US20030023478A1 - Electronic initiative petition - Google Patents

Electronic initiative petition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20030023478A1
US20030023478A1 US10201884 US20188402A US2003023478A1 US 20030023478 A1 US20030023478 A1 US 20030023478A1 US 10201884 US10201884 US 10201884 US 20188402 A US20188402 A US 20188402A US 2003023478 A1 US2003023478 A1 US 2003023478A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
user
computer
signature
petition
initiative
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10201884
Inventor
Gregory Piccionelli
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
KOLETRY PROCESSING LLC
Original Assignee
Piccionelli Gregory A.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G07CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07CTIME OR ATTENDANCE REGISTERS; REGISTERING OR INDICATING THE WORKING OF MACHINES; GENERATING RANDOM NUMBERS; VOTING OR LOTTERY APPARATUS; ARRANGEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS FOR CHECKING NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • G07C13/00Voting apparatus

Abstract

Preferred embodiments of the instant invention are directed to a system, method and apparatus for providing an efficient means for qualifying a petition, referendum or initiative on a ballot on a network. Users on the network access the petition qualifying system via a user interface and requests petitions or initiatives in the user's relevant voting area. After the user has reviewed the petition, the user can endorse the petition by providing the petition qualifying system endorsement indicia. The petition qualifying system verifies the eligibility of the user. The petition qualifying system compiles the received endorsement indicia, and presents such indicia to the relevant agency to secure placement of the initiative on the appropriate ballot.

Description

    RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is related to, and claims priority from, U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 60/308,011, entitled Electronic Initiative Petition, filed Jul. 26, 2001, and is fully incorporated herein by reference.[0001]
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a computer-based method for qualifying an initiative for placement on a ballot. More particularly, the present invention relates to a computer-based method by which registered voters can electronically sign a petition for a ballot initiative. [0002]
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Presently, when backers of a ballot initiative seek to qualify the initiative, they must obtain a prescribed minimum number of valid signatures from registered voters within the appropriate jurisdiction (e.g., state, county, city, etc.). Typically, these signatures must be obtained by personally convincing voters to physically sign petitions for placement of the initiative on a ballot as prescribed by law. Proper identification of the voter must be obtained. This signature-gathering process is costly as well as labor-intensive. Further, in current signature gathering efforts, the employee gathering the signatures cannot easily verify the eligibility of the person to vote. As such, duplicate efforts must often be expended as signature counts fall below the required numbers once ineligible signatures are removed from the roster. [0003]
  • A need exists for a method for obtaining signatures to qualify an initiative, referendum or other form of petition that reduces the required expenditure of time and labor. A further need exists for immediately ascertaining whether the user signing a petition is eligible to endorse a petition for placing an initiative, referendum or other matter on a ballot. [0004]
  • A still further need exists for a method for obtaining a user's opinion in circumstances where a signature or other validation of a user's identity to authenticate the opinion reduces the required expenditure of time and labor involved in obtaining such authenticated opinions.[0005]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • The invention may be more readily understood by referring to the accompanying drawings in which [0006]
  • FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating the operation of an embodiment of the invention. [0007]
  • FIG. 2 is a flow diagram illustrating the operation of a more specific embodiment of the invention in which the number of voter signatures is tracked. [0008]
  • FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating the operation of another more specific embodiment of the invention in which the validity of the voter's signature is verified prior to acceptance.[0009]
  • SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE
  • Preferred embodiments of the instant invention are directed to a system, method and apparatus for providing an efficient means for qualifying a petition, referendum or initiative on a ballot. In preferred embodiments, petitions are presented to the system by lobbying groups, organizations, and in some instances, users. Petitions are stored in association with relevant voting areas. [0010]
  • In preferred embodiments, users on the network access the petition qualifying system via a user interface, such as a web page. Overall, a user accesses the petition qualifying system and requests petitions or initiatives in the user's relevant voting area. After the user has reviewed the petition, the user can endorse the petition by providing the petition qualifying system endorsement indicia, such as, a digital signature. In some preferred embodiments, the system compares relevant user information, or the digital signature, with previously stored information, and can immediately ascertain the eligibility of the user to vote. The petition qualifying system compiles the received signatures, or other endorsement indicia, and presents such indicia the relevant agency to secure placement of the initiative on the appropriate ballot. [0011]
  • A feature of preferred embodiments of the invention is that petitions for a given area can be stored in a single location. An advantage to this feature is that users can access all the petitions in the user's relevant voting area such that the user can efficiently review the desired petitions. [0012]
  • A further feature of preferred embodiments is that the system compares the user endorsement information with previously stored information to determine eligibility of the user to vote. An advantage to this feature is that a more accurate count of the required number of ‘signatures’ to qualify the petition can be ascertained, thereby eliminating the requirement to recollect signatures due to ineligible signatures [0013]
  • The above and other advantages of embodiments of this invention will be apparent from the following more detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It is intended that the above advantages can be achieved separately by different aspects of the invention and that additional advantages of this invention will involve various combinations of the above independent advantages such that synergistic benefits may be obtained from combined techniques. [0014]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • Preferred embodiments of the instant invention operate on a network, such as, for example, the WWW, or another type of remote access system, such as, a kiosk, telephone, facsimile, personal digital assistant, pulse code system, web TV, or any other device or method the communicates alpha numeric data with a server. [0015]
  • Hardware Environment [0016]
  • Preferred embodiments of the instant invention operate in accordance with a plurality of networked computers, such as, for example, a user computer and a server computer which are coupled together on a communications network, such as, for example, the Internet or a wide area network. In preferred embodiments, the network system includes a server computer, or a provider computer, and a user computer, wherein the server computer and the user computer are in electronic communication with each other via a communication link. [0017]
  • In some preferred embodiments, the network system includes a plurality of either the server, the user computer, or any combination thereof The server contains petition, referendum or initiative information and other relevant data that is accessible by the user computer. In some preferred embodiments, the server computer also contains other information, including, but not limited to, data regarding the geophysical boundaries of the relevant jurisdiction pertaining to the petition, rules pertaining to the petitioning process, such as acceptable means of endorsing a petition, one or more databases of registered voters, advertisements, and/or the server can access other third party servers containing this and/or other information, programs, etc. [0018]
  • The provider computer, or server, may comprise any suitable network device capable of providing content (data representing text, hypertext, photographs, graphics video and/or audio) for communication over the network. In preferred embodiments, the provider computer comprises a programmable processor capable of operating in accordance with programs stored on one or more computer readable media (for example, but not limited to, floppy disks, hard disks, random access memory RAM, CD-ROM), to provide content for communication to a user computer. The provider computer may comprise, for example, but not limited to, a personal computer, a mainframe computer, network computer, portable computer, personal digital assistant (such as, a 3Com Palm Pilot), a cellular telephone-based computer, an implanted computer, a molecular computer, biological computer, and similar devices. The provider computer may include one or more internal data storage devices (not shown) for storing content for communication to a user computer. Alternatively, or in addition, the provider computer may be coupled to an external data storage device, computer or other means from which the provider computer may obtain content for communication to a user computer. The provider computer is controlled by suitable software to provide the requested content to the requesting user computer in accordance with protocol procedures commonly utilized and understood in the art. [0019]
  • The user computer may comprise any suitable network device capable of communicating with other network devices in the network system. In preferred embodiments, the user computer comprises a programmable processor capable of operating in accordance with programs stored on one or more computer readable media (for example, but not limited to floppy disc, hard disc, computer network, random access memory (RAM), CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, SmartMedia®, molecular data storage means and the like); a display device for providing a user-perceivable display (for example, but not limited to visual displays, such as cathode ray tube CRT displays, light-emitting-diode LED or liquid-crystal-diode LCD displays, plasma, displays or the like, audio displays or tactile displays), and a user input device (for example, but not limited to, a keyboard, mouse, microphone, neuronal interface, or the like). In one preferred embodiment, the user computer comprises a personal computer system having a CRT display, a keyboard and a mouse user-input device. [0020]
  • The user computer is controlled by suitable software, including network communication and browser software to allow a user to request, receive and display information (or content) from or through a provider computer on the network system. The user computers operate in accordance with programs stored on a readable medium, including, but not limited to, floppy disks, hard disks, RAM, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, SmartMedia®, molecular-based media, and the like. The user computers are any means capable of communicating with the server computers, including, but not limited, to personal computers, telephones, kiosks, ATM-type machines, personal digital assistants, molecular computers and biological computers. The user computers access the server computers via the wide area network or through some other remote access, such as, for example, by telephone, facsimile, personal digital assistant, pulse code system, interactive television, or any other device or method that communicates alpha numeric data with a server. [0021]
  • General Description of Preferred Embodiments [0022]
  • Preferred embodiments of the instant invention are directed to a system, method and apparatus for providing an efficient means for qualifying a petition, referendum or initiative on a ballot, wherein qualification of the petition occurs via a network. It to be understood that preferred embodiments of the qualifying system and methods described herein are not limited to public initiatives and referenda, and can apply to any type of petition, legislation, ballot, poll, survey or other form of public or private opinion collection. [0023]
  • Petitions are presented to the qualifying system by lobbying groups, organizations, and in some instances, users. In preferred embodiments, users on the network can access the petition qualifying system via a user interface, such as a web page. Overall, a user accesses the petition qualifying system and requests petitions or initiatives in the user's relevant voting area. After the user has reviewed the petition, the user can endorse the petition by providing the petition qualifying system endorsement indicia, such as, a digital signature. The petition qualifying system compiles the received signatures, or other endorsement indicia, and presents such indicia the relevant agency to secure placement of the initiative on the appropriate ballot. [0024]
  • With reference to FIG. 1, a user, or voter, is initially directed (by, e.g., a commercial, a petition worker, an advertisement, etc.) to a site maintained by an organization or organizations promoting the ballot initiative, for example a site on a wide-area network such as the World Wide Web or the Internet. Once the voter accesses the initiative site [0025] 10, he or she is afforded the opportunity to read the text of the proposed initiative, for example via a menu. The voter then reads the text of the petition or initiative 12, or alternatively proceeds directly to the next step.
  • At the next step, the voter is afforded the opportunity to add his or her signature, endorsement, attestation, acknowledgment or other form of approval to a petition to place the proposed initiative on the appropriate ballot as prescribed by the election law of the jurisdiction within which the proposed initiative is to be submitted to voters [0026] 14. If the voter elects to do so, the voter then submits his or her signature in electronic form, using any conventional means, such as an electronic signature pad, a previously prepared file containing his or her electronic signature, or any other digital transmittable means which is recognized by the relevant jurisdiction to impart legally acceptable endorsement of the petition 16. Once submitted to the initiative site, the voter's signature is then added to a signature file 18. The signature file, containing the signatures of one or more voters, is then submitted to the appropriate governmental authority, preferably together with data files or hard copies of the petition and the text of the proposed initiative. It is to be understood that the use of term “voter” in the described embodiments of the qualifying system is not intended to limit the type of opinion giving user of the invention in any manner and can refer to any type of user of the described system.
  • In some preferred embodiments, the voter is directed to the initiative via a web site banner advertisement or any Internet browser, user computer or server mediated method, or combination thereof, by which an Internet or other wide area computer network user's computer is directed to a web site or other interface which allows the user to gain access to the initiative site. [0027]
  • In other preferred embodiments, the voter's physical location and/or address, such as address used for voter registration purposes, is determined prior to forwarding an initiative to the voter. In still other preferred embodiments, the location and/or address may be determined by requesting location and/or address information from the voter which is then inputted by the voter and transmitted to one or more computers for further processing. In some preferred embodiments, the inputting of location and/or address data may be verified by digital signature means or verification by a third party, such as a live notary public or a notary public accessible online. In other preferred embodiments, the voter's location and/or address is determined by querying the user's computer for location and/or address information based on data calculated from signal information, such as that provided by the Global Positioning System (“GPS”), from cellular telephone location information, from location data correlated to the user's Internet Service Provider's (“ISP's”) number, from the voter's location or address information stored in the voter's computer or one or more other computers, such as those containing voter registration data and/or any other methods of location determination such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,154,172 and related patents. [0028]
  • In some preferred embodiments, the specific initiative or referendum advertisement or advertisements, or site or sites relating thereto, or initiative or referendum text, to which the voter is directed is determined on the basis of the voter's location or address, thereby initiating a process which will provide the voter with initiatives, referenda and other data which is relevant to the voter in the voter's jurisdiction. In some preferred embodiments, the process by which the differential data is presented to the voter, based upon the voter's location and/or address, may be any means such as, for example, those set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 6,154,172 and related patents. [0029]
  • A more particular embodiment of the inventive method, as illustrated in FIG. 2, includes an internal calendar and means for determining whether time remains within a statutory period for obtaining signatures for the petition to place the proposed initiative on the ballot, as well as tracking means for counting the number of signatures obtained. First, a voter counter is initialized to zero prior to activation of the initiative site [0030] 22. An index is also set to the specific cut-off date 24, and preferably also time (for example, Jun. 1, 11:59 p.m.), after which no more petition signatures may be obtained, as prescribed by the election law of the jurisdiction within which the proposed initiative is to be submitted to voters. The present date is next determined 26. If the present date is prior to the cut-off date/time, then the process proceeds; if the present date is later than the cut-off date/time, the process ends.
  • A voter then accesses the initiative site [0031] 28 and is afforded the opportunity to read or listen to an audio version of the text of the proposed initiative 30 and provide an electronic petition signature 32, in a manner similar to that described with respect to the preceding embodiment. After the voter provides his or her electronic signature, the voter's signature is added to the signature file 34. The voter counter is advanced and the new count is provided to the signature file for submission to an appropriate governmental and/or other recipient 36. This facilitates the determination of the total number of signatures obtained from all sources in support of the proposed initiative, whether electronic or physical signatures.
  • It should here be noted that any of the foregoing features can be included independently in an embodiment of the inventive method. [0032]
  • FIG. 3 illustrates another more specific embodiment which allows for determination of the validity of a signature prior to submission, and for exclusion of invalid signatures, i.e., signatures of persons not registered to vote within the jurisdiction within which the proposed initiative is to be submitted to voters. As with the preceding embodiments, a voter accesses the initiative site [0033] 38 and is afforded the opportunity to read the text of the proposed initiative 40, 42 and to submit an electronic signature in support of a petition to place the initiative on the ballot. At this point, the voter submits identifying information, e.g., the voter's name, address, driver's licence number, Social Security number and/or other indicia, together with the electronic signature 44. The submitted identifying information is then compared with an appropriate database containing information on the voters who are currently registered to vote within the jurisdiction of interest or otherwise be eligible to endorse'the petition, referendum, etc. 46. In some preferred embodiments, voter location and/or address information is inputted and confirmed via comparison to data in one or more databases, such as voter registration records, driver license databases, social security information databases, credit history databases or one or more databases specially configured for such or similar confirmation purposes. Next, the voter's eligibility or ineligibility to endorse the petition or referendum, etc., is determined. In some preferred embodiments, the voter's eligibility to endorse the petition is determined by applying an appropriate set of rules to relevant data obtained regarding the voter, such as the voter's voting registration status. For example, in some preferred embodiments, once there has been a determination that the voter is currently a registered voter within the jurisdiction, then his or her signature is added to the signature file 48. If the voter is determined not to be currently registered within the jurisdiction, then the voter's signature is not added to the signature file and an error message is returned 50. At this point the voter can be advised, for example, to consult the registrar of voters or other appropriate governmental authority in order to change his or her registration status.
  • In some preferred embodiments, the voter's identification is verified by biometric means transmittable over a wide area network wherein such biometric data regarding the voter has been previously collected by or registered with the provider of the initiative or referendum, a third party that maintains one or more databases of such information, such as a state department of motor vehicles, one or more police entities, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation, or one or more medical database keepers. Such biometric means include, but are not limited to, eye scanning, voice print identification, finger print analysis, dna analysis, and combinations thereof. In some preferred embodiments, once the biometric data has been collected from the voter, such biometric data is compared with said previously collected or registered biometric data regarding the voter to determine if such data matches. In some preferred embodiments, the degree of matching of such data may be varied to provide varying degrees of probable likelihood that the voter is who the voter represents himself or herself to be. [0034]
  • While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to a preferred embodiment thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various other changes in the form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, in some preferred embodiments, in lieu of or in addition to providing the voter with the text of the initiative or referendum, the voter is provided with an audio version of the text. In other preferred embodiments the system will accept initiatives and referenda from users where the petitioner user types in or uploads text or other materials comprising the petition, initiative or referendum to a website computer or other computer for the purpose of making the petition, initiative or referendum available to qualified voters or other users online. In some preferred embodiments the user desiring to implement the subject system to make an initiative or referendum available to voters or other potential signatories can put restrictions on the presentation of the initiative or referendum, including, without limitation, restrictions regarding location of the voter, location of transmission source of the text, other voter demography, such as party affiliation, age, gender, etc., and legal voting status. [0035]

Claims (7)

    What is claimed is:
  1. 1. A system for collecting user signatures for a referendum on a computer network having a provider computer and a user computer, the referendum being provided by a third party to the provider computer, wherein the provider computer includes a user interface, the system comprising:
    means to access a user registrar database, wherein the user registrar database contains information regarding the user pertaining to the user's eligibility to endorse the referendum;
    an interface for presenting the referendum to the user computer, the interface being configured to receive user identification information;
    means for receiving a user indicia to approve the referendum;
    means for operating the provider computer to compare the user identification information with the user registrar database to determine the user's eligibility to vote;
    means for compiling a user indicia list; and
    means for transmitting the user indicia list.
  2. 2. A system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising means for notifying user of ineligibility.
  3. 3. A system as claimed in claim 1, wherein user indicia is a digital signature
  4. 4. A system as claimed in claim 1, further comprising a counter for determining the number of user indicia received.
  5. 5. A method for collecting user signatures for a referendum on a computer network having a provider computer and a user computer, the referendum being provided by a third party to the provider computer, wherein the provider computer includes a user interface, the method comprising:
    receiving, from the user computer, a request for the transmission of the initiative;
    receiving, from the user computer, user identifying information;
    receiving, from the user computer, a user signature, wherein the signature signifies an approval of the initiative;
    confirming the eligibility of the user providing the user signature;
    adding the user's signature to a signature file; and
    submitting the signature list to a receiving agent.
  6. 6. A method as claimed in claim 5, further comprising transmitting notification to the user computer that the user signature does not represent an eligible user.
  7. 7. A method as claimed in claim 5, further comprising increasing a count of the number of signatures upon the addition of the signature to the signature file.
US10201884 2001-07-26 2002-07-24 Electronic initiative petition Abandoned US20030023478A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US30801101 true 2001-07-26 2001-07-26
US10201884 US20030023478A1 (en) 2001-07-26 2002-07-24 Electronic initiative petition

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10201884 US20030023478A1 (en) 2001-07-26 2002-07-24 Electronic initiative petition
US11784218 US7890364B2 (en) 2001-07-26 2007-04-05 Electronic initiative petition
US12931833 US20120072269A1 (en) 2001-07-26 2011-02-11 Electronic initiative petition

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11784218 Continuation US7890364B2 (en) 2001-07-26 2007-04-05 Electronic initiative petition

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20030023478A1 true true US20030023478A1 (en) 2003-01-30

Family

ID=26897176

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10201884 Abandoned US20030023478A1 (en) 2001-07-26 2002-07-24 Electronic initiative petition
US11784218 Active 2022-12-15 US7890364B2 (en) 2001-07-26 2007-04-05 Electronic initiative petition
US12931833 Abandoned US20120072269A1 (en) 2001-07-26 2011-02-11 Electronic initiative petition

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11784218 Active 2022-12-15 US7890364B2 (en) 2001-07-26 2007-04-05 Electronic initiative petition
US12931833 Abandoned US20120072269A1 (en) 2001-07-26 2011-02-11 Electronic initiative petition

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US20030023478A1 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050092835A1 (en) * 2001-08-02 2005-05-05 Chung Kevin K. Registration method, as for voting
US20060015564A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2006-01-19 Steve Angelica Modulated cascading electronic messaging network
WO2006088736A1 (en) * 2005-02-14 2006-08-24 Kakaire, James Voting and voter registration system
US20070235535A1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2007-10-11 Davoust David M Method and software for determining the eligibility of a voter and for providing pollworker training
US20090149155A1 (en) * 2007-12-07 2009-06-11 Grossman Victor A Apparatus and method for targeted acquisition
US20090307065A1 (en) * 2008-06-05 2009-12-10 Ian Kincaid Direct democracy framework
US20100127064A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Secure voting via multimedia processing resources
US20180288040A1 (en) * 2013-09-25 2018-10-04 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and Method for Biometric Authentication-Based Electronic Notary Public

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7383223B1 (en) 2000-09-20 2008-06-03 Cashedge, Inc. Method and apparatus for managing multiple accounts
US8355948B2 (en) * 2009-05-05 2013-01-15 Groupon, Inc. System and methods for discount retailing
US8650072B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2014-02-11 Groupon, Inc. System and methods for providing location based discount retailing
US8301495B2 (en) 2009-05-05 2012-10-30 Groupon, Inc. System and methods for discount retailing
US8090351B2 (en) * 2009-09-01 2012-01-03 Elliot Klein Geographical location authentication method
US9996859B1 (en) 2012-03-30 2018-06-12 Groupon, Inc. Method, apparatus, and computer readable medium for providing a self-service interface
CN103426226A (en) * 2012-05-23 2013-12-04 路华科技(深圳)有限公司 Portable multifunctional ballot box
CN105117484A (en) * 2015-09-17 2015-12-02 广州银讯信息科技有限公司 Internet public opinion monitoring method and system

Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5875432A (en) * 1994-08-05 1999-02-23 Sehr; Richard Peter Computerized voting information system having predefined content and voting templates
US5878399A (en) * 1996-08-12 1999-03-02 Peralto; Ryan G. Computerized voting system
US20010034640A1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2001-10-25 David Chaum Physical and digital secret ballot systems
US20010037234A1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2001-11-01 Parmasad Ravi A. Method and apparatus for determining a voting result using a communications network
US20020019767A1 (en) * 2000-06-15 2002-02-14 Babbitt Victor L. Distributed network voting system
US20020077885A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2002-06-20 Jared Karro Electronic voting system
US20020077887A1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Ibm Corporation Architecture for anonymous electronic voting using public key technologies
US20020077886A1 (en) * 2000-11-03 2002-06-20 Chung Kevin Kwong-Tai Electronic voting apparatus, system and method
US20020107724A1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2002-08-08 Openshaw Charles Mark Voting method and apparatus
US20020133396A1 (en) * 2001-03-13 2002-09-19 Barnhart Robert M. Method and system for securing network-based electronic voting
US20020138341A1 (en) * 2001-03-20 2002-09-26 Edward Rodriguez Method and system for electronic voter registration and electronic voting over a network
US20020161628A1 (en) * 2001-04-26 2002-10-31 C. Lane Poor Voter feedback and receipt system
US20020169756A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2002-11-14 Biddulph David L. Voting system and method for secure voting with increased voter confidence
US6550675B2 (en) * 1998-09-02 2003-04-22 Diversified Dynamics, Inc. Direct vote recording system
US20030182182A1 (en) * 2000-12-18 2003-09-25 Kocher Robert W. Biometrics-based voting
US6671805B1 (en) * 1999-06-17 2003-12-30 Ilumin Corporation System and method for document-driven processing of digitally-signed electronic documents
US6688517B1 (en) * 1997-10-16 2004-02-10 Hart Intercivic, Inc. Electronic voting system
US6769613B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2004-08-03 Anthony I. Provitola Auto-verifying voting system and voting method
US6845447B1 (en) * 1998-11-11 2005-01-18 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Electronic voting method and system and recording medium having recorded thereon a program for implementing the method
US6865543B2 (en) * 2001-03-09 2005-03-08 Truvote, Inc. Vote certification, validation and verification method and apparatus
US6950948B2 (en) * 2000-03-24 2005-09-27 Votehere, Inc. Verifiable, secret shuffles of encrypted data, such as elgamal encrypted data for secure multi-authority elections

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6219423B1 (en) * 1995-12-29 2001-04-17 Intel Corporation System and method for digitally signing a digital agreement between remotely located nodes
US5923848A (en) * 1996-05-31 1999-07-13 Microsoft Corporation System and method for resolving names in an electronic messaging environment
US6480587B1 (en) * 1999-06-04 2002-11-12 Sanjay K. Rao Intelligent keyboard system
US7237717B1 (en) * 1996-12-16 2007-07-03 Ip Holdings, Inc. Secure system for electronic voting
US6169789B1 (en) * 1996-12-16 2001-01-02 Sanjay K. Rao Intelligent keyboard system
US6801900B1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2004-10-05 Samuel H. Lloyd System and method for online dispute resolution
WO2002013444A3 (en) * 2000-08-04 2002-05-16 First Data Corp Trusted authentication digital signature (tads) system
US20030042298A1 (en) * 2001-01-30 2003-03-06 Allen Rodney F. Paperless system for the display and registry of choices and the collection of data entered online and offline in elections and surveys
US6607137B2 (en) * 2001-03-23 2003-08-19 Fernando Morales Method and apparatus for casting a vote from home on elections

Patent Citations (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5875432A (en) * 1994-08-05 1999-02-23 Sehr; Richard Peter Computerized voting information system having predefined content and voting templates
US5878399A (en) * 1996-08-12 1999-03-02 Peralto; Ryan G. Computerized voting system
US6688517B1 (en) * 1997-10-16 2004-02-10 Hart Intercivic, Inc. Electronic voting system
US6550675B2 (en) * 1998-09-02 2003-04-22 Diversified Dynamics, Inc. Direct vote recording system
US6845447B1 (en) * 1998-11-11 2005-01-18 Nippon Telegraph And Telephone Corporation Electronic voting method and system and recording medium having recorded thereon a program for implementing the method
US6671805B1 (en) * 1999-06-17 2003-12-30 Ilumin Corporation System and method for document-driven processing of digitally-signed electronic documents
US20010034640A1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2001-10-25 David Chaum Physical and digital secret ballot systems
US6950948B2 (en) * 2000-03-24 2005-09-27 Votehere, Inc. Verifiable, secret shuffles of encrypted data, such as elgamal encrypted data for secure multi-authority elections
US20010037234A1 (en) * 2000-05-22 2001-11-01 Parmasad Ravi A. Method and apparatus for determining a voting result using a communications network
US20020019767A1 (en) * 2000-06-15 2002-02-14 Babbitt Victor L. Distributed network voting system
US20020077886A1 (en) * 2000-11-03 2002-06-20 Chung Kevin Kwong-Tai Electronic voting apparatus, system and method
US20020077885A1 (en) * 2000-12-06 2002-06-20 Jared Karro Electronic voting system
US6769613B2 (en) * 2000-12-07 2004-08-03 Anthony I. Provitola Auto-verifying voting system and voting method
US20020077887A1 (en) * 2000-12-15 2002-06-20 Ibm Corporation Architecture for anonymous electronic voting using public key technologies
US20030182182A1 (en) * 2000-12-18 2003-09-25 Kocher Robert W. Biometrics-based voting
US20020107724A1 (en) * 2001-01-18 2002-08-08 Openshaw Charles Mark Voting method and apparatus
US6865543B2 (en) * 2001-03-09 2005-03-08 Truvote, Inc. Vote certification, validation and verification method and apparatus
US20020133396A1 (en) * 2001-03-13 2002-09-19 Barnhart Robert M. Method and system for securing network-based electronic voting
US20020138341A1 (en) * 2001-03-20 2002-09-26 Edward Rodriguez Method and system for electronic voter registration and electronic voting over a network
US20020161628A1 (en) * 2001-04-26 2002-10-31 C. Lane Poor Voter feedback and receipt system
US20020169756A1 (en) * 2001-05-10 2002-11-14 Biddulph David L. Voting system and method for secure voting with increased voter confidence

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050092835A1 (en) * 2001-08-02 2005-05-05 Chung Kevin K. Registration method, as for voting
US7561724B2 (en) * 2001-08-02 2009-07-14 AI Technology Registration method, as for voting
US20060015564A1 (en) * 2004-07-19 2006-01-19 Steve Angelica Modulated cascading electronic messaging network
US8731986B2 (en) * 2004-07-19 2014-05-20 Steve Angelica Modulated cascading electronic messaging network
WO2006088736A1 (en) * 2005-02-14 2006-08-24 Kakaire, James Voting and voter registration system
US20070235535A1 (en) * 2006-04-05 2007-10-11 Davoust David M Method and software for determining the eligibility of a voter and for providing pollworker training
US20090149155A1 (en) * 2007-12-07 2009-06-11 Grossman Victor A Apparatus and method for targeted acquisition
US9460578B2 (en) * 2007-12-07 2016-10-04 Victor A. Grossman Apparatus and method for targeted acquisition
US20090307065A1 (en) * 2008-06-05 2009-12-10 Ian Kincaid Direct democracy framework
US20100127064A1 (en) * 2008-11-21 2010-05-27 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Secure voting via multimedia processing resources
US8931695B2 (en) * 2008-11-21 2015-01-13 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Secure voting via multimedia processing resources
US20180288040A1 (en) * 2013-09-25 2018-10-04 Jpmorgan Chase Bank, N.A. System and Method for Biometric Authentication-Based Electronic Notary Public

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
US20070265909A1 (en) 2007-11-15 application
US7890364B2 (en) 2011-02-15 grant
US20120072269A1 (en) 2012-03-22 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6216116B1 (en) System and method for handling permits
Daniel Sampling essentials: Practical guidelines for making sampling choices
US7668738B2 (en) Insurance claim filing system and method
Heinlen et al. The scope of webcounseling: A survey of services and compliance with NBCC standards for the ethical practice of webcounseling
US20050216953A1 (en) System and method for verification of identity
Bederson et al. Electronic voting system usability issues
Komarinski Automated fingerprint identification systems (AFIS)
US20090210241A1 (en) Emergency Contact System that Interfaces with Government ID
Grenier et al. Randomized evaluation in legal assistance: What difference does representation (offer and actual use) make
US7383572B2 (en) Use of public switched telephone network for authentication and authorization in on-line transactions
US20100223192A1 (en) System and method for authorization and disclosure for background information searches
US20020002474A1 (en) Systems and methods for selecting and recruiting investigators and subjects for clinical studies
US20020042879A1 (en) Electronic signature system
US6904407B2 (en) Repository for jobseekers' references on the internet
US20050027983A1 (en) Integrated verification system
US20110093769A1 (en) Computer form action zone summary system and method
US20020138341A1 (en) Method and system for electronic voter registration and electronic voting over a network
US20030105642A1 (en) Selection of individuals from a pool of candidates in a competition system
US20050021476A1 (en) Method and system for detecting identify theft in non-personal and personal transactions
US20030212790A1 (en) Network verification systems and methods
McComas Citizen satisfaction with public meetings used for risk communication
Cranor et al. Sensus: A security-conscious electronic polling system for the internet
US20050177528A1 (en) Authenticating digital records
US20010034731A1 (en) Method and system for assembling databases in multiple-party proceedings
US20080133270A1 (en) Systems and Methods for Selecting and Recruiting Investigators and Subjects for Clinical Studies

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KOLETRY PROCESSING L.L.C., DELAWARE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GEOCOM, LLC;REEL/FRAME:027782/0262

Effective date: 20120126