US12211013B2 - Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US12211013B2
US12211013B2 US18/217,054 US202318217054A US12211013B2 US 12211013 B2 US12211013 B2 US 12211013B2 US 202318217054 A US202318217054 A US 202318217054A US 12211013 B2 US12211013 B2 US 12211013B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
damage
user input
vehicle
input command
image
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US18/217,054
Other versions
US20230342729A1 (en
Inventor
Daniel George Gould
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Degould Ltd
Original Assignee
Degould Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Degould Ltd filed Critical Degould Ltd
Priority to US18/217,054 priority Critical patent/US12211013B2/en
Assigned to DEGOULD LIMITED reassignment DEGOULD LIMITED ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GOULD, Daniel George
Publication of US20230342729A1 publication Critical patent/US20230342729A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US12211013B2 publication Critical patent/US12211013B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • G06F3/016Input arrangements with force or tactile feedback as computer generated output to the user

Definitions

  • This invention relates to methods and apparatus for recording instances of damage to a vehicle.
  • a damage assessment may be performed at a number of successive stages within the production process.
  • a damage assessment the vehicle is visually inspected by a person and any instances of damage to the vehicle are recorded in a damage report. This will be referred to herein as damage mapping. This information can be used to identify damage patterns such that corrective measures can be taken to improve the manufacturing process.
  • a vehicle damage assessment it is common for a vehicle damage assessment to involve a person using a pen or pencil to draw a graphical representation of observed damage on a piece of paper containing an image of the vehicle.
  • the present inventor has devised an improved method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping.
  • a method for mapping damage on a vehicle comprising:
  • the method according to the first aspect provides a robust method for vehicle damage mapping which removes much of the subjectivity involved with prior art damage mapping systems. This can enable damage to be recorded more consistently and accurately, which can lead to better, more timely corrective measures being taken.
  • the first image can be a three dimensional model of the vehicle in which the Y axis origin for the first coordinate system is aligned with the vehicle longitudinal centre within the image, the X axis intersects or is adjacent to a furthermost forward portion of the front of the bumper of the vehicle within the image when viewed from a side and the Z axis origin intersects or is adjacent to the bottom of the tyres within the image when viewed from the front or side.
  • the first image can be a two dimensional side view image of the vehicle and the origin for the first coordinates system is parallel to the front of the bumper and the bottom of the tyres.
  • the method can further comprise:
  • the second image can be a two dimensional front or back view image of the vehicle and the origin for the second coordinates system is the vehicle centre and the bottom of the tyres.
  • the method can further comprise:
  • the method can comprise a step of detecting a second user input command, the second user input command causing the GUI to display a magnified representation of part of the vehicle.
  • the method can enable a user to enlarge a relevant portion of the vehicle image, which can enable the first user input command (damage location input) to be a more accurate representation of where the instance of damage has been observed on the vehicle.
  • the method can comprise one or more further steps of detecting the second user input command, each second user input command causing the GUI to display a further magnified representation of the part of the vehicle.
  • the method can further comprise:
  • the method can further comprise:
  • the method can further comprise:
  • the step of modifying information displayed on the GUI can comprise displaying only damage types and/or damage severity levels applicable to the region(s).
  • the method can provide a more efficient GUI enabling damage mapping to be achieved in a timely manner, thereby resulting in less system power per mapping exercise.
  • the method of this embodiment can also improve the accuracy of damage mapping by reducing the number of options available for selection in the damage description menu or damage severity menu i.e. not presenting options that do not apply to the region(s).
  • the step of storing damage information can comprise storing the damage information as a fixed length multi digit code representative of the damage information. Saving the damage information in a structured code can simplify downstream data collation and comparison.
  • a computing device including a processor and memory, the memory storing computer program code which when executed by the processor is configured to execute the steps of the method according to the first aspect.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a graphical user interface (GUI) of apparatus for vehicle damage mapping according to an embodiment of the invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a magnified portion of the vehicle;
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a damage description menu
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a damage severity menu
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating one example format of storing damage data
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a front image of a vehicle
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a three dimensional image of a vehicle.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a method according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of apparatus 10 for vehicle damage mapping according to an embodiment of the invention.
  • a conventional computing device 12 comprising one or more processors, memory, input device etc. is arranged to execute a control program.
  • the control program implements a method for vehicle damage mapping.
  • Any suitable computing device 12 can be used and therefore, for brevity, the features of the computing device are not illustrated and will not be discussed in any detail.
  • Examples of suitable computing devices are general purpose computers, smart phones, tablets and the like.
  • a display device 14 of the computing device 12 is arranged to display a graphical user interface (GUI) via which a user can record the type and location of damage the user has observed on a vehicle (not shown).
  • GUI graphical user interface
  • the GUI displays an image 16 which represents a particular vehicle.
  • the computing device 12 can include a database in memory which contains images for various vehicles, from which a user can select one.
  • an image can be located from an external database via a wireless or wired communications link.
  • the control program is arranged to generate a coordinate system, denoted by an X axis and Y axis, relative to the image, which may or may not be visible to the user.
  • the coordinate system has an origin O defined relative to a particular part of the image.
  • the Y axis for the coordinate system is aligned with the furthermost forward region of the car bumper and the X axis is aligned with the bottom of the tyres (in both cases a space is shown in FIG. 1 for clarity).
  • the coordinate system origin can be based on some other features of the vehicle.
  • the computing device 12 includes an input device, which in the illustrated embodiment is a touchscreen input 14 of the display device 14 , but in other embodiments could be a mouse, trackball or the like.
  • the input device 14 enables the user to provide one or more types of user input command, which are registered by the control program.
  • a first type of user input command is a damage location input through which a user can input a damage location marker 18 on the image 16 which corresponds to an instance of observed damage on the vehicle. This can for example be achieved by the input device 14 detecting a single finger gesture at a set of coordinates on the image 16 . The computing device 12 can then store the damage location input locally to memory or transmit the information via the communications link.
  • the coordinates system can be scaled to the vehicle image, which in turn can be scaled to the vehicle.
  • the control program knows the scale between the image displayed on the display device 14 and the vehicle the image represents and as such the computing device 12 can directly relate damage location co-ordinates to a precise location on the vehicle; for example in mm from the co-ordinate datum point.
  • a second type of user input command can be a zoom input through which a user can magnify a particular portion of the image 16 .
  • This can for example be achieved by the input device 14 detecting a two fingered pinch or expand gesture at a set of coordinates on the image 16 .
  • FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a user having magnified the portion of the image containing a door handle 20 .
  • the input device 14 can be arranged to detect zoom in and zoom out gestures, as well as pan gestures by means which will be apparent to the skilled person.
  • the apparatus 10 can enable a user to enlarge a relevant portion of the vehicle image 16 , which can enable a more accurate damage location input to be made.
  • control program is arranged to detect from the damage location input not only the set of coordinates DC on the image 16 but also the magnitude M and direction of the damage from the set of coordinates so as to establish a damage vector DV from the set of coordinates.
  • This can for example be achieved by the input device 14 detecting a user swiping one finger from an initial touch point.
  • the direction can be described as an angle 8 relative to the X or Y axis.
  • the magnitude and direction can be determined using the start and end coordinates of the finger stroke.
  • a straight line approximation can be made for the damage location marker 18 , or the swipe can be broken down into a plurality of contiguous damage vectors to describe non-linear damage location markers.
  • the control program can be arranged to present the user with a description menu 20 of user selectable damage description options.
  • the menu enables a user to describe the observed damage as a “scratch”, a “dent” or a “chip”.
  • the description menu 20 can be automatically displayed in response to the input device detecting damage location input, or the GUI can position a damage description icon (not shown) on the display to enable a user to assign a damage description to a damage location marker 18 .
  • the control program can be arranged to store the assigned damage description locally to memory or transmit the information via the communications link. This can result in a more informative or accurate vehicle damage mapping system.
  • the vehicle 16 can be broken down into a number of discrete regions which correspond to discrete or groups of corresponding externally visible components of the vehicle such as panels, windows, door handles etc.
  • the control program is arranged to tailor the description menu 20 presented to the user to only show options that are available for the region(s) in which the damage location marker 18 exists; for example, a menu provided for the door panel can include “scratch”, “dent” or “chip” options, but a menu provided for a window can present “scratch”, “crack, or “chip” options.
  • This can result in an improved GUI in which a user is not presented with every possible damage description in every menu, thereby simplifying and expediting the process of damage description which can reduce the power consumption of the system and reduce the likelihood of erroneous input.
  • the control program can be arranged to present the user with a severity menu 22 of user selectable damage severity options.
  • the severity menu 22 enables a user to describe the observed damage as “minor”, “intermediate” or “severe”, but in other embodiments the control program can provide different representations of damage severity level.
  • the severity menu 22 can be automatically displayed in response to the input device detecting damage location input, or the GUI can position a damage severity icon (not shown) on the display to enable a user to assign a damage description to a damage location marker 18 .
  • the control program can be arranged to store the assigned damage severity locally to memory or transmit the information via the communications link. This can result in more informative or accurate vehicle damage mapping.
  • the control program can be arranged to associate each damage location marker 18 with the time and date of recordal in the system; for example, by using the output from the system clock of the computing device 12 . This can result in more informative vehicle damage mapping.
  • the control program can be arranged to determine a daylight status i.e. whether it is light or dark at the time and date of detection of the first user input command at the location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command and associate this with the damage location marker 18 .
  • the control program can be arranged to associate each damage location marker 18 with the location of the computing device 12 using for example Global Positioning System information. This can result in more informative vehicle damage mapping.
  • the control program can be arranged to associate each damage location marker 18 with the weather at the location of the computing device 12 at the time the damage is recorded. This can for example be achieved by the control program using the communications interface of the computing device 12 to access freely available weather databases via the internet and recording one of more information fields from the website. This can result in more informative vehicle damage mapping because an entry made during poor weather conditions may be less credible than one made in sunny conditions.
  • the control program can be arranged to save damage information as a code, such as a 14 digit code 24 .
  • the first four digits 26 describe in mm the distance of the damage coordinate along the X axis.
  • the second four digits 28 describe in mm the distance of the damage coordinate along the Y axis.
  • the ninth digit 30 describes one of up to nine damage descriptions.
  • the tenth digit 32 described one of up to nine damage severities.
  • the final four digits 34 describe the damage size.
  • the fixed length code can have any suitable length to represent the damage location in addition to one or more further pieces of damage information as described herein. Saving the damage information in a structured code can simplify downstream data collation and comparison.
  • the system can be arranged to simply save each piece of damage information associated with an instance of damage in a computer file with a common damage instance identifier.
  • FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a second image of the vehicle that can be displayed on the GUI.
  • the second image is a front view image of the vehicle, but can also be a back view.
  • the Y axis for the second coordinates system is aligned with the vehicle centre within the image and the X axis intersects or is adjacent to the bottom of the tyres within the image.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of an alternative first image of the vehicle that can be displayed on the GUI.
  • the first image in this embodiment is a three dimensional model of the vehicle.
  • the Y axis origin for the first coordinate system is aligned with the vehicle longitudinal centre within the image, the X axis intersects or is adjacent to a furthermost forward portion of the front of the bumper of the vehicle within the image when viewed from a side and the Z axis origin intersects or is adjacent to the bottom of the tyres within the image when viewed from the front or side.
  • a user can rotate the model using the pan command and zoom as with the previous embodiment.
  • the control program can establish the 3D location of the damage in an analogous manner to that described above.
  • FIG. 8 illustrates a method according to an embodiment of the invention generally at 40 .
  • the method comprises displaying a graphical user interface on a display device of a computing device which shows a first image representing a first view of a vehicle and defining a first coordinate system relative to the first image.
  • the method comprises an optional step of detecting a second user input command, the second user input command causing the GUI to display a magnified representation of part of the vehicle. This step can be repeated one or more times and the user can pan around the magnified image to select a portion of the vehicle image that corresponds to a portion of the vehicle where damage has been observed.
  • the method comprises detecting a first user input command provided via a user input device associated with the computing device, the first user input command being representative of an instance of damage observed on the vehicle.
  • the method comprises an optional step of detecting a stroke length and/or direction of the first user input command and determining a damage magnitude and/or direction.
  • the method comprises an optional step of partitioning the image into a plurality of regions, each region representing one or more discrete components of the vehicle, determining the region(s) to which the first or second user input command(s) relate and accessing a database containing vehicle information relating to the plurality of regions.
  • the method comprises an optional step of detecting the first or a third user input command provided via the user input device and displaying a damage description menu such that a user can select a damage type corresponding to the observed instance of damage.
  • the method can display only damage types applicable to the region(s).
  • the method comprises an optional step of detecting the first or a fourth user input command provided via the user input device and displaying a damage severity menu such that a user can select a damage severity level corresponding to the observed instance of damage.
  • the method can display only damage severity levels applicable to the region(s).
  • the method comprises an optional step of determining the time and date of detection of the first user input command and/or the location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command.
  • the method can comprise an optional step of determining a daylight status i.e. whether it is light or dark at the time and date of detection of the first user input command at the location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command.
  • the method comprises an optional step of determining a weather condition at the time and date of detection of the first user input command and location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command.
  • the method comprises storing the information associated with the first user input command.
  • the method can be repeated in an analogous manner for further first input commands, provided on the first image representative of further damage to that side of the vehicle, and/or for further input commands representative of damage to other areas of the vehicle.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • User Interface Of Digital Computer (AREA)

Abstract

A method and apparatus for mapping damage on a vehicle, the method comprising: displaying a graphical user interface on a display device of a computing device which shows a first image representing a first view of a vehicle; defining a first coordinate system relative to the first image; detecting a first user input command provided via a user input device associated with the computing device, the first user input command being representative of an instance of damage observed on the vehicle; storing one or more sets of image coordinates representing the first user input command to map damage to the vehicle.

Description

The present application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 120 to U.S. Application Ser. No. 16/608,977 filed on Oct. 28, 2019, under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to Great Britain Application No. 1706800.8 filed on Apr. 28, 2017, and under 35 U.S.C. § 365 to International Application No. PCT/GB2018/051110 filed on Apr. 27, 2018. The entire contents of these applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
FIELD
This invention relates to methods and apparatus for recording instances of damage to a vehicle.
BACKGROUND
It can be desirable to assess the damage status of a vehicle throughout various stages of its lifespan.
For example, during manufacture of a motor vehicle, a damage assessment may be performed at a number of successive stages within the production process. During a damage assessment the vehicle is visually inspected by a person and any instances of damage to the vehicle are recorded in a damage report. This will be referred to herein as damage mapping. This information can be used to identify damage patterns such that corrective measures can be taken to improve the manufacturing process.
It is common for a vehicle damage assessment to involve a person using a pen or pencil to draw a graphical representation of observed damage on a piece of paper containing an image of the vehicle.
The present inventor has devised an improved method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping.
SUMMARY
In accordance with the first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method for mapping damage on a vehicle, the method comprising:
    • displaying a graphical user interface on a display device of a computing device which shows a first image representing a first view of a vehicle;
    • defining a first coordinate system relative to the first image;
    • detecting a first user input command provided via a user input device associated with the computing device, the first user input command being representative of an instance of damage observed on the vehicle;
    • storing one or more sets of image coordinates representing the first user input command to map damage to the vehicle.
Thus, the method according to the first aspect provides a robust method for vehicle damage mapping which removes much of the subjectivity involved with prior art damage mapping systems. This can enable damage to be recorded more consistently and accurately, which can lead to better, more timely corrective measures being taken.
The first image can be a three dimensional model of the vehicle in which the Y axis origin for the first coordinate system is aligned with the vehicle longitudinal centre within the image, the X axis intersects or is adjacent to a furthermost forward portion of the front of the bumper of the vehicle within the image when viewed from a side and the Z axis origin intersects or is adjacent to the bottom of the tyres within the image when viewed from the front or side.
The first image can be a two dimensional side view image of the vehicle and the origin for the first coordinates system is parallel to the front of the bumper and the bottom of the tyres.
The method can further comprise:
    • displaying on the display device a second image representing a second view of the vehicle;
    • defining a second coordinate system relative to the second image;
    • detecting a first user input command provided via the user input command device, the first user input command being representative of an instance of damage on the vehicle;
    • storing one or more sets of image coordinates representing the first user input command to map damage to the vehicle.
The second image can be a two dimensional front or back view image of the vehicle and the origin for the second coordinates system is the vehicle centre and the bottom of the tyres.
The method can further comprise:
    • detecting a stroke length and/or direction of the first user input command;
    • determining a damage magnitude and/or direction; and
    • storing the damage magnitude and/or direction associated with the first user input command.
Prior to the step of detecting the first user input command, the method can comprise a step of detecting a second user input command, the second user input command causing the GUI to display a magnified representation of part of the vehicle.
Thus, the method can enable a user to enlarge a relevant portion of the vehicle image, which can enable the first user input command (damage location input) to be a more accurate representation of where the instance of damage has been observed on the vehicle.
The method can comprise one or more further steps of detecting the second user input command, each second user input command causing the GUI to display a further magnified representation of the part of the vehicle.
The method can further comprise:
    • detecting the first or a third user input command provided via the user input device;
    • displaying a damage description menu such that a user can select a damage type corresponding to the observed instance of damage; and
    • storing the user selected damage type associated with the first user input command.
The method can further comprise:
    • detecting the first or a fourth user input command provided via the user input device;
    • displaying a damage severity menu such that a user can select a damage severity level corresponding to the observed instance of damage; and
    • storing the user selected damage severity level associated with the first user input command.
The method can further comprise:
    • partitioning the image into a plurality of regions, each region representing one or more discrete components of the vehicle;
    • determining the region(s) to which the first or second user input command(s) relate;
    • accessing a database containing vehicle information relating to the plurality of regions; and
    • using the vehicle information to modify information displayed on the GUI.
The step of modifying information displayed on the GUI can comprise displaying only damage types and/or damage severity levels applicable to the region(s).
Thus, the method can provide a more efficient GUI enabling damage mapping to be achieved in a timely manner, thereby resulting in less system power per mapping exercise. The method of this embodiment can also improve the accuracy of damage mapping by reducing the number of options available for selection in the damage description menu or damage severity menu i.e. not presenting options that do not apply to the region(s).
The step of storing damage information can comprise storing the damage information as a fixed length multi digit code representative of the damage information. Saving the damage information in a structured code can simplify downstream data collation and comparison.
In accordance with a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a computing device including a processor and memory, the memory storing computer program code which when executed by the processor is configured to execute the steps of the method according to the first aspect.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a graphical user interface (GUI) of apparatus for vehicle damage mapping according to an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a magnified portion of the vehicle;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a damage description menu;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a damage severity menu;
FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating one example format of storing damage data;
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a front image of a vehicle;
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of the GUI of FIG. 1 , showing a three dimensional image of a vehicle; and
FIG. 8 illustrates a method according to an embodiment of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of apparatus 10 for vehicle damage mapping according to an embodiment of the invention.
A conventional computing device 12 comprising one or more processors, memory, input device etc. is arranged to execute a control program. The control program implements a method for vehicle damage mapping.
Any suitable computing device 12 can be used and therefore, for brevity, the features of the computing device are not illustrated and will not be discussed in any detail. Examples of suitable computing devices are general purpose computers, smart phones, tablets and the like.
A display device 14 of the computing device 12 is arranged to display a graphical user interface (GUI) via which a user can record the type and location of damage the user has observed on a vehicle (not shown).
The GUI displays an image 16 which represents a particular vehicle. The computing device 12 can include a database in memory which contains images for various vehicles, from which a user can select one. Alternatively, an image can be located from an external database via a wireless or wired communications link.
The control program is arranged to generate a coordinate system, denoted by an X axis and Y axis, relative to the image, which may or may not be visible to the user. The coordinate system has an origin O defined relative to a particular part of the image. In the illustrated embodiment, the Y axis for the coordinate system is aligned with the furthermost forward region of the car bumper and the X axis is aligned with the bottom of the tyres (in both cases a space is shown in FIG. 1 for clarity). However, in other embodiments the coordinate system origin can be based on some other features of the vehicle.
The computing device 12 includes an input device, which in the illustrated embodiment is a touchscreen input 14 of the display device 14, but in other embodiments could be a mouse, trackball or the like.
The input device 14 enables the user to provide one or more types of user input command, which are registered by the control program.
A first type of user input command is a damage location input through which a user can input a damage location marker 18 on the image 16 which corresponds to an instance of observed damage on the vehicle. This can for example be achieved by the input device 14 detecting a single finger gesture at a set of coordinates on the image 16. The computing device 12 can then store the damage location input locally to memory or transmit the information via the communications link.
The coordinates system can be scaled to the vehicle image, which in turn can be scaled to the vehicle. Thus, the control program knows the scale between the image displayed on the display device 14 and the vehicle the image represents and as such the computing device 12 can directly relate damage location co-ordinates to a precise location on the vehicle; for example in mm from the co-ordinate datum point.
Referring additionally to FIG. 2 , a second type of user input command can be a zoom input through which a user can magnify a particular portion of the image 16. This can for example be achieved by the input device 14 detecting a two fingered pinch or expand gesture at a set of coordinates on the image 16. FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a user having magnified the portion of the image containing a door handle 20. The input device 14 can be arranged to detect zoom in and zoom out gestures, as well as pan gestures by means which will be apparent to the skilled person. Thus, the apparatus 10 can enable a user to enlarge a relevant portion of the vehicle image 16, which can enable a more accurate damage location input to be made.
It is preferred that the control program is arranged to detect from the damage location input not only the set of coordinates DC on the image 16 but also the magnitude M and direction of the damage from the set of coordinates so as to establish a damage vector DV from the set of coordinates. This can for example be achieved by the input device 14 detecting a user swiping one finger from an initial touch point. The direction can be described as an angle 8 relative to the X or Y axis. The magnitude and direction can be determined using the start and end coordinates of the finger stroke. A straight line approximation can be made for the damage location marker 18, or the swipe can be broken down into a plurality of contiguous damage vectors to describe non-linear damage location markers.
Referring additionally to FIG. 3 , the control program can be arranged to present the user with a description menu 20 of user selectable damage description options. In the illustrated example the menu enables a user to describe the observed damage as a “scratch”, a “dent” or a “chip”. The description menu 20 can be automatically displayed in response to the input device detecting damage location input, or the GUI can position a damage description icon (not shown) on the display to enable a user to assign a damage description to a damage location marker 18. The control program can be arranged to store the assigned damage description locally to memory or transmit the information via the communications link. This can result in a more informative or accurate vehicle damage mapping system.
As best illustrated in FIG. 1 , the vehicle 16 can be broken down into a number of discrete regions which correspond to discrete or groups of corresponding externally visible components of the vehicle such as panels, windows, door handles etc. It is preferred that the control program is arranged to tailor the description menu 20 presented to the user to only show options that are available for the region(s) in which the damage location marker 18 exists; for example, a menu provided for the door panel can include “scratch”, “dent” or “chip” options, but a menu provided for a window can present “scratch”, “crack, or “chip” options. This can result in an improved GUI in which a user is not presented with every possible damage description in every menu, thereby simplifying and expediting the process of damage description which can reduce the power consumption of the system and reduce the likelihood of erroneous input.
Referring additionally to FIG. 4 , the control program can be arranged to present the user with a severity menu 22 of user selectable damage severity options. In the illustrated example the severity menu 22 enables a user to describe the observed damage as “minor”, “intermediate” or “severe”, but in other embodiments the control program can provide different representations of damage severity level. The severity menu 22 can be automatically displayed in response to the input device detecting damage location input, or the GUI can position a damage severity icon (not shown) on the display to enable a user to assign a damage description to a damage location marker 18. The control program can be arranged to store the assigned damage severity locally to memory or transmit the information via the communications link. This can result in more informative or accurate vehicle damage mapping.
The control program can be arranged to associate each damage location marker 18 with the time and date of recordal in the system; for example, by using the output from the system clock of the computing device 12. This can result in more informative vehicle damage mapping. Alternatively or in addition the control program can be arranged to determine a daylight status i.e. whether it is light or dark at the time and date of detection of the first user input command at the location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command and associate this with the damage location marker 18.
The control program can be arranged to associate each damage location marker 18 with the location of the computing device 12 using for example Global Positioning System information. This can result in more informative vehicle damage mapping.
The control program can be arranged to associate each damage location marker 18 with the weather at the location of the computing device 12 at the time the damage is recorded. This can for example be achieved by the control program using the communications interface of the computing device 12 to access freely available weather databases via the internet and recording one of more information fields from the website. This can result in more informative vehicle damage mapping because an entry made during poor weather conditions may be less credible than one made in sunny conditions.
Referring to FIG. 5 , the control program can be arranged to save damage information as a code, such as a 14 digit code 24. The first four digits 26 describe in mm the distance of the damage coordinate along the X axis. The second four digits 28 describe in mm the distance of the damage coordinate along the Y axis. The ninth digit 30 describes one of up to nine damage descriptions. The tenth digit 32 described one of up to nine damage severities. The final four digits 34 describe the damage size. The fixed length code can have any suitable length to represent the damage location in addition to one or more further pieces of damage information as described herein. Saving the damage information in a structured code can simplify downstream data collation and comparison. In some embodiments, the system can be arranged to simply save each piece of damage information associated with an instance of damage in a computer file with a common damage instance identifier.
FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a second image of the vehicle that can be displayed on the GUI. The second image is a front view image of the vehicle, but can also be a back view. The Y axis for the second coordinates system is aligned with the vehicle centre within the image and the X axis intersects or is adjacent to the bottom of the tyres within the image.
FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of an alternative first image of the vehicle that can be displayed on the GUI. The first image in this embodiment is a three dimensional model of the vehicle. The Y axis origin for the first coordinate system is aligned with the vehicle longitudinal centre within the image, the X axis intersects or is adjacent to a furthermost forward portion of the front of the bumper of the vehicle within the image when viewed from a side and the Z axis origin intersects or is adjacent to the bottom of the tyres within the image when viewed from the front or side. Thus, a user can rotate the model using the pan command and zoom as with the previous embodiment. When a damage location input is provided, the control program can establish the 3D location of the damage in an analogous manner to that described above.
FIG. 8 illustrates a method according to an embodiment of the invention generally at 40.
At step 42 the method comprises displaying a graphical user interface on a display device of a computing device which shows a first image representing a first view of a vehicle and defining a first coordinate system relative to the first image.
At step 44 the method comprises an optional step of detecting a second user input command, the second user input command causing the GUI to display a magnified representation of part of the vehicle. This step can be repeated one or more times and the user can pan around the magnified image to select a portion of the vehicle image that corresponds to a portion of the vehicle where damage has been observed.
At step 46 the method comprises detecting a first user input command provided via a user input device associated with the computing device, the first user input command being representative of an instance of damage observed on the vehicle.
At step 48 the method comprises an optional step of detecting a stroke length and/or direction of the first user input command and determining a damage magnitude and/or direction.
At step 50 the method comprises an optional step of partitioning the image into a plurality of regions, each region representing one or more discrete components of the vehicle, determining the region(s) to which the first or second user input command(s) relate and accessing a database containing vehicle information relating to the plurality of regions.
At step 52 the method comprises an optional step of detecting the first or a third user input command provided via the user input device and displaying a damage description menu such that a user can select a damage type corresponding to the observed instance of damage. The method can display only damage types applicable to the region(s).
At step 54 the method comprises an optional step of detecting the first or a fourth user input command provided via the user input device and displaying a damage severity menu such that a user can select a damage severity level corresponding to the observed instance of damage. The method can display only damage severity levels applicable to the region(s).
At step 56 the method comprises an optional step of determining the time and date of detection of the first user input command and/or the location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command. Alternatively or in addition the method can comprise an optional step of determining a daylight status i.e. whether it is light or dark at the time and date of detection of the first user input command at the location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command.
At step 58 the method comprises an optional step of determining a weather condition at the time and date of detection of the first user input command and location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command.
At step 60 the method comprises storing the information associated with the first user input command.
The method can be repeated in an analogous manner for further first input commands, provided on the first image representative of further damage to that side of the vehicle, and/or for further input commands representative of damage to other areas of the vehicle.
Although the invention has been described above with reference to one or more preferred embodiments, it will be appreciated that various changes or modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. The word “comprising” can mean “including” or “consisting of” and therefore does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those listed in any claim or the specification as a whole. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.

Claims (13)

The invention claimed is:
1. A method for mapping damage on a vehicle having tires and a bumper, the method comprising:
displaying a graphical user interface on a display device of a computing device which shows a first image representing a first view of the vehicle;
defining a first coordinate system relative to the first image;
partitioning the first image into a plurality of regions, each region representing a part or a component of the vehicle;
detecting a first user input command provided via a user input device associated with the computing device, the first user input command being representative of an instance of damage observed on the vehicle; and
in response to detecting the first user input command, the computing device automatically performing the following:
detecting a stroke length and stroke direction of the first user input command;
determining a damage magnitude and damage direction based on the detected stroke length and stroke direction of the first user input command; and
storing damage information, whereby the storing damage information comprises storing a set of image coordinates of the first coordinate system and a damage vector based on the damage magnitude and damage direction representing the first user input command; and
determining a region of the plurality of regions to which the first user input command relates;
accessing a database containing vehicle information relating to the plurality of regions; and
using the vehicle information to modify selectable menu information displayed on the graphical user interface by displaying only damage types applicable to the region to which the first user input command relates, whereby the modifying selectable menu information displayed on the graphical user interface comprises displaying only damage severity levels applicable to the region to which the first user input command relates.
2. The method according to claim 1, whereby the first image is a three dimensional model of the vehicle, a Y axis origin for the first coordinate system is aligned with a vehicle longitudinal center within the first image, an X axis intersects or is adjacent to a furthermost forward portion of a front of the bumper of the vehicle within the image when viewed from a side and a Z axis origin intersects or is adjacent to a bottom of the tires within the image when viewed from the front or side.
3. The method according to claim 1, whereby the first image is a side view image of the vehicle, a Y axis origin for the first coordinates system intersects or is adjacent to a bottom of the tires within the image and the X axis origin intersects or is adjacent to a furthermost forward portion of a front of the bumper of the vehicle within the first image.
4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
displaying on the display device a second image representing a second view of the vehicle;
defining a second coordinate system relative to the second image;
detecting a second user input command provided via the user input command device, the first user input command being representative of an instance of damage on the vehicle;
whereby the storing damage information comprises storing one or more sets of image coordinates representing the second user input command to map damage to the vehicle.
5. The method according to claim 4, whereby the second image is a front or back view image of the vehicle, a Y axis origin for the second coordinates system intersects or is adjacent to a bottom of the tires and an X axis origin is aligned with a center of the vehicle within the second image.
6. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
prior to the detecting the first user input command, detecting a second user input command, the second user input command causing the GUI to display a magnified representation of part of the vehicle.
7. The method according to claim 6, further comprising one or more further steps of detecting the second user input command, each second user input command causing the GUI to display a further magnified representation of the part of the vehicle.
8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
detecting the first or a third user input command provided via the user input device;
displaying a damage description menu such that a user can select a damage type corresponding to the observed instance of damage; and
whereby the storing damage information comprises storing the user selected damage type associated with the first user input command.
9. The method according to claim 1, further comprising:
detecting the first or a fourth user input command provided via the user input device;
displaying a damage severity menu such that a user can select a damage severity level corresponding to the observed instance of damage; and
whereby the storing damage information comprises storing the user selected damage severity level associated with the first user input command.
10. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining a time and date of detection of the first and/or second user input commands and/or daylight status and/or a location of the computing device during detection of the first and/or second user input commands and whereby the storing damage information comprises storing the time and date and/or daylight status and/or location information associated with the first and/or second user input commands.
11. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining a weather condition at a time and date of detection of the first user input command and location of the computing device during detection of the first user input command and whereby the storing damage information comprises storing the weather information associated with the first user input commands.
12. The computing device including a processor and memory, the memory storing computer program code which when executed by the processor is configured to execute the steps of the method according to claim 1.
13. A method for mapping damage on a vehicle having tires and a bumper, the method comprising:
displaying a graphical user interface on a display device of a computing device which shows a first image representing a first view of the vehicle;
defining a first coordinate system relative to the first image;
partitioning the first image into a plurality of regions, each region representing a part or a component of the vehicle;
detecting a first user input command provided via a user input device associated with the computing device, the first user input command being representative of an instance of damage observed on the vehicle; and
in response to detecting the first user input command, automatically performing the following computer implemented functions:
detecting a stroke length and stroke direction of the first user input command;
determining a damage magnitude and damage direction based on the detected stroke length and stroke direction of the first user input command; and
storing damage information, whereby the step of storing damage information comprises storing a set of image coordinates and a damage vector based on the damage magnitude and damage direction representing the first user input command; and
determining the region to which the first user input command relates;
accessing a database containing vehicle information relating to the plurality of regions; and using the vehicle information to modify selectable menu information displayed on the graphical user interface by displaying only damage types applicable to the region to which the first user input command relates, whereby the storing damage information comprises storing the damage information as a fixed length multi digit code representative of the damage information, at least some of the digits of the fixed length multi digit code representing the coordinates and at least some of the digits of the fixed length multi digit code representing damage vector.
US18/217,054 2017-04-28 2023-06-30 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping Active US12211013B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US18/217,054 US12211013B2 (en) 2017-04-28 2023-06-30 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping

Applications Claiming Priority (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB1706800.8 2017-04-28
GBGB1706800.8A GB201706800D0 (en) 2017-04-28 2017-04-28 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping
GB1706800 2017-04-28
PCT/GB2018/051110 WO2018197889A1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-04-27 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping
US201916608977A 2019-10-28 2019-10-28
US18/217,054 US12211013B2 (en) 2017-04-28 2023-06-30 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping

Related Parent Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/608,977 Continuation US20200219069A1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-04-27 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping
PCT/GB2018/051110 Continuation WO2018197889A1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-04-27 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20230342729A1 US20230342729A1 (en) 2023-10-26
US12211013B2 true US12211013B2 (en) 2025-01-28

Family

ID=59010946

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/608,977 Abandoned US20200219069A1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-04-27 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping
US18/217,054 Active US12211013B2 (en) 2017-04-28 2023-06-30 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/608,977 Abandoned US20200219069A1 (en) 2017-04-28 2018-04-27 Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US20200219069A1 (en)
EP (1) EP3616136B1 (en)
GB (1) GB201706800D0 (en)
WO (1) WO2018197889A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6543729B2 (en) * 2015-12-25 2019-07-10 富士フイルム株式会社 Similar damage search device and similar damage search method

Citations (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5956658A (en) 1993-09-18 1999-09-21 Diagnostic Instruments Limited Portable data collection apparatus for collecting maintenance data from a field tour
US20020161533A1 (en) 2000-02-15 2002-10-31 Tateo Uegaki System for recognizing damaged part of accident-involved car and computer-readable medium on which program is recorded
US20040148188A1 (en) 2001-05-02 2004-07-29 Tateo Uegaki System and method for recognizing damaged portions of vehichle after accident
WO2005109263A1 (en) 2004-05-11 2005-11-17 Fausto Siri Process and system for analysing deformations in motor vehicles
US20060171704A1 (en) 2002-11-14 2006-08-03 Bingle Robert L Imaging system for vehicle
US20110218825A1 (en) 2010-03-03 2011-09-08 International Business Machines Corporation Three-dimensional interactive vehicle damage claim interface
US20110313951A1 (en) 2010-06-19 2011-12-22 SHzoom LLC Vehicle Repair Cost Estimate Acquisition System and Method
US8230362B2 (en) 2006-05-31 2012-07-24 Manheim Investments, Inc. Computer-assisted and/or enabled systems, methods, techniques, services and user interfaces for conducting motor vehicle and other inspections
WO2012113084A1 (en) 2011-02-25 2012-08-30 Audatex Gmbh System and method for estimating collision damage to a car
US20120297337A1 (en) 2006-05-31 2012-11-22 Manheim Investments, Inc. Computer-based technology for aiding the repair of motor vehicles
US20130120375A1 (en) 2008-08-22 2013-05-16 Hailin Jin Selectively displaying surfaces of an object model
US20130325541A1 (en) 2012-05-08 2013-12-05 John A. Capriotti System and method for managing and providing vehicle maintenance
KR20140035852A (en) 2012-09-14 2014-03-24 가부시키가이샤 켄텍스 Vehicle repair cost estimation system and apparatus thereof
US8756085B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-06-17 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for assessing property damage
US20140306826A1 (en) 2012-03-14 2014-10-16 Flextronics Ap, Llc Automatic communication of damage and health in detected vehicle incidents
CN104346752A (en) 2014-10-20 2015-02-11 中进汽贸(天津)进口汽车贸易有限公司 Method for recording vehicle damage inspection results
US20150097924A1 (en) 2012-11-30 2015-04-09 Sharp Cars Detailing & More, LLC Mobile inspection system
US20150106133A1 (en) 2013-10-15 2015-04-16 Audatex North America, Inc. Mobile system for generating a damaged vehicle insurance estimate
US20160266046A1 (en) 2013-10-24 2016-09-15 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Defect inspection system and method
US20160300406A1 (en) 2015-04-11 2016-10-13 Versan Bora Hamamcioglu Method and system for vehicle body inspection
US20170109715A1 (en) 2015-10-20 2017-04-20 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Vehicle system with vehicle report generation and methods for use therewith
US20170148102A1 (en) 2015-11-23 2017-05-25 CSI Holdings I LLC Damage assessment and repair based on objective surface data
US9691189B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2017-06-27 United Services Automobile Association Accident assessment and reconstruction systems and applications
US20170293894A1 (en) 2016-04-06 2017-10-12 American International Group, Inc. Automatic assessment of damage and repair costs in vehicles
US20170301154A1 (en) 2016-04-19 2017-10-19 Rozint Enterprises, Inc. Systems and methods for use of diagnostic scan tool in automotive collision repair
US9799010B1 (en) 2014-07-11 2017-10-24 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company System, method, and computer-readable medium for facilitating delivery of replacement parts for a damaged vehicle
US20180012350A1 (en) 2016-07-09 2018-01-11 Keith Joseph Gangitano Automated radial imaging and analysis system
US9886771B1 (en) 2016-05-20 2018-02-06 Ccc Information Services Inc. Heat map of vehicle damage
US20180299352A1 (en) 2015-10-09 2018-10-18 Wheelright Limited Tyre condition analysis
US10332209B1 (en) 2012-08-16 2019-06-25 Allstate Insurance Company Enhanced claims damage estimation using aggregate display
US10360601B1 (en) 2014-12-11 2019-07-23 Alexander Omeed Adegan Method for generating a repair estimate through predictive analytics
US10846627B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2020-11-24 Etsia Digital, Inc. Method, apparatus, and program product for generating product repair cost estimates

Patent Citations (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5956658A (en) 1993-09-18 1999-09-21 Diagnostic Instruments Limited Portable data collection apparatus for collecting maintenance data from a field tour
US20020161533A1 (en) 2000-02-15 2002-10-31 Tateo Uegaki System for recognizing damaged part of accident-involved car and computer-readable medium on which program is recorded
US20040148188A1 (en) 2001-05-02 2004-07-29 Tateo Uegaki System and method for recognizing damaged portions of vehichle after accident
US20060171704A1 (en) 2002-11-14 2006-08-03 Bingle Robert L Imaging system for vehicle
WO2005109263A1 (en) 2004-05-11 2005-11-17 Fausto Siri Process and system for analysing deformations in motor vehicles
US20080267487A1 (en) 2004-05-11 2008-10-30 Fausto Siri Process and System for Analysing Deformations in Motor Vehicles
US8230362B2 (en) 2006-05-31 2012-07-24 Manheim Investments, Inc. Computer-assisted and/or enabled systems, methods, techniques, services and user interfaces for conducting motor vehicle and other inspections
US20120297337A1 (en) 2006-05-31 2012-11-22 Manheim Investments, Inc. Computer-based technology for aiding the repair of motor vehicles
US9189960B2 (en) 2006-05-31 2015-11-17 Manheim Investments, Inc. Computer-based technology for aiding the repair of motor vehicles
US9103743B2 (en) 2006-05-31 2015-08-11 Manheim Investments, Inc. Computer-assisted and/or enabled systems, methods, techniques, services and user interfaces for conducting motor vehicle and other inspections
US20130120375A1 (en) 2008-08-22 2013-05-16 Hailin Jin Selectively displaying surfaces of an object model
US9691189B1 (en) 2008-09-29 2017-06-27 United Services Automobile Association Accident assessment and reconstruction systems and applications
US20110218825A1 (en) 2010-03-03 2011-09-08 International Business Machines Corporation Three-dimensional interactive vehicle damage claim interface
US20110313951A1 (en) 2010-06-19 2011-12-22 SHzoom LLC Vehicle Repair Cost Estimate Acquisition System and Method
WO2012113084A1 (en) 2011-02-25 2012-08-30 Audatex Gmbh System and method for estimating collision damage to a car
US20140306826A1 (en) 2012-03-14 2014-10-16 Flextronics Ap, Llc Automatic communication of damage and health in detected vehicle incidents
US20130325541A1 (en) 2012-05-08 2013-12-05 John A. Capriotti System and method for managing and providing vehicle maintenance
US10332209B1 (en) 2012-08-16 2019-06-25 Allstate Insurance Company Enhanced claims damage estimation using aggregate display
KR20140035852A (en) 2012-09-14 2014-03-24 가부시키가이샤 켄텍스 Vehicle repair cost estimation system and apparatus thereof
US10846627B2 (en) 2012-09-19 2020-11-24 Etsia Digital, Inc. Method, apparatus, and program product for generating product repair cost estimates
US20150097924A1 (en) 2012-11-30 2015-04-09 Sharp Cars Detailing & More, LLC Mobile inspection system
US8756085B1 (en) 2013-03-15 2014-06-17 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for assessing property damage
US20150106133A1 (en) 2013-10-15 2015-04-16 Audatex North America, Inc. Mobile system for generating a damaged vehicle insurance estimate
US20160266046A1 (en) 2013-10-24 2016-09-15 Koninklijke Philips N.V. Defect inspection system and method
US9799010B1 (en) 2014-07-11 2017-10-24 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company System, method, and computer-readable medium for facilitating delivery of replacement parts for a damaged vehicle
CN104346752A (en) 2014-10-20 2015-02-11 中进汽贸(天津)进口汽车贸易有限公司 Method for recording vehicle damage inspection results
US10360601B1 (en) 2014-12-11 2019-07-23 Alexander Omeed Adegan Method for generating a repair estimate through predictive analytics
US20160300406A1 (en) 2015-04-11 2016-10-13 Versan Bora Hamamcioglu Method and system for vehicle body inspection
US20180299352A1 (en) 2015-10-09 2018-10-18 Wheelright Limited Tyre condition analysis
US20170109715A1 (en) 2015-10-20 2017-04-20 At&T Mobility Ii Llc Vehicle system with vehicle report generation and methods for use therewith
US20170148102A1 (en) 2015-11-23 2017-05-25 CSI Holdings I LLC Damage assessment and repair based on objective surface data
US20170293894A1 (en) 2016-04-06 2017-10-12 American International Group, Inc. Automatic assessment of damage and repair costs in vehicles
US20170301154A1 (en) 2016-04-19 2017-10-19 Rozint Enterprises, Inc. Systems and methods for use of diagnostic scan tool in automotive collision repair
US9886771B1 (en) 2016-05-20 2018-02-06 Ccc Information Services Inc. Heat map of vehicle damage
US20180012350A1 (en) 2016-07-09 2018-01-11 Keith Joseph Gangitano Automated radial imaging and analysis system

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in the International Application No. PCT/GB2018/051110, mailed on Jul. 17, 2018.
Search report issued in International Application No. GB1706800.8 on Sep. 19, 2017.
The foreign references and the NPLs are not submitted herewith as they can be retrieved in the Parent U.S. Appl. No. 16/608,977, filed Oct. 28, 2019.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20230342729A1 (en) 2023-10-26
EP3616136B1 (en) 2025-04-02
WO2018197889A1 (en) 2018-11-01
GB201706800D0 (en) 2017-06-14
EP3616136C0 (en) 2025-04-02
EP3616136A1 (en) 2020-03-04
US20200219069A1 (en) 2020-07-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10545643B2 (en) User interface for data comparison
JP3471920B2 (en) Method for determining a computationally significant response and method for operating a processor control system
US9501219B2 (en) 2D line data cursor
CN103019483B (en) Touch object identification method
US8619045B2 (en) Calculator and computer-readable medium
US8542207B1 (en) Pencil eraser gesture and gesture recognition method for touch-enabled user interfaces
KR101158679B1 (en) Method for directly inputting figure on electronic document, and computer-readable recording medium storing program of directly inputting figure on electronic document
CN112596661A (en) Writing track processing method and device and interactive panel
JP6877446B2 (en) Systems and methods for recognizing multiple object structures
CN110910414A (en) Image contour generation method, image labeling method, electronic device and storage medium
US12211013B2 (en) Method and apparatus for vehicle damage mapping
CN102298595A (en) Browser guiding system and guiding method thereof
US20250306755A1 (en) Multi-Host Touch Display
US9229608B2 (en) Character display apparatus, character display method, and computer readable medium
US20120299837A1 (en) Identifying contacts and contact attributes in touch sensor data using spatial and temporal features
JPS63123166A (en) Correlation of cursor and entity
CN116778458B (en) Parking space detection model construction method, parking space detection method, equipment and storage medium
US10521108B2 (en) Electronic apparatus for detecting touch, method of controlling the same, and display apparatus including touch controller
US20130201161A1 (en) Methods, Systems and Apparatus for Digital-Marking-Surface Content-Unit Manipulation
CN115471852A (en) Touch recognition method, touch device, storage medium and computer device
US20140152601A1 (en) Touch display device and control method thereof
CN112912830B (en) Touch position recognition method, device, system and computer-readable storage medium
CN104463086A (en) Information processing method and device
JP2015079350A (en) Display device
WO2012144998A1 (en) User interface for data comparison

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

AS Assignment

Owner name: DEGOULD LIMITED, UNITED KINGDOM

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:GOULD, DANIEL GEORGE;REEL/FRAME:064431/0464

Effective date: 20191029

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE