US20010002272A1 - Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food - Google Patents
Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20010002272A1 US20010002272A1 US09/767,982 US76798201A US2001002272A1 US 20010002272 A1 US20010002272 A1 US 20010002272A1 US 76798201 A US76798201 A US 76798201A US 2001002272 A1 US2001002272 A1 US 2001002272A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- palatability
- pet food
- dry
- weight
- accordance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K50/00—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
- A23K50/40—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for carnivorous animals, e.g. cats or dogs
- A23K50/45—Semi-moist feed
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K40/00—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs
- A23K40/30—Shaping or working-up of animal feeding-stuffs by encapsulating; by coating
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
- A23K—FODDER
- A23K50/00—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
- A23K50/40—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for carnivorous animals, e.g. cats or dogs
- A23K50/42—Dry feed
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S426/00—Food or edible material: processes, compositions, and products
- Y10S426/805—Pet food for dog, cat, bird, or fish
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to methods and compositions for enhancing the palatability of pet foods, and more particularly to compositions and methods for enhancing the palatability of dry and semi-dry cat food.
- Pet food manufacturers have a long-standing desire to provide foods which combine high nutritional value, and resistance to decomposition and bacterial contamination, with low production costs.
- pet food manufacturers desire a high degree of palatability which can be attained at low cost.
- the three main types of pet foods embody the desired characteristics to varying degrees.
- Canned or high-moisture (greater than 50% moisture) foods are typically all meat and therefore generally highly palatable to animals.
- Such foods are typically costly to produce and package, require the use of preservatives to inhibit decomposition and contamination, and are relatively less nutritious per unit weight than other pet food products.
- Dry or low-moisture content pet foods (less than 15% moisture) are generally highly nutritious, may be inexpensively packaged, and are highly convenient to store and use.
- dry or low-moisture foods are generally the least palatable of pet foods.
- Semi-dry or intermediate moisture content pet foods are generally more palatable than dry foods, have higher nutritional value, and are more inexpensively packaged and more conveniently used than high moisture foods.
- intermediate moisture content foods may be more susceptible to bacterial contamination than dry pet foods, and are generally less palatable than high moisture content foods.
- Dry and semi-dry foods are generally preferred by manufacturers and pet owners alike because such foods are more convenient to store and use, and because of the higher nutritional content than high-moisture pet foods.
- many animals, and particularly cats are picky eaters desiring a high degree of palatability.
- known palatability enhancers for low moisture pet foods include various surface coating compositions.
- known palatability enhancers include surface coatings of phosphoric acid; a combination of fat with hexamic, phosphoric or citric acid; and a mixture of phosphoric acid and citric acid.
- Palatability may also be enhanced by the application of liquid or dry flavorings as a coating.
- Liquid or dry animal digest coatings are widely used to enhance palatability, and animal digest is also used in a liquid combination with phosphoric acid. Dry animal digest may be used in a two step coating process with liquid phosphoric acid. Dry application of sodium acid phosphate, which may be used in combination with animal digest, is also known.
- compositions and methods remain limited in the resulting degree of palatability. It would be desirable to provide a composition and method for further enhancing the palatability of dry and semi-dry pet foods. It would also be desirable to provide such a composition with a high degree of palatability for cats. It would be further desirable to provide such a composition and method which enhances dry and semi-dry pet food palatability at a relatively low production cost. It would be still further desirable to provide such a palatability enhancer which is robust among different formulations.
- a pet food palatability enhancer which includes tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- the palatability enhancer, and methods for enhancing the palatability of pet foods generally relate to dry and semi-dry pet foods including a nutritionally balanced mixture of proteinaceous and farinaceous materials.
- the palatability enhancer is a dry formulation including from about 0.1% up to about 99% by weight tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- the palatability enhancer is formulated by adding tetrasodium pyrophosphate in dry powdered form to a dry composition for application to a dry pet food.
- the dry composition typically also includes readily commercially available ingredients such as dried whey, dried animal digest, and yeast.
- the amount of tetrasodium pyrophosphate added to the dry composition is adjusted so that tetrasodium pyrolphosphate contributes about 0.1% to about 1.0% by weight of the finished dry pet food.
- the palatability enhancer is applied to particles or pieces of extruded, dry or semi-dry cat food. More specifically, the particles or pieces are added to a coating drum and molten animal fat and other liquids are sprayed over the dry pieces. The palatability enhancer is applied to the pieces and the pieces are tumbled in the drum to thoroughly coat the pieces.
- the palatability enhancer improves the palatability of dry and semi-dry pet foods.
- the palatability enhancer is particularly effective for enhancing the palatability to cats of dry and semi-dry cat foods. Further, the palatability enhancer may be added to commercially available dry and semi-dry cat foods or other pet and animal foods at a relatively low production cost.
- the palatability enhancer generally is a dry composition including from about 0.1% up to about 99% by weight tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- the palatability enhancer is generally externally applied, using dry application methods, to commercially available, dry or semi-dry pet foods.
- the palatability enhancer and methods for enhancing the palatability of dry and semi-dry pet foods generally relate to a nutritionally balanced mixture of proteinaceous and farinaceous materials having a moisture content of about 50% or less by weight. Such mixtures are known as dry or semi-dry pet foods to those skilled in the art, and the palatability enhancer is applied to pieces of the dry or semi-dry food.
- the pet food compositions described herein are not intended to be limited to a specific listing of ingredients because such ingredients will depend on such factors as, for example, the desired nutritional balance for the specific type of pet, and availability of ingredients to the manufacturer.
- the pet food composition generally may include vitamins, minerals, and other additives such as flavorings, preservatives, emulsifiers and humectants.
- the nutritional balance including the relative proportions of vitamins, minerals, fat, protein and carbohydrate, is determined according to dietary standards known in the veterinary art. For example, the nutritional balance of a cat food composition is determined according to the known dietary requirements for cats.
- the proteinaceous material may include any material having a protein content of at least about 15% by weight including vegetable proteins such as soybean, cotton seed, and peanut; animal proteins such as casein, albumin, and fresh animal tissue including fresh meat tissue and fresh fish tissue; and dried or rendered meals such as fish meal, poultry meal, meat meal, bone meal and the like.
- vegetable proteins such as soybean, cotton seed, and peanut
- animal proteins such as casein, albumin, and fresh animal tissue including fresh meat tissue and fresh fish tissue
- dried or rendered meals such as fish meal, poultry meal, meat meal, bone meal and the like.
- suitable proteinaceous materials include wheat gluten or corn gluten, and microbial proteins such as yeast.
- the farinaceous material may be defined as any material having a protein content of less than about 15% by weight and containing a substantial proportion of starches or carbohydrates, including grains such as corn, milo, alfalfa, wheat, barley, rice, soy hulls, and other grains having low protein content.
- starches or carbohydrates including grains such as corn, milo, alfalfa, wheat, barley, rice, soy hulls, and other grains having low protein content.
- other materials such as whey and other dairy by-products, as well as other carbohydrates may be added.
- known flavorings including, for example, corn syrup or molasses, may be added.
- the palatability enhancer is applied to a dry cat food composition.
- cat food composition as used herein applies to commercially sold, nutritionally balanced food compositions which are intended to provide substantially the sole diet for a cat.
- such compositions may be described as having a minimum protein content at which cat health is maintained.
- the minimum protein content of the food varies according to the age and breeding status for the animal.
- a nutritionally balanced cat food composition for breeding females and kittens requires a minimum protein content of at least about 28% by weight on a dry matter basis.
- a nutritionally balanced cat food composition for non-breeding and adult cats requires a minimum protein content of about 26% by weight on a dry matter basis.
- the protein content of commercially available cat food compositions for adult, non-breeding cats is about 30% by weight on a dry matter basis, to insure that the food meets the nutritional requirements of any cat.
- a typical formula well known in the art for a dry cat food composition to which the palatability enhancer is applied is as follows (in percent by weight): about 0 - 70% grain-based meal or flour, such as corn, wheat, barley or rice; about 0 - 30% animal by-product meal, such as poultry or beef meal; about 0 - 25% corn gluten meal; about 0 - 25% fresh animal tissue, such as poultry or beef tissue; about 0 - 25% soybean meal or flour; about 0 - 10% animal fat; about 0 - 20% seafood-based meal; about 0 - 25% fresh fish tissue; about 0 - 10% high fructose corn syrup; about 0 - 10% dried molasses; about 0 -1.5% phosphoric acid; and about 0 - 1.5% citric acid.
- Vitamins and minerals are added according to known American Association of Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) Cat Food Nutrient profiles, and include calcium carbonate, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, choline chloride, taurine, zinc oxide, ferrous sulfate, vitamin E, vitamin A, vitamin B 12 , vitamin D 3 , riboflavin, niacin, calcium pantothenate, biotin, thiamine mononitrate, copper sulfate, folic acid, pyroxidine hydrochloride, calcium iodate, and menadione sodium bisulfite complex (a source of vitamin K activity).
- AAFCO American Association of Feed Control Officials
- the palatability enhancer relates to other pet foods and animal foods in general without regard to the protein content which typically varies according to species, breeding status, and age, among other factors.
- the palatability enhancer may be used with a dry or semi-dry dog food composition for non-breeding, adult dogs, which requires a minimum protein content of about 18% by weight on a dry matter basis.
- the palatability enhancer may be applied to a dry or semi-dry puppy food having a minimum protein content of about 22% by weight on a dry matter basis.
- the palatability enhancer may also be used with other dry and semi-dry foods of varying protein content, and with foods for other animals such as livestock and research animals.
- the palatability enhancer generally includes tetrasodium pyrophosphate and is formulated as a dry mixture in powdered, granulated or encapsulated form.
- Tetrasodium pyrophosphate is available in dry, powdered form from, for example, Solutia of St. Louis, Mo., and is combined with other dry ingredients including known palatability enhancing ingredients and preservatives.
- suitable ingredients for the palatability enhancer include various nucleotides such as inosine monophosphate (IMP), guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP); amino acids such as alanine and lysine; other inorganic salts such as NaCl, monosodium phosphate, and dicalcium phosphate; and organic materials such as whey, yeast and animal by-products digest.
- the palatability enhancer includes about 0.1% up to about 99% by weight tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- the amount of tetrasodium pyrophosphate is adjusted so that tetrasodium pyrophosphate contributes about 0.1% to about 1.0% by weight to the finished pet food, depending on the relative amount of the palatability enhancer added to the finished pet food. Generally, the palatability enhancer contributes from about 0.5% to about 3.0% by weight to the finished cat food product.
- both the exact proportion of tetrasodium pyrophosphate in the palatability enhancer, as well as the relative proportion of the palatability enhancer to the finished cat food product may be varied and are limited by such factors as relative availability of the ingredients, cost, and health of the animal.
- the palatability enhancer described herein is not intended to be limited to a specific listing of ingredients because such ingredients will similarly depend on availability and cost of ingredients to the manufacturer.
- a dry formulation of the palatability enhancer for example, commercially available dry ingredients, including tetrasodium pyrophosphate, various nucleotides, amino acids, inorganic salts and organic materials are combined in the desired proportions in a batch mixer and blended to homogeneity.
- a dry formulation of the palatability enhancer typically includes about 15 - 25 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate, about 0.1 -3.0 weight % amino acid, about 35 - 50 weight % animal by-products such as dried animal digest, and about 35 - 50 weight % microbial protein such as brewer's yeast.
- the palatability enhancer includes about 18 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate or, in another embodiment, about 25 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- the palatability enhancer includes about 39.7 weight % dried brewer's yeast, about 39.7 weight % dried chicken liver, about 19.8% tetrasodium pyrophosphate, and about 0.8 weight % L-alanine.
- liquid ingredients are combined in a mixer.
- Wet ingredients such as animal tissue are ground or emulsified to a slurry and the liquid ingredients are combined with the slurry.
- a commercially available protease is added to the slurry to hydrolyze the proteins, and later inactivated with heat, acid or another method.
- Preservatives such as sorbates are also added to the slurry.
- Water is added to adjust the viscosity and the solids content of the slurry to between about 10% and 50% to facilitate the application process as described below.
- the tetrasodium pyrophosphate, and other dry ingredients as desired, are added to the slurry prior to application.
- a liquid formulation of the palatability enhancer includes about 5 - 45 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate; about 1 -50 weight % animal tissue such as beef hearts or livers, or chicken hearts or livers; about 0.1 - 3.0 weight % amino acid such as alanine or lysine; about 0.1 -1.0 weight % preservatives such as sorbic acid and about 0.1 - 2.0 weight % enzymes such as protease.
- one embodiment of the liquid formulation includes about 14 - 20 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- the palatability enhancer is applied to the particles or pieces of dry or semi-dry pet food such as, for example, dry extruded kibbles as known in the art.
- the palatability enhancer is applied, for example, by spraying or dusting onto the particles or pieces of the food. More specifically, to make a cat food composition to which the palatability enhancer is applied, proteinaceous and farinaceous materials and additional desired materials as described above are combined to form an admixture and are well blended. The admixture is then transferred to a steam conditioner and subjected to steam and moisture to adjust the moisture content of the admixture to between about 20% and 40% by weight.
- the conditioned admixture is then cooked under conditions of elevated temperature and pressure in an extruder such as a single screw extruder.
- the extruder may include a die having a particular shape, such as a fish, cross or circle.
- the product is segmented into discrete particles or pieces by a rotating cutting knife as the product is extruded.
- the particles or pieces are conveyed to a forced air drying system which raises the temperature of the pieces to about 140°F., and reduces the moisture level to about 8% by weight.
- the dried particles or pieces are then transferred by bulk conveyor to a coating drum and sprayed with animal fat.
- Other liquids such as, for example, citric acid or phosphoric acid may alternatively be applied to the pieces, or applied in addition to the animal fat.
- the pieces are then sprayed or dusted with the palatability enhancer, and tumbled to thoroughly coat the pieces with the palatability enhancer.
- the pieces are then cooled to ambient temperature and packaged.
- the palatability enhancer with tetrasodium pyrophosphate in both liquid and dry formulations, was tested against known dry cat food coatings. In both formulations, the palatability enhancer was shown to improve palatability over that obtained with known palatability enhancers.
- R1 consisted of dry cat food kibbles of Meow Mix® basal formula, commercially available from Ralston Purina Company, Checkerboard Square, St. Louis, Mo. 63164, with 2.25% by weight of a typical dry cat coating containing about 0.1 - 3.0 weight % amino acid, about 35 - 50 weight % animal by-products such as dried animal digest, and about 35 - 50 weight % brewer's yeast.
- R2 was Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with 2.5% by weight of a dry cat coating which also included 0.5% by weight tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- R2 represented 84.6% of the total, while R1 represented 15.4%, and the ratio of the amount of R2 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 5.5.
- the animals ate 55.3 grams/day/cat of R2, compared with 11.0 grams/day/cat of R1. All eighteen cats preferred R2 over R1.
- R2 represented 82.7% of the total, while R1 represented 17.3%, and the ratio of the amount of R2 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 4.8.
- the animals ate 58.0 grams/day/cat of R2, compared with 12.0 grams/day/cat of R1. Seventeen cats preferred R2 over R1, while one cat showed no preference.
- R2 represented 85.4% of the total, while R1 represented 14.6%, and the ratio of the amount of R2 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 5.9.
- the animals ate 54.4 grams/day/cat of R2, compared with 8.7 grams/day/cat of R1.
- R2 represented 77.6% of the total, while R1 represented 22.4%, and the ratio of the amount of R2 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 3.5.
- the animals ate 49.2 grams/day/cat of R2, compared with 14.7 grams/day/cat of R1.
- Table 1 summarizes the results of Examples 1 through 4.
- TABLE 1 most consumed/ % of all Grams # of # of animals Ra- least food eaten/ animals without Ex. tion consumed consumed day/cat with pref. pref. 1
- R1 5.5 15.4 11.0 0 0 R2 84.6 55.3 18 2
- R1 4.8 17.3 12.0 0 1 R2 82.7 58.0 17 3
- R1 5.9 14.6 8.7 0 1 R2 85.4 54.4
- 16 4 R1 3.5 22.4 14.7 1 1 R2 77.6 49.2 16
- R1 consisted of Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with liquid animal digest at 3% by weight.
- R3 was Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with liquid animal digest at 3% by weight, plus tetrasodium pyrophosphate at 0.75% by weight.
- R3 represented 69.0% of the total, while R1 represented 31.0%, and the ratio of the amount of R3 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 2.2.
- the animals ate 41.5 grams/day/cat of R3, compared with 19.0 grams/day/cat of R1.
- R2 was Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with liquid animal digest at 3% by weight plus tetrasodium pyrophosphate at 0.5% by weight.
- R3 was Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with liquid animal digest at 3% by weight plus tetrasodium pyrophosphate at 0.75% by weight.
- R3 represented 60.9% of the total, while R2 represented 39.1%, and the ratio of the amount of R3 consumed to the amount of R2 consumed was 1.6.
- the animals ate 35.1 grams/day/cat of R3, compared with 23.2 grams/day/cat of R1. Fourteen cats preferred R3 over R2, while three preferred R2 over R3, and one showed no preference.
- the results suggest a positive dose response relationship between the amount of tetrasodium pyrophosphate added to the food and the degree of animal preference for the food.
- Table 2 summarizes the results of Examples, 5 and 6. TABLE 2 most consumed/ % of all Grams # of # of animals Rat- least food eaten/ animals without Ex. ion consumed consumed day/cat with pref. pref. 5 R1 2.2 31.0 19.0 2 1 R3 69.0 41.5 15 6 R2 1.6 39.1 23.2 3 1 R3 60.9 35.1 14
- Examples 1 through 6 show that tetrasodium pyrophosphate improves palatability in both dry and liquid formulations of a palatability enhancer.
- the addition of tetrasodium pyrophosphate to liquid animal digest was found to be more effective as a palatability enhancer than liquid animal digest alone.
- the addition of tetrasodium pyrophosphate to a dry cat coating produced a more effective palatability enhancer than a typical dry coating alone.
- tetrasodium pyrophosphate to enhance the palatability of dry and semi-dry pet foods represents a substantial improvement over current methods.
- the palatability enhancer is particularly effective for enhancing the palatability to cats of dry and semi-dry cat foods.
- the use of tetrasodium pyrophosphate represents a relatively low added production cost for pet food manufacturers.
- the improved palatability enhancing effect of tetrasodium pyrophosphate survives a range of different application systems and different formulations.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Food Science & Technology (AREA)
- Animal Husbandry (AREA)
- Birds (AREA)
- Fodder In General (AREA)
- Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates generally to methods and compositions for enhancing the palatability of pet foods, and more particularly to compositions and methods for enhancing the palatability of dry and semi-dry cat food.
- Pet food manufacturers have a long-standing desire to provide foods which combine high nutritional value, and resistance to decomposition and bacterial contamination, with low production costs. In addition, and with particular regard to cat foods, pet food manufacturers desire a high degree of palatability which can be attained at low cost.
- The three main types of pet foods embody the desired characteristics to varying degrees. Canned or high-moisture (greater than 50% moisture) foods are typically all meat and therefore generally highly palatable to animals. However, such foods are typically costly to produce and package, require the use of preservatives to inhibit decomposition and contamination, and are relatively less nutritious per unit weight than other pet food products. Dry or low-moisture content pet foods (less than 15% moisture) are generally highly nutritious, may be inexpensively packaged, and are highly convenient to store and use. However, dry or low-moisture foods are generally the least palatable of pet foods. Semi-dry or intermediate moisture content pet foods (about 15% to about 50% moisture) are generally more palatable than dry foods, have higher nutritional value, and are more inexpensively packaged and more conveniently used than high moisture foods. However, intermediate moisture content foods may be more susceptible to bacterial contamination than dry pet foods, and are generally less palatable than high moisture content foods.
- Dry and semi-dry foods are generally preferred by manufacturers and pet owners alike because such foods are more convenient to store and use, and because of the higher nutritional content than high-moisture pet foods. However, many animals, and particularly cats, are picky eaters desiring a high degree of palatability. There remains a need for a low-moisture pet food with a high degree of palatability.
- Known palatability enhancers for low moisture pet foods include various surface coating compositions. For example, known palatability enhancers include surface coatings of phosphoric acid; a combination of fat with hexamic, phosphoric or citric acid; and a mixture of phosphoric acid and citric acid. Palatability may also be enhanced by the application of liquid or dry flavorings as a coating. Liquid or dry animal digest coatings are widely used to enhance palatability, and animal digest is also used in a liquid combination with phosphoric acid. Dry animal digest may be used in a two step coating process with liquid phosphoric acid. Dry application of sodium acid phosphate, which may be used in combination with animal digest, is also known.
- However, the known compositions and methods remain limited in the resulting degree of palatability. It would be desirable to provide a composition and method for further enhancing the palatability of dry and semi-dry pet foods. It would also be desirable to provide such a composition with a high degree of palatability for cats. It would be further desirable to provide such a composition and method which enhances dry and semi-dry pet food palatability at a relatively low production cost. It would be still further desirable to provide such a palatability enhancer which is robust among different formulations.
- These and other objects may be attained by a pet food palatability enhancer which includes tetrasodium pyrophosphate. The palatability enhancer, and methods for enhancing the palatability of pet foods, generally relate to dry and semi-dry pet foods including a nutritionally balanced mixture of proteinaceous and farinaceous materials. Generally, the palatability enhancer is a dry formulation including from about 0.1% up to about 99% by weight tetrasodium pyrophosphate. In one embodiment, the palatability enhancer is formulated by adding tetrasodium pyrophosphate in dry powdered form to a dry composition for application to a dry pet food. The dry composition typically also includes readily commercially available ingredients such as dried whey, dried animal digest, and yeast. The amount of tetrasodium pyrophosphate added to the dry composition is adjusted so that tetrasodium pyrolphosphate contributes about 0.1% to about 1.0% by weight of the finished dry pet food.
- In use and in one embodiment, the palatability enhancer is applied to particles or pieces of extruded, dry or semi-dry cat food. More specifically, the particles or pieces are added to a coating drum and molten animal fat and other liquids are sprayed over the dry pieces. The palatability enhancer is applied to the pieces and the pieces are tumbled in the drum to thoroughly coat the pieces.
- The palatability enhancer improves the palatability of dry and semi-dry pet foods. The palatability enhancer is particularly effective for enhancing the palatability to cats of dry and semi-dry cat foods. Further, the palatability enhancer may be added to commercially available dry and semi-dry cat foods or other pet and animal foods at a relatively low production cost.
- The palatability enhancer generally is a dry composition including from about 0.1% up to about 99% by weight tetrasodium pyrophosphate. The palatability enhancer is generally externally applied, using dry application methods, to commercially available, dry or semi-dry pet foods.
- More specifically, the palatability enhancer and methods for enhancing the palatability of dry and semi-dry pet foods, generally relate to a nutritionally balanced mixture of proteinaceous and farinaceous materials having a moisture content of about 50% or less by weight. Such mixtures are known as dry or semi-dry pet foods to those skilled in the art, and the palatability enhancer is applied to pieces of the dry or semi-dry food. The pet food compositions described herein are not intended to be limited to a specific listing of ingredients because such ingredients will depend on such factors as, for example, the desired nutritional balance for the specific type of pet, and availability of ingredients to the manufacturer. In addition to the proteinaceous and farinaceous materials, the pet food composition generally may include vitamins, minerals, and other additives such as flavorings, preservatives, emulsifiers and humectants. The nutritional balance, including the relative proportions of vitamins, minerals, fat, protein and carbohydrate, is determined according to dietary standards known in the veterinary art. For example, the nutritional balance of a cat food composition is determined according to the known dietary requirements for cats.
- The proteinaceous material may include any material having a protein content of at least about 15% by weight including vegetable proteins such as soybean, cotton seed, and peanut; animal proteins such as casein, albumin, and fresh animal tissue including fresh meat tissue and fresh fish tissue; and dried or rendered meals such as fish meal, poultry meal, meat meal, bone meal and the like. Other types of suitable proteinaceous materials include wheat gluten or corn gluten, and microbial proteins such as yeast.
- The farinaceous material may be defined as any material having a protein content of less than about 15% by weight and containing a substantial proportion of starches or carbohydrates, including grains such as corn, milo, alfalfa, wheat, barley, rice, soy hulls, and other grains having low protein content. In addition to the proteinaceous and farinaceous materials, other materials such as whey and other dairy by-products, as well as other carbohydrates may be added. In addition, known flavorings including, for example, corn syrup or molasses, may be added.
- In one exemplary embodiment, the palatability enhancer is applied to a dry cat food composition. Generally, the term cat food composition as used herein applies to commercially sold, nutritionally balanced food compositions which are intended to provide substantially the sole diet for a cat. Thus, such compositions may be described as having a minimum protein content at which cat health is maintained. However, the minimum protein content of the food varies according to the age and breeding status for the animal. For example, a nutritionally balanced cat food composition for breeding females and kittens requires a minimum protein content of at least about 28% by weight on a dry matter basis. A nutritionally balanced cat food composition for non-breeding and adult cats requires a minimum protein content of about 26% by weight on a dry matter basis. More typically, the protein content of commercially available cat food compositions for adult, non-breeding cats is about 30% by weight on a dry matter basis, to insure that the food meets the nutritional requirements of any cat.
- For example, a typical formula well known in the art for a dry cat food composition to which the palatability enhancer is applied is as follows (in percent by weight): about 0 - 70% grain-based meal or flour,, such as corn, wheat, barley or rice; about 0 - 30% animal by-product meal, such as poultry or beef meal; about 0 - 25% corn gluten meal; about 0 - 25% fresh animal tissue, such as poultry or beef tissue; about 0 - 25% soybean meal or flour; about 0 - 10% animal fat; about 0 - 20% seafood-based meal; about 0 - 25% fresh fish tissue; about 0 - 10% high fructose corn syrup; about 0 - 10% dried molasses; about 0 -1.5% phosphoric acid; and about 0 - 1.5% citric acid. Vitamins and minerals are added according to known American Association of Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) Cat Food Nutrient profiles, and include calcium carbonate, potassium chloride, sodium chloride, choline chloride, taurine, zinc oxide, ferrous sulfate, vitamin E, vitamin A, vitamin B 12, vitamin D3, riboflavin, niacin, calcium pantothenate, biotin, thiamine mononitrate, copper sulfate, folic acid, pyroxidine hydrochloride, calcium iodate, and menadione sodium bisulfite complex (a source of vitamin K activity).
- In addition, the palatability enhancer relates to other pet foods and animal foods in general without regard to the protein content which typically varies according to species, breeding status, and age, among other factors. For example, the palatability enhancer may be used with a dry or semi-dry dog food composition for non-breeding, adult dogs, which requires a minimum protein content of about 18% by weight on a dry matter basis. Similarly, the palatability enhancer may be applied to a dry or semi-dry puppy food having a minimum protein content of about 22% by weight on a dry matter basis. The palatability enhancer may also be used with other dry and semi-dry foods of varying protein content, and with foods for other animals such as livestock and research animals.
- The palatability enhancer generally includes tetrasodium pyrophosphate and is formulated as a dry mixture in powdered, granulated or encapsulated form. Tetrasodium pyrophosphate is available in dry, powdered form from, for example, Solutia of St. Louis, Mo., and is combined with other dry ingredients including known palatability enhancing ingredients and preservatives. For example, other suitable ingredients for the palatability enhancer include various nucleotides such as inosine monophosphate (IMP), guanosine triphosphate (GTP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP); amino acids such as alanine and lysine; other inorganic salts such as NaCl, monosodium phosphate, and dicalcium phosphate; and organic materials such as whey, yeast and animal by-products digest. The palatability enhancer includes about 0.1% up to about 99% by weight tetrasodium pyrophosphate. In one embodiment, the amount of tetrasodium pyrophosphate is adjusted so that tetrasodium pyrophosphate contributes about 0.1% to about 1.0% by weight to the finished pet food, depending on the relative amount of the palatability enhancer added to the finished pet food. Generally, the palatability enhancer contributes from about 0.5% to about 3.0% by weight to the finished cat food product. However, both the exact proportion of tetrasodium pyrophosphate in the palatability enhancer, as well as the relative proportion of the palatability enhancer to the finished cat food product, may be varied and are limited by such factors as relative availability of the ingredients, cost, and health of the animal. In addition, the palatability enhancer described herein is not intended to be limited to a specific listing of ingredients because such ingredients will similarly depend on availability and cost of ingredients to the manufacturer.
- To make a dry formulation of the palatability enhancer, for example, commercially available dry ingredients, including tetrasodium pyrophosphate, various nucleotides, amino acids, inorganic salts and organic materials are combined in the desired proportions in a batch mixer and blended to homogeneity. In one embodiment, a dry formulation of the palatability enhancer typically includes about 15 - 25 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate, about 0.1 -3.0 weight % amino acid, about 35 - 50 weight % animal by-products such as dried animal digest, and about 35 - 50 weight % microbial protein such as brewer's yeast. For example, in one embodiment the palatability enhancer includes about 18 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate or, in another embodiment, about 25 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate. In one specific exemplary embodiment, the palatability enhancer includes about 39.7 weight % dried brewer's yeast, about 39.7 weight % dried chicken liver, about 19.8% tetrasodium pyrophosphate, and about 0.8 weight % L-alanine.
- To make a liquid formulation of the palatability enhancer, for example, commercially available liquid ingredients are combined in a mixer. Wet ingredients such as animal tissue are ground or emulsified to a slurry and the liquid ingredients are combined with the slurry. A commercially available protease is added to the slurry to hydrolyze the proteins, and later inactivated with heat, acid or another method. Preservatives such as sorbates are also added to the slurry. Water is added to adjust the viscosity and the solids content of the slurry to between about 10% and 50% to facilitate the application process as described below. The tetrasodium pyrophosphate, and other dry ingredients as desired, are added to the slurry prior to application. A liquid formulation of the palatability enhancer includes about 5 - 45 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate; about 1 -50 weight % animal tissue such as beef hearts or livers, or chicken hearts or livers; about 0.1 - 3.0 weight % amino acid such as alanine or lysine; about 0.1 -1.0 weight % preservatives such as sorbic acid and about 0.1 - 2.0 weight % enzymes such as protease. For example, one embodiment of the liquid formulation includes about 14 - 20 weight % tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- In use, the palatability enhancer is applied to the particles or pieces of dry or semi-dry pet food such as, for example, dry extruded kibbles as known in the art. The palatability enhancer is applied, for example, by spraying or dusting onto the particles or pieces of the food. More specifically, to make a cat food composition to which the palatability enhancer is applied, proteinaceous and farinaceous materials and additional desired materials as described above are combined to form an admixture and are well blended. The admixture is then transferred to a steam conditioner and subjected to steam and moisture to adjust the moisture content of the admixture to between about 20% and 40% by weight. The conditioned admixture is then cooked under conditions of elevated temperature and pressure in an extruder such as a single screw extruder. The extruder may include a die having a particular shape, such as a fish, cross or circle. The product is segmented into discrete particles or pieces by a rotating cutting knife as the product is extruded.
- The particles or pieces are conveyed to a forced air drying system which raises the temperature of the pieces to about 140°F., and reduces the moisture level to about 8% by weight. The dried particles or pieces are then transferred by bulk conveyor to a coating drum and sprayed with animal fat. Other liquids such as, for example, citric acid or phosphoric acid may alternatively be applied to the pieces, or applied in addition to the animal fat. The pieces are then sprayed or dusted with the palatability enhancer, and tumbled to thoroughly coat the pieces with the palatability enhancer. The pieces are then cooled to ambient temperature and packaged.
- The palatability enhancer with tetrasodium pyrophosphate, in both liquid and dry formulations, was tested against known dry cat food coatings. In both formulations, the palatability enhancer was shown to improve palatability over that obtained with known palatability enhancers.
- In four separate tests described in Examples 1 through 4, eighteen adult cats were each offered a control ration R1, and a test ration R2 in a two bowl test over a period of two days. R1 consisted of dry cat food kibbles of Meow Mix® basal formula, commercially available from Ralston Purina Company, Checkerboard Square, St. Louis, Mo. 63164, with 2.25% by weight of a typical dry cat coating containing about 0.1 - 3.0 weight % amino acid, about 35 - 50 weight % animal by-products such as dried animal digest, and about 35 - 50 weight % brewer's yeast. R2 was Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with 2.5% by weight of a dry cat coating which also included 0.5% by weight tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- Of all food consumed over the two days, R2 represented 84.6% of the total, while R1 represented 15.4%, and the ratio of the amount of R2 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 5.5. The animals ate 55.3 grams/day/cat of R2, compared with 11.0 grams/day/cat of R1. All eighteen cats preferred R2 over R1.
- Of all food consumed over the two days, R2 represented 82.7% of the total, while R1 represented 17.3%, and the ratio of the amount of R2 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 4.8. The animals ate 58.0 grams/day/cat of R2, compared with 12.0 grams/day/cat of R1. Seventeen cats preferred R2 over R1, while one cat showed no preference.
- Of all food consumed over the two days, R2 represented 85.4% of the total, while R1 represented 14.6%, and the ratio of the amount of R2 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 5.9. The animals ate 54.4 grams/day/cat of R2, compared with 8.7 grams/day/cat of R1. Sixteen cats preferred R2 over R1, while one cat showed no preference, and one cat was eliminated for insignificant consumption.
- Of all food consumed over the two days, R2 represented 77.6% of the total, while R1 represented 22.4%, and the ratio of the amount of R2 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 3.5. The animals ate 49.2 grams/day/cat of R2, compared with 14.7 grams/day/cat of R1. Sixteen cats preferred R2 over R1, while one cat preferred R1 over R2 and one cat showed no preference.
- Table 1 summarizes the results of Examples 1 through 4.
TABLE 1 most consumed/ % of all Grams # of # of animals Ra- least food eaten/ animals without Ex. tion consumed consumed day/cat with pref. pref. 1 R1 5.5 15.4 11.0 0 0 R2 84.6 55.3 18 2 R1 4.8 17.3 12.0 0 1 R2 82.7 58.0 17 3 R1 5.9 14.6 8.7 0 1 R2 85.4 54.4 16 4 R1 3.5 22.4 14.7 1 1 R2 77.6 49.2 16 - In two separate tests set forth in Examples 5 and 6, a control ration coated with liquid animal digest was tested against a test ration coated with liquid animal digest including an amount of tetrasodium pyrophosphate.
- Eighteen adult cats were each offered a control ration R1, and a test ration R3 in a two bowl test over a period of two days. R1 consisted of Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with liquid animal digest at 3% by weight. R3 was Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with liquid animal digest at 3% by weight, plus tetrasodium pyrophosphate at 0.75% by weight. Of all food consumed over the two days, R3 represented 69.0% of the total, while R1 represented 31.0%, and the ratio of the amount of R3 consumed to the amount of R1 consumed was 2.2. The animals ate 41.5 grams/day/cat of R3, compared with 19.0 grams/day/cat of R1. Fifteen cats preferred R3 over R1, while two preferred R1 over R3, and one showed no preference.
- Eighteen adult cats were each offered a first test ration R2, and a second test ration R3 in a two bowl test over a period of two days. R2 was Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with liquid animal digest at 3% by weight plus tetrasodium pyrophosphate at 0.5% by weight. R3 was Meow Mix® basal formula kibbles coated with liquid animal digest at 3% by weight plus tetrasodium pyrophosphate at 0.75% by weight. Of all food consumed over the two days, R3 represented 60.9% of the total, while R2 represented 39.1%, and the ratio of the amount of R3 consumed to the amount of R2 consumed was 1.6. The animals ate 35.1 grams/day/cat of R3, compared with 23.2 grams/day/cat of R1. Fourteen cats preferred R3 over R2, while three preferred R2 over R3, and one showed no preference. The results suggest a positive dose response relationship between the amount of tetrasodium pyrophosphate added to the food and the degree of animal preference for the food.
- Table 2 summarizes the results of Examples, 5 and 6.
TABLE 2 most consumed/ % of all Grams # of # of animals Rat- least food eaten/ animals without Ex. ion consumed consumed day/cat with pref. pref. 5 R1 2.2 31.0 19.0 2 1 R3 69.0 41.5 15 6 R2 1.6 39.1 23.2 3 1 R3 60.9 35.1 14 - Examples 1 through 6 show that tetrasodium pyrophosphate improves palatability in both dry and liquid formulations of a palatability enhancer. The addition of tetrasodium pyrophosphate to liquid animal digest was found to be more effective as a palatability enhancer than liquid animal digest alone. The addition of tetrasodium pyrophosphate to a dry cat coating produced a more effective palatability enhancer than a typical dry coating alone.
- The use of tetrasodium pyrophosphate to enhance the palatability of dry and semi-dry pet foods represents a substantial improvement over current methods. The palatability enhancer is particularly effective for enhancing the palatability to cats of dry and semi-dry cat foods. Further, the use of tetrasodium pyrophosphate represents a relatively low added production cost for pet food manufacturers. In addition, the improved palatability enhancing effect of tetrasodium pyrophosphate survives a range of different application systems and different formulations.
- From the preceding description of various embodiments of the present invention, it is evident that the objects of the invention are attained. Although the invention has been described and illustrated in detail, it is to be clearly understood that the same is intended by way of illustration and example only and is not to be taken by way of limitation. Accordingly, the spirit and scope of the invention are to be limited only by the terms of the appended claims.
Claims (21)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/767,982 US6350485B2 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 2001-01-23 | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US10968698P | 1998-11-24 | 1998-11-24 | |
| US09/428,631 US6254920B1 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 1999-10-27 | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food |
| US09/767,982 US6350485B2 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 2001-01-23 | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/428,631 Continuation US6254920B1 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 1999-10-27 | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20010002272A1 true US20010002272A1 (en) | 2001-05-31 |
| US6350485B2 US6350485B2 (en) | 2002-02-26 |
Family
ID=23699727
Family Applications (2)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/428,631 Expired - Lifetime US6254920B1 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 1999-10-27 | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food |
| US09/767,982 Expired - Lifetime US6350485B2 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 2001-01-23 | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food |
Family Applications Before (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US09/428,631 Expired - Lifetime US6254920B1 (en) | 1998-11-24 | 1999-10-27 | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food |
Country Status (2)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US6254920B1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2000030456A1 (en) |
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20030147991A1 (en) * | 2001-09-13 | 2003-08-07 | Land O'lakes Farmland Feed Llc | Method of feeding young pigs |
| US20050123585A1 (en) * | 2003-12-08 | 2005-06-09 | The Iams Company | Edible compositions which are adapted for use by a companion animal |
| US20060160978A1 (en) * | 2005-01-20 | 2006-07-20 | Gupta Laxmi C | Flame retardant systems, and related methods and uses |
| US20090309077A1 (en) * | 2008-03-13 | 2009-12-17 | Gupta Laxmi C | Fire retardant coatings and bodies, and methods of use |
| US20110159149A1 (en) * | 2009-12-29 | 2011-06-30 | Josephson David B | Performance of companion animal palatability systems leading to increased pet food consumption preferences |
| WO2012023990A1 (en) * | 2010-08-20 | 2012-02-23 | Nestec S.A. | Food compositions having visible food flakes on the surface and methods for making such compositions |
| US20120093986A1 (en) * | 2009-06-19 | 2012-04-19 | Bramoulle Loic | Method for producing highly palatable dry cat food |
| US20140093621A1 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-03 | Junya Sakoda | Pet food |
| US20150056347A1 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2015-02-26 | Specialites Pet Food | Food products having an improved appeal to pet owners and at least a maintained palatability to pets, and methods of preparation |
| WO2015066009A1 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-07 | Mars, Inc. | Dry pet food comprising a palatability enhancing coating |
| EP2796055A4 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2015-11-18 | Unicharm Corp | Pet food |
| EP2597963B1 (en) | 2010-08-03 | 2016-07-27 | Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. | Pet food compositions having antimicrobial activity |
| US10973243B2 (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2021-04-13 | Hills Pet Nutrition, Inc. | Animal food product for dental efficacy, methods of manufacture and use |
Families Citing this family (44)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6669975B1 (en) * | 2000-02-03 | 2003-12-30 | Mars Incorporated | Customized dietary health maintenance system for pets |
| US6955831B2 (en) * | 2000-05-09 | 2005-10-18 | Her Majesty The Queen In Right Of Canada As Represented By The Minister Of Fisheries And Oceans | Protein and lipid sources for use in aquafeeds and animal feeds and a process for their preparation |
| US7125574B2 (en) * | 2001-01-10 | 2006-10-24 | Nestec S.A. | Dental diet for reducing tartar |
| DE10105306A1 (en) * | 2001-02-02 | 2002-08-22 | Nutrinova Gmbh | Feed for livestock rearing containing sorbic acid and enzymes |
| FR2831769B1 (en) * | 2001-11-07 | 2004-07-30 | Diana Ingredients | APPEARANCE FACTOR AND TASTEFAST |
| DE60238663D1 (en) * | 2002-04-05 | 2011-02-03 | Nestle Sa | Compositions and methods for improving lipid assimilation in pets |
| US20040134438A1 (en) * | 2002-10-11 | 2004-07-15 | Richard Ticktin | Pet food dispensers and methods of dispensing pet food |
| US7025965B1 (en) * | 2003-02-12 | 2006-04-11 | Pharma Chemie, Inc. | Method of use and dosage composition of bluegreen algae extract for inflammation in animals |
| US20050037108A1 (en) * | 2003-08-14 | 2005-02-17 | Charles Lin | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of animal feed using tetrapotassium pyrophosphate |
| EP1679968A4 (en) * | 2003-11-07 | 2008-01-16 | Hills Pet Nutrition Inc | Fluid composition for increased total water intake |
| US7244460B2 (en) * | 2003-11-17 | 2007-07-17 | Nusci Laboratories Llc | Tripolyphosphate pet food palatability enhancers |
| US20050170067A1 (en) * | 2004-02-03 | 2005-08-04 | Bioproducts, Inc. | Potassium pyrophosphate pet food palatability enhancers |
| US20060193950A1 (en) * | 2004-02-20 | 2006-08-31 | Axelrod Glen S | Pet food with enhanced nutritional value |
| US20050186307A1 (en) * | 2004-02-20 | 2005-08-25 | Axelrod Glen S. | Pet food with enhanced nutritional value |
| US20050276881A1 (en) * | 2004-04-27 | 2005-12-15 | Teh-Kuei Chen | Animal food palatability enhancer and method of use and manufacture thereof |
| WO2006017693A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2006-02-16 | General Mills, Inc. | Food products having low acrylamide content comprising cyclodextrin and amino acids |
| US8252314B2 (en) | 2004-09-24 | 2012-08-28 | Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. | Hypoallergenic composition |
| CA2591229C (en) * | 2004-12-09 | 2013-08-20 | Bio Products, Inc. | Tripolyphosphate pet food palatability enhancers |
| CA2592842A1 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2006-07-13 | Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. | Methods for enhancing the palatability of compositions for consumption by animals |
| BRPI0501477B1 (en) * | 2005-04-15 | 2014-08-05 | Total Alimentos S/A | Animal feed with added external and internal palatability enhancing product |
| BRPI0610965A2 (en) * | 2005-06-01 | 2011-02-22 | Hills Pet Nutrition Inc | composition for consumption by an animal, methods for improving the palatability of a composition for consumption by an animal, for increasing the frequency of ingestion or ingestion rate of a composition for consumption by an animal, and for making a composition for animal consumption, product, kit, and means for communicating information about or instructions for mixing and administering an animal composition having improved palatability to an animal |
| US20060193945A1 (en) * | 2005-06-17 | 2006-08-31 | Nusci Laboratories | Stabilization of oxidized fats |
| US7691424B2 (en) * | 2005-10-28 | 2010-04-06 | T.F.H. Pulications, Inc. | Nutritional supplement |
| US20070095293A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2007-05-03 | Moulton Reynolds E | Treat dispensing device and a method thereof |
| TW200744473A (en) | 2006-04-19 | 2007-12-16 | Specialites Pet Food | Use of inorganic phosphate compounds as palatability enhancers of flavours generated by thermal reactions in wet pet foodstuffs |
| AU2006350215B2 (en) * | 2006-11-03 | 2012-04-26 | T.F.H. Publications, Inc. | Nutritional supplement |
| WO2008144234A1 (en) * | 2007-05-16 | 2008-11-27 | Wenger Manufacturing Inc. | Extruded pet food product |
| US20110124743A1 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2011-05-26 | Pascal Vanacker | Palatability enhancers and methods for enhancing palatability |
| US20100303967A1 (en) * | 2009-05-28 | 2010-12-02 | Gregory Dean Sunvold | Pet Food Having Improved Animal Preference |
| US10104903B2 (en) | 2009-07-31 | 2018-10-23 | Mars, Incorporated | Animal food and its appearance |
| US20110027417A1 (en) | 2009-07-31 | 2011-02-03 | Patrick Joseph Corrigan | Process for Dusting Animal Food |
| US20120213889A1 (en) * | 2009-10-09 | 2012-08-23 | Wen Chiang | Methods for enhancing animal digest palatability |
| WO2012052425A1 (en) | 2010-10-18 | 2012-04-26 | Danisco A/S | Chewable product |
| BR112013027474A2 (en) * | 2011-04-29 | 2017-01-10 | Nestec Sa | compositions that improve palatability |
| AR087093A1 (en) * | 2011-07-12 | 2014-02-12 | Specialites Pet Food | COMPOSITION THAT IMPROVES THE PALATABILITY THAT UNDERSTANDS FREE AMINO ACIDS TO USE IN FOOD FOR PETS |
| GB201120989D0 (en) | 2011-12-06 | 2012-01-18 | Mars Inc | Genetic test |
| RU2015121372A (en) | 2012-11-05 | 2016-12-27 | Нестек Са | AROMATED DRINKING WATER AND WAYS TO IMPROVE THE COMPLETION OF LOSS OF LIQUID IN ANIMALS |
| EP3065559B1 (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2019-01-09 | Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. | Palatability enhancers for foods designed for dogs and cats with renal insufficiency |
| CN106163297A (en) * | 2013-12-19 | 2016-11-23 | 雀巢产品技术援助有限公司 | Increase compositions and the method for dried pet food palatability |
| RU2698130C2 (en) * | 2014-11-03 | 2019-08-22 | Спесиалите Пет Фуд | Appetizing dry fodders for cats and methods for their preparation |
| US11388914B2 (en) | 2015-04-28 | 2022-07-19 | Mars, Incorporated | Process of preparing a wet pet food, wet pet food produced by the process and uses thereof |
| PL3468383T3 (en) | 2016-06-14 | 2023-04-11 | Spécialités Pet Food | Method for producing a wet pet food having enhanced palatability |
| HUE071106T2 (en) | 2021-04-30 | 2025-08-28 | Specialites Pet Food | New palatability enhancing preparation |
| WO2025114776A1 (en) * | 2023-11-29 | 2025-06-05 | Societe Des Produits Nestle Sa | Compositions and methods for increasing the palatability of dry pet food |
Family Cites Families (27)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4044158A (en) | 1975-07-23 | 1977-08-23 | The Quaker Oats Company | Caseinate replacement for pet food using a neutral chelating agent |
| US4127678A (en) | 1975-07-23 | 1978-11-28 | The Quaker Oats Company | Caseinate replacement in semi-moist pet foods |
| US4039689A (en) | 1976-02-03 | 1977-08-02 | The Quaker Oats Company | Soft dry pet food product and process |
| US4276311A (en) | 1976-06-17 | 1981-06-30 | Mars Limited | Food product and process |
| US4267195A (en) | 1976-09-10 | 1981-05-12 | University Of Texas | Dog food flavors |
| US4215149A (en) * | 1978-11-17 | 1980-07-29 | Standard Brands Incorporated | Process for improving the palatability of pet food |
| JPS5944019B2 (en) | 1979-09-14 | 1984-10-26 | 株式会社上野製薬応用研究所 | Method for producing medium-humidity feed with good storage stability |
| JPS6041047B2 (en) * | 1982-06-29 | 1985-09-13 | ライオン株式会社 | toothpaste composition |
| US4514431A (en) | 1983-06-23 | 1985-04-30 | International Flavors & Fragrances Inc. | Enhancing the taste of a meat-flavored foodstuff |
| GB8502124D0 (en) | 1985-01-29 | 1985-02-27 | Spillers Foods Ltd | Pet food |
| US4806340A (en) | 1985-09-13 | 1989-02-21 | Colgate-Palmolive Company | Anticalculus oral composition |
| US4678662A (en) * | 1985-10-09 | 1987-07-07 | Monsanto Company | Pyrophosphate coating process for calcium carbonate dental abrasives |
| FR2607704B1 (en) | 1986-12-05 | 1990-05-04 | Boyer Danielle | HYGIENE PRODUCT, PARTICULARLY FOR THE DENTURE CARE OF DOGS |
| US5047231A (en) | 1989-05-30 | 1991-09-10 | Nabisco Brands, Inc. | Raw hide containing an inorganic pyrophosphate |
| US5000940A (en) * | 1989-05-30 | 1991-03-19 | Nabisco Brands, Inc. | Devices, compositions and the like having or containing an inorganic pyrophosphate |
| US5094870A (en) | 1989-05-30 | 1992-03-10 | Nabisco Brands, Inc. | Canine biscuits containing an inorganic pyrophosphate |
| US5015485A (en) | 1989-05-30 | 1991-05-14 | Nabisco Brands, Inc. | Dog biscuits having a coating containing an inorganic pyrophosphate |
| US5011679A (en) | 1989-05-30 | 1991-04-30 | Nabisco Brands, Inc. | Raw hide having a coating containing an inorganic pyrophosphate |
| US5114704A (en) | 1989-05-30 | 1992-05-19 | Nabisco Brands, Inc. | Raw hide having a coating containing an inorganic pyrophosphate |
| US5000973A (en) | 1989-05-30 | 1991-03-19 | Nabisco Brands, Inc. | Nutritionally-balanced canine biscuits containing an inorganic pyrophosphate |
| US5000943A (en) | 1989-05-30 | 1991-03-19 | Nabisco Brands, Inc. | Canine biscuits containing an inorganic pyrophosphate |
| US5186964A (en) * | 1990-09-04 | 1993-02-16 | Applied Food Biotechnology, Inc. | Flavor composition for pet food |
| US5296209A (en) | 1992-01-17 | 1994-03-22 | Colgate Palmolive Company | Pet chew product having oral care properties |
| US5296217A (en) | 1992-06-15 | 1994-03-22 | Indiana University Foundation | Methods for preventing dental calculus in domestic animals |
| US5532010A (en) * | 1993-05-28 | 1996-07-02 | Nabisco, Inc. | Coated canine biscuits and preparation process |
| US5618518A (en) | 1995-06-06 | 1997-04-08 | Indiana University Foundation | Methods and compositions for use against dental calculus in domestic animals |
| CA2244084C (en) | 1997-10-14 | 2006-07-25 | Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A. | Dental care pet food |
-
1999
- 1999-10-27 US US09/428,631 patent/US6254920B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1999-11-12 WO PCT/US1999/026640 patent/WO2000030456A1/en not_active Ceased
-
2001
- 2001-01-23 US US09/767,982 patent/US6350485B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Cited By (20)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6783777B2 (en) | 2001-09-13 | 2004-08-31 | Land O'lakes, Inc. | Method of feeding swine |
| US20030147991A1 (en) * | 2001-09-13 | 2003-08-07 | Land O'lakes Farmland Feed Llc | Method of feeding young pigs |
| US20050123585A1 (en) * | 2003-12-08 | 2005-06-09 | The Iams Company | Edible compositions which are adapted for use by a companion animal |
| US12059465B2 (en) | 2003-12-08 | 2024-08-13 | Mars, Incorporated | Edible compositions |
| US9827314B2 (en) * | 2003-12-08 | 2017-11-28 | Mars, Incorporated | Edible compositions which are adapted for use by a companion animal |
| US20060160978A1 (en) * | 2005-01-20 | 2006-07-20 | Gupta Laxmi C | Flame retardant systems, and related methods and uses |
| US20090309077A1 (en) * | 2008-03-13 | 2009-12-17 | Gupta Laxmi C | Fire retardant coatings and bodies, and methods of use |
| US8932497B2 (en) | 2008-03-13 | 2015-01-13 | Laxmi C. Gupta | Fire retardant coatings and bodies, and methods of use |
| US9743683B2 (en) * | 2009-06-19 | 2017-08-29 | Specialites Pet Food | Method for producing highly palatable dry cat food |
| US20120093986A1 (en) * | 2009-06-19 | 2012-04-19 | Bramoulle Loic | Method for producing highly palatable dry cat food |
| US20110159149A1 (en) * | 2009-12-29 | 2011-06-30 | Josephson David B | Performance of companion animal palatability systems leading to increased pet food consumption preferences |
| EP2597963B1 (en) | 2010-08-03 | 2016-07-27 | Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. | Pet food compositions having antimicrobial activity |
| EP2597963B2 (en) † | 2010-08-03 | 2024-10-02 | Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. | Method for making a pet food composition having antimicrobial activity |
| WO2012023990A1 (en) * | 2010-08-20 | 2012-02-23 | Nestec S.A. | Food compositions having visible food flakes on the surface and methods for making such compositions |
| EP2796055A4 (en) * | 2011-12-21 | 2015-11-18 | Unicharm Corp | Pet food |
| US20150056347A1 (en) * | 2012-03-30 | 2015-02-26 | Specialites Pet Food | Food products having an improved appeal to pet owners and at least a maintained palatability to pets, and methods of preparation |
| US20140093621A1 (en) * | 2012-09-28 | 2014-04-03 | Junya Sakoda | Pet food |
| WO2015066009A1 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2015-05-07 | Mars, Inc. | Dry pet food comprising a palatability enhancing coating |
| EP3622826A1 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2020-03-18 | Mars, Incorporated | Dry pet food comprising a palatability enhancing coating |
| US10973243B2 (en) * | 2014-12-19 | 2021-04-13 | Hills Pet Nutrition, Inc. | Animal food product for dental efficacy, methods of manufacture and use |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| US6350485B2 (en) | 2002-02-26 |
| US6254920B1 (en) | 2001-07-03 |
| WO2000030456A1 (en) | 2000-06-02 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US6350485B2 (en) | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food | |
| JP2008301824A (en) | Method and composition for enhancing palatability of pet food | |
| US3930031A (en) | Synergistic flavor enhancing coatings for cat food compositions comprising citric and phosphoric acids | |
| US20050037108A1 (en) | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of animal feed using tetrapotassium pyrophosphate | |
| US7244460B2 (en) | Tripolyphosphate pet food palatability enhancers | |
| AU2002358875B2 (en) | Appetizing factor and taste enhancer | |
| US20050170067A1 (en) | Potassium pyrophosphate pet food palatability enhancers | |
| EP0877559B1 (en) | Cat food composition of improved palatability | |
| US20100330229A1 (en) | Method for enhancing pet food palatability | |
| EP0547108A4 (en) | Flavor composition for pet food | |
| CA2591229C (en) | Tripolyphosphate pet food palatability enhancers | |
| MXPA01005247A (en) | Methods and compositions for enhancing palatability of pet food | |
| CA1077331A (en) | Casein replacement in semi-moist pet foods | |
| CA2244751C (en) | Cat food composition of improved palatability | |
| HK1076008B (en) | Appetizing factor and taste enhancer |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NESTEC, LTD., SWITZERLAND Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NPPC SERVICES, INC.;REEL/FRAME:013506/0230 Effective date: 20021023 Owner name: NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, MISSOURI Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:RALSTON PURINA COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:013506/0222 Effective date: 20011212 Owner name: NPPC SERVICES, INC., MISSOURI Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:013506/0226 Effective date: 20021024 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: BIG HEART PET BRANDS, CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:DEL MONTE CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:032472/0782 Effective date: 20140218 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A., SWITZERLAND Free format text: MERGER;ASSIGNOR:NESTEC S.A.;REEL/FRAME:049391/0756 Effective date: 20190528 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A., SWITZERLAND Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION TO SHOW THE FULL AND CORRECT NEW NAME IN SECTION 51. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 049391 FRAME: 0756. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER;ASSIGNOR:NESTEC S.A.;REEL/FRAME:049853/0398 Effective date: 20190528 |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A., SWITZERLAND Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENT NUMBER 16062921 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 049391 FRAME 0756. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE PATENT NUMBER SHOULD HAVE BEEN 16062912;ASSIGNOR:NESTEC S.A.;REEL/FRAME:054082/0001 Effective date: 20190528 Owner name: SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A., SWITZERLAND Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENT NUMBER 16062921 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 049391 FRAME 0756. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE PATENT NUMBER SHOULD HAVE BEEN 16062912;ASSIGNOR:NESTEC S.A.;REEL/FRAME:054082/0165 Effective date: 20190528 |