US11826912B2 - Method and control means for controlling a robot assembly - Google Patents
Method and control means for controlling a robot assembly Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US11826912B2 US11826912B2 US16/761,059 US201816761059A US11826912B2 US 11826912 B2 US11826912 B2 US 11826912B2 US 201816761059 A US201816761059 A US 201816761059A US 11826912 B2 US11826912 B2 US 11826912B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- trajectory
- path
- robot assembly
- robot
- cartesian
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 32
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000000844 transformation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1656—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
- B25J9/1664—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators characterised by motion, path, trajectory planning
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/02—Programme-controlled manipulators characterised by movement of the arms, e.g. cartesian coordinate type
- B25J9/023—Cartesian coordinate type
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1602—Programme controls characterised by the control system, structure, architecture
- B25J9/1607—Calculation of inertia, jacobian matrixes and inverses
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1628—Programme controls characterised by the control loop
- B25J9/1643—Programme controls characterised by the control loop redundant control
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1628—Programme controls characterised by the control loop
- B25J9/1653—Programme controls characterised by the control loop parameters identification, estimation, stiffness, accuracy, error analysis
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1656—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators
- B25J9/1669—Programme controls characterised by programming, planning systems for manipulators characterised by special application, e.g. multi-arm co-operation, assembly, grasping
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
- B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
- B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
- B25J9/16—Programme controls
- B25J9/1679—Programme controls characterised by the tasks executed
- B25J9/1687—Assembly, peg and hole, palletising, straight line, weaving pattern movement
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
- G05B2219/39—Robotics, robotics to robotics hand
- G05B2219/39358—Time optimal control along path for singular points, having veloctiy constraints
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and a control means for controlling a robot assembly comprising at least one robot arm, and to a computer program product for carrying out the method, and to a robot assembly comprising the control means.
- the object of the present invention is that of improving the control of a robot assembly.
- This object is achieved by a method as described herein, a control means or a computer program product for carrying out a method described herein, or a robot assembly comprising control means described herein.
- a robot assembly comprises one or more robot arms which, or one or more of which, comprises or comprise, in one embodiment, one or more, in particular at least three, in each case, in one embodiment at least six, in one development at least seven, axes or joints, in particular axes of rotation or swivel joints, which, in one embodiment, can be or are moved or adjusted by means of an, in particular electromotive, drive in each case.
- a method for controlling the robot assembly comprises the steps of:
- the one or more reference(s) fixed to the robot assembly can (in each case) comprise, in particular be, a TCP (tool center point) of the (corresponding) robot arm.
- TCP tool center point
- operational processes of the robot assembly can be controlled in an advantageous manner.
- a cartesian pose of a reference fixed to the robot has a one-, two- or three-dimensional cartesian position and/or orientation of the reference, and can in particular define this and/or be defined thereby.
- the cartesian poses are specified in advance by approaching, in particular manually, with the robot assembly, and by storing parameters (known as “teaching”).
- cartesian poses can also be specified in a model-assisted manner, in particular using a simulation, on the basis of CAD data or the like (known as offline programming).
- the path may comprise one or more of the specified cartesian poses.
- the path may be spaced apart from one or more of the specified cartesian poses, in particular overshoot particular poses, or the like.
- the axis space of the robot assembly comprises one or more, and in one embodiment it comprises all, of the (possible) axial or joint coordinate values, in particular axial or joint positions, in particular angles, of the robot assembly, in particular of the or of one or more, in particular all, of the robot arms which, in the present case, are designated in the conventional manner by q, and can in particular be defined or spanned thereby.
- the plurality of cartesian poses of the path, specified in advance, on the basis of which the trajectory in the axis space of the robot assembly is determined comprises three or more, in particular, excluding a start and end point, one or more further intermediate points specified in advance.
- the plurality of cartesian poses of the path is already specified prior to (the start of) traveling the path using the robot assembly, and in a development this is stored, in particular in a non-volatile manner, and in one embodiment is accordingly retrieved from an in particular non-volatile memory in order to determine the trajectory.
- control values are determined on the basis of the trajectory in axis space, and no longer, as was the case according to the in-house practice explained at the outset, only at the transit time, on the basis of the cartesian path, a variation which results for example in the case of resolution of redundancy or iterative determination of discrete inverse transformations, and thus leads to different trajectories in the axis space, on the basis of the same specified cartesian poses, can advantageously be reduced.
- the computing load during transit time or when traveling the path can be reduced thereby.
- the method comprises the steps of:
- first of all the same trajectory is determined in the same manner, and this trajectory is then used for controlling the robot assembly.
- control values are newly determined, starting from a contact point of the trajectory that is spaced apart from the start of the trajectory and has previously not been approached on the trajectory.
- the same trajectory is entirely newly determined, in the same manner as in the primary determination, but then only a portion starting with a contact point is used or traveled in order to control the robot assembly, said contact point not being previously approached in another manner, i.e. on the trajectory. In this way, it is possible to achieve the same trajectory again, in the axis space, starting from the contact point, but without having to pass through said trajectory completely.
- the primary and/or renewed determination of control values comprises: variable scanning of the primarily or newly determined trajectory.
- scanning comprises determining discrete values, in particular by evaluating a function having corresponding discrete parameter or variable values.
- the same trajectory can be scanned or traveled in a manner adjusted to the situation.
- said trajectory can be scanned in a more fine manner at slow velocities and in a coarser manner at higher velocities.
- the trajectory for determining control values is scanned in a (current) interpolation cycle of a drive controller of the robot assembly, in the present case, for more compact illustration, regulation also being referred to, in a generalized manner, as control.
- the primary and/or renewed determination of control values comprises: correcting one or more points of the primarily or newly determined trajectory to a control value, if a deviation of a cartesian pose, which corresponds to said (relevant) point of the trajectory, from a corresponding point of the path, in one embodiment corrected in a sensor-assisted manner relative to the path having the poses specified in advance, exceeds a specified tolerance value, in particular while resolving a redundancy of the robot assembly with respect to the path and/or in order to reduce the deviation.
- the trajectory is determined such that at least at specified discrete trajectory points, in particular interpolation or support points, a deviation of a cartesian pose, which corresponds to the relevant point of the trajectory, from a corresponding point of the path having the poses specified in advance, does not exceed a specified tolerance value.
- the currently desired or target path may also deviate from the poses specified in advance, in particular if, in one embodiment, it is changed in a sensor-assisted manner. It is thus possible, for example, for taught target poses to be changed on the basis of sensor-detected deviations of a workpiece to be machined, or the like. Then the trajectory maps the target poses that are specified in advance or taught, but not the target poses changed in a sensor-assisted manner or the path corrected in a sensor-assisted manner, with said poses changed in a sensor-assisted manner. This, too, can be counteracted by corresponding correction of the trajectory points to the control values.
- the primary and/or renewed determination of the trajectory comprises: planning, in particular optimizing, the path on the basis of the poses and/or of an operational program for the robot assembly.
- This optimization can in particular comprise, in particular be, an optimization of the shape of the path, in particular in order to prevent collisions or the like.
- the poses can be traveled on a particularly advantageously globally optimized path.
- planning, in particular optimizing, the (complete) path on the basis of an operational program for the robot assembly that is in particular specified in advance and, in one embodiment, is stored in particular in a non-volatile manner, in one embodiment the desired path can be specified easily, reliably, and/or in a manner requiring little memory space.
- linear travel of a pose x i which is optionally also more distant, in the cartesian space, to be specified easily, reliably, and/or in a manner requiring little memory space, by the command “LIN(x i ).”
- the path is specified in advance on the basis of an operational program for the robot assembly.
- the primary or renewed determination of the trajectory comprises: determining, in particular iteratively and/or incrementally determining, discrete trajectory points, in particular inverse transformations, on the basis of discrete path points, in particular together with recursive minimization of a deviation of a cartesian pose, which corresponds to the relevant trajectory point, from a corresponding point of the path.
- incremental determination of discrete trajectory points advantageously makes it possible to use linearization, in particular also in the case of redundancy resolution.
- incremental determination of said trajectory points comprises determination of discrete trajectory points on the basis of preceding trajectory points and (determined) increments.
- the primary or renewed determination of the trajectory comprises: optimizing a velocity profile of the trajectory (along the robot assembly) on the basis of a dynamic model of the robot assembly.
- a velocity profile along said trajectory is optimized, on the basis of a dynamic model of the robot assembly.
- the primary or renewed determination of the trajectory comprises: interpolating discrete trajectory points.
- interpolation of discrete trajectory points in particular by means of a parameterized function, can advantageously improve the scanning of the trajectory.
- the primary or renewed determination of the trajectory comprises: resolving a redundancy of the robot assembly with respect to the path.
- the redundancy is resolved taking account of a quality factor that is specified in cartesian and/or in axis space, in particular a distance from axis regions to be avoided and/or desired cartesian poses, in particular by means of a null space projection.
- resolving the redundancy when determining the trajectory makes it possible to advantageously always determine at least substantially the same trajectory, and in addition to reduce a computation time requirement in the transit time or when traveling the path.
- redundancy of the robot assembly with respect to the path comprises, in a manner that is per se conventional in the art, an excess number of dimensions of axial coordinates of the robot assembly relative to the specified poses.
- this can result from the robot assembly comprising two or more, in particular cooperating, robot arms, having a total of at least seven axes and/or at least one robot arm having at least seven axes, which correspondingly constitutes advantageous applications of the present invention.
- redundancy of the robot assembly with respect to the path can for example also result in the case of six-axis robot arms and specified cartesian poses, in which a position and/or orientation is not specified, in one or more directions.
- a control means for controlling the robot assembly is designed, in particular in terms of hardware and/or software, in particular in terms of programming technology, to carry out a method described herein, and/or comprises:
- control means or the means thereof comprises:
- control means or the means thereof for primary and/or renewed determination of control values comprises:
- control means or the means thereof for primary and/or renewed determination of the trajectory comprises:
- a means within the meaning of the present invention can be designed so as to be hardware-based and/or software-based, and can in particular comprise an in particular digital processing unit, in particular microprocessor unit (CPU), which is preferably in data or signal connection with a memory and/or bus system, and/or one or more programs or program modules.
- the CPU can be designed to process commands that are implemented as a program stored in a memory system, to detect input signals from a data bus, and/or to emit output signals to a data bus.
- a memory system may comprise one or more, in particular different, storage media, in particular optical, magnetic, solid state, and/or other nonvolatile media.
- a computer program product can comprise, in particular be, an, in particular nonvolatile, storage medium for storing a program or having a program stored thereon, execution of said program triggering a control means or a controller, in particular a computer, to execute a method described herein or one or more of the steps thereof.
- one or more, in particular all, of the steps of the method are performed in a completely or partially automated manner, in particular by the control means or the means thereof.
- the present invention can be used particularly advantageously in redundant robots. Similarly, it can also be used in particular when determining the inverse transformation of the cartesian in the axis space, in the case of a forwards transformation function that cannot be analytically inverted, in particular in planning (in particular with constant discretization) or in interpolation (in particular with variable discretization).
- FIG. 1 shows a robot assembly comprising two robot arms and a control means for controlling the robot assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 shows a method for controlling the robot assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 1 shows, by way of example, a robot assembly comprising two robot arms 1 , 2 having seven axes in each case, and a control means in the form of a robot controller 5 for controlling the robot assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention which carries out a method described in the following with reference to FIG. 2 .
- both robot arms 1 , 2 each comprise a linear axis having an axial coordinate q 1,1 or q 2,1 , and six axes of rotation of which, by way of example, the axial coordinates or joint angles q 1,2 , q 1,3 , q 1,7 , q 2,2 , q 2,3 and q 2,7 are labelled.
- the master robot 1 guides a workpiece 3 which the slave robot 2 is intended to machine using a tool 4 .
- a step S 5 carried out in advance, first of all cartesian poses x i of the TCP of the slave robot 2 relative to the master robot-guided workpiece 3 are taught, and an operational program for the robot assembly is created on the basis of said poses, for example with program commands “travel from pose x i in cartesian space, on a straight line, to pose x i+1 ” or the like.
- This again, is also purely by way of example, and in the same way, in modifications, for example three-dimensional positions and orientations of a TCP of a seven-axis or multiple-axis robot arm, or merely the three-dimensional position of a TCP of a six-axis robot arm could be taught.
- step S 10 the controller 5 reads in the taught poses x i and, in a step S 20 , plans the cartesian path on the basis of said poses and of the operational program x(s).
- step S 30 the incrementally determined trajectory point q j is interpolated by spline functions which are stored.
- optimization of the velocity profile ⁇ (s) along the trajectory can take place.
- this trajectory q(s) is then scanned during the transit time in the interpolation cycle of the controller, and thus in a variable manner, or the corresponding spline functions are evaluated, and thus preliminary control values for the drives of the robot arms 1 , 2 are determined.
- a step S 50 the deviation of the cartesian pose, which corresponds to the trajectory points scanned in each case or the preliminary control value, from a corresponding point of the planned path is determined, and, in a step S 60 , the scanned trajectory points or preliminary control values are corrected to final control values, as has already been described above for scanning the path or determining the trajectory, if the deviation exceeds a specified tolerance value (S 50 : “Y”).
- the planned path can additionally be corrected in a sensor-assisted manner, for example be displaced or the like, due to deviations of the workpiece 3 that are recorded in a sensor-assisted manner.
- a step S 70 the drives of the robot arms 1 , 2 are controlled/actuated on the basis of said control values, until the entire trajectory has been traveled (S 80 : “Y”).
- step S 40 can also start from a contact point that is spaced apart from the start of the trajectory and has previously not been approached on the trajectory.
- the cartesian path is planned (S 20 ) prior to travel in each case, and a trajectory in axis space is determined (S 30 ) therefor, using redundancy resolution and optionally recursive minimization of a deviation, which is subsequently scanned (S 40 ) during the transit time, the scanned trajectory points optionally being corrected (S 60 ) and the robot arms 1 , 2 being controlled (S 80 ) on the basis of these, optionally corrected, trajectory points or control values.
- the reference fixed to the robot assembly is the TCP of the slave robot 2 , the cartesian poses of which, relative to the workpiece 3 , are specified in advance (S 5 ).
- This is, as already mentioned, given merely by way of example, and in the same way, for example it is also possible to teach absolute cartesian poses of a TCP of a robot arm, relative to the surroundings or the robot arm base.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Robotics (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Manipulator (AREA)
Abstract
Description
-
- determining, in particular calculating and/or storing, a trajectory in the axis space of the robot assembly, on the basis of a path having a plurality of cartesian poses, specified in advance, of one or more reference(s) fixed to the robot assembly;
- determining control values in the axis space, on the basis of said trajectory, in particular during the transit time or when travelling the path, and/or in an interpolation cycle of a controller; and
- controlling the robot assembly on the basis of said control values, said determination of the trajectory or control values also being referred to, in the present case and without restricting the generality, as primary determination, in order to distinguish it from a following determination which is accordingly also referred to as renewed determination, without primary being intended to indicate a higher level or the like.
-
- renewed determination of the same trajectory in the same manner as during primary determination, in particular by means of the same scanning of the path and/or the same starting pose of the robot assembly;
- renewed determination of control values in the axis space on the basis of said newly determined trajectory; and
- controlling the robot assembly on the basis of said newly determined control values, said steps being repeated, in one embodiment, one or more times.
-
- means for primary determination, in particular calculation and/or storage, of a trajectory in the axis space of the robot assembly, on the basis of a path having a plurality of cartesian poses, specified in advance, of one or more reference(s) fixed to the robot assembly;
- means for primary determination of control values in the axis space, on the basis of said trajectory, in particular during the transit time or when travelling the path, and/or in an interpolation cycle of a controller; and
- means for controlling the robot assembly on the basis of said control values.
-
- means for renewed determination of the same trajectory in the same manner;
- means for renewed determination of control values in the axis space, on the basis of said newly determined trajectory, in particular starting from a contact point of the trajectory that is spaced apart from the start of the trajectory and has previously not been approached on the trajectory; and
- means for controlling the robot assembly on the basis of said newly determined control values.
-
- means for variable scanning of the primarily or newly determined trajectory; and/or
- means for correcting at least one point of the primarily or newly determined trajectory to a control value, if a deviation of a cartesian pose, which corresponds to said point of the trajectory, from a corresponding point of the path, which has in particular been corrected in a sensor-assisted manner, exceeds a specified tolerance value, in particular while resolving a redundancy of the robot assembly with respect to the path and/or in order to reduce the deviation.
-
- means for planning, in particular optimizing, the path on the basis of the poses and/or of an operational program for the robot assembly;
- means for determining discrete trajectory points, in particular inverse transformations, on the basis of discrete path points, in particular together with recursive minimization of a deviation of a cartesian pose, which corresponds to the relevant trajectory point, from a corresponding point of the path;
- means for interpolating discrete trajectory points;
- means for optimizing a velocity profile of the trajectory on the basis of a dynamic model of the robot assembly; and/or
- means for resolving the redundancy of the robot assembly with respect to the path, taking account of a quality factor that is specified in cartesian and/or in axis space, in particular a distance from axis regions to be avoided and/or desired cartesian poses, in particular by means of a null space projection.
Δx=J·Δq.
J·J #=1;J # ·J≠1,
which defines a null-space transformation (1−J#·J).
Δq=J # ·Δx+(1−J # ·J)·Δq opt.
Δq opt =λ·∇w(q)
having a scalar weighting λ of a function w(q), which rises (significantly), close to the axis regions to be avoided, and the known nabla operator ∇.
Δx opt =J opt ·Δq.
Δq=J # ·Δx+(1−J # ·J)·λ∇w(q)
or
Δq=J # ·Δx+[J opt·(J opt·(1−J # ·J)]#·(Δx opt −J opt ·J # ·Δx)
having the right inverses as defined above [Jopt·(1−J#·J)]#.
q j+1 =q i +Δq i,
the increments Δqi being determined for example according to any of the above equations for Δq, and the cartesian path x(s) always being scanned in the same manner, beginning with the same starting pose of the robot assembly.
Δx Rest =J·Δq Rest
until the deviation ΔxRest falls below a specified residual error limit.
Claims (13)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| DE102017010244.9 | 2017-11-03 | ||
| DE102017010244.9A DE102017010244A1 (en) | 2017-11-03 | 2017-11-03 | Method and control means for controlling a robot arrangement |
| PCT/EP2018/079380 WO2019086339A1 (en) | 2017-11-03 | 2018-10-26 | Method and control means for controlling a robot assembly |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20210178582A1 US20210178582A1 (en) | 2021-06-17 |
| US11826912B2 true US11826912B2 (en) | 2023-11-28 |
Family
ID=64017375
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/761,059 Active 2039-05-22 US11826912B2 (en) | 2017-11-03 | 2018-10-26 | Method and control means for controlling a robot assembly |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US11826912B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP3703914A1 (en) |
| KR (1) | KR102725371B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN111405966B (en) |
| DE (1) | DE102017010244A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2019086339A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102021201024B3 (en) | 2021-02-04 | 2022-05-12 | Kuka Deutschland Gmbh | Method and system for operating a robot |
| WO2024076266A1 (en) * | 2022-10-05 | 2024-04-11 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Control node and method performed therein for handling control commands for a robot device |
Citations (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102004044457A1 (en) | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-30 | Wiest Ag | Method for compensating kinetic changes at robot, comprising determination of transformation matrix |
| WO2010057528A1 (en) | 2008-11-19 | 2010-05-27 | Abb Technology Ab | A method and a device for optimizing a programmed movement path for an industrial robot |
| US20110153297A1 (en) * | 2008-06-09 | 2011-06-23 | Andreas Keibel | Device and method for the computer-assisted generation of a manipulator path |
| US20110224815A1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2011-09-15 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Industrial Robot And Path Planning Method For Controlling The Movement Of An Industrial Robot |
| WO2012143044A1 (en) * | 2011-04-19 | 2012-10-26 | Abb Research Ltd. | An industrial robot having a kinematically redundant arm and a method for controlling the robot |
| US20140074289A1 (en) * | 2012-09-10 | 2014-03-13 | Fanuc America Corporation | Method of controlling a redundant robot |
| US20150073593A1 (en) | 2013-09-10 | 2015-03-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Operating machine with redundant axes and resolution of the redundancy in real time |
| DE102014103370A1 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Method and device for discrete-time control of a manipulator |
| DE102008058298B4 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2016-01-14 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for computer-aided motion planning of a robot |
| DE102014213262A1 (en) | 2014-07-08 | 2016-01-14 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Machine and method for operating a machine |
| DE102011082800B4 (en) | 2011-09-15 | 2016-04-14 | Convergent Information Technologies Gmbh | System and method for the automated creation of robot programs |
| DE102015004146B3 (en) | 2015-03-27 | 2016-06-16 | Kuka Systems Gmbh | Surface treatment of a component by means of a mobile robot |
| US20170371314A1 (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2017-12-28 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Method And System For Correcting A Processing Path Of A Robot-Guided Tool |
Family Cites Families (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102004021468A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-24 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Method for controlling a machine, in particular an industrial robot |
| DE102009049172B4 (en) * | 2009-10-13 | 2019-07-25 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Method and device for controlling a manipulator |
| DE102013222456A1 (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2015-05-07 | Kuka Laboratories Gmbh | Method for programming the motion sequences of a redundant industrial robot and associated industrial robots |
-
2017
- 2017-11-03 DE DE102017010244.9A patent/DE102017010244A1/en active Pending
-
2018
- 2018-10-26 US US16/761,059 patent/US11826912B2/en active Active
- 2018-10-26 CN CN201880071407.XA patent/CN111405966B/en active Active
- 2018-10-26 EP EP18793415.3A patent/EP3703914A1/en active Pending
- 2018-10-26 WO PCT/EP2018/079380 patent/WO2019086339A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2018-10-26 KR KR1020207014079A patent/KR102725371B1/en active Active
Patent Citations (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE102004044457A1 (en) | 2004-09-15 | 2006-03-30 | Wiest Ag | Method for compensating kinetic changes at robot, comprising determination of transformation matrix |
| DE102008058298B4 (en) | 2008-04-29 | 2016-01-14 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method for computer-aided motion planning of a robot |
| US20110153297A1 (en) * | 2008-06-09 | 2011-06-23 | Andreas Keibel | Device and method for the computer-assisted generation of a manipulator path |
| US20110224815A1 (en) * | 2008-10-06 | 2011-09-15 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Industrial Robot And Path Planning Method For Controlling The Movement Of An Industrial Robot |
| US20110106308A1 (en) * | 2008-11-19 | 2011-05-05 | Abb Technology Ab | Method and a device for optimizing a programmed movement path for an industrial robot |
| WO2010057528A1 (en) | 2008-11-19 | 2010-05-27 | Abb Technology Ab | A method and a device for optimizing a programmed movement path for an industrial robot |
| WO2012143044A1 (en) * | 2011-04-19 | 2012-10-26 | Abb Research Ltd. | An industrial robot having a kinematically redundant arm and a method for controlling the robot |
| DE102011082800B4 (en) | 2011-09-15 | 2016-04-14 | Convergent Information Technologies Gmbh | System and method for the automated creation of robot programs |
| US20140074289A1 (en) * | 2012-09-10 | 2014-03-13 | Fanuc America Corporation | Method of controlling a redundant robot |
| US20150073593A1 (en) | 2013-09-10 | 2015-03-12 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Operating machine with redundant axes and resolution of the redundancy in real time |
| DE102014103370A1 (en) | 2014-03-12 | 2015-09-17 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Method and device for discrete-time control of a manipulator |
| DE102014213262A1 (en) | 2014-07-08 | 2016-01-14 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Machine and method for operating a machine |
| US20170197310A1 (en) | 2014-07-08 | 2017-07-13 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Machine And Method For Operating A Machine |
| US20170371314A1 (en) * | 2014-11-21 | 2017-12-28 | Kuka Roboter Gmbh | Method And System For Correcting A Processing Path Of A Robot-Guided Tool |
| DE102015004146B3 (en) | 2015-03-27 | 2016-06-16 | Kuka Systems Gmbh | Surface treatment of a component by means of a mobile robot |
Non-Patent Citations (4)
| Title |
|---|
| Chinese Patent Office; Office Action in related Chinese Patent Application No. 201880071407X dated Nov. 21, 2022; 9 pages. |
| European Patent Office; Search Report in related International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2018/079380 dated Mar. 15, 2019; 3 pages. |
| German Patent Office; Office Action in related German Patent Application No. 10 2017 010 244.9 dated May 24, 2018; 5 pages. |
| Pashkevich A P et al, "Computer-aided programming of robotic manufacturing cells for laser cutting applications", Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation, 2001. Proceedings. 2001 8th IEEE International Conference on Oct. 15-18, 2001, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE, (Oct. 15, 2001), ISBN 978-0-7803-7241-2, pp. 603-612, XP010589021 [A] 1-10; the whole document. |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| DE102017010244A1 (en) | 2019-05-09 |
| CN111405966A (en) | 2020-07-10 |
| US20210178582A1 (en) | 2021-06-17 |
| CN111405966B (en) | 2024-02-23 |
| EP3703914A1 (en) | 2020-09-09 |
| KR102725371B1 (en) | 2024-11-01 |
| WO2019086339A1 (en) | 2019-05-09 |
| KR20200077533A (en) | 2020-06-30 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| JP7411012B2 (en) | Industrial robots and their operating methods | |
| US10919153B2 (en) | Teaching method for teaching operations to a plurality of robots and teaching system used therefor | |
| CN110877334B (en) | Method and device for robot control | |
| JP2895672B2 (en) | Multiple robot control method | |
| WO2021165745A1 (en) | Collision avoidance motion planning method for industrial robot | |
| JP2014024162A (en) | Robot system, robot control device, robot control method and robot control program | |
| Zube | Cartesian nonlinear model predictive control of redundant manipulators considering obstacles | |
| US11203117B2 (en) | Teaching data generation system for vertical multi-joint robot | |
| CN111687838A (en) | Online compensation method and system for manipulator track following error and storage medium | |
| JP2024177314A (en) | ROBOT SYSTEM, PLANNING SYSTEM, ROBOT CONTROL METHOD, AND PLANNING PROGRAM | |
| US11826912B2 (en) | Method and control means for controlling a robot assembly | |
| US10022868B2 (en) | Inverse kinematic solution for multi-joint link mechanism, and teaching-data creating device using the inverse kinematic solution | |
| US12240124B2 (en) | Moving along a predetermined path with a robot | |
| US11964391B2 (en) | Robot system | |
| CN110154043B (en) | Robot system for learning control based on machining result and control method thereof | |
| CN119610103B (en) | Welding path planning method, system and medium based on robot kinematics | |
| US12036677B2 (en) | Method and system for transferring an end effector of a robot between one end effector pose and a further end effector pose | |
| JP7674501B2 (en) | Control device and robot system | |
| CN117182898A (en) | Automatic path correction method for industrial robot | |
| CN117055361B (en) | Mobile robot control method based on sliding mode model predictive control | |
| CN117075525B (en) | Mobile robot control method based on constraint model predictive control | |
| RU2775693C1 (en) | Method for controlling a multi-stage manipulator | |
| JPS60200313A (en) | Robot coordinate corrector | |
| JP2025055388A (en) | Robot teaching method and teaching system | |
| Wagner et al. | Cooperative processing with multi-robot systems |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: KUKA DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HUETTENHOFER, MANFRED;REEL/FRAME:052643/0722 Effective date: 20200506 |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |