US1946921A - Means of preventing spinning in aircraft - Google Patents

Means of preventing spinning in aircraft Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US1946921A
US1946921A US515961A US51596131A US1946921A US 1946921 A US1946921 A US 1946921A US 515961 A US515961 A US 515961A US 51596131 A US51596131 A US 51596131A US 1946921 A US1946921 A US 1946921A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
wing
aircraft
pressure
spinning
pumping
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US515961A
Inventor
Edward A Stalker
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US515961A priority Critical patent/US1946921A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US1946921A publication Critical patent/US1946921A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C21/00Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces by affecting boundary layer flow
    • B64C21/02Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces by affecting boundary layer flow by use of slot, ducts, porous areas or the like
    • B64C21/025Influencing air flow over aircraft surfaces by affecting boundary layer flow by use of slot, ducts, porous areas or the like for simultaneous blowing and sucking
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C2230/00Boundary layer controls
    • B64C2230/04Boundary layer controls by actively generating fluid flow
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64CAEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
    • B64C2230/00Boundary layer controls
    • B64C2230/06Boundary layer controls by explicitly adjusting fluid flow, e.g. by using valves, variable aperture or slot areas, variable pump action or variable fluid pressure
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T50/00Aeronautics or air transport
    • Y02T50/10Drag reduction

Definitions

  • FIG-5 @MMM Patented Feb. 13, 1934 PATENT OFFICE MEANS OF PREVENTING SPINNING IN AIRCRAFT Edward A. Stalker, Ann Arbor, Mich.
  • My invention relates to a means of preventing spinning in aircraft by the adjustment of the air pressure on the wings. It also relates to means of providing for the safe use of boundary I layer energization by providing against a serious reduction of normal lift when the pumping means fails to function. It also provides against a loss of lift due to a chordwise exchange of pressure when the pumping means fails, by pro- 10 viding an effective and practical method.
  • the ilriietigiod must provide great airtightness and be g As is well known, spinning causes the largest percentage of accidents. A spin when entered is during the procedure of landing is very likely to be fatal because several hundred feet of altitude are needed to effect recovery.
  • Spinning is caused by exceeding the maximum lift angle which introduces an unstable lateral balance which may be upset by such things as wind currents and movement of the controls.
  • the ailerons are of very little use and may actually help the spin instead of preventing it.
  • chordwise equalization If chordwise equalization is not prevented this will be the mode of equalization (and not spanwise) because of the greater pressure differences chordwise. Chordwise equalization willlead to a loss of efficient operation of the wings and must be prevented. Likewise a flow into the wing from any source induced by the low pressure over the upper surface at the opening will reduce the lift, and should be prevented.
  • the procedure by which it is accomplished entails removing the boundary layer.
  • This layer is the strata of air close to an aerodynamic body in which. the normal velocity has been reduced by friction with the body surface. If the boundary layer is drawn into the wing the lift will increase as is well lmown.
  • Effective lateral control is essential for slow landing speeds, but if a conventional aileron is used for lateral control it will give insuflloient rolling moment.
  • a conventional aileron depends for its rolling effect on changing the camber of a wing so that that portion ahead of the aileron has the suction pressure increased on its upper surface and vice versa on the opposite wing.
  • Ailerons must be provided which do'not depend on varying the pressure over the main wings.
  • Figure l is a plan view of the aircraft;
  • Figures 2 and 3 are vertical sections through the wing;
  • Figure 4 is a front elevation of the aircraft showing the location of the ailerons;
  • Figures 5 and 6 show the elevation and plan of the ailecompartment from the leading edge of the right wing, cannot equalize with the pressure in the first compartment of the left wing. This is very important, for spinning depends for its inception and maintenance on a spanwise difference in pressure, and the prevention of spinning depends on the elimination of this difierence. The elimination will not occur satisfactorily if there is an easier route for the pressure to travel. Furthermore, the chordwise distribution of pressure must not be greatly disturbed in the interests of efiioiency.
  • FIG 3 is shown a means of removing the boundary layer of the wing which permits the operation of the wing at high angles of attack.
  • the motor 4 drives a pump 5 which removes the air from the compartments 3 and so causes an inward flow of air through the openings 2.
  • Check valves 6 are provided so that the air may pass only out of the wing toward the suction pump. Thus if the motor fails to operate the valves close and the spanwise equalization as described above may be consummated.
  • FIG 4 is.shown an aileron arrangement which does not depend on changing the pressure distribution over the main lifting wings.
  • An airscrew 9 is provided of such a design that it autorotates at all flying angles.
  • An upward thrust is provided and its magnitude depends on the rate of rotation. Rolling moments may be obtained by the variation of the rate of rotation. This is accomplished by varying the discharge of air from the blower 11 driven by the airscrew 9. When there is no discharge no work is done by the blower and it .runs fast and vice versa.
  • the exit 12 of the A similar aileron is described in my patent.
  • the above aileron could be carried at the wing tip in the plane of the wing but without depending on changing the pressure distribution on the wing for the rolling moment.
  • a wing possessing a perforated surface and subdivided into spanwise compartments, a pumping means driven by a prime mover, means of communication between the pumping means and the compartments, automatic means to seal the compartments from each .other when the pumping means fails to function.
  • a wing possessing a set of openings distributed over the upper surface, a means of pumping to cause a flow through the openings, and means to seal automatically the wing from the pumping means when the latter fails to function.
  • a wing possessing an elongated opening in the upper surface over the central portion of the span, like openings in the upper surface near the outer extremity of the span and an enclosed passage extending therebetween to permit energizing the 115 boundary layer of one extremity of the wing at the expense of energy in the flow over the central portion.
  • a wing possessing an elongated opening in the upper sur- 120 face over the central portion of the span, like openings in the upper surface near the outer extremity of the span and an enclosed passage extending therebetween to permit energizing the boundary layer of one extremity of the wing at 126 the expense of energy in the flow over the central portion and the other extremity.
  • a wing possessing an elongated opening in the upper surfaceover the central portion of the span, like 1 openings in the lateral extensions of the wing, an enclosed passage extending therebetween, a blower to energize the boundary layer and automatic means to seal the wing from the blower when it fails to function.
  • a hollow wing In combination in an aircraft, a hollow wing, a set of openings in the upper surface distributed chordwise and leading into the wing interior, a means of pumping to cause an in- I ward flow through the openings, compartments 40 in the wing to segregate the wingopenings at localities of different pressure, and automatic means to seal the compartments from each other and from the pumping means when the latter fails to function.

Description

Feb. 13, 1934 s K 1 946,92l'
HEARS OF PREVENTING SPINNING IN AIRCRAFT Filed Feb. 16. 1931 3 SECTION A-A 7 FIG. 2
2/ \8 I F|a.4
\NVENTOE,
FIG-5 1. @MMM Patented Feb. 13, 1934 PATENT OFFICE MEANS OF PREVENTING SPINNING IN AIRCRAFT Edward A. Stalker, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Application February 16, 1931. Serial No. 515,961
Claims.
My invention relates to a means of preventing spinning in aircraft by the adjustment of the air pressure on the wings. It also relates to means of providing for the safe use of boundary I layer energization by providing against a serious reduction of normal lift when the pumping means fails to function. It also provides against a loss of lift due to a chordwise exchange of pressure when the pumping means fails, by pro- 10 viding an effective and practical method. The ilriietigiod must provide great airtightness and be g As is well known, spinning causes the largest percentage of accidents. A spin when entered is during the procedure of landing is very likely to be fatal because several hundred feet of altitude are needed to effect recovery. Spinning is caused by exceeding the maximum lift angle which introduces an unstable lateral balance which may be upset by such things as wind currents and movement of the controls. In this precarious condition of balance the ailerons are of very little use and may actually help the spin instead of preventing it.
Attention of investigators has been focused on the phenomenon of the spin, that is, the mechanics of its motion, and the development of lateral control to oppose or correct the spin. I propose to eliminate the spin by so rearrangeing the air pressures on a normal wing that the spin cannot take place. Spinning is only possible because the pressures are such as to push one wing fo' 'ard and up and the other wing backward and. downward. These pressures may I 86 be adjusted between both wings by causing the pressures on symmetrically disposed areas to equalize through the interior of the wing. If the pressures are equal in every sense on both sides of the center of gravity of the airplane 40 spinning will not be possible.
For angles of attack near the normal maximum spinning is best prevented by permitting a flow from the region near the tip to the region midway between the tips. This is the region of largest pressure difference when the spin is Just beginning. The center section of the wing has not yet burbled but the tip sec-' tion has because its relative angle of attack is larger due to the incipient downward movement. 0 Lateral compartments within the wing provide for the equalization of the pressure between opposite and symmetrically spaced areas which contain openings in the surface. The equalization of pressure must take place spanwise and not chordwise. its is well known, the greatest suction over the upper surface of a wing is near the leading edge, and the greatest pressure difference is between the areas near the leading and trailing edges. If chordwise equalization is not prevented this will be the mode of equalization (and not spanwise) because of the greater pressure differences chordwise. Chordwise equalization willlead to a loss of efficient operation of the wings and must be prevented. Likewise a flow into the wing from any source induced by the low pressure over the upper surface at the opening will reduce the lift, and should be prevented.
Although the equalization of the pressure on the wing spanwise is the final end sought, the procedure by which it is accomplished entails removing the boundary layer. This layer is the strata of air close to an aerodynamic body in which. the normal velocity has been reduced by friction with the body surface. If the boundary layer is drawn into the wing the lift will increase as is well lmown.
Effective lateral control is essential for slow landing speeds, but if a conventional aileron is used for lateral control it will give insuflloient rolling moment. A conventional aileron depends for its rolling effect on changing the camber of a wing so that that portion ahead of the aileron has the suction pressure increased on its upper surface and vice versa on the opposite wing. In the wing I have described, with means to equalize the pressures between the wings such an aileron cannot function sufficiently because the pressures it creates will almost instantaneously be equalized between the wings. Ailerons must be provided which do'not depend on varying the pressure over the main wings.
I attain the above obiects by the devices illustrated in the accompanying drawing in which Figure l is a plan view of the aircraft; Figures 2 and 3 are vertical sections through the wing;
Figure 4 is a front elevation of the aircraft showing the location of the ailerons; Figures 5 and 6 show the elevation and plan of the ailecompartment from the leading edge of the right wing, cannot equalize with the pressure in the first compartment of the left wing. This is very important, for spinning depends for its inception and maintenance on a spanwise difference in pressure, and the prevention of spinning depends on the elimination of this difierence. The elimination will not occur satisfactorily if there is an easier route for the pressure to travel. Furthermore, the chordwise distribution of pressure must not be greatly disturbed in the interests of efiioiency.
In Figure 3 is shown a means of removing the boundary layer of the wing which permits the operation of the wing at high angles of attack. The motor 4 drives a pump 5 which removes the air from the compartments 3 and so causes an inward flow of air through the openings 2. Check valves 6 are provided so that the air may pass only out of the wing toward the suction pump. Thus if the motor fails to operate the valves close and the spanwise equalization as described above may be consummated.
In Figure 4 is.shown an aileron arrangement which does not depend on changing the pressure distribution over the main lifting wings. An airscrew 9 is provided of such a design that it autorotates at all flying angles. An upward thrust is provided and its magnitude depends on the rate of rotation. Rolling moments may be obtained by the variation of the rate of rotation. This is accomplished by varying the discharge of air from the blower 11 driven by the airscrew 9. When there is no discharge no work is done by the blower and it .runs fast and vice versa. In the exit 12 of the A similar aileron is described in my patent.
application filed January 5, 1931, Serial Number 506,619. It is not my object to claim the construction broadlyhere but its location and only such features as are novel and beneficial in an airplane of fixed wings, designed to provide for the elimination of spimiing without destroying the maneuverability of the airplane.
The above aileron could be carried at the wing tip in the plane of the wing but without depending on changing the pressure distribution on the wing for the rolling moment.
In the limiting case of placing holes close together, they form a slot.
It is to be understood that I do not limit myself to wings stationary with respect to the airall types. of
spanwise compartments, a pumping means eeaear driven by a prime mover, means of communication between the pumping means and the compartments, and automatic means to prevent a chordwise exchange of pressure when the pumping means fails to function.
3. In combination in an aircraft, a wing possessing a perforated surface and subdivided into spanwise compartments, a pumping means driven by a prime mover, means of communication between the pumping means and the compartments, automatic means to seal the compartments from each .other when the pumping means fails to function.
4. In combination in an aircraft an autorotative element disposed eccentrically to the aircrafts plane of symmetry, a means of pumping actuated by the element, and means to alter the quantity of fluid handled by the pumping means to control the rolling movements of the airplane.
5. In combination in an aircraft an autorotative element disposed eccentrically to the aircrafts plane of symmetry, and whose plane of rotation is approximately horizontal, a means of pumping actuated by the element, and means to alter the quantity of fluid handled by the pumping means to control the rolling movements of the airplane.
6. In combination in anaircraft a wing possessing a set of openings distributed over the upper surface, a means of pumping to cause a flow through the openings, and means to seal automatically the wing from the pumping means when the latter fails to function.
7'. In combination in an aircraft, a wing possessing an elongated opening in the upper surface over the central portion of the span, like openings in the upper surface near the outer extremity of the span and an enclosed passage extending therebetween to permit energizing the 115 boundary layer of one extremity of the wing at the expense of energy in the flow over the central portion.
8. In combination in an aircraft, a wing possessing an elongated opening in the upper sur- 120 face over the central portion of the span, like openings in the upper surface near the outer extremity of the span and an enclosed passage extending therebetween to permit energizing the boundary layer of one extremity of the wing at 126 the expense of energy in the flow over the central portion and the other extremity.
9. In combination in an aircraft a wing possessing an elongated opening in the upper surfaceover the central portion of the span, like 1 openings in the lateral extensions of the wing, an enclosed passage extending therebetween, a blower to energize the boundary layer and automatic means to seal the wing from the blower when it fails to function.
r 10. In combination in an aircraft, a hollow wing, a set of openings in the upper surface distributed chordwise and leading into the wing interior, a means of pumping to cause an in- I ward flow through the openings, compartments 40 in the wing to segregate the wingopenings at localities of different pressure, and automatic means to seal the compartments from each other and from the pumping means when the latter fails to function.
EDWARD A. STALKER.
US515961A 1931-02-16 1931-02-16 Means of preventing spinning in aircraft Expired - Lifetime US1946921A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US515961A US1946921A (en) 1931-02-16 1931-02-16 Means of preventing spinning in aircraft

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US515961A US1946921A (en) 1931-02-16 1931-02-16 Means of preventing spinning in aircraft

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US1946921A true US1946921A (en) 1934-02-13

Family

ID=24053531

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US515961A Expired - Lifetime US1946921A (en) 1931-02-16 1931-02-16 Means of preventing spinning in aircraft

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US1946921A (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4146202A (en) * 1976-10-21 1979-03-27 Pender David R Aircraft suction system for laminar flow control

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4146202A (en) * 1976-10-21 1979-03-27 Pender David R Aircraft suction system for laminar flow control

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2077471A (en) Aircraft
US3936013A (en) Vortex control
US2910254A (en) Boundary layer control apparatus relating to aircraft
US2406506A (en) All-wing airplane
US2041795A (en) Aircraft
US2867392A (en) Boundary layer control for aircraft
US2994493A (en) Channelled fan aircraft
US2041796A (en) Aircraft
US2380535A (en) Aircraft
US1946921A (en) Means of preventing spinning in aircraft
US2041794A (en) Aircraft
US2008424A (en) Aircraft
US2679364A (en) Convertible aircraft
US1697770A (en) Aircraft
US1264037A (en) Flying-machine.
US1881034A (en) Safety device for aeroplanes
US2041791A (en) Aircraft
GB2093152A (en) Boundary Layer Control
US1968497A (en) Aeroplane
US4044972A (en) Aircraft with circular wings
US2532481A (en) Multiple channel wing airplane
US2069047A (en) Aircraft control
US2308477A (en) Aircraft
CN108706093B (en) Plate wing machine
US2303713A (en) Aircraft