TWI626847B - System and method for video with personalized weighted rating scores - Google Patents

System and method for video with personalized weighted rating scores Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI626847B
TWI626847B TW106129136A TW106129136A TWI626847B TW I626847 B TWI626847 B TW I626847B TW 106129136 A TW106129136 A TW 106129136A TW 106129136 A TW106129136 A TW 106129136A TW I626847 B TWI626847 B TW I626847B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
video
data
score
audio
client
Prior art date
Application number
TW106129136A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW201914305A (en
Inventor
張沛強
Original Assignee
中華電信股份有限公司
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 中華電信股份有限公司 filed Critical 中華電信股份有限公司
Priority to TW106129136A priority Critical patent/TWI626847B/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI626847B publication Critical patent/TWI626847B/en
Publication of TW201914305A publication Critical patent/TW201914305A/en

Links

Abstract

一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之系統與方法,係包括:客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器,係用以取得一使用者針對一影音之影音評分資料,以將該使用者的資料及該影音評分資料整合成客戶端評分資料;詮釋資料蒐集伺服器,係用以連接外部複數個機構以取得該複數個機構對於該影音之評分資料,以將該影音之評分資料整合成影音詮釋資料;以及評分與加權分析計算伺服器,係用以接收該客戶端評分資料及該影音詮釋資料,以透過一關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算取得影音評分結果與影音排序推薦。 A system and method for personalizing audio-visual data scoring comprehensive weighting information includes: a client-level scoring record integration server for obtaining a user's video score data for a video and audio, to the user's data and the video and audio The scoring data is integrated into the client scoring data; the interpreting data collecting server is configured to connect an external plurality of institutions to obtain the scoring data of the plurality of institutions for the audiovisual, and integrate the scoring data of the video into the audio and video interpretation data; The scoring and weighting analysis computing server is configured to receive the client rating data and the video interpretation data to calculate the video score result and the video sounding recommendation through a relationship factor difference weighted analysis algorithm.

Description

個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之系統與方法 System and method for personalized weighted information of personalized audio and video data scores

本發明係有關一種影音資料評分技術,尤指一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之系統與方法。 The invention relates to a video material data scoring technology, in particular to a system and method for personalizing video and audio data scoring comprehensive weighting information.

近年來網際網路的快速發展,讓人們要踏入電影院前或於線上影視選擇欲觀賞影音的同時,往往會根據影評或電影評分機構所給予之評價左右花錢購票或訂閱的意願,也因此越來越多提供影音介紹、評論或評分服務的網站也隨之興起,如歐美發展較久且較具指標性的網路電影資料庫(英語:Internet Movie Database,簡稱IMDb)、較偏向觀眾喜好的Rotten Potato(爛蕃茄指數)、中國大陸地區用戶較常駐的豆辦網站以及臺灣網友愛用之Yahoo!奇摩電影等,皆有各自的評價單位與計算分析方式。 In recent years, the rapid development of the Internet has made people want to enter the cinema or choose to watch audio and video on-line movies. At the same time, they will be willing to pay for tickets or subscriptions based on the evaluations given by film reviews or film rating agencies. Therefore, more and more websites that provide audio-visual introduction, commentary or scoring services have also emerged. For example, the Internet movie database (English: Internet Movie Database, IMDb), which has developed for a long time in Europe and America, is more biased to the audience. The favorite Rotten Potato (Rotten Tomato Index), the mainland China users are more resident of the Dou Do website and the Taiwanese netizens love Yahoo! Chimo movies, etc., have their own evaluation units and calculation analysis methods.

然而,當使用者在參考上述影音介紹評分網站的同時,往往可能會因為單位計算之問題,像是最常見的網站使用百分制或十分制、甚至有的使用五分制的評分來做為影音評價之指標。此舉容易讓使用者混亂,對於心中衡量拿捏標準會不準確,不易由評價的參考來做選擇。另一方 面,各評分網站組成的主要盛行的區域、評分者因生活文化背景產生的喜好感受程度之不同,有時會造成口味偏好的落差,造成使用者無法發掘可能被隱藏的好片。 However, when the user refers to the above-mentioned audio and video introduction scoring website, it is often possible to use the unit calculation problem, such as the most common website using the percentage system or the system, or even the use of the five-point rating as the audio evaluation. Indicators. This is easy to confuse the user. It is not accurate to measure the standard of the heart, and it is not easy to make a choice by evaluation. The other side In addition, the main prevailing areas of the scoring websites and the different levels of preferences of the scorers due to the background of life culture sometimes lead to a gap in taste preferences, which prevents users from discovering good films that may be hidden.

除此之外,目前線上提供隨選影音訂閱之服務,往往也僅透過單一評分機構之分數做排序推薦給使用的消費者,並無將各大機構之評分整合做個人化的綜合加權排序之展現,故消費者不容易認知不同機構口味、類型與自身差異之問題,而可能導致服務內真正適合該消費者之優質影音訂閱率不高,對於服務提供商或消費者皆是一個雙輸的局面。 In addition, the online subscription service for on-demand audio and video subscriptions is often only sorted and recommended to consumers using the scores of a single rating agency. There is no integrated weighted ranking of the scores of major organizations. Display, so consumers are not easy to recognize the differences in tastes, types and differences between different organizations, and may lead to a low rate of high-quality audio and video subscriptions that are really suitable for the consumer in the service, which is a lose for both service providers and consumers. situation.

因此,如何能透過各大機構評分之整合並根據消費者之喜好與習性,利用此進行智慧化之差異分析,找出適合消費者的優質影音內容之個人化排序推薦,以達到觀賞影片滿意度之提升與營收的最大效益,即為本申請所要解決之技術問題。 Therefore, how can we use the integration of the scores of major institutions and according to the preferences and habits of consumers, use this to analyze the difference of intelligence and find out the personalized ranking recommendations for high-quality audio and video content suitable for consumers to achieve the satisfaction of viewing videos. The biggest benefit of the promotion and revenue is the technical problem to be solved in this application.

為克服習知技術之缺失,本發明係提供一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之系統,係包括:客戶端裝置,包含一客戶端評分模組及一客戶端顯示模組,該客戶端評分模組用以接收一使用者針對一影音之影音評分資料;客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器,係用以接收該客戶端裝置之該影音評分資料,以將該使用者的資料及該影音評分資料整合成客戶端評分資料;詮釋資料蒐集伺服器,係用以連接複數個機構以取得該複數個機構對於該影音之評分資料, 以將該影音之評分資料整合成影音詮釋資料;以及評分與加權分析計算伺服器,係用以接收該客戶端評分資料及該影音詮釋資料,以透過一對應有關係因子之種類之關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算取得對應該影音之影音評分結果與影音排序推薦,俾提供該客戶端顯示模組讀取該影音評分結果與影音排序推薦以顯示該影音評分結果與影音排序推薦。 In order to overcome the deficiencies of the prior art, the present invention provides a system for personalizing video and audio data scoring integrated weighting information, which comprises: a client device, including a client scoring module and a client display module, the client rating The module is configured to receive a user's audio and video score data for a video and audio; the client score record integration server is configured to receive the video score data of the client device, to use the user's data and the video score data. Integrating client-side scoring data; interpreting a data collecting server for connecting a plurality of organizations to obtain scoring data of the plurality of institutions for the video and audio, Integrating the audio and video score data into video and audio interpretation data; and the scoring and weighting analysis calculation server is configured to receive the client rating data and the audiovisual interpretation data to pass a relationship factor difference corresponding to the type of the relationship factor The weighted analysis algorithm calculates and obtains the video score result and the video sequence recommendation corresponding to the video and audio, and provides the client display module to read the video score result and the video sequence recommendation to display the video score result and the video sequence recommendation.

本發明提供一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之方法,係包括:取得一使用者針對一影音之影音評分資料,以將該使用者的資料及該影音評分資料整合成客戶端評分資料;將該客戶端評分資料與一由複數個機構對該影音之評分資料所整合之影音詮釋資料透過一對應有關係因子之種類之關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算取得該複數個機構所對應之差異權重;以及將該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重依據該關係因子之種類而輸出為一個人化關係因子權重表。 The present invention provides a method for personalizing video and audio data to score comprehensive weighted information, which comprises: obtaining a video score data of a user for an audio and video, and integrating the user's data and the video score data into client rating data; The client rating data and a video interpretation data integrated by the plurality of institutions of the audiovisual score data are calculated by a relationship factor difference weighting analysis algorithm corresponding to the type of the relationship factor, and the difference weights corresponding to the plurality of institutions are obtained. And outputting the difference weight corresponding to the plurality of institutions as a humanized relationship factor weight table according to the type of the relationship factor.

由上述可得知,本發明由複數個機構對該影音之評分資料所整合之影音詮釋資料及個人化關係因子權重進行評分計算,可得到對每部影音之個人化的影音評分結果,並將該影音評分結果進行排序,以產生個人化的影音排序推薦,因此,本發明解決了使用者往往只能透過單一機構之評分來做選擇參考的問題,更可藉此呈現出自身與不同評分機構口味與類型之差異,進而取得最佳之排序推薦。 It can be seen from the above that the present invention is obtained by scoring and calculating the audio-visual interpretation data and the personalized relationship factor weights integrated by the scores of the audio-visual scores by a plurality of institutions, and obtaining the personalized video score results for each video and audio, and The results of the audio and video scoring are sorted to generate personalized audio and video ranking recommendations. Therefore, the present invention solves the problem that the user can only make a selection reference through the rating of a single institution, and can also present himself and different scoring organizations. The difference between taste and type, in order to get the best sorting recommendation.

100‧‧‧詮釋資料蒐集伺服器 100‧‧‧ Interpretation data collection server

110‧‧‧機構評分資料擷取模組 110‧‧‧Institutional scoring data acquisition module

120‧‧‧資料轉換標準化模組 120‧‧‧Data Conversion Standardization Module

130‧‧‧資料整合配對模組 130‧‧‧Data Integration Pairing Module

140‧‧‧儲存單元 140‧‧‧ storage unit

141‧‧‧影音詮釋資料 141‧‧‧ audio and video interpretation materials

142‧‧‧伺服器日誌 142‧‧‧Server log

150‧‧‧儲存單元存取介面 150‧‧‧storage unit access interface

200‧‧‧客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器 200‧‧‧Client score record integration server

210‧‧‧客戶端評分資料整合交換模組 210‧‧‧Client rating data integration exchange module

220‧‧‧儲存單元 220‧‧‧ storage unit

221‧‧‧客戶端評分資料 221‧‧‧Client rating data

222‧‧‧伺服器日誌 222‧‧‧Server log

230‧‧‧資料交換傳遞模組 230‧‧‧Data Exchange Module

300‧‧‧評分與加權分析計算伺服器 300‧‧‧Score and weighted analysis calculation server

310‧‧‧第一資料交換傳遞模組 310‧‧‧First Data Exchange Delivery Module

320‧‧‧權重分配計算模組 320‧‧‧weight distribution calculation module

330‧‧‧儲存單元 330‧‧‧ storage unit

331‧‧‧個人化關係因子權重表 331‧‧‧ Personalized Relationship Factor Weight Table

332‧‧‧影音評分結果 332‧‧‧ video score results

333‧‧‧影音排序推薦 333‧‧‧Video Sorting Recommended

334‧‧‧伺服器日誌 334‧‧‧Server log

340‧‧‧加權評分計算模組 340‧‧‧weighted score calculation module

350‧‧‧第二資料交換傳遞模組 350‧‧‧Second Data Exchange Delivery Module

360‧‧‧影音詮釋資料存取介面 360‧‧‧Video Interpretation Data Access Interface

400‧‧‧客戶端裝置 400‧‧‧Client device

401‧‧‧輸入單元 401‧‧‧ input unit

402‧‧‧客戶端評分模組 402‧‧‧Client Scoring Module

403‧‧‧隨選(VOD)影音評分模組 403‧‧‧Voice (VOD) Video Score Module

404‧‧‧電視頻道影音評分模組 404‧‧‧TV channel audio and video scoring module

405‧‧‧資料交換傳遞介面 405‧‧‧Data exchange interface

406‧‧‧客戶端顯示模組 406‧‧‧Client display module

第1圖為本發明之個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊系統之架構圖;第2圖為本發明之詮釋資料蒐集伺服器的架構圖;第3圖為本發明之客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器的架構圖;第4圖為本發明之評分與加權分析計算伺服器的架構圖;第5圖為本發明之個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊方法之流程圖;第6圖為本發明之新影音上架或頻道影音首播時之初始評分運算之方法的流程圖。 1 is an architectural diagram of a personalized weighted information system for personalized video and audio data scoring of the present invention; FIG. 2 is a structural diagram of an interpretation data collection server of the present invention; and FIG. 3 is a client score recording integration server of the present invention; FIG. 4 is a structural diagram of a scoring and weighting analysis computing server of the present invention; FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a personalized weighted information method for personalized video and audio data scoring of the present invention; FIG. 6 is a new flowchart of the present invention; A flow chart of the method of initial scoring operation when the video is on the shelf or the channel is premiered.

以下藉由特定的具體實施例說明本發明之實施方式,熟悉此技藝之人士可由本說明書所揭示之內容輕易地瞭解本發明之其他優點及功效。 The other embodiments of the present invention will be readily understood by those skilled in the art from this disclosure.

須知,本說明書所附圖式所繪示之結構、比例、大小等,均僅用以配合說明書所揭示之內容,以供熟悉此技藝之人士之瞭解與閱讀,並非用以限定本發明可實施之限定條件,故不具技術上之實質意義,任何結構之修飾、比例關係之改變或大小之調整,在不影響本發明所能產生之功效及所能達成之目的下,均應仍落在本發明所揭示之技術內容得能涵蓋之範圍內。同時,本說明書中所引用之如「上」、「第一」、「第二」、「第三」及「一」等之用語,亦僅為便於敘述之明瞭,而非用以限定本發明可實施之範 圍,其相對關係之改變或調整,在無實質變更技術內容下,當視為本發明可實施之範疇。 It is to be understood that the structure, the proportions, the size, and the like of the present invention are intended to be used in conjunction with the disclosure of the specification, and are not intended to limit the invention. The conditions are limited, so it is not technically meaningful. Any modification of the structure, change of the proportional relationship or adjustment of the size should remain in this book without affecting the effects and the objectives that can be achieved by the present invention. The technical content disclosed in the invention can be covered. In the meantime, the terms "upper", "first", "second", "third" and "one" are used in this specification for convenience of description and are not intended to limit the invention. Implementable The change or adjustment of the relative relationship is considered to be within the scope of the invention.

本發明所述之單元係可為硬體結構,而本發明所述之模組則可為供處理器運行之程式碼,例如為韌體(firmware)或儲存在記憶體或硬碟中的軟體程式。 The unit of the present invention may be a hardware structure, and the module of the present invention may be a code for running by a processor, such as a firmware or a software stored in a memory or a hard disk. Program.

請參閱第1圖所示,係本發明之個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊系統之架構圖,係包括:客戶端裝置400,包含一輸入單元401,包含用以接收一使用者針對一影音之影音評分資料,以將該影音評分資料傳送至該客戶端評分模組402;客戶端評分模組402,係用以接收該使用者透過輸入單元401針對一影音之影音評分資料,區分該使用者所針對之該影音的類型為隨選(Video on Demand,VOD)影音或電視頻道影音;隨選影音評分模組403,當該影音的類型為隨選影音時,由隨選(VOD)影音評分模組403處理該影音評分資料;電視頻道影音評分模組404,當該影音的類型為電視頻道影音時,由電視頻道影音評分模組404處理該影音評分資料;資料交換傳遞介面405,用以存取該影音評分資料、評分與加權分析計算伺服器300所算出的影音評分結果332及影音排序推薦333;一客戶端顯示模組406,係包含隨選影音之服務區或該電視頻道影音之資訊頁,該些資訊頁用以顯示資料交換傳遞介面405讀取的影音評分結果332及影音排序推薦333。 The architecture diagram of the personalized video and audio data scoring integrated weighting information system of the present invention includes: the client device 400, comprising an input unit 401, configured to receive a user for an audio-visual And the video scoring data is transmitted to the client scoring module 402. The client scoring module 402 is configured to receive the user's audio and video score data for an audio and video through the input unit 401, and distinguish the user. The type of video and audio that is targeted is Video on Demand (VOD) video or TV channel audio and video; on-demand video score module 403, when the type of video and audio is selected audio and video, by on-demand (VOD) video score The module 403 processes the video score data; the TV channel video score module 404, when the type of the video is the TV channel video, the video channel score module 404 processes the video score data; the data exchange delivery interface 405, Accessing the video score data, the score and weight analysis calculation server 300 calculates the video score result 332 and the video sequence recommendation 333; a client display mode 406, the system contains on-demand video service area or the television channel of video information page, the page for displaying a plurality of information transfer audio and video data exchange interface 405 reading score results of 332 and AV 333 Sort recommended.

於一實施例中,該輸入單元401為遙控器或智慧型手機之APP。該客戶端顯示模組406則是用以顯示在一顯示 器上的軟體介面,例如隨選影音之服務區或該電視頻道影音之資訊頁等軟體介面,以供使用者觀看操作使用。 In an embodiment, the input unit 401 is an APP of a remote controller or a smart phone. The client display module 406 is for displaying on a display The software interface on the device, such as the service interface of the audio-visual service area or the information page of the television channel audio and video, for the user to watch and use.

詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100,係連接外部複數個機構之伺服器以取得複數個機構對於影音的評分資料,以將該影音的評分資料標準化轉換成該系統所須的評分資料,再將該標準化後的該各機構相同影音的評分資料整合成影音詮釋資料141。 The interpretation data collection server 100 is connected to a server of an external plurality of institutions to obtain score data of a plurality of institutions for audio and video, to standardize and convert the score data of the video to the rating data required by the system, and then normalize the score data. The scores of the same audio and video of the various institutions are integrated into the audio and video interpretation data 141.

在本實施例中,所謂的外部複數個機構之伺服器,係指現有的影評或電影評分機構而言,例如網路電影資料庫(IMDb)、較偏向觀眾喜好的Rotten Potato(爛蕃茄指數)、中國大陸地區用戶較常駐的豆辦網站以及臺灣網友愛用之Yahoo!奇摩電影等等,但本發明並不以此為限。 In this embodiment, the so-called server of the external plurality of institutions refers to an existing film review or film scoring institution, such as an Internet movie database (IMDb), and a more favored viewer's preference for Rotten Potato (Rotten Tomato Index). , the mainland China users are more resident of the Dou Office website and Taiwanese users love Yahoo! Chimo movies and the like, but the invention is not limited thereto.

客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器200,係用以接收該客戶端裝置400之該影音評分資料,以將該使用者的資料及該影音評分資料整合成客戶端評分資料221。 The client score record integration server 200 is configured to receive the video score data of the client device 400 to integrate the user profile and the video score data into the client rating data 221 .

評分與加權分析計算伺服器300,係用以接收該客戶端評分資料221及該影音詮釋資料141,以透過一對應有關係因子之種類之關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算取得對應該影音之影音評分結果332與影音排序推薦333,俾提供該客戶端顯示模組406讀取該影音評分結果332與影音排序推薦333以顯示該影音評分結果332與影音排序推薦333。 The scoring and weighting analysis computing server 300 is configured to receive the client rating data 221 and the video interpretation data 141 to calculate and obtain the audio and video corresponding to the video through a relationship factor difference weighting analysis algorithm corresponding to the type of the relationship factor. The score result 332 and the video sequence recommendation 333 are provided, and the client display module 406 reads the video score result 332 and the video sequence recommendation 333 to display the video score result 332 and the video sequence recommendation 333.

於一實施例中,上述客戶端裝置400與詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100、客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器200或評分與加 權分析計算伺服器300之間的連接,可透過有線網路或例如為WiFi、3G/4G、藍芽等無線網路來彼此相互連接。 In an embodiment, the client device 400 and the interpretation data collection server 100, the client score record integration server 200 or the score and the addition The weight analysis calculates the connections between the servers 300 and can be connected to each other via a wired network or a wireless network such as WiFi, 3G/4G, Bluetooth, or the like.

於一實施例中,由隨選影音評分模組403處理該影音評分資料時,隨選影音評分模組403判斷該使用者是否對該影音有輸入該影音評分資料,若無,該隨選影音評分模組係以該複數個機構對該影音之該評分資料之平均值作為該使用者針對該影音之該影音評分資料。 In an embodiment, when the video score data is processed by the on-demand video score module 403, the on-demand video score module 403 determines whether the user has input the video score data for the video, and if not, the on-demand video The scoring module uses the average of the scoring data of the audio and video by the plurality of institutions as the video score data of the user for the video.

於一實施例中,由電視頻道影音評分模組404處理該影音評分資料時,將該使用者針對該影音所輸入之該影音評分資料之時間點對應至頻道節目表或電影播放之時間區間,以將所對應之頻道節目或電影作為該影音之該影音評分資料。 In an embodiment, when the video channel score data is processed by the television channel video score module 404, the time point of the video score data input by the user for the video is corresponding to the time range of the channel program list or the movie playing time. The corresponding channel program or movie is used as the video score data of the video.

請參閱第2圖所示,第2圖為第1圖中的詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100的架構圖,該詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100係包括:機構評分資料擷取模組110、資料轉換標準化模組120、資料整合配對模組130、儲存單元140以及儲存單元存取介面150。 Please refer to FIG. 2 , which is a block diagram of the interpretation data collection server 100 in FIG. 1 . The interpretation data collection server 100 includes an organization rating data acquisition module 110 and a data conversion standardization module. The group 120, the data integration pairing module 130, the storage unit 140, and the storage unit access interface 150.

在本實施例中,該機構評分資料擷取模組110係定期連接外部各機構之伺服器以取得各機構對於影音的評分資料,所謂定期係例如一天一次、一小時一次等利用排程自動進行。 In this embodiment, the mechanism scoring data acquisition module 110 periodically connects the servers of the external organizations to obtain the scoring data of the audio and video of each institution, and the so-called periodic system, for example, once a day, once an hour, etc., automatically performs scheduling. .

資料轉換標準化模組120,係用以將該影音的評分資料標準化轉換成該系統所須的評分資料,例如將各機構對於該影音之不同格式之評分資料重新編排為與本系統相同 格式之評分資料。 The data conversion standardization module 120 is configured to standardize and convert the score data of the video and audio into the rating data required by the system, for example, re-arrange the rating data of different formats of the audio and video to the same system as the system. Rating data for the format.

資料整合配對模組130,係用以接收該標準化後的評分資料,以將該標準化後的該各機構相同影音的評分資料整合成影音詮釋資料141。 The data integration matching module 130 is configured to receive the standardized score data to integrate the standardized score data of the same audio and video of the organizations into the audio and video interpretation data 141.

儲存單元140係用以儲存該影音詮釋資料141及伺服器日誌142,其中該伺服器日誌142為記錄該各機構擷取與標準化之歷史記錄(history log)。此外,儲存單元存取介面150,係提供系統內其他伺服器、模組或單元存取該影音詮釋資料141。 The storage unit 140 is configured to store the video interpretation data 141 and the server log 142, wherein the server log 142 is a history log for recording and standardizing the institutions. In addition, the storage unit access interface 150 provides access to the video interpretation material 141 by other servers, modules or units in the system.

請參閱第3圖所示,第3圖為第1圖中的客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器200的架構圖,該客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器200包括:客戶端評分資料整合交換模組210、儲存單元220以及資料交換傳遞模組230。 Referring to FIG. 3, FIG. 3 is a structural diagram of the client rating record integration server 200 in FIG. 1. The client rating record integration server 200 includes: a client rating data integration switching module 210, The storage unit 220 and the data exchange delivery module 230.

該客戶端評分資料整合交換模組210係用以接收該客戶端裝置400之該影音評分資料,以將該使用者的資料及其所輸入的影音評分資料整合成客戶端評分資料221。 The client rating data integration switching module 210 is configured to receive the video rating data of the client device 400 to integrate the user data and the input video score data into the client rating data 221 .

該儲存單元220係用以儲存該客戶端評分資料221及伺服器日誌222,其中該伺服器日誌222係儲存為與客戶端裝置400交換資料之記錄及客戶端評分資料221的存取紀錄;資料交換傳遞模組230,係提供系統內其他伺服器、模組或單元存取該客戶端評分資料221。 The storage unit 220 is configured to store the client rating data 221 and the server log 222, wherein the server log 222 is stored as a record of exchanging data with the client device 400 and an access record of the client rating data 221; The exchange delivery module 230 provides access to the client rating data 221 by other servers, modules or units in the system.

請參閱第4圖所示,第4圖為第1圖中的評分與加權分析計算伺服器300的架構圖,該評分與加權分析計算伺服器300係包括:第一資料交換傳遞模組310、權重分配 計算模組320、儲存單元330、加權評分計算模組340、第二資料交換傳遞模組350以及影音詮釋資料存取介面360。 Referring to FIG. 4, FIG. 4 is a structural diagram of the scoring and weighting analysis computing server 300 in FIG. 1. The scoring and weighting analysis computing server 300 includes: a first data exchange delivery module 310, Weight distribution The calculation module 320, the storage unit 330, the weighted score calculation module 340, the second data exchange delivery module 350, and the video interpretation data access interface 360.

該第一資料交換傳遞模組310係與客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器200中的資料交換傳遞模組230交換資料以取得該客戶端評分資料221;影音詮釋資料存取介面360,係與詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100中的儲存單元儲存介面150交換資料以取得該影音詮釋資料141。 The first data exchange delivery module 310 exchanges data with the data exchange delivery module 230 in the client score record integration server 200 to obtain the client rating data 221; the audio and video interpretation data access interface 360, and the interpretation data. The storage unit storage interface 150 in the collection server 100 exchanges data to obtain the video interpretation material 141.

權重分配計算模組320係將該客戶端評分資料221及該影音詮釋資料141進行一對應有關係因子之種類之關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算以取得一個人化關係因子權重表331,該關係因子之種類係為該影音的類型、分級、導演、演員、語系、年份及發行地之一者或其組合。加權評分計算模組340係將該個人化關係因子權重表331與該影音詮釋資料141進行加權評分計算得到影音評分結果332,該加權評分計算模組340依據各個影音的該影音評分結果332進行排序,以產生該影音排序推薦333。 The weight distribution calculation module 320 calculates the relationship score difference weighting analysis algorithm for the type of the relationship factor by the client rating data 221 and the video interpretation data 141 to obtain a personalized relationship factor weight table 331, the relationship factor The category is one of the type, rating, director, actor, language, year, and place of the video or a combination thereof. The weighted score calculation module 340 calculates the weighted score of the personalized relationship factor weight table 331 and the video interpretation data 141 to obtain a video score result 332. The weighted score calculation module 340 sorts the video score results 332 of the respective audio and video. To produce the video sorting recommendation 333.

儲存單元330係用以儲存該客戶端權重資料331、該影音評分結果332、該影音排序推薦333及伺服器日誌334,其中該伺服器日誌334為紀錄該客戶端權重資料331、該影音評分結果332及該影音排序推薦333被存取的紀錄;第二資料交換傳遞模組350,係提供客戶端裝置400讀取該影音評分結果332、該影音排序推薦333。 The storage unit 330 is configured to store the client weight data 331, the video score result 332, the video sequence recommendation 333, and the server log 334, wherein the server log 334 records the client weight data 331 and the video score result. 332 and the record that the video sequence recommendation 333 is accessed; the second data exchange delivery module 350 provides the client device 400 to read the video score result 332 and the video sequence recommendation 333.

於一實施例中,評分與加權分析計算伺服器300未建立個人化關係因子權重表331,且使用者第一次完成影音 評分時,該權重分配計算模組320所利用之該關係因子差異加權分析演算法,係先計算該客戶端評分資料221及該影音詮釋資料141之間的各該複數個機構之分數差,根據該分數差之絕對值大小給定各該複數個機構之差異程度配分,以根據各該複數個機構之該差異程度配分計算出對應該客戶端評分資料221之各該複數個機構之該差異權重,並將該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重依據該關係因子之種類而輸出一個人化關係因子權重表331。 In an embodiment, the score and weight analysis calculation server 300 does not establish a personalized relationship factor weight table 331, and the user completes the video for the first time. When the score is used, the relationship factor difference weighting analysis algorithm used by the weight distribution calculation module 320 first calculates the score difference between the client rating data 221 and the video interpretation data 141, according to the scores of the plurality of institutions. The difference value of the score difference is given by the degree of difference of each of the plurality of institutions, and the difference weight of each of the plurality of institutions corresponding to the client rating data 221 is calculated according to the degree of difference of the plurality of institutions. And the difference weight corresponding to the plurality of institutions outputs a personalized relationship factor weight table 331 according to the type of the relationship factor.

於一實施例中,評分與加權分析計算伺服器300已建立個人化關係因子權重表331,且使用者再次完成影音評分時,該權重分配計算模組320利用該關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算取得新的該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重,並將該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重輸出更新至該個人化關係因子權重表331,以產生新的個人化關係因子權重表331。 In an embodiment, the score and weight analysis calculation server 300 has established a personalized relationship factor weight table 331, and when the user completes the video score again, the weight distribution calculation module 320 uses the relationship factor difference weighting analysis algorithm to calculate The difference weight corresponding to the new plurality of institutions is obtained, and the difference weight output corresponding to the plurality of institutions is updated to the personalized relationship factor weight table 331 to generate a new personalized relationship factor weight table 331.

於一實施例中,評分與加權分析計算伺服器300已建立個人化關係因子權重表331,且使用者未觀賞影音及未針對該未觀賞影音評分時,該未觀賞影音為新影音或舊影音任一,該加權評分計算模組340在該詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100產生新的影音詮釋資料141時,係根據該個人化關係因子權重表331及該新的影音詮釋資料141作評分計算,以產生新的影音評分結果332。 In an embodiment, the score and weight analysis calculation server 300 has established a personalized relationship factor weight table 331, and when the user does not view the video and audio and does not score the unviewed video, the unobserved video is a new video or an old video. In any case, the weighted score calculation module 340 calculates a score based on the personalized relationship factor weight table 331 and the new video interpretation data 141 when the interpretation data collection server 100 generates a new video interpretation data 141. A new video score result 332 is generated.

於一實施例中,上述儲存單元140、220、330可為硬碟、軟碟、隨身碟或光碟等,但本發明並不以此為限。 In one embodiment, the storage unit 140, 220, 330 may be a hard disk, a floppy disk, a flash drive, or a compact disk, but the invention is not limited thereto.

請參閱第5、6圖所示,係關於本發明一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之方法,係可為第5圖之一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權方法S100,或由第5圖所示之個人化影音資料評分綜合加權方法S100及第6圖之影音評分運算之方法S200所組成。 Please refer to FIG. 5 and FIG. 6 , which is a method for comprehensive weighting information of personalized audio and video data scores according to the present invention, which may be a personalized weighting method S100 for personalized audio and video data in FIG. 5 , or by FIG. 5 . The personalized video and audio data scoring integrated weighting method S100 and the method S200 of the audio and video scoring operation of FIG. 6 are composed.

具體而言,一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權方法S100包括: Specifically, a personalized video and audio material score comprehensive weighting method S100 includes:

(S110):取得使用者針對一影音之影音評分資料,其中由客戶端裝置400中的輸入單元401接收使用者針對一影音之影音評分資料。 (S110): Obtaining the user's audio and video score data for a video and audio, wherein the input unit 401 of the client device 400 receives the video score data of the user for a video.

(S111):區分該影音評分資訊之影音的類型,其中由客戶端評分模組402區分該使用者所針對之該影音的類型為隨選影音或電視頻道影音。 (S111): distinguishing the type of video and audio of the video rating information, wherein the type of the video for which the user is directed by the client scoring module 402 is an audio-visual or television channel video.

(S121):隨選(VOD)影音評分,其中當該影音的類型為隨選影音時,由隨選影音評分模組403處理該影音評分資料。 (S121): On-demand (VOD) video score, wherein the video score data is processed by the on-demand video score module 403 when the type of the video is the on-demand video.

(S122):電視頻道影音評分,其中當該影音的類型為電視頻道影音時,由電視頻道影音評分模組404處理該影音評分資料。 (S122): TV channel video score, wherein the video score data is processed by the television channel video score module 404 when the type of the video is television channel video.

(S130):是否評分,其中隨選(VOD)影音評分單元412判斷使用者是否有進行隨選(VOD)影音評分。若有評分,則進至步驟S142,若無評分,則進至步驟S141。 (S130): Whether to score, wherein the on-demand (VOD) video score unit 412 determines whether the user has performed a on-demand (VOD) video score. If there is a score, the process goes to step S142, and if there is no score, the process goes to step S141.

(S141):由訂閱之影音,令其給為中立分數(其他機構之平均)。亦即,隨選(VOD)影音評分模組403判斷使用者 是否對該影音有輸入該影音評分資料,若無,該隨選影音評分模組403係以該複數個機構對該影音之該評分資料之平均值作為該使用者針對該影音之該影音評分資料。 (S141): The subscription video is given a neutral score (average of other institutions). That is, the on-demand (VOD) video score module 403 determines the user Whether the audio and video score data is input to the video and audio. If not, the on-demand video score module 403 uses the average of the score data of the audio and video as the user's video score data for the video and audio. .

(S142):無論訂閱與否,皆可在介紹頁、播放時各階段進行評分。 (S142): Whether you subscribe or not, you can score at each stage of the introduction page and playback.

(S143):對應該頻道節目表,在影音播放之各個時間點進行評分,其中係由電視頻道影音評分模組404處理將該使用者針對該影音所輸入之該影音評分資料之時間點對應至頻道節目表或電影播放之時間區間,以將所對應之頻道節目或電影作為該影音之該影音評分資料。 (S143): corresponding to the channel program list, at each time point of the video playback, the television channel video score module 404 processes the time point of the video score data input by the user for the video to The channel program schedule or the time interval of the movie playing, so that the corresponding channel program or movie is used as the video score data of the video.

(S150):由給出之評分進行關係因子差異加權分析計算,其中評分與加權分析計算伺服器300向客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器200讀取客戶端評分資料221及向詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100讀取由複數個機構對該影音評分的影音詮釋資料141,並由權重分配計算模組320將讀取到的影音詮釋資料141與該客戶端評分資料221進行關係因子差異加權分析計算,以取得該複數個機構所對應之差異權重。 (S150): a relationship factor difference weighting analysis calculation is performed from the given score, wherein the score and weight analysis calculation server 300 reads the client rating data 221 and the interpretation data collection server 100 to the client rating record integration server 200. The video interpretation data 141 of the video is scored by a plurality of organizations, and the weighted interpretation calculation module 320 performs the relationship factor weighting analysis and calculation on the read video interpretation data 221 to obtain The difference weights corresponding to the plurality of institutions.

(S160):輸出一個人化關係因子權重表,其中權重分配計算模組320將該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重依據該關係因子之種類而輸出為一個人化關係因子權重表331並儲存在儲存單元330內。 (S160): output a personalization relationship factor weight table, wherein the weight distribution calculation module 320 outputs the difference weight corresponding to the plurality of institutions as a humanized relationship factor weight table 331 according to the type of the relationship factor and stores the same in the storage. Within unit 330.

上述(S150)步驟中,該關係因子之種類係為該影音的類型、分級、導演、演員、語系、年份及發行地之一者或其組合。 In the above (S150) step, the type of the relationship factor is one of the type, classification, director, actor, language, year, and place of the video or a combination thereof.

上述(S160)步驟中,更包括取得新的該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重時,更新該個人化關係因子權重表331之步驟。 The step (S160) further includes the step of updating the personalized relationship factor weight table 331 when the new difference weight corresponding to the plurality of institutions is obtained.

此外,上述一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權方法S100,於一新影音上架或頻道影音首播時進一步進行影音評分運算之方法S200,包括以下步驟: In addition, the above-mentioned personalized video and audio data scoring integrated weighting method S100, the method S200 for further performing the audio and video scoring operation when a new video or audio channel is first broadcasted, includes the following steps:

(S210)當新影音上架或頻道影音首播。 (S210) When the new video is on the shelf or the channel video is premiered.

(S220)擷取新影音之詮釋資料,其中加權評分計算模組340藉由影音詮釋資料存取介面360向儲存單元存取介面150讀取新影音或頻道影音首播之影音詮釋資料141。 (S220) extracting the interpretation data of the new video and audio, wherein the weighted score calculation module 340 reads the new video or channel video premiere video interpretation material 141 from the memory unit access interface 360 through the video and audio interpretation data access interface 360.

(S230)取出個人化關係因子權重,其中加權評分計算模組340向儲存單元330取出個人化關係因子權重表331。 (S230) The personalized relationship factor weights are retrieved, wherein the weighted score calculation module 340 retrieves the personalized relationship factor weight table 331 from the storage unit 330.

(S240)根據影音詮釋資料之各機構評分計算個人化加權分數,其中加權評分計算模組340將該個人化關係因子權重表331與該影音詮釋資料141進行評分計算,以取得該影音評分結果332。 (S240) Calculating the personalized weighted score according to each institution score of the audiovisual interpretation data, wherein the weighted score calculation module 340 performs the score calculation on the personalized relationship factor weight table 331 and the video interpretation data 141 to obtain the video score result 332. .

(S250)產生影音排序推薦,其中加權評分計算模組340依據該影音評分結果332進行排序,以產生該影音之影音排序推薦333。 (S250) A video sequence recommendation is generated, wherein the weighted score calculation module 340 sorts according to the video score result 332 to generate the video and audio sequence recommendation 333 of the video.

(S260)顯示影音評分結果及影音排序推薦,其中客戶端顯示模組402向評分與加權分析計算伺服器讀取影音評分結果332及影音排序推薦333,並顯示於客戶端顯示模組402中的隨選影音之服務區或電視頻道影音之資訊頁 中。 (S260) displaying a video score result and a video sequence recommendation, wherein the client display module 402 reads the video score result 332 and the video sequence recommendation 333 to the score and weight analysis calculation server, and displays the result in the client display module 402. Information page of the audio-visual service area or TV channel in.

上述方法S200進一步包含針對使用者未觀賞及未評分的舊有影音執行評分計算及產生影音排序推薦,即方法S200中的新影音處理步驟改為針對舊影音處理步驟。 The method S200 further includes performing a score calculation and generating a video sequence recommendation for the old video that is not viewed and unrated by the user, that is, the new video processing step in the method S200 is changed to the old video processing step.

在本發明一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之方法之另一實施例中,當評分與加權分析計算伺服器300已建立個人化關係因子權重表331,且使用者再次完成影音評分時,執行步驟S150、S160、S200計算出個人化關係因子權重表331、影音評分結果332及影音排序推薦333。 In another embodiment of the method for personalizing video and audio data scoring integrated weighting information according to the present invention, when the scoring and weighting analysis computing server 300 has established the personalized relationship factor weighting table 331, and the user completes the video score again, the execution is performed. Steps S150, S160, and S200 calculate a personalized relationship factor weight table 331, a video score result 332, and a video sequence recommendation 333.

例如,此次使用者對一部影音給予8.7的影音評分資料,而該已建立個人化關係因子權重表331係由使用者於先前進行9次的影音評分並透過步驟S150~S160計算取得,該已建立個人化關係因子權重表331如下表1所示。 For example, the user gives a video score of 8.7 to an audiovisual, and the established personalized relationship factor weight table 331 is obtained by the user in the previous 9 video scores and is calculated through steps S150 to S160. The personalized relationship factor weight table 331 has been established as shown in Table 1 below.

甲、乙、丙以及丁係為差異比較之評分機構,a、b、c、d及e係為關係因子種類。 A, B, C and D are the scoring institutions for the difference comparison, and a, b, c, d and e are the relationship factor types.

首先,依據此次使用者的影音評分資料進行步驟S150中的關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算,該演算法中的符號及變數代表意義如下所述: First, the relationship factor difference weighting analysis algorithm in step S150 is performed according to the video score data of the user, and the meanings of the symbols and variables in the algorithm are as follows:

GRK,n是機構的數量。 G R K , n is the number of institutions.

接著,計算使用者本次評分與該影音在各機構之分數差(DifferenceD u)之絕對值。 Next, calculate the absolute value of the user's current score and the score difference ( Differential , D u ) of the video.

Du(M,O)=|Ru(M)-Ro(M)|,m是Ru(M)的數量 D u (M,O)=|R u (M)-R o (M)|,m is the number of R u (M)

評分與加權分析計算伺服器300的影音詮釋資料存取介面360向詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100中的儲存單元存取介面150讀取本次使用者評分之影音於各機構之評分的影音詮釋資料141,該影音詮釋資料如下所示:R (a,b,d)=8.5、R (a,b,d)=9.0、R (a,b,d)=8.3、R (a,b,d)=8.2 The video interpretation data access interface 360 of the scoring and weighting analysis computing server 300 reads the video interpretation data 141 of the rating of the video of the user rating to the storage unit access interface 150 in the interpretation data collection server 100. The video interpretation data is as follows: R A ( b, d ) = 8.5, R B ( a, b, d ) = 9.0, R C ( a, b, d ) = 8.3, R D ( a, b,d )=8.2

故各機構與本次使用者評分之分數差為:D u (M,甲)=0.2、D u (M,乙)=0.3、D u (M,丙)=0.4、D u (M,丁)=0.5 Therefore, the score difference between each institution and this user rating is: D u ( M, A ) = 0.2, D u ( M, B ) = 0.3, D u ( M, C ) = 0.4, D u ( M, D )=0.5

再根據上述分數差之絕對值大小,給定其差異程度之配分: 則每個機構之差異程度配分如下:P (D u )=7、P (D u )=7、P (D u )=5、P (D u )=5並由配分分別算出該影音於本次評分於各機構之差異權重 則每個機構之差異權重如下: Then according to the absolute value of the above score difference, the score of the degree of difference is given: Then the degree of difference in each institution is as follows: P A ( D u )=7, P B ( D u )=7, P C ( D u )=5, P D ( D u )=5 and are calculated separately from the distribution The video is based on the difference weights of the agencies in this rating. Then the weight difference of each institution is as follows:

最後,根據使用者於各關係因子(類型)之影音評分計算出各機構之最終綜合權重:其中,可依需求設定threshold以使用者評分次數之門檻值。 Finally, the final combined weights of each institution are calculated based on the user's audio and video scores for each relationship factor (type): Among them, the threshold can be set according to the demand to the user's rating.

加入本次評分後,新產生之個人化關係因子權重表331如下表2: After joining this rating, the newly generated personalization relationship factor weight table 331 is shown in Table 2 below:

以上述個人化關係因子權重表331中的W(a)=0.254 之計算說明如下: The calculation of W A (a) = 0.254 in the above personalized relationship factor weight table 331 is as follows:

其中0.25係為表1中W(a)之值,9為表1中個人化關係因子權重表331先前已計算之次數,係為上述W (M)之差異權重,10為加入本次評分後的總計算次數。 Wherein the system is 0.25 W Table A (a) value of 1, 9 of Table 1 Weights personal relationship table 331 times the weight of the previously calculated, A system of the above-mentioned W (M) of the weight difference, the total number of calculations is 10 after the addition of this score.

若系統未建立差異權重表時,則由上述差異權重W (M)、W (M)、W (M)、W (M)依據關係因子建立出個人化關係因子權重表331。 When the difference in the weight table if the system has not been established, by the above-described difference weights W A (M), W B (M), W propionate (M), W D (M) to establish based on the relationship between factors that Weights personal relationships weight table 331.

以上述計算方法所分析之結果,取得對應各機構的個人化關係因子權重表331後,未來當影音新上架或頻道影音首播時,執行S200方法,加權評分計算模組340藉由影音詮釋資料存取介面360向詮釋資料蒐集伺服器100中的儲存單元存取介面150讀取對應新影音或頻道影音首播時的影音詮釋資料141,加權評分計算模組340將所讀取到的影音詮釋資料141與上述表2中的個人化關係因子權重表331進行評分計算,評分計算如下所示: After obtaining the personalized relationship factor weight table 331 corresponding to each institution according to the result of the above calculation method, the S200 method is executed when the video is newly added or the channel video is premiered in the future, and the weighted score calculation module 340 stores the data by video and audio. The interface 360 reads the video interpretation material 141 corresponding to the new video or channel video premiere to the storage unit access interface 150 in the interpretation data collection server 100, and the weighted score calculation module 340 reads the read video interpretation data 141. The score calculation is performed with the personalized relationship factor weight table 331 in Table 2 above, and the score calculation is as follows:

新影音上架或頻道影音首播之個人化加權評分生成過程,若有一片(該片分類為 a , c , e 類型)於四機構評分取得的影音詮釋資料141如下: R (a,c,e)=6.5、R (a,c,e)=7.6、R (a,c,e)=8.2、R (a,c,e)=8.0 The process of generating personalized weighted scores for new audio-visual shelves or channel video premieres. If there is a piece (the film is classified as a , c , e type), the audio-visual interpretation data obtained by the four-institution score is as follows: R A ( a, c, e ) = 6.5, R B ( a, c, e ) = 7.6, R C ( a, c, e ) = 8.2, R D ( a, c, e ) = 8.0

則依據各影音所含關係因子之機構權重做計算新影音評分結果Rnew(a,c,e)為: Calculate the new video score result R new (a, c, e) according to the institutional weight of the relationship factor contained in each video:

最後,各新上架或頻道首播影音皆會有一評分為新計算出來之R new (M),並由加權評分計算模組340將此新影音評分結果進行排序,此一排序即為依據每個使用者個人之於各機構與其關係因子所加權產生出的影音排序推薦333結果。 Finally, each new shelf or channel first broadcast video will have a score of newly calculated R new ( M ), and the weighted score calculation module 340 sorts the new video score results, which is based on each use. The results are 333 recommended by the individuals and their relationship factors.

由上述可得知,本發明由複數個機構對該影音之評分資料所整合之影音詮釋資料及個人化關係因子權重表進行評分計算,可得到對每部影音之個人化的影音評分結果,並將該影音評分結果進行排序,以產生個人化的影音排序推薦,因此,本發明解決了使用者往往只能透過單一機構之評分來做選擇參考的問題,更可藉此呈現出自身與不同評分機構口味與類型之差異,進而取得最佳之排序推薦。 As can be seen from the above, the present invention is obtained by scoring and calculating the audio-visual interpretation data and the personalized relationship factor weighting table integrated by the scores of the audio-visual scores by a plurality of institutions, and obtaining the personalized video-audio score results for each of the audio-visual sounds, and The video score results are sorted to generate a personalized video sequence recommendation. Therefore, the present invention solves the problem that the user can only make a selection reference through the score of a single institution, and can also present himself and different scores. The difference between the taste and type of the organization, and then the best sorting recommendation.

上述實施例係用以例示性說明本發明之原理及其功效,而非用於限制本發明。任何熟習此項技藝之人士均可 在不違背本發明之精神及範疇下,對上述實施例進行修改。因此本發明之權利保護範圍,應如後述之申請專利範圍所列。 The above embodiments are intended to illustrate the principles of the invention and its effects, and are not intended to limit the invention. Anyone who is familiar with this skill can The above embodiments are modified without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Therefore, the scope of protection of the present invention should be as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims (10)

一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之系統,係包括:客戶端裝置,包含一客戶端評分模組及一客戶端顯示模組,該客戶端評分模組用以接收一使用者針對一影音之影音評分資料;客戶端評分紀錄整合伺服器,係用以接收該客戶端裝置之該影音評分資料,以將該使用者的資料及該影音評分資料整合成客戶端評分資料;詮釋資料蒐集伺服器,係用以連接複數個機構以取得該複數個機構對於該影音之評分資料,以將該影音之評分資料整合成影音詮釋資料;以及評分與加權分析計算伺服器,係用以接收該客戶端評分資料及該影音詮釋資料,以透過一對應有關係因子之種類之關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算取得對應該影音之影音評分結果與影音排序推薦,俾提供該客戶端顯示模組讀取該影音評分結果與影音排序推薦以顯示該影音評分結果與影音排序推薦。 A system for personalizing video and audio data scoring integrated weighting information includes: a client device, comprising a client scoring module and a client display module, wherein the client scoring module is configured to receive a user for an audiovisual Video score data; the client score record integration server is configured to receive the video score data of the client device, to integrate the user data and the video score data into client rating data; and to interpret the data collection server And a system for connecting the plurality of institutions to obtain the score information of the plurality of institutions for integrating the audio and video scores into the audio and video interpretation data; and the scoring and weighting analysis calculation server for receiving the client The score data and the audiovisual interpretation data are obtained by using a relationship factor difference weighted analysis algorithm corresponding to the type of the relationship factor to obtain a video score result and a video sequence recommendation corresponding to the audio and video, and providing the client display module to read the data. Video score results and video sorting recommendations to display the video score results and video sorting push . 如申請專利範圍第1項所述之系統,其中,該評分與加權分析計算伺服器更包括:權重分配計算模組,係利用該關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算取得該複數個機構所對應之差異權重,以將該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重依據該關係因子之種類而輸出一個人化關係因子權重表;以及 加權評分計算模組,係用以將該個人化關係因子權重與該影音詮釋資料進行評分計算,以取得該影音評分結果,再將該影音評分結果進行排序,俾產生該影音排序推薦。 The system of claim 1, wherein the scoring and weighting analysis calculation server further comprises: a weight distribution calculation module, wherein the relationship factor difference weighting analysis algorithm is used to calculate and obtain the corresponding number of institutions a weighting difference, wherein the difference weight corresponding to the plurality of institutions outputs a personalization factor weight table according to the type of the relationship factor; The weighted score calculation module is configured to perform the score calculation on the personalized relationship factor weight and the video interpretation data to obtain the video score result, and then sort the video score result to generate the video sound sequence recommendation. 如申請專利範圍第2項所述之系統,其中,該客戶端評分模組更用以區分該使用者所針對之該影音的類型為隨選影音或電視頻道影音,且該客戶端裝置更包括:輸入單元,包含用以接收該影音評分資料,以將該影音評分資料傳送至該客戶端評分模組;隨選影音評分模組,當該影音的類型為隨選影音時,判斷該使用者是否對該影音有輸入該影音評分資料,若無,該隨選影音評分模組係以該複數個機構對該影音之該評分資料之平均值作為該使用者針對該影音之該影音評分資料;電視頻道影音評分模組,當該影音的類型為電視頻道影音時,將該使用者針對該影音所輸入之該影音評分資料之時間點對應至頻道節目表或電影播放之時間區間,以將所對應之頻道節目或電影作為該影音之該影音評分資料;以及資料交換傳遞介面,用以存取該影音評分資料、該影音評分結果及該影音排序推薦。 The system of claim 2, wherein the client scoring module is further configured to distinguish that the type of the video for which the user is directed is an audio-visual or television channel, and the client device further includes An input unit, configured to receive the video rating data, to transmit the video rating data to the client rating module; and the optional video rating module, when the type of the audio and video is selected audio and video, determine the user Whether the video score data is input to the video and audio recording, if not, the on-demand video score module uses the average of the rating data of the audio and video as the user's rating data for the video and audio; a TV channel video score module, when the type of the video is a TV channel video, the time point of the audio score data input by the user for the video is corresponding to the time range of the channel program table or the movie playing time, Corresponding channel program or movie as the video score data of the audio and video; and a data exchange delivery interface for accessing the video score data, the video and audio The result of the rating and the recommended order of the video. 如申請專利範圍第2項所述之系統,其中,該權重分配計算模組用以在取得新的該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重時,更新該個人化關係因子權重表。 The system of claim 2, wherein the weight distribution calculation module is configured to update the personalized relationship factor weight table when the new difference weight corresponding to the plurality of institutions is obtained. 如申請專利範圍第2項所述之系統,其中,該權重分配計算模組所利用之該關係因子差異加權分析演算法,係先計算該客戶端評分資料及該影音詮釋資料之間的各該複數個機構之分數差,根據該分數差之絕對值給定各該複數個機構之差異程度配分,以根據各該複數個機構之該差異程度配分計算出對應該客戶端評分資料之各該複數個機構之該差異權重。 The system of claim 2, wherein the weighting analysis algorithm used by the weighting calculation module first calculates the score between the client rating data and the audiovisual interpretation data. a score difference of a plurality of institutions, and a score of the degree of difference of each of the plurality of institutions is given according to an absolute value of the score difference, and the plural score corresponding to the score of the client is calculated according to the degree of the degree of difference of each of the plurality of institutions The difference weight of the institutions. 如申請專利範圍第2項所述之系統,其中,該加權評分計算模組在該詮釋資料蒐集伺服器產生新的影音詮釋資料時,係根據該個人化關係因子權重表及該新的影音詮釋資料作評分計算,以產生新的影音評分結果。 The system of claim 2, wherein the weighted score calculation module generates a new audio and video interpretation data according to the personalized relationship factor weighting table and the new video interpretation The data is scored to generate new video score results. 一種個人化影音資料評分綜合加權資訊之方法,包括:取得一使用者針對一影音之影音評分資料,以將該使用者的資料及該影音評分資料整合成客戶端評分資料;將該客戶端評分資料與一由複數個機構對該影音之評分資料所整合之影音詮釋資料透過一對應有關係因子之種類之關係因子差異加權分析演算法計算取得該複數個機構所對應之差異權重;以及將該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重依據該關係因子之種類而輸出為一個人化關係因子權重表。 A method for personalizing video and audio data to score comprehensive weighted information, comprising: obtaining a video score data of a user for an audio and video, and integrating the user data and the video score data into a client rating data; The data and a video interpretation data integrated by the plurality of institutions of the audiovisual score data are obtained by a correlation factor difference weighted analysis algorithm corresponding to the type of the relationship factor, and the difference weights corresponding to the plurality of institutions are obtained; The difference weight corresponding to the plurality of institutions is output as a humanized relationship factor weight table according to the type of the relationship factor. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之方法,更包括取得新的該複數個機構所對應之該差異權重時,更新該個人化關係因子權重表之步驟。 The method of updating the personalized relationship factor weighting table when the method of claim 7 further includes obtaining the new difference weight corresponding to the plurality of institutions. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之方法,其中,該關係因子差異加權分析演算法更包括下列計算步驟:計算該客戶端評分資料及該影音詮釋資料之間的各該複數個機構之分數差;根據該分數差之絕對值給定各該複數個機構之差異程度配分;以及根據各該複數個機構之該差異程度配分計算出對應該客戶端評分資料之各該複數個機構之差異權重。 The method of claim 7, wherein the relationship factor difference weighting analysis algorithm further comprises the following calculating step: calculating a score difference between the client rating data and the plurality of institutions between the video interpretation data And determining, according to the absolute value of the score difference, a degree of difference distribution of each of the plurality of institutions; and calculating, according to the degree of difference of the plurality of institutions, a difference weight of each of the plurality of institutions corresponding to the client rating data. 如申請專利範圍第7項所述之方法,其中,在取得該個人化關係因子權重表之後,更包括下列步驟:將該個人化關係因子權重表及該影音詮釋資料進行評分計算,以產生影音評分結果;以及依據該影音評分結果進行排序,以產生該影音之影音排序推薦。 The method of claim 7, wherein after obtaining the personalized relationship factor weight table, the method further comprises the following steps: calculating the personalized relationship factor weight table and the video interpretation data to generate audio and video The result of the scoring; and sorting according to the result of the video scoring to generate the audio and video ranking recommendation of the video.
TW106129136A 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 System and method for video with personalized weighted rating scores TWI626847B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW106129136A TWI626847B (en) 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 System and method for video with personalized weighted rating scores

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW106129136A TWI626847B (en) 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 System and method for video with personalized weighted rating scores

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TWI626847B true TWI626847B (en) 2018-06-11
TW201914305A TW201914305A (en) 2019-04-01

Family

ID=63256054

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW106129136A TWI626847B (en) 2017-08-28 2017-08-28 System and method for video with personalized weighted rating scores

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI626847B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
TWI817859B (en) * 2022-12-05 2023-10-01 中華電信股份有限公司 A customizing and recommend video or audio content system, method and computer-readable medium thereof by integrating user status based on ring back tone

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2009073664A2 (en) * 2007-12-04 2009-06-11 Google Inc. Rating raters
TW200951858A (en) * 2008-03-03 2009-12-16 Yahoo Inc Method and apparatus for social network marketing with advocate referral
US7996396B2 (en) * 2006-03-28 2011-08-09 A9.Com, Inc. Identifying the items most relevant to a current query based on user activity with respect to the results of similar queries
TW201513020A (en) * 2013-07-01 2015-04-01 Yahoo Inc Quality scoring system for advertisements and content in an online system
CN103514304B (en) * 2013-10-29 2017-01-18 海南大学 Project recommendation method and device

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7996396B2 (en) * 2006-03-28 2011-08-09 A9.Com, Inc. Identifying the items most relevant to a current query based on user activity with respect to the results of similar queries
WO2009073664A2 (en) * 2007-12-04 2009-06-11 Google Inc. Rating raters
TW200951858A (en) * 2008-03-03 2009-12-16 Yahoo Inc Method and apparatus for social network marketing with advocate referral
TW201513020A (en) * 2013-07-01 2015-04-01 Yahoo Inc Quality scoring system for advertisements and content in an online system
CN103514304B (en) * 2013-10-29 2017-01-18 海南大学 Project recommendation method and device

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201914305A (en) 2019-04-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US10321173B2 (en) Determining user engagement with media content based on separate device usage
US11025583B2 (en) Recommendation system based on common interests in social networks
US9270918B2 (en) Method of recommending broadcasting contents and recommending apparatus therefor
Bury et al. Is it live or is it timeshifted, streamed or downloaded? Watching television in the era of multiple screens
JP5592546B2 (en) Converting digital content postings into cash
CN101047826B (en) Electronic apparatus, information browsing method thereof
US8132200B1 (en) Intra-video ratings
RU2524840C2 (en) Adaptive implicit examination for recommendation systems
US8489515B2 (en) Social network based recommendation method and system
US10762152B2 (en) Displaying a summary of media content items
US20130297608A1 (en) Content presentation device, content presentation terminal, content presentation system, content presentation program, and content presentation method
US20120158527A1 (en) Systems, Methods and/or Computer Readable Storage Media Facilitating Aggregation and/or Personalized Sequencing of News Video Content
US10028000B2 (en) Automatic rating optimization
JP4370850B2 (en) Information processing apparatus and method, program, and recording medium
US20230089961A1 (en) Optimizing content distribution using a model
US20210319475A1 (en) Method and system for matching location-based content
JP2005056361A (en) Information processor and method, program, and storage medium
TWI626847B (en) System and method for video with personalized weighted rating scores
JP2011015355A (en) Attribute estimation apparatus and method, and program
TWI538491B (en) Television service system and method for supplying video service
CN113709507A (en) Video recommendation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
KR20190044592A (en) Dynamic multi-dimensional analysis based advertisements recommendation apparatus and method
US20120116879A1 (en) Automatic information selection based on involvement classification
JP5637954B2 (en) RECOMMENDED PROGRAM PRESENTATION DEVICE AND ITS PROGRAM
JP5008250B2 (en) Information processing apparatus and method, program, and recording medium