US10430595B2 - Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers - Google Patents
Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US10430595B2 US10430595B2 US15/273,020 US201615273020A US10430595B2 US 10430595 B2 US10430595 B2 US 10430595B2 US 201615273020 A US201615273020 A US 201615273020A US 10430595 B2 US10430595 B2 US 10430595B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- rendering
- browser
- content
- computing device
- browsers
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related, expires
Links
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 95
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 26
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 19
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 16
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012517 data analytics Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012384 transportation and delivery Methods 0.000 description 2
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009172 bursting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013507 mapping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005055 memory storage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013439 planning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920001690 polydopamine Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000011176 pooling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013468 resource allocation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/60—Protecting data
- G06F21/62—Protecting access to data via a platform, e.g. using keys or access control rules
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/50—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems
- G06F21/51—Monitoring users, programs or devices to maintain the integrity of platforms, e.g. of processors, firmware or operating systems at application loading time, e.g. accepting, rejecting, starting or inhibiting executable software based on integrity or source reliability
Definitions
- the present invention relates in general to computing systems, and more particularly to, various embodiments for rendering content by a processor on a computing device.
- Modern computing devices e.g., desktop computers, laptop computers, tablets, cellular telephones, etc.
- desktop computers e.g., desktop computers, laptop computers, tablets, cellular telephones, etc.
- desktop computers and laptop computers are often equipped with multiple applications that may be used to open, render, and/or display content.
- desktop computers and laptop computers it is not uncommon for desktop computers and laptop computers to have multiple web browsers installed, all of which are generally capable of allowing the user to navigate to most, if not all, websites on the Internet.
- Various embodiments for rendering content by a processor are provided.
- a request to render content is received.
- a rendering browser is selected from a plurality of rendering browsers to render the content on a computing device.
- the selecting of the rendering browser is based on, for example, security information associated with at least one of the content and the plurality of rendering browsers.
- FIG. 1 is a block diagram depicting an exemplary cloud computing node according to an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 is an additional block diagram depicting an exemplary cloud computing environment according to an embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 3 is an additional block diagram depicting abstraction model layers according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- FIG. 4 is a flowchart diagram depicting an exemplary method for rendering content, in which various aspects of the present invention may be realized;
- FIG. 5 is a block/flow diagram illustrating certain aspects of functionality according to the present invention.
- FIGS. 6-10 are tables showing various weight values and/or scoring of browsers according to various aspects of the present invention.
- FIG. 11 is an additional flowchart diagram depicting an additional exemplary method for rending content, again in which various aspects of the present invention may be realized.
- users may have to select which browser (i.e., web browser) to use to view or parse content due to, for example, the content they wish to display, the languages the browsers can support, and/or the performance of particular browsers for the particular types of content.
- browser i.e., web browser
- the provider may be required to, for example, support multiple browsers, or multiple versions of the same browser, due to end user preference and/or compatibility issues with respect to older browser technology.
- the “correct” (or “best”) browser would be automatically launched and perform the intended action, where the selected browser would be seamlessly selected based on, for example, security risk posture, the transactional context, language support, performance characteristics, and/or user preference. In some embodiments described herein, some, if not all, of these attributes are assessed, ranked and evaluated in order to select, and perhaps automatically instanciate, the most appropriate browser.
- various attributes and/or information associated with, for example, the content, the available browsers (e.g., those installed on the computing device), the computing device in use, the network(s) involved, etc., is used to select one of the available browsers.
- the selected browser may be chosen based on the attributes/information and a set of predetermined rules.
- that browser is automatically instanciated to render the requested content.
- the user is simply provided with an indication of the selected browser.
- the selection of the browser is based on security information (e.g., operating system (OS) type, OS patch level, browser type, browser patch level, etc.) associated with the computing device being used by the user.
- security information e.g., operating system (OS) type, OS patch level, browser type, browser patch level, etc.
- the selection of the browser may (also) be based on performance characteristics associated with the content and the computing device (e.g., the type of objects or code in the content and the ability of the computing device and/or the browsers to render such objects/code).
- the selection may (also) be based on information associated with the owner of the computing device (e.g., a personal computing device vs. a business/corporation owned computing device).
- the selection of the browser may include (and/or be based on) a “scoring” of the available browsers which is performed using the attributes/information and the predetermined rules.
- the content is (at least originally) stored on a (second) computing device (e.g., a server) that is remote (e.g., at a different location, on a different network, etc.) from the computing device being used by the user (e.g., by navigation of the Internet).
- a (second) computing device e.g., a server
- the terms “browser,” “rendering browser,” “rendering engine,” and the like may refer to any application that may be used to open, render, and/or display content other than what is available on the Internet.
- the systems and methods described herein may be applicable to applications in which the content to be rendered is stored locally (e.g., on the same computing device and/or on the same network as the computing device), such as text documents, spreadsheets, and images, including, for example, those that were previously downloaded from the Internet or an email.
- applications in which the content to be rendered is stored locally (e.g., on the same computing device and/or on the same network as the computing device), such as text documents, spreadsheets, and images, including, for example, those that were previously downloaded from the Internet or an email.
- Cloud computing is a model of service delivery for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g. networks, network bandwidth, servers, processing, memory, storage, applications, virtual machines, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or interaction with a provider of the service.
- This cloud model may include at least five characteristics, at least three service models, and at least four deployment models.
- On-demand self-service a cloud consumer can unilaterally provision computing capabilities, such as server time and network storage, as needed automatically without requiring human interaction with the service's provider.
- Resource pooling the provider's computing resources are pooled to serve multiple consumers using a multi-tenant model, with different physical and virtual resources dynamically assigned and reassigned according to demand. There is a sense of location independence in that the consumer generally has no control or knowledge over the exact location of the provided resources but may be able to specify location at a higher level of abstraction (e.g., country, state, or datacenter).
- Rapid elasticity capabilities can be rapidly and elastically provisioned, in some cases automatically, to quickly scale out and rapidly released to quickly scale in. To the consumer, the capabilities available for provisioning often appear to be unlimited and can be purchased in any quantity at any time.
- Measured service cloud systems automatically control and optimize resource use by leveraging a metering capability at some level of abstraction appropriate to the type of service (e.g., storage, processing, bandwidth, and active user accounts). Resource usage can be monitored, controlled, and reported providing transparency for both the provider and consumer of the utilized service.
- level of abstraction appropriate to the type of service (e.g., storage, processing, bandwidth, and active user accounts).
- SaaS Software as a Service: the capability provided to the consumer is to use the provider's applications running on a cloud infrastructure.
- the applications are accessible from various client devices through a thin client interface such as a web browser (e.g., web-based e-mail).
- a web browser e.g., web-based e-mail
- the consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including network, servers, operating systems, storage, or even individual application capabilities, with the possible exception of limited user-specific application configuration settings.
- PaaS Platform as a Service
- the consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure including networks, servers, operating systems, or storage, but has control over the deployed applications and possibly application hosting environment configurations.
- IaaS Infrastructure as a Service
- the consumer does not manage or control the underlying cloud infrastructure but has control over operating systems, storage, deployed applications, and possibly limited control of select networking components (e.g., host firewalls).
- Private cloud the cloud infrastructure is operated solely for an organization. It may be managed by the organization or a third party and may exist on-premises or off-premises.
- Public cloud the cloud infrastructure is made available to the general public or a large industry group and is owned by an organization selling cloud services.
- Hybrid cloud the cloud infrastructure is a composition of two or more clouds (private, community, or public) that remain unique entities but are bound together by standardized or proprietary technology that enables data and application portability (e.g., cloud bursting for load-balancing between clouds).
- a cloud computing environment is service oriented with a focus on statelessness, low coupling, modularity, and semantic interoperability.
- An infrastructure comprising a network of interconnected nodes.
- Cloud computing node 10 is only one example of a suitable cloud computing node and is not intended to suggest any limitation as to the scope of use or functionality of embodiments of the invention described herein. Regardless, cloud computing node 10 is capable of being implemented and/or performing any of the functionality set forth hereinabove.
- cloud computing node 10 there is a computer system/server 12 , which is operational with numerous other general purpose or special purpose computing system environments or configurations.
- Examples of well-known computing systems, environments, and/or configurations that may be suitable for use with computer system/server 12 include, but are not limited to, personal computer systems, server computer systems, thin clients, thick clients, hand-held or laptop devices, multiprocessor systems, microprocessor-based systems, set top boxes, programmable consumer electronics, network PCs, minicomputer systems, mainframe computer systems, and distributed cloud computing environments that include any of the above systems or devices, and the like.
- Computer system/server 12 may be described in the general context of computer system-executable instructions, such as program modules, being executed by a computer system.
- program modules may include routines, programs, objects, components, logic, data structures, and so on that perform particular tasks or implement particular abstract data types.
- Computer system/server 12 may be practiced in distributed cloud computing environments where tasks are performed by remote processing devices that are linked through a communications network.
- program modules may be located in both local and remote computer system storage media including memory storage devices.
- computer system/server 12 in cloud computing node 10 is shown in the form of a general-purpose computing device.
- the components of computer system/server 12 may include, but are not limited to, one or more processors or processing units 16 , a system memory 28 , and a bus 18 that couples various system components including system memory 28 to processor 16 .
- Bus 18 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures.
- bus architectures include Industry Standard Architecture (ISA) bus, Micro Channel Architecture (MCA) bus, Enhanced ISA (EISA) bus, Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) local bus, and Peripheral Component Interconnects (PCI) bus.
- Computer system/server 12 typically includes a variety of computer system readable media. Such media may be any available media that is accessible by computer system/server 12 , and it includes both volatile and non-volatile media, removable and non-removable media.
- System memory 28 can include computer system readable media in the form of volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM) 30 and/or cache memory 32 .
- Computer system/server 12 may further include other removable/non-removable, volatile/non-volatile computer system storage media.
- storage system 34 can be provided for reading from and writing to a non-removable, non-volatile magnetic media (not shown and typically called a “hard drive”).
- a magnetic disk drive for reading from and writing to a removable, non-volatile magnetic disk (e.g., a “floppy disk”).
- an optical disk drive for reading from or writing to a removable, non-volatile optical disk such as a CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or other optical media can be provided.
- system memory 28 may include at least one program product having a set (e.g., at least one) of program modules that are configured to carry out the functions of embodiments of the invention.
- Program/utility 40 having a set (at least one) of program modules 42 , may be stored in system memory 28 by way of example, and not limitation, as well as an operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data. Each of the operating system, one or more application programs, other program modules, and program data or some combination thereof, may include an implementation of a networking environment.
- Program modules 42 generally carry out the functions and/or methodologies of embodiments of the invention as described herein.
- Computer system/server 12 may also communicate with one or more external devices 14 such as a keyboard, a pointing device, a display 24 , etc.; one or more devices that enable a user to interact with computer system/server 12 ; and/or any devices (e.g., network card, modem, etc.) that enable computer system/server 12 to communicate with one or more other computing devices. Such communication can occur via Input/Output (I/O) interfaces 22 . Still yet, computer system/server 12 can communicate with one or more networks such as a local area network (LAN), a general wide area network (WAN), and/or a public network (e.g., the Internet) via network adapter 20 .
- LAN local area network
- WAN wide area network
- public network e.g., the Internet
- network adapter 20 communicates with the other components of computer system/server 12 via bus 18 .
- bus 18 It should be understood that although not shown, other hardware and/or software components could be used in conjunction with computer system/server 12 . Examples, include, but are not limited to: microcode, device drivers, redundant processing units, external disk drive arrays, RAID systems, tape drives, and data archival storage systems, etc.
- cloud computing environment 50 comprises one or more cloud computing nodes 10 with which local computing devices used by cloud consumers, such as, for example, personal digital assistant (PDA) or cellular telephone 54 A, desktop computer 54 B, laptop computer 54 C, and/or automobile computer system 54 N may communicate.
- Nodes 10 may communicate with one another. They may be grouped (not shown) physically or virtually, in one or more networks, such as Private, Community, Public, or Hybrid clouds as described hereinabove, or a combination thereof.
- This allows cloud computing environment 50 to offer infrastructure, platforms and/or software as services for which a cloud consumer does not need to maintain resources on a local computing device.
- computing devices 54 A-N shown in FIG. 2 are intended to be illustrative only and that computing nodes 10 and cloud computing environment 50 can communicate with any type of computerized device over any type of network and/or network addressable connection (e.g., using a web browser).
- FIG. 3 a set of functional abstraction layers provided by cloud computing environment 50 ( FIG. 2 ) is shown. It should be understood in advance that the components, layers, and functions shown in FIG. 3 are intended to be illustrative only and embodiments of the invention are not limited thereto. As depicted, the following layers and corresponding functions are provided:
- Hardware and software layer 60 includes hardware and software components.
- hardware components include: mainframes 61 ; RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) architecture based servers 62 ; servers 63 ; blade servers 64 ; storage devices 65 ; and networks and networking components 66 .
- software components include network application server software 67 and database software 68 .
- Virtualization layer 70 provides an abstraction layer from which the following examples of virtual entities may be provided: virtual servers 71 ; virtual storage 72 ; virtual networks 73 , including virtual private networks; virtual applications and operating systems 74 ; and virtual clients 75 .
- management layer 80 may provide the functions described below.
- Resource provisioning 81 provides dynamic procurement of computing resources and other resources that are utilized to perform tasks within the cloud computing environment.
- Metering and Pricing 82 provides cost tracking as resources are utilized within the cloud computing environment, and billing or invoicing for consumption of these resources. In one example, these resources may comprise application software licenses.
- Security provides identity verification for cloud consumers and tasks, as well as protection for data and other resources.
- User portal 83 provides access to the cloud computing environment for consumers and system administrators.
- Service level management 84 provides cloud computing resource allocation and management such that required service levels are met.
- Service Level Agreement (SLA) planning and fulfillment 85 provides pre-arrangement for, and procurement of, cloud computing resources for which a future requirement is anticipated in accordance with an SLA.
- SLA Service Level Agreement
- Workloads layer 90 provides examples of functionality for which the cloud computing environment may be utilized. Examples of workloads and functions which may be provided from this layer include: mapping and navigation 91 ; software development and lifecycle management 92 ; virtual classroom education delivery 93 ; data analytics processing 94 ; transaction processing 95 ; and, in the context of the illustrated embodiments of the present invention, various communication processing workloads and functions 96 .
- communication processing workloads and functions 96 may include such operations as data analytics, data analysis, and as will be further described, browser scoring and/or selection.
- communication processing workloads and functions 96 may also work in conjunction with other portions of the various abstractions layers, such as those in hardware and software 60 , virtualization 70 , management 80 , and other workloads 90 (such as data analytics processing 94 , for example) to accomplish the various purposes of the illustrated embodiments of the present invention.
- the mechanisms of the illustrated embodiments provide novel approaches for rendering content on a computing device in such a way that the content is rendered, perhaps automatically and/or seamlessly, by an appropriate browser when considering, for example, security threats, user preference, device performance, corporate policies, etc.
- method 400 begins (step 402 ) with a request to render content (e.g., a website) being received (step 404 ).
- a request to render content e.g., a website
- step 404 a request to render content
- additional steps or processes may be performed prior to the receiving of the request, as described below.
- a rendering browser is then selected (e.g., from multiple browsers) based on information associated with the content and/or available browsers (step 406 ).
- the information upon which the browser selection is made is related to security considerations associated with the content and/or the browsers.
- security considerations associated with the content and/or the browsers.
- other information may be used, such as user preference, performance considerations, corporate policies, etc., perhaps in combination with the security considerations.
- Method 400 ends (step 408 ) with, for example, the selected browser being instanciated to render the content, or perhaps the user simply being provided with an indication of which browser was selected.
- FIG. 5 illustrates these exemplary functional blocks 500 and associated notes on specific functionality.
- Each of the functional blocks 500 may be implemented in hardware and/or software, such as by the computer/server 12 ( FIG. 1 ), and/or the workloads layer 90 ( FIG. 3 ).
- a rendering engine or browser weights and rules for each pertinent circumstance are established at weight establishment block 502 .
- the rules which are used to select the rendering browser are established or generated (and/or the rules are stored therein).
- rendering engine weights for each rendering engine are established.
- the weights may be based on risk, user experience, and other criteria. In some embodiments, the higher the weight, the more favorable/desirable it is to use that particular rendering browser. However, it should be understood that the weights could be arranged so that the lower the weight, the more favorable/desirable it is to use that particular rendering browser.
- Device rules may assign a weight to each available rendering browser or engine (RE) for each pertinent attribute related to the device (i.e., the computing device) in use.
- Device rules may be related to, for example, the type of operating system (OS) in use on the computing device, the version/patch level of the operating system, and/or the ownership of the computing device (e.g., owned by a company, individual employee, etc.).
- OS operating system
- the selection of pertinent device attributes may be made by the solution administrator or may be a default setting in the systems described herein. Exemplary device rules are shown below:
- rendering engine 1 (RE 1) is given a score (or weight value) of 30
- rendering engine 2 (RE 2) is given a score of 40
- rendering engine 3 (RE 3) is given a score of 80.
- the computing device is owned by a company (e.g., the employer of the user)
- RE 1 is given a score of 10
- RE 2 is given a score of 300
- RE 3 is given a score of 10.
- the numbers or values associated with the scores may be arbitrary and are simply provided to indicate the relative strengths (and/or weaknesses) of the rendering engines when compared to each other (and/or the preference of using one over the others) based on the rules.
- Organizational rules may assign a weight to each available rendering browser for each pertinent organizational policy (e.g., company/corporate rules) associated with the computing device in use.
- pertinent organizational policy e.g., company/corporate rules
- the selection of pertinent organizational attributes may be made by the solution administrator or may be a default setting in the systems described herein. Exemplary organizational rules are shown below:
- Environmental rules may assign a weight to each available rendering browser for each pertinent environmental attribute (e.g., network threat level) associated with the computing device in use.
- pertinent environmental attributes e.g., network threat level
- the selection of pertinent environmental attributes may be made by the solution administrator or may be a default setting in the systems described herein. Exemplary environmental rules are shown below:
- the weighting may change for the same condition, based on other factors. For example, if the patch level is “current ⁇ 1” for the OS or browser (i.e., indicating that the OS or browser is not the latest version), but there are no security concerns with “current ⁇ 1” for that particular OS or browser, then the weighting may be higher. However, if there was a security concern, the weighting would be lower.
- the weighting may change based on other factors. For example, if there was little or no change in security posture from a previous version (or patch) of a browser (e.g., “current ⁇ 1”) to the current version of the browser (e.g., “current”), the weighting may be the same for both “current” and “current ⁇ 1.” However, if there was a significant change or improvement in security posture from the previous version of the browser to the current version of the browser, the weighting may be significantly different for “current” and “current ⁇ 1.” This feature may be particularly beneficial with respect to minimizing security threats while still optimizing performance and/or user experience.
- the weightings of each attribute may themselves be weighted (e.g., two levels of weighting). For example, if the risk when streaming content containing a particular type of object, code, or software (e.g., “Code X” or “Software Y”) is much greater than the risk if the OS patch level is not current, the weights for the object/code attributes may be set lower than the weights for the OS patch level. If the risk is particularly bad, certain attributes may be “safety” weighted to minimize the chance that a particular browser is selected. As an example, the presence of the particular object/code in the streaming content may by weighted at ⁇ 500, while the previous OS patch level may be weighted at 50.
- embodiments described herein allow for the relative importance of each evaluated attribute to set and/or be adjusted.
- browsers are assigned weight values (or scores) based on real time input combined with the rules established in the preparation phase. For example, when a request to render content is received from user 504 through, for example, container browser 506 , the request is parsed and initial content is received from the source of the content (e.g., the webpage server). Each element in the content stream may be assessed for attributes of interest (e.g., as described above) by, for example, input acquisition block 508 .
- the attributes of interest along with the rules established in weight establishment block 502 are sent to browser selection engine scoring component 510 .
- Browser selection engine scoring component 510 generates scores for each of the available browsers based on, for example, the rules, weights, etc. described above, along with the pertinent information associated with the requested content.
- a weight value is assigned to each browser engine based on the weighting rules.
- the device attributes established in the preparation phase may be OS type/kind, OS version/patch level, browser patch level, ownership, and user type.
- a browser weighting may be assigned for each attribute.
- each browser may be assigned a weighting (or score) based on how current the patch level is, as described above.
- weighting or score
- FIG. 6 illustrates a table 600 of exemplary browser weights (or scores) that may be generated based on the device attributes described above.
- a weight value is assigned to each browser engine based on the weighting rules.
- the organizational attributes established in the preparation phase may be the web server domain and the security posture of the computing device.
- RE 1 With respect to web server domain, when the domain is internal (i.e., within enterprise) RE 1 is weighted higher than RE 2 and RE 3 and is restricted to specific internal application servers running legacy applications. With respect to device security, when the device security is poor, RE 3 is safer (or “better”) than both RE 1 and RE 2.
- FIG. 7 illustrates a table 700 of exemplary browser weights that may be generated based on the organizational attributes described above.
- a weight value is assigned to each browser engine based on the weighting rules.
- the environmental attributes established in the preparation phase may be whether or not an “active” threat has been identified for the browsers and whether or not an exploit for the browsers has been published.
- Examples are as follows: With respect to active threats, one or more of the browsers may be known to be currently targeted by an active threat. With respect to exploits, an exploit may have been recently published for the browsers.
- FIG. 8 illustrates a table 800 of exemplary browser weights that may be generated based on the environmental attributes described above.
- the browser weights (or scores) generated based on different sets of rules may be combined to provide an overall representation of which browser is “best” (or “correct” or “preferred”).
- the web server domain is internal (i.e., within enterprise), so RE 1 is weighted higher than RE 2 and RE 3 and is restricted to specific internal application servers running legacy applications.
- the content contains a particular type of object or code, so RE 3 is safer than RE 2 which is safer than RE 1.
- the content links to a known malicious website, so RE 3 is safer than RE 2 which is safer than RE 1.
- FIG. 9 illustrates a table 900 of exemplary browser scores that may be generated based on the rules and attributes described above. As is shown, given the particular rules and attributes, RE 1 scores higher than RE 2 and RE 3 with respect to some rules and weights, while RE 3 scores the highest with respect to other rules and weights.
- a browser selection engine scoring component 510 may compile and/or compute a total score for each of the browsers, such as the generic example shown in table 1000 depicted in FIG. 10 .
- browser selection engine (BSE) 512 selects one of the available rendering engines (or browsers) 514 based on the total scores calculated for each of the browsers 514 (e.g., the browser with the highest score).
- the selected browser may be automatically instanciated to render the requested content.
- the user is provided with an indication of the selected browser (e.g., via a message on a display device on the computing device of the user), perhaps in combination with an option of whether or not to render the requested content with the browser selected by the browser selection engine 512 .
- FIG. 11 an additional flowchart showing an additional exemplary method 1100 for rendering content is depicted, here again in which various aspects of the present invention may be realized.
- the various steps depicted in method 1100 may be completed in an order or version differing from the depicted embodiment to suit a particular scenario.
- Method 1100 begins (step 1102 ) with the establishing of rules and/or weights for the available rendering browsers (step 1104 ), in a manner described above with respect to, for example, weight establishment block 502 in FIG. 5 .
- a request to render content is received (step 1106 ).
- the request may be sent through any suitable computing device.
- the content is stored on a remote computing device (e.g., a server), but it should be understood that the content may also be stored on the computing device from which the request is sent (e.g., a downloaded file).
- the rendering browsers are then scored based on the rules/weights previously established combined with information associated with, for example, the content and/or the available browsers (step 1108 ).
- this information may be related to any attribute of the computing environment in which method 1100 is performed, such as, security attributes (e.g., related to the content, the computing device, the OS, the browser, etc.), organizational policies, user preference, as described above.
- a rendering browser is then selected from the available rendering browsers based on the scores (step 1110 ).
- the system is configured such that the rendering browser with the highest score is selected.
- the selected browser may be the one with the lowest score.
- the content is then rendered using the selected rendering browser (step 1112 ).
- the selected browser is automatically instanciated, and the content is opened and displayed (e.g., on a display device of the user's computing device).
- the system may provide the user with an indication (e.g., via a message on the display device of the computing device) of which browser has been selected and perhaps provide the user with an option of whether or not to proceed with the selected browser. In this way, in some embodiments, the selected browser may essentially be simply recommended to the user.
- method 1100 again establishes (or reestablishes) the rules and/or weights for the available rendering browsers (step 1114 , step 1104 ). If no such changes have occurred, but another request to render content has been received (step 1116 ), method 1100 again scores the browsers in the manner(s) described above (step 1108 ). If another request has not been received (step 1116 ), method 1100 ends (step 1118 ).
- the present invention may be a system, a method, and/or a computer program product.
- the computer program product may include a computer readable storage medium (or media) having computer readable program instructions thereon for causing a processor to carry out aspects of the present invention.
- the computer readable storage medium can be a tangible device that can retain and store instructions for use by an instruction execution device.
- the computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
- a non-exhaustive list of more specific examples of the computer readable storage medium includes the following: a portable computer diskette, a hard disk, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory), a static random access memory (SRAM), a portable compact disc read-only memory (CD-ROM), a digital versatile disk (DVD), a memory stick, a floppy disk, a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon, and any suitable combination of the foregoing.
- RAM random access memory
- ROM read-only memory
- EPROM or Flash memory erasable programmable read-only memory
- SRAM static random access memory
- CD-ROM compact disc read-only memory
- DVD digital versatile disk
- memory stick a floppy disk
- a mechanically encoded device such as punch-cards or raised structures in a groove having instructions recorded thereon
- a computer readable storage medium is not to be construed as being transitory signals per se, such as radio waves or other freely propagating electromagnetic waves, electromagnetic waves propagating through a waveguide or other transmission media (e.g., light pulses passing through a fiber-optic cable), or electrical signals transmitted through a wire.
- Computer readable program instructions described herein can be downloaded to respective computing/processing devices from a computer readable storage medium or to an external computer or external storage device via a network, for example, the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network and/or a wireless network.
- the network may comprise copper transmission cables, optical transmission fibers, wireless transmission, routers, firewalls, switches, gateway computers and/or edge servers.
- a network adapter card or network interface in each computing/processing device receives computer readable program instructions from the network and forwards the computer readable program instructions for storage in a computer readable storage medium within the respective computing/processing device.
- Computer readable program instructions for carrying out operations of the present invention may be assembler instructions, instruction-set-architecture (ISA) instructions, machine instructions, machine dependent instructions, microcode, firmware instructions, state-setting data, or either source code or object code written in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Smalltalk, C++ or the like, and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the “C” programming language or similar programming languages.
- the computer readable program instructions may execute entirely on the user's computer, partly on the user's computer, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computer and partly on a remote computer or entirely on the remote computer or server.
- the remote computer may be connected to the user's computer through any type of network, including a local area network (LAN) or a wide area network (WAN), or the connection may be made to an external computer (for example, through the Internet using an Internet Service Provider).
- electronic circuitry including, for example, programmable logic circuitry, field-programmable gate arrays (FPGA), or programmable logic arrays (PLA) may execute the computer readable program instructions by utilizing state information of the computer readable program instructions to personalize the electronic circuitry, in order to perform aspects of the present invention.
- These computer readable program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions/acts specified in the flowcharts and/or block diagram block or blocks.
- These computer readable program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage medium that can direct a computer, a programmable data processing apparatus, and/or other devices to function in a particular manner, such that the computer readable storage medium having instructions stored therein comprises an article of manufacture including instructions which implement aspects of the function/act specified in the flowcharts and/or block diagram block or blocks.
- the computer readable program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer, other programmable data processing apparatus, or other device to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer, other programmable apparatus or other device to produce a computer implemented process, such that the instructions which execute on the computer, other programmable apparatus, or other device implement the functions/acts specified in the flowcharts and/or block diagram block or blocks.
- each block in the flowcharts or block diagrams may represent a module, segment, or portion of instructions, which comprises one or more executable instructions for implementing the specified logical function(s).
- the functions noted in the block may occur out of the order noted in the figures.
- two blocks shown in succession may, in fact, be executed substantially concurrently, or the blocks may sometimes be executed in the reverse order, depending upon the functionality involved.
Abstract
Description
-
- If device OS=“
OS 1,” then RE 1=30,RE 2=40,RE 3=80. - If device ownership=“company,” then RE 1=10,
RE 2=300,RE 3=10. - If device OS patch level=“current,” then RE 1=10,
RE 2=10,RE 3=10. - If device OS Patch level=“current−1,” then RE 1=50,
RE 2=100,RE 3=50. - If device OS Patch level=“current−2,” then RE 1=10,
RE 2=100,RE 3=10.
- If device OS=“
-
- If URL domain=“.my_company,” then RE 1=10,
RE 2=10,RE 3=10. - If URL domain≠“.my_company,” then RE 1=5,
RE 2=300,RE 3=10. - If security posture of endpoint=“poor,” then RE 1=5,
RE 2=300,RE 3=10. - If security posture of endpoint=“good,” then RE 1=10,
RE 2=100,RE 3=10. - If security posture of endpoint=“excellent,” then RE 1=10,
RE 2=10,RE 3=10.
- If URL domain=“.my_company,” then RE 1=10,
-
- If current active threat=“
RE 1 remote code execution,” then RE 1=10,RE 2=100,RE 3=100. - If device is connected to a “trusted” network, then RE 1=10,
RE 2=10,RE 3=10. - If device is connected to an “untrusted” network, then RE 1=100,
RE 2=500,RE 3=10.
- If current active threat=“
Claims (15)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/273,020 US10430595B2 (en) | 2016-09-22 | 2016-09-22 | Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers |
US16/534,951 US10963580B2 (en) | 2016-09-22 | 2019-08-07 | Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/273,020 US10430595B2 (en) | 2016-09-22 | 2016-09-22 | Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/534,951 Continuation US10963580B2 (en) | 2016-09-22 | 2019-08-07 | Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180082070A1 US20180082070A1 (en) | 2018-03-22 |
US10430595B2 true US10430595B2 (en) | 2019-10-01 |
Family
ID=61621175
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US15/273,020 Expired - Fee Related US10430595B2 (en) | 2016-09-22 | 2016-09-22 | Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers |
US16/534,951 Active US10963580B2 (en) | 2016-09-22 | 2019-08-07 | Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/534,951 Active US10963580B2 (en) | 2016-09-22 | 2019-08-07 | Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US10430595B2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20210136059A1 (en) * | 2019-11-05 | 2021-05-06 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Monitoring resource utilization of an online system based on browser attributes collected for a session |
CN111984892A (en) * | 2020-08-27 | 2020-11-24 | 网易(杭州)网络有限公司 | Page access method, device, equipment and storage medium |
CN114077368B (en) * | 2022-01-19 | 2022-06-28 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Vehicle-mounted applet running method and device, computer equipment and storage medium |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20040012627A1 (en) | 2002-07-17 | 2004-01-22 | Sany Zakharia | Configurable browser for adapting content to diverse display types |
US7225225B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2007-05-29 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Selective synchronization of web browsers |
EP1895744A1 (en) | 2006-08-30 | 2008-03-05 | Research In Motion Limited | Method and apparatus for simplified user access to multiple browser transports in a mobile communication device |
US20110087962A1 (en) | 2009-10-14 | 2011-04-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for the automatic predictive selection of input methods for web browsers |
US20130097298A1 (en) | 2011-10-18 | 2013-04-18 | OneScreen Inc. | Standardized adapter interface for multiple browser-based devices |
US9009218B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2015-04-14 | Broadcom Corporation | Cloud server/thin client/gateway selective browser instantiation |
US9055048B2 (en) * | 2003-05-16 | 2015-06-09 | Questionmark Computing Limited | Secure browser |
US20160034118A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-02-04 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Determining appropriate browsing applications for selected network resources |
-
2016
- 2016-09-22 US US15/273,020 patent/US10430595B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2019
- 2019-08-07 US US16/534,951 patent/US10963580B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7225225B2 (en) | 2001-03-30 | 2007-05-29 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Selective synchronization of web browsers |
US20040012627A1 (en) | 2002-07-17 | 2004-01-22 | Sany Zakharia | Configurable browser for adapting content to diverse display types |
US9055048B2 (en) * | 2003-05-16 | 2015-06-09 | Questionmark Computing Limited | Secure browser |
EP1895744A1 (en) | 2006-08-30 | 2008-03-05 | Research In Motion Limited | Method and apparatus for simplified user access to multiple browser transports in a mobile communication device |
US20110087962A1 (en) | 2009-10-14 | 2011-04-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for the automatic predictive selection of input methods for web browsers |
US9009218B2 (en) | 2011-02-23 | 2015-04-14 | Broadcom Corporation | Cloud server/thin client/gateway selective browser instantiation |
US20130097298A1 (en) | 2011-10-18 | 2013-04-18 | OneScreen Inc. | Standardized adapter interface for multiple browser-based devices |
US20160034118A1 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-02-04 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Determining appropriate browsing applications for selected network resources |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
Chen et al., "App Isolation: Get the Security of Multiple Browsers with Just One," ACM, 2011 (11 pages). |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20190362084A1 (en) | 2019-11-28 |
US20180082070A1 (en) | 2018-03-22 |
US10963580B2 (en) | 2021-03-30 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9990195B2 (en) | Generating and managing applications using any number of different platforms | |
US10841328B2 (en) | Intelligent container resource placement based on container image vulnerability assessment | |
US9998474B2 (en) | Secure assertion attribute for a federated log in | |
US10963580B2 (en) | Systems and methods for rule based dynamic selection of rendering browsers | |
US10552616B2 (en) | Determining and managing application vulnerabilities | |
US11573821B2 (en) | Executing commands in a virtual environment | |
US10534804B2 (en) | Customized content for social browsing flow | |
US20170061287A1 (en) | FAQs UPDATER AND GENERATOR FOR MULTI-COMMUNICATION CHANNELS | |
US10237364B2 (en) | Resource usage anonymization | |
US10902037B2 (en) | Cognitive data curation on an interactive infrastructure management system | |
US9824113B2 (en) | Selective content storage with device synchronization | |
US11275800B2 (en) | Gauging credibility of digital content items | |
US20180101794A1 (en) | Method and system for creating mapping between business models | |
US11669676B2 (en) | Comparing similar applications with redirection to a new web page | |
US11205042B2 (en) | System and method to transform content and to generate a visual indicator of that transformation | |
US20180113942A1 (en) | Testing pairings to determine whether they are publically known |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHENNAMSETTY, RAMAMOHAN;DAVIS, CHARLES K.;DOTSON, CHRISTOPHER R.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20160914 TO 20160921;REEL/FRAME:039834/0696 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, NEW Y Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHENNAMSETTY, RAMAMOHAN;DAVIS, CHARLES K., III;DOTSON, CHRISTOPHER R.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20160914 TO 20160929;REEL/FRAME:039903/0299 |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP., ISSUE FEE NOT PAID |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED FOR FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEES (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: EXP.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20231001 |