TWI378685B - Sensor-fault detection method and wireless detection method for wireless sensor networks system - Google Patents

Sensor-fault detection method and wireless detection method for wireless sensor networks system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
TWI378685B
TWI378685B TW98107918A TW98107918A TWI378685B TW I378685 B TWI378685 B TW I378685B TW 98107918 A TW98107918 A TW 98107918A TW 98107918 A TW98107918 A TW 98107918A TW I378685 B TWI378685 B TW I378685B
Authority
TW
Taiwan
Prior art keywords
sensing
nodes
error
node
sensing node
Prior art date
Application number
TW98107918A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
TW201034410A (en
Inventor
Tsang Yi Wang
pei yin Chen
Li Yuan Chang
Original Assignee
Univ Nat Sun Yat Sen
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Univ Nat Sun Yat Sen filed Critical Univ Nat Sun Yat Sen
Priority to TW98107918A priority Critical patent/TWI378685B/en
Publication of TW201034410A publication Critical patent/TW201034410A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of TWI378685B publication Critical patent/TWI378685B/en

Links

Landscapes

  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
  • Arrangements For Transmission Of Measured Signals (AREA)

Description

1378685. 六、發明說明: . 【發明所屬之技術領域】 本發明係有關於一種無線感測網路系統的錯誤感測節點 偵測方法及感測方法,且特別係有關於可減少感測錯誤率之無 線感測網路系統的錯誤感測節點偵測方法及感測方法。 【先前技術】 由於微型製造技術、通訊技術及電池技術的進步,目前已 鲁 發展出微型感測器,用以感應、無線通訊及處理資訊。微型感 測器可感應及偵測環境的目標物及改變,並可處理收集到的數 據,再將處理過後的資料以無線傳輸的方式送到資訊融合中心 或基地台(Base Station)。而無線感測網路(Wireless〜⑽沉1378685. VI. Description of the Invention: [Technical Field] The present invention relates to a method and a method for detecting an error sensing node of a wireless sensing network system, and particularly relates to reducing sensing errors The error sensing node detection method and sensing method of the wireless sensing network system. [Prior Art] Due to advances in micro-manufacturing technology, communication technology, and battery technology, miniature sensors have been developed to sense, wirelessly communicate and process information. The micro sensor senses and detects the target and changes of the environment, and can process the collected data, and then send the processed data to the information fusion center or base station by wireless transmission. Wireless sensing network (Wireless~(10) sink

Networks)係由一或多個無線資料收集器以及多個感測器 (Sensor)所構成的網路系統,其中無線感測網路中的通訊方式係 採用無線通訊方式,因此,感測器或是無線資料收集器可方便 地設置於任意位置’並可節省佈線費用。 φ 然而,在無線感測網路中,往往不可避免地存在錯誤的感 測節點,感測器可能因其能源用盡或硬體損壞而送出不正確的 訊息到資訊融合中心,因而造成系統之估計正確度的下降,並 導致整體的估測準確度效能降低。 j . 【發明内容】 因此本發明之一方面係在於提供一種無線感測網路系統 的錯誤感測節點偵測方法及感測方法’藉以提高無線感測網路 系統的感測準確率。 根據本發明之實施例,本發明之無線感測網路系統的錯誤 [S3 3 1378685 ' 感測節點偵測方法係用以偵測至少一錯誤感測節點,其中無線 • 感測網路系統包含複數個感測節點和資訊融合中心,感測節點 係用以感測偵測目標,並分別傳送測量值至資訊融合中心,此 方法包含:接收感測節點的測量值;假設感測節點的其中至少 一者為至少一假設錯誤感測節點;對假設錯誤感測節點以外之 其他感測節點的觀察值進行同質性檢測,以檢測假設錯誤感測 節點以外之其他感測節點的測量值是否實質相同;當檢測出假 設錯誤感測節點以外之其他感測節點的測量值為實質相同 φ 時,判斷假設錯誤感測節點為錯誤感測節點;以及當檢測出假 設錯誤感測節點以外之其他感測節點的觀察值為實質不相同 時判斷假δ又錯誤感測節點不是錯誤感測節點,並重新假設新 的至少一假設錯誤感測節點,以重新進行同質性檢測。 又,根據本發明之實施例,本發明之無線感測網路系統的 感測方法係用以估測摘測目標,其中無線感測網路系統包含複 數個感測節點和資訊融合中心,此方法包含:利用感測節點來 感測偵測目標,並分別傳送測量值至資訊融合中心;利用資訊 #融合中心來根據感測節點的測量值,而進行錯誤感測節點偵 偵測至少一錯誤感測節點;以及排除錯誤感測節點的測 里值,並根據錯誤感測節點以外之感測節點所傳送的測量值來 進行估測。 入眘^根據本發明之實施例’本發明之無線感測網路系統包 中心及複數個感測節點。感測節點係用以分別感測 ^ ’而接收到觀察值,並分別傳送測量值至資訊融合中 中感測節點的其中至少—者為錯誤感測節點。資訊融合 中、、勺衽::接從感測知點的測量值來進行估測,其中資訊融合 中π括谓錯單元,用以根據感測節點的測量值來偵測出錯誤 1378685. 感測節點,資訊融合中心係根據錯誤感測節點以外之感測節點 所傳送的測量值來估測偵測目標。 因此,本發明之無線感測網路系統的錯誤感測節點偵測方 法及感測方法可預先偵測出異常的感測節點,藉以排除異常的 感測節點所發出錯誤的感測資訊,因而可提高無線感測網路系 統的感測正確率。 【實施方式】 •為讓本發明之上述和其他目的、特徵、優點與實施例能更 明顯易懂,本說明書將特舉出一系列實施例來加以說明。但值 得注意的係,此些實施例只係用以說明本發明之實施方式,而 非用以限定本發明。 請參照第1圖和第2圖,第1圖繪示依照本發明之一實施 例之無線感測網路系統的系統示意圖,第2圖繪示依照本發明 之一實施例之資訊融合中心的結構示意圖。本實施例之無線感 測網路系統100例如為分散式網路偵測系統,用以感測至少一 Φ 债測目標(未繪示)’而可應用於例如軍事或環境監控。無線感 測網路系統1〇〇包含資訊融合中心(Fusi〇n Center)!20和複數個 感測節點110。感測節點11〇可任意地設置於偵測目標的周圍, 以進行感測,並對所接收到的至少一觀察值來進行初步之目標 事件的判斷,例如是否發生火災事件。感測節點丨1〇可再將所 '判斷的測量值傳送至資訊融合中心12〇來做最後的事件判斷。 备無線感測網路系統1 〇〇之感測節點丨丨〇的其中至少一者因能 源用盡、硬體損壞或意外故障而發生異常時,此異常的感測節 點^即錯誤感測節點m)會傳送與真實觀測狀況不符合的資料 到資訊融合中心120,而這些不正確的資料會影響到資訊融合 078.685. 中心120的參數估計,導致無線感測網路系統100的感測正確 率大幅地下降。此時,本實施例之無線感測網路系統1〇〇及其 錯誤感測節點偵測方法與感測方法可偵測出異常的感測節點 H0’並在感測過程中排除錯誤之感測節點11〇所送出的資訊, 以提升無線感測網路系統100的感測準確率。其中,資訊融合 中心120包含接收單元121、偵錯單元122及判斷單元123。 接收單元121係用以接收感測節點U0所發出測量值,偵錯單 兀* 122係用以根據感測節點110的測量值來偵測此些感測節點 中是否有錯誤感測節點m(異常的感測節點110),以及在 此些感測節點110中何者為錯誤感測節點ιη。在偵錯單元122 偵測出錯誤感測節點U1後,判斷單元123可根據錯誤感測節 點111以外之感測節點110所傳送的測量值來進行估測。 請參照第3圖和第4圖,第3圖繪示依照本發明之一實施 例之無線感測網路系統之感測方法的方法流程圖,第4圖繪示 依照本發明之一實施例之無線感測網路系統的系統架構圖。當 進行本實施例之無線感測網路系統1〇〇的感測方法時,首先,Networks) is a network system consisting of one or more wireless data collectors and a plurality of sensors. The communication method in the wireless sensing network is wireless communication, so the sensor or The wireless data collector can be easily set up anywhere' and saves on wiring costs. Φ However, in wireless sensing networks, there are inevitably erroneous sensing nodes. Sensors may send incorrect messages to the information fusion center due to energy exhaustion or hardware damage, thus causing the system to It is estimated that the accuracy is reduced and the overall estimation accuracy is reduced. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION Accordingly, it is an aspect of the present invention to provide a method and method for detecting an error sensing node of a wireless sensing network system to improve sensing accuracy of a wireless sensing network system. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the error of the wireless sensing network system of the present invention [S3 3 1378685 ' sensing node detecting method is for detecting at least one error sensing node, wherein the wireless sensing network system includes a plurality of sensing nodes and an information fusion center, wherein the sensing nodes are used to sense the detection target and respectively transmit the measured values to the information fusion center, the method comprising: receiving the measured values of the sensing nodes; At least one is at least one hypothetical error sensing node; homogeneity detection is performed on observation values of other sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node to detect whether the measured values of other sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node are substantial The same; when it is detected that the measured values of the sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node are substantially the same φ, it is determined that the error sensing node is the error sensing node; and when the detected error sensing node is detected, When the observed values of the measured nodes are substantially different, the false δ is detected and the error sensing node is not the error sensing node, and the new one is re-assumed. A hypothetical error sensing node to re-test homogeneity. Moreover, according to an embodiment of the present invention, a sensing method of the wireless sensing network system of the present invention is used to estimate a target of measurement, wherein the wireless sensing network system includes a plurality of sensing nodes and an information fusion center. The method comprises: sensing a detection target by using a sensing node, and transmitting the measurement value to the information fusion center respectively; using the information #fusion center to perform at least one error detection by the error sensing node according to the measured value of the sensing node Sensing the node; and eliminating the measured value of the error sensing node, and estimating based on the measured value transmitted by the sensing node other than the error sensing node. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the wireless sensing network system packet center and a plurality of sensing nodes of the present invention. The sensing nodes are configured to sense the observations respectively and receive the observed values, and respectively transmit the measured values to at least one of the sensing nodes in the information fusion as the error sensing node. In the information fusion, the scoop:: Estimate from the measured value of the sensing point, wherein the information fusion includes the π bracketing error unit to detect the error according to the measured value of the sensing node 1378685. The measurement node, the information fusion center estimates the detection target based on the measurement values transmitted by the sensing nodes other than the error sensing node. Therefore, the error sensing node detecting method and the sensing method of the wireless sensing network system of the present invention can detect an abnormal sensing node in advance, thereby eliminating the wrong sensing information sent by the abnormal sensing node, thereby The sensing accuracy rate of the wireless sensing network system can be improved. The above and other objects, features, advantages and embodiments of the present invention will become more apparent and understood. However, it is to be understood that the embodiments are merely illustrative of the embodiments of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention. Please refer to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 . FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a system of a wireless sensing network system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an information fusion center according to an embodiment of the present invention. Schematic. The wireless sensing network system 100 of the present embodiment is, for example, a distributed network detection system for sensing at least one Φ debt measurement target (not shown) and can be applied to, for example, military or environmental monitoring. The wireless sensing network system 1 includes a information fusion center (Fusi〇n Center)! 20 and a plurality of sensing nodes 110. The sensing node 11A can be arbitrarily disposed around the detection target for sensing, and the preliminary target event is judged for the received at least one observation value, for example, whether a fire event occurs. The sensing node 〇1〇 can then transmit the determined measurement value to the information fusion center 12 for the final event determination. When an abnormality occurs in at least one of the sensing node 备 of the wireless sensing network system 1 due to energy exhaustion, hardware damage or unexpected failure, the abnormal sensing node ^ is an error sensing node m) will transmit data that does not match the actual observation status to the information fusion center 120, and these incorrect data will affect the information fusion 078.685. The parameter estimation of the center 120 results in the sensing accuracy rate of the wireless sensing network system 100. Drastically dropped. At this time, the wireless sensing network system 1 〇〇 and its error sensing node detecting method and sensing method of the embodiment can detect the abnormal sensing node H0 ′ and eliminate the sense of error in the sensing process. The information sent by the node 11 is measured to improve the sensing accuracy of the wireless sensing network system 100. The information fusion center 120 includes a receiving unit 121, a debugging unit 122, and a determining unit 123. The receiving unit 121 is configured to receive the measurement value sent by the sensing node U0, and the debugging unit is used to detect whether there is an error sensing node m among the sensing nodes according to the measured value of the sensing node 110. The abnormal sensing node 110), and which of the sensing nodes 110 are the error sensing nodes ιη. After the error detecting unit 122 detects the error sensing node U1, the determining unit 123 can perform estimation based on the measured values transmitted by the sensing node 110 other than the error sensing node 111. Please refer to FIG. 3 and FIG. 4 . FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for sensing a wireless sensing network system according to an embodiment of the present invention, and FIG. 4 is a diagram illustrating an embodiment of the present invention. A system architecture diagram of a wireless sensing network system. When the sensing method of the wireless sensing network system 1 of the present embodiment is performed, first,

利用感測節點110來感測偵測目標,並分別接收到觀察值(步驟 210) ^在本實施例中,無線感測網路系統1〇〇係使用貝氏估計 法來估測感測節點110的觀測參數(觀察值。假設無線感 測網路系統100认有S-A,·..,SN}共Ν個感測節點110來觀測 參數Θ,而感測節點11〇會在每一個回報時間點傳送其測量值 到資訊融合中心、12〇。再者,,的分佈函數假設已知為咖。感 測節點uo觀測到的值為尤,其中n為感測節點ιι〇的編號, 而t為觀測時間的索引。每一感測節·點11〇會根據觀測到的· 出一個決定 <(測量值)並傳送到資訊融合中心12〇,而一可以 被對應於一向量訊號恥,·..,(},而此向量可用以”代表 1378685 {ql,...,qM }共Μ個不同的值》因此,資訊融合中心i2〇可根據 . 此些感測節點110所發出的沁來使用貝氏估計,而估測所觀察 的0值。 如第3圖所示,接著,利用資訊融合中心12〇的偵錯單元 122來根據感測節點11〇的測量值,而進行一錯誤感測節點偵 測(步驟220),以偵測出錯誤感測節點u i。 以下,進一步說明本實施例的錯誤感測節點偵測方法。請 參照第5圖,其繪示依照本發明之一實施例之無線感測網路系 φ 統之錯誤感測節點偵測方法的方法流程圖。首先,假設所有的 感測Ip點110皆為正常的感測節點(步驟S221)。接著,對所有 感測節點110的觀察值進行同質性檢測,以檢測所有感測節點 110的測量值是否實質相同(步驟S222)e當檢測所有感測節點 no的測量值為實質相同時,判斷所有的感測節點11〇皆為正 常的感測節點(步驟S223),亦即這些感測節點11〇中並無任何 錯誤感測節點111。當檢測出這些感測節點11〇的觀察值為實 質不相同時,判斷並非所有的感測節點11〇皆為正常的感測節 鲁點(亦即這些感測節點11〇的其中至少一者為錯誤感測節點 ill)’並假設這些感測節點110的其中至少一者為假設錯誤感 測節點(步驟S224)。接著,對假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他感 測節點110的觀察值進行同質性檢測,以檢測此假設錯誤感測 .節點以外之其他感測節·點110的測量值是否實質相同(步驟 -S225)。當檢測出此假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他感測節點削 的測量值為實質相同時,判斷此假設錯誤感測節點為錯誤感測 節點UK步驟S226)。當檢測出假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他 j測知點110的觀察值為實質不相同時,判斷此假設錯誤感測 節點不是錯誤感測節點(步驟S227),並重新假設新的至少一假 1378685. 設錯誤感測節點,以重新進行同質性檢測。在本實施例中,此 同質性檢測係假設無線感測網路系統刚中大多數的感測節點 為正*運作,則在無線感測網路系統_中之大多數感測 即點110應具有相同性質,亦即大多數正常之感測節點11〇的 測量值應為實質相同。 在本實施例中,首先’假設FT為錯誤感測節點U1的集合, 則下述公式(1)之二元假設檢定問題可用來測試與求得此錯誤 感測節點的集合。 :Pr[^« = qt Iθ] -ρί]β f〇rallsnsS\FT;The sensing node 110 is used to sense the detection target and respectively receive the observation value (step 210). In the embodiment, the wireless sensing network system 1 uses the Bayesian estimation method to estimate the sensing node. The observation parameters of 110 (observed values. It is assumed that the wireless sensing network system 100 recognizes SA, . . . , SN} a total of one sensing node 110 to observe the parameter Θ, and the sensing node 11 〇 will be at each reporting time. Point transmits its measured value to the information fusion center, 12 〇. Furthermore, the distribution function is assumed to be known as coffee. The value observed by the sensing node uo is especially, where n is the number of the sensing node ιι〇, and t For the index of the observation time, each sensing node·point 11〇 will be determined according to the observed one<(measurement value) and transmitted to the information fusion center 12〇, and one can be corresponding to a vector signal shame, ·.., (}, and this vector can be used to represent 1378685 {ql,...,qM } for a total of different values. Therefore, the information fusion center i2 can be based on the sensing nodes 110 The Bayesian estimate is used to estimate the observed value of 0. As shown in Figure 3, then The error-sensing node 122 is detected by the error-inducing unit 122 of the information fusion center 12〇 according to the measured value of the sensing node 11〇 (step 220) to detect the error sensing node ui. The error sensing node detecting method of this embodiment. Referring to FIG. 5, a method flowchart of a method for detecting an error sensing node of a wireless sensing network system according to an embodiment of the present invention is shown. First, assume that all of the sensing Ip points 110 are normal sensing nodes (step S221). Next, homogeneity detection is performed on the observed values of all the sensing nodes 110 to detect whether the measured values of all the sensing nodes 110 are substantial. The same (step S222) e, when detecting that the measured values of all the sensing nodes no are substantially the same, it is determined that all the sensing nodes 11〇 are normal sensing nodes (step S223), that is, the sensing nodes 11〇 There is no error sensing node 111. When it is detected that the observed values of these sensing nodes 11〇 are substantially different, it is determined that not all sensing nodes 11〇 are normal sensing node lunar points (ie, these feelings Test node 11 At least one of them is an error sensing node ill)' and assumes that at least one of the sensing nodes 110 is a hypothetical error sensing node (step S224). Next, for other sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node The observation value of 110 is subjected to homogeneity detection to detect whether the hypothesis error sensing. The measurement values of the other sensing nodes and points 110 other than the node are substantially the same (step-S225). When the hypothetical error sensing node is detected, When the measured values of the other sensing node cuts are substantially the same, it is judged that the assumed error sensing node is the error sensing node UK step S226). When the detected value of the j-measurement point 110 other than the hypothetical error sensing node is detected, the observed value is When the essence is different, it is judged that the hypothetical error sensing node is not the error sensing node (step S227), and the new at least one false 1378685 is newly assumed to set the error sensing node to perform the homogeneity detection again. In this embodiment, the homogeneity detection assumes that most of the sensing nodes in the wireless sensing network system are positive*, and most of the sensing in the wireless sensing network system is point 110. The same property, that is, the measurement value of most normal sensing nodes 11〇 should be substantially the same. In the present embodiment, first, assuming that FT is a set of error sensing nodes U1, the binary hypothesis verification problem of the following formula (1) can be used to test and find the set of the error sensing nodes. :Pr[^« = qt Iθ] -ρί]β f〇rallsnsS\FT;

Hx: otherwise. ........................................(1) 其中,當H〇成立時,若再為所選擇之錯誤感測節點集合, 則下述的統計量寧洱)就會收斂為一個自由度為(n_|f雜 —1)的卡方分配(Chi square distribution) » mS\FT) = fil{snGS\ FT)Y^Le^\ ,Λ、 "=1 ,=1 e, ................................... > X(N-\FtUM-\yHx: otherwise. ..................................(1) Among them, when When H〇 is established, if the selected error sensing node set is selected, the following statistics will be converged to a chi-square distribution with a degree of freedom (n_|f---1). » mS\FT) = fil{snGS\ FT)Y^Le^\ , Λ, "=1 ,=1 e, .................... ............... > X(N-\FtUM-\y

且〜=2賦=义},....................................... /=1 ....................... j ) —[二取巧\再K, 1 I .........................................(4) 然後’利用此統計量鄭⑹,上述公式⑴之二元假設性檢 定問題可被處理如下。 右^'(|^\6)>712-〇:,(;^-|/:;卜丨)(从-1)’則接受1^; 右付(S (AHfr卜 1)(A/-1) ’ 則接受 H〇。 其中,α為檢定之顯著水準。 此錯誤感測節點偵測方法的同質性檢測可依據如下步驟 1378685. 來進行: 步驟⑷:設定k=〇,並設置檢定之顯著水準“ 步帮⑻:料所有,W,騎料 一個候選集合妒滿足^如禾仔社 扭…一… 質性檢測,且最後決定的 錯誤郎點集合片為滿足下列公式(5) · 心、漂,㈣).........................:..............(5) 步隸⑷:若在步驟附轉結何㈣集合妒滿足h。, 則k值增加1,亦即是=免+ 1。And ~=2fu=义},........................................../= 1 ....................... j ) —[Two tricks, then K, 1 I.............. ...........................(4) Then 'using this statistic Zheng (6), the binary hypothesis verification problem of the above formula (1) can be It is processed as follows. Right ^'(|^\6)>712-〇:,(;^-|/:;卜丨)(from -1)' accepts 1^; right pays (S (AHfr)1) (A/ -1) ' Accept H〇. Where α is the significant level of the verification. The homogeneity detection of the error sensing node detection method can be performed according to the following steps 1378685. Step (4): Set k=〇, and set the verification Significant level "Step gang (8): material all, W, riding a candidate set 妒 meet ^ such as Wo Tsai Society twist ... a... Qualitative detection, and finally decided the wrong lang point collection piece to meet the following formula (5) Heart, drift, (4))...........................................(5) Step Lie (4): If the (4) set 妒 satisfies h in the step, then the value of k increases by 1, which is = free + 1.

^⑷:若㈣小則接受H〇 ’且所決定的為為隨機地從 〃個感測知點110中選出^個。否則回到步驟⑻並且重覆執 行步驟步驟(b)到(d),直到奂被決定出來。 在摘測到錯誤感測節點⑴後,接著,資訊融合中心120 可排除錯誤感測節,點lu的測量值,並根據錯誤感測節點⑴ 以外之其他感測節·點110所傳送的測量值來進行估測(步驟 230) ’因而可避免所估測的資訊中具有錯誤資訊,以確保 感測網路系統1 00的估測正確率。 — 以下舉例來說明本實施例的錯誤感測節點偵測方法與智 線感測方法。此無線感測網路系統1 〇〇例如設有5個感測節點 1 S2 Ss S4及Ss ’其中S<t和S5為錯誤感測節點。此時, 假-又實際的觀測參數0為2,而正常的感測節點s i、S2及S3應 大多會送出測量值h到資訊融合中心12〇,則錯誤感測節點% 和S5則大多會送出…以外的測量值至資訊融合中心12^資訊4 融合中心120由此些感測節•點Si、S2、S3、^及&在時間點 T=1到τ=5所收集到的資訊如下表一: 表一 τ=ι S\ 9a S2 -------- 94 54 9\^(4): If (4) is small, then H〇' is accepted and it is determined that one of the sensing points 110 is randomly selected. Otherwise, return to step (8) and repeat steps (b) through (d) until 奂 is determined. After the error sensing node (1) is extracted, the information fusion center 120 can exclude the error sensing section, the measured value of the point lu, and the measurement transmitted according to the sensing node-point 110 other than the error sensing node (1). The value is estimated (step 230) 'Therefore, the error information in the estimated information can be avoided to ensure the estimation accuracy rate of the sensing network system 100. The following describes an error sensing node detecting method and a smart line sensing method in this embodiment. The wireless sensing network system 1 is, for example, provided with five sensing nodes 1 S2 Ss S4 and Ss ' where S<t and S5 are error sensing nodes. At this time, the false-actual observation parameter 0 is 2, and the normal sensing nodes si, S2, and S3 should mostly send the measured value h to the information fusion center 12〇, then the error sensing nodes % and S5 will mostly Sending measurements other than... to the information fusion center 12^Information 4 Fusion Center 120 The information collected by the sensing nodes • Points Si, S2, S3, ^, and & at time T=1 to τ=5 Table 1 below: Table τ=ι S\ 9a S2 -------- 94 54 9\

有的感測方法時,可先假設所When there are some sensing methods, you can assume that

中並無錯誤感物(或錯二::點,亦即感測節點W 所有感測節點Sl〜S5的觀;數量為零)’接著’對 gg «t c c 察值進行同質性檢測,以檢測所有感 s s的J丨县5的測量值是否實質相同。當檢測所有感測節點 正當“值為實質相同時’則判斷所有的感測節點Sl〜S5 常:感測節點。當檢測出這些感測節點…觀察值 為實質不相同時,則去丨齡^ #There is no wrong sensory object (or the wrong two:: point, that is, the sense node W all sense nodes S1 ~ S5 view; the number is zero) 'then' homogeneity detection of gg «tcc value to detect Whether the measured values of J丨县5 of all senses ss are substantially the same. When it is detected that all the sensing nodes are "the value is substantially the same", then all the sensing nodes S1 to S5 are judged: the sensing node. When the sensing nodes are detected, the observed values are substantially different, then the age is gone. ^ #

π _斷並非所有的感測節點Sl〜S5皆為正常 的感測節點,亦gp i言此# M 二感測郎點Sl〜ss的其中至少一者為假設 •曰、 Ίϋ。接著’假設錯誤感測節點的數量為—個,並例 :假設Sl為錯誤感測節點’亦即8,為假設錯誤感測節點。接 2對感測節點s2、s3、s4及s5進行同質性檢測,以檢測感測 即點S2、S”S4&amp;S5的測量值是否實質相同。若感測節點s2、 从3 S4及々S5通過㈤質性檢測’則判斷S1確實為錯誤感測節點; 若感測節點S2 s3、s4及s5未通過同質性檢測,則判斷Si並 非為錯誤感測節點,並重新假設其他感測節點S2、I、^或^ 為錯誤感測節點來進行檢測4任—感測節.點s 1、s 2、s 3、s 4 及s5中皆無法通過同質性檢測,則假設錯誤感測節點的數量為 10 [S3 1378685 二個’並例如假設s!和S2為錯誤感測節點,以檢測任二感測 . 節點Si、S2、S3、S4及S5的集合是否為錯誤感測節點集合。在 此說明例中,則可依此方式偵測到S4和Ss為錯誤感測節點, 然不限於此’在其他實施例中,若無線感測網路系統1 〇〇具有 更多的錯誤感測節點的數量(二個以上)’可同理地繼續進行檢 測’直到偵測到最終的錯誤感測節點集合(多個錯誤感測節點 110)。 在上述說明例中,若使用現有的無線感測網路系統及估測 Φ 方法來進行感測,則資訊融合中心會根據所有感測節點h、s2、 S3、S4及Ss(包含錯誤感測節點)的資訊來進行判斷,此時所估 測出的6值為0.53,因而大幅地降低估測正確率(相較於實際觀 測參數0=2)。 反之,若使用本實施例的無線感測網路系統1〇〇及感測方 法來進行感測,則資訊融合中心12〇會預先排除(或消除)錯誤 感測節點的資訊’並根據錯誤感測節點以外的感測節點^h 及S3的資訊來進行判斷,此時所估測出的3值為187,因而可 ^ 大幅地提升估測正確率。 請參照第6圖,其繪示依照現有感測方法與本發明之一實 施例的估測誤差比較圖。當感測節點中具有二個錯誤感測節點 時’如第3圖所示,橫轴代表現有無線感測網路系統的感測方 法與本發明之無線感測網路系統100的感測時間,縱軸之 • 代表分別使用現有無線感測網路系統的感測方法與本發明之 無線感測網路系統100所產生的估測誤差。由第3圖可知,使 用現有感測方法的估測誤差-直無法下降,而使用本發明之感 測方法的無線感測網路系統1 〇 〇可隨時間的增加而大幅地降低 估測誤差,因而可大幅地改善無線感測網路系統的感測正確 1378685. ο - 由上述本發明的實施例可知,本發明之無線感測網路系統 的錯誤感測節點偵測方法及感測方法可預先偵測系統中是否 有錯誤感測節點’並可4貞測出異常的感測節點,來排除錯誤的 感測資訊,因而大幅地提高無線感測網路系統的感測正確率。 综上所述,雖然本發明已用較佳實施例揭露如上,然其並 非用以限定本發明,本發明所屬技術領域中具有通常知識者, 在不脫離本發明之精神和範圍内,當可作各種之更動與潤飾, Φ 因此本發明之保護範圍當視後附之申請專利範圍所界定者為 準。 【圖式簡單說明】 為讓本發明之上述和其他目的、特徵、優點與實施例能更 明顯易懂’所附圖式之詳細說明如下: 第1圖繪示依照本發明之一實施例之無線感測網路系統的 系統示意圖。 第2圖繪示依照本發明之一實施例之資訊融合中心的結構 示意圖。 第3圖綠示依照本發明之一實施例之無線感測網路系統之 感測方法的方法流程圖。 第4圖繪示依照本發明之一實施例之無線感測網路系統的 系統架構圖。 第5圖繪示依照本發明之一實施例之無線感測網路系統之 錯誤感測節點偵測方法的方法流程圖。 第6圖繪示依照現有感測方法與本發明之一實施例的估測 誤差比較圖。 12 (S] 1378685. 【主要元件符號說明】 110 :感測節點 120 :資訊融合中心 122 :偵錯單元 100 :無線感測網路系統 111 :錯誤感測節點 121 :接收單元 123 :判斷單元 210 :接收觀察值 220 :錯誤感測節點摘測π _ 断 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不 不Next, it is assumed that the number of error sensing nodes is one, and for example: S1 is assumed to be an error sensing node', that is, 8, which is a hypothetical error sensing node. Performing homogeneity detection on the sensing nodes s2, s3, s4 and s5 to detect whether the measured values of the points S2, S"S4&amp;S5 are substantially the same. If the sensing node s2, from 3 S4 and 々S5 By (5) qualitative detection', it is judged that S1 is indeed the error sensing node; if the sensing nodes S2 s3, s4 and s5 fail to pass the homogeneity detection, it is judged that Si is not the error sensing node, and the other sensing nodes S2 are re-assured , I, ^ or ^ is the error sensing node to detect 4 - sensing nodes. Points s 1, s 2, s 3, s 4 and s5 can not pass the homogeneity detection, then assume the error sensing node The number is 10 [S3 1378685 two 'and for example suppose s! and S2 are error sensing nodes to detect any two sensing. Whether the set of nodes Si, S2, S3, S4 and S5 is a set of error sensing nodes. In this example, S4 and Ss can be detected as error sensing nodes in this manner, but it is not limited to this. In other embodiments, if the wireless sensing network system 1 has more error sensing. The number of nodes (two or more) 'can continue to detect in the same way' until the final error is detected a set of nodes (a plurality of error sensing nodes 110). In the above illustrative example, if the existing wireless sensing network system and the estimated Φ method are used for sensing, the information fusion center will be based on all sensing nodes h, The information of s2, S3, S4 and Ss (including the error sensing node) is judged. The estimated value of 6 is 0.53, which greatly reduces the estimation accuracy (compared to the actual observation parameter 0=2). On the contrary, if the wireless sensing network system 1 and the sensing method of the embodiment are used for sensing, the information fusion center 12 预先 pre-excludes (or eliminates) the error sensing node information 'and according to The information of the sensing nodes ^h and S3 other than the error sensing node is used for judgment. At this time, the estimated value of 3 is 187, so that the estimation accuracy can be greatly improved. Please refer to FIG. A comparison error estimation map according to an existing sensing method and an embodiment of the present invention. When there are two error sensing nodes in the sensing node, as shown in FIG. 3, the horizontal axis represents the existing wireless sensing network. System sensing method and wireless sensing of the present invention The sensing time of the network system 100, the vertical axis represents the estimation error generated by the sensing method of the existing wireless sensing network system and the wireless sensing network system 100 of the present invention, respectively. The estimation error using the existing sensing method cannot be lowered, and the wireless sensing network system 1 using the sensing method of the present invention can greatly reduce the estimation error with time, and thus can be greatly reduced Improving the sensing of the wireless sensing network system is correct. 1378685. ο - According to the embodiment of the present invention, the error sensing node detecting method and the sensing method of the wireless sensing network system of the present invention can detect the system in advance. Whether there is an error sensing node, and the abnormal sensing node can be detected to eliminate the wrong sensing information, thereby greatly improving the sensing accuracy rate of the wireless sensing network system. In the above, the present invention has been disclosed in the above preferred embodiments, and is not intended to limit the invention, and the present invention may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. </ RTI> </ RTI> <RTIgt; </ RTI> <RTIgt; </ RTI> <RTIgt; </ RTI> <RTIgt; BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS The above and other objects, features, advantages and embodiments of the present invention will become more <RTIgt; A schematic diagram of a system of a wireless sensing network system. FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the structure of an information fusion center according to an embodiment of the present invention. Figure 3 is a flow chart showing a method of sensing a wireless sensing network system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. 4 is a system architecture diagram of a wireless sensing network system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 5 is a flow chart of a method for detecting an error sensing node of a wireless sensing network system according to an embodiment of the invention. Figure 6 is a diagram showing a comparison error estimation error according to an existing sensing method and an embodiment of the present invention. 12 (S] 1378685. [Main component symbol description] 110: Sensing node 120: Information fusion center 122: Debug unit 100: Wireless sensing network system 111: Error sensing node 121: Receiving unit 123: Judging unit 210 : Receive observation value 220: error sensing node measurement

221 .假設所有的感測節點皆為正常的感測節點 222 :檢測所有感測節點的測量值是否實質相同 223 :判斷所有的感測節點皆為正常的感測節點 224 .假設感測節點的其中至少一者為假設錯誤感測節點 225 .檢測假設錯誤感測節點以外之感測節點的測量值是 否實質相同 226 :判斷假設錯誤感測節點為錯誤感測節點 227 ·判斷假設錯誤感測節點不是錯誤感測節點 23〇 :根據錯誤感測節·點以外之其他感測節點的測量值來 進行估測221. It is assumed that all the sensing nodes are normal sensing nodes 222: detecting whether the measured values of all the sensing nodes are substantially the same 223: determining that all the sensing nodes are normal sensing nodes 224. Suppose the sensing nodes are At least one of them is a hypothetical error sensing node 225. Detecting whether the measured values of the sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node are substantially the same 226: determining that the hypothetical error sensing node is the error sensing node 227 • determining the hypothetical error sensing node Not the error sensing node 23〇: Estimating based on the measured values of other sensing nodes other than the error sensing node and the point

Claims (1)

1378685. 101年09月18曰替換頁 - 七、申請專利範圍: ~- 丨.—種無線感測網路系統的錯誤感測節貞測方法,用以 .福測至少-錯誤感測節點’其中該無線感測網路系統包含複數 』 ㈣測節點和一資訊融合中心,該些感測節點係用以m貞 測目標’並分別傳送測量值至該資訊融合中心,該方法包含: 接收該些感測節點的測量值; 假設該些感測節點的其中至少一者為至少一假設錯誤感 測節點; • 對該假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他該些感測節點的觀察 值,進打一同質性檢測,以檢測該假設錯誤感測節點以外之其 他該些感測節點的測量值是否實質相同; 當檢測出該假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他該些感測節點 的測置值為實質相同時,判斷該假設錯誤感測節點為該錯誤感 測節點;以及 當檢測出該假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他該些感測節點 的觀察值為實質不相同時,判斷該假設錯誤感測節點不是該錯 Φ 誤感測節點,並重新假設新的至少一假設錯誤感測節點,以重 新進行該同質性檢測。 2·如申請專利範圍第丨項所述之方法,更包含: 在該假設錯誤感測節點的步驟前,假設該些感測節點皆為 • 正常感測節點; 對該些感測節點的觀察值進行該同質性檢測,以檢測該些 感測節點的測量值是否實質相同; 當檢測該些感測節點的測量值為實質相同時,判斷該些感 '則節點皆為正常的感測節點;以及 14 1378685. 1〇1年09月18曰替換頁 • 當檢測出該些感測節點的觀察值為實質不相同時,判斷該 .些感測節點的其中至少一者為錯誤感測節點,並進行該假設錯 誤感測節點的步驟。 % 3 · 一種無線感測網路系統的感測方法,用以估測至少一债 貝J目標其中該無線感測網路系統包含被數個感測節點和一資 訊融合中心’該方法包含: 利用該些感測節點來感測該偵測目標,並分別傳送測量值 • 至該資訊融合中心; 利用該資訊融合中心來根據該些感測節點的測量值而進 订一錯誤感測節點偵測,以偵測至少一錯誤感測節點,其中該 錯誤感測節點偵測步驟包含: 假設該些感測節點的其中至少一者為至少一假設錯 誤感測節點; 對該假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他該些感測節點的 觀察值’進行一同質性檢測,以檢測該假設錯誤感測節點 φ 以外之其他該些感測節點的測量值是否實質相同; 當檢測出該假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他該些感剛 卽點的測量值為實質相同時,判斷該假設錯誤感測節點為 該錯誤感測節點;以及 當檢測出該假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他該些感剛 ' 節點的觀察值為實質不相同時,判斷該假設錯誤感測節點 不是該錯誤感測節點,並重新假設新的至少一假設錯誤残 '則節點’以重新進行該同質性檢測;以及 排除該錯誤感測節點的測量值,並根據該錯誤感測節點以 該些感測即點所傳送的測量值來進行估測。 15 1378685. Ml年09月18日替換頁1378685. 101年09月18曰Replacement page - VII. Patent application scope: ~- 丨.--A wireless sensing network system error sensing section measurement method, used to measure at least - error sensing node' The wireless sensing network system includes a plurality of (four) measuring nodes and an information fusion center, wherein the sensing nodes are used to measure the target' and respectively transmit the measured values to the information fusion center, the method comprising: receiving the Measuring values of the sensing nodes; assuming that at least one of the sensing nodes is at least one hypothetical error sensing node; • observing the observation values of the sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node a homogeneity detection to detect whether the measured values of the sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node are substantially the same; when the detected false sensing node is detected, the measured values of the sensing nodes are When substantially the same, determining that the hypothetical error sensing node is the error sensing node; and detecting the observed values of the sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node Are the same, determining that the node is not assumed that the error sensing error Φ erroneous sensing node and at least one re-assuming the new error sensing node is assumed to carry out the re-detection homogeneity. 2. The method of claim 2, further comprising: before the step of the hypothetical error sensing node, assuming that the sensing nodes are all • normal sensing nodes; observation of the sensing nodes Performing the homogeneity detection to detect whether the measured values of the sensing nodes are substantially the same; when detecting that the measured values of the sensing nodes are substantially the same, determining the senses, the nodes are all normal sensing nodes. And 14 1378685. 1〇09月18曰 Replacement page • When it is detected that the observed values of the sensing nodes are substantially different, it is determined that at least one of the sensing nodes is an error sensing node And perform the steps of the hypothetical error sensing node. % 3 · A sensing method of a wireless sensing network system for estimating at least one debt J target, wherein the wireless sensing network system includes a plurality of sensing nodes and an information fusion center. The method comprises: Using the sensing nodes to sense the detection target and respectively transmitting the measurement values to the information fusion center; using the information fusion center to subscribe to an error sensing node based on the measured values of the sensing nodes Detecting to detect at least one error sensing node, wherein the error sensing node detecting step comprises: assuming that at least one of the sensing nodes is at least one hypothetical error sensing node; Performing a homogeneity detection on the observation values of the other sensing nodes to detect whether the measured values of the other sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node φ are substantially the same; when the hypothetical error sensing is detected When the measured values of the other sense points other than the node are substantially the same, the assumed error sensing node is determined to be the error sensing node; and when the false is detected When the observed values of the other sense nodes other than the error sensing node are substantially different, it is determined that the hypothetical error sensing node is not the error sensing node, and the new at least one hypothetical error residual node is re-assumed. To perform the homogeneity detection again; and to exclude the measurement value of the error sensing node, and perform estimation according to the error sensing node to transmit the measured values transmitted by the sensing points. 15 1378685. Ml Year September 18 Replacement Page 4.如申請專利範圍第3項所述之 在該假設錯誤感測節點的步驟前 正常感測節點; 方法’更包含: •假設該些感測節點皆為 對該些感測節點的觀察值進行該同質性檢測 感測節點的測量值是否實質相同; 當檢測該些感測節點的測量值為實質相同時 测節點皆為正常的感測節點;以及 以檢測該些 判斷該些感 當檢測出該些感測節點的觀察值為實質不相叫,判斷該 些感測節點的其中至少-者為錯誤感測節點,並進行該假設錯 誤感測節點的步驟。 5. —種無線感測網路系統,包含: 複數個感測節點,用以分別感測至少一伯 到至少一觀察值,並分別傳送出一測量值其 的其中至少一者為至少一錯誤感測節點;以及 測目標,而接收 中該些感測節點 一資訊融合中心,用以接收該些感測節點的測量值,並判 斷^貞測目標是否發生該事件,其中該資訊融合中,。包括一憤 錯單元’用以根據該些感測節點的測量值來進行估測,該資訊 融合中心係根據該錯誤感測節點以外之該些感測節點所傳送 的測量值來估測該彳貞測目標; 其中’ S 6玄谓錯單元該谓測該錯誤感測節點時,該偵錯單 元假設該些感測節點的其中至少一者為至少—假設錯誤感測 節點’且對該假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他該些感測節點的觀 察值,進行-同質性檢測,以檢測該假設錯誤感測節點以外之 其他該些感測節點的測量值是否實質相同,當檢測出該假設錯 1378685 . . 101年09月㈣ 誤感測節點以外之其他該些感測 -——^ 時,判斷該假設錯誤感測節點為 值马只質相同 ~必特誤感測節點,者 假設錯誤感測節點以外之其他該此 89 剛出該 八°〆二场測節點的觀家估% ^ 不相同時,判斷該假設錯誤感測節點不是 '為貫質 重新假設新的至少一假設錯誤感 …曰、感測郎點,並 檢測 J p點’以重新進行該同質性 6.如申請專利範圍第5項所述之盔 該無線感測網料統為-分散式網路偵^統1網路系統’其中 利範圍第5項所述之無線感測網路系統,” 融合中心更包括一接收單元和一判斷單單 係用以接收該些感測節點所發出測量值,該判斷單元传= :::誤感測節點以外之該些感測節點所傳送的測量值來進 174. Normally sensing the node before the step of the hypothetical error sensing node as described in claim 3 of the patent application; the method 'more includes: • assuming that the sensing nodes are observations of the sensing nodes Performing the homogeneity detection whether the measured values of the sensing nodes are substantially the same; when detecting that the measured values of the sensing nodes are substantially the same, the measured nodes are all normal sensing nodes; and detecting the senses by detecting the senses The observation values of the sensing nodes are substantially inconsistent, and at least one of the sensing nodes is determined to be an error sensing node, and the step of the hypothetical error sensing node is performed. 5. A wireless sensing network system, comprising: a plurality of sensing nodes for respectively sensing at least one track to at least one observation value and respectively transmitting a measured value of at least one of which is at least one error Sensing the node; and measuring the target, and receiving the sensing nodes, the information fusion center, for receiving the measured values of the sensing nodes, and determining whether the target is generated by the target, wherein the information fusion . Including an anger unit </ RTI> for estimating based on the measured values of the sensing nodes, the information fusion center estimating the 根据 according to the measured values transmitted by the sensing nodes other than the error sensing node贞 目标 ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; Detecting the observation values of the other sensing nodes other than the error sensing node, performing a homogeneity detection to detect whether the measured values of the sensing nodes other than the hypothetical error sensing node are substantially the same, when the hypothesis is detected Wrong 1378685 . . 101 September (4) When the other senses other than the sensory sense--^, it is judged that the hypothetical error-sensing node is the same as the value-- When the other than the sensing node is just out of the 8° 〆 two field measurement nodes, the hypothesis error sensing node is not 're-hypothetically hypothesized new at least one hypothesis Sense...曰, sensing the 朗点, and detecting the J p point' to re-do the homogeneity. 6. The helmet of the wireless sensing network is distributed-distributed network detection. The network system of the wireless sensing network system of the fifth aspect, wherein the convergence center further comprises a receiving unit and a determining unit for receiving the measured values sent by the sensing nodes, the determining unit Pass = ::: The measured values transmitted by the sensing nodes other than the sensory nodes are entered.
TW98107918A 2009-03-11 2009-03-11 Sensor-fault detection method and wireless detection method for wireless sensor networks system TWI378685B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW98107918A TWI378685B (en) 2009-03-11 2009-03-11 Sensor-fault detection method and wireless detection method for wireless sensor networks system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
TW98107918A TWI378685B (en) 2009-03-11 2009-03-11 Sensor-fault detection method and wireless detection method for wireless sensor networks system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
TW201034410A TW201034410A (en) 2010-09-16
TWI378685B true TWI378685B (en) 2012-12-01

Family

ID=44855489

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
TW98107918A TWI378685B (en) 2009-03-11 2009-03-11 Sensor-fault detection method and wireless detection method for wireless sensor networks system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
TW (1) TWI378685B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016194235A1 (en) * 2015-06-05 2016-12-08 富士通株式会社 Observation system and observation method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TW201034410A (en) 2010-09-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN108872744B (en) Method and system for identifying distribution room
CN109738760B (en) Distribution network short-circuit fault positioning method fusing various distribution terminal data
US20130151170A1 (en) Sensor system, computer, and machine
CN104200701A (en) Parking space detection comprehensive judgment method
CN102547812B (en) Fault detection method of wireless sensor network and event detection method thereof
CN105512011B (en) A kind of electronics testability modeling appraisal procedure
CN106787169A (en) A kind of method of multi-data source comparison techniques diagnosis transformer station remote measurement failure
CN109543743B (en) Multi-sensor fault diagnosis method for refrigerating unit based on reconstructed prediction residual error
CN109733238B (en) Fault detection method, device, storage medium and processor
CN108809708A (en) A kind of powerline network node failure detecting system
CN110554940A (en) Serial port detection tool and method based on electric energy meter communication
CN105306235A (en) Method for identifying train marshalling number
CN111027721B (en) System fault positioning method
CN112052573A (en) Distributed fault identification method based on finite time observer
CN108682140A (en) A kind of enhanced method for detecting abnormality based on compressed sensing and autoregression model
CN102694692A (en) Fault detecting method and device of distributed equipment
CN111596317A (en) Method for detecting and identifying multi-dimensional fault
CN104076808A (en) Fault diagnosis system and method for industrial control equipment
TWI436081B (en) An analyzing method for fault indicators of power networks
TWI378685B (en) Sensor-fault detection method and wireless detection method for wireless sensor networks system
CN106294066B (en) Alert data processing method and device
CN105407496A (en) Method of recognizing error measurement value in wireless sensor network
JP6981386B2 (en) Meter reading value collection device and meter reading value collection method
CN103997126A (en) Fault diagnosis grading method and system based on on-off state
CN107561470A (en) A kind of fault detector evaluation of running status system

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MM4A Annulment or lapse of patent due to non-payment of fees