US11005744B2 - Port rate determining method and computer device - Google Patents
Port rate determining method and computer device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US11005744B2 US11005744B2 US16/369,650 US201916369650A US11005744B2 US 11005744 B2 US11005744 B2 US 11005744B2 US 201916369650 A US201916369650 A US 201916369650A US 11005744 B2 US11005744 B2 US 11005744B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- negotiated
- rate
- port
- computer device
- rates
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F13/00—Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
- G06F13/38—Information transfer, e.g. on bus
- G06F13/382—Information transfer, e.g. on bus using universal interface adapter
- G06F13/385—Information transfer, e.g. on bus using universal interface adapter for adaptation of a particular data processing system to different peripheral devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F13/00—Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
- G06F13/38—Information transfer, e.g. on bus
- G06F13/40—Bus structure
- G06F13/4004—Coupling between buses
- G06F13/4022—Coupling between buses using switching circuits, e.g. switching matrix, connection or expansion network
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F13/00—Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
- G06F13/38—Information transfer, e.g. on bus
- G06F13/42—Bus transfer protocol, e.g. handshake; Synchronisation
- G06F13/4265—Bus transfer protocol, e.g. handshake; Synchronisation on a point to point bus
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L12/00—Data switching networks
- H04L12/28—Data switching networks characterised by path configuration, e.g. LAN [Local Area Networks] or WAN [Wide Area Networks]
- H04L12/40—Bus networks
- H04L12/4013—Management of data rate on the bus
- H04L12/40136—Nodes adapting their rate to the physical link properties
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/08—Configuration management of networks or network elements
- H04L41/0896—Bandwidth or capacity management, i.e. automatically increasing or decreasing capacities
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
- H04L43/0876—Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
- H04L43/0882—Utilisation of link capacity
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
- H04L43/0876—Network utilisation, e.g. volume of load or congestion level
- H04L43/0894—Packet rate
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D30/00—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
- Y02D30/50—Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wire-line communication networks, e.g. low power modes or reduced link rate
Definitions
- This application relates to the computer field, and in particular, to a port rate determining method and a computer device.
- the serial attached small computer system interface is an intelligent general-purpose interface standard, and is used for a communication connection between modules in a computer and a connection between the computer and another peripheral device (for example, a hard disk drive or a CD-ROM drive).
- SAS serial attached small computer system interface
- a point-to-point connection is established between a data initiator and a data target, and an appropriate physical channel is selected for data transmission.
- a rate of data transmission on each physical channel usually needs to be negotiated by using a rate negotiation method.
- a negotiated rate is used to represent a largest transmission rate of data transmission on each physical channel. To be specific, on the physical channel, data can be transmitted at a rate less than or equal to the negotiated rate, but data cannot be transmitted at a rate greater than the negotiated rate.
- a concept of a port is further defined in the SAS standard. Specifically, a plurality of physical channels may be integrated into one port. A device that uses the port can transmit data on any physical channel in the port. An SAS port is controlled by a computer device. If the initiator is to transmit data, the computer device sets a channel transmission rate of the data, then selects an available physical channel from the port at random, and transmits the data on the selected physical channel at the specified channel transmission rate. The plurality of physical channels are integrated into the port, so that an effective bandwidth between the data initiator and the data target can be improved, improving data transmission efficiency.
- negotiated rates of different physical channels in a same port may be the same or different, and this makes it troublesome for the computer device to set a data transmission rate. For example, if the computer device sets a relatively high channel transmission rate, data transmission fails if a physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the specified channel transmission rate is selected for the port during data transmission. To reduce a data transmission failure probability, in an existing technology, the computer device usually sets the channel transmission rate to a lowest negotiated rate in negotiated rates of all the physical channels. However, in this case, an obtained total port transmission bandwidth is smallest, and consequently data transmission efficiency is not ideal enough.
- the embodiments of this application provide a port rate determining method, to determine a channel transmission rate of an SAS port.
- This application further provides a related computer device.
- a first aspect of this application provides a port rate determining method, including: for a port including N physical channels, determining, by a computer device, M negotiated rates of the N physical channels, where the negotiated rate is a communication rate negotiated for each physical channel when a connection is established between the port and a port of a peer end; separately determining, by the computer device, M total port bandwidths corresponding to the M different negotiated rates, where a total port bandwidth corresponding to an i th negotiated rate in the M negotiated rates is a total bandwidth reached by the port when the i th negotiated rate is set as a channel transmission rate of the port; and setting, by the computer device, a negotiated rate corresponding to a largest total port bandwidth in the M total port bandwidths as the channel transmission rate of the port.
- a lowest negotiated rate is no longer used as the channel transmission rate of the port, but the negotiated rate corresponding to the largest total port bandwidth is determined as the channel transmission rate of the port. In this way, the largest total port bandwidth can be obtained, to improve data transmission efficiency.
- the total port bandwidth corresponding to the i th negotiated rate is a product of the i th negotiated rate and a quantity of physical channels whose negotiated rates are not less than the i th negotiated rate.
- the computer device disables a physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the channel transmission rate in the port.
- the disabled physical channel cannot be used any longer.
- the physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the channel transmission rate is not selected, so that a data transmission failure probability can be greatly reduced.
- the computer device decreases a negotiated rate of a physical channel that is greater than the specified channel transmission rate to the channel transmission rate.
- the negotiated rates of all the physical channels are the same. Therefore, a physical channel only needs to be selected from the port at random for data transmission, without a need of selecting a physical channel by the computer device, reducing a computation amount of the computer device, namely, a rate determining apparatus, and balancing use frequency of all the physical channels.
- the computer device selects, from the two or more negotiated rates, a lowest negotiated rate as the channel transmission rate. In this way, more physical channels can be used instead of being disabled, and load of all the physical channels can be balanced.
- a second aspect of this application provides a computer device, including a port used to perform data transmission with a peer end.
- the port includes N physical channels.
- the computer device further includes a negotiated rate determining module, configured to obtain a negotiated rate of each of the N physical channels, to obtain M different negotiated rates, where N is a positive integer greater than 1, and M is a positive integer not greater than N.
- the negotiated rate is used to represent a communication rate negotiated for each physical channel when a connection is established between the port and a port of the peer end.
- the computer device further includes a port bandwidth calculation module, configured to determine a total port bandwidth corresponding to each of the M negotiated rates.
- a total port bandwidth corresponding to an i th negotiated rate in the M negotiated rates is a total bandwidth that can be reached by the port when the i th negotiated rate is used as a channel transmission rate of the port.
- the channel transmission rate is used to represent an actual rate of data transmission on each physical channel in the port.
- the computer device further includes a channel rate control module, configured to set a negotiated rate corresponding to a largest total port bandwidth in total port bandwidths corresponding to the M negotiated rates as the channel transmission rate of the port.
- the computer device provided in this application no longer uses a lowest negotiated rate as the channel transmission rate of the port, but determines the negotiated rate corresponding to the largest total port bandwidth as the channel transmission rate of the port. In this way, the largest total port bandwidth can be obtained, to improve data transmission efficiency.
- the total port bandwidth corresponding to the i th negotiated rate is specifically a product of the i th negotiated rate and a quantity of physical channels whose negotiated rates are not less than the i th negotiated rate.
- the channel rate control module is further configured to disable a physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the channel transmission rate in the port.
- the disabled physical channel cannot be used any longer. In this case, during subsequent selection of a data transmission physical channel, the physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the channel transmission rate is not selected, so that a data transmission failure probability can be greatly reduced.
- the channel rate control module is further configured to decrease a negotiated rate of a physical channel in the port that is greater than the channel transmission rate, so that the negotiated rate of the physical channel decreases to the channel transmission rate.
- negotiated rates of available physical channels in the port are the same, so that utilization of transmission performance of all the physical channels can be balanced.
- the channel rate control module may select, from the two or more negotiated rates, a lowest negotiated rate as the channel transmission rate.
- a low negotiated rate is selected as the channel transmission rate, so that more physical channels can be used instead of being disabled, and load of all the physical channels can be balanced.
- a third aspect of this application provides a computer device, including a processor, a memory, and a communications interface.
- the processor is configured to invoke program code stored in the memory, to perform the port rate determining method according to the first aspect of this application.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of an SAS port
- FIG. 2 is a structural diagram of an embodiment of a computer device according to this application.
- FIG. 3 is a flowchart of an embodiment of a port rate determining method according to this application.
- FIG. 4 is a structural diagram of an embodiment of a computer device according to this application.
- Embodiments of this application provide a port rate determining method, to determine a channel transmission rate of an SAS port. Embodiments of this application further provide a related computer device. Descriptions are separately provided below.
- the SAS port is usually integrated into an SAS interface card.
- the SAS interface card is controlled by program software that runs on the computer device.
- the SAS interface card may serve as a peripheral interface of the computer device or a device in which the computer device is disposed, and is connected to the computer device in a Peripheral Component Interconnect Express (PCIe) manner.
- PCIe Peripheral Component Interconnect Express
- FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a port defined in the SAS standard. It can be learned from FIG. 1 that one port may include a plurality of physical channels. After a connection is established between the port and a port of a peer end, an electrical signal of the port changes, to trigger the computer device to perform rate negotiation.
- a communication rate negotiated for each physical channel is a negotiated rate of the physical channel. Negotiated rates of all the physical channels may be the same or different. Common negotiated rates of the physical channel include 12 G bits per second (bps), 6 Gbps, 3 Gbps, and the like.
- a port including four physical channels whose negotiated rates are successively 12 Gbps, 6 Gbps, 6 Gbps, and 3 Gbps from left to right is merely used as an example in FIG. 1 for description. If an initiator is to send data on the SAS port, the computer device usually first determines a channel transmission rate of the port, and then transmits the data on any physical channel in the port at the determined channel transmission rate.
- the computer device provided in an embodiment of this application may be implemented by a computer device 200 shown in FIG. 2 .
- the computer device 200 includes a processor 201 , a memory 202 , and a communications interface 203 .
- the computer device 200 further includes a bus 204 .
- the processor 201 , the memory 202 , and the communications interface 203 may implement a communication connection to each other by using the bus 204 , or certainly, may communicate with each other by another means, for example, through wireless transmission.
- the memory 202 may include a volatile memory, for example, a random access memory (RAM); or the memory 202 may include a non-volatile memory, for example, a read-only memory (ROM), a flash memory, a hard disk drive (HDD), or a solid state disk (SSD); or the memory 202 may include a combination of the foregoing types of memories.
- RAM random access memory
- ROM read-only memory
- HDD hard disk drive
- SSD solid state disk
- program code used to implement the port rate determining method provided in embodiments of this application may be stored in the memory 202 , and may be executed by the processor 201 .
- the communications interface 203 is configured to connect to an SAS interface card.
- a PCIe interface matching the SAS interface card is usually used as the communications interface 203 , or another interface may be used. This is not limited in this application.
- the processor 201 may be one or a combination of the following hardware units with a processing function: a CPU, digital signal processor (DSP), an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a hardware chip, and the like.
- the processor 201 invokes the program code stored in the memory 202 and runs the program code in the memory 202 , to perform a port rate determining method shown in FIG. 3 .
- the port rate determining method is shown in FIG. 3 , and is applicable to a computer device.
- the computer device includes a port used to perform data transmission with a peer end, and the port rate determining method includes the following steps.
- the port including the N physical channels is used as an example for description, where N is a positive integer greater than 1.
- the computer device obtains a negotiated rate of each of the N physical channels. Specifically, the computer device may determine the negotiated rate of each physical channel through rate negotiation, or obtain the negotiated rate of each physical channel in another manner. This is not limited in this embodiment.
- the port shown in FIG. 1 is used as an example for description.
- Negotiated rates of four physical channels are successively 12 Gbps, 6 Gbps, 6 Gbps, and 3 Gbps, and therefore a total of three different negotiated rates are determined: successively 12 Gbps, 6 Gbps, and 3 Gbps.
- the computer device determines total port bandwidths corresponding to the M different negotiated rates.
- a total port bandwidth corresponding to an i th negotiated rate in the M negotiated rates is a total bandwidth that can be reached by the port when the i th negotiated rate is used as a channel transmission rate of the port.
- the channel transmission rate of the port is a data transmission rate of any one of the N physical channels that is selected from the port, where i is a positive integer not greater than M.
- the total port bandwidth corresponding to the i th negotiated rate is a product of the i th negotiated rate and a quantity of physical channels whose negotiated rates are not less than the i th negotiated rate.
- the port shown in FIG. 1 is used as an example for description.
- the negotiated rates of the four physical channels are successively 12 Gbps, 6 Gbps, 6 Gbps, and 3 Gbps, and the three different negotiated rates are determined in step 301 : 12 Gbps, 6 Gbps, and 3 Gbps. If the first negotiated rate 12 Gbps is used as the channel transmission rate, a first physical channel can be used, and a second physical channel to a fourth physical channel cannot be used because negotiated rates of the second physical channel to the fourth physical channel are less than 12 Gbps and data cannot be transmitted in 12 Gbps. Therefore, a total port bandwidth corresponding to the negotiated rate 12 Gbps is 12 Gbps.
- the computer device determines the total port bandwidth corresponding to each of the M negotiated rates based on a method the same as the method for determining the total port bandwidth corresponding to the i th negotiated rate, to obtain the M total port bandwidths in total.
- the computer device After determining the M total port bandwidths corresponding to all the M negotiated rates, the computer device determines a negotiated rate corresponding to a largest total port bandwidth in the M total port bandwidths as the channel transmission rate of the port.
- the port shown in FIG. 1 is used as an example for description.
- the negotiated rates of the four physical channels are successively 12 Gbps, 6 Gbps, 6 Gbps, and 3 Gbps.
- the second negotiated rate 6 Gbps is corresponding to the largest total port bandwidth 18 Gbps. Therefore, the negotiated rate 6 Gbps is determined as the channel transmission rate of the port.
- the computer device determines the channel transmission rate of the port, if new data is to be transmitted on the port, the computer device selects a physical channel from the port, and transmits the new data on the physical channel at the channel transmission rate.
- This embodiment of this application provides the port rate determining method.
- the computer device determines the M different negotiated rates of the N physical channels; separately determines the M total port bandwidths corresponding to the M different negotiated rates; and determines the negotiated rate corresponding to the largest total port bandwidth in the M total port bandwidths as the channel transmission rate of the port.
- a lowest negotiated rate is no longer used as the channel transmission rate of the port, but the negotiated rate corresponding to the largest total port bandwidth is determined as the channel transmission rate of the port. In this way, the largest total port bandwidth can be obtained, to improve data transmission efficiency.
- the computer device may disable a physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the channel transmission rate in the port.
- the disabled physical channel cannot be used any longer.
- the physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the channel transmission rate is not selected, so that a data transmission failure probability can be greatly reduced.
- the channel transmission rate that is of the port and that is determined in step 303 may be less than negotiated rates of some available physical channels in the port.
- the computer device further has a physical channel selection function. When negotiated rates of available physical channels in the port are different, the computer device preferentially selects a physical channel with a relatively low negotiated rate, to fully utilize performance of each physical channel. However, in this method, a physical channel is not selected at random, increasing a computation amount of the computer device; and in addition, a physical channel with a relatively low negotiated rate is preferentially used, and consequently use frequency of all the physical channels is imbalanced, and utilization of transmission performance of all the physical channels cannot be balanced.
- the computer device may decrease a negotiated rate of a physical channel in the port that is greater than the channel transmission rate, so that the negotiated rate of the physical channel decreases to the channel transmission rate.
- negotiated rates of available physical channels in the port are the same. Therefore, a physical channel only needs to be selected from the port at random for data transmission, without a need of selecting a physical channel by the computer device. In this way, a computation amount of the computer device is decreased.
- selecting a physical channel at random balances use frequency of all the physical channels and can balance utilization of transmission performance of all the physical channels.
- one of the two or more negotiated rates may be selected at random as the channel transmission rate of the port, or one of the two or more negotiated rates may be selected as the channel transmission rate of the port based on a specific rule. This is not limited in this application. For example, a lowest negotiated rate in the two or more negotiated rates may be selected as the channel transmission rate. A low negotiated rate is selected as the channel transmission rate, so that more physical channels can be used instead of being disabled, and load of all the physical channels can be balanced.
- the computer device performs the port rate determining method shown in FIG. 3 again to determine a channel transmission rate of the port again.
- the foregoing embodiment describes the port rate determining method provided in this application, and a computer device that implements the foregoing method is described below.
- the computer device mainly includes a negotiated rate determining module 401 , a port bandwidth calculation module 402 , and a channel rate control module 403 .
- the negotiated rate determining module 401 is configured to determine a negotiated rate of each of N physical channels in an SAS port, where N is a positive integer greater than 1, and the negotiated rate is used to represent a communication rate negotiated for each physical channel when a connection is established between the port and a port of a peer end.
- Negotiated rates of the N physical channels include M different negotiated rates, where M is a positive integer not greater than N.
- the port bandwidth calculation module 402 is configured to determine a total port bandwidth corresponding to each of the M negotiated rates.
- a total port bandwidth corresponding to an i th negotiated rate in the M negotiated rates is a total bandwidth that can be reached by the port when the i th negotiated rate is used as a channel transmission rate of the port.
- the channel transmission rate is used to represent an actual rate of data transmission on each physical channel in the port.
- the channel rate control module 403 is configured to set a negotiated rate corresponding to a largest total port bandwidth in total port bandwidths corresponding to the M negotiated rates as the channel transmission rate of the port.
- the negotiated rate determining module 401 determines the M different negotiated rates of the N physical channels.
- the port bandwidth calculation module 402 separately determines the M total port bandwidths corresponding to the M different negotiated rates.
- the channel rate control module 403 determines the negotiated rate corresponding to the largest total port bandwidth in the M total port bandwidths as the channel transmission rate of the port.
- the computer device provided in this embodiment no longer uses a lowest negotiated rate as the channel transmission rate of the port, but determines the negotiated rate corresponding to the largest total port bandwidth as the channel transmission rate of the port. In this way, the largest total port bandwidth can be obtained, to improve data transmission efficiency.
- the total port bandwidth corresponding to the i th negotiated rate is specifically a product of the i th negotiated rate and a quantity of physical channels whose negotiated rates are not less than the i th negotiated rate.
- the channel rate control module 403 is further configured to disable a physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the channel transmission rate in the port.
- the disabled physical channel cannot be used any longer. In this case, during subsequent selection of a data transmission physical channel, a physical channel whose negotiated rate is less than the channel transmission rate is not selected, so that a data transmission failure probability can be greatly reduced.
- the channel rate control module 403 is further configured to decrease a negotiated rate of a physical channel in the port that is greater than the channel transmission rate, so that the negotiated rate of the physical channel decreases to the channel transmission rate. In this way, negotiated rates of available physical channels in the port are the same, so that utilization of transmission performance of all the physical channels can be balanced.
- the channel rate control module 403 may select, from the two or more negotiated rates, a lowest negotiated rate as the channel transmission rate.
- a low negotiated rate is selected as the channel transmission rate, so that more physical channels can be used instead of being disabled, and load of all the physical channels can be balanced.
- the computer device shown in FIG. 4 may be implemented by the computer device 200 shown in FIG. 2 . This is not limited in this application.
- the disclosed system, apparatus, and method may be implemented in other manners.
- the described apparatus embodiment is merely an example.
- the unit division is merely logical function division and may be other division in actual implementation.
- a plurality of units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be ignored or not performed.
- the displayed or discussed mutual couplings or direct couplings or communication connections may be implemented by using some interfaces.
- the indirect couplings or communication connections between the apparatuses or units may be implemented in electronic, mechanical, or other forms.
- functional units in the embodiments of this application may be integrated into one processing unit, or each of the units may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated into one unit.
- the integrated unit may be implemented in a form of hardware, or may be implemented in a form of a software functional unit.
- the integrated unit When the integrated unit is implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as an independent product, the integrated unit may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium.
- the software product is stored in a storage medium and includes several instructions for instructing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to perform all or some of the steps of the methods described in the embodiments of this application.
- the foregoing storage medium includes: any medium that can store program code, such as a USB flash drive, a removable hard disk, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disc.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Communication Control (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (8)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN201610876824.4A CN107888442B (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2016-09-30 | A kind of port rate determination method and computer equipment |
| CN201610876824.4 | 2016-09-30 | ||
| PCT/CN2017/104022 WO2018059498A1 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2017-09-28 | Port rate determination method, and computer device |
Related Parent Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/CN2017/104022 Continuation WO2018059498A1 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2017-09-28 | Port rate determination method, and computer device |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| US20190230018A1 US20190230018A1 (en) | 2019-07-25 |
| US11005744B2 true US11005744B2 (en) | 2021-05-11 |
Family
ID=61763757
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| US16/369,650 Active 2037-10-27 US11005744B2 (en) | 2016-09-30 | 2019-03-29 | Port rate determining method and computer device |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US11005744B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP3512161B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN107888442B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO2018059498A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN111526042B (en) * | 2020-04-10 | 2022-09-06 | 深圳震有科技股份有限公司 | Port aggregation method, system and storage medium based on rate |
| WO2022134085A1 (en) * | 2020-12-25 | 2022-06-30 | 深圳市大疆创新科技有限公司 | Data sending method, and device |
| CN114297112B (en) * | 2021-12-29 | 2023-12-19 | 无锡唐古半导体有限公司 | Data transmission device, silicon-based micro display and data transmission method |
| CN114706803B (en) * | 2022-03-29 | 2023-11-10 | 深圳市广和通科技有限公司 | Multi-rate adaptation method and PCIe (peripheral component interconnect express) equipment |
Citations (19)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20020122421A1 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2002-09-05 | Thales | Method for the sizing of a deterministic type packet-switching transmission network |
| CN1414737A (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2003-04-30 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method of flow load sharing |
| US20050138202A1 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2005-06-23 | Intel Corporation | Addresses assignment for adaptor interfaces |
| US20050210159A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | William Voorhees | Methods and structure for improved transfer rate performance in a SAS wide port environment |
| US20060034334A1 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2006-02-16 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically allocating traffic in a physical layer device |
| US20070093124A1 (en) * | 2005-10-20 | 2007-04-26 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Methods and structure for SAS expander optimization of SAS wide ports |
| US20070206509A1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Finisar Corporation | Capture rcdt and sntt sas speed negotiation decodes in a network diagnostic component |
| CN101217436A (en) | 2008-01-16 | 2008-07-09 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Ethernet port and its rate setting method |
| US20080240092A1 (en) | 2007-03-31 | 2008-10-02 | Yoav Moratt | Arrangements for controlling multiple mac interfaces |
| CN101442781A (en) | 2007-11-23 | 2009-05-27 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Self-adapting method and apparatus for far-end equipment transmission rate |
| CN101510847A (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2009-08-19 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and apparatus for adjusting link velocity |
| CN102651709A (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2012-08-29 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Power-saving exchanger and power-saving method thereof |
| US20120233399A1 (en) * | 2011-03-09 | 2012-09-13 | Midori Kurokawa | Storage apparatus and method of controlling the same |
| CN103139088A (en) | 2011-11-28 | 2013-06-05 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method for controlling transmission rate of communication interface and network equipment |
| US20130195154A1 (en) | 2012-01-30 | 2013-08-01 | Mohammad Mobin | Transmitter Adaptation Loop Using Adjustable Gain and Convergence Detection |
| US20140129723A1 (en) * | 2012-11-06 | 2014-05-08 | Lsi Corporation | Connection Rate Management in Wide Ports |
| US20140169210A1 (en) * | 2012-12-13 | 2014-06-19 | Lsi Corporation | Link Rate Availability Based Arbitration |
| US20140341231A1 (en) * | 2013-05-15 | 2014-11-20 | Lsi Corporation | Lane-based multiplexing for physical links in serial attached small computer system interface architectures |
| US20150324268A1 (en) | 2014-04-02 | 2015-11-12 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method, Device, and System for Processing PCIe Link Fault |
-
2016
- 2016-09-30 CN CN201610876824.4A patent/CN107888442B/en active Active
-
2017
- 2017-09-28 WO PCT/CN2017/104022 patent/WO2018059498A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2017-09-28 EP EP17854948.1A patent/EP3512161B1/en active Active
-
2019
- 2019-03-29 US US16/369,650 patent/US11005744B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (21)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20020122421A1 (en) | 2000-12-01 | 2002-09-05 | Thales | Method for the sizing of a deterministic type packet-switching transmission network |
| CN1414737A (en) | 2002-05-23 | 2003-04-30 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method of flow load sharing |
| US20050138202A1 (en) | 2003-12-18 | 2005-06-23 | Intel Corporation | Addresses assignment for adaptor interfaces |
| US20050210159A1 (en) * | 2004-03-18 | 2005-09-22 | William Voorhees | Methods and structure for improved transfer rate performance in a SAS wide port environment |
| US20060034334A1 (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2006-02-16 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for dynamically allocating traffic in a physical layer device |
| CN1989740A (en) | 2004-08-12 | 2007-06-27 | 思科技术公司 | Method and apparatus for dynamically allocating traffic in a physical layer device |
| US20070093124A1 (en) * | 2005-10-20 | 2007-04-26 | Lsi Logic Corporation | Methods and structure for SAS expander optimization of SAS wide ports |
| US20070206509A1 (en) | 2006-03-03 | 2007-09-06 | Finisar Corporation | Capture rcdt and sntt sas speed negotiation decodes in a network diagnostic component |
| US20080240092A1 (en) | 2007-03-31 | 2008-10-02 | Yoav Moratt | Arrangements for controlling multiple mac interfaces |
| CN101442781A (en) | 2007-11-23 | 2009-05-27 | 大唐移动通信设备有限公司 | Self-adapting method and apparatus for far-end equipment transmission rate |
| CN101217436A (en) | 2008-01-16 | 2008-07-09 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Ethernet port and its rate setting method |
| CN101510847A (en) | 2009-02-24 | 2009-08-19 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method and apparatus for adjusting link velocity |
| CN102651709A (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2012-08-29 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Power-saving exchanger and power-saving method thereof |
| US20120221742A1 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2012-08-30 | Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. | Switch capable of saving power and method thereof |
| US20120233399A1 (en) * | 2011-03-09 | 2012-09-13 | Midori Kurokawa | Storage apparatus and method of controlling the same |
| CN103139088A (en) | 2011-11-28 | 2013-06-05 | 华为技术有限公司 | Method for controlling transmission rate of communication interface and network equipment |
| US20130195154A1 (en) | 2012-01-30 | 2013-08-01 | Mohammad Mobin | Transmitter Adaptation Loop Using Adjustable Gain and Convergence Detection |
| US20140129723A1 (en) * | 2012-11-06 | 2014-05-08 | Lsi Corporation | Connection Rate Management in Wide Ports |
| US20140169210A1 (en) * | 2012-12-13 | 2014-06-19 | Lsi Corporation | Link Rate Availability Based Arbitration |
| US20140341231A1 (en) * | 2013-05-15 | 2014-11-20 | Lsi Corporation | Lane-based multiplexing for physical links in serial attached small computer system interface architectures |
| US20150324268A1 (en) | 2014-04-02 | 2015-11-12 | Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. | Method, Device, and System for Processing PCIe Link Fault |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO2018059498A1 (en) | 2018-04-05 |
| US20190230018A1 (en) | 2019-07-25 |
| CN107888442A (en) | 2018-04-06 |
| EP3512161A1 (en) | 2019-07-17 |
| EP3512161B1 (en) | 2020-04-22 |
| CN107888442B (en) | 2021-05-14 |
| EP3512161A4 (en) | 2019-09-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11005744B2 (en) | Port rate determining method and computer device | |
| US9674013B2 (en) | Enhanced receiver equalization | |
| US11799697B2 (en) | Fast equalization method, chip, and communications system | |
| EP3817255A1 (en) | Data verification method and apparatus, and storage medium | |
| CN107329774A (en) | The method and apparatus for determining Redriver chip parameters | |
| US11102322B2 (en) | Data processing method and apparatus, server, and controller | |
| US11119960B2 (en) | Adapter to concatenate connectors | |
| US20220308928A1 (en) | Resource Adjustment Method and Apparatus | |
| WO2020102928A1 (en) | Wireless signal transmission method, wireless signal transmission device and terminal device | |
| US11593033B2 (en) | Electronic device for communicating with host and operating method of the electronic device | |
| US10268555B2 (en) | System and method for policy based management of a communication device configuration persistence | |
| CN114244431B (en) | Transmission parameter calibration method and optical communication equipment | |
| US20240223684A1 (en) | Auto-negotiation method and apparatus | |
| US20180248808A1 (en) | Communication method, communication apparatus, and program | |
| CN108121496B (en) | Data storage method, device and system | |
| CN118316573A (en) | Communication baud rate adaptation method, module, device and readable storage medium | |
| US20110022765A1 (en) | System, method, and computer program product for maintaining a direct connection between an initiator and a drive | |
| KR20240105844A (en) | Method for controlling network congestion, and apparatus implementing the same method | |
| US8769175B2 (en) | Adjustment of post and non-post packet transmissions in a communication interconnect | |
| US12438753B2 (en) | Data interface equalization adjustment method and apparatus, device, and storage medium | |
| US10579394B2 (en) | Control method and control device | |
| WO2018035681A1 (en) | Method of establishing interface connection, and interface chip | |
| CN103346808B (en) | A kind of terminal equipment | |
| CN116156023A (en) | Protocol data unit determining method, data matching method, electronic device and medium | |
| CN120067022A (en) | Data transmission method, device, electronic equipment, program product and medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
| AS | Assignment |
Owner name: HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., CHINA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WEI, XU;LONG, YUANTING;REEL/FRAME:049220/0499 Effective date: 20190506 |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
| STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
| STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
| MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |