US11467607B2 - Method and device for controlling trajectory of a follower aircraft - Google Patents
Method and device for controlling trajectory of a follower aircraft Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US11467607B2 US11467607B2 US16/369,214 US201916369214A US11467607B2 US 11467607 B2 US11467607 B2 US 11467607B2 US 201916369214 A US201916369214 A US 201916369214A US 11467607 B2 US11467607 B2 US 11467607B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- zone
- aircraft
- follower aircraft
- search
- module
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C13/00—Control systems or transmitting systems for actuating flying-control surfaces, lift-increasing flaps, air brakes, or spoilers
- B64C13/02—Initiating means
- B64C13/16—Initiating means actuated automatically, e.g. responsive to gust detectors
- B64C13/18—Initiating means actuated automatically, e.g. responsive to gust detectors using automatic pilot
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/0005—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots with arrangements to save energy
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/02—Control of position or course in two dimensions
- G05D1/0202—Control of position or course in two dimensions specially adapted to aircraft
- G05D1/0204—Control of position or course in two dimensions specially adapted to aircraft to counteract a sudden perturbation, e.g. cross-wind, gust
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/10—Simultaneous control of position or course in three dimensions
- G05D1/101—Simultaneous control of position or course in three dimensions specially adapted for aircraft
- G05D1/104—Simultaneous control of position or course in three dimensions specially adapted for aircraft involving a plurality of aircrafts, e.g. formation flying
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/10—Simultaneous control of position or course in three dimensions
- G05D1/101—Simultaneous control of position or course in three dimensions specially adapted for aircraft
- G05D1/106—Change initiated in response to external conditions, e.g. avoidance of elevated terrain or of no-fly zones
- G05D1/1062—Change initiated in response to external conditions, e.g. avoidance of elevated terrain or of no-fly zones specially adapted for avoiding bad weather conditions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05D—SYSTEMS FOR CONTROLLING OR REGULATING NON-ELECTRIC VARIABLES
- G05D1/00—Control of position, course, altitude or attitude of land, water, air or space vehicles, e.g. using automatic pilots
- G05D1/10—Simultaneous control of position or course in three dimensions
- G05D1/101—Simultaneous control of position or course in three dimensions specially adapted for aircraft
- G05D1/106—Change initiated in response to external conditions, e.g. avoidance of elevated terrain or of no-fly zones
- G05D1/1064—Change initiated in response to external conditions, e.g. avoidance of elevated terrain or of no-fly zones specially adapted for avoiding collisions with other aircraft
Definitions
- the disclosure herein relates to a method and a device for controlling the trajectory of an aircraft, termed the follower aircraft, with respect to vortices generated by an aircraft termed the leader aircraft which precedes it, the leader aircraft and follower aircraft carrying out a formation flight.
- vortex or wake turbulence
- aerodynamic turbulence or a whirlpool
- An airplane in flight generates in its wake, mainly, two vortices, namely a vortex starting from each of its wings on account of the pressure difference between the underside and the topside of the wing, and of the deflection of the downwards air flow resulting therefrom.
- These vortices are counter-rotating whirlpools and are characterized by a wind field which is globally ascending outside the whirlpools and globally descending between the whirlpools.
- the vortices tend firstly to approach one another, and then to maintain a more or less constant distance between them while losing altitude with respect to the altitude at which they were generated.
- the trajectory of the follower aircraft towards an appropriate position such as this may include risks of encountering zones of turbulence generated by a vortex causing a feeling of discomfort by the follower aircraft.
- the method comprises the succession of following steps:
- the follower aircraft follows an optimized trajectory to the optimization zone in which it benefits from the effects of a vortex enabling it in particular to make fuel savings. Moreover, in the course of this optimized trajectory, the risks of the follower aircraft undergoing turbulence related to a vortex causing a feeling of discomfort before reaching the optimization zone are minimized.
- the method comprises a first determination step, implemented by a first determination module, prior to the first section control step, the first determination step consisting, with the aid of current measurements of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and leader aircraft and of a theoretical model of vortex characteristics, in determining the position of the center of a vortex and the location of an influence zone generated by and situated around a vortex, the influence zone comprising a discomfort zone and the optimization zone.
- the method comprises a second determination step implemented by a second determination module, the second determination step comprising or consisting in determining the approach zone with the aid of measurements of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft and of values of integrity of the measurements.
- the method comprises a third determination step, implemented by a third determination module, the third determination step comprising or consisting in determining the search zone with the aid of measurements of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft and of values of precision of the measurements, the common limit between the approach zone and the search zone being defined by the search position.
- the method comprises a second calculation step, implemented by a second calculation module, the second calculation step comprising or consisting in calculating, and then in providing to the control module, the search section in the search zone, determined in the third determination step by the third determination module, with the aid of values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft and of theoretical model of vortex characteristics.
- the first section control step comprises a protection step implemented by a protection module, the protection step comprising the succession of following sub-steps:
- the second section control step comprises an estimation step, implemented by an estimation module, the estimation step comprising or consisting in searching for the optimization zone and comprising the succession of following sub-steps:
- the optimization section comprises a plurality of optimization segments the succession of which forms a temporal vertical sweep in the environs of the optimization zone and then a lateral sweep in the search zone, so as to determine the optimal position that the follower aircraft seeks to reach, each optimization segment corresponding to a distance between two current positions of the follower aircraft in the environs or in the optimization zone.
- the disclosure herein also relates to a system for controlling the trajectory of an aircraft, termed the follower aircraft, to an optimal position, in which the follower aircraft benefits from effects of at least one of the vortices generated by an aircraft termed the leader aircraft, the leader aircraft and follower aircraft carrying out a formation flight in which the leader aircraft precedes the follower aircraft.
- the system comprises a first determination module configured to, with the aid of current measurements of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and leader aircraft and of a theoretical model of vortex characteristics, determine the position of the center of a vortex and the location of an influence zone generated by and situated around a vortex, the influence zone comprising a discomfort zone and the optimization zone.
- the system comprises a second calculation module configured to calculate, and then provide to the control module, the search section in the search zone determined by the third determination module in the third determination step, with the aid of values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft and of theoretical model of vortex characteristics.
- the first control unit comprises a protection module comprising:
- the third control unit comprises a convergence module configured to determine the optimal position with respect to the current position of the follower aircraft in the optimization zone and comprising:
- FIG. 1 is the schematic diagram of an embodiment of a system for controlling the trajectory of an craft in accordance with the disclosure herein;
- FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of a formation flight showing a leader aircraft generating vortices and an aircraft;
- FIG. 3 is the schematic diagram of an embodiment of a method of controlling the trajectory of an aircraft in accordance with the disclosure herein;
- FIG. 6 represents an approach section in the approach zone, from the safety position up to the search position
- FIG. 8 represents an optimization section in the optimization zone, from the precision position up to the optimal position
- the system S illustrates the disclosure herein and represented in a schematic manner in FIG. 1 is a system for controlling the trajectory of a follower aircraft AC 2 , with respect to vortices V 1 and V 2 generated by a leader aircraft AC 1 which precedes it, as illustrated in FIG. 2 .
- the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 for example two transport airplanes, carry out a formation flight F.
- the system S is mounted in the follower aircraft AC 2 , as represented very schematically in FIG. 2 .
- the formation F comprises the leader aircraft AC 1 and a follower aircraft, as represented in the example of FIG. 2 , which follows the leader aircraft AC 1 , situated at a position PL.
- the aircraft AC 1 and AC 2 fly one behind the other at the same flight level, with the same heading and the same speed.
- system S forms part of a general unit (not represented specifically) also comprising a formation flight management unit, which is embedded on board the follower aircraft AC 2 .
- a formation flight management unit which is embedded on board the follower aircraft AC 2 .
- Such a unit is configured to manage the formation flight for the follower aircraft AC 2 .
- the leader aircraft AC 1 follows a flight trajectory TV, and it generates in its wake, mainly, two vortices V 1 and V 2 , namely a vortex V 1 and V 2 starting from each of its wings 2 A and 2 B on account of the pressure difference between the underside and the topside of each wing, and of the deflection of the downwards air flow resulting therefrom.
- These vortices V 1 and V 2 are counter-rotating whirlpools and are characterized by a wind field which is globally ascending outside the whirlpools and globally descending between the whirlpools.
- the vortices V 1 and V 2 tend firstly to approach one another, and then to maintain a more or less constant distance between them while losing altitude with respect to the altitude at which they were generated.
- a distance E between the leader aircraft AC 1 and the follower aircraft AC 2 is shown.
- the point 0 is represented outside the leader aircraft AC 1 in FIG. 2 , it can correspond to the center of gravity of the leader aircraft AC 1 .
- the system 5 is configured to control the trajectory of the follower aircraft AC 2 , from a safety position PS to an optimal position PO, as represented in FIG. 5 .
- the safety position PS corresponds to a position of the follower aircraft AC 2 in which it does not feel any effect of at least one of the vortices V 1 , V 2 generated by the leader aircraft AC 1 .
- the optimal position PO corresponds to a position at which the follower aircraft AC 2 benefits from effects of at least one of the vortices V 1 , V 2 . These effects may in particular result in the follower aircraft AC 2 making fuel savings,
- the system S comprises a set of information sources configured to measure and receive information on flight parameters of the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 .
- the set of information sources 10 comprises at least one measurement unit 10 A comprising a plurality of sensors and at least one measurement information reception unit 10 B.
- the sensors are satellite positioning systems such as the GPS system (“Global Positioning System” in English) or the GALILEO system, onboard inertial platforms, etc.
- the information reception unit 10 B comprises in particular an item of equipment for automatic dependent monitoring in broadcast mode (“Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast” or ADS-B in English).
- the information reception unit 10 B comprises an antenna for receiving responses of Crosslink type on a frequency of 1090 MegaHertz. It can also comprise information provided by a dedicated telecommunication link.
- the set of information sources 10 measures flight parameters of the follower aircraft AC 2 and leader aircraft, such as the current positions and the relative speeds.
- the measured flight parameters may also correspond to the values of the roll or lateral attitude controls from which are deducted the values of respectively the roll control or lateral attitude control which are estimated in the absence of any vortex influence.
- the measured flight parameters can also correspond to the sideslip, to the angular yaw rate, to the angular roll rate and to the lateral attitude.
- the system S comprises a calculation element 11 which is configured to calculate vortex characteristics, using a theoretical model of vortex characteristics.
- the vortex V 1 , V 2 characteristics depend on criteria representative of parameters of the leader aircraft AC 1 : weight, wingspan, speed of the air, density of the air, temperature of the air, wind felt.
- the vortex V 1 , V 2 characteristics also depend on the wind felt by the follower aircraft AC 2 .
- the system S also comprises a first determination module 1 A which is configured to determine the position of the vortices V 1 and V 2 generated in the wake of the leader airplane.
- the determination module 1 A makes it possible to determine a location of an influence zone ZT (see FIGS. 4 and 5 for example) around each vortex V 1 and V 2 , on the basis of the measurements of flight parameters provided by the set of information sources 10 , and of data provided by the calculation element 11 .
- Each influence zone ZT comprises a discomfort zone ZI and an optimization zone ZO, as is represented in FIG. 4 .
- the optimization zone ZO corresponds to a zone in which the follower aircraft AC 2 can benefit from the effects of a vortex which allow it to reduce its fuel consumption. These effects are, for example, a lift effect of the follower aircraft AC 2 .
- the system S also comprises a second determination module 1 B which is configured to determine an approach zone ZA around the vortex V 1 , V 2 , with the aid of measurements of flight parameters of the follower aircraft AC 2 and AC 1 as well as integrity values of these measurements.
- the approach zone ZA is defined along the transverse axis Y and the vertical axis Z.
- the measurements of flight parameters are, by way of example, the measurements of positions of the follower aircraft AC 2 and leader aircraft AC 1 obtained by satellite positioning systems or the barometric altitude of each aircraft AC 1 , AC 2 .
- the integrity values regarding the measurements of positions of the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 along the transverse axis Y are determined by a Horizontal Integrity Level, HIL.
- the values of integrity of the measurements of barometric altitude along the vertical axis Z are determined by an Air Data Reference unit, ADR.
- the measurements of flight parameters and the corresponding integrity values also comprise wind measurements provided by an Air Data Inertial Reference Unit, ADIRU.
- the inertial reference unit and the satellite positioning system form part of the measurement unit 10 A.
- the approach zone ZA is defined as a region along the transverse axis Y and the vertical axis Z around each vortex V 1 , V 2 in which the probability of vortex presence is fixed and defined according to safety and operability criteria: it is sufficiently low to permit the cancellation of the operation but sufficiently high to necessitate a particular trajectory such as the approach section TA.
- the probability of vortex presence is lower than the probability of presence of the vortex in the search zone ZR.
- the probability of vortex presence is greater than 10 ⁇ 7 per flying hour since the integrity value of the HIL is given with a probability of 10 ⁇ 7 per flying hour.
- This probability value can be adapted as a function of the fault rate of the ADR unit, in particular for the vertical axis Z.
- the system S comprises a third determination module 1 C which is configured to determine the search zone ZR with the aid of measurements of flight parameters of the follower aircraft AC 2 and leader aircraft AC 1 and of the values of precision of these measurements.
- the measurements of positions of the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 as well as the position of the vortices V 1 and V 2 may lack precision.
- Precision values are determined by the horizontal and/or vertical figure of merit HFOM/VFOM (“Horizontal Figure Of Merit/Vertical Figure Of Merit”), By way of example, the precision value of the position measurements obtained from a GPS is 95%. It is also possible to couple the precision values with wind measurements provided by the sensors of the follower aircraft AC 2 and/or leader aircraft AC 1 .
- the measurements of positions of the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 and the precision values obtained by the HFOMNFOM make it possible to define a search zone ZR along the transverse axis Y and the vertical axis Z, as represented in FIGS. 5 and 6 .
- this search zone ZR the probability of presence of a vortex V 1 , V 2 is deduced directly from the probability representative of the measurement precision.
- 95% of the measurements lie in the search zone ZR defined by the HFOMNFOM figure of merit.
- the precision in the measurements corresponds to the difference between the actual position of the vortex V 1 , V 2 and the estimated position of the vortex V 1 , V 2 when the equipment of the follower aircraft AC 2 and leader aircraft AC 1 operate in a nominal manner.
- the system S comprises a plurality of calculation modules 2 A, 2 B.
- the calculation modules 2 A and 2 B form part of a calculation unit 2 ( FIG. 1 ).
- the calculation modules 2 A and 2 B are two separate calculation modules.
- the calculation module 2 A is configured to calculate the approach section TA in the approach zone ZA which is determined by the determination module 1 B on the basis of the integrity values of HIL type.
- the approach section TA is calculated with the aid of values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft AC 2 and leader aircraft AC 1 , of theoretical model of vortex characteristics, and as a function of the vortex V 1 , V 2 characteristics (which include the wind).
- the values of flight parameters correspond in particular to measurements of the positions of the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 transmitted by a satellite positioning system or on the basis of measurements of the barometric altitude as well as their integrity values, coupled with the information transmitted by the determination module 1 A.
- the approach section TA starts at the safety position PS and finishes at a search position PR.
- the search position PR corresponds to a position representing the end of the approach zone ZA.
- the calculation module 2 A is also configured to provide the data corresponding to the approach section TA to a control module 6 .
- the calculation module 2 B is configured to calculate the search section TR in the search zone ZR, which is provided by the determination module 1 C on the basis of the precision values of type HFOMNFOM.
- the calculation of the search section TR is carried out on the basis of measurements of positions of the leader airplane AC 1 and follower airplane AC 2 transmitted by a satellite positioning system and as a function of the vortex V 1 , V 2 characteristics (which include the wind).
- the measurements of positions can also be provided by an inertial platform embedded on board the follower aircraft AC 2 .
- the measurements of positions are coupled with the information transmitted by the determination module 1 A to determine the position of the vortices V 1 and V 2 .
- the search section TR starts at the search position PR and finishes at a precision position PP corresponding to a position representing the end of the search zone ZR.
- the calculation module 2 B is also configured to provide the data corresponding to the search section TR to the control module 6 .
- the system S comprises a plurality of control units 3 , 4 , 5 specified hereinafter.
- the positions of the vortices V 1 and V 2 generated by the leader aircraft AC 1 as well as the locations of their respective influence zones ZT are transmitted to these control units 3 , 4 and 5 .
- Each control unit 3 , 4 , 5 comprises at least the control module 6 configured to control the flight of the follower aircraft AC 2 along the approach section TA, search section TR and optimization section TO successively.
- the control unit 3 which comprises the control module 6 , controls the flight of the follower aircraft AC 2 from the safety position PS up to a search position PR, along the approach section TA provided by the calculation module 2 A, in the approach zone ZA.
- control unit 3 also comprises a protection module 7 configured to, along the approach section TA, estimate the risk of entry of the follower aircraft AC 2 into the discomfort zone ZI of a vortex V 1 , V 2 .
- This protection module 7 comprises:
- control unit 4 which comprises the control module 6 , controls the flight of the follower aircraft AC 2 from the search position PR to a precision position PP, along the search section TR provided by the calculation module 2 B, in the search zone ZR.
- control unit 4 also comprises an estimation module 8 configured to estimate the optimization zone ZO.
- the estimation module 8 comprises, as represented in FIG. 1 :
- control unit 5 controls the flight of the follower aircraft AC 2 from the precision position PP to the optimal position PO, along an optimization section TO in the optimization zone ZO.
- the optimization section TO is determined on the basis of measurements of flight parameters, provided by the set of flight parameter information sources 10 ,
- the system S implements, in an automatic manner, the general steps of the method represented in FIG. 3 .
- flight parameters of the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 such as the position, the speed, the lateral attitude, the angular yaw rate, the angular roll rate, are measured and provided in a repetitive manner by the set of information sources 10 to the determination modules 1 A, 1 B and 10 .
- the calculation element 11 which uses a theoretical model of the vortex characteristics, also provides the determination module 1 A with information representative of the moments and forces generated by a vortex.
- the determination module 1 A determines, in the course of a determination step E 11 , the position of the vortex or vortices V 1 and V 2 generated in the wake of the leader aircraft AC 1 , An influence zone ZT of the vortices V 1 and V 2 in which the latter generate effects that can be measured by the calculation unit 10 A is also determined.
- the influence zone ZT of a vortex is defined as a function of the value of the moments generated by a vortex as a function of the vertical distance ⁇ Z and transverse distance AY relative to the position of the center of the vortex.
- the influence zone ZT comprises a discomfort zone ZI and an optimization zone ZO,
- the discomfort zone ZI is a zone in which the value of the moments is less than ⁇ 0.5. This is the suction zone generated by the vortex V 1 which causes turbulences felt by the follower aircraft AC 2 .
- the optimization zone ZO is a zone in which the value of the moments is greater than ⁇ 0.5. The optimization zone ZO therefore corresponds to a zone of repulsion of the vortex V 1 which allows the follower aircraft AC 2 to benefit from a recovery of lift that may result in a reduction in its fuel consumption.
- the vortex V 2 situated to the left of the leader airplane AC 1 in the direction S of the flight trajectory TV generates similar effects to the vortex V 1 situated to the right of the leader aircraft AC 1 but with opposite moments,
- the approach zone ZA centered on a vortex V 1 , V 2 is thereafter determined in the course of a determination step E 12 .
- This determination step E 12 comprises or consists in determining the size of the region surrounding the vortex V 1 , V 2 such that the probability of vortex presence in this region is sufficiently low to permit the cancellation of the operation but sufficiently high to necessitate a particular trajectory such as the approach section TA.
- the probability of vortex presence is lower than the probability of presence of the vortex in the search zone ZR.
- the probability of vortex presence is greater than 10 ⁇ 7 per flying hour since the integrity value of the HIL is given with a probability of 10 ⁇ 7 per flying hour.
- This probability value can be adapted as a function of the fault rate of the ADR unit, in particular for the vertical axis Z.
- the determination module 1 B uses the measurements of positions of the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 provided by the satellite positioning system as well as the barometric altitudes. It is also necessary to know the integrity values of these measurements.
- the integrity values correspond to values of the HIL or of the barometric altitude.
- the values of the HIL may be of the order of 150 metres.
- the integrity in these measurements is 300 feet.
- this information is supplemented with integrity values in respect of wind measurements provided by an Air Data Inertial Reference Unit (ADIRU) which forms part of the measurement unit 10 A.
- ADIRU Air Data Inertial Reference Unit
- the search zone ZR is determined.
- the search zone ZR corresponds to a region whose size is defined by a certain predetermined probability of presence of a vortex V 1 , V 2 .
- This probability of presence of a vortex V 1 , V 2 is deduced directly from the probability representative of the precision of the measurements.
- 95% of the measurements lie in the search zone ZR defined by the HFOM/VFOM figure of merit
- the precision in the measurements corresponds to the difference between the actual position of the vortex V 1 , V 2 and the estimated position of the vortex V 1 , V 2 when the equipment of the follower aircraft AC 2 and leader aircraft AC 1 operate in a nominal manner.
- the determination of the size of the search zone ZR is performed on the basis of the measurements of positions of the leader aircraft AC 1 and follower aircraft AC 2 provided by the satellite positioning systems and the vortex V 1 V 2 positions coupled with the precision values in respect of these measurements.
- This information is supplemented with integrity values in respect of wind measurements provided by an Air Data Inertial Reference Unit (ADIRU) which forms part of the measurement unit 10 A.
- ADIRU Air Data Inertial Reference Unit
- These precision values are provided by the horizontal and/or vertical figure of merit HFOM/VFOM.
- the possible error in the position measurements is about 60 metres.
- the information on the approach zone ZA, coupled with the model of vortex characteristics, is provided to the calculation module 2 A.
- the approach section TA is determined defining the flight trajectory of the follower aircraft AC 2 , from its safety position in the direction of the vortex V 1 , V 2 which is closest to it, as represented in FIGS. 5 and 6 .
- the approach section TA towards the vortex V 1 situated to the right of the leader aircraft AC 1 corresponds to a trajectory with a progressive increase in the altitude of the follower aircraft AC 2 and a narrowing of bias towards the position of the vortex V 1 .
- the approach section TA finishes at a search position PR which corresponds to the end of the approach zone ZA.
- the information on the search zone ZR determined in the determination step E 12 is coupled with the model of vortex characteristics so as to calculate the search section TR in the search zone ZR.
- the search section TR is defined as the flight trajectory of the follower aircraft AC 2 to a precision point PP which corresponds to the common limits of the search zone ZR and of the optimization zone ZO and is calculated in the calculation step E 22 .
- the first search segment SR 1 starts at the search point PR.
- the length of each segment as well as the angle between several segments are determined by the vortex V 1 , V 2 characteristics.
- the control step E 3 comprises, in particular, a protection step comprising or consisting in performing a set of sub-steps E 31 to E 33 so as to determine whether a vortex, whose presence would not have been detected on the basis of the information of the determination modules 1 A and 1 B, is situated on the approach section TA of the flight of the follower aircraft AC 2 .
- a sub-step of processing measurements E 31 are evaluated the moments or the forces measured by the difference between the value of the lateral attitude or the roll control value and their respective values away from any influence of vortices V 1 , V 2 .
- the processed measurements are transmitted to a test module 7 B, which, during a test sub-step E 32 , compares them with threshold values determined in the determination step E 11 .
- the threshold values are characteristic of the values of the moments and forces in the influence zone ZT of a vortex V 1 , V 2 .
- the result of this comparison is thereafter transmitted to the decision module 7 C.
- the return section is determined by taking into account the possible displacements of the vortex V 1 , V 2 .
- the information on the possible displacements of the vortex V 1 , V 2 is transmitted by the calculation element 11 , coupled with wind measurements by surface sensors on the leader aircraft AC and follower aircraft AC 2 .
- the measurements provided by the difference between the value of the roll control or of the lateral attitude and their respective values estimated away from any influence of vortices V 1 , V 2 are processed to determine values of moments and/or of force, representative of the feeling of the follower aircraft AC 2 on the approach to the influence zone ZT of a vortex V 1 , V 2 .
- the measurements are processed throughout the succession of search segments SRn represented in FIG. 7 .
- the processed measurements are thereafter transmitted to the test module 8 B.
- the test module 8 B compares the processed measurements with threshold values of the moments and/or of the forces which are characteristic of the discomfort zone ZI and optimization zone ZO. The result of these comparisons is analysed in the course of a decision sub-step E 43 by the decision module 8 C.
- an item of information is provided to the control module 6 , indicating the arrival of the follower aircraft AC 2 at the precision position PP.
- values of the moments, provided to the measurement processing sub-step E 41 of greater than or equal to 1, indicate that the follower aircraft AC 2 has arrived at the precision position PP.
- the control module 6 receives the item of information in respect of arrival at the precision position PP and commands the passage to a control step E 5 and therefore controls the flight of the follower aircraft AC 2 in the optimization zone ZO.
- control module 6 then continues to control the flight of the follower aircraft AC 2 in the search zone ZR along a plurality of search segments SRn forming the search section TR.
- the estimation of the optimal position PO may be marred by errors due to the sensors and to the satellite positioning systems.
- the actual optimal position PO is estimated by convergence.
- the estimation of the optimal position PO may be marred by errors due to the wind information and to the measurements of the satellite positioning systems.
- the convergence step comprises a succession of several sub-steps E 51 to E 53 .
- the measurements of the lateral attitude or of the roll control are processed to determine the moments and forces felt by the follower aircraft AC 2 in the optimization zone ZO.
- the processing of these measurements consists in deducting from the values of the measurements of lateral attitude or of roll control, estimations, respectively, of the lateral attitude or of the roll control in the absence of vortex.
- the follower aircraft AC 2 reaches the precision point PP, it performs an additional flight on a vertical search segment up to an ancillary position PK in a part of the search zone ZR in the environs of the optimization zone ZO.
- the processed measurements representing the moments and/or the forces felt by the follower aircraft AC 2 in the environs and then in the optimization zone ZO, are provided to a Kalman filter until the convergence of the value of the optimal position PO by the Kalman filter is obtained.
- an item of information in respect of the determination of the actual optimal position PO representative of the value of the optimal position PO obtained previously is transmitted, during a decision sub-step E 53 , to the control module 6 .
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
- Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
Abstract
Description
-
- a first section control step, implemented by a first control unit, the first section control step comprising or consisting in controlling the flight of the follower aircraft, on the basis of current measurements of flight parameter of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft, from a safety position to a search position, along a section of the trajectory termed the approach section passing through an approach zone;
- a second section control step, implemented by a second control unit, the second section control step comprising or consisting in controlling the flight of the follower aircraft, downstream of the approach section, in the direction of flight of the follower aircraft, on the basis of current measurements of flight parameter of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft, from the search position to a precision position, along a section of the trajectory termed the search section passing through a search zone; and
- a third section control step, implemented by a third control unit, the third section control step comprising or consisting in controlling the flight of the follower aircraft, downstream of the search section in the direction of flight of the follower aircraft, from the precision position to the optimal position, along a section of the trajectory termed optimization passing through an optimization zone.
-
- a first sub-step of processing measurements, implemented by a first module for processing measurements, comprising or consisting in processing values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft in the approach zone;
- a first test sub-step, implemented by a first test module, comprising or consisting in comparing the values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft with threshold values of flight parameters, determined by theoretical model of vortex characteristics; and
- a first decision sub-step, implemented by a first decision module, consisting:
- if the measured values of flight parameters correspond to the characteristic threshold values in the influence zone of the vortex, in providing, to the control module, an item of information in respect of fallback of the follower aircraft from the approach zone to a safety position along a return section; and
- if the measured values of flight parameters do not correspond to characteristic threshold values in the influence zone, in not providing any particular item of information to the control module.
-
- a second measurement processing sub-step, implemented by a measurement processing module, comprising or consisting in processing values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft in the search zone;
- a second test sub-step, implemented by a test module, comprising or consisting in comparing the values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft with threshold values of flight parameters, determined by theoretical model of vortex characteristics; and
- a second decision sub-step, implemented by a decision module, consisting:
- if the measured values of flight parameters correspond to the characteristic threshold values in the optimization zone, in providing an item of information in respect of arrival of the follower aircraft at the precision position to the control module, the precision position representing the position of entry into the optimization zone; and
- if the measured values of flight parameters correspond to characteristic threshold values in the discomfort zone, in providing an item of information in respect of passage from the current search segment to a new search segment to the control module, so as to avoid the entry of the follower aircraft into the discomfort zone; and
- if the measured values of flight parameters do not correspond to characteristic threshold values in the influence zone, in not providing any particular item of information to the control module.
-
- a third measurement processing sub-step, implemented by a third measurement processing module, comprising or consisting in processing flight parameter values of the follower aircraft on each optimization segment;
- a third convergence calculation sub-step, implemented by a convergence calculation module, comprising or consisting in providing the values of flight parameters to a Kalman filter until convergence of the optimal position obtained by the Kalman filter and that obtained by theoretical model of vortex characteristics is obtained; and
- a third decision sub-step, implemented by a decision module, comprising or consisting in providing an item of information in respect of flight control of the follower aircraft up to the optimal position to the control module.
-
- a first control unit comprising at least one control module and being configured to control the flight of the follower aircraft, on the basis of current measurements of flight parameter of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft, from a safety position to a search position, along a section of the trajectory termed the approach section passing through an approach zone;
- a second control unit comprising at least the control module and being configured to control the flight of the follower aircraft, downstream of the approach section in the direction of flight of the follower aircraft, on the basis of current measurements of flight parameter of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft, from the search position to a precision position, along a section of the trajectory termed the search section passing through a search zone; and
- a third control unit comprising at least the control module and being configured to control the flight of the follower aircraft, downstream of the search section in the direction of flight of the follower aircraft, from the precision position to the optimal position, along a section of the trajectory termed optimization passing through an optimization zone.
-
- a first measurement processing module, configured to process values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft and of the leader aircraft in the approach zone;
- a first test module, configured to compare the values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft with threshold values of flight parameters, determined by theoretical model of vortex characteristics; and
- a first decision module, configured:
- if the measured values of flight parameters correspond to the characteristic threshold values in the influence zone of the vortex, to provide, to the control module, an item of information in respect of fallback of the follower aircraft from the approach zone to a safety position along a return section; and
- if the measured values of flight parameters do not correspond to characteristic threshold values in the influence zone, to not provide any particular item of information to the control module.
-
- a second measurement processing module, configured to process values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft in the search zone;
- a second test module, configured to compare the values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft with threshold values of flight parameters determined by theoretical model of vortex characteristics; and
- a third decision module, configured:
- if the measured values of flight parameters correspond to the characteristic threshold values in the optimization zone, to provide an item of information in respect of arrival of the follower aircraft at the precision position to the control module, the precision position representing the position of entry into the optimization zone; and
- if the measured values of flight parameters correspond to characteristic threshold values in the discomfort zone, to provide an item of information in respect of passage from the current search segment to a new search segment to the control module, so as to avoid the entry of the follower aircraft into the discomfort zone; and
- if the measured values of flight parameters do not correspond to characteristic threshold values in the influence zone, to not provide any particular item of information to the control module.
-
- a third measurement processing module, configured to process values of flight parameters of the follower aircraft on each optimization segment;
- a third convergence calculation module, configured to provide the values of flight parameters to a Kalman filter until convergence of the optimal position obtained by the Kalman filter and that obtained by theoretical model of vortex characteristics is obtained; and
- a third decision module, configured to provide an item of information in respect of flight control of the follower aircraft up to the optimal position to the control module.
-
- X is the longitudinal axis of the fuselage of the leader aircraft AC1 oriented positively in the direction of advance S of the leader aircraft AC1;
- Z is a vertical axis which forms with the axis X a plane corresponding to the vertical symmetry plane of the leader aircraft AC1; and
- Y is a transverse axis which is orthogonal to the axes X and Z.
-
- a measurement processing module 7A configured to process the values of the flight parameters. The processed flight parameters are forces and moments estimated by the difference between the value of the lateral attitude or the roll control value and their respective values away from any influence of vortices V1, V2;
- a test module 7B configured to compare the values of the forces and moments processed by the measurement processing module 7A with threshold values provided by the
calculation element 11 based on theoretical model of vortex characteristics. The threshold values define the presence of the discomfort zone ZI of a vortex V1, V2; - a decision module 7C which:
- if the values of the moments and forces correspond to the threshold values characteristic of the presence of a discomfort zone ZI of a vortex V1, V2, decides to provide the control module 6 with an item of information in respect of fallback of the follower aircraft AC2 from its current position to a safety position PS, along a return section TR. The return section TR corresponds to the part already performed of the approach section TA but in an opposite direction; and
- if the values of the moments and forces do not correspond to the threshold values characteristic of the presence of a discomfort zone ZI of vortices V1, V2, decides not to provide any particular item of information to the control module 6.
-
- a module for processing measurements 8A of the flight parameters. These flight parameters are moments and forces provided by the set of information sources 10. The set of
information sources 10 can comprise an estimation of the forces and moments via the value of the roll control or the value of the lateral attitude of the follower aircraft AC2 from which are deducted respectively their estimated values away from any influence of vortices V1, V2; - a test module 8B, configured to compare the values of the moments and forces, processed by the module for processing measurements 8A, with a plurality of threshold values determined on the basis of the information in respect of the positions of the vortices V1 and V2 and of the location of their influence zones ZT, provided by the vortex
characteristics calculation element 11. The threshold values are representative of the effects generated in the influence zone ZT of a vortex V1, V2; - a
decision module 8C which:- if the flight parameter values processed by the module for processing measurements 8A correspond to the threshold values representative of the optimization zone ZO, decides to provide an item of information to the control module 6, indicating the arrival of the follower aircraft AC2 at the precision position PP. The arrival of the follower aircraft AC2 at the precision position PP also corresponds to its entry into the optimization zone ZO; and
- if the flight parameter values processed by the module for processing measurements 8A correspond to the threshold values representative of the discomfort zone ZI, decides to provide, to the control module 6, an item of information in respect of passage from a search segment SR of the search section TR to a new search segment SR, the succession of search segment SR forming the search section TR; and
- if the flight parameter values processed do not correspond to the threshold values representative of the optimization zone ZO, decides not to provide any particular item of information to the control module 6.
- a module for processing measurements 8A of the flight parameters. These flight parameters are moments and forces provided by the set of information sources 10. The set of
-
- a module for processing measurements 9A which processes the measurements provided by the position and speed sensors of the leader and follower aircraft (GPS, barometer, . . . ) along the optimization section TO. To this effect, the optimization section TO comprises a plurality of optimization segments SOn the succession of which forms a sweep which is vertical and temporal in the environs of the optimization zone ZO and then lateral in the search zone ZO, so as to determine the optimal position PO that the follower aircraft AC2 seeks to reach, each optimization segment SOn corresponding to a distance between two current positions of the follower aircraft AC2 in the environs or in the optimization zone ZO (
FIG. 8 ); - a convergence module 9B which provides the processed measurements to a Kalman filter until the convergence of the optimal position PO in the optimization zone ZO to the optimal position PO provided by the
calculation element 11 is obtained; and - a decision module 9C which provides to the control module 5, an item of information in respect of determination of the optimal position PO determined by the convergence module 9B to the control module 6.
- a module for processing measurements 9A which processes the measurements provided by the position and speed sensors of the leader and follower aircraft (GPS, barometer, . . . ) along the optimization section TO. To this effect, the optimization section TO comprises a plurality of optimization segments SOn the succession of which forms a sweep which is vertical and temporal in the environs of the optimization zone ZO and then lateral in the search zone ZO, so as to determine the optimal position PO that the follower aircraft AC2 seeks to reach, each optimization segment SOn corresponding to a distance between two current positions of the follower aircraft AC2 in the environs or in the optimization zone ZO (
Claims (14)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| FR1852909A FR3079942B1 (en) | 2018-04-04 | 2018-04-04 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE TRACK TOWARD AN OPTIMAL POSITION OF A FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT IN RELATION TO VORTEX GENERATED BY A LEADING AIRCRAFT |
| FR1852909 | 2018-04-04 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20190310642A1 US20190310642A1 (en) | 2019-10-10 |
| US11467607B2 true US11467607B2 (en) | 2022-10-11 |
Family
ID=62751092
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/369,214 Active 2040-12-30 US11467607B2 (en) | 2018-04-04 | 2019-03-29 | Method and device for controlling trajectory of a follower aircraft |
Country Status (3)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US11467607B2 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN110347175B (en) |
| FR (1) | FR3079942B1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR3069948B1 (en) | 2017-08-03 | 2020-04-10 | Airbus Operations | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MONITORING THE TRAJECTORY OF A FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT IN RELATION TO A LEADING AIRCRAFT DURING A RISK OF COLLISION. |
| FR3079942B1 (en) | 2018-04-04 | 2021-02-26 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE TRACK TOWARD AN OPTIMAL POSITION OF A FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT IN RELATION TO VORTEX GENERATED BY A LEADING AIRCRAFT |
| EP4113243B1 (en) * | 2021-07-01 | 2023-10-25 | Airbus (S.A.S.) | System to assist formation flight of aircraft |
| FR3128036A1 (en) * | 2021-10-13 | 2023-04-14 | Airbus | AIRCRAFT FORMATION FLIGHT AID SYSTEM |
| FR3135332A1 (en) * | 2022-05-03 | 2023-11-10 | Airbus | WAKE VIRIL TRACKING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FOR AIRCRAFT |
| FR3136866A1 (en) * | 2022-06-15 | 2023-12-22 | Airbus | METHOD FOR MANAGING THE LONGITUDINAL POSITION OF A FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT IN RELATION TO A LEADING AIRCRAFT |
Citations (72)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5845874A (en) | 1996-10-29 | 1998-12-08 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | System and method for creating visual images of aircraft wake vortices |
| US6271768B1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2001-08-07 | Honeywell Inc. | Vertical speed indicator/traffic resolution advisory display for TCAS |
| US20020011950A1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2002-01-31 | James A. Frazier | Close/intra-formation positioning collision avoidance system and method |
| US20020063653A1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2002-05-30 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Method for reducing transmit power for traffic alert and collision avoidance systems and airborne collision avoidance systems |
| US20020075171A1 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2002-06-20 | Daryal Kuntman | System and method for predicting and displaying wake vortex turbulence |
| US20020080059A1 (en) | 1999-04-08 | 2002-06-27 | My Tran | Midair collision avoidance system |
| US20020089432A1 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2002-07-11 | Staggs Thomas J. | Vertical speed indicator and traffic alert collision avoidance system |
| US6483454B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2002-11-19 | Bae Systems Aerospace Inc. | Close formation aircraft collision avoidance |
| US20030137444A1 (en) | 2001-07-20 | 2003-07-24 | Stone Cyro A. | Surveillance and collision avoidance system with compound symbols |
| US20030222795A1 (en) * | 2002-05-17 | 2003-12-04 | Holforty Wendy L. | Dynamic wake prediction and visualization with uncertainty analysis |
| US20030236623A1 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2003-12-25 | Ybarra Kathryn W. | System and method for inhibiting transponder replies |
| US6718236B1 (en) | 2003-04-29 | 2004-04-06 | The Mitre Corporation | Method for conducting a moving vehicle along a trajectory of a coordinated maneuver based on state information broadcast by other vehicles participating in the coordinated maneuver |
| US20050055143A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-10 | Doane Paul M. | Autonomous station keeping system for formation flight |
| US20050156777A1 (en) | 2004-01-15 | 2005-07-21 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Integrated traffic surveillance apparatus |
| US20050230563A1 (en) | 2004-02-21 | 2005-10-20 | Corcoran James J Iii | Automatic formation flight control system |
| US20060244637A1 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2006-11-02 | Russian Federation Department of Justice (GU "FAPRID") | Method and system for preventing an aircraft from penetrating into a dangerous trailing vortex area of a vortex generator |
| US20070103340A1 (en) | 2003-07-25 | 2007-05-10 | Federal Agency under the rightss of protection of intellectual activity military, special and | Integrated system for aircraft vortex safety |
| US20070132638A1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2007-06-14 | Frazier James A | Close/intra-formation positioning collision avoidance system and method |
| US20070268175A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2007-11-22 | Rowlan Stacey R | Systems and methods employing a collision avoidance system to enhance pilot awareness |
| US20070299611A1 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2007-12-27 | Airbus France | Method and device for assisting in the piloting of an aircraft |
| US20080103647A1 (en) | 2006-10-26 | 2008-05-01 | Airbus France | Guidance system for an aircraft |
| US20090088972A1 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | The Boeing Company | Vehicle-based automatic traffic conflict and collision avoidance |
| US20100001882A1 (en) | 2008-07-01 | 2010-01-07 | Babak Ghalebsaz Jeddi | Methods and Device for Landing Aircraft |
| EP1464037B1 (en) | 2002-01-11 | 2010-04-07 | Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems, LLC | On-board air traffic surveillance display distinguishing between formation and non-formation aircraft |
| US20100117892A1 (en) | 2007-05-15 | 2010-05-13 | Thales | Method for radar monitoring of wake turbulence |
| EP2187371A1 (en) | 2008-11-13 | 2010-05-19 | Saab Ab | Collision avoidance system and a method for determining an escape manoeuvre trajectory for collision avoidance |
| US20100292871A1 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2010-11-18 | The University Of North Dakota | Adaptive surveillance and guidance system for vehicle collision avoidance and interception |
| US20100294890A1 (en) * | 2007-10-16 | 2010-11-25 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device for reducing the induced speeds in vortices in the wake of an aircraft |
| EP2256517A1 (en) | 2009-05-20 | 2010-12-01 | Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company, Inc. | INS based GPS carrier phase cycle slip detection and repairing |
| US20110137498A1 (en) | 2008-12-03 | 2011-06-09 | Satoshi Suzuki | Unmanned aircraft and aerial surveillance system for unmanned aircraft |
| US20110282582A1 (en) | 2010-05-17 | 2011-11-17 | Stayton Gregory T | Dynamic collision avoidance systems and methods |
| US8135500B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2012-03-13 | Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. | Wake vortex detection and reporting system |
| US8219264B1 (en) * | 2009-06-08 | 2012-07-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Close formation flight positioning system using air data measurements |
| US8229604B2 (en) | 2008-06-02 | 2012-07-24 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for automatically managing a convoy of aircraft during a taxiing |
| US20120209457A1 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2012-08-16 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft Traffic Separation System |
| US8362925B2 (en) | 2009-05-05 | 2013-01-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Avionics display system and method for generating flight information pertaining to neighboring aircraft |
| US8447443B1 (en) * | 2011-06-21 | 2013-05-21 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Systems and methods for peak-seeking control |
| US20130261949A1 (en) | 2010-12-22 | 2013-10-03 | Saab Ab | System and method for vehicle separation for a plurality of vehicles |
| EP2693417A2 (en) | 2012-08-01 | 2014-02-05 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for presentation of probable wake turbulence |
| US20140136110A1 (en) | 2011-06-10 | 2014-05-15 | Ohio University | Wake turbulence analyzer for real-time visualization, detection, and avoidance |
| US20140214243A1 (en) * | 2013-01-28 | 2014-07-31 | The Boeing Company | Formation flight control |
| US20150025797A1 (en) | 2012-08-06 | 2015-01-22 | The Boeing Company | Precision Multiple Vehicle Navigation System |
| EP2851889A2 (en) | 2013-09-24 | 2015-03-25 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for processing and displaying wake turbulence |
| EP2892000A1 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2015-07-08 | Federal State Budgetary Institution "Federal Agency For Legal Protection Of Military, Special And Dual Use Intellectual Activity Results" | Method and on-board system for ensuring distance minima for longitudinal separation under turbulent conditions from a vortex wake |
| US20160093224A1 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2016-03-31 | Ge Aviation Systems Llc | System and method for airport control using wake duration |
| WO2016067019A1 (en) | 2014-10-30 | 2016-05-06 | Isis Innovation Limited | A method and apparatus for adjusting drag on a trailing air vehicle flying behind a leading air vehicle |
| US20160272340A1 (en) | 2014-12-24 | 2016-09-22 | Environmental Tectonics Corporation | Aircraft-vision systems and methods for maintaining situational awareness and spatial orientation |
| US9536435B1 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2017-01-03 | Double Black Aviation Technology L.L.C. | System and method for optimizing an aircraft trajectory |
| FR3041121A1 (en) | 2016-06-16 | 2017-03-17 | Airbus | METHOD OF CONTROLLING A FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT IN RELATION TO TOURBILLONS GENERATED BY AN AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT |
| US20170110018A1 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2017-04-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft maneuver data management system |
| US20170131726A1 (en) | 2015-11-06 | 2017-05-11 | SySense Incorporated | Automated operation of aircraft systems in inverted-v formations |
| US20170178516A1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2017-06-22 | Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. | Aircraft collision warning |
| DE102016103704A1 (en) | 2016-03-02 | 2017-09-07 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Optimal position finder for energy saving formation flight |
| US9758257B1 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2017-09-12 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Airflow sensing systems and apparatus |
| US20170269612A1 (en) | 2016-03-18 | 2017-09-21 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Flight control methods for operating close formation flight |
| US20170267371A1 (en) * | 2016-03-18 | 2017-09-21 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Methods of three dimensional (3d) airflow sensing and analysis |
| WO2017161304A1 (en) | 2016-03-18 | 2017-09-21 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Systems, methods, and apparatus for airflow sensing and close formation flight |
| FR3049076A1 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2017-09-22 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD OF CONTROLLING A FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT IN RELATION TO TOURBILLONS GENERATED BY AN AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT |
| US20170293307A1 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2017-10-12 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Apparatus for close formation flight |
| US20170301251A1 (en) | 2016-04-19 | 2017-10-19 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Collision avoidance method and system for a trailer aircraft of an aircraft formation relative to an intruder aircraft |
| US20170309192A1 (en) | 2016-03-08 | 2017-10-26 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Collision avoidance method and device for an aircraft formation relative to an intrusive aircraft |
| US20170337822A1 (en) | 2016-05-19 | 2017-11-23 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method making it possible to identify the proximity of a wake turbulence and to generate a report relative to that proximity |
| US9864380B1 (en) * | 2015-07-23 | 2018-01-09 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Formation flight system extremum-seeking-control using blended performance parameters |
| US20180301044A1 (en) | 2017-04-11 | 2018-10-18 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method for transmitting flight parameters of a lead aircraft to an intruder aircraft |
| US20180308369A1 (en) | 2017-04-24 | 2018-10-25 | Airbus Operations S.A.S. | Method for transmitting flight parameters from a leading aircraft to an intruding aircraft |
| US20180348796A1 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2018-12-06 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device to control aircraft flying in formation |
| US20190004544A1 (en) * | 2017-06-29 | 2019-01-03 | Ge Aviation Systems, Llc | Method for flying at least two aircraft |
| US20190041876A1 (en) | 2017-08-03 | 2019-02-07 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device for controlling the path of a following aircraft, with respect to a leading aircraft, in front of the following aircraft, in particular when there is a risk of collision, the leading and following aircraft flying in formation |
| US20190041874A1 (en) | 2017-08-03 | 2019-02-07 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method for anticipating the displacement of a wake vortex in a formation flight of two aircraft |
| US20190041875A1 (en) | 2017-08-03 | 2019-02-07 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device for monitoring the position of a following aircraft with respect to a leading aircraft during a formation flight |
| US20190302808A1 (en) | 2018-03-27 | 2019-10-03 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and a system for controlling the trajectory of an aircraft |
| CN110347175A (en) | 2018-04-04 | 2019-10-18 | 空中客车运营简化股份公司 | The method and system and aircraft that the track of aircraft to optimum position is controlled |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UA82378C2 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2008-04-10 | Государственное Учреждение "Федеральное Агентство По Правовой Защите Результатов Интеллектуальной Деятельности Военного, Специального И Двойного Назначения" При Министерстве Юстиции Российской Федерации | Aviation simulator |
| FR3043456B1 (en) * | 2015-11-05 | 2018-09-21 | Airbus Operations | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING AN OPTIMUM VERTICAL TRACK TO BE FOLLOWED BY AN AIRCRAFT. |
-
2018
- 2018-04-04 FR FR1852909A patent/FR3079942B1/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-03-29 US US16/369,214 patent/US11467607B2/en active Active
- 2019-04-01 CN CN201910256470.7A patent/CN110347175B/en active Active
Patent Citations (89)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5845874A (en) | 1996-10-29 | 1998-12-08 | Silicon Graphics, Inc. | System and method for creating visual images of aircraft wake vortices |
| EP1147506B1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2003-09-10 | Honeywell Inc. | Tcas system for intra-formation control |
| US6271768B1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2001-08-07 | Honeywell Inc. | Vertical speed indicator/traffic resolution advisory display for TCAS |
| US20020011950A1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2002-01-31 | James A. Frazier | Close/intra-formation positioning collision avoidance system and method |
| US20070132638A1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2007-06-14 | Frazier James A | Close/intra-formation positioning collision avoidance system and method |
| US6459411B2 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2002-10-01 | L-3 Communications Corporation | Close/intra-formation positioning collision avoidance system and method |
| US20020154061A1 (en) | 1998-12-30 | 2002-10-24 | L-3 Communications Corporation | Close/intra-formation positioning collision avoidance system and method |
| US20020075171A1 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2002-06-20 | Daryal Kuntman | System and method for predicting and displaying wake vortex turbulence |
| US20020089432A1 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2002-07-11 | Staggs Thomas J. | Vertical speed indicator and traffic alert collision avoidance system |
| US6703945B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2004-03-09 | Honeywell International, Inc. | System and method for predicting and displaying wake vortex turbulence |
| US6683541B2 (en) | 1999-01-21 | 2004-01-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | Vertical speed indicator and traffic alert collision avoidance system |
| US20020080059A1 (en) | 1999-04-08 | 2002-06-27 | My Tran | Midair collision avoidance system |
| US7411519B1 (en) | 1999-05-14 | 2008-08-12 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for predicting and displaying wake vortex turbulence |
| US8135500B1 (en) | 2000-05-26 | 2012-03-13 | Aerotech Research (Usa), Inc. | Wake vortex detection and reporting system |
| US20020063653A1 (en) | 2000-08-31 | 2002-05-30 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Method for reducing transmit power for traffic alert and collision avoidance systems and airborne collision avoidance systems |
| US6483454B1 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2002-11-19 | Bae Systems Aerospace Inc. | Close formation aircraft collision avoidance |
| US20030137444A1 (en) | 2001-07-20 | 2003-07-24 | Stone Cyro A. | Surveillance and collision avoidance system with compound symbols |
| EP1464037B1 (en) | 2002-01-11 | 2010-04-07 | Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems, LLC | On-board air traffic surveillance display distinguishing between formation and non-formation aircraft |
| US20030222795A1 (en) * | 2002-05-17 | 2003-12-04 | Holforty Wendy L. | Dynamic wake prediction and visualization with uncertainty analysis |
| US6963291B2 (en) | 2002-05-17 | 2005-11-08 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | Dynamic wake prediction and visualization with uncertainty analysis |
| US20030236623A1 (en) | 2002-06-21 | 2003-12-25 | Ybarra Kathryn W. | System and method for inhibiting transponder replies |
| WO2004029902A1 (en) | 2002-09-30 | 2004-04-08 | Aviation Communication & Surveillance Systems Llc | Surveillance and collision avoidance system with compound symbols |
| US6718236B1 (en) | 2003-04-29 | 2004-04-06 | The Mitre Corporation | Method for conducting a moving vehicle along a trajectory of a coordinated maneuver based on state information broadcast by other vehicles participating in the coordinated maneuver |
| US20060244637A1 (en) * | 2003-07-25 | 2006-11-02 | Russian Federation Department of Justice (GU "FAPRID") | Method and system for preventing an aircraft from penetrating into a dangerous trailing vortex area of a vortex generator |
| US20070103340A1 (en) | 2003-07-25 | 2007-05-10 | Federal Agency under the rightss of protection of intellectual activity military, special and | Integrated system for aircraft vortex safety |
| US20050055143A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-10 | Doane Paul M. | Autonomous station keeping system for formation flight |
| US20050156777A1 (en) | 2004-01-15 | 2005-07-21 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Integrated traffic surveillance apparatus |
| US20050230563A1 (en) | 2004-02-21 | 2005-10-20 | Corcoran James J Iii | Automatic formation flight control system |
| US20070268175A1 (en) | 2004-03-30 | 2007-11-22 | Rowlan Stacey R | Systems and methods employing a collision avoidance system to enhance pilot awareness |
| US20070299611A1 (en) | 2006-02-28 | 2007-12-27 | Airbus France | Method and device for assisting in the piloting of an aircraft |
| US20080103647A1 (en) | 2006-10-26 | 2008-05-01 | Airbus France | Guidance system for an aircraft |
| US20100117892A1 (en) | 2007-05-15 | 2010-05-13 | Thales | Method for radar monitoring of wake turbulence |
| US20090088972A1 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2009-04-02 | The Boeing Company | Vehicle-based automatic traffic conflict and collision avoidance |
| US20120209457A1 (en) | 2007-09-28 | 2012-08-16 | The Boeing Company | Aircraft Traffic Separation System |
| US20100294890A1 (en) * | 2007-10-16 | 2010-11-25 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device for reducing the induced speeds in vortices in the wake of an aircraft |
| US8229604B2 (en) | 2008-06-02 | 2012-07-24 | Airbus Operations Sas | Method and system for automatically managing a convoy of aircraft during a taxiing |
| US20100001882A1 (en) | 2008-07-01 | 2010-01-07 | Babak Ghalebsaz Jeddi | Methods and Device for Landing Aircraft |
| EP2187371A1 (en) | 2008-11-13 | 2010-05-19 | Saab Ab | Collision avoidance system and a method for determining an escape manoeuvre trajectory for collision avoidance |
| US20110137498A1 (en) | 2008-12-03 | 2011-06-09 | Satoshi Suzuki | Unmanned aircraft and aerial surveillance system for unmanned aircraft |
| US20100292871A1 (en) | 2009-03-26 | 2010-11-18 | The University Of North Dakota | Adaptive surveillance and guidance system for vehicle collision avoidance and interception |
| US8362925B2 (en) | 2009-05-05 | 2013-01-29 | Honeywell International Inc. | Avionics display system and method for generating flight information pertaining to neighboring aircraft |
| EP2256517A1 (en) | 2009-05-20 | 2010-12-01 | Northrop Grumman Guidance and Electronics Company, Inc. | INS based GPS carrier phase cycle slip detection and repairing |
| US8219264B1 (en) * | 2009-06-08 | 2012-07-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force | Close formation flight positioning system using air data measurements |
| US20110282582A1 (en) | 2010-05-17 | 2011-11-17 | Stayton Gregory T | Dynamic collision avoidance systems and methods |
| US20130261949A1 (en) | 2010-12-22 | 2013-10-03 | Saab Ab | System and method for vehicle separation for a plurality of vehicles |
| US20140136110A1 (en) | 2011-06-10 | 2014-05-15 | Ohio University | Wake turbulence analyzer for real-time visualization, detection, and avoidance |
| US8447443B1 (en) * | 2011-06-21 | 2013-05-21 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Systems and methods for peak-seeking control |
| EP2693417A2 (en) | 2012-08-01 | 2014-02-05 | Honeywell International Inc. | Systems and methods for presentation of probable wake turbulence |
| US20150025797A1 (en) | 2012-08-06 | 2015-01-22 | The Boeing Company | Precision Multiple Vehicle Navigation System |
| EP2892000A1 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2015-07-08 | Federal State Budgetary Institution "Federal Agency For Legal Protection Of Military, Special And Dual Use Intellectual Activity Results" | Method and on-board system for ensuring distance minima for longitudinal separation under turbulent conditions from a vortex wake |
| US20150235559A1 (en) * | 2012-08-30 | 2015-08-20 | Federal State Budgetary Institution Federal Agency for Legal Protection of Military, Special and Dua | A method and on-board system for ensuring the minimum longitudinal separation distance under wake turbulent conditions |
| US20140214243A1 (en) * | 2013-01-28 | 2014-07-31 | The Boeing Company | Formation flight control |
| EP2772817A2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2014-09-03 | The Boeing Company | Formation flight control |
| US8949090B2 (en) | 2013-01-28 | 2015-02-03 | The Boeing Company | Formation flight control |
| EP2851889A2 (en) | 2013-09-24 | 2015-03-25 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for processing and displaying wake turbulence |
| US20170178516A1 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2017-06-22 | Israel Aerospace Industries Ltd. | Aircraft collision warning |
| US20160093224A1 (en) | 2014-09-26 | 2016-03-31 | Ge Aviation Systems Llc | System and method for airport control using wake duration |
| WO2016067019A1 (en) | 2014-10-30 | 2016-05-06 | Isis Innovation Limited | A method and apparatus for adjusting drag on a trailing air vehicle flying behind a leading air vehicle |
| US20170315564A1 (en) | 2014-10-30 | 2017-11-02 | Oxford University Innovation Limited | A method and apparatus for adjusting drag on a trailing air vehicle flying behind a leading air vehicle |
| US20160272340A1 (en) | 2014-12-24 | 2016-09-22 | Environmental Tectonics Corporation | Aircraft-vision systems and methods for maintaining situational awareness and spatial orientation |
| US9536435B1 (en) | 2015-07-13 | 2017-01-03 | Double Black Aviation Technology L.L.C. | System and method for optimizing an aircraft trajectory |
| US9864380B1 (en) * | 2015-07-23 | 2018-01-09 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Administrator Of The National Aeronautics And Space Administration | Formation flight system extremum-seeking-control using blended performance parameters |
| US20170110018A1 (en) | 2015-10-19 | 2017-04-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Aircraft maneuver data management system |
| US20170131726A1 (en) | 2015-11-06 | 2017-05-11 | SySense Incorporated | Automated operation of aircraft systems in inverted-v formations |
| DE102016103704A1 (en) | 2016-03-02 | 2017-09-07 | Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Optimal position finder for energy saving formation flight |
| US10380903B2 (en) | 2016-03-08 | 2019-08-13 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Collision avoidance method and device for an aircraft formation relative to an intrusive aircraft |
| US20170309192A1 (en) | 2016-03-08 | 2017-10-26 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Collision avoidance method and device for an aircraft formation relative to an intrusive aircraft |
| WO2017161304A1 (en) | 2016-03-18 | 2017-09-21 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Systems, methods, and apparatus for airflow sensing and close formation flight |
| US20170267371A1 (en) * | 2016-03-18 | 2017-09-21 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Methods of three dimensional (3d) airflow sensing and analysis |
| US20170269612A1 (en) | 2016-03-18 | 2017-09-21 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Flight control methods for operating close formation flight |
| US9758257B1 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2017-09-12 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Airflow sensing systems and apparatus |
| US20170293307A1 (en) | 2016-04-07 | 2017-10-12 | Sunlight Photonics Inc. | Apparatus for close formation flight |
| US20170301251A1 (en) | 2016-04-19 | 2017-10-19 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Collision avoidance method and system for a trailer aircraft of an aircraft formation relative to an intruder aircraft |
| US10347143B2 (en) | 2016-04-19 | 2019-07-09 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Collision avoidance method and system for a trailer aircraft of an aircraft formation relative to an intruder aircraft |
| US20170337822A1 (en) | 2016-05-19 | 2017-11-23 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method making it possible to identify the proximity of a wake turbulence and to generate a report relative to that proximity |
| FR3041121A1 (en) | 2016-06-16 | 2017-03-17 | Airbus | METHOD OF CONTROLLING A FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT IN RELATION TO TOURBILLONS GENERATED BY AN AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT |
| FR3049076A1 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2017-09-22 | Airbus Operations Sas | METHOD OF CONTROLLING A FOLLOWING AIRCRAFT IN RELATION TO TOURBILLONS GENERATED BY AN AIRCRAFT AIRCRAFT |
| US10170009B2 (en) | 2017-04-11 | 2019-01-01 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method for transmitting flight parameters of a lead aircraft to an intruder aircraft |
| US20180301044A1 (en) | 2017-04-11 | 2018-10-18 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method for transmitting flight parameters of a lead aircraft to an intruder aircraft |
| US20180308369A1 (en) | 2017-04-24 | 2018-10-25 | Airbus Operations S.A.S. | Method for transmitting flight parameters from a leading aircraft to an intruding aircraft |
| US20180348796A1 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2018-12-06 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device to control aircraft flying in formation |
| US10678270B2 (en) | 2017-05-30 | 2020-06-09 | Airbus Operation (Sas) | Method and device to control aircraft flying in formation |
| US20190004544A1 (en) * | 2017-06-29 | 2019-01-03 | Ge Aviation Systems, Llc | Method for flying at least two aircraft |
| US20190041876A1 (en) | 2017-08-03 | 2019-02-07 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device for controlling the path of a following aircraft, with respect to a leading aircraft, in front of the following aircraft, in particular when there is a risk of collision, the leading and following aircraft flying in formation |
| US20190041874A1 (en) | 2017-08-03 | 2019-02-07 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method for anticipating the displacement of a wake vortex in a formation flight of two aircraft |
| US20190041875A1 (en) | 2017-08-03 | 2019-02-07 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device for monitoring the position of a following aircraft with respect to a leading aircraft during a formation flight |
| US10884434B2 (en) | 2017-08-03 | 2021-01-05 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and device for controlling the path of a following aircraft, with respect to a leading aircraft, in front of the following aircraft, in particular when there is a risk of collision, the leading and following aircraft flying in formation |
| US20190302808A1 (en) | 2018-03-27 | 2019-10-03 | Airbus Operations (S.A.S.) | Method and a system for controlling the trajectory of an aircraft |
| CN110347175A (en) | 2018-04-04 | 2019-10-18 | 空中客车运营简化股份公司 | The method and system and aircraft that the track of aircraft to optimum position is controlled |
Non-Patent Citations (32)
| Title |
|---|
| European Office Action for Application No. 18161829.9 dated Sep. 24, 2018. |
| European Office Action for Application No. 18182454.1 dated Jan. 16, 2019. |
| European Office Action for Application No. 18182461.6 dated Jan. 16, 2019. |
| European Office Action for Application No. 18182475.6 dated Jan. 16, 2019. |
| European Search Report for Application No. 18161829.9 dated Sep. 11, 2018. |
| European Search Report for Application No. 18182454.1 dated Jan. 3, 2019. |
| European Search Report for Application No. 18182461.6 dated Jan. 3, 2019. |
| European Search Report for Application No. 18182475.6 dated Jan. 3, 2019. |
| First Action Interview for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,057 dated Sep. 29, 2020. |
| First Action Interview for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,143 dated Sep. 25, 2020. |
| First Action Interview for U.S. Appl. No. 16/363,156 dated Jan. 12, 2021. |
| First Action Interview for U.S. Appl. No. 16/363,156 dated Nov. 5, 2020. |
| First Action Interview Office Action Summary and Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,506 dated Dec. 4, 2018. |
| First Action Interview Office Action Summary and Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 15/491,771 dated Dec. 4, 2018. |
| First Action Interview Pilot Program Pre-Interview Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,506 dated Oct. 2, 2018. |
| First Action Interview Pilot Program Pre-Interview Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 15/491,771 dated Sep. 6, 2018. |
| French Search Report for Application No. 1651927 dated Dec. 8, 2016. |
| French Search Report for Application No. 1653444 dated Dec. 9, 2016. |
| French Search Report for Application No. 1753139 dated Oct. 24, 2017. |
| French Search Report for Application No. 1852633 dated Nov. 22, 2018. |
| French Search Report for Application No. 1852909 dated Oct. 22, 2018. |
| French Search Report for French Application No. 1757446 dated Apr. 24, 2018. |
| French Search Report for French Application No. 1757452 dated May 9, 2018. |
| French Search Report for French Application No. 1757453 dated May 8, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/445,506 dated Apr. 9, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/491,771 dated Feb. 27, 2019. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 15/950,111 dated Aug. 30, 2018. |
| Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,216 dated Sep. 2, 2020. |
| Pre-interview First Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,057 dated Apr. 30, 2020. |
| Pre-interview First Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,143 dated Jul. 7, 2020. |
| Pre-interview First Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 16/051,216 dated Jul. 24, 2020. |
| Trollip, E.F. et al., "Ride comfort in commercial aircraft during formation flight using conventional flight control", 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Date of Conference: Mar. 5-12, 2016, 20 pages (Year: 2016). |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN110347175B (en) | 2022-04-19 |
| CN110347175A (en) | 2019-10-18 |
| FR3079942A1 (en) | 2019-10-11 |
| US20190310642A1 (en) | 2019-10-10 |
| FR3079942B1 (en) | 2021-02-26 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11467607B2 (en) | Method and device for controlling trajectory of a follower aircraft | |
| JP4253239B2 (en) | Navigation system using image recognition | |
| US10041809B2 (en) | Aircraft intent processor | |
| US9870005B2 (en) | Apparatus for close formation flight | |
| US9758257B1 (en) | Airflow sensing systems and apparatus | |
| US11987382B2 (en) | Method for aircraft localization and control | |
| US10884434B2 (en) | Method and device for controlling the path of a following aircraft, with respect to a leading aircraft, in front of the following aircraft, in particular when there is a risk of collision, the leading and following aircraft flying in formation | |
| US10678270B2 (en) | Method and device to control aircraft flying in formation | |
| US20140246541A1 (en) | Method for the guidance of a rotorcraft, which method limits noise discomfort in a procedure for the approach to a landing point | |
| US20190041875A1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring the position of a following aircraft with respect to a leading aircraft during a formation flight | |
| Hanson et al. | Experimental measurements of fuel savings during aircraft wake surfing | |
| CN116050080A (en) | A system and method for predicting the landing area of an airdrop parachute | |
| Balmer et al. | Enhancing model-free wind estimation for fixed-wing UAV | |
| Vitale et al. | An innovative angle of attack virtual sensor for physical-analytical redundant measurement system applicable to commercial aircraft | |
| US20230359225A1 (en) | System for assisting tracking of a wake vortex for aircrafts | |
| Halaas et al. | Formation flight for aerodynamic benefit simulation development and validation | |
| US12198556B2 (en) | Flight formation assistance system for aircraft | |
| KR20160034691A (en) | Method of flare path generation for automatic landing | |
| US9889926B2 (en) | Air vehicles and systems for preemptive turbulence mitigation | |
| US7702428B2 (en) | Method and device to assist in the piloting of an aircraft | |
| JP2000062698A (en) | Turbulence avoiding navigation device | |
| Ennis et al. | A formal approach to the analysis of aircraft protected zone | |
| Sevil | Airdata sensor based position estimation and fault diagnosis in aerial refueling | |
| Sevil et al. | Airdata sensor fault detection and isolation for receiver aircraft in aerial refueling | |
| EP3705857B1 (en) | Aircraft landing weight determination systems and methods |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: AIRBUS OPERATIONS (S.A.S.), FRANCE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ROBIN, JEAN-LUC;TORRALBA, JOSE;LEBAS, JULIE;REEL/FRAME:050845/0075 Effective date: 20190807 |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PRE-INTERVIEW COMMUNICATION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE AFTER FINAL ACTION FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |