US1337548A - Concentration of ores - Google Patents

Concentration of ores Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US1337548A
US1337548A US243175A US24317518A US1337548A US 1337548 A US1337548 A US 1337548A US 243175 A US243175 A US 243175A US 24317518 A US24317518 A US 24317518A US 1337548 A US1337548 A US 1337548A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
froth
particles
pulp
water
sodium silicate
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US243175A
Inventor
Edser Edwin
Tucker Stanley
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Minerals Separation North American Corp
Original Assignee
Minerals Separation North American Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Minerals Separation North American Corp filed Critical Minerals Separation North American Corp
Priority to US243175A priority Critical patent/US1337548A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US1337548A publication Critical patent/US1337548A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03DFLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00Flotation
    • B03D1/02Froth-flotation processes
    • B03D1/06Froth-flotation processes differential
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S209/00Classifying, separating, and assorting solids
    • Y10S209/901Froth flotation; copper

Definitions

  • The'Tf-roth-flotation process of concentrating ores'f consists in mixing the ore with water to which is added a small proportion of a mineral-frothing agent, with or without other agents, and agitating and/or aerating the pulp so as to form a froth of the metalliferous particles of the ore, and
  • the present invention relates more par- 4 ticularly to differential separation, that is to the separation of one kind of metalliferous particles from another kind of metalliferous particles, both of which said kinds of particles have heretofore under certain conditions been floated together, and it has now been discovered that by employing a soluble soap, such as sodium oleate, asthe mineral-frothin agent in certain proportions and toget 'er' with sodium silicate, it is possible to obtain a diiferential separation of certain metalliferous particles fromother metalliferous particles, the differentiations being dependent on the relative concentration of these reagents in thewater and especially of the silicate of soda.
  • a soluble soap such as sodium oleate
  • the mineral-frothin agent in certain proportions and toget 'er' with sodium silicate
  • a process for the differential separation of certain metalliferous particles from other metalliferous particles in a mixture containin them consists in agitating and or aeratingt e mixture in water to which has been added a small-proportion of sodium silicate and a suflicient quantity of a soluble soap to produce a froth of the metalliferou's particles first above alluded to free from said other metalliferous particles .and separatin the froth.
  • ticular ore depends upon the amount of water 1n which it is dissolved, and thus after the separation of the froth containing one kind of metalliferous particles the liquor 1f diluted by adding a further quantity of water and reagitated and or aerated will yield a froth of the metalliferous particles not previously floated in the first instance when the concentration of the silicate of soda was greater.
  • a certain proportion of sodium silicate in the circuit water causes the galena to be floated preferentially to the blende and gangue, while with a smaller proportion of sodium silicate to the water both the galena and blende float in preference to the gangue.
  • the ore should preferably be in a freshly ground condition as it is found that a better separation is then obtained.
  • soluble soaps which we have found suitable are sodium oleate, sodium stearate, sodium palmitate and sodium resinate, or mixtures of these soaps.
  • Example I 500 grams of a zine-lead or assaying Pb 19.54% and Zn 33.4% freshly crushed to 80 mesh was mixed in an experimental flotation machine with 1380 cos. of soft water to which was added sodium silicate amounting to 16 lbs. per ton of ore, to-
  • Example II 500 grams of a Peruvian ore, ground to .80 mesh, and assaying 18.2% Pb, in the form of galena and 33.5% Zn, in the form of light-colored blende, was made into a pulp with four times its weight of soft water, to which had been added 0.25% of commercial sodium silicate. Sodium oleate was then added in quantity amounting to 5 lbs. per ton of ore and the pulp agitated and aerated.
  • a mineralized froth was produced, the solid contents of which weighed 147 grams and assayed 54.6% Pb and 15.5% Zn, giving a recovery of 88.2% Pb and 13.6% Zn; The residues weighed 353 grams and assayed 3.6% Pb and 41% Zn.
  • the froth was continuously produced in a sub-aeration machine so that it was necessary at intervals to make up the quantity of pulp by adding water containing 0.25% of sodium silicate.
  • the amount of sodium silicate necessary for the flotation of a given mineral is proportional to the quantity of water used, though the quantity may vary with different ores; for ores tested about 5 lbs. of sodium silicate per ton of water have been found suitable to float galena from blende whether the pulp be 8: 1, 4: 1 or 2: 1. The latter is readily floated with the galena when about 3 lbs. of sodium silicate per ton of water are employed.
  • concentration of sodium silicate which will give the cleanest separation of the galena from the blende will vary with the nature of the blende and of the ore, and can be easily determined by a laboratory experiment on the particular. ore to be treated.
  • the sodium silicate is preferably added as a 40% solution made by mixing the commercial liquid sodium silicate (140 Twaddell) with water. It is important that the solution should not be allowed to stand for too long a time before use, as its properties are found to deteriorate in a few weeks. 7
  • the amount of soap required is proportional to the ore, and with the particular ores the treatment of which has been described above, it was found that 4 to 5 lbs. of soap per ton of ore was suflicient to bring about the flotation of the lead particles.
  • the quantity may vary with different ores, and it may bereadily determined by alaboratory experiment.
  • the consumption of reagents can be economized by re-using the circuit liquor it only being necessary, to make up the quantities of reagents contained therein to the proportions originally found necessary.
  • the present invention is particularly applicable to the separation of lead sulfid (galena) from zinc sulfid (blende) in a mixed sulfid ore, but it is to be understood that it may be employed for the separation of other metalliferous particles from one another; for example iron pyrites may be floated in preference to blende.
  • ores in this specification is to be understood to include all metallurgical products as well as crude materials.
  • the present invention is applicable to the separation of two or more kinds of metalliferous particles from one or more kinds of other metalliferous particles.
  • a process for the differential separation of certain metalliferous particles from other metalliferous particles which consists in adding the mixed particles to water to form a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a sufiicient quantity of sodium oleate to produce a froth of the first said metalliferous particles, relatively free from said other metalliferous particles, separating the froth, diluting the liquor of the remaining pulp by adding a further quantity of water, aerating the resulting pulp mixture for the production of a second froth bearing metalliferous particles not previously floated, and separating said second froth.
  • a process for the differential separation of lead sulfid from zinc sulfid which consists in addin a mixed lead-zinc sulfid ore to Water to orm a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a'sufiicient quantity of a ,soluble soap to produce a froth selectively floating the lead sulfid particles and relatively free from the zinc sulfid particles, and separating the froth.
  • a process for the differential separation of lead sulfid from zinc sulfid which consists in adding a mixed lead-zinc sulfid ore to Water to form a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a suflicient quantity of a soluble soap to produce a froth selectively bearing the lead sulfid particles and relatively free from the zinc sulfid particles, separating the froth, diluting the liquor of the remaining pulp by adding a further quantity of water, re-aerating said remaining pulp for the production of a second froth of zinc sulfid particles, and separating said second froth.

Landscapes

  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Description

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE.
EDWIN EDSER, OF BROCKLEY, LONDON, AND STANLEY TUCKER, OF LONDON, ENGLAND, ASSIGNORS TO MINERALS SEPARATION NORTH AMERICAN CORPORATION, OF NEW Patented Apr. 20, 1920..
Application filed July 3, 1918. Serial No. 243,175.
Yonx, N. Y.
CONCENTRATION OF OBES.
1,337,548., Specification of Letters Patent.
No Drawing.
- described, forfexample, in the prior Patents Nos. 835120, arrears, and 1064723.
The'Tf-roth-flotation process of concentrating ores'fconsists in mixing the ore with water to which is added a small proportion of a mineral-frothing agent, with or without other agents, and agitating and/or aerating the pulp so as to form a froth of the metalliferous particles of the ore, and
separating the froth. The present invention relates more par- 4 ticularly to differential separation, that is to the separation of one kind of metalliferous particles from another kind of metalliferous particles, both of which said kinds of particles have heretofore under certain conditions been floated together, and it has now been discovered that by employing a soluble soap, such as sodium oleate, asthe mineral-frothin agent in certain proportions and toget 'er' with sodium silicate, it is possible to obtain a diiferential separation of certain metalliferous particles fromother metalliferous particles, the differentiations being dependent on the relative concentration of these reagents in thewater and especially of the silicate of soda.
According to the present invention, therefore, a process for the differential separation of certain metalliferous particles from other metalliferous particles in a mixture containin them consists in agitating and or aeratingt e mixture in water to which has been added a small-proportion of sodium silicate and a suflicient quantity of a soluble soap to produce a froth of the metalliferou's particles first above alluded to free from said other metalliferous particles .and separatin the froth. i
It as also been discovered that the quantity of the sodium silicate necessary to obtain a differential separation with any par-.
ticular ore depends upon the amount of water 1n which it is dissolved, and thus after the separation of the froth containing one kind of metalliferous particles the liquor 1f diluted by adding a further quantity of water and reagitated and or aerated will yield a froth of the metalliferous particles not previously floated in the first instance when the concentration of the silicate of soda was greater.
Thus in treating a mixed galena-blende ore a certain proportion of sodium silicate in the circuit water causes the galena to be floated preferentially to the blende and gangue, while with a smaller proportion of sodium silicate to the water both the galena and blende float in preference to the gangue. In carrying the present invention 1nto effect the ore should preferably be in a freshly ground condition as it is found that a better separation is then obtained.
Among the soluble soaps which we have found suitable are sodium oleate, sodium stearate, sodium palmitate and sodium resinate, or mixtures of these soaps.
Examples of the present invention will now be described Example I: 500 grams of a zine-lead or assaying Pb 19.54% and Zn 33.4% freshly crushed to 80 mesh was mixed in an experimental flotation machine with 1380 cos. of soft water to which was added sodium silicate amounting to 16 lbs. per ton of ore, to-
gether with sodium oleate amounting to 4" lbs. per ton of ore.
After agitating and aerating the mixturea voluminous froth was formed on the surface of the liquid. This froth was removed and its solid contents weighed 140 grams, and assayed Pb 51.8% and Zn 16.2%, giving a recovery of 74.3% Pb and Zn 13.6%.
After removal of this first froth additional soft water was added to the pulp until the total amount used was 2200 ccs., and the. mixture was then again agitated and aerated for the formation of a second froth. This froth was removed and its solid contents weighed 268 grams, and assayed Pb 7.4% and Zn 45.4%, giving a recovery of Pb 20.3% and Zn 72.5%.
Example II: 500 grams of a Peruvian ore, ground to .80 mesh, and assaying 18.2% Pb, in the form of galena and 33.5% Zn, in the form of light-colored blende, was made into a pulp with four times its weight of soft water, to which had been added 0.25% of commercial sodium silicate. Sodium oleate was then added in quantity amounting to 5 lbs. per ton of ore and the pulp agitated and aerated. A mineralized froth was produced, the solid contents of which weighed 147 grams and assayed 54.6% Pb and 15.5% Zn, giving a recovery of 88.2% Pb and 13.6% Zn; The residues weighed 353 grams and assayed 3.6% Pb and 41% Zn. In this test the froth was continuously produced in a sub-aeration machine so that it was necessary at intervals to make up the quantity of pulp by adding water containing 0.25% of sodium silicate.
In an experiment on the same ore and under exactly the same conditions but employ ing a circuit liquor containing 0.125% of sodium silicate, the froth formed weighed 421 grams and assayed 20.7% Pb and 35.3% Zn, giving a recovery of 95.6% Pb and 88.7% Zn. The residues weighed 79 grams and assayed 3.4% Pb and 24.0% Zn.
From these experiments it is seen that most of the lead was floated in both cases but a much smaller proportion of the zinc was floated in the case in which a larger concentration of sodium silicate was employed.
It has been found that the amount of sodium silicate necessary for the flotation of a given mineral is proportional to the quantity of water used, though the quantity may vary with different ores; for ores tested about 5 lbs. of sodium silicate per ton of water have been found suitable to float galena from blende whether the pulp be 8: 1, 4: 1 or 2: 1. The latter is readily floated with the galena when about 3 lbs. of sodium silicate per ton of water are employed. The concentration of sodium silicate, however, which will give the cleanest separation of the galena from the blende will vary with the nature of the blende and of the ore, and can be easily determined by a laboratory experiment on the particular. ore to be treated.
The sodium silicate is preferably added as a 40% solution made by mixing the commercial liquid sodium silicate (140 Twaddell) with water. It is important that the solution should not be allowed to stand for too long a time before use, as its properties are found to deteriorate in a few weeks. 7
The amount of soap required is proportional to the ore, and with the particular ores the treatment of which has been described above, it was found that 4 to 5 lbs. of soap per ton of ore was suflicient to bring about the flotation of the lead particles. The quantity, however, may vary with different ores, and it may bereadily determined by alaboratory experiment.
The consumption of reagents can be economized by re-using the circuit liquor it only being necessary, to make up the quantities of reagents contained therein to the proportions originally found necessary.
The present invention is particularly applicable to the separation of lead sulfid (galena) from zinc sulfid (blende) in a mixed sulfid ore, but it is to be understood that it may be employed for the separation of other metalliferous particles from one another; for example iron pyrites may be floated in preference to blende.
The term ores in this specification is to be understood to include all metallurgical products as well as crude materials.
It is to be understood that the present invention is applicable to the separation of two or more kinds of metalliferous particles from one or more kinds of other metalliferous particles.
What we claim as our invention and desire to secure by Letters Patent is 1. The process of differentially separating certain metalliferous particles from other metalliferous particles, which consists in adding the mixed particles to water to form a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a suflicient quantity of a soluble soap to produce a froth selectively bearing the first said metalliferous particles, and separating the froth.
2. The process of differentially separating certain metalliferous particles from other metalliferous particles, which consists in adding the mixed particles to water to form a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a sufiicient quantity of a soluble soap to produce a froth selectively floating the first said metalliferous particles, separating the froth bearing the first said particles, diluting the liquor of the remaining pulp by adding afurther quantity of water, aerating the mixture for the production of a second froth bearing metalliferous particles not previously floated, and separating said second froth.
3. The process of differentially separating certain metalliferous particles from other metalliferous particles, which consists in adding the mixed particles to water to form a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a suflicient quantity of sodium oleate to produce a froth' selectively bearing the first said metalliferous particles, and separating the froth.
4. A process for the differential separation of certain metalliferous particles from other metalliferous particles, which consists in adding the mixed particles to water to form a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a sufiicient quantity of sodium oleate to produce a froth of the first said metalliferous particles, relatively free from said other metalliferous particles, separating the froth, diluting the liquor of the remaining pulp by adding a further quantity of water, aerating the resulting pulp mixture for the production of a second froth bearing metalliferous particles not previously floated, and separating said second froth.
5. A process for the differential separation of lead sulfid from zinc sulfid, which consists in addin a mixed lead-zinc sulfid ore to Water to orm a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a'sufiicient quantity of a ,soluble soap to produce a froth selectively floating the lead sulfid particles and relatively free from the zinc sulfid particles, and separating the froth.
6. A process for the differential separation of lead sulfid from zinc sulfid, which consists in adding a mixed lead-zinc sulfid ore to Water to form a pulp, aerating the pulp in the presence of a small proportion of sodium silicate and a suflicient quantity of a soluble soap to produce a froth selectively bearing the lead sulfid particles and relatively free from the zinc sulfid particles, separating the froth, diluting the liquor of the remaining pulp by adding a further quantity of water, re-aerating said remaining pulp for the production of a second froth of zinc sulfid particles, and separating said second froth.
In testimony whereof we have signed our names to this specification in the presence of two subscribingflwitnesses.
DWIN EDSER, STANLEY TUCKER. Witnesses:
ALBERT OWEN WILLIAMS, WILLIAM JAMES WALTON.
US243175A 1918-07-03 1918-07-03 Concentration of ores Expired - Lifetime US1337548A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US243175A US1337548A (en) 1918-07-03 1918-07-03 Concentration of ores

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US243175A US1337548A (en) 1918-07-03 1918-07-03 Concentration of ores

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US1337548A true US1337548A (en) 1920-04-20

Family

ID=22917635

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US243175A Expired - Lifetime US1337548A (en) 1918-07-03 1918-07-03 Concentration of ores

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US1337548A (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2647629A (en) * 1950-08-25 1953-08-04 Atomic Energy Commission Flotation of uranium
US2854346A (en) * 1955-06-20 1958-09-30 Hoyt H Todd Liquid suspension of high density particles
US3454161A (en) * 1968-04-03 1969-07-08 Engelhard Min & Chem Froth flotation of complex zinc-tin ore

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2647629A (en) * 1950-08-25 1953-08-04 Atomic Energy Commission Flotation of uranium
US2854346A (en) * 1955-06-20 1958-09-30 Hoyt H Todd Liquid suspension of high density particles
US3454161A (en) * 1968-04-03 1969-07-08 Engelhard Min & Chem Froth flotation of complex zinc-tin ore

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US2231265A (en) Process of ore concentration
US3837489A (en) Molybdenum disulfide flotation antifoam
US1157176A (en) Separation of metallic sulfids from ores.
US1102873A (en) Ore concentration.
US1337548A (en) Concentration of ores
US1364308A (en) Flotation of minerals
US1208171A (en) Concentration of sulfid ores.
US1492904A (en) Concentration of ores
US955012A (en) Concentration of ores.
US3635337A (en) Method for treating floated solids
US1274505A (en) Separation of mixed metallic sulfids.
US3151062A (en) Method for the froth flotation of slimed minerals and ores
US2922522A (en) Method of recovering mineral values from ore
US2381662A (en) Concentration of ores
US2682337A (en) Froth flotation of phosphate values involving ph control
US1261810A (en) Separation of mixed sulfid ores.
US1326855A (en) Edwin edser
US1236934A (en) Concentration of ores.
US1417263A (en) Concentration of ores
US1968008A (en) Concentration of minerals
US1833427A (en) Flotation concentration of metalliferous minerals
US1182890A (en) Separation of metallic sulfids.
US1467354A (en) Process of concentrating oxidized ores and minerals
US1142821A (en) Separation of mixed-sulfid ores.
US1334420A (en) Process of concentrating ores