US20020064136A1 - Conferencing network resource optimization for multi-point conferences - Google Patents

Conferencing network resource optimization for multi-point conferences Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020064136A1
US20020064136A1 US10/053,310 US5331001A US2002064136A1 US 20020064136 A1 US20020064136 A1 US 20020064136A1 US 5331001 A US5331001 A US 5331001A US 2002064136 A1 US2002064136 A1 US 2002064136A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
network
gatekeeper
control units
point control
network resources
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/053,310
Inventor
Timothy O'Neil
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US10/053,310 priority Critical patent/US20020064136A1/en
Publication of US20020064136A1 publication Critical patent/US20020064136A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
    • H04L65/80Responding to QoS
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/02Details
    • H04L12/16Arrangements for providing special services to substations
    • H04L12/18Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast
    • H04L12/1813Arrangements for providing special services to substations for broadcast or conference, e.g. multicast for computer conferences, e.g. chat rooms
    • H04L12/1827Network arrangements for conference optimisation or adaptation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/15Flow control; Congestion control in relation to multipoint traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control; Congestion control
    • H04L47/24Traffic characterised by specific attributes, e.g. priority or QoS
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control; Resource allocation
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control; Resource allocation
    • H04L47/74Admission control; Resource allocation measures in reaction to resource unavailability
    • H04L47/745Reaction in network
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control; Resource allocation
    • H04L47/74Admission control; Resource allocation measures in reaction to resource unavailability
    • H04L47/748Negotiation of resources, e.g. modification of a request
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control; Resource allocation
    • H04L47/78Architectures of resource allocation
    • H04L47/781Centralised allocation of resources
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control; Resource allocation
    • H04L47/78Architectures of resource allocation
    • H04L47/783Distributed allocation of resources, e.g. bandwidth brokers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control; Resource allocation
    • H04L47/78Architectures of resource allocation
    • H04L47/783Distributed allocation of resources, e.g. bandwidth brokers
    • H04L47/785Distributed allocation of resources, e.g. bandwidth brokers among multiple network domains, e.g. multilateral agreements
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control; Resource allocation
    • H04L47/80Actions related to the user profile or the type of traffic
    • H04L47/806Broadcast or multicast traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic control in data switching networks
    • H04L47/70Admission control; Resource allocation
    • H04L47/82Miscellaneous aspects
    • H04L47/822Collecting or measuring resource availability data
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
    • H04L65/1066Session management
    • H04L65/1101Session protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
    • H04L65/1066Session management
    • H04L65/1101Session protocols
    • H04L65/1104Session initiation protocol [SIP]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
    • H04L65/1066Session management
    • H04L65/1101Session protocols
    • H04L65/1106Call signalling protocols; H.323 and related
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L65/00Network arrangements, protocols or services for supporting real-time applications in data packet communication
    • H04L65/40Support for services or applications
    • H04L65/403Arrangements for multi-party communication, e.g. for conferences
    • H04L65/4038Arrangements for multi-party communication, e.g. for conferences with floor control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/56Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities
    • H04M3/562Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities where the conference facilities are distributed
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/56Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities
    • H04M3/563User guidance or feature selection
    • H04M3/565User guidance or feature selection relating to time schedule aspects
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M3/00Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
    • H04M3/42Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
    • H04M3/56Arrangements for connecting several subscribers to a common circuit, i.e. affording conference facilities
    • H04M3/567Multimedia conference systems
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M7/00Arrangements for interconnection between switching centres
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M2207/00Type of exchange or network, i.e. telephonic medium, in which the telephonic communication takes place
    • H04M2207/20Type of exchange or network, i.e. telephonic medium, in which the telephonic communication takes place hybrid systems
    • H04M2207/203Type of exchange or network, i.e. telephonic medium, in which the telephonic communication takes place hybrid systems composed of PSTN and data network, e.g. the Internet
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04MTELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04M7/00Arrangements for interconnection between switching centres
    • H04M7/006Networks other than PSTN/ISDN providing telephone service, e.g. Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), including next generation networks with a packet-switched transport layer

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to management of conferencing networks, and more particularly to applications for optimizing network resources for multi-point conferences.
  • H.323 is an umbrella recommendation from the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) that describes standards for multimedia communications over IP-based local area networks (LANs) that do not provide a guaranteed Quality of Service (QoS).
  • ITU International Telecommunications Union
  • QoS Quality of Service
  • Common LAN configurations utilize packet-switched TCP/IP and IPX over Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, and Token Ring technologies. Therefore the H.323 standards are commonly used in the implementation of enterprise videoconferencing networks.
  • conference requesters/initiators often want to include a relatively large number of participants in their conference call, i.e., more participants than a single MCU is capable of facilitating.
  • a common approach to this issue is to cascade, or connect, two or more MCUs together to increase the number of endpoints in a multi-point conference. This allows seamless integration of the conferences hosted by each MCU and the associated exchange of audio and video, with the cascaded nature of the conference typically being transparent to the conference participants, thus creating one unified conference.
  • cascading MCUs optimizes the use of network resources. The task of cascading MCUs is currently accomplished manually, although it is a complex and non-user friendly operation, even for an experienced network administrator. Therefore, an additional need in the videoconferencing art is to simplify the use of cascading MCUs to optimize network bandwidth.
  • Conference reguesters/initiators often want to include a relatively large number of participants in their conference call, i.e., more participants than a single MCU is capable of facilitating.
  • a common approach to this issue is to cascade, or connect, two or more MCUs together to increase the number of endpoints in a multi-point conference. This allows seamless integration of the conferences hosted by each MCU and the associated exchange of audio and video, with the cascaded nature of the conference typically being transparent to the conference participants, thus creating one unified conference.
  • cascading MCUs optimizes the use of network resources. The task of cascading MCUs is currently accomplished manually, although it is a complex and non-user friendly operation, even for an experienced network administrator. Therefore, a need exists in the videoconferencing art to simplify the use of cascading MCUs to optimize network bandwidth.
  • the present invention provides a cascade optimization module for determining an optimum configuration for cascading two or more multi-point control units together, consequently optimizing the local area network (LAN) and wide are network (WAN) links, bandwidth, and other resources.
  • the multi-point control units may be centralized multi-point control units where each multi-point control unit includes a media controller (MC) integrated with a media processor (MP), or decentralized multi-point control units in which the MC is separate from the MP.
  • the cascade configuration is also determined according to the network Quality of Service and connectivity policies maintained by the gatekeeper.
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an enterprise network, in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of gatekeeper, in accordance with the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart of method steps for scheduling a conference call within a network.
  • Scheduling and/or calendar applications are often used in enterprises, especially those with multiple campuses or work sites, in order to aid coordination of conferences or other collaborations among desired participants. These applications typically offer the ability to view the calendars of others on the enterprise network, as well as send conference invitations and subsequently update conference participant calendars upon acceptance of an invitation. Enterprises often use third party scheduling applications or may use proprietary applications developed for unique needs.
  • a method and system providing reliable connectivity of conference calls regulated by the H.323 audio and video conferencing protocol or Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is first described.
  • the system ensures that adequate network resources are available for a requested conference by binding an enterprise scheduling application with gatekeeper QoS/connectivity policies maintained by a network administrator.
  • an endpoint can request network resources via the scheduling application, which can then access the gatekeeper policies and call authorization and management functionality.
  • the gatekeeper can verify that adequate resources are available to complete the requested conference call and can ensure that the requested call is given priority over competing non-scheduled calls, thus ensuring successful initiation of the requested conference.
  • the gatekeeper may be replaced by an SIP proxy in which scheduling applications (described below) are bound to the SIP proxy.
  • FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary operating environment of the system and methods described herein.
  • An enterprise network 100 is depicted comprising at least two campuses, campus 1 and campus 2 .
  • Each campus comprises a LAN 102 interconnecting an MCU 104 and various workstations.
  • the LANs 102 may utilize well-known technology such as Ethernet or any other suitable network technology, and employ appropriate communication protocols, for example TCP/IP.
  • an MCU supports conferences between three or more endpoints.
  • An MCU typically includes a media controller (not shown) for, among other things, processing negotiations among endpoints and controlling audio, video, and multiplexed streams, and an optional media processor (not shown) for, among other things, processing, mixing, and switching of audio, video, and data signals.
  • the scope of the present invention includes centralized and decentralized MCUs.
  • a centralized MCU includes integrated media controller and media processor units.
  • a decentralized MCU includes separate media controller and media processor units.
  • Each LAN 102 additionally interconnects one or more various videoconference-enabled devices, for example, a stand-alone videoconferencing unit (VCU) 106 such as the ViewStationTM MP available from Polycom, Inc. of Milpitas, California; a personal computer (PC) 108 ; and a PC/VCU 110 combination.
  • VCU stand-alone videoconferencing unit
  • the PC/VCU 110 is intended to depict a videoconference-enabled PC that is configured with a microphone, camera, speakers, and an associated conferencing application, or a PC coupled with a personal videoconferencing device such as the ViaVideoTM available from Polycom, Inc. of Milpitas, Calif.
  • the devices coupled to the LANs 102 intercommunicate through an appropriate protocol such as TCP/IP, IPX, or any other suitable communication protocol.
  • an appropriate protocol such as TCP/IP, IPX, or any other suitable communication protocol.
  • the MCU 104 may not be a separate device as depicted in FIG. 1, but may be integrated into another device such as the VCU 106 or a network server 112 .
  • the network server 112 includes a plurality of software applications and associated functions, and is coupled to the LAN 102 for communication with other network connected devices.
  • the server applications may include, but are not limited to, a network management system 114 , a gatekeeper 116 , a resource scheduler 118 , and optionally a gateway 120 .
  • the network management system 114 manages the LAN 102 and connected devices.
  • the network management system 114 manages hardware, for example, packet exchange monitoring and node diagnosis, and software, for example diagnosis and updating.
  • An additional feature of the management system 114 is the capability to communicate and co-manage the resources of other network management systems 130 that reside on a service provider (SP) server 122 .
  • Exemplary functions include, but are not limited to, coordinating conference connectivity with the SP server 122 through a network 124 (preferably packet-switched), coordinating conference bandwidth management, and coordinating cascading of two or more MCUs 104 (or MCUs 128 resident at the SP server 122 ) together for expanding the number of endpoints in a multi-point conference.
  • the resource scheduler 118 is an application offering the ability, among others, to view and interact with the calendars of others on the enterprise network, as well as send conference invitations and subsequently update participant calendars upon acceptance of an invitation.
  • the resource scheduler 118 is operative to communicate with the gatekeeper 116 upon a conference request from endpoint devices VCU 106 , PC 108 or PC/VCU 110 .
  • the scheduler 118 is depicted as resident on the network server 112 , the invention is not limited to this configuration.
  • the functionality of the scheduler 118 may also reside in the network management system 114 , on any or all of the plurality of videoconferencing-enabled devices 106 - 110 , or on any other workstation (not shown) on the LAN 102 .
  • the scheduler 118 is not only provided with access to the work calendars of enterprise personnel in order to coordinate the scheduling of meetings, conferences, etc., but is also provided with access to the gatekeeper connectivity policy, described below with respect to FIGS. 2 and 3.
  • the communication between the scheduler 118 and the gatekeeper 116 facilitates the capabilities for reliable conference scheduling described herein.
  • the gatekeeper 116 is described in detail below in reference to FIG. 2.
  • An optional gateway 120 may be present at the network server 112 , for providing many services to network or LAN 102 endpoints such as 104 - 110 .
  • the gateway 120 is operative to provide interface functionality between different network types.
  • the gateway 120 provides translation functionality between differing endpoints, including but not limited to translation between transmission formats, communications procedures, audio and video codecs, and possibly network address translation (NAT).
  • NAT network address translation
  • the gateway 120 facilitates communication between H.323 devices and analog PSTN (public-switched telephone network) devices.
  • PSTN public-switched telephone network
  • FIG. 1 depicts the network server 112 being optionally coupled to the SP server 122 through a network 124 .
  • the network server 112 and the SP server 122 may interoperate for various enterprise conference scheduling, MCU 104 cascading, bandwidth management, and other activities that may contribute to the successful integration and use of a service provider offering conferencing services.
  • FIG. 2 depicts in block format some of the functionality of the gatekeeper 116 , in accordance with one aspect of the present invention.
  • a QoS/connectivity policy (policy) module 202 maintains the enterprise network policies set by a network administrator. These policies are intended to describe the allowed capabilities of the network and the associated network devices 104 - 112 (FIG. 1), and may include, among other things, call authorization and management and network bandwidth management. Examples of policy rules include but are not limited to the speeds at which various devices 104 - 112 are able to transmit information over the LAN 102 to the packet-switched network 124 (FIG. 1), and/or to the circuit-switched network 126 (FIG.
  • a gatekeeper 116 policy is the priority assigned to various types of information transmission (e.g., audio, video, data, and e-mail) that may be competing for network resources, and the amount of network bandwidth that is allocated for such transmissions. Further, policies likely differ at various times of a day and of a week.
  • a bandwidth management/control module (BWM) 204 is provided for supporting, among other things, bandwidth request, confirm, and reject messages; for determining whether adequate bandwidth is available to complete a call; for determining if adequate bandwidth is available upon a request for additional bandwidth from an active call; and related functions.
  • the BWM 204 communicates with and receives inquiries and requests from the scheduler 118 (FIG. 1) based upon a conference call request from a user.
  • the gatekeeper 116 and the scheduler 118 intercommunicate through a scheduler interface module 206 , which is operative to facilitate transfer of information therebetween.
  • the gatekeeper 116 and the network management system 114 (FIG. 1) intercommunicate through a network management interface module 208 , which facilitates transfer of information therebetween.
  • the gatekeeper 116 is further provided with a call authorization/management module (CM) 210 that is capable of communicating with the BWM 204 and supplying information thereto.
  • CM call authorization/management module
  • the gatekeeper 116 may maintain a list of ongoing calls and it may restrict access to network resources for certain network devices 104 - 110 (FIG. 1) during certain periods of time.
  • the gatekeeper is operative to manage network resources based on call requests made through the scheduler 118 and based on the policies defined by a network administrator in the policy module 202 .
  • MCUs 104 and endpoints 106 - 110 within the gatekeeper 116 zone register with the gatekeeper 116 when attempting to place a call, and the gatekeeper 116 has access to network configuration information describing the LANs 102 and the devices 104 - 110 .
  • the gatekeeper functionality described above is employed to ensure that sufficient network resources (i.e., bandwidth, etc.) are available to reliably connect and complete a scheduled conference call, and/or to accept or reject competing ad hoc call attempts.
  • gatekeeper 116 The interaction between the gatekeeper 116 and the resource scheduler 118 is not limited by the configuration as described. Those skilled in the art may appreciate that alternate gatekeeper 116 configurations and functions, and additional intercommunication between the gatekeeper 116 and the scheduler 118 , may provide reliable network bandwidth management and thus reliable connectivity for conference calls initiated in a network. These alternatives are thus considered within the scope of the present invention.
  • gatekeeper 116 Another component of gatekeeper 116 is a cascade optimization algorithm 212 , which is described below in reference to FIG. 3.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow diagram depicting a method for scheduling a conference call within a network, wherein sufficient network resources are ensured to provide a successful conference initiation.
  • the method depicted also includes the method of the present invention for gatekeeper-based dynamic cascading of MCUs, wherein utilization of network resources is optimized.
  • step 302 users at the devices 106 - 110 (FIG. 1) request a conference call, which is received by the resource scheduler 118 (FIG. 1).
  • the request is routed to the gatekeeper 116 (FIG. 1) at step 304 , whereby the requested conference registration with the gatekeeper 116 is initiated.
  • the QoS/connectivity policy module 202 is accessed at step 306 .
  • the BWM 204 (FIG. 2) is capable of determining whether there are sufficient network resources available to successfully connect the requested conference call based on the policies defined in the policy module 202 (FIG. 2). The BWM 204 does this in step 308 .
  • the resource scheduler 118 (FIG. 1) is notified at step 310 .
  • the scheduler 118 then notifies the conference requester at step 312 .
  • the scheduler 118 in conjunction with the gatekeeper 116 , suggests an alternate conference time to the requester, again according to the known network capacities and policies. Users at the devices 106 - 110 (FIG. 1) may repeat the request for a conference call at step 302 .
  • the scheduler 118 schedules the requested conference and the appropriate invitations may be transmitted to conference invitees in step 316 .
  • the CM 210 (FIG. 2) is notified to reject any competing ad hoc conference calls that may attempt to register with the gatekeeper 116 (through scheduler 118 or via direct connection attempts), if necessary. Additional features may include notifying connected ad hoc callers shortly prior to the initiation of the scheduled call, whereupon the availability of network resources for the ad hoc call will expire. For example, a message may appear on their monitor indicating that only five minutes remain for their current call. Those skilled in the art can appreciate that a number of additional similar features may be integrated into the basic architecture described herein, and that such features are within the scope of the present invention.
  • the method for gatekeeper-based dynamic cascading of MCUs of the present invention begins at step 320 .
  • This portion of the method further contributes to the optimization of network resources. For example, if endpoint devices 106 - 110 (FIG. 1) connected to the LAN 102 (FIG. 1) in campus 1 want to participate in a conference managed by an MCU 104 (FIG. 1) connected to LAN 102 in campus 2, without cascading the campus 1 devices would typically connect “directly” to the MCU 104 of campus 2, thus unnecessarily consuming MCU resources (e.g., ports and processing power).
  • MCU resources e.g., ports and processing power
  • An improvement over the current manual method of cascading MCUs 104 is to provide a method and system for dynamically cascading MCUs according to gatekeeper 116 (FIG. 1) QoS and network resource utilization policies.
  • the network management system 114 (FIG. 1) is notified (through the network management interface module 208 of FIG. 2) and provided relevant network management information to assist in global management of the networks, i.e., LANs 102 (FIG. 1). Included in this information are parameters related to the scheduled meeting, such as the identity of participating endpoint devices 106 - 110 , the meeting time, the identity of the utilized MCU 104 , the required bandwidth, and the like.
  • step 322 it is determined whether dynamic cascading is required for resource optimization. If it is determined that cascading is not required, then the conference call endpoints can be successfully connected at the scheduled time, step 328 , and the call is essentially guaranteed the resources necessary for a successful conference.
  • the gatekeeper 116 (FIG. 1) is notified of such, at step 324 .
  • the gatekeeper 116 is provided with a cascade optimization algorithm 212 (FIG. 2) for determining an optimum cascade configuration from a multiplicity of possible configurations.
  • Information utilized by the optimization algorithm 212 includes, but is not limited to, network scheduling information (from the resource scheduler 118 ), gatekeeper 116 policy information related to the participating devices (e.g., devices 106 - 110 and MCU 104 ) and network segments (from the QoS/connectivity module 202 ), and network configuration information.
  • the network management system 114 (FIG. 1) is operative to direct the participating devices and MCUs to dial into the appropriate ports, thus economizing the limited WAN (i.e., network 124 of FIG. 1) and LAN 102 links, bandwidth, etc.
  • the embodiments are described in a specific operating environment and in a configuration in which the gatekeeper 116 is separate from the network management, system 114 , it is contemplated that the gatekeeper 116 and management system 114 functionality may be configured in a single application (which may also include the resource scheduler 118 ).
  • the cascade optimization module 212 is described as residing in the gatekeeper 116 , it is contemplated that the cascade optimization module 212 and its related functionality could also and/or alternatively reside in the network management system 114 (if separate from the gatekeeper 116 ).
  • the inventions described herein may be practiced in various application configurations without diverging from the scope of the invention.
  • the enterprise networks may be coupled to a service provider 122 through a network 124 , preferably a packet-switched network.
  • a network 124 preferably a packet-switched network.
  • services provided by the SP may include a videoconferencing service, whereby the SP populates its customer enterprises with appropriate videoconferencing devices, provides the network resources required for the audio, video, and data transmission from the LANs to and through a WAN (i.e., the Internet), and manages/controls conferences requested by enterprise personnel.
  • network management systems 130 (which may be a variation of network management system 114 ) are provided for the service providers 122 , and that the network management systems 114 and 130 intercommunicate to co-manage network resources.
  • the SP management system 130 has access to the enterprise MCUs and gatekeeper policy (and any SP MCU 128 and gatekeeper policy), then the scheduling and cascading may be managed and controlled remotely.

Abstract

A system and method for dynamically cascading MCUs according to gatekeeper and network resource utilization policies. The system comprises local area networks that couple multiple endpoints and multiple MCUs to a resource scheduler, a gatekeeper, and a network resource manager. The network manager determines whether network resources are optimized by cascading MCUs. The gatekeeper includes a cascade optimization module for determining an optimum configuration for cascading two or more MCUs together. The cascade configuration is determined according to the connectivity policies maintained by the gatekeeper.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims the benefit of Provisional Patent Application Serial No. 60/245,728 filed on Nov. 2, 2000, entitled “Conference Network Resource Management And Optimization” and is also related to co-owned Patent Application Serial No. _______ filed on Nov. 2, 2001, entitled “Conferencing Network Resource Management For Call Connectivity” which are hereby incorporated by reference.[0001]
  • BACKGROUND
  • 1. Field of the Invention [0002]
  • The present invention relates generally to management of conferencing networks, and more particularly to applications for optimizing network resources for multi-point conferences. [0003]
  • 2. Description of the Background Art [0004]
  • H.323 is an umbrella recommendation from the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) that describes standards for multimedia communications over IP-based local area networks (LANs) that do not provide a guaranteed Quality of Service (QoS). Common LAN configurations utilize packet-switched TCP/IP and IPX over Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, and Token Ring technologies. Therefore the H.323 standards are commonly used in the implementation of enterprise videoconferencing networks. [0005]
  • Furthermore, conference requesters/initiators often want to include a relatively large number of participants in their conference call, i.e., more participants than a single MCU is capable of facilitating. A common approach to this issue is to cascade, or connect, two or more MCUs together to increase the number of endpoints in a multi-point conference. This allows seamless integration of the conferences hosted by each MCU and the associated exchange of audio and video, with the cascaded nature of the conference typically being transparent to the conference participants, thus creating one unified conference. In addition, cascading MCUs optimizes the use of network resources. The task of cascading MCUs is currently accomplished manually, although it is a complex and non-user friendly operation, even for an experienced network administrator. Therefore, an additional need in the videoconferencing art is to simplify the use of cascading MCUs to optimize network bandwidth. [0006]
  • Conference reguesters/initiators often want to include a relatively large number of participants in their conference call, i.e., more participants than a single MCU is capable of facilitating. A common approach to this issue is to cascade, or connect, two or more MCUs together to increase the number of endpoints in a multi-point conference. This allows seamless integration of the conferences hosted by each MCU and the associated exchange of audio and video, with the cascaded nature of the conference typically being transparent to the conference participants, thus creating one unified conference. In addition, cascading MCUs optimizes the use of network resources. The task of cascading MCUs is currently accomplished manually, although it is a complex and non-user friendly operation, even for an experienced network administrator. Therefore, a need exists in the videoconferencing art to simplify the use of cascading MCUs to optimize network bandwidth. [0007]
  • SUMMARY
  • The present invention provides a cascade optimization module for determining an optimum configuration for cascading two or more multi-point control units together, consequently optimizing the local area network (LAN) and wide are network (WAN) links, bandwidth, and other resources. The multi-point control units may be centralized multi-point control units where each multi-point control unit includes a media controller (MC) integrated with a media processor (MP), or decentralized multi-point control units in which the MC is separate from the MP. The cascade configuration is also determined according to the network Quality of Service and connectivity policies maintained by the gatekeeper. [0008]
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an enterprise network, in accordance with the present invention; [0009]
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of gatekeeper, in accordance with the present invention; and [0010]
  • FIG. 3 is a flowchart of method steps for scheduling a conference call within a network. [0011]
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Scheduling and/or calendar applications are often used in enterprises, especially those with multiple campuses or work sites, in order to aid coordination of conferences or other collaborations among desired participants. These applications typically offer the ability to view the calendars of others on the enterprise network, as well as send conference invitations and subsequently update conference participant calendars upon acceptance of an invitation. Enterprises often use third party scheduling applications or may use proprietary applications developed for unique needs. [0012]
  • A method and system providing reliable connectivity of conference calls regulated by the H.323 audio and video conferencing protocol or Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is first described. The system ensures that adequate network resources are available for a requested conference by binding an enterprise scheduling application with gatekeeper QoS/connectivity policies maintained by a network administrator. Through this conferencing network architecture, an endpoint can request network resources via the scheduling application, which can then access the gatekeeper policies and call authorization and management functionality. The gatekeeper can verify that adequate resources are available to complete the requested conference call and can ensure that the requested call is given priority over competing non-scheduled calls, thus ensuring successful initiation of the requested conference. Alternatively, the gatekeeper may be replaced by an SIP proxy in which scheduling applications (described below) are bound to the SIP proxy. [0013]
  • FIG. 1 depicts an exemplary operating environment of the system and methods described herein. An [0014] enterprise network 100 is depicted comprising at least two campuses, campus 1 and campus 2. Each campus comprises a LAN 102 interconnecting an MCU 104 and various workstations. The LANs 102 may utilize well-known technology such as Ethernet or any other suitable network technology, and employ appropriate communication protocols, for example TCP/IP. As is known in the art, an MCU supports conferences between three or more endpoints. An MCU typically includes a media controller (not shown) for, among other things, processing negotiations among endpoints and controlling audio, video, and multiplexed streams, and an optional media processor (not shown) for, among other things, processing, mixing, and switching of audio, video, and data signals. The scope of the present invention includes centralized and decentralized MCUs. A centralized MCU includes integrated media controller and media processor units. A decentralized MCU includes separate media controller and media processor units.
  • Each [0015] LAN 102 additionally interconnects one or more various videoconference-enabled devices, for example, a stand-alone videoconferencing unit (VCU) 106 such as the ViewStation™ MP available from Polycom, Inc. of Milpitas, California; a personal computer (PC) 108; and a PC/VCU 110 combination. The PC/VCU 110 is intended to depict a videoconference-enabled PC that is configured with a microphone, camera, speakers, and an associated conferencing application, or a PC coupled with a personal videoconferencing device such as the ViaVideo™ available from Polycom, Inc. of Milpitas, Calif. The devices coupled to the LANs 102 intercommunicate through an appropriate protocol such as TCP/IP, IPX, or any other suitable communication protocol. Note also that the MCU 104 may not be a separate device as depicted in FIG. 1, but may be integrated into another device such as the VCU 106 or a network server 112.
  • The [0016] network server 112 includes a plurality of software applications and associated functions, and is coupled to the LAN 102 for communication with other network connected devices. The server applications may include, but are not limited to, a network management system 114, a gatekeeper 116, a resource scheduler 118, and optionally a gateway 120.
  • The [0017] network management system 114 manages the LAN 102 and connected devices. The network management system 114 manages hardware, for example, packet exchange monitoring and node diagnosis, and software, for example diagnosis and updating. An additional feature of the management system 114 is the capability to communicate and co-manage the resources of other network management systems 130 that reside on a service provider (SP) server 122. Exemplary functions include, but are not limited to, coordinating conference connectivity with the SP server 122 through a network 124 (preferably packet-switched), coordinating conference bandwidth management, and coordinating cascading of two or more MCUs 104 (or MCUs 128 resident at the SP server 122) together for expanding the number of endpoints in a multi-point conference.
  • The [0018] resource scheduler 118 is an application offering the ability, among others, to view and interact with the calendars of others on the enterprise network, as well as send conference invitations and subsequently update participant calendars upon acceptance of an invitation. In addition, the resource scheduler 118 is operative to communicate with the gatekeeper 116 upon a conference request from endpoint devices VCU 106, PC 108 or PC/VCU 110. Although the scheduler 118 is depicted as resident on the network server 112, the invention is not limited to this configuration. The functionality of the scheduler 118 may also reside in the network management system 114, on any or all of the plurality of videoconferencing-enabled devices 106-110, or on any other workstation (not shown) on the LAN 102. The scheduler 118 is not only provided with access to the work calendars of enterprise personnel in order to coordinate the scheduling of meetings, conferences, etc., but is also provided with access to the gatekeeper connectivity policy, described below with respect to FIGS. 2 and 3. The communication between the scheduler 118 and the gatekeeper 116 facilitates the capabilities for reliable conference scheduling described herein. The gatekeeper 116 is described in detail below in reference to FIG. 2.
  • An [0019] optional gateway 120 may be present at the network server 112, for providing many services to network or LAN 102 endpoints such as 104-110. The gateway 120, is operative to provide interface functionality between different network types. As a network interface, the gateway 120 provides translation functionality between differing endpoints, including but not limited to translation between transmission formats, communications procedures, audio and video codecs, and possibly network address translation (NAT). In general, the gateway 120 facilitates communication between H.323 devices and analog PSTN (public-switched telephone network) devices. Thus, signal transmission between any or all of the LAN 102 connected devices 104-110 and the circuit-switched network 126 (i.e., the PSTN), may route through the optional gateway 120.
  • Finally, FIG. 1 depicts the [0020] network server 112 being optionally coupled to the SP server 122 through a network 124. The network server 112 and the SP server 122 may interoperate for various enterprise conference scheduling, MCU 104 cascading, bandwidth management, and other activities that may contribute to the successful integration and use of a service provider offering conferencing services.
  • FIG. 2 depicts in block format some of the functionality of the [0021] gatekeeper 116, in accordance with one aspect of the present invention. A QoS/connectivity policy (policy) module 202 maintains the enterprise network policies set by a network administrator. These policies are intended to describe the allowed capabilities of the network and the associated network devices 104-112 (FIG. 1), and may include, among other things, call authorization and management and network bandwidth management. Examples of policy rules include but are not limited to the speeds at which various devices 104-112 are able to transmit information over the LAN 102 to the packet-switched network 124 (FIG. 1), and/or to the circuit-switched network 126 (FIG. 1); designation of which devices 104-112 at each campus are allowed to communicate with which other devices 104-112 at each campus; and designation of services that are available to various devices 104-110. Another relevant example of a gatekeeper 116 policy is the priority assigned to various types of information transmission (e.g., audio, video, data, and e-mail) that may be competing for network resources, and the amount of network bandwidth that is allocated for such transmissions. Further, policies likely differ at various times of a day and of a week.
  • A bandwidth management/control module (BWM) [0022] 204 is provided for supporting, among other things, bandwidth request, confirm, and reject messages; for determining whether adequate bandwidth is available to complete a call; for determining if adequate bandwidth is available upon a request for additional bandwidth from an active call; and related functions. In addition, the BWM 204 communicates with and receives inquiries and requests from the scheduler 118 (FIG. 1) based upon a conference call request from a user. The gatekeeper 116 and the scheduler 118 intercommunicate through a scheduler interface module 206, which is operative to facilitate transfer of information therebetween. In addition, the gatekeeper 116 and the network management system 114 (FIG. 1) intercommunicate through a network management interface module 208, which facilitates transfer of information therebetween.
  • The [0023] gatekeeper 116 is further provided with a call authorization/management module (CM) 210 that is capable of communicating with the BWM 204 and supplying information thereto. Through the CM 210, the gatekeeper 116 may maintain a list of ongoing calls and it may restrict access to network resources for certain network devices 104-110 (FIG. 1) during certain periods of time. As a result of being able to communicate with the resource scheduler 118 (FIG. 1) through the scheduler interface 206, the gatekeeper is operative to manage network resources based on call requests made through the scheduler 118 and based on the policies defined by a network administrator in the policy module 202. In addition, MCUs 104 and endpoints 106-110 within the gatekeeper 116 zone register with the gatekeeper 116 when attempting to place a call, and the gatekeeper 116 has access to network configuration information describing the LANs 102 and the devices 104-110. Thus, being privy to all of this information, the gatekeeper functionality described above is employed to ensure that sufficient network resources (i.e., bandwidth, etc.) are available to reliably connect and complete a scheduled conference call, and/or to accept or reject competing ad hoc call attempts.
  • The interaction between the [0024] gatekeeper 116 and the resource scheduler 118 is not limited by the configuration as described. Those skilled in the art may appreciate that alternate gatekeeper 116 configurations and functions, and additional intercommunication between the gatekeeper 116 and the scheduler 118, may provide reliable network bandwidth management and thus reliable connectivity for conference calls initiated in a network. These alternatives are thus considered within the scope of the present invention.
  • Another component of [0025] gatekeeper 116 is a cascade optimization algorithm 212, which is described below in reference to FIG. 3.
  • FIG. 3 is a flow diagram depicting a method for scheduling a conference call within a network, wherein sufficient network resources are ensured to provide a successful conference initiation. The method depicted also includes the method of the present invention for gatekeeper-based dynamic cascading of MCUs, wherein utilization of network resources is optimized. [0026]
  • At [0027] step 302, users at the devices 106-110 (FIG. 1) request a conference call, which is received by the resource scheduler 118 (FIG. 1). The request is routed to the gatekeeper 116 (FIG. 1) at step 304, whereby the requested conference registration with the gatekeeper 116 is initiated. The QoS/connectivity policy module 202 is accessed at step 306.
  • Since the devices [0028] 104-110 have previously registered with the gatekeeper 116 (FIG. 1) and the relevant network segments for the devices are known, the BWM 204 (FIG. 2) is capable of determining whether there are sufficient network resources available to successfully connect the requested conference call based on the policies defined in the policy module 202 (FIG. 2). The BWM 204 does this in step 308.
  • If sufficient resources are unavailable at the requested time and the requested conference configuration, the resource scheduler [0029] 118 (FIG. 1) is notified at step 310. The scheduler 118 then notifies the conference requester at step 312. In optional step 314, the scheduler 118, in conjunction with the gatekeeper 116, suggests an alternate conference time to the requester, again according to the known network capacities and policies. Users at the devices 106-110 (FIG. 1) may repeat the request for a conference call at step 302.
  • If it is determined at [0030] step 308 that sufficient network resources are available to complete the requested conference call, then the scheduler 118 schedules the requested conference and the appropriate invitations may be transmitted to conference invitees in step 316. At step 318, the CM 210 (FIG. 2) is notified to reject any competing ad hoc conference calls that may attempt to register with the gatekeeper 116 (through scheduler 118 or via direct connection attempts), if necessary. Additional features may include notifying connected ad hoc callers shortly prior to the initiation of the scheduled call, whereupon the availability of network resources for the ad hoc call will expire. For example, a message may appear on their monitor indicating that only five minutes remain for their current call. Those skilled in the art can appreciate that a number of additional similar features may be integrated into the basic architecture described herein, and that such features are within the scope of the present invention.
  • The method for gatekeeper-based dynamic cascading of MCUs of the present invention begins at [0031] step 320. This portion of the method further contributes to the optimization of network resources. For example, if endpoint devices 106-110 (FIG. 1) connected to the LAN 102 (FIG. 1) in campus 1 want to participate in a conference managed by an MCU 104 (FIG. 1) connected to LAN 102 in campus 2, without cascading the campus 1 devices would typically connect “directly” to the MCU 104 of campus 2, thus unnecessarily consuming MCU resources (e.g., ports and processing power). On the other hand, if the participating endpoint devices 106-110 in campus 1 connect to the MCU 104 on their campus LAN, which in turn connects to the MCU 104 of campus 2, then only one port per MCU 104 is utilized to transmit one audio/video stream between campus 1 and campus 2. Therefore, overall network bandwidth usage and delay are reduced.
  • An improvement over the current manual method of cascading MCUs [0032] 104 (FIG. 1) is to provide a method and system for dynamically cascading MCUs according to gatekeeper 116 (FIG. 1) QoS and network resource utilization policies. Returning to FIG. 3 at step 320, the network management system 114 (FIG. 1) is notified (through the network management interface module 208 of FIG. 2) and provided relevant network management information to assist in global management of the networks, i.e., LANs 102 (FIG. 1). Included in this information are parameters related to the scheduled meeting, such as the identity of participating endpoint devices 106-110, the meeting time, the identity of the utilized MCU 104, the required bandwidth, and the like. From this information, it is determined whether dynamic cascading is required for resource optimization, step 322. If it is determined that cascading is not required, then the conference call endpoints can be successfully connected at the scheduled time, step 328, and the call is essentially guaranteed the resources necessary for a successful conference.
  • If it were determined at [0033] step 322 that dynamic cascading would benefit the optimization of network resources, then the gatekeeper 116 (FIG. 1) is notified of such, at step 324. The gatekeeper 116 is provided with a cascade optimization algorithm 212 (FIG. 2) for determining an optimum cascade configuration from a multiplicity of possible configurations. Information utilized by the optimization algorithm 212 includes, but is not limited to, network scheduling information (from the resource scheduler 118), gatekeeper 116 policy information related to the participating devices (e.g., devices 106-110 and MCU 104) and network segments (from the QoS/connectivity module 202), and network configuration information.
  • Upon determination of an optimal cascading configuration, the network management system [0034] 114 (FIG. 1) is operative to direct the participating devices and MCUs to dial into the appropriate ports, thus economizing the limited WAN (i.e., network 124 of FIG. 1) and LAN 102 links, bandwidth, etc.
  • Although the embodiments are described in a specific operating environment and in a configuration in which the [0035] gatekeeper 116 is separate from the network management, system 114, it is contemplated that the gatekeeper 116 and management system 114 functionality may be configured in a single application (which may also include the resource scheduler 118). Further, although the cascade optimization module 212 is described as residing in the gatekeeper 116, it is contemplated that the cascade optimization module 212 and its related functionality could also and/or alternatively reside in the network management system 114 (if separate from the gatekeeper 116). Those skilled in the art may appreciate that the inventions described herein may be practiced in various application configurations without diverging from the scope of the invention.
  • Finally, as depicted in the exemplary operating environment of FIG. 1, the enterprise networks (campus 1 and campus 2 and network server [0036] 112) may be coupled to a service provider 122 through a network 124, preferably a packet-switched network. It is therefore further contemplated that the functionality described above-, both the system and methods for reliable connectivity management (generally, scheduling of conference calls through a scheduler 118 bound to the gatekeeper policy 202 of FIG. 2) and the system and methods for resource optimization (generally, dynamic cascading of MCUs 104 according to gatekeeper policy 202), may be provided at either the enterprise level, the service provider level, or a combination of both. For example, services provided by the SP may include a videoconferencing service, whereby the SP populates its customer enterprises with appropriate videoconferencing devices, provides the network resources required for the audio, video, and data transmission from the LANs to and through a WAN (i.e., the Internet), and manages/controls conferences requested by enterprise personnel. To this end, it is envisioned that network management systems 130 (which may be a variation of network management system 114) are provided for the service providers 122, and that the network management systems 114 and 130 intercommunicate to co-manage network resources. As long as the SP management system 130 has access to the enterprise MCUs and gatekeeper policy (and any SP MCU 128 and gatekeeper policy), then the scheduling and cascading may be managed and controlled remotely.
  • It will be recognized by those skilled in the art that, while the invention has been described above in terms of preferred embodiments, it is not limited thereto. Various features and aspects of the above-described invention may be used individually or jointly. Further, although the invention has been described in the context of its implementation in a particular environment and for particular applications, those skilled in the art will recognize that its usefulness is not limited thereto and that the present invention can be utilized in any number of environments and implementations. [0037]

Claims (17)

What is claimed is:
1. A system for optimizing network resources for conference calls, comprising:
endpoints that request the conference calls;
multi-point control units for supporting conference calls between three or more endpoints;
a resource scheduler for receiving the conference call requests; and
a gatekeeper communicatively coupled to the resource scheduler for managing the network resources;
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the gatekeeper includes a connectivity policy module for maintaining network policies.
3. The system of claim 2, wherein the network policies include network bandwidth management policies.
4. The system of claim 2, wherein the gatekeeper manages the network resources based on the conference call requests and the network policies.
5. The system of claim 4, wherein the gatekeeper includes a bandwidth module communicatively coupled to the connectivity policy module for determining network bandwidth availability for the conference call requests.
6. The system of claim 4, further comprising a network management system communicatively coupled to the gatekeeper to determine if dynamic cascading of the multi-point control units is required for resource optimization.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein the gatekeeper further includes a cascade optimization module for determining an optimum cascade configuration for the multi-point control units.
8. The system of claim 7, wherein if the network management system determines that dynamic cascading of the multi-point control units is required for resource optimization, then the gatekeeper determines the optimum cascade configuration for the multi-point control units.
9. A method for optimizing network resources for a conference call requested by endpoints, comprising the steps of:
receiving the conference call request by a resource scheduler;
accessing a connectivity policy module;
determining if sufficient network resources are available to connect the conference call; and
supporting the conference call between three or more endpoints with multi-point control units;
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the connectivity policy module maintains network policies.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the connectivity policy module accesses a bandwidth module for determining available network resources.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein if sufficient network resources are available to connect the conference call, the resource scheduler schedules the conference call.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein a determination is made whether network resources are optimized by a dynamic cascading of the multi-point control units.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein if dynamic cascading of the multi-point control units is required for resource optimization, then an optimum cascade configuration for the multi-point control units is determined.
15. A system for optimization of network resources for a conference call, comprising:
means for requesting the conference call;
means for receiving the conference call request;
means for accessing a connectivity policy module, the connectivity policy module having connectivity policies;
means for determining available network resources;
means for determining if sufficient network resources are available to connect the conference call based on connectivity policies, the conference call request, and the available network resources;
means for determining whether network resources are optimized by a dynamic cascading of the multi-point control units; and
means for determining an optimum cascade configuration of the multi-point control units.
16. A system for optimizing network resources for conference calls, comprising:
a plurality of local area networks;
a plurality of endpoints coupled to the local area networks for requesting conference calls;
a plurality of multi-point control units coupled to the local area networks for supporting conference calls between three or more endpoints;
a resource scheduler coupled to the local area networks for scheduling the conference calls;
a gatekeeper coupled to the resource scheduler for determining an optimum cascade configuration for the multi-point control units; and
a network management system coupled to the gatekeeper for determining whether dynamic cascading of the multi-point control units is required for resource optimization.
17. The system of claim 16, wherein each of the plurality of endpoints is a videoconference-enabled device.
US10/053,310 2000-11-02 2001-11-02 Conferencing network resource optimization for multi-point conferences Abandoned US20020064136A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/053,310 US20020064136A1 (en) 2000-11-02 2001-11-02 Conferencing network resource optimization for multi-point conferences

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US24572800P 2000-11-02 2000-11-02
US10/053,310 US20020064136A1 (en) 2000-11-02 2001-11-02 Conferencing network resource optimization for multi-point conferences

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020064136A1 true US20020064136A1 (en) 2002-05-30

Family

ID=22927832

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/053,310 Abandoned US20020064136A1 (en) 2000-11-02 2001-11-02 Conferencing network resource optimization for multi-point conferences
US10/032,979 Active 2024-06-09 US7009943B2 (en) 2000-11-02 2001-11-02 Conferencing network resource management for call connectivity

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/032,979 Active 2024-06-09 US7009943B2 (en) 2000-11-02 2001-11-02 Conferencing network resource management for call connectivity

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (2) US20020064136A1 (en)
AU (1) AU2002231282A1 (en)
WO (2) WO2002060126A1 (en)

Cited By (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030187986A1 (en) * 2000-09-05 2003-10-02 Jim Sundqvist Method for, and a topology aware resource manager in an ip-telephony system
US20060066717A1 (en) * 2004-09-28 2006-03-30 Sean Miceli Video conference choreographer
US20070091169A1 (en) * 2003-11-05 2007-04-26 Liquan Zhang Videoconference system and a management method thereof
EP1830568A2 (en) * 2006-03-01 2007-09-05 Polycom, Inc. Method and system for providing continuous presence video in a cascading conference
US20070239899A1 (en) * 2006-04-06 2007-10-11 Polycom, Inc. Middleware server for interfacing communications, multimedia, and management systems
US20080043645A1 (en) * 2006-07-07 2008-02-21 Russell Norman Anson Method and Apparatus for Expanding Conference Sizes
US20080069011A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Distributable, scalable, pluggable conferencing architecture
US20080091778A1 (en) * 2006-10-12 2008-04-17 Victor Ivashin Presenter view control system and method
WO2008135999A1 (en) * 2007-05-08 2008-11-13 Radvision Ltd. Devices, methods, and media for providing multi-point video conferencing unit functions
US20090089072A1 (en) * 2007-10-02 2009-04-02 International Business Machines Corporation Configuration management database (cmdb) which establishes policy artifacts and automatic tagging of the same
WO2009134260A1 (en) 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Event management system
US20100268541A1 (en) * 2007-12-28 2010-10-21 Yingbin Li Audio processing method, system, and control server
US20110058013A1 (en) * 2009-09-09 2011-03-10 Gautam Khot Email Based Scheduling Mechanism for Conference Calls
US8149262B2 (en) 2008-04-02 2012-04-03 Freeport Technologies Network management server for managing multiple operating modes of a conferencing network with different sets of policies
CN102685253A (en) * 2012-05-31 2012-09-19 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 Message scheduling method and system of web conference
CN102739782A (en) * 2012-06-13 2012-10-17 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 Message batch scheduling method and system
CN102739412A (en) * 2012-06-13 2012-10-17 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 Batch scheduling control method and system of information
CN102739781A (en) * 2012-06-13 2012-10-17 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 Batch scheduling method and system of messages
US20130208663A1 (en) * 2012-02-09 2013-08-15 Senthil K. Kanniappan Bandwidth allocation for multimedia conferencing
US20140146128A1 (en) * 2012-11-23 2014-05-29 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System and method for providing video conference service
US20150092617A1 (en) * 2012-06-11 2015-04-02 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method, Device, and System For Establishing Cascade of Multipoint Control Servers
EP2482552A4 (en) * 2009-09-27 2017-11-29 ZTE Corporation Method and system for controlling multipoint video conference, central control subsystem and video terminal
US11303581B2 (en) * 2017-12-20 2022-04-12 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Predictive network bandwidth adjustment based on identified future event and corresponding network service
US11539540B1 (en) 2021-11-30 2022-12-27 International Business Machines Corporation Ameliorative resource action during an e-conference

Families Citing this family (47)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN1134936C (en) * 2001-02-06 2004-01-14 华为技术有限公司 Method for implementing video communication service and its information data format
US7739497B1 (en) * 2001-03-21 2010-06-15 Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. Method and apparatus for anonymous IP datagram exchange using dynamic network address translation
US20030028535A1 (en) * 2001-07-31 2003-02-06 Forgent Networks, Inc. Call control system for video communication networks
US7437463B1 (en) * 2002-06-21 2008-10-14 Polycom, Inc. Method and means for providing scheduling for a videoconferencing network in a manner to ensure bandwidth
NO318974B1 (en) * 2003-07-07 2005-05-30 Tandberg Telecom As Distributed MCU
CN100433626C (en) * 2004-01-08 2008-11-12 华为技术有限公司 Multimedia conference convening method
NO319437B1 (en) 2004-01-16 2005-08-15 Tandberg Telecom As Procedure for ad hoc buffer
CN100341326C (en) * 2004-03-31 2007-10-03 华为技术有限公司 Main-caller call-out method for video conference system
US8219434B2 (en) * 2004-07-19 2012-07-10 Sap Ag Ad-hoc coordination actions in business processes
US7693734B2 (en) * 2004-09-17 2010-04-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for scheduling conference resources
US20060106929A1 (en) * 2004-10-15 2006-05-18 Kenoyer Michael L Network conference communications
US7545435B2 (en) * 2004-10-15 2009-06-09 Lifesize Communications, Inc. Automatic backlight compensation and exposure control
US8149739B2 (en) * 2004-10-15 2012-04-03 Lifesize Communications, Inc. Background call validation
US7492730B2 (en) 2005-04-19 2009-02-17 Polycom, Inc. Multi-site conferencing system and method
CN100450111C (en) * 2005-04-25 2009-01-07 华为技术有限公司 System and method for interconnection between private network users and other networks with qualified business service
US8126992B2 (en) * 2005-10-27 2012-02-28 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for optimally scheduling a web conference managed by a web application
US7581038B1 (en) 2006-03-16 2009-08-25 Polycom, Inc. Multicast distribution over one or more addressable buses wherein a switch includes a remapping table for inputting address for one or more destinations
US8793354B2 (en) 2006-04-20 2014-07-29 Cisco Technology, Inc. System and method for optimizing maintenance of geographically distributed processing units
US8817965B2 (en) * 2006-07-21 2014-08-26 Bce Inc. Method, system and apparatus for handling establishment of a communication session
US8300556B2 (en) 2007-04-27 2012-10-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Optimizing bandwidth in a multipoint video conference
US8300789B2 (en) 2007-04-30 2012-10-30 Cisco Technology, Inc. Method and system for identifying a multipoint control unit for hosting a conference
US9661267B2 (en) * 2007-09-20 2017-05-23 Lifesize, Inc. Videoconferencing system discovery
US8009593B2 (en) * 2008-03-25 2011-08-30 Siemens Enterprise Communications, Inc. Telecommunications system, method of managing a telecommunications system for optimized bandwidth usage during conference calls and program product therefor
US8117306B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2012-02-14 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Optimizing content management
US8122124B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2012-02-21 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Monitoring performance and operation of data exchanges
US8051166B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2011-11-01 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Service provider optimization of content management
US7865594B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2011-01-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Managing resources consolidation configurations
US8286176B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2012-10-09 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Optimizing resource configurations
US8316124B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2012-11-20 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Managing network data display
US7930393B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2011-04-19 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Monitoring domain allocation performance
US8122098B1 (en) 2008-11-17 2012-02-21 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Managing content delivery network service providers by a content broker
US7917618B1 (en) 2009-03-24 2011-03-29 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Monitoring web site content
US8521851B1 (en) 2009-03-27 2013-08-27 Amazon Technologies, Inc. DNS query processing using resource identifiers specifying an application broker
US8305421B2 (en) * 2009-06-29 2012-11-06 Lifesize Communications, Inc. Automatic determination of a configuration for a conference
US8325730B2 (en) * 2009-12-17 2012-12-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Distributed routing architecture
US8331370B2 (en) * 2009-12-17 2012-12-11 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Distributed routing architecture
US8331371B2 (en) 2009-12-17 2012-12-11 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Distributed routing architecture
US10205698B1 (en) 2012-12-19 2019-02-12 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Source-dependent address resolution
CN104009956B (en) * 2013-02-22 2017-05-03 杭州海康威视数字技术股份有限公司 Communication method based on embedded multi-core co-processing gatekeeper system
US10027739B1 (en) 2014-12-16 2018-07-17 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Performance-based content delivery
US9769248B1 (en) 2014-12-16 2017-09-19 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Performance-based content delivery
US9654524B2 (en) * 2014-12-17 2017-05-16 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. System and method to customize a multipoint control unit
US10311371B1 (en) 2014-12-19 2019-06-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Machine learning based content delivery
US10225365B1 (en) 2014-12-19 2019-03-05 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Machine learning based content delivery
US10311372B1 (en) 2014-12-19 2019-06-04 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Machine learning based content delivery
US10225326B1 (en) 2015-03-23 2019-03-05 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Point of presence based data uploading
US10616179B1 (en) 2015-06-25 2020-04-07 Amazon Technologies, Inc. Selective routing of domain name system (DNS) requests

Citations (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5737010A (en) * 1994-03-18 1998-04-07 Fujitsu Limited System for connection and disconnection in multipoint conference system of cascade configuration
US5784561A (en) * 1996-07-01 1998-07-21 At&T Corp. On-demand video conference method and apparatus
US6005845A (en) * 1996-10-03 1999-12-21 Telefonaktiebolaget L/M Ericsson (Publ) System and method for IP-activated call setup
US6018360A (en) * 1998-09-09 2000-01-25 Motorola, Inc. Method of switching a call to a multipoint conference call in a H.323 communication compliant environment
US6035026A (en) * 1997-06-27 2000-03-07 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus of call conferencing in a telephone exchange system
US20010005382A1 (en) * 1999-07-13 2001-06-28 Inter Voice Limited Partnership System and method for packet network media redirection
US6275574B1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2001-08-14 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dial plan mapper
US6282278B1 (en) * 1998-04-22 2001-08-28 International Business Machines Corporation Universal conference control manager
US6324169B1 (en) * 1997-02-10 2001-11-27 At&T Corp. Providing multimedia conferencing services over a wide area network interconnecting nonguaranteed quality of service LANs
US20020016729A1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-02-07 Aramark, Corporation System and method for scheduling events and associated products and services
US6411605B1 (en) * 1998-07-08 2002-06-25 Qwest Communications International, Inc. Scheduler for telecommunications bridge
US6452915B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2002-09-17 Malibu Networks, Inc. IP-flow classification in a wireless point to multi-point (PTMP) transmission system
US6502131B1 (en) * 1997-05-27 2002-12-31 Novell, Inc. Directory enabled policy management tool for intelligent traffic management
US6590885B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-07-08 Malibu Networks, Inc. IP-flow characterization in a wireless point to multi-point (PTMP) transmission system
US6594246B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-07-15 Malibu Networks, Inc. IP-flow identification in a wireless point to multi-point transmission system
US6600735B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2003-07-29 Hitachi, Ltd. Internet telephone connection method, bandwidth controller and gate keeper
US6614781B1 (en) * 1998-11-20 2003-09-02 Level 3 Communications, Inc. Voice over data telecommunications network architecture
US6628629B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-09-30 Malibu Networks Reservation based prioritization method for wireless transmission of latency and jitter sensitive IP-flows in a wireless point to multi-point transmission system
US6640248B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-10-28 Malibu Networks, Inc. Application-aware, quality of service (QoS) sensitive, media access control (MAC) layer
US6646997B1 (en) * 1999-10-25 2003-11-11 Voyant Technologies, Inc. Large-scale, fault-tolerant audio conferencing in a purely packet-switched network
US6680922B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2004-01-20 Malibu Networks, Inc. Method for the recognition and operation of virtual private networks (VPNs) over a wireless point to multi-point (PtMP) transmission system
US6687234B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2004-02-03 Siemens Information & Communication Networks, Inc. Apparatus and method for optimal conference call renegotiation in telephony over LAN systems
US6748433B1 (en) * 1999-07-12 2004-06-08 Ectel, Ltd. Method and system for controlling quality of service over a telecommunication network
US6816903B1 (en) * 1997-05-27 2004-11-09 Novell, Inc. Directory enabled policy management tool for intelligent traffic management
US6862622B2 (en) * 1998-07-10 2005-03-01 Van Drebbel Mariner Llc Transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) packet-centric wireless point to multi-point (PTMP) transmission system architecture
US6879565B2 (en) * 1999-10-25 2005-04-12 Polycom, Inc. Large-scale, fault-tolerant audio conferencing over a hybrid network

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5751338A (en) * 1994-12-30 1998-05-12 Visionary Corporate Technologies Methods and systems for multimedia communications via public telephone networks
JPH09102831A (en) * 1995-07-31 1997-04-15 Canon Inc System, equipment and method for communicating
US5680392A (en) * 1996-01-16 1997-10-21 General Datacomm, Inc. Multimedia multipoint telecommunications reservation systems
US5999966A (en) * 1997-10-07 1999-12-07 Mcdougall; Floyd Control network-directed video conferencing switching system and method

Patent Citations (27)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5737010A (en) * 1994-03-18 1998-04-07 Fujitsu Limited System for connection and disconnection in multipoint conference system of cascade configuration
US5784561A (en) * 1996-07-01 1998-07-21 At&T Corp. On-demand video conference method and apparatus
US6005845A (en) * 1996-10-03 1999-12-21 Telefonaktiebolaget L/M Ericsson (Publ) System and method for IP-activated call setup
US6324169B1 (en) * 1997-02-10 2001-11-27 At&T Corp. Providing multimedia conferencing services over a wide area network interconnecting nonguaranteed quality of service LANs
US6502131B1 (en) * 1997-05-27 2002-12-31 Novell, Inc. Directory enabled policy management tool for intelligent traffic management
US6816903B1 (en) * 1997-05-27 2004-11-09 Novell, Inc. Directory enabled policy management tool for intelligent traffic management
US6035026A (en) * 1997-06-27 2000-03-07 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus of call conferencing in a telephone exchange system
US6282278B1 (en) * 1998-04-22 2001-08-28 International Business Machines Corporation Universal conference control manager
US6411605B1 (en) * 1998-07-08 2002-06-25 Qwest Communications International, Inc. Scheduler for telecommunications bridge
US6594246B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-07-15 Malibu Networks, Inc. IP-flow identification in a wireless point to multi-point transmission system
US6452915B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2002-09-17 Malibu Networks, Inc. IP-flow classification in a wireless point to multi-point (PTMP) transmission system
US6640248B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-10-28 Malibu Networks, Inc. Application-aware, quality of service (QoS) sensitive, media access control (MAC) layer
US6590885B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-07-08 Malibu Networks, Inc. IP-flow characterization in a wireless point to multi-point (PTMP) transmission system
US6862622B2 (en) * 1998-07-10 2005-03-01 Van Drebbel Mariner Llc Transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) packet-centric wireless point to multi-point (PTMP) transmission system architecture
US6680922B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2004-01-20 Malibu Networks, Inc. Method for the recognition and operation of virtual private networks (VPNs) over a wireless point to multi-point (PtMP) transmission system
US6628629B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-09-30 Malibu Networks Reservation based prioritization method for wireless transmission of latency and jitter sensitive IP-flows in a wireless point to multi-point transmission system
US6018360A (en) * 1998-09-09 2000-01-25 Motorola, Inc. Method of switching a call to a multipoint conference call in a H.323 communication compliant environment
US6614781B1 (en) * 1998-11-20 2003-09-02 Level 3 Communications, Inc. Voice over data telecommunications network architecture
US6275574B1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2001-08-14 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dial plan mapper
US6636594B1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2003-10-21 Cisco Technology, Inc. Dial plan mapper
US6600735B1 (en) * 1999-01-29 2003-07-29 Hitachi, Ltd. Internet telephone connection method, bandwidth controller and gate keeper
US6748433B1 (en) * 1999-07-12 2004-06-08 Ectel, Ltd. Method and system for controlling quality of service over a telecommunication network
US20010005382A1 (en) * 1999-07-13 2001-06-28 Inter Voice Limited Partnership System and method for packet network media redirection
US6687234B1 (en) * 1999-10-05 2004-02-03 Siemens Information & Communication Networks, Inc. Apparatus and method for optimal conference call renegotiation in telephony over LAN systems
US6646997B1 (en) * 1999-10-25 2003-11-11 Voyant Technologies, Inc. Large-scale, fault-tolerant audio conferencing in a purely packet-switched network
US6879565B2 (en) * 1999-10-25 2005-04-12 Polycom, Inc. Large-scale, fault-tolerant audio conferencing over a hybrid network
US20020016729A1 (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-02-07 Aramark, Corporation System and method for scheduling events and associated products and services

Cited By (46)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030187986A1 (en) * 2000-09-05 2003-10-02 Jim Sundqvist Method for, and a topology aware resource manager in an ip-telephony system
US20060069779A1 (en) * 2000-09-05 2006-03-30 Operax Ab Method for, and a topology aware resource manager in an IP-telephony system
US7606885B2 (en) * 2000-09-05 2009-10-20 Netsocket, Inc. Method for, and a topology aware resource manager in an IP-telephony system
US8310518B2 (en) 2003-11-05 2012-11-13 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Videoconference system and management method thereof
US20070091169A1 (en) * 2003-11-05 2007-04-26 Liquan Zhang Videoconference system and a management method thereof
US20100134589A1 (en) * 2003-11-05 2010-06-03 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Videoconference system and management method thereof
US7683923B2 (en) * 2003-11-05 2010-03-23 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Videoconference system and a management method thereof
US7499075B2 (en) 2004-09-28 2009-03-03 Seiko Epson Corporation Video conference choreographer
US20060066717A1 (en) * 2004-09-28 2006-03-30 Sean Miceli Video conference choreographer
EP3193500A1 (en) * 2006-03-01 2017-07-19 Polycom, Inc. Method and system for providing continuous presence video in a cascading conference
EP1830568A2 (en) * 2006-03-01 2007-09-05 Polycom, Inc. Method and system for providing continuous presence video in a cascading conference
US7975073B2 (en) * 2006-04-06 2011-07-05 Polycom, Inc. Middleware server for interfacing communications, multimedia, and management systems
US20070239899A1 (en) * 2006-04-06 2007-10-11 Polycom, Inc. Middleware server for interfacing communications, multimedia, and management systems
US20080043645A1 (en) * 2006-07-07 2008-02-21 Russell Norman Anson Method and Apparatus for Expanding Conference Sizes
US7990899B2 (en) * 2006-07-07 2011-08-02 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for expanding conference sizes
US20080069011A1 (en) * 2006-09-15 2008-03-20 Microsoft Corporation Distributable, scalable, pluggable conferencing architecture
US8817668B2 (en) * 2006-09-15 2014-08-26 Microsoft Corporation Distributable, scalable, pluggable conferencing architecture
US20080091778A1 (en) * 2006-10-12 2008-04-17 Victor Ivashin Presenter view control system and method
US7634540B2 (en) 2006-10-12 2009-12-15 Seiko Epson Corporation Presenter view control system and method
WO2008135999A1 (en) * 2007-05-08 2008-11-13 Radvision Ltd. Devices, methods, and media for providing multi-point video conferencing unit functions
US20090089072A1 (en) * 2007-10-02 2009-04-02 International Business Machines Corporation Configuration management database (cmdb) which establishes policy artifacts and automatic tagging of the same
US7971231B2 (en) * 2007-10-02 2011-06-28 International Business Machines Corporation Configuration management database (CMDB) which establishes policy artifacts and automatic tagging of the same
US8649300B2 (en) 2007-12-28 2014-02-11 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Audio processing method, system, and control server
US8531994B2 (en) * 2007-12-28 2013-09-10 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Audio processing method, system, and control server
US20100268541A1 (en) * 2007-12-28 2010-10-21 Yingbin Li Audio processing method, system, and control server
US8149262B2 (en) 2008-04-02 2012-04-03 Freeport Technologies Network management server for managing multiple operating modes of a conferencing network with different sets of policies
EP2271998A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2011-01-12 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Event management system
WO2009134260A1 (en) 2008-04-30 2009-11-05 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Event management system
KR101519935B1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2015-05-14 휴렛-팩커드 디벨롭먼트 컴퍼니, 엘.피. Event management system
EP2271998A4 (en) * 2008-04-30 2013-02-20 Hewlett Packard Development Co Event management system
US20110093590A1 (en) * 2008-04-30 2011-04-21 Ted Beers Event Management System
US8279261B2 (en) 2009-09-09 2012-10-02 Lifesize Communications, Inc. Email based scheduling mechanism for conference calls
US20110058013A1 (en) * 2009-09-09 2011-03-10 Gautam Khot Email Based Scheduling Mechanism for Conference Calls
EP2482552A4 (en) * 2009-09-27 2017-11-29 ZTE Corporation Method and system for controlling multipoint video conference, central control subsystem and video terminal
US9444635B2 (en) * 2012-02-09 2016-09-13 Cisco Technology, Inc. Bandwidth allocation for multimedia conferencing
US20130208663A1 (en) * 2012-02-09 2013-08-15 Senthil K. Kanniappan Bandwidth allocation for multimedia conferencing
CN102685253A (en) * 2012-05-31 2012-09-19 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 Message scheduling method and system of web conference
EP2852156A4 (en) * 2012-06-11 2015-05-27 Huawei Tech Co Ltd Method, device, and system for establishing concatenation between multipoint controllers
US20150092617A1 (en) * 2012-06-11 2015-04-02 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method, Device, and System For Establishing Cascade of Multipoint Control Servers
US9425972B2 (en) * 2012-06-11 2016-08-23 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. Method, device, and system for establishing cascade of multipoint control servers
CN102739781A (en) * 2012-06-13 2012-10-17 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 Batch scheduling method and system of messages
CN102739412A (en) * 2012-06-13 2012-10-17 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 Batch scheduling control method and system of information
CN102739782A (en) * 2012-06-13 2012-10-17 苏州阔地网络科技有限公司 Message batch scheduling method and system
US20140146128A1 (en) * 2012-11-23 2014-05-29 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute System and method for providing video conference service
US11303581B2 (en) * 2017-12-20 2022-04-12 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Predictive network bandwidth adjustment based on identified future event and corresponding network service
US11539540B1 (en) 2021-11-30 2022-12-27 International Business Machines Corporation Ameliorative resource action during an e-conference

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2002037301A9 (en) 2003-11-06
AU2002231282A1 (en) 2002-05-15
WO2002037301A1 (en) 2002-05-10
US20020085490A1 (en) 2002-07-04
US7009943B2 (en) 2006-03-07
WO2002060126A1 (en) 2002-08-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20020064136A1 (en) Conferencing network resource optimization for multi-point conferences
Series Multimedia Conference Control in a Packet− switched Teleconferencing System
KR100971273B1 (en) Method and system for setting up a multicast session between clients
EP1678951B1 (en) System and method for performing distributed video conferencing
KR100964983B1 (en) Method and system for automatically initiating a videoconference session over a network, and method for joining a videoconference session and a multicast session over a network
US20050027581A1 (en) System and method for setup of meetings and conferences
US6989856B2 (en) System and method for performing distributed video conferencing
US8311197B2 (en) Method and system for allocating, revoking and transferring resources in a conference system
US20050226172A1 (en) Video conference call set up
EP2208309B1 (en) Systems and methods for managing virtual collaboration systems spread over different networks
KR20040104526A (en) Videoconference system architecture
US7274675B2 (en) Dynamic distribution of participants in a centralized telephone conference
Natseri Aspects of the Requirements and Implementation of a Booking Service for Internet-based Videoconferencing

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION