018-04-10 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Preservation/degradation of video/audio aspects of a data stream
US10003762B2 (en) 2005-04-26 2018-06-19 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image devices

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6040825A (en) * 1993-11-08 2000-03-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Input/display integrated information processing device
US6240416B1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2001-05-29 Ambeo, Inc. Distributed metadata system and method
US20020146232A1 (en) * 2000-04-05 2002-10-10 Harradine Vince Carl Identifying and processing of audio and/or video material
US20030069968A1 (en) * 1998-10-01 2003-04-10 O'neil Kevin M. System for balancing loads among network servers
US6804719B1 (en) * 2000-08-24 2004-10-12 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for relocating files that are partially stored in remote storage

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6040825A (en) * 1993-11-08 2000-03-21 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Input/display integrated information processing device
US6240416B1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2001-05-29 Ambeo, Inc. Distributed metadata system and method
US20030069968A1 (en) * 1998-10-01 2003-04-10 O'neil Kevin M. System for balancing loads among network servers
US20020146232A1 (en) * 2000-04-05 2002-10-10 Harradine Vince Carl Identifying and processing of audio and/or video material
US6804719B1 (en) * 2000-08-24 2004-10-12 Microsoft Corporation Method and system for relocating files that are partially stored in remote storage

Cited By (81)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7370121B2 (en) 2002-07-05 2008-05-06 Nid Solutions, Inc. System and method for the capture, storage and manipulation of remote information
US7899949B2 (en) 2002-07-05 2011-03-01 Nid Solutions, Inc. System and method for the capture, storage and manipulation of remote information
US20080296370A1 (en) * 2002-07-05 2008-12-04 Nid Solutions System and Method for the Capture, Storage and Manipulation of Remote Information
US20040078578A1 (en) * 2002-07-05 2004-04-22 Harsch Khandelwal System and method for the capture, storage and manipulation of remote information
US20060285150A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-12-21 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Regional proximity for shared image device(s)
US20060187228A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-24 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Sharing including peripheral shared image device
US8902320B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2014-12-02 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image device synchronization or designation
US8606383B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2013-12-10 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Audio sharing
US9019383B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2015-04-28 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image devices
US8350946B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2013-01-08 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Viewfinder for shared image device
US20060187230A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-24 Searete Llc Peripheral shared image device sharing
US20060173972A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Audio sharing
US8988537B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2015-03-24 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image devices
US9124729B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2015-09-01 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image device synchronization or designation
US7920169B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2011-04-05 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Proximity of shared image devices
US20060174204A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2006-08-03 Jung Edward K Shared image device resolution transformation
US20070236505A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2007-10-11 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Resampling of transformed shared image techniques
US7876357B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2011-01-25 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Estimating shared image device operational capabilities or resources
US9910341B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2018-03-06 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image device designation
US9489717B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2016-11-08 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image device
US9082456B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2015-07-14 The Invention Science Fund I Llc Shared image device designation
US20090027505A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2009-01-29 Searete Llc Peripheral shared image device sharing
US20110069196A1 (en) * 2005-01-31 2011-03-24 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Viewfinder for shared image device
US9325781B2 (en) 2005-01-31 2016-04-26 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Audio sharing
US20080088713A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2008-04-17 Searete LLC, a liability corporation of the State of Delaware Image transformation estimator of an imaging device
US20060221197A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2006-10-05 Jung Edward K Image transformation estimator of an imaging device
US20090027546A1 (en) * 2005-03-30 2009-01-29 Searete Llc,A Limited Liability Corporation Image transformation estimator of an imaging device
US10003762B2 (en) 2005-04-26 2018-06-19 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Shared image devices
US20100271490A1 (en) * 2005-05-04 2010-10-28 Assignment For Published Patent Application, Searete LLC, a limited liability corporation of Regional proximity for shared image device(s)
US9819490B2 (en) * 2005-05-04 2017-11-14 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Regional proximity for shared image device(s)
US9451200B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2016-09-20 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Storage access technique for captured data
US20070274563A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-11-29 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of State Of Delaware Capturing selected image objects
US20080219589A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2008-09-11 Searete LLC, a liability corporation of the State of Delaware Estimating shared image device operational capabilities or resources
US20070139529A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-06-21 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Dual mode image capture technique
US20070120981A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-05-31 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Storage access technique for captured data
US9621749B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2017-04-11 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Capturing selected image objects
US7782365B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2010-08-24 Searete Llc Enhanced video/still image correlation
US20070109411A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-05-17 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Composite image selectivity
US7872675B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2011-01-18 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Saved-image management
US9041826B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2015-05-26 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Capturing selected image objects
US9967424B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2018-05-08 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Data storage usage protocol
US10097756B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2018-10-09 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Enhanced video/still image correlation
US20070052856A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-03-08 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware. Composite image selectivity
US9191611B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2015-11-17 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Conditional alteration of a saved image
US20070040928A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-02-22 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Capturing selected image objects
US20070008326A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2007-01-11 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Dual mode image capture technique
US20060274165A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Levien Royce A Conditional alteration of a saved image
US20060274153A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Third party storage of captured data
US20060274157A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Enhanced video/still image correlation
US8681225B2 (en) 2005-06-02 2014-03-25 Royce A. Levien Storage access technique for captured data
US9001215B2 (en) * 2005-06-02 2015-04-07 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Estimating shared image device operational capabilities or resources
US20060274154A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-07 Searete, Lcc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Data storage usage protocol
US20060279643A1 (en) * 2005-06-02 2006-12-14 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Storage access technique for captured data
US20070098348A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Degradation/preservation management of captured data
US20070097215A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Degradation/preservation management of captured data
US20070100533A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of State Of Delaware Preservation and/or degradation of a video/audio data stream
US20070097214A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Preservation/degradation of video/audio aspects of a data stream
US9942511B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2018-04-10 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Preservation/degradation of video/audio aspects of a data stream
US8253821B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2012-08-28 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Degradation/preservation management of captured data
US8804033B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2014-08-12 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Preservation/degradation of video/audio aspects of a data stream
US20070100860A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Preservation and/or degradation of a video/audio data stream
US20070120980A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-31 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Preservation/degradation of video/audio aspects of a data stream
US8233042B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2012-07-31 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Preservation and/or degradation of a video/audio data stream
US9167195B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2015-10-20 Invention Science Fund I, Llc Preservation/degradation of video/audio aspects of a data stream
US8072501B2 (en) 2005-10-31 2011-12-06 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Preservation and/or degradation of a video/audio data stream
US20070200934A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Imagery processing
US9093121B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2015-07-28 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Data management of an audio data stream
US9076208B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2015-07-07 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Imagery processing
US20070203595A1 (en) * 2006-02-28 2007-08-30 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Data management of an audio data stream
US20070222865A1 (en) * 2006-03-15 2007-09-27 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Enhanced video/still image correlation
US20080043108A1 (en) * 2006-08-18 2008-02-21 Searete Llc, A Limited Liability Corporation Of The State Of Delaware Capturing selected image objects
US8964054B2 (en) 2006-08-18 2015-02-24 The Invention Science Fund I, Llc Capturing selected image objects
US20130054356A1 (en) * 2011-08-31 2013-02-28 Jason Richman Systems and methods for contextualizing services for images
US9667849B2 (en) * 2012-12-27 2017-05-30 Intel Corporation Enabling a metadata storage subsystem
US9244694B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2016-01-26 Intel Corporation Executing a command within a transport mechanism based on a get and set architecture
US20140184828A1 (en) * 2012-12-27 2014-07-03 Brent Chartrand Enabling a metadata storage subsystem
US20140184817A1 (en) * 2012-12-27 2014-07-03 Brent Chartrand Enabling a metadata storage subsystem
US9686460B2 (en) * 2012-12-27 2017-06-20 Intel Corporation Enabling a metadata storage subsystem
US9600296B2 (en) 2012-12-27 2017-03-21 Intel Corporation Executing a command within a transport mechanism based on a get and set architecture
US10331794B2 (en) * 2013-05-13 2019-06-25 Facebook, Inc. Hybrid, offline/online speech translation system
US20160364385A1 (en) * 2013-05-13 2016-12-15 Facebook, Inc. Hybrid, Offline/Online Speech Translation System

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0118603D0 (en) 2001-09-19
GB2378275A (en) 2003-02-05
GB2378275B (en) 2005-06-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP3705429B2 (en) Audio-visual summary How to Create
US9026901B2 (en) Viewing annotations across multiple applications
Yeo et al. Retrieving and visualizing video
Van House et al. Technologies of memory: Key issues and critical perspectives
US7761427B2 (en) Method, system, and computer program product for processing and converting electronically-stored data for electronic discovery and support of litigation using a processor-based device located at a user-site
US9304657B2 (en) Audio tagging
EP2402867B1 (en) A computer-implemented method, a computer program product and a computer system for image processing
KR100641791B1 (en) Tagging Method and System for Digital Data
US20100005061A1 (en) Information processing with integrated semantic contexts
US20080168070A1 (en) Method and apparatus for classifying multimedia artifacts using ontology selection and semantic classification
US9159048B2 (en) Knowledge gathering system based on user's affinity
ES2253531T3 (en) Storage management on the basis of content.
US20080126329A1 (en) Expanding the scope of an annotation to an entity level
US6687671B2 (en) Method and apparatus for automatic collection and summarization of meeting information
US7197493B2 (en) Collection management database of arbitrary schema
JP5037627B2 (en) Image identification using face recognition
JP5890308B2 (en) Automatic discovery of contextually related task items
US20030088582A1 (en) Visual history multi-media database software
CN102929950B (en) Social networking is recommended for personalized search results and recommendations of content members
KR100987314B1 (en) Categorizing objects, such as documents and/or clusters, with respect to a taxonomy and data structures derived from such categorization
US9928242B2 (en) Managing the content of shared slide presentations
JP5021640B2 (en) Detect, store, index, and search means for leveraging data on user activity, attention, and interests
US9292519B2 (en) Signature-based system and method for generation of personalized multimedia channels
US9262533B2 (en) Context based data searching
CN101601029B (en) Data object search and retrieval

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD LIMITED;REEL/FRAME:013154/0746

Effective date: 20020729

AS Assignment

Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L.P., TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:014061/0492

Effective date: 20030926

Owner name: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY L.P.,TEXAS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:014061/0492

Effective date: 20030926

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION