LU500286B1 - An optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault - Google Patents

An optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault Download PDF

Info

Publication number
LU500286B1
LU500286B1 LU500286A LU500286A LU500286B1 LU 500286 B1 LU500286 B1 LU 500286B1 LU 500286 A LU500286 A LU 500286A LU 500286 A LU500286 A LU 500286A LU 500286 B1 LU500286 B1 LU 500286B1
Authority
LU
Luxembourg
Prior art keywords
fault
orbital elements
thrust
rbfnn
launch vehicles
Prior art date
Application number
LU500286A
Other languages
German (de)
Inventor
Zhigang Wu
Shujun Tan
Xiao He
Liyong Zhang
Original Assignee
Univ Dalian Tech
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Univ Dalian Tech filed Critical Univ Dalian Tech
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of LU500286B1 publication Critical patent/LU500286B1/en

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/27—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using machine learning, e.g. artificial intelligence, neural networks, support vector machines [SVM] or training a model
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G06N3/08—Learning methods
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/15—Vehicle, aircraft or watercraft design
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64G—COSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64G1/00—Cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/22—Parts of, or equipment specially adapted for fitting in or to, cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/24—Guiding or controlling apparatus, e.g. for attitude control
    • B64G1/242—Orbits and trajectories
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64G—COSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64G1/00—Cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/22—Parts of, or equipment specially adapted for fitting in or to, cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/24—Guiding or controlling apparatus, e.g. for attitude control
    • B64G1/244—Spacecraft control systems
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64G—COSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64G1/00—Cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/22—Parts of, or equipment specially adapted for fitting in or to, cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/24—Guiding or controlling apparatus, e.g. for attitude control
    • B64G1/244—Spacecraft control systems
    • B64G1/247—Advanced control concepts for autonomous, robotic spacecraft, e.g. by using artificial intelligence, neural networks or autonomous agents
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G06N3/04—Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G06N3/04—Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
    • G06N3/045—Combinations of networks
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G06N3/04—Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
    • G06N3/0499—Feedforward networks
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G06N3/08—Learning methods
    • G06N3/09—Supervised learning
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64G—COSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64G1/00—Cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/002—Launch systems
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64G—COSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64G1/00—Cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/22—Parts of, or equipment specially adapted for fitting in or to, cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/24—Guiding or controlling apparatus, e.g. for attitude control
    • B64G1/242—Orbits and trajectories
    • B64G1/2427—Transfer orbits
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
    • B64G—COSMONAUTICS; VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT THEREFOR
    • B64G1/00—Cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/22—Parts of, or equipment specially adapted for fitting in or to, cosmonautic vehicles
    • B64G1/52—Protection, safety or emergency devices; Survival aids
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
    • G06F2119/14—Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N3/00—Computing arrangements based on biological models
    • G06N3/02—Neural networks
    • G06N3/04—Architecture, e.g. interconnection topology
    • G06N3/048—Activation functions
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING OR CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06N—COMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N5/00—Computing arrangements using knowledge-based models
    • G06N5/01—Dynamic search techniques; Heuristics; Dynamic trees; Branch-and-bound

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Robotics (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Critical Care (AREA)
  • Emergency Medicine (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)
  • Control Of Position, Course, Altitude, Or Attitude Of Moving Bodies (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention discloses an optimal rescue orbital elements online decision- making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault? including: establishing the flight dynamic equations of launch vehicles in the second-stage ascending phase in the geocentric inertial coordinate system, to construct a series of optimization problems of maximum semi-major axis of circular orbit under the thrust drop fault; using the adaptive pseudo-spectrum method to solve the optimization problems of maximum semi-major, and using the maximum and minimum method to normalize the sample data to [-1, 1], using the orthogonal least square method to select the data center of the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), where the Gaussian function is selected as the radial basis function, and the RBFNN is trained offline to establish a nonlinear mapping relationship from the fault states to the optimal rescue orbital elements. The RBFNN is transferred to the actual flight of launch vehicles, and taking the fault states of the flight as the input, the RBFNN determines the optimal rescue orbital elements online.

Description

BL-5254 AN OPTIMAL RESCUE ORBITAL ELEMENTS ONLINE DECISION-MAKING METH&#p00286
BASED ON RBFNN FOR LAUNCH VEHICLES UNDER THRUST DROP FAULT Technical Field The present invention relates to the technical field of launch vehicles under thrust drop fault, in particular to an optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault.
Background As a rocket power plant, the engine is a decisive factor for the reliability and safety of a rocket. Its reliability is related to the success or failure of the entire flight mission. In the actual flight mission, when the thrust drop fault of the launch vehicle engine occurs, it is difficult to complete the mission if the guidance and control scheme under nominal ballistic conditions is continued. In order to avoid the fall of the payload, it is necessary to decide the optimal rescue orbital elements online according to the fault state so that the payload enters into the rescue orbit.
At present, for the problem of online rescue under the thrust drop failure, the main idea is to couple the two problems of rescue trajectory decision and trajectory optimization based on the dynamic model for online optimization [1,2]. SONG [1] proposed an autonomous rescue strategy and algorithm for launch vehicle thrust descent failure, combined with the injection point geocentric angle estimation, convex optimization, adaptive collocation method, etc., to provide a good online solution for the original coupling optimization problem, online providing a good initial value for the original coupling optimization problem to improve the computational efficiency of online trajectory planning. LI [2] proposed an online trajectory optimization algorithm for launch vehicles based on convex optimization to obtain a high-precision and high-efficiency online trajectory optimization method. The above method couples the two problems of rescue trajectory decision and flight trajectory together and optimizes them. Due to the unknown rescue orbit, the search space of the optimal solution is very large, which affects the calculation efficiency of the online part.
Summary
According to the problems exist in the prior art, the present invention provides an optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault, specifically comprising: establishing the dynamic equations of launch vehicles in the second-stage ascending phase in the geocentric inertial coordinate system; setting the boundary condition and the constraint condition with different fault times and thrust drop percentages, to construct a series of optimization problems of maximum semi-major axis of circular orbit under the thrust drop fault; using the adaptive pseudo-spectral method (APM) to solve the optimization problems of maximum semi-major axis offline , to obtain a sample set of the optimal rescue orbital elements under different fault states, wherein the input feature of the sample set is the fault state, and the fault state includes the time of the thrust fault, the percentage of thrust drop, the position, the speed, the mass and the output features of the sample set are the orbital elements of the rescue orbit, the orbital elements of the rescue orbit includes the semi- major axis, the inclination, and the longitude of the ascending node of the rescue orbit; using the maximum-minimum method to normalize the sample data, and all data are normalized to [-1,1]; using the orthogonal least square method to select a data center of a radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), wherein a Gaussian basis function is selected as the radial basis function; the radial basis function neural network is trained offline to establish a nonlinear mapping relationship from the fault state to the optimal rescue orbital elements; transferring the well-trained radial basis function neural network to the actual flight; taking the fault state of as the input of the radial basis function neural network, determining the optimal rescue orbital elements online.
Furthermore, when constructing the optimization problems of maximum semi-major axis: setting the Xi axis to point the primary meridian at the time of launch in an equatorial plane, the Z1 axis vertical to the equatorial plane and to point the North Pole, and the Y1 axis to meet the right-hand rule; establishing the dynamic equations of the launch vehicles in the second-stage ascending phase in the geocentric inertial coordinate system as follows: 17000888 F=V (1) v= A r+ EM om u I 7 (2) i = — Sohn (3) Golsp wherein r and v represent the position and the velocity vector of launch vehicles; u=GM is an earth's gravitational constant; represents a total mass of the launch vehicles, and i; represents a specific impulse of the engine of the launch vehicles; 4 = {it y. ul" is a component of a thrust unit vector of the engine; when the engine fault occurs, a percentage of thrust drop is = ; a thrust magnitude is {1 — #}T um, Wherein Ta is a nominal thrust of the engine; in the case of a thrust drop fault, the specific impulse of the engine remains unchanged, a propellant consumption per second decreased;, and a total flight time exceeds a nominal flight time; assuming the engine thrust drop failure occurs at tq, SO the constraint condition of the starting point is expressed as follow: x{ta) = x, 4) wherein x, is the state of the starting point, a nonlinear relationship from the number of orbital elements to a terminal state is expressed as [aps ep ip 2p, 0017 = Prt) v(t) (5) wherein £; is a terminal moment; €, ef, Er, Ar, wy is the orbital elements of the target orbit including the semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, longitude of the ascending node, argument perigee of the terminal point.
a total mass of the launch vehicle and payload after the fuels exhaustion is expressed as my, the radius of the earth is R,, and the minimum safe orbit height is defined as Ê re the terminal mass and the height meets: mt) = mp, À, É v(t) — Ro (6) when the thrust drop fault occurs, because an energy required to send a load into a circular orbit is less than an energy of an elliptical orbit under a same perigee height, so searching for a highest circular orbit within the current orbital plane as the optimal rescue orbital elements; describing, by the solution to the highest circular orbit under the thrust 0200 drop failure, the maximum optimization problem of the semi-major axis: Objective Function: min] = —a(t,) Boundary Conditions: [ey ir, 2, 17 = [0,i1%%, 27°17, Eq.(4), Eq.(6) Dynamics Constraints: Eq. (1)-(3) Control Constraints: ~~ {ul} = 1 The orbital inclination {= and the longitude of the ascending node (2; is in accordance with the fault states of launch vehicles. Due to the above technical scheme, the present invention provides an optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault, which has the following beneficial effects: (1) Benefiting from the invention, the complicated trajectory optimization problem of launch vehicles under the thrust drop fault is decoupled into an optimal rescue orbital elements decision-making and a simplified trajectory optimization problem.
(2) RBFNN can fit the nonlinear relationship from the optimal rescue orbital elements to the fault states accurately. The online decision-making time is almost negligible compared with trajectory optimization time.
(3) The invention can quickly determine the optimal rescue orbital elements online and provide reasonable terminal constraints for subsequent online trajectory optimization. Then the complexity of the online trajectory optimization problem will also be greatly reduced, thereby improving the overall computational efficiency of online rescue.
Brief Description of the Drawings In order to explain more clearly the embodiment of this application or the technical scheme in the prior art, a brief description of the attached drawings required in the specific embodiment or the existing technical description is given below. Obviously, the attached drawings in the following description are only some of the embodiments recorded in this application. For general technical personnel in this field, other drawings can be obtained without creative work.
Fig. 1 shows the scheme of the optimal rescue orbital elements decision-making strategy.
Fig. 2 shows the flow chart of sample set generation. 7500286 Fig. 3 shows the results of the optimal rescue orbital elements decision-making. Detailed Description In order to make the technical scheme and advantages of the invention clearer, a clear and complete description of the technical scheme in the embodiments of the invention will be described in conjunction with drawings attached in the embodiments of the invention hereinafter.
Fig. 1 shows an optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under a thrust drop fault, specifically steps are as follows: S1: Taking the two-stage launch vehicle as the research object, it is assumed that the thrust drop failure occurs in the second stage of flight. At this time, the atmosphere is thin and the influence of aerodynamic forces can be ignored. Define the geocentric inertial coordinate system: the origin is at the center of the earth, the X1 axis points to the primary meridian at the time of launch in the equatorial plane, the Z1 axis is vertical to the equatorial plane and points to the North Pole, and the Y1 axis satisfies the right-hand rule, respectively. Establishing the dynamic equations of the launch vehicles in the second-stage ascending phase in the geocentric inertial coordinate system as follows: r=v (1) Ya À. p+ 0 on i bo (2) . T= Tham mp = — Fam Tob = (3) wherein ¥ and” represent the position and the velocity vector of launch vehicles; u=GM is an earth’s gravitational constant; ** represents a total mass of the launch vehicles, and I, represents a specific impulse of the engine of the launch vehicles; # = fre, 1, al‘ isa component of a thrust unit vector of the engine; when the engine fault occurs, a percentage of thrust drop is 1; a thrust magnitude is {1 — 737,,m, Wherein T.……m is à nominal thrust of the engine; in the case of a thrust drop fault, the specific impulse of the engine remains unchanged, a propellant consumption per second decreased n, and a total flight time exceeds a nominal flight time; assuming the engine thrust drop failure occurs at t,, so the constraint condition of the starting point is expressed as follow: x(ty) = x, 4) wherein x, is the state of the starting point, a nonlinear relationship from the number of orbital elements to a terminal state is expressed as fap, ef. ip, 2p, we] = (rte) v(t) (5) wherein tr is a terminal moment; Gr, pip, lp, wp is the orbital elements of the target orbit including the semi-major axis, eccentricity, inclination, longitude of the ascending node, argument perigee of the terminal point.
a total mass of the launch vehicle and payload after the fuels exhaustion is expressed as my, the radius of the earth is R,, and the minimum safe orbit height is defined as À re the terminal mass and the height meets: mt) = mp, À, € TU Ro (6) when the thrust drop fault occurs, because an energy required to send a load into a circular orbit is less than an energy of an elliptical orbit under a same perigee height, so searching for a highest circular orbit within the current orbital plane as the optimal rescue orbital elements; describing, by the solution to the highest circular orbit under the thrust drop failure, the maximum optimization problem of the semi-major axis: Objective Function: min} = —a(t;) Boundary Conditions: fey, ir. {2 1" = [0, ie, een Eq.(4), Eq.(6) Dynamics Constraints: Eq. (1) - (3) Control Constraints: {full = 1 The orbital inclination .** and the longitude of the ascending node £2. is in accordance with the fault states of launch vehicles.
S2: In the actual flight, the position, speed and mass of the rocket are merely near the nominal trajectory due to the noise disturbance. Therefore, the state of the fault is the time when the fault occurs, the size, location, speed, and mass of the thrust drop. Traverse different fault states, construct the optimization problem, and use the adaptive pseudo-spectrum method to solve the optimization problem, as shown in Figure 2. The 786 sample set of optimal rescue orbital elements versus fault states is the training date for RBFNN.
S3: The data of sample set are normalized into the range [-1...1] in order to eliminate the order of the magnitude difference between the data of each dimension and avoid the large prediction error caused by the large magnitude difference between the input and output data. The orthogonal least square method is used to select the RBF network data center, and the nonlinear mapping the relationship from the fault state to the optimal rescue orbital elements is established.
The hidden unit is activated by the basis function, the Gaussian basis function is used in present application. The output of j-th hidden layer is: [ities | Oj = exp he AN | (7) | 20, J wherein XS is the { -th input data. g; is the center of the basis function of the hidden node, and 7; is the expansion speed of the radial basis function. The center of the basis function and the expansion speed are determined by the training of the network. The output layer linearly combines the output of the hidden layer of the radial basis function to generate the expected output. The output of the kth node in the output layer is
A wed wep, (E=L-5) = (8) Wherein w,, is the weight from the jth hidden layer neuron to the à output neuron. In order to achieve appropriate approximation accuracy, the following parameters are determined through training: the number of hidden layer neurons, the center of the basis function of each hidden layer neuron, and the weight of the radial basis function output passed to the summation layer.
S4: The well-trained RBFNN is transferred to online application for decision-making of the optimal rescue orbital elements, taking the fault states of the actual flight as the input,
can quickly determine the optimal rescue orbital elements online. 7500286 Example: In this section, simulation verification is conducted in the entire second stage flight phase of a launch vehicle, and the parameters are from reference [1]. The state distribution of the faults established by the sample set is based on the fault time is incremented by 1s from Os to 375s, and the proportion of thrust-drop is incremented by 1% from 13% to 40%. Excluding the fault conditions that can enter the target orbit and the rescue orbit height is less than 160km, the fault conditions that require rescue are shown in Figure 3. In the sample set, 90% of the data is randomly selected as the training set, and the remaining 10% of the data is used as the test set. A radial basis function neural network is used to establish a nonlinear mapping from the fault state to the optimal rescue orbital elements. The spread factor of RBF neural network training is 1, and the final number of trained hidden layer neurons is 50. In the test set, the optimal rescue orbital elements are determined by the RBF neural network are shown in Figure 3. The error of the semi-major axis decision is [-0.148, 0.774km], and the relative error is within 0.015%. The error of orbital inclination and the longitude of the ascending node is within+10-*deg, and the maximum relative error is within 10.
Table 1 RMSE of different machine learning models No. Mechanism learning model RMSE (km) 1 Linear regression 3.854 2 Decision tree 2.225 3 SVM (Gauss) 1.214 4 SVM (Cubic) 1.111 Gaussian process regression 0.129 6 Radial basis function neural network 0.105 Table 1 is a comparison of the root mean square error (RMSE) of the results of different machine learning methods. The RMSE obtained by linear regression is larger than that of the nonlinear regression method, because the relationship from the fault state to the optimal rescue orbital elements are nonlinear, and it is suitable to use the nonlinear function approximation method. Compared with several other machine models, the RBF neural network model has a smaller RMSE, which means that it has a better function 786 approximation effect in mapping the relationship from the fault state to the optimal rescue orbital elements.
The above is the preferred implement approach of the invention, the protection range is not limited to what mentioned above. Any technician who is familiar with this technical field replaces or revises technical schemes and inventive created on the basis of the present invention within the technical scope disclosed in this invention, schemes and inventive should be involved in the protection range of this invention.
[1] Z. Song, C. Wang, Q. Gong, Joint dynamic optimization of the target orbit and flight trajectory of a launch vehicle based on state-triggered indices, Acta Astronaut., 174 (2020) 82-93.
[2] Y.Li, B.J.Pang, C.Z Wei, N.G.Cui, Y.B.Liu, Online trajectory optimization for power system fault of launch vehicles via convex programming, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 98(2020) P.1 (1-10).

Claims (2)

Claims LU500286
1. An optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault, comprising: establishing the dynamic equations of launch vehicles in the second-stage ascending phase in the geocentric inertial coordinate system; setting the boundary condition and the constraint condition with different fault times and thrust drop percentages, to construct a series of optimization problems of maximum semi-major axis of circular orbit under the thrust drop fault using the adaptive pseudo-spectral method (APM) to solve the optimization problems of maximum semi-major axis offline , to obtain a sample set of the optimal rescue orbital elements under different fault states, wherein the input features of the sample set are the fault state, and the fault state includes the time of the thrust fault, the percentage of thrust drop, the position, the speed, the mass and the output features of the sample set are the rescue orbital elements, the rescue orbital elements include the semi-major axis, the inclination, and the longitude of the ascending node of the rescue orbit; using a maximum-minimum method to normalize a sample data, and all data are normalized to [-1,1]; using the orthogonal least square method to select a data center of a radial basis function neural network (RBFNN), wherein a Gaussian basis function is selected as the radial basis function; the radial basis function neural network is trained offline to establish a nonlinear mapping relationship from the fault state to the optimal rescue orbital elements; transferring the well-trained radial basis function neural network to the actual flight; taking the fault state of as the input of the radial basis function neural network, to determine the optimal rescue orbital elements online.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein, when constructing the optimization problems of maximum semi-major axis: setting the Xi axis to point a primary meridian at the time of launch in an equatorial plane, the Z1 axis vertical to the equatorial plane and to point the North Pole, and the Y1 axis to meet the right-hand rule; establishing the dynamic equations of the launch vehicles in the second-stage ascending phase in the geocentric inertial coordinate system as 7500286 follows: PS (1) P= te a ee H I " (2)
i = — Oh 3) wherein 7 and © represent the position and the velocity vector of launch vehicles; u=GM is an earth’s gravitational constant; =: represents a total mass of the launch vehicles, and I, represents a specific impulse of the engine of the launch vehicles; te = fax, [TR is a component of a thrust unit vector of the engine; when the engine fault occurs, a percentage of thrust drop is 1; a thrust magnitude is {1 — #)T.om wherein T,m is à nominal thrust of the engine; in the case of a thrust drop fault, the specific impulse of the engine remains unchanged, a propellant consumption per second decreased and a total flight time exceeds a nominal flight time; assuming the engine thrust drop failure occurs at #; so the constraint condition of the starting point is expressed as follow:
x{te) = Xp (4) wherein Xx; is the state of the starting point, a nonlinear relationship from the number of orbital elements to a terminal state is expressed as lap, ep tp lp wp] = Bre), vit) (5) wherein ¢, is a terminal moment; a;,e., ir, 2; wy is the orbital elements of the target orbit including the semi-major axis, the eccentricity, the inclination, the longitude of the ascending node, the argument perigee of the terminal point. a total mass of the launch vehicle and payload after the fuels exhaustion is expressed as my, the radius of the earth is Æ,, and the minimum safe orbit height is defined as Ë the terminal mass and the height meets: mit) > my, A = Ft) — Ro (6) when the thrust drop fault occurs, because an energy required to send a load into a circular orbit is less than an energy of an elliptical orbit under a same perigee height, so searching for a highest circular orbit within the current orbital plane as the optimal pese 799 orbital elements; describing, by the solution to the highest circular orbit under the thrust drop failure, the maximum optimization problem of the semi-major axis:
Objective Function: min J = —aG,)
Boundary Conditions: Îe,, i, 0:7 = [0 EEE, Eq.(4), Eq.(6)
Dynamics Constraints: Eq. (1) - (3)
Control Constraints: jiujl = 1 determining the orbital inclination à"? and the longitude of the ascending node 12” according to the fault states of launch vehicles.
LU500286A 2020-11-12 2021-06-16 An optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault LU500286B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202011262295.1A CN112455723B (en) 2020-11-12 2020-11-12 RBFNN-based rescue orbit decision method under rocket thrust descent fault

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
LU500286B1 true LU500286B1 (en) 2021-12-16

Family

ID=74825595

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
LU500286A LU500286B1 (en) 2020-11-12 2021-06-16 An optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US12242962B2 (en)
CN (1) CN112455723B (en)
LU (1) LU500286B1 (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114413691A (en) * 2021-12-24 2022-04-29 北京航天自动控制研究所 Cross-gliding-section analytic guidance reconstruction method for thrust descent fault of carrier rocket
CN117234090A (en) * 2023-11-10 2023-12-15 西安现代控制技术研究所 Design method for attitude dumping determination and attitude control and stability enhancement control of vertically launched guided rockets
CN118094779A (en) * 2024-04-23 2024-05-28 西安现代控制技术研究所 Optimization method of large-area glide-range extended-range trajectory for guided rockets based on ant colony algorithm
CN118343311A (en) * 2024-04-16 2024-07-16 西北工业大学 A NRHO track station maintenance method and system
CN119163528A (en) * 2024-09-21 2024-12-20 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Liquid rocket engine starting process control method and system
CN119533197A (en) * 2024-02-02 2025-02-28 北京航空航天大学 A Dual-Pulse Missile Initial Guidance Method Based on Pseudo-Spectral Method and Neural Network

Families Citing this family (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN113031448B (en) * 2021-03-24 2022-03-04 西安电子科技大学 Aircraft ascending section track optimization method based on neural network
CN113189870B (en) * 2021-04-12 2024-11-05 大连理工大学 A trajectory replanning method for elliptical rescue orbits under rocket thrust descent failure
CN113485108A (en) * 2021-07-07 2021-10-08 大连理工大学 Intelligent task reconstruction method for ascending section of carrier rocket under thrust descent fault
CN113899257B (en) * 2021-08-23 2023-04-14 上海宇航系统工程研究所 A Reconstruction Method of Launch Vehicle Orbit Parameters Based on Iterative Guidance
CN114065375B (en) * 2021-10-20 2025-09-19 南京航空航天大学 Method for evaluating orbit entering capability and reconstructing track based on local point distribution method and neural network
CN114036631B (en) * 2021-10-22 2024-09-20 南京航空航天大学 A method for generating guidance strategy for autonomous rendezvous and docking of spacecraft based on reinforcement learning
CN114216376B (en) * 2021-12-09 2023-11-14 北京航天自动控制研究所 Multi-load hierarchical optimization method of carrier rocket
CN114718762B (en) * 2022-05-18 2022-08-23 北京宇航系统工程研究所 A shutdown method for a high-thrust hydrogen-oxygen rocket engine that improves the probability of entering orbit
CN114781275B (en) * 2022-05-19 2023-04-07 哈尔滨工业大学 Fuel control method, device and medium for spacecraft orbit interception based on artificial intelligence
CN115455790B (en) * 2022-06-01 2024-01-30 北京理工大学 Finite element intelligent post-processing method for launch dynamics of carrier rocket
CN114802819B (en) * 2022-07-01 2022-10-14 星河动力(北京)空间科技有限公司 Rocket terminal-level off-orbit control method and device
CN115494727B (en) * 2022-08-15 2025-08-22 北京航空航天大学 A launch vehicle orbital trajectory planning method based on orbit prediction
CN115877860B (en) * 2022-09-23 2026-01-09 北京理工大学 Design Method of Strongly Adaptive Control Law under Launch Vehicle Nozzle Thrust Decrease Condition
CN115407664B (en) * 2022-11-01 2023-02-03 北京航天自动控制研究所 A Non-Procedural Guidance Method Based on Neural Network Training
CN115657461B (en) * 2022-11-07 2024-12-10 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 A fast prediction method for the transfer trajectory fuel of cluster spacecraft based on DNN
CN116305729A (en) * 2022-11-16 2023-06-23 北京航天飞行控制中心 A Calculation Method for NRHO Orbits of Multi-circle Near-Celestial Objects
CN116119029B (en) * 2022-11-18 2023-09-26 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 Dynamic imaging satellite attitude control system actuator fault reconstruction method
CN116258064B (en) * 2023-02-01 2025-09-23 中国西安卫星测控中心 Hybrid method of neural network and parameter optimization for low-thrust rendezvous trajectory optimization
CN115994477B (en) * 2023-03-24 2023-07-14 西安航天动力研究所 A method for determining the life of a rocket engine pipeline
CN116679756A (en) * 2023-07-03 2023-09-01 北京理工大学 Parameter intelligent-adjustment space non-cooperative target adhesion obstacle avoidance guidance method
CN116620566B (en) * 2023-07-12 2025-08-22 北京理工大学 Multi-node intelligent collaborative guidance method for non-cooperative target attachment
CN116627157B (en) * 2023-07-26 2023-09-29 东方空间技术(山东)有限公司 Carrier rocket operation control method, device and equipment
CN117657475A (en) * 2023-10-20 2024-03-08 中国运载火箭技术研究院 A method for re-planning high-orbit missions under power failure by redesigning parking tracks
CN117270573B (en) * 2023-11-15 2024-02-06 航天科工火箭技术有限公司 Control method, device, medium and equipment for rocket evasion space fragment group
CN117631542B (en) * 2023-12-14 2026-08-04 北京航空航天大学 Calculation method and device for guidance law in double-pulse air-to-air missile optimization
CN117521535B (en) * 2024-01-08 2024-03-12 东方空间(江苏)航天动力有限公司 A DQN-based launch vehicle trajectory planning method
CN117909849A (en) * 2024-01-23 2024-04-19 北京邮电大学 Space non-cooperative target pulse maneuver detection method based on support vector machine
CN117932793B (en) * 2024-03-21 2024-06-14 西安现代控制技术研究所 Joint design method of internal and external trajectory of guided rockets using coupled iterative optimization
CN117951922B (en) * 2024-03-26 2024-06-14 西安现代控制技术研究所 Remote guidance rocket online aerodynamic coefficient identification method
CN118133585B (en) * 2024-05-07 2024-08-13 西安现代控制技术研究所 A long-range rocket trajectory optimization method considering multi-dimensional mechanical and thermal constraints
CN118618633B (en) * 2024-05-23 2025-09-30 北京航空航天大学 A method, device, medium and product for calculating modeled achievable track elements and making decisions on degraded tracks
CN118642521B (en) * 2024-05-24 2026-05-05 北京航空航天大学 A method for planning space-time flight paths to avoid rocket debris

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9061775B2 (en) * 2012-06-22 2015-06-23 Isaac M. Ross Method and apparatus for spacecraft attitude control using polynomial interpolation
US9849785B1 (en) * 2012-12-10 2017-12-26 The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method and apparatus for state space trajectory control of uncertain dynamical systems
CN109491246B (en) * 2018-11-19 2021-08-10 北京航天自动控制研究所 Self-adaptive rescue track planning method based on numerical optimization algorithm
CN109573103B (en) * 2018-11-19 2021-04-13 北京航天自动控制研究所 Residual carrying capacity evaluation method suitable for thrust descent fault condition
US11292617B1 (en) * 2019-07-24 2022-04-05 National Technology & Egineering Solutions Of Sandia, Llc Spin-stabilized orbital rocket guidance
CN111259927B (en) * 2020-01-08 2022-08-05 西北工业大学 A Fault Diagnosis Method of Rocket Engine Based on Neural Network and Evidence Theory
CN111428372B (en) * 2020-03-29 2022-04-29 西北工业大学 Degraded Orbit Guidance Method for Rocket Power Failure Based on Convex Programming and Adaptive Iteration
US11987396B2 (en) * 2020-06-28 2024-05-21 Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories Inc. Fail-safe vehicle rendezvous in case of total control failure

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114413691A (en) * 2021-12-24 2022-04-29 北京航天自动控制研究所 Cross-gliding-section analytic guidance reconstruction method for thrust descent fault of carrier rocket
CN114413691B (en) * 2021-12-24 2024-06-04 北京航天自动控制研究所 Cross-sliding section analytic guidance reconstruction method for carrier rocket thrust descent fault
CN117234090A (en) * 2023-11-10 2023-12-15 西安现代控制技术研究所 Design method for attitude dumping determination and attitude control and stability enhancement control of vertically launched guided rockets
CN117234090B (en) * 2023-11-10 2024-03-15 西安现代控制技术研究所 Design method for attitude dumping determination and attitude control and stability enhancement control of vertically launched guided rockets
CN119533197A (en) * 2024-02-02 2025-02-28 北京航空航天大学 A Dual-Pulse Missile Initial Guidance Method Based on Pseudo-Spectral Method and Neural Network
CN118343311A (en) * 2024-04-16 2024-07-16 西北工业大学 A NRHO track station maintenance method and system
CN118094779A (en) * 2024-04-23 2024-05-28 西安现代控制技术研究所 Optimization method of large-area glide-range extended-range trajectory for guided rockets based on ant colony algorithm
CN119163528A (en) * 2024-09-21 2024-12-20 中国人民解放军国防科技大学 Liquid rocket engine starting process control method and system

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN112455723B (en) 2022-06-24
US20220147820A1 (en) 2022-05-12
US12242962B2 (en) 2025-03-04
CN112455723A (en) 2021-03-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US12242962B2 (en) Optimal rescue orbital elements online decision-making method based on RBFNN for launch vehicles under thrust drop fault
CN110276159B (en) A Multidisciplinary Optimization Method for Satellite Systems Based on Multi-Model Fusion
CN109573103B (en) Residual carrying capacity evaluation method suitable for thrust descent fault condition
CN113189870B (en) A trajectory replanning method for elliptical rescue orbits under rocket thrust descent failure
CN111578950A (en) Space-based optical monitoring-oriented GEO target autonomous arc segment association and orbit determination method
CN113343442B (en) A method and system for solving fixed-time finite fuel multi-pulse transfer orbits
CN115258196A (en) Low-orbit satellite constellation networking electric propulsion orbit transfer strategy optimization method and system
CN104898691A (en) Formation satellite finite-time configuration containment control method
Colmenarejo et al. Methods and outcomes of the COMRADE project-Design of robust Combined control for robotic spacecraft and manipulator in servicing missions: comparison between between Hinf and nonlinear Lyapunov-based approaches
Hanson et al. Advanced guidance and control methods for reusable launch vehicles: test results
Corban et al. Reusable launch vehicle adaptive guidance and control using neural networks
Sun Saturated adaptive output-constrained control of cooperative spacecraft rendezvous and docking
CN109976362B (en) Rocket upper-level trajectory re-planning method using differential evolution algorithm
Huang et al. Nonlinear Robust $ H_ {\infty} $ Control for Spacecraft Body-Fixed Hovering Around Noncooperative Target Via Modified $\theta-D $ Method
Lv et al. Survey on nonlinear reconfigurable flight control
CN119087797A (en) A sliding mode control method for micro-satellite cluster assembly based on onboard GPS positioning
Zhengyu The development of autonomous dynamic trajectory optimization control of launch vehicles
Laguardia Design of an optimization algorithm for in-orbit inspection relative trajectories
Liu et al. Fully distributed adaptive fault-tolerant attitude synchronization for a team of heterogenous minisatellites
Ramezani et al. Autonomous Orbital Correction for Nano Satellites Using J2 Perturbation and LSTM Networks
Li et al. Fault-tolerant control for launch vehicle based on fuzzy sliding mode and adaptive dynamic programming
Jiang Robust optimization of Mars entry trajectory under uncertainty
CN121115801A (en) An Online Planning Method for Launch Vehicle Flight Trajectory Considering Collision Constraints
Mora et al. Mimo control for 6dof relative motion
Gelly et al. Neural networks as a guidance solution for soft-landing and aerocapture

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FG Patent granted

Effective date: 20211216