US10385649B2 - Plug of extended reach - Google Patents
Plug of extended reach Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US10385649B2 US10385649B2 US15/697,572 US201715697572A US10385649B2 US 10385649 B2 US10385649 B2 US 10385649B2 US 201715697572 A US201715697572 A US 201715697572A US 10385649 B2 US10385649 B2 US 10385649B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- tool
- slip
- casing
- slips
- run
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 claims description 11
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims 8
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 claims 4
- 229910001018 Cast iron Inorganic materials 0.000 abstract description 34
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 28
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 33
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 17
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 17
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 16
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 16
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000005755 formation reaction Methods 0.000 description 10
- 235000019589 hardness Nutrition 0.000 description 10
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 10
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000004568 cement Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910000838 Al alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 229910000881 Cu alloy Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 235000015076 Shorea robusta Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 244000166071 Shorea robusta Species 0.000 description 3
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 238000007789 sealing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N methane Chemical compound C VNWKTOKETHGBQD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000012935 Averaging Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001369 Brass Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 229910000906 Bronze Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010951 brass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010974 bronze Substances 0.000 description 1
- KUNSUQLRTQLHQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N copper tin Chemical compound [Cu].[Sn] KUNSUQLRTQLHQQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011152 fibreglass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003345 natural gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000088 plastic resin Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
- E21B33/1204—Packers; Plugs permanent; drillable
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B29/00—Cutting or destroying pipes, packers, plugs, or wire lines, located in boreholes or wells, e.g. cutting of damaged pipes, of windows; Deforming of pipes in boreholes or wells; Reconditioning of well casings while in the ground
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B29/00—Cutting or destroying pipes, packers, plugs, or wire lines, located in boreholes or wells, e.g. cutting of damaged pipes, of windows; Deforming of pipes in boreholes or wells; Reconditioning of well casings while in the ground
- E21B29/002—Cutting, e.g. milling, a pipe with a cutter rotating along the circumference of the pipe
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
- E21B33/124—Units with longitudinally-spaced plugs for isolating the intermediate space
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
- E21B33/129—Packers; Plugs with mechanical slips for hooking into the casing
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/12—Packers; Plugs
- E21B33/129—Packers; Plugs with mechanical slips for hooking into the casing
- E21B33/1293—Packers; Plugs with mechanical slips for hooking into the casing with means for anchoring against downward and upward movement
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B33/00—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells
- E21B33/10—Sealing or packing boreholes or wells in the borehole
- E21B33/13—Methods or devices for cementing, for plugging holes, crevices, or the like
- E21B33/134—Bridging plugs
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/14—Obtaining from a multiple-zone well
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B43/00—Methods or apparatus for obtaining oil, gas, water, soluble or meltable materials or a slurry of minerals from wells
- E21B43/25—Methods for stimulating production
- E21B43/26—Methods for stimulating production by forming crevices or fractures
- E21B43/261—Separate steps of (1) cementing, plugging or consolidating and (2) fracturing or attacking the formation
Definitions
- This invention relates to a settable well tool used in wells extending into the earth and to slips used to wedge the well tool inside a pipe string.
- one procedure is to drill a horizontal leg through the productive formation, perform several frac jobs to generate vertical fractures at horizontally spaced locations along the horizontal leg of the well and produce the contents of the formation to the surface through conventional surface equipment.
- frac jobs In order to frac a series of spaced locations in the horizontal leg, it may be necessary to set a bridge plug or other settable well tool to isolate the previously fraced zone from the next zone to be fraced.
- the settable well tools are removed, typically by drilling with a coiled tubing unit or with a work string and workover/completion rig.
- Cast iron metal slips are more time consuming to drill up when one has the luxury of a workover rig wording in a vertical well where drill collars can foe used to apply weight to the bit. It is considerably more tedious to drill up a bridge plug using cast iron slips in a horizontal well or using a coiled tubing unit where very little weight can be applied to the bit.
- Shales or other tight formations completed in a horizontal well section have a history of rapidly declining production so an economic limit is reached sooner than desired.
- One proposed technique to continue producing such a well is to refrac the well at intervals between the original fractures. This is currently accomplished by squeezing off the old fracture with cement, drilling out cement inside the casing string, reperforating the well between the old fractures and then retracing the well through the new perforations.
- the problem with squeezing off the old perforations is that one is never confident that the squeeze job won't fail at frac pressure in one or more of the perforations so frac fluid is diverted into an old fracture.
- Such cast iron bridge plugs are commercially available from all major oilfield service companies and have typically been used in vertical wells. In vertical wells, using a work over rig, a drill string and drill collars, enough weight can be put on the cast iron bridge plug to drill it up in a reasonable length of time. The problem is it is difficult and slow to drill up a single cast iron bridge plug in a horizontal well segment where very little weight can foe applied to the bit. To date, it has not been possible to drill up two or more cast iron bridge plugs in a horizontal well because debris from the upper bridge plug interferes with and prevents drilling up the lower bridge plug due, in large measure, because not much weight can be put on the bit. In addition, it has not been possible to drill up two or more cast iron bridge plugs in a single bit run in a horizontal well because the effort completely wears out bits.
- Cast iron slips are typically manufactured in one or two relatively large pieces. When the tool is assembled, two piece slips are held together in some fashion so they act as a one piece device. When the tool is set in the well, the slips are forced onto an expander cone which fractures the slips into a series of segments that are trapped between the expander cone and the inside of the casing. In the past, the slip segments are of one piece and extend along the axis of the well. When the tool is drilled up in order to conduct another operation, the expander cone is drilled up thereby freeing the slip segments. Because the slip segments are so large, they must be either ground up by the bit and circulated out of the well or allowed to fall into the rat hole below the lowest perforations in the case of a vertical well. In the case of a horizonal well, large slip segments must be reduced in size by the bit or mill in order to circulate to the surface.
- a settable well tool can be made of, or made mainly of, composite materials for increased drillability and can be of smaller O.D. than prior art tools and still be able to expand into setting engagement with a production string. This allows the settable well tool to pass through a section of the production string that is restricted for one reason or other.
- the heel or curved section of a horizontal well is more restricted than expected. This can occur because the drilled hole has dogleg sections that restrict the passage of tools of conventional O.D. This can also occur because the production string cemented in the well has become corrugated or ovate on the inside of the bend. Other examples will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
- the restriction in the production string is from a casing patch set over a damaged section of a production string or set over old perforations in the process of refracing an existing horizontal well.
- the well tool described herein can pass through the reduced I.D. of the casing patch and then expand into gripping and sealing engagement with the inside of an unpatched section of the casing. It might be thought that one would simply duplicate the conventional cast iron bridge plug having this capability yet making the components of a composite material. This has not proven to be feasible.
- a conventional bridge plug passes through the heaviest wall I.D. pipe but must expand enough to wedge against the interior of the lightest wall I.D. pipe.
- this problem is magnified or made worse because the tool can desirably pass through the inside a casing patch in the heaviest wall pipe and have the capability of expanding into gripping engagement with the inside of the lightest wall pipe.
- Table I shows an example of the reduction in thickness from casing patches in 41 ⁇ 2′′ O.D. oilfield casing:
- One technique to increase the expansibility of a well tool can be by increasing the angle and/or the length of the abutting composite expander cone, increasing the corresponding single and/or length of the abutting face on the cast iron slips and/of increasing the thickness of the slips and reducing the O.D. of the mandrel. This proved unsuccessful.
- a close study of the problem revealed the cast iron slips either gouged into the composite cone during setting whereby the slips were not expanded sufficiently or, after setting, the composite expander cone extruded between gaps in the cast iron slips thereby allowing the slips to relax and retreat away from the inside of the casing and thereby lose their grip.
- the hardness of the composite expander cone and the strength of the expander cone can be increased to avoid these problems.
- a drillable metal skin can be provided on the exterior of the composite expander cone.
- a drillable metal end can be provided for the expander cone.
- a composite material having an increased hardness and strength may be employed. Other techniques will be apparent to those skilled in the art.
- slips can be made thicker in order to provide greater expansibility of the slips. In one sense, this is counterintuitive and is clearly counterproductive because thicker cast iron slips are more difficult to drill up than conventional cast iron slips.
- slips can be designed to fracture into much smaller pieces than conventional cast iron slips. These pieces can be small enough that they can be circulated out of a well without requiring further reduction in size.
- slips of this design can be used on any settable well tool that can ultimately be drilled up, such as one that is not designed or intended to be run through a casing patch or other restricted casing section.
- increasing the drillability of a settable well tool is desirable, regardless of whether the tool is run into a vertical or horizontal well, regardless of whether casing patches have been run into the well or regardless of whether there is a restriction in the casing.
- the advantage of the disclosed composite settable tool may be viewed as increased expansibility of the settable tool.
- Typical prior art composite tools are capable of expanding on the order of 1 ⁇ 4′′ in diameter.
- composite tools intended to work inside 41 ⁇ 2′′ O.D. casing expand about 6% or so while tools intended to work inside 51 ⁇ 2′′ O.D. casing expand about 5% or so.
- some embodiments of the disclosed tool can expand at least 15% and preferably can expand considerably more, e.g. in the range of 20-25%, as will be more fully apparent hereinafter.
- One object of this invention is to provide an improved composite settable well tool which can be drilled up more easily than prior art devices.
- Another object of this invention is to provide an improved settable well tool which has increased expansibility, e.g. it can be run through casing having some type restriction therein.
- Another object of this invention is to provide improved slips for wedging a down hole tool in a well where the slips fracture into relatively small pieces in the act of setting the slips.
- FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a horizontal well showing a set of perforations which have been fraced;
- FIG. 2 is an enlarged view of a well section where a casing patch has been placed over an existing set of perforations
- FIG. 3 is a view, partly in cross-section, of a settable well tool
- FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of an expander cone used in the well tool of FIG. 3 , the cross-section being taken along line 4 - 4 of FIG. 7 as viewed in the direction indicated by the arrows;
- FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of an expander cone made of a composite material having a drillable metal layer on the cone;
- FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of an expander cone
- FIG. 7 is an end view of the expander cones of FIGS. 4-6 ;
- FIG. 8 is an end view of slips used in the well tool of FIG. 3 ;
- FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of the slips of FIG. 8 , taken substantially along line 9 - 9 thereof as viewed in the direction indicated by the arrows;
- FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of the slips of FIG. 7 , taken substantially along line 10 - 10 thereof as viewed in the direction indicated by the arrows;
- FIG. 11 is a side view of the slips of FIGS. 8 and 9 ;
- FIG. 12 is an isometric view of a slip segment following fracturing of the slips into a series of segments
- FIG. 13 is a back view of the slip segment of FIG. 12 ;
- FIG. 14 is an isometric view of the slip segment of FIGS. 12-13 after it has been fractured along a zone of weakness perpendicular to the tool axis;
- FIG. 15 is an isometric view of the upper half of the slip segment of FIG. 14 after it has been fractured along a second zone of weakness parallel to the tool axis;
- FIG. 16 is an isometric view of the lower half of the slip segment of FIG. 14 after it has been fractured along a second zone of weakness parallel to the tool axis;
- FIG. 17 is an end view, similar to FIG. 8 , of another embodiment of a set of slips.
- FIG. 18 is a partial isometric view of another embodiment of a set of slips.
- the present invention relates to devices for use in hydrocarbon wells drilled into the earth and completed using a variety of techniques.
- the materials from which the tools are made are subject to considerable variation.
- Some of the components can be of drillable metal and some can be of composite material.
- a composite material can be a fabric core impregnated with a resin which is hardened in some suitable manner. Any components left in the well are usually made of drillable materials.
- Various changes and adaptations can be made in the tools without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is to be measured solely by the claims themselves.
- FIGS. 1-2 there is illustrated a hydrocarbon well 10 having a vertical well bore section 12 and a horizontal well bore section 14 .
- the horizontal well bore section 14 can extend through a hydrocarbon bearing formation 16 .
- a casing string 18 can be cemented in the well bore sections 12 , 14 by a cement sheath 20 .
- the well 10 is illustrated as being a well that has already produced through a series of perforations 22 which were stimulated by a frac job to provide a series of fractures 24 . In some situations, production from the well 10 can decline to an extent where it can be desirable to blank off the existing perforations 22 and fractures 24 and produce one or more new fractures.
- FIG. 2 shows a casing patch 26 that has been run into the well 10 and expanded in a conventional manner to blank off the perforations 22 and the fracture 24 .
- Casing patches are conventional equipment and are available from Owen Oil Tools, Weatherford International, Baker Hughes Incorporated and various independent oil field service companies.
- Conventional casing patches are tubular and typically include an inner metal layer and a thin outer rubber or resilient layer. The patches initially have an O.D. slightly less them the I.D. of the casing into which they are run.
- the patch When the patch is positioned at its desired location, a swedge is pulled through the patch stretching the patch beyond the elastic limit of the metal layer and forcing the patch against the inside of the casing. Because the metal layer is stretched beyond its elastic limit, the patch remains against the casing and does not relax to its original O.D. As mentioned, the difficulty is that the thickness of the casing patch reduces the I.D. of the casing string 18 and thereby complicates expanding a settable well tool against the inside of the casing string 18 .
- a series of casing patches can be run into the well 10 and set across all existing perforations. Then, a first set of new perforations can be created at the most distant location from the surface, the first set of new perforations is fraced to produce a first fracture and a bridge plug is set near the first new fracture to seal it off temporarily. This process is repeated as many times as desired to produce a series of new fractures which hopefully will reestablish commercial production from the well 10 . This process is illustrated in FIGS. 1-2 where the old perforations 22 and 34 are blanked off, a new set of perforations 28 are created and then fraced to produce a new fracture 36 .
- a settable tool 32 which is illustrated as a bridge plug can be run above the first new set of perforations 28 in order to shoot a second set of perforations 34 and frac through them to create a second new fracture 36 .
- the bridge plug 32 is illustrated as being of the type shown in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/317,497, filed Dec. 23, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference for a more complete description thereof.
- the bridge plug 32 can comprise a mandrel 38 , a pair of slips 40 , 42 which may be identical, a pair of expanders or expander cones 44 , 46 which may be identical, an expandable seal 48 , a muleshoe 50 and a setting assembly 52 including a reaction ring 54 abutting the upper slips 40 and a sliding sleeve 56 .
- the settable tool 32 can be made of drillable materials.
- the mandrel 30 , the slip expanders 44 , 46 , the tube 56 , the muleshoe 50 , the reaction ring 54 are made of drillable materials selected from the group consisting essentially of aluminum, aluminum alloys, copper, copper alloys and composites.
- the strength and hardness of a composite depends on the fabric material, the resin employed and the conditions under which the composite is manufactured. Composites can be made in a wide range of strengths and hardnesses, many of which are drillable.
- the seal 48 is typically of rubber and the slips 40 , 44 may be of cast iron.
- a wire line or other setting tool (not shown) is threaded onto a connection 58 and including a sleeve (not shown) abutting the sleeve 56 .
- the reaction ring 54 pushes against the upper slips 40 .
- the expander cones 44 , 46 are ultimately driven into the slips 40 , 42 .
- the slips 40 , 42 are fractured as explained more fully hereinafter and expand into engagement with the interior of the casing string 18 thereby wedging the bridge plug 32 securely against the inside of the casing string 18 .
- the seal 48 also expands against the inside of the casing 18 thereby providing a pressure seal.
- the settable tool 32 its set inside the casing 18 in a more-or-less conventional manner.
- the settable tool 32 is capable of being run through the casing patch 26 or other restriction and then expanded into gripping engagement with the inside of the casing string 18 .
- Prior art expander cones are made of a composite material or engineered plastic. These type materials can comprise a fabric impregnated with a resin which is then cured to form a blank which is then machined into a desired shape.
- One modification of the settable tool 32 that facilitates increased expansibility is the design of the expander cones 44 , 46 . Simply increasing the angle of the frustoconical surface 60 of the cones 44 , 46 and the complementary surface in the slips 40 , 42 did not work.
- the expander cone 44 is considerably harder, at least in the area of the surface 60 , than is conventional.
- Conventional composite materials used in well tools i.e. fiberglass impregnated with a standard plastic resin, has a Rockwell B hardness in the range of 45-50. These materials have been proven to fail when used as an expander cone in an extended reach well tool.
- the hardness of the composite frustoconical surface 60 is at least 70 on the Rockwell B scale and preferably is at least 80 which, in the right situation, can be sufficient to prevent extruding the expander cone between the slip segments.
- the ability of the expander cone to withstand the forces of an extended reach tool may depend on other factors such as tensile or compressive strength, meaning the higher the better.
- Increasing the angle of the surface 60 and increasing the hardness of the surface 60 provides a partial solution to increased expansibility and, in one approach, one might increase the expansibility of settable well tools without providing a single device that would operate over the entire range necessary for operation in a specific sized casing. For example, one might provide two slightly different tools for operation in 51 ⁇ 2′′ casing, e.g. one tool for 51 ⁇ 2′′ casing weighing 15.5#-17#/foot and a second tool for 51 ⁇ 2′′ casing weighing 20-26#/foot. In situations like this, one could design a tool using a high angle expandable cone of increased hardness to provide the increased expansibility.
- the expander 44 can otherwise be of conventional shape and can comprise a body 62 having a central passage 64 and one or more set screw passages 66 for securing the expander cone 44 to the mandrel 30 .
- the bottom of the expander cone 44 includes a series of tapered segments 68 which receive the seal 48 .
- the segments 68 can act like flower petals and constrain movement of the seal 48 into sealing engagement with the casing 18 .
- a metal cone can be provided to further constrain movement of the seal.
- the cone 44 can be scored to split and thereby create the segments 68 in an appropriate manner during expansion of the seal 48 .
- a guide or series of guides 72 may be provided that will act in a manner to be disclosed more fully hereinafter.
- the guides 72 can comprise a pin glued in a blind passage 74 , can comprise a set screw threaded into the passage 74 or can comprise any mechanism providing an abutment or shoulder 76 extending above the conical surface 60 .
- an expander cone can comprise a body 80 having a central passage 82 and one or more set screw passages 84 for securing the expander 78 to the mandrel 38 .
- the body 80 can be of a conventional composite material, i.e. having conventional hardness, and can be equipped with a sleeve 86 or layer of drillable metal such as aluminum and aluminum alloys, copper and copper alloys such as brass or bronze and the like.
- the bottom of the expander 78 can be of the same style and shape as that of the expander 44 .
- the sleeve 86 can have turned ends 88 , 90 captivating the sleeve 86 to the expander body 80 . In this manner, the hardness of the conical upper end of the expander body 80 can be increased.
- the expander 78 may also be provided with a guide or series of guides 92 comprising a pin or set screw 94 in a blind passage 96 .
- an expander 98 having a one end 100 of a composite material and a conical end section 102 of a drillable metal such as aluminum, aluminum alloys, copper, copper alloys and the like.
- the end 100 can be shaped and configured as in the expander 44 having a threaded connection 104 for receiving threads 106 provided by the metal end section 102 .
- One or the other of the sections 100 , 102 may have passages 108 for receiving set screws 110 to fix the expander 98 to the mandrel 38 .
- the expander 98 can have a guide or series of guides 112 on the conical surface 114 to promote reliable fracturing of the slips 40 as explained more fully hereinafter. If desired, the function of the guides 112 can foe accomplished by selecting the set screws 110 to extend beyond the conical surface 114 as will become more fully apparent hereinafter.
- Another approach to increase the expansibility of the settable well tool 32 is to increase the thickness of the cast iron slips. This is counterintuitive because it is often desirable to drill up settable well tools and thicker cast iron slips segments are much harder to drill up, meaning that one has traded one large advantage for one large disadvantage.
- the slips Upon expansion of the well tool into engagement with the casing, the slips move relative to the expanders. Because the slips are made with a series of external grooves parallel to the tool axis 116 , the slips fracture into a series of substantially identical elongate slip segments which are parallel to the tool axis 116 . When conventional cast iron slips are thickened in an attempt to increase the expansibility of a well tool, the well tool inherently becomes more difficult to drill up.
- the slips 40 , 42 are designed to fracture into an unusually large number of pieces.
- Standard cast iron slips fracture into a number of elongate slip segments corresponding to the number of external grooves that promote fracturing.
- conventional cast iron slips typically comprise six or eight grooves causing the slips to fracture into six or eight elongate slip segments.
- the slips 40 , 42 also fracture into a series of elongate slip segments and each slip segment can further fractured into at least two pieces and may preferably be fractured into at least four pieces. It is believed that fracturing first occurs along the external grooves but it is not material in which order fracturing occurs.
- each slip piece weighs much less than conventional slip pieces, meaning they are much easier to circulate out of the well without much, if any, drilling of the pieces.
- the slips 40 include a body 118 that may be of one piece but which may be multipiece that is held together by a suitable mechanism in the retracted position shown in FIG. 3 .
- the slip body 118 includes a central passage 120 having a tapered or conical surface 122 which is at a complementary angle to the conical surfaces 60 , 86 , 114 of the expanders 44 , 78 , 98 .
- the slip body 118 can include a series of grooves 124 , 126 which can be on the exterior of the slips and which can divide the slips into a series of more-or-less identical slip segments 128 .
- some of the grooves 124 may be considerably deeper or more pronounced than alternate grooves 126 . This is believed to cause fracturing along the grooves 124 first but the order in which fracturing occurs is not material. It will be seen that the grooves 124 , 126 produce zones of weakness parallel to the tool axis 116 .
- Each of the slip segments 128 includes teeth or wickers 130 on the exterior that grip the casing 18 when the slips 40 are expanded. It may be preferred to heat treat the slips 40 , 42 so that only the surface of the wickers 130 is hardened.
- Some or all of the slip segments 128 can include a second zone of weakness or notch 132 transverse to the tool axis 116 which causes the slip segment 128 to fracture into upper and lower halves 134 , 136 as shown in FIG. 14 .
- the notches 132 lie in a common plane.
- the notch or crease 132 is distinct from the inside edge or inside I.D. 138 of the teeth 130 because conventional cast iron slips do not fracture at the edge 138 .
- the notches 132 may be coincident with one of the tooth edges 138 and, in the illustrated embodiment, are very close to one of the tooth edges 138 .
- the second zone of weakness 132 accordingly divides the slip segment 128 into two pieces.
- the segment halves 134 , 136 may vary in the range of 1 ⁇ 3 to 2 ⁇ 3rds of the weight of the slip segment 128 and may preferably each be about half the weight of the slip segment 128 . Another relevant characteristic is the tendency of the segment halves 134 , 136 to fall by gravity through an upwardly moving body of liquid.
- the segment halves 134 , 136 may preferably be equally propelled upwardly in a column of moving liquid so they may be circulated out of a well with little or no additional reduction in size, as from drilling.
- the location of the notch or crease 132 may vary considerably along the long dimension of the slip segment 128 .
- the slips 40 , 42 can be wholly of metal, or may comprise non-metallic inclusions but, in any event, the metal of the slips 40 , 42 is continuous and provides the structural strength and integrity of the slips 40 , 42 .
- a more sophisticated approach is to determine a cross-sectional parameter of the upper and lower segment halves 134 , 136 that is related to their movement in an upwardly moving column of liquid. This parameter and the weight of the segment halves may be combined to provide an optimum location for the crease 132 .
- some or all of the slip segments 128 provide a third zone of weakness or passage 140 opening between the conical surface 122 and an end 142 of the slip body 118 .
- the passage 140 is conveniently illustrated as a cylindrical hole. If may be of any desired shape.
- the third zone of weakness can accordingly be generally parallel to the tool axis 116 .
- the slip segment halves 134 , 136 can divide roughly into mirror imagine halves 144 , 146 , meaning that each slip segment 128 has the potential to divide into four slip pieces.
- slip segments 128 can include multiple horizontal creases or notches 132 thereby dividing the slip segments 128 into more than two horizontal pieces.
- the slip segments 128 can include multiple zones of weakness parallel to the tool axis thereby dividing the slip segments 128 into more than two vertical pieces.
- the tool 32 can be run on wireline and can be conveyed by slickline or wireline and can be dropped, pumped or run on coiled tubing into the well 10 .
- a setting tool (not shown) pulls on the connection 58 and pushes on the reaction ring 54 . This causes the mandrel 38 to move upwardly in FIG. 3 so the expanders 44 , 46 move into the central passages of the slips 40 , 42 .
- the guides 92 can be located in or near the entrance to the grooves 124 , 126 so the guides 92 enter the grooves 124 , 126 and guide the slips 40 , 42 in a predictable manner toward the expanders 44 , 46 . This can prevent the slips 40 , 42 from fracturing only on one side thereby preventing the slips 40 , 42 from clamshelling.
- connection 58 causes the expanders 44 , 46 to nest further in the slips 40 , 42 . Soon, the slips 40 , 42 fracture along zones of weakness provided by the grooves 124 , 126 . It is believed the larger grooves 124 fracture first although the sequence or order of fracturing is not material. This produces the series of separate slip segments 128 .
- the slip segments 128 can fracture to produce the pieces 134 , 136 and the pieces 134 , 136 can fracture to produce four pieces for every slips segment as shown in FIGS. 15-16 .
- slips may be designed to run in small enough casing to produce slip pieces of a desirable size if the slip segments 128 fracture into only two pieces. However, it may be preferred for each slip segment 128 to fracture into four pieces regardless of the size casing in which the slips 40 are run. It may be that some of the slip segments 128 do not fracture completely because of strange events but the complete fracturing of any slip segment increases the drillability of the slips 40 , 42 and is thus of considerable advantage.
- the upper end of the well tool 32 parts along a necked down area 148 so the connection 58 and sleeve 56 can be pulled out of the well 10 .
- a bit or mill on the bottom of coiled tubing or on the bottom of a work string is run into the well 10 .
- the bit is rotated and advanced into engagement with the tool 32 thereby drilling up the sleeve 56 part of the mandrel 30 , and the reaction ring 54 .
- the bit is typically small enough to pass through the expanded slip pieces and can drill on the upper expander 44 . When enough of the upper expander 44 is drilled up, the pieces from the slips 40 are no longer jammed against the casing 18 whereupon the slip pieces are circulated out of the well 10 by liquid pumped down the coiled tubing or down the work string.
- the slip pieces created by fracturing the slips 40 may preferably be small enough and light enough to be circulated out of the well 10 without further reduction in size. Circulation can be down through a coiled tubing or conventional tubing string and up in the annulus between the tubing and casing 18 or circulation can be down in the annulus between a tubing and casing strings and up inside the tubing.
- the upward velocity needed to circulate the slip pieces out of the well depends on the density of the circulating liquid or gas and properties of the slip pieces, i.e. their cross-sectional size and weight.
- the pieces of the slip segments can be as small and as light as possible, consistent with maintaining a grip on the inner casing wall.
- the pieces may preferably weigh less than one ounce and, in well tools of standard expansibility, the pieces may preferably weigh less than 3 ⁇ 4 ounce or even one half ounce.
- Cast iron pieces of these sizes are readily circulated out of the well 10 at typical pumping volumes. Irregular as they are, pieces of the slip segments are not stable during upward movement as a sphere might be. The slip pieces will likely tumble during movement inside the well 10 .
- a typical completion liquid is 2% by weight KCl in water or 2% by weight KCl in water with some HCl and having a density of about 9#/gallon.
- An upward velocity sufficient to circulate the slip pieces upwardly is less than about 400 feet/minute in a 9#/gallon completion liquid.
- normal pumping volumes produce upward velocities of less than about 200 feet/minute is adequate to circulate the slip pieces out of the well 10 without further reduction in size.
- coiled tubing produces an upward velocity of about 360 ft/minute inside 41 ⁇ 2′′ O.D.
- the slips 150 may differ from the slips 40 in the shape of the passage 152 through the slip body.
- the passage 152 is a groove opening through the tapered section, through one end 154 and through a central passage or side 156 of the slip body.
- FIG. 18 there is illustrated another embodiment of a set of slips 160 comprising a series of individual elongate unitary metal slip segments 162 which can be more-or-less identical and which extend about the periphery of the mandrel even though only three are shown in FIG. 18 .
- the slip segments 162 can be more-or-less identical to the segments 128 except the segments 162 are separate and independent.
- Some or all of the slip segments 162 include a plane or zone of weakness 164 running parallel an axis 166 of the slips 160 and axially of a tool of which FIG. 3 is an example. This may be accomplished by the provision of a passage 168 extending through the slip segments 162 .
- slip segments 162 include a place or zone of weakness 170 extending transverse to the axis 166 .
- the segments 162 can be individually mounted in the manner of the slips 47 and restrained in any suitable manner, as by the provision of frangible wire 172 , frangible pins, or other suitable means.
- the slips 160 operate in much the same manner as the slips 47 except there is no requirement for the slips to break into parallel segments since the segments 162 start out as independent elements. In other words, the slip segments 162 fracture along the zones of weakness into at least two and preferably four or more slip pieces.
- Casing patches 26 are run into the casing 18 adjacent each set of existing perforations 22 and set, usually by expanding the casing patch 26 into permanent engagement with the inside of the casing. This may seal off all or selected ones of the old perforations.
- a new set of perforations 28 is created near the end of the horizontal leg 14 of the well 10 and the first set of new perforations are fraced to produce a new fracture 30 .
- a bridge plug 32 is run into the casing 18 past one or more casing patches 26 to a location above the new fracture 30 and then set against the casing 18 thereby isolating the new fracture.
- a second new set of perforations 28 is created nearer the surface of the well 10 and then fraced to produce a second new fracture.
- a bridge plug 32 is run into the casing 18 past one or more casing patches to a location above the second new fracture and then set against the casing 18 thereby isolating the new fracture. This process is repeated until the desired number of new fractures are created, typically more than five.
- the bridge plugs 32 are then drilled up with a bit or mill on the bottom of coiled tubing or on the bottom of a tubing string. Because the slips 40 , 42 are broken into so many pieces, the bridge plugs 32 can be quickly drilled up.
- a set of slips 40 having an O.D. of 4.25′′ was designed to run in a tool of conventional expansibility inside unobstructed 51 ⁇ 2′′ casing weighing between 17-26#/foot, meaning that the casing I.D. is in the range of 4.892-4.548′′.
- the slips 40 had ten grooves 124 , 126 providing ten slip segments 128 .
- the weight of the slips 40 was 1 pound 7.3 ounces, meaning that each slip segment 128 weighed about 2.3 ounces and each of the slip pieces, after setting, weighed in the range of from less than about 1 ⁇ 2 ounce to about 3 ⁇ 4 ounce, averaging 0.58 ounces. Slip pieces of this size can easily be circulated out of a horizontal or vertical well without further reduction in size by drilling.
- slips 40 are particularly adapted for use in horizontal wells, it is apparent that an increase in drillability is desirable for settable well tools used in vertical wells. Thus, slips that are fractured in many pieces are likewise advantageously used in vertical wells thereby increasing the drillability of settable well tools.
- Standard composite settable tools for casing strings of these sizes, are capable of expanding, as defined below, about 10%.
- Extended reach tools or increased expansibility tools have the capability of expanding at least 15% and can preferably expand greater than 20%.
- the disclosed settable tool is capable of movement between a retracted position and an expanded position gripping the inner casing wall of these size casing strings.
- Table V shows the percent expansibility of the tools of Tables II-IV, as follows:
Abstract
Description
TABLE I |
Example Using Conventional 4½″ O.D. Oilfield Casing |
casing | I.D. | ||
grade and | I.D. in | patch | of casing |
weight/ft | inches | thickness | with patch |
J-55 9.5# | 4.090 | .125″ | 3.84″ |
N-80 11.6# | 4.000 | .125″ | 3.75″ |
N-80 13.6# | 3.920 | .125″ | 3.67″ |
P-110 13.5# | 3.920 | .125″ | 3.67″. |
There is an inherent variation in thickness and straightness of oilfield casing, meaning that anything run into a well has to accommodate normal manufacturing tolerances. Thus, a conventional bridge plug for use in 4½″ casing has an O.D. of no more than about 3.75″ meaning there is nominally about one quarter inch difference between the I.D. of typical 4½″ casing and the O.D of the tool, meaning there is nominally a ⅛″ clearance around the outside of the tool as it is being ran into a well. It will be seen this is too small to run into a casing string having one or more casing patches or having some other type restriction in the casing. It will also be seen that conventional settable well tools do not have to expand much to grip the inside of the casing string in which they are run.
TABLE II | |||||||
size | O.D. | I.D. | weight | number | ave wt | number | ave wt |
of | of | of | of | of | of seg- | of | of |
casing | slips | slips | slips | segments | ments | pieces | pieces |
4½″ | 3.45″ | 2.02″ | 20.8 oz | 8 | 2.60 oz | 8 | 2.60 oz |
5½″ | 4.25″ | 2.85″ | 34.0 oz | 8 | 4.25 oz | 8 | 4.25 oz |
TABLE III | |||||||
size | O.D. | I.D. | weight | number | ave wt | number | ave wt |
of | of | of | of | of | of seg- | of | of |
casing | slips | slips | slips | segments | ments | pieces | pieces |
4½″ | 3.45″ | 2.02″ | 16.0 |
10 | 1.6 |
40 | .40 oz |
5½″ | 4.25″ | 2.85″ | 24.0 |
10 | 2.4 |
40 | .60 oz |
TABLE IV | |||||||
size | O.D. | I.D. | weight | number | ave wt | number | ave wt |
of | of | of | of | of | of seg- | of | of |
casing | slips | slips | slips | segments | ments | pieces | pieces |
4½″ | 3.00″ | 1.55″ | 29.0 oz | 6 | 4.83 | 24 | 1.21 oz |
5½″ | 3.90″ | 2.53″ | 32.0 oz | 8 | 4.00 | 32 | 1.00 oz |
The number of slip segments in the slips can vary as desired. As larger diameter slips are made, there can be
% expansibility=(exp. O.D.−ret. O.D.)/ret. O.D.×100
where exp. O.D. is the expanded outer diameter of the tool and ret. O.D. is the retracted outer diameter of the tool. The O.D. of the packer or rubber element of settable tools is typically slightly larger, e.g. 0.030″, than the O.D. of the slips to prevent the slips from snagging some obstruction in a well. Thus, Table V shows the percent expansibility of the tools of Tables II-IV, as follows:
TABLE V |
expansibility of tools |
maximum | ||||||
retracted | expanded | % | ||||
slip O.D. | tool O.D. | tool O.D. | expansibility | |||
normally expansible tools of Tables II and III |
4½″ | 3.45″ | 3.75″ | 4.10″ | 9.3% | |
5″ | 3.82″ | 4.12″ | 4.60″ | 11.6% | |
5½″ | 4.25″ | 4.55″ | 5.05″ | 10.9% |
extended reach tools of Table IV |
4½″ | 3.00″ | 3.25″ | 4.10″ | 24.2% | ||
5″ | 3.60″ | 3.75″ | 4.60″ | 21.1% | ||
5½″ | 3.88″ | 4.18″ | 5.05″ | 20.8% | ||
Of course, it may be desirable to provide two models for each casing size, one for relatively thin wall pipe and one for relatively thick wall pipe. This can have an effect on the desired expansibility of any particular tool.
Claims (20)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US15/697,572 US10385649B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2017-09-07 | Plug of extended reach |
US16/265,808 US20190169951A1 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2019-02-01 | Extended reach plug having degradable elements |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/373,223 US9388662B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2011-11-08 | Settable well tool and method |
US14/999,637 US10260308B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2016-06-09 | Settable well tool method |
US15/697,572 US10385649B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2017-09-07 | Plug of extended reach |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US14/999,637 Continuation US10260308B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2016-06-09 | Settable well tool method |
Related Child Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/893,205 Continuation-In-Part US9127527B2 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2013-05-13 | Decomposable impediments for downhole tools and methods for using same |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20180010413A1 US20180010413A1 (en) | 2018-01-11 |
US10385649B2 true US10385649B2 (en) | 2019-08-20 |
Family
ID=48222921
Family Applications (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/373,223 Active 2033-12-13 US9388662B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2011-11-08 | Settable well tool and method |
US14/999,637 Expired - Fee Related US10260308B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2016-06-09 | Settable well tool method |
US15/588,608 Active US9850736B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2017-05-06 | Extended reach plug |
US15/697,572 Active US10385649B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2017-09-07 | Plug of extended reach |
Family Applications Before (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/373,223 Active 2033-12-13 US9388662B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2011-11-08 | Settable well tool and method |
US14/999,637 Expired - Fee Related US10260308B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2016-06-09 | Settable well tool method |
US15/588,608 Active US9850736B2 (en) | 2011-11-08 | 2017-05-06 | Extended reach plug |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US9388662B2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2783904A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (22)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2013028800A2 (en) * | 2011-08-22 | 2013-02-28 | Boss Hog Oil Tools Llc | Downhole tool and method of use |
US9388662B2 (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2016-07-12 | Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd. | Settable well tool and method |
US9995107B2 (en) * | 2012-10-29 | 2018-06-12 | Ccdi Composites, Inc. | Optimized composite downhole tool for well completion |
US9175533B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2015-11-03 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Drillable slip |
WO2014185913A1 (en) * | 2013-05-16 | 2014-11-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method for deploying a casing patch |
US9828827B2 (en) | 2014-04-25 | 2017-11-28 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Composite segmenting backup ring for a subterranean plug |
CN104632126B (en) * | 2014-12-26 | 2017-11-21 | 杰瑞能源服务有限公司 | A kind of big orifice bridging plug and its set method |
US10316611B2 (en) * | 2016-08-24 | 2019-06-11 | Kevin David Wutherich | Hybrid bridge plug |
US10753178B2 (en) * | 2017-06-28 | 2020-08-25 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Method for removing a downhole plug |
US10590723B2 (en) * | 2017-06-28 | 2020-03-17 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Method for removing a downhole plug |
CN108952662B (en) * | 2018-08-09 | 2021-03-12 | 中国海洋石油集团有限公司 | Large-span well staged hydraulic impact fracturing string and implementation method thereof |
CN109138960B (en) * | 2018-08-13 | 2019-11-08 | 中国石油大学(北京) | A kind of fracturing fluid and fracturing process |
CA3053711C (en) * | 2018-08-30 | 2024-01-02 | Avalon Research Ltd. | Plug for a coiled tubing string |
US11365600B2 (en) | 2019-06-14 | 2022-06-21 | Nine Downhole Technologies, Llc | Compact downhole tool |
CN112112600A (en) * | 2019-06-19 | 2020-12-22 | 中国石油集团长城钻探工程有限公司压裂公司 | Novel sealed bridge plug and preparation method thereof |
CN110454128A (en) * | 2019-07-15 | 2019-11-15 | 中国石油集团川庆钻探工程有限公司长庆井下技术作业公司 | A kind of casing patching blocks the coiled tubing drag fracturing method of old well reservoir |
CN110331959B (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2020-07-17 | 西南石油大学 | Plugging tool |
CN110924905B (en) * | 2019-12-13 | 2022-10-18 | 牡丹江市井田石油钻采配件有限公司 | Layered oil production device for petroleum deformation cased well |
CN111005702A (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2020-04-14 | 陕西海格瑞恩实业有限公司 | Novel-sleeved integrated seat sealing tool soluble magnesium alloy bridge plug |
US20230235640A1 (en) * | 2022-01-26 | 2023-07-27 | The Wellboss Company, Llc | Hybrid Slip |
US11795789B1 (en) | 2022-08-15 | 2023-10-24 | Saudi Arabian Oil Company | Cased perforation tools |
CN117266776B (en) * | 2023-11-14 | 2024-01-30 | 东营市恒信机械有限责任公司 | Hydraulic bidirectional expansion shaping device for underground casing |
Citations (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2204659A (en) * | 1939-12-23 | 1940-06-18 | Baker Oil Tools Inc | Slip for oil well tools |
US2714232A (en) | 1952-04-23 | 1955-08-02 | Straussler Nicholas | Closures for apertures |
US3687198A (en) | 1970-01-30 | 1972-08-29 | Cities Service Oil Co | High density miscible fluid injection with aquifer encroachment |
US4176715A (en) | 1977-12-23 | 1979-12-04 | Baker International Corporation | High temperature well packer |
US5224540A (en) | 1990-04-26 | 1993-07-06 | Halliburton Company | Downhole tool apparatus with non-metallic components and methods of drilling thereof |
US5472049A (en) | 1994-04-20 | 1995-12-05 | Union Oil Company Of California | Hydraulic fracturing of shallow wells |
US5540279A (en) | 1995-05-16 | 1996-07-30 | Halliburton Company | Downhole tool apparatus with non-metallic packer element retaining shoes |
US5669448A (en) | 1995-12-08 | 1997-09-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Overbalance perforating and stimulation method for wells |
US5819846A (en) | 1996-10-01 | 1998-10-13 | Bolt, Jr.; Donald B. | Bridge plug |
US5984007A (en) | 1998-01-09 | 1999-11-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Chip resistant buttons for downhole tools having slip elements |
US6167963B1 (en) | 1998-05-08 | 2001-01-02 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Removable non-metallic bridge plug or packer |
US6394184B2 (en) | 2000-02-15 | 2002-05-28 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method and apparatus for stimulation of multiple formation intervals |
US6578633B2 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2003-06-17 | Bj Services Company | Drillable bridge plug |
US6581681B1 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2003-06-24 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Bridge plug for use in a wellbore |
US20030188860A1 (en) | 2002-04-04 | 2003-10-09 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Releasing mechanism for downhole sealing tool |
US20030188876A1 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2003-10-09 | Vick Michael Lee | Spring wire composite corrosion resistant anchoring device |
US20040003928A1 (en) | 2002-07-02 | 2004-01-08 | Frazier Warren L | Composite bridge plug system |
US6695051B2 (en) | 2002-06-10 | 2004-02-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Expandable retaining shoe |
US20040045616A1 (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2004-03-11 | Shell Oil Co. | Tubular liner for wellbore casing |
US20040069502A1 (en) * | 2002-10-09 | 2004-04-15 | Luke Mike A. | High expansion packer |
US6769491B2 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2004-08-03 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Anchoring and sealing system for a downhole tool |
US20070074873A1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-04-05 | Mckeachnie W J | Wellbore tool with disintegratable components |
US20070102165A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2007-05-10 | Bj Services Company | Self centralizing non-rotational slip and cone system for downhole tools |
US7228908B2 (en) | 2004-12-02 | 2007-06-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Hydrocarbon sweep into horizontal transverse fractured wells |
US20070175631A1 (en) | 2006-02-02 | 2007-08-02 | O'brien Robert S | Extended reach anchor |
US20070284109A1 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-13 | East Loyd E | Methods and devices for treating multiple-interval well bores |
US20080087417A1 (en) * | 2006-10-12 | 2008-04-17 | Doane James C | Downhole tools having a seal ring with reinforcing element |
US20080173453A1 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2008-07-24 | Bj Services Company | Mill and method for drilling composite bridge plugs |
US7434627B2 (en) | 2005-06-14 | 2008-10-14 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method and apparatus for friction reduction in a downhole tool |
US20090211759A1 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2009-08-27 | East Jr Loyd E | Methods and Devices for Treating Multiple-Interval Well Bores |
US7600572B2 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2009-10-13 | Bj Services Company | Drillable bridge plug |
US7681654B1 (en) | 2009-07-31 | 2010-03-23 | Matthew Cugnet | Isolating well bore portions for fracturing and the like |
US20100263876A1 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2010-10-21 | Frazier W Lynn | Combination down hole tool |
US20100276159A1 (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2010-11-04 | Tejas Completion Solutions | Non-Damaging Slips and Drillable Bridge Plug |
US8127859B2 (en) | 2008-11-24 | 2012-03-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Use of swellable material in an annular seal element to prevent leakage in a subterranean well |
US8496052B2 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2013-07-30 | Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd. | Bottom set down hole tool |
US20140332239A1 (en) * | 2013-05-07 | 2014-11-13 | Freudenberg Oil & Gas, Llc | Expandable packing element and cartridge |
US20160298413A1 (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2016-10-13 | Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd. | Settable well tool method |
Family Cites Families (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2714932A (en) | 1951-08-08 | 1955-08-09 | Lane Wells Co | Bridging plug |
US2776013A (en) * | 1954-03-11 | 1957-01-01 | Exxon Research Engineering Co | Apparatus for completion in a plurality of hydrocarbon productive strata |
US3687196A (en) * | 1969-12-12 | 1972-08-29 | Schlumberger Technology Corp | Drillable slip |
US5361843A (en) * | 1992-09-24 | 1994-11-08 | Halliburton Company | Dedicated perforatable nipple with integral isolation sleeve |
US6354372B1 (en) * | 2000-01-13 | 2002-03-12 | Carisella & Cook Ventures | Subterranean well tool and slip assembly |
US6712153B2 (en) * | 2001-06-27 | 2004-03-30 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Resin impregnated continuous fiber plug with non-metallic element system |
US6668930B2 (en) * | 2002-03-26 | 2003-12-30 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method for installing an expandable coiled tubing patch |
US6896061B2 (en) * | 2002-04-02 | 2005-05-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Multiple zones frac tool |
US7690436B2 (en) * | 2007-05-01 | 2010-04-06 | Weatherford/Lamb Inc. | Pressure isolation plug for horizontal wellbore and associated methods |
US7958940B2 (en) * | 2008-07-02 | 2011-06-14 | Jameson Steve D | Method and apparatus to remove composite frac plugs from casings in oil and gas wells |
-
2011
- 2011-11-08 US US13/373,223 patent/US9388662B2/en active Active
-
2012
- 2012-07-25 CA CA2783904A patent/CA2783904A1/en not_active Abandoned
-
2016
- 2016-06-09 US US14/999,637 patent/US10260308B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2017
- 2017-05-06 US US15/588,608 patent/US9850736B2/en active Active
- 2017-09-07 US US15/697,572 patent/US10385649B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (43)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2204659A (en) * | 1939-12-23 | 1940-06-18 | Baker Oil Tools Inc | Slip for oil well tools |
US2714232A (en) | 1952-04-23 | 1955-08-02 | Straussler Nicholas | Closures for apertures |
US3687198A (en) | 1970-01-30 | 1972-08-29 | Cities Service Oil Co | High density miscible fluid injection with aquifer encroachment |
US4176715A (en) | 1977-12-23 | 1979-12-04 | Baker International Corporation | High temperature well packer |
US5224540A (en) | 1990-04-26 | 1993-07-06 | Halliburton Company | Downhole tool apparatus with non-metallic components and methods of drilling thereof |
US5472049A (en) | 1994-04-20 | 1995-12-05 | Union Oil Company Of California | Hydraulic fracturing of shallow wells |
US5540279A (en) | 1995-05-16 | 1996-07-30 | Halliburton Company | Downhole tool apparatus with non-metallic packer element retaining shoes |
US5669448A (en) | 1995-12-08 | 1997-09-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Overbalance perforating and stimulation method for wells |
US5819846A (en) | 1996-10-01 | 1998-10-13 | Bolt, Jr.; Donald B. | Bridge plug |
US5984007A (en) | 1998-01-09 | 1999-11-16 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Chip resistant buttons for downhole tools having slip elements |
US6167963B1 (en) | 1998-05-08 | 2001-01-02 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Removable non-metallic bridge plug or packer |
US20040045616A1 (en) | 1998-12-07 | 2004-03-11 | Shell Oil Co. | Tubular liner for wellbore casing |
US6394184B2 (en) | 2000-02-15 | 2002-05-28 | Exxonmobil Upstream Research Company | Method and apparatus for stimulation of multiple formation intervals |
US6581681B1 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2003-06-24 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Bridge plug for use in a wellbore |
US6578633B2 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2003-06-17 | Bj Services Company | Drillable bridge plug |
US7600572B2 (en) | 2000-06-30 | 2009-10-13 | Bj Services Company | Drillable bridge plug |
US20030188860A1 (en) | 2002-04-04 | 2003-10-09 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Releasing mechanism for downhole sealing tool |
US20030188876A1 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2003-10-09 | Vick Michael Lee | Spring wire composite corrosion resistant anchoring device |
US6769491B2 (en) | 2002-06-07 | 2004-08-03 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Anchoring and sealing system for a downhole tool |
US6695051B2 (en) | 2002-06-10 | 2004-02-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Expandable retaining shoe |
US6796376B2 (en) | 2002-07-02 | 2004-09-28 | Warren L. Frazier | Composite bridge plug system |
US20040003928A1 (en) | 2002-07-02 | 2004-01-08 | Frazier Warren L | Composite bridge plug system |
US20040069502A1 (en) * | 2002-10-09 | 2004-04-15 | Luke Mike A. | High expansion packer |
US7228908B2 (en) | 2004-12-02 | 2007-06-12 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Hydrocarbon sweep into horizontal transverse fractured wells |
US20070074873A1 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2007-04-05 | Mckeachnie W J | Wellbore tool with disintegratable components |
US7350582B2 (en) | 2004-12-21 | 2008-04-01 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Wellbore tool with disintegratable components and method of controlling flow |
US7434627B2 (en) | 2005-06-14 | 2008-10-14 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Method and apparatus for friction reduction in a downhole tool |
US20070102165A1 (en) * | 2005-11-10 | 2007-05-10 | Bj Services Company | Self centralizing non-rotational slip and cone system for downhole tools |
US20070175631A1 (en) | 2006-02-02 | 2007-08-02 | O'brien Robert S | Extended reach anchor |
US7478676B2 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2009-01-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods and devices for treating multiple-interval well bores |
US20090211759A1 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2009-08-27 | East Jr Loyd E | Methods and Devices for Treating Multiple-Interval Well Bores |
US20070284109A1 (en) | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-13 | East Loyd E | Methods and devices for treating multiple-interval well bores |
US20080087417A1 (en) * | 2006-10-12 | 2008-04-17 | Doane James C | Downhole tools having a seal ring with reinforcing element |
US20080173453A1 (en) | 2007-01-18 | 2008-07-24 | Bj Services Company | Mill and method for drilling composite bridge plugs |
US8127859B2 (en) | 2008-11-24 | 2012-03-06 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Use of swellable material in an annular seal element to prevent leakage in a subterranean well |
US8496052B2 (en) | 2008-12-23 | 2013-07-30 | Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd. | Bottom set down hole tool |
US20100263876A1 (en) | 2009-04-21 | 2010-10-21 | Frazier W Lynn | Combination down hole tool |
US7681654B1 (en) | 2009-07-31 | 2010-03-23 | Matthew Cugnet | Isolating well bore portions for fracturing and the like |
US20100276159A1 (en) | 2010-07-14 | 2010-11-04 | Tejas Completion Solutions | Non-Damaging Slips and Drillable Bridge Plug |
US20160298413A1 (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2016-10-13 | Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd. | Settable well tool method |
US20170241233A1 (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2017-08-24 | Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd. | Extended reach plug |
US9850736B2 (en) * | 2011-11-08 | 2017-12-26 | Magnum Oil Tools International, Ltd | Extended reach plug |
US20140332239A1 (en) * | 2013-05-07 | 2014-11-13 | Freudenberg Oil & Gas, Llc | Expandable packing element and cartridge |
Non-Patent Citations (5)
Title |
---|
Magnum Oil Tools International, "Composite Plugs", Jan. 13, 2010, published by Magnum Oil Tools International (Year: 2010). * |
Owens Oil Tools. pp. 4.0-4.1 lest revised Sep. 2002. |
Schlumberger Oilfield Glossary entry for "staged fracturing", accessed May 9, 2018 via www.glossary.oilfield.slb.com. * |
Thru-Tubing Systems, Inc. Wireline Products Catalog, pp cover sheet, 1, 13, 19, 26, 32, 36-publication revised Feb. 12, 2014 but contents earlier than Nov. 2011. |
Thru-Tubing Systems, Inc. Wireline Products Catalog, pp cover sheet, 1, 13, 19, 26, 32, 36—publication revised Feb. 12, 2014 but contents earlier than Nov. 2011. |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US9850736B2 (en) | 2017-12-26 |
US20130112412A1 (en) | 2013-05-09 |
US20160298413A1 (en) | 2016-10-13 |
CA2783904A1 (en) | 2013-05-08 |
US10260308B2 (en) | 2019-04-16 |
US20170241233A1 (en) | 2017-08-24 |
US9388662B2 (en) | 2016-07-12 |
US20180010413A1 (en) | 2018-01-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US10385649B2 (en) | Plug of extended reach | |
US20190169951A1 (en) | Extended reach plug having degradable elements | |
US10584562B2 (en) | Multi-stage well isolation | |
CA3027639C (en) | Composite frac plug | |
US20180171741A1 (en) | Wellbore Plug Isolation System and Method | |
CA2978577C (en) | Pressure perforated well casing collar and method of use | |
US20160123100A1 (en) | Angled segmented backup ring | |
US20220372835A1 (en) | Cup plug having a large flow-through inside diameter | |
US10364626B2 (en) | Composite fracture plug and associated methods | |
US10626697B2 (en) | Frac plug with bi-directional gripping elements | |
US20160245039A1 (en) | Slip Configuration for Downhole Tool | |
US20190309599A1 (en) | Frac plug apparatus, setting tool, and method | |
CA3071108A1 (en) | Improved frac plug | |
GB2573143A (en) | Improvements in or relating to coupling of tubulars downhole | |
US10570686B2 (en) | Top set liner hanger and packer with hanger slips above the packer seal | |
US8875799B2 (en) | Covered retaining shoe configurations for use in a downhole tool | |
US20180045017A1 (en) | Slip Assembly for Anchoring Downhole Plugs and Retainers | |
US20210293112A1 (en) | Isolation device with inner mandrel removed after setting | |
US20220243546A1 (en) | Releasable locking assembly, system, and method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED |
|
STPP | Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general |
Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: MAGNUM OIL TOOLS INTERNATIONAL LTD., TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:FRAZIER, W LYNN;REEL/FRAME:050651/0382 Effective date: 20191003 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: NINE DOWNHOLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, TEXAS Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MAGNUM OIL TOOLS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.;REEL/FRAME:058025/0914 Effective date: 20211103 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, TENNESSEE Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES);ASSIGNORS:NINE ENERGY SERVICE, INC.;NINE DOWNHOLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC;MAGNUM OIL TOOLS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.;REEL/FRAME:062545/0970 Effective date: 20230130 Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS Free format text: PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (ABL);ASSIGNORS:NINE ENERGY SERVICE, INC.;NINE DOWNHOLE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC;MAGNUM OIL TOOLS INTERNATIONAL, LTD.;REEL/FRAME:062546/0076 Effective date: 20230130 |