US20010055332A1  Method and apparatus for minimizing near end cross talk due to discrete multitone transmission in cable binders  Google Patents
Method and apparatus for minimizing near end cross talk due to discrete multitone transmission in cable binders Download PDFInfo
 Publication number
 US20010055332A1 US20010055332A1 US09769516 US76951601A US2001055332A1 US 20010055332 A1 US20010055332 A1 US 20010055332A1 US 09769516 US09769516 US 09769516 US 76951601 A US76951601 A US 76951601A US 2001055332 A1 US2001055332 A1 US 2001055332A1
 Authority
 US
 Grant status
 Application
 Patent type
 Prior art keywords
 power
 data
 function
 bit
 channel
 Prior art date
 Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
 Granted
Links
Images
Classifications

 H—ELECTRICITY
 H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
 H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
 H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
 H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating subchannels of the transmission path
 H04L5/0058—Allocation criteria
 H04L5/0064—Rate requirement of the data, e.g. scalable bandwidth, data priority

 H—ELECTRICITY
 H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
 H04B—TRANSMISSION
 H04B3/00—Line transmission systems
 H04B3/02—Details
 H04B3/32—Reducing crosstalk, e.g. by compensating

 H—ELECTRICITY
 H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
 H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
 H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
 H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating subchannels of the transmission path
 H04L5/0044—Arrangements for allocating subchannels of the transmission path allocation of payload
 H04L5/0046—Determination of how many bits are transmitted on different subchannels

 H—ELECTRICITY
 H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
 H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
 H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
 H04L5/003—Arrangements for allocating subchannels of the transmission path
 H04L5/0058—Allocation criteria
 H04L5/006—Quality of the received signal, e.g. BER, SNR, water filling

 H—ELECTRICITY
 H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
 H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
 H04L5/00—Arrangements affording multiple use of the transmission path
 H04L5/0001—Arrangements for dividing the transmission path
 H04L5/0003—Twodimensional division
 H04L5/0005—Timefrequency
 H04L5/0007—Timefrequency the frequencies being orthogonal, e.g. OFDM(A), DMT
Abstract
In a discrete multitone modem, a method of minimizing cross talk over a twisted pair of a twisted pair cable binder in which discrete multitone data transmission is utilized comprises the steps of one of jointly minimizing near end cross talk while maximizing total data rate, jointly minimizing an arbitrary function of total power while maximizing total data rate and minimizing total near end cross talk for a given data rate, selecting a function to be optimized and performing a bit and power allocation algorithm responsive to the selected function. The process may be combined with known optimization functions such as jointly minimizing an average bit error rate while maximizing the data rate. As a result, the process is considerably more flexible and adaptable to changing parameters such as environmental parameters impacting data transmission performance in the presence of cross talk. Either a telecommunications central office modem or a remote terminal modem may be so adapted to apply such a cross talk minimization method.
Description
 [0001]This invention claims the benefit of earlier filed U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/183,308, filed Feb. 17, 2000.
 [0002]The invention relates to a method and apparatus for minimizing near end cross talk due to discrete multitone (DMT) transmission in cable binders.
 [0003]In digital communication systems employing multichannel or multicarrier transmission, the most effective allocation of bits to the channels has been discussed in the literature. The wellknown solution from information theory, analogized to pouring water over a terrain defined by the noise/attenuation of the channel transform characteristic, has been found to insure efficient use of signal power within limits defined by aggregate power and power spectral density mask limits. However, the method in some instances may not go as far as possible in exploiting available power imposed by these limits.
 [0004]For heuristic purposes, the prior art and the invention are discussed in terms of N quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) channels with a uniform symbol rate and a nonuniform (unique to each channel) QAM constellation. QAM, a form of combined amplitude and phase modulation, represents kbit sets of data by modulating two (orthogonal) quadrature carriers, cos 2πfct and sin 2πfct to generate a pulse whose phase and amplitude convey the encoded kbits of information. The QAM signal tone can be and amplitude convey the encoded kbits of information. The QAM signal tone can be viewed as a phasor in the complex plane, each distinguishable phasor representing a unique state of the tone identified with one unique value in a range. Thus, if the channel and signal power are such that 4 separate phasors can be reliably distinguished, the scheme allows two bits to be represented. For 3 bits to be represented, 8 phasors must be distinguished and so on. The number of different phasors or states that are distinguishable in a single tone (pulse), the QAM constellation, is limited by the signal to noise ratio of the channel and limits imposed by external standards as discussed below.
 [0005]In a DMT modem, a transmission frequency band is separated into N subbands or frequency bins, each corresponding to one QAM channel. In a nonideal channel each subband has a different capacity as a result of the variation of noise and attenuation with frequency. In addition, external standards impose limits on the aggregate power of a signal (the power applied in all subband channels) and a cap on the power as a function of frequency defined by a power spectral density mask.
 [0006]The power spectral density mask may be dictated by a standard used in a particular country implementing the standard (such as A.N.S.I. standard T1.4131995). The mask may also be a design constraint intentionally imposed by a modem designer for some other reason. For example, a designer may intentionally impose a constraint that no more than n bits are to be transmitted on a transmit channel frequency. Similarly, the designer may impose a constraint that a minimum of bits (or no bits) must be transmitted on a particular tone or frequency. For example, the power limit for frequencies or tones between 0 and 200 kilohertz must be less than −40 dBm/Hz (a power level referenced to one milliwatt over 1 Hz bandwidth). Above 200 kHz (to frequencies, for example, in the megahertz of spectrum), the constraint may be −34 dBm/Hz.
 [0007]Referring to FIG. 1, the attenuation/noise characteristics of a medium can be graphically represented by a floor in a power spectral graph where frequency may be represented in 100 kHz increments. The lower curve, the channel transform characteristic A, represents this floor, that is, the combined effect of noise and attenuation as a function of frequency. A certain margin of transmit power is required to meet or exceed the minimum threshold of a signal for reliable data transmission. In other words, the power of a signal in a given subband must be sufficiently high to carry a minimal (1bit) QAM tone to obtain a predefined bit error rate. The minimum margin, that is required to transmit a single bit, is represented by curve B. Curve C represents the limits imposed by a power spectral density mask imposed by an external communications standard. The other limit is on the aggregate power, also defined by an external communication standard; for example, ANSI Standard T1.4131995 limits the total or aggregate power for all subbands to 100 m Watts in the downstream direction. Some coding techniques, such as Wei code described in American National Standard for Telecommunications—Network and Customer Installation Interfaces—Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line Metallic Interface, ANSI T1.4131995, may also require a minimum number of bits in a frequency band if the band is to convey any information at all. In other words, the power spectral density mask limit may require that less energy be used than the minimum required to transmit a single bit.
 [0008]Note that the minimum allowable size of the power margin is, in part, arbitrary, since, to an extent, it is defined in terms of some a priori rules and technical criteria (which are arbitrary to the extent that they establish a dividing line between acceptable and unacceptable error rates; Bit Error Rate or BER) for the given communication system. Note also that the size of the margin available for a given subband corresponds to the dimension of the constellation that can be represented in a signal carried in that QAM channel. That is, the larger the margin in a band, the greater the number of states that can be reliably distinguished in that band and the larger the constellation that can be used.
 [0009]The above context creates a bitallocation problem. That is, given the constraints, how should bits be allocated among the available QAM channels to provide the highest possible data rates? DSL modems that use DMT modulation concentrate the transmitted information in the frequency subbands that have the minimum attenuation and noise. The optimum distribution of transmission power is obtained by distributing the power according to the wellknown “water pouring” analogy as described in Robert C. Gallagher, Information Theory and Reliable Communication, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1968. Such optimal distribution requires a strategy for allocating bits to the subbands for the idealized situation where the channel subbands approach zero width. For discrete bits, the applicable metaphor could be described as an icecube pouring analogy.
 [0010]Digital Subscriber loop (DSL) technology was conceived to maximize the throughput on twisted pair copper wiring with attendant background noise, timevariant Far End Cross Talk (FEXT) and Near End Cross Talk (NEXT). To determine the transform characteristic of the channel, the modems at a telecommunications central office and a remote terminal negotiate during an initial channel signaltonoise ratio (SNR) estimation procedure. During the procedure, the transmitter sends a known pseudo noise (PN) signal. The receiver computes the characteristics of the received signal in the form of a ratio N_{k}/g_{k}, where g_{k }is the channel gain (inverse of the attenuation) in frequency band k and N_{k }is the noise power in the band k. The literature contains many algorithms for determining the power distribution across the full frequency bandwidth for maximum data throughput. As noted above, the optimum approach for a nonuniform Gaussian noise channel divided such that each band can be considered an additive white Gaussian noise channel has been proved to be the “water pouring” algorithm of power distribution. In this case, the g_{k}/N_{k }profile is compared to a terrain and the available aggregate power limit to a fixed supply of water poured over the terrain. The depth of the water corresponds to the power spectral density. The water pouring analogy is inappropriate to allocation of power in digital channels intended for transmission of binary data (bits).
 [0011]The Digital Subscriber Loop (DSL) modems that use the Discrete MultiTone (DMT) technology must use an algorithm for assigning data bits to the multiple tones that are used for modulation. Some algorithms exist in the literature that are designed to optimally allocate the data bits and the budgeted power to the multiple tones. Most of these algorithms are based on the ‘waterfilling’ approach that postulates that optimal power allocation is obtained when the noise to attenuation ratio is considered as the ‘terrain’ and the available power is treated as ‘water’ to be poured on the terrain. All these algorithms utilize various performance functions that minimize the total allocated power, or maximize the data rate, or a combination of the two. The algorithms are designed with the purpose of either maximizing the total transmitted data rate or meeting the desired data rate, within the constraints of the budgeted total power. This strategy is quite appropriate when the required data rate is such that the DSL transmission loop is power limited. In other words, the bit and power allocation algorithm must perform the allocation such that the maximum number of data bits per frame is allocated to the frequency bins that require the least amount of power for achieving the desired bit error rate (BER).
 [0012]However, not all cases are power limited. When the required data rate is less than the maximum rate that can be supported on the loop, the assignment of data bits to frequency bins will depend upon the minimization strategy used by the allocation algorithm. The conventional algorithms minimize the total power used for transmitting a given number of data bits in one DMT frame such that the receiver experiences an average BER that is equal to the desired BER. The primary problem at the central office (CO) is that of higher near end cross talk (NEXT) and the algorithms that minimize power may not necessarily minimize the NEXT at the CO, even though the NEXT is proportional to the transmit power.
 [0013]It is an object of the invention to provide a method and apparatus for allowing any bit/power allocation algorithm to meet the objective of minimizing the near end cross talk at the central office.
 [0014]The algorithms in the prior art do not specifically attempt to minimize the near end cross talk at the central office, although the implicit intentions of the algorithm designers include the objective of minimizing the NEXT. All other algorithm designers have assumed that since the NEXT is linearly proportional to the transmitted power, minimizing the transmit power is sufficient to minimizing the crosstalk. However, the coupling of the transmit power in a typical cable binder of pairs of twisted copper wires from a source pair to a disturber pair within the binder is a nonlinear function of frequency. Therefore, equal power values in two different frequency bins result in different levels of crosstalk power. The invention solves this problem by altering the performance function that is used by the conventional algorithms.
 [0015]The foregoing summary of the invention, as well as the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are included by way of example, and not by way of limitation with regard to the claimed invention:
 [0016][0016]FIG. 1 shows an arbitrary transform characteristic of an arbitrary channel of signal transmit power versus frequency with multitone channels, a power spectral density mask limit, and a minimum power required to transmit a single bit, assuming a specific error and symbol rates, superimposed thereon and FIG. 1A is a graph of a typical cable characteristic showing channel attenuation as a function of frequency, where in both FIGS. 1 and 1A, frequency is shown in increments of 100 kHz;
 [0017][0017]FIG. 2 shows a modem in communication over one or more twisted wire pairs for purposes of describing an embodiment of the invention;
 [0018][0018]FIG. 3 shows a general diagram of elements of a communication system for purposes of describing an embodiment of the invention;
 [0019][0019]FIG. 4 shows a digital modulator and demodulator connected by a communication channel for a multitone QAM system for purposes of describing an embodiment of the invention;
 [0020][0020]FIG. 5 illustrates the major processing steps in the operation of a DMT modem; and
 [0021][0021]FIG. 6 schematically shows the various inputs to a bit allocation algorithm.
 [0022]Referring to FIGS. 1, 1A and 2, a transmitting modem 31 is connected to a receiving modem 32 by a cable 33 having one twisted pair of conductors. In long loop systems where cable 33 is of length of the order 18,000 feet or more, high signal attenuation at higher frequencies (greater than 500 kHz) is observed. This characteristic of a typical cable 33 is represented graphically by curve A′ in FIG. 1A.
 [0023]For convenience of description, the details of digital modulator 14 and digital demodulator 16 are described in terms of a QAM multitone system, although the invention is applicable to other kinds of multicarrier and multichannel signaling as will be understood by those skilled in the art in light of the teachings disclosed herein.
 [0024]Referring now also to FIG. 3, Modems 31 and 32 contain a source encoder 12, a channel encoder 13, a digital modulator 14, to accept and transmit data on channel 15 (typically, a twisted pair) from a data source 11. Channel 15 may comprise a hybrid fiber/twisted pair channel as well as comprise a twisted pair among other possible subscriber distribution plant architectures involving twisted pair cables. Modems 31 and 32 also contain a digital demodulator 16, a channel decoder 17, and a source decoder 18 to receive the data from channel 15 and supply it to a data sink 19.
 [0025]As will be recognized by those skilled in the art, source encoder 12 compresses data from data source 11 and applies the result to channel encoder 13 for error correction/detection data and applies the result to digital modulator 14. Digital modulator 14 acts as the interface with the communication channel 15 by modulating the data to generate a signal that can be applied to the communication channel 15.
 [0026]Digital demodulator 16 constructs a data stream from the received signal and applies it to channel decoder 17. Channel decoder 17 corrects errors in the data stream and applies the corrected data to source decoder 18 which decompresses the data and outputs the decompressed data to data sink 19.
 [0027]Referring to FIG. 4, in a QAM multitone modulation, the spectrum is broken into multiple subbands or QAM channels. Digital modulator 14 generates N QAM signal tones, one for each QAM channel. Each i^{th }QAM channel carries k_{i }bits of data. A serialtoparallel buffer 41 segments a serial stream of digital data into N frames, each having allocated to it k_{i }bits of data. These are applied to respective inputs of a multicarrier modulator 42 which generates a QAM tone for each channel. Multicarrier modulator 42 generates N QAM tones, one for each channel, at the same symbol rate but with a respective constellation for each channel. That is, the i^{th }QAM channel carries an 2^{kiary }QAM tone, a tone with 2^{k} _{i }signal points. Multicarrier modulator 42 modulates N subcarriers by corresponding symbols to generate the N QAM signal tones using an inverse digital Fourier transform. The allocation of bits in serialtoparallel buffer 41 is discussed in detail below.
 [0028]A paralleltoserial converter 43 adds a cyclic prefix (one known method of preventing intersymbol interference) and passes the resulting data stream through an D/A converter 44 yielding a single analog signal. After the analog signal reaches receiving modem 32, the opposite operation occurs in A/D converter 46, serialtoparallel converter 47, and multicarrier demodulator 48 and detector 49. Multicarrier demodulator 48 strips the modulating signal from the carrier, that is, it converts the QAM tone data into data representing the original modulating symbols. Detector 49 maps the resulting symbols into a set of bits either by quantizing or softdecision quantization. These symbols are then queued up in a serial data stream by parallel to serial converter 50.
 [0029][0029]FIG. 5 shows the major processing steps in the operation of a DMT modem. First, the transmitter and the receiver modems perform a process of measurement 510 during which each of the two modems at the telecommunications central office (CO) and the remote terminal (RT) measure the power spectral density (PSD) of the noise over the bandwidth of interest. Then each modem transmits a known pseudorandom noise (PRN) sequence for a predetermined duration while the respective receiving modem remains silent. The received signal is recorded for subsequent processing. The second step 520 in the initialization processing consists of estimation of the channel transfer functions by each of the two modems. The noise PSDs and the channel transfer functions are inputs to the bit and power allocation algorithm. Then, settings for any time and frequency domain equalizers can be estimated and set in the respective modems. Data transmission 530 commences after the initialization is completed.
 [0030]The mathematical model for calculating the NEXT and far end cross talk (FEXT) due to the signal carried within a twisted pair of wire sources is wellknown to those familiar with the prior art related to DMT technology. The prior art includes models of the power spectral densities of various interfering sources and equations used for calculating the cross talk power spectral densities. The same reference also includes the mathematical model of the NEXT caused by the transmitted power and the frequency band over which the power is transmitted.
 [0031]The model of the PSD of the NEXT that could be caused by n identical power sources within a binder is given by the following expression for binders containing up to 50 pairs of wires.
$\begin{array}{cc}{\mathrm{PDS}}_{\mathrm{NEXT}}\ue8a0\left({f}_{k}\right)={\mathrm{PSD}}_{\mathrm{disturber}}\ue8a0\left({f}_{k}\right)\times \left({x}_{n}\times {f}^{3/2}\right)\ue89e\text{}\ue89e\mathrm{for}\ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e0\le {f}_{k}<\infty ,n<50,\mathrm{where}\ue89e\text{}\ue89e{x}_{n}=8.818\times {10}^{14}\times {\left(\frac{n}{49}\right)}^{0.6}=0.8536\times {10}^{14}\times {n}^{0.6}={x}_{1}\times {n}^{0.6}.& \text{Eq. 1}\end{array}$  [0032]This expression emphasizes that the nearend cross coupling increases in proportion to the threehalves power of the frequency. Hence, for an interfering source that has equal PSDs at frequencies ƒ_{2 }and η_{1}, the NEXT that the source causes at frequency ƒ_{2 }is greater than the NEXT at frequency ƒ_{1 }by
$15\times \mathrm{log}\ue8a0\left(\frac{{f}_{2}}{{f}_{1}}\right)\ue89e\mathrm{dB}.$ . Thus, equal PSDs at ƒ_{2 }and ƒ_{1}, result in higher NEXT PSD at ƒ_{2 }than at ƒ_{1 }by 4.5 dB if ƒ_{2 }is twice as large as ƒ_{1}. This relationship suggests a different performance function for bit and power allocation algorithms. For NEXT limited systems, it would be more appropriate to minimize the total NEXT rather than minimizing the total power consumed.  [0033]Any algorithm that is based on minimizing a weighted combination of the total power and total data rate could utilize the new performance function described in this patent application. An algorithm for simplex operation of DSL modems that depends upon minimizing the power allocation is disclosed in “An Efficient Bit Loading Algorithm for DMT Applications” by Ranjan V. Sonalkar and Richard Shively, Globecom 98, Sydney Australia, November 1998, pp 26832688 incorporated herein by reference. For QAM constellations, the power needed to transmit b_{k }bits is given by the expression below.
$\begin{array}{cc}{E}_{k}\ue8a0\left[{b}_{k}\ue89e\mathrm{bits}\right]=\left({2}^{\mathrm{bk}}1\right)\xb7\left(\frac{{\mathrm{KN}}_{k}}{3\ue89e\uf603{H}_{k}^{2}\ue89e{G}_{c}}\right)\ue89e\text{}\ue89e\Delta \ue8a0\left({2}^{{b}_{k}}1\right)\xb7{a}_{k}& \text{Eq. 2}\end{array}$  [0034]The power needed to transmit one additional bit in bin k, that already contains b_{k }bits is:
$\begin{array}{cc}\begin{array}{c}\Delta \ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e{E}_{k}^{A}={E}_{k}\ue8a0\left[\left({b}_{k\ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}}+1\right)\ue89e\mathrm{bits}\right]{E}_{k}\ue8a0\left[{b}_{k}\ue89e\mathrm{bits}\right]\\ =\lfloor \left({2}^{{b}_{k}+1}1\right)\left({2}^{{b}_{k}}1\right)\rfloor \ue89e{a}_{k}\\ ={a}_{k}\xb7{2}^{{b}_{k}}\end{array}& \text{Eq. 3}\end{array}$  [0035]
 [0036]In the above expressions, N_{k }is the noise power, and H_{k }is the channel transfer function at frequency k. A constant G_{c }represents the coding gain. If the coding method used in the modem provides a BERdependent and b_{k}dependent gain, then a simpler approach is to use a table of SNRs, S(BER, b), dependent on the two parameters, BER and the number of bits, b. Then the transmit power that would result in the appropriate SNR for BER and a 2^{b}size constellation is simply the following:
$\begin{array}{cc}{E}_{k}=\frac{{N}_{k}\xb7S\ue8a0\left(\mathrm{BER},{b}_{k}\right)}{{g}_{k}}& \text{Eq. 5}\end{array}$  [0037]The following two expressions represent the increment in power needed for a bitaddition algorithm and the decrement in power obtained in a bitremoval algorithm, respectively. The conventional bitaddition algorithms that minimize power while maximizing the data rate would sort the array of ΔE_{k} ^{A }for k=1:256 in ascending order. Similarly, the bitremoval algorithm would sort the array of ΔE_{k} ^{R }quantities in the descending order. From now on, the NEXTminimization approach will be described in terms of a bitaddition algorithm. The principle applies equally well to the previously discussed bitremoval algorithm.
$\begin{array}{cc}\Delta \ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e{E}^{\stackrel{A}{k}}=\frac{{N}_{k}}{{g}_{k}}\times \left[S\ue8a0\left(\mathrm{BER},{b}_{k}+1\right)S\ue8a0\left(\mathrm{BER},{b}_{k}\right)\right]\ue89e\text{}\ue89e\Delta \ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e{E}_{k}^{R}=\frac{{N}_{k}}{{g}_{k}}\times \left[S,\left(\mathrm{BER},{b}_{k}\right)S\ue8a0\left(\mathrm{BER},{b}_{k}1\right)\right]& \text{Eq. 6}\end{array}$  [0038]The bitaddition algorithm requires that the array of ΔE_{k} ^{A }be sorted in ascending order and a bit added to the frequency bin that requires the least increment of power. The power needed for increasing the number of bits by one bit in the frequency bin, to which a bit was added in this step, is recalculated, and the array is resorted. Bit allocation is then determined based on this array, such that bit allocation to frequency bins requires the least possible power for the maximum possible or the desired data rate. This process is continued until the addition of one bit in any of the frequency bins violates at least one of the constraints—power budget, power mask and maximum number of bits per frame.
 [0039]The algorithm described above would minimize the total power consumed for transmitting the maximum possible number of data bits per frame, while staying within all the required constraints. A modification of the incremental power term would result in an algorithm that can minimize NEXT, instead. The incremental power term is weighted by ƒ_{K} ^{{fraction (3/2)} }and then the array of these weighted terms is used to determine the bit allocation. Note that the constant x_{1 }used in Eq. 1 need not be applied since it will be common to all terms and hence, will not affect the sorting order.
$\begin{array}{cc}\Delta \ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e{\mathrm{NEXT}}_{k}^{R}=\Delta \ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e{E}_{k}^{R}\times {f}_{k}^{1.5}& \text{Eq. 7}\end{array}$  [0040]The effect of the weighting function would be to force the allocation towards the lower frequencies. The algorithm would result in a total integrated NEXT power that would be less than the integrated NEXT power that would result from an algorithm that minimizes the total power. The array of ΔNEXT_{k} ^{A }would be sorted in the ascending order for determining the frequency bins to which bits are to be added.
 [0041]The algorithm can be generalized to encompass the case where the function of the transmit power is differently weighted than the threehalves power of frequency. A general performance function that can be minimized would weight the incremental power by an arbitrary function of frequency depending upon situations that may warrant it.
$\begin{array}{cc}\Delta \ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e{\mathrm{PF}}_{k}^{A}=\Delta \ue89e\text{\hspace{1em}}\ue89e{E}_{k}^{A}\times \theta \ue8a0\left({f}_{k}\right)& \text{Eq. 8}\end{array}$  [0042]In the above equation θ(ƒ_{k}) is the arbitrary function of frequency and the array of ΔPF_{k} ^{A }would be sorted for determining the bit allocation.
 [0043][0043]FIG. 6 schematically shows the various inputs to the bit allocation algorithm. The blocks 6168 at the top of the figure represent the various objective functions that can be identified from the various algorithms that exist in the literature and include the new objective functions (represented by shaded blocks) that are defined in this document. Any algorithm that minimizes a performance function can utilize the crosstalk dependent function defined herein. FIG. 6 also includes a performance function block 63 that is left undefined to indicate the possibility that other performance functions are also possible.
 [0044]Referring now to FIG. 6, function block 61, a shaded block, represents joint minimization of the NEXT and the maximization of the total data rate. Function 62 represents joint minimization of the Bit Error Rate (BER) and maximization of the total data rate. Function 63 represents any other arbitrary function that may be defined for optimization as introduced above that may come to mind of one of ordinary skill in the art. Function 64, a shaded block, represents the joint minimization of an arbitrary function of the total power and maximization of the total data rate. Function 65 represents the minimization of the total power used for transmission for a given data rate. Function 66 represents the maximization of the transmitted data rate for a given total transmit power. Function 67, a shaded block, represents the minimization of the total Crosstalk (NEXT) power for a given data rate. Function 68 represents the joint minimization of the total power and maximization of the total transmitted data rate. All of the processes or functions 6168 provide input to function selection box 69.
 [0045]The decision block 69 represents the selection of the function to be optimized for the bit and power allocation algorithm that a modem designer intends to use.
 [0046]Block 70 inputs the selected function to be optimized from block 69 to the bit and power allocation algorithm 73.
 [0047]Block 71 supplies the required constraints to the allocation algorithm 73. Block 72 supplies the parameters that were measured and estimated during the initial measurement and calculation processes 510 and 520 (FIG. 5).
 [0048]Block 73 represents the bit and power allocation algorithm that is implemented after all the above steps 6172 as utilized are completed.
 [0049]Although preferred embodiments of the method and apparatus of the invention have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing detailed description, it is understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as set forth and defined by the following claims.
Claims (10)
 1. In a discrete multitone modem, a method of minimizing cross talk over a twisted pair of a twisted pair cable binder, the method comprising the steps of:one of jointly minimizing near end cross talk while maximizing total data rate; jointly minimizing an arbitrary function of total power while maximizing total data rate and minimizing total near end cross talk for a given data rate;selecting a function to be optimized; andperforming a bit and power allocation algorithm responsive to the selected function.
 2. The method ofclaim 1
 3. The method ofclaim 1measuring a noise power spectral density of said twisted pair.
 4. The method ofclaim 1
 5. The method ofclaim 1
 6. In a discrete multitone modem, apparatus for minimizing cross talk in a twisted pair, said apparatus comprising:means for one of minimizing near end cross talk while maximizing total data rate, jointly minimizing an arbitrary function of total power while maximizing total data rate and minimizing total near end cross talk for a given data rate;means for selecting a function to be optimized; andmeans for performing a bit and power allocation algorithm responsive to the selected function.
 7. The apparatus ofclaim 6
 8. The apparatus ofclaim 6
 9. The apparatus ofclaim 6
 10. The apparatus ofclaim 6
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

US18330800 true  20000217  20000217  
US09769516 US6393052B2 (en)  20000217  20010126  Method and apparatus for minimizing near end cross talk due to discrete multitone transmission in cable binders 
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number  Priority Date  Filing Date  Title 

US09769516 US6393052B2 (en)  20000217  20010126  Method and apparatus for minimizing near end cross talk due to discrete multitone transmission in cable binders 
EP20010910725 EP1256223A1 (en)  20000217  20010215  Method and apparatus for minimising cross talk due to discrete mutlitone transmission in cable binders 
PCT/US2001/004835 WO2001061956A1 (en)  20000217  20010215  Method and apparatus for minimizing cross talk due to discrete multitone transmission in cable binders 
Publications (2)
Publication Number  Publication Date 

US20010055332A1 true true US20010055332A1 (en)  20011227 
US6393052B2 US6393052B2 (en)  20020521 
Family
ID=26878981
Family Applications (1)
Application Number  Title  Priority Date  Filing Date 

US09769516 Expired  Fee Related US6393052B2 (en)  20000217  20010126  Method and apparatus for minimizing near end cross talk due to discrete multitone transmission in cable binders 
Country Status (3)
Country  Link 

US (1)  US6393052B2 (en) 
EP (1)  EP1256223A1 (en) 
WO (1)  WO2001061956A1 (en) 
Cited By (24)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US20030028898A1 (en) *  20010504  20030206  General Instrument Corporation  Enhanced return path performance using modulationbased alignment criteria 
US20030112858A1 (en) *  20011219  20030619  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Nearend crosstalk noise minimization and power reduction for digital subscriber loops 
US20030117963A1 (en) *  20011219  20030626  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Method and apparatus for application driven adaptive duplexing of digital subscriber loops 
US20040171359A1 (en) *  20030228  20040902  Olav Tirkkonen  Power allocation in a communication system 
EP1492261A1 (en) *  20030625  20041229  Alcatel  Power control method for remotely deployed communication service 
US20060002457A1 (en) *  20040630  20060105  Pasquale Romano  Multicarrier communication using adaptive tonepruning 
EP1670202A1 (en) *  20041208  20060614  Alcatel  Method and appartus for spectrum management for communication channels with crosstalk 
US20060280237A1 (en) *  20050610  20061214  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  DSL system loading and ordering 
US20070177558A1 (en) *  20060131  20070802  Ayachitula Naga A  Location aware, on demand, media delivery to remote devices 
US20090207985A1 (en) *  20060606  20090820  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  DSL System 
US20090257581A1 (en) *  20080409  20091015  Conexant Systems, Inc.  Cooperative MIMO for Alien Noise Cancellation (COMAC) for Upstream VDSL Systems 
US20100067544A1 (en) *  20020401  20100318  At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.  Multiuser Allocation Method for Maximizing Transmission Capacity 
US20100220823A1 (en) *  20090227  20100902  Ikanos Communications, Inc.  Systems and Methods for Mitigating SelfInduced FarEnd Crosstalk 
US7813439B2 (en)  20060206  20101012  Broadcom Corporation  Various methods and apparatuses for impulse noise detection 
US7852950B2 (en)  20050225  20101214  Broadcom Corporation  Methods and apparatuses for canceling correlated noise in a multicarrier communication system 
US7953163B2 (en)  20041130  20110531  Broadcom Corporation  Block linear equalization in a multicarrier communication system 
US8194722B2 (en)  20041011  20120605  Broadcom Corporation  Various methods and apparatuses for impulse noise mitigation 
US8204211B2 (en)  20090429  20120619  Ikanos Communications, Inc.  Systems and methods for selecting tones for farend cross talk mitigation 
US8472533B2 (en)  20081010  20130625  Broadcom Corporation  Reducedcomplexity commonmode noise cancellation system for DSL 
US8761348B2 (en)  20050602  20140624  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  DSL system training 
US20140254704A1 (en) *  20010601  20140911  The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University  Dynamic digital communication system control 
US20150016344A1 (en) *  20120504  20150115  Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.  Signal Transmission Method, Communications Equipment, and System 
US9374257B2 (en)  20050318  20160621  Broadcom Corporation  Methods and apparatuses of measuring impulse noise parameters in multicarrier communication systems 
US9941928B2 (en)  20150126  20180410  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  Systems, methods, and apparatuses for implementing a DSL system 
Families Citing this family (14)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US6711121B1 (en) *  19981009  20040323  At&T Corp.  Orthogonal code division multiplexing for twisted pair channels 
US7263130B1 (en) *  20010525  20070828  3Com Corporation  Method and apparatus for evaluating error control parameters of selfsimilar constellations 
US20030031239A1 (en) *  20010808  20030213  Posthuma Carl Robert  Maximizing DSL throughput 
US7076514B2 (en) *  20011218  20060711  Conexant, Inc.  Method and system for computing preequalizer coefficients 
US7356049B1 (en) *  20011228  20080408  Ikanos Communication, Inc.  Method and apparatus for optimization of channel capacity in multiline communication systems using spectrum management techniques 
US7693189B2 (en) *  20021017  20100406  Coppergate Communication Ltd.  HPNA hub 
US6999433B2 (en) *  20021017  20060214  Coppergate Communication Ltd.  Method of reducing nearend crosstalk in an MxU networking architecture 
US7471931B2 (en) *  20021213  20081230  Adtran, Inc.  System and method for controlling transceivers based on a location indicator 
US7697408B2 (en) *  20021213  20100413  Adtran, Inc.  Data communication system and method capable of limiting effects of crosstalk by adjusting transceiver power levels 
US7512149B2 (en) *  20030423  20090331  At & T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P.  Bit and power allocation scheme for fullduplex transmission with echo cancellation in multicarrierbased modems 
US8029528B2 (en) *  20050103  20111004  Atricure, Inc.  Instrument guide and method for use 
US8073135B2 (en) *  20050510  20111206  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  Binder identification 
US7688884B2 (en) *  20050610  20100330  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  Vectored DSL nesting 
US8320480B2 (en) *  20060904  20121127  Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ)  Method for bitloading in a multitone DSL system 
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US6130882A (en)  19970925  20001010  Motorola, Inc.  Method and apparatus for configuring a communication system 
US5991311A (en) *  19971025  19991123  Centillium Technology  Timemultiplexed transmission on digitalsubscriber lines synchronized to existing TCMISDN for reduced crosstalk 
WO1999033215A1 (en)  19971219  19990701  Rice University  Spectral optimization and joint signaling techniques for communication in the presence of cross talk 
US6144696A (en) *  19971231  20001107  At&T Corp.  Spread spectrum bit allocation algorithm 
EP0930752A3 (en)  19980114  19991020  Motorola, Inc.  Method for allocating data and power in a discrete multitone communication system 
JP3201350B2 (en)  19980515  20010820  日本電気株式会社  Training methods and training device of the adaptive equalizer tap coefficients 
Cited By (51)
Publication number  Priority date  Publication date  Assignee  Title 

US7684341B2 (en) *  20010504  20100323  General Instrument Corporation  Enhanced return path performance using modulationbased alignment criteria 
US20030028898A1 (en) *  20010504  20030206  General Instrument Corporation  Enhanced return path performance using modulationbased alignment criteria 
US9160385B2 (en) *  20010601  20151013  The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University  Dynamic digital communication system control 
US20140254704A1 (en) *  20010601  20140911  The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University  Dynamic digital communication system control 
US9843348B2 (en)  20010601  20171212  The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University  Dynamic digital communication system control 
US20070036207A1 (en) *  20011219  20070215  Xianbin Wang  Nearend crosstalk noise minimization and power reduction for digital subscriber loops 
US7826387B2 (en)  20011219  20101102  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Method and apparatus for application driven adaptive duplexing of digital subscriber loops 
US7903725B2 (en)  20011219  20110308  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Nearend crosstalk noise minimization and power reduction for digital subscriber loops 
US20030117963A1 (en) *  20011219  20030626  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Method and apparatus for application driven adaptive duplexing of digital subscriber loops 
US20030112858A1 (en) *  20011219  20030619  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Nearend crosstalk noise minimization and power reduction for digital subscriber loops 
US7103004B2 (en) *  20011219  20060905  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Method and apparatus for application driven adaptive duplexing of digital subscriber loops 
US7126984B2 (en)  20011219  20061024  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Nearend crosstalk noise minimization and power reduction for digital subscriber loops 
US8059704B2 (en)  20011219  20111115  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Nearend crosstalk noise minimization and power reduction for digital subscriber loops 
US20070019681A1 (en) *  20011219  20070125  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Method and apparatus for application driven adaptive duplexing of digital subscriber loops 
US20110129005A1 (en) *  20011219  20110602  Stmicroelectronics, Inc.  Nearend crosstalk noise minimization and power reduction for digital subscriber loops 
US20100067544A1 (en) *  20020401  20100318  At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P.  Multiuser Allocation Method for Maximizing Transmission Capacity 
US7916802B2 (en) *  20020401  20110329  At&T Intellectual Property I, Lp  Multiuser allocation method for maximizing transmission capacity 
US20040171359A1 (en) *  20030228  20040902  Olav Tirkkonen  Power allocation in a communication system 
WO2004077778A1 (en) *  20030228  20040910  Nokia Corporation  Power and bit loading allocation in a communication system with a plurality of channels 
US7330516B2 (en)  20030625  20080212  Alcatel  Power control method for remotely deployed communication service 
EP1492261A1 (en) *  20030625  20041229  Alcatel  Power control method for remotely deployed communication service 
US20040264559A1 (en) *  20030625  20041230  Alcatel  Power control method for remotely deployed communication service 
US20060002457A1 (en) *  20040630  20060105  Pasquale Romano  Multicarrier communication using adaptive tonepruning 
US7502336B2 (en) *  20040630  20090310  2Wire, Inc.  Multicarrier communication using adaptive tonepruning 
US8194722B2 (en)  20041011  20120605  Broadcom Corporation  Various methods and apparatuses for impulse noise mitigation 
US7953163B2 (en)  20041130  20110531  Broadcom Corporation  Block linear equalization in a multicarrier communication system 
US7782748B2 (en)  20041208  20100824  Alcatel Lucent  Power spectrum control method for communication channels limited by disturbers and apparatus for performing such a method 
EP1670202A1 (en) *  20041208  20060614  Alcatel  Method and appartus for spectrum management for communication channels with crosstalk 
US20060153178A1 (en) *  20041208  20060713  Alcatel  Power spectrum control method for communication channels limited by disturbers and apparatus for performing such a method 
US7852950B2 (en)  20050225  20101214  Broadcom Corporation  Methods and apparatuses for canceling correlated noise in a multicarrier communication system 
US9374257B2 (en)  20050318  20160621  Broadcom Corporation  Methods and apparatuses of measuring impulse noise parameters in multicarrier communication systems 
US8761348B2 (en)  20050602  20140624  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  DSL system training 
US7852952B2 (en) *  20050610  20101214  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  DSL system loading and ordering 
US20060280237A1 (en) *  20050610  20061214  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  DSL system loading and ordering 
US7647037B2 (en)  20060131  20100112  International Business Machines Corporation  Location aware, on demand, media delivery to remote devices 
US20070177558A1 (en) *  20060131  20070802  Ayachitula Naga A  Location aware, on demand, media delivery to remote devices 
US7813439B2 (en)  20060206  20101012  Broadcom Corporation  Various methods and apparatuses for impulse noise detection 
US20090207985A1 (en) *  20060606  20090820  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  DSL System 
US8483369B2 (en)  20060606  20130709  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  DSL system 
US8300803B2 (en)  20080409  20121030  Ikanos Communications, Inc.  Cooperative MIMO for alien noise cancellation (COMAC) for upstream VDSL systems 
US20090257581A1 (en) *  20080409  20091015  Conexant Systems, Inc.  Cooperative MIMO for Alien Noise Cancellation (COMAC) for Upstream VDSL Systems 
US8605837B2 (en)  20081010  20131210  Broadcom Corporation  Adaptive frequencydomain reference noise canceller for multicarrier communications systems 
US8472533B2 (en)  20081010  20130625  Broadcom Corporation  Reducedcomplexity commonmode noise cancellation system for DSL 
US9160381B2 (en)  20081010  20151013  Broadcom Corporation  Adaptive frequencydomain reference noise canceller for multicarrier communications systems 
US8644127B2 (en)  20090227  20140204  Ikanos Communications, Inc.  Systems and methods for mitigating selfinduced farend crosstalk 
US20100220823A1 (en) *  20090227  20100902  Ikanos Communications, Inc.  Systems and Methods for Mitigating SelfInduced FarEnd Crosstalk 
WO2010099399A1 (en) *  20090227  20100902  Ikanos Technology, Ltd.  Systems and methods for mitigating selfinduced farend crosstalk 
US8204211B2 (en)  20090429  20120619  Ikanos Communications, Inc.  Systems and methods for selecting tones for farend cross talk mitigation 
US9485740B2 (en) *  20120504  20161101  Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.  Signal transmission method, communications equipment, and system 
US20150016344A1 (en) *  20120504  20150115  Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.  Signal Transmission Method, Communications Equipment, and System 
US9941928B2 (en)  20150126  20180410  Adaptive Spectrum And Signal Alignment, Inc.  Systems, methods, and apparatuses for implementing a DSL system 
Also Published As
Publication number  Publication date  Type 

EP1256223A1 (en)  20021113  application 
WO2001061956A1 (en)  20010823  application 
US6393052B2 (en)  20020521  grant 
Similar Documents
Publication  Publication Date  Title 

Leke et al.  A maximum rate loading algorithm for discrete multitone modulation systems  
US6510184B1 (en)  Multicarrier transmission system and method thereof  
US6061405A (en)  Time domain source matched multicarrier quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) method and apparatus  
Yu et al.  Constantpower waterfilling: performance bound and lowcomplexity implementation  
US5832032A (en)  Interference reduction in telecommunications systems  
US5852633A (en)  Method for allocating data in a data communication system  
US7356049B1 (en)  Method and apparatus for optimization of channel capacity in multiline communication systems using spectrum management techniques  
US6650697B1 (en)  Wireline communication system and method of frequency allocation therein  
US6327311B1 (en)  Frequency diverse single carrier modulation for robust communication over inpremises wiring  
US5822374A (en)  Method for fine gains adjustment in an ADSL communications system  
US6275522B1 (en)  Method for allocating data and power in a discrete, multitone communication system  
US6922448B1 (en)  Upstream power backoff  
US6075821A (en)  Method of configuring and dynamically adapting data and energy parameters in a multichannel communications system  
US20070274404A1 (en)  Method for distributed spectrum management of digital communications systems  
Baccarelli et al.  Novel efficient bitloading algorithms for peakenergylimited ADSLtype multicarrier systems  
US6823002B1 (en)  Linear block interleaver for discrete multitone modulation  
US6128348A (en)  Method for configuring data and energy parameters in a multichannel communications system  
US6516027B1 (en)  Method and apparatus for discrete multitone communication bit allocation  
US6839429B1 (en)  Spectral optimization for communication under a peak frequencydomain power constraint  
Im et al.  Bandwidthefficient digital transmission over unshielded twistedpair wiring  
US6580752B1 (en)  Alternative configurations for an ADSL system operating in a time duplex noise environment  
US5519731A (en)  ADSL compatible discrete multitone apparatus for mitigation of T1 noise  
US20050058115A1 (en)  Method and apparatus for data allocation in an overlapenable communication system  
US5995566A (en)  Interference reduction in telecommunication systems  
US6366555B1 (en)  Method and device for controlling signal clipping in a discrete multitone communications system 
Legal Events
Date  Code  Title  Description 

AS  Assignment 
Owner name: AT&T CORP., NEW YORK Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SADJADPOUR, HAMID R.;SONALKAR, RANJAN V.;REEL/FRAME:011508/0739 Effective date: 20010125 

FPAY  Fee payment 
Year of fee payment: 4 

FPAY  Fee payment 
Year of fee payment: 8 

REMI  Maintenance fee reminder mailed  
LAPS  Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees  
FP  Expired due to failure to pay maintenance fee 
Effective date: 20140521 