New! View global litigation for patent families

US20020038373A1 - Method and system for improving network performance enhancing proxy architecture with gateway redundancy - Google Patents

Method and system for improving network performance enhancing proxy architecture with gateway redundancy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20020038373A1
US20020038373A1 US09903780 US90378001A US2002038373A1 US 20020038373 A1 US20020038373 A1 US 20020038373A1 US 09903780 US09903780 US 09903780 US 90378001 A US90378001 A US 90378001A US 2002038373 A1 US2002038373 A1 US 2002038373A1
Authority
US
Grant status
Application
Patent type
Prior art keywords
tcp
connection
pep
end
point
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US09903780
Inventor
John Border
Matthew Butehorn
Ken Burrell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hughes Network Systems LLC
Original Assignee
DirecTV Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/50Network service management, i.e. ensuring proper service fulfillment according to an agreement or contract between two parties, e.g. between an IT-provider and a customer
    • H04L41/5019Ensuring SLA
    • H04L41/5022Ensuring SLA by giving priorities, e.g. assigning classes of service
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/14Relay systems
    • H04B7/15Active relay systems
    • H04B7/185Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
    • H04B7/18578Satellite systems for providing broadband data service to individual earth stations
    • H04B7/18582Arrangements for data linking, i.e. for data framing, for error recovery, for multiple access
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04BTRANSMISSION
    • H04B7/00Radio transmission systems, i.e. using radiation field
    • H04B7/14Relay systems
    • H04B7/15Active relay systems
    • H04B7/185Space-based or airborne stations; Stations for satellite systems
    • H04B7/18578Satellite systems for providing broadband data service to individual earth stations
    • H04B7/18584Arrangements for data networking, i.e. for data packet routing, for congestion control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/28Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. local area networks [LAN], wide area networks [WAN]
    • H04L12/2854Wide area networks, e.g. public data networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/28Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. local area networks [LAN], wide area networks [WAN]
    • H04L12/46Interconnection of networks
    • H04L12/4604LAN interconnection over a backbone network, e.g. Internet, Frame Relay
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L12/00Data switching networks
    • H04L12/66Arrangements for connecting between networks having differing types of switching systems, e.g. gateways
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L29/00Arrangements, apparatus, circuits or systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04L1/00 - H04L27/00 contains provisionally no documents
    • H04L29/02Communication control; Communication processing contains provisionally no documents
    • H04L29/06Communication control; Communication processing contains provisionally no documents characterised by a protocol
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/04Architectural aspects of network management arrangements
    • H04L41/046Aspects of network management agents
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08Configuration management of network or network elements
    • H04L41/0803Configuration setting of network or network elements
    • H04L41/0823Configuration optimization
    • H04L41/083Configuration optimization for network speed increase
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08Configuration management of network or network elements
    • H04L41/0896Bandwidth or capacity management, i.e. automatically increasing or decreasing capacities, e.g. bandwidth on demand
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L43/00Arrangements for monitoring or testing packet switching networks
    • H04L43/08Monitoring based on specific metrics
    • H04L43/0805Availability
    • H04L43/0811Connectivity
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/22Alternate routing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/24Multipath
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/28Route fault recovery
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/30Special provisions for routing multiclass traffic
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/30Special provisions for routing multiclass traffic
    • H04L45/306Route determination based on the nature of the carried application
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L45/00Routing or path finding of packets in data switching networks
    • H04L45/30Special provisions for routing multiclass traffic
    • H04L45/308Route determination based on user's profile, e.g. premium users
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/14Flow control or congestion control in wireless networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/19Flow control or congestion control at layers above network layer
    • H04L47/193Flow control or congestion control at layers above network layer at transport layer, e.g. TCP related
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/24Flow control or congestion control depending on the type of traffic, e.g. priority or quality of service [QoS]
    • H04L47/2408Different services, e.g. type of service [ToS]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/24Flow control or congestion control depending on the type of traffic, e.g. priority or quality of service [QoS]
    • H04L47/2425Service specification, e.g. SLA
    • H04L47/2433Allocation of priorities to traffic types
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/24Flow control or congestion control depending on the type of traffic, e.g. priority or quality of service [QoS]
    • H04L47/2491Mapping QoS requirements between different networks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/10Flow control or congestion control
    • H04L47/40Using splitted connections, e.g. IP spoofing
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L47/00Traffic regulation in packet switching networks
    • H04L47/50Queue scheduling
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L49/00Packet switching elements
    • H04L49/90Queuing arrangements
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L49/00Packet switching elements
    • H04L49/90Queuing arrangements
    • H04L49/901Storage descriptor, e.g. read or write pointers
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L49/00Packet switching elements
    • H04L49/90Queuing arrangements
    • H04L49/9042Separate storage for different parts of the packet, e.g. header and payload
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L49/00Packet switching elements
    • H04L49/90Queuing arrangements
    • H04L49/9094Arrangements for simultaneous transmit and receive, e.g. simultaneous reading/writing from/to the storage element
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/14Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for detecting or protecting against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1441Countermeasures against malicious traffic
    • H04L63/1466Active attacks involving interception, injection, modification, spoofing of data unit addresses, e.g. hijacking, packet injection or TCP sequence number attacks
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/28Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for the provision of proxy services, e.g. intermediate processing or storage in the network
    • H04L67/2814Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for the provision of proxy services, e.g. intermediate processing or storage in the network for data redirection
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/28Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for the provision of proxy services, e.g. intermediate processing or storage in the network
    • H04L67/2833Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for the provision of proxy services, e.g. intermediate processing or storage in the network for grouping or aggregating service requests, e.g. for unified processing of service requests
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/28Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for the provision of proxy services, e.g. intermediate processing or storage in the network
    • H04L67/2866Architectural aspects
    • H04L67/2871Implementation details of a single intermediate entity
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/32Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions involving the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
    • H04L67/322Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions involving the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources whereby quality of service [QoS] or priority requirements are taken into account
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L67/00Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
    • H04L67/32Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions involving the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources
    • H04L67/327Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications for scheduling or organising the servicing of application requests, e.g. requests for application data transmissions involving the analysis and optimisation of the required network resources whereby the routing of a service request to a node providing the service depends on the content or context of the request, e.g. profile, connectivity status, payload or application type
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/16Transmission control protocol/internet protocol [TCP/IP] or user datagram protocol [UDP]
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/16Transmission control protocol/internet protocol [TCP/IP] or user datagram protocol [UDP]
    • H04L69/161Implementation details of TCP/IP or UDP/IP stack architecture; Specification of modified or new header fields
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/16Transmission control protocol/internet protocol [TCP/IP] or user datagram protocol [UDP]
    • H04L69/163Adaptation of TCP data exchange control procedures
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/16Transmission control protocol/internet protocol [TCP/IP] or user datagram protocol [UDP]
    • H04L69/165Transmission control protocol/internet protocol [TCP/IP] or user datagram protocol [UDP] involving combined use or selection criteria between TCP and UDP protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/22Header parsing or analysis
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L29/00Arrangements, apparatus, circuits or systems, not covered by a single one of groups H04L1/00 - H04L27/00 contains provisionally no documents
    • H04L29/02Communication control; Communication processing contains provisionally no documents
    • H04L29/06Communication control; Communication processing contains provisionally no documents characterised by a protocol
    • H04L29/08Transmission control procedure, e.g. data link level control procedure
    • H04L29/08081Protocols for network applications
    • H04L29/08702Protocols for network applications involving intermediate processing or storage in the network, e.g. proxy
    • H04L29/08846Arrangements to globally emulate or virtualize the functionalities of an end device
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/06Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks involving management of faults or events or alarms
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L41/00Arrangements for maintenance or administration or management of packet switching networks
    • H04L41/08Configuration management of network or network elements
    • H04L41/0866Checking configuration
    • H04L41/0873Checking configuration by checking configuration conflicts with other network elements
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/02Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for separating internal from external traffic, e.g. firewalls
    • H04L63/0281Proxies
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L63/00Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security
    • H04L63/04Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks
    • H04L63/0428Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security for providing a confidential data exchange among entities communicating through data packet networks wherein the data content is protected, e.g. by encrypting or encapsulating the payload
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/14Multichannel or multilink protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/18Multi-protocol handler, e.g. single device capable of handling multiple protocols
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04LTRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
    • H04L69/00Application independent communication protocol aspects or techniques in packet data networks
    • H04L69/30Definitions, standards or architectural aspects of layered protocol stacks
    • H04L69/32High level architectural aspects of 7-layer open systems interconnection [OSI] type protocol stacks
    • H04L69/322Aspects of intra-layer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions
    • H04L69/329Aspects of intra-layer communication protocols among peer entities or protocol data unit [PDU] definitions in the application layer, i.e. layer seven
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS
    • H04W28/00Network traffic or resource management
    • H04W28/16Central resource management; Negotiation of resources or communication parameters, e.g. negotiating bandwidth or QoS [Quality of Service]
    • H04W28/18Negotiating wireless communication parameters
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS
    • H04W40/00Communication routing or communication path finding
    • H04W40/02Communication route or path selection, e.g. power-based or shortest path routing
    • Y02D70/00
    • Y02D70/1262
    • Y02D70/30
    • Y02D70/446

Abstract

A communication gateway for providing redundant communication in a communication system having a remote platform is disclosed. The gateway includes a communication interface that receives a message from a host over a connection according to a prescribed protocol. Additionally, the gateway includes a processor that is coupled to the communication interface and is configured to identify the message received as an unspoofed message, and configured to terminate, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identified message. The processor is configured to restart a spoofed connection with another host. The above arrangement has particular applicability to a bandwidth constrained communication system, such as a satellite network.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATION
  • [0001]
    This application is related to and claims the benefit of priority to: (i) U.S. Provisional Patent Application (Serial No. 60/220,026), filed Jul. 21, 2000, entitled “Performance Enhancing Proxy,” and (ii) U.S. Provisional Patent Application (Serial No. 60/225,630), filed Aug. 15, 2000, entitled “Performance Enhancing Proxy”; all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • [0002]
    1. Field of the Invention
  • [0003]
    The present invention relates to a communication system, and is more particularly related to a proxy architecture for improving network performance.
  • [0004]
    2. Discussion of the Background
  • [0005]
    The entrenchment of data networking into the routines of modern society, as evidenced by the prevalence of the Internet, particularly the World Wide Web, has placed ever-growing demands on service providers to continually improve network performance. To meet this challenge, service providers have invested heavily in upgrading their networks to increase system capacity (i.e., bandwidth). In many circumstances, such upgrades may not be feasible economically or the physical constraints of the communication system does not permit simply “upgrading.” Accordingly, service providers have also invested in developing techniques to optimize the performance of their networks. Because much of today's networks are either operating with or are required to interface with the Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) suite, attention has been focused on optimizing TCP/IP based networking operations.
  • [0006]
    As the networking standard for the global Internet, TCP/IP has earned such acceptance among the industry because of its flexibility and rich heritage in the research community. The transmission control protocol (TCP) is the dominant protocol in use today on the Internet. TCP is carried by the Internet protocol (IP) and is used in a variety of applications including reliable file transfer and Internet web page access applications. The four layers of the TCP/IP protocol suite are illustrated in FIG. 15. As illustrated, the link layer (or the network interface layer) 10 includes device drivers in the operating system and any corresponding network interface cards. Together, the device driver and the interface cards handle hardware details of physically interfacing with any cable or whatever type of media that is being used. The network layer (also referred to as the Internet layer) 12 handles the movement of packets around the network. Routing of packets, for example, takes place at the network layer 12. IP, Internet control message protocol (ICMP), and Internet group management protocol (IGMP) may provide the network layer in the TCP/IP protocol suite. The transport layer 14 provides a flow of data between two hosts, for the application layer 16 above.
  • [0007]
    In the TCP/IP protocol suite, there are at least two different transport protocols, TCP and a user datagram protocol (UDP). TCP, which provides a reliable flow of data between two hosts, is primarily concerned with dividing the data passed to it from the application layer 16 into appropriately sized segments for the network layer 12 below, acknowledging received packets, setting timeouts to make certain the other end acknowledges packets that are sent, and so on. Because this reliable flow of data is provided by the transport layer 14, the application layer 16 is isolated from these details. UDP, on the other hand, provides a much simpler service to the application layer 16. UDP just sends packets of data called datagrams from one host to another, with no guarantee that the datagrams will reach their destination. Any desired reliability must be added by a higher layer, such as the application layer 16.
  • [0008]
    The application layer 16 handles the details of the particular application. There are many common TCP/IP applications that almost every implementation provides, including telnet for remote log-in, the file transfer protocol (FTP), the simple mail transfer protocol (SMTP) or electronic mail, the simple network management protocol (SNMP), the hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), and many others.
  • [0009]
    As mentioned, TCP provides reliable, in-sequence delivery of data between two IP hosts. The IP hosts set up a TCP connection, using a conventional TCP three-way handshake and then transfer data using a window based protocol with the successfully received data acknowledged.
  • [0010]
    To understand where optimizations may be made, it is instructive to consider a typical TCP connection establishment. FIG. 16 illustrates an example of the conventional TCP three-way handshake between IP hosts 20 and 22. First, the IP host 20 that wishes to initiate a transfer with IP host 22, sends a synchronize (SYN) signal to IP host 22. The IP host 22 acknowledges the SYN signal from IP host 20 by sending a SYN acknowledgement (ACK). The third step of the conventional TCP three-way handshake is the issuance of an ACK signal from the IP host 20 to the other IP host 22. At this point, IP host 22 is ready to receive the data from IP host 20 (and vice versa). After all the data has been delivered, another handshake (similar to the handshake described to initiate the connection) is used to close the TCP connection.
  • [0011]
    TCP was designed to be very flexible and to work over a wide variety of communication links, including both slow and fast links, high latency links, and links with low and high error rates. However, while TCP (and other high layer protocols) works with many different kinds of links, TCP performance, in particular, the throughput possible across the TCP connection, is affected by the characteristics of the link in which it is used. There are many link layer design considerations that should be taken into account when designing a link layer service that is intended to support Internet protocols. However, not all characteristics can be compensated for by choices in the link layer design. TCP has been designed to be very flexible with respect to the links which it traverses. Such flexibility is achieved at the cost of sub-optimal operation in a number of environments vis-à-vis a tailored protocol. The tailored protocol, which is usually proprietary in nature, may be more optimal, but greatly lacks flexibility in terms of networking environments and interoperability.
  • [0012]
    An alternative to a tailored protocol is the use of performance enhancing proxies (PEPs), to perform a general class of functions termed “TCP spoofing,” in order to improve TCP performance over impaired (i.e., high latency or high error rate) links. TCP spoofing involves an intermediate network device (the performance enhancing proxy (PEP)) intercepting and altering, through the addition and/or deletion of TCP segments, the behavior of the TCP connection in an attempt to improve its performance.
  • [0013]
    Conventional TCP spoofing implementations include the local acknowledgement of TCP data segments in order to get the TCP data sender to send additional data sooner than it would have sent if spoofing were not being performed, thus improving the throughput of the TCP connection. Generally, conventional TCP spoofing implementations have focused simply on increasing the throughput of TCP connections either by using larger windows over the link or by using compression to reduce the amount of data which needs to be sent, or both.
  • [0014]
    Many TCP PEP implementations are based on TCP ACK manipulation. These may include TCP ACK spacing where ACKs which are bunched together are spaced apart, local TCP ACKs, local TCP retransmissions, and TCP ACK filtering and reconstruction. Other PEP mechanisms include tunneling, compression, and priority-based multiplexing.
  • [0015]
    In addition to optimization mechanisms, network redundancy is imperative for the operation of modem communication systems. However, such redundancy should not degrade or hinder the performance of the system. That is, redundancy needs to be achieved without compromising performance.
  • [0016]
    Based on the foregoing, there is a clear need for improved approaches to optimizing network performance, while achieving network redundancy. There is also a need to enhance network performance, without a costly infrastructure investment. There is also a need to employ a network performance enhancing mechanism that complies with existing standards to facilitate rapid deployment. There is a further need to simplify the receiver design. Therefore, an approach for optimizing network performance using a proxy architecture is highly desirable.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • [0017]
    The present invention addresses the above stated needs by providing a system for providing performance enhancing proxy (PEP) functionalities. The system utilizes a redundant platform that minimizes the impact on the network of redundancy switching as the spoofed connections are restarted. An “unspoofed startup delay” process provides for the termination of unspoofed connections for a predetermined period, so that the restart process of spoofed TCP connections is not delayed.
  • [0018]
    According to one aspect of the invention, a method for performing redundancy switching from a first platform to a second platform is provided. The method includes identifying a message received over a connection according to a prescribed protocol as an unspoofed message. The method also includes terminating, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identifying step. Further, the method includes restarting a spoofed connection between the second platform and a host. Under this approach, network performance is enhanced.
  • [0019]
    According to another aspect of the invention, a communication system includes a first platform that is configured to communicate with a remote platform and a second platform that is configured to communicate with the remote platform upon failure of the first platform to communicate with the remote platform. The second platform is configured to identify a message received from a local host over a connection according to a prescribed protocol as an unspoofed message, wherein the second platform terminates, during a predetermined period, the connection in response to the identified message. The above arrangement advantageously improves system throughput and system reliability of a communication system.
  • [0020]
    According to one aspect of the invention, a communication gateway for providing redundant communication in a communication system having a remote platform is provided. The gateway includes a communication interface that is configured to receive a message from a host over a connection according to a prescribed protocol. Additionally, the gateway includes a processor that is coupled to the communication interface and is configured to identify the message received as an unspoofed message, and configured to terminate, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identified message, the processor being configured to restart a spoofed connection with another host. The above arrangement advantageously provides improved system performance.
  • [0021]
    According to another aspect of the invention, a communication gateway for providing redundant communication in a communication system having a remote platform is disclosed. The gateway includes means for identifying a message received over a connection according to a prescribed protocol as an unspoofed message, and means for terminating, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identified message. The gateway also includes means for restarting a spoofed connection between the second platform and a host. The above approach minimizes delay associated with redundancy switching.
  • [0022]
    In yet another aspect of the invention, a computer-readable medium carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions for performing redundancy switching from a first platform to a second platform is disclosed. The one or more sequences of one or more instructions include instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the step of identifying a message received over a connection according to a prescribed protocol as an unspoofed message. Another step includes terminating, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identifying step. Yet another step includes restarting a spoofed connection between the second platform and a host. This approach advantageously provides improved system reliability and performance.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • [0023]
    A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
  • [0024]
    [0024]FIG. 1 is a diagram of a communication system in which the performance enhancing proxy (PEP) of the present invention is implemented;
  • [0025]
    [0025]FIG. 2 is a diagram of a PEP end point platform environment, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0026]
    [0026]FIG. 3 is a diagram of a TCP Spoofing Kernel (TSK) utilized in the environment of FIG. 2;
  • [0027]
    [0027]FIGS. 4A and 4B are flow diagrams of the connection establishment with three-way handshake spoofing and without three-way handshake spoofing, respectively;
  • [0028]
    [0028]FIG. 5 is a diagram of a PEP packet flow between two PEP end points, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0029]
    [0029]FIG. 6 is a diagram of an IP (Internet Protocol) packet flow through a PEP end point, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0030]
    [0030]FIG. 7 is a diagram of PEP end point profiles utilized in the platform of FIG. 2;
  • [0031]
    [0031]FIG. 8 is a diagram of the interfaces of a PEP end point implemented as an IP gateway, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0032]
    [0032]FIG. 9 is a diagram of the interfaces of a PEP end point implemented as a Multimedia Relay, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0033]
    [0033]FIG. 10 is a diagram of the interfaces of a PEP end point implemented as a Multimedia VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal), according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0034]
    [0034]FIG. 11 is a diagram of the interfaces of a PEP end point implemented in an earth station, according to an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0035]
    [0035]FIG. 12 is a diagram an architecture of a PEP end point in which redundancy is provided at the hub site, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0036]
    [0036]FIGS. 13A and 13B are a flow chart of an unspoofed startup delay processing performed by a gateway, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0037]
    [0037]FIG. 14 is a diagram of a computer system that can perform PEP functions, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;
  • [0038]
    [0038]FIG. 15 is diagram of the protocol layers of the TCP/IP protocol suite; and
  • [0039]
    [0039]FIG. 16 is diagram of a conventional TCP three-way handshake between IP hosts.
  • DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
  • [0040]
    In the following description, for the purpose of explanation, specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be apparent that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In some instances, well-known structures and devices are depicted in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the invention.
  • [0041]
    Although the present invention is discussed with respect to the Internet and the TCP/IP protocol suite, the present invention has applicability to other packet switched networks and equivalent protocols.
  • [0042]
    [0042]FIG. 1 illustrates an exemplary network 100 in which the performance enhancing proxy (PEP) of the present invention may be utilized. The network 100 in FIG. 1 includes one or more hosts 110 connected to a network gateway 120 via TCP connections. The network gateway 120 is connected to another network gateway 140 via a backbone connection on a backbone link 130. As seen in FIG. 1, the backbone link 130, in an exemplary embodiment, is shown as a satellite link that is established over a satellite 101; however, it is recognized by one of ordinary skill in the art that other network connections may be implemented. For example, these network connections may be established over a wireless communications system, in general, (e.g., radio networks, cellular networks, etc.) or a terrestrial communications system. The network gateway 140 is further connected to a second group of hosts 150, also via TCP connections. In the arrangement illustrated in FIG. 1, the network gateways 120, 140 facilitate communication between the groups of hosts 110, 150.
  • [0043]
    The network gateways 120, 140 facilitate communication between the two groups of hosts 110, 150 by performing a number of performance enhancing functions. These network gateways 120, 140 may perform selective TCP spoofing, which allows flexible configuration of the particular TCP connections that are to be spoofed. Additionally, gateways 120, 140 employs a TCP three-way handshake, in which the TCP connections are terminated at each end of the backbone link 130. Local data acknowledgements are utilized by the network gateways 120, 140, thereby permitting the TCP windows to increase at local speeds.
  • [0044]
    The network gateway 120, 140 further multiplexes multiple TCP connections across a single backbone connection; this capability reduces the amount of acknowledgement traffic associated with the data from multiple TCP connections, as a single backbone connection acknowledgement may be employed. The multiplexing function also provides support for high throughput TCP connections, wherein the backbone connection protocol is optimized for the particular backbone link that is used. The network gateways 120, 140 also support data compression over the backbone link 130 to reduce the amount of traffic to be sent, further leveraging the capabilities of the backbone connection. Further, the network gateways 120, 140 utilize data encryption in the data transmission across the backbone link 130 to protect data privacy, and provide prioritized access to backbone link 130 capacity on a per TCP connection basis. Each of the network gateways 120, 140 may select a particular path for the data associated with a connection to flow. The above capabilities of the network gateways 120, 140 are more fully described below.
  • [0045]
    [0045]FIG. 2 illustrates a performance enhancing proxy (PEP) 200 as implemented in a network gateway 120, 140, according to one embodiment of the present invention. In this embodiment, the PEP 200 has a platform environment 210, which includes the hardware and software operating system. The PEP 200 also includes local area network (LAN) interfaces 220 and wide area network (WAN) interfaces 230. In the example in FIG. 1, the network gateway 120 may establish the TCP connections with the IP hosts 110, via a local LAN interface 220 and may establish the backbone connection with the network gateway 140 via a WAN interface 230. The PEP platform environment 210 may also include general functional modules: routing module 240, buffer management module 250, event management module 260, and parameter management module 270. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the network gateway also includes a TCP spoofing kernel (TSK) 280, a backbone protocol kernel (BPK) 282, a prioritization kernel (PK) 284, and a path selection kernel (PSK) 286. These four kernels essentially make up the functionality of the performance enhancing proxy 200.
  • [0046]
    The platform environment 210 performs a number of functions. One such function is to shield the various PEP kernels 280, 282, 284, 286 from implementation specific constraints. That is, the platform environment 210 performs functions that the various PEP kernels 280, 282, 284, 286 cannot perform directly because the implementation of the function is platform specific. This arrangement has the advantageous effect of hiding platform specific details from the PEP kernels 280, 282, 284, 286, making the PEP kernels more portable. An example of a platform specific function is the allocation of a buffer. In some platforms, buffers are created as they are needed, while in other platforms, buffers are created at start-up and organized into linked lists for later use. It is noted that platform specific functions are not limited to functions generic to all of the kernels 280, 282, 284, 286. A function specific to a particular kernel, for example, the allocation of a control block for TCP spoofing, may also be implemented in the platform environment to hide platform specific details from the kernel.
  • [0047]
    Additionally, the platform environment 210 may provide the task context in which the PEP kernels 280,282, 284, 286 run. In one exemplary embodiment, all PEP kernels 280, 282, 284, 286 can run in the same task context for efficiency. However, this is not required.
  • [0048]
    Furthermore, the platform environment 210, in an exemplary embodiment, provides an interface between the PEP functionality (embodied in kernels 280, 282, 284, 286) and the other functionality of the network gateway 120, 140. The platform environment 210 may provide the interface between the PEP functionality and the routing function 240, as seen in FIG. 2. It is noted that the platform specific functions illustrated in FIG. 2 are examples and are not considered an exhaustive list. It is further noted that the PEP kernels shown touching each other (280, 282 and 284, 286) in FIG. 2 may have a direct procedural interface to each other. Further, the kernels 280, 282, 284, 286 may include direct interfaces to improve performance, as opposed to routing everything through the platform environment 210 (as shown in FIG. 2).
  • [0049]
    In addition to the PEP kernels 280, 282, 284, and 286, the PEP end point platform 210 may utilize a data compression kernel (CK) 290 and an encryption kernel (EK) 292. These kernels 280, 282, 284, 286, 290, and 292, as described above, facilitate communication between the two groups of hosts 110, 150, by performing a variety of performance enhancing functions, either singly or in combination. These performance enhancing functions include selective TCP spoofing, three-way handshake spoofing, local data acknowledgement, TCP connection to backbone connection multiplexing, data compression/encryption, prioritization, and path selection.
  • [0050]
    Selective TCP Spoofing is performed by the TSK 280 and includes a set of user configurable rules that are used to determine which TCP connections should be spoofed. Selective TCP spoofing improves performance by not tying up TCP spoofing-related resources, such as buffer space, control blocks, etc., for TCP connections for which the user has determined that spoofing is not beneficial or required and by supporting the use of tailored parameters for TCP connections that are spoofed.
  • [0051]
    In particular, the TSK 280 discriminates among the various TCP connections based on the applications using them. That is, TSK 280 discriminates among these TCP connections to determine which connection should be spoofed as well as the manner in which the connection is spoofed; e.g., whether to spoof the three-way handshake, the particular timeout parameters for the spoofed connections, etc. TCP spoofing is then performed only for those TCP connections that are associated with applications for which high throughput or reduced connection startup latency (or both) is required. As a result, the TSK 280 conserves TCP spoofing resources for only those TCP connections for which high throughput or reduced connection startup latency (or both) is required. Further, the TSK 280 increases the total number of TCP connections which can be active before running out of TCP spoofing resources, since any active TCP connections which do not require high throughput are not allocated resources.
  • [0052]
    One criterion for identifying TCP connections of applications for which TCP spoofing should and should not be performed is the TCP port number field contained in the TCP packets being sent. In general, unique port numbers are assigned to each type of application. Which TCP port numbers should and should not be spoofed can be stored in the TSK 280. The TSK 280 is also re-configurable to allow a user or operator to reconfigure the TCP port numbers which should and should not be spoofed. The TSK 280 also permits a user or operator to control which TCP connections are to be spoofed based on other criteria. In general, a decision on whether to spoof a TCP connection may be based on any field within a TCP packet. The TSK 280 permits a user to specify which fields to examine and which values in these fields identify TCP connections that should or should not be spoofed. Another example of a potential use for this capability is for the user or operator to select the IP address of the TCP packet in order to control for which users TCP spoofing is performed. The TSK 280 also permits a user to look at multiple fields at the same time. As a result, the TSK 280 permits a user or operator to use multiple criteria for selecting TCP connections to spoof. For example, by selecting both the IP address and the TCP port number fields, the system operator can enable TCP spoofing for only specific applications from specific users.
  • [0053]
    The user configurable rules may include five exemplary criteria which can be specified by the user or operator in producing a selective TCP spoofing rule: Destination IP address; Source IP address; TCP port numbers (which may apply to both the TCP destination and source port numbers); TCP options; and IP differentiated services (DS) field. However, as indicated above, other fields within the TCP packet may be used.
  • [0054]
    As discussed above, in addition to supporting selective TCP spoofing rules for each of these criterion, AND and OR combination operators can be used to link criteria together. For example, using the AND combination operator, a rule can be defined to disable TCP spoofing for FTP data received from a specific host. Also, the order in which the rules are specified may be significant. It is possible for a connection to match the criteria of multiple rules. Therefore, the TSK 280 can apply rules in the order specified by the operator, taking the action of the first rule that matches. A default rule may also be set which defines the action to be taken for TCP connections which do not match any of the defined rules. The set of rules selected by the operator may be defined in a selective TCP spoofing selection profile.
  • [0055]
    As an example, assuming sufficient buffer space has been allocated to spoof five TCP connections, if four low speed applications (i.e., applications which, by their nature, do not require high speed) bring up connections along with one high speed application, the high speed connection has access to only ⅕ of the available spoofing buffer space. Further, if five low speed connections are brought up before the high speed connection, the high speed connection cannot be spoofed at all. Using the TSK 280 selective spoofing mechanism, the low speed connections are not allocated any spoofing buffer space. Therefore, the high speed connection always has access to all of the buffer space, improving its performance with respect to an implementation without the selective TCP spoofing feature of the TSK 280.
  • [0056]
    The TSK 280 also facilitates spoofing of the conventional three-way handshake. Three-Way Handshake Spoofing involves locally responding to a connection request to bring up a TCP connection in parallel with forwarding the connection requests across the backbone link 130 (FIG. 1). This allows the originating IP host (for example, 110) to reach the point of being able to send the data it must send at local speeds, i.e. speeds that are independent of the latency of the backbone link 130. Three-way Handshake Spoofing allows the data that the IP host 110 needs to send to be sent to the destination IP host 150 without waiting for the end-to-end establishment of the TCP connection. For backbone links 130 with high latency, this significantly reduces the time it takes to bring up the TCP connection and, more importantly, the overall time it takes to get a response (from an IP host 150) to the data the IP host 110 sends.
  • [0057]
    A specific example in which this technique is useful relates to an Internet web page access application. With three-way handshake spoofing, an IP host's request to retrieve a web page can be on its way to a web server without waiting for the end-to-end establishment of the TCP connection, thereby reducing the time it takes to download the web page.
  • [0058]
    With Local Data Acknowledgement, the TSK 280 in the network gateway 120 (for example) locally acknowledges data segments received from the IP host 110. This allows the sending IP host 110 to send additional data immediately. More importantly, TCP uses received acknowledgements as signals for increasing the current TCP window size. As a result, local sending of the acknowledgements allows the sending IP host 110 to increase it TCP window at a much faster rate than supported by end to end TCP acknowledgements. The TSK 280 (the spoofer) takes on the responsibility for reliable delivery of the data which it has acknowledged.
  • [0059]
    In the BPK 282, multiple TCP connections are multiplexed onto and carried by a single backbone connection. This improves system performance by allowing the data for multiple TCP connections to be acknowledged by a single backbone connection acknowledgement (ACK), significantly reducing the amount of acknowledgement traffic required to maintain high throughput across the backbone link 130. In addition, the BPK 282 selects a backbone connection protocol that is optimized to provide high throughput for the particular link. Different backbone connection protocols can be used by the BPK 282 with different backbone links without changing the fundamental TCP spoofing implementation. The backbone connection protocol selected by the BPK 282 provides appropriate support for reliable, high speed delivery of data over the backbone link 130, hiding the details of the impairments (for example high latency) of the link from the TCP spoofing implementation.
  • [0060]
    The multiplexing by the BPK 282 allows for the use of a backbone link protocol which is individually tailored for use with the particular link and provides a technique to leverage the performance of the backbone link protocol with much less dependency upon the individual performance of the TCP connections being spoofed than conventional methods. Further, the ability to tailor the backbone protocol for different backbone links makes the present invention applicable to many different systems.
  • [0061]
    The PEP 200 may optionally include a data compression kernel 290 for compressing TCP data and an encryption kernel 292 for encrypting TCP data. Data compression increases the amount of data that can be carried across the backbone connection. Different compression algorithms can be supported by the data compression kernel 290 and more than one type of compression can be supported at the same time. The data compression kernel 290 may optionally apply compression on a per TCP connection basis, before the TCP data of multiple TCP connections is multiplexed onto the backbone connection or on a per backbone connection basis, after the TCP data of multiple TCP connections has been multiplexed onto the backbone connection. Which option is used is dynamically determined based on user configured rules and the specific compression algorithms being utilized. Exemplary data compression algorithms are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,973,630, 5,955,976, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The encryption kernel 292 encrypts the TCP data for secure transmission across the backbone link 130. Encryption may be performed by any conventional technique. It is also understood that the corresponding spoofer (in the example outlined above, the network gateway 140) includes appropriate kernels for decompression and decryption, both of which may be performed by any conventional technique.
  • [0062]
    The PK 284 provides prioritized access to the backbone link capacity. For example, the backbone connection can actually be divided into N (N>1) different sub-connections, each having a different priority level. In one exemplary embodiment, four priority levels can be supported. The PK 284 uses user-defined rules to assign different priorities, and therefore different sub-connections of the backbone connection, to different TCP connections. It should be noted that PK 284 may also prioritize non-TCP traffic (e.g., UDP (User Datagram Protocol) traffic) before sending the traffic across the backbone link 130.
  • [0063]
    The PK 284 also uses user-defined rules to control how much of the backbone link 130 capacity is available to each priority level. Exemplary criteria which can be used to determine priority include the following: Destination IP address; Source IP address; IP next protocol; TCP port numbers (which may apply to both the TCP destination and source port numbers); UDP port numbers (which may apply to both the UDP destination and source port numbers); and IP differentiated services (DS) field. The type of data in the TCP data packets may also be used as a criterion. For example, video data could be given highest priority. Mission critical data could also be given high priority. As with selective TCP spoofing, any field in the IP packet can be used by PK 284 to determine priority. However, it should be noted that under some scenarios the consequence of using such a field may cause different IP packets of the same flow (e.g., TCP connection) to be assigned different priorities; these scenarios should be avoided.
  • [0064]
    As mentioned above, in addition to supporting selective prioritization rules for each of these criteria, AND and OR combination operators can be used to link criteria together. For example, using the AND combination operator, a rule can be defined to assign a priority for SNMP data received from a specific host. Also, the order in which the rules are specified may be significant. It is possible for a connection to match the criteria of multiple rules. Therefore, the PK 284 can apply rules in the order specified by the operator, taking the action of the first rule that matches. A default rule may also be set which defines the action to be taken for IP packets which do not match any of the defined rules. The set of rules selected by the operator may be defined in a prioritization profile.
  • [0065]
    As regards the path selection functionality, the PSK 286 is responsible for determining which path an IP packet should take to reach its destination. The path selected by the PSK 286 can be determined by applying path selection rules. The PSK 286 also determines which IP packets should be forwarded using an alternate path and which IP packets should be dropped when one or more primary paths fail. Path selection parameters can also be configured using profiles. The path selection rules may be designed to provide flexibility with respect to assigning paths while making sure that all of the packets related to the same traffic flow (e.g., the same TCP connection) take the same path (although it is also possible to send segments of the same TCP connection via different paths, this segment “splitting” may have negative side effects). Exemplary criteria that can be used to select a path include the following: priority of the IP packet as set by the PK 284 (should be the most common criterion): Destination IP address; Source IP address; IP next protocol; TCP port numbers (which may apply to both the TCP destination and source port numbers); UDP port numbers (which may apply to both the UDP destination and source port numbers); and IP differentiated services (DS) field. Similar to selective TCP spoofing and prioritization, the PSK 284 may determine a path by using any field in the IP packet.
  • [0066]
    As with the prioritization criteria (rules) the AND and OR combination operators can be used to link criteria together. For example, using the AND combination operator, a rule can be defined to select a path for SNMP data received from a specific host. Also, the order in which the rules are specified may be significant. It is possible for a connection to match the criteria of multiple rules. Therefore, the PSK 286 can apply rules in the order specified by the operator, taking the action of the first rule that matches. A default rule may also be set which defines the action to be taken for IP packets which do not match any of the defined rules. The set of rules selected by the operator may be defined in a path selection profile.
  • [0067]
    By way of example, a path selection rule may select the path based on any of the following path information in which IP packets match the rule: a primary path, a secondary path, and a tertiary path. The primary path is be specified in any path selection rule. The secondary path is used only when the primary path has failed. If no secondary path is specified, any IP packets that match the rule can be discarded when the primary path fails. The tertiary path is specified only if a secondary path is specified. The tertiary path is selected if both the primary and secondary paths have failed. If no tertiary path is specified, any IP packets that match the rule can be discarded when both the primary and secondary paths fail. Path selection may be generalized such that the path selection rule can select up to N paths where the Nth path is used only if the (N−1)th path fails. The example above where N=3 is merely illustrative, although N is typically a fairly small number.
  • [0068]
    By way of example, the operation of the system 100 is described as follows. First, a backbone connection is established between the PEPs 200 of two network gateways 120, 140 (i.e., the two spoofers), located at each end of the backbone link 130 for which TCP spoofing is desired. Whenever an IP host 110 initiates a TCP connection, the TSK 280 of the PEP 200 local to the IP host 110 checks its configured selective TCP spoofing rules. If the rules indicate that the connection should not be spoofed, the PEP 200 allows the TCP connection to flow end-to-end unspoofed. If the rules indicate that the connection should be spoofed, the spoofing PEP 200 locally responds to the IP host's TCP three-way handshake. In parallel, the spoofing PEP 200 sends a message across the backbone link 130 to its partner network gateway 140 asking it to initiate a TCP three-way handshake with the IP host 150 on its side of the backbone link 130. Data is then exchanged between the IP host 110, 150 with the PEP 200 of the network gateway 120 locally acknowledging the received data and forwarding it across the backbone link 130 via the high speed backbone connection, compressing the data as appropriate based on the configured compression rules. The priority of the TCP connection is determined when the connection is established. The BPK 282 can multiplex the connection with other received connections over a single backbone connection, the PK 284 determines the priority of the connection and the PSK 286 determines the path the connection is to take.
  • [0069]
    The PEP 200, as described above, advantageously improves network performance by allocating TCP spoofing-related resources, such as buffer space, control blocks, etc., only to TCP connections for which spoofing is beneficial; by spoofing the three-way handshake to decrease data response time; by reducing the number of ACKs which are transmitted by performing local acknowledgement and by acknowledging multiple TCP connections with a single ACK; by performing data compression to increase the amount of data that can be transmitted; by assigning priorities to different connections; and by defining multiple paths for connections to be made.
  • [0070]
    [0070]FIG. 3 shows an exemplary stack, which illustrates the relationship between the TCP stack and the PEP kernels 280, 282, 284, 286 of the present invention. The TSK 280 is primarily responsible for functions related to TCP spoofing. The TSK 280, in an exemplary embodiment, includes two basic elements: a transport layer that encompasses a TCP stack 303 and an IP stack 305; and a TCP spoofing application 301. The transport layer is responsible for interacting with the TCP stacks (e.g., 303) of IP hosts 110 connected to a local LAN interface 220 of a PEP 210.
  • [0071]
    The TSK 280 implements the TCP protocol, which includes the appropriate TCP state machines and terminates spoofed TCP connections. The TCP spoofing application 301 rests on top of the transport layer and act as the application that receives data from and sends data to the IP hosts 110 applications. Because of the layered architecture of the protocol, the TCP spoofing application 301 isolates the details of TCP spoofing from the transport layer, thereby allowing the transport layer to operate in a standard fashion.
  • [0072]
    As shown in FIG. 3, the TCP spoofing application 301 can also interface to the BPK 282 associated with the WAN interfaces 230. The BPK 282 performs backbone protocol maintenance, implementing the protocol by which the network gateways 120, 140 (in FIG. 1) communicate. The BPK 282 provides reliable delivery of data, uses a relatively small amount of acknowledgement traffic, and supports generic backbone use (i.e., use not specific to the TSK 280); one such example is the reliable data protocol (RDP).
  • [0073]
    The BPK 282 lies above the PK 284 and the PSK 286, according to an exemplary embodiment. The PK 284 is responsible for determining the priority of IP packets and then allocating transmission opportunities based on priority. The PK 284 can also control access to buffer space by controlling the queue sizes associated with sending and receiving IP packets. The PSK 286 determines which path an IP packet should take to reach its destination. The path selected by the PSK 286 can be determined applying path selection rules. PSK 286 may also determine which IP packet should be forwarded using an alternate path and which packets should be dropped when one or more primary paths fail.
  • [0074]
    [0074]FIGS. 4A and 4B show flow diagrams of the establishment of a spoofed TCP connection utilizing three-way handshake spoofing and without three-way handshake spoofing, respectively. The TCP Spoofing Kernel 280 establishes a spoofed TCP connection when a TCP <SYN> segment is received from its local LAN or a Connection Request message from its TSK peer. It is noted that the three-way handshake spoofing may be disabled to support an end to end maximum segment size (MSS) exchange, which is more fully described below. For the purpose of explanation, the spoofed TCP connection establishment process is described with respect to a local host 400, a local PEP end point 402, a remote PEP end point 404, and a remote host 406. As mentioned previously, the TSK 280 within each of the PEP end points 402 and 404 provides the spoofing functionality.
  • [0075]
    In step 401, the local host 400 transmits a TCP <SYN> segment to the local PEP end point 402 at a local LAN interface 220. When a TCP segment is received from the local LAN interface 220, the platform environment 402 determines whether there is already a TCP connection control block (CCB) assigned to the TCP connection associated with the TCP segment. If there is no CCB, the environment 402 checks whether the TCP segment is a <SYN> segment that is being sent to a non-local destination. If so, the <SYN> segment represents an attempt to bring up a new (non-local) TCP connection, and the environment 402 passes the segment to the TCP Spoofing Kernel 280 to determine the TCP connection's disposition. When a TCP <SYN> segment is received from the local LAN interface 220 for a new TCP connection, the TCP Spoofing Kernel 280 first determines if the connection should be spoofed. If the connection should be spoofed, TSK 280 uses (in an exemplary embodiment) the priority indicated in the selected TCP spoofing parameter profile and the peer index (provided by the environment 210 with the TCP <SYN> segment) to construct the handle of the backbone connection which should be used to carry this spoofed TCP connection. In the exemplary embodiment, the peer index is used as the 14 high order bits of the handle and the priority is used as the two low order bits of the handle. The backbone connection handle is then used (via the TSK control block (TCB) mapping table) to find the TCB associated with the backbone connection. TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 then checks whether the backbone connection is up. If the backbone connection is up, TSK 280 determines whether the number of spoofed TCP connections that are already using the selected backbone connection is still currently below the CCB resource limit. The CCB resource limit is the smaller of the local number of CCBs (provided as a parameter by the platform environment 210) and the peer number of CCBs (received in the latest TSK peer parameters (TPP) message from the TSK peer) available for this backbone connection. If the number of connections is still below the limit, TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 assigns a unique TCP connection identifier (e.g., a free CCB mapping table entry index) to the connection and calls the environment 210 to allocate a TCP connection control block for the connection.
  • [0076]
    TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 returns the TCP <SYN> segment back to the environment 210 to be forwarded unspoofed if any of the above checks fail. In other words, the following conditions result in the TCP connection being unspoofed. First, if the selective TCP spoofing rules indicate that the connection should not be spoofed. Also, there is no backbone connection for the priority at which the TCP connection should be spoofed (indicated by the absence of a TCB for the backbone connection). No spoofing is performed if the backbone connection is down. Additional, if the number of spoofed TCP connections that are already using the backbone connection reaches or exceeds a predetermined threshold, then no spoofing is performed. Further, if there is no CCB mapping table entry available or there is no CCB available from the CCB free pool, then the TCP connection is forwarded unspoofed. For the case in which there is no backbone connection, TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 may also post an event to alert the operator that there is a mismatch between the configured TCP spoofing parameter profiles and the configured set of backbone connections.
  • [0077]
    Continuing with the example, if all of the above checks pass, TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 writes the backbone connection handle into the buffer holding the TCP <SYN> segment. It is noted that this is not done until a CCB is successfully allocated by the platform environment 402, because the environment does not count the buffer unless a CCB is successfully allocated. TSK 280 then copies the parameters from the selected TCP spoofing parameter profile into the CCB. Consequently, relevant information (e.g., the maximum segment size that is advertised by the host (if smaller than the configured MSS), the initial sequence number, and etc.) is copied out of the TCP <SYN> segment and stored in the CCB. It is noted that the source and destination IP addresses and source and destination TCP port numbers will already have been placed into the CCB by the platform environment 402 when the CCB was allocated; the environment 402 uses this information to manage CCB hash function collisions.
  • [0078]
    After allocating and setting up the CCB, the TCP Spoofing Kernel 280 of PEP end point 402 constructs a Connection Request (CR) message, per step 403, and sends it to its TSK peer associated with the remote PEP end point 404. The CR message basically contains all of the information extracted from the TCP spoofing parameter profile and the TCP <SYN> segment and stored in the local CCB, e.g., the source and destination IP addresses, the source and destination TCP port numbers, the MSS value, etc., with the exception of fields that have only local significance, such as the initial sequence number. (The IP addresses and TCP port numbers are placed into a TCP connection header.) In other words, the CR message contains all of the information that the peer TSK of PEP end point 404 requires to set up its own CCB. To complete the local connection establishment, the TCP Spoofing Kernel 280 of the local PEP end point 402 sends a TCP <SYN,ACK> segment to the local host 400 in response to the <SYN> segment received, per step 405. TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 performs step 405 simultaneously with the step of sending the Connection Request message (i.e., step 403), if three-way handshake spoofing is enabled. Otherwise, TSK 280 of 402 waits for a Connection Established (CE) message from its TSK peer of the remote PEP end point 404 before sending the <SYN,ACK> segment. In an exemplary embodiment, TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 selects a random initial sequence number (as provided in IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) RFC 793, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) to use for sending data.
  • [0079]
    If three-way handshake spoofing is disabled, the MSS value sent in the <SYN,ACK> segment is set equal to the MSS value received in the CE message. If three-way handshake spoofing is enabled, the MSS value is determined from the TCP spoofing parameter profile selected for the connection (and the configured path maximum transmission unit (MTU)). For this case, TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 then compares the MSS value received in the Connection Established message, when it arrives, to the value it sent to the local host in the TCP <SYN,ACK> segment. If the MSS value received in the CE message is smaller than the MSS value sent to the local host, a maximum segment size mismatch exists. (If an MSS mismatch exists, TSK may need to adjust the size of TCP data segments before sending them.) After sending the TCP <SYN,ACK> segment (step 405), TSK 280 of the local PEP end point 402 is ready to start accepting data from the local host 400. In step 407, the local host 400 transmits an <ACK> segment to the TSK 280 of PEP end point 402; thereafter, the local host forwards, as in step 409 data to the TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 as well. When three-way handshake spoofing is being used, TSK 280 does not need to wait for the Connection Established message to arrive from its TSK peer before accepting and forwarding data. As seen in FIG. 4A, in step 411, TSK 280 of the local PEP end point 402 sends an <ACK> segment to the local host and simultaneously sends the TCP data (TD) from the local host 400 to the peer TSK of PEP end point 404 (per step 413) prior to receiving a CE message from the peer TSK of PEP end point 404.
  • [0080]
    However, TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 does not accept data from its TSK peer of PEP end point 404 until after the CE message has been received. TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 does not forward any data received from its TSK peer of PEP end point 404 to the local host 400 until it has received the TCP <ACK> segment indicating that the local host has received the <SYN,ACK> segment (as in step 407).
  • [0081]
    When a Connection Request message is received from a peer TSK (step 403), the TCP Spoofing Kernel 280 allocates a CCB for the connection and then stores all of the relevant information from the CR message in the CCB. TSK 280 of PEP end point 404 then uses this information to generate a TCP <SYN> segment, as in step 415, to send to the remote host 406. The MSS in the <SYN> segment is set to the value received from the TSK peer of PEP end point 404. When the remote host responds with a TCP <SYN,ACK> segment (step 417), TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 sends a Connection Established message to its TSK peer of the remote PEP end point 404 (step 419), including in the CE message the MSS that is sent by the local host in the <SYN,ACK> segment. TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 also responds, as in step 421, with a TCP <ACK> segment to complete the local three-way handshake. The peer TSK of PEP end point 404 then forwards the data that is received from TSK 280 to the host, per step 423. Concurrently, in step 425, the remote host 406 sends data to the peer TSK of PEP end point 404, which acknowledges receipt of the data by issuing an <ACK> segment to the remote PEP end point 404, per step 427. Simultaneously with the acknowledgement, the data is sent to TSK 280 of PEP end point 402 (step 429).
  • [0082]
    At this point, TSK 280 is ready to receive and forward data from either direction. TSK 280 forwards the data, as in step 431 to the local host, which, in turn, sends an <ACK> segment (step 433). If the data arrives from its TSK peer before a <SYN,ACK> segment response is received from the local host, the data is queued and then sent after the <ACK> segment is sent in response to the <SYN,ACK> segment (when it arrives).
  • [0083]
    Turning now to FIG. 4B, a spoofed TCP connection is established with the three-way handshake spoofing disabled. Under this scenario, the local host 400 transmits a TCP <SYN> segment, as in step 451, to the TSK 280 within the local PEP end point 402. Unlike the TCP connection establishment of FIG. 4A, the local PEP end point 402 does not respond to the a TCP <SYN> segment with a <SYN,ACK> segment, but merely forwards a CR message to the remote PEP end point 404 (step 453). Next, in step 455, sends a TCP <SYN> segment to the remote host 406. In response, the remote host 406 transmit a TCP <SYN,ACK> segment back to the remote PEP end point 404 (per step 457). Thereafter, the remote PEP end point 404, as in step 459, forwards a CE message to the local PEP end point 402, which subsequently issues a <SYN,ACK> segment to the local host 400, per step 461. Simultaneous with step 459, the remote PEP end point 404 issues an <ACK> segment to the remote host 406 (step 463).
  • [0084]
    Upon receiving the <ACK> segment, the remote host 406 may begin transmission of data, as in step 465. Once the PEP end point 404 receives the data from the remote host 406, the remote PEP end point 404 simultaneously transmits, as in step 467, the TD message to the local PEP end point 402 and transmits an <ACK> segment to the remote host 406 to acknowledge receipt of the data (step 469).
  • [0085]
    Because the local host 400 has received a <SYN,ACK> segment from the local PEP end point 402, the local host 400 acknowledges the message, per step 471. Thereafter, the local host 400 transmits data to the local PEP end point 402. In this example, before the local PEP end point 402 receives the data from the local host 400, the local PEP end point 402 forwards the data that originated from the remote host 406 via the TD message (step 467) to the local host 400, per step 475.
  • [0086]
    In response to the data received (in step 473), the local PEP end point 402 issues an <ACK> segment, as in step 477, and forwards the data in a TD message to the remote PEP end point 404, per step 479. The local host 400 responds to the received data of step 475 with an <ACK> segment to the local PEP end point 402 (step 481). The remote PEP end point 404 sends the data from the local host 400, as in step 483, upon receipt of the TD message. After receiving the data, the remote host 406 acknowledges receipt by sending an <ACK> segment back to the remote PEP end point 404, per step 485.
  • [0087]
    [0087]FIG. 5 shows the flow of packets with the PEP architecture, according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown, a communication system 500 includes a hub site (or local) PEP end point 501 that has connectivity to a remote site PEP end point 503 via a backbone connection. By way of example, at the hub site (or local site) and at each remote site, PEP end points 501 and 503 handle IP packets. PEP end point 501 includes an internal IP packet routing module 501 a that receives local IP packets and exchanges these packets with a TSK 501 b and a BPK 501 c. Similarly, the remote PEP end point 503 includes an internal IP packet routing module 503 a that is in communication with a TSK 503 b and a BPK 503 c. Except for the fact that the hub site PEP end point 501 may support many more backbone protocol connections than a remote site PEP end point 503, hub and remote site PEP processing is symmetrical.
  • [0088]
    For local-to-WAN traffic (i.e., upstream direction), the PEP end point 501 receives IP packets from its local interface 220 (FIG. 2). Non-TCP IP packets are forwarded (as appropriate) to the WAN interface 230 (FIG. 2). TCP IP packets are internally forwarded to TSK 501 b. TCP segments which belong to connections that are not be spoofed are passed back by the spoofing kernel 501 b to the routing module 501 a to be forwarded unmodified to the WAN interface 230. For spoofed TCP connections, the TCP spoofing kernel 501 a locally terminates the TCP connection. TCP data that is received from a spoofed connection is passed from the spoofing kernel 501 a to the backbone protocol kernel 501 c, and then multiplexed onto the appropriate backbone protocol connection. The backbone protocol kernel 501 c ensures that the data is delivered across the WAN.
  • [0089]
    For WAN-to-local traffic (i.e., downstream direction), the remote PEP end point 503 receives IP packets from its WAN interface 230 (FIG. 2). IP packets that are not addressed to the end point 503 are simply forwarded (as appropriate) to the local interface 220 (FIG. 2). IP packets addressed to the end point 503, which have a next protocol header type of “PBP” are forwarded to the backbone protocol kernel 503 c. The backbone protocol kernel 503 c extracts the TCP data and forwards it to the TCP spoofing kernel 503 b for transmission on the appropriate spoofed TCP connection. In addition to carrying TCP data, the backbone protocol connection is used by the TCP spoofing kernel 501 b to send control information to its peer TCP spoofing kernel 503 b in the remote PEP end point 503 to coordinate connection establishment and connection termination.
  • [0090]
    Prioritization may be applied at four points in the system 500 within routing 501 a and TSK 501 b of PEP end point 501, and within routing 503 a, and TSK 503 b of PEP end point 503. In the upstream direction, priority rules are applied to the packets of individual TCP connections at the entry point to the TCP spoofing kernel 501 b. These rules allow a customer to control which spoofed applications have higher and lower priority access to spoofing resources. Upstream prioritization is also applied before forwarding packets to the WAN. This allows a customer to control the relative priority of spoofed TCP connections with respect to unspoofed TCP connections and non-TCP traffic (as well as to control the relative priority of these other types of traffic with respect to each other). On the downstream side, prioritization is used to control access to buffer space and other resources in the PEP end point 503, generally and with respect to TCP spoofing.
  • [0091]
    At the hub (or local) site, the PEP end point 501 may be implemented in a network gateway (e.g. an IP Gateway), according to one embodiment of the present invention. At the remote site, the PEP end point 503 may be implemented in the remote site component, e.g. a satellite terminal such as a Multimedia Relay, a Multimedia VSAT or a Personal Earth Station (PES) Remote.
  • [0092]
    The architecture of system 500 provides a number of advantages. First, TCP spoofing may be accomplished in both upstream and downstream directions. Additionally, the system supports spoofing of TCP connection startup, and selective TCP spoofing with only connections that can benefit from spoofing actually spoofed. Further, system 500 enables prioritization among spoofed TCP connections for access to TCP spoofing resources (e.g., available bandwidth and buffer space). This prioritization is utilized for all types of traffic that compete for system resources.
  • [0093]
    With respect to the backbone connection, the system 500 is suitable for application to a satellite network as the WAN. That is, the backbone protocol is optimized for satellite use in that control block resource requirements are minimized, and efficient error recovery for dropped packets are provided. The system 500 also provides a feedback mechanism to support maximum buffer space resource efficiency. Further, system 500 provides reduced acknowledgement traffic by using a single backbone protocol ACK to acknowledge the data of multiple TCP connections.
  • [0094]
    [0094]FIG. 6 illustrates the flow of IP packets through a PEP end point, according to an embodiment of the present invention. When IP packets are received at the local LAN interface 220, the PEP end point 210 determines (as shown by decision point A), whether the packets are destined for a host that is locally situated; if so, the IP packets are forwarded to the proper local LAN interface 220. If the IP packets are destined for a remote host, then the PEP end point 210 decides, per decision point B, whether the traffic is a TCP segment. If the PEP end point 210 determines that in fact the packets are TCP segments, then the TSK 280 determines whether the TCP connection should be spoofed. However, if the PEP end point 210 determines that the packets are not TCP segments, then the BPK 282 processes the traffic, along with the PK 284 and the PSK 286 for eventual transmission out to the WAN. It should be noted that the BPK 282 does not process unspoofed IP packets; i.e., the packets flow directly to PK 284. As seen in FIG. 6, traffic that is received from the WAN interface 230 is examined to determine whether the traffic is a proper PBP segment (decision point D) for the particular PEP end point 210; if the determination is in the affirmative, then the packets are sent to the BPK 282 and then the TSK 280.
  • [0095]
    Routing support includes routing between the ports of the PEP End Point 210 (FIG. 2), e.g., from one Multimedia VSAT LAN port to another. Architecturally, the functionalities of TCP spoofing, prioritization and path selection, fit between the IP routing functionality and the WAN. PEP functionality need not be applied to IP packets which are routed from local port to local port within the same PEP End Point 210. TCP spoofing, prioritization and path selection are applied to IP packets received from a local PEP End Point interface that have been determined to be destined for another site by the routing function.
  • [0096]
    [0096]FIG. 7 shows the relationship between PEP End Points and PEP End Point profiles, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. PEP parameters are primarily configured via a set of profiles 701 and 703, which are associated with one or more PEP end points 705. In an exemplary embodiment, PEP parameters are configured on a per PEP End Point basis, such as whether TCP spoofing is globally enabled. These parameters are configured in the PEP End Point profiles 701 and 703. It is noted that parameters that apply to specific PEP kernels may be configured via other types of profiles. Profiles 701 and 703 are a network management construct; internally, a PEP End Point 705 processes a set of parameters that are received via one or more files.
  • [0097]
    Whenever the PEP End Point 705 receives new parameters, the platform environment compares the new parameters to the existing parameters, figures out which of the PEP kernels are affected by the parameter changes, and then passes the new parameters to the affected kernels. In an exemplary embodiment, all parameters are installed dynamically. With the exception of parameters that are component specific (such as the IP addresses of a component), all parameters may be defined with default values.
  • [0098]
    As mentioned previously, the PEP end point 210 may be implemented in a number of different platforms, in accordance with the various embodiments of the present invention. These platforms may include an IP gateway, a Multimedia Relay, a Multimedia VSAT (Very Small Aperture Terminal), and a Personal Earth Station (PES) Remote, as shown in FIGS. 8-11, respectively. In general, as discussed in FIG. 2, the PEP end point 210 defines a local LAN interface 220 an interface through which the PEP End Point 210 connects to IP hosts located at the site. A WAN interface 230 is an interface through which the PEP End Point 210 connects to other sites. It is noted that a WAN interface 230 can physically be a LAN port. FIGS. 8-11, below, describe the specific LAN and WAN interfaces of the various specific PEP End Point platforms. The particular LAN and WAN interfaces that are employed depend on which remote site PEP End Points are being used, on the configuration of the hub and remote site PEP End Points and on any path selection rules which may be configured.
  • [0099]
    [0099]FIG. 8 shows the interfaces of the PEP end point implemented as an IP gateway, according to one embodiment of the present invention. By way of example, an IP Gateway 801 has a single local LAN interface, which is an enterprise interface 803. The IP Gateway 803 employs two WAN interfaces 805 for sending and receiving IP packets to and from remote site PEP End Points: a backbone LAN interface and a wide area access (WAA) LAN interface.
  • [0100]
    The backbone LAN interface 805 is used to send IP packets to remote site PEP End Points via, for example, a Satellite Gateway (SGW) and a VSAT outroute. A VSAT outroute can be received directly by Multimedia Relays (FIG. 9) and Multimedia VSATs (FIG. 10) (and is the primary path used with these End Points); however, IP packets can be sent to a PES Remote (FIG. 11) via a VSAT outroute.
  • [0101]
    [0101]FIG. 9 shows a Multimedia Relay implementation of a PEP end point, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. A Multimedia Relay has two or three local LAN interfaces 903. A Multimedia Relay 901 has up to two WAN interfaces 905 for sending IP packets to hub site PEP End Points: one of its LAN interfaces and a PPP serial port interface, and four or five interfaces for receiving IP packets from hub site PEP End Points, a VSAT outroute, all of its LAN interfaces, and a PPP serial port interface. It is noted that a PPP (Point-to-Point Protocol) serial port interface and a LAN interface are generally not be used at the same time.
  • [0102]
    A Multimedia Relay 901 supports the use of all of its LAN interfaces 903 at the same time for sending and receiving IP packets to and from hub site PEP End Points. Further, a Multimedia Relay 905 supports the use of a VADB (VPN Automatic Dial Backup) serial port interface for sending and receiving IP packets to and from the hub site PEP End Points.
  • [0103]
    [0103]FIG. 10 shows a Multimedia VSAT implementation of the PEP end point, according to one embodiment of the present invention. A Multimedia VSAT 1001, in an exemplary embodiment, has two local LAN interfaces 1003. Support for one or more local PPP serial port interfaces may be utilized. The Multimedia VSAT 1001 has two WAN interfaces 1005 for sending IP packets to hub site PEP End Points: a VSAT inroute and one of its LAN interfaces. The Multimedia VSAT 1001 thus has three interfaces for receiving IP packets from hub site PEP End Points, the VSAT outroute and both of its LAN interfaces 1003. A Multimedia VSAT 1003 may support uses of both of its LAN interfaces 1003 at the same time for sending and receiving IP packets to and from hub site PEP End Points. The Multimedia VSAT 1003 further supports the use of a VADB serial port interface for sending and receiving IP packets to and from the hub site PEP End Points.
  • [0104]
    [0104]FIG. 11 shows a PES Remote implementation of a PEP end point, according to one embodiment of the present invention. A PES Remote 1101 may have a local LAN interface and/or several local IP (e.g. PPP, SLIP, etc.) serial port interfaces, collectively denoted as LAN interfaces 1103. The particular LAN interfaces 1103 depend on the specific PES Remote platform. PES Remote 1101, in an exemplary embodiment, has up to five WAN interfaces 1105 for sending IP packets to hub site PEP End Points, an ISBN inroute, a LAN interface, a VADB serial port interface, a Frame Relay serial port interface and an IP serial port interface, and up to five existing interfaces for receiving IP packets from hub site PEP End Points: an ISBN outroute, a LAN interface, a VADB serial port interface, a Frame Relay serial port interface, and an IP serial port interface. The physical Frame Relay serial port interface may be supporting multiple Permanent Virtual Circuits (PVCs); some of which are equivalent to local interfaces 1103 and some of which are WAN interfaces 1105.
  • [0105]
    [0105]FIG. 12 shows an architecture of the PEP end point in which redundancy is provided at the local site, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. A local site PEP end point 1201 (or gateway), within a communications system 1200, serves as the primary gateway, whereby a remote site gateway 1203 maintains connectivity with the local site gateway 1201 over backbone connections, as described with respect to FIG. 2. In an exemplary embodiment, the gateways 1201 and 1203 may employ the Internet Protocol (IP) to communicate. Under normal operating conditions, the remote site PEP end point 1203 coordinates with the primary hub site gateway 1201 to establish spoofed TCP connections. In the event of some failure (e.g., hardware and/or software failure), another local site gateway 1205 is utilized as the redundant gateway; that is, a gateway redundancy switch is performed. According to one embodiment of the present invention, the remote gateway 1203 may not be aware of the redundancy switch; in fact, the remote gateway 1203 does not know that the local gateway 1201 is configured for redundancy. In this embodiment, the redundant gateway 1205 assumes the IP addresses of the primary gateway 1201. In an alternative embodiment, the remote site gateway 1203 may be informed of the redundancy switch because the redundant gateway 1205 utilizes different addresses.
  • [0106]
    It is recognized that the mechanics of gateway redundancy switch handling has a bias against unspoofed TCP connections in a network that utilizes a mix of both spoofed and unspoofed connections. After a redundancy switch, unspoofed TCP connections may be blocked (for several minutes) during the initial startup period to allow spoofed TCP connections to recover properly. The present invention, according to one embodiment, addresses this problem by modifying the handling of unspoofed TCP connections such that, during this initial startup period, the TCP Spoofing Kernel 280 uses its selective TCP spoofing rules to determine the particular TCP segments that belong to spoofed versus unspoofed TCP connections. This information may then be used to allow the unspoofed TCP segments to be forwarded, instead of blocked.
  • [0107]
    In an exemplary embodiment, system 1200 need not support redundancy of the components of the remote site. However, both systems support redundancy of local site components. If a redundancy switch of a local site PEP End Point (i.e. gateway) occurs, there is no requirement that TCP connections currently being spoofed be unaffected. It is noted that all of the backbone connections from all of the remote site PEP End Points 1203 that used the failed gateway are capable of automatically switching to another (redundant) gateway 1205; this is accomplished by using PEP End Point IP addresses that are shared by both gateways 1201, 1205. As a result of the redundancy switch, all of the TCP connections that were being spoofed by the primary gateway 1201 will eventually terminate (because the redundant gateway 1205 has no TCP spoofing state for these connections). This termination of the spoofed TCP connections may take some time to take effect, thereby prolonging the impact on the network as a result of the redundancy switch. Therefore, the redundant gateway 1205, according to an embodiment of the present invention, is capable of performing startup processing, which is designed to expedite restart of the TCP connections, as more fully described below.
  • [0108]
    When a gateway redundancy switch occurs, all of the backbone connections are restarted by the redundant gateway 1205. The gateway platform environment 1205 opens PBP connections as active, resulting in PBP <SYN> segments being sent by the PEP Backbone Protocol Kernel 282 for every connection. The remote site PEP End Points 1203, upon receiving the PBP <SYN> segments, are alerted to the fact that the backbone connections have failed. As a result, a TCP <RST> segment is sent for every TCP connection that is being spoofed. The above behavior advantageously results in a relatively gracefully shutdown of the remote half of the spoofed TCP connections that are affected by a gateway redundancy switch.
  • [0109]
    However, the hub half of the spoofed TCP connections remain open. As noted above, because the redundant gateway 1205 has no state stored for the spoofed TCP connections, the gateway 1205 does not know that these connections are spoofed TCP connections. Therefore, any TCP segments that are sent by the local host(s) (except <SYN> segments) may be forwarded unspoofed by the gateway 1205. Besides wasting bandwidth, sending such unspoofed TCP segments to the remote site hosts is undesirable because the reaction by the receiving hosts is not completely predictable. In many cases, the hosts will respond with a TCP <RST> segment which will knock down the local site host's TCP connection. But, in other cases, the remote site hosts may just ignore these segments. This results in the hub side of the TCP connection still being open and more segments being needlessly sent. Other possibilities also exist. For example, if the PBP <SYN> segment for a particular backbone connection is lost, the remote site local host might not yet have had its half of the TCP connection terminated. Then, the TCP segment from the hub arrives on a still open TCP connection. The consequences of this depend on how disjoint the sequence number space is between the two halves of the spoofed connection. In most cases, the segments get discarded. But, it is not impossible that this could lead to the delivery of out of sequence data to the application in the host. To avoid all of the above problems, the gateway platform environment 1205 implements a startup delay function for unspoofed TCP segments.
  • [0110]
    [0110]FIGS. 13A and 13B shows a flow chart of the unspoofed startup delay processing performed by a gateway, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. In step 1301, the redundancy switch occurs. Next, the redundant gateway 1205 determines whether the TCP spoofing function has been globally enabled, per step 1307; if the TCP spoofing function has been enabled, then a delay timer is started, per step 1311.
  • [0111]
    As seen in FIG. 3B, an IP packet is received by the gateway 1205, as in step 1319. The gateway 1205 then determines whether the received packets are TCP or non-TCP, as in step 1303. It is noted that the startup delay, according to an embodiment of the present invention, applies to TCP segments; thus, non-TCP IP packets are forwarded normally without any startup delay processing, regardless of the setting of the global TCP spoofing parameter (as in step 1305). If the packets are non-TCP packets, the redundant gateway 1205 checks whether the TCP spoofing function has been globally enabled, per step 1321. It is noted that the gateway platform environment 1205 only invokes the “unspoofed startup delay” processing if TCP spoofing is globally enabled. However, if TCP spoofing is globally disabled, all TCP segments are forwarded unspoofed, as in step 1309, without performing the delay processing.
  • [0112]
    If the TCP spoofing is globally enabled, then the gateway 1205 examines the delay timer to determine whether the timer has expired, as in step 1315. The gateway 1205 is configured with an “unspoofed startup delay” timeout value. The delay value is configurable, largely because of its potential impact on unspoofed TCP connections. Accordingly, at startup the gateway 1205 starts the delay timer with this value. While the timer is running, the gateway environment 1205 terminates unspoofed TCP connections on the hub side, as in step 1313, by forwarding all TCP segments—except <SYN> segments—for which it has no CCB (which will be all segments at first) to a special TCP Spoofing Kernel utility function, as determined per step 1323. This utility function, tsk_reset_tcp_connection( ), responds to any TCP segment provided to it by the environment 1205 by sending a TCP <RST> segment to the local host, effectively tearing down the TCP connection. In this manner, the unspoofed TCP connections can be terminated (step 1313). This reset function is more fully described below.
  • [0113]
    The gateway 1205 continues to forward TCP <SYN> segments for which no CCB exists to the normal TSK new connection entry point. However, if TSK returns the <SYN> segment to be forwarded unspoofed (e.g., because the appropriate backbone connection is not up yet) while the delay timer is still running, the environment will discard the segment rather than forward it. After the timer expires, the gateway environment 210 processes TCP segments normally, per step 1317. The above approach has the benefit that it does not delay restarting spoofed TCP connections. As soon as the backbone connection comes up, TSK 280 of gateway 1205 accepts a TCP <SYN> segment for spoofing and allocates a CCB for the TCP connection. With a CCB in place, the environment 1205 ceases forwarding TCP segments from that TCP connection to the TCP connection “reset” function.
  • [0114]
    As mentioned above, the value of the delay timer may be configurable depending on the mix of traffic. If, in general, all TCP connections are intended to be spoofed, the delay timer can be set to a relatively large value to ensure that all of the hub side spoofed TCP connections that are left over from before a redundancy switch are handled. In the scenario whereby unspoofed TCP connections exist, either because of selective TCP spoofing rules or because of a lack of TCP connection control block resources, a smaller value for the delay timer might be warranted. It is noted that discarding TCP segments for unspoofed TCP connections during the startup delay period results in the tear down of these connections if the startup delay period (i.e., timer value) is too long.
  • [0115]
    As evident from the above discussion, if a local site PEP End Point (i.e., gateway) redundancy switch occurs, all of the backbone connections of the gateway will restart. Under this condition, only the TCP Spoofing Kernels in the remote site PEP End Points 1203 is aware of the restart so that they may terminate all of their spoofed TCP connections. The TCP Spoofing Kernel 280 of the now switched in gateway (i.e., redundant gateway 1205) views this as normal connection startup, such that the TSK 280 will not have any state stored for the TCP connections that had been being spoofed by the now switched out gateway 1201. Therefore, to aid the gateway platform environment 1205 in handling this scenario, TSK 280 provides a utility function that the environment 1205 can use to send TCP <RST> segments to terminate TCP connections. The use of this utility function, which is a reset TCP connection command, is described below.
  • [0116]
    The reset function, tsk_reset_tcp connection( ), is a utility procedure that is provided by the TCP Spoofing Kernel 280, as called by the platform environment 1205 to request that a TCP <RST> segment be sent in response to a TCP segment that is received from a local LAN port. The procedural interface of the TSK 280 takes a single parameter, e.g., a pointer, to the received IP packet containing the TCP segment. tsk_reset_tcp_connection( ) is used by the local site PEP End Point platform environment 1205 to tear down spoofed TCP connections after a redundancy switch. The tsk_reset_tcp_connection( ) results in an allocation of a buffer from the environment 1205, and the building of a TCP <RST> segment in the buffer (using the IP addresses and TCP port numbers, reversed, extracted from the received TCP segment); this command then forwards the <RST> segment to the environment 1205 for transmission. Because there is no backbone connection that is associated with the segment being discarded, TSK 280 allocates the WAN to LAN buffer against a generic 0xFFFF “backbone connection”, for example. The original received TCP segment is then discarded.
  • [0117]
    In an alternative approach, the redundant gateway 1205 (i.e., backup PEP End Point) may track the state of the primary gateway 1201. However, this approach introduces some complexity, as real time tracking of spoofed connection state by the redundant gateway 1205 is required. Additionally, under this approach, no matter how fast the communication is between the two gateways 1201 and 1205, there exists a window of opportunity, albeit small, in which a failure can occur in the primary gateway 1201 before the primary gateway 1201 can pass updated state information to the redundant gateway 1205, leading to a loss of state. Therefore, the redundant gateway 1205 is required to handle connections which the redundant gateway 1205 detects as unspoofed, but which may actually have been spoofed be the primary gateway 1201.
  • [0118]
    [0118]FIG. 14 illustrates a computer system 1401 upon which an embodiment according to the present invention may be implemented. Such a computer system 1401 may be configured as a server to execute code that performs the PEP functions of the PEP end point 210 as earlier discussed. Computer system 1401 includes a bus 1403 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, and a processor 1405 coupled with bus 1403 for processing the information. Computer system 1401 also includes a main memory 1407, such as a random access memory (RAM) or other dynamic storage device, coupled to bus 1403 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 1405. In addition, main memory 1407 may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 1405. Notably, TCP spoofing control blocks may be stored in main memory 1407. Computer system 1401 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 1409 or other static storage device coupled to bus 1403 for storing static information and instructions for processor 1405. A storage device 1411, such as a magnetic disk or optical disk, is provided and coupled to bus 1403 for storing information and instructions.
  • [0119]
    Computer system 1401 may be coupled via bus 1403 to a display 1413, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 1415, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 1403 for communicating information and command selections to processor 1405. Another type of user input device is cursor control 1417, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 1405 and for controlling cursor movement on display 1413.
  • [0120]
    Embodiments are related to the use of computer system 1401 to perform the PEP functions of the PEP end point 210. According to one embodiment, this automatic update approach is provided by computer system 1401 in response to processor 1405 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 1407. Such instructions may be read into main memory 1407 from another computer-readable medium, such as storage device 1411. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 1407 causes processor 1405 to perform the process steps described herein. One or more processors in a multiprocessing arrangement may also be employed to execute the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 1407. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions. Thus, embodiments are not limited to any specific combination of hardware circuitry and software.
  • [0121]
    The term “computer-readable medium” as used herein refers to any medium that participates in providing instructions to processor 1405 for execution of the PEP functions of the PEP end point 210. Such a medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, non-volatile media, volatile media, and transmission media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as storage device 1411. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory 1407. Transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise bus 1403. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio wave and infrared data communications.
  • [0122]
    Common forms of computer-readable media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards, paper tape, any other physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave as described hereinafter, or any other medium from which a computer can read.
  • [0123]
    Various forms of computer readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 1405 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions relating to execution of the PEP functions of the PEP end point 210 into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem local to computer system 1401 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infrared transmitter to convert the data to an infrared signal. An infrared detector coupled to bus 1403 can receive the data carried in the infrared signal and place the data on bus 1403. Bus 1403 carries the data to main memory 1407, from which processor 1405 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 1407 may optionally be stored on storage device 1411 either before or after execution by processor 1405.
  • [0124]
    Computer system 1401 also includes one or more communication interfaces 1419 coupled to bus 1403. Communication interfaces 1419 provide a two-way data communication coupling to network links 1421 and 1422, which are connected to a local area network 14(LAN) 1423 and a wide area network (WAN) 1424, respectively. The WAN 1424, according to one embodiment of the present invention, may be a satellite network. For example, communication interface 1419 may be a network interface card to attach to any packet switched LAN. As another example, communication interface 1419 may be an asymmetrical digital subscriber line (ADSL) card, an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card, a cable modem, or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. Wireless links may also be implemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 1419 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information.
  • [0125]
    Network link 1421 typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, network link 1421 may provide a connection through local area network 1423 to a host computer 1425 or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP) 1427. ISP 1427 in turn provides data communication services through the Internet 505. In addition, LAN 1423 is linked to an intranet 1429. The intranet 1429, LAN 1423 and Internet 505 all use electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals on network link 1421 and through communication interface 1419, which carry the digital data to and from computer system 1401, are exemplary forms of carrier waves transporting the information.
  • [0126]
    Computer system 1401 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 1421 and communication interface 1419. In the Internet example, a server 1431 might transmit a requested code for an application program through Internet 505, ISP 1427, LAN 1423 and communication interface 1419. The received code may be executed by processor 1405 as it is received, and/or stored in storage device 1411, or other non-volatile storage for later execution. In this manner, computer system 1401 may obtain application code in the form of a carrier wave. Computer system 1401 can transmit notifications and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link 1421 and communication interface 1419.
  • [0127]
    The techniques described herein provide several advantages over prior approaches to improving network performance, particularly in a packet switched network such as the Internet. A local PEP end point and a remote PEP end point communicate to optimize the exchange of data through a TCP spoofing functionality. In the event of a failure of the local PEP end point, a redundancy switch occurs, whereby the remote PEP end point directs its communication to another local PEP end point that serves as a redundant gateway. The redundant gateway is configured to minimize the blocking of unspoofed TCP connections through the use of a reset function in conjunction with a delay timer. The reset function effectively terminates the unspoofed TCP connections on the local side for the duration of the delay timer period. This approach advantageously avoids delaying the restarting of spoofed TCP connections.
  • [0128]
    Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.

Claims (35)

    What is claimed is:
  1. 1. A method for performing redundancy switching from a first platform to a second platform, the method comprising:
    identifying a message received over a connection according to a prescribed protocol as an unspoofed message;
    terminating, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identifying step; and
    restarting a spoofed connection between the second platform and a host.
  2. 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
    invoking a reset function, wherein the reset function transmits a reset message to a local host that forwarded the message to terminate the connection.
  3. 3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
    determining whether the predetermined period has expired; and
    forwarding unspoofed messages to a remote platform based upon the determining step.
  4. 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the prescribed protocol is the Transmission Control Protocol, the method further comprising:
    determining whether global TCP spoofing is enabled; and
    selectively forward TCP segments unspoofed to a remote platform.
  5. 5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
    establishing a backbone connection from the second platform to a remote platform; and
    forwarding a spoofed message over the backbone connection to a remote host.
  6. 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the backbone connection in the establishing step includes a space link over a satellite network.
  7. 7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
    forwarding messages associated with another protocol to a remote platform irrespective of the predetermined period.
  8. 8. A communication system comprising:
    a first platform configured to communicate with a remote platform; and
    a second platform configured to communicate with the remote platform upon failure of the first platform to communicate with the remote platform, the second platform being configured to identify a message received from a local host over a connection according to a prescribed protocol as an unspoofed message, wherein the second platform terminates, during a predetermined period, the connection in response to the identified message.
  9. 9. The system according to claim 8, wherein the second platform restarts a spoofed connection with another host.
  10. 10. The system according to claim 8, wherein the second platform has a timer to measure the predetermined period, the second platform being configured to determine whether the timer has expired and forwarding unspoofed messages to the remote platform.
  11. 11. The system according to claim 8, wherein the prescribed protocol is the Transmission Control Protocol, the second platform being configured to determine whether global TCP spoofing is enabled and to selectively forward TCP segments unspoofed to the remote platform.
  12. 12. The system according to claim 8, further comprising:
    a backbone connection providing connectivity between the second platform and the remote platform, wherein the second platform configured to forward a spoofed message over the backbone connection.
  13. 13. The system according to claim 12, wherein the backbone connection is established over a satellite network.
  14. 14. The system according to claim 8, wherein the second platform is configured to forward messages associated with another protocol to the remote platform irrespective of the predetermined period.
  15. 15. A communication gateway for providing redundant communication in a communication system having a remote platform, the gateway comprising:
    a communication interface configured to receive a message from a host over a connection according to a prescribed protocol; and
    a processor coupled to the communication interface and configured to identify the message received as an unspoofed message, and configured to terminate, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identified message, the processor being configured to restart a spoofed connection with another host.
  16. 16. The gateway according to claim 15, wherein the processor is configured to invoke a reset function to transmit a reset message to the host via the communication interface to terminate the connection.
  17. 17. The gateway according to claim 15, wherein the processor is configured to determine whether the predetermined period has expired, and to selectively forward unspoofed messages to a remote platform.
  18. 18. The gateway according to claim 15, wherein the prescribed protocol is the Transmission Control Protocol, the processor being configured determine whether global TCP spoofing is enabled and to selectively forward TCP segments unspoofed to a remote platform.
  19. 19. The gateway according to claim 15, wherein the communication interface communicates to a remote platform over a backbone connection, the processor being configured to forward a spoofed message over the backbone connection to the remote platform.
  20. 20. The gateway according to claim 19, wherein the backbone connection includes a space link over a satellite network.
  21. 21. The gateway according to claim 15, wherein the processor forwards messages associated with another protocol to a remote platform irrespective of the predetermined period.
  22. 22. A communication gateway for providing redundant communication in a communication system having a remote platform, the gateway comprising:
    means for identifying a message received over a connection according to a prescribed protocol as an unspoofed message;
    means for terminating, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identified message; and
    means for restarting a spoofed connection between the second platform and a host.
  23. 23. The gateway according to claim 22, further comprising:
    means for invoking a reset function, wherein the reset function transmits a reset message to a local host that forwarded the message to terminate the connection.
  24. 24. The gateway according to claim 22, further comprising:
    means for determining whether the predetermined period has expired; and
    means for forwarding unspoofed messages to a remote platform based upon the expiration of the predetermined period.
  25. 25. The gateway according to claim 22, wherein the prescribed protocol is the Transmission Control Protocol, the gateway further comprising:
    means for determining whether global TCP spoofing is enabled; and
    means for selectively forward TCP segments unspoofed to a remote platform.
  26. 26. The gateway according to claim 22, further comprising:
    means for establishing a backbone connection from the second platform to a remote platform; and
    means for forwarding a spoofed message over the backbone connection to a remote host.
  27. 27. The gateway according to claim 26, wherein the backbone connection includes a space link over a satellite network.
  28. 28. The gateway according to claim 22, further comprising:
    means for forwarding messages associated with another protocol to a remote platform irrespective of the predetermined period.
  29. 29. A computer-readable medium carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions for performing redundancy switching from a first platform to a second platform, the one or more sequences of one or more instructions including instructions which, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform the steps of:
    identifying a message received over a connection according to a prescribed protocol as an unspoofed message;
    terminating, during a predetermined period, the connection based upon the identifying step; and
    restarting a spoofed connection between the second platform and a host.
  30. 30. The computer-readable medium according to claim 29, wherein the one or more processors further perform the step of:
    invoking a reset function, wherein the reset function transmits a reset message to a local host that forwarded the message to terminate the connection.
  31. 31. The computer-readable medium according to claim 29, wherein the one or more processors further perform the steps of:
    determining whether the predetermined period has expired; and
    forwarding unspoofed messages to a remote platform based upon the determining step.
  32. 32. The computer-readable medium according to claim 29, wherein the prescribed protocol is the Transmission Control Protocol, the one or more processors further performing the steps of:
    determining whether global TCP spoofing is enabled; and
    selectively forward TCP segments unspoofed to a remote platform.
  33. 33. The computer-readable medium according to claim 29, wherein the one or more processors further perform the steps of:
    establishing a backbone connection from the second platform to a remote platform; and
    forwarding a spoofed message over the backbone connection to a remote host.
  34. 34. The computer-readable medium according to claim 33, wherein the backbone connection in the establishing step includes a space link over a satellite network.
  35. 35. The computer-readable medium according to claim 29, wherein the one or more processors further perform the step of:
    forwarding messages associated with another protocol to a remote platform irrespective of the predetermined period.
US09903780 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for improving network performance enhancing proxy architecture with gateway redundancy Abandoned US20020038373A1 (en)

Priority Applications (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US22002600 true 2000-07-21 2000-07-21
US22563000 true 2000-08-15 2000-08-15
US09903780 US20020038373A1 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for improving network performance enhancing proxy architecture with gateway redundancy

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09903780 US20020038373A1 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for improving network performance enhancing proxy architecture with gateway redundancy

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20020038373A1 true true US20020038373A1 (en) 2002-03-28

Family

ID=26914502

Family Applications (8)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09903781 Abandoned US20020010765A1 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for prioritizing traffic in a network
US09903832 Active 2023-10-06 US7219158B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for improving network performance using a performance enhancing proxy
US09903755 Active 2024-03-30 US7213077B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for providing buffer management in a performance enhancing proxy architecture
US09903779 Active 2024-01-23 US6993584B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for improving network performance by utilizing path selection, path activation, and profiles
US09903780 Abandoned US20020038373A1 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for improving network performance enhancing proxy architecture with gateway redundancy
US09905151 Abandoned US20020013840A1 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-13 Network management of a performance enhancing proxy architecture
US09905502 Active 2024-01-06 US7006480B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-13 Method and system for using a backbone protocol to improve network performance
US09905215 Active 2025-04-01 US7596802B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-13 Method and system for providing connection handling

Family Applications Before (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09903781 Abandoned US20020010765A1 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for prioritizing traffic in a network
US09903832 Active 2023-10-06 US7219158B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for improving network performance using a performance enhancing proxy
US09903755 Active 2024-03-30 US7213077B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for providing buffer management in a performance enhancing proxy architecture
US09903779 Active 2024-01-23 US6993584B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-12 Method and system for improving network performance by utilizing path selection, path activation, and profiles

Family Applications After (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US09905151 Abandoned US20020013840A1 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-13 Network management of a performance enhancing proxy architecture
US09905502 Active 2024-01-06 US7006480B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-13 Method and system for using a backbone protocol to improve network performance
US09905215 Active 2025-04-01 US7596802B2 (en) 2000-07-21 2001-07-13 Method and system for providing connection handling

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (8) US20020010765A1 (en)
EP (8) EP1175050B1 (en)
CA (8) CA2353328A1 (en)
DE (13) DE60116447T2 (en)

Cited By (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030046418A1 (en) * 2001-08-31 2003-03-06 Jignesh Raval Method and system for verifying the hardware implementation of TCP/IP
FR2842683A1 (en) * 2002-07-22 2004-01-23 Cit Alcatel Multiplexing device, comprises data compressor, bandwidth prediction device and formatting device for splicing and inserting IP datagram section
US20040044761A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-03-04 Phillipi Mark P. Systems and methods for broadband network optimization
US20040218612A1 (en) * 2003-02-03 2004-11-04 Zetterlund Jerker Mattias Shared risk group handling within a media gateway
US20050063302A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-03-24 Samuels Allen R. Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control
US20050074007A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-04-07 Samuels Allen R. Transaction boundary detection for reduction in timeout penalties
US20050249230A1 (en) * 2004-05-05 2005-11-10 Bennett Richard T Systems and methods for implementing an acknowledgement mechanism for transmission of a real-time data stream
US20070206497A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2007-09-06 Robert Plamondon Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets
US20070206615A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2007-09-06 Robert Plamondon Systems and methods for stochastic-based quality of service
US20080089347A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2008-04-17 End Ii End Communications Inc. Systems and methods for broadband network optimization
US20100050040A1 (en) * 2002-10-30 2010-02-25 Samuels Allen R Tcp selection acknowledgements for communicating delivered and missing data packets
US20100195513A1 (en) * 2009-02-04 2010-08-05 National Taiwan University Packet inspection device and method
US8259729B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2012-09-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements
US20140370820A1 (en) * 2013-06-12 2014-12-18 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus and method for measuring and reporting redundant wireless connectivity over time
US9054957B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2015-06-09 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Shared risk group handling within a media gateway
US9496991B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2016-11-15 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention

Families Citing this family (247)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7188183B1 (en) * 2000-08-04 2007-03-06 Oracle International Corporation Maintaining state information in mobile applications
US8024481B2 (en) * 2000-04-17 2011-09-20 Circadence Corporation System and method for reducing traffic and congestion on distributed interactive simulation networks
US8065399B2 (en) 2000-04-17 2011-11-22 Circadence Corporation Automated network infrastructure test and diagnostic system and method therefor
US8996705B2 (en) 2000-04-17 2015-03-31 Circadence Corporation Optimization of enhanced network links
US8898340B2 (en) 2000-04-17 2014-11-25 Circadence Corporation Dynamic network link acceleration for network including wireless communication devices
USRE45009E1 (en) 2000-04-17 2014-07-08 Circadence Corporation Dynamic network link acceleration
US8195823B2 (en) * 2000-04-17 2012-06-05 Circadence Corporation Dynamic network link acceleration
US8510468B2 (en) 2000-04-17 2013-08-13 Ciradence Corporation Route aware network link acceleration
WO2001080033A3 (en) 2000-04-17 2002-10-03 Circadence Corp System and method for implementing application -independent functionality within a network infrastructure
US7519695B2 (en) * 2000-05-26 2009-04-14 Ipass Inc. Service quality monitoring process
US7111163B1 (en) 2000-07-10 2006-09-19 Alterwan, Inc. Wide area network using internet with quality of service
US20020010765A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-01-24 John Border Method and system for prioritizing traffic in a network
US6973097B1 (en) * 2000-08-29 2005-12-06 Nortel Networks Limited Modifying message size indications in communications over data networks
US7756032B2 (en) 2000-10-17 2010-07-13 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for communicating data within measurement traffic
US7349994B2 (en) 2000-10-17 2008-03-25 Avaya Technology Corp. Method and apparatus for coordinating routing parameters via a back-channel communication medium
US7720959B2 (en) * 2000-10-17 2010-05-18 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for characterizing the quality of a network path
US7336613B2 (en) * 2000-10-17 2008-02-26 Avaya Technology Corp. Method and apparatus for the assessment and optimization of network traffic
US7487237B2 (en) * 2000-10-17 2009-02-03 Avaya Technology Corp. Load optimization
US8023421B2 (en) * 2002-07-25 2011-09-20 Avaya Inc. Method and apparatus for the assessment and optimization of network traffic
DE60141417D1 (en) 2000-10-17 2010-04-08 Avaya Technology Corp Method and apparatus for optimizing the performance and cost in an internetwork
US7406539B2 (en) * 2000-10-17 2008-07-29 Avaya Technology Corp. Method and apparatus for performance and cost optimization in an internetwork
US7839890B1 (en) * 2000-11-02 2010-11-23 Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc. Multiplexed data transmissions through a communication link
US20020087724A1 (en) * 2000-12-29 2002-07-04 Ragula Systems D/B/A Fatpipe Networks Combining connections for parallel access to multiple frame relay and other private networks
WO2002076038A1 (en) * 2001-03-19 2002-09-26 Bob Tang A method for guaranteeing quality of service on the internet by routing data along nodes without error correction processing capability
US7269157B2 (en) * 2001-04-10 2007-09-11 Internap Network Services Corporation System and method to assure network service levels with intelligent routing
FI115271B (en) * 2001-05-28 2005-03-31 Nokia Corp Method and system for implementing a high-speed local area network recovery process
WO2003015330A3 (en) 2001-08-08 2003-10-09 Flash Networks Ltd A system and a method for accelerating communication of tcp/ip based content
FI114365B (en) * 2001-08-31 2004-09-30 First Hop Oy A method for optimizing the performance of wireless networks
US7788381B2 (en) * 2001-09-17 2010-08-31 Foundry Networks, Inc. System and method for router keep-alive control
US7613167B2 (en) * 2001-09-27 2009-11-03 Broadcom Corporation Method and system for upstream priority lookup at physical interface
US7127503B2 (en) * 2001-10-10 2006-10-24 Juniper Networks, Inc. Computer networking system, device, and method for improved speed in web page rendering
US7668966B2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2010-02-23 Internap Network Services Corporation Data network controller
US7222190B2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2007-05-22 Internap Network Services Corporation System and method to provide routing control of information over data networks
US7561517B2 (en) 2001-11-02 2009-07-14 Internap Network Services Corporation Passive route control of data networks
US7133365B2 (en) * 2001-11-02 2006-11-07 Internap Network Services Corporation System and method to provide routing control of information over networks
DE60231138D1 (en) * 2001-11-12 2009-03-26 Ericsson Telefon Ab L M Process for provision of quality-of-service systems in accordance ieee 802.11
US20030131079A1 (en) * 2001-11-13 2003-07-10 Ems Technologies, Inc. Performance enhancing proxy techniques for internet protocol traffic
US7221675B2 (en) * 2001-12-07 2007-05-22 Nortel Networks Limited Address resolution method for a virtual private network, and customer edge device for implementing the method
EP1328091B1 (en) * 2002-01-11 2008-11-19 Alcatel Lucent Modem system and aggregator for paths with different transmission profiles
US8090866B1 (en) 2002-01-18 2012-01-03 Cisco Technology, Inc. TCP proxy connection management in a gigabit environment
US20030172264A1 (en) * 2002-01-28 2003-09-11 Hughes Electronics Method and system for providing security in performance enhanced network
DE60322988D1 (en) * 2002-01-28 2008-10-02 Hughes Network Systems Llc Method and apparatus for integrating functions to improve performance in a virtual private network (VPN)
US20030219022A1 (en) * 2002-01-28 2003-11-27 Hughes Electronics Method and system for utilizing virtual private network (VPN) connections in a performance enhanced network
US8976798B2 (en) 2002-01-28 2015-03-10 Hughes Network Systems, Llc Method and system for communicating over a segmented virtual private network (VPN)
US7389533B2 (en) * 2002-01-28 2008-06-17 Hughes Network Systems, Llc Method and system for adaptively applying performance enhancing functions
CN100544307C (en) * 2002-03-06 2009-09-23 艾利森电话股份有限公司 Method and system of load control
US7103674B2 (en) * 2002-03-28 2006-09-05 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus and method of reducing dataflow distruption when detecting path maximum transmission unit (PMTU)
KR100453056B1 (en) * 2002-03-29 2004-10-15 삼성전자주식회사 Method for changing PMTU on dynamic IP network and apparatus thereof
US7543087B2 (en) * 2002-04-22 2009-06-02 Alacritech, Inc. Freeing transmit memory on a network interface device prior to receiving an acknowledgement that transmit data has been received by a remote device
US8140888B1 (en) * 2002-05-10 2012-03-20 Cisco Technology, Inc. High availability network processing system
US20040105445A1 (en) * 2002-06-19 2004-06-03 Jeremy Wyn-Harris Internet protocol for resource-constrained devices
US9088494B2 (en) * 2002-06-26 2015-07-21 Avaya Communication Israel Ltd. Packet fragmentation prevention
US7512120B2 (en) * 2002-07-09 2009-03-31 Ntt Docomo, Inc. Node, correspondent node, mobility anchor point, and home agent in packet communication system, packet communication system, and path MTU discovery method
JP2004056306A (en) * 2002-07-17 2004-02-19 Ntt Docomo Inc Communication control system, communication control method, repeater, and communication control program
US7653012B2 (en) * 2002-09-26 2010-01-26 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Relay transmission of data in a centralized network
US20040081089A1 (en) * 2002-09-26 2004-04-29 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Transmitting data on scheduled channels in a centralized network
US7698453B2 (en) * 2003-07-29 2010-04-13 Oribital Data Corporation Early generation of acknowledgements for flow control
US7542471B2 (en) * 2002-10-30 2009-06-02 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method of determining path maximum transmission unit
US7656799B2 (en) * 2003-07-29 2010-02-02 Citrix Systems, Inc. Flow control system architecture
EP1652087B1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2015-07-08 Citrix Systems, Inc. Flow control architecture
US7949737B2 (en) * 2002-11-04 2011-05-24 Riverbed Technology, Inc. Method and apparatus for grouping nodes based on connection characteristics
US8090809B2 (en) * 2002-11-04 2012-01-03 Riverbed Technology, Inc. Role grouping
EP1570392A4 (en) * 2002-11-08 2006-09-27 Arbitration Forums Inc A system and process for electronic subrogation, inter-organization workflow management, inter-organization transaction processing and optimized web-baser user interaction
US7730063B2 (en) * 2002-12-10 2010-06-01 Asset Trust, Inc. Personalized medicine service
US20060184473A1 (en) * 2003-11-19 2006-08-17 Eder Jeff S Entity centric computer system
US7584298B2 (en) * 2002-12-13 2009-09-01 Internap Network Services Corporation Topology aware route control
US7295510B2 (en) * 2002-12-17 2007-11-13 At&T Corporation Method of estimating restoration capacity in a network
US20060155856A1 (en) * 2003-01-10 2006-07-13 Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha Communications device, network system, communication management method, request signal, response signal, program, and recording medium containing the program
US6965564B2 (en) 2003-02-14 2005-11-15 America Online, Inc. Wireless datagram transaction protocol system
CN100556025C (en) * 2003-03-20 2009-10-28 艾利森电话股份有限公司 Data unit transmission method and device
CN1300986C (en) * 2003-04-14 2007-02-14 华为技术有限公司 Method of realizing quick five seven layer exchange
US20050055371A1 (en) * 2003-06-05 2005-03-10 Singam Sunder Method and system to manage a network connection application
US7248589B2 (en) * 2003-06-05 2007-07-24 International Business Machines Corporation Apparatus for enabling multi-tuple TCP sockets within a computer network
US20040264368A1 (en) * 2003-06-30 2004-12-30 Nokia Corporation Data transfer optimization in packet data networks
US7286476B2 (en) * 2003-08-01 2007-10-23 F5 Networks, Inc. Accelerating network performance by striping and parallelization of TCP connections
EP1509002B1 (en) * 2003-08-19 2007-10-24 Sony Deutschland GmbH RF Coverage extension for wireless home networking systems
CN1954574B (en) 2003-12-08 2011-04-06 美国博通公司 Unified infrastructure over Ethernet
US8285881B2 (en) * 2003-09-10 2012-10-09 Broadcom Corporation System and method for load balancing and fail over
US7468948B2 (en) * 2003-09-17 2008-12-23 Steven A Rogers Empirical scheduling of network packets using coarse and fine testing periods
US7529247B2 (en) * 2003-09-17 2009-05-05 Rivulet Communications, Inc. Empirical scheduling of network packets
WO2005034531A3 (en) * 2003-10-09 2006-03-23 Jong Hoe An Method of generating plcm for broadcast/multicast service and apparatus thereof
US7339923B2 (en) * 2003-10-31 2008-03-04 Rivulet Communications, Inc. Endpoint packet scheduling system
US7978716B2 (en) 2003-11-24 2011-07-12 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for providing a VPN solution
US7925754B2 (en) * 2003-11-21 2011-04-12 Microsoft Corporation Method and computer program product to provide synch notifications to client devices
US7508813B2 (en) * 2003-11-25 2009-03-24 Rivulet Communications Local area network contention avoidance
DE60312347D1 (en) * 2003-12-16 2007-04-19 Cit Alcatel Arrangement with a terminal, an access multiplexer and a network
US20050141551A1 (en) * 2003-12-29 2005-06-30 Mcneil Roy Jr. Common LAN architecture and flow control relay
KR100602651B1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2006-07-19 삼성전자주식회사 Apparatus and method of tcp connection management
US7409445B2 (en) * 2004-05-27 2008-08-05 International Business Machines Corporation Method for facilitating monitoring and simultaneously analyzing of network events of multiple hosts via a single network interface
US7757074B2 (en) 2004-06-30 2010-07-13 Citrix Application Networking, Llc System and method for establishing a virtual private network
US8954595B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2015-02-10 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP buffering
US8495305B2 (en) * 2004-06-30 2013-07-23 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and device for performing caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network
US8739274B2 (en) 2004-06-30 2014-05-27 Citrix Systems, Inc. Method and device for performing integrated caching in a data communication network
EP1771979B1 (en) 2004-07-23 2011-11-23 Citrix Systems, Inc. A method and systems for securing remote access to private networks
KR20070045282A (en) 2004-07-23 2007-05-02 사이트릭스 시스템스, 인크. Systems and methods for optimizing communications between network nodes
US9189307B2 (en) * 2004-08-06 2015-11-17 LiveQoS Inc. Method of improving the performance of an access network for coupling user devices to an application server
KR101111099B1 (en) * 2004-09-09 2012-02-17 아바야 테크놀러지 코퍼레이션 Methods of and systems for network traffic security
US8024483B1 (en) 2004-10-01 2011-09-20 F5 Networks, Inc. Selective compression for network connections
US7453885B2 (en) * 2004-10-13 2008-11-18 Rivulet Communications, Inc. Network connection device
EP1813075A1 (en) * 2004-11-15 2007-08-01 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (publ) Method for modifying mss
US7610400B2 (en) * 2004-11-23 2009-10-27 Juniper Networks, Inc. Rule-based networking device
US7810089B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2010-10-05 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for automatic installation and execution of a client-side acceleration program
US8700695B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2014-04-15 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP pooling
US8549149B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2013-10-01 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for providing client-side accelerated access to remote applications via TCP multiplexing
US20060253605A1 (en) * 2004-12-30 2006-11-09 Prabakar Sundarrajan Systems and methods for providing integrated client-side acceleration techniques to access remote applications
US8706877B2 (en) 2004-12-30 2014-04-22 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for providing client-side dynamic redirection to bypass an intermediary
WO2006074436A3 (en) * 2005-01-06 2006-08-31 Rockwell Automation Tech Inc Firewall method and apparatus for industrial systems
US7664857B2 (en) 2007-01-26 2010-02-16 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods of using an IP ID field for automatic WAN/LAN detection
US8077632B2 (en) * 2005-01-20 2011-12-13 Citrix Systems, Inc. Automatic LAN/WAN port detection
US7581005B2 (en) 2005-01-20 2009-08-25 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for preserving transport layer protocol options
US20060209824A1 (en) * 2005-03-01 2006-09-21 The Mitre Corporation Method, apparatus, and computer program product for transmitting and receiving broadcast packets
US7773551B1 (en) * 2005-03-18 2010-08-10 Raytheon Company Data handling in a distributed communication network
US20060242156A1 (en) * 2005-04-20 2006-10-26 Bish Thomas W Communication path management system
US8069250B2 (en) * 2005-04-28 2011-11-29 Vmware, Inc. One-way proxy system
US7657537B1 (en) 2005-04-29 2010-02-02 Netapp, Inc. System and method for specifying batch execution ordering of requests in a storage system cluster
US8064459B2 (en) * 2005-07-18 2011-11-22 Broadcom Israel Research Ltd. Method and system for transparent TCP offload with transmit and receive coupling
US8392684B2 (en) 2005-08-12 2013-03-05 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Data encryption in a network memory architecture for providing data based on local accessibility
US8929402B1 (en) 2005-09-29 2015-01-06 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for compressing packet data by predicting subsequent data
EP1763201B1 (en) * 2005-09-13 2009-04-15 NTT DoCoMo INC. Apparatus and method for data relay
US8335576B1 (en) * 2005-09-22 2012-12-18 Teradici Corporation Methods and apparatus for bridging an audio controller
US20070071026A1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2007-03-29 Rivulet Communications, Inc. Compressed video packet scheduling system
US8250229B2 (en) * 2005-09-29 2012-08-21 International Business Machines Corporation Internet protocol security (IPSEC) packet processing for multiple clients sharing a single network address
CN100401688C (en) 2005-09-30 2008-07-09 华为技术有限公司 Automatic restoring detection method for optical communication system, automatic restoring method and device
US7773630B2 (en) * 2005-11-12 2010-08-10 Liquid Computing Corportation High performance memory based communications interface
JP4531683B2 (en) * 2005-11-16 2010-08-25 パナソニック株式会社 Wireless communication device and an ad hoc route information acquisition method
EP1793553A1 (en) * 2005-12-02 2007-06-06 Alcatel Lucent A transmission control protocol (TCP) host with TCP convergence module
US7940713B2 (en) * 2005-12-08 2011-05-10 Electronics And Telecommunications Research Institute Apparatus and method for traffic performance improvement and traffic security in interactive satellite communication system
US7921184B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2011-04-05 Citrix Systems, Inc. System and method for performing flash crowd caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network
US8255456B2 (en) * 2005-12-30 2012-08-28 Citrix Systems, Inc. System and method for performing flash caching of dynamically generated objects in a data communication network
US8301839B2 (en) 2005-12-30 2012-10-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. System and method for performing granular invalidation of cached dynamically generated objects in a data communication network
JP4984531B2 (en) * 2006-01-06 2012-07-25 富士通株式会社 Server monitoring program, the relay device, server monitoring method
US8199731B2 (en) * 2006-01-25 2012-06-12 Motorola Mobility, Inc. Method and apparatus for facilitating switched packet data services on multiple networks
US8160062B2 (en) * 2006-01-31 2012-04-17 Microsoft Corporation Network connectivity determination based on passive analysis of connection-oriented path information
JP2007206871A (en) * 2006-01-31 2007-08-16 Toshiba Corp Information processor and drawing control method
US7890655B2 (en) * 2006-02-16 2011-02-15 Cisco Technology, Inc. Storage area network port based data transfer acceleration
WO2007095967A1 (en) * 2006-02-27 2007-08-30 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Flow control mechanism using local and global acknowledgements
EP2030349B1 (en) * 2006-03-06 2016-11-02 Marc Timothy Turk Data message management system
US20070226347A1 (en) * 2006-03-23 2007-09-27 Chu Hsiao-Keng J Method and apparatus for dynamically changing the TCP behavior of a network connection
US20070233886A1 (en) * 2006-04-04 2007-10-04 Fan Kan F Method and system for a one bit TCP offload
US8004973B2 (en) 2006-04-25 2011-08-23 Citrix Systems, Inc. Virtual inline configuration for a network device
US7650406B2 (en) * 2006-04-26 2010-01-19 Microsoft Corporation Termination of a security association between devices
US7596628B2 (en) * 2006-05-01 2009-09-29 Broadcom Corporation Method and system for transparent TCP offload (TTO) with a user space library
US7756134B2 (en) 2006-05-02 2010-07-13 Harris Corporation Systems and methods for close queuing to support quality of service
US7894509B2 (en) * 2006-05-18 2011-02-22 Harris Corporation Method and system for functional redundancy based quality of service
US8064464B2 (en) 2006-06-16 2011-11-22 Harris Corporation Method and system for inbound content-based QoS
US7990860B2 (en) 2006-06-16 2011-08-02 Harris Corporation Method and system for rule-based sequencing for QoS
US7856012B2 (en) 2006-06-16 2010-12-21 Harris Corporation System and methods for generic data transparent rules to support quality of service
US8516153B2 (en) 2006-06-16 2013-08-20 Harris Corporation Method and system for network-independent QoS
US20070291768A1 (en) * 2006-06-16 2007-12-20 Harris Corporation Method and system for content-based differentiation and sequencing as a mechanism of prioritization for QOS
US7916626B2 (en) 2006-06-19 2011-03-29 Harris Corporation Method and system for fault-tolerant quality of service
WO2007149742A3 (en) * 2006-06-19 2008-04-03 Liquid Computing Corp Methods and systems for reliable data transmission using selective retransmission
US8730981B2 (en) 2006-06-20 2014-05-20 Harris Corporation Method and system for compression based quality of service
US7769028B2 (en) 2006-06-21 2010-08-03 Harris Corporation Systems and methods for adaptive throughput management for event-driven message-based data
US8300653B2 (en) 2006-07-31 2012-10-30 Harris Corporation Systems and methods for assured communications with quality of service
US8885632B2 (en) 2006-08-02 2014-11-11 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Communications scheduler
US8755381B2 (en) 2006-08-02 2014-06-17 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Data matching using flow based packet data storage
US7907621B2 (en) * 2006-08-03 2011-03-15 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for using a client agent to manage ICMP traffic in a virtual private network environment
US8244883B2 (en) 2006-08-03 2012-08-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods of for providing multi-mode transport layer compression
US8493858B2 (en) 2006-08-22 2013-07-23 Citrix Systems, Inc Systems and methods for providing dynamic connection spillover among virtual servers
US8312120B2 (en) * 2006-08-22 2012-11-13 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for providing dynamic spillover of virtual servers based on bandwidth
EP1892883A1 (en) * 2006-08-23 2008-02-27 Thomson Telecom Belgium Method and device for identifying and selecting an interface to access a network
US7933257B2 (en) * 2006-09-20 2011-04-26 Cisco Technology, Inc. Using QoS tunnels for TCP latency optimization
EP2074769A2 (en) * 2006-10-06 2009-07-01 ViaSat, Inc. Dynamic feedback for outbound link rate adjustment in multi-rate downstream
US8102768B2 (en) * 2006-10-18 2012-01-24 D & S Consultants, Inc. Method and system for traffic flow control in a communication network
WO2008049425A1 (en) * 2006-10-24 2008-05-02 Medianet Innovations A/S Method and system for firewall friendly real-time communication
US7873964B2 (en) 2006-10-30 2011-01-18 Liquid Computing Corporation Kernel functions for inter-processor communications in high performance multi-processor systems
WO2008058263A3 (en) * 2006-11-08 2008-08-21 Marius Buibas Complex network mapping
US9344356B2 (en) * 2007-02-28 2016-05-17 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development Lp Transmitting a packet from a distributed trunk switch
US7706266B2 (en) * 2007-03-12 2010-04-27 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods of providing proxy-based quality of service
US7865589B2 (en) 2007-03-12 2011-01-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for providing structured policy expressions to represent unstructured data in a network appliance
US7853679B2 (en) * 2007-03-12 2010-12-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for configuring handling of undefined policy events
US7870277B2 (en) * 2007-03-12 2011-01-11 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for using object oriented expressions to configure application security policies
US8490148B2 (en) 2007-03-12 2013-07-16 Citrix Systems, Inc Systems and methods for managing application security profiles
US8631147B2 (en) 2007-03-12 2014-01-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for configuring policy bank invocations
US7853678B2 (en) * 2007-03-12 2010-12-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for configuring flow control of policy expressions
US8009687B2 (en) * 2007-03-28 2011-08-30 Ixia Measurement of network performance in transporting packet streams
US8677479B2 (en) * 2007-04-16 2014-03-18 Microsoft Corporation Detection of adversaries through collection and correlation of assessments
US8606861B2 (en) 2007-04-27 2013-12-10 Cellco Partnership Method, apparatus, and computer program product for reducing session related message size
US8171238B1 (en) 2007-07-05 2012-05-01 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Identification of data stored in memory
US8095774B1 (en) 2007-07-05 2012-01-10 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Pre-fetching data into a memory
US8582966B2 (en) * 2007-09-10 2013-11-12 Cortina Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for protection switching in passive optical network
US20090083422A1 (en) * 2007-09-25 2009-03-26 Network Connectivity Solutions Corp. Apparatus and method for improving network infrastructure
US8305896B2 (en) * 2007-10-31 2012-11-06 Cisco Technology, Inc. Selective performance enhancement of traffic flows
US8307115B1 (en) 2007-11-30 2012-11-06 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Network memory mirroring
US8489562B1 (en) 2007-11-30 2013-07-16 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Deferred data storage
US8464074B1 (en) 2008-05-30 2013-06-11 Cisco Technology, Inc. Storage media encryption with write acceleration
US20090319531A1 (en) * 2008-06-20 2009-12-24 Bong Jun Ko Method and Apparatus for Detecting Devices Having Implementation Characteristics Different from Documented Characteristics
US9717021B2 (en) 2008-07-03 2017-07-25 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Virtual network overlay
US8743683B1 (en) 2008-07-03 2014-06-03 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Quality of service using multiple flows
FR2933834A1 (en) * 2008-07-11 2010-01-15 Canon Kk Method for managing a transmission of data streams on a transport channel of a tunnel, tunnel header, and computer program product means corresponding storage.
CN101631065B (en) * 2008-07-16 2012-04-18 华为技术有限公司 Method and device for controlling congestion of wireless multi-hop network
US8811431B2 (en) 2008-11-20 2014-08-19 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for compressing packet data
US8407721B2 (en) 2008-12-12 2013-03-26 Microsoft Corporation Communication interface selection on multi-homed devices
FR2950215B1 (en) * 2009-09-11 2011-11-25 Thales Sa Method and system for controlling the routing of a stream of data from a service class through a mesh network and figure
JP5785556B2 (en) * 2009-12-10 2015-09-30 ロイヤル バンク オブ カナダ Synchronization of data with networked computing resources
US8423607B2 (en) * 2010-06-01 2013-04-16 Qualcomm Incorporated Fallback procedures for domain name server update in a mobile IP registration
US8819777B2 (en) * 2010-06-04 2014-08-26 Lockheed Martin Corporation Method and apparatus for preventing and analyzing network intrusion
JP5672779B2 (en) * 2010-06-08 2015-02-18 ソニー株式会社 Transmission control apparatus, and a transmission control method
US20120005063A1 (en) * 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 NYSE Euronext Fix proxy server
KR20120002424A (en) * 2010-06-30 2012-01-05 한국전자통신연구원 Communication node and communication method
US8875220B2 (en) * 2010-07-01 2014-10-28 Raytheom Company Proxy-based network access protection
US8417812B1 (en) * 2010-07-12 2013-04-09 Vmware, Inc. Methods and systems for detecting anomalies during IO accesses
US8719401B1 (en) 2010-07-12 2014-05-06 Vmware, Inc. Decentralized input/output resource management
US8364812B2 (en) 2010-08-27 2013-01-29 Sandvine Incorporated Ulc Method and system for network data flow management
US8699499B2 (en) * 2010-12-08 2014-04-15 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Methods and apparatus to provision cloud computing network elements
US8929816B2 (en) * 2011-05-13 2015-01-06 Nokia Corporation Multiple apparatus selection via touch
US8929817B2 (en) 2011-05-13 2015-01-06 Nokia Corporation Sensor-based touch inquiry control
US8965285B2 (en) 2011-05-13 2015-02-24 Nokia Corporation Touch inquiry
US8650300B2 (en) * 2011-06-07 2014-02-11 International Business Machines Corporation Transparent heterogenous link pairing
US8732798B2 (en) * 2011-08-03 2014-05-20 Blackberry Limited Automatic disabling of enabled connection profile for wireless network
US9130991B2 (en) * 2011-10-14 2015-09-08 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Processing data packets in performance enhancing proxy (PEP) environment
US9626224B2 (en) 2011-11-03 2017-04-18 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Optimizing available computing resources within a virtual environment
JP5845462B2 (en) * 2011-11-07 2016-01-20 パナソニックIpマネジメント株式会社 Communication system and a transmission unit for use therein
US8665847B2 (en) 2011-11-08 2014-03-04 Microsoft Corporation Service-assisted network access point selection
EP2798797B1 (en) * 2011-12-29 2016-04-06 Thomson Licensing Network gateway and a method for transmitting packets of a data stream
CN103188727B (en) 2011-12-30 2016-08-24 财团法人工业技术研究院 Communication system and method to assist tcp packet transmission
US8812542B1 (en) * 2012-03-30 2014-08-19 Emc Corporation On-the-fly determining of alert relationships in a distributed system
CN103390148B (en) * 2012-05-10 2017-04-26 宏碁股份有限公司 Use barcode pattern connection setting method, system and user devices
JP6056857B2 (en) * 2012-06-25 2017-01-11 日本電気株式会社 The communication control apparatus and communication control method
EP2725868B1 (en) * 2012-10-24 2017-10-04 BlackBerry Limited System and method for controlling connection timeout in a communication network
JP2014096674A (en) * 2012-11-08 2014-05-22 Hitachi High-Technologies Corp Network device, network device control method, and network system
US9769034B2 (en) 2012-12-14 2017-09-19 Futurewei Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for policy based routing in information centric networking based home networks
US9398039B2 (en) * 2013-03-15 2016-07-19 Aruba Networks, Inc. Apparatus, system and method for suppressing erroneous reporting of attacks on a wireless network
US20140325064A1 (en) * 2013-04-08 2014-10-30 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Controlling Establishment of Multiple TCP Connections
CN104754003A (en) * 2013-12-30 2015-07-01 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 Data transmission method and system
US9356879B2 (en) * 2014-05-22 2016-05-31 Dell Products L.P. Optimized path maximum transmission unit discovery
US9860297B2 (en) 2014-06-02 2018-01-02 Nokia Technologies Oy Method, apparatus, and computer program product for media selection for moving user
US9635690B2 (en) 2014-06-24 2017-04-25 Nokia Technologies Oy Method, apparatus, and computer program product for improving security for wireless communication
US9338635B2 (en) 2014-07-01 2016-05-10 Nokia Technologies Oy Method, apparatus, and computer program product for device tracking
US9875344B1 (en) 2014-09-05 2018-01-23 Silver Peak Systems, Inc. Dynamic monitoring and authorization of an optimization device
JP6179492B2 (en) * 2014-09-11 2017-08-16 コニカミノルタ株式会社 Communication relay apparatus, a program and a communication relay method
US9265080B1 (en) 2014-10-01 2016-02-16 Nokia Technologies Oy Method, apparatus, and computer program product for multi-device output mode configuration
US20160164794A1 (en) * 2014-12-04 2016-06-09 Dell Products L.P. Detecting path mtu mismatch at first-hop router
US20160182372A1 (en) * 2014-12-22 2016-06-23 Arista Networks, Inc. Method and Apparatus of Compressing Network Forwarding Entry Information
US9755731B2 (en) * 2015-01-10 2017-09-05 Hughes Network Systems, Llc Hardware TCP accelerator
US9769070B2 (en) 2015-01-28 2017-09-19 Maxim Basunov System and method of providing a platform for optimizing traffic through a computer network with distributed routing domains interconnected through data center interconnect links
WO2016172252A1 (en) * 2015-04-20 2016-10-27 Shoelace Wireless, Inc. Systems for improved mobile internet speed and security
US9319363B1 (en) 2015-08-07 2016-04-19 Machine Zone, Inc. Scalable, real-time messaging system
US9407585B1 (en) 2015-08-07 2016-08-02 Machine Zone, Inc. Scalable, real-time messaging system
US9602455B2 (en) 2015-08-07 2017-03-21 Machine Zone, Inc. Scalable, real-time messaging system
WO2017062594A1 (en) * 2015-10-06 2017-04-13 Casbu, LLC Multi-level constrained communication system
US9319365B1 (en) 2015-10-09 2016-04-19 Machine Zone, Inc. Systems and methods for storing and transferring message data
US9385976B1 (en) 2015-10-09 2016-07-05 Machine Zone, Inc. Systems and methods for storing message data
US9397973B1 (en) 2015-10-16 2016-07-19 Machine Zone, Inc. Systems and methods for transferring message data
US9602450B1 (en) 2016-05-16 2017-03-21 Machine Zone, Inc. Maintaining persistence of a messaging system
US9608928B1 (en) * 2016-07-06 2017-03-28 Machine Zone, Inc. Multiple-speed message channel of messaging system
US9667681B1 (en) 2016-09-23 2017-05-30 Machine Zone, Inc. Systems and methods for providing messages to multiple subscribers

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5949753A (en) * 1997-04-11 1999-09-07 International Business Machines Corporation Redundant internet protocol gateways using local area network emulation
US6070073A (en) * 1997-12-18 2000-05-30 Nortel Networks Corporation Communication system and method for notification and call routing in a mobile satellite network
US6205481B1 (en) * 1998-03-17 2001-03-20 Infolibria, Inc. Protocol for distributing fresh content among networked cache servers
US6415329B1 (en) * 1998-03-06 2002-07-02 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus for improving efficiency of TCP/IP protocol over high delay-bandwidth network
US6466976B1 (en) * 1998-12-03 2002-10-15 Nortel Networks Limited System and method for providing desired service policies to subscribers accessing the internet

Family Cites Families (65)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1991004540A1 (en) * 1989-09-08 1991-04-04 Auspex Systems, Inc. Multiple facility operating system architecture
US5367643A (en) * 1991-02-06 1994-11-22 International Business Machines Corporation Generic high bandwidth adapter having data packet memory configured in three level hierarchy for temporary storage of variable length data packets
CA2072169A1 (en) * 1991-06-24 1992-12-25 Lih-Juan L. Danielson In-band/out-of-band alert delivery system
JPH0537456A (en) * 1991-07-31 1993-02-12 Nec Corp Call reconnecting system
US5309562A (en) * 1991-08-19 1994-05-03 Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. Method and apparatus for establishing protocol spoofing from a modem
EP0574140A1 (en) 1992-05-29 1993-12-15 Hewlett-Packard Company Network adapter which places a network header and data in separate memory buffers
US5432932A (en) * 1992-10-23 1995-07-11 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for dynamically controlling remote processes from a performance monitor
US5577105A (en) * 1994-03-11 1996-11-19 U.S. Robotics, Inc. Telephone call routing and switching techniques for data communications
US6658465B1 (en) * 1997-08-25 2003-12-02 Intel Corporation Method and apparatus for monitoring and controlling programs in a network
US6701370B1 (en) * 1994-06-08 2004-03-02 Hughes Electronics Corporation Network system with TCP/IP protocol spoofing
WO1995034153A1 (en) 1994-06-08 1995-12-14 Hughes Aircraft Company Apparatus and method for hybrid network access
WO1996027513A1 (en) * 1995-03-03 1996-09-12 Qualcomm Incorporated Method and apparatus for monitoring parameters of vehicle electronic control units
US5802286A (en) * 1995-05-22 1998-09-01 Bay Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for configuring a virtual network
US6418324B1 (en) * 1995-06-01 2002-07-09 Padcom, Incorporated Apparatus and method for transparent wireless communication between a remote device and host system
US5987521A (en) * 1995-07-10 1999-11-16 International Business Machines Corporation Management of path routing in packet communications networks
US5867661A (en) * 1996-02-15 1999-02-02 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus of using virtual sockets for reducing data transmitted over a wireless communication link between a client web browser and a host web server using a standard TCP protocol
US5726979A (en) * 1996-02-22 1998-03-10 Mci Corporation Network management system
US5841980A (en) * 1996-05-15 1998-11-24 Rtime, Inc. Distributed system for communication networks in multi-user applications
US6219708B1 (en) * 1996-05-30 2001-04-17 Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. System for network resource management
US5996022A (en) * 1996-06-03 1999-11-30 Webtv Networks, Inc. Transcoding data in a proxy computer prior to transmitting the audio data to a client
US6039245A (en) * 1996-06-10 2000-03-21 Diebold, Incorporated Financial transaction processing system and method
US5805818A (en) * 1996-09-11 1998-09-08 Novell, Inc. System for acknowledging availability of neighbor node using data packet containing data that is ordinarily fowarded to neighbor node
US6003084A (en) * 1996-09-13 1999-12-14 Secure Computing Corporation Secure network proxy for connecting entities
US5961594A (en) * 1996-09-26 1999-10-05 International Business Machines Corporation Remote node maintenance and management method and system in communication networks using multiprotocol agents
US6038216A (en) * 1996-11-01 2000-03-14 Packeteer, Inc. Method for explicit data rate control in a packet communication environment without data rate supervision
US6012088A (en) * 1996-12-10 2000-01-04 International Business Machines Corporation Automatic configuration for internet access device
US6085243A (en) * 1996-12-13 2000-07-04 3Com Corporation Distributed remote management (dRMON) for networks
US6023456A (en) * 1996-12-23 2000-02-08 Nortel Networks Corporation Dynamic traffic conditioning
US5995830A (en) * 1997-04-09 1999-11-30 At&T Wireless Services Inc. System and method for processing dropped calls
US6134589A (en) 1997-06-16 2000-10-17 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson Dynamic quality control network routing
US6151332A (en) * 1997-06-20 2000-11-21 Tantivy Communications, Inc. Protocol conversion and bandwidth reduction technique providing multiple nB+D ISDN basic rate interface links over a wireless code division multiple access communication system
US6081536A (en) * 1997-06-20 2000-06-27 Tantivy Communications, Inc. Dynamic bandwidth allocation to transmit a wireless protocol across a code division multiple access (CDMA) radio link
US6098108A (en) * 1997-07-02 2000-08-01 Sitara Networks, Inc. Distributed directory for enhanced network communication
US6006264A (en) * 1997-08-01 1999-12-21 Arrowpoint Communications, Inc. Method and system for directing a flow between a client and a server
US6385647B1 (en) * 1997-08-18 2002-05-07 Mci Communications Corporations System for selectively routing data via either a network that supports Internet protocol or via satellite transmission network based on size of the data
JP2001517034A (en) * 1997-09-16 2001-10-02 トランスネクサス エルエルシー Internet telephone call routing engine
JPH11163947A (en) 1997-09-22 1999-06-18 Toshiba Corp Gateway device, radio terminal, router device and gateway control method for communication network
US6061341A (en) * 1997-12-16 2000-05-09 Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) Use of transmission control protocol proxy within packet data service transmissions in a mobile network
US6038594A (en) * 1998-02-02 2000-03-14 Loral Cyberstar, Inc. Internet communication system and method with asymmetric terrestrial and satellite links
US5987233A (en) * 1998-03-16 1999-11-16 Skycache Inc. Comprehensive global information network broadcasting system and implementation thereof
US6836483B1 (en) * 1998-06-24 2004-12-28 Research Investment Network, Inc. Message system for asynchronous transfer
US6862622B2 (en) * 1998-07-10 2005-03-01 Van Drebbel Mariner Llc Transmission control protocol/internet protocol (TCP/IP) packet-centric wireless point to multi-point (PTMP) transmission system architecture
US6640248B1 (en) * 1998-07-10 2003-10-28 Malibu Networks, Inc. Application-aware, quality of service (QoS) sensitive, media access control (MAC) layer
US6173324B1 (en) * 1998-07-15 2001-01-09 At&T Corp Method and apparatus for fault detection and isolation in data
US6618393B1 (en) * 1998-08-26 2003-09-09 3Com Corporation Method and apparatus for transparent support of network protocols with header translation
US6327626B1 (en) * 1998-09-15 2001-12-04 Alteon Networks, Inc. Method and apparatus for MSS spoofing
US6856676B1 (en) * 1998-10-15 2005-02-15 Alcatel System and method of controlling and managing voice and data services in a telecommunications network
US6487170B1 (en) * 1998-11-18 2002-11-26 Nortel Networks Limited Providing admission control and network quality of service with a distributed bandwidth broker
US6434134B1 (en) * 1998-12-11 2002-08-13 Lucent Technologies, Inc. Dynamic address assignment for wireless devices accessing packet-based wired networks
US6934255B1 (en) * 1999-02-02 2005-08-23 Packeteer, Inc. Internet over satellite apparatus
US6789118B1 (en) * 1999-02-23 2004-09-07 Alcatel Multi-service network switch with policy based routing
US6570867B1 (en) * 1999-04-09 2003-05-27 Nortel Networks Limited Routes and paths management
US6275470B1 (en) * 1999-06-18 2001-08-14 Digital Island, Inc. On-demand overlay routing for computer-based communication networks
US6480901B1 (en) * 1999-07-09 2002-11-12 Lsi Logic Corporation System for monitoring and managing devices on a network from a management station via a proxy server that provides protocol converter
US6748439B1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2004-06-08 Accelerated Networks System and method for selecting internet service providers from a workstation that is connected to a local area network
US6598034B1 (en) * 1999-09-21 2003-07-22 Infineon Technologies North America Corp. Rule based IP data processing
US6839355B1 (en) * 1999-12-14 2005-01-04 Stmicroelectronics, Inc. Cable modem link layer bridge
US6829221B1 (en) * 1999-12-27 2004-12-07 Nortel Networks Limited Border gateway protocol manager and method of managing the selection of communication links
US6742043B1 (en) * 2000-01-14 2004-05-25 Webtv Networks, Inc. Reformatting with modular proxy server
US8359405B1 (en) 2000-02-28 2013-01-22 John Border Performance enhancing proxy and method for enhancing performance
US6987741B2 (en) * 2000-04-14 2006-01-17 Hughes Electronics Corporation System and method for managing bandwidth in a two-way satellite system
US6519703B1 (en) * 2000-04-14 2003-02-11 James B. Joyce Methods and apparatus for heuristic firewall
US6823387B1 (en) * 2000-06-23 2004-11-23 Microsoft Corporation System and method for enhancing a server's ability to withstand a “SYN flood” denial of service attack
US6842463B1 (en) * 2000-07-14 2005-01-11 Nortel Networks Limited Automated and adaptive management of bandwidth capacity in telecommunications networks
US20020010765A1 (en) * 2000-07-21 2002-01-24 John Border Method and system for prioritizing traffic in a network

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5949753A (en) * 1997-04-11 1999-09-07 International Business Machines Corporation Redundant internet protocol gateways using local area network emulation
US6070073A (en) * 1997-12-18 2000-05-30 Nortel Networks Corporation Communication system and method for notification and call routing in a mobile satellite network
US6415329B1 (en) * 1998-03-06 2002-07-02 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Method and apparatus for improving efficiency of TCP/IP protocol over high delay-bandwidth network
US6205481B1 (en) * 1998-03-17 2001-03-20 Infolibria, Inc. Protocol for distributing fresh content among networked cache servers
US6466976B1 (en) * 1998-12-03 2002-10-15 Nortel Networks Limited System and method for providing desired service policies to subscribers accessing the internet

Cited By (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20030046418A1 (en) * 2001-08-31 2003-03-06 Jignesh Raval Method and system for verifying the hardware implementation of TCP/IP
US7020716B2 (en) * 2001-08-31 2006-03-28 Adaptec, Inc. Method and system for verifying the hardware implementation of TCP/IP
US20050100056A1 (en) * 2002-07-22 2005-05-12 Alcatel Multiplexing device, a demultiplexing device, and a multiplexing/demultiplexing system
FR2842683A1 (en) * 2002-07-22 2004-01-23 Cit Alcatel Multiplexing device, comprises data compressor, bandwidth prediction device and formatting device for splicing and inserting IP datagram section
EP1385315A2 (en) * 2002-07-22 2004-01-28 Alcatel Alsthom Compagnie Generale D'electricite Multiplexing device, demultiplexing device and multiplexing/demultiplexing system
US7623554B2 (en) 2002-07-22 2009-11-24 Thales Multiplexing device, a demultiplexing device, and a multiplexing/demultiplexing system
EP1385315A3 (en) * 2002-07-22 2010-07-14 Alcatel Lucent Multiplexing device, demultiplexing device and multiplexing/demultiplexing system
US20040044761A1 (en) * 2002-09-03 2004-03-04 Phillipi Mark P. Systems and methods for broadband network optimization
US7305464B2 (en) 2002-09-03 2007-12-04 End Ii End Communications, Inc. Systems and methods for broadband network optimization
US8411560B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2013-04-02 Citrix Systems, Inc. TCP selection acknowledgements for communicating delivered and missing data packets
US8553699B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2013-10-08 Citrix Systems, Inc. Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements
US8259729B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2012-09-04 Citrix Systems, Inc. Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgements
US9496991B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2016-11-15 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods of using packet boundaries for reduction in timeout prevention
US9008100B2 (en) 2002-10-30 2015-04-14 Citrix Systems, Inc. Wavefront detection and disambiguation of acknowledgments
US20100050040A1 (en) * 2002-10-30 2010-02-25 Samuels Allen R Tcp selection acknowledgements for communicating delivered and missing data packets
US9054957B2 (en) 2003-02-03 2015-06-09 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Shared risk group handling within a media gateway
US7457237B2 (en) * 2003-02-03 2008-11-25 Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (Publ) Shared risk group handling within a media gateway
US20040218612A1 (en) * 2003-02-03 2004-11-04 Zetterlund Jerker Mattias Shared risk group handling within a media gateway
US8462630B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2013-06-11 Citrix Systems, Inc. Early generation of acknowledgements for flow control
US8824490B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2014-09-02 Citrix Systems, Inc. Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control
US20100232294A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2010-09-16 Samuels Allen R Early generation of acknowledgements for flow control
US8233392B2 (en) * 2003-07-29 2012-07-31 Citrix Systems, Inc. Transaction boundary detection for reduction in timeout penalties
US20070206615A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2007-09-06 Robert Plamondon Systems and methods for stochastic-based quality of service
US20070206497A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2007-09-06 Robert Plamondon Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets
US20050063302A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-03-24 Samuels Allen R. Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control
US9071543B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2015-06-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets
US8432800B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2013-04-30 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for stochastic-based quality of service
US8437284B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2013-05-07 Citrix Systems, Inc. Systems and methods for additional retransmissions of dropped packets
US8238241B2 (en) 2003-07-29 2012-08-07 Citrix Systems, Inc. Automatic detection and window virtualization for flow control
US20050074007A1 (en) * 2003-07-29 2005-04-07 Samuels Allen R. Transaction boundary detection for reduction in timeout penalties
US20080089347A1 (en) * 2003-08-29 2008-04-17 End Ii End Communications Inc. Systems and methods for broadband network optimization
US7394813B2 (en) 2004-05-05 2008-07-01 Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. Systems and methods for implementing an acknowledgement mechanism for transmission of a real-time data stream
US20050249230A1 (en) * 2004-05-05 2005-11-10 Bennett Richard T Systems and methods for implementing an acknowledgement mechanism for transmission of a real-time data stream
US8374185B2 (en) * 2009-02-04 2013-02-12 National Taiwan University Packet inspection device and method
US20100195513A1 (en) * 2009-02-04 2010-08-05 National Taiwan University Packet inspection device and method
US20140370820A1 (en) * 2013-06-12 2014-12-18 Honeywell International, Inc. Apparatus and method for measuring and reporting redundant wireless connectivity over time
US9191843B2 (en) * 2013-06-12 2015-11-17 Honeywell International Inc. Apparatus and method for measuring and reporting redundant wireless connectivity over time

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date Type
DE60117485T2 (en) 2006-10-12 grant
EP1175065A2 (en) 2002-01-23 application
EP1175045B1 (en) 2005-11-16 grant
EP1175066B1 (en) 2006-01-04 grant
DE60114097T2 (en) 2006-08-10 grant
EP1175065A3 (en) 2003-08-13 application
EP1175066A2 (en) 2002-01-23 application
US7596802B2 (en) 2009-09-29 grant
US20020071436A1 (en) 2002-06-13 application
EP1176788A3 (en) 2003-08-20 application
EP1175045B8 (en) 2006-02-01 grant
US20020059435A1 (en) 2002-05-16 application
EP1175051B1 (en) 2006-03-01 grant
EP1175066A3 (en) 2004-05-19 application
CA2353295A1 (en) 2002-01-21 application
DE60114097D1 (en) 2006-03-02 grant
CA2353345A1 (en) 2002-01-21 application
US20020034173A1 (en) 2002-03-21 application
US7219158B2 (en) 2007-05-15 grant
US20020010792A1 (en) 2002-01-24 application
US20020016851A1 (en) 2002-02-07 application
DE60117723D1 (en) 2006-05-04 grant
EP1175042B1 (en) 2006-03-08 grant
EP1175051A2 (en) 2002-01-23 application
EP1175042A3 (en) 2003-08-13 application
US20020013840A1 (en) 2002-01-31 application
CA2353348A1 (en) 2002-01-21 application
EP1175064B8 (en) 2006-02-01 grant
CA2353332A1 (en) 2002-01-21 application
EP1175050B1 (en) 2006-03-08 grant
DE60114942D1 (en) 2005-12-22 grant
CA2353328A1 (en) 2002-01-21 application
CA2353339A1 (en) 2002-01-21 application
DE60116447D1 (en) 2006-03-30 grant
EP1175045A3 (en) 2003-08-27 application
CA2353325A1 (en) 2002-01-21 application
EP1175045A2 (en) 2002-01-23 application
EP1176788B1 (en) 2006-03-29 grant
DE60112674T2 (en) 2006-06-14 grant
US20020010765A1 (en) 2002-01-24 application
CA2353348C (en) 2008-04-08 grant
EP1175050A3 (en) 2003-08-20 application
EP1175051A3 (en) 2003-08-13 application
US6993584B2 (en) 2006-01-31 grant
EP1175064B1 (en) 2005-10-19 grant
EP1175064A3 (en) 2003-08-13 application
DE60112674D1 (en) 2005-09-22 grant
CA2353329A1 (en) 2002-01-21 application
DE60114942T2 (en) 2006-08-17 grant
EP1175064A2 (en) 2002-01-23 application
EP1175065B1 (en) 2005-08-17 grant
DE60116447T2 (en) 2006-09-28 grant
EP1175050A2 (en) 2002-01-23 application
EP1175042A2 (en) 2002-01-23 application
DE60118305D1 (en) 2006-05-18 grant
DE60117485D1 (en) 2006-04-27 grant
US7006480B2 (en) 2006-02-28 grant
US7213077B2 (en) 2007-05-01 grant
DE60117722D1 (en) 2006-05-04 grant
EP1176788A2 (en) 2002-01-30 application

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Stewart et al. SCTP: new transport protocol for TCP/IP
Ong An introduction to the stream control transmission protocol (SCTP)
Tian et al. TCP in wireless environments: problems and solutions
Montenegro et al. Long thin networks
US6546425B1 (en) Method and apparatus for providing mobile and other intermittent connectivity in a computing environment
US6876639B1 (en) Transmission control protocol handoff notification system and method
US7181531B2 (en) Method to synchronize and upload an offloaded network stack connection with a network stack
US7609721B2 (en) Systems and methods for adjusting the maximum transmission unit for encrypted communications
US7007103B2 (en) Method to offload a network stack
Henderson et al. Transport protocols for Internet-compatible satellite networks
US20100098092A1 (en) Accelerating data communication using tunnels
US20060179147A1 (en) System and method for connection failover using redirection
Ford et al. TCP extensions for multipath operation with multiple addresses
US6907042B1 (en) Packet processing device
US6912588B1 (en) System and method for managing client requests in client-server networks
US7953869B2 (en) Cooperative proxy auto-discovery and connection interception
US20050281288A1 (en) Method and apparatus for discovering path maximum transmission unit (PMTU)
US20020004834A1 (en) Interception method and system for compensating disadvantageous characteristics of a communication protocol
US20050223114A1 (en) Method and apparatus for providing mobile and other intermittent connectivity in a computing environment
US6487689B1 (en) Receiver initiated recovery algorithm (RIRA) for the layer 2 tunneling protocol (L2TP)
US7369498B1 (en) Congestion control method for a packet-switched network
US20040133631A1 (en) Communication system
US20050223115A1 (en) Method and apparatus for providing mobile and other intermittent connectivity in a computing environment
US20080279216A1 (en) System and Method of Traffic Management Over Mixed Networks
US20010047474A1 (en) Communication control scheme using proxy device and security protocol in combination

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:BORDER, JOHN;BUTEHORN, MATTHEW;BURRELL, KEN;REEL/FRAME:011992/0795;SIGNING DATES FROM 20010706 TO 20010712

AS Assignment

Owner name: HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC, MARYLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIRECTV GROUP, INC., THE;REEL/FRAME:016323/0867

Effective date: 20050519

Owner name: HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,MARYLAND

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:DIRECTV GROUP, INC., THE;REEL/FRAME:016323/0867

Effective date: 20050519

AS Assignment

Owner name: DIRECTV GROUP, INC.,THE, MARYLAND

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016427/0731

Effective date: 20040316

Owner name: DIRECTV GROUP, INC.,THE,MARYLAND

Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:HUGHES ELECTRONICS CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:016427/0731

Effective date: 20040316

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

Free format text: SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:016345/0368

Effective date: 20050627

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT

Free format text: FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC;REEL/FRAME:016345/0401

Effective date: 20050627

AS Assignment

Owner name: BEAR STEARNS CORPORATE LENDING INC., NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN U.S. PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:018184/0196

Effective date: 20060828

Owner name: HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC, MARYLAND

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:018184/0170

Effective date: 20060828

Owner name: HUGHES NETWORK SYSTEMS, LLC,MARYLAND

Free format text: RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:018184/0170

Effective date: 20060828

Owner name: BEAR STEARNS CORPORATE LENDING INC.,NEW YORK

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN U.S. PATENT RIGHTS;ASSIGNOR:JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.;REEL/FRAME:018184/0196

Effective date: 20060828